Next Article in Journal
Molecular Network Analysis of HBV Persistent Infection from the Perspective of Whole Transcriptome
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms and Functions of Chromophore Regeneration in the Classical Visual Cycle: Implications for Retinal Disease Pathogenesis and Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Modelling Neural Disorders with the D. melanogaster Larval Peripheral and Adult Dopaminergic Systems

by
Daniel Tendero-Lopez
,
Maria Dominguez
* and
Mario Aguilar-Aragon
*
Instituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Miguel Hernández (CSIC-UMH), 03550 Sant Joan d’Alacant, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(12), 1677; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121677
Submission received: 7 October 2025 / Revised: 13 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 1 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of neurological disorders highlights the need for disease animal models to elucidate the underlying biomolecular and cellular mechanisms of disease and to facilitate studies aimed at developing effective treatments. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, at both larval and adult stages, can serve as an effective model for different human-relevant neurological diseases. Larvae are particularly suited for studying peripheral nervous system disorders, such as Charcot–Marie–Tooth and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, while adults enable investigations of higher-order cognitive functions and age-related conditions, including Parkinson’s disease and depression-like behaviours. Combining larval and adult models offers a complementary framework to dissect the biomolecular pathways of neurological disorders and accelerate preclinical research.

1. Introduction

Neurological disorders constitute a growing global health challenge. Currently, over 1 in 3 people are affected by neurological conditions, representing the leading cause of illness and disability worldwide [1]. These conditions can arise in, or affect, both the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS), often involving complex and interconnected pathophysiological mechanisms.
Given the growing burden of neurological disorders, there is an urgent need for accessible and genetically tractable animal model systems to elucidate the underlying disease mechanisms and to enable preclinical studies aimed at developing effective treatments [2].
The juvenile (larvae) and adult stages of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster have emerged as powerful and complementary experimental systems for dissecting the fundamental mechanisms of human-relevant neurological diseases [3,4,5]. Each developmental stage offers unique advantages and constraints that can be strategically leveraged depending on the specific disease under investigation.
The larval stage is particularly well-suited for modelling neurological diseases involving the PNS. The reasons include a relatively simple nervous system [6], the accessibility of peripheral nerves for high-resolution imaging and electrophysiological studies [6,7,8,9], and the repertoire of simple and robust behaviours [10,11,12,13]. Larvae are also valuable for the preclinical preselection and testing of therapeutic strategies [14,15]. Their sensory neurons, particularly the multidendritic (md) Class 4 neurons (C4da), are valuable for research because they are large, highly branched, and easy to genetically manipulate and image [16].
The adult stage provides significant opportunities for modelling complex neurological diseases involving high-order cognitive functions, such as memory and learning [17,18], as well as complex behaviours [19] and studies related to ageing [20]. The dopaminergic system plays crucial roles in promoting survival, health, and rewards, as well as contributing to memory consolidation, learning, motion, and age-related neural changes. By effectively modelling dysfunction in this system, one can gain valuable insights into dopamine-related neurological disorders [21].
This narrative review examines the complementary use of D. melanogaster across its life stages to model neurological diseases, highlighting larval-stage studies of peripheral neuropathies and adult-stage investigations of dopaminergic-related disorders. Drosophila models have also been widely applied to study polyglutamine expansion disorders, such as Huntington’s disease and spinocerebellar ataxias, which share conserved pathogenic mechanisms with mammalian systems [22,23]. Although these diseases are not covered in the present review, they further exemplify the fly’s versatility as a model for neurodegeneration.
Relevant articles were identified through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, using general keywords such as “Drosophila larvae and adult models”, “neural disorders”, “dopamine-related disorders”, and more specific terms including “Charcot–Marie–Tooth”, “diabetic and chemotherapy-induced neuropathies”, “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis”, “depression-like disorder”, “Parkinson’s disease”, and “attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)”. The search covered the period from 2010 to 2025. Together, these approaches emphasise the fruit fly’s versatility and its capacity to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying a broad range of nervous system pathologies.

2. Modelling Peripheral Neuropathies in the Larval Peripheral Nervous System of D. melanogaster

The D. melanogaster larval peripheral nervous system provides a tractable experimental model that allows for experimental consistency and comparability. The larval peripheral nervous system is a highly stereotyped network [24], crucial for sensory perception and motor coordination.
The head contains chemosensory organs: pharyngeal sensilla, the cool-sensing terminal organ, and the Bolwig organ for photoreception and circadian regulation [25,26]. Along the body wall, repetitive neuronal sensory clusters in each hemisegment of the body contain type I mechanosensory neurons—external sensory (es) and chordotonal (cho) organs—and type II md neurons [24]. The md neurons are characterised by their multiple dendritic projections, and include bipolar dendrite (bd), tracheal dendrite (td), and dendritic arborization (da) subtypes [24]. Da neurons are further divided into classes 1–4, ranging from proprioceptors and gentle-touch sensors to multimodal nociceptors detecting thermal, mechanical, chemical, and UV light exposure [27,28,29]. Among the four classes, the nociceptive C4da neurons (C4da) stand out as one of the most utilised neuronal subtypes for studying neurological diseases in larvae.

2.1. Charcot–Marie–Tooth

Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) is a group of inherited motor and sensory neuropathies, with a prevalence of 17.69 per 100,000 [30]. The clinical phenotype is defined by demyelination, length-dependent axonal degeneration, or a combination of both, affecting peripheral motor and sensory nerves [31,32]. These pathological changes manifest during childhood or adolescence, generating muscle weakness in the extremities, foot and hand deformities, reduced or absent tendon reflexes, and varying degrees of sensory loss [32].
A summary of the D. melanogaster models of CMT discussed in this section is presented in Table 1. One major pathogenic mechanism involves mutations in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, particularly the glycyl–tRNA synthetase (GARS). In CMT D. melanogaster larval models, a mutant form of human GARS disrupts neuromuscular junction integrity, causes progressive muscle denervation, and impairs neuronal function via translational dysregulation [33,34]. Expression of mutant GARS in C4da neurons reduces dendritic coverage without affecting cell bodies and decreases protein translation, lowering newly synthesised proteins by ~30–50% [34] (Figure 1A).
Further elucidating this mechanism, Zuko et al. (2021) [33] demonstrated that GARS1 mutations disrupt translation elongation by depleting available Glycine tRNA, causing ribosomes to pause at glycine codons and triggering activation of the integrated stress response, shutting down global protein synthesis (Figure 1A). Importantly, overexpression of Glycine tRNA partially rescued the observed phenotypes in the GARS model, including translational defects, larval muscle denervation, larval sensory neuron morphology defects, adult motor deficits, developmental lethality, and shortened lifespan (Figure 1A).
CMT can also be caused by missense mutations in the RAB7A gene, which encodes a small GTP-ase involved in intracellular trafficking, particularly in the endo-lysosomal system [35]. RAB7 is a highly conserved protein; the human form shares 76% identity and 95% similarity with its single D. melanogaster ortholog. When the human mutant RAB7 form is expressed in sensory neurons, larvae exhibit reduced temperature perception, as well as a decreased nociceptive response compared to controls. These phenotypes recapitulate aspects of the sensory deficits observed in human CMT patients, suggesting conservation in the pathogenic mechanisms [36]. Despite the presence of sensory defects, the dendritic morphology of affected neurons remains unaltered in class I sensory neurons, as demonstrated by Janssens et al. (2014) [36]. This finding indicates that the observed functional impairments are not due to structural abnormalities. Instead, axons from mutant neurons showed abnormal accumulation of RAB7-positive vesicles with reduced stationary time, suggesting that trafficking defects might underlie the sensory impairments (Figure 1B).
Studies in D. melanogaster models of CMT disease demonstrate that mutations in GARS disrupt global protein synthesis and induce neuromuscular degeneration, paralleling translational defects observed in human and mouse models [37]. Similarly, pathogenic RAB7 mutations impair endolysosomal trafficking in flies, mirroring phenotypes and transport deficits seen in human CMT patients [38]. These findings have provided critical insights into how disruptions in protein synthesis and intracellular trafficking contribute to neurodegeneration.

2.2. Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy and Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy

Diabetes is currently the largest global epidemic, with 537 million adults affected in 2021, projected to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045 [39]. Both type I and type II diabetes can lead to secondary complications, with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) being the most prevalent. DPN involves nerve damage, primarily in the lower limbs, and often leads to nociceptive sensitization, resulting in sensory loss, pain, foot ulcers, and lower limb amputations, contributing to significant morbidity [40,41]. Similarly, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) also damages limb nerves, causing allodynia, hyperalgesia, and other neuropathic symptoms [42].
Several D. melanogaster larval models have been developed to investigate mechanisms underlying DNP and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (summarised in Table 1). Im et al. (2018) [43] examined the role of impaired insulin signalling in nociceptive dysfunction by analysing mutants of the insulin-like receptor (InR). InR mutant larvae display persistent thermal hyperalgesia following UV-induced injury, suggesting a failure to resolve acute nociceptive sensitization despite normal baseline sensitivity, resembling early DPN. Using both type 1 and type 2 diabetes models—silencing insulin-producing cells and a high-sugar diet, respectively—both models also displayed persistent thermal hyperalgesia. In the type 1 model, UV injury reduced dendritic length and branch number in C4da neurons, whereas the type 2 model showed no significant morphological changes (Figure 2, top panel).
To assess insulin signalling in sensory neurons, InR knockdown in md neurons reproduced the diabetic-like persistent hyperalgesia phenotype, with reduced baseline dendritic length and unchanged dendritic length post-injury despite increased branching [43]. This persistent thermal hyperalgesia correlated with elevated calcium responses in C4da neurons. Constitutive InR activation caused acute-phase hyposensitivity, whereas restoring insulin-like signalling specifically in md neurons rescued persistent nociceptive hypersensitivity [43].
In addition to thermal nociceptive sensitization, InR in peripheral md neurons also regulates diabetic mechanical nociceptive hypersensitivity, but only in the type II diabetic model [44,45].
Peripheral neuropathies that include nociceptive sensitization could also be induced by anti-cancer drugs. Some of them are paclitaxel and vincristine, drugs that bind along the microtubule lattice and suppress microtubule dynamics, leading to cell cycle arrest and tumour cell death [46]. A D. melanogaster larvae model of CIPN generated by feeding larvae with either paclitaxel or vincristine was reported to cause axonal injury and loss, independent of apoptosis [47,48,49] (Figure 2, bottom panel).
CIPN models enable the study of the mechanisms and the exploration of potential preclinical treatments to relieve symptoms. In 2020, Kim et al. demonstrated that ectopic expression of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (Pink1) in C4da peripheral neurons alleviates paclitaxel-induced thermal hypersensitivity in D. melanogaster larvae by restoring mitochondrial homeostasis (Figure 2, bottom panel). In addition, Pink1 silencing worsens sensitivity, supporting its protective role [50]. Subsequent studies have shown that the Pink1 activator niclosamide mitigates paclitaxel-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in a Pink1-dependent manner, without reversing C4da neuron arborization defects, and similar effects were observed in human SH-SY5Y cells [51]. In a vincristine-induced neuropathy model, thermal hypersensitivity and C4da dendritic structural alterations were also observed, and silencing the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH) rescued the mitochondrial and sensory abnormalities caused by vincristine [49] (Figure 2, bottom panel). These models have provided valuable insights for identifying potential therapeutic targets for CIPN.
More recently, Im et al. (2024) [52] reported that PDE701, a diphenyl ether derivative from a marine sponge, could act as a therapy against CIPN. This compound induces mitophagy, a specific type of autophagy that selectively degrades mitochondria, ensuring proper mitochondrial quality control and turnover (Figure 2, bottom panel). The compound alleviates mitochondrial dysfunction in both in vitro human SH-SY5Y cells and in vivo in D. melanogaster larvae and reduces chemotherapy-induced thermal hyperalgesia.
Beyond mitochondrial regulators, additional protective mechanisms have been identified in response to paclitaxel exposure [47,48,53]. That is the case of nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (Nmnat), which can block the axonal degeneration induced by the drug [47] (Figure 2, bottom panel). Nmnat is required for maintenance of sensory neuron integrity and for maintenance of nociceptive integrity, and its overexpression in C4da neurons mitigates the nociceptive hypersensitivity of the model (Brazil et al., 2018 [48]). Integrins represent another protective mechanism that contributes to sensory neuron resilience against paclitaxel-induced neuropathy [53]. Paclitaxel disrupts integrin-mediated adhesion to the extracellular matrix, leading to defects in dendritic self-avoidance characterised by wide branch crossing. The co-overexpression of αPS1 and βPS integrins in nociceptive neurons reduces these defects, indicating that integrins help maintain a dendritic structure, protect against paclitaxel-induced damage, and prevent thermal nociceptive sensitivity (Figure 2, bottom panel). This protective effect of integrin overexpression is linked to the fact that paclitaxel impairs the integrin trafficking in larvae by disrupting the endosomal–lysosomal pathways, which precedes the early morphological signs of degeneration [53].
D. melanogaster models of diabetic and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy recapitulate key features observed in mammals, including persistent nociceptive sensitization, dendritic and axon degeneration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and deficits in sensory integration [54,55]. Interventions that modulate mitochondrial quality control, axonal degeneration, hyperalgesia, or integrin function in fruit flies offer key experimental validation for therapeutic approaches that may extend to human peripheral neuropathies, highlighting the translational importance of these conserved mechanisms.

2.3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common neurodegenerative disease affecting motor neurons. It is characterised by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, with a median survival of 2 to 4 years after diagnosis. It is a relatively rare disease, with an incidence that ranges from 0.73 to 2.25 per 100,000 person-years [56].
Although ALS has been considered a specific motor neuron disease, in recent years, the paradigm is changing to consider it a multisystem disorder, including non-motor symptoms like dysautonomia, cognitive impairments, and sensory problems, suggesting that the sensory system may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease [57,58]. The D. melanogaster larval peripheral nervous system has emerged as a powerful model to study ALS-associated molecular mechanisms to discover novel biomolecular pathways. The main D. melanogaster larval ALS models are listed in Table 1.
A hallmark of ALS pathology is the mislocalization and aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), a conserved RNA-binding protein involved in RNA metabolism and transport [59]. In larvae, the ALS model based on the overexpression of TAR DNA-binding protein-43 homologue (TBPH), the ortholog for human TDP-43, leads to excessive dendritic branching in sensory neurons C4da, while the downregulation reduces branching, demonstrating its critical role in neuronal morphogenesis via cell-autonomous mechanisms [60]. Under physiological conditions, TBPH is predominantly localised in the cytoplasm during larval stages, with only a small fraction in the nucleus, but TBPH changes its localization from cytoplasm to the nucleus at the pupal stage [61]. This subcellular redistribution is regulated by cytosolic calcium levels, as increased calcium in pupae correlates with reduced cytoplasmic/nuclear TBPH ratios, whereas mutations that reduce intracellular calcium led to increased TBPH cytoplasmic accumulation [61].
Interestingly, inhibition of Valosin-Containing Protein (VPN), a ubiquitin-dependent ATPase whose human homologue is linked to ALS, causes TDP-43 to relocalise to the nucleus without altering total protein levels [62].
Notably, the ALS-linked mutant TDP-43 G287S also relocalises from the cytoplasm to the nucleus during development, but the response to calcium fluctuations is reduced, suggesting impaired calcium-dependent transport mechanisms. Several calcium-dependent regulators, including Calmodulin, Protein kinase C, and Calpain-A (CalpA), are essential for proper TBPH nuclear localization [61]. RNAi silencing of these regulators leads to TBPH cytoplasmic retention in pupal sensory neurons. In addition, core nuclear transport proteins, including Importin α1, α3, β1, Importin 7, and Transportin-SR, are required for efficient nuclear import of TBPH. Overexpression of Importin α3 and β1 enhances nuclear translocation, suggesting that these nuclear transport biomolecules modulate TBPH localization dynamics [61].
CalpA emerges as a critical mediator linking calcium signalling to the nuclear import machinery. Co-overexpression experiments demonstrated that CalpA enhanced nuclear accumulation of Importin α3, whereas CalpA knockdown blocked the calcium-induced nuclear localization of Importin α3, and as a result, TDP-43 (TBPH) also failed to enter the nucleus [61]. These findings reveal a biomolecular regulatory axis involving cytosolic calcium, CalpA, and importins that control the subcellular distribution of TDP-43.
Another D. melanogaster larval model of ALS is based on the GGGGCC RNA microsatellite repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene, a major genetic cause of the disease [63,64]. Expressing UAS-(GGGGCC)48 RNA in C4da neurons leads to normal dendrites at early third instar larvae but severe defects in the late third instar stage, including 42% fewer distal intersections and 53% loss of higher-order branches. These neurons form complex arbours initially, but later fail to grow and degenerate [65].
The data suggest that the mechanism of branching defects could be due to altered RNA transport granule function. Downregulation of dFMR1, a component of mRNA transport granules or Orb2, a transport granule protein involved in the local translation of neuritic RNAs, rescues the dendritic branching defects generated by the expanded microsatellite repeat in D. melanogaster sensory neurons. In contrast, the upregulation of either dFMR1 or Orb2 generates an increase in the branching abnormalities, indicating that modulation of transport granule molecules impacts the branching defects [65].
Repeated sequences such as GGGCC can be transcribed in both sense and antisense directions, producing repeat RNAs that frequently form nuclear concentrations where various RNA-binding proteins are trapped. Some of these repeated RNAs can exit the nucleus and undergo repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation, generating distinct dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) [66]. In 2020, Park and collaborators showed that arginine-rich DPRs, specifically PR36 and GR36, induce loss of dendritic branch points in D. melanogaster C4da da neurons [67]. These arginine-rich DPRs also disrupt plasma membrane supply and reduce the number of Golgi outposts (GOPs), which are structures essential for maintaining dendritic architecture. The GOPs could be regulated by secretory pathway-related genes, with the Cyclic-AMP response element binding protein A (CrebA) being one of the most important. PR36 localises to the nucleus and downregulates the expression of CrebA, while GR36 does not change CrebA mRNA levels, indicating a possible different mechanism of toxicity [67]. Overexpression of CrebA restores GOPs and plasma membrane supply in neurons that express PR36 but fails to recover dendritic morphology or prevent degeneration, suggesting that toxicity induced by PR36 involves both CrebA-dependent and independent pathways [67].
ALS could also be caused by mutations of the copper-zinc superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene. In the larval Sod1-ALS model [68], motor impairments occur in both early and late larval stages. While late-stage larvae exhibit clear motor neuron degeneration, early-stage larvae show only minor changes in motor neuron structure and function [69]. Analysis of the intact motor circuit in the early larval stage revealed a defect in sensory feedback before motor degeneration that could cause the altered motor activity. Remarkably, cell-autonomous activation of BMP signalling in proprioceptive sensory neurons, which are critical for relaying muscle contractile status to the central nerve cord, fully rescues early-stage motor defects and partially rescues late-stage motor function to extend lifespan, highlighting the critical role of nonmotor neurons in ALS progression [69].
These D. melanogaster ALS models, including those based on TBPH mislocalization, C9orf72 repeat expansions, and Sod1 mutations, replicate key pathological features such as dendritic and synaptic defects, dysfunction of nucleocytoplasmic transport, impairment of axonal transport of TDP-43 mRNA granules, and motor and sensory neuron dysfunctions observed in human patients, mouse models, and human stem cell models [70,71,72]. The molecular mechanisms uncovered in flies are conserved in ALS patients, providing vital insights into disease pathogenesis. These models have also revealed candidate therapeutic targets, including importins, FMR1, and the human orthologs of CrebA, that have potential translational implications for intervening early in ALS progression in humans.

3. Modelling CNS Neuropathies Using the Dopaminergic System of D. melanogaster

The adult D. malanogaster brain contains approximately 127 dopaminergic neurons distributed across eight clusters in each hemisphere. Each cluster consists of 4 to 13 individual neurons. Additionally, single dopaminergic neurons can be found in up to four distinct regions: PPD, PPL3, PPL4, and PPL5 [73].
Despite their relatively small quantities, dopaminergic neurons have extensive projections throughout the brain, exerting broad functional influence. Dopamine plays a crucial role in regulating behaviours, including basal locomotion, sleep, arousal, light perception, circadian rhythms, courtship, feeding, learning, aversive conditioning, aggression, and social spacing. Furthermore, dopamine is essential for higher-order cognitive processes such as memory, addiction, attention, decision-making, and appetite regulation [74].

3.1. Depression-like Disorder

Depressive disorder is a prevalent mental health condition worldwide, characterised by symptoms such as persistent sadness, feelings of emptiness, diminished interest or pleasure in daily activities, impaired concentration, hopelessness, disrupted sleep and appetite, reduced energy, and, in severe cases, suicidal thoughts. Globally, it is estimated that approximately 5% of adults experience depression, with women being more affected compared to men, according to the World Health Organization. The pathophysiology of depression disorder includes the dysregulation of neurotransmitters, including serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine [75,76,77].
D. melanogaster has been employed to study induced depressive-like behaviours and various depressive-like symptoms. This review focuses on the D. melanogaster models that investigate the role of dopamine in mediating depression-associated phenotypes, summarised in Table 2. Depression-like phenotypes could be induced by drugs, such as levodopa (L-DOPA), the metabolic precursor of dopamine, and Chlorpromazine (CPZ), an antipsychotic drug [78,79,80]. Treatment with either L-DOPA or CPZ in flies induces a reduction in appetite, as well as a decrease in sexual activity, with the males being more affected by the drugs [80]. Flies treated with L-DOPA also display negative geotaxis deficits, as assessed by the climbing assay paradigm [79] (Figure 3). Transcriptomic analysis has revealed that male flies treated with CPZ exhibited distinct gene expression changes compared to controls. Among the Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), the largest group identified based on Gene Ontology analysis comprised genes involved in metabolic processes, followed by genes involved in single-organism processes [80]. Notably, CG4269, a socially responsive gene whose molecular function is still unknown, was strongly upregulated in CPZ-treated males. In contrast, CG6821, which encodes Larval serum protein 1 gamma (Lsp1γ), a component of the tyrosine metabolism pathway, was markedly downregulated in depressive-like males following CPZ treatment. Interestingly, L-DOPA-treated males also exhibited overexpression of CG4269, whereas in females, CG6821 was the most strongly downregulated gene compared to untreated controls. Unlike the CPZ condition, however, CG6821 expression remained unchanged in L-DOPA-treated males, highlighting a treatment and sex-specific difference in gene regulation [79]. Ahn et al. (2021) [78] investigated the potential antidepressant effects of C. sativa (hemp) seed ethanol extract (HE) using the CPZ-induced depression model in adult flies. CPZ-induced depression was associated with decreased movement during the subjective daytime and a disrupted circadian rhythm measured using the Drosophila Activity Monitor (DAM) system. Depressive-like flies also exhibited a significant reduction in different locomotor behaviours, including distance movement, velocity, and mobility, compared to untreated controls. Remarkably, the combination treatment of CPZ and HE significantly enhanced the subjective daytime activity and improved the locomotor behaviour (Figure 3).
At the molecular level, CPZ-induced depression-like behaviour reduced Dop1R1 and 5-HT1A expression. In addition, co-treatment with 1.5% HE significantly upregulated both receptors, highlighting HE’s potential to counteract CPZ-induced dopaminergic and serotonergic dysregulation [78]. A deeper analysis of depression-related neurotransmitters showed that dopamine and L-DOPA levels were significantly lower in CPZ-treated flies compared to untreated flies. In contrast, HE treatment in CPZ-depressive flies produced a dose-dependent increase in both L-DOPA and dopamine, with the highest HE dose significantly elevating L-DOPA compared to controls [78].
Depression-like models in D. melanogaster can also be established through chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), a paradigm in which animals are exposed to a variety of unpredictable stressors. This strategy mirrors the etiopathogenesis of depression. In these models of depression-like behaviour, adult flies are exposed to different stressors during 10 days, including heat, cold, sleep deprivation, and starvation [81,82] (Figure 3).
Following the exposure to these stressors, flies that suffered the CUMS displayed several depression-like phenotypes, including shorter swimming times and increased immobility in the free-swimming test (FST), heightened aggression, and deficits in mating behaviours, such as longer latency to copulation, reduced copulation duration, and lower male fertility. Additional features include decreased sucrose preference, reduced body weight, more time in the dark compartment in the light–dark box test, and diminished levels of serotonin and dopamine. Importantly, dopamine reduction negatively correlates with aggression and immobility, while positively correlating with mating time, sucrose preference, and light–dark box performance [81].
Following these findings, researchers treated CUMS flies subjected to fluoxetine (FLX), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, to confirm the antidepressant-like effects of the model [81]. In another study, γ-oryzanol (ORY) was administered under the same conditions to explore its potential antidepressant effect [82]. Both drugs improved different depression-like phenotypes induced by CUMS, attenuating aggression, preventing impairment of mating performance, and reducing anxiety (Figure 3). Interestingly, FLX and ORY partially restored dopamine levels and completely restored serotonin levels, confirming that the recovery was caused by the antidepressant effects of the drugs and not by random side effects [81,82].
Chronic stress is known to impair learning and memory and increase susceptibility to psychiatric disorders such as depression, although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In D. melanogaster, chronic-stress-induced learning deficits (CSLD) are persistent and accompanied by other depression-like behaviours. Using a paradigm of repeated mechanical stress for generating chronic stress treatment (CST), flies give rise to impaired olfactory learning and middle-term memory, as well as behavioural impairments, without causing body or brain damage, indicating selective disruption of associative processes [83] (Figure 3). Crucially, dopamine (DA) signalling was identified as a central mediator.
Reduction in DA using 3-iodotyrosine (3-IY) during the final phase of CST alleviated learning deficits (Figure 3), whereas elevating DA with L-DOPA plus carbidopa worsened impairment, suggesting that excess DA under stress is maladaptive [83]. At the receptor level, partial downregulation of Dop1R1 (Dop1R1dumb2/+ heterozygotes) did not alter baseline learning but protected against CSLD. Conversely, overexpression of Dop1R1 in mushroom bodies (MBs) induced learning deficits even in the absence of stress, highlighting the importance of receptor dosage. Finally, neuronal manipulations revealed that dopaminergic activity is both necessary and sufficient for CSLD. Blocking DA neuron transmission during CST prevented deficits, while their chronic activation with TrpA1 alone was sufficient to induce them [83].
Further building on these findings, it was demonstrated that chronic stress not only involves DA-mediated modulation but also impairs neuronal autophagy [84]. Excessive stress-induced dopamine activity disrupts autophagic flux, leading to learning deficits, whereas neuropeptide F (NPF) signalling to dopamine neurons preserves autophagy and confers resilience [84] (Figure 3). These results suggest that maladaptive DA signalling under stress compromises both synaptic and cellular homeostasis, while protective NPF input stabilises dopamine neuron function, highlighting a critical balance between stress vulnerability and resilience mechanisms.
These D. melanogaster models of depression, based on pharmacological induction, chronic stress, and dopaminergic dysregulation, replicate key features of human depressive disorder, including altered motivation, disrupted circadian rhythms, impaired cognition, and neurotransmitter imbalances. The conservation of dopamine signalling validates these models for dissecting the molecular basis of depression and testing potential antidepressants. For example, studies show that cannabis oil improves depressive-like behaviours in chronic complex stress mice [85], and FLX reversed depressive-like phenotypes in poststroke depression mice [86], highlighting flies as efficient tools to complement mammalian research in antidepressant therapies.

3.2. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsive behaviour [87]. Its global prevalence is estimated to be 5–7% worldwide [88]. ADHD has a strong genetic basis, with heritability estimated at approximately 80% [89]. However, environmental risk factors also play a role in its development, including maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and smoking during pregnancy [90].
A summary of the D. melanogaster models developed to study ADHD-related mechanisms is presented in Table 2. Among the genetic factors, several risk loci have been identified that affect neurotransmitter regulation, particularly through alterations in dopamine signalling at synapses, thereby linking dopaminergic dysregulation to ADHD pathophysiology [91]. Related to this alteration in dopamine signalling, in 2015, a study was performed to explore a dopamine-associated behavioural endophenotype in adult fruit flies [92]. Pan-neuronal knockdown of three ADHD-related gene orthologs, Dopamine transporter (DAT), Latrophilin (LPHN3), and Neurofibromin (Nf1), produced elevated activity and reduced sleep during darkness. Notably, these phenotypes occurred without changes in dopaminergic neuron counts, suggesting altered dopamine function rather than cell loss. Importantly, feeding flies with the ADHD stimulating medication methylphenidate (MPH) reversed these behavioural abnormalities, further solidifying their link to dopamine signalling [92].
A subsequent study tested whether genes implicated in intellectual disability are associated with ADHD using large Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) datasets. Gene-level analyses highlighted MEF2C, TRAPPC9, and ST3GAL3 as key contributors [93]. To examine their functional roles, the authors knocked down Mef2 and TRAPPC9 in D. melanogaster neurons, including pan-neuronal, dopaminergic, and circadian populations. Pan-neuronal and dopaminergic Mef2 knockdown markedly increased night activity and reduced sleep, especially under constant darkness, with shorter, more frequent bouts and delayed sleep onset. Conversely, silencing TRAPPC9 in dopaminergic neurons decreased activity and increased daytime sleep but elevated night activity in constant darkness, while silencing TRAPPC9 in circadian neurons consistently increased night activity and reduced sleep across light and dark conditions [93].
Regarding environmental influences and factors that could play a role in ADHD development, exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) during the embryonic period has been shown to induce ADHD-related symptoms [94]. Embryonic BPA exposure reduced the eclosion rate, while the pupae exposed during the larval period to the compound led to smaller body size, morphological abnormalities, and decreased lifespan. Flies exposed to BPA during embryogenesis exhibited elevated aggression and hyperactivity compared to controls, symptoms related to ADHD. These behavioural and physiological alterations are thought to result from reduced dopamine levels and increased production of reactive oxygen species [94].
ADHD treatment varies greatly among patients, particularly in response to methylphenidate (MPH), making it essential to understand this heterogeneity. D. melanogaster provides a powerful way to uncover the genetic signatures that drive differences in drug response [95], as well as to pinpoint the specific cell types that respond to MPH or to the non-stimulant drug atomoxetine (ATX), offering valuable insights into treatment mechanisms [96].
Rohde et al. (2019) [95] showed that exposing wild-type flies to MPH increased locomotor activity and altered the expression of genes linked to carbohydrate metabolism. Using the D. melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel, they found that behavioural responses to MPH varied widely across genotypes, highlighting strong genetic influences. Network modelling identified 87 predictive gene sets, of which 36 were prioritised, and functional knockdown confirmed contributions of several candidates. Intriguingly, offspring of MPH-exposed parents displayed altered activity without direct exposure, suggesting heritable, likely epigenetic, effects. These findings established that both genotype and intergenerational mechanisms shape drug responsiveness.
At the cellular level, Qu et al. (2024) [96] investigated transcriptional responses to MPH and the non-stimulant atomoxetine (ATX) using single-cell RNA sequencing of adult fly brains. MPH induced broader and stronger effects than ATX, including selective upregulation of the dopamine receptor genes Dop2R and DopEcR and the dopamine metabolism genes Syt1, Sytα, Syt7, and Ih.
Beyond dopamine-related genes, MPH broadly suppressed glutamate and GABA receptor genes as well as synaptic signalling molecules, suggesting wide-reaching synaptic modulation. In contrast, ATX elicited much weaker gene expression changes across these pathways. Together, these studies link population-level genetic variation with cell-type-specific transcriptional mechanisms, demonstrating how inherited and epigenetic factors converge on dopamine pathways and synaptic networks to drive variability in ADHD drug responses [96].
The inattention and hyperactivity present in ADHD patients lead to abnormal social interactions. Parallel phenomena can be modelled in fruit flies, where exposure to the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid disrupted social interaction among flies using the social space assay and increased locomotor activity, moving faster and for longer durations than controls [97]. Imidacloprid also significantly reduces dopamine levels and increases oxidative stress in the fly brain [98]. Moreover, imidacloprid exposure was shown to impair dopaminergic function by decreasing tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity. This impairment could be counteracted by supplementation with lutein carrier nanoparticles, which restored TH activity and preserved dopamine signalling [99]. These findings highlight how environmental neurotoxins compromise dopamine synthesis and suggest that targeted neuroprotective strategies may help maintain dopaminergic homeostasis under chemical stress.
ADHD is challenging to model due to its clinical heterogeneity, with symptoms and treatment responses varying widely among individuals. D. melanogaster provides a powerful tool for modelling ADHD-related mechanisms. For instance, silencing different genes related to dopamine, including DAT, Latrophilin, Nf1, Mef2, or TRAPPC9 in neuronal populations, reproduces core human ADHD phenotypes, including hyperactivity, reduced sleep, and altered circadian rhythms. Notably, some of these manipulations respond to clinically validated ADHD drugs like MPH, highlighting their translational relevance for elucidating disease mechanisms. Moreover, environmental impacts on dopamine synthesis, such as the neurotoxic effects of insecticides and their rescue by antioxidants, demonstrate the value of flies for studying gene–environment interactions and neuroprotection in ADHD pathophysiology.

3.3. Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease, affecting an estimated 6.1 million people worldwide in 2016. It is characterised by uncontrollable motor symptoms, including tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural abnormalities. which primarily arise from the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). While most cases are sporadic, familial forms have been associated with mutations in several genes, including Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) and α-synuclein (α-Syn) [100].
D. melanogaster has served as a critical model system for studying PD, providing insights into both the genetic and environmental factors contributing to the disease, as summarised in Table 2. Pan-neural expression of human α-Syn exclusively in adult flies results in aggregations of ubiquitin conjugated proteins. This overexpression produces PD-like features, including loss of DA neurons, reduced locomotor activity, and shortened lifespan, confirming that DA neuron degeneration can be triggered after development [21]. Directly targeting the expression of α-Syn in DA neurons also revealed a key role of ferroptosis in dopaminergic neuron degeneration. Iron supplementation with ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) and glutathione depletion via erastin significantly worsened the phenotype [101]. Conversely, treatments that counteracted ferroptosis offered partial protection. The iron chelator deferiprone (DEF) reduced iron-driven toxicity, while N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutathione precursor, restored antioxidant capacity, improving dopaminergic neuron survival, motor behaviour, and lifespan [101]. Additional studies have demonstrated that functional and molecular interactions between α-Syn and parkin contribute to DA neuron degeneration. Simultaneous α-Syn overexpression and parkin downregulation resulted in a significant loss of dopaminergic neurons in the PPL1 and PPM1/2 clusters. These effects were associated with mitochondrial fragmentation in those clusters, while other dopaminergic ones remained unaffected, highlighting the selective vulnerability within the dopaminergic system. Moreover, α-Syn overexpression alone was sufficient to reduce parkin transcript levels, suggesting transcriptional regulation as a contributing mechanism [102].
Beyond neuronal factors, glial function is also a determinant of dopaminergic neuron loss. Disruption of the autophagy protein Atg9 in glial cells impaired autophagic flux and led to progressive, age-dependent degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, accompanied by locomotor deficits and glial activation [103].
These α-Syn D. melanogaster models have also been employed to investigate molecular changes and metabolic reprogramming associated with PD and ageing. Multi-omic analysis revealed that neuronal α-Syn expression induces reprogramming distinct from age-dependent changes. Flies overexpressing α-Syn exhibit suppression of glycolysis, insulin signalling, oxidative phosphorylation, and complex I biogenesis, impairing energy metabolism [104]. Together, these findings support a model in which both age-related and α-Syn-driven metabolic changes collaborate to induce PD. Furthermore, the neurotoxic effects of α-Syn involve alterations to the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway, which is essential for neuronal health [104]. These findings underscore the unique metabolic changes in PD neurons that differ from those associated with normal ageing.
Besides the accumulation of α-Syn, mutations in the LRKK2 gene are the most common causes of both familial and sporadic PD. These mutations enhance LRRK2 kinase activity, resulting in neurite degeneration and neuronal cell death. In adult fruit flies, overexpression of mutated LRRK2 in DA neurons produced age-dependent neuron loss. This effect is mediated by elevated translation of Furin1 (Fur1) in DA neurons, which enhances Gbb-mediated activation of BMP signalling in glia, leading to DA neurodegeneration. Reducing Fur1 levels rescued DA neuron survival, climbing behaviour, and fly lifespan [105]. Interestingly, knockdown of Gbb or BMP pathway components in glia, but not neurons, significantly prevented DA neuron loss. Besides that, exposure to the herbicide paraquat similarly increased Fur1 translation and activated BMP signalling in glia, mirroring effects seen with LRRK2 mutation, suggesting that genetic and environmental factors could converge to generate the disease [105].
Further research revealed that the expression of mutant forms of LRRK2 in glia also caused age-dependent degeneration of DA neurons in PPL1 clusters, accompanied by locomotor deficits. This deficient glia induced neuroinflammatory responses, but pharmacological intervention with levetiracetam attenuated these effects, rescuing dopaminergic survival, restoring motor performance, and reducing inflammatory markers [106].
PD is generally regarded as an age-related disorder. However, mutations in PINK1 are associated with early-onset cases, in which symptoms typically appear before the age of 50. Knockout flies of Pink1 (Pink1 B9) exhibit electrophysiological defects in dopamine PPM3 cluster neurons, leading to increased spontaneous activity and altered properties of action potentials. This disrupted PPM3 neuronal function generates motor impairments in Pink1-deficient flies [107]. Additionally, brain dopamine levels are reduced, and the lifespan of Pink1 B9 flies is shorter than WT controls [108] (CITA Xiao-Lin Bai 2023).
In this context, the neuroprotective effects of Lycium barbarum fruit extract (LBFE) and ginseng total protein (GTP) against Pink1-related PD symptoms have been investigated. Both LBFE- and GTP-treated Pink1 B9 flies had an improved lifespan compared to untreated ones, as well as improved locomotor ability. GTP-supplemented diet reduced dopamine neuron loss, whereas LBFA increased dopamine brain levels [108,109].
PD can also be induced in flies using the pesticide rotenone [110,111]. Exposure to the pesticide induces changes in locomotor behaviour in a time-dependent manner without generating DA neuron loss [110]. Rotenone-exposed flies exhibit a reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) synthesis in DA neurons, the rate-limiting enzyme for dopamine production, which generates decreased DA levels in the brain, accompanied by a reduction in 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and an increase in Homovanillic acid (HVA), which are DA metabolites, indicating increased oxidative turnover of dopamine [111]. Interestingly, rotenone also induces transcriptomic changes in DA neurons in an early phase of PD, associated with cell death and neuronal function. Among the molecular changes, key signalling pathways such as MAPK/EGFR and TGF-β were upregulated, while the Wnt signalling pathway was notably suppressed [110]. Notably, Wnt signalling rescued the rotenone-induced locomotor deficits, suggesting that Wnt pathway impairment is a driving mechanism in DA neuron pathology [110].
Fruit flies have been instrumental in elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying PD, particularly the progressive degeneration of DA neurons that underlie motor dysfunction. These models recapitulate key human PD phenotypes, such as loss of DA neurons, reduced locomotor activity, shortened lifespan, and neuroinflammatory responses, which emphasise conserved pathogenic pathways with mammals. Some examples of these conserved pathogenic pathways include the generation of mouse models of PD generated by mutations in the LRRK2 gene [112] or exposing mice to rotenone [113], similar to D. melanogaster models. Different treatments tested in flies have also been tested and used in PD patients or mouse models, including NAC treatment [114] and levetiracetam [115]. Overall, D. melanogaster represents a powerful and versatile tool for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying PD and for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic compounds and mechanistic interventions in a conserved biological context.

4. Conclusions

Recent advances in modelling diseases related to peripheral and dopamine systems highlight D. melanogaster as a valuable resource for exploring mechanisms behind neurological disorders. Its significant genetic and functional similarities with humans enhance its role in translational research and for cost-effective preclinical applications.
These models not only facilitate genetic dissection but also enable in vivo investigation of disease-associated biomolecules through genetic and pharmacological approaches. Such approaches can deepen our understanding of molecular pathways and accelerate the discovery of new therapeutic targets. Moreover, the automation of behavioural tests in flies, powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning, can significantly accelerate gene and drug discovery, opening opportunities to treat and reduce the burden of these neurological disorders.
Additionally, the recently completed D. melanogaster brain connectome offers exciting opportunities for mapping neural substrates and synaptic connections linked to disease phenotypes. By integrating connectomics information with molecular analyses, we can effectively link genotype, neural circuitry, and behaviour in the context of diseases.
In conclusion, D. melanogaster provides an integral model for unravelling the molecular and cellular bases of neurological disorders, with ongoing advancements promising to shape future discoveries and therapeutic interventions significantly.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, D.T.-L. and M.A.-A.; writing—review and editing, D.T.-L., M.D. and M.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The laboratory is supported by Spanish Grants PID2022-136859NB-I00 funded by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and co-funded by FEDER, UE, the Proof-of-concept Grant R+D+i PDC2022-133387-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the “European Union NexGenerationEU/PRTR”, the Spanish Scientific Foundation Against Cancer (AECC) (IDEAS247021AGUI) (CICPF16001DOMÍ), the Severo Ochoa Grant CEX2021-001165-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the “European Union NexGenerationEU/PRTR”, the Generalitat Valenciana (GVA) Grants, IN.Pulse, Agencia Valenciana de Innovacion (AVI) INNAI/2023-25, and the excellence grant PROMETEO/2021/027 also co-financed by ERDF. D.T-L. is a Spanish doctoral FPI fellow (PRE2020-094990) funded by MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
3-IY3-iodotyrosine
ADHDAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
ALSAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis
ATXAtomoxetine
BPABisphenol A
C4daClass IV dendritic arborization
CalpACalpain-A
ChoChordotonal
CIPNChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
CMTCharcot–Marie–Tooth
CNSCentral nervous system
CPZChlorpromazine
CrebACyclic-AMP response element-binding protein A
CSLDChronic-stress-induced learning deficits
CSTChronic stress treatment
CUMSChronic unpredictable mild stress
daDendritic arborization
DADopamine
DEFDeferiprone
DEGSDifferentially Expressed Genes
DOPAC3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
Dop1R1Dopamine 1-like receptor 1
DPNDiabetic peripheral neuropathy
DPRsDipeptide repeat proteins
FLXFluoxetine
Fur1Furin1
GARSGlycyl–tRNA synthetase
Golgi outpostsGolgi outposts
GTPGinseng total protein
GWASGenome-Wide Association Study
HEEthanol extract
HVAHomovanillic acid
InRInsulin Receptor
LBFELycium barbarum fruit extract
L-DOPALevodopa
LRRK2Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2
mdMultidendritic
MPHMethylphenidate
NACN-acetylcysteine
NmatNicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase
NMDNonsense-mediated decay
NPFNeuropeptide F
ORYγ-oryzanol
PNSPeripheral Nervous System
PDParkinson’s disease
PDHPyruvate dehydrogenase complex
PINK1PTEN-induced kinase 1
Sod1Superoxide dismutase 1
TDP-43TAR DNA-binding protein-43 homologue
TBPHTAR DNA-binding protein 43
THTyrosine hydroxylase
VPNValosin-Containing Protein
α-synAlfa-synuclein

References

  1. Steinmetz, J.D.; Seeher, K.M.; Schiess, N.; Nichols, E.; Cao, B.; Servili, C.; Cavallera, V.; Cousin, E.; Hagins, H.; Moberg, M.E.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024, 23, 344–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Neziri, S.; Köseoğlu, A.E.; Deniz Köseoğlu, G.; Özgültekin, B.; Özgentürk, N.Ö. Animal Models in Neuroscience with Alternative Approaches: Evolutionary, Biomedical, and Ethical Perspectives. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2024, 7, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rooney, T.M.; Freeman, M.R. Drosophila Models of Neuronal Injury. ILAR J. 2014, 54, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, T.; Song, B.; Lee, I.-S. Drosophila Glia: Models for Human Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tanaka, T.; Chung, H.-L. Exploiting Fly Models to Investigate Rare Human Neurological Disorders. Neural Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Winding, M.; Pedigo, B.D.; Barnes, C.L.; Patsolic, H.G.; Park, Y.; Kazimiers, T.; Fushiki, A.; Andrade, I.V.; Khandelwal, A.; Valdes-Aleman, J.; et al. The Connectome of an Insect Brain. Science 2023, 379, eadd9330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chiba, A. Early Development of the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction: A Model for Studying Neuronal Networks in Development. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1999, 43, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Terada, S.-I.; Matsubara, D.; Onodera, K.; Matsuzaki, M.; Uemura, T.; Usui, T. Neuronal Processing of Noxious Thermal Stimuli Mediated by Dendritic Ca2+ Influx in Drosophila Somatosensory Neurons. eLife 2016, 5, e12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ugur, B.; Chen, K.; Bellen, H.J. Drosophila Tools and Assays for the Study of Human Diseases. Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhattacharya, M.R.C. A Nerve-Wracking Buzz: Lessons from Drosophila Models of Peripheral Neuropathy and Axon Degeneration. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1166146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mauthner, S.E.; Borjon, L.J.; Tracey, W.D. Assaying Nociception Behaviors in Drosophila Larvae During Parasitoid Wasp Attacks. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2025, 2025, pdb.prot108129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, J.; Chen, J.; Gu, P.; Shang, Y.; Ruppell, K.T.; Yang, Y.; Wang, F.; Wen, Q.; Xiang, Y. Shear Stress Activates Nociceptors to Drive Drosophila Mechanical Nociception. Neuron 2022, 110, 3727–3742.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, P.; Wang, F.; Shang, Y.; Liu, J.; Gong, J.; Xie, W.; Han, J.; Xiang, Y. Nociception and Hypersensitivity Involve Distinct Neurons and Molecular Transducers in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2113645119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hope, K.A.; Berman, A.R.; Peterson, R.T.; Chow, C.Y. An in Vivo Drug Repurposing Screen and Transcriptional Analyses Reveals the Serotonin Pathway and GSK3 as Major Therapeutic Targets for NGLY1 Deficiency. PLoS Genet. 2022, 18, e1010228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stilwell, G.E.; Saraswati, S.; Littleton, J.T.; Chouinard, S.W. Development of a Drosophila Seizure Model for in Vivo High-throughput Drug Screening. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 2211–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nanda, S.; Das, R.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Cox, D.N.; Ascoli, G.A. Morphological Determinants of Dendritic Arborization Neurons in Drosophila Larva. Brain Struct. Funct. 2018, 223, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baltruschat, L.; Prisco, L.; Ranft, P.; Lauritzen, J.S.; Fiala, A.; Bock, D.D.; Tavosanis, G. Circuit Reorganization in the Drosophila Mushroom Body Calyx Accompanies Memory Consolidation. Cell Rep. 2021, 34, 108871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dolan, M.-J.; Belliart-Guérin, G.; Bates, A.S.; Frechter, S.; Lampin-Saint-Amaux, A.; Aso, Y.; Roberts, R.J.V.; Schlegel, P.; Wong, A.; Hammad, A.; et al. Communication from Learned to Innate Olfactory Processing Centers Is Required for Memory Retrieval in Drosophila. Neuron 2018, 100, 651–668.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thiem, J.; Viskadourou, M.; Gaitanidis, A.; Stravopodis, D.J.; Strauß, R.; Duch, C.; Consoulas, C. Biological Aging of Two Innate Behaviors of Drosophila melanogaster: Escape Climbing versus Courtship Learning and Memory. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0293252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ratliff, E.P.; Mauntz, R.E.; Kotzebue, R.W.; Gonzalez, A.; Achal, M.; Barekat, A.; Finley, K.A.; Sparhawk, J.M.; Robinson, J.E.; Herr, D.R.; et al. Aging and Autophagic Function Influences the Progressive Decline of Adult Drosophila Behaviors. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dabool, L.; Juravlev, L.; Hakim-Mishnaevski, K.; Kurant, E. Modeling Parkinson’s Disease in Adult Drosophila. J. Neurosci. Methods 2019, 311, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Costa, M.D.; Maciel, P. Modifier Pathways in Polyglutamine (PolyQ) Diseases: From Genetic Screens to Drug Targets. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barwell, T.; Seroude, L. Polyglutamine Disease in Peripheral Tissues. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2023, 32, 3303–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singhania, A.; Grueber, W.B. Development of the Embryonic and Larval Peripheral Nervous System of Drosophila. WIREs Dev. Biol. 2014, 3, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Komarov, N.; Sprecher, S.G. The Chemosensory System of the Drosophila Larva: An Overview of Current Understanding. Fly 2022, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kohsaka, H.; Guertin, P.A.; Nose, A. Neural Circuits Underlying Fly Larval Locomotion. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1722–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vaadia, R.D.; Li, W.; Voleti, V.; Singhania, A.; Hillman, E.M.C.; Grueber, W.B. Characterization of Proprioceptive System Dynamics in Behaving Drosophila Larvae Using High-Speed Volumetric Microscopy. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 935–944.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Turner, H.N.; Armengol, K.; Patel, A.A.; Himmel, N.J.; Sullivan, L.; Iyer, S.C.; Bhattacharya, S.; Iyer, E.P.R.; Landry, C.; Galko, M.J.; et al. The TRP Channels Pkd2, NompC, and Trpm Act in Cold-Sensing Neurons to Mediate Unique Aversive Behaviors to Noxious Cold in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 3116–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boivin, J.-C.; Zhu, J.; Ohyama, T. Nociception in Fruit Fly Larvae. Front. Pain Res. 2023, 4, 1076017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, M.; Li, Y.; Dai, S.; Chu, M.; Sun, L.; Liu, L.; Zhou, J.-C. A Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence of Charcot–Marie–Tooth Disease and Related Inherited Peripheral Neuropathies. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 2468–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schröder, J.M. Neuropathology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth and Related Disorders. NeuroMolecular Med. 2006, 8, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Barisic, N.; Claeys, K.G.; Sirotković-Skerlev, M.; Löfgren, A.; Nelis, E.; De Jonghe, P.; Timmerman, V. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Clinico-genetic Confrontation. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2008, 72, 416–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zuko, A.; Mallik, M.; Thompson, R.; Spaulding, E.L.; Wienand, A.R.; Been, M.; Tadenev, A.L.D.; Van Bakel, N.; Sijlmans, C.; Santos, L.A.; et al. tRNA Overexpression Rescues Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Mutations in tRNA Synthetase. Science 2021, 373, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Niehues, S.; Bussmann, J.; Steffes, G.; Erdmann, I.; Köhrer, C.; Sun, L.; Wagner, M.; Schäfer, K.; Wang, G.; Koerdt, S.N.; et al. Impaired Protein Translation in Drosophila Models for Charcot–Marie–Tooth Neuropathy Caused by Mutant tRNA Synthetases. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meggouh, F.; Bienfait, H.M.E.; Weterman, M.A.J.; De Visser, M.; Baas, F. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Due to a de Novo Mutation of the RAB7 Gene. Neurology 2006, 67, 1476–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Janssens, K.; Goethals, S.; Atkinson, D.; Ermanoska, B.; Fransen, E.; Jordanova, A.; Auer-Grumbach, M.; Asselbergh, B.; Timmerman, V. Human Rab7 Mutation Mimics Features of Charcot–Marie–Tooth Neuropathy Type 2B in Drosophila. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 65, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seburn, K.L.; Nangle, L.A.; Cox, G.A.; Schimmel, P.; Burgess, R.W. An Active Dominant Mutation of Glycyl-tRNA Synthetase Causes Neuropathy in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2D Mouse Model. Neuron 2006, 51, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mulligan, R.J.; Winckler, B. Regulation of Endosomal Trafficking by Rab7 and Its Effectors in Neurons: Clues from Charcot–Marie–Tooth 2B Disease. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B.B.; Stein, C.; Basit, A.; Chan, J.C.N.; Mbanya, J.C.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, Regional and Country-Level Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2021 and Projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 183, 109119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eid, S.A.; Rumora, A.E.; Beirowski, B.; Bennett, D.L.; Hur, J.; Savelieff, M.G.; Feldman, E.L. New Perspectives in Diabetic Neuropathy. Neuron 2023, 111, 2623–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Feldman, E.L.; Callaghan, B.C.; Pop-Busui, R.; Zochodne, D.W.; Wright, D.E.; Bennett, D.L.; Bril, V.; Russell, J.W.; Viswanathan, V. Diabetic Neuropathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2019, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burgess, J.; Ferdousi, M.; Gosal, D.; Boon, C.; Matsumoto, K.; Marshall, A.; Mak, T.; Marshall, A.; Frank, B.; Malik, R.A.; et al. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanisms and Treatment. Oncol. Ther. 2021, 9, 385–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Im, S.H.; Patel, A.A.; Cox, D.N.; Galko, M.J. Drosophila Insulin Receptor Regulates the Persistence of Injury-Induced Nociceptive Sensitization. Dis. Model. Mech. 2018, 11, dmm034231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dabbara, H.; Schultz, A.; Im, S.H. Drosophila Insulin Receptor Regulates Diabetes-Induced Mechanical Nociceptive Hypersensitivity. MicroPublication Biol. 2021, 2021, 10-17912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Lopez-Bellido, R.; Huo, X.; Kavelaars, A.; Galko, M.J. The Insulin Receptor Regulates the Persistence of Mechanical Nociceptive Sensitization in Flies and Mice. Biol. Open 2023, 12, bio059864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Singla, A.K.; Garg, A.; Aggarwal, D. Paclitaxel and Its Formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 235, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bhattacharya, M.R.C.; Gerdts, J.; Naylor, S.A.; Royse, E.X.; Ebstein, S.Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Milbrandt, J.; DiAntonio, A. A Model of Toxic Neuropathy in Drosophila Reveals a Role for MORN4 in Promoting Axonal Degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 5054–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brazill, J.M.; Cruz, B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhai, R.G. Nmnat Mitigates Sensory Dysfunction in a Drosophila Model of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Dis. Model. Mech. 2018, 11, dmm032938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, H.; Kim, S.; Han, J.E.; Kang, K.; Koh, H. PDH Inhibition in Drosophila Ameliorates Sensory Dysfunction Induced by Vincristine Treatment in the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Models. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, Y.Y.; Yoon, J.-H.; Um, J.-H.; Jeong, D.J.; Shin, D.J.; Hong, Y.B.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, C.; Chung, C.G.; et al. Correction: PINK1 Alleviates Thermal Hypersensitivity in a Paclitaxel-Induced Drosophila Model of Peripheral Neuropathy. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jang, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-Y.; Lee, K.-M.; Shin, J.-E.; Yun, J. The PINK1 Activator Niclosamide Mitigates Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Thermal Hypersensitivity in a Paclitaxel-Induced Drosophila Model of Peripheral Neuropathy. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Im, S.; Jeong, D.J.; Kim, E.; Choi, J.; Jang, H.; Kim, Y.Y.; Um, J.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, K.; et al. A Novel Marine-derived Mitophagy Inducer Ameliorates Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Thermal Hypersensitivity in Paclitaxel-induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 181, 4012–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shin, G.J.; Pero, M.E.; Hammond, L.A.; Burgos, A.; Kumar, A.; Galindo, S.E.; Lucas, T.; Bartolini, F.; Grueber, W.B. Integrins Protect Sensory Neurons in Models of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2006050118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Klein, I.; Lehmann, H. Pathomechanisms of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Toxics 2021, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schreiber, A.K. Diabetic Neuropathic Pain: Physiopathology and Treatment. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feldman, E.L.; Goutman, S.A.; Petri, S.; Mazzini, L.; Savelieff, M.G.; Shaw, P.J.; Sobue, G. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Lancet 2022, 400, 1363–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bombaci, A.; Lupica, A.; Pozzi, F.E.; Remoli, G.; Manera, U.; Di Stefano, V. Sensory Neuropathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 5677–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rubio, M.A.; Herrando-Grabulosa, M.; Navarro, X. Sensory Involvement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Riancho, J.; Gonzalo, I.; Ruiz-Soto, M.; Berciano, J. Why Do Motor Neurons Degenerate? Actualisation in the Pathogenesis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neurol. Engl. Ed. 2019, 34, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, Y.; Ferris, J.; Gao, F.-B. Frontotemporal Dementia and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Associated Disease Protein TDP-43 Promotes Dendritic Branching. Mol. Brain 2009, 2, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Park, J.H.; Chung, C.G.; Park, S.S.; Lee, D.; Kim, K.M.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, E.S.; Cho, J.H.; Jeon, Y.-M.; Shen, C.-K.J.; et al. Cytosolic Calcium Regulates Cytoplasmic Accumulation of TDP-43 through Calpain-A and Importin A3. eLife 2020, 9, e60132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rumpf, S.; Bagley, J.A.; Thompson-Peer, K.L.; Zhu, S.; Gorczyca, D.; Beckstead, R.B.; Jan, L.Y.; Jan, Y.N. Drosophila Valosin-Containing Protein Is Required for Dendrite Pruning through a Regulatory Role in mRNA Metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7331–7336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J.; et al. Expanded GGGGCC Hexanucleotide Repeat in Noncoding Region of C9ORF72 Causes Chromosome 9p-Linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Renton, A.E.; Majounie, E.; Waite, A.; Simón-Sánchez, J.; Rollinson, S.; Gibbs, J.R.; Schymick, J.C.; Laaksovirta, H.; van Swieten, J.C.; Myllykangas, L.; et al. A Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion in C9ORF72 Is the Cause of Chromosome 9p21-Linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011, 72, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Burguete, A.S.; Almeida, S.; Gao, F.-B.; Kalb, R.; Akins, M.R.; Bonini, N.M. GGGGCC Microsatellite RNA Is Neuritically Localized, Induces Branching Defects, and Perturbs Transport Granule Function. eLife 2015, 4, e08881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Freibaum, B.D.; Taylor, J.P. The Role of Dipeptide Repeats in C9ORF72-Related ALS-FTD. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Park, J.H.; Chung, C.G.; Seo, J.; Lee, B.-H.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kweon, J.H.; Lee, S.B. C9orf72-Associated Arginine-Rich Dipeptide Repeat Proteins Reduce the Number of Golgi Outposts and Dendritic Branches in Drosophila Neurons. Mol. Cells 2020, 43, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Şahin, A.; Held, A.; Bredvik, K.; Major, P.; Achilli, T.-M.; Kerson, A.G.; Wharton, K.; Stilwell, G.; Reenan, R. Human SOD1 ALS Mutations in a Drosophila Knock-In Model Cause Severe Phenotypes and Reveal Dosage-Sensitive Gain- and Loss-of-Function Components. Genetics 2017, 205, 707–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Held, A.; Major, P.; Sahin, A.; Reenan, R.A.; Lipscombe, D.; Wharton, K.A. Circuit Dysfunction in SOD1-ALS Model First Detected in Sensory Feedback Prior to Motor Neuron Degeneration Is Alleviated by BMP Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 2347–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Philips, T.; Rothstein, J.D. Rodent Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 2015, 69, 5.67.1–5.67.21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Xu, R. The Pathogenic Mechanism of TAR DNA-Binding Protein 43 (TDP-43) in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Giacomelli, E.; Vahsen, B.F.; Calder, E.L.; Xu, Y.; Scaber, J.; Gray, E.; Dafinca, R.; Talbot, K.; Studer, L. Human Stem Cell Models of Neurodegeneration: From Basic Science of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis to Clinical Translation. Cell Stem Cell 2022, 29, 11–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mao, Z. Eight Different Types of Dopaminergic Neurons Innervate the Drosophila Mushroom Body Neuropil: Anatomical and Physiological Heterogeneity. Front. Neural Circuits 2009, 3, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kasture, A.S.; Hummel, T.; Sucic, S.; Freissmuth, M. Big Lessons from Tiny Flies: Drosophila melanogaster as a Model to Explore Dysfunction of Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Neurotransmitter Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hamon, M.; Blier, P. Monoamine Neurocircuitry in Depression and Strategies for New Treatments. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 45, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Grace, A.A. Dysregulation of the Dopamine System in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia and Depression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhao, T.; Liu, T.; Wang, L.; Xie, K.; Tang, H.; Tang, M. Dysfunction of Neurotransmitter Metabolism Is Associated with the Severity of Depression in First-Diagnosed, Drug-Naïve Depressed Patients. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 349, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ahn, Y.; Han, S.H.; Kim, M.G.; Hong, K.-B.; Kim, W.J.; Suh, H.J.; Jo, K. Anti-Depressant Effects of Ethanol Extract from Cannabis Sativa (Hemp) Seed in Chlorpromazine-Induced Drosophila melanogaster Depression Model. Pharm. Biol. 2021, 59, 996–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moulin, T.C.; Ferro, F.; Hoyer, A.; Cheung, P.; Williams, M.J.; Schiöth, H.B. The Drosophila melanogaster Levodopa-Induced Depression Model Exhibits Negative Geotaxis Deficits and Differential Gene Expression in Males and Females. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 653470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Jiang, M.-D.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, J.-L.; Wang, Y.-F. Drug Induces Depression-like Phenotypes and Alters Gene Expression Profiles in Drosophila. Brain Res. Bull. 2017, 132, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Araujo, S.M.; Poetini, M.R.; Bortolotto, V.C.; De Freitas Couto, S.; Pinheiro, F.C.; Meichtry, L.B.; De Almeida, F.P.; Santos Musachio, E.A.; De Paula, M.T.; Prigol, M. Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress-Induced Depressive-like Behavior and Dysregulation of Brain Levels of Biogenic Amines in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 351, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Araujo, S.M.; Bortolotto, V.C.; Poetini, M.R.; Dahleh, M.M.M.; Couto, S.D.F.; Pinheiro, F.C.; Meichtry, L.B.; Musachio, E.A.S.; Ramborger, B.P.; Roehrs, R.; et al. γ-Oryzanol Produces an Antidepressant-like Effect in a Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress Model of Depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Stress 2021, 24, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Jia, J.; He, L.; Yang, J.; Shuai, Y.; Yang, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Wang, G.; Wang, X.; et al. A Pair of Dopamine Neurons Mediate Chronic Stress Signals to Induce Learning Deficit in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023674118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chen, T.; Zhang, M.; Ding, Z.; Hu, J.; Yang, J.; He, L.; Jia, J.; Yang, J.; Yang, J.; Song, X.; et al. The Drosophila NPY-like System Protects against Chronic Stress–Induced Learning Deficit by Preventing the Disruption of Autophagic Flux. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2307632120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shen, B.; Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Shen, X.; Li, L.; Ru, Y.; Yang, C.; Du, G.; Lai, C.; Gao, Y. Medicinal Cannabis Oil Improves Anxiety-like and Depressive-like Behaviors in CCS Mice via the BDNF/TRPC6 Signaling Pathway. Behav. Brain Res. 2024, 467, 115005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vahid-Ansari, F.; Albert, P.R. Chronic Fluoxetine Induces Activity Changes in Recovery From Poststroke Anxiety, Depression, and Cognitive Impairment. Neurotherapeutics 2018, 15, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Thapar, A.; Cooper, M. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Lancet 2016, 387, 1240–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Thomas, R.; Sanders, S.; Doust, J.; Beller, E.; Glasziou, P. Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 2015, 135, e994–e1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Faraone, S.V.; Bellgrove, M.A.; Brikell, I.; Cortese, S.; Hartman, C.A.; Hollis, C.; Newcorn, J.H.; Philipsen, A.; Polanczyk, G.V.; Rubia, K.; et al. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2024, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.; Jeong, G.H.; Lee, E.; Lee, S.; Lee, K.H.; Kronbichler, A.; Stubbs, B.; Solmi, M.; et al. Environmental Risk Factors, Protective Factors, and Peripheral Biomarkers for ADHD: An Umbrella Review. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 955–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. ADHD Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC); Early Lifecourse & Genetic Epidemiology (EAGLE) Consortium; 23andMe Research Team; Demontis, D.; Walters, R.K.; Martin, J.; Mattheisen, M.; Als, T.D.; Agerbo, E.; Baldursson, G.; et al. Discovery of the First Genome-Wide Significant Risk Loci for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Van Der Voet, M.; Harich, B.; Franke, B.; Schenck, A. ADHD-Associated Dopamine Transporter, Latrophilin and Neurofibromin Share a Dopamine-Related Locomotor Signature in Drosophila. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Klein, M.; Singgih, E.L.; Van Rens, A.; Demontis, D.; Børglum, A.D.; Mota, N.R.; Castells-Nobau, A.; Kiemeney, L.A.; Brunner, H.G.; Arias-Vasquez, A.; et al. Contribution of Intellectual Disability–Related Genes to ADHD Risk and to Locomotor Activity in Drosophila. Am. J. Psychiatry 2020, 177, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Musachio, E.A.S.; De Freitas Couto, S.; Poetini, M.R.; Bortolotto, V.C.; Dahleh, M.M.M.; Janner, D.E.; Araujo, S.M.; Ramborger, B.P.; Rohers, R.; Guerra, G.P.; et al. Bisphenol A Exposure during the Embryonic Period: Insights into Dopamine Relationship and Behavioral Disorders in Drosophila melanogaster. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 157, 112526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rohde, P.D.; Jensen, I.R.; Sarup, P.M.; Ørsted, M.; Demontis, D.; Sørensen, P.; Kristensen, T.N. Genetic Signatures of Drug Response Variability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2019, 213, 633–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qu, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Jiang, L.; et al. The Effects of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Drosophila Brain at Single-Cell Resolution and Potential Drug Repurposing for ADHD Treatment. Mol. Psychiatry 2024, 29, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kim, S.; Lee, H.-S.; Park, Y. Perinatal Exposure to Low-Dose Imidacloprid Causes ADHD-like Symptoms: Evidences from an Invertebrate Model Study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 110, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Janner, D.E.; Gomes, N.S.; Poetini, M.R.; Poleto, K.H.; Musachio, E.A.S.; De Almeida, F.P.; De Matos Amador, E.C.; Reginaldo, J.C.; Ramborger, B.P.; Roehrs, R.; et al. Oxidative Stress and Decreased Dopamine Levels Induced by Imidacloprid Exposure Cause Behavioral Changes in a Neurodevelopmental Disorder Model in Drosophila melanogaster. NeuroToxicology 2021, 85, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Janner, D.E.; De Moura Brinck, A.; Marquez De Figueiredo, F.; Santos Musachio, E.A.; Meichtry, L.B.; Fernandes, E.J.; Piardi De Almeida, P.; Filho, C.B.; Kemmerich, M.; De Carvalho, A.S.; et al. Modulation of Dopamine, Serotonin, and Behavior by Lutein Carrier Nanoparticles in a Drosophila melanogaster Model of Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2025, 414, 111500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bloem, B.R.; Okun, M.S.; Klein, C. Parkinson’s Disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 2284–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Agostini, F.; Bubacco, L.; Chakrabarti, S.; Bisaglia, M. α-Synuclein Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster Is Enhanced by the Presence of Iron: Implications for Parkinson’s Disease. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Narwal, S.; Singh, A.; Tare, M. Analysis of α-Syn and Parkin Interaction in Mediating Neuronal Death in Drosophila Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2024, 17, 1295805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yi, S.; Wang, L.; Ho, M.S.; Zhang, S. The Autophagy Protein Atg9 Functions in Glia and Contributes to Parkinsonian Symptoms in a Drosophila Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Moore, J.; Wu, T.; Dhindsa, J.; El Fadel, O.; Le, A.; Perez, A.; Amoh, B.; Tarkunde, A.; Zhu, K.F.; Avalos, M.; et al. Longitudinal Multi-Omics in Alpha-Synuclein Drosophila Model Discriminates Disease- from Age-Associated Pathologies in Parkinson’s Disease. npj Park. Dis. 2025, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Maksoud, E.; Liao, E.H.; Haghighi, A.P. A Neuron-Glial Trans-Signaling Cascade Mediates LRRK2-Induced Neurodegeneration. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 1774–1786.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nguyen, H.N.; Galleri, G.; Rassu, A.; Ciampelli, C.; Bernardoni, R.; Galioto, M.; Albani, D.; Crosio, C.; Iaccarino, C. Evaluation of Neuroinflammatory Contribution to Neurodegeneration in LRRK2 Drosophila Models. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Qiao, J.-D.; Mao, Y.-L. Knockout of PINK1 Altered the Neural Connectivity of Drosophila Dopamine PPM3 Neurons at Input and Output Sites. Invert. Neurosci. 2020, 20, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bai, X.-L.; Luo, Y.-J.; Fan, W.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Liao, X. Neuroprotective Effects of Lycium Barbarum Fruit Extract on Pink1B9Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2023, 78, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Liu, M.; Yu, S.; Wang, J.; Qiao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y. Ginseng Protein Protects against Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration by Inducing Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response in Drosophila melanogaster PINK1 Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 247, 112213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Stephano, F.; Nolte, S.; Hoffmann, J.; El-Kholy, S.; Von Frieling, J.; Bruchhaus, I.; Fink, C.; Roeder, T. Impaired Wnt Signaling in Dopamine Containing Neurons Is Associated with Pathogenesis in a Rotenone Triggered Drosophila Parkinson’s Disease Model. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ayajuddin, M.; Phom, L.; Koza, Z.; Modi, P.; Das, A.; Chaurasia, R.; Thepa, A.; Jamir, N.; Neikha, K.; Yenisetti, S.C. Adult Health and Transition Stage-Specific Rotenone-Mediated Drosophila Model of Parkinson’s Disease: Impact on Late-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease Models. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022, 15, 896183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Volta, M.; Melrose, H. LRRK2 Mouse Models: Dissecting the Behavior, Striatal Neurochemistry and Neurophysiology of PD Pathogenesis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2017, 45, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Innos, J.; Hickey, M.A. Using Rotenone to Model Parkinson’s Disease in Mice: A Review of the Role of Pharmacokinetics. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 1223–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Mohammad, A.; Ibrahim, M.; Akram, M.; Mohsin, H.; Imran, M.T.; Khan Alizai, H.N. N-Acetylcysteine for Parkinson’s Disease: A Translational Systematic Review of Mechanistic and Early Clinical Data. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 2025, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rassu, M.; Biosa, A.; Galioto, M.; Fais, M.; Sini, P.; Greggio, E.; Piccoli, G.; Crosio, C.; Iaccarino, C. Levetiracetam Treatment Ameliorates LRRK2 Pathological Mutant Phenotype. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 8505–8510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Pathogenic mechanisms of GARS and Rab7 mutations in CMT models. (A) In wild-type C4da, sufficient levels of Gly tRNA allow for normal dendritic coverage and protein translation. In contrast, GARS mutant neurons show reduced Gly tRNA availability, leading to ribosome stopping at glycine codons, activation of the stress response, reduced protein synthesis, and decreased dendritic coverage, generating CMT-related phenotypes (bottom panel). (B) Wild-type Rab7 promotes normal axonal trafficking of Rab7-positive vesicles without affecting neuronal morphology. Mutant Rab7 causes abnormal accumulation and defective trafficking of Rab7-positive vesicles, resulting in sensory impairments despite preserved neuronal morphology that gives rise to sensory defects (bottom panel). Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Figure 1. Pathogenic mechanisms of GARS and Rab7 mutations in CMT models. (A) In wild-type C4da, sufficient levels of Gly tRNA allow for normal dendritic coverage and protein translation. In contrast, GARS mutant neurons show reduced Gly tRNA availability, leading to ribosome stopping at glycine codons, activation of the stress response, reduced protein synthesis, and decreased dendritic coverage, generating CMT-related phenotypes (bottom panel). (B) Wild-type Rab7 promotes normal axonal trafficking of Rab7-positive vesicles without affecting neuronal morphology. Mutant Rab7 causes abnormal accumulation and defective trafficking of Rab7-positive vesicles, resulting in sensory impairments despite preserved neuronal morphology that gives rise to sensory defects (bottom panel). Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Biomolecules 15 01677 g001
Figure 2. D. melanogaster models of diabetic and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. (Top panel) Type I and II diabetes, or InR knockdown, lead to persistent thermal hyperalgesia after UV-induced injury. In type I diabetes and InR knockdown, C4da neurons show reduced dendritic branching, whereas type II diabetes preserves morphology. (Bottom panel) Chemotherapy with paclitaxel or vincristine causes axonal and dendritic degeneration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and nociceptive hypersensitivity. Protective mechanisms include mitochondrial regulators that restore mitochondrial homeostasis and integrity factors that preserve dendritic architecture and neuronal function. These interventions reduce thermal hypersensitivity, block axonal degeneration, and restore sensory, among other defects. The models highlight conserved pathways and potential therapeutic targets for diabetic and chemotherapy-induced neuropathies. Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Figure 2. D. melanogaster models of diabetic and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. (Top panel) Type I and II diabetes, or InR knockdown, lead to persistent thermal hyperalgesia after UV-induced injury. In type I diabetes and InR knockdown, C4da neurons show reduced dendritic branching, whereas type II diabetes preserves morphology. (Bottom panel) Chemotherapy with paclitaxel or vincristine causes axonal and dendritic degeneration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and nociceptive hypersensitivity. Protective mechanisms include mitochondrial regulators that restore mitochondrial homeostasis and integrity factors that preserve dendritic architecture and neuronal function. These interventions reduce thermal hypersensitivity, block axonal degeneration, and restore sensory, among other defects. The models highlight conserved pathways and potential therapeutic targets for diabetic and chemotherapy-induced neuropathies. Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Biomolecules 15 01677 g002
Figure 3. D. melanogaster models of depression-like disorders. Depression-like phenotypes in D. melanogaster can be induced through pharmacological treatments (e.g., L-DOPA, CPZ), chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), or chronic stress treatment (CST). These manipulations result in behavioural and physiological alterations, (top panel, right). Antidepressant interventions shown to ameliorate these phenotypes include Cannabis sativa ethanol extract, 3-IY, NPF, FLX, and ORY (bottom panel, right). Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Figure 3. D. melanogaster models of depression-like disorders. Depression-like phenotypes in D. melanogaster can be induced through pharmacological treatments (e.g., L-DOPA, CPZ), chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), or chronic stress treatment (CST). These manipulations result in behavioural and physiological alterations, (top panel, right). Antidepressant interventions shown to ameliorate these phenotypes include Cannabis sativa ethanol extract, 3-IY, NPF, FLX, and ORY (bottom panel, right). Created with BioRender, https://BioRender.com/ (accessed on 7 October 2025).
Biomolecules 15 01677 g003
Table 1. Peripheral neuropathy models using the larval peripheral nervous system of D. melanogaster.
Table 1. Peripheral neuropathy models using the larval peripheral nervous system of D. melanogaster.
Disease ModelGenetic/Chemical ManipulationObserved PhenotypesValidated Interventions
CMT—GARS mutantExpression of mutant GARS in motor and C4da neuronsDisrupted neuromuscular junction integrity; progressive muscle denervation; impaired neuronal function via translational dysregulation; reduced dendritic coverage; decreased protein translation; developmental lethality; shortened lifespanOverexpression of Glycine tRNA partially restores translation, reduces denervation, improves sensory morphology, motor function, and survival
CMT—RAB7A mutantExpression of human mutant Rab7 in sensory neuronsReduced temperature perception; decreased nociceptive response; no dendritic alteration; accumulation of Rab7-positive vesicles in axons; reduced vesicle stationary timeNone reported in flies
DPN—InR mutantInR mutantsPersistent thermal hyperalgesiaNone reported in flies
DPN—Diabetes type 1Silencing the insulin-producing cellsPersistent thermal hyperalgesia; reduced C4da dendritic length and branch numberNone reported in flies
DPN—Diabetes type 2High sugar dietPersistent thermal hyperalgesia; no major dendritic changesNone reported in flies
DPN—Sensory neuron-specificInR knockdown in md neuronsPersistent thermal hyperalgesia; reduced baseline dendritic length; elevated calcium responses in C4da neuronsRestoring insulin-like signalling in md neurons rescues persistent nociceptive hypersensitivity
CIPN—PaclitaxelFeeding larvae paclitaxelThermal hypersensitivity; C4da dendritic defects; axonal loss; disrupted integrin-mediated adhesion and trafficking, causing dendritic branch crossing; mitochondrial dysfunction.Pink1 overexpression in C4da neurons restores mitochondrial homeostasis and alleviates thermal hypersensitivity.
Niclosamide and PDE701 similarly improve mitochondrial function, with PDE701 additionally reducing thermal hyperalgesia.
Nmnat overexpression prevents axonal degeneration and mitigates nociceptive hypersensitivity.
Enhanced expression of αPS1 and βPS integrins preserves dendritic integrity and protects against thermal sensitivity.
CIPN—VincristineFeeding larvae vincristineThermal hypersensitivity; structural alterations in C4da neurons; mitochondrial and sensory dysfunctionPDH knockdown rescues mitochondrial and sensory defects
ALS—TBPHUpregulation of TBPH
Downregulation of TBPH
G287S TDP-43 mutant
Excessive dendritic branching in C4da neurons (overexpression); reduced dendritic branching in C4da neurons (downregulation);
altered nuclear–cytoplasmic localization (G287S mutant impairs calcium-dependent transport)
None reported in flies
ALS—Calcium-dependent regulatorsSilencing Calmodulin, Protein kinase C, or CalpainA in sensory neuronsTBPH cytoplasmic retention in pupal sensory neuronsOverexpression of Importin α3 and β1 enhances nuclear translocation
ALS—C9orf72Expression of UAS-(GGGGCC)48 RNA in C4da neuronsLate-stage severe dendritic loss; defective local RNA translationSilencing dFMR1 or Orb2 rescues dendritic branching defects.
Overexpression of dFMR1 or CrebA increases the branching abnormalities
ALS—DPRs (PR36, GR36)Expression of PR36 or GR36 in C4da neuronsLoss of dendritic branch points; reduced GOPs; impaired plasma membrane supply; PR36 causes CrebA downregulationCrebA overexpression restores GOPs and plasma membrane supply in neurons that express PR36 but fails to recover dendritic morphology or prevent degeneration
ALS—Sod1 mutantExpression of mutant Sod1Early stage: sensory feedback defects preceded motor degeneration; late stage: motor neuron degeneration; motor impairmentBMP signalling activation in proprioceptive neurons rescues early and partially late phenotypes
Table 2. CNS neuropathy models using the dopaminergic system of adult D. melanogaster.
Table 2. CNS neuropathy models using the dopaminergic system of adult D. melanogaster.
Disease ModelGenetic/Chemical ManipulationObserved PhenotypesValidated Interventions
Depression-like—L-DOPAFeeding larvae L-DOPAReduction in appetite; decreased sexual activity; negative geotaxis deficits; CG4269 upregulation in males; downregulation of CG6821 in femalesNone reported in flies
Depression-like—CPZFeeding larvae CPZReduction in appetite; decreased sexual activity; CG4269 upregulation and CG6821 downregulation in males; reduced Dop1R1 and 5-HT1A; lower dopamine and L-DOPA levelsC. sativa HE improves locomotor and circadian behaviours, restores Dop1R1/5-HT1A, and increases dopamine/L-DOPA
Depression-like—CUMSChronic unpredictable stressors (10 days of multiple stressors: heat, cold, sleep deprivation, starvation)Shorter swimming times; increased immobility; heightened aggression; mating deficits; decreased sucrose preference; reduced body weight; more time in dark box; lower serotonin and dopamineFLX and ORY improve aggression, mating, anxiety, restore serotonin and partially dopamine levels
Depression-like—CST/CSLDRepeated mechanical stressImpaired olfactory learning and memory; behavioural impairments; maladaptive dopaminergic signalling; disrupted autophagy flux in neurons3-IY alleviates learning deficits.
Blocking DA neuron transmission prevents learning deficits.
NPF signalling confers resilience, preserving autophagy
ADHD—DAT, LPHN3, NF1 knockdownPan-neuronal knockdown of DAT, LPHN3, Nf1Elevated activity; reduced sleep during darknessMPH reversed behavioural abnormalities
ADHD—Mef2 and TRAPPC9 knockdownKnockdown of Mef2 and TRAPPC9 in pan-neuronal, dopaminergic, or circadian populationsPan-neuronal and dopaminergic MEF2 knockdown: Increased night activity; reduced sleep under constant darkness; delayed sleep onset.
TRAPPC9 silencing in dopaminergic neurons: decreased activity; increased daytime sleep with elevated activity in darkness.
TRAPPC9 silencing in circadian neurons: increased night activity and reduced sleep
None reported in flies
ADHD—Bisphenol ABPA feeding parental fliesReduced eclosion rate; smaller body size, morphological abnormalities, and decreased lifespan in pupae; elevated aggression and hyperactivity; reduced dopamine levels; increased production of reactive oxygen species.None reported in flies
ADHD—MPHExposing flies to MPHIncreased locomotor activity; altered carbohydrate metabolism; selective upregulation of dopamine receptor genes and dopamine metabolism genes; suppression of glutamate and GABA receptor genes; suppression of synaptic signalling moleculesNone reported in flies
ADHD—imidaclopridExposing flies to imidaclopridDisruption of social interaction; increased locomotor activity; reduction in dopamine levels; oxidative stress increase; impairment of dopaminergic function by decreasing TH activityLutein carrier nanoparticles restore DA synthesis and TH activity
PD—α-SynPan-neural expression of human α-SynAggregation of ubiquitin-conjugated proteins; loss of DA neurons; reduced locomotor activity; shortened lifespan; reduction in parkin transcript levels; suppression of glycolysis, insulin signalling, oxidative phosphorylation, and complex I biogenesis; impairing energy metabolism; alterations in NMD pathwayDEF and NAC restore antioxidant capacity, improving dopaminergic neuron survival, motor behaviour, and lifespan
PD—α-Syn and parkinα-Syn overexpression and parkin downregulationSignificant loss of dopaminergic neurons in the PPL1 and PPM1/2 clusters; mitochondrial fragmentationNone reported in flies
PD—Pink1 B9Pink1 B9Dopamine PPM3 electrophysiological defects; motor impairments; reduced brain dopamine levels; reduced lifespan.LBFE and GTP improve lifespan, locomotor ability, reduce dopamine neuron loss, and increase dopamine brain levels.
PD—Atg9Silencing Atg9 in glial cellsImpaired autophagic flux; progressive, age-dependent dopaminergic neuron degeneration; locomotor deficits; glial activationNone reported in flies
PD—Mutated LRRK2Overexpression of mutated LRRK2 in DA neuronsAge-dependent neuron loss; elevated Fur1 in DA neurons; activation of BMP signalling in glia; DA neurodegenerationFurin1 reduction rescues DA neuron survival, climbing behaviour, and lifespan; knockdown of Gbb or BMP pathway components in glia prevents DA neuron loss.
PD—paraquatExposure to paraquatAge-dependent neuron loss; elevated Fur1 in DA neurons; activation of BMP signalling in glia; DA neurodegenerationReducing Fur1 or BMP pathway prevents DA neuron loss
PD—Mutated LRRK2Overexpression of mutated LRRK2 in gliaAge-dependent DA neuron loss in PPL1 clusters; locomotor deficits; neuroinflammatory responsesLevetiracetam exposure restores dopaminergic survival, locomotor performance, and reduces inflammatory markers.
PD—rotenoneExposure to rotenoneChanges in locomotor behaviour without DA neuron loss; reduction in TH synthesis in DA neurons; decreased DA levels in the brain; reduction in DOPAC and increase in HVA; increased oxidative dopamine turnover; upregulation of MAPK/EGFR and TGF-β pathways; Wnt pathway suppression.Wnt pathway activation rescues motor phenotype
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tendero-Lopez, D.; Dominguez, M.; Aguilar-Aragon, M. Modelling Neural Disorders with the D. melanogaster Larval Peripheral and Adult Dopaminergic Systems. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121677

AMA Style

Tendero-Lopez D, Dominguez M, Aguilar-Aragon M. Modelling Neural Disorders with the D. melanogaster Larval Peripheral and Adult Dopaminergic Systems. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(12):1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tendero-Lopez, Daniel, Maria Dominguez, and Mario Aguilar-Aragon. 2025. "Modelling Neural Disorders with the D. melanogaster Larval Peripheral and Adult Dopaminergic Systems" Biomolecules 15, no. 12: 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121677

APA Style

Tendero-Lopez, D., Dominguez, M., & Aguilar-Aragon, M. (2025). Modelling Neural Disorders with the D. melanogaster Larval Peripheral and Adult Dopaminergic Systems. Biomolecules, 15(12), 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop