Next Article in Journal
Production of Abzymes in Th, CBA, and C57BL/6 Mice before and after MOG Treatment: Comparing Changes in Cell Differentiation and Proliferation
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Three-Dimensional Bioengineered Platform for Articular Cartilage Regeneration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/biom10010054
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants

by
Mohamed Moustafa-Farag
1,2,*,†,
Abdulwareth Almoneafy
3,*,†,
Ahmed Mahmoud
2,4,
Amr Elkelish
5,
Marino B. Arnao
6,
Linfeng Li
1 and
Shaoying Ai
1,*
1
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
2
Horticulture Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, 9 Gmaa St, Giza 12619, Egypt
3
Department of Biology sciences, College of Education and Science at Rada’a, Albaydaa University, Rada’a, Yemen
4
Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding, Institute of Vegetable Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
5
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
6
Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010054
Submission received: 13 November 2019 / Revised: 16 December 2019 / Accepted: 25 December 2019 / Published: 28 December 2019
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biotic stress causes immense damage to agricultural products worldwide and raises the risk of hunger in many areas. Plants themselves tolerate biotic stresses via several pathways, including pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which trigger immunity and plant resistance (R) proteins. On the other hand, humans use several non-ecofriendly methods to control biotic stresses, such as chemical applications. Compared with chemical control, melatonin is an ecofriendly compound that is an economical alternative strategy which can be used to protect animals and plants from attacks via pathogens. In plants, the bactericidal capacity of melatonin was verified against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, as well as multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and -positive bacteria under in vitro conditions. Regarding plant–bacteria interaction, melatonin has presented effective antibacterial activities against phytobacterial pathogens. In plant–fungi interaction models, melatonin was found to play a key role in plant resistance to Botrytis cinerea, to increase fungicide susceptibility, and to reduce the stress tolerance of Phytophthora infestans. In plant–virus interaction models, melatonin not only efficiently eradicated apple stem grooving virus (ASGV) from apple shoots in vitro (making it useful for the production of virus-free plants) but also reduced tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) viral RNA and virus concentration in infected Nicotiana glutinosa and Solanum lycopersicum seedlings. Indeed, melatonin has unique advantages in plant growth regulation and increasing plant resistance effectiveness against different forms of biotic and abiotic stress. Although considerable work has been done regarding the role of melatonin in plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, its role in biotic stress remains unclear and requires clarification. In our review, we summarize the work that has been accomplished so far; highlight melatonin’s function in plant tolerance to pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi; and determine the direction required for future studies on this topic.

1. Introduction

Biotic stress can be described as damage caused to crops by several live organisms such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, parasitic nematodes, insects, weeds, and other indigenous or grown plants. The severity of these effects and the resulting loss of crops depend on multiple factors, such as causal organisms, environmental conditions, and corresponding levels of crops and causal organisms [1]. Pathogens such as fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and viruses are mainly accountable for plant diseases. Among other symptoms, fungi and bacteria may cause leaf spots, vascular wilts, and cankers and can impact various plant organs. Nematodes take up plant cell content and attack all plant parts; they are also able to ease the entry of soil-borne pathogens into the root system, causing nutrient-deficiency-related symptoms such as stunting or wilting. Viruses not only produce local lesions but also cause systemic damage, resulting in malformations, stunting, and chlorosis in various plant sections, even if their hosts are often not killed [2]. Insects and mites, on the other hand, should be emphasized. They cause damage to plants by laying eggs or feeding. Piercing–sucking insects can function as vectors of viruses and deliver them to plants through their own stylets [3].

2. How Plants Defend Themselves against Biotic Stresses

Plants usually have a sophisticated immune system to cope with biotic stresses. First, plants have physical obstacles, such as waxes, dense cuticles, and special trichomes, which stop pathogens or insects from settling on plants. Furthermore, plants generate chemical complexes to protect themselves against herbivores and pathogens [4]. Additionally, plants can recognize pathogens via two pathways that activate defense responses. The first one is the pattern recognition receptor, which detects pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as flagellin, bacterial lipopolysaccharides, fungal chitin, peptidoglycans, and quorum sensing. This basic form of defense is known as PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) [5]. The second pathway of the immune system is plant resistance (R) proteins, which recognize pests’ or pathogens’ specific effectors (Avr proteins) and activate the plant defense response through a process known as effector-triggered immunity (ETI). This kind of mechanism can activate hypersensitive responses (HR), which include programming of cell death in impacted cells and its surrounding areas [6]. Within signaling pathways induced by PTI and ETI, several plant hormones stand out: ethylene (ET), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA). While the SA mechanism promotes resistance defense to hemi-biotrophic and biotrophic pathogens, the ET and JA pathways are commonly induced against chewing insects and necrotrophic pathogens in Arabidopsis [7]. Generally, three hormones of SA, JA, and ET act as signaling molecules of two effective defense mechanisms against plant pathogens. The first one is called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which is activated after primary infection with a necrotizing pathogen and is accompanied by increasing concentrations of SA and related proteins of pathogenesis [8]. The second one is called induced systemic resistance (ISR), which is a kind of plant resistance that is activated via specific strains of non-pathogenic root-colonizing bacteria; its signaling requires JA and ET [9]. Likewise, phytophagous insects cause plants to exhale volatiles to attract their enemies and alert their neighbor plants to imminent threats by recognition of conserved herbivore-associated elicitors of the invading insect [10].

3. Management Approaches of Biotic Stress

Although plants have several defense mechanisms to tolerate and adapt to stress conditions, biotic stresses cause massive economic losses from important crops every year. The direct yield loss due to these pests ranges between 20% and 40% of agricultural productivity worldwide [11,12,13,14,15].
Different control methods have been applied to prevent or mitigate biotic stress initiated by agricultural pests, including chemical, genetic, biological, and agricultural controls, as well as integrated pest management, which incorporates the use of different pest control approaches and can alter the suitability of pests’ microenvironment and influence their prevalence [16]. Agricultural producers prefer to use chemical control, as it is an effective management option for many plant pests. However, the development of pathogens that are resistant to these chemicals and the effects on untargeted organisms are major environmental concerns [17]. In addition, the high expense of using these chemicals in agricultural production systems and the great impact of their residues on human health and the environment have prompted the search for control approaches that are less toxic to non-target organisms, renewable, highly biodegradable, and more economical than synthetic chemical pesticides [18].

4. Melatonin as an Alleviating Agent against Plant Pathogens

Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), an animal hormone was discovered in the pineal gland of the cow in 1958 [19], has multiple functions in humans and animals, and it has been seen since its discovery in plants in 1995 [20,21] to present a multitude of regulatory functions also in plants [22,23,24]. Melatonin acts as an excellent antioxidant against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS). One of the most studied functions of melatonin in plants is its role as a protective agent against various stress situations [25]. In addition to acting as an antioxidant agent, melatonin induces numerous changes in gene expression. These regulatory changes are beneficial for dealing with adverse situations, assuming reinforcement against plant stress. Thus, melatonin reinforces physiological processes such as germination, photosynthesis, stomatic uptake, growth, rooting, osmoregulation, anti-senescence, primary and secondary metabolism, and also, plant hormone regulation [24,26].
Melatonin is synthesized in plants through a route from tryptophan, although it differs in several of its stages and enzymes from biosynthesis in animals [27,28]. In their mini review, Dhole, et al. [29] reported that melatonin was synthesized in plant in various subcellular sites with intensive enzymatic support of tryptophan hydroxylase, tryptamine 5-hydroxylase, caffeic acid O-methyltransferase, N-acetylserotonin methyltransferase, tryptophan decarboxylase and serotonin N-acetyltransferase enzymes. Phytomelatonin synthesis starts from tryptophan decarboxylase which catalyzes tryptophan into 5-hydroxytryptophan or tryptamine to serotonin. The next step in the biosynthesis of melatonin is the catalyzed via tryptophan 5-hydroxylase and is associated-hydroxylation reaction, which is mainly moderated in plants by cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases (P450s) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (2-ODDs). Additionally, this also catalyses N-Acetyl tryptamine to N-acetyl serotonin reactions and tryptophan to 5-hydroxytryptophan. The second-to-last step in this pathway is catalyzed by serotonin N-acetyltransferase (SNAT), which catalyzes the carrying of the acetyl group from acetylcoenzyme A to the array of aminoglycosides and arylalkylamines molecules. The last step is 5-hydroxyindol O-methyltranseferase which catalyzes N-acetylserotonin into phytomelatonin through an O-methyltransferase (OMT) reaction. More information about this pathway can be found in Kaur, et al. Ref. [30].
Considering that melatonin is an environmentally friendly molecule, it may represent an economical alternative strategy to induce plant protection against biotic stress. Many studies have shown that melatonin can play a key role in plant protection against biotic stress. melatonin has been reported to have immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective activities in animals [31,32,33,34], so it can be applied as an effective therapeutic substitute for the suppression of microbial diseases. On the other hand, recently, many important findings have shown the beneficial effect of melatonin in plant–pathogen interaction. In this regard, further related details are extensively discussed in the following subsections.

4.1. Melatonin as an Antiviral Agent

In animals, the antiviral activity of melatonin has been demonstrated in many investigations. For example, melatonin treatment reduced the deleterious effects of ROS involved in the dissemination of the Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis (VEE) virus. Melatonin administration significantly decreased blood and brain viruses in comparison with infected control mice [31]. In another study, melatonin and the antiviral drug ribavirin cotreatment significantly increased the survival rate of influenza-virus-infected mice compared with ribavirin treatment only [35]. In this context, melatonin could regulate the autophagy process during some viral infections due to its high antioxidation efficiency and its ability to suppress endoplasmic reticulum stress [36]. Until now, few studies have considered the antiviral effect of melatonin in plants. Regarding this, treatment with exogenous melatonin (100 µM, twice) resulted in the reduction of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) viral RNA and virus concentration in infected Nicotiana glutinosa and Solanum lycopersicum seedlings. This positive effect of melatonin was attributed to the increase of SA concentrations in the NO-dependent pathway [37]. Moreover, melatonin efficiently eradicated apple stem grooving virus (ASGV) from the in vitro virus-infected apple shoots of “Gala” and could be a useful means to produce virus-free plants [38]. The beneficial antiviral activities of melatonin in plants are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Further studies are required to elucidate melatonin’s effect on plant–virus interaction.

4.2. Melatonin Bioactivity against Bacteria

Melatonin defensive activities against bacterial infections in animals have been tested under in vitro and in vivo conditions. The bactericidal capacity of melatonin was verified against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, such as carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus under in vitro conditions [52]. Also, the strong inhibitory action of melatonin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv strain) was revealed after application of a 10 µM concentration; however, the combined application of melatonin with isoniazid inhibited the growth of bacteria three to four times more than any compound alone [53]. Besides its ability to potentiate immune responses, additional explanations have been provided to clarify the mechanism of melatonin’s antibacterial action in animals, including cellular cAMP and Ca2+ regulation, reduction of intracellular substrates, free radical formation, and binding to the bacterial cell wall, which causes cytoderm destabilization [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,52,53,54]. In plant–bacteria interaction, melatonin has presented effective antibacterial activities against phytobacterial pathogens. For instance, incidence of rice bacterial leaf streak (BLS) due to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoo) was reduced by exogenous melatonin treatment on leaves by 17% [55]. Additionally, the direct inhibitory effect of melatonin was reported on phytopathogenic bacteria such as X. oryzae pv. oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola [55,56]. Likewise, Nehela, et al. [57] found that supplemented melatonin treatment could invert the negative disorders of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) (the causal agent of citrus greening disease) on its insect vector by enhancement of melatonin content, extend the longevity of healthy and infected vectors, and reduce the CLas bacterial population within the vector psyllids. In another study, it was reported that direct transcriptional activators of melatonin biosynthesis genes in cassava crops, namely, MeRAV2 and MeRAV1 genes, are required to confer plant disease resistance against bacterial blight of cassava [58]. Antibacterial mechanisms against plant pathogenic bacteria are characterized by upregulation of defense genes such as plant defensin 1.2 (PDF1.2), plant resistance 1 (PR1), and PR5 through several signal transduction pathways, such as augmentation of NO levels in plants, which collaborate with melatonin in upregulating SA-associated genes [43] such as PAD4, EDS1, PR5, PR1, and PR2. Also, melatonin can stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades in (Pst)-DC3000-infected Arabidopsis thaliana, which in turn upregulate SA biosynthesis gene isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1) [44,47,48]. In A. thaliana plants infected with (Pst) DC3000, Zhao, et al. [45] found that the high cell wall invertase (CWI) activity within melatonin-treated Arabidopsis leads to improved cell wall strengthening and callose-depositing factors (cellulose, xylose, and galactose). Additionally, sugar and glycerol are involved in melatonin-related defense toward (Pst) DC3000 in SA- and NO-dependent pathways in Arabidopsis. Melatonin therapy is reported to induce 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 6 (ACS6), which is the main enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis, which in turn induces PDF1.2 expression [44]. Since JA can also induce PDF1.2 expression, we cannot exclude JA’s potential involvement with melatonin in pathogen resistance [44,45,46].
Also, Qian, et al. [42] reported on the participation of sugar and glycerol in melatonin-associated protection against (Pst) DC3000 through SA- and NO-dependent pathways in Arabidopsis [42]. Recently, exogenous melatonin treatment was found to activate ETI- and PTI-associated genes in watermelon and Arabidopsis according to transcriptomic data [40,41]. All of the bactericidal activities of melatonin, the related mechanisms involved, and the resulting constructive effects in plants are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 1.

4.3. Antifungal Effect of Melatonin

Concerning animal models, melatonin was shown to have therapeutic advantages due to its immune regulatory role in Candida sepsis and classic antimycotic therapy, where it was able to lower interleukin-6 levels and reduce the time needed to improve Candida sepsis in rats [59]. Furthermore, results from some investigations support the hypothesis that melatonin increases phagocytic activity and decreases oxidative stress during candidiasis [60,61,62]. In a plant–fungi interaction model, melatonin played a promotional role in the resistance of tomato fruit to Botrytis cinerea via the regulation of H2O2 generation and the jasmonic acid signaling mechanism [63]. Melatonin can increase fungicide susceptibility, enhance vulnerability of Phytophthora infestans to different environmental stress, decrease the dosage level, and promote the efficiency of fungicide treatment against potato late blight [64]. An increase of melatonin accumulation in plants produces more resistance against foliar pathogens such as powdery mildew and soil-borne oomycetes in watermelon and other cucurbits through changes in the expression of the genes associated with ETI- and PAMP-mediated defenses [40]. After melatonin treatment, both the incidence of A. thaliana infection by Plasmodiophora brassicae and the number of pathogen sporangia were reduced, and this reduction was attributed to the high expression of the JA-responsive PR3 and PR4 genes [65]. Powdery mildew on cucumber plants decreased significantly after application of 100 μM of melatonin. This pretreatment reduced the disease index by activating antioxidant enzymes and the expression of antioxidant-related genes [66]. Zhang, et al. [67] demonstrated that the combined application of melatonin and ethylicin (an oomycete antifungal) has a synergistic effect that inhibits the in vitro and in vivo growth of Phytophthora nicotianae through disturbed amino acid metabolic homeostasis of this fungus. Exogenous application of melatonin in replant soil enhances apple seedling growth, raises K levels, and stimulates photosynthesis, which subsequently relieves the disorders of replant disease [68]. Similar results have been obtained in fungi such as Botrytis spp., Penicillium spp., Fusarium spp., P. nicotianae, and Alternaria spp. [67,68,69]. Furthermore, several investigations have studied the role of endophytic rhizobacteria in the reinforcement ability of plants to produce melatonin [70,71]. In addition, melatonin inhibited the total microorganisms, including mold, yeast, and bacteria, in stored apple juice during the storage time (4–12 h) [72]. Unlike the other studies mentioned, melatonin was found to reduce resistance to green mold disease on the fruit of citrus caused by Penicillium digitatum through scavenging of defense-related ROS in the infected fruits [73]. Several interpretations to explain the protective role of melatonin against plant fungal pathogens have been proposed. For instance, some researchers have ascribed the defense mechanism of melatonin to its ability to maintain H2O2 cellular concentration and the generation and regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities [50,51].
Recently, exogenous melatonin treatment was found to activate ETI- and PTI-associated genes in watermelon and Arabidopsis according to transcriptomic data [40,41]. In addition, melatonin plays a key role in the regulation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) rates in plants, which act as a signal in many cellular and physiologic responses to both abiotic and biotic stresses, both directly (as scavengers of ROS/RNS) and indirectly (as gene regulators of the redox network) [25,49]. Other melatonin defense mechanisms are elaborated in Table 3 and Figure 1.

5. Conclusions and Research Gaps

Recently, melatonin has gained a considerable amount of interest because of its unique advantages in plant growth regulation and increasing plant resistance effectiveness against different forms of biotic and abiotic stresses. In that respect and in light of recent studies, there has been great progress in exploring the different roles of melatonin in plants, and several attempts have been made to clarify the positive effect of this molecule on plants. Although many regulatory elements of the melatonin-related defense signaling network have been investigated, clarification remains necessary for some upstream components in this network [42,43,44,47]. Recently, this knowledge gap was partially bridged when AtPMTR1, the first receptor for phytomelatonin, was discovered in Arabidopsis [75]. This finding has created new expectations for melatonin’s function as a plant hormone [49]. Although this important discovery has elucidated the upstream pathway regarding stomata closure phenotype, there is still the need to explore the crucial role of other melatonin receptor-mediated signaling pathways during biotic/abiotic stress in plants [25,76], although interesting transcriptome approaches have already been made [41]. Recent studies that discerned the ability of melatonin to upregulate ETI and PTI defense-related genes need to affirm their findings within proteomic approaches by establishing a clear signal transduction pathway for this process. Plant growth promotion rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been extensively studied due to their beneficial role in shielding plants against pathogenic diseases and enhancing plant development and growth through nitrogen fixation, siderophore production, phosphorus solubilization, and increasing plant hormone accumulations [77,78,79]. Many studies have reported that PGPR can produce melatonin and subsequently raise its endogenous levels in different plant organs [70,71,80]. However, it is necessary to investigate in detail the effect of combined applications of melatonin and PGPR on plant defense against several environmental stressors. Also, the synergistic effect of combined melatonin and antifungal treatments is an interesting way by which to obtain a high degree of plant pathogen resistance response with lower concentrations of chemical fungicides. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is available regarding the impact of melatonin on plant infection by viruses, nematodes, and insects, so further research in this respect is required.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the dean funding project scheme of the Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China (no. 201811B).

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my group team Yichun Li, Mingdeng Tang, and Yanhong Wang for their support and cooperation during the writing of this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Walters, D.R. (Ed.) Why Do Plants Need Defenses? In Plant Defense; Wiley-Blackwell: Edinburgh, UK, 2010; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrios, G.N. Preface. In Plant Pathology, 5th ed.; Agrios, G.N., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schumann, G.L.; D’Arcy, C.J. Essential Plant Pathology; American Phytopathological Society (APS Press): St. Paul, MI, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zaynab, M.; Fatima, M.; Abbas, S.; Sharif, Y.; Umair, M.; Zafar, M.H.; Bahadar, K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Monaghan, J.; Zipfel, C. Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane. Curr. Opin. Plant Boil. 2012, 15, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Spoel, S.H.; Dong, X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Vleesschauwer, D.; Xu, J.; Hãfte, M.; Höfte, M. Making sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: From rice to Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Grant, M.; Lamb, C. Systemic immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Boil. 2006, 9, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Loon, L.C.v.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1998, 36, 453–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Santamaria, M.E.; Martínez, M.; Cambra, I.; Grbić, V.; Diaz, I. Understanding plant defence responses against herbivore attacks: An essential first step towards the development of sustainable resistance against pests. Transgenic Res. 2013, 22, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oerke, E.-C. Estimated crop losses due to pathogens, animal pests and weeds. In Crop Production and Crop Protection; Oerke, E.C., Dehne, H.W., SchÖNbeck, F., Weber, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 72–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oerke, E.C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oerke, E.-C.; Dehne, H.-W. Safeguarding production—losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop. Prot. 2004, 23, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Savary, S.; Savary, S.; Zadoks, J.C.; Zadoks, J.C. Analysis of crop loss in the multiple pathosystem groundnut-rust- late leaf spot. I. Six experiments. Crop. Prot. 1992, 11, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teng, P.S. Crop Loss Assessment and Pest Management; APS Press: St. Paul, MI, USA, 1987; p. 270. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wyckhuys, K.A.G.; Hughes, A.C.; Buamas, C.; Johnson, A.C.; Vasseur, L.; Reymondin, L.; Deguine, J.-P.; Sheil, D. Biological control of an agricultural pest protects tropical forests. Commun. Boil. 2019, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lamichhane, J.R.; Osdaghi, E.; Behlau, F.; Kohl, J.; Jones, J.B.; Aubertot, J.-N. Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fortunati, E.; Mazzaglia, A.; Balestra, G.M. Sustainable control strategies for plant protection and food packaging sectors by natural substances and novel nanotechnological approaches. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 986–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lerner, A.B.; Case, J.D.; Takahashi, Y.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, T.H.; Mori, W. Isolation of melatonin, the pineal gland factor that lightens melanocytes1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hattori, A.; Migitaka, H.; Iigo, M.; Itoh, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Ohtani-Kaneko, R.; Hara, M.; Suzuki, T.; Reiter, R.J. Identification of melatonin in plants and its effects on plasma melatonin levels and binding to melatonin receptors in vertebrates. Biochem. Mol. Boil. Int. 1995, 35, 627–634. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dubbels, R.; Reiter, R.; Klenke, E.; Goebel, A.; Schnakenberg, E.; Ehlers, C.; Schiwara, H.; Schloot, W. Melatonin in edible plants identified by radioimmunoassay and by high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Pineal Res. 1995, 18, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reiter, R.J.; Tan, D.X.; Galano, A. Melatonin: Exceeding Expectations. Physiology 2014, 29, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhao, D.; Yu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Sharma, R.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin Synthesis and Function: Evolutionary History in Animals and Plants. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin: A New Plant Hormone and/or a Plant Master Regulator? Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: A model for the plant redox network. Melatonin Res. 2019, 2, 152–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. The multi-regulatory properties of melatonin in plants. In Neurotransmitters in Plants; Ramakrishna, A., Roshchina, V., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA; Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 71–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Back, K.; Tan, D.-X.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin biosynthesis in plants: Multiple pathways catalyze tryptophan to melatonin in the cytoplasm or chloroplasts. J. Pineal Res. 2016, 61, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tan, D.-X.; Hardeland, R.; Back, K.; Manchester, L.C.; Alatorre-Jimenez, M.A.; Reiter, R.J. On the significance of an alternate pathway of melatonin synthesis via 5-methoxytryptamine: Comparisons across species. J. Pineal Res. 2016, 61, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Dhole, A.M.; Shelat, H.N. Phytomelatonin: A plant hormone for management of stress. J. Anal. Pharm. Res. 2018, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kaur, H.; Mukherjee, S.; Baluska, F.; Bhatla, S.C. Regulatory roles of serotonin and melatonin in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e1049788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Vielma, J.R.; Bonilla, E.; Chacín-Bonilla, L.; Mora, M.; Medina-Leendertz, S.; Bravo, Y. Effects of melatonin on oxidative stress, and resistance to bacterial, parasitic, and viral infections: A review. Acta Trop. 2014, 137, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carrillo-Vico, A.; Lardone, P.J.; Álvarez-Sánchez, N.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A.; Guerrero, J.M. Melatonin: Buffering the Immune System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 8638–8683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Nabavi, S.M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Sureda, A.; Xiao, J.; Dehpour, A.R.; Shirooie, S.; Silva, A.S.; Baldi, A.; Khan, H.; Daglia, M. Anti-inflammatory effects of Melatonin: A mechanistic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Regodon, S.; Martín-Palomino, P.; Fernández-Montesinos, R.; Herrera, J.L.; Carrascosa-Salmoral, M.P.; Píriz, S.; Vadillo, S.; Guerrero, J.M.; Pozo, D.; Perez, P.D.D.P. The use of melatonin as a vaccine agent. Vaccine 2005, 23, 5321–5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, S.-H.; Liao, C.-L.; Chen, S.-J.; Shi, L.-G.; Lin, L.; Chen, Y.-W.; Cheng, C.-P.; Sytwu, H.-K.; Shang, S.-T.; Lin, G.-J. Melatonin possesses an anti-influenza potential through its immune modulatory effect. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 58, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boga, J.A.; Caballero, B.; Potes, Y.; Perez-Martinez, Z.; Reiter, R.J.; Vega-Naredo, I.; Coto-Montes, A. Therapeutic potential of melatonin related to its role as an autophagy regulator: A review. J. Pineal Res. 2019, 66, 12534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhao, L.; Chen, L.; Gu, P.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, C.; Wu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Q. Exogenous application of melatonin improves plant resistance to virus infection. Plant Pathol. 2019, 68, 1287–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, L.; Wang, M.; Li, J.; Feng, C.; Cui, Z.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Q. Exogenous application of melatonin improves eradication of apple stem grooving virus from the infected in vitro shoots by shoot tip culture. Plant Pathol. 2019, 68, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, H.Y.; Byeon, Y.; Tan, D.X.; Reiter, R.J.; Back, K. Arabidopsis serotonin N-acetyltransferase knockout mutant plants exhibit decreased melatonin and salicylic acid levels resulting in susceptibility to an avirulent pathogen. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 58, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mandal, M.K.; Suren, H.; Ward, B.; Boroujerdi, A.; Kousik, C. Differential roles of melatonin in plant-host resistance and pathogen suppression in cucurbits. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Weeda, S.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, X.; Ndip, G.; Guo, Y.; Buck, G.A.; Fu, C.; Ren, S. Arabidopsis Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Key Roles of Melatonin in Plant Defense Systems. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Qian, Y.; Tan, D.-X.; Reiter, R.J.; Shi, H. Comparative metabolomic analysis highlights the involvement of sugars and glycerol in melatonin-mediated innate immunity against bacterial pathogen in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Shi, H.; Chen, Y.; Tan, D.X.; Reiter, R.J.; Chan, Z.; He, C. Melatonin induces nitric oxide and the potential mechanisms relate to innate immunity against bacterial pathogen infection in Arabidopsis. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 59, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, H.Y.; Byeon, Y.; Back, K. Melatonin as a signal molecule triggering defense responses against pathogen attack in Arabidopsisand tobacco. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, H.; Xu, L.; Su, T.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, L.; Ma, F. Melatonin regulates carbohydrate metabolism and defenses against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 59, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  46. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin and its relationship to plant hormones. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, H.Y.; Back, K. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways are required for melatonin-mediated defense responses in plants. J. Pineal Res. 2016, 60, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, H.Y.; Back, K. Melatonin is required for H2O2- and NO-mediated defense signaling through MAPKKK3 and OXI1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Pineal Res. 2017, 62, 12379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin as a Chemical Substance or as Phytomelatonin Rich-Extracts for Use as Plant Protector and/or Biostimulant in Accordance with EC Legislation. Agronomy 2019, 9, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Aghdam, M.S.; Fard, J.R. Melatonin treatment attenuates postharvest decay and maintains nutritional quality of strawberry fruits (Fragaria×anannasa cv. Selva) by enhancing GABA shunt activity. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1650–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yin, L.; Wang, P.; Li, M.; Ke, X.; Li, C.; Liang, N.; Wu, S.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Zou, Y.; et al. Exogenous melatonin improves Malus resistance to Marssonina apple blotch. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 54, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tekbaş, Ö.F.; Ogur, R.; Korkmaz, A.; Kilic, A.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin as an antibiotic: New insights into the actions of this ubiquitous molecule. J. Pineal Res. 2008, 44, 222–226. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiid, I.; Helden, E.H.-V.; Hon, D.; Lombard, C.; Van Helden, P. Potentiation of Isoniazid Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Melatonin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 975–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ma, N.; Zhang, J.; Reiter, R.J.; Ma, X. Melatonin mediates mucosal immune cells, microbial metabolism, and rhythm crosstalk: A therapeutic target to reduce intestinal inflammation. Med. Res. Rev. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, X.; Sun, C.; Laborda, P.; He, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, F. Melatonin treatments reduce the pathogenicity and inhibit the growth of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola. Plant Patho. 2019, 68, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, X.; Sun, C.; Laborda, P.; Zhao, Y.; Palmer, I.; Fu, Z.Q.; Qiu, J.; Liu, F. Melatonin Treatment Inhibits the Growth of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Nehela, Y.; Killiny, N. Infection with phytopathogenic bacterium inhibits melatonin biosynthesis, decreases longevity of its vector, and suppresses the free radical-defense. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wei, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Liu, G.; He, C.; Shi, H. RAV transcription factors are essential for disease resistance against cassava bacterial blight via activation of melatonin biosynthesis genes. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 64, 12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yavuz, T.; Kaya, D.; Behçet, M.; Ozturk, E.; Yavuz, O. Effects of melatonin on Candida sepsis in an experimental rat model. Adv. Ther. 2007, 24, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Terron, M.P.; Cubero, J.; Barriga, C.; Ortega, E.; Rodriguez, A.B. Phagocytosis of Candida albicans and superoxide anion Levels in ring dove (Streptopelia risoria) heterophils: Effect of melatonin. J. Neuroendocr. 2003, 15, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paredes, S.; Barriga, C.; Ortega, E. Comparative study of the heterophil phagocytic function in young and old ring doves (Streptopelia risoria) and its relationship with melatonin levels. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2004, 174, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cengiz, M.I.; Cengiz, S.; Wang, H.-L. Melatonin and Oral Cavity. Int. J. Dent. 2012, 2012, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Liu, C.; Chen, L.; Zhao, R.; Li, R.; Zhang, S.; Yu, W.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Melatonin Induces Disease Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Fruit by Activating Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 6116–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, S.; Zheng, X.; Reiter, R.J.; Feng, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Jin, L.; Li, Z.; Datla, R.; Ren, M. Melatonin Attenuates Potato Late Blight by Disrupting Cell Growth, Stress Tolerance, Fungicide Susceptibility and Homeostasis of Gene Expression in Phytophthora infestans. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chang, F.; Cao, X.; Peng, J.; Tan, X.; Chen, T.; Zeng, J.; Cao, Y.; Qiao, D. Induced resistance to Plasmodiophora brassicae in Arabidopsis by melatonin. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Bio. 2018, 24, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lan, G.; Jiao, C.; Sun, Y. Effect ofexogenous melatonin on resistance of cucumber to downy mildew. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 255, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Reiter, R.J.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, D.; Luo, X.; Khalid, A.R.; Wang, H.; Feng, L.; et al. Synergistic anti-oomycete effect of melatonin with a biofungicide against oomycetic black shank disease. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, C.; Zhao, Q.; Gao, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, B.; Wei, Z.; Liu, C.; Ma, F. The mitigation effects of exogenous melatonin on replant disease in apple. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Functions of melatonin in plants: A review. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 59, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Jiao, J.; Ma, Y.; Chen, S.; Liu, C.; Song, Y.; Qin, Y.; Yuan, C.; Liu, Y. Melatonin-Producing Endophytic Bacteria from Grapevine Roots Promote the Abiotic Stress-Induced Production of Endogenous Melatonin in Their Hosts. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Ma, Y.; Jiao, J.; Fan, X.; Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Liu, C. Endophytic Bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens RG11 May Transform Tryptophan to Melatonin and Promote Endogenous Melatonin Levels in the Roots of Four Grape Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Ji, Y.; Shi, K.; Wang, L.; Zheng, X.; Kong, J. Melatonin in Apples and Juice: Inhibition of Browning and Microorganism Growth in Apple Juice. Molecules 2018, 23, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Lin, Y.; Fan, L.; Xia, X.; Wang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Z. Melatonin decreases resistance to postharvest green mold on citrus fruit by scavenging defense-related reactive oxygen species. Postharvest Boil. Technol. 2019, 153, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wei, Y.; Hu, W.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, H.; Li, X.; Yan, Y.; Reiter, R.J.; He, C.; Shi, H. Identification, transcriptional and functional analysis of heat-shock protein 90s in banana (Musa acuminata L.) highlight their novel role in melatonin-mediated plant response to Fusarium wilt. J. Pineal Res. 2017, 62, 12367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wei, J.; Li, D.-X.; Zhang, J.-R.; Shan, C.; Rengel, Z.; Song, Z.-B.; Chen, Q. Phytomelatonin receptor PMTR1-mediated signaling regulates stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhan, H.; Nie, X.; Zhang, T.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Du, X.; Tong, W.; Song, W. Melatonin: A Small Molecule but Important for Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Almoneafy, A.A.; Kakar, K.U.; Nawaz, Z.; Li, B.; Saand, M.A.; Chun-Lan, Y.; Xie, G.-L. Tomato plant growth promotion and antibacterial related-mechanisms of four rhizobacterial Bacillus strains against Ralstonia solanacearum. Symbiosis 2014, 63, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Almoneafy, A.A.; Ojaghian, M.R.; Seng-Fu, X.; Ibrahim, M.; Guan-Lin, X.; Yu, S.; Wen-Xiao, T.; Bin, L. Synergistic effect of acetyl salicylic acid and DL-Beta-aminobutyric acid on biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus strains against tomato bacterial wilt. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2013, 38, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kakar, K.U.; Duan, Y.P.; Nawaz, Z.; Sun, G.; Almoneafy, A.A.; Hassan, M.A.; Elshakh, A.; Li, B.; Xie, G.-L. A novel rhizobacterium Bk7 for biological control of brown sheath rot of rice caused by Pseudomonas fuscovaginae and its mode of action. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 138, 819–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, T.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Z.; Zuo, Y.; Hou, J.; Wang, Y. Identification of melatonin in Trichoderma spp. and detection of melatonin content under controlled-stress growth conditions from T. asperellum. J. Basic Micro. 2016, 56, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 10 00054 g001 550
Figure 1. Expected model of melatonin-related defense pathways according to the findings obtained from many studies [24,25,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Abbreviations: NBS-LRR, nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat; LRR-RLKs, leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases; ETI, effector triggered immunity; PTI, PAMP-triggered immunity; TFs, transcription factors; CWI, cell wall invertase; CW enf, cell wall enforcement; Cal Dep, callose deposition; PM, plasma membrane; Suc, sucrose; Glu, glucose; Fru, fructose; Cel, cellulose; Gal, galactose; Xyl, xylose; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; SA, salicylic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; ET, ethylene; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase. Lined and dotted arrows denote the assumed mechanisms; lines with bars point to negative action in the respective pathway.
Figure 1. Expected model of melatonin-related defense pathways according to the findings obtained from many studies [24,25,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Abbreviations: NBS-LRR, nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat; LRR-RLKs, leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases; ETI, effector triggered immunity; PTI, PAMP-triggered immunity; TFs, transcription factors; CWI, cell wall invertase; CW enf, cell wall enforcement; Cal Dep, callose deposition; PM, plasma membrane; Suc, sucrose; Glu, glucose; Fru, fructose; Cel, cellulose; Gal, galactose; Xyl, xylose; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; SA, salicylic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; ET, ethylene; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase. Lined and dotted arrows denote the assumed mechanisms; lines with bars point to negative action in the respective pathway.
Biomolecules 10 00054 g001
Table
Table 1. Effect of melatonin on plant–virus pathosystem.
Table 1. Effect of melatonin on plant–virus pathosystem.
Plant NamePathogen NameMelatonin Dosage (µM)Delivery MethodInvolved MechanismResulting EffectRef.
Nicotiana glutinosa and Solanum lycopersicumTobacco mosaic virus (TMV)100 (twice)Root irrigationSalicylic acid (SA) concentrations lead to increased expression of PR1 and PR5 genesReduction of virus concentration in infected plants[37]
Malus domesticaApple stem grooving virus (ASGV)15To the shoot proliferation mediumNot reconnoiteredEradication of virus from previously infected shoot tips[38]
SA = Salicylic acid; PR1 and PR5 = plant resistance genes 1 and 5.
Table
Table 2. Beneficial action of melatonin in plants infected with bacterial pathogens.
Table 2. Beneficial action of melatonin in plants infected with bacterial pathogens.
Plant Pathogen Melatonin Dosage (µM)Delivery MethodMechanismEffectRef.
Arabidopsis thaliana,
Nicotiana benthamiana		Pseudomonas syringae1 or 10Leaf treatment▲ Expression of defense genes PR1, PR5, and PDF1.2Inhibition of pathogen propagation[44]
A. thalianaP. syringae10Leaf treatment▲ Pathogenesis-related
(PR) genes by the harmonizing signaling between SA and ET		Increase resistance against pathogen[39]
A. thaliana,
N. benthamiana		P. syringae1Leaf treatment▲ Induction of PR genes through MAPK signaling cascadesDisease resistance[47]
A. thalianaP. syringae20Added to nutrient solutionInvolvement of sugars and
glycerol in melatonin-mediated innate immunity in SA- and NO-dependent
pathways		Disease resistance[42]
A. thalianaP. syringae20Added to nutrient solution▲ NO and melatonin levels in leaves
▲ Defense-related genes		Improvement of disease resistance[43]
A. thalianaP. syringae50Added to plant culture medium▲ Activities of CWI and
vacuolar invertase (VI)		Cell-wall reinforcement and callose deposition during infection[45]
A. thalianaP. syringae1Leaf treatmentInduction of PR1 and ICS1 expression genes through MAPK cascades in coexistence H2O2 and NODisease resistance[48]
▲ = increasing in content or action; SA = salicylic acid; PR1 and PR5 = plant resistance genes 1 and 5; ET = ethylene; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; NO = nitric oxide; PDF1.2 = plant defensin 1.2 gene; ICS1 = isochorismate synthase 1 gene; H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide.
Table
Table 3. Role of exogenous melatonin treatment in plant–fungal interaction.
Table 3. Role of exogenous melatonin treatment in plant–fungal interaction.
Plant NamePathogen NameMelatonin Dosage (µM)Delivery MethodInvolved MechanismResulting EffectRef.
Malus prunifoliaDiplocarpon mali50–500Root irrigationMaintain intracellular H2O2 concentrations
▲ Activities of plant defense-related enzymes		Alleviating disease damage
Fungal infection resistance
Lesion reduction		[51]
Musa acuminataFusarium oxysporum100Leaf and root treatment▲ Resistance induced via regulating the expression of MaHSP90s geneImprovement of disease resistance[74]
Fragaria ananassaBotrytis cinerea and
Rhizopus stolonifer		100Fruit dipping▲ H2O2 levels
▲ Antioxidant enzyme activities		Reduction of postharvest decay
in stored strawberry fruits		[50]
Citrullus lanatusPodosphaera xanthii and
Phythophthora capsici		100Leaf treatment▲ Upregulation of PTI- and ETI-associated genesDisease resistance[40]
A. thaliana--------1 × 10−4 or 100Seedling rinsing▲ Upregulation of genes involved in abscisic acid (ABA), ET, SA, and JA pathwaysIncrease plant resilience to
biotic and abiotic stress.		[41]
▲ = increasing in content or action; H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide; SA = salicylic acid; ET = ethylene; PTI = pattern-triggered immunity; ETI = effector-triggered. immunity; JA = jasmonic acid; ABA = abscisic acid.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moustafa-Farag, M.; Almoneafy, A.; Mahmoud, A.; Elkelish, A.; Arnao, M.B.; Li, L.; Ai, S. Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010054

AMA Style

Moustafa-Farag M, Almoneafy A, Mahmoud A, Elkelish A, Arnao MB, Li L, Ai S. Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(1):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moustafa-Farag, Mohamed, Abdulwareth Almoneafy, Ahmed Mahmoud, Amr Elkelish, Marino B. Arnao, Linfeng Li, and Shaoying Ai. 2020. "Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants" Biomolecules 10, no. 1: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010054

APA Style

Moustafa-Farag, M., Almoneafy, A., Mahmoud, A., Elkelish, A., Arnao, M. B., Li, L., & Ai, S. (2020). Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants. Biomolecules, 10(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010054

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop