Next Article in Journal
Bio-Based Formulations for Sustainable Applications in Agri-Food-Pharma
Next Article in Special Issue
Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System
Previous Article in Journal
Can Cannabidiol Affect the Efficacy of Chemotherapy and Epigenetic Treatments in Cancer?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective Herbs for the Management of Alzheimer’s Disease
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Targeting Protein Misfolding in Drug Discovery for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21949-900, Brazil
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(5), 767;
Received: 21 April 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 16 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Natural and Synthetic Compounds in Neurodegenerative Disorders)


The potential to treat neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) of the major bioactive compound of green tea, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), is well documented. Numerous findings now suggest that EGCG targets protein misfolding and aggregation, a common cause and pathological mechanism in many NDs. Several studies have shown that EGCG interacts with misfolded proteins such as amyloid beta-peptide (Aβ), linked to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and α-synuclein, linked to Parkinson’s disease (PD). To date, NDs constitute a serious public health problem, causing a financial burden for health care systems worldwide. Although current treatments provide symptomatic relief, they do not stop or even slow the progression of these devastating disorders. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective drugs for these incurable ailments. It is expected that targeting protein misfolding can serve as a therapeutic strategy for many NDs since protein misfolding is a common cause of neurodegeneration. In this context, EGCG may offer great potential opportunities in drug discovery for NDs. Therefore, this review critically discusses the role of EGCG in NDs drug discovery and provides updated information on the scientific evidence that EGCG can potentially be used to treat many of these fatal brain disorders.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a global public health threat and a huge financial burden for health care systems, not to mention a major hardship for society and families [1,2,3]. No effective treatment currently exists for NDs, and current therapies merely alleviate the symptoms. Thus, there is an urgent need for new, safer, and more effective drugs [4,5]. Natural products (NPs) and their unique polypharmacology provide significant advantages for drug discovery, particularly for the treatment of multifactorial and complex NDs [6,7,8,9].
The natural compound epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) has been extensively explored and studied for its therapeutic potential for NDs [10,11]. EGCG is a dietary polyphenol found in green tea with potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and an ability to modulate multiple targets implicated in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and NDs [12].
The neuroprotective effects of EGCG have been reported for several NDs, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), the two most common NDs [10,13]. The pathogenesis of NDs shares many fundamental processes associated with progressive neuronal dysfunction and death, with protein misfolding, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and neuroinflammation as some of them [14,15]. Meanwhile, EGCG has a multi-target mode of action (Figure 1) and synergistically acts against protein misfolding, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and neuroinflammation. Indeed, it is now recognized that the role of EGCG in ND management can be attributed to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and anti-amyloidogenic properties [16].
The pathological hallmark of many NDs is the accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates in the brain [17,18]. A growing body of evidence suggests that targeting protein misfolding is a promising strategy to prevent NDs. Protein misfolding and aggregation are principal causative factors in neurodegeneration, making their modulation a feasible target for ND prevention [17,19,20].
Protein misfolding and the consequent self-association into toxic oligomers and amyloid deposits are now considered central elements of the etiology of a wide range of NDs, including highly prevalent ones such as AD and PD, as well as rarer disorders such as prion diseases [21,22,23]. Although each ND is associated with abnormalities in the folding of a different protein, the molecular pathways leading to misfolding and aggregation appear to be similar. These findings suggest that a common therapy for NDs might be possible [24].
Studies have revealed that EGCG can interact with a variety of proteins linked to protein misfolding, such as Aβ, tau, α-synuclein (α-syn), transthyretin (TTR), and huntingtin [25,26,27,28]. This review addresses the contribution of EGCG research toward advances in neurodegenerative disease drug discovery. We begin by summarizing the available data of in-cell and animal ND models that support the therapeutic role of EGCG. We then focus on the protein misfolding as one of the most promising targets for ND treatment using EGCG.

2. Neurodegenerative Diseases

NDs are among the most widespread health problems, affecting millions of people worldwide [29]. Moreover, the number of individuals living with NDs such as AD and PD is increasing, negatively affecting families, communities, and healthcare systems worldwide [1,2]. These disorders are becoming highly prevalent, in part due to global increases in human life expectancy, since NDs are age-dependent disorders [30,31]. Indeed, aging is the primary risk factor for most NDs [32]. The impact of these diseases will further increase in the coming decades as humans live longer lives [31].
NDs are common chronic diseases typically characterized by a progressive loss of function and death of neurons in the brain or peripheral nervous system [15]. Although NDs differ in their clinical presentation, they do share several common pathological mechanisms, which are characterized by multiple targets. The underlying pathobiological processes are largely shared, with most involving the formation of abnormal protein deposits at their onset and all exhibiting a common and characteristic pattern of neuronal degeneration in anatomically or functionally related regions [14]. This idea that diverse NDs have a common cause and pathological mechanism supports that a common therapeutic strategy for these devastating disorders might be possible [24].
AD, PD, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington’s disease (HD) are just a few examples of NDs that share similar biochemical reactions that lead to neurodegeneration [17,29,33]. Extensive evidence shows that misfolded proteins such as Aβ and tau in AD, α-syn in PD, and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) in ALS participate in the formation, accumulation, and deposition of toxic misfolded aggregates [34,35,36]. Furthermore, protein misfolding (Table 1) is one of the principal causes of the onset and progression of NDs [17,21].
It has also been proposed that the overproduction of reactive oxygen species may have a complex role in promoting disease development [38,39]. In such cases, neurodegeneration results from the excessive production of free radicals induced by fragments of insoluble and/or overproduced misfolded proteins due to functional alterations in the mitochondria, inadequate energy supply, production of inflammatory mediators, and alteration of antioxidant defenses. Oxidative stress is, therefore, considered to be a common key player in the etiology and progression of these NDs [39,40].
Protein misfolding events can promote an excessive immune response causing neuroinflammation, which is also a common feature of NDs [41]. It is hypothesized that release of protein aggregates from neurons activates microglia triggering an inflammatory response characterized by liberation of inflammatory mediators, which contribute to disease progression and severity. For instance, in AD, the glial activation is followed by nuclear factor NF-kβ activation, synthesis, and release of proinflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-12 that affect neuronal receptors with an overactivation of protein kinases [41].
Neurodegeneration can, therefore, be seen as a consequence of several detrimental processes, including protein aggregation, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, which finally lead to the loss of neuronal functions and cognitive impairments [17,39,41]. Since NDs are multifactorial diseases related to complex pathophysiological characteristics and complicated interactions with a large number of genes and proteins, there is still no effective drug treatment of these conditions [42,43].
It is unlikely that targeting a single change will be effective at treating neurodegeneration, as several changes occur in the development of NDs. Given this multifactorial profile, NDs require a multi-target therapeutic approach, and current research is exploring multitarget drugs that can address more than a single event at the same time [44,45,46,47].

2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

AD is the most common ND worldwide and also the most common cause of dementia in elderly patients [2,3]. In 2019, AD and other forms of dementia were ranked by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the seventh most common cause of death in the world [48]. To date, only five drugs (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine) have been approved by the FDA to treat AD. The disease is currently incurable, with the available drugs only managing the symptoms and exhibiting severe side effects [42,49,50]. These drugs are based on a single-target strategy and focus on restoring neurotransmitter homeostasis. Finding disease-modifying AD therapies remains an urgent and unmet clinical need [5,51].
Since the approval of memantine in 2003, the first drug approved for AD was a marine-derived oligosaccharide, sodium oligomannate. With mode of action related to gut microbiota and neuroinflammation, this latter compound was approved in 2019 in China for treating mild to moderate AD to improve cognition function [52,53].
AD is a multifactorial disease characterized by the progressive accumulation of Aβ fibrils and abnormal tau proteins in extracellular spaces and in neurons, respectively, with associated neuron and synapse loss in multiple brain regions, especially in the frontal cortex and hippocampus [54,55]. The Aβ (Aβ40 and Aβ42 with 40 and 42 amino acids) and tau proteins (352 to 421 amino acids) have been clearly identified as the key misfolded proteins in AD [56,57].
At the microscopic level, the brains of AD patients are characterized by the concurrent presence of two classes of abnormal structures: extracellular amyloid plaques and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Both structures are made of highly insoluble, densely packed filaments. These structures are formed by distinct soluble building blocks: Aβ peptides for plaques and tau for NFTs [56].
The senile plaques and NFTs are recognized as the two major neuropathological hallmarks of AD [58,59,60]. As the major component of senile plaques, the Aβ peptide is considered to be a crucial factor that underlies neuronal and synaptic dysfunction in AD progression [61]. Hence, the amyloid hypothesis proposes Aβ as the principal cause of AD, suggesting that clinical symptoms such as memory loss and cognitive decline are caused by misfolding of the extracellular Aβ protein accumulates in senile plaques and also by intracellular deposition of misfolded tau protein [61,62,63].
In this context, Aβ has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in attempts to develop a disease-modifying treatment for AD. Most drugs tested for AD in the past 20 years have targeted the accumulation of the Aβ with a focus on decreasing levels of Aβ monomers, oligomers, aggregates, and plaques using compounds that decrease production, antagonize aggregation, or increase brain clearance of Aβ, such as β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) inhibitors, and anti-Aβ antibodies [64,65,66]. Despite the large number of anti-Aβ drugs entering clinical development and the enormous expenditure on large and complex trials, these drug candidates have so far failed to show clinical benefits for AD [65].
It has, therefore, been suggested that the failure of drug discovery in AD reflects an incomplete understanding of disease mechanisms. Since Aβ has a physiological role, some anti-Aβ drugs that inhibit the production of ‘nascent’ Aβ, such as γ- secretase and BACE inhibitors, have been found to accelerate cognitive decline, possibly owing to off-target effects. It is speculated that more favorable outcomes might be achieved by targeting Aβ oligomers, the most neurotoxic molecular species, with encouraging results from monoclonal antibodies directed against these oligomers [66,67,68,69].
Notably, there has been a shift from an initial focus on amyloid plaques to a more contemporary view that memory failure in AD is caused by small soluble Aß oligomers acting as synaptotoxins, leading to cognitive impairment [70]. According to recent findings, Aβ oligomers play a key role in AD brain inflammation by activating the pro-inflammatory interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptors that mediate the alteration in levels of mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins, resulting in memory impairment [71].

2.2. Parkinson’s Disease

PD is s considered to be the second most frequent ND in the world after AD [1,72]. It has been estimated that the global burden of PD more than doubled globally from 1990 to 2015 as a result of an aging population, with potential contributions from longer disease duration and environmental factors [1]. Studies in the area have implicated environmental and genetic risk factors in the pathogenesis of PD [73]. The environmental risk factors include pesticides and ambient air pollution [74,75,76,77].
PD is a progressive ND characterized by the selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, located in the basal ganglia of the brain, resulting in the lack of dopamine in this organ [78,79,80]. Dopaminergic cell loss causes clinical signs and symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, and tremors [73].
So far, no cure has been available to treat PD, with pharmacological treatments mainly consisting of dopaminergic drugs, which are only therapies to reduce symptoms that are still limited by several side effects [81]. The majority of current drugs were approved for clinical use in the second half of the twentieth century, with the development of new drugs proceeding slowly since the FDA approval of levodopa in 1970. Levodopa remains the most effective drug therapy for the motor symptoms of PD, despite its long-term complications [82,83,84].
The pathological hallmark of PD is the presence of Lewy bodies within dopaminergic neurons in the brains of affected patients, and misfolded α-syn is known to be the principal component of Lewy bodies [85,86,87,88]. Although the formation of amyloid fibrils by α-syn aggregation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of PD, it has recently been shown that the formation of Lewy bodies—rather than fibrils—is one of the major drivers of neurodegeneration by disrupting cellular functions and inducing synaptic dysfunctions, as well as mitochondrial damage and deficits [89].
Several studies have shown that α-syn oligomers are the primary cause of neurotoxicity and play a critical role in PD, similar to that of Aβ oligomers in AD [90]. Emerging evidence suggests that small soluble α-syn oligomers are the most toxic species among the forms of α-syn aggregates and that size and topological structural properties are crucial factors for oligomer-mediated toxicity, involving the interaction with either neurons or glial cells [91].

2.3. Neurodegenerative Drug Discovery

Most NDs, including AD, PD, HD, and ALS, remain essentially incurable to date. As mentioned before, current therapy merely alleviates the symptoms but cannot stop the progress of the disease, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapeutic strategies [4,5]. Barriers to the development of new drugs for NDs include an incomplete understanding of the biology of these multifactorial disorders, the presence of a blood-brain barrier (BBB) that restricts the flow of molecules to the brain, and a lack of clinically relevant animal models on which to test new drugs [92].
Although NDs are characterized pathologically by the aggregation of disease-specific misfolded proteins and changes in cellular stress responses, researchers remain focused almost exclusively on reducing the misfolded protein load (particularly that of Aβ in drug development for AD); however, outcomes have been disappointing [50,93].
Given the low success rate of ND drug discovery, a paradigm shift for innovative drug development strategies was required [94]. New treatments have been proposed, including ones that target various generic stress responses and preventative measures targeting the original misfolded protein triggers, their toxicity, and the spread of aggregates, which may hold promise for the future management of these diseases [93].
Ultimately, the drug discovery paradigm of NDs has gradually shifted from the design of selective drugs targeting a single pathophysiological pathway toward the development of multitarget agents directed at complex pathophysiological pathways of the diseases [44,45,46,47]. Indeed, the complexity and multiple etiologies of NDs make it challenging to obtain desirable therapeutic effects using single-target drugs. Therefore, the use of multitarget directed ligands has emerged in recent years as a powerful strategy to develop potential therapeutics for NDs [95,96,97]. NPs with multiple biological activities that can affect the pathophysiological changes in the brain that contribute to ND development and progression are of particular interest in anti-neurodegenerative drug discovery [98].

2.4. Natural Products against Neurodegeneration

The use of phytotherapeutics continues to expand around the world, with many people now resorting to phytomedicine to treat and prevent a wide array of pathologies [99]. Many medicinal plants and their NPs have been reported as being able to alleviate the symptoms of NDs, including AD and PD [100,101,102,103,104,105]. Historically, NPs that are the most important sources of drugs may also hold promise for treating NDs [106,107].
A number of medicinal plants contain active components that are known to possess antioxidant action [108,109]. Abundant data in the literature suggests that dietary NPs found in fruits and vegetables are powerful antioxidants that offer health benefits against several oxidative stress-induced NDs, including AD [110,111]. Most of these NPs have remarkable antioxidant properties and act mainly by scavenging free radical species [109,112].
Since oxidative stress has long been associated with neurodegeneration, there has been a significant increase of interest in finding natural and synthetic compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects as promising drug candidates for treating NDs [113]. In recent years, several natural antioxidants have been exploited for their actual or supposed beneficial effect against oxidative stress, including flavonoids and polyphenols [114,115]. Likewise, plant-derived antioxidant polyphenols have come under the research spotlight due to their potential to prevent oxidative stress [109,112].
Several dietary phytochemicals with known antioxidant properties and anti-amyloidogenic effects have been investigated for their potential beneficial effects, including curcumin, resveratrol, and green tea catechins like EGCG [111]. In particular, green tea catechins have been highlighted as having potential protective effects against NDs due to their diverse array of physiological actions, which include potent antioxidant effects [116,117].
Notably, because of their broad spectrum of pharmacological and biological activities, NPs are considered promising alternatives for treating neurodegeneration as they might play a role in ND drug development and discovery [118,119,120,121]. NPs remain a promising pool for discovering scaffolds with high structural diversity and various bioactivities that can be directly developed or used as starting points for optimization into novel drugs [122]. Many of these NPs are known as multi-targeted compounds as they alter multiple pathways at the molecular level, making them ideal therapeutic options for multifactorial and complex diseases such as NDs [7].
NPs have, therefore, emerged as potential multi-targeted agents for treating NDs. The major mechanisms through which NPs exert their neuroprotective effects include antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, antiapoptotic, and neurotrophic activities, as well as acetylcholinesterase and monoamine oxidase inhibition [123]. Among neuroprotective NPs, phenolic molecules are of particular interest since most can target both amyloid aggregation and oxidative stress, as confirmed by numerous studies with phenolic compounds such as EGCG, curcumin, resveratrol, quercetin, and oleuropein [123,124,125,126]. Evidence also exists that some of these NPs suppress the neurotoxicity of the most toxic oligomer species [127,128,129,130,131].
Finally, targeting protein misfolding with different NPs has been recognized as one of the most promising therapeutic strategies against NDs since many NDs involve the misfolding and aggregation of specific proteins into abnormal, toxic species [125,132]. Therefore, the use of small molecules to stop, slow, or reverse the protein misfolding and aggregation process may be a valuable approach to reduce neurodegeneration [17,20]. Concerning the molecular mechanisms by which NPs target misfolded proteins, it is likely that they interfere with electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions which stabilize β-sheets due to the establishment of intermolecular interactions with sidechain or backbone residues of the protein. These intermolecular interactions might be covalent and non-covalent such as hydrogen bonding, π-π interactions, or charge-charge interactions [132].

3. Protein Misfolding in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The conversion of proteins from their native state to misfolded aggregates is associated with and thought to be the cause of some NDs, including AD and PD [133]. The misfolding, aggregation, and deposition of specific proteins is the key characteristic of most progressive NDs [21,134]. Aβ, tau, α-syn, TDP-43, huntingtin, or the prion protein (PrP) are just a few examples of disease-specific proteins that can aggregate and contribute to the pathogenesis of NDs (Figure 2). The misfolded protein aggregates cause cellular toxicity and eventually lead to cell death in neurodegenerative pathologies. In all cases, the aggregation process plays a key role in the disease progression either due to a loss of protein function (as a result of the aggregation itself) or to the toxicity of soluble aggregates [17,22].
Given that NDs originate through a common pathway of aggregation, with aggregates sharing a similar structure, it is not surprising that these aggregates cause cellular damage through similar mechanisms. However, key differences among misfolded proteins occur due to the location of the aggregates, whether intra- or extracellular and their concentration, which depends on several factors, including the stability of the fibrils [93]. It is well known that the misfolding, aggregation, and accumulation of proteins culminate in damage to the neurons in which the proteins accumulate, causing the neurodegeneration process [135]. A particular protein can fold into a stable alternative conformation, which in most cases results in its aggregation and accumulation in tissues as fibrillar deposits [136].
Increasing evidence shows that the assembly of amyloid fibrils is accompanied by conformational changes in the aggregating proteins. The ‘natively unfolded’ polypeptides Aβ and α-syn, for example, have a primarily random-coil structure in their soluble, native state [24]. However, in the fibrillogenesis process (Figure 3), their structure converts into a β-sheet conformation, suggesting that β-sheet formation drives the amyloid assembly process. In addition, in vitro experiments suggest that these misfolded proteins readily form cross-β structures with an aggregation kinetics profile that typically displays a sigmoidal curve where the proteins assemble into oligomers (lag phase) prior to fibril elongation (growth phase) and a plateau where the fibrils and free monomers are in equilibrium (saturation phase) [137,138].
Indeed, amyloid fibril formation is a complex, multiphase process consisting of three phases: nucleation or the lag phase, elongation or the growth phase, and a saturation phase. The lag phase starts with monomers undergoing structural rearrangements and self-assembly into dimers, trimers, and/or oligomers. In the growth phase, the oligomeric nucleus acts as a template for the monomers in solution and proceeds by fibril elongation, aided by fragmentation, secondary nucleation, and fibril conjoining. Finally, the fibril formation reaches an equilibrium in the saturation phase with mature fibrils and a reduced concentration of the monomeric species [138].
Notably, Stanley Prusiner’s discovery that the PrP can misfold into a pathological conformation that encodes structural information capable of both propagating and inducing severe neuropathology has contributed significantly toward understanding other NDs [139,140]. While there is increasing evidence that other NDs, especially AD (Aβ and tau) and PD (α-syn), exhibit at least some of the same properties as misfolded PrP, many NDs with a protein misfolding component are now referred to as ‘prion-like’ [141,142].
Even though distinct proteins are involved in each ND, the process of protein misfolding and aggregation is strikingly similar. Misfolded proteins are transferred between cells, becoming what is referred to as ‘pathological seeds’ [136]. Experimental studies suggest that these assemblies come from the prion-like seeded aggregation of specific misfolded proteins that upbuild and accumulate to form the intracellular and/or extracellular lesions typical of each disorder [135,143,144]. The prion paradigm has thus emerged as a unifying molecular basis for the pathogenesis of many NDs [145].
The prion paradigm holds that the misfolding and seeded aggregation of certain proteins is a fundamental cause of specific disorders. This discovery has vast implications for understanding the mechanisms involved in the initiation and progression of NDs, as well as for the design of novel treatment and diagnosis strategies. Researchers are now focusing on developing therapies for protein misfolding disorders that employ diverse strategies. These include inhibiting the production of disease-relevant proteins that are prone to misfolding, inhibiting the aggregation of misfolded proteins, removing and preventing the spread of aggregated misfolded proteins, and manipulating cellular systems to mitigate the toxic effects of misfolded proteins [19].
Since protein misfolding and aggregation have been shown to be the leading cause of many NDs, several studies have examined the potential of targeting the fibrillization process of amyloid proteins to combat neurodegeneration. An array of compounds has been identified as potential inhibitors or modulators of protein misfolding and aggregation. Notably, most of the promising molecules that have been identified target misfolded Aβ and α-syn; these molecules appear to bind to oligomers and larger aggregates such as amyloid plaques [146,147]. Such compounds can be categorized into three main types: antibodies, peptide inhibitors, and small molecule inhibitors such as NPs [132].
Finally, in view of multiple lines of evidence that support protein misfolding as a common cause and pathological mechanism in NDs, it has been suggested that a common therapy for these incurable disorders might be possible [24]. It is important to note that the potential of EGCG against many NDs reinforces the possibility of developing a common drug therapy for different NDs. In recent decades, the role of natural polyphenol EGCG against protein misfolding and aggregation has been widely studied. A variety of evidence is now available to support the potential of EGCG to inhibit fibrillization and potentially to induce the disassembly of misfolded aggregated proteins (Aβ, tau, and α-syn) [148,149,150,151].

3.1. Misfolded Aβ in AD

Aβ is a misfolded peptide involved in AD pathogenesis, and the plaque composed of aggregated Aβ peptide features prominently in AD pathology; thus, most drugs tested for AD over the past two decades have targeted the Aβ peptide [50,66]. The Aβ peptides are 39–42-residue-long peptides found in the senile plaques of AD patients’ brains [61]. These peptides are proteolytic fragments generated by the metabolism of the transmembrane amyloid precursor protein (APP), which then self-aggregate in aqueous solution, going from soluble and mainly unstructured monomers to insoluble ordered fibrils. As soon as Aβ aggregates into fibrils outside the cell, it becomes resistant to proteolytic cleavage [61,152].
The cleavage of APP by a complex family of enzymes (γ-secretases and β-secretases) releases Aβ peptides as mainly unstructured monomers [152]. Given the hydrophobicity of the primary structure, Aβ can be divided into four regions: two hydrophobic ones and two hydrophilic ones. The 16 first N-terminal residues constitute a hydrophilic tail, while the two hydrophobic regions are comprised of the central L17–A21 portion and the C-terminus A30–V40/A42, which are separated by the central hydrophilic region E22–G29. The two Aβ hydrophobic regions exhibit a secondary structure propensity for β-structures. These regions transiently adopt β conformations and may then transiently fold into a hairpin. It has been suggested that Aβ monomers in solution adopt a transient hairpin-like conformation, whereas residues D23 to K30 are directly involved in hairpin formation [152].
As mentioned previously, despite the harmful properties of senile plaques, a large body of evidence implicates soluble oligomeric Aβ as the most neurotoxic molecular species [70,153,154]. The misfolding and extracellular aggregation of Aβ peptides have been recognized as the main cause of AD progression, leading to the formation of toxic Aβ oligomers and deposition of β-amyloid plaques in the brain [61]. It has been suggested that oligomeric Aβ species may represent a valid biological target [66,155,156].

3.2. Misfolded α-Syn in PD

The α-syn protein is predominantly localized at synaptic sites, where it interacts with many partners such as monoamine transporters, cytoskeletal components, lipid membranes, chaperones, and synaptic vesicle (SV)-associated proteins [157]. The α-syn is monomeric and disordered in its physiological form, though some studies debate whether it adopts a helical tetramer in vivo [158,159,160].
In addition to intracellular aggregation of the misfolded α-syn being linked to PD, it has been implicated in other NDs like AD, multiple system atrophy (MSA), and dementia with Lewy bodies. Furthermore, a disorder group called synucleinopathies is characterized by the accumulation of inclusions rich in the α-syn protein that can appear later in life [161,162]. It is thought that different types of aggregated species (oligomers, protofibrils, fibrils, and others) are formed during the process of α-syn aggregation in these synucleinopathies and that at least some might be neurotoxic and lead to neurodegeneration [163]. Hence, targeting neuronal accumulation of α-syn is appealing as a potential method to halt or delay the progression of PD and other synucleinopathies [164].
The 140-amino acid α-syn is a 14 kDa neuronal protein encoded by the SNCA gene on human chromosome 4 [165]. Its primary amino acid sequence can be divided into three major domains: the N-terminal domain (1–60), the central domain (61–95), and the C-terminal domain (96–140). The N-terminal domain, which contains a multi-repeated consensus sequence (KTKEGV) and has an α-helical propensity, is characterized by an amphipathic lysine-rich amino terminus, which plays a crucial role in modulating its interactions with membranes and a disordered, acidic carboxy-terminal tail. The tail has been implicated in regulating its nuclear localization and interactions with metals, small molecules, and proteins. The central region of α-syn contains a highly hydrophobic motif known as the non-amyloid-β component of AD amyloid plaques (NAC), which is involved in α-syn aggregation when acquiring the β-sheet structure. The NAC region is indispensable for α-syn aggregation. The C-terminal domain is enriched with negatively charged and proline residues, providing flexibility to the polypeptide [166,167].
Since the NAC region of α-syn confers a high propensity for the protein to misfold, it forms β-sheet rich amyloid assemblies, also termed fibrils, under pathological conditions. However, the α-syn assembly into amyloid fibrils is dynamic, and the existence of intermediate oligomeric species has been studied extensively [164]. Similar to oligomeric Aβ, α-syn oligomers cause more neurotoxic effects than larger fibrillar assemblies, inferring that they might, in fact, be the main pathogenic species [168].
The toxic intermediate hypothesis builds on this view, suggesting that toxic oligomers disrupt the integrity of membranes via amyloid pore formation, while the fibrillar end-products are simply a by-product of detoxification. This view is supported by the fact that the fibril-containing Lewy bodies are often found in healthy dopaminergic neurons [169,170,171].

4. EGCG for Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases

In light of the major potential of using green tea in ND treatment, green tea catechins have been extensively studied, including in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials [16,117]. The therapeutic potential of EGCG, the major bioactive compound of green tea, is now well known in ND research [10]. Over the last 20 years, EGCG has been shown to counteract oxidative stress and improves AD- and PD-like phenotypes in different in vitro and in vivo models (Table 2 and Table 3).
In addition to displaying well-demonstrated neuroprotective effects, EGCG has emerged as a promising modulator of amyloid aggregation that can prevent the toxicity of misfolded protein aggregates in a range of experimental models of NDs. A wealth of evidence is now available to support EGCG as a potent anti-amyloidogenic agent that interacts with a set of amyloidogenic proteins, such as Aβ in the case of AD and α-syn in the case of PD (Table 4).

4.1. Evidence from In Vitro Neurotoxicity Models

In the 1990s, studies with the Aβ-induced neurotoxicity model showed that the presence of Aβ1-42 leads to neurotoxicity and increased protein oxidation and, as a result, oxidative stress [220,221,222]. The neurotoxicity of the Aβ protein is mediated through oxygen-free radicals and can be attenuated by antioxidants and free radical scavengers. The attenuation of oxidative stress by antioxidant compounds can, therefore, be a potential therapeutic strategy for treating AD. In the early 2000s, the potent antioxidant properties of the green tea polyphenol EGCG were investigated in an Aβ-induced neurotoxicity model using cultured hippocampal neurons, with the results suggesting that EGCG has protective effects against Aβ-induced neuronal apoptosis from scavenging reactive oxygen species. This was one of the first reports on the benefits of EGCG for preventing AD [172].
Subsequently, the molecular mechanism underlying the neuroprotective effect of EGCG in the Aβ-induced neurotoxicity model was investigated with a focus on the cellular metabolism of reduced glutathione with antioxidant properties. The results indicated that EGCG treatment fortified the cellular glutathione pool via elevated expression of γ-glutamylcysteine ligase [176].
Oxidative stress has also been shown to induce BACE-1 protein upregulation in neuronal cells, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in APP processing and Aβ generation, as well as being a therapeutic target for AD [223,224]. Although exposure of Aβ1-42 to neuronal culture increased BACE-1 protein levels, EGCG treatment significantly attenuated the Aβ-induced production of radical oxygen and β-sheet structure formation [174].
In the early 2010s, it was known that EGCG inhibits Aβ and α-syn fibrillogenesis in cell-free assays; researchers then investigated whether EGCG can remodel insoluble Aβ and α-syn aggregates in a cell model system [148]. This research showed that EGCG can reduce cellular toxicity of mature Aβ and α-syn fibrils by remodeling their structure. The EGCG-mediated remodeling of β-sheet-rich amyloid structures leads to the appearance of smaller amorphous protein aggregates that are nontoxic to mammalian cells [148].
In 2017, the employment of α-syn-transduced PC12 cells was performed to investigate the protective effects of EGCG, providing evidence that EGCG can protect these cells against α-syn-induced damage by inhibiting the overexpression and fibrillation of α-syn in the cells [151].
A more recent study reported that EGCG can interfere with Cu(II)-induced fibrillation of α-syn and protect cell viability. The researchers demonstrated that EGCG inhibits the generation of Cu(II)-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to reduced overexpression and fibrillation of α-syn in the cells. Moreover, the combination of Cu and EGCG exhibited better cryoprotection than EGCG alone. Here, it is worth noting that Cu(II) is an oxidant that also accelerates fibrillation and protein aggregation [183].
There are also pieces of evidence of neuroprotective effects of EGCG in neurotoxicity models of PD Parkinsonian neurotoxins include compounds like 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), rotenone (ROT), and paraquat. EGCG has demonstrated remarkable neuronal protection against paraquat, 6-OHDA, and MPP+ neurotoxicity, though not against ROT [173,175,178,180,181].
In an evaluation of the neuroprotective effects of EGCG on ROT-treated dissociated mesencephalic cultures and organotypic striatal cultures, EGCG partially counteracted the effects of ROT in striatal slice cultures through the reduction of nitric oxide (NO) but did not dissociate cells against ROT toxicity [178]. Although the latter study did not demonstrate that EGCG protects against ROT-induced neurotoxicity in cell models, it was recently reported that EGCG had a neuroprotective effect in vivo on ROT-induced PD models [206,207]. Together, these results from in vitro neurotoxicity models support the notion that EGCG can be used as a neuroprotective agent to treat NDs.

4.2. Evidence from Animal Models

Because of its broad spectrum of pharmacological activities, EGCG displayed therapeutic potential on various in vivo models of NDs, including AD, PD, HD, and ALS (Table 2). The therapeutic potential of EGCG in an animal model of AD was first reported in 2005 using Swedish mutant APP-overexpressing mice (Tg APPsw). The researchers demonstrated that intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (20 mg/kg) of EGCG significantly decreased both Aβ levels and Aβ plaques in the brain. The study further demonstrated that EGCG promoted cleavage in the α-C-terminal fragment of APP and elevated the N-terminal APP cleavage product, soluble APP-α. This suggests that the reduction of cerebral Aβ levels is associated with increased α-secretase cleavage activity [184].
Moreover, EGCG similarly reduced Aβ deposition in Tg APPsw when administered orally in drinking water (50 mg/kg), as observed in a study conducted in 2008. The results further indicated that EGCG provides cognitive benefits and modulates tau hyperphosphorylation in these AD transgenic mice [186]. Another study involving Tg APPsw mice focused on the molecular mechanism of neuroprotective action of EGCG. EGCG was found to reduce Aβ-induced neurotoxicity by inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) activation and c-Ab/FE65 complex nuclear translocation in these transgenic mice [177]. In addition to transgenic mouse models of human AD pathology, toxin-induced models are also considered to be suitable for exploring the therapeutic treatments of NDs. The neuroprotective effects of EGCG have been reported in toxin-induced AD models such as Aβ-induced, LPS-induced, D-galactose (D-gal)-induced, streptozotocin-induced, and aluminum chloride (AlCl3)-induced AD models [13].
Two studies from the 2000s and early 2010s used the LPS-induced AD model with orally administered EGCG (1.5 or 3 mg/kg). They demonstrated that EGCG prevents apoptotic cell death by preventing elevated levels of Aβ via the inhibition of β- and γ-secretases. The findings also showed that EGCG prevents memory impairment and amyloidogenesis by inhibiting neuroinflammatory-related cytokines released from astrocytes [187,190].
The oral administration of EGCG (1.5 or 3 mg/kg) has also been shown to protect against Aβ-induced memory and coordination impairment in Aβ-induced AD rats, while intragastrical (i.g.) administration of EGCG (2 or 6 mg/kg) had potent neuroprotective effects on aging mice induced by D-gal, acting via antioxidative and antiapoptotic mechanisms [188,189]. Furthermore, additional evidence from toxin-induced models confirms the potential of EGCG to improve oxidative stress with streptozotocin-induced and AlCl3-induced models. These studies showed that EGCG can reduce oxidative stress in peripheral and brain tissue and that it may suppress behavioral changes related to toxin-induced cognitive deficits in these animal models [191,195].
The senescence-accelerated mouse prone (SAMP8), a spontaneous animal model of accelerated aging, has also been used in studies with EGCG. This animal model is considered a robust model for studying the pathology of sporadic AD [225]. Studies have demonstrated the ability of EGCG to attenuate cognitive deterioration and memory deficits in these mice via i.g administration of low (5 mg/kg) and high doses (15 mg/kg) [193,194].
EGCG administration was shown to upregulate the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and amplify the Bcl- 2/Bax ratio and an association was found between EGCG-induced reduction in Aβ accumulation and elevated neprilysin expression (the rate-limiting degradation enzyme of Aβ) [193]. In addition to upregulating neprilysin expression, EGCG was shown to inhibit BACE-1 activity and ameliorate abnormal synaptic protein levels in the frontal cortex and hippocampus in the SAMP8 mice model [194].
Returning to the transgenic mice model, in the late 2010s, studies with APP/PS1 mice provide additional evidence for the in vivo neuroprotective properties of EGCG. One study investigated the effect of EGCG on neuronal apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, revealing that EGCG treatment inhibited ER-stress-induced apoptosis in the cerebral cortex of APP/PS1 mice [196].
It has also been suggested that therapies combining EGCG and ferulic acid in aged APP/PS1 mice confer additional benefits over single treatments in terms of improving behavioral deficits, ameliorating cerebral amyloidosis, and reducing Aβ generation [197]. There is also evidence that dual-drug loaded nanoparticles of EGCG/ascorbic acid enhance the therapeutic efficacy of EGCG in APPswe/PS1 transgenic mice [198]. Recently, a study with a well-established preclinical mixed model of familial AD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using transgenic APP/PS1 mice fed with a high-fat diet revealed that EGCG improves cognitive deficits aggravated by an obesogenic diet through modulation of the unfolded protein response [199].
EGCG has also been widely studied in toxin-induced animal models of PD, including the classical 6-OHDA and MPTP, which are the two most extensively used neurotoxins for in vivo PD models [226]. The neuroprotective effect of EGCG on the MPTP-induced PD model was first reported in the early 2000s. Oral administration of EGCG (2 and 10 mg/kg), as well as green tea extract (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) containing high levels of EGCG, clearly alleviated dopamine neuron loss in the substantia nigra and TH protein level depletion [201]. In this model, the toxicity of MPTP is mediated by oxidative stress, especially by NO. Another study tested whether EGCG attenuates MPTP-induced PD in mice by inhibiting neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) expression. The outcomes revealed that both green tea extract and EGCG decreased expressions of nNOS in the substantia nigra [202].
In the 2010s, additional studies using the MPTP-induced PD model confirmed the neuroprotective effect of EGCG against MPTP neurotoxicity [204,205]. EGCG was shown to regulate the iron-export protein ferroportin in substantia nigra, reducing oxidative stress and exerting a neurorescue effect against MPTP-induced functional and neurochemical deficits in mice [204].
A 2018 study with an MPTP-induced mouse model of PD focused on the effects of EGCG on the peripheral immune system. The outcomes revealed that EGCG treatment protects dopaminergic neurons from MPTP-induced degeneration, restoring the movement behavior of these mice. In addition, EGCG inhibited the expression of neuroinflammatory cytokines and reversed the T cell dysfunction in the peripheral immune system of MPTP mice [205].
An in vivo study with a 6-OHDA-induced PD rat model showed that EGCG administered by gavage (10 mg/kg) reverts the striatal oxidative stress and immunohistochemistry alterations. Furthermore, EGCG treatment attenuated the behavioral changes, indicating neuroprotection manifested as decreased rotational behavior, increased locomotor activity, anti-depressive effects, and improvement of cognitive dysfunction [203].
Recently, another study with a PD rat model focused on the effects of EGCG on ROT-induced motor and neurochemical dysfunctions. This study demonstrated that the possible neuroprotective effects of EGCG (100 or 300 mg/kg i.p.) against ROT-induced motor and neurochemical dysfunctions in rats are associated with its antioxidant effects, prevention of mitochondrial dysfunction, prevention of neurochemical deficiency, anti-neuroinflammatory effects, and anti-apoptotic effects [207].
EGCG supplementation was recently shown to result in profound changes in gut microbial compositions in an invertebrate PD model, restoring the abundance of a set of bacteria [206]. The study with PTEN induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) mutant flies showed that EGCG ameliorates neuronal and behavioral defects by remodeling gut microbiota [206]. In PD animal models, gut microbiota regulates motor deficits and neuroinflammation [227]. Interestingly, emerging evidence suggests that EGCG remodels the architecture of human gut microbiota [228,229]. However, further studies are necessary to state that modulation of gut microbiota is related to EGCG’s mode of action.
Researchers are now convinced that gut bacteria may be involved in many NDs, and remodeling the gut microbiota to maintain their balance might be a novel therapeutic strategy [230,231]. Indeed, the most recent drug approved for AD was sodium oligomannate, whose mode of action is related to gut microbiota and neuroinflammation, highlighting the importance of the gut microbiome as a potential drug target for AD [53].
The wealth of evidence from studies with animal AD and PD models suggests that EGCG may be useful for treating AD and PD. However, the available evidence of EGCG neuroprotective effects is not just limited to studies with AD and PD animal models. EGCG has also demonstrated in vivo potential in preventing other NDs in studies published since the 2000s, including transgenic mouse models of ALS and FAP, a Drosophila model of HD, and a 3-nitropropionic acid-induced rat model of HD [25,208,209,210,211]. Taken together, these preclinical animal studies suggest that EGCG has considerable potential as a drug candidate for neurodegenerative drug discovery.

4.3. Evidence from Clinical Trials

The efficacy of EGCG has been demonstrated in preclinical models of NDs in the 2000s and 2010s; thus, it was approved for a clinical trial in 2019. To this end, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group phase III study was conducted in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), a rare ND characterized by aggregation of α-syn in oligodendrocytes and neurons, which shares neuropathological features with PD. However, this trial found that supplementation of EGCG did not affect MSA progression. The same study found that although EGCG was generally well tolerated, it was associated with hepatotoxic effects in some patients, thus doses of more than 1200 mg should not be used [232]. There are also reports that phase II clinical trials for AD (NCT00951834) and HD (NCT01357681) have been completed.
Given the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of NDs, antioxidant therapy for NDs has received considerable attention in recent years as a promising approach to delay or slow oxidative stress-induced neurodegeneration. Many antioxidants, including EGCG, have undergone clinical studies in recent years. Nevertheless, there are barriers to taking antioxidants from the preclinical stage to clinical settings, which are mainly related to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic constraints. Hence, despite promising outcomes in in vitro and in vivo assays, few to no positive results have been attained to date in clinical trials for any of the antioxidants investigated [233].
Researchers have assumed that the low bioavailability of EGCG was an important factor behind these inconsistencies. Indeed, it has been suggested that the therapeutic potential of EGCG is limited by its poor systemic absorption following oral administration, including low absorption, poor pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, scarce biodistribution, first-pass metabolism, trivial penetration, and low accumulation in the related tissues of the body, or low targeting efficacy. Furthermore, EGCG is unstable under physiologic conditions, and it can be rapidly degraded or metabolized due to interactions with the hydroxyl groups on the phenol rings. Intravenous administration of EGCG results in partial degradation before it reaches the target tissues [234].

5. EGCG Targeting Misfolded Aggregates in AD and PD

The in vitro effects of NPs that target protein misfolding have been widely studied by numerous independent research groups, combining biochemical and biophysical characterizations with imaging techniques and cell viability assays. These included transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), thioflavin (ThT) binding assay, dynamic light scattering (DLS), circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [125].
Multiple studies have shown the effectiveness of EGCG at inhibiting Aβ and α-syn aggregation and other proteins (Table 4). EGCG was first reported in 2006 by Dagmar E. Ehrnhoefer et al. as a modulator of early events in huntingtin misfolding, which changes the conformation of the huntingtin and prevents the formation of destructive protein-protein interactions [25].
Next, Ehrnhoefer et al. turned to investigate whether EGCG has the same effect in the fibrillogenesis of other aggregation-prone ‘natively unfolded’ polypeptides such as Aβ and α-syn. They were able to show that EGCG effectively inhibited the fibrillogenesis of both α-syn and Aβ by directly binding to the natively unfolded polypeptides, which can also prevent their conversion into toxic, on-pathway aggregation intermediates. This suggests that EGCG recognizes unfolded polypeptides and directly binds to the main chain common to all proteins [26].
This discovery suggests that EGCG could potentially be a candidate for developing a common pharmacological therapy for NDs and protein misfolding and amyloid diseases in general. Since these findings became known, many studies postulated that EGCG can reduce the neurotoxicity of misfolded proteins related to numerous NDs. Most studies in this area have been focused on Aβ and α-syn aggregation and toxicity (Table 4).
In the early 2010s, after findings demonstrated that EGCG redirects amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers, researchers investigated whether EGCG disassembles preformed amyloid fibrils. The results revealed that the EGCG treatment of amyloid fibrils does not reverse the amyloid formation process but rather directly converts fibrillar species into benign protein aggregates, suggesting that EGCG is a potent remodeling agent of mature amyloid fibrils [148].
Researchers found that EGCG binds to preformed Aβ and α-syn amyloid fibrils and oligomers and directly alters their morphology, as confirmed by biochemical, biophysical, and cell-based assays, providing experimental evidence that EGCG directly binds to β-sheet-rich aggregates, mediating a conformational change without disassembling them into monomers or small diffusible oligomers [148]. It was proposed that a compound-mediated reorientation of bonds between ordered protein molecules in the polymer might be responsible for amyloid remodeling and the appearance of unordered, amorphous protein aggregates.
On the other hand, another study has suggested that EGCG can robustly disaggregate pre-formed oligomers and has a potent dose-dependent inhibitory activity on α-syn aggregation. This study used confocal single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy to characterize the effects on α-syn oligomer formation of 14 phenolic compounds and black tea extract, including EGCG. The structure-activity analysis concluded that the presence of three vicinal groups on a single phenyl ring, which has been observed in compounds as EGCG, can be an important molecular feature for more effective in inhibiting and destabilizing self-assembly by α-syn [212].
Concerning the chemical mechanisms of EGCG–Aβ interactions, one study showed that EGCG interferes with the aromatic hydrophobic core of Aβ, forming nontoxic Aβ oligomers. Using magic angle spinning solid-state NMR investigations, researchers demonstrated that the nontoxic aggregates formed in the presence of EGCG are well structured, with a characteristic hairpin structure commonly observed for Aβ fibrils and oligomers [128].
A study aimed at understanding the molecular mechanism by which EGCG remodels mature amyloid fibrils was published in 2013 and showed that EGCG amyloid remodeling activity in vitro is dependent on auto-oxidation of the EGCG [213]. EGCG can self-oxidize, affording a complex mixture of monomeric and polymeric EGCG-based quinones, and auto-oxidation has been considered one of the major reactions causing the in vitro instability of EGCG [235].
Researchers have suggested that the molecular mechanism by which EGCG remodels mature amyloid fibrils may be partially due to hydrophobic binding and Schiff base formation with lysine residues of proteins. It was hypothesized that aberrant post-translational modifications mediated by EGCG treatment could occur concomitantly with the hydrophobic remodeling process that seems to be the main driver for EGCG amyloid remodeling. Finally, the primary hydrophobic binding mechanism suggested for amyloid remodeling by EGCG and, more likely, its oxidation products may also explain the ability of EGCG to prevent the fibrillar aggregation of monomeric amyloidogenic proteins, perhaps by binding to and making oligomeric seeds less kinetically competent [213].
Additionally, another study from 2013 noted that oxidized EGCG can be useful to fabricate drug delivery microparticles from naturally reproducible and edible green tea [236]. More recently, it was demonstrated that green tea polyphenol microparticles based on the oxidative coupling of EGCG inhibit amyloid aggregation/cytotoxicity of the protein α-syn and serve as a platform for drug delivery [219]. The study proposed using EGCG microparticles as a possible bifunctional strategy, blocking amyloidogenesis directly and carrying a molecule that can act synergistically to potentiate the anti-amyloidogenic effect [219].
In 2014, a study that combined NMR spectroscopy, TEM, and CD characterized the interaction of green tea catechins (epicatechin, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and EGCG) with toxic oligomers in detail. The flavan-3-ol unit of catechins was shown to be essential for EGCG–Aβ interactions. In addition, similar experiments still demonstrated that the same flavan-3-ol unit is also essential for the interaction with oligomers of PrP [214].
The effect of EGCG on tau aggregation has also been reported. This effect was characterized in a study conducted in 2015, which combined cell-free aggregation and a cell-based assay, and found that EGCG could be a potent inhibitor of tau aggregation and toxicity, preventing the aggregation of tau protein into toxic oligomers at substoichiometric ratios [150]. More recently, a study with various biophysical and biochemical analyses suggested a possible dual effect of EGCG on aggregation inhibition and disassembly of full-length tau and their binding affinity [28].
Returning to studies of α-syn oligomers, it has been proposed that the EGCG’s mechanism of action to inhibit the formation and block the toxicity of oligomers is related to EGCG affecting the degree of binding of α-syn oligomers to membranes, resulting in the reduction (but not complete elimination) of the oligomer’s affinity for cell membranes. According to in vitro assays, this does not affect oligomer size distribution or secondary structure. The data demonstrated that EGCG immobilizes the C-terminal region and moderately reduces the binding degree of oligomers to membranes [149].
As a matter of fact, it has been recognized that EGCG does not inhibit α-syn fibril formation but rather exerts protection against α-syn cytotoxicity, both by enriching the population of nontoxic off-pathway oligomers as well as by promoting the conversion of toxic oligomers into the less toxic fibril (Figure 4). This might be attributed to EGCG binding to on-pathway oligomers and accelerating their conversion to fibrils so that the effective population of toxic oligomeric intermediates can be reduced [131].
In this regard, a 2017 study by Yang et al. provided convincing evidence that EGCG does not inhibit α-syn fibrillation but actually facilitates it, contradicting previous reports that EGCG acts as a remodeling agent favoring the production of small amorphous protein aggregates from mature fibrils [26,131]. A sample of co-incubated mixture of α-syn with EGCG completely diminished the fluorescence signal in a ThT binding assay, indicating a possible full inhibition of amyloid formation. Morphologically altered fibrils which appeared slightly curly compared to the straight fibrils obtained in the same fibrillation conditions but in the absence of EGCG were observed. The authors thus suggested that the ThT binding assay is inappropriate to evaluate the ‘inhibitory’ effect of EGCG on α-syn fibrillation [131].
In fact, although ThT is a gold standard probe to detect amyloid fibrils in vitro, it has been recommended caution to test polyphenols using the ThT binding assay since some critical limitations have been reported such as background signal and competitive binding with the extrinsic probe. This method needs to be validated by other techniques to confirm that the significant decrease in ThT fluorescence observed in the presence of the evaluated compound is related to an inhibitory effect on amyloid fibrillation or rather by compound displacement by ThT [237,238,239,240].
It should be mentioned that the reduction in ThT emission in the presence of EGCG might result from the competition of this compound with ThT for amyloid fibrils binding sites [237,238]. Recently, pentameric thiophene fluorescence was proposed as an alternative probe to monitor the aggregation kinetics in the presence of EGCG [240]. According to the study by Yang et al., it is pertinent to consider that EGCG induces two types of α-syn oligomers. The TEM and AFM findings revealed that EGCG-treated α-syn not only produces the off-pathway compact oligomers but also produced amyloid fibrils formed by the conversion of on-pathway toxic oligomers into fibrils. This supports the hypothesis that EGCG acts to facilitate the conversion of on-pathway oligomers into amyloid fibrils, suppressing this population of toxic oligomers [131].
In a recent study, researchers confirmed that EGCG can accelerate α-syn amyloid fibril formation by facilitating its heterogeneous primary nucleation. This work showed that the aggregation conditions define whether EGCG is an inhibitor or enhancer of α-syn amyloid fibril formation, since the inhibitory action is not robust against various physiologically relevant changes in experimental conditions [241].
Taken together, these last findings suggest that EGCG can exert its neuroprotective effect against α-syn-induced cytotoxicity by modifying the aggregation pathway toward the formation of nontoxic aggregates and ameliorating oligomer-induced toxicity, possibly through reducing the extent of cell membrane permeabilization induced by toxic aggregates [131,149].
In another study published in 2017, the effects of EGCG on the fibrillation and disaggregation of α-syn at a molecular level were assessed by using chemical, biochemical, and cell-based methods like ThT binding assay, NMR, microscopy, and MTT. These studies indicated that EGCG binding to Leu, His, Phe, and Tyr aminoacid residues inhibits the conformational transition of α-syn to β-sheet-enriched conformers and also disaggregates the amyloid fibrils of α-syn in a dose-dependent manner [151].
Additionally, in 2017, a study compared the effect of EGCG on α-syn aggregation to other three inhibitors (dopamine, amphotericin-B, and quinacrine dihydrochloride). The experiment conducted in this study revealed that, at high concentrations, EGCG slows down fibrillization kinetics. EGCG was also able to reduce the toxicity of α-syn aggregates in a concentration-dependent manner. The morphological study of nontoxic aggregates formed in the presence of EGCG showed a smaller fibrillar size. Researchers proposed that the decrease in cytotoxicity of α-syn aggregates in the presence of a higher concentration of EGCG can be attributed to its ability to reduce the exposure of a hydrophobic surface, as shown in 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) binding studies [215].
Interestingly, the ANS binding assay has already provided valuable insights into the role of exposure of hydrophobic surfaces as a result of the aggregation of misfolded species, which is a crucial and common feature of these pathogenic species [242]. It is now known that the exposure of hydrophobic groups on the oligomer surface appears to be a major determinant of oligomer-mediated toxicity. A range of proteins, oligomeric species of similar sizes and morphologies but with very different toxicities, have been isolated and shown to differ in their solvent-exposed hydrophobicity [243].
There is also strong evidence that Aβ toxicity is regulated by the solvent exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. Meanwhile, the exposure of hydrophobic surfaces is the decisive factor for toxicity rather than the presence of β-sheets. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that exposure to these toxic surfaces facilitates interactions with multiple cellular components, including membranes, which underlie key pathogenic steps in AD progression [244,245].
Since the exposure of hydrophobic surfaces seems to remodel misfolded protein aggregation, recent studies reported that the mechanism of action of EGCG against protein misfolding is directly related to the regulation of the solvent exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. EGCG, therefore, reduces the toxicity of misfolded aggregates by binding to preformed oligomers and fibrils and altering their hydrophobic surface exposure [216,217].
Ahmed et al., in 2017, elucidated how EGCG remodels Aβ oligomers using 15N and 1H dark-state exchange saturation transfer (DEST), relaxation, and chemical shift projection NMR analyses with fluorescence, DLS, and electron microscopy. The experimental findings suggested that the mechanism of amyloid inhibition of EGCG is driven by the preferential binding to Aβ oligomers [216]. The solution NMR studies concluded that EGCG can bind weakly to Aβ monomers while it displays a higher affinity toward oligomers. It is speculated that the Aβ40 oligomers become less exposed to solvent upon binding to EGCG, and the β-regions, which are involved in direct monomer−protofibril contacts in the absence of EGCG, undergo a direct-to-tethered contact shift [216].
To gain further insight on the structural determinants of Aβ toxicity, Ahmed et al. investigated Aβ oligomers with different toxicity degrees generated in the absence or presence of a catechin library that included EGCG and six EGCG analogs. By combining cell toxicity assays, electron microscopy, NMR spectroscopy, DLS, wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and fluorescence assays, the comparative analysis identified a cluster of key toxicity determinants and the associated mechanism of action, which includes exposure of a hydrophobic surface spanning residues 17–28 and the concurrent shielding of the highly charged N-terminus [217].
The study findings indicated that toxic Aβ assemblies (Aβn) exhibit solvent-exposed hydrophobic sites accessible to ANS binding, while EGCG-remodeled Aβ aggregates are less toxic and have fewer exposed hydrophobic sites. These exposed hydrophobic surfaces facilitate the colocalization, interaction, and subsequent insertion of Aβ assemblies into the membrane. These findings indicate that Aβn toxicity is regulated by the solvent exposure of hydrophobic surfaces [217].
Up to this point of our discussion, all the in vitro evidence strongly suggests that EGCG targets protein misfolding, indicating a potential therapeutic for NDs. However, it is important to recognize that all cited studies have analyzed amyloid fibrils and other aggregates that are formed from chemically synthetic or recombinantly expressed peptides or proteins in vitro, and in vitro amyloid fibril structures may differ profoundly from ex vivo amyloid fibril structures [246,247]. It is unclear whether the assays using protein structures that may not represent the in vivo amyloid structure can truly explain how EGCG acts against protein misfolding in vivo.

6. Conclusions

A considerable body of evidence that supports the use of EGCG for ND therapy has become available over the past two decades. The potential effects of EGCG in NDs are now well described and proven by a range of experimental in vitro and in vivo assays discussed in this review. However, despite extensive evidence from in vitro and in vivo models of AD, PD, and other NDs suggesting that EGCG is a promising drug candidate for ND treatment, clinical evidence on its anti-neurodegenerative effects does not yet exist. In a clinical trial phase III with MSA patients, no effect on disease progression was found, while some patients showed hepatotoxic effects [232].
Some authors have suggested that the inconsistency between the evidence from preclinical stages and clinical trials in humans might be attributed to catechins, like EGCG having poor pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability, limiting their effectiveness as drug leads. However, this could be improved through new techniques such as nanoparticle-based delivery systems, structurally modified molecules of catechins, or co-administration with other drugs or bioactive compounds [234].
The ability of a small molecule to reduce the toxicity of oligomeric species has been shown to represent a promising therapeutic strategy against NDs. EGCG has been shown to significantly reduce the cell toxicity of several amyloid aggregates by binding to preformed oligomers and fibrils and altering their hydrophobic surface exposure. These findings suggest that the use of EGCG could, therefore, be viewed as common drug therapy for many NDs targeting protein misfolding, a common feature of numerous NDs.
It is also important to note that the studies of the mechanisms by which EGCG combats neurodegeneration have already provided significant advances in our knowledge of the mechanisms of protein misfolding toxicity. Furthermore, EGCG and other green tea catechins have been recognized as valuable tools for identifying the drivers of amyloid aggregation and developing other aggregation modulators through structural mimicry [16].
Notably, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the interactions between small molecules and a misfolded protein may have a prominent role in rational drug design and the development of new therapeutic strategies for NDs. The ultimate message that emerges is that, although current EGCG research has limited impact on clinical practice, it has provided strong evidence and testable hypotheses to contribute to clinical advances and neurodegenerative disease drug discovery.

Author Contributions

P.B.G. conceived the topic, conceptualized design, and wrote the manuscript. A.C.R.S. and Y.C. reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the design of the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This work was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq); National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES) Finance code 001; and Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.


The authors acknowledge Lucas Machado Ascari and Mariana J. do Amaral for providing helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


  1. Dorsey, E.R.; Elbaz, A.; Nichols, E.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Adsuar, J.C.; Ansha, M.G.; Brayne, C.; Choi, J.Y.J.; Collado-Mateo, D.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  2. Nichols, E.; Szoeke, C.E.I.; Vollset, S.E.; Abbasi, N.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Aichour, M.T.E.; Akinyemi, R.O.; Alahdab, F.; Asgedom, S.W.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020, 16, 391–460. [CrossRef]
  4. Yacoubian, T.A. Neurodegenerative Disorders: Why Do We Need New Therapies? Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; ISBN 9780128028117. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gribkoff, V.K.; Kaczmarek, L.K. The need for new approaches in CNS drug discovery: Why drugs have failed, and what can be done to improve outcomes. Neuropharmacology 2017, 120, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Koeberle, A.; Werz, O. Multi-target approach for natural products in inflammation. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 1871–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ho, T.T.; Tran, Q.T.; Chai, C.L. The polypharmacology of natural products. Future Med. Chem. 2018, 10, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gonçalves, P.B.; Romeiro, N.C. Multi-target natural products as alternatives against oxidative stress in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 163, 911–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martins, M.; Silva, R.; Pinto, M.M.M.; Sousa, E. Marine natural products, multitarget therapy and repurposed agents in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Singh, N.A.; Mandal, A.K.A.; Khan, Z.A. Potential neuroprotective properties of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG). Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Cascella, M.; Bimonte, S.; Muzio, M.R.; Schiavone, V.; Cuomo, A. The efficacy of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (green tea) in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: An overview of pre-clinical studies and translational perspectives in clinical practice. Infect. Agent. Cancer 2017, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chowdhury, A.; Sarkar, J.; Chakraborti, T.; Pramanik, P.K.; Chakraborti, S. Protective role of epigallocatechin-3-gallate in health and disease: A perspective. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 78, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, S.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, J.Y.; OuYang, D.; Lu, J.H. The pharmacological activity of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on Alzheimer’s disease animal model: A systematic review. Phytomedicine 2020, 79, 153316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vadakkan, K.I. Neurodegenerative disorders share common features of “loss of function” states of a proposed mechanism of nervous system functions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 83, 412–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dugger, B.N.; Dickson, D.W. Pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pomier, K.M.; Ahmed, R.; Melacini, G. Catechins as tools to understand the molecular basis of neurodegeneration. Molecules 2020, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sweeney, P.; Park, H.; Baumann, M.; Dunlop, J.; Frydman, J.; Kopito, R.; McCampbell, A.; Leblanc, G.; Venkateswaran, A.; Nurmi, A.; et al. Protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: Implications and strategies. Transl. Neurodegener. 2017, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  18. Iadanza, M.G.; Jackson, M.P.; Hewitt, E.W.; Ranson, N.A.; Radford, S.E. A new era for understanding amyloid structures and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 755–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Scannevin, R.H. Therapeutic strategies for targeting neurodegenerative protein misfolding disorders. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2018, 44, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zaman, M.; Wahiduzzaman; Khan, A.N.; Zakariya, S.M.; Khan, R.H. Protein misfolding, aggregation and mechanism of amyloid cytotoxicity: An overview and therapeutic strategies to inhibit aggregation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 1022–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Soto, C.; Pritzkow, S. Protein misfolding, aggregation, and conformational strains in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lázaro, D.F.; Bellucci, A.; Brundin, P.; Outeiro, T.F. Editorial: Protein Misfolding and Spreading Pathology in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 12, 2019–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Ritchie, D.L.; Barria, M.A. Prion diseases: A unique transmissible agent or a model for neurodegenerative diseases? Biomolecules 2021, 11, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Soto, C. Unfolding the role of protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ehrnhoefer, D.E.; Duennwald, M.; Markovic, P.; Wacker, J.L.; Engemann, S.; Roark, M.; Legleiter, J.; Marsh, J.L.; Thompson, L.M.; Lindquist, S.; et al. Green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-gallate modulates early events in huntingtin misfolding and reduces toxicity in Huntington’s disease models. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 2743–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ehrnhoefer, D.E.; Bieschke, J.; Boeddrich, A.; Herbst, M.; Masino, L.; Lurz, R.; Engemann, S.; Pastore, A.; Wanker, E.E. EGCG redirects amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferreira, N.; Cardoso, I.; Domingues, M.R.; Vitorino, R.; Bastos, M.; Bai, G.; Saraiva, M.J.; Almeida, M.R. Binding of epigallocatechin-3-gallate to transthyretin modulates its amyloidogenicity. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3569–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Sonawane, S.K.; Chidambaram, H.; Boral, D.; Gorantla, N.V.; Balmik, A.A.; Dangi, A.; Ramasamy, S.; Marelli, U.K.; Chinnathambi, S. EGCG impedes human Tau aggregation and interacts with Tau. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erkkinen, M.G.; Kim, M.O.; Geschwind, M.D. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Vaupel, J.W. Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 2010, 464, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Beard, J.R.; Officer, A.; De Carvalho, I.A.; Sadana, R.; Pot, A.M.; Michel, J.P.; Lloyd-Sherlock, P.; Epping-Jordan, J.E.; Peeters, G.M.E.E.; Mahanani, W.R.; et al. The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016, 387, 2145–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Hou, Y.; Dan, X.; Babbar, M.; Wei, Y.; Hasselbalch, S.G.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sami, N.; Rahman, S.; Kumar, V.; Zaidi, S.; Islam, A.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, F.; Hassan, M.I. Protein aggregation, misfolding and consequential human neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Neurosci. 2017, 127, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mroczko, B.; Groblewska, M.; Litman-Zawadzka, A. The role of protein misfolding and tau oligomers (TauOs) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  35. Mehra, S.; Sahay, S.; Maji, S.K. α-Synuclein misfolding and aggregation: Implications in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Proteins Proteomics 2019, 1867, 890–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prasad, A.; Bharathi, V.; Sivalingam, V.; Girdhar, A.; Patel, B.K. Molecular mechanisms of TDP-43 misfolding and pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Scheckel, C.; Aguzzi, A. Prions, prionoids and protein misfolding disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Liu, Z.; Zhou, T.; Ziegler, A.C.; Dimitrion, P.; Zuo, L. Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative stress: A key modulator in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Cenini, G.; Lloret, A.; Cascella, R. Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases: From a mitochondrial point of viewCenini, G., Lloret, A.; Cascella, R. Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases: From a mitochondrial point of view. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. Guzman-Martinez, L.; Maccioni, R.B.; Andrade, V.; Navarrete, L.P.; Pastor, M.G.; Ramos-Escobar, N. Neuroinflammation as a common feature of neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Liu, Z.; Zhang, A.; Sun, H.; Han, Y.; Kong, L.; Wang, X. Two decades of new drug discovery and development for Alzheimer’s disease. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 6046–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Gabr, M.T.; Yahiaoui, S. Multitarget Therapeutics for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomed Res. Int. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ramsay, R.R.; Popovic-Nikolic, M.R.; Nikolic, K.; Uliassi, E.; Bolognesi, M.L. A perspective on multi-target drug discovery and design for complex diseases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  45. Benchekroun, M.; Maramai, S. Multitarget-directed ligands for neurodegenerative diseases: Real opportunity or blurry mirage? Future Med. Chem. 2019, 11, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  46. Maramai, S.; Benchekroun, M.; Gabr, M.T.; Yahiaoui, S. Multitarget Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease: Review on Emerging Target Combinations. Biomed Res. Int. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rossi, M.; Freschi, M.; Nascente, L.D.C.; Salerno, A.; de Melo, S.; Teixeira, V.; Nachon, F.; Chantegreil, F.; Soukup, O.; Malaguti, M.; et al. Sustainable Drug Discovery of Multi-Target-Directed Ligands for Alzheimer ’ s Disease. J. Med. Chem. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. World Health Organization WHO - The top 10 causes of death. Available online: (accessed on 6 January 2021).
  49. Du, X.; Wang, X.; Geng, M. Alzheimer’s disease hypothesis and related therapies. Transl. Neurodegener. 2018, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  50. Cummings, J.; Lee, G.; Ritter, A.; Sabbagh, M.; Zhong, K. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2020. Alzheimer’s Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 2020, 6, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fish, P.V.; Steadman, D.; Bayle, E.D.; Whiting, P. New approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.; Sun, G.; Feng, T.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Wang, T.; Xie, Z.; Chu, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; et al. Sodium oligomannate therapeutically remodels gut microbiota and suppresses gut bacterial amino acids-shaped neuroinflammation to inhibit Alzheimer’s disease progression. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 787–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Syed, Y.Y. Sodium Oligomannate: First Approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Masters, C.L.; Bateman, R.; Blennow, K.; Rowe, C.C.; Sperling, R.A.; Cummings, J.L. Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2015, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lane, C.A.; Hardy, J.; Schott, J.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bloom, G.S. Amyloid-β and tau: The trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Busche, M.A.; Hyman, B.T. Synergy between amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 1183–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grundke-Iqbal, I.; Iqbal, K.; Tung, Y.C. Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein τ (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 44913–44917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  59. Goedert, M. Tau protein and the neurofibrillary pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 1993, 16, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Takahashi, R.H.; Nagao, T.; Gouras, G.K. Plaque formation and the intraneuronal accumulation of β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Pathol. Int. 2017, 67, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Reiss, A.B.; Arain, H.A.; Stecker, M.M.; Siegart, N.M.; Kasselman, L.J. Amyloid toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 29, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hardy, J.A.; Higgins, G.A.; Hardy, J.A.; Higgins, G.A. Alzheimer ’ s Disease: The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Alzheimer ’ s Disease: The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis. Science 1992, 256, 184–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bejanin, A.; Schonhaut, D.R.; La Joie, R.; Kramer, J.H.; Baker, S.L.; Sosa, N.; Ayakta, N.; Cantwell, A.; Janabi, M.; Lauriola, M.; et al. Tau pathology and neurodegeneration contribute to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2017, 140, 3286–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  64. Mullard, A. BACE failures lower AD expectations, again. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mullard, A. News in Brief: Innovative antidepressants arrive; Anti-amyloid failures stack up as Alzheimer antibody flops. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  66. Panza, F.; Lozupone, M.; Logroscino, G.; Imbimbo, B.P. A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guerrero-Muñoz, M.J.; Castillo-Carranza, D.L.; Kayed, R. Therapeutic approaches against common structural features of toxic oligomers shared by multiple amyloidogenic proteins. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 88, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Imbimbo, B.P.; Ippati, S.; Watling, M. Should drug discovery scientists still embrace the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease or should they be looking elsewhere? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kreiser, R.P.; Wright, A.K.; Block, N.R.; Hollows, J.E.; Nguyen, L.T.; Leforte, K.; Mannini, B.; Vendruscolo, M.; Limbocker, R. Therapeutic strategies to reduce the toxicity of misfolded protein oligomers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ferreira, S.T.; Lourenco, M.V.; Oliveira, M.M.; De Felice, F.G. Soluble amyloid-β oligomers as synaptotoxins leading to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  71. Batista, A.F.; Rody, T.; Forny-Germano, L.; Cerdeiro, S.; Bellio, M.; Ferreira, S.T.; Munoz, D.P.; De Felice, F.G. Interleukin-1β mediates alterations in mitochondrial fusion/fission proteins and memory impairment induced by amyloid-β oligomers. J. Neuroinflammation 2021, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Feigin, V.L.; Nichols, E.; Alam, T.; Bannick, M.S.; Beghi, E.; Blake, N.; Culpepper, W.J.; Dorsey, E.R.; Elbaz, A.; Ellenbogen, R.G.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 459–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  73. Dickson, D.W. Neuropathology of Parkinson disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2018, 46, S30–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Betarbet, R.; Sherer, T.B.; MacKenzie, G.; Garcia-Osuna, M.; Panov, A.V.; Greenamyre, J.T. Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3, 1301–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lee, H.; Myung, W.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, S.E.; Kim, C.T.; Kim, H. Short-term air pollution exposure aggravates Parkinson’s disease in a population-based cohort. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  76. Ahmed, H.; Abushouk, A.I.; Gabr, M.; Negida, A.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Parkinson’s disease and pesticides: A meta-analysis of disease connection and genetic alterations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 90, 638–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kasdagli, M.I.; Katsouyanni, K.; Dimakopoulou, K.; Samoli, E. Air pollution and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis up to 2018. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Surmeier, D.J. Determinants of dopaminergic neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 3657–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  79. Emamzadeh, F.N.; Surguchov, A. Parkinson’s disease: Biomarkers, treatment, and risk factors. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Draoui, A.; El Hiba, O.; Aimrane, A.; El Khiat, A.; Gamrani, H. Parkinson’s disease: From bench to bedside. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 176, 543–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Charvin, D.; Medori, R.; Hauser, R.A.; Rascol, O. Therapeutic strategies for Parkinson disease: Beyond dopaminergic drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 804–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fahn, S. The 200-year journey of Parkinson disease: Reflecting on the past and looking towards the future. Park. Relat. Disord. 2018, 46, S1–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Williams-Gray, C.H.; Worth, P.F. Parkinson’s disease. Medicine 2020, 48, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. McFarthing, K.; Buff, S.; Rafaloff, G.; Dominey, T.; Wyse, R.K.; Stott, S.R.W. Parkinson’s Disease Drug Therapies in the Clinical Trial Pipeline: 2020. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2020, 10, 757–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gibb, W.R.; Lees, A.J. The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1988, 51, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  86. Spillantini, M.G.; Schmidt, M.L.; Lee, V.M.Y.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Jakes, R.; Goedert, M. a -Synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 1997, 388, 839–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Spillantini, M.G.; Crowther, R.A.; Jakes, R.; Hasegawa, M.; Goedert, M. α-Synuclein in filamentous inclusions of Lewy bodies from Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 6469–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  88. Meade, R.M.; Fairlie, D.P.; Mason, J.M. Alpha-synuclein structure and Parkinson’s disease - Lessons and emerging principles. Mol. Neurodegener. 2019, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  89. Mahul-Mellier, A.L.; Burtscher, J.; Maharjan, N.; Weerens, L.; Croisier, M.; Kuttler, F.; Leleu, M.; Knott, G.W.; Lashuel, H.A. The process of Lewy body formation, rather than simply α-synuclein fibrillization, is one of the major drivers of neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4971–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  90. Du, X.Y.; Xie, X.X.; Liu, R.T. The role of α-synuclein oligomers in parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Boi, L.; Pisanu, A.; Palmas, M.F.; Fusco, G.; Carboni, E.; Casu, M.A.; Satta, V.; Scherma, M.; Janda, E.; Mocci, I.; et al. Modeling Parkinson’s disease neuropathology and symptoms by intranigral inoculation of preformed human α-synuclein oligomers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Danon, J.J.; Reekie, T.A.; Kassiou, M. Challenges and Opportunities in Central Nervous System Drug Discovery. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mallucci, G.R.; Klenerman, D.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Developing Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders: Insights from Protein Aggregation and Cellular Stress Responses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 36, 165–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Imbimbo, B.P.; Ippati, S.; Watling, M.; Balducci, C.; Imbimbo, B.P.; Ippati, S.; Watling, M.; Balducci, C.; Imbimbo, B.P.; Ippati, S.; et al. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Accelerating Alzheimer ’ s disease drug discovery and development: What ’ s the way forward ? Accelerating Alzheimer ’ s disease drug discovery and development: What ’ s the way. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gong, C.X.; Liu, F.; Iqbal, K. Multifactorial Hypothesis and Multi-Targets for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 64, S107–S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cheong, S.L.; Federico, S.; Spalluto, G.; Klotz, K.N.; Pastorin, G. The current status of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: Transition from single-target to multitarget therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 1769–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Albertini, C.; Salerno, A.; de Sena, P.; Pinheiro, M.; Bolognesi, M.L. From combinations to multitarget-directed ligands: A continuum in Alzheimer ’ s disease polypharmacology. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khan, A.; Jahan, S.; Imtiyaz, Z.; Alshahrani, S.; Makeen, H.A.; Alshehri, B.M.; Kumar, A.; Arafah, A.; Rehman, M.U. Neuroprotection: Targeting multiple pathways by naturally occurring phytochemicals. Biomedicines 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Romano, B.; Lucariello, G.; Capasso, R. Topical Collection “Pharmacology of Medicinal Plants”. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Solanki, I.; Parihar, P.; Parihar, M.S. Neurodegenerative diseases: From available treatments to prospective herbal therapy. Neurochem. Int. 2016, 95, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Akram, M.; Nawaz, A. Effects of medicinal plants on Alzheimer’s disease and memory deficits. Neural Regen. Res. 2017, 12, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Srivastav, S.; Fatima, M.; Mondal, A.C. Important medicinal herbs in Parkinson’s disease pharmacotherapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 92, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Javed, H.; Nagoor Meeran, M.F.; Azimullah, S.; Adem, A.; Sadek, B.; Ojha, S.K. Plant Extracts and Phytochemicals Targeting α-Synuclein Aggregation in Parkinson’s Disease Models. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 9, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  104. Rabiei, Z.; Solati, K.; Amini-Khoei, H. Phytotherapy in treatment of Parkinson’s disease: A review. Pharm. Biol. 2019, 57, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  105. Gregory, J.; Vengalasetti, Y.V.; Bredesen, D.E.; Rao, R.V. Neuroprotective herbs for the management of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Lankatillake, C.; Dias, D.A.; Docea, A.O.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Lobine, D.; Chazot, P.L.; Kurt, B.; Boyunegmez Tumer, T.; Catarina Moreira, A.; et al. Impact of Natural Compounds on Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Preclinical to Pharmacotherapeutics. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  108. Pohl, F.; Lin, P.K.T. The potential use of plant natural products and plant extracts with antioxidant properties for the prevention/treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: In vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. Molecules 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  109. Cardoso, S.M. Special issue: The antioxidant capacities of natural products. Molecules 2019, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  110. Thapa, A.; Carroll, N.J. Dietary modulation of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  111. Pogačnik, L.; Ota, A.; Poklar Ulrih, N. An Overview of Crucial Dietary Substances and Their Modes of Action for Prevention of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cells 2020, 9, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  112. Hano, C.; Tungmunnithum, D. Plant Polyphenols, More than Just Simple Natural Antioxidants: Oxidative Stress, Aging and Age-Related Diseases. Medicines 2020, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Viegas, C.; Fraga, C.A.M.; Sousa, M.E.; Tarozzi, A. Editorial: Oxidative Stress: How Has It Been Considered in the Design of New Drug Candidates for Neurodegenerative Diseases? Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bhullar, K.S.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. Polyphenols: Multipotent therapeutic agents in neurodegenerative diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  115. Devi, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S.K.; Dubey, A.K.; Kim, J.J. Flavonoids: Potential candidates for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Peluso, I.; Serafini, M. Antioxidants from black and green tea: From dietary modulation of oxidative stress to pharmacological mechanisms. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1195–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  117. Pervin, M.; Unno, K.; Ohishi, T.; Tanabe, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Nakamura, Y. Beneficial Effects of Green Tea Catechins on Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2018, 23, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  118. Guest, J.; Grant, R. The Benefits of Natural Products for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Advances in Neurobiology; Essa, M.M., Akbar, M., Guillemin, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 12, ISBN 978-3-319-28381-4. [Google Scholar]
  119. Di Paolo, M.; Papi, L.; Gori, F.; Turillazzi, E. Natural products in neurodegenerative diseases: A great promise but an ethical challenge. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  120. Maher, P. The potential of flavonoids for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  121. Uddin, M.S.; Kabir, M.T.; Niaz, K.; Jeandet, P.; Clément, C.; Mathew, B.; Rauf, A.; Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Ashraf, G.M.; et al. Molecular Insight into the Therapeutic Promise of Flavonoids against Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules 2020, 25, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  122. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; Orhan, I.E.; Banach, M.; Rollinger, J.M.; Barreca, D.; Weckwerth, W.; Bauer, R.; Bayer, E.A.; et al. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mohd Sairazi, N.S.; Sirajudeen, K.N.S. Natural Products and Their Bioactive Compounds: Neuroprotective Potentials against Neurodegenerative Diseases. Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dhouafli, Z.; Cuanalo-Contreras, K.; Hayouni, E.A.; Mays, C.E.; Soto, C.; Moreno-Gonzalez, I. Inhibition of protein misfolding and aggregation by natural phenolic compounds. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 3521–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Henríquez, G.; Gomez, A.; Guerrero, E.; Narayan, M. Potential Role of Natural Polyphenols against Protein Aggregation Toxicity: In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Studies. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 2915–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Fukutomi, R.; Ohishi, T.; Koyama, Y.; Pervin, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Isemura, M. Beneficial Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate, Chlorogenic Acid, Resveratrol, and Curcumin on Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2021, 26, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Feng, Y.; Wang, X.P.; Yang, S.G.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, X.; Du, X.T.; Sun, X.X.; Zhao, M.; Huang, L.; Liu, R.T. Resveratrol inhibits beta-amyloid oligomeric cytotoxicity but does not prevent oligomer formation. Neurotoxicology 2009, 30, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Lopez Del Amo, J.M.; Fink, U.; Dasari, M.; Grelle, G.; Wanker, E.E.; Bieschke, J.; Reif, B. Structural properties of EGCG-induced, nontoxic Alzheimer’s disease Aβ oligomers. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 421, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Singh, P.K.; Kotia, V.; Ghosh, D.; Mohite, G.M.; Kumar, A.; Maji, S.K. Curcumin modulates α-synuclein aggregation and toxicity. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  130. Thapa, A.; Jett, S.D.; Chi, E.Y. Curcumin Attenuates Amyloid-β Aggregate Toxicity and Modulates Amyloid-β Aggregation Pathway. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yang, J.E.; Rhoo, K.Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.T.; Park, J.H.; Bhak, G.; Paik, S.R. EGCG-mediated Protection of the Membrane Disruption and Cytotoxicity Caused by the “Active Oligomer” of α-Synuclein. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  132. Terry, C. Insights from nature: A review of natural compounds that target protein misfolding in vivo. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2020, 2, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bemporad, F.; Chiti, F. Protein misfolded oligomers: Experimental approaches, mechanism of formation, and structure-toxicity relationships. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  134. Lim, K.H. Diverse misfolded conformational strains and cross-seeding of misfolded proteins implicated in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Jucker, M.; Walker, L.C. Propagation and spread of pathogenic protein assemblies in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Peng, C.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M.Y. Protein transmission in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cerdà-Costa, N.; Esteras-Chopo, A.; Avilés, F.X.; Serrano, L.; Villegas, V. Early Kinetics of Amyloid Fibril Formation Reveals Conformational Reorganisation of Initial Aggregates. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 366, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ilie, I.M.; Caflisch, A. Simulation Studies of Amyloidogenic Polypeptides and Their Aggregates. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6956–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Prusiner, S. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982, 216, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  140. Prusiner, S.B. Biology and Genetics of Prions Causing Neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47, 601–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  141. Leighton, P.L.A.; Ted Allison, W. Protein misfolding in prion and prion-like diseases: Reconsidering a required role for protein loss-of-function. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 54, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  142. Jaunmuktane, Z.; Brandner, S. Invited Review: The role of prion-like mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2020, 46, 522–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  143. McAlary, L.; Plotkin, S.S.; Yerbury, J.J.; Cashman, N.R. Prion-Like Propagation of Protein Misfolding and Aggregation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  144. Duyckaerts, C.; Clavaguera, F.; Potier, M.C. The prion-like propagation hypothesis in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2019, 32, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Walker, L.C.; Jucker, M. Neurodegenerative Diseases: Expanding the Prion Concept. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 38, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  146. Oliveri, V. Toward the discovery and development of effective modulators of α-synuclein amyloid aggregation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 167, 10–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Pagano, K.; Tomaselli, S.; Molinari, H.; Ragona, L. Natural Compounds as Inhibitors of Aβ Peptide Aggregation: Chemical Requirements and Molecular Mechanisms. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bieschke, J.; Russ, J.; Friedrich, R.P.; Ehrnhoefer, D.E.; Wobst, H.; Neugebauer, K.; Wanker, E.E. EGCG remodels mature α-synuclein and amyloid-β fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US.A 2010, 107, 7710–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  149. Lorenzen, N.; Nielsen, S.B.; Yoshimura, Y.; Vad, B.S.; Andersen, C.B.; Betzer, C.; Kaspersen, J.D.; Christiansen, G.; Pedersen, J.S.; Jensen, P.H.; et al. How epigallocatechin gallate can inhibit α-synuclein oligomer toxicity in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 21299–21310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  150. Wobst, H.J.; Sharma, A.; Diamond, M.I.; Wanker, E.E.; Bieschke, J. The green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate prevents the aggregation of tau protein into toxic oligomers at substoichiometric ratios. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  151. Zhao, J.; Liang, Q.; Sun, Q.; Chen, C.; Xu, L.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, P. The green tea polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) inhibits fibrillation, disaggregates amyloid fibrils of α-synuclein, and protects PC12 cells against α-synuclein-induced toxicity. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 32508–32517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  152. Abelein, A.; Abrahams, J.P.; Danielsson, J.; Gräslund, A.; Jarvet, J.; Luo, J.; Tiiman, A.; Wärmländer, S.K.T.S. The hairpin conformation of the amyloid β peptide is an important structural motif along the aggregation pathway Topical Issue in honor of Ivano Bertini Guest editors: Lucia Banci, Claudio Luchinat. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 19, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lambert, M.P.; Barlow, A.K.; Chromy, B.A.; Edwards, C.; Freed, R.; Liosatos, M.; Morgan, T.E.; Rozovsky, I.; Trommer, B.; Viola, K.L.; et al. Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Aβ1-42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 6448–6453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  154. Ferreira, S.T.; Klein, W.L. The Aβ oligomer hypothesis for synapse failure and memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2011, 96, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  155. Galzitskaya, O.V. Oligomers Are Promising Targets for Drug Development in the Treatment of Proteinopathies. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  156. Fantini, J.; Chahinian, H.; Yahi, N. Progress toward Alzheimer’s disease treatment: Leveraging the Achilles’ heel of Aβ oligomers? Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 1748–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Longhena, F.; Faustini, G.; Spillantini, M.G.; Bellucci, A. Living in promiscuity: The multiple partners of alpha-synuclein at the synapse in physiology and pathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  158. Bartels, T.; Choi, J.G.; Selkoe, D.J. α-Synuclein occurs physiologically as a helically folded tetramer that resists aggregation. Nature 2011, 477, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  159. Fauvet, B.; Mbefo, M.K.; Fares, M.B.; Desobry, C.; Michael, S.; Ardah, M.T.; Tsika, E.; Coune, P.; Prudent, M.; Lion, N.; et al. α-Synuclein in central nervous system and from erythrocytes, mammalian cells, and Escherichia coli exists predominantly as disordered monomer. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 15345–15364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  160. Theillet, F.X.; Binolfi, A.; Bekei, B.; Martorana, A.; Rose, H.M.; Stuiver, M.; Verzini, S.; Lorenz, D.; Van Rossum, M.; Goldfarb, D.; et al. Structural disorder of monomeric α-synuclein persists in mammalian cells. Nature 2016, 530, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  161. Goedert, M.; Jakes, R.; Spillantini, M.G. The Synucleinopathies: Twenty Years on. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2017, 7, S53–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  162. Brás, I.C.; Dominguez-Meijide, A.; Gerhardt, E.; Koss, D.; Lázaro, D.F.; Santos, P.I.; Vasili, E.; Xylaki, M.; Outeiro, T.F. Synucleinopathies: Where we are and where we need to go. J. Neurochem. 2020, 153, 433–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  163. Outeiro, T.F. Emerging concepts in synucleinopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 2021, 36, 229–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Teil, M.; Arotcarena, M.L.; Faggiani, E.; Laferriere, F.; Bezard, E.; Dehay, B. Targeting α-synuclein for PD Therapeutics: A Pursuit on All Fronts. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  165. Ghiglieri, V.; Calabrese, V.; Calabresi, P. Alpha-synuclein: From early synaptic dysfunction to neurodegeneration. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  166. Lashuel, H.A.; Overk, C.R.; Oueslati, A.; Masliah, E. The many faces of α-synuclein: From structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  167. Villar-Piqué, A.; Lopes da Fonseca, T.; Outeiro, T.F. Structure, function and toxicity of alpha-synuclein: The Bermuda triangle in synucleinopathies. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Winner, B.; Jappelli, R.; Maji, S.K.; Desplats, P.A.; Boyer, L.; Aigner, S.; Hetzer, C.; Loher, T.; Vilar, M.; Campioni, S.; et al. In vivo demonstration that α-synuclein oligomers are toxic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4194–4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  169. Lashuel, H.A.; Petre, B.M.; Wall, J.; Simon, M.; Nowak, R.J.; Walz, T.; Lansbury, P.T. A-Synuclein, Especially the Parkinson’S Disease-Associated Mutants, Forms Pore-Like Annular and Tubular Protofibrils. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 322, 1089–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  170. Lashuel, H.A.; Hartley, D.; Petre, B.M.; Walz, T.; Lansbury, P.T. Neurodegenerative disease: Amyloid pores from pathogenic mutations. Nature 2002, 418, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tsigelny, I.F.; Sharikov, Y.; Wrasidlo, W.; Gonzalez, T.; Desplats, P.A.; Crews, L.; Spencer, B.; Masliah, E. Role of α-synuclein penetration into the membrane in the mechanisms of oligomer pore formation. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 1000–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  172. Choi, Y.T.; Jung, C.H.; Lee, S.R.; Bae, J.H.; Baek, W.K.; Suh, M.H.; Park, J.; Park, C.W.; Suh, S. Il The green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate attenuates β-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons. Life Sci. 2001, 70, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Hou, R.R.; Chen, J.Z.; Chen, H.; Kang, X.G.; Li, M.G.; Wang, B.R. Neuroprotective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on paraquat-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2008, 32, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shimmyo, Y.; Kihara, T.; Akaike, A.; Niidome, T.; Sugimoto, H. Epigallocatechin-3 -gallate and curcumin suppress amyloid beta-induced beta-site APP cleaving enzyme-1 upregulation. Neuroreport 2008, 19, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Xu, X.; Chan, P. (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate protects SH-SY5Y cells against 6-OHDA-induced cell death through stat3 activation. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2009, 17, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kim, C.Y.; Lee, C.; Park, G.H.; Jang, J.H. Neuroprotective effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate against β-amyloid-induced oxidative and nitrosative cell death via augmentation of antioxidant defense capacity. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2009, 32, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Lin, C.L.; Chen, T.F.; Chiu, M.J.; Way, T.D.; Lin, J.K. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) suppresses β-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity through inhibiting c-Abl/FE65 nuclear translocation and GSK3β activation. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Moldzio, R.; Radad, K.; Krewenka, C.; Kranner, B.; Duvigneau, J.C.; Wang, Y.; Rausch, W.D. Effects of epigallocatechin gallate on rotenone-injured murine brain cultures. J. Neural Transm. 2010, 117, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Tai, K.K.; Truong, D.D. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a green tea polyphenol, reduces dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT)-induced cell death in dopaminergic SHSY-5Y cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 482, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Ye, Q.; Ye, L.; Xu, X.; Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, X. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridine-induced oxidative stress in PC12 cells via the SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling pathway. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  181. Chen, D.; Kanthasamy, A.G.; Reddy, M.B. EGCG Protects against 6-OHDA-Induced Neurotoxicity in a Cell Culture Model. Parkinsons. Dis. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  182. Cheng-Chung Wei, J.; Huang, H.C.; Chen, W.J.; Huang, C.N.; Peng, C.H.; Lin, C.L. Epigallocatechin gallate attenuates amyloid β-induced inflammation and neurotoxicity in EOC 13.31 microglia. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 770, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Teng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ding, L.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, P. Complex of EGCG with Cu(II) suppresses amyloid aggregation and Cu(II)-induced cytotoxicity of α-synuclein. Molecules 2019, 24, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  184. Rezai-Zadeh, K.; Shytle, D.; Sun, N.; Mori, T.; Hou, H.; Jeanniton, D.; Ehrhart, J.; Townsend, K.; Zeng, J.; Morgan, D.; et al. Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) modulates amyloid precursor protein cleavage and reduces cerebral amyloidosis in Alzheimer transgenic mice. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 8807–8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  185. Rasoolijazi, H.; Joghataie, M.T.; Roghani, M.; Nobakht, M. The beneficial effect of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease in rat: A behavioral analysis. Iran. Biomed. J. 2007, 11, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  186. Rezai-Zadeh, K.; Arendash, G.W.; Hou, H.; Fernandez, F.; Jensen, M.; Runfeldt, M.; Shytle, R.D.; Tan, J. Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) reduces β-amyloid mediated cognitive impairment and modulates tau pathology in Alzheimer transgenic mice. Brain Res. 2008, 1214, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Lee, Y.K.; Yuk, D.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, S.Y.; Ha, T.Y.; Oh, K.W.; Yun, Y.P.; Hong, J.T. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced elevation of beta-amyloid generation and memory deficiency. Brain Res. 2009, 1250, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Lee, J.W.; Lee, Y.K.; Ban, J.O.; Ha, T.Y.; Yun, Y.P.; Han, S.B.; Oh, K.W.; Hong, J.T. Green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits β-amyloid-induced cognitive dysfunction through modification of secretase activity via inhibition of ERK and NF-κB pathways in mice. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1987–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. He, M.; Zhao, L.; Wei, M.J.; Yao, W.F.; Zhao, H.S.; Chen, F.J. Neuroprotective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on aging mice induced by D-galactose. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  190. Lee, Y.J.; Choi, D.Y.; Yun, Y.P.; Han, S.B.; Oh, K.W.; Hong, J.T. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents systemic inflammation-induced memory deficiency and amyloidogenesis via its anti-neuroinflammatory properties. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Biasibetti, R.; Tramontina, A.C.; Costa, A.P.; Dutra, M.F.; Quincozes-Santos, A.; Nardin, P.; Bernardi, C.L.; Wartchow, K.M.; Lunardi, P.S.; Gonçalves, C.A. Green tea (-)epigallocatechin-3-gallate reverses oxidative stress and reduces acetylcholinesterase activity in a streptozotocin-induced model of dementia. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 236, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Walker, J.M.; Klakotskaia, D.; Ajit, D.; Weisman, G.A.; Wood, W.G.; Sun, G.Y.; Serfozo, P.; Simonyi, A.; Schachtman, T.R. Beneficial effects of dietary EGCG and voluntary exercise on behavior in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 44, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Chang, X.; Rong, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; Hu, Q.; Mo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Gu, X.; Zhang, L.; He, W.; et al. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates cognitive deterioration in Alzheimer’s disease model mice by upregulating neprilysin expression. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 334, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Nan, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate ameliorates memory impairment and rescues the abnormal synaptic protein levels in the frontal cortex and hippocampus in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 590–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Singh, N.A.; Bhardwaj, V.; Ravi, C.; Ramesh, N.; Mandal, A.K.A.; Khan, Z.A. EGCG nanoparticles attenuate aluminum chloride induced neurobehavioral deficits, beta amyloid and tau pathology in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Du, K.; Liu, M.; Zhong, X.; Yao, W.; Xiao, Q.; Wen, Q.; Yang, B.; Wei, M. Epigallocatechin Gallate Reduces Amyloid β-Induced Neurotoxicity via Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Mori, T.; Koyama, N.; Tan, J.; Segawa, T.; Maeda, M.; Town, T. Combined treatment with the phenolics ()-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and ferulic acid improves cognition and reduces Alzheimer-like pathology in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 2714–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  198. Cano, A.; Ettcheto, M.; Chang, J.H.; Barroso, E.; Espina, M.; Kühne, B.A.; Barenys, M.; Auladell, C.; Folch, J.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Dual-drug loaded nanoparticles of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)/Ascorbic acid enhance therapeutic efficacy of EGCG in a APPswe/PS1dE9 Alzheimer’s disease mice model. J. Control. Release 2019, 301, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Ettcheto, M.; Cano, A.; Manzine, P.R.; Busquets, O.; Verdaguer, E.; Castro-Torres, R.D.; García, M.L.; Beas-Zarate, C.; Olloquequi, J.; Auladell, C.; et al. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Improves Cognitive Deficits Aggravated by an Obesogenic Diet Through Modulation of Unfolded Protein Response in APPswe/PS1dE9 Mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 57, 1814–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Chen, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Inhibition of Aβ aggregates in Alzheimer’s disease by epigallocatechin and epicatechin-3-gallate from green tea. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 105, 104382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Levites, Y.; Weinreb, O.; Maor, G.; Youdim, M.B.H.; Mandel, S. Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents N-methyl-4-phenyl- 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2001, 78, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Choi, J.Y.; Park, C.S.; Kim, D.J.; Cho, M.H.; Jin, B.K.; Pie, J.E.; Chung, W.G. Prevention of nitric oxide-mediated 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced Parkinson’s disease in mice by tea phenolic epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Neurotoxicology 2002, 23, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Bitu Pinto, N.; Da Silva Alexandre, B.; Neves, K.R.T.; Silva, A.H.; Leal, L.K.A.M.; Viana, G.S.B. Neuroprotective Properties of the Standardized Extract from Camellia sinensis (Green Tea) and Its Main Bioactive Components, Epicatechin and Epigallocatechin Gallate, in the 6-OHDA Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  204. Xu, Q.; Langley, M.; Kanthasamy, A.G.; Reddy, M.B. Epigallocatechin Gallate Has a Neurorescue Effect in a Mouse Model of Parkinson Disease. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1926–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  205. Zhou, T.; Zhu, M.; Liang, Z. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate modulates peripheral immunity in the MPTP-induced mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 4883–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  206. Xu, Y.; Xie, M.; Xue, J.; Xiang, L.; Li, Y.; Xiao, J.; Xiao, G.; Wang, H.L. EGCG ameliorates neuronal and behavioral defects by remodeling gut microbiota and TotM expression in Drosophila models of Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 5931–5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  207. Tseng, H.C.; Wang, M.H.; Chang, K.C.; Soung, H.S.; Fang, C.H.; Lin, Y.W.; Li, K.Y.; Yang, C.C.; Tsai, C.C. Protective Effect of (−)Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on Rotenone-Induced Parkinsonism-like Symptoms in Rats. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 37, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Xu, Z.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Luo, G.; Li, L.; Le, W. Neuroprotective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurochem. Res. 2006, 31, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Koh, S.H.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.Y.; Lee, K.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, H.T.; Kim, J.; Kim, M.H.; Hwang, M.S.; Song, C.; et al. The effect of epigallocatechin gallate on suppressing disease progression of ALS model mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 395, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Kumar, P.; Kumar, A. Effect of lycopene and epigallocatechin-3-gallate against 3-nitropropionic acid induced cognitive dysfunction and glutathione depletion in rat: A novel nitric oxide mechanism. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Ferreira, N.; Saraiva, M.J.; Almeida, M.R. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a potential therapeutic drug for TTR-related amyloidosis: “In vivo” evidence from FAP mice models. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Caruana, M.; Högen, T.; Levin, J.; Hillmer, A.; Giese, A.; Vassallo, N. Inhibition and disaggregation of α-synuclein oligomers by natural polyphenolic compounds. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  213. Palhano, F.L.; Lee, J.; Grimster, N.P.; Kelly, J.W. Toward the molecular mechanism(s) by which EGCG treatment remodels mature amyloid fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7503–7510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  214. Sironi, E.; Colombo, L.; Lompo, A.; Messa, M.; Bonanomi, M.; Regonesi, M.E.; Salmona, M.; Airoldi, C. Natural compounds against neurodegenerative diseases: Molecular characterization of the interaction of catechins from green tea with Aβ1-42, PrP106-126, and ataxin-3 oligomers. Chem. A Eur. J. 2014, 20, 13793–13800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Jha, N.N.; Kumar, R.; Panigrahi, R.; Navalkar, A.; Ghosh, D.; Sahay, S.; Mondal, M.; Kumar, A.; Maji, S.K. Comparison of α-Synuclein Fibril Inhibition by Four Different Amyloid Inhibitors. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 2722–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Ahmed, R.; Vanschouwen, B.; Jafari, N.; Ni, X.; Ortega, J.; Melacini, G. Molecular mechanism for the (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate-induced toxic to nontoxic remodeling of Aβ oligomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13720–13734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Ahmed, R.; Akcan, M.; Khondker, A.; Rheinstädter, M.C.; Bozelli, J.C.; Epand, R.M.; Huynh, V.; Wylie, R.G.; Boulton, S.; Huang, J.; et al. Atomic resolution map of the soluble amyloid beta assembly toxic surfaces. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 6072–6082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  218. Park, G.; Xue, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, Z. Distinguishing the Effect on the Rate and Yield of Aβ42 Aggregation by Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21497–21505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Fernandes, L.; Messias, B.; Pereira-Neves, A.; Azevedo, E.P.; Araújo, J.; Foguel, D.; Palhano, F.L. Green Tea Polyphenol Microparticles Based on the Oxidative Coupling of EGCG Inhibit Amyloid Aggregation/Cytotoxicity and Serve as a Platform for Drug Delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 4414–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Butterfield, D.A. β-amyloid-associated free radical oxidative stress and neurotoxicity: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Yatin, S.M.; Varadarajan, S.; Link, C.D.; Butterfield, D.A. In vitro and in vivo oxidative stress associated with Alzheimer’s amyloid β-peptide (1-42). Neurobiol. Aging 1999, 20, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Varadarajan, S.; Yatin, S.; Aksenova, M.; Butterfield, D.A. Review: Alzheimer’s amyloid β-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress and neurotoxicity. J. Struct. Biol. 2000, 130, 184–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Tamagno, E.; Bardini, P.; Obbili, A.; Vitali, A.; Borghi, R.; Zaccheo, D.; Pronzato, M.A.; Danni, O.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G.; et al. Oxidative stress increases expression and activity of BACE in NT2 neurons. Neurobiol. Dis. 2002, 10, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  224. Maia, M.A.; Sousa, E. BACE-1 and γ-secretase as therapeutic targets for Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  225. Cheng, X.R.; Zhou, W.X.; Zhang, Y.X. The behavioral, pathological and therapeutic features of the senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 strain as an Alzheimer’s disease animal model. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014, 13, 13–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Blesa, J.; Przedborski, S. Parkinson’s disease: Animal models and dopaminergic cell vulnerability. Front. Neuroanat. 2014, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  227. Sampson, T.R.; Debelius, J.W.; Thron, T.; Janssen, S.; Shastri, G.G.; Ilhan, Z.E.; Challis, C.; Schretter, C.E.; Rocha, S.; Gradinaru, V.; et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell 2016, 167, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  228. Most, J.; Penders, J.; Lucchesi, M.; Goossens, G.H.; Blaak, E.E. Gut microbiota composition in relation to the metabolic response to 12-week combined polyphenol supplementation in overweight men and women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 71, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Liu, Z.; De Bruijn, W.J.C.; Bruins, M.E.; Vincken, J.P. Reciprocal Interactions between Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and Human Gut Microbiota in Vitro. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9804–9815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Zhu, F.; Li, C.; Chu, F.; Tian, X.; Zhu, J. Target Dysbiosis of Gut Microbes as a Future Therapeutic Manipulation in Alzheimer ’ s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020; 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Goyal, D.; Ali, S.A.; Singh, R.K. Emerging role of gut microbiota in modulation of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration with emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 106, 110112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Levin, J.; Maaß, S.; Schuberth, M.; Giese, A.; Oertel, W.H.; Poewe, W.; Trenkwalder, C.; Wenning, G.K.; Mansmann, U.; Südmeyer, M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of epigallocatechin gallate in multiple system atrophy (PROMESA): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Silva, C.; Pinto, M.; Fernandes, C.; Benfeito, S.; Borges, F. Antioxidant Therapy and Neurodegenerative Disorders: Lessons From Clinical Trials; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; ISBN 9780128012383. [Google Scholar]
  234. Cai, Z.Y.; Li, X.M.; Liang, J.P.; Xiang, L.P.; Wang, K.R.; Shi, Y.L.; Yang, R.; Shi, M.; Ye, J.H.; Lu, J.L.; et al. Bioavailability of tea catechins and its improvement. Molecules 2018, 23, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  235. Sang, S.; Lee, M.J.; Hou, Z.; Ho, C.T.; Yang, C.S. Stability of tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and formation of dimers and epimers under common experimental conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9478–9484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Chen, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Li, X. Biocompatible, functional spheres based on oxidative coupling assembly of green tea polyphenols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4179–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Suzuki, Y.; Brender, J.R.; Hartman, K.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Marsh, E.N.G. Alternative pathways of human islet amyloid polypeptide aggregation distinguished by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance-detected kinetics of monomer consumption. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 8154–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  238. Nie, R.Z.; Zhu, W.; Peng, J.M.; Ge, Z.; Li, C. mei Comparison of disaggregative effect of A-type EGCG dimer and EGCG monomer on the preformed bovine insulin amyloid fibrils. Biophys. Chem. 2017, 230, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Roy, D.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Bhunia, A. Do catechins (ECG and EGCG)bind to the same site as thioflavin T (ThT) in amyloid fibril? Answer from saturation transfer difference NMR. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  240. Kelley, M.; Sant’Anna, R.; Fernandes, L.; Palhano, F.L. Pentameric Thiophene as a Probe to Monitor EGCG’s Remodeling Activity of Mature Amyloid Fibrils: Overcoming Signal Artifacts of Thioflavin T. ACS Omega 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Sternke-Hoffmann, R.; Peduzzo, A.; Bolakhrif, N.; Haas, R.; Buell, A.K. The aggregation conditions define whether EGCG is an inhibitor or enhancer of α-synuclein amyloid fibril formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  242. Bolognesi, B.; Kumita, J.R.; Barros, T.P.; Esbjorner, E.K.; Luheshi, L.M.; Crowther, D.C.; Wilson, M.R.; Dobson, C.M.; Favrin, G.; Yerbury, J.J. ANS binding reveals common features of cytotoxic amyloid species. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Protein misfolding, amyloid formation, and human disease: A summary of progress over the last decade. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 27–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Ladiwala, A.R.A.; Litt, J.; Kane, R.S.; Aucoin, D.S.; Smith, S.O.; Ranjan, S.; Davis, J.; Van Nostrand, W.E.; Tessier, P.M. Conformational differences between two amyloid βoligomers of similar size and dissimilar toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 24765–24773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  245. Kotler, S.A.; Walsh, P.; Brender, J.R.; Ramamoorthy, A. Differences between amyloid-β aggregation in solution and on the membrane: Insights into elucidation of the mechanistic details of Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6692–6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  246. Terry, C.; Harniman, R.L.; Sells, J.; Wenborn, A.; Joiner, S.; Saibil, H.R.; Miles, M.J.; Collinge, J.; Wadsworth, J.D.F. Structural features distinguishing infectious ex vivo mammalian prions from non-infectious fibrillar assemblies generated in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  247. Kollmer, M.; Close, W.; Funk, L.; Rasmussen, J.; Bsoul, A.; Schierhorn, A.; Schmidt, M.; Sigurdson, C.J.; Jucker, M.; Fändrich, M. Cryo-EM structure and polymorphism of Aβ amyloid fibrils purified from Alzheimer’s brain tissue. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic showing the role of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) in neuroprotection. Neurodegeneration is a multifactorial process, and preclinical models have shown that EGCG exerts neuroprotective effects through several mechanisms.
Figure 1. Schematic showing the role of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) in neuroprotection. Neurodegeneration is a multifactorial process, and preclinical models have shown that EGCG exerts neuroprotective effects through several mechanisms.
Biomolecules 11 00767 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation showing that neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) share their origin in protein misfolding followed by the formation of β-sheet-enriched structures. These protein misfolding events are the molecular alterations that trigger several NDs. 3D structures of monomers and fibrils retrieved in the protein data bank (PDB). Aβ monomer (PDB code: 1IYT); α-syn monomer (PDB code: 1XQ8); murine cellular prion protein (PDB code: 1AG2); Aβ fibril (PDB code: 5KK3); α-syn fibril (PDB code: 2N0A); prion protein fibril (PDB code: 6UUR). The protein structures here shown were obtained from recombinantly expressed proteins in vitro, except for Aβ monomer, a chemically synthesized peptide.
Figure 2. Schematic representation showing that neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) share their origin in protein misfolding followed by the formation of β-sheet-enriched structures. These protein misfolding events are the molecular alterations that trigger several NDs. 3D structures of monomers and fibrils retrieved in the protein data bank (PDB). Aβ monomer (PDB code: 1IYT); α-syn monomer (PDB code: 1XQ8); murine cellular prion protein (PDB code: 1AG2); Aβ fibril (PDB code: 5KK3); α-syn fibril (PDB code: 2N0A); prion protein fibril (PDB code: 6UUR). The protein structures here shown were obtained from recombinantly expressed proteins in vitro, except for Aβ monomer, a chemically synthesized peptide.
Biomolecules 11 00767 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the amyloid aggregation process. (A) Aggregation kinetics of misfolded proteins: the sigmoidal curve represents the temporal evolution of a fluorescent signal. (B) Under pathological conditions, natively unfolded monomers are able to self-aggregate in pathological oligomers (primary nucleation). Thus, oligomers can be extended into protofibrils (secondary nucleation) and mature fibrils.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the amyloid aggregation process. (A) Aggregation kinetics of misfolded proteins: the sigmoidal curve represents the temporal evolution of a fluorescent signal. (B) Under pathological conditions, natively unfolded monomers are able to self-aggregate in pathological oligomers (primary nucleation). Thus, oligomers can be extended into protofibrils (secondary nucleation) and mature fibrils.
Biomolecules 11 00767 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration showing the effect of EGCG on α-syn aggregation. EGCG induces the formation of two distinctive types of α-syn oligomers. The accelerated amyloid fibril formation is also observed in the presence of EGCG.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration showing the effect of EGCG on α-syn aggregation. EGCG induces the formation of two distinctive types of α-syn oligomers. The accelerated amyloid fibril formation is also observed in the presence of EGCG.
Biomolecules 11 00767 g004
Table 1. Protein misfolding disorders affecting the nervous system [37].
Table 1. Protein misfolding disorders affecting the nervous system [37].
Cell Types Primarily AffectedClinical
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)Aβ, tauHippocampal neuronsDementia
Parkinson’s disease (PD)α-synSubstantia nigra
Dopaminergic neuron
Multiple system atrophy (MSA)α-synBasal ganglia and/or cerebellar oligodendrocytesParkinsonism and/or ataxia
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)α-synCortical and/or hippocampal and/or striatal neuronsDementia and/or parkinsonism
Huntington disease (HD)huntingtinStriatal neuronsDementia
Spinocerebellar ataxiaAtaxinCerebellar neuronsCerebellar ataxia
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)Ataxin, FUS, TDP43, C9orf72 or superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)Motor neuronsMuscular atrophy
Frontotemporal dementiaFUS, TDP43, C9orf72 or SOD1Cortical neuronsDementia
Gerstmann–Sträussler– Scheinker syndrome (GSS)Prion proteinCerebellar neuronsAtaxia
Fatal familial insomniaPrion proteinThalamic neuronsInsomnia
Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD)Prion proteinCortical neuronsDementia
Table 2. Selected evidence of EGCG effectiveness on in vitro neurotoxicity models.
Table 2. Selected evidence of EGCG effectiveness on in vitro neurotoxicity models.
Experimental ModelsCell LineOutcomes
Aβ-induced neurotoxicity modelPrimary cultureElevates cell survival and decreases the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and caspase activity [172]
Paraquat-induced PD modelPC12 cellsProtects against paraquat-induced apoptosis via modulating mitochondrial function [173]
1-42-exposure neuronal cellsPrimary cultureSuppresses Aβ-induced BACE-1 upregulation [174]
6-OHDA-induced PD modelSH-SY5Y cellsProtects against cell death through STAT3 activation [175]
Aβ-induced oxidative and nitrosative cell deathBV2 microgliaFortifies cellular antioxidant glutathione pool via elevated expression of γ-glutamylcysteine ligase [176]
Human neuronal cellsMC65 cells
(overexpressing APP)
Suppresses Aβ -induced neurotoxicity by inhibiting c-Abl/FE65 nuclear translocation and GSK3β activation [177]
ROT-injured murine brain culturesPrimary mesencephalic cell culturesNo influence on the survival of dopaminergic neurons in mesencephalic cultures [178]
DDT-induced cell deathSH-SY5Y cellsActivates endogenous neuroprotective mechanism(s) that can protect against cell death [179]
Fibril-induced neurotoxicityHEK-293 cells(overexpressing α-syn)7PA2 cells(overexpressing APP)PC12 cellsRemodels mature α-syn and amyloid-β fibrils and reduces cellular toxicity [148]
MPP+-induced PD modelPC12 cellsSuppresses oxidative stress via the SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling pathway [180]
6-OHDA-induced PD modelN27 cellsPretreatment with EGCG protected against neurotoxicity by regulating genes and proteins involved in brain iron homeostasis, especially modulating hepcidin levels [181]
EOC 13.31Attenuates Aβ-induced inflammation and neurotoxicity [182]
α-syn induced neurotoxicityα-syn transduced-PC12 cellsProtects cells against α-syn-induced damage by inhibiting the overexpression and fibrillation of α-syn in the cells [151]
Cu(II)-mediated toxicityα-syn transduced-PC12 cellsInhibits the overexpression and fibrillation of α-syn and reduces Cu(II)-induced oxidative stress [183]
BACE-1: Beta-secretase-1; BV2: Murine brain microglial cell line; DDT: Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; EOC 13.31: Mouse immortalized microglia cell line; GSK3β: Glycogen synthase kinase 3β; HEK-293: Human kidney (embryonic) cell line; 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine; 7PA2: CHO cells overexpressing APP; MC65: Human neuroblastoma cell line (MC65) that conditionally expresses a C-terminal derivative of APP; MPP+: 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (ion); N27: Rat mesencephalic dopaminergic neuronal cell line; PD: Parkinson´s disease; PC12: Rat adrenal phaeochromocytoma cell line; ROT: Rotenone; SH-SY5Y: Human neuroblastoma cell line; SIRT1/PGC-1α: Sirtuin 1/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-α; STAT3: Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3.
Table 3. Main evidence of the neuroprotective effects of EGCG in animal models.
Table 3. Main evidence of the neuroprotective effects of EGCG in animal models.
Alzheimer’s Disease
Experimental ModelsAnimal StrainOutcomes
Transgenic mice overproducing AβTg APPsw (line 2576)Decreases Aβ levels and plaque associated with promotion of the nonamyloidogenic α-secretase proteolytic pathway [184]
Stereotaxic surgery lesionWistar ratsRestores β-amyloid-induced behavioral derangements relating to coordination and memory abilities [185]
Transgenic mice overproducing AβTg APPsw (line 2576)Provides cognitive benefit and modulates tau pathology [186]
Transgenic mice overproducing AβTg APPsw (line 2576)Inhibits GSK3β activation and c-Abl/Fe65 complex nuclear translocation [177].
LPS-induced AD modelICR miceInhibition of Aβ generation through the inhibition of β- and γ-secretase activity [187]
Aβ-induced AD modelICR miceDownregulates β- and γ-secretase activities and eventually decreases toxic Aβ levels in the cortex and hippocampus [188]
D-gal-induced AD modelKunming miceIncreases the activities of antioxidant enzymes and reduces the activation of caspase-3 [189]
LPS-induced AD modelICR micePrevents activation of astrocytes and elevation of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, as well as the increase of inflammatory proteins such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) andcyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2) [190]
Streptozotocin-induced AD modelWistar ratsNeuroprotective effects through reversion of oxidative stress and decreased acetylcholinesterase activity [191]
Transgenic mice overproducing AβTg CRND8 miceAmeliorates some behavioral manifestations and cognitive impairments [192]
Senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) SAMP8Attenuates cognitive deterioration by upregulating neprilysin expression [193]
Senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) SAMP8Oral consumption of EGCG ameliorates memory impairment and reduces the levels of Aβ1–42 and BACE-1 [194]
Aluminum-induced AD model Wistar ratsOral administration of EGCG nanoparticles attenuates neurobehavioral deficits and Aβ and Tau pathology [195]
Transgenic mice expressing mutant
human APP and presenilin 1
APP/PS1 miceInhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated neuronal apoptosis [196]
Transgenic mice expressing mutant
human APP and presenilin 1
APP/PS1 miceCombination of EGCG with ferulic acid improves behavioral deficits, ameliorating cerebral amyloidosis and reducing Aβ generation [197]
Transgenic mice producing abundant Aβ plaquesAPPswe/PS1dE9 miceOral administration of EGCG/ascorbic acid nanoparticles reduces Aβ plaque burden, Aβ42 peptide levels, and neuroinflammation while enhancing synaptogenesis, memory, and the learning process [198]
Transgenic mice producing abundant Aβ plaques fed with a high-fat diet
(mixed model of familial AD and T2DM)
APPswe/PS1dE9 miceDecreases brain Aβ production and plaque burden by increasing the levels of α-secretase and reduces neuroinflammation by the decrease in astrocyte reactivity and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) levels [199]
Transgenic mice expressing mutant
human APP and presenilin 1
APP/PS1 miceReduces Aβ plaques in the brain [200]
Parkinson’s disease
Experimental modelsAnimal strainOutcomes
MPTP-induced PD modelC57/BL miceAlleviates dopamine neuron loss in the substantia nigra and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein level depletion [201]
MPTP-induced PD modelC57B6 miceDecreases expressions of nitric oxide synthase in the substantia nigra [202]
6-OHDA-induced PD modelWistar ratsReverses the striatal oxidative stress and immunohistochemistry alterations [203]
MPTP-induced PD modelC57BL/6J miceRegulates the iron-export protein ferroportin in substantia nigra, reduces oxidative stress, and exerts a neurorescue effect [204]
MPTP-induced PD modelC57BL/6J miceMay exert neuroprotective effects by modulating peripheral immune response [205]
ROT-induced PD modelDrosophila melanogasterAmeliorates neuronal and behavioral defects by remodeling gut microbiota and turandot M (TotM) expression [206]
ROT-induced PD modelWistar ratsReduces NO level and lipid peroxidation production, increases the levels of catecholamines in the striatum, and reduces the levels of neuroinflammatory and apoptotic markers [207]
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Experimental modelsAnimal strainOutcomes
Transgenic mice carrying a human SOD1 with a G93A mutationB6SJL Tg
Increases the number of motor neurons and reduces the concentration of NF-kB caspase-3 and iNOS [208]
Transgenic mice carrying a human SOD1 with a G93A mutationB6SJL Tg
Prolongs symptom onset and life span, preserving more survival signals and attenuating death signals [209]
Huntington’s disease
Experimental modelsAnimal strainOutcomes
Transgenic flies expressing mutant
huntingtin fragments with 93 glutamines
Drosophila melanogasterModulates early events in huntingtin misfolding and reduces toxicity [25]
3-nitropropionic acid induced cognitive dysfunction and glutathione depletionWistar ratsImproves memory and restores glutathione system functioning [210]
Familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP)
Experimental modelsAnimal strainOutcomes
Transgenic mice for human TTRTg hTTR V30M miceDecreases non-fibrillar TTR deposition and disaggregation of amyloid deposits [211]
APP/PS1 or PS1dE9: Double transgenic mice expressing a chimeric mouse/human amyloid precursor protein (Mo/HuAPP695swe) and a mutant human presenilin 1 (PS1-dE9); B6SJL Tg: Transgenic mice expressing a G93A mutant form of human SOD1; 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine; iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase; MPTP: 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; ROT: Rotenone; SAMP8: Senescence-accelerated mouse prone; Tg APPsw (line 2576): Overexpresses a mutant form of APP (isoform 695) with the Swedish mutation (KM670/671NL), resulting in elevated levels of Aβ and ultimately amyloid plaques; Tg hTTR V30M mice: Transgenic mice expressing human transthyretin (TTR) with the V30M point mutation.
Table 4. Main evidence that EGCG targets toxic misfolded aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases.
Table 4. Main evidence that EGCG targets toxic misfolded aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases.
ProteinMain OutcomeExperimental Techniques
HuntingtinModulates misfolding and oligomerization [25]Dot-blot and AFM
Redirects aggregation cascades and thus prevents the formation of toxic, β-sheet–rich aggregation products [26]ThT fluorescence, TEM, CD, and dot-blot
Binds to β-sheet-rich aggregates remodeling mature fibrils [148]ThT fluorescence, TEM, AFM, and CD
α-synInhibits and disaggregates oligomers [212]Confocal single-particle fluorescence spectroscopy
40Induces the formation of nontoxic well-structured oligomers [128]Solid-state NMR and MTT assay
40The amyloid remodeling activity is dependent on auto-oxidation of the EGCG [213]ThT fluorescence, congo red assay, EM, AFM, CD, and MTT assay
Reduces the number of fibrils [214]NMR, TEM, and CD
α-synInhibits oligomer toxicity, moderately reduces membrane binding, and immobilizing the oligomer -terminal tail [149]Calcein release assay, LSCM, NMR, TEM, CD, DLS, SAXS, MTT assay, and ITC
TauPrevents aggregation and toxicity [150]ThT fluorescence, AFM, and MTT assay
α-synInhibits fibrillation and disaggregates amyloid fibrils [174]ThT fluorescence, CD, NMR, AFM, and TEM
α-synAggregates showed small fibrillar length, and less toxicity correlates with reduction of exposed hydrophobic surface [215]ThT fluorescence, CD, FTIR, ANS fluorescence, TEM, NMR, SPR, and MTT assay
α-synProtects against membrane disruption and cytotoxicity caused by oligomers [131]ThT fluorescence, tyrosine intrinsic fluorescence, TEM, CD, DLS, FTIR, AFM, and MTT assay
40Remodels toxic oligomers to nontoxic aggregates [216]DEST, NMR, ANS fluorescence, DLS, and TEM
42Remodels soluble Aβ assemblies into less toxic species with less exposed hydrophobic sites [217]Comparative analysis of N-R2 and DEST NMR combined with WAXD, TEM, DLS, and extrinsic fluorescence
42Higher EGCG-to-Aβ42 ratios promote the rate of aggregation, while lower EGCG-to-Aβ42 ratios inhibit the aggregation rate [218]ThT fluorescence, TEM and EPR
Aβ40Alleviates aggregation induced by metal ions [200]ThT fluorescence, TEM, ICP-MS, UV–Vis spectroscopy
TauDual effect on aggregation inhibition and disassembly of full-length Tau [28]ThT fluorescence, MALDI-TOF analysis, and ITC
α-synEGCG microparticles reduce the cytotoxic effects of oligomers; besides, they increase the activity of other antiamyloidogenic compounds when used together [219]ThT fluorescence, CD, DLS, TEM, and cell viability assay
ANS: 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid ammonium salt; AFM: Atomic force microscopy; CD: Circular dichroism; DEST: 15N-dark state exchange saturation transfer; DLS: Dynamic light scattering; EPR: Electron paramagnetic resonance; FTIR: Fourier-transform infrared; MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; ICP-MS: Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry; ITC: Isothermal titration calorimetry; LSCM: Laser scanning confocal microscopy; MALDI-TOF: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance; SAXS: Small-angle x-ray scattering; SPR: Surface plasmon resonance; TEM; Transmission electron microscopy; ThT: Thioflavin T; UV–Vis: Ultraviolet-visible; WAXD: Wide-angle X-ray diffraction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gonçalves, P.B.; Sodero, A.C.R.; Cordeiro, Y. Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Targeting Protein Misfolding in Drug Discovery for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 767.

AMA Style

Gonçalves PB, Sodero ACR, Cordeiro Y. Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Targeting Protein Misfolding in Drug Discovery for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(5):767.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gonçalves, Priscila Baltazar, Ana Carolina Rennó Sodero, and Yraima Cordeiro. 2021. "Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Targeting Protein Misfolding in Drug Discovery for Neurodegenerative Diseases" Biomolecules 11, no. 5: 767.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop