Next Article in Journal
High-Intensity Interval Training Induces Protein Lactylation in Different Tissues of Mice with Specificity and Time Dependence
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparing the Efficacy of Myo-Inositol Plus α-Lactalbumin vs. Myo-Inositol Alone on Reproductive and Metabolic Disturbances of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Novel Biomarkers in Late Preterm Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) Using Urinary Metabolomic Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impaired Carbohydrate Metabolism and Excess of Lipid Accumulation in Offspring of Hyperandrogenic Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/metabo13050646
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation between Selected Clinical Symptoms and Severity of Aggression, Impulsiveness and Their Selected Behavioral Manifestations in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotype A

by
Aleksandra Barabasz-Gembczyk
1,*,
Wojciech Mędrala
1,
Patryk Rodek
1,
Barbara Alli-Balogun
1,
Jan Chrobak
1,
Marlena Cwynar
2,
Dominika Sikora
2,
Mariusz Wójtowicz
3,
Grzegorz Franik
2,4,
Paweł Madej
2,4 and
Krzysztof Kucia
1
1
Department and Clinic of Adult Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Ziołowa 45/47, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
2
Department of Gynecological Endocrinology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
3
Department of Gynecological and Obstetrics Women’s and Child Health Center, Medical University of Silesia, 41-803 Zabrze, Poland
4
Infertility Outpatient Clinic, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Silesia, 40-042 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(5), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050646
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 9 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic and Hormonal Profile of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Current Update and Future Prospects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Previous studies on aggressiveness and impulsiveness in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are ambiguous. Furthermore, no biochemical or clinical factors related to these variables have been definitively confirmed. The aim of the study was to clarify whether, in women with phenotype A of PCOS, variables such as body mass index and clinical and biochemical hyperandrogenism have an impact on either the intensity of impulsivity or aggression or on other selected behavioral manifestations of these variables. The study included 95 patients diagnosed with PCOS phenotype A. The criterion for recruitment into the study group and the control group was body mass index. The study was conducted with the use of a closed-format questionnaire and calibrated clinical scales. Higher body mass index (BMI) values in women with PCOS phenotype A are associated with poor eating habits. The severity of impulsivity and aggression syndrome, as well as the tendency to engage in risky sexual behavior and patterns of alcohol consumption among patients diagnosed with PCOS phenotype A, are not dependent on BMI. The severity of impulsiveness and the syndrome of aggression in women with phenotype A PCOS are not associated with clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism or with androgen levels.

1. Introduction

PCOS is a complex endocrine and metabolic disorder, affecting, depending on accepted diagnostic criteria, anywhere from 6% to 13% of women of reproductive age [1]. PCOS is associated with symptoms such as ovulatory disorders, hyperandrogenemia, clinical hyperandrogenism, impaired secretion of gonadotropic hormones, insulin resistance, obesity, infertility, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism disorders [2]. Increasing attention has been attributed to the co-occurrence of eating disorders and abnormal eating habits in women with PCOS [2,3]. Among the factors predisposing to this coincidence, the literature cites increased body mass index (BMI), greater dietary restrictions, dissatisfaction with one’s own body, low self-esteem, co-occurrence of depressive symptoms, anxiety, distress, and poorer quality of life [4,5].
The neurobiological basis of impulsive and aggressive behavior has not been precisely defined due to the complexity of interactions between biological and environmental factors [6]. Testosterone and serotonin have been linked to high levels of aggression and impulsivity for years [7]. Studies show a high correlation between testosterone levels and aggressive behavior and feelings of hostility and anger in both men and women [8].
Obesity can be viewed as an expression of emotional urges, habitual impulsivity, and self-aggression [9]. In addition, effective inhibition of responses to sexual stimuli has been shown to be inversely related to overall impulsivity [10]. Moreover, high impulsivity is associated with a higher frequency of engaging in risky and compulsive sexual behavior, hypersexuality, low levels of sexual restraint, and a tendency toward infidelity [10]. Recent studies indicate that alcohol-dependent individuals are characterized by greater impulsivity [11]. High behavioral impulsivity is also associated with a worse course of addiction, while cognitive impulsivity leads to an early onset of drinking [12]. Based on these reports, we created the following research hypotheses: Firstly, there are differences in the severity of impulsivity and aggression syndrome and their selected behavioral aspects among women with phenotype A PCOS dependent on their BMI, severity of symptoms of clinical hyperandrogenism, and results of biochemical tests. Secondly, there are different relationships between the dominant direction and dimensions of aggressiveness and impulsivity and selected behavioral aspects, i.e., incorrect eating habits, risky sexual behavior, and alcohol consumption patterns, among women with PCOS phenotype A depending on their BMI, severity of symptoms of clinical hyperandrogenism, and results of biochemical tests.

2. Materials and Test Methods

The study enrolled 95 women with PCOS phenotype A, diagnosed according to the Rotterdam criteria, who were hospitalized in the Department of Gynecological Endocrinology of the Prof. Kornel Gibinski University Clinical Center in Katowice, Poland. Information from the department’s medical records, including the diagnosis of PCOS phenotype A, biochemical test results, assessment of hyperandrogenism symptoms, measurement of anthropometric parameters, and demographic data, was used in the study. Initially, 350 women were invited to take part in the study; 255 participants were excluded from the final analysis as they did not meet all inclusion criteria and/or due to incompletely completed questionnaires. A total of 95 participants were qualified for the study, of whom 41 patients (43.16%) with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 were included in the study group. The remaining 54 patients (56.84%) with a BMI below 25 kg/m2 were included in the control group (Figure 1).
The mean age values were 26.05 years for the study group and 25.24 years for the control group. In both the study group and the control group, the youngest person was 19 and the oldest was 34 (Table 1).
Inclusion criteria for the study and control group were: (1) age above 18 years and below 35 years; (2) diagnosis of PCOS phenotype A according to the Rotterdam criteria; and (3) informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria for the study and control group were: (1) diagnosis of psychiatric diseases and disorders, including psychoactive substance use disorders (excluding caffeine and nicotine); (2) use of hormonal medications or medications affecting hormone levels and dietary supplements in the last 6 months; (3) diagnosed endocrine and metabolic diseases other than PCOS (e.g., thyroid disease, adrenal disease, diabetes mellitus); (4) incomplete completion of the study questionnaire; and (5) lack of consent to participate in the study.
All patients were informed of the principles and purpose of the study and qualified for it after obtaining informed consent. The study was carried out with care for the patients’ anonymity; the self-completed sheets were returned in a folder attached to the questionnaires to ensure respondents’ anonymity.
PCOS was diagnosed on the basis of the occurrence of three Rotterdam criteria. A routine ultrasound examination of the ovaries was performed by an experienced ultrasonographer using the Voluson 730 Expert device after a gynecological examination and assessment of androgen serum levels of ovarian and adrenal origin. In all patients who fasted, in the morning, anthropometric parameters such as BMI and height were measured. Body weight was assessed with the use of a certified electronic scale with an accuracy of 0.1 kg and height with an accuracy of 0.5 cm. A BMI nutrition assessment was made according to WHO criteria [13]. Blood samples were taken in all patients in the morning, 16 h after the last meal, in the follicular phase between the 2nd and 5th days of the menstrual cycle. Subsequently, the levels of androgens, total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were tested. The free androgen index (FAI) was calculated from the formula: FAI = (TT/SHBG) × l00%.
Standardized scales and self-completion inventories were used to assess the severity of individual variables: the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11—Barratt Impulsiveness Scale version 11), the Psychological Inventory of Aggression Syndrome (I.P.S.A.) by Professor Zbigniew Gaś, the Eating Related Behaviours Questionnaire (KZZJ) by Professor Nina Ogińska-Bulik, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and the Sexual Risky Survey (SRS) by Turchik & Garske, 2009 [9,14,15,16,17]. The research was conducted between November 2018 and October 2020. The research project was assessed in accordance with the resolution of the Bioethics Committee of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice (No. KNW/0022/KB/243/18 of 7 November 2018) as not having the character of a medical experiment in light of the Act of 5 December 1996 on the professions of physician and dentist (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 617, as amended) and not requiring the assessment of the Bioethics Committee.

3. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were coded and transferred to a database prepared in the Statistica 13.3 package. Statistical analysis of the data included elements of descriptive and analytical statistics, and a p-value < 0.05 was used as the criterion for statistical significance.
To describe the quantitative variables, arbitrary measures of central tendency (mean, median, and quartiles) were used along with measures of dispersion (standard deviation, or interquartile distance—IQR), and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the distribution of variables identifying the assessed domains of the individual questionnaires. For the interpretation of the variation of quantitative variables in independent groups defined by their membership in the study group or control group as well as by their pattern of alcohol consumption, non-parametric tests (the Mann-Whitney U test and the Anova Kruskal-Wallis test) were applied due to the deviation of the distribution of variables from the normal distribution. As a countermeasure, due to the small size of the study and control groups (as well as the deviation of the variable distributions from the normal distribution), the evaluation of the significance and direction of the relationships between the individual quantitative variables was carried out using Spearman’s r correlation.

4. Results

4.1. Severity of Impulsivity

There were no statistically significant differences in scores for all analyzed variables between the study group and the control group (Table 2).

4.2. Severity of Aggression

There were no statistically significant differences in scores for all analyzed variables between the study group and the control group (Table 3).

4.3. Eating Habits

The statistical analysis of the following factors: total eating habits, emotional overeating, and dietary restrictions showed statistical significance (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 4).

4.4. Predisposition to Engage in Risky Sexual Behavior

There were no statistically significant differences in scores for the assessed factors of the SRS questionnaire between the study group and the control group (Table 5).

4.5. Patterns of Alcohol Consumption

It was observed that the risky pattern of alcohol consumption was slightly more frequent in the study group (14.63%; N = 6) than in the control group (11.11%; N = 6), while the low-risk drinking pattern was more frequent in the control group (87.04%; N = 47) versus in the study group (82.93%; N = 34) (Figure 2).

4.6. Correlation between Impulsivity and Severity of Clinical Hyperandrogenism Symptoms and Biochemical Test Results

There were no statistically significant differences in scores for the assessed factors of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and biochemical test results (Table 6).

4.7. Correlation between Aggression and Severity of Clinical Hyperandrogenism Symptoms and Biochemical Test Results

There were no statistically significant differences between aggression and severity of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and biochemical test results (Table 7).

5. Discussion

As expected, the study indicated an increase in abnormal eating habits in the group of women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 compared to the normal-weight group among patients with PCOS phenotype A. According to the literature review, the prevalence of eating disorders, especially bulimia and binge eating disorders, as well as the presence of unhealthy eating habits, is higher in women with PCOS compared to healthy women, as suggested by some researchers, irrespective of their BMI [18,19,20,21,22]. No publications evaluating differences in the severity of abnormal eating habits between the normal-weight group and the group of women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and PCOS phenotype A were found in the available literature. The most similar study is the one published in 2019 by Pirotta et al. The study showed that abnormal eating habits are more common in women with PCOS compared to a group of healthy women, and a dietary restriction is the only abnormal eating habit that occurs more frequently in the group of women with PCOS. They also emphasized that a significant predictor of the occurrence of both eating disorders and poor eating habits is increased BMI alone, irrespective of PCOS [23].
The study showed no significant differences in the severity of impulsivity and aggression between the normal-weight group and the group of women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and PCOS phenotype A. Unfortunately, the results obtained cannot be compared with those of other authors, as no available publication on aggression and impulsivity in women with PCOS has divided the control and study groups according to BMI in women with PCOS phenotype A. In all available studies addressing aggression in women with PCOS, the control group was composed of healthy women. Researchers report, among other things, a higher number of hospitalizations for self-harm (7.2% to 2.9%), more frequent suicide attempts (14% to 2%), and more intense feelings and expressions of anger combined with poorer self-control in women with PCOS compared to healthy women [24,25,26]. In addition, the available studies on the severity of anger expression in relation to BMI only apply to women without PCOS and show no significant correlation between those variables [27]. Most of the available literature focuses on the study of the severity of impulsivity as one of the symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or impulse control disorders observed in eating disorders, the prevalence of which is described as higher in a group of women with PCOS compared to women without PCOS [28,29].
The study further showed that there were no statistically significant differences in scores for the assessed scales of the SRS questionnaire between the study group and the control group. In the available literature, there are both descriptions of the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients with PCOS compared to groups of women without the syndrome and the absence of such differences [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. In addition, the relationship between BMI and sexual functioning in women with PCOS is inconclusive [40]. Studies comparing the sexual functioning of obese and normal-weight PCOS patients provide the following findings: higher BMI is associated with a significant reduction in orgasm, reduced sexual activity, reduced sexual satisfaction, overall poorer sexual functioning, and a sense of lower sexual attractiveness [30,31,35,40,41]. Interestingly, it is noted that obesity and overweight alone do not affect sexual activity, but the co-occurrence of obesity and PCOS may interfere with it [40]. No publications were found in the available literature assessing the difference in severity of the tendency to engage in risky sexual behavior among women with PCOS phenotype A with a BMI-based stratification.
In the next stage of the study, it was observed that the risky pattern of alcohol consumption was slightly more frequent in the study group than in the control group, while the low-risk drinking pattern was more frequent in the control group. Given the very high prevalence of individuals in the overall population included in the analysis whose pattern is defined as a low-risk pattern (81 women), which represents a deviation of the distribution of the variables from the normal distribution for the interpretation of the variation in these quantitative variables, a non-parametric test (Anova Kruskal-Wallis) was used. Considering that more caution should be exercised with this test in drawing far-reaching conclusions from the study, it was decided to terminate the study of the severity of these characteristics at this stage, making it impossible to demonstrate the statistical significance of these results. There is a clear gap in the available literature when it comes to research on alcohol consumption patterns in women with PCOS. In the Chinese study published in 2014, Zhang J. et al. described alcohol drinking as an independent risk factor for PCOS [42]. In contrast, Zhang B. et al. in 2020 found no difference between the three study groups (a group of women with PCOS and oligo-ovulation, a group of women with PCOS and normal ovulation, and a group of healthy women without PCOS) in alcohol consumption patterns [43]. Similar findings were published by Sánchez-Ferrer et al. in 2020 and Cutillas-Tolín et al. in 2021, showing no differences in alcohol consumption patterns between a group of women with PCOS and a group of healthy women [44,45]. However, all the cited studies differ significantly in methodology, did not use the AUDIT test, and only asked about drinking alcohol. No studies comparing alcohol consumption patterns in women with PCOS phenotype A with a BMI-based stratification were found in the available literature.
In both the study group and the control group, there were no statistically significant correlations between the severity of impulsivity and the symptoms of clinical hyperandrogenism or the results of biochemical tests. There are inconclusive reports in the literature on the relationship between testosterone levels and impulsivity in healthy women without PCOS, confirming an indirect effect or showing a negative correlation [46,47]. An association has been shown between higher testosterone concentrations and more severe symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in women without diagnosed PCOS [48]. Özdil et al. found a significant correlation between increased levels of total testosterone (TT) and higher scores on the total impulsivity scale, as well as between increasing values of the free androgen index (FAI) and higher scores on the total impulsivity scale, or impulsivity due to a lack of planning and motor impulsivity [49]. In addition, they showed a significant correlation between decreasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin and the motor impulsivity scale and impulsivity related to a lack of planning. No such relationship has been demonstrated in this study. It is difficult to explain the reasons for this discrepancy given that the study populations were very similar in terms of both age and size, the location of the study, and the fact that the same questionnaire was used in both studies to assess impulsivity. A noticeable difference is the selection of the group. It is possible that the final results were influenced by ethnic, cultural, and genetic differences between the groups of women included in the study. The study by Özdil et al. was conducted in Turkey, while this one was carried out in Poland.
No statistically significant associations were found between indicators of aggression severity, symptoms of clinical hyperandrogenism, and biochemical test results in the compared groups. There are descriptions in the available literature of a relationship between testosterone concentrations and the severity of aggression and anger, but the available studies differ significantly in the population of subjects [7,8,50]. Barry et al. published a study negating the relationship between androgen levels and aggression severity in women with PCOS; however, in their study, the control group was infertile women without PCOS [51]. Again, the only findings with which to compare the results obtained in this study are those of a previously cited study published by Özdil et al. The study showed that as TT and FAI concentrations increase, the feeling and expression of anger also increase, and the ability to control and inhibit its expression decreases. They identify FAI as a predictor of feeling, expressing, and controlling anger [49]. In the present study, a complementary relationship was not obtained. As before, it is difficult to explain the reasons for this discrepancy given that the study populations were very similar in terms of age, size, and location. Different questionnaires assessing the severity of aggression or anger were used as in the previous case. It is also possible that the final results were influenced by ethnic, cultural, and genetic differences between the groups of women included in the study.
Several clinical implications of our results need to be considered. Firstly, a thorough medical interview with an assessment of eating habits should be conducted for patients with PCOS. Finding people with poor eating habits would allow them to receive additional psychological, dietary, or psychiatric support. Secondly, detailed psychoeducation in the field of healthy lifestyles should be provided. Finally, the results of this work could serve to determine the areas for further investigation of the mechanisms and severity of impulsivity and aggression in patients with PCOS, with special attention to their behavioral manifestations.
There are various limitations to the study that need to be considered. Firstly, we did not run a power analysis to assess the adequate sample size prior to the enrollment of patients, which is a major limitation to our study. The sample size of the study group was relatively small, which might contribute to false positive or false negative results; thus, replication studies with larger sample sizes are necessary. This is due to the broad exclusion criteria, which resulted in a 56% reduction in the study population. Secondly, the study design, based on self-administered questionnaires, retrospectively resulted in a negative impact on the sample size. A large number of the respondents withdrew from participating in the survey when filling out the questionnaires (16% of the respondents). Furthermore, we cautiously speculate that some of the questions, especially those related to alcohol consumption patterns or engaging in risky sexual behavior after psychoactive substance use, were answered with a certain degree of self-correction, driven by ongoing hospitalization and possible concern that such information might affect respondents’ treatment or influence the direction of further diagnosis. As with the behavioral manifestations of aggression and impulsivity in this population, there is relatively little data on the aggressiveness and impulsiveness of women with PCOS. In particular, the areas of risky sexual behavior, alcohol consumption patterns, and inappropriate eating habits in women with PCOS should be thoroughly assessed in the future. Such a scarcity of knowledge is reflected in the small number of sources that were cited in our study, especially those from the last five years. Consequently, further studies with larger groups are needed to confirm our findings.

6. Conclusions

Higher BMI values in women with PCOS phenotype A are associated with poor eating habits.
The severity of impulsivity and aggression syndrome, as well as the tendency to engage in risky sexual behavior and patterns of alcohol consumption, among patients diagnosed with PCOS phenotype A are not dependent on BMI.
The severity of impulsiveness and the syndrome of aggression in women with PCOS phenotype A are not associated with clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism or with androgen levels.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo13050646/s1, File S1: Raw data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, writing-original draft preparation: A.B.-G.; formal analysis: W.M., P.R., B.A.-B. and J.C.; investigation and resources: M.C. and D.S., supervision: M.W., G.F., P.M. and K.K.: project administration and writing review and editing: P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The research project was assessed in accordance with the resolution of the Bioethics Committee of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice (No. KNW/0022/KB/243/18 of 07.11.2018) as not having the character of a medical experiment in light of the Act of 5 December 1996 on the professions of physician and dentist (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 617, as amended) and not requiring the assessment of the Bioethics Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material (File S1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Milewicz, A.; Kudła, M.; Spaczyński, R.Z.; Dębski, R.; Męczekalski, B.; Wielgoś, M.; Ruchała, M.; Małecka-Tendera, E.; Kos-Kudła, B.; Jędrzejuk, D.; et al. Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Endokrynologicznego, Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologów i Położników oraz Polskiego Towarzystwa Endokrynologii Ginekologicznej w sprawie diagnostyki i leczenia zespołu policystycznych jajników. Endokrynol. Pol. 2018, 69, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cincione, R.I.; Losavio, F.; Ciolli, F.; Valenzano, A.; Cibelli, G.; Messina, G.; Polito, R. Effects of Mixed of a Ketogenic Diet in Overweight and Obese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chudzicka-Strugała, I.; Gołębiewska, I.; Banaszewska, B.; Brudecki, G.; Zwoździak, B. The Role of Individually Selected Diets in Obese Women with PCOS—A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krug, I.; Giles, S.; Paganini, C. Binge eating in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: Prevalence, causes, and management strategies. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019, 15, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tay, C.T.; Teede, H.J.; Hill, B.; Loxton, D.; Joham, A.E. Increased prevalence of eating disorders, low self-esteem, and psychological distress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A community-based cohort study. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 112, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Waltes, R.; Chiocchetti, A.G.; Freitag, C.M. The neurobiological basis of human aggression: A review on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2016, 171, 650–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vetulani, J. Neurochemistry of impulsiveness and aggression. Psychiatr. Pol. 2013, 47, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  8. Armstrong, T.; Wells, J.; Boisvert, D.L.; Lewis, R.H.; Cooke, E.M.; Woeckener, M.; Kavish, N. An exploratory analysis of testosterone, cortisol, and aggressive behavior type in men and women. Biol. Psychol. 2021, 161, 108073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ogińska-Bulik, N. Do I Know What I’m Eating? The Psychology of Excessive Eating and Weight Loss; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego: Łódź, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodriguez-Nieto, G.; Emmerling, F.; Dewitte, M.; Sack, A.T.; Schuhmann, T. The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2019, 48, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jakubczyk, A.; Trucco, E.M.; Kopera, M.; Kobyliński, P.; Suszek, H.; Fudalej, S.; Brower, K.J.; Wojnar, M. The association between impulsivity, emotion regulation, and symptoms of alcohol use disorder. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2018, 91, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rubio, G.; Jiménez, M.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, R.; Martínez, I.; Ávila, C.; Ferre, F.; Jiménez-Arriero, M.A.; Ponce, G.; Palomo, T. The Role of Behavioral Impulsivity in the Development of Alcohol Dependence: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 32, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weir, C.B.; Jan, A. BMI Classification Percentile and Cut off Points. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Tampa, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. Grzesiak, M.; Beszłej, J.A. Barratt Impulsivity Scale. Postępy Psychiatr. Neurol. 2008, 17, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaś, Z. Inwentarz Psychologiczny Syndromu Agresji [The Psychological Inventory of Aggression Syndrome]; Przegląd Psychologiczny: Warsaw, Poland, 1980; Volume 23, pp. 143–157. [Google Scholar]
  16. Higgins-Biddle, J.C.; Babor, T.F. A review of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C, and USAUDIT for screening in the United States: Past issues and future directions. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abus. 2018, 44, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Turchik, J.A.; Garske, J.P. Measurement of Sexual Risk Taking Among College Students. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009, 38, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bernadett, M.; Szemán-N, A. Prevalence of eating disorders among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Psychiatr. Hung. A Magy. Pszichiatr. Tars. Tud. F. 2016, 31, 136–145. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, I.; Cooney, L.G.; Saini, S.; Smith, M.E.; Sammel, M.D.; Allison, K.C.; Dokras, A. Increased risk of disordered eating in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dokras, A.; Stener-Victorin, E.; Yildiz, B.O.; Li, R.; Ottey, S.; Shah, D.; Epperson, N.; Teede, H. Androgen Excess-Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society: Position statement on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and eating disorders in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basu, B.R.; Chowdhury, O.; Saha, S.K. Possible Link Between Stress-related Factors and Altered Body Composition in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 11, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asdaq, S.M.B.; Jomah, S.; Hasan, R.; Al-Baroudi, D.; Alharbi, M.; Alsubaie, S.; Buhamad, M.H.; Alyahya, B.; Al-Yamani, M.J. Impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on eating behavior, depression and health related quality of life: A cross-sectional study in Riyadh. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3342–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pirotta, S.; Barillaro, M.; Brennan, L.; Grassi, A.; Jeanes, Y.M.; Joham, A.E.; Kulkarni, J.; Couch, L.M.; Lim, S.S.; Moran, L.J. Disordered Eating Behaviours and Eating Disorders in Women in Australia with and Without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hart, R.; Doherty, D.A. The Potential Implications of a PCOS Diagnosis on a Woman’s Long-Term Health Using Data Linkage. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Månsson, M.; Holte, J.; Landin-Wilhelmsen, K.; Dahlgren, E.; Johansson, A.; Landén, M. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome are often depressed or anxious—A case control study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008, 33, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Borghi, L.; Leone, D.; Vegni, E.; Galiano, V.; Lepadatu, C.; Sulpizio, P.; Garzia, E. Psychological distress, anger and quality of life in polycystic ovary syndrome: Associations with biochemical, phenotypical andsocio-demographic factors. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 39, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kalantari, N.; Doaei, S.; Gordali, M.; Rahimzadeh, G.; Gholamalizadeh, M. The Association between Dairy Intake, Simple Sugars and Body Mass Index with Expression and Extent of Anger in Female Students. Iran. J. Psychiatry 2016, 11, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Hergüner, S.; Harmancı, H.; Toy, H. Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2015, 50, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Paganini, C.; Peterson, G.; Stavropoulos, V.; Krug, I. The Overlap Between Binge Eating Behaviors and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: An Etiological Integrative Model. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stapinska-Syniec, A.; Grabowska, K.; Szpotanska-Sikorska, M.; Pietrzak, B. Depression, sexual satisfaction, and other psychological issues in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2018, 34, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kogure, G.S.; Ribeiro, V.B.; Lopes, I.P.; Furtado, C.L.M.; Kodato, S.; de Sá, M.F.S.; Ferriani, R.A.; Lara, L.A.D.S.; dos Reis, R.M. Body image and its relationships with sexual functioning, anxiety, and depression in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 253, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Benetti-Pinto, C.L.; Ferreira, S.R.; Antunes, A., Jr.; Yela, D.A. The influence of body weight on sexual function and quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015, 291, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castelo-Branco, C.; Naumova, I. Quality of life and sexual function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A comprehensive review. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2020, 36, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thannickal, A.; Brutocao, C.; Alsawas, M.; Morrow, A.; Zaiem, F.; Murad, M.H.; Chattha, A.J. Eating, sleeping and sexual function disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 92, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stovall, D.W.; Scriver, J.L.; Clayton, A.H.; Williams, C.D.; Pastore, L.M. Sexual Function in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Glowinska, A.; Duleba, A.J.; Zielona-Jenek, M.; Siakowska, M.; Pawelczyk, L.; Banaszewska, B. Disparate Relationship of Sexual Satisfaction, Self-Esteem, Anxiety, and Depression with Endocrine Profiles of Women With or Without PCOS. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kępczyńska-Nyk, A.; Kuryłowicz, A.; Nowak, A.; Bednarczuk, T.; Ambroziak, U. Sexual function in women with androgen excess disorders: Classic forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2021, 44, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, X.; Ji, Y.; Chan, C.L.W.; Chan, C.H.Y. The mental health of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 2020, 24, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Xie, Q.; Luo, L.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhao, Z. Is polycystic ovary syndrome associated with risk of female sexual dysfunction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2019, 38, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuchs, A.; Dulska, A.; Drosdzol-Cop, A. Is weight just a number? Relationship between overweight, obesity and domains of sexual functioning among young women. Ginekol. Pol. 2020, 91, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tian, X.; Ruan, X.; Du, J.; Wang, J.; Yin, D.; Cheng, J.; Ju, R.; Mueck, A.O. Sexual Function in Chinese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Correlation with Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 28, 3181–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.Z.; Zhou, L.L.; Tang, L.L.; Zhuang, J.; Li, T.T.; Guo, W.Q.; Hu, R.; et al. Environmental risk factors for women with polycystic ovary syndrome in china: A popula-tion-based case-control study. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2014, 28, 203–211. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, B.; Zhou, W.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cui, L.; Chen, Z.-J. Lifestyle and environmental contributions to ovulatory dysfunction in women of polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020, 20, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sánchez-Ferrer, M.L.; Adoamnei, E.; Prieto-Sánchez, M.T.; Mendiola, J.; Corbalán-Biyang, S.; Moñino-García, M.; Palomar-Rodríguez, J.A.; Torres-Cantero, A.M. Health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome attending to a tertiary hospital in Southeastern Spain: A case-control study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cutillas-Tolín, A.; Arense-Gonzalo, J.J.; Mendiola, J.; Adoamnei, E.; Navarro-Lafuente, F.; Sánchez-Ferrer, M.L.; Prieto-Sánchez, M.T.; Carmona-Barnosi, A.; Vioque, J.; Torres-Cantero, A.M. Are Dietary Indices Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Its Phenotypes? A Preliminary Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bjork, J.; Moeller, F.; Dougherty, D.; Swann, A. Endogenous plasma testosterone levels and commission errors in women: A preliminary report. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 73, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tajima-Pozo, K.; Bayòn, C.; Díaz-Marsá, M.; Carrasco, J.L. Correlation Between Personality Traits and Testosterone Concentrations in Healthy Population. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2015, 37, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roberts, B.; Eisenlohr-Moul, T.; Martel, M.M. Reproductive steroids and ADHD symptoms across the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2018, 88, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Demiryürek, E.; Tekin, A.; Çakmak, E.; Temizkan, O.; Karamustafalıoğlu, O.; Gökova, S.; Demiryürek, E. Correlations between impulsiveness and biochemical parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016, 207, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Denson, T.F.; Mehta, P.H.; Tan, D.H. Endogenous testosterone and cortisol jointly influence reactive aggression in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Barry, J.A.; Hardiman, P.J.; Saxby, B.K.; Kuczmierczyk, A. Testosterone and mood dysfunction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome compared to subfertile controls. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 32, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 13 00646 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram for inclusion and exclusion in the study and control groups.
Figure 1. Flow diagram for inclusion and exclusion in the study and control groups.
Metabolites 13 00646 g001
Metabolites 13 00646 g002 550
Figure 2. Patterns of alcohol consumption in the study group and the control group.
Figure 2. Patterns of alcohol consumption in the study group and the control group.
Metabolites 13 00646 g002
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of age and BMI in the study and control groups.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of age and BMI in the study and control groups.
Study GroupControl Group
N4154
AgeM ± SD26.05 ± 4.1125.24 ± 4.22
Me ± IQR25.00 ± 6.0025.00 ± 7.00
Min19.0019.00
Max34.0034.00
Q1/423.0021.00
Q3/429.0028.00
BMIM ± SD32.30 ± 4.5020.94 ± 2.16
Me ± IQR31.62 ± 5.9020.89 ± 3.19
Min25.1015.63
Max47.6624.88
Q1/428.4819.53
Q3/434.3822.72
M—mean; SD—standard deviation; Me—median; IQR—interquartile range; Min—minimum; Max—maximum; Q1/4—lower quartile; Q3/4—upper quartile.
Table
Table 2. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for BIS-11 dimensions between the study group and the control group.
Table 2. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for BIS-11 dimensions between the study group and the control group.
BIS-11 DimensionsSignificance of Differences
Zp
IC−0.7060.479
IU−0.2360.811
M−1.8400.064
IP−0.6120.053
IC—total impulsivity; IU—impulsivity of attention; IM—motor impulsivity; IP—impulsivity resulting from lack of planning; Z—outwardly directed aggression index; p—p-value.
Table
Table 3. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for the I.P.S.A. indicators between the study group and the control group.
Table 3. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for the I.P.S.A. indicators between the study group and the control group.
I.P.S.A. IndicatorsSignificance of Differences
Zp
WO0.1390.889
O0.3980.690
S0.6950.487
U−0.5220.601
Z0.9270.353
K−1.2390.215
WO—general index of the aggression syndrome; O—propensity to retaliate; S—self-aggression index; U—latent aggression index; Z—outwardly directed aggression index; K—control of aggressive behavior; p—p-value.
Table
Table 4. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test of significance for the Mann-Whitney differences in the scores for the KZZJ factors between the study group and the control group.
Table 4. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test of significance for the Mann-Whitney differences in the scores for the KZZJ factors between the study group and the control group.
KZZJ FactorsSignificances of Differences
Zp
NŻ−3.610<0.001
NP−1.7350.083
EP−2.9150.003
RD−3.745<0.001
NŻ—total eating habits; NP—habitual overeating; EP—emotional overeating; RD—dietary restrictions; Z—outwardly directed aggression index; p—p-value.
Table
Table 5. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for SRS factors between the study group and the control group.
Table 5. Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for significance of differences in scores for SRS factors between the study group and the control group.
SRS FactorsSignificance of Differences
Zp
SRS-T−0.4170.676
F10.0860.931
F2−0.7510.452
F31.4460.148
F40.1650.868
F50.2960.766
SRS-T—total risky sexual behavior; F1—sexual behavior with casual partners; F2—risky sexual intercourse; F3—impulsive sexual behavior; F4—intentions to engage in risky sexual behavior; F5—risky anal sexual intercourse; Z—outwardly directed aggression index; p—p-value.
Table
Table 6. Spearman’s r correlation analysis between BIS-11 dimensions and severity of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and biochemical test results in the study group and the control group.
Table 6. Spearman’s r correlation analysis between BIS-11 dimensions and severity of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and biochemical test results in the study group and the control group.
Study Group
VariableBIS-11 Dimensions
ICIUIMIP
rprprprp
TT*−0.220.1670.030.858−0.150.341−0.240.131
FT−0.100.5260.000.998−0.100.519−0.100.510
FAI−0.130.417−0.150.350−0.070.656−0.060.711
mFG0.000.955−0.270.0840.250.114−0.020.879
SHBG−0.020.8800.200.212−0.010.946−0.130.421
Control Group
VariableBIS-11 Dimensions
ICIUIMIP
rprprprp
TT*0.020.8600.170.228−0.080.539−0.060.666
FT−0.070.6280.030.844−0.090.536−0.200.133
FAI0.000.996−0.100.482−0.040.791−0.130.340
mFG−0.130.361−0.080.565−0.030.837−0.050.692
SHBG−0.040.7920.240.073−0.100.4900.070.605
IC—total impulsivity; IU—attention impulsivity; IM—motor impulsivity; IP—impulsivity due to lack of planning; TT*—TT (ng/mL); p—p-value; r—Spearman’s r correlation; mFG—modified Ferriman-Gallwey scores; FAI—free androgen index; SHBG—sex hormone-binding globulin.
Table
Table 7. Spearman’s r correlation analysis between I.P.S.A. indicators and severity of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and results of biochemical tests in the study group and the control group.
Table 7. Spearman’s r correlation analysis between I.P.S.A. indicators and severity of clinical hyperandrogenism symptoms and results of biochemical tests in the study group and the control group.
Study Group
VariableI.P.S.A. Indicators
WOOSUZK
rprprprprprp
TT*−0.010.956−0.080.6060.060.664−0.090.5750.110.496−0.200.206
FT−0.010.9280.170.2850.020.858−0.040.7700.020.887−0.240.115
FAI−0.170.2780.000.996−0.230.135−0.190.233−0.160.3100.100.522
mFG−0.020.8730.080.582−0.060.680−0.020.915−0.090.5700.130.386
SHBG0.230.1450.020.9090.290.0640.230.1320.280.077−0.260.104
Control Group
VariableI.P.S.A. Indicators
WOOSUZK
rprprprprprp
TT*0.100.4680.080.5490.130.3280.150.2910.030.805−0.160.233
FT0.010.900−0.090.4770.240.0760.120.359−0.110.426−0.150.277
FAI0.130.333−0.030.8450.210.1280.110.4270.010.916−0.170.229
mFG−0.070.5840.050.685−0.030.836−0.090.497−0.120.378−0.080.526
SHBG−0.090.4830.100.437−0.210.133−0.030.8080.010.9270.030.819
WO—general index of aggression syndrome; O—retaliatory tendencies; S—self-aggression; U—latent aggression; Z—outwardly directed aggression; K—control of aggressive behavior; TT*—TT (ng/mL); p—p-value; r—Spearman’s r correlation; mFG—modified Ferriman-Gallwey scores; FAI—free androgen index; SHBG—sex hormone-binding globulin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barabasz-Gembczyk, A.; Mędrala, W.; Rodek, P.; Alli-Balogun, B.; Chrobak, J.; Cwynar, M.; Sikora, D.; Wójtowicz, M.; Franik, G.; Madej, P.; et al. Correlation between Selected Clinical Symptoms and Severity of Aggression, Impulsiveness and Their Selected Behavioral Manifestations in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotype A. Metabolites 2023, 13, 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050646

AMA Style

Barabasz-Gembczyk A, Mędrala W, Rodek P, Alli-Balogun B, Chrobak J, Cwynar M, Sikora D, Wójtowicz M, Franik G, Madej P, et al. Correlation between Selected Clinical Symptoms and Severity of Aggression, Impulsiveness and Their Selected Behavioral Manifestations in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotype A. Metabolites. 2023; 13(5):646. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barabasz-Gembczyk, Aleksandra, Wojciech Mędrala, Patryk Rodek, Barbara Alli-Balogun, Jan Chrobak, Marlena Cwynar, Dominika Sikora, Mariusz Wójtowicz, Grzegorz Franik, Paweł Madej, and et al. 2023. "Correlation between Selected Clinical Symptoms and Severity of Aggression, Impulsiveness and Their Selected Behavioral Manifestations in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotype A" Metabolites 13, no. 5: 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050646

APA Style

Barabasz-Gembczyk, A., Mędrala, W., Rodek, P., Alli-Balogun, B., Chrobak, J., Cwynar, M., Sikora, D., Wójtowicz, M., Franik, G., Madej, P., & Kucia, K. (2023). Correlation between Selected Clinical Symptoms and Severity of Aggression, Impulsiveness and Their Selected Behavioral Manifestations in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotype A. Metabolites, 13(5), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop