Next Article in Journal
BlocklyAR: A Visual Programming Interface for Creating Augmented Reality Experiences
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of an Ultra-Wideband Microstrip-to-Slotline Transition on Low-Permittivity Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel QoS-Aware A-MPDU Aggregation Scheduler for Unsaturated IEEE802.11n/ac WLANs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compact Planar Super-Wideband Monopole Antenna with Four Notched Bands

School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2020, 9(8), 1204; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081204
Submission received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 23 July 2020 / Accepted: 25 July 2020 / Published: 27 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultra-Wideband Microwave/MM-Wave Components and Packaging)

Abstract

:
A compact-sized planar super-wideband (SWB) monopole antenna with four notched bands is presented in this paper. The antenna consists of a rectangular ground plane and a circular radiator that is fed by a tapered microstrip feed line. The overall size of the antenna is 18 mm × 12 mm × 0.5 mm, and its impedance bandwidth (S11 ≤ −10 dB) ranges from 2.5 GHz to 40 GHz (bandwidth ratio of 16:1). Four notched bands are obtained using two inverted U-shaped slots, a split-ring resonator (SRR), and a meandered slot. The notched frequency bands can be adjustable by changing the parameters of parasitic slot elements, and the realized notched bands in this paper are Wi-MAX band (3.5 GHz), WLAN band (5.5 GHz), satellite communication X-band (7.5 GHz), and amateur radio band (10.5 GHz). The simulated and experimental results show good agreement with each other. The antenna possesses a high gain, super-wide impedance bandwidth, and omni-directional radiation patterns.

1. Introduction

Recently, ultra-wideband (UWB) systems have attracted the attention of researchers, due to their high data transmission rate and low power consumption [1,2]. According to the regulations defined by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a frequency range of 3.1–10.6 GHz was allocated for UWB systems [3]. Though UWB antennas cover a wide frequency range, still, they cannot be used for high-speed long-range applications. UWB antennas are mainly preferred for indoor communications, due to their limited transmission power [4,5]. The limitations of the UWB antennas can be overcome by super-wideband (SWB) antennas, which work well even with single device communication systems. The SWB antennas are characterized by a bandwidth ratio of 10:1 or higher [6]. The SWB antenna supports both short-range and long-range communication systems, and therefore serves as a potential candidate for wireless personal area networks (WPANs). SWB could be used for screening, sensing, and to provide high-resolution images required by the modern sensors. It can also be useful for radar imaging and real-time monitoring systems. SWB provides the advantage of high-speed audio/video transmission with enhanced channel capacity [7,8].
In the literature, several antenna structures have been reported for SWB applications [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In [9], the authors proposed a microstrip line-fed modified rectangular-shaped SWB antenna with an elliptical ground surface, where two stubs were used to obtain a bandwidth ratio of 14.6:1. A crescent-shaped radiating patch SWB antenna was reported with a bandwidth ratio of 11.6:1 [10]. In [11], a triangular Sierpinski geometry with a truncated ground plane and semi-circular patches on either side of the radiator was proposed, where a bandwidth ratio of 15.5:1 and maximum gain of 5.5 dBi were achieved. A microstrip line-fed star-shaped fractal antenna design with the semi-elliptical ground surface was presented [12], where the bandwidth ratio of 11.3:1 was obtained. In Reference [13], a truncated circular-shaped monopole antenna, loaded with an elliptical slot in its center, was proposed to obtain a bandwidth ratio of 11:1. A coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed square-shaped antenna loaded with two stubs on either side of the radiator was presented [14] with a bandwidth ratio of 14.5:1. An S-shaped SWB monopole antenna with defected ground structure (DGS) and bandwidth ratio of 13.3:1 was proposed [15]. In Reference [16], a microstrip line-fed asymmetrical rectangular patch antenna loaded with U-slots and triangular slits was reported with a bandwidth ratio of 13.5:1. The above-reported antennas suffer from the disadvantage of large size, which limits their applications into portable RF devices. The compact size antennas can be easily incorporated into miniaturized wireless systems and RF devices used for commercial and defense applications [17].
Furthermore, due to the super-wide frequency bandwidth of the SWB antennas, they may cause interference with the surrounding wireless equipment working in the licensed frequency bands such as wireless local area network (WLAN), worldwide interoperability for microwave access (Wi-MAX), amateur radio bands, and so forth [18,19]. The notch bands introduced in the wideband spectra can alleviate this interference issue. Recently, a few SWB antennas with band-notched features have been reported [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In Reference [20], a microstrip line-fed octagonal ring-shaped SWB antenna with WLAN band-notched behavior was presented. A tapered microstrip line-fed SWB monopole antenna was designed in Reference [21], where a rectangular slit was introduced in the patch to reject the WLAN band. In Reference [22], a microstrip line-fed rectangular-shaped SWB antenna was proposed, where two U-shaped slots were etched in the radiator and the feed line to notch WLAN and X-band, respectively. A dual band-notched SWB antenna was presented in Reference [23], where a U-shaped parasitic element, a T-shaped stub, and a U-shaped slot were introduced in the ground plane and the radiating patch to notch Wi-MAX and satellite communication-based X-band. In Reference [24], a triple band-notched SWB antenna with U-shaped DGS and two open arc-shaped slots was reported to eliminate WLAN and X-band. A monopole SWB antenna with three notch bands was investigated in Reference [25], where elliptical and rectangular split-ring resonators (SRRs) were introduced with varactor diode to notch WLAN, Wi-MAX, and X-band. A guitar-shaped resonating patch and chamfered rectangular ground plane SWB antenna was presented in Reference [26], where RF PIN diodes based reconfigurable band-stop filters were used to eliminate Wi-MAX, WLAN, and downlink satellite system bands. However, the band-notched SWB monopole antennas available in the literature are relatively large in size with the complicated ground surface embedded with parasitic elements and stubs. Also, the reported SWB antenna structures possess one, two, or three notch band characteristics, and SWB antenna with quad-band elimination characteristics is hardly reported.
In this paper, a low-profile compact-sized SWB antenna with quad notched-band behavior is presented. The proposed SWB antenna consists of a circular monopole radiator and a rectangular-shaped ground plane. A super-wide impedance bandwidth is achieved by integrating a triangular-shaped tapered feed line with a circular patch. In order to reject WLAN (5.5 GHz) and satellite communication X-band (7.5 GHz) from the SWB antenna, two inverted U-shaped elements are introduced in the radiating patch. The Wi-MAX (3.5 GHz) and amateur radio (10.5 GHz) bands are notched by introducing a meandered slot and an SRR in the monopole radiator, respectively. The measured and simulated results confirm the quadruple notched-band behavior of the antenna. The center frequency of the notched-band can be easily tuned by changing the length of the implanted slot. The presented SWB antenna is easy to design and can be easily integrated with other RF devices due to its compact and simple geometry. The antenna offers high gain, super-wide bandwidth, and omni-directional radiation characteristics. It covers various modern communication application bands and can be used for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio systems.

2. Antenna Design

The layout of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna is shown in Figure 1a. The RT/Duroid 5880 substrate with thickness (h) of 0.5 mm, relative permittivity (ɛr) of 2.2, and loss tangent (tan δ) of 0.0027 is used for the antenna. The proposed antenna consists of a circular radiating patch and a rectangular-shaped ground plane. A tapered microstrip line is integrated with the radiator to feed the antenna. Two inverted U-shaped slots are introduced in the middle portion of the circular patch to notch WLAN and satellite communication-based X-band. Further, a meandered slot and an SRR are introduced in the upper and lower portions of the radiating patch to eliminate Wi-MAX and amateur radio bands, respectively. The enlarged view with design parameters of the meandered slot are shown in Figure 1b. The antenna is designed and optimized using a 3-D electromagnetic solver (ANSYS HFSS). The design parameters of the proposed SWB antenna are listed in Table 1. The overall size of the proposed SWB antenna is 18 mm × 12 mm × 0.5 mm.
The evolution steps of the proposed SWB antenna are presented in Figure 2. The Antenna-1, shown in Figure 2a, consists of a simple circular patch and a rectangular ground plane. A tapered microstrip line is employed between the radiating patch and the connector to match impedance for wide bandwidth. The characteristic impedance at each section of the tapered microstrip line is transformed from 100 Ω to 50 Ω by [27]
Z ( z ) = { Z 0 e 2 ( z L t ) 2 ln ( Z L / Z 0 ) , 0 z L t / 2 Z 0 e ( 4 z / L t 2 z 2 / L t 2 1 ) ln ( Z L / Z 0 ) , L t / 2 z L t
where Lt is the length of the taper, and ZL and Z0 are the corresponding load and characteristic line impedances. The reflection coefficients of the proposed SWB antenna are shown in Figure 3a,b. The Antenna-1 offers (S11 ≤ −10 dB) an impedance bandwidth of 2.5–40 GHz. In order to generate band-stop characteristics for the amateur radio band, an SRR is introduced in the lower region of the monopole radiator, as shown in Figure 2b. The length (LS) of the SRR is calculated as [28,29]
L S = ( b 1 + 2 l 2 + b 2 + w 2 ) 0.5 λ g i
λ g i   = c f r i   ( 1 ε r e f f )
ε r e f f = ( ε r + 1 ) 2 + ( ε r 1 ) 2 ( 1 + 12 h 0.5 π a e f f ) 1 / 2
a e f f = a { 1 + 2 h π ε r a [ ln ( a 2 h ) + 1.41 ε r + 1.77 + h a ( 0.268 ε r + 1.65 ) ] } 1 / 2
where fri and λgi are the corresponding center frequency and guided wavelength of the rejected band, a is the radius of the circular patch, h is the thickness of the substrate, εreff is the effective relative permittivity of the dielectric substrate, and c is the velocity of light in free space. Similarly, as shown in Figure 2c, the interfering satellite communication X-band is notched using an inverted U-shaped slot. The length (LUi) of the introduced U-shaped slot is estimated as
L U i = ( 2 l 3 + b 3 + w 3 ) 0.5 λ g i .
Further, the interfering WLAN band is eliminated by introducing another inverted U-shaped slot at the center region of the circular patch, as shown in Figure 2d. The length (LUo) of the U-shaped slot is calculated as
L U o = ( 2 l 4 + b 4 + w 4 ) 0.5 λ g i
The interfering Wi-MAX band is rejected by forming a meandered slot in the upper region of the circular disc, as shown in Figure 2e. The length (LM) of the meandered slot is estimated as
L M = ( l 5 + 2 b 5 + 2 l 6 + 2 b 6 + 2 l 7 + 2 b 7 + 2 l 8 + 2 b 8 + 2 l 9 + w 5 ) 0.5 λ g i .
By introducing a meandered slot, two U-shaped slots, and SRR in the presented SWB monopole antenna, four notched bands are obtained at the frequencies 3.5 GHz, 5.5 GHz, 7.5 GHz, and 10.5 GHz, respectively. The calculated lengths of the notching elements are optimized to notch the entire Wi-MAX, WLAN, amateur radio, and satellite communication bands.
The reflection coefficient curves in Figure 3a illustrate the behavior of Antenna-1, -2, and -3, whereas the curves in Figure 3b display the behavior of Antenna-4 and -5. In the SWB range, a single notch band (at 10.5 GHz) is obtained in the case of Antenna-2, while dual notch bands (at 10.5 GHz and 7.5 GHz) are noticed in the Antenna-3.
Similarly, by loading three notching elements in the circular disc, three notch frequencies (at 10.5 GHz, 7.5 GHz, and 5.5 GHz) are achieved in the Antenna-4. In the same way, four elements are loaded in the Antenna-5 to notch four frequencies (at 10.5 GHz, 7.5 GHz, 5.5 GHz, and 3.5 GHz). The notch frequency can be controlled by varying the dimensions of the slot/resonator.
Figure 4 illustrates the matching performance of the proposed SWB Antenna-1. The deviations in the real/imaginary values of the input impedance provide an approximate characteristic impedance of the feeding connector, which illustrates a good matching among them.
Four notch elements are formed in the proposed antenna patch to remove interfering frequencies from the SWB. Figure 5 displays the surface current distribution on the proposed antenna at notch frequencies. It is noticed that the current is mainly concentrated around the SRR, inverted U-shaped slots, and meandered slot. As compared with the current direction on the radiator patch, the current around the notching element flows in the opposite direction at notch frequency. As the current is out-of-phase and flows in the opposite direction, it shows strong attenuation and cancellation of the radiating field.

Parametric Studies of Antenna Performance

The effects of the ground plane length, U-shaped slots, meandered slot, and SRR on the proposed antenna are studied.
The gap between the ground plane and the radiating element is mainly responsible for impedance matching. Figure 6 shows the simulated reflection coefficients of the proposed SWB antenna when the ground plane length (l1) is varied. The length l1 is varied from 5.65 mm to 6.65 mm, while the other dimensions of the antenna are kept fixed. When the length l1 is increased or decreased, the impedance matching becomes poorer in the higher frequency bands. On the other hand, when l1 is increased to 6.65 mm, the antenna shows resonance only for the UWB range. However, a longer ground plane results in a long feed line, which increases the size of the antenna.
To study further the behavior of the notch bands, a parametric analysis on the length of the U-shaped slots, meandered slot, and SRR is performed, as illustrated in Figure 7. In Figure 7a, the changes of the reflection coefficients as varying the SRR length (b1) are shown. It is noticed that as the value of b1 increases, the notch band moves towards the lower frequency side. Whereas, when the length of the SRR is decreased, the notch band shifts towards the higher frequency side.
In Figure 7b,c, the variations of the reflection coefficients of the U-slot lengths (l3 and l4) are shown. It is observed that as the value of l3 increases from 4.6 mm to 5.2 mm, the center frequency of the notch band shifts towards the lower frequency range. In the same way, the notch band shifts towards the lower frequency range, when the length l4 of the larger U-slot varies from 4.05 mm to 4.65 mm. Hence, the center frequency of the notch band can be easily tuned by changing the length of the U-shaped slot. The effect of varying the length (l9) of the meandered slot is shown in Figure 7d. On varying the length l9 from 2.6 mm to 3.2 mm, the notch center frequency shifts towards the lower side. Considering, the available patch space and the required notch band frequencies, the optimized values are chosen for designing the proposed antenna.

3. Results and Discussion

The fabricated prototype of the proposed quadruple notched-band SWB antenna is displayed in Figure 1c. A tapered feed line is used to excite the antenna and to provide better impedance matching. Figure 8 displays the measured and simulated reflection coefficient curves of the proposed antenna. The antenna covers a wide frequency range from 2.5–40 GHz. In the resonating frequency band, four notched bands (at 3.5 GHz, 5.5 GHz, 7.5 GHz, and 10.5 GHz) are achieved to remove interfering frequencies from the SWB. The notched frequency bands can be controlled by varying the lengths of the slots. This simulated and measured reflection coefficient curves show reasonably good agreement between them.
Figure 9 shows the measured and simulated plots of the antenna gain. The simulated peak gain of the presented quad-notched band antenna is 7 dBi. The gain steadily increases from 2.5 GHz to 15 GHz, and remains almost constant up to 40 GHz. It is also observed that the gain sharply falls in the vicinity of the notched bands.
The simulated efficiency curve of the proposed quadruple notched-band antenna is depicted in Figure 10a. The efficiency is more than 90% in the passband region and it decreases sharply at the rejection bands. The group delay is an important parameter used to characterize the degree of distortion of the pulse signal [30]. Figure 10b shows the simulated group delay of the proposed quadruple notched-band antenna. The group delay curve is stable over the SWB range except at four rejection bands.
The co-polar and cross-polar patterns of the proposed SWB antenna are shown in Figure 11. It is noticed that omni-directional co-polar radiation patterns are obtained in the H-plane, while bi-directional patterns in the E-plane. Furthermore, the cross-polarization level is lesser than the co-polarization level in both the E- and H-planes.
A comparison of the proposed quad notched-band antenna with the recently reported SWB antenna designs is shown in Table 2. The antennas presented in References [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] did not have band rejection features. The elimination of unwanted frequency bands improves the quality of communication. The SWB antennas in References [20,21] rejected only one frequency band, while the antennas in References [22,23] rejected two frequency bands. The antenna designs in References [24,25,26] showed triple-band rejection characteristics. However, the drawbacks of these notched band antennas were their poor selectivity and complicated ground planes embedded with parasitic elements and stubs. Furthermore, the sizes of the SWB antennas in References [9,11,13,14,15,22,24,25] were quite large, which may limit their applications in monolithic microwave integrated circuits and portable high-frequency devices. The radiating patch designs in References [11,12,26] were practically complex, due to the fractal shape and integrated active elements. Furthermore, most of the SWB antennas proposed in the literature were printed on the FR-4 substrate, which is a lossy substrate and exhibits poor performance at high frequency. In the proposed antenna design, the four notched bands are obtained without using any filter/active elements, thus simplifying the antenna design process. The total area occupied by the proposed SWB antenna is comparatively small, and it can be easily integrated into portable RF devices. Thus, the proposed antenna outperforms the reported SWB antennas in terms of bandwidth ratio, simple design, compact size, and the number of notch bands.

4. Conclusions

A compact SWB monopole antenna with quadruple notched-band characteristics is presented. The antenna radiator is fed using a tapered feed line for broadband impedance matching. Four notch bands are introduced in the proposed SWB antenna to eliminate the interfering radiations of WLAN (5.5 GHz), Wi-MAX (3.5 GHz), satellite communication X-band (7.5 GHz), and amateur radio (10.5 GHz) band. The interference of WLAN and satellite communication bands are notched using inverted U-shaped slots, while the Wi-MAX and amateur radio bands are notched through a meandered slot and an SRR, respectively. The presented antenna has a simple design, without any active components on the patch or the ground plane. The proposed wide bandwidth antenna can be used for a variety of applications such as cognitive radios spectrum sensing, defense systems, doppler navigation, personal communication, radio astronomy, and so forth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K., H.C.C., and K.W.K.; methodology, S.K. and G.H.L.; software, S.K.; validation, D.H.K., N.S.H. and H.C.C.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K. and K.W.K.; resources, G.H.L., D.H.K., K.W.K., and H.C.C.; data curation, S.K., D.H.K., and N.S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, K.W.K. and H.C.C.; visualization, S.K. and G.H.L.; supervision, K.W.K. and H.C.C.; project administration, K.W.K. and H.C.C.; funding acquisition, K.W.K. and H.C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education, Korea.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. NRF-2019M1A7A1A03088464) and the BK21 Plus Project funded by the Ministry of Education, Korea (No. 21A20131600011).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moradhesari, A.; Moosazadeh, M.; Esmati, Z. Design of compact planar antenna with dual notched bands using slotted rectangular patch for ultrawideband applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2012, 54, 2053–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moosazadeh, M.; Esmati, Z. A small CPW-fed ultra wideband antenna with dual band-notched characteristics. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2012, 54, 1528–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Federal Communications Commission. First Report and Order, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Ultrawideband Transmission Systems; Federal Communications Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  4. Schantz, H.G. A brief history of UWB antennas. IEEE Aero. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2004, 19, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Esmati, Z.; Moosazadeh, M. Dual band-notched small monopole antenna with bandwidth enhancement by means of defected ground structure (DGS) for UWB application. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2015, 30, 619–625. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balani, W.; Sarvagya, M.; Ali, T.; Anguera, J.; Andujar, A.; Das, S. Design techniques of super-wideband antenna–existing and future prospective. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 141241–141257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, S.U.; Cao, Q.; Ullah, H.; Khalil, H. Compact design of trapezoid shape monopole antenna for SWB application. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 1931–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, K.R.; Row, J.S. A compact monopole antenna for super wideband applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Okas, P.; Sharma, A.; Gangwar, R.K. Circular base loaded modified rectangular monopole radiator for super wideband application. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2017, 59, 2421–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rahman, M.N.; Islam, M.T.; Mahmud, M.Z.; Samsuzzaman, M. Compact microstrip patch antenna proclaiming super wideband characteristics. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2017, 59, 2563–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Figueroa-Torres, C.Á.; Medina-Monroy, J.L.; Lobato-Morales, H.; Chávez-Pérez, R.A.; Calvillo-Téllez, A. A novel fractal antenna based on the Sierpinski structure for super wide-band applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2017, 59, 1148–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singhal, S.; Singh, A.K. Modified star-star fractal (MSSF) super-wideband antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2017, 59, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Okas, P.; Sharma, A.; Das, G.; Gangwar, R.K. Elliptical slot loaded partially segmented circular monopole antenna for super wideband application. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2018, 88, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okas, P.; Sharma, A.; Gangwar, R.K. Super-wideband CPW fed modified square monopole antenna with stabilized radiation characteristics. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2018, 60, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ullah, S.; Ruan, C.; Sadiq, M.S.; Haq, T.U.; Fahad, A.K.; He, W. Super wide band, defected ground structure (DGS), and stepped meander line antenna for WLAN/ISM/WiMAX/UWB and other wireless communication applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Aziz, S.Z.; Jamlos, M.F. Compact super wideband patch antenna design using diversities of reactive loaded technique. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2016, 58, 2811–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rao, Q.; Geyi, W. Compact multiband antenna for handheld devices. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 3337–3339. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chiani, M.; Giorgetti, A. Coexistence between UWB and narrow-band wireless communication systems. Proc. IEEE 2009, 97, 231–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, D.H.; Mohyuddin, W.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, K.W. Multiple-input-multiple-output/diversity antenna with dual band-notched characteristics for ultra-wideband applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2020, 62, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shahsavari, H.; Nourinia, J.; Shirzad, H.; Shokri, M.; Asiaban, S.; Amiri, Z.h.; Virdee, B. Compact planar super-wideband antenna with band-notched function. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2013, 28, 608–613. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oskouei, H.D.; Mirtaheri, A. A monopole super wideband microstrip antenna with band-notch rejection. In Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium—Fall (PIERS—FALL); IEEE: Singapore, 2017; pp. 2019–2024. [Google Scholar]
  22. Abbas, A.S.; Abdelazeez, M.K. A dual band notch planar SWB antenna with two vertical sleeves on slotted ground plane. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Fajardo, Puerto Rico, 26 June–1 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. Manohar, M.; Kshetrimayum, R.S.; Gogoi, A.K. A compact dual band-notched circular ring printed monopole antenna for super-wideband applications. Radioengineering 2017, 26, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.; Esselle, K.P.; Hay, S.G.; Zhong, S.S. Study of an extremely wideband monopole antenna with triple band-notched characteristics. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2012, 123, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, X.; Ur Rahman, S.; Cao, Q.; Gil, I.; Khan, M.I. A novel SWB antenna with triple band-notches based on elliptical slot and rectangular split ring resonators. Electronics 2019, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Singh, S.; Varma, R.; Sharma, M.; Hussain, S. Superwideband monopole reconfigurable antenna with triple notched band characteristics for numerous applications in wireless system. Wireless Pers. Commun. 2019, 106, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pozar, D.M. Microwave Engineering; Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sarkar, D.; Srivastava, K.V.; Saurav, K. A compact microstrip-fed triple band-notched UWB monopole antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 396–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gurel, C.S.; Yazgan, E. Resonant frequency of an air gap tuned circular disc microstrip antenna. Int. J. Electron. 2000, 87, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abdelhalim, C.; Farid, D. A compact planar UWB antenna with triple controllable band-notched characteristics. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2014, 848062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed quad band-notched super-wideband (SWB) antenna: (a) schematic, (b) enlarged view of the meandered slot, (c) fabricated prototype.
Figure 1. Proposed quad band-notched super-wideband (SWB) antenna: (a) schematic, (b) enlarged view of the meandered slot, (c) fabricated prototype.
Electronics 09 01204 g001
Figure 2. Design steps of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna: (a) Antenna-1; (b) Antenna-2; (c) Antenna-3; (d) Antenna-4; (e) Antenna-5.
Figure 2. Design steps of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna: (a) Antenna-1; (b) Antenna-2; (c) Antenna-3; (d) Antenna-4; (e) Antenna-5.
Electronics 09 01204 g002
Figure 3. S11 of the proposed antenna design steps: (a) Antenna-1 to -3; (b) Antenna-4 to -5.
Figure 3. S11 of the proposed antenna design steps: (a) Antenna-1 to -3; (b) Antenna-4 to -5.
Electronics 09 01204 g003aElectronics 09 01204 g003b
Figure 4. Input impedance of the SWB antenna.
Figure 4. Input impedance of the SWB antenna.
Electronics 09 01204 g004
Figure 5. Simulated current distribution at frequency: (a) 10.5 GHz, (b) 7.5 GHz, (c) 5.5 GHz, (d) 3.5 GHz.
Figure 5. Simulated current distribution at frequency: (a) 10.5 GHz, (b) 7.5 GHz, (c) 5.5 GHz, (d) 3.5 GHz.
Electronics 09 01204 g005
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna when the ground plane length (l1) is varied.
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna when the ground plane length (l1) is varied.
Electronics 09 01204 g006
Figure 7. Simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna: (a) when b1 is varied, (b) when l3 is varied, (c) when l4 is varied, (d) when l9 is varied.
Figure 7. Simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna: (a) when b1 is varied, (b) when l3 is varied, (c) when l4 is varied, (d) when l9 is varied.
Electronics 09 01204 g007aElectronics 09 01204 g007b
Figure 8. Reflection coefficients of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna.
Figure 8. Reflection coefficients of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna.
Electronics 09 01204 g008
Figure 9. Gain of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna.
Figure 9. Gain of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna.
Electronics 09 01204 g009
Figure 10. Proposed quadruple band-notched SWB antenna: (a) efficiency, (b) group delay.
Figure 10. Proposed quadruple band-notched SWB antenna: (a) efficiency, (b) group delay.
Electronics 09 01204 g010
Figure 11. Radiation patterns of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna: (a) H-plane/3 GHz, (b) E-plane/3 GHz, (c) H-plane/12 GHz, (d) E-plane/12 GHz, (e) H-plane/21 GHz, (f) E-plane/21 GHz.
Figure 11. Radiation patterns of the proposed quad band-notched SWB antenna: (a) H-plane/3 GHz, (b) E-plane/3 GHz, (c) H-plane/12 GHz, (d) E-plane/12 GHz, (e) H-plane/21 GHz, (f) E-plane/21 GHz.
Electronics 09 01204 g011aElectronics 09 01204 g011b
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed quad band-notched super-wideband (SWB) antenna.
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed quad band-notched super-wideband (SWB) antenna.
ParameterDimension (mm)ParameterDimension (mm)
L18b36
W12b49
a5.55b51.55
l16.15b60.75
l23.5b71
l35b82.25
l44.45w10.3
l58w20.5
l62.75w30.3
l71.25w40.4
l82.25w50.25
l93t11.5
b11.2t20.4
b23.9h0.5
Table 2. Comparison between the proposed quad notched-band SWB antenna and previous works related to the SWB antenna.
Table 2. Comparison between the proposed quad notched-band SWB antenna and previous works related to the SWB antenna.
Ref.Antenna Size (mm × mm × mm)Resonating Band (GHz)Impedance Bandwidth (GHz)Bandwidth RatioNumber of Notch BandsNotch Band Center Frequency (GHz)Peak Gain (dB)
[9]52 × 42 × 1.5750.96–13.9813.0214.6:1--5.5
[10]32 × 22 × 1.62.5–2926.511.6--6
[11]62 × 64 × 1.581.68–2624.3215.5:1--5
[12]19.7 × 19 × 1.64.6–5247.411.3:1--14
[13]52.25 × 42 × 1.5750.99–10.99.9111:1--4.5
[14]52 × 46 × 1.60.95–13.812.8514.5:1--6
[15]35 × 35 × 1.573.08–40.937.8213.3:1--5.9
[16]25 × 26 × 1.62.43–32.9330.513.5:1--7.35
[20]30 × 30 × 1.62.39–4037.6116.7:115.53.5
[21]30 × 30 × 1.63–504716.7:115.510
[22]35 × 30 × 1.63.2–4036.812.5:125.5, 7.56.5
[23]30 × 24 × 0.7871.6–2523.415.6:123.5, 7.56
[24]150 × 150 × 0.7870.72–2524.2834:132.4, 5.5, 7.57
[25]57 × 34 × 11.42–5048.5835.2:133.4, 5.6, 96.5
[26]27 × 32 × 0.7873.36–39.6136.2511.8:133.75, 5.48, 7.386.89
Prop.18 × 12 × 0.52.5–4037.516:143.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.55.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, S.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, D.H.; Haunan, N.S.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, K.W. Compact Planar Super-Wideband Monopole Antenna with Four Notched Bands. Electronics 2020, 9, 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081204

AMA Style

Kumar S, Lee GH, Kim DH, Haunan NS, Choi HC, Kim KW. Compact Planar Super-Wideband Monopole Antenna with Four Notched Bands. Electronics. 2020; 9(8):1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Sachin, Gwan Hui Lee, Dong Hwi Kim, Nashuha Syifa Haunan, Hyun Chul Choi, and Kang Wook Kim. 2020. "Compact Planar Super-Wideband Monopole Antenna with Four Notched Bands" Electronics 9, no. 8: 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081204

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop