Next Article in Journal
Establishment of a Cell Line Stably Expressing the Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor to Identify Crocin as a Ghrelin Agonist
Next Article in Special Issue
Antizyme Inhibitor 2-Deficient Mice Exhibit Altered Brain Polyamine Levels and Reduced Locomotor Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Considerations for the Use of Photobiomodulation in the Treatment of Retinal Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unique Chemistry, Intake, and Metabolism of Polyamines in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and Its Body
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium

by
Jan Benedikt
1,
Christian J. Malpica-Nieves
2,*,
Yomarie Rivera
3,
Miguel Méndez-González
4,
Colin G. Nichols
5,
Rüdiger W. Veh
6,
Misty J. Eaton
2 and
Serguei N. Skatchkov
1,2,*
1
Department of Physiology, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
3
Department of Chiropractic, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
4
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Aguadilla, PR 00603, USA
5
Department of Cell Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
6
Institut für Zell- und Neurobiologie, Charité, 10115 Berlin, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(12), 1812; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121812
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022

Abstract

:
The interest in astrocytes, the silent brain cells that accumulate polyamines (PAs), is growing. PAs exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antidepressant, neuroprotective, and other beneficial effects, including increasing longevity in vivo. Unlike neurons, astrocytes are extensively coupled to others via connexin (Cx) gap junctions (GJs). Although there are striking modulatory effects of PAs on neuronal receptors and channels, PA regulation of the astrocytic GJs is not well understood. We studied GJ-propagation using molecules of different (i) electrical charge, (ii) structure, and (iii) molecular weight. Loading single astrocytes with patch pipettes containing membrane-impermeable dyes, we observed that (i) even small molecules do not easily permeate astrocytic GJs, (ii) the ratio of the charge to weight of these molecules is the key determinant of GJ permeation, (iii) the PA spermine (SPM) induced the propagation of negatively charged molecules via GJs, (iv) while no effects were observed on propagation of macromolecules with net-zero charge. The GJ uncoupler carbenoxolone (CBX) blocked such propagation. Taken together, these findings indicate that SPM is essential for astrocytic GJ communication and selectively facilitates intracellular propagation via GJs for negatively charged molecules through glial syncytium.

1. Introduction

In brain, neurons and glial cells are isolated one from another by the aquatic-intercellular space. Astrocytes are connected by large diameter connexin (Cx) gap junction pores (GJs) that facilitate astrocytic communication and function [1,2,3,4]. Over the past decade, the interest about astrocytes [5,6,7,8] and polyamines (PAs) in the nervous system [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] has increased. Astrocytes have extensive communication via Cx GJ channels that make the three-dimensional astrocytic syncytium large, electrically isopotential [4,19], and unique [10,11,19,20]. Furthermore, astrocytes, but not neurons, accumulate PAs [15,18,21,22,23] and provide PA fluxes via Cx GJs [24], specifically via Cx43 GJs [25,26]. Half-GJs, Cx43-hemichannels (HCs) are open to the extracellular space and are pathways for PA release from astrocytes [14] as well as for glutamate [27], glutathione [28], D-serine [29], and ATP [30]. Metabolites are transferred via glial Cx43 and Cx30 GJs for large distances where they may affect the neuronal environment [2,20,29,31,32,33]. Therefore, GJs and HCs together with transporters like SLC18B1 [34] and SLC22A [11,15,16,35,36,37] are PA uptake/release pathways in astrocytes and other glial cells.
Recently, PAs and their derivatives have been recognized as novel gliotransmitters [10,11,14,18,24,34]. Acetylated PAs [38], acrolein, putreanine, and hypusine [15] are novel (patho)physiological-glial PA derivatives and markers. Intriguingly, the PAs spermidine (SPD) and spermine (SPM) are not synthesized in adult astrocytes [9,39,40], but are accumulated in these glia, suggesting a high rate of unidirectional PA uptake in astrocytes [14,34,41]. Therefore, such PA accumulation is clearly evolutionarily determined; it is found throughout the brain [21,42], retina [22,23,43], peripheral nervous system [44], and in glial-neuronal co-cultures [45] of multiple species, including humans [22]. While the brain contains high amounts of SPD and SPM, the smaller PA putrescine is present at much lower concentrations, about 2% of the total PA content [46,47,48]. Conversion of putrescine to GABA in astrocytes was suggested [3,49,50] and, indeed, astrocytes release GABA [15,18]. GABA released from astrocytes confers tonic inhibition and is an anti-epileptic glial agent [18,49].
SPD/SPM are observed only in a few adult neurons and neurosecretory-neuronal- synaptic terminals [42] and the mechanisms of PA accumulation in glia, action, and astrocyte-to-astrocyte communication remain a mystery [14,15,24,41]. PAs underlie many glial cell-involved CNS diseases and syndromes [3,10,11,15]. PA catabolism in brain is regulated by Spermidine/Spermine N 1-Acetyltransferase (SSAT), which catalyzes acetylation of SPD and SPM and polyamine oxidases (PAO, SMOX); these catalyze the oxidation of acetylated PAs to dangerous radicals, such as hydrogen peroxide and propyl aldehyde (3-aminopropanal) causing excitotoxicity, epilepsy, seizure, and astrogliosis [16,17,51,52]. There are ways to quench oxidation of PAs and to induce neuroprotection by blocking DAO, PAO, and SMOX by aminoguanidine, chloroquine [53,54], and probably by SPD which has a clear neuroprotective effect [55]. Both SPD and D-glucosamine are found to promote longevity [56].
Recently, it was shown that glial cell-to-cell communication in brain [24], retina [57], and specifically in cells expressing Cx43-GJs [26] is strongly dependent on the intracellular store of PAs. PAs enter Cx43-expressing cells via PA uptake from the extracellular space and then act internally to affect cell-to-cell communication [58]. We have previously shown that intracellular SPM and SPD open Cx43-GJs [25,26]. The opening of GJs is crucial for processes, such as glucose transport [59], potassium buffering [4,60,61], and large-scale distribution of energetic substrates and signaling molecules throughout the syncytium [2,61,62,63,64].
Intriguingly, the trafficking of glucose molecules with zero charge (fluorescent 2-NBDG and fluorescent 6-NBGD) via GJs was about two orders higher in the astrocytic syncytium, compared with a negatively charged phosphorylated glucose, such as 2-NBGD-6P (glucose-6-phosphate) [31,59]. Therefore, this unexpected difference in charge-dependent trafficking of molecules through astrocytic GJs prompted us to investigate (i) the propagation of differently charged molecules with (ii) varying molecular weights, and (iii) the role the PA SPM may play. We have previously shown that SPM (1) opens gap junctions in astrocytes [24] and (2) in Novikoff cells [26] which natively express Cx43, where SPM (3) removes hydrogen block [25] and (4) calcium block of Cx43 [26]. A part of the current work was presented in abstract form at the Annual Society for Neuroscience meeting [65].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

All procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines for the humane treatment of laboratory animals and with the approval from the Universidad Central del Caribe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.2. Brain Slice Preparation

To avoid age-dependent variation in Cx-based communication, we used brains of 25–30 postnatal-day-old Sprague-Dawley (P25–P30) rats. At this age, glial cells are mature and both Cx 43 gap junctions and Kir4.1 channels are fully developed [3,66,67,68]. Transverse 350 µm thick hippocampal slices were prepared from the brains of Sprague-Dawley rats of both sexes. Brains were dissected in ice-cold artificial-cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) saturated with 5% CO2/95% O2 and slices were cut using a vibratome (VT1000S; Leica, Nussloch, Germany). The slices were then incubated for recovery in a standard ACSF solution containing (mM) 127 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 10 glucose, 26 NaHCO3, gassed with 5% CO2/95% O2, pH 7.4, (osmolarity 305 mOsm/L). The incubation was for 20 min at 35 °C and an additional 10 min at RT. After 30 min of total incubation, slices were placed in a recording chamber (0.5 mL volume) and superfused continuously with oxygenated ACSF at room temperature (23–24 °C, 1 mL/min). Whole cell recording and fluorescent dye tracing studies were performed as described previously [24,57,65].

2.3. Electrophysiology

MX7500R/L manipulators with MC-1000 drives (Siskiyou Inc., Grants Pass, OR, USA) were used for positioning micropipettes for whole-cell voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings. Astrocytes were clamped with patch pipettes made from borosilicate-glass tubing (OD 1.5 mm, ID 1.0 mm; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA) pulled in four steps using a Flaming-Brown P-97 pipette puller (Sutter Instruments Corporation, Novato, CA, USA). Pipettes were filled with intracellular solution (ICS) containing (mM) 117 K-gluconate, 13 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, (1 SPM-Cl was used in part of experiments), pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH (osmolarity ~285 mOsm/L). After filling with ICS, the final micropipette resistance was close to 8 MΩ, which was optimized for astrocyte recordings to achieve seals of more than 3 GΩ on cell membranes. In slices, voltage clamping and current recording in the whole-cell patch-clamp mode from astrocytes were performed using MultiClamp700B (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The pClamp 10 software package (Molecular Devices Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for data acquisition and analysis. The traces were low-pass filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz (Axon DigiData 1440A interface) (Molecular Devices Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The electrophysiological data were analyzed with the software, Clampfit 10.2 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).
Astrocytes were dialyzed in whole-cell configuration in current clamp (zero-current) mode. Each single astrocyte tested was loaded via a patch pipette with the physiological ICS containing different fluorescent dyes in the presence or absence of 1 mM SPM. This concentration of SPM was chosen because it is close to the cytoplasmic SPM concentration of about 800 µM in glia [69].
Astrocyte recordings were accepted only if (i) the membrane potential was negative to ~−70 mV and (ii) if cells had a linear current-voltage relation (adult-passive astrocytes) and (iii) low input resistance (<20 MΩ). We used voltage-clamp mode to test current-to-voltage relationships and to characterize the type of cells. The holding potential was kept equal to the resting potential (to keep zero current), and cells were stimulated by short 60 ms voltage steps applied from the holding potential to −150, and then up to +150 mV in 10 mV increments, or by a “step-ramp” protocol using a step to −120 mV (for 100 ms), followed by a rising voltage ramp to +100 mV during 80 ms, and then a step back to resting voltage. We selected short protocols with a well-tolerated voltage range to help keep cells healthy while cell type was determined. Passive astrocytes, which are part of a large syncytium, produced linear I/V curves and were further utilized for GJ communication experiments. We avoided using astrocytes localized closer to the slice surface because those astrocytes may be artificially decoupled by the trauma obtained during cutting the slice. Instead, we recorded only from astrocytes situated at least 100 µm below the surface of the slice [70]. Therefore, the data were collected from well-coupled mature-passive astrocytes in the syncytium [66] with isopotentiality [19], but not from other cell types.

2.4. Cell Selection and Morphology

Morphologically and electrophysiologically identified astrocytes were used but not neurons, NG-2 cells, and oligodendrocytes. Astrocytes accumulating SPM/SPD, pyramidal neurons, and interneurons show different localizations (Figure 1) in stratum pyramidale (SP), in stratum radiatum (SR), and in stratum oriens (SO). In living brain slices, the astrocytes were visualized and identified using several procedures: (i) by their localization in SR and SO, (ii) by their small size and (iii) by their passive electrical properties. We used an Olympus infrared microscope (BX51WI; Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 40X water-immersion objective and two cameras: a CCD-video-camera (XC-73, Sony, Tokyo, Japan) for infrared differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) with DIC optics; a second camera (DP30BW digital, Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) for fluorescent images with. DP controller software (Olympus, version 3.3.1.292) was used to visualize, record black and white images, and quantify the spread of the dyes.
We specifically selected the CA1 area of hippocampus where (i) astrocytes are clearly separated from pyramidal neurons in specific areas (which is not like in cortex where astrocytes are mixed with different neuronal cells) and (ii) the astrocyte size is about twice smaller than neurons (Figure 1). In addition, we tested electrophysiological properties of patched astrocytes. No neurons or NG2 cells were used. The cells patched have no spontaneous-synaptic potentials (either depolarizing or hyperpolarizing miniature potentials) and no spikes.
We visualized the dye-coupled astrocytes (loaded with membrane-impermeable dyes via the micropipette) and determined the size of the syncytium, the heterogeneous connectivity, and the extent of dye propagation in recipient astrocytes after 10 min of single-cell dialysis. Counting of coupled cells was carried out in a single X-Y plane (focused on the cell which was filled with fluorescent dye) and was equally applied for all the slices and procedures tested. In addition, for high-resolution imaging and for retention of the dyes after 10 min of single-cell dialysis, each slice was immersed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS solution, pH 7.4, in 5 mL tubes. After shaking for 5 min at room temperature, the slices were stored at 4 °C for 1 h. Freshly fixed slices were then processed via confocal microscopy to obtain fresh additional 3D images showing propagation of different dyes with and without cytoplasmic SPM in the glial syncytium using a confocal-scanning microscope (LSM 510 META, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany and Olympus Fluoview FV1200, Olympus, Japan).

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

Brain slices (350 µm thick from 25–30 days old Sprague Dawley rats) were used for immunohistochemical studies. We used a total of 56 rats for the experiments presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. From each rat, we obtained 5 brain slices. From each brain slice, we used one to two astrocytes to test-dye propagation. The slices (prepared as described above) were fixed in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.05% glutaraldehyde, and 0.2% picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 16 h. After fixation, the slices were cryoprotected by immersion in 0.15 M sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (for 24 h), 0.5 M sucrose (for 24 h), and 0.8 M sucrose (for 48 h). Subsequently, they were frozen at −60 °C in liquid pentane and then stored in a −80 °C freezer until next use. The 350 µm slices were mounted on a platform of frozen OCT compound in a cryostat and resectioned at 25 µm thickness using Leica CM1520 cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at −20 °C. The sections were pretreated with 1% sodium borohydride in PBS for 15 min, and subsequently permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min. The primary anti-SPM and anti-Kir2.4 antibodies were generated and characterized in the laboratory of Dr. Rüdiger Veh [21,22,71]. Antibodies were used at dilutions of anti-SPM at 1:300 and anti-Kir2.4 at 1:5000. After incubation with the primary antibody for 36 h at 4 °C, freely floating sections were treated with the secondary antibody (biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG 1:2000, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Newark, CA, USA) for 18 h, and then with an ABC complex (Vectastain Elite, 1:1000, Vector Laboratory) for 6 h. Peroxidase activity was revealed with 1.4 mM 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB), 10 mM imidazole, 0.3% nickel ammonium sulfate and 0.015% hydrogen peroxide in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6 for 3 min at room temperature. Controls were obtained by omitting the primary antibody and occasionally supplemented by cell-body staining (Cresyl violet). All sections were developed for 3 min, mounted on glasses and dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, transferred into xylene and coverslipped with Entellan (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.6. Materials

In this study, we used several different charged (negative, positive, and neutral) molecules of fluorescent dyes. Alexa-488-biocytin, Alexa-568, and sulforhodamine-101 were purchased from Molecular Probes. Lucifer Yellow, sulforhodamine-B, 1,1-Diethyl-2,2-cyanine iodide (decynium22, D22) 2-NBD-glucose, and 4-(4-(dimethylamino)-styryl)-N-methylpyridinium, (ASP+) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). For testing the compounds, one of these negatively or positively charged, or polar molecules, was added to the ICS at the following concentrations: 2 mg/mL (~3.6 µM) 2-NBD-Glucose [59]; 2 µM ASP+ [72]; 1 µM D-22 [72,73]; 1 µM sulforhodamine-101 [74,75,76]; 100 µM Alexa 488-biocytin [65]; 1 mM Lucifer Yellow [24,77]; 200 µM Alexa 568 [65]; and 2 mM sulforhodamine-B [57].
Carbenoxolone (200 µM CBX), a gap junction uncoupler, used in this study to block fluorescent dye propagation was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.7. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using pCLAMP-10, version 10.4.0.36 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) or Origin 8 software, version 8.0725 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) and were reported as mean ± SEM. Significant differences between groups of data were evaluated using the paired Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was expected if p < 0.05. Note: brain slices incubated for longer than 1 h were not used. In addition, all the data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test (they passed the normality test).

3. Results

3.1. Localization of Polyamines Spermine and Spermidine (SPM/SPD) in Astrocytes and Polyamine-Sensitive Potassium Inwardly Rectifying Channels Kir2.4 in Neurons

To visualize astrocytes versus neurons, we used antibodies against the PAs SPD/SPM and the neuronal Kir2.4 channels. We found localization of PAs in astrocytes (Figure 1A, white arrowheads) while Kir2.4 channels are localized in pyramidal cells (Figure 1C, black arrow) and in interneurons (Figure 1C, red arrow), but not in glia (Figure 1C). The Kir2.x family displays the highest PA-sensitivity and SPM regulates the permeability of these channels [78]. PAs were found in glia and astrocytes are co-localized with interneurons (Figure 1). From the literature, it is known that the interneurons and astrocytes express PA sensitive AMPAR and KAR (AMPA-kainate receptors) [79,80,81,82,83,84], n-n-AChR [85,86], NMDAR [87,88], TRP channels [89,90,91], and a variety of Kir channels [69,78,92]. This suggests that glial cells can use SPM and SPD to regulate not only their own Kir4.1 channels [22,23,69] or Cx43 GJs [26,93], but also the neighboring neuronal receptors and channels by SPM, if released. The astrocytes may also propagate PAs through the astrocytic syncytium via GJs [24] and then release them into the neuronal network under special conditions, such as gliotoxin [18] or during uptake/release [14].
Figure 1. Localization of SPM in astrocytes and Kir 2.4 in neurons in CA1 hippocampus. (A) Immunocytochemical visualization of spermine/spermidine (SPM/SPD) accumulation in astrocytes (white arrowheads). Black arrow indicates the pyramidal cell area showing that pyramidal cells are not accumulating SPM and stay transparent. White arrow points to a blood vessel enwrapped by fine-astrocytic processes. (B) Staining with cresyl violet shows all cells (neurons and astrocytes) in the CA1 area of hippocampus. White arrowheads show small cells, likely astrocytes. Red arrow points to large interneuron. (C) Red arrows show interneurons, whereas black arrows show pyramidal cells. The neuronal channel Kir2.4 is localized in neurons. SO, SP, and SR are stratum oriens, pyramidale, and radiatum, respectively. Note: most of the patch-clamp recordings ignore the fact that the astrocytic cytoplasm contains SPM.
Figure 1. Localization of SPM in astrocytes and Kir 2.4 in neurons in CA1 hippocampus. (A) Immunocytochemical visualization of spermine/spermidine (SPM/SPD) accumulation in astrocytes (white arrowheads). Black arrow indicates the pyramidal cell area showing that pyramidal cells are not accumulating SPM and stay transparent. White arrow points to a blood vessel enwrapped by fine-astrocytic processes. (B) Staining with cresyl violet shows all cells (neurons and astrocytes) in the CA1 area of hippocampus. White arrowheads show small cells, likely astrocytes. Red arrow points to large interneuron. (C) Red arrows show interneurons, whereas black arrows show pyramidal cells. The neuronal channel Kir2.4 is localized in neurons. SO, SP, and SR are stratum oriens, pyramidale, and radiatum, respectively. Note: most of the patch-clamp recordings ignore the fact that the astrocytic cytoplasm contains SPM.
Biomolecules 12 01812 g001

3.2. Determination of Membrane Permeable (Uptake) versus Impermeable Dyes to Study Astrocyte-to-Astrocyte Dye Propagation

The next question was: which molecules may be used to analyze transfer via astrocytic GJs? For this, we need to distinguish between membrane-permeable versus membrane-impermeable dyes. To visualize the diffusion only through the gap-junctions, we carefully selected the dyes we would use in our experiments. We found that some dyes were crossing the astrocytic membrane and, therefore, were not suitable to study intracellular propagation through the astrocytic syncytium.
Several dyes (Figure 2) were taken up by the astrocytes during the time when the puffing tip of patch micropipette was approaching the cells, and therefore, were not suitable for the present study. 4-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-N-methylpyridinium (ASP+), sulforhodamine-101 (S101), and decynium-22 (D22) were rapidly, robustly, and selectively taken up by astrocytes, but not neurons (Figure 2A–C). Similarly, 2-NBDG was taken up by astrocytes (Figure 2D). Our previous data showed that membrane uptake of amines could occur in astrocytes and gliomas [72,94] via SLC22A-type transporters that also transport ASP+, MPP+ (amines) and PAs [36]. Therefore, amino group-containing dyes could be substrates for polyspecific mono- and polyamine transporters [36,95] expressed in glia [5,34,35,96]. In general, positively charged dyes with cationic-functional groups, such as −NR3+ or =NR2+ (such as, ASP+, MPP+, and thiazine, D22) were deemed not suitable for the present study. Also, fluorescent glucose (Figure 2D) was taken up by astrocytes most probably by the GLUT1 transporter [97,98]. It would be difficult to determine if the dyes shown in Figure 2A–D were taken up by the cells through the membrane or propagated to neighboring cells via GJs communication; therefore, these dyes were not suitable for further experiments for the intracellular propagation study.
Figure 2. Dyes taken up versus membrane-impermeable dyes in astroglial syncytium. (AD): molecules which are taken up by astrocytes (white arrowheads and red arrows), but by neurons (gray arrows) and (EH): molecules which were not taken up by astrocytes in brain slices. (A): 4-(4-(dimethylamino)-styryl)-N-methylpyridinium (ASP+), MW = 366.24, net charge = +1; (B): 1,1′-Diethyl-2,2′-cyanine iodide or decynium22 (D22), MW = 454.35, charge = +1; (C): Sulforhodamine-101 (S101), MW = 606.71, net charge = 0; (D): 2-NBD-Glucose (2NBDG), MW = 342.26, net charge = 0; (E): Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B), MW = 974.98, net charge = −2; (E1) Brightfield image showing patched astrocyte. (F): Sulforhodamine B (SB), MW = 558.66, net charge = 0; (G): Lucifer yellow (LY), MW = 521.57, net charge = −2. (H): Alexa 568 (A568), MW = 730.74, net charge = −1.
Figure 2. Dyes taken up versus membrane-impermeable dyes in astroglial syncytium. (AD): molecules which are taken up by astrocytes (white arrowheads and red arrows), but by neurons (gray arrows) and (EH): molecules which were not taken up by astrocytes in brain slices. (A): 4-(4-(dimethylamino)-styryl)-N-methylpyridinium (ASP+), MW = 366.24, net charge = +1; (B): 1,1′-Diethyl-2,2′-cyanine iodide or decynium22 (D22), MW = 454.35, charge = +1; (C): Sulforhodamine-101 (S101), MW = 606.71, net charge = 0; (D): 2-NBD-Glucose (2NBDG), MW = 342.26, net charge = 0; (E): Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B), MW = 974.98, net charge = −2; (E1) Brightfield image showing patched astrocyte. (F): Sulforhodamine B (SB), MW = 558.66, net charge = 0; (G): Lucifer yellow (LY), MW = 521.57, net charge = −2. (H): Alexa 568 (A568), MW = 730.74, net charge = −1.
Biomolecules 12 01812 g002
In addition, there are large pores, such as connexin [1,64,99,100] and pannexin hemichannels [2], which can potentially take up the fluorescent molecules from the extracellular space, particularly if astrocytes are in a low metabolic stage or during gliosis [99,101]. To minimize this uptake, we prevented activation and opening of large pores, such as connexin and pannexin hemichannels, P2X receptors, and others by (i) keeping concentrations of extracellular divalent cations at high physiological millimolar concentrations (block of Cx43 HCs), (ii) avoiding metabolic deficiency, and (iii) avoiding the use of any agonists which open pannexin hemichannels and P2X receptors. Figure 2E–H shows compounds that are not taken up from the extracellular spaces (i.e., membrane impermeable). These molecules include Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B), sulforhodamine B (SB), Lucifer yellow (LY), and Alexa 568 (A568), and were used for the dye-propagation studies described below.

3.3. Astrocyte-to-Astrocyte Dye Spreading in Absence and Presence of Polyamines in Glia

Using the whole-cell configuration, we examined the propagation of various dyes through the astrocytic syncytium with and without SPM in the patch pipette. We used a concentration of SPM (1 mM) close to the physiological concentration [69] to estimate the physiological effect of SPM on molecular propagation in the glial syncytium. We kept the holding potential equal to membrane potential to maintain iosopotentiality [19]. Isopotentiality means that astrocytes “clamp” each other electrically via gap junctions providing equal conditions where each astrocyte in this glial network has the same membrane potential as coupled neighbors. It is important because changes of the trans-junctional potential (trans-junctional voltage gradient, GJ gradient) may block electrical currents from cell-to-cell [102,103] and specifically can block dye permeation because propagation is dependent on the difference between the membrane potentials of GJ coupled cells [103,104]. Also, keeping the holding potential equal to resting minimizes unwanted ionic currents via membranes, and avoids ionic and molecular transport across the surface membrane. The latter can prevent calcium load and minimize changes of cytoplasmic calcium to which GJs are extremely sensitive [26]. Finally, since magnesium [105] and hydrogen gradients [25,106] play a role for gap junction opening/closing, we kept these concentrations normal, stable, and equal for each astrocyte patched. These conditions were equally applied in each experiment and for each cell to keep the protocol consistent.
To obtain representative images (Figure 3) of dye propagation in stratum radiatum of rat CA1 hippocampus, the soma of a single astrocyte was clamped in whole-cell mode and the cell was dialyzed using either SPM-free or 1 mM SPM-containing ICS with 200 µM Alexa 568, 100 µM Alexa 488-biocytin, 2 mM SB, or 1 mM LY. These concentrations were close to those reported in the literature [77,107,108]. We compared differently charged dyes: two negatively charged dyes (−2 charge) but with largely different molecular weight: (i) Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B), (MW = 974.98, charge −2) and (ii) Lucifer Yellow (LY), (MW = 521.57, charge −2). Then, we used negatively charged dye (−1 charge) (iii) Alexa 568 (A568), (MW = 730.74 net charge = −1) and a polar molecule with net charge of zero (iv) Sulforhodamine B (SB), (MW = 558.66 with net charge = 0). These molecules were tested in terms of their propagation throughout the astrocytic syncytium in the presence and absence of SPM. We conducted the experiments in hippocampal brain slices under constant slice perfusion of 1 mL/min with ACSF. After achieving a gigaseal and cell opening, cells were clamped at zero current (at resting Em) in voltage-clamp mode, and i/V-test was made. Then the cells were dialyzed for 10 min. After 10 min, the pipette was carefully withdrawn away from the cell and fluorescent micrographs were obtained to quantify the number of coupled cells (see Section 2).
In the absence of SPM ([SPM] = 0, Figure 3(A1,B1,C1)), LY propagated only between few (or none) astrocytes (Figure 3(A1)), while 10–14 astrocytes (rarely up to 27 cells) were typically filled with LY when SPM was included in the pipette (Figure 3(A2)). To establish complete uncoupling of gap junctions, slices were perfused with carbenoxolone (200 µM), a gap junction uncoupler, for 20 min before penetration with a patch pipette containing the fluorescent dye. This procedure effectively blocked all dye propagation (Figure 3(A3)). Alexa 488-biocytin propagated relatively freely (Figure 3(B1)) and, in the presence of SPM, the number of coupled cells nearly doubled (Figure 3(B2)), but again, propagation was blocked by 200 µM CBX (Figure 3(B3)). Similar results were obtained for Alexa 568 (see Figure 4 and Figure 5). In contrast, propagation of SB was unaffected by SPM (Figure 3(C1,C2)), but SB propagation was also blocked by CBX justifying a GJ pathway (Figure 3(C3)). To monitor integrity of the cells, the membrane potential and current-voltage relationship were obtained twice: immediately after breaking into whole-cell mode and a second time after 10 min of cell dialysis (Figure 3D). Only cells that showed stable electrophysiological properties as passive astrocytes [4,19] were included in the study. Figure 3D shows an example of a current recording from a passive astrocyte (with linear I/V-curve) and such astrocytes were used for further analysis.
Figure 3. Confocal images of Lucifer Yellow (LY), Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B) and Sulforhodamine-B (SB) propagation in the astrocytic syncytium of adult rat CA1 hippocampus. (A1A3): shows LY (1 mM) dye propagation in the astrocyte syncytium without SPM (A1), with 1 mM SPM (A2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (A3). The pipette containing LY patching a single astrocyte is visible on the left side of A1 and A3. (B1B3): shows A488B (100 µM) dye propagation without SPM (B1), with 1 mM SPM (B2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (B3). (C1C3): shows SB (2 mM) dye propagation in the astrocyte syncytium without SPM (C1), with 1 mM SPM (C2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (C3). (D): Astrocyte currents were measured at the beginning (left) and at the end (right) of experiments. Responses to voltage steps applied from the holding potential in the range from −150 mV to +150 mV with 10 mV increments during 60 ms are shown. The linear conductances represent mature-passive astrocytes and they are stable during the 10 min of the experiment.
Figure 3. Confocal images of Lucifer Yellow (LY), Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B) and Sulforhodamine-B (SB) propagation in the astrocytic syncytium of adult rat CA1 hippocampus. (A1A3): shows LY (1 mM) dye propagation in the astrocyte syncytium without SPM (A1), with 1 mM SPM (A2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (A3). The pipette containing LY patching a single astrocyte is visible on the left side of A1 and A3. (B1B3): shows A488B (100 µM) dye propagation without SPM (B1), with 1 mM SPM (B2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (B3). (C1C3): shows SB (2 mM) dye propagation in the astrocyte syncytium without SPM (C1), with 1 mM SPM (C2) and with 1 mM SPM after 20 min pretreatment with 200 µM CBX (C3). (D): Astrocyte currents were measured at the beginning (left) and at the end (right) of experiments. Responses to voltage steps applied from the holding potential in the range from −150 mV to +150 mV with 10 mV increments during 60 ms are shown. The linear conductances represent mature-passive astrocytes and they are stable during the 10 min of the experiment.
Biomolecules 12 01812 g003

3.4. Extent of Dye-Spreading between Astrocytes Located in Stratum Radiatum of Rat CA1 Hippocampus Is Charge- and MW-Dependent and Correlates with the Ratio of Charge to MW: Polyamine-Independent Propagation in the Glial Syncytium

For statistical evaluation of astrocytic coupling, we used different slices from different animals for all fluorescent dyes used. Intuitively, the smaller molecular weight compound should permeate easier, faster, and for more distance than large dyes. Intriguingly and in contradiction to the obvious expectation, without SPM, LY (the lowest molecular weight dye) permeates via GJ syncytium much less than the larger molecular-weight dyes (Alexa 488-biocytin, Sulforhodamine B), indicating the opposite of what was predicted (Figure 4A). The average number of cells filled with LY was only 2.7 ± 0.2 (Figure 4A, Vm = −80.2 ± 0.7 mV, N = 15), whereas the average number of fluorescent cells filled by Alexa 488-biocytin was 21.4 ± 1.6 cells (Figure 4A, Vm = −79.7 ± 1.4 mV, N = 11). Alexa 568 spread to a greater number of coupled cells (36.9 ± 4.6 cells; Vm = −80 ± 0.8 mV, N = 10) and sulforhodamine B showed much more propagation with 60.4 ± 2.9 coupled cells (Vm = −79.4 ± 1.1 mV, N = 7). In general, A488B, A568, and SB that gradually differed by molecular weight showed the number of fluorescently labeled astrocytes correlated with the molecular weight of the fluorescent dye, with better molecular propagation of lower molecular-weight compounds, but not for LY (Figure 4A). Indeed, the substances with nearly equal molecular weights, such as LY and SB, have ~20 times different permeability (Figure 4A). The smallest molecule, Lucifer Yellow, was nearly 10 times less permeable than Alexa 488-biocytin which has the same −2 charge (Figure 4B). This suggests that the density of the charge per molecular weight (size) plays a role, such that when the negative charge is condensed as in the case of a small LY molecule, the permeability decreases. There was no clear dependence of the degree of dye-coupling on molecular weight alone (Figure 4A, note right column for LY) nor on net charge alone (Figure 4B (compare A488B with LY)).
Therefore, we calculated the ratio of the charge to weight of the molecules, and this appears to be a key determinant for molecular propagation. Indeed, the ratio of net charge and molecular weight of the dye clearly correlated with the number of cells coupled (Figure 4C). Therefore, we conclude that the interaction of dyes with the GJ pore can be dependent on both the electrical field of the pore and the density of the molecular charge of the dye. The next question was: does SPM change such behavior?
Figure 4. Comparison of astrocyte-to-astrocyte coupling in the control group (in the absence of spermine ([SPM] = 0 in the intracellular solution)) and their dependence on the characteristics of the individual dyes. (AC): The number of coupled cells in the Alexa 488-biocytin group (A488B, 21.4 ± 1.6, N = 11, Vm = −79.7 ± 1.4 mV), Alexa 568 (A568, 36.9 ± 4.6 cells; Vm = −80 ± 0.8 mV, N = 10), Sulforhodamine B (SB, 60.4 ± 2.9, N = 7, Vm = −79.4 ± 1.1 mV) and Lucifer Yellow (LY, 2.7 ± 0.2, N = 15, Vm = −80.2 ± 0.7 mV) is dependent on (A) molecular weight of the dye, (B) net charge of the dye and correlates (C) with the ratio of net charge and molecular weight of the dye. Error bars indicate standard error of mean (SEM).
Figure 4. Comparison of astrocyte-to-astrocyte coupling in the control group (in the absence of spermine ([SPM] = 0 in the intracellular solution)) and their dependence on the characteristics of the individual dyes. (AC): The number of coupled cells in the Alexa 488-biocytin group (A488B, 21.4 ± 1.6, N = 11, Vm = −79.7 ± 1.4 mV), Alexa 568 (A568, 36.9 ± 4.6 cells; Vm = −80 ± 0.8 mV, N = 10), Sulforhodamine B (SB, 60.4 ± 2.9, N = 7, Vm = −79.4 ± 1.1 mV) and Lucifer Yellow (LY, 2.7 ± 0.2, N = 15, Vm = −80.2 ± 0.7 mV) is dependent on (A) molecular weight of the dye, (B) net charge of the dye and correlates (C) with the ratio of net charge and molecular weight of the dye. Error bars indicate standard error of mean (SEM).
Biomolecules 12 01812 g004

3.5. Spermine Differentially Affects Spreading of Electrically Negative and Neutral Dyes Independently on Membrane Potential

It is known that Cx pores may be negatively charged and retain charged molecules, as has been shown for Cx40 and Cx43 [109,110,111,112,113,114]. We, therefore, hypothesized that (i) the positively charged SPM (SPM+4 at neutral pH) may either neutralize the negative pore charge and relieve the electrical shield inside the GJ pores, or neutralize the negative charge of the trafficking molecules [109], and (ii) the membrane potential of the cells should not play a role since the astrocytes are joined in the isopotential syncytium [4,19], where the electrical profile of each GJ is identical. Therefore, the trans-junctional potential between communicating astrocytes is near zero and this is the best condition for GJ opening [103,106,109,110,111,112,113,114]. We tested this hypothesis. Recordings from control (no SPM) and SPM-filled cells were carried out in each slice in non-overlapping areas within 30 min of each other. In some experiments, controls were performed first, whereas in others, SPM treatment was carried out first. The number of coupled cells loaded with the electrically neutral dye SB (Sulforhodamine B, 2 mM) was 60.4 ± 2.9 (N = 7) for control, compared to 60.7 ± 2.5 (N = 6) for the SPM-treated group, indicating that inclusion of 1 mM SPM in the pipette did not alter the propagation of the neutral dye SB (Figure 5(A1)). On the other hand, 1 mM SPM significantly increased the extent of coupling of negatively charged Alexa 568 (Figure 5(B1)), control (36.9 ± 4.6, N = 10), compared to SPM-treated group (59.3 ± 5.2, N = 10, p < 0.01), and also increased the level of coupling of negatively charged Alexa 488-biocytin (Figure 5C1), control (21.4 ± 1.6, N = 11), compared to the SPM-treated group (33.3 ± 3.4, N = 10, p < 0.01). The most dramatic effect of SPM was seen with LY, control (2.7 ± 0.2, N = 15), compared to SPM-treated group (11.0 ± 1.4, N = 15; p < 0.0001) which was a 292% increase.
These results suggest that SPM affects only permeation of negatively charged molecules, while having no effect on neutral ones. Indeed, as was expected, we observed a lack of correlation between dye coupling and the astrocytic membrane potential in the control group and in the SPM-treated group (Figure 5(A2,B2,C2)). This is most probably due to well-known isopotentiality of the astrocytic syncytium where each coupled astrocyte has the same membrane potential as neighboring astrocytes [4,19]. For optimal GJ communication, the only major consideration is the equal trans-GJ membrane potential of neighboring cells [25,110,111,112,113,114]. This condition is present in the astrocytic syncytium [19].

3.6. Extent of Spermine Effect Correlates with the Ratio of Charge and MW of the Dyes

Using the above data (Figure 5), we calculated the % increase in cell coupling in response to SPM in the patch pipette, i.e., dialysis of the cytoplasm of the cell with SPM (Figure 5 and Figure 6) representing a percentile of SPM-induced increase of dye propagation (Figure 6A–C). SPM induced an increase in propagation of charged molecules of 56% for Alexa 488-biocytin (A488B) group, of 61% for Alexa 568 (A568) and of 292% for the smaller but strongly charged molecule of LY.
Figure 5. Effect of intracellular spermine (SPM) on propagation of electrically neutral and charged dyes through the astroglial syncytium. (A1) Using neutral-polar dye SB, electrically neutral amine Sulforhodamine B (2 mM), 1 mM spermine (SPM) included in the pipette has no effect on the amount of coupling cells: control (60.4 ± 2.9, N = 6) compared to the SPM-treated group (60.7 ± 2.5, N = 6). (B1) Using negatively charged dye A568, Alexa 568 (200 µM), 1 mM spermine increases the extent of coupling, control (36.9 ± 4.6, N = 10) compared to the SPM-treated group (59.3 ± 5.2, N = 10). (C1) 1 mM spermine increases the amount of coupling of cells filled with negatively charged Alexa 488-biocytin (100 µM), control (21.4 ± 1.6, N = 11) compared to the SPM-treated group (33.3 ± 3.4, N = 10). The asterisks indicate a significant difference between the control and SPM-treated groups. (D1) 1 mM SPM strongly increases the amount of coupling of cells filled with negatively charged LY, Lucifer Yellow (100 µM), control (3.5 ± 1.7, N = 15) compared to SPM-treated group (11.5 ± 3.6, N = 14). The asterisks indicate a significant difference between the control and SPM-treated groups (p < 0.01), error bars indicate standard error of mean (SEM). (A2D2): There is no correlation found between coupling and the astrocytic-membrane potential in the control group (white triangles) or in the spermine-treated group (black-filled circles).
Figure 5. Effect of intracellular spermine (SPM) on propagation of electrically neutral and charged dyes through the astroglial syncytium. (A1) Using neutral-polar dye SB, electrically neutral amine Sulforhodamine B (2 mM), 1 mM spermine (SPM) included in the pipette has no effect on the amount of coupling cells: control (60.4 ± 2.9, N = 6) compared to the SPM-treated group (60.7 ± 2.5, N = 6). (B1) Using negatively charged dye A568, Alexa 568 (200 µM), 1 mM spermine increases the extent of coupling, control (36.9 ± 4.6, N = 10) compared to the SPM-treated group (59.3 ± 5.2, N = 10). (C1) 1 mM spermine increases the amount of coupling of cells filled with negatively charged Alexa 488-biocytin (100 µM), control (21.4 ± 1.6, N = 11) compared to the SPM-treated group (33.3 ± 3.4, N = 10). The asterisks indicate a significant difference between the control and SPM-treated groups. (D1) 1 mM SPM strongly increases the amount of coupling of cells filled with negatively charged LY, Lucifer Yellow (100 µM), control (3.5 ± 1.7, N = 15) compared to SPM-treated group (11.5 ± 3.6, N = 14). The asterisks indicate a significant difference between the control and SPM-treated groups (p < 0.01), error bars indicate standard error of mean (SEM). (A2D2): There is no correlation found between coupling and the astrocytic-membrane potential in the control group (white triangles) or in the spermine-treated group (black-filled circles).
Biomolecules 12 01812 g005
In contrast, there is no increase in Sulforhodamine B propagation (Figure 5A versus Figure 6A, SB). The dependence on the molecular weight of the dye (Figure 6A), net charge of the dye (Figure 6B), and the ratio of net charge to molecular weight of the dye (Figure 6C) is graphed. One important observation is that SPM increased equally permeation of A488 and A568; however, these molecules differed by molecular weight and charge (Figure 6A–C). That is not the case when SPM was absent in the cytoplasm (Figure 4C).
Figure 6. Spermine strongly increases propagation of negatively charged molecules: Dependence of the % increase in astrocytic coupling by SPM (1 mM) on the characteristics of the individual dyes. SPM-induced a 56% increase in the Alexa 488-biocytin group, a 61% increase in the Alexa 568 group, no change in the Sulforhodamine B group and a 292% increase in the Lucifer Yellow group. These changes were dependent on (A) molecular weight of the dye, (B) net charge of the dye and correlate (C) with the ratio of net charge and molecular weight of the dye. The red line shows the strength of SPM to increase propagation of various negatively charged molecules through GJs in the astrocytic syncytium. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Note: compare with Figure 4 where endogenous PAs were dialyzed out of the astrocytes.
Figure 6. Spermine strongly increases propagation of negatively charged molecules: Dependence of the % increase in astrocytic coupling by SPM (1 mM) on the characteristics of the individual dyes. SPM-induced a 56% increase in the Alexa 488-biocytin group, a 61% increase in the Alexa 568 group, no change in the Sulforhodamine B group and a 292% increase in the Lucifer Yellow group. These changes were dependent on (A) molecular weight of the dye, (B) net charge of the dye and correlate (C) with the ratio of net charge and molecular weight of the dye. The red line shows the strength of SPM to increase propagation of various negatively charged molecules through GJs in the astrocytic syncytium. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Note: compare with Figure 4 where endogenous PAs were dialyzed out of the astrocytes.
Biomolecules 12 01812 g006
There is a clear dependence on the ratio of net charge to MW, indicating that charge density is the major factor in SPM-induced dye propagation.

4. Discussion

PAs play a key role in brain function and cell survival [12,34,40,47,115,116,117]. Recently, it was reviewed that PAs are anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antithrombotic, antidepressant [10,11,13,15,16,118], and neuroprotective [55]. Indeed, both SPM and SPD have demonstrated similar effects. Both SPM and SPD are accumulated in healthy, but not in, damaged by gliotoxin astrocytes [18], and SPM is more effective than SPD and PUT as an opener of Cx43 [26]. For this reason, we chose to investigate the effect of SPM in the present study.
Also, PA content declines during aging [48] but SPD supplement is beneficial for memory [12,116,119,120,121], immune response [12], and increasing longevity [122]. Intriguingly, in the long-lived rodent, the naked-mole rat, PAs (in particular SPD, cadaverine, N8-acetyl-SPD, and N1,N8-diacetyl-SPD) were elevated, compared to its short-lived counterparts. Well known age-associated decline in SPD and N1-acetylspermidine levels in rodents did not occur in the naked-mole rat or was not even reversed (in the case of N1-acetylspermidine) [123]. It seems that PAs are key players in a large scope of diseases and age-related processes.
However, the functional analysis of astrocytic Cx43 GJs in respect to PAs is not well established. Interestingly, due to different amino-acid-pore sequences, Cx40 GJs are blocked by PAs [109,112,113], while Cx43 and Cx38 are not [25,26,109,124]. Glial cells do not have Cx38 and Cx40, but recently, robust glial Cx43 overexpression (over 6 times) was shown during aging-related tau astrogliopathy [125], making Cx43 and PAs of special interest. Cx43 is the dominant connexin subunit in cortical and hippocampal astrocytes accompanied by minor expression of Cx30 and Cx26 [20,100,118,126,127,128]. Consequently, cell-to-cell coupling for small ions and molecules is strongly reduced in Cx43 KO [58] and abolished in double-knockout mice lacking both Cx43 and Cx30 [32,59,61].
Intriguingly, studies in brain slices demonstrate variable cell-to-cell coupling [57,66,70,129,130], and large inconsistency has been reported in terms of the actual number of coupled astrocytes when using the fluorescent dyes in the same CA1 area of the hippocampus with and without SPM in the pipette (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Indeed, in the absence of SPM, very low coupling is typically reported [24,66,70,130]. As we can assume, astrocytes accumulate PAs in healthy brain (Figure 1A) which is consistent with an earlier study [15,21]. In contrast, (i) traumatic brain injury, (ii) rising acidity of the cytoplasm [131,132], and (iii) other conditions, such as gliotoxin [18], may lead to PA loss in astrocytes. The lowering pH results in blockade of gap junctions [105,106]; however, PAs restore GJ conductance by removing such hydrogen cation block of Cx43 [25,26]. Cells accumulate PAs [133], and SPM/SPD may be liberated from these stores and open Cx43 GJs by removing hydrogen and calcium-cation block [26]. Intriguingly, when SPM was not used, the trafficking of glucose with zero charge (fluorescent 2-NBDG or 6-NBGD) was robust in the astrocytic syncytium while the traffic of the phosphorylated-metabolite glucose-6-phosphate (2-NBGD-6P) was dramatically decreased by about 70% [31,59]. The phosphorylated glucose has a negative charge and is similar to negatively charged LY, A488, and A568 whose permeability is limited in the absence of SPM, but increased by SPM (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). In addition, if LY is tagged to biocytin (which neutralizes a negative charge of LY), the astrocytic coupling was extensive and similar to zero charge sulforhodamine-B [59].
Since SPD synthesis is absent in adult astrocytes [39,134], the endogenous PAs of glial cells are typically washed out rapidly (during 70–120 s) after attainment of whole-cell configuration [69]. Astrocytes can lose SPM during brain-slice preparation and incubation (unpublished observations); therefore, inclusion of SPM intracellularly at a concentration shown to be physiologically present in vivo in glial cells [69] considerably increases propagation of negatively charged dyes, such as Alexa 568 and Alexa 488-biocytin, and most dramatically, the relatively small and highly charged LY (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). We suggest that different results in the literature may be due to variation in PA content and factors, such as the species and age of the animal, area of the brain or retina, molecular weight, charge, size, and shape of the dye.
As we show, without SPM, none (Figure 3(A1)) or few astrocytes (Figure 5(D2)) showed LY propagation, which is in good agreement with previous work [24,70,130]. We infer that SPM itself must propagate through gap junctions because it opens LY spreading further than just the adjacent astrocyte and can cause robust coupling of cells in the distant part of the syncytium (Figure 3(A2)). Therefore, the native SPM concentration may be rapidly equilibrated among astrocytes through gap junctions and, thereby, help to keep the network chemically and electrically coupled. This may help to maintain the isopotentiality that was found previously [4,19].
PA signaling through gap junctions may be a key to regulate cell proliferation [109], particularly of astrocytes [41] and gap-junction organization in mammalian tissues [135]. Our finding suggests a mechanism by which SPM could facilitate diffusion of negatively charged molecules, without having an effect on neutral ones. These possibilities include: direct binding of the PA cations (SPM4+) to negatively charged dye molecules as was shown for acid proteins, ATP, and RNA, etc. in the cytoplasm [133]. By binding and neutralizing the negative charge of these molecules, PAs can enhance their permeation via GJ pores. It is known that astrocytes modulate activity of neurons by release of such negatively charged transmitters via hemichannels [1,64,99,136,137]; however, the studies did not highlight whether these molecules are bound to positively charged cations in the cytoplasm, such as PAs, that was shown [133]. So, an acid pH shift occurring in glial cells after their activation may lead to liberation of PAs from cytoplasmic buffers (with ATP, adenosine, proteins, phosphates, etc. [133]) and result in GJ regulation [25,26].
An alternative, but only theoretical explanation, could be that positively charged SPM4+ binds directly in the Cx43-pore and neutralizes the charge in this pore, and thus, making the pore wall electrically inert and enhancing the propagation of negatively charged molecules. Testing this mechanism in a separate large study is required. Therefore, PAs and their derivatives may serve many functions both within the astrocytic cytoplasm and upon being released from glial cells [10,11,14,15] to the extrasynaptic receptors localized in areas which are less studied.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings suggest that we may predict the extent of coupling between astrocytes for novel, untested molecules or fluorescent dyes by knowing MW and charge, but most importantly, for biologically active molecules and drugs. By extension, this suggests that SPM will facilitate diffusion of negatively charged intracellular-organic and -inorganic anions, amino acids, polypeptides, and other signaling molecules through the astrocytic syncytium, and may therefore, have profound effects on glial-neuronal signaling.

Author Contributions

Research plan: J.B., M.J.E., R.W.V., C.G.N. and S.N.S.; experiments, figures and writing of the initial part of the manuscript: J.B., Y.R., M.J.E., M.M.-G., C.J.M.-N. and S.N.S.; finalized the manuscript: M.J.E., C.G.N., J.B., C.J.M.-N., R.W.V. and S.N.S.; Resources and acquired funding: M.M.-G., R.W.V., M.J.E. and S.N.S. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was made possible by grants from the National Institutes of Health 1R01NS065201 (S.N.S.), 1R15NS116478 (S.N.S.), SC2NS124907 (M.M.-G.), SC1GM088019 (M.J.E.) and G12MD007583 (for core facilities). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Universidad Central del Caribe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A breeding colony was established using Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Protocol number #018-2021-04-00; approval date: March 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Additional data supporting the conclusions of this finding will be made available without undue reservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paola López Pieraldi, Dinely Pérez, Natalia Skachkova, Feliksas Bukauskas, and Yuriy Kucheryavykh for their great scientific and technical help. We thank Priscila Sanabria for excellent optical-imaging-facility assistance; Betzaida Torres, supervisor of the animal resources center, for the care of our animals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest that can be identified as influencing the impartiality of the research presented herein.

References

  1. Bennett, M.V.L.; Contreras, J.E.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Sáez, J.C. New Roles for Astrocytes: Gap Junction Hemichannels Have Something to Communicate. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Giaume, C.; Naus, C.C.; Sáez, J.C.; Leybaert, L. Glial Connexins and Pannexins in the Healthy and Diseased Brain. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 93–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olsen, M.L.; Khakh, B.S.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Zhou, M.; Lee, C.J.; Rouach, N. New Insights on Astrocyte Ion Channels: Critical for Homeostasis and Neuron-Glia Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 13827–13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhou, M.; Du, Y.; Aten, S.; Terman, D. On the Electrical Passivity of Astrocyte Potassium Conductance. J. Neurophysiol. 2021, 126, 1403–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Furihata, T.; Anzai, N. Functional Expression of Organic Ion Transporters in Astrocytes and Their Potential as a Drug Target in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ji, R.-R.; Donnelly, C.R.; Nedergaard, M. Astrocytes in Chronic Pain and Itch. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 667–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rasmussen, M.K.; Mestre, H.; Nedergaard, M. Fluid Transport in the Brain. Physiol. Rev. 2022, 102, 1025–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mills, W.A.; Woo, A.M.; Jiang, S.; Martin, J.; Surendran, D.; Bergstresser, M.; Kimbrough, I.F.; Eyo, U.B.; Sofroniew, M.V.; Sontheimer, H. Astrocyte Plasticity in Mice Ensures Continued Endfoot Coverage of Cerebral Blood Vessels Following Injury and Declines with Age. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peters, D.; Berger, J.; Langnaese, K.; Derst, C.; Madai, V.I.; Krauss, M.; Fischer, K.D.; Veh, R.W.; Laube, G. Arginase and Arginine Decarboxylase—Where Do the Putative Gate Keepers of Polyamine Synthesis Reside in Rat Brain? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Skatchkov, S.N.; Woodbury-Fariña, M.A.; Eaton, M. The Role of Glia in Stress. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 37, 653–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skatchkov, S.N.; Antonov, S.M.; Eaton, M.J. Glia and Glial Polyamines. Role in Brain Function in Health and Disease. Biochem. Suppl. Ser. A 2016, 10, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sigrist, S.J.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Gupta, V.K.; Bhukel, A.; Mertel, S.; Eisenberg, T.; Madeo, F. Spermidine-Triggered Autophagy Ameliorates Memory during Aging. Autophagy 2014, 10, 178–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bernstein, H.-G.; Keilhoff, G.; Laube, G.; Dobrowolny, H.; Steiner, J. Polyamines and Polyamine-Metabolizing Enzymes in Schizophrenia: Current Knowledge and Concepts of Therapy. World J. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 1177–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera, Y.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Phanstiel, O.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Uptake of Biotinylated Spermine in Astrocytes: Effect of Cx43 SiRNA, HIV-Tat Protein and Polyamine Transport Inhibitor on Polyamine Uptake. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rieck, J.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Derst, C.; Eaton, M.J.; Veh, R.W. Unique Chemistry, Intake, and Metabolism of Polyamines in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and Its Body. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zahedi, K.; Barone, S.; Soleimani, M. Polyamines and Their Metabolism: From the Maintenance of Physiological Homeostasis to the Mediation of Disease. Med. Sci. 2022, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cervelli, M.; Averna, M.; Vergani, L.; Pedrazzi, M.; Amato, S.; Fiorucci, C.; Rossi, M.N.; Maura, G.; Mariottini, P.; Cervetto, C.; et al. The Involvement of Polyamines Catabolism in the Crosstalk between Neurons and Astrocytes in Neurodegeneration. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kovács, Z.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Veh, R.W.; Szabó, Z.; Németh, K.; Szabó, P.T.; Kardos, J.; Héja, L. Critical Role of Astrocytic Polyamine and GABA Metabolism in Epileptogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 15, 787319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, B.; Buckalew, R.; Du, Y.; Kiyoshi, C.M.; Alford, C.C.; Wang, W.; McTigue, D.D.; Enyeart, J.J.; Terman, D.; Zhou, M. Gap Junction Coupling Confers Isopotentiality on Astrocyte Syncytium. Glia 2016, 64, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Griemsmann, S.; Höft, S.P.; Bedner, P.; Zhang, J.; von Staden, E.; Beinhauer, A.; Degen, J.; Dublin, P.; Cope, D.W.; Richter, N.; et al. Characterization of Panglial Gap Junction Networks in the Thalamus, Neocortex, and Hippocampus Reveals a Unique Population of Glial Cells. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25, 3420–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Laube, G.; Veh, R.W. Astrocytes, Not Neurons, Show Most Prominent Staining for Spermidine/Spermine-like Immunoreactivity in Adult Rat Brain. Glia 1997, 19, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Biedermann, B.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Brunk, I.; Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Bernstein, H.G.; Faude, F.; Germer, A.; Veh, R.; Reichenbach, A. Spermine/Spermidine Is Expressed by Retinal Glial (Muller) Cells and Controls Distinct K+ Channels of Their Membrane. Glia 1998, 23, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Krusek, J.; Veh, R.W.; Biedermann, B.; Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Orkand, R.K.; Reichenbach, A. Spatial Distribution of Spermine/Spermidine Content and K(+)-Current Rectification in Frog Retinal Glial (Muller) Cells. Glia 2000, 31, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benedikt, J.; Inyushin, M.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Rivera, Y.; Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Nichols, C.G.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Intracellular Polyamines Enhance Astrocytic Coupling. Neuroreport 2012, 23, 1021–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Skatchkov, S.N.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Benedikt, J.; Inyushin, M.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V. Intracellular Spermine Prevents Acid-Induced Uncoupling of Cx43 Gap Junction Channels. Neuroreport 2015, 26, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Benedikt, J.; Cubano, L.A.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V. Polyamines Preserve Connexin 43-Mediated Gap Junctional Communication during Intracellular Hypercalcemia and Acidosis. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ye, Z.-C.; Wyeth, M.S.; Baltan-Tekkok, S.; Ransom, B.R. Functional Hemichannels in Astrocytes: A Novel Mechanism of Glutamate Release. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 3588–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ye, B.; Shen, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Ransom, B.R.; Chen, X.-C.; Ye, Z.-C. Dual Pathways Mediate β-Amyloid Stimulated Glutathione Release from Astrocytes. Glia 2015, 63, 2208–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Linsambarth, S.; Carvajal, F.J.; Moraga-Amaro, R.; Mendez, L.; Tamburini, G.; Jimenez, I.; Verdugo, D.A.; Gómez, G.I.; Jury, N.; Martínez, P.; et al. Astroglial Gliotransmitters Released via Cx43 Hemichannels Regulate NMDAR-Dependent Transmission and Short-Term Fear Memory in the Basolateral Amygdala. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, J.; Kang, N.; Lovatt, D.; Torres, A.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, J.; Nedergaard, M. Connexin 43 Hemichannels Are Permeable to ATP. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 4702–4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gandhi, G.K.; Cruz, N.F.; Ball, K.K.; Theus, S.A.; Dienel, G.A. Selective Astrocytic Gap Junctional Trafficking of Molecules Involved in the Glycolytic Pathway: Impact on Cellular Brain Imaging. J. Neurochem. 2009, 110, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gosejacob, D.; Dublin, P.; Bedner, P.; Hüttmann, K.; Zhang, J.; Tress, O.; Willecke, K.; Pfrieger, F.; Steinhäuser, C.; Theis, M. Role of Astroglial Connexin30 in Hippocampal Gap Junction Coupling. Glia 2011, 59, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kekesi, O.; Ioja, E.; Szabó, Z.; Kardos, J.; Héja, L. Recurrent Seizure-like Events Are Associated with Coupled Astroglial Synchronization. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hiasa, M.; Miyaji, T.; Haruna, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Harada, Y.; Moriyama, S.; Yamamoto, A.; Omote, H.; Moriyama, Y. Identification of a Mammalian Vesicular Polyamine Transporter. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Inazu, M.; Takeda, H.; Matsumiya, T. Expression and Functional Characterization of the Extraneuronal Monoamine Transporter in Normal Human Astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 2003, 84, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sala-Rabanal, M.; Li, D.C.; Dake, G.R.; Kurata, H.T.; Inyushin, M.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Nichols, C.G. Polyamine Transport by the Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 1450–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Makarov, V.; Kucheryavykh, L.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Rivera, A.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Inyushin, M. Transport Reversal during Heteroexchange: A Kinetic Study. J. Biophys. 2013, 2013, 683256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Merali, S.; Barrero, C.A.; Sacktor, N.C.; Haughey, N.J.; Datta, P.K.; Langford, D.; Khalili, K. Polyamines: Predictive Biomarker for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders. J. AIDS Clin. Res. 2014, 5, 1000312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Krauss, M.; Langnaese, K.; Richter, K.; Brunk, I.; Wieske, M.; Ahnert-Hilger, G.; Veh, R.W.; Laube, G. Spermidine Synthase Is Prominently Expressed in the Striatal Patch Compartment and in Putative Interneurones of the Matrix Compartment. J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Piletz, J.E.; Klenotich, S.; Lee, K.S.; Zhu, Q.L.; Valente, E.; Collins, M.A.; Jones, V.; Lee, S.N.; Yangzheng, F. Putative Agmatinase Inhibitor for Hypoxic-Ischemic New Born Brain Damage. Neurotox. Res. 2013, 24, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Tejeda-Bayron, F.A.; Mayor, A.M.; Phanstiel, O.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. The Involvement of Polyamine Uptake and Synthesis Pathways in the Proliferation of Neonatal Astrocytes. Amino Acids 2020, 52, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Laube, G.; Bernstein, H.-G.; Wolf, G.; Veh, R.W. Differential Distribution of Spermidine/Spermine-like Immunoreactivity in Neurons of the Adult Rat Brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002, 444, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Valentino, T.L.; Lukasiewicz, P.D.; Romano, C. Immunocytochemical Localization of Polyamines in the Tiger Salamander Retina. Brain Res. 1996, 713, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lindquist, T.D.; Sturman, J.A.; Gould, R.M.; Ingoglia, N.A. Axonal Transport of Polyamines in Intact and Regenerating Axons of the Rat Sciatic Nerve. J. Neurochem. 1985, 44, 1913–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gilad, G.M.; Gilad, V.H. Novel Polyamine Derivatives as Neuroprotective Agents. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 291, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shaw, G.G.; Pateman, A.J. The Regional Distribution of the Polyamines Spermidine and Spermine in Brain. J. Neurochem. 1973, 20, 1225–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shaw, G.G. The Polyamines in the Central Nervous System. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1979, 28, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nishimura, K.; Shiina, R.; Kashiwagi, K.; Igarashi, K. Decrease in Polyamines with Aging and Their Ingestion from Food and Drink. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Héja, L.; Nyitrai, G.; Kékesi, O.; Dobolyi, Á.; Szabó, P.; Fiáth, R.; Ulbert, I.; Pál-Szenthe, B.; Palkovits, M.; Kardos, J. Astrocytes Convert Network Excitation to Tonic Inhibition of Neurons. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kim, J.-I.; Ganesan, S.; Luo, S.X.; Wu, Y.-W.; Park, E.; Huang, E.J.; Chen, L.; Ding, J.B. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1a1 Mediates a GABA Synthesis Pathway in Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons. Science 2015, 350, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Leonetti, A.; Baroli, G.; Fratini, E.; Pietropaoli, S.; Marcoli, M.; Mariottini, P.; Cervelli, M. Epileptic Seizures and Oxidative Stress in a Mouse Model Over-Expressing Spermine Oxidase. Amino Acids 2020, 52, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Marcoli, M.; Cervetto, C.; Amato, S.; Fiorucci, C.; Maura, G.; Mariottini, P.; Cervelli, M. Transgenic Mouse Overexpressing Spermine Oxidase in Cerebrocortical Neurons: Astrocyte Dysfunction and Susceptibility to Epileptic Seizures. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cockroft, K.M.; Meistrell, M.; Zimmerman, G.A.; Risucci, D.; Bloom, O.; Cerami, A.; Tracey, K.J. Cerebroprotective Effects of Aminoguanidine in a Rodent Model of Stroke. Stroke 1996, 27, 1393–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ivanova, S.; Batliwalla, F.; Mocco, J.; Kiss, S.; Huang, J.; Mack, W.; Coon, A.; Eaton, J.W.; Al-Abed, Y.; Gregersen, P.K.; et al. Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia by Neutralization of 3-Aminopropanal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5579–5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Noro, T.; Namekata, K.; Kimura, A.; Guo, X.; Azuchi, Y.; Harada, C.; Nakano, T.; Tsuneoka, H.; Harada, T. Spermidine Promotes Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Optic Nerve Regeneration in Adult Mice Following Optic Nerve Injury. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Janssens, G.E.; Houtkooper, R.H. Identification of Longevity Compounds with Minimized Probabilities of Side Effects. Biogerontology 2020, 21, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zayas-Santiago, A.; Agte, S.; Rivera, Y.; Benedikt, J.; Ulbricht, E.; Karl, A.; Davila, J.; Savvinov, A.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Inyushin, M.; et al. Unidirectional Photoreceptor-to-Muller Glia Coupling and Unique K+ Channel Expression in Caiman Retina. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shore, L.; McLean, P.; Gilmour, S.K.; Hodgins, M.B.; Finbow, M.E. Polyamines Regulate Gap Junction Communication in Connexin 43-Expressing Cells. Biochem. J. 2001, 357, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rouach, N.; Koulakoff, A.; Abudara, V.; Willecke, K.; Giaume, C. Astroglial Metabolic Networks Sustain Hippocampal Synaptic Transmission. Science 2008, 322, 1551–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kofuji, P.; Newman, E.A. Potassium Buffering in the Central Nervous System. Neuroscience 2004, 129, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wallraff, A.; Kohling, R.; Heinemann, U.; Theis, M.; Willecke, K.; Steinhauser, C. The Impact of Astrocytic Gap Junctional Coupling on Potassium Buffering in the Hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 5438–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Theis, M.; Söhl, G.; Eiberger, J.; Willecke, K. Emerging Complexities in Identity and Function of Glial Connexins. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Giaume, C.; Koulakoff, A.; Roux, L.; Holcman, D.; Rouach, N. Astroglial Networks: A Step Further in Neuroglial and Gliovascular Interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chever, O.; Lee, C.-Y.; Rouach, N. Astroglial Connexin43 Hemichannels Tune Basal Excitatory Synaptic Transmission. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 11228–11232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Benedikt, J.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Nichols, C.G.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Spermine differentially affects astrocytic coupling in CA1 hippocampus as assessed by using dyes of different molecular weights and charges. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–13 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  66. Schools, G.P.; Zhou, M.; Kimelberg, H.K. Development of Gap Junctions in Hippocampal Astrocytes: Evidence That Whole Cell Electrophysiological Phenotype Is an Intrinsic Property of the Individual Cell. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Djukic, B.; Casper, K.B.; Philpot, B.D.; Chin, L.S.; McCarthy, K.D. Conditional Knock-out of Kir4.1 Leads to Glial Membrane Depolarization, Inhibition of Potassium and Glutamate Uptake, and Enhanced Short-Term Synaptic Potentiation. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 11354–11365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Wiencken-Barger, A.E.; Djukic, B.; Casper, K.B.; McCarthy, K.D. A Role for Connexin43 during Neurodevelopment. Glia 2007, 55, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Shuba, Y.M.; Antonov, S.M.; Inyushin, M.Y.; Cubano, L.; Pearson, W.L.; Kurata, H.; Reichenbach, A.; Veh, R.W.; Nichols, C.G.; et al. Complex Rectification of Muller Cell Kir Currents. Glia 2008, 56, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cotrina, M.L.; Kang, J.; Lin, J.H.; Bueno, E.; Hansen, T.W.; He, L.; Liu, Y.; Nedergaard, M. Astrocytic Gap Junctions Remain Open during Ischemic Conditions. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 2520–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Xin Liu, G.; Derst, C.; Schlichthörl, G.; Heinen, S.; Seebohm, G.; Brüggemann, A.; Kummer, W.; Veh, R.W.; Daut, J.; Preisig-Müller, R. Comparison of Cloned Kir2 Channels with Native Inward Rectifier K+ Channels from Guinea-Pig Cardiomyocytes. J. Physiol. 2001, 532, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Inyushin, M.; Kucheryaykh, Y.; Kucheryavykh, L.; Sanabria, P.; Jimenez-Rivera, C.; Struganova, I.; Eaton, M.; Skatchkov, S. Membrane Potential and PH-Dependent Accumulation of Decynium-22 (1,1′-Diethyl-2,2′-Cyanine Iodide) Flourencence through OCT Transporters in Astrocytes. Bol. Asoc. Med. Puerto Rico 2010, 102, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  73. Cetinkaya, I.; Ciarimboli, G.; Yalçinkaya, G.; Mehrens, T.; Velic, A.; Hirsch, J.R.; Gorboulev, V.; Koepsell, H.; Schlatter, E. Regulation of Human Organic Cation Transporter HOCT2 by PKA, PI3K, and Calmodulin-Dependent Kinases. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2003, 284, F293–F302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nimmerjahn, A.; Kirchhoff, F.; Kerr, J.N.D.; Helmchen, F. Sulforhodamine 101 as a Specific Marker of Astroglia in the Neocortex in Vivo. Nat. Methods 2004, 1, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Schnell, C.; Hagos, Y.; Hülsmann, S. Active Sulforhodamine 101 Uptake into Hippocampal Astrocytes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Hill, R.A.; Grutzendler, J. In Vivo Imaging of Oligodendrocytes with Sulforhodamine 101. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 1081–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hanani, M. Lucifer Yellow—An Angel Rather than the Devil. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nichols, C.G.; Lee, S.-J. Polyamines and Potassium Channels: A 25-Year Romance. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 18779–18788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Burnashev, N.; Khodorova, A.; Jonas, P.; Helm, P.J.; Wisden, W.; Monyer, H.; Seeburg, P.H.; Sakmann, B. Calcium-Permeable AMPA-Kainate Receptors in Fusiform Cerebellar Glial Cells. Science 1992, 256, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Williams, K. Modulation and Block of Ion Channels: A New Biology of Polyamines. Cell. Signal. 1997, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mott, D.D.; Washburn, M.S.; Zhang, S.; Dingledine, R.J. Subunit-Dependent Modulation of Kainate Receptors by Extracellular Protons and Polyamines. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Rozov, A.; Burnashev, N. Polyamine-Dependent Facilitation of Postsynaptic AMPA Receptors Counteracts Paired-Pulse Depression. Nature 1999, 401, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bowie, D. Polyamine-Mediated Channel Block of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors and Its Regulation by Auxiliary Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 18789–18802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rozov, A.; Zakharova, Y.; Vazetdinova, A.; Valiullina-Rakhmatullina, F. The Role of Polyamine-Dependent Facilitation of Calcium Permeable AMPARs in Short-Term Synaptic Enhancement. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Haghighi, A.P.; Cooper, E. Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Are Blocked by Intracellular Spermine in a Voltage-Dependent Manner. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 4050–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Sharma, G.; Vijayaraghavan, S. Nicotinic Cholinergic Signaling in Hippocampal Astrocytes Involves Calcium-Induced Calcium Release from Intracellular Stores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4148–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Lalo, U.; Pankratov, Y.; Kirchhoff, F.; North, R.A.; Verkhratsky, A. NMDA Receptors Mediate Neuron-to-Glia Signaling in Mouse Cortical Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 2673–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ceprian, M.; Fulton, D. Glial Cell AMPA Receptors in Nervous System Health, Injury and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ahern, G.P.; Wang, X.; Miyares, R.L. Polyamines Are Potent Ligands for the Capsaicin Receptor TRPV1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8991–8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Shigetomi, E.; Tong, X.; Kwan, K.Y.; Corey, D.P.; Khakh, B.S. TRPA1 Channels Regulate Astrocyte Resting Calcium and Inhibitory Synapse Efficacy through GAT-3. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 15, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Scimemi, A. A TRP among the Astrocytes. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Skatchkov, S.N.; Thomzig, A.; Eaton, M.J.; Biedermann, B.; Eulitz, D.; Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Veh, R.W.; Reichenbach, A. Kir Subfamily in Frog Retina: Specific Spatial Distribution of Kir 6.1 in Glial (Müller) Cells. Neuroreport 2001, 12, 1437–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kirichenko, E.Y.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Ermakov, A.M. Structure and Functions of Gap Junctions and Their Constituent Connexins in the Mammalian CNS. Biochem. Suppl. Ser. A 2021, 15, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Rolon-Reyes, K.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Sanabria, P.; Wessinger, W.D.; Inyushin, M. Glioblastoma Development in Mouse Brain: General Reduction of OCTs and Mislocalization of OCT3 Transporter and Subsequent Uptake of ASP+ Saubstrate to the Nuclei. Neurosci. Neuroeng. 2014, 3, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Koepsell, H. The SLC22 Family with Transporters of Organic Cations, Anions and Zwitterions. Mol. Aspects Med. 2013, 34, 413–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jedlitschky, G.; Grube, M.; Mosyagin, I.; Kroemer, H.K.; Vogelgesang, S. Targeting CNS Transporters for Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Koepsell, H. Organic Cation Transporters in Health and Disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 2020, 72, 253–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Koepsell, H. Update on Drug-Drug Interaction at Organic Cation Transporters: Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Proposal for Advanced in Vitro Testing. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021, 17, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bennett, M.V.L.; Garré, J.M.; Orellana, J.A.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Nedergaard, M.; Sáez, J.C. Connexin and Pannexin Hemichannels in Inflammatory Responses of Glia and Neurons. Brain Res. 2012, 1487, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. De Bock, M.; Wang, N.; Bol, M.; Decrock, E.; Ponsaerts, R.; Bultynck, G.; Dupont, G.; Leybaert, L. Connexin 43 Hemichannels Contribute to Cytoplasmic Ca2+ Oscillations by Providing a Bimodal Ca2+-Dependent Ca2+ Entry Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12250–12266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Sáez, J.C.; Vargas, A.A.; Hernández, D.E.; Ortiz, F.C.; Giaume, C.; Orellana, J.A. Permeation of Molecules through Astroglial Connexin 43 Hemichannels Is Modulated by Cytokines with Parameters Depending on the Permeant Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lin, X.; Veenstra, R.D. Effect of Transjunctional KCl Gradients on the Spermine Inhibition of Connexin40 Gap Junctions. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Palacios-Prado, N.; Bukauskas, F.F. Modulation of Metabolic Communication through Gap Junction Channels by Transjunctional Voltage; Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Gating and Ionophoresis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 1884–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Harris, A.L. Emerging Issues of Connexin Channels: Biophysics Fills the Gap. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2001, 34, 325–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Palacios-Prado, N.; Chapuis, S.; Panjkovich, A.; Fregeac, J.; Nagy, J.I.; Bukauskas, F.F. Molecular Determinants of Magnesium-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity at Electrical Synapses Formed by Connexin36. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Palacios-Prado, N.; Briggs, S.W.; Skeberdis, V.A.; Pranevicius, M.; Bennett, M.V.L.; Bukauskas, F.F. PH-Dependent Modulation of Voltage Gating in Connexin45 Homotypic and Connexin45/Connexin43 Heterotypic Gap Junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9897–9902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Fiacco, T.A.; McCarthy, K.D. Intracellular Astrocyte Calcium Waves in Situ Increase the Frequency of Spontaneous AMPA Receptor Currents in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Kim, S.; Guzman, S.J.; Hu, H.; Jonas, P. Active Dendrites Support Efficient Initiation of Dendritic Spikes in Hippocampal CA3 Pyramidal Neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Veenstra, R.D. Control of Cell Proliferation by Polyamine Signaling through Gap Junctions, Feasible or Not? Bioessays 2018, 40, e1800043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Musa, H.; Veenstra, R.D. Voltage-Dependent Blockade of Connexin40 Gap Junctions by Spermine. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Musa, H.; Fenn, E.; Crye, M.; Gemel, J.; Beyer, E.C.; Veenstra, R.D. Amino Terminal Glutamate Residues Confer Spermine Sensitivity and Affect Voltage Gating and Channel Conductance of Rat Connexin40 Gap Junctions. J. Physiol. 2004, 557, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gemel, J.; Lin, X.; Veenstra, R.D.; Beyer, E.C. N-Terminal Residues in Cx43 and Cx40 Determine Physiological Properties of Gap Junction Channels, but Do Not Influence Heteromeric Assembly with Each Other or with Cx26. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 2258–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Lin, X.; Fenn, E.; Veenstra, R.D. An Amino-Terminal Lysine Residue of Rat Connexin40 That Is Required for Spermine Block. J. Physiol. 2006, 570, 251–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lin, X.; Gemel, J.; Glass, A.; Zemlin, C.W.; Beyer, E.C.; Veenstra, R.D. Connexin40 and Connexin43 Determine Gating Properties of Atrial Gap Junction Channels. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 48, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Gilad, G.M.; Gilad, V.H. Overview of the Brain Polyamine-Stress-Response: Regulation, Development, and Modulation by Lithium and Role in Cell Survival. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2003, 23, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gupta, V.K.; Scheunemann, L.; Eisenberg, T.; Mertel, S.; Bhukel, A.; Koemans, T.S.; Kramer, J.M.; Liu, K.S.; Schroeder, S.; Stunnenberg, H.G.; et al. Restoring Polyamines Protects from Age-Induced Memory Impairment in an Autophagy-Dependent Manner. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pegg, A.E. The Function of Spermine. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bellé, N.A.V.; Dalmolin, G.D.; Fonini, G.; Rubin, M.A.; Rocha, J.B.T. Polyamines Reduces Lipid Peroxidation Induced by Different Pro-Oxidant Agents. Brain Res. 2004, 1008, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Soda, K.; Kano, Y.; Chiba, F.; Koizumi, K.; Miyaki, Y. Increased Polyamine Intake Inhibits Age-Associated Alteration in Global DNA Methylation and 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine-Induced Tumorigenesis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Fredriksson, R.; Sreedharan, S.; Nordenankar, K.; Alsiö, J.; Lindberg, F.A.; Hutchinson, A.; Eriksson, A.; Roshanbin, S.; Ciuculete, D.M.; Klockars, A.; et al. The Polyamine Transporter Slc18b1(VPAT) Is Important for Both Short and Long Time Memory and for Regulation of Polyamine Content in the Brain. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Wirth, M.; Schwarz, C.; Benson, G.; Horn, N.; Buchert, R.; Lange, C.; Köbe, T.; Hetzer, S.; Maglione, M.; Michael, E.; et al. Effects of Spermidine Supplementation on Cognition and Biomarkers in Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SmartAge)-Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2019, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Eisenberg, T.; Knauer, H.; Schauer, A.; Buttner, S.; Ruckenstuhl, C.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Ring, J.; Schroeder, S.; Magnes, C.; Antonacci, L.; et al. Induction of Autophagy by Spermidine Promotes Longevity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Viltard, M.; Durand, S.; Pérez-Lanzón, M.; Aprahamian, F.; Lefevre, D.; Leroy, C.; Madeo, F.; Kroemer, G.; Friedlander, G. The Metabolomic Signature of Extreme Longevity: Naked Mole Rats versus Mice. Aging 2019, 11, 4783–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Enkvetchakul, D.; Ebihara, L.; Nichols, C.G. Polyamine Flux in Xenopus Oocytes through Hemi-Gap Junctional Channels. J. Physiol. 2003, 553, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kovacs, G.G.; Yousef, A.; Kaindl, S.; Lee, V.M.; Trojanowski, J.Q. Connexin-43 and Aquaporin-4 Are Markers of Ageing-Related Tau Astrogliopathy (ARTAG)-Related Astroglial Response. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2018, 44, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Nagy, J.I.; Rash, J.E. Astrocyte and Oligodendrocyte Connexins of the Glial Syncytium in Relation to Astrocyte Anatomical Domains and Spatial Buffering. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2003, 10, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Nagy, J.I.; Ionescu, A.-V.; Lynn, B.D.; Rash, J.E. Coupling of Astrocyte Connexins Cx26, Cx30, Cx43 to Oligodendrocyte Cx29, Cx32, Cx47: Implications from Normal and Connexin32 Knockout Mice. Glia 2003, 44, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. De Bock, M.; Decrock, E.; Wang, N.; Bol, M.; Vinken, M.; Bultynck, G.; Leybaert, L. The Dual Face of Connexin-Based Astroglial Ca(2+) Communication: A Key Player in Brain Physiology and a Prime Target in Pathology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2211–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. D’Ambrosio, R.; Wenzel, J.; Schwartzkroin, P.A.; McKhann, G.M.; Janigro, D. Functional Specialization and Topographic Segregation of Hippocampal Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 4425–4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Bordey, A.; Sontheimer, H. Postnatal Development of Ionic Currents in Rat Hippocampal Astrocytes in Situ. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 78, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Landis, D.M. The Early Reactions of Non-Neuronal Cells to Brain Injury. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1994, 17, 133–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tsai, K.L.; Wang, S.M.; Chen, C.C.; Fong, T.H.; Wu, M.L. Mechanism of Oxidative Stress-Induced Intracellular Acidosis in Rat Cerebellar Astrocytes and C6 Glioma Cells. J. Physiol. 1997, 502, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Watanabe, S.; Kusama-Eguchi, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Igarashi, K. Estimation of Polyamine Binding to Macromolecules and ATP in Bovine Lymphocytes and Rat Liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20803–20809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Krauss, M.; Weiss, T.; Langnaese, K.; Richter, K.; Kowski, A.; Veh, R.W.; Laube, G. Cellular and Subcellular Rat Brain Spermidine Synthase Expression Patterns Suggest Region-Specific Roles for Polyamines, Including Cerebellar Pre-Synaptic Function. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Hamon, L.; Savarin, P.; Pastré, D. Polyamine Signal through Gap Junctions: A Key Regulator of Proliferation and Gap-Junction Organization in Mammalian Tissues? Bioessays 2016, 38, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Orellana, J.A.; Stehberg, J. Hemichannels: New Roles in Astroglial Function. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Haydon, P.G.; Nedergaard, M. How Do Astrocytes Participate in Neural Plasticity? Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 7, a020438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benedikt, J.; Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera, Y.; Méndez-González, M.; Nichols, C.G.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121812

AMA Style

Benedikt J, Malpica-Nieves CJ, Rivera Y, Méndez-González M, Nichols CG, Veh RW, Eaton MJ, Skatchkov SN. The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(12):1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benedikt, Jan, Christian J. Malpica-Nieves, Yomarie Rivera, Miguel Méndez-González, Colin G. Nichols, Rüdiger W. Veh, Misty J. Eaton, and Serguei N. Skatchkov. 2022. "The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium" Biomolecules 12, no. 12: 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121812

APA Style

Benedikt, J., Malpica-Nieves, C. J., Rivera, Y., Méndez-González, M., Nichols, C. G., Veh, R. W., Eaton, M. J., & Skatchkov, S. N. (2022). The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium. Biomolecules, 12(12), 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop