Next Article in Journal
Raychaudhuri Equations, Tidal Forces, and the Weak-Field Limit in Schwarzshild–Finsler–Randers Spacetime
Next Article in Special Issue
The Operational Meaning of Total Energy of Isolated Systems in General Relativity
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Axion Lasing in Astrophysics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyperparameter Optimization of an hp-Greedy Reduced Basis for Gravitational Wave Surrogates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparing Numerical Relativity and Perturbation Theory Waveforms for a Non-Spinning Equal-Mass Binary

1
Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
2
Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
3
Center for Scientific Computing and Data Science Research, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
4
Department of Physics and Center for Computational Research, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2024, 10(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010025
Submission received: 23 November 2023 / Revised: 15 December 2023 / Accepted: 20 December 2023 / Published: 9 January 2024

Abstract

Past studies have empirically demonstrated a surprising agreement between gravitational waveforms computed using adiabatic–driven–inspiral point–particle black hole perturbation theory (ppBHPT) and numerical relativity (NR) following a straightforward calibration step, sometimes referred to as α-β scaling. Specifically focusing on the quadrupole mode, this calibration technique necessitates only two time-independent parameters to scale the overall amplitude and time coordinate. In this article, part of a Special Issue, we investigate this scaling for non-spinning binaries at the equal-mass limit. Even without calibration, NR and ppBHPT waveforms exhibit an unexpected degree of similarity after accounting for different mass scale definitions. Post-calibration, good agreement between ppBHPT and NR waveforms extends nearly up to the point of the merger. We also assess the breakdown of the time-independent assumption of the scaling parameters, shedding light on current limitations and suggesting potential generalizations for the α-β scaling technique.
Keywords: numerical relativity; black hole perturbation theory; gravitational waves; binary black holes numerical relativity; black hole perturbation theory; gravitational waves; binary black holes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islam, T.; Field, S.E.; Khanna, G. Comparing Numerical Relativity and Perturbation Theory Waveforms for a Non-Spinning Equal-Mass Binary. Universe 2024, 10, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010025

AMA Style

Islam T, Field SE, Khanna G. Comparing Numerical Relativity and Perturbation Theory Waveforms for a Non-Spinning Equal-Mass Binary. Universe. 2024; 10(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islam, Tousif, Scott E. Field, and Gaurav Khanna. 2024. "Comparing Numerical Relativity and Perturbation Theory Waveforms for a Non-Spinning Equal-Mass Binary" Universe 10, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010025

APA Style

Islam, T., Field, S. E., & Khanna, G. (2024). Comparing Numerical Relativity and Perturbation Theory Waveforms for a Non-Spinning Equal-Mass Binary. Universe, 10(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop