Next Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome and Metabolic Profiling Analysis of Buckwheat (Fagopyrum Tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) under Salinity Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Lipid Profiles after Dietary Intake of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Using Integrated Untargeted and Targeted Lipidomics
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Profiling and Cytotoxic Tetrahydrofurofuran Lignans Investigations from Premna odorata Blanco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/metabo9100224
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolomics Approach Reveals the Effects of Breed and Feed on the Composition of Chicken Eggs

by
Tatsuhiko Goto
1,2,*,
Hiroki Mori
2,
Shunsuke Shiota
3 and
Shozo Tomonaga
3
1
Research Center for Global Agromedicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
2
Department of Life and Food Sciences, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
3
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2019, 9(10), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100224
Submission received: 24 September 2019 / Revised: 10 October 2019 / Accepted: 10 October 2019 / Published: 13 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolomic Applications in Animal Science)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chicken eggs provide essential nutrients to consumers around the world. Although both genetic and environmental factors influence the quality of eggs, it is unclear how these factors affect the egg traits including egg metabolites. In this study, we investigated breed and feed effects on 10 egg traits, using two breeds (Rhode Island Red and Australorp) and two feed conditions (mixed feed and fermented feed). We also used gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) to analyze 138 yolk and 132 albumen metabolites. Significant breed effects were found on yolk weight, eggshell weight, eggshell colors, and one albumen metabolite (ribitol). Three yolk metabolites (erythritol, threitol, and urea) and 12 albumen metabolites (erythritol, threitol, ribitol, linoleic acid, isoleucine, dihydrouracil, 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, alanine, glycine, N-butyrylglycine, pyruvic acid, and valine) were significantly altered by feed, and a significant interaction between breed and feed was discovered in one albumen metabolite (N-butyrylglycine). Yolk and albumin had higher levels of sugar alcohols when hens were fed a fermented diet, which indicates that sugar alcohol content can be transferred from diet into eggs. Linoleic acid was also enriched in albumen under fermented feed conditions. This study shows that yolk and albumen metabolites will be affected by breed and feed, which is the first step towards manipulating genetic and environmental factors to create “designer eggs.”

1. Introduction

Approximately 80 million tons of chicken eggs are produced every year, and they are a crucial source of animal protein in many developing countries [1,2]. Globally, 821 million people are malnourished [3], so international efforts to increase egg production are of high priority. In more developed countries, consumers are increasingly concerned with the quality of eggs and the bioavailability of favorable functional ingredients [4,5]. Increasing the quantity and quality of eggs around the world is key not only to alleviating hunger, but also to providing important dietary nutrients and keeping up with a rapidly changing international livestock industry. Currently, huge scientific effort is devoted to modifying agricultural produce traits to create “designer foods” [6]; eggs are no exception, and considerable effort is currently underway to modify egg traits and produce “designer eggs” to meet consumer demand [7,8].
Both genetic and environmental factors influence the quantity and quality of eggs [9,10,11]. Heritability estimates of egg traits such as overall weight, albumen weight, and yolk weight, are around 0.30–0.70 [12,13,14], which indicates that genetic factors are crucial to the regulation of egg traits. These general egg traits, which are mass and quality of egg components (yolk, albumen, and eggshell), are important for quality of egg itself as the product of egg market. Environmental factors including age, nutrition, stress, disease, medication, and production system also have important roles in modifying egg traits [9,10]. Thus, studies seeking to enhance egg traits should be cognizant of both genetic and environmental factors.
Egg enrichment with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA), which provide various human health benefits, is of current interest [15]. Evidence suggests that fatty acids quantity can be altered through changes to hens’ diet [16]. Other research suggests that responses to dietary enrichment and conversion into egg metabolites may be breed-specific [17]. Both breed and feed appear to regulate the abundance of metabolites in egg yolk and albumen. Recently, we also have reported that egg yolk amino acid was modified by both breed and feed [18]. This is very likely to be the tip of the iceberg regarding the effects of genetic and environmental factors on egg composition.
Metabolomics, the study of the set of metabolites present in various tissues, is used to identify novel metabolites or changes in metabolite ratios in tissues [19]. Metabolomic analyses are used in a variety of fields, including biomedicine [20,21], plant science [19], food science [22,23], and ecological/environmental science [24,25]. Typical metabolite analyses use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry (CE–MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Metabolome analyses have previously been used to identify changes caused by stress and/or feed in mice using CE–MS [26] and GC–MS [27], so we expect a metabolomics approach to provide useful insight into the role of breed and feed in determining egg composition.
As studies into the metabolomes of livestock animals accumulate, a central database—the Livestock Metabolome Database—has been developed to compile this information. Research into cattle metabolic constitutes a large proportion of this work (76 of 149 articles), as does research into animal health, nutrition, and production (97 of 149 papers; [28]). For instance, effects of long-distance transportation in serum metabolites have been studied in cattle [29] and heat stress-induced metabolomic changes have been investigated in chicks [30]. Relatively few reports target non-major livestock breeds, and there is a need to populate the Livestock Metabolome Database with basic metabolome data for all livestock breeds.
In this study, we analyzed the yolk and albumen metabolome of eggs and general egg traits from two different breeds of hens under two different feed conditions. We used the GC–MS/MS technique to measure metabolome content, and tested how egg metabolites are influenced by specific genetic and environmental factors, i.e., breed and feed, respectively.

2. Results

2.1. Egg Traits

To test the effects of breed and feed on egg traits, 10 traits were investigated (Table 1). Two-way mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant effect of breed on yolk weight (F1,12 = 8.098, P = 0.0147), eggshell weight (F1,12 = 7.287, P = 0.0193), lightness of eggshell color (F1,12 = 6.022, P = 0.0304), redness of eggshell color (F1,12 = 10.818, P = 0.0065), and yellowness of eggshell color (F1,12 = 14.394, P = 0.0026). Rhode Island Red (RIR) eggs showed higher yolk weight and lower eggshell weight than Australorp (AUS) eggs. Eggshell color in RIR eggs had less lightness, and more redness and yellowness than that of AUS. There were no significant effects of feed or interaction terms between breed and feed on any of the egg traits.

2.2. Egg Metabolite Traits

Egg metabolite traits from yolk (138 metabolites) and albumen (132 metabolites) were semi-quantified using GC−MS/MS. Full results were shown for yolk and albumen in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, respectively. Controlling for multiple comparisons in each sample, some metabolites were found to be metabolome-wide significantly altered by breed and feed (Q < 0.1).
Albumen ribitol was significantly affected by breed (Table 2), with RIR eggs containing significantly higher ribitol levels than AUS eggs. Three metabolites in yolk and 12 metabolites in albumen had significant effects of feed (Table 3). Erythritol and threitol were significantly altered by feed in both the yolk and the albumen. Urea was altered in the yolk samples only, whereas isoleucine, dihydrouracil, linoleic acid, 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, alanine, glycine, N-butyrylglycine, pyruvic acid, ribitol, and valine were altered in albumen samples only. For threitol, erythritol, dihydrouracil, linoleic acid, pyruvic acid, and ribitol, the fermented feed group in both chicken breeds showed significantly higher metabolite content than mixed feed. On the other hand, the fermented feed group had significantly lower contents of urea, isoleucine, 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, alanine, glycine, N-butyrylglycine, and valine than the mixed feed group. There was a significant interaction between breed and feed on N-butyrylglycine in the albumen; N-butyrylglycine content in RIR chickens was higher with mixed feed than with fermented feed, but this effect was reversed in the AUS samples (Table 4).

3. Discussion

This study was designed to test the effects of breed and feed on 10 egg traits, 138 yolk metabolite traits, and 132 albumen metabolite traits, in RIR/AUS hens fed with either mixed feed or fermented feed. There were significant breed effects on yolk weight, eggshell weight, eggshell colors, and one albumen metabolite. Three yolk metabolites and 12 albumen metabolites were significantly altered by feed, and a significant interaction between breed and feed affected levels of one albumen metabolite. Using the metabolome technique, this study has demonstrated that certain egg properties, including metabolites in the yolk and albumen, can be changed by both genetic and environmental factors.
Since general egg traits, which are mass and quality of egg components (yolk, albumen, and eggshell), are crucial to maintain egg quality, we investigated 10 egg traits in this study. Egg traits including weight, length, width, albumen weight, and eggshell thickness showed no significant differences between RIR and AUS hens in this study, although AUS eggshell weight was higher than RIR. Average body weight at 35 weeks of age in RIR hens was more than twice that of AUS hens (3.69 and 1.58 kg in RIR and AUS, respectively). Yolk weight in RIR was significantly greater than that in AUS, corresponding to differences in body weight. We previously reported that Oh-Shamo (2.91 kg), and classical type of White Leghorn hens (1.54 kg) with average body weight at 36 weeks of age produced 53.8 ± 4.2 g and 47.4 ± 2.3 g of egg weight at 300 days of age, respectively [32,33]. Egg weight in AUS hens was 56.7 ± 4.9 g at around 300 days (41 weeks). Thus, AUS hens have a potential to produce eggs that are relatively larger than expected from their body weight [18]. On the other hand, significant breed effects were found on eggshell colors (lightness, redness, and yellowness), with RIR hens laying darker brown eggs than AUS hens. White to brown variation in eggshell color is a heritable quantitative trait [9,10,11], and eggshell colors of Oh-Shamo, White Leghorn, Hy-line Brown, and Onagadori chickens were reported [33,34,35]. Comparing this study to previous work, eggs appear to decrease in color from brown to white in the order of Hy-Line Brown > RIR > Oh-Shamo > AUS > Onagadori > White Leghorn [33,34,35]. Further efforts must be needed to reveal the genetic basis of eggshell coloration in chickens using population genomics and genome-wide scan.
The present metabolome analyses revealed significant changes in the amount of sugar alcohols (polyols) present in eggs. Erythritol and threitol in the yolk and albumen appear to be affected by dietary changes, specifically moving to a fermented diet. Sugar alcohols are naturally found in small quantities in fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, and fermented foods such as wine, beer, sake, and soy sauce [36], and can be produced by several yeasts and fungi [37]. The fermented feed used in this study was made with wheat, pumpkin, yam, soybean, potato, rice bran, fish meal, beet lees, scallop shell, and other materials, and lactic acid bacteria were used to ferment the mixture [18]; the amount of sugar alcohols in fermented feed would be higher than in mixed feed. Eggs produced under the fermented feed treatment had high sugar alcohol content, which is likely due to the transfer of these nutrients from feed to eggs. The same trend was also apparent for ribitol, which was found at a higher concentration in eggs produced on the fermented diet. There was also a significant breed effect, and ribitol levels in RIR eggs were higher than those of AUS eggs. These results indicate that different genetic backgrounds can affect the transfer of nutrients into eggs.
After 7 weeks on the fermented feed treatment, erythritol contents in both the yolk and albumen were significantly higher than on mixed feed. Erythritol is a four-carbon sugar alcohol (polyol) that has a sweetness 60% to 80% that of sucrose, and is used as a low-calorie sweetener [38]. This may indicate that yolk and albumen taste are affected by feed type. In humans, erythritol is fast absorbed through the small intestine, and >90% is excreted intact in urine. The remaining 10% is fermented in the large intestine by colonic microorganisms [36]. Polyols act as probiotics like a fiber, and can help normalize intestine function [36]. There are massive evidences that the intake of erythritol would not cause adverse effects in humans [38]. Artificial sweeteners and/or polyols may be helpful in diabetes and weight control, and eggs enriched with erythritol may be useful as a functional food.
Linoleic acid levels in egg albumen were significantly increased by the fermented feed diet. Linoleic acid is a long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and an essential nutrient in wide range of animals including humans. PUFA is vital for body functions and plays an important role in the formation and functioning of cell membranes, cell physiology, signaling, immunity, and reproduction [39]. Many animals lack the ability to synthesize linoleic acid de novo, so dietary intake of linoleic acid is necessary [39]. Enrichment of eggs with PUFAs, including linoleic acid, is relatively common and increases the nutritional functionality of enriched eggs [15]. Linoleic acid is found at relatively high levels in seed oils [40]. Fermented feed may derive its high linoleic acid content from its constituent plant matter, which includes pumpkin seeds, or from its relatively high proportion of crude fat. However, although isoleucine, alanine, glycine, and valine levels in the fermented feed were also higher than those of mixed feed, albumin isoleucine, alanine, glycine, and valine contents of eggs under the fermented feed diet were significantly lower than those of the mixed feed diet. More works are required to understand the changes to these amino acids levels in albumen.
There was a significant interaction between breed and feed on albumin N-butyrylglycine levels. N-butyrylglycine is an acylglycine [41], which is formed by the conjugation of acyl-CoA esters with glycine [42]. Acylglycines are used as diagnostic markers of inborn errors of metabolism [41], and previous studies have shown that acylglycine levels are sensitive in the urine of spontaneously hypertensive rats on a high-fat diet [42]. In this study, we found that acylglycine content was higher under the mixed feed treatment than fermented feed in RIR hens, but the opposite was true for AUS hens. Since N-butyrylglycine is involved in fatty acid metabolism [42], this may indicate that the combination of breed and feed can affect fatty acid metabolism. Actually, linoleic acid in albumen was significantly altered in this study. Such interaction effects of breed and feed have been documented in the enriched fatty acid levels of yolks in other studies [17]. In the modern chicken industry, hybrid chickens rather than pure breeds are often used for egg and meat production. This study indicates that the combination of breed and feed should be considered to modulate metabolite levels in yolk and albumen.
In conclusion, we found significant breed and feed effects on yolk weight, eggshell weight, eggshell colors, and several metabolites in the yolk and albumen. Feed alone had a notable impact on sugar alcohol and fatty acid levels, which were enriched in both yolk and albumen under the fermented feed treatment. We illustrated that both genetic and environmental factors are critical to determining egg composition and should be considered in the efforts to meet consumer needs and develop nutritionally functional designer eggs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Animals

Rhode Island Red (RIR; n = 5) and Australorp (AUS; n = 5) hens were procured from the Animal Research Center of the Hokkaido Research Organization, Japan. They were introduced to the experimental farm of the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan, at 22 weeks of age. After introduction, all hens were reared in individual cages under a photoperiod cycle of 16 h light and 8 h dark, with free access to diet and water. Body weight at 35 weeks of age was 3.69 ± 0.57 and 1.58 ± 0.09 kg (mean ± standard deviation) for RIR and AUS, respectively (F1,8 = 67.324, P = 3.6 × 10−5). Animal management was carried out following the Guide for the Use of Experimental Animals in Universities (The Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Tokyo, Japan 1987) and the Standards Related to the Care and Management of Experimental Animals (Prime Ministers’ Office, Tokyo, Japan, 1980). This study (authorization number 18–15) was approved from the Experimental Animal Committee of the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine.

4.2. Experimental Conditions and Sampling

To test the effects of breed and feed on egg metabolome, RIR and AUS hens were reared under two different feed conditions. Mixed feed (Rankeeper; Marubeni Nisshin Feed Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was provided for 11 weeks, from introduction until 33 weeks of age. Fermented feed (Kusanagi Farm Limited Company, Obihiro, Japan) was provided for 9 weeks, from 34 weeks of age until the end of the experiment. The fermented feed was made from many feed materials such as potato peel, cottons and seeds of pumpkin, sake lees, and wheat, especially using a silage preparation additive, WS360 (Protocol Japan Ltd., Obihiro, Japan), which contains lactic acid bacteria and cellulolytic enzyme [18]. The ingredients of both mixed and fermented feeds were analyzed at the Institute of Chemurgy, in the Tokachi Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Japan (Supplementary Table S3). Eggs from each breed (RIR and AUS) were collected at two stages: at the end of the mixed feed period (33 weeks of age) and near the end of the fermented feed period (41 weeks of age, see Figure 1). Five eggs were collected from each breed at each stage, totaling 20 eggs over the course of the study.

4.3. Measuring Egg Properties

Ten egg traits were measured, including egg weight, length of the long axis, length of the short axis, eggshell weight, yolk weight, albumen weight, eggshell thickness, and eggshell lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*). Size was measured using a digital caliper (P01 110–120; ASONE, Japan). Eggshell colors were measured using a chromameter (CR-10 Plus Color Reader; Konica Minolta Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and eggshell thickness was measured with a Peacock dial pipe gauge P-1 (Ozaki MFG Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). After weighing, yolk and albumen were kept separately at −30 °C pending further analysis.

4.4. Metabolomic Analysis of Egg Yolk and Albumen

Prior to metabolomic analysis, yolk and albumen samples were dried using a freeze dryer (FD-550P, Eyela; Tokyo Rikakikai Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Samples were crushed into a powder form, and 10 mg of each sample was used for metabolomic analysis. Powder samples were mixed with 250 μL of pretreatment liquid (methanol/H2O/chloroform 5:2:2) and 5 μL of internal standard solution (2-isopropylmalic acid, 1 mg/mL). After vortex mixing, the sample tubes were shaken at 1200 rpm at 37 °C for 30 min under dark light conditions. After centrifugation at 16,000× g, 4 °C for 5 min, the supernatants (160 μL) were collected and placed in new tubes with 200 μL of H2O and mixed using a vortex. The tubes were again centrifuged at 16,000× g, 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatants (200 μL) were collected into new tubes and centrifuged at room temperature in a vacuum (Centrifugal Evaporator RD400; Yamato Scientific Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for 20 min. Then, the tubes were placed in −80 °C until freezing. The tubes were centrifuged at room temperature in a vacuum for 7−8 h. Methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg/mL, 40 μL) was added to each tube and mixed using the vortex. The tubes were shaken for 90 min at 1200 rpm, 30 °C, under dark conditions, for oximation. N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamine (MSTFA; 20 μL) was added to each tube and vortex-mixed. The tubes were shaken at 1200 rpm at 37 °C for 45 min in the dark to prepare trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives. GC−MS/MS analyses were carried out using a GCMS-TQ8050 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with BPX-5 column (Length 30 m; 0.25 mm I.D.; df = 0.25 μm) (SGE, Melbourne, Australia) according to the method in Smart Metabolites Database (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
Data processing was performed with Smart Metabolites Database (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), MS-DIAL ver 3.08 [43] and MRMPROBS program ver. 2.42 [44]. Peaks of 40 samples (20 eggs × 2 samples) were recorded over the mass range 45−600 m/z. Peaks were automatically detected via MS-DIAL with peak detection options that minimum peak height is 2000. A data quality check was conducted using thresholds, which are −10 < RI < 10, dot prod > 0.8, and presence > 0.6 and then manually checked. Finally, 138 and 132 metabolites for yolk and albumen were identified, respectively. Relative quantity of metabolites was calculated using the peak area of each metabolite relative to an internal standard (2-isopropylmalic acid).

4.5. Statistical Methods

To identify the effects of breed and feed on egg properties, data were analyzed using a two-way mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) with breed group (RIR and AUS) as the between-subjects factor and feed group (mixed feed and fermented feed) as the within-subject (repeated) factor [18,45,46,47]. Main- and interaction-effects of breed and feed on egg properties were tested (P < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean and standard deviation. Statistical analyses were conducted using R [48]. In metabolites in particular, individual values were standardized with their mean and standard deviation.
To control the P value for multiple comparisons in metabolites, the false discovery rate was determined using the approach of Benjamini and Hochberg [49]. The P values were adjusted using the Benjamini−Hochberg correction, and post-adjustment are referred to as Q values. The metabolome-wide significance threshold was set at Q < 0.1, following previous studies [26,27,50,51].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/9/10/224/s1: Table S1: All yolk metabolites, Table S2: All albumen metabolites, Table S3: Ingredient analysis of mixed feed and fermented feed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G. and S.T.; methodology, T.G. and S.T.; software, S.S. and S.T.; validation, T.G., H.M., S.S. and S.T.; formal analysis, T.G. and H.M.; investigation, T.G., H.M., S.S. and S.T.; resources, T.G. and S.T.; data curation, T.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G.; writing—review and editing, T.G. and S.T.; visualization, T.G.; supervision, T.G.; project administration, T.G.; funding acquisition, T.G.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from The Akiyama Life Science Foundation and Obihiro City Office to T.G.

Acknowledgments

We thank Masaaki Hanada and Masafumi Tetsuka for the use of laboratory equipments, and all members of the Animal Breeding Research Group at the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine for their continuous support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 20 September 2019).
  2. Goto, T.; Fernandes, A.F.A.; Tsudzuki, M.; Rosa, G.J.M. Causal phenotypic networks for egg traits in an F2 chicken population. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hunger Map. 2018. Available online: https://www.wfp.org/content/2018-hunger-map (accessed on 20 September 2019).
  4. Kralik, G.; Kralik, Z. Poultry products enriched with nutricines have beneficial effects on human health. Med. Glas. 2017, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Laudodio, V.; Lorusso, V.; Lastella, N.M.B.; Dhama, K.; Karthik, K.; Tiwari, R.; Alam, G.M.; Tufarelli, V. Enhancement of nutraceutical value of table eggs through poultry feeding strategies. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 11, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajasekaran, A.; Kalaivani, M. Designer foods and their benefits: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zaheer, K. An updated review on chicken eggs: Production, consumption, management aspects and nutritional benefits to human health. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 6, 1208–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Dhama, K.; Patra, A. Nutritional significance and health benefits of designer eggs. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roberts, J. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 41, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilson, P.B. Recent advances in avian egg science: A review. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 3747–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Goto, T.; Tsudzuki, M. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for egg production and egg quality traits in chickens: A review. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 54, 0160121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wolc, A.; White, I.M.S.; Hill, W.G.; Olori, V.E. Inheritance of hatchability in broiler chickens and its relationship to egg quality traits. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2334–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wolc, A.; Arango, J.; Settar, P.; O’Sullivan, N.P.; Olori, V.E.; White, I.M.S.; Hill, W.G.; Dekkers, J.C.M. Genetic parameters of egg defects and egg quality in layer chickens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 1292–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.C.; Ning, Z.H.; Xu, G.Y.; Hou, Z.C.; Yang, N. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 1209–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fraeye, I.; Bruneel, C.; Lemahieu, C.; Buyse, J.; Muylaert, K.; Foubert, I. Dietary enrichment of eggs with omega-3 fatty acids: A review. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Surai, P.F.; Sparks, N.H.C. Designer eggs: From improvement of egg composition to functional food. Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yin, J.D.; Shang, X.G.; Li, D.F.; Wang, F.L.; Guan, Y.F.; Wang, Z.Y. Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of egg yolks from different breeds of layers. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mori, H.; Takaya, M.; Nishimura, K.; Goto, T. Breed and feed affect amino acid contents of egg yolk and eggshell color in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weckwerth, W. Metabolomics in systems biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 669–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Griffiths, W.J.; Koal, T.; Wang, Y.; Kohl, M.; Enot, D.P.; Deigner, H.P. Targeted metabolomics for biomarker discovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 26, 5426–5445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, B.; He, X.; Jia, W.; Li, H. Novel applications of metabolomics in personalized medicine: A mini-review. Molecules 2017, 22, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wishart, D.S. Metabolomics: Applications to food science and nutrition research. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cubero-Leon, E.; Peñalver, R.; Maquet, A. Review on metabolomics for food authentication. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bundy, J.G.; Davey, M.P.; Viant, M.R. Environmental metabolomics: A critical review and future perspectives. Metabolomics 2009, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Macel, M.; Van Dam, N.M.; Keurentjes, J.J. Metabolomics: The chemistry between ecology and genetics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goto, T.; Kubota, Y.; Toyoda, A. Plasma and liver metabolic profiles in mice subjected to subchronic and mild social defeat stress. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goto, T.; Tomonaga, S.; Toyoda, A. Effects of diet quality and psychosocial stress on the metabolic profiles of mice. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 1857–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Goldansaz, S.A.; Guo, A.C.; Sajed, T.; Steele, M.A.; Plastow, G.S.; Wishart, D.S. Livestock metabolomics and the livestock metabolome: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Takemoto, S.; Tomonaga, S.; Funaba, M.; Matsui, T. Effect of long-distance transportation on serum metabolic profiles of steer calves. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 1970–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tomonaga, S.; Okuyama, H.; Tachibana, T.; Makino, R. Effects of high ambient temperature on plasma metabolomic profiles in chicks. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wishart, D.S.; Feunang, Y.D.; Marcu, A.; Guo, A.C.; Liang, K.; Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.; Li, C.; Karu, N.; et al. HMDB 4.0: The human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acid Res. 2017, 46, D608–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goto, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Nishibori, M.; Tsudzuki, M. A longitudinal quantitative trait locus mapping of chicken growth traits. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 294, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goto, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Yoshida, M.; Goto, N.; Umino, T.; Nishibori, M.; Tsudzuki, M. Quantitative trait loci mapping for external egg traits in F2 chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 51, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goto, T.; Shiraishi, J.I.; Bungo, T.; Tsudzuki, M. Characteristics of egg-related traits in the Onagadori (Japanese Extremely Long Tail) breed of chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 52, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sirri, F.; Zampiga, M.; Berardinelli, A.; Meluzzi, A. Variability and interaction of some egg physical and eggshell quality attributes during the entire laying hen cycle. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Grembecka, M. Sugar alcohols—their role in the modern world of sweeteners: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 241, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wisselink, H.W.; Weusthuis, R.A.; Eggink, G.; Hugenholtz, J.; Grobben, G. Mannitol production by lactic acid bacteria: A review. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bernt, W.O.; Borzelleca, J.F.; Flamm, G.; Munro, I.C. Erythritol: A review of biological and toxicological studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S191–S197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Malcicka, M.; Visser, B.; Ellers, J. An evolutionary perspective on linoleic acid synthesis in animals. Evol. Biol. 2018, 45, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Abedi, E.; Sahari, M.A. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid sources and evaluation of their nutritional and functional properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Stanislaus, A.; Guo, K.; Li, L. Development of an isotope labeling ultra-high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method for quantification of acylglycines in human urine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 750, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Čermáková, M.; Pelantová, H.; Neprašová, B.; Šedivá, B.; Maletínská, L.; Kuneš, J.; Tomášová, P.; Železná, B.; Kuzma, M. Metabolomic study of obesity and its treatment with palmitoylated prolactin-releasing peptide analog in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 1735–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lai, Z.; Tsugawa, H.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Mehta, S.; Mueller, M.; Zheng, Y.; Ogiwara, A.; Meissen, J.; Showalter, M.; Takeuchi, K.; et al. Identifying metabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass spectrometry cheminformatics. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tsugawa, H.; Kanazawa, M.; Ogiwara, A.; Arita, M. MRMPROBS suite for metabolomics using large-scale MRM assays. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2379–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Olejnik, S.; Algina, J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol. Methods 2003, 4, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Franz, V.H.; Loftus, G.R. Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2012, 19, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Nikiforuk, A.; Potasiewicz, A.; Kos, T.; Popik, P. The combination of memantine and galantamine improves cognition in rats: The synergistic role of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine and NMDA receptors. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 313, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. R Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 20 September 2019).
  49. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McClay, J.L.; Adkins, D.E.; Vunck, S.A.; Batman, A.M.; Vann, R.E.; Clark, S.L.; Beardsley, P.M.; van den Oord, E.J. Large-scale neurochemical metabolomics analysis identifies multiple compounds associated with methamphetamine exposure. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pedersen, H.K.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Nielsen, H.B.; Hyotylainen, T.; Nielsen, T.; Jensen, B.A.; Forslund, K.; Hildebrand, F.; Prifti, E.; Falony, G.; et al. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity. Nature 2016, 535, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Metabolites 09 00224 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental design. Eggs from Rhode Island Red (RIR) and Australorp (AUS) hens, which had been fed mixed feed, were collected at 33 weeks of age (mixed feed). Feed was switched at 34 weeks of age to fermented feed. Eggs were again collected at 41 weeks of age (fermented feed). Five eggs were collected at each stage from each breed; egg traits and yolk and albumen metabolite traits were measured in the 20 eggs. These data were analyzed using two-way mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA) with breed group as the between-subjects factor and feed group as the within-subject factor.
Figure 1. Experimental design. Eggs from Rhode Island Red (RIR) and Australorp (AUS) hens, which had been fed mixed feed, were collected at 33 weeks of age (mixed feed). Feed was switched at 34 weeks of age to fermented feed. Eggs were again collected at 41 weeks of age (fermented feed). Five eggs were collected at each stage from each breed; egg traits and yolk and albumen metabolite traits were measured in the 20 eggs. These data were analyzed using two-way mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA) with breed group as the between-subjects factor and feed group as the within-subject factor.
Metabolites 09 00224 g001
Table
Table 1. Egg traits at two stages in Rhode Island Red and Australorp.
Table 1. Egg traits at two stages in Rhode Island Red and Australorp.
TraitsRhode Island Red (RIR)Australorp (AUS)P-Value from ANOVA Mixed Design
MixedFermentedMixedFermentedMain-EffectInteraction-Effect
33 Weeks41 Weeks33 Weeks41 WeeksBreedFeedBreed × Feed
Egg weight (g)54.2 ± 2.055.5 ± 2.552.6 ± 4.756.7 ± 4.90.068 0.573 0.918
Length of long axis of the egg (mm)56.2 ± 2.457.8 ± 1.054.8 ± 2.157.8 ± 1.60.067 0.421 0.563
Length of short axis of the egg (mm)42.0 ± 0.941.8 ± 1.041.4 ± 1.441.2 ± 1.20.065 0.974 0.953
Yolk weight (g)15.5 ± 0.517.0 ± 1.213.4 ± 1.115.5 ± 1.10.015 0.287 0.826
Eggshell weight (g)6.0 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.86.3 ± 1.40.019 0.657 0.186
Albumen weight (g)29.7 ± 1.729.5 ± 2.029.5 ± 3.031.1 ± 2.70.360 0.404 0.971
Eggshell thickness (mm)0.38 ± 0.010.40 ± 0.050.42 ± 0.030.38 ± 0.030.227 0.725 0.667
Eggshell color L *62.5 ± 5.066.3 ± 5.468.5 ± 2.075.5 ± 1.50.030 0.705 0.950
Eggshell color a *14.3 ± 2.912.2 ± 2.69.5 ± 1.36.3 ± 0.70.006 0.376 0.600
Eggshell color b *22.3 ± 3.520.6 ± 3.015.2 ± 1.812.5 ± 2.10.003 0.453 0.886
Table
Table 2. Metabolite with breed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
Table 2. Metabolite with breed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
MetaboliteHMDB 1Relative Area (Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD))Mixed-Design ANOVA
RIRRIRAUSAUSBreed
MixedFermentedMixedFermentedP-ValueQ-Value
Albumen_RibitolHMDB0000508−0.17±0.650.59±0.49−0.84±1.270.42±0.590.00050.0628*
1 The Human Metabolome Database [31]. * Q < 0.1.
Table
Table 3. Metabolites with feed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
Table 3. Metabolites with feed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
MetaboliteHMDB 1Relative Area (Mean ± SD)Mixed Design ANOVA
RIRRIRAUSAUSFeed
MixedFermentedMixedFermentedP-ValueQ-Value
Yolk_UreaHMDB00002940.47±0.22−0.78±0.560.81±1.24−0.50±0.420.0020.085*
Yolk_ThreitolHMDB0004136−0.84±0.270.89±0.33−1.02±0.130.97±0.370.0010.082*
Yolk_ErythritolHMDB0002994−0.77±0.340.93±0.45−1.05±0.090.89±0.390.0010.075*
Albumen_IsoleucineHMDB00001720.26±0.77−0.89±0.631.20±0.41−0.57±0.390.0010.020*
Albumen_DihydrouracilHMDB0000076−0.57±0.930.69±0.93−0.77±0.480.65±0.430.0000.001*
Albumen_ErythritolHMDB0002994−0.67±0.201.13±0.72−1.04±0.120.58±0.300.0010.017*
Albumen_Linoleic acidHMDB0000673−0.02±0.880.81±1.34−0.75±0.32−0.04±0.250.0000.008*
Albumen_4-Hydroxyphenyllactic acidHMDB00007550.41±0.79−1.05±0.521.05±0.43−0.40±0.570.0070.091*
Albumen_AlanineHMDB00001610.54±1.29−0.75±0.390.85±0.55−0.64±0.180.0070.082*
Albumen_GlycineHMDB00001230.44±1.28−0.70±0.730.83±0.42−0.57±0.250.0040.066*
Albumen_N-ButyrylglycineHMDB00008080.12±0.78−0.34±0.72−0.04±1.020.26±1.240.0000.007*
Albumen_Pyruvic acidHMDB0000243−0.06±1.360.19±0.99−0.17±1.070.04±0.390.0050.083*
Albumen_RibitolHMDB0000508−0.17±0.650.59±0.49−0.84±1.270.42±0.590.0070.083*
Albumen_ThreitolHMDB0004136−0.70±0.171.11±0.74−1.01±0.140.59±0.340.0010.020*
Albumen_ValineHMDB00008830.54±1.27−0.77±0.360.89±0.49−0.67±0.100.0060.088*
1 The Human Metabolome Database [31]. * Q < 0.1.
Table
Table 4. Metabolite with breed × feed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
Table 4. Metabolite with breed × feed-induced changes (Q < 0.1).
MetaboliteHMDB 1Relative Area (Mean ± SD)Mixed Design ANOVA
RIRRIRAUSAUSBreed × Feed
MixedFermentedMixedFermentedP-ValueQ-Value
Albumen_N-ButyrylglycineHMDB00008080.12±0.78−0.34±0.72−0.04±1.020.26±1.240.00000.0048*
1 The Human Metabolome Database [31]. * Q < 0.1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Goto, T.; Mori, H.; Shiota, S.; Tomonaga, S. Metabolomics Approach Reveals the Effects of Breed and Feed on the Composition of Chicken Eggs. Metabolites 2019, 9, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100224

AMA Style

Goto T, Mori H, Shiota S, Tomonaga S. Metabolomics Approach Reveals the Effects of Breed and Feed on the Composition of Chicken Eggs. Metabolites. 2019; 9(10):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Goto, Tatsuhiko, Hiroki Mori, Shunsuke Shiota, and Shozo Tomonaga. 2019. "Metabolomics Approach Reveals the Effects of Breed and Feed on the Composition of Chicken Eggs" Metabolites 9, no. 10: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100224

APA Style

Goto, T., Mori, H., Shiota, S., & Tomonaga, S. (2019). Metabolomics Approach Reveals the Effects of Breed and Feed on the Composition of Chicken Eggs. Metabolites, 9(10), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop