Next Article in Journal
Blue Light-Based Method to Induce Oxidative Stress on Rabbit Corneal Epithelial (RCE) Cells: Development and Validation
Previous Article in Journal
Fucoidan–Chitosan Polyelectrolyte Complex as a Marine-Derived Colloidal Carrier Platform for Photoprotective Agents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids from the Genus Croton Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review

by
José Jailson Lima Bezerra
1,*,
Mateus Araújo da Luz
2,
Aline Peres Ferreira
3,
Joseilton Franco França
3,
Tatiana Porto Santos
3,
Anderson Angel Vieira Pinheiro
4 and
Maria da Conceição de Menezes Torres
3
1
Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. da Engenharia, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50670-420, PE, Brazil
2
Unidade Acadêmica de Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Av. Aprígio Veloso 882, Bairro Universitário, Campina Grande 58429-500, PB, Brazil
3
Departamento de Química, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, R. Baraúnas 351, Universitário, Campina Grande 58429-500, PB, Brazil
4
Centro de Formação de Professores, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, R. Sérgio Moreira de Figueiredo s/n, Casas Populares, Cajazeiras 58900-000, PB, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2026, 94(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm94010024
Submission received: 12 January 2026 / Revised: 10 March 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 21 March 2026

Abstract

Globally, breast cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors in women and remains a major concern due to its high mortality rate. Although treatment options for this disease have evolved over the years, there are still many cases of recurrence and metastasis. In this context, considering the importance of evaluating less aggressive and more efficient therapeutic alternatives to aid in the treatment of breast cancer, the present study critically discusses the cytotoxic effects of diterpenoids isolated from Croton species (Euphorbiaceae). The articles were retrieved from different databases, from the first report published in 2005 to October 2025. A total of 115 diterpenoids were isolated from 15 Croton species and investigated against different breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468). These compounds mainly belong to the kaurane group (40%), followed by clerodane (14%), tigliane (12%), and abietane (10%). Of this total, only 25 compounds showed promising results (IC50 = < 10 µM). The mechanisms of action of the compounds crokokaugenoid A, kongensin A, kongensin D, ent-16β,17α-dihydroxykaurane, and lauicyclone A have been reported. These compounds likely act by inducing apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of cell migration and invasion, and DNA fragmentation in breast cancer cell lines. To date, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted using Croton diterpenoids for the treatment of breast cancer. Therefore, further studies on the modulation of the immune response by these natural products are essential to better understand their immunotherapeutic activity in the tumor microenvironment during breast cancer progression.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors in women and remains a major challenge for global health. Its occurrence is associated with several factors, such as genetic mutations, late menopause, and obesity [1]. Statistical data from 2022 showed that breast cancer in women was the first or second most commonly diagnosed cancer in 183 out of 185 countries, with a high mortality rate in 169 countries [2]. Additionally, projections for 2050 estimate the occurrence of 3.2 million new cases and 1.1 million deaths from breast cancer worldwide [2]. Mortality rates from this disease can be influenced by genetic factors and the interaction between genetic predispositions and the environment [3]. Although developed countries continually update data on new cancer cases, most developing countries have limited information on this disease [4].
Over the years, breast cancer treatment has evolved from simple surgical resection to more modern therapeutic alternatives, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy [5]. However, despite continuous advances in treatment methods for this disease, recurrence and metastasis remain major concerns [6]. In this context, there is an urgent need to develop more targeted, efficient, and less aggressive treatment approaches to halt the progression of breast cancer. Natural products and their derivatives can be considered promising alternatives for the development of new drugs against breast cancer due to their low toxicity and reduced side effects [7].
Diterpenoids are a large class of organic compounds in the terpene family that exert their cytotoxic effects through a wide range of mechanisms of action [8], including antiproliferative action, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of tumor metastasis, and induction of cell death [9]. Paclitaxel, better known as Taxol®, is an example of a natural diterpene derived from the bark of Taxus brevifolia Nutt., and its mechanism of action is associated with attacking the microtubules of cancer cells [10]. In addition to their occurrence in T. brevifolia, diterpenes are also considered a class of taxonomic markers of the Euphorbiaceae family, occurring in several genera such as Croton, Euphorbia, and Jatropha [11,12,13,14,15]. Croton comprises approximately 1200 species that occur in habitats ranging from dry to humid vegetation in the tropics and subtropics worldwide [16].
Different groups of diterpenoids, such as labdane [17], pimarane [18], abietane [19], tigliane [20], clerodane [21,22], and kaurane [23,24] isolated from Croton species, have demonstrated potential cytotoxic activity in experimental studies. Only one review study reported the cytotoxic potential of diterpenoids from Croton tonkinensis [15]; however, to date, no literature reviews have been found on the cytotoxic effects of diterpenoids isolated from various representatives of this genus against breast cancer cell lines. In this context, considering the importance of evaluating less aggressive and more efficient therapeutic alternatives to aid in the treatment of breast cancer, the present study critically discusses the cytotoxic effects of diterpenoids isolated from Croton species.

2. Data Sources and Retrieval Strategy

2.1. Databases

The articles were retrieved from SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases. The following keywords were defined and combined to aid in article searches: “anticancer”, “diterpenes”, “diterpenoids”, “cytotoxicity”, “Croton”, “antiproliferative”, “antitumor”, “breast cancer”, “MDA-MB-231”, “MCF-7”, and “MDA-MB-468”.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Only articles on the topic published from the first report by Morales et al. [25] until October 2025 were considered. Specifically, to be included in this review, studies should present detailed methodological information on the extraction, isolation, and NMR elucidation process of diterpenoids from Croton species, as well as the cytotoxic investigation of the compounds against different breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468). Literature review studies, book chapters, e-books, undergraduate theses, Master’s theses, PhD theses, and abstracts published in proceedings of scientific events were excluded [26]. In addition, articles that reported the cytotoxic potential of semi-synthetic diterpenoids or that were not directly isolated from Croton species were excluded. All scientific names of the plants were checked on the World Flora Online (WFO) Plant List platform (https://wfoplantlist.org/ (Accessed on 20 March 2026)).

2.3. Data Screening and Information Categorization

Initially, 982 documents were found in the databases. Subsequently, a pre-selection was carried out, where the authors read the titles, abstracts, and keywords to eliminate any documents that did not meet the pre-established inclusion criteria. Following this pre-selection, a complete reading of 421 documents was carried out. Finally, 25 articles were included in this study. The results were organized and described according to the different diterpenoid groups of Croton: (1) Abietane, (2) Clerodane, (3) Kaurane, (4) Labdane, (5) Tigliane, (6) Casbane, (7) Cembrane, (8) Crotofolane, (9) Pimarane, and (10) Crotinsulidane.

2.4. Data Analysis

The results reported in scientific articles on the cytotoxic activity of Croton diterpenoids against breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468) were analyzed based on Brahemi et al. [27]. Following these criteria, isolated compounds that showed IC50 values (concentration that causes 50% cell death) > 10 μM were considered inactive.

3. Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids

A total of 115 diterpenoids were isolated from 15 species of Croton and investigated against different breast cancer cell lines. Most of these compounds belong to the kaurane group (40%), followed by clerodane (14%), tigliane (12%), and abietane (10%) (Figure 1). These compounds were isolated from C. kongensis Gagnep., C. laevigatus Vahl, C. caudatus Geiseler, C. oligandrus Pierre ex Hutch., C. oblongus Burm.f., C. oblongifolius (= C. persimilis Müll.Arg.), C. laui Merr. & F.P.Metcalf, C. tonkinensis (= C. kongensis Gagnep.), C. mekongensis Gagnep., C. malambo H.Karst., C. caracasanus Pittier, C. stipuliformis (= C. costatus Kunth), C. tiglium L., C. damayeshu Y.T.Chang, and C. insularis Baill. The leaves and branches were the main plant parts used for the extraction and isolation of diterpenoids. Regarding the main cell lines evaluated in the cytotoxicity assays, it was observed that MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 stood out, while MDA-MB-468 was the least tested. The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was the most widely used to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of Croton diterpenoids.

3.1. Abietane

A total of 11 compounds belonging to the abietane group were isolated from Croton species and evaluated against breast cancer cell lines (Table 1 and Figure 2). Only compound 4 (crokongendin B) isolated from C. kongensis branches showed high activity when evaluated against MDA-MB-231 (IC50 = 1.77 µM), MDA-MB-468 (IC50 = 0.116 µM), and MCF-7 (IC50 = 1.24 µM) [24].

3.2. Clerodane

Although 16 clerodane compounds were isolated from Croton species (Table 2 and Figure 3), none of these compounds showed activity (IC50 = > 10 µM) against the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines evaluated in cytotoxicity studies.

3.3. Kaurane

Several molecules belonging to the kaurane group have been isolated from Croton species and evaluated for their cytotoxic effect (Table 3 and Figure 4). Among these, compounds 28 (crokokaugenoid A), 32 (crokokaugenoid E), 39 (kongensin E), 40 (serrin F), 41 (isolushinin D), 43 (croyanhuin A), 44 (kongeniod C), 45 (kongensin B), 51 (ent-1β-acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en15-one), 52 (ent-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-one), 70 (ent-18-acetoxy-7α-hydroxykaur-16-en-15-one), and 71 (ent-18-acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-one) isolated from the leaves and branches of C. kongensis were active (IC50 = < 10 µM) against the MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines [28]. In another study, Thuong et al. [32] reported that compound 65 (crotonkinensin D) isolated from C. tonkinensis leaves also exhibited a promising cytotoxic effect against MCF-7 cells (IC50 = 9.4 µM). Compounds 56 (crokongendin A), 60 (kongensin D), 61 (kongeniod B), 62 (kongensin A), and 63 (kongensin F) isolated from C. kongensis branches, were also tested against MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and MCF-7 cells and showed IC50 values lower than 10 µM, indicating that they are promising against breast cancer [24].

3.4. Labdane

Only three compounds belonging to the labdane group were isolated from C. stipuliformis and C. laui and evaluated against the MCF-7 cell line (Table 4 and Figure 5). None of these compounds showed promising results.

3.5. Tigliane

A total of 14 compounds belonging to the tigliane group were isolated from Croton species and tested against breast cancer cells (Table 5 and Figure 6). According to Chen et al. [20], compounds 79 (crotusin A), 80 (crotusin B), and 81 (crotusin C) isolated from the leaves and branches of C. caudatus exhibited IC50 values of only 9.56, 1.49, and 0.49 µM against MCF-7 cells, respectively. In another study, Jia et al. [37] reported that compound 88 (12-O-(2-metil)butiril-4-desoxi-4y-forbol-13-decanoato) isolated from C. damayeshu also showed activity (IC50 = 1.992 µM) against MDA-MB-231 cells.

3.6. Casbane

Compounds 94 (EBC-304) and 95 (EBC-320), belonging to the casbane group, were isolated from the aerial parts of C. insularis and exhibited promising cytotoxic activity, with IC50 values of only 5 and 3 µM, respectively, against MCF-7 cells [40] (Table 6 and Figure 7).

3.7. Cembrane

A total of six cembrane compounds were isolated from the aerial parts of C. laui and evaluated for their cytotoxic potential. However, all of these compounds showed IC50 values greater than 50 μM and were considered inactive against MCF-7 cells (Table 7 and Figure 8).

3.8. Crotofolane

As observed for cembrane, compounds belonging to the crotofolane group isolated from Croton species also did not show any relevant cytotoxic effect against the MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines (Table 8 and Figure 9).

3.9. Pimarane

Compounds belonging to the pimarane group were isolated from the bark of C. insularis and the leaves of C. laui and evaluated against MCF-7 cells. The IC50 values obtained were greater than 10 µM and, therefore, considered inactive against this specific cell line (Table 9 and Figure 10).

3.10. Crotinsulidane

Compound 115 (EBC-219) isolated from the stem of C. insularis was the only representative of the crotinsulidene group tested against breast cancer cells. This compound showed no relevant effect against MCF-7 cells (Table 10 and Figure 11).

4. Discussion

Although 115 diterpenoids isolated from Croton species were evaluated for their cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cell lines, only 25 showed promising results (IC50 = < 10 µM). The mechanisms of action of compounds 28 (crokokaugenoid A), 60 (kongensin D), 67 (ent-16β,17α-dihydroxykaurane), and 111 (lauicyclone A) have been well reported in the literature. According to Zhu et al. [28], MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with different concentrations (1, 2 and 4 μM) of compound 28 and, after 48 h, a concentration-dependent cell cycle arrest was observed in the G2/M phase, while the G0/G1 and S phases decreased. Furthermore, both early-stage and late-stage apoptotic cells increased in a dose-dependent manner by up to 16.0% (1 μM), 16.9% (2 μM), and 43.1% (4 μM), respectively. These results indicated that compound 28 effectively induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells, as well as increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and regulated the STAT3 and FAK signaling pathways [28].
Compound 60 showed promising anti-TNBC (triple-negative breast cancer) potential in in vitro and in vivo studies. According to Fan et al. [24], murine models of TNBC xenograft were developed by subcutaneous injection of MDA-MB-468 cells into female NOD/SCID mice and treated with compound 60 at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg per day, via intraperitoneal injection. After 33 days, compound 60 was observed to suppress the growth of xenotransplanted TNBC tumors in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, investigations revealed that the levels of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) and its downstream target, phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR), decreased significantly with treatment with compound 60 in a dose-dependent manner, while the level of its upstream target, phosphorylated PI3K (p-PI3K), was not changed [24]. Moreover, compound 60 had no influence on the expression of PI3K, Akt, and mTOR, suggesting that it could affect the phosphorylation cascades downstream of p-PI3K [24]. Mechanistic studies in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells revealed that compound 60 can induce apoptosis, autophagy, G2/M cell cycle arrest, and inhibit cell migration and invasion. These promising cytotoxic effects of compound 60 may be related to the cleavage of the C8-C9 bond and the presence of the α,β-unsaturated ketone moiety [24].
Similar to compound 60, compound 62 (kongensin A) was also effective against the MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and MCF-7 cell lines [24]. According to Li et al. [44], compound 62 inhibits RIP3-dependent necroptosis and favors apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. The mechanism involves covalent binding to cysteine 420 of HSP90, which destabilizes the complex formed with the co-chaperone CDC37. On the other hand, Chen et al. [45] reported that low concentrations of compound 62 blocked necroptosis, exerted anti-inflammatory effects on NPCs (nucleus pulposus cells), and inhibited apoptosis. This phenomenon was investigated through RNA-seq analysis, where it was observed that compound 62 significantly increased the expression of TAK1. This increase was crucial for restoring mitochondrial function, as it mitigated oxidative stress and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by TBHP (tert-butyl hydroperoxide) in NPCs, culminating in the inhibition of PANoptosis [45].
In a study by Morales et al. [25], it was reported that MCF-7 cells treated with compound 67 at a concentration of 12.5 μg/mL showed a reduction in Bcl-2 and hTERT levels. Furthermore, after 24 h of treatment with compound 67 (12.5 μg/mL), the MCF-7 cell line showed a marked pattern of DNA fragmentation [25]. According to Morales et al. [46], compound 67 dissociates the Ap2α-Rb activator complex from the Bcl-2 gene promoter and induces the translocation of Ap2α from the nucleus to the cell periphery without affecting Rb. This effect contributes to the initiation of apoptosis through the downregulation of Bcl-2 [46]. Regarding the mechanisms of action of compound 111 in MCF-7 cells, it has been reported that the cytotoxic effect may be associated with cellular bio-oxidation pathways and glucose metabolism [43]. In this context, Li et al. [43] reported that compound 111 can influence the expression of HIF-1α, promoting cellular glucose uptake and reducing pyruvate entry into the Krebs cycle.
The cytotoxic activity of compounds isolated from Croton justifies the use of these plants in the traditional medicine of several countries for the treatment of cancer. According to ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological surveys, the species C. penduliflorus [47], C. lechleri [48], C. draconoides [49], C. urucurana [50,51] C. macrostachyus [52,53,54,55], C. heliotropiifolius [56], and C. gratissimus [57] are widely used for cancer treatment in countries in Africa and South America. However, records regarding the isolation of diterpenes and tests on breast cancer cell lines have not yet been found for these plants. This ethnomedicinal information can guide future studies on the cytotoxic potential of diterpenes from these species used in traditional communities.
Croton is not the only genus in the Euphorbiaceae family that includes species rich in diterpenoids with cytotoxic effects. Several studies have reported that diterpenoids such as pubescenol, helioscopinolide A–B, curcusone B, jatrophalactone, jatrophaketone, jatrophadiketone, jatrocurcasenones A–E, jatrophodiones B–E, curcusecons A–E, curcusones F–J, ent-atisane, myrsinanes, premyrsinanes, jatrophone, and resiniferatoxin have been isolated from the species Euphorbia pubescens [58], Jatropha curcas [59,60,61,62], Jatropha ribifolia [63], Euphorbia connata [64], Euphorbia fischeriana [65], Jatropha gossypiifolia [66], Euphorbia sororia [67], Euphorbia bicolor [68], Euphorbia gedrosiaca [69], and Jatropha spinosa [70]. All of these diterpenoids have also been investigated against breast cancer cell lines, particularly MCF-7 cells. In this context, the Euphorbiaceae family stands out as a source of diterpenoids with potential anti-breast cancer properties.
Although this review has focused only on diterpenoids isolated from Croton species, it is important to highlight that essential oils obtained from C. argyrophyllus [71,72], C. campestris [73], C. doctoris [74], C. heliotropiifolius [75], C. malambo [76], C. matourensis [77], and C. urucurana [78] have also been investigated against the MDA-MB-435 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Considering that essential oils are rich in monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, the planning and development of pharmaceutical formulations containing terpenes obtained from these plants are necessary to evaluate their potential in the treatment of cancer patients, especially against breast cancer.

5. Future Perspectives

To date, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted using Croton diterpenoids for the treatment of breast cancer. Most studies are limited to in vitro assays, with considerable gaps related to the possible mechanisms of action of these natural products. Therefore, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicokinetic studies of these compounds are of great importance to ensure their use as potential anticancer agents in the future.
Based on in vitro and in vivo studies, bioactive compounds have been shown to have a positive effect on the immune system and its ability to fight cancer cells. In murine models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), for example, natural products can be investigated for their immunotherapeutic activity in the tumor microenvironment (TME) during breast cancer progression [79]. These compounds have been reported can reverse tumor signaling pathways associated with the immune system, restoring its normal function by inhibiting the secretion of TGF-β, PGE2, and IL-10, as well as promoting the secretion of antitumor factors such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β [80]. Taken together, this promising evidence encourages the development of future studies focused on the possibility of modulating the immune response in breast cancer cell lines using diterpenoids from Croton species.
Furthermore, the use of nanotechnology combined with Croton diterpenoids can improve the bioavailability of these molecules, intensifying and targeting their effects against tumor cells. It has been reported that nanoparticles based on compounds such as carbon, dendrimers, lipids, polymers, proteins, secondary metabolites, as well as metallic and mesoporous silica nanoparticles, represent the main classes of nanostructured drug delivery systems that have been explored for breast cancer therapy [81]. According to Sharmila et al. [82], terpene-based nanoformulations offer several advantages in drug delivery, as they improve solubility, bioavailability, and biocompatibility, overcoming the disadvantages of plant-derived terpenoids used in cancer treatment. Among other advantages, nanotechnology allows for the administration of natural products specifically targeted to cancer cells, which directly contributes to safer treatment free from side effects [83]. In this context, the structural modification of natural products, in combination with biosynthetic and computational technologies, will become an important direction for the development of future studies against breast cancer [84].

6. Conclusions

Although 115 diterpenoids were isolated from 15 Croton species and evaluated for their cytotoxic potential, only 25 showed promising results when tested against the MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468 cell lines. Most of the compounds tested belong to the kaurane group, followed by clerodane, tigliane, abietane, pimarane, cembrane, crotofolane, casbane, labdane, and crotinsulidane. The mechanisms of action of the compounds crokokaugenoid A, kongensin A, kongensin D, ent-16β,17α-dihydroxykaurane, and lauicyclone A have been reported. These compounds likely act by inducing apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of cell migration and invasion, and DNA fragmentation in breast cancer cell lines.

Author Contributions

J.J.L.B.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, and Writing—original draft. M.A.d.L.: Software, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. A.P.F.: Software, Investigation, Data curation. J.F.F.: Software, Investigation, Data curation. T.P.S.: Software, Investigation, Data curation. A.A.V.P.: Software. M.d.C.d.M.T.: Formal analysis, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES—Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (FACEPE—Brazil), and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba (FAPESQ—Brazil).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CCK-8cell counting kit-8
DNAdeoxyribonucleic acid
IC50 concentration that causes 50% cell death
MTS colorimetric assay
MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
ROSreactive oxygen species
SRBsulforhodamine B
WFOworld flora online

References

  1. Xiong, X.; Zheng, L.W.; Ding, Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Cai, Y.W.; Wang, L.P.; Huang, L.; Liu, C.C.; Shao, Z.M.; Yu, K.D. Breast cancer: Pathogenesis and treatments. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, J.; Harper, A.; McCormack, V.; Sung, H.; Houssami, N.; Morgan, E.; Mutebi, M.; Garvey, G.; Soerjomataram, I.; Fidler-Benaoudia, M.M. Global patterns and trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality across 185 countries. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liao, L. Inequality in breast cancer: Global statistics from 2022 to 2050. Breast 2025, 79, 103851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diao, X.; Guo, C.; Jin, Y.; Li, B.; Gao, X.; Du, X.; Chen, Z.; Jo, M.; Zeng, Y.; Ding, C.; et al. Cancer situation in China: An analysis based on the global epidemiological data released in 2024. Cancer Commun. 2025, 45, 178–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jiang, D.; Wen, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, N.; Shao, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Qin, Y.; Qu, F.; et al. Knowledge mapping of tumor microenvironment for breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2023. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1550988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Riggio, A.I.; Varley, K.E.; Welm, A.L. The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Yang, X.; Xia, G.; Wang, G. Natural products and derivatives for breast cancer treatment: From drug discovery to molecular mechanism. Phytomedicine 2024, 129, 155600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bangay, G.; Brauning, F.Z.; Rosatella, A.; Díaz-Lanza, A.M.; Domínguez-Martín, E.M.; Goncalves, B.; Hussein, A.A.; Efferth, T.; Rijo, P. Anticancer diterpenes of African natural products: Mechanistic pathways and preclinical developments. Phytomedicine 2024, 129, 155634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tomiotto-Pellissier, F.; Gonçalves, M.D.; Silva, T.F.; Concato, V.M.; Bortoleti, B.T.S.; Arakawa, N.S.; Conchon-Costa, I.; Pavanelli, W.R.; Panis, C. Plant-derived diterpenes for breast cancer treatment: New perspectives and recent advances. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2022, 74, 41–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Quispe, C.; Patra, J.K.; Singh, Y.D.; Panda, M.K.; Das, G.; Adetunji, C.O.; Michael, O.S.; Sytar, O.; Polito, L.; et al. Paclitaxel: Application in modern oncology and nanomedicine-based cancer therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 3687700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kemboi, D.; Siwe-Noundou, X.; Krause, R.W.; Langat, M.K.; Tembu, V.J. Euphorbia diterpenes: An update of isolation, structure, pharmacological activities and structure–activity relationship. Molecules 2021, 26, 5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alves, A.L.V.; Silva, L.S.; Faleiros, C.A.; Silva, V.A.; Reis, R.M. The role of ingenane diterpenes in cancer therapy: From bioactive secondary compounds to small molecules. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022, 17, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhan, Z.J.; Li, S.; Chu, W.; Yin, S. Euphorbia diterpenoids: Isolation, structure, bioactivity, biosynthesis, and synthesis (2013–2021). Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 2132–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Souza, T.A.D.; Pereira, L.H.; Alves, A.F.; Dourado, D.; Lins, J.D.S.; Scotti, M.T.; Scotti, L.; Abreu, L.S.; Tavares, J.F.; Silva, M.S. Jatropha Diterpenes: An Updated Review Concerning Their Structural Diversity, Therapeutic Performance, and Future Pharmaceutical Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tu, V.L.; Quynh, T.T.T.; Van An, N.D.; Chi, N.L.L. Diterpenoids from Croton tonkinensis Gagnep as antitumor agents: A Systematic review. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2025, 78, 102513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Steinmann, V.W. A Synopsis of Croton (Euphorbiaceae) in Michoacán, Mexico. Taxonomy 2021, 1, 395–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franco, M.S.; Cordero, C.P.; Morantes, S.J.; Aristizabal, F.; Osorio, C. Cytotoxic labdane diterpenoids isolated from the hexane fraction of the Croton stipuliformis stem bark. Vitae 2011, 18, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maslovskaya, L.A.; Savchenko, A.I.; Gordon, V.A.; Reddell, P.W.; Pierce, C.J.; Parsons, P.G.; Williams, C.M. EBC-316, 325–327, and 345: New pimarane diterpenes from Croton insularis found in the Australian rainforest. Aust. J. Chem. 2015, 68, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, J.-T.; Liu, X.-Y.; Li, A.-L.; Wang, X.-L.; Shen, T.; Ren, D.-M.; Lou, H.-X.; Wang, X.-N. Cytotoxic abietane-type diterpenoids from twigs and leaves of Croton laevigatus. Phytochem. Lett. 2017, 22, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.Y.; Yang, K.X.; Yang, X.W.; Khan, A.; Liu, L.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Liu, Y.-P.; Li, Y.; Luo, X.-D. New cytotoxic tigliane diterpenoids from Croton caudatus. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aziz, A.N.; Ismail, N.H.; Halim, S.N.A.; Looi, C.Y.; Anouar, E.H.; Langat, M.K.; Mulholland, D.; Awang, K. Laevifins A–G, clerodane diterpenoids from the Bark of Croton oblongus Burm. f. Phytochemistry 2018, 156, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zou, M.F.; Hu, R.; Liu, Y.X.; Fan, R.Z.; Xie, X.L.; Yin, S. Two highly oxygenated nor-clerodane diterpenoids from Croton caudatus. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 22, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Udomthawee, K.; Chainok, K.; Jiajaroen, S.; Nuntasaen, N.; Pompimon, W. New ent-kaurane-type diterpenoid with cytotoxic activity from Croton mekongensis. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 23, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fan, R.Z.; Chen, L.; Su, T.; Li, W.; Huang, J.L.; Sang, J.; Tang, G.-H.; Yin, S. Discovery of 8,9-seco-ent-kaurane diterpenoids as potential leads for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 9926–9942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morales, A.; Pérez, P.; Mendoza, R.; Compagnone, R.; Suarez, A.I.; Arvelo, F.; Ramírez, J.L.; Galindo-Castro, I. Cytotoxic and proapoptotic activity of ent-16β-17α-dihydroxykaurane on human mammary carcinoma cell line MCF-7. Cancer Lett. 2005, 218, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bezerra, J.J.L. Anticancer potential of essential oils from Croton L. species (Euphorbiaceae): A comprehensive review of ethnomedicinal, pharmacological, phytochemical, and toxicological evidence. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 175, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brahemi, G.; Kona, F.R.; Fiasella, A.; Buac, D.; Soukupová, J.; Brancale, A.; Burger, A.M.; Westwell, A.D. Exploring the structural requirements for inhibition of the ubiquitin E3 ligase breast cancer associated protein 2 (BCA2) as a treatment for breast cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2757–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhu, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Yu, J.; Yue, J.; Zhou, B. Cytotoxic diterpenoids from Croton kongensis inhibiting tumor proliferation and migration. Bioorg. Chem. 2024, 152, 107739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, J.T.; Han, Y.; Wang, X.L.; Shen, T.; Lou, H.X.; Wang, X.N. Diterpenoids from the twigs and leaves of Croton caudatus var. tomentosus. Fitoterapia 2015, 107, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guetchueng, S.T.; Nahar, L.; Ritchie, K.J.; Ismail, F.M.D.; Evans, A.R.; Sarker, S.D. Ent-clerodane diterpenes from the bark of Croton oligandrus Pierre ex Hutch. and assessment of their cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines. Molecules 2018, 23, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Youngsa-ad, W.; Ngamrojanavanich, N.; Mahidol, C.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prawat, H.; Kittakoop, P. Diterpenoids from the roots of Croton oblongifolius. Planta Med. 2007, 73, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Thuong, P.T.; Pham, T.H.M.; Le, T.V.T.; Dao, T.T.; Dang, T.T.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Oh, W.K. Symmetric dimers of ent-kaurane diterpenoids with cytotoxic activity from Croton tonkinensis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 1122–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kuo, P.C.; Shen, Y.C.; Yang, M.L.; Wang, S.H.; Thang, T.D.; Dung, N.X.; Chiang, P.-C.; Lee, K.-H.; Lee, E.-J.; Wu, T.-S. Crotonkinins A and B and related diterpenoids from Croton tonkinensis as anti-inflammatory and antitumor agents. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1906–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Quan, K.T.; Van Tuan, V.; Xuyen, P.T.; Tuan, N.Q.; Minh, P.T.H.; Ito, F.; Thuong, P.T. Asymmetric dimeric ent-kauranoids from Croton tonkinensis and their cytotoxicity. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 1099–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Suárez, A.I.; Chavez, K.; Mateu, E.; Compagnone, R.S.; Muñoz, A.; Sojo, F.; Arvelo, F.; Mijares, M.; De Sanctis, J.B. Cytotoxic activity of seco-entkaurenes from Croton caracasana on human cancer cell lines. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1547–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, L.; Wu, Z.N.; Zhang, Y.B.; Chen, N.H.; Zhuang, L.; Li, Y.L.; Wang, G.C. Three new diterpenoids from Croton laui Merr. et Metc. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 1028–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jia, R.L.; Liang, Q.; Hu, J.X.; Xie, S.D.; Su, X.M.; Xu, W.H. Tigliane diterpenoids with cytotoxic activities from Croton damayeshu. Phytochem. Lett. 2023, 57, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.; Qin, L.; Zhao, B.; Cai, L.; Zhong, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X. Crotonols A and B, two rare tigliane diterpenoid derivatives against K562 cells from Croton tiglium. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.-F.; Yang, S.-H.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Li, D.-X.; He, W.-J.; Zhang, X.-X.; Liu, Y.-H.; Zhou, X.-J. Five new phorbol esters with cytotoxic and selective anti-inflammatory activities from Croton tiglium. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maslovskaya, L.A.; Savchenko, A.I.; Gordon, V.A.; Reddell, P.W.; Pierce, C.J.; Parsons, P.G.; Williams, C.M. The First casbane hydroperoxides EBC-304 and EBC-320 from the Australian rainforest. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maslovskaya, L.A.; Savchenko, A.I.; Krenske, E.H.; Pierce, C.J.; Gordon, V.A.; Reddell, P.W.; Parsons, P.G.; Williams, C.M. EBC-219: A new diterpene skeleton, crotinsulidane, from the Australian rainforest containing a bridgehead double bond. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 7126–7129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maslovskaya, L.A.; Savchenko, A.I.; Pierce, C.J.; Gordon, V.A.; Reddell, P.W.; Parsons, P.G.; Williams, C.M. Unprecedented 1, 14-seco-Crotofolanes from Croton insularis: Oxidative Cleavage of Crotofolin C by a Putative Homo-Baeyer–Villiger Rearrangement. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 14226–14230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Q.; Xu, C.-S.; Yu, H.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Shen, Y.-B.; Wu, H.-W.; Gu, M.-M.; Liao, Z.-X. A Tricyclo [4.3. 1] decane Diterpenoid Skeleton from Croton laui: Isolation and 1H NMR-Based Metabolomic Profiling. Org. Lett. 2025, 27, 4300–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, D.; Li, C.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Lei, X.; Shen, Z. Natural product kongensin A is a non-canonical HSP90 inhibitor that blocks RIP3-dependent necroptosis. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, Y.; Hu, B.; Ni, F.; Han, Y.; Shu, S.; Xiong, L.; Shao, Z.; Wei, Y. Kongensin a attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration by inhibiting TAK1-mediated PANoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 129, 111661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Morales, A.; Alvarez, A.; Arvelo, F.; Suárez, A.I.; Compagnone, R.S.; Galindo-Castro, I. The natural diterpene ent-16β-17α-dihydroxykaurane down-regulates Bcl-2 by disruption of the Ap-2α/Rb transcription activating complex and induces E2F1 up-regulation in MCF-7 cells. Apoptosis 2011, 16, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ashidi, J.S.; Houghton, P.J.; Hylands, P.J.; Efferth, T. Ethnobotanical survey and cytotoxicity testing of plants of South-western Nigeria used to treat cancer, with isolation of cytotoxic constituents from Cajanus cajan Millsp. leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 128, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Polesna, L.; Polesny, Z.; Clavo, M.Z.; Hansson, A.; Kokoska, L. Ethnopharmacological inventory of plants used in coronel Portillo province of Ucayali department, Peru. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hajdu, Z.; Hohmann, J. An ethnopharmacological survey of the traditional medicine utilized in the community of Porvenir, Bajo Paraguá Indian Reservation, Bolivia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 139, 838–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bieski, I.G.C.; Santos, F.R.; Oliveira, R.M.; Espinosa, M.M.; Macedo, M.; Albuquerque, U.P.; Martins, D.T.O. Ethnopharmacology of medicinal plants of the pantanal region (Mato Grosso, Brazil). Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2012, 2012, 272749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ribeiro, R.V.; Bieski, I.G.C.; Balogun, S.O.; Martins, D.T.O. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Ribeirinhos in the North Araguaia microregion, Mato Grosso, Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 205, 69–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ochwang’i, D.O.; Kimwele, C.N.; Oduma, J.A.; Gathumbi, P.K.; Mbaria, J.M.; Kiama, S.G. Medicinal plants used in treatment and management of cancer in Kakamega County, Kenya. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 151, 1040–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kewessa, G.; Abebe, T.; Demessie, A. Indigenous knowledge on the use and management of medicinal trees and shrubs in Dale District, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2015, 14, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tesfaye, S.; Belete, A.; Engidawork, E.; Gedif, T.; Asres, K. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by traditional healers to treat cancer-like symptoms in eleven districts, Ethiopia. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 2020, 7683450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tamene, S.; Negash, M.; Makonda, F.B.; Chiwona-Karltun, L. Influence of socio-demographic factors on medicinal plant knowledge among three selected ethnic groups in south-central Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2024, 20, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Macêdo, D.G.; Ribeiro, D.A.; Coutinho, H.D.; Menezes, I.R.; Souza, M.M. Práticas terapêuticas tradicionais: Uso e conhecimento de plantas do cerrado no estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil). Bol. Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromat. 2015, 14, 491–508. [Google Scholar]
  57. Segun, P.A.; Ogbole, O.O.; Ajaiyeoba, E.O. Medicinal plants used in the management of cancer among the Ijebus of Southwestern Nigeria. J. Herb. Med. 2018, 14, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Valente, C.; Pedro, M.; Duarte, A.; Nascimento, M.S.J.; Abreu, P.M.; Ferreira, M.J.U. Bioactive Diterpenoids, a New Jatrophane and Two ent-Abietanes, and Other Constituents from Euphorbia pubescens. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 902–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Muangman, S.; Thippornwong, M.; Tohtong, R. Anti-metastatic effects of curcusone B, a diterpene from Jatropha curcas. In Vivo 2005, 19, 265–268. [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu, J.Q.; Yang, Y.F.; Wang, C.F.; Li, Y.; Qiu, M.H. Three new diterpenes from Jatropha curcas. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 972–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, J.-Q.; Yang, Y.-F.; Li, X.-Y.; Liu, E.-Q.; Li, Z.-R.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Qiu, M.-H. Cytotoxicity of naturally occurring rhamnofolane diterpenes from Jatropha curcas. Phytochemistry 2013, 96, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Xia, J.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Qiu, M. Cytotoxic diterpenoids from Jatropha curcas cv. nigroviensrugosus CY Yang Roots. Phytochemistry 2015, 117, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fernandes, E.D.S.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Tófoli, D.; Imamura, P.M.; Carvalho, J.E.; Ruiz, A.L.; Foglio, M.A.; Minguzzi, S.; Silva, R.C. Isolation, structural identification and cytotoxic activity of hexanic extract, cyperenoic acid, and jatrophone terpenes from Jatropha ribifolia roots. Rev. Bras. Farm. 2013, 23, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shadi, S.; Saeidi, H.; Ghanadian, M.; Rahimnejad, M.R.; Aghaei, M.; Ayatollahi, S.M.; Choudhary, M.I. New macrocyclic diterpenes from Euphorbia connata Boiss. with cytotoxic activities on human breast cancer cell lines. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kuang, X.; Li, W.; Kanno, Y.; Yamashita, N.; Nemoto, K.; Asada, Y.; Koike, K. ent-Atisane diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana inhibit mammosphere formation in MCF-7 cells. J. Nat. Med. 2016, 70, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fatima, I.; El-Ayachi, I.; Taotao, L.; Lillo, M.A.; Krutilina, R.; Seagroves, T.N.; Radaszkiewicz, T.W.; Hutnan, M.; Bryja, V.; A Krum, S.; et al. The natural compound Jatrophone interferes with Wnt/β-catenin signaling and inhibits proliferation and EMT in human triple-negative breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hu, R.; Gao, J.; Rozimamat, R.; Aisa, H.A. Jatrophane diterpenoids from Euphorbia sororia as potent modulators against P-glycoprotein-based multidrug resistance. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 146, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Basu, P.; Meza, E.; Bergel, M.; Maier, C. Estrogenic, antiestrogenic and antiproliferative activities of Euphorbia bicolor (Euphorbiaceae) latex extracts and its phytochemicals. Nutrients 2019, 12, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yazdiniapour, Z.; Sohrabi, M.H.; Motinia, N.; Zolfaghari, B.; Mehdifar, P.; Ghanadian, M.; Lanzotti, V. Diterpenoids from Euphorbia gedrosiaca as potential anti-proliferative agents against breast cancer cells. Metabolites 2023, 13, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Shari, K.; El Gedaily, R.A.; Allam, R.M.; Meselhy, K.M.; Khaleel, A.E.; Abdel-Sattar, E. Jatrophone: A cytotoxic macrocylic diterpene targeting PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway, inducing apoptosis and autophagy in resistant breast cancer cells. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2023, 23, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Amaral, R.G.; Andrade, L.N.; Severino, P.; Araujo, S.S.; Santos, M.I.S.; Dias, A.S.; de Moraes Filhob, M.O.; do Ó Pessoab, C.; Carvalhoa, A.A.; Thomazzia, S.M.; et al. Investigation of the possible antioxidant and anticancer effects of Croton argyrophyllus (Euphorbiaceae). Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 64, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Oliveira, M.A.; Arruda, M.G.M.; da Silva, N.F.; da Cruz, R.C.D.; de Barros, S.C.L.; da Silva, M.S.; Souza, T.G.d.S.; de Oliveira, E.B.; Chagas, C.A.; Aguiar, J.d.S.; et al. Cytotoxic, acute oral toxicity, genotoxic and mutagenic assessment of the essential oil from fresh leaves of Croton argyrophyllus (Kunth.). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 330, 118206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Monteiro, P.A.; Zelioli, I.A.M.; Sousa, I.M.O.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; Vendramini-Costa, D.B.; Foglio, M.A.; Carvalho, J.E.D. Chemical composition and antiproliferative activity of Croton campestris A. St.-Hil. essential oil. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cândido, A.C.S.; Scalon, S.P.Q.; Silva, C.B.; Simionatto, E.; Morel, A.F.; Stüker, C.Z.; Matos, M.F.C.; Peres, M.T.L.P. Chemical composition and phytotoxicity of essential oils of Croton doctoris S. Moore (Euphorbiaceae). Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 82, e231957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cavalcanti, B.C.; Magalhães, I.L.; Rocha, D.D.; Barreto, F.S.; Andrade Neto, J.B.; Magalhães, H.I.F.; dos Santos, C.C.; de Moraes, M.O. In vitro evaluation of cytotoxic potential of essential oil extracted from leaves of Croton heliotropiifolius Kunth in human tumor cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2024, 87, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Suárez, A.I.; Vásquez, L.J.; Taddei, A.; Arvelo, F.; Compagnone, R.S. Antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of leaf essential oil of Croton malambo. J. Essent. Oil-Bear Plants 2008, 11, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. de Lima, E.J.S.P.; Alves, R.G.; D´elia, G.M.A.; da Anunciação, T.A.; Silva, V.R.; Santos, L.d.S.; Soares, M.B.P.; Cardozo, N.M.D.; Costa, E.V.; da Silva, F.M.A.; et al. Antitumor effect of the essential oil from the leaves of Croton matourensis Aubl. (Euphorbiaceae). Molecules 2018, 23, 2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Simionatto, E.; Bonani, V.F.; Peres, M.T.; Hess, S.C.; Candido, A.C.; Diraimo, D.L.; Poppi, N.R.; Matos, M.d.F.C.; Santos, E.C.; Oguma, P.M.; et al. Bioactivity and chemical composition of the essential oils of Croton urucurana Baillon (Euphorbiaceae). J. Essent. Oil-Bear Plants 2009, 12, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alqathama, A. Natural products as promising modulators of breast cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1410300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gupta, M.; Chandan, K.; Sarwat, M. Natural Products and Their Derivatives as Immune Check Point Inhibitors: Targeting Cytokine/Chemokine Signalling in Cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 86, 214–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yap, K.M.; Sekar, M.; Fuloria, S.; Wu, Y.S.; Gan, S.H.; Mat Rani, N.N.I.; Subramaniyan, V.; Kokare, C.; Lum, P.T.; Begum, M.Y.; et al. Drug delivery of natural products through nanocarriers for effective breast cancer therapy: A comprehensive review of literature. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 7891–7941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sharmila, A.; Bhadra, P.; Kishore, C.; Selvaraj, C.I.; Kavalakatt, J.; Bishayee, A. Nanoformulated Terpenoids in Cancer: A Review of Therapeutic Applications, Mechanisms, and Challenges. Cancers 2025, 17, 3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Attri, K.; Sharda, D.; Chudasama, B.; Mahajan, R.L.; Choudhury, D. A review on terpenes for treatment of gastric cancer: Current status and nanotechnology-enabled future. RSC Sustain. 2023, 1, 1109–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, X.; Miao, J.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Miao, M. Review on effects and mechanisms of plant-derived natural products against breast cancer bone metastasis. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diterpenoid groups isolated from Croton species evaluated for cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cell lines.
Figure 1. Diterpenoid groups isolated from Croton species evaluated for cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cell lines.
Scipharm 94 00024 g001
Figure 2. Abietane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 2. Abietane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g002
Figure 3. Clerodane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 3. Clerodane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g003
Figure 4. Kaurane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 4. Kaurane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g004
Figure 5. Labdane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 5. Labdane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g005
Figure 6. Tigliane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 6. Tigliane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g006
Figure 7. Casbane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 7. Casbane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g007
Figure 8. Cembrane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 8. Cembrane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g008
Figure 9. Crotofolane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 9. Crotofolane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g009
Figure 10. Pimarane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 10. Pimarane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g010
Figure 11. Crotinsulidane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Figure 11. Crotinsulidane from Croton investigated for anti-breast cancer potential. Structures drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 12.0.
Scipharm 94 00024 g011
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of abietane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of abietane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(1) Crokoabiegenoid ACroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(2) Crokoabiegenoid BCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(3) Corokongenolide A Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(4) Crokongendin BCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 1.77 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.116 μM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 1.24 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 14.9 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 4.93 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(5) Crotolaevigatone BCroton laevigatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 33.4 µMSong et al. [19]
(6) Crotolaevigatone GCroton laevigatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 32.7 µMSong et al. [19]
(7) Crotontomentosin ACroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 54.1 µMSong et al. [29]
(8) Crotontomentosin BCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 28.7 µMSong et al. [29]
(9) Crotontomentosin CCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = > 100 µMSong et al. [29]
(10) Crotontomentosin Croton caudatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 49.3 µMSong et al. [29]
(11) 15-Hydroxy-7-oxoabieta-8,11,13-trieneCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 69.8 µMSong et al. [29]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of clerodane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of clerodane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(12) Crocleropene ACroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 35.8 µMZou et al. [22]
(13) Crocleropene BCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 40.2 µMZou et al. [22]
(14) 12-epi-CrotocorylifuranCroton oligandrusStem barkMCF-7 MTTIC50 = > 200 μMGuetchueng et al. [30]
(15) 12-epi-Megalocarpodolide DCroton oligandrusStem barkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 171.3 μMGuetchueng et al. [30]
(16) Megalocarpodolide DCroton oligandrusStem barkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 136.2 µMGuetchueng et al. [30]
(17) Laevifin ACroton oblongusStem barkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 102 µMAziz et al. [21]
(18) Laevifin BCroton oblongusStem barkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 115 µMAziz et al. [21]
(19) Laevifin GCroton oblongusStem barkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 106 µMAziz et al. [21]
(20) Methyl 15,16-epoxy-3,13(16),14-ent-clerodatrien-18,19-olide-17-carboxylateCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 29.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(21) Dimethyl-12-oxo-3,13(16),14-ent-clerodatriene-17,18-dicarboxylateCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 27.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(22) Nasimalun ACroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 40.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(23) Nasimalun BCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 26.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(24) LevatinCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = > 50 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(25) (−)-Hardwickiic acidCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 28.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(26) 15-Hydroxy-cis-ent-cleroda-3,13(E)-dieneCroton oblongifoliusRootMDA-MB-231Colorimetric assayIC50 = 25.0 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
(27) Launine KCroton lauiAerial partMCF-7Colorimetric assayIC50 = 62.5 µMYoungsa-ad et al. [31]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.
Table 3. Cytotoxicity of kaurane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 3. Cytotoxicity of kaurane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(28) Crokokaugenoid ACroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7 MTTIC50 = 2.52 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 3.30 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(29) Crokokaugenoid BCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(30) Crokokaugenoid CCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(31) Crokokaugenoid DCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 15.43 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 13.21 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(32) Crokokaugenoid ECroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 6.57 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 9.55 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(33) Crokokaugenoid FCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(34) Crokokaugenoid GCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(35) Crokokaugenoid HCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(36) (4α)-15-Oxokaur-16-en-18-oic acid Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(37) ent-19-Hydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 18.02 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 19.48 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(38) ent-19-Oxo-kaur-16-en-15-one Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(39) Kongensin ECroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 7.89 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 3.75 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(40) Serrin FCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 6.35 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 6.34 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(41) Isolushinin DCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 8.15 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 9.47 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(42) 15β-Hydroxy-(−)-kaur-16-en19-oic acid Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(43) Croyanhuin ACroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 2.62 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 2.97 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(44) Kongeniod C Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 10.65 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 8.88 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(45) Kongensin BCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 9.38 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 7.75 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(46) ent-8,9-seco-1β,7α-Dihydroxy-8(14)-en-9,15-dioneCroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(47) ent-7β-Hydroxy-16-kauren-15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 1.47 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(48) ent-7β-Hydroxy-15-oxokaur-16-en-18-yl acetateCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 0.65 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(49) ent-Kaur-16-en-15-one 18-oic acidCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 2.69 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(50) ent-18-Acetoxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 6.11 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(51) ent-1β-Acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 0.94 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 5.02 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 6.52 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(52) ent-7α,14β-Dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 0.75 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 2.96 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 3.36 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(53) ent-18-Hydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 4.31 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(54) ent-7β-Hydroxy-15-oxokaur-16-en-18-olCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 0.98 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 14.03 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 14.30 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(55) ent-18-Acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisWhole plantMCF-7MTSEC50 = 1.98 µg/mLKuo et al. [33]
(56) Crokongendin ACroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 0.153 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.116 μM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 0.248 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
(57) Euphoranginone DCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = > 5 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
(58) ent-Kaurane-3-oxo-16β,17-diolCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = > 5 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
(59) ent-16β-H-3-Oxokauran-17-olCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 5 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = > 5 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
(60) Kongensin DCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 0.0783 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.0716 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 0.113 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 17.74 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 9.82 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(61) Kongeniod BCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 0.185 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.121 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 0.215 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
(62) Kongensin ACroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 0.177 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.228 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 0.120 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 3.27 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 5.83 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(63) Kongensin FCroton kongensisBranchesMDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 0.677 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 0.236 µM (MDA-MB-468), IC50 = 0.266 μM (MCF-7)Fan et al. [24]
Croton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 5.23 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 5.15 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(64) Crotonkinensin CCroton tonkinensisLeavesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 30 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 30 μM (MCF-7)Thuong et al. [32]
(65) Crotonkinensin DCroton tonkinensisLeavesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 22.0 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 9.4 μM (MCF-7)Thuong et al. [32]
(66) Crotonmekongenin ACroton mekongensisAerial partsMDB-MB-231SRBED50 =
0.55 µg/mL
Udomthawee et al. [23]
(67) ent-16β,17α-DihydroxykauraneCroton malamboBarkMCF-7MTTIC50 = 12.5 µg/mLMorales et al. [25]
(68) Crotonkinensin ECroton tonkinensisLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 24.1 µg/mLQuan et al. [34]
(69) ent-1β-Acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisLeaves MCF-7MTTIC50 = 7.3 µg/mLQuan et al. [34]
(70) ent-18-Acetoxy-7α-hydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisLeaves MCF-7MTTIC50 = 6.0 µg/mLQuan et al. [34]
Croton kongensisBranches, leavesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 4.32 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 4.21 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(71) ent-18-Acetoxy-7α,14β-dihydroxykaur-16-en-15-oneCroton tonkinensisLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 4.5 µg/mLQuan et al. [34]
Croton kongensisBranches, leavesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = 2.86 µM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = 3.87 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(72) CaracasineCroton caracasanusFlowersMCF-7MTTIC50 = 15.7 µg/mLSuárez et al. [35]
(73) Caracasine acidCroton caracasanusFlowersMCF-7MTTIC50 = 6.0 µg/mLSuárez et al. [35]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. MTS: colorimetric assay. SRB: sulforhodamine B.
Table 4. Cytotoxicity of labdane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 4. Cytotoxicity of labdane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(74) 12E-3,4-seco-Labda-4(18),8(17),12,14-tetraen-3-oic acid methyl ester Croton stipuliformisStem barkMCF-7MTTLC50 = 24.8 µg/mLFranco et al. [17]
(75) 12E-3,4-seco-Labda-4(18),8(17),12,14-tetraen-3-oic acid Croton stipuliformisStem barkMCF-7MTTLC50 = 16.0 µg/mLFranco et al. [17]
(76) Labdinine NCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of tigliane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of tigliane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(77) Crotonol ACroton tigliumLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 17.60 µMWang et al. [38]
(78) Crotonol BCroton tigliumLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 µMWang et al. [38]
(79) Crotusin ACroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMCF-7MTSIC50 = 9.56 µMChen et al. [20]
(80) Crotusin BCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMCF-7MTSIC50 = 1.49 µMChen et al. [20]
(81) Crotusin CCroton caudatusLeaves, branchesMCF-7MTSIC50 = 0.49 µMChen et al. [20]
(82) 12-O-Acetylphorbol-13-isobutyrateCroton tigliumAerial partsMCF-7CCK-8IC50 = 13 µMWang et al. [39]
(83) 12-O-benzoylphorbol-13-(2-methyl)butyrate Croton tigliumLeaves, branchesMCF-7CCK-8 IC50 = 20 µMWang et al. [39]
(84) 12-O-Tiglyl-7-oxo-5-ene-phorbol-13-(2-methylbutyrate)Croton tigliumAerial partsMCF-7CCK-8IC50 = 20 µMWang et al. [39]
(85) 13-O-(2-Metyl)butyryl-4-deoxy-4ɑ-phorbolCroton tigliumLeaves, branchesMCF-7CCK-8 IC50 = 24 µMWang et al. [39]
(86) 12-O-Tiglylphorbol-13-isobutyrateCroton tigliumLeaves, branchesMCF-7CCK-8 IC50 = > 50 µMWang et al. [39]
(87) Tiglin ACroton tigliumLeaves, branchesMCF-7CCK-8 IC50 = > 50 µMWang et al. [39]
(88) 12-O-(2-Methyl)butyryl-4-deoxy-4α-phorbol-13-decanoateCroton damayeshuWhole plantMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 1.992 µMJia et al. [37]
(89) 12-O-Tiglyl-4α-deoxyphorbol-13-(2-methyl)-butyrateCroton damayeshuWhole plantMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 16.41 µMJia et al. [37]
(90) 12-O-Tiglylphorbol-13-(2-methyl)butyrateCroton damayeshuWhole plantMDA-MB-231MTTIC50 = 14.59 µMJia et al. [37]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. MTS: colorimetric assay. CCK-8: Cell Counting Kit-8.
Table 6. Cytotoxicity of casbane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 6. Cytotoxicity of casbane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(91) EBC-131Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 60 µMMaslovskaya et al. [41]
(92) EBC-180Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 18 µMMaslovskaya et al. [41]
(93) EBC-181Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 30 µMMaslovskaya et al. [41]
(94) EBC-304Croton insularisAerial partsMCF-7MTSIC50 = 5 µMMaslovskaya et al. [40]
(95) EBC-320Croton insularisAerial partsMCF-7MTSIC50 = 3 µMMaslovskaya et al. [40]
MTS: colorimetric assay.
Table 7. Cytotoxicity of cembrane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 7. Cytotoxicity of cembrane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(96) Launine OCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
(97) Launine PCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
(98) (1S,4R,13S)-Cembra-2E,7E,11-E-trien-4,13-diolCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
(99) Sarcophytol TCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
(100) SerratolCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
(101) NephthenolCroton lauiAerial partsMCF-7MTTIC50 = > 50 μMYang et al. [36]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.
Table 8. Cytotoxicity of crotofolane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 8. Cytotoxicity of crotofolane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(102) Crokocrotogenoid ACroton kongensisLeaves, branchesMDA-MB-231, MCF-7MTTIC50 = > 20 μM (MDA-MB-231), IC50 = > 20 μM (MCF-7)Zhu et al. [28]
(103) EBC-162Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 30 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [42]
(104) EBC-233Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 20 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [42]
(105) EBC-300Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 100 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [42]
(106) EBC-240Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 50 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [42]
(107) EBC-241Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 40 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [42]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. MTS: colorimetric assay.
Table 9. Cytotoxicity of pimarane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 9. Cytotoxicity of pimarane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(108) EBC-325Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 20 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [18]
(109) EBC-326Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 14 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [18]
(110) EBC-327Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 10 µg/mLMaslovskaya et al. [18]
(111) Lauicyclone ACroton lauiLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 36.7 µMLi et al. [43]
(112) Lauicyclone BCroton lauiLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 24.6 µMLi et al. [43]
(113) Lauicyclone DCroton lauiLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 38.8 µMLi et al. [43]
(114) Lauicyclone ECroton lauiLeavesMCF-7MTTIC50 = 49.3 µMLi et al. [43]
MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. MTS: colorimetric assay.
Table 10. Cytotoxicity of crotinsulidane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
Table 10. Cytotoxicity of crotinsulidane from Croton species against breast cancer cell lines.
CompoundSpeciesPlant PartCancer Cell LineMethodResultsReferences
(115) EBC-219Croton insularisStemMCF-7MTSIC50 = 80 µMMaslovskaya et al. [41]
MTS: colorimetric assay.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bezerra, J.J.L.; Luz, M.A.d.; Ferreira, A.P.; França, J.F.; Santos, T.P.; Pinheiro, A.A.V.; Torres, M.d.C.d.M. Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids from the Genus Croton Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review. Sci. Pharm. 2026, 94, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm94010024

AMA Style

Bezerra JJL, Luz MAd, Ferreira AP, França JF, Santos TP, Pinheiro AAV, Torres MdCdM. Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids from the Genus Croton Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2026; 94(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm94010024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bezerra, José Jailson Lima, Mateus Araújo da Luz, Aline Peres Ferreira, Joseilton Franco França, Tatiana Porto Santos, Anderson Angel Vieira Pinheiro, and Maria da Conceição de Menezes Torres. 2026. "Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids from the Genus Croton Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review" Scientia Pharmaceutica 94, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm94010024

APA Style

Bezerra, J. J. L., Luz, M. A. d., Ferreira, A. P., França, J. F., Santos, T. P., Pinheiro, A. A. V., & Torres, M. d. C. d. M. (2026). Cytotoxic Potential of Diterpenoids from the Genus Croton Against Breast Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 94(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm94010024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop