Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Optimization in Power Electronics: Methods, Applications, and Practical Limits
Next Article in Special Issue
Rethinking Video Transmission: A Quantum Fourier Transform-Based Approach for Error-Prone Channels
Previous Article in Journal
An Enhanced MADDPG–A2C Framework for Optimized Resource Allocation in High-Speed Vehicular Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fine-Grained Radar Hand Gesture Recognition Method Based on Variable-Channel DRSN
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recovery of Weak Ambient Backscattered Signals from Off-the-Shelf PCB Under Dominant Self-Interference

by
Gosa Feyissa Degefa
and
Jae-Young Chung
*
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2026, 15(6), 1215; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061215
Submission received: 27 January 2026 / Revised: 3 March 2026 / Accepted: 12 March 2026 / Published: 14 March 2026

Abstract

Ambient backscatter systems enable passive sensing and information transfer by utilizing the reflection and modulation of incident radio-frequency (RF) signals. However, in real-world scenarios involving non-cooperative targets such as off-the-shelf printed circuit boards (PCBs), the backscattered signal is extremely weak and often obscured by strong direct-path self-interference (SI) at the receiver. This issue becomes even more severe when unintentional PCB structures act as radiating elements. In this work, we explore ambient backscatter leakage from a compromised PCB using a realistic measurement setup that includes separated transmit and receive antennas and a direct-conversion Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP)-based receiver. We demonstrate that residual carrier frequency offset (CFO), caused by oscillator mismatch and hardware imperfections, can spread the dominant SI in the baseband and completely mask the weak backscattered signal. To solve this problem, a software-based post-processing framework is applied. This method leverages the complex baseband representation enabled by the homodyne receiver to jointly manage the carrier and SI components without relying on intermediate-frequency processing or prior knowledge of the target signal parameters. Experimental results show that this approach significantly improves the detectability of weak backscattered baseband information that would otherwise be concealed within the raw I/Q data. This study emphasizes the importance of CFO-aware digital processing in ambient backscatter systems and offers new insights into unintended electromagnetic leakage mechanisms from commercial PCB platforms.

1. Introduction

Bistatic backscatter communication is a common concept in radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems, where passive tags reflect signals by changing their antenna impedance instead of producing an active radio frequency (RF) carrier [1,2,3,4]. In these systems, a dedicated reader emits a continuous-wave (CW) signal onto the tag, which encodes information by altering its reflection coefficient, enabling ultra-low-power communication. Recently, this idea has been extended to ambient backscatter and battery-free Internet of Things (IoT) systems, in which devices use existing RF signals from sources such as Wi-Fi, cellular, or broadcast transmitters for communication sensing [5,6,7,8,9]. By eliminating the need for dedicated RF transmitters, ambient backscatter significantly reduces power consumption and hardware complexity, making it attractive for large-scale deployment of energy-efficient sensors in smart environments, industrial monitoring, and healthcare. However, most prior work designs the backscattering node with a dedicated antenna and impedance-modulation circuitry, and the system parameters, such as modulation format and bit rate, are either known or controllable.
Beyond conventional RFID and IoT applications, backscatter is attracting interest in emerging wireless technologies such as full-duplex wireless systems, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC), and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) networks. In full-duplex systems, where transmission and reception occur simultaneously on the same frequency, bistatic-like coupling and significant self-interference (SI) become key challenges, prompting the development of advanced suppression and cancellation techniques that also benefit backscatter reception [10,11,12]. In ISAC scenarios, reflections from passive or semi-passive objects are used for joint communication and environmental sensing [13,14,15,16]. Meanwhile, in V2X and distributed radar systems, bistatic geometries offer extended coverage, improved spatial diversity, and better situational awareness. Overall, these studies demonstrate that backscatter can support low-rate data transmission, localization, and motion sensing while utilizing existing wireless infrastructure [17,18,19,20].
Despite these advances, most existing backscatter systems depend on intentionally designed antennas and cooperative tag structures. In contrast, little attention has been paid to ambient backscatter from non-cooperative targets, such as off-the-shelf printed circuit boards (PCBs), which lack dedicated antennas. The scattering mechanism in these cases is driven by unintended electromagnetic coupling through PCB traces and structures, producing a naturally weak, uncontrolled backscattered signal that heavily depends on the physical layout of the target device. This dependency makes reliable signal recovery much more difficult. This work explores ambient backscatter leakage from an off-the-shelf PCB acting as an unintentional radiator.
A fundamental challenge in ambient backscatter systems, especially in non-cooperative and long-range scenarios, is the presence of strong direct-path SI at the receiver, as shown in Figure 1. The direct signal from the transmitter can be significantly stronger than the weak backscattered component, effectively obscuring the desired information-bearing signal. This issue becomes even more problematic when the backscattering mechanism does not use a dedicated antenna or controlled impedance modulation, as is the case for unintentional PCB-based backscatter. To address this issue, extensive research has investigated SI suppression and cancellation methods across various fields, such as antenna isolation, RF and analog cancellation, and digital baseband processing.
Antenna isolation is the primary defense against SI and aims to minimize coupling between the transmitter and receiver at both the physical and electromagnetic levels. In bistatic or full-duplex backscatter systems, antenna isolation is usually achieved through spatial separation, antenna orientation (polarization diversity), directional antennas, absorptive shielding, or decoupling structures [21,22,23]. By physically reducing the power of the direct-path signal reaching the receiver, antenna isolation prevents front-end saturation and enhances the receiver’s dynamic range. However, analog cancellation is inherently limited by hardware imperfections such as component mismatch, limited phase shifter resolution, bandwidth constraints, and nonlinear distortions, which prevent perfect cancellation. Digital baseband processing provides the most flexible and detailed approach to SI cancellation. After down-conversion to baseband, digital algorithms can model and decrease residual SI using adaptive filters like LMS, NLMS, or Volterra-based models, as well as frequency-domain cancellation and statistical signal processing techniques [24,25,26]. Digital baseband processing plays an essential and complementary role, providing detailed adaptability and modeling abilities that cannot be achieved in the physical or analog domain. Digital signal processing (DSP) techniques enable precise estimation and removal of residual SI through adaptive filtering, frequency-domain cancellation, and nonlinear modeling while also addressing impairments such as carrier frequency offset and phase noise.
However, existing studies mainly focus on intentionally designed tag antennas or cooperative backscatter nodes, where synchronization, reference signals, or structural knowledge can be utilized. In contrast, the scenario of unintentional PCB radiators under ambient bistatic illumination remains largely unexplored. These non-cooperative targets lack a predefined modulation structure, controlled synchronization, and predictable radiation characteristics, making conventional SI mitigation and carrier frequency offset (CFO) compensation techniques ineffective. Therefore, a specific post-processing framework is needed, one that directly addresses dominant SI, hardware-induced frequency offsets, and the unstructured scattering behavior of unintended PCB radiators in ambient bistatic environments.
To address these challenges, this article makes the following contributions:
  • Ambient Backscatter Signal Analysis under Dominant SI: We examine a practical backscatter reception scenario where the received signal is overwhelmed by a strong direct-path SI component, while the desired backscattered signal remains extremely weak. The analysis emphasizes the crucial influence of SI and CFO on baseband signal recovery in homodyne reception.
  • Software-Based CFO Estimation and Correction Framework: A fully digital post-processing approach is employed to estimate and correct CFO directly from measured I/Q data, avoiding the need for synchronized reference clocks, hardware-level frequency alignment, or prior knowledge of the backscattered signal parameters.
  • Experimental Validation under Realistic Measurement Conditions: The proposed processing chain is validated using measured ambient backscatter data collected with a homodyne receiver, demonstrating that meaningful baseband information can be recovered even in the presence of severe SI and hardware-induced frequency offsets.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews related work on ambient backscatter and unintentional PCB leakage, including previous studies on intentional backscatter tags, Wi-Fi extensions, IoT applications, and SI, CFO, and phase noise in receivers. Section 3 introduces a hierarchical, subsystem-based modeling framework that combines SIwave, HFSS, and circuit-level simulations to model PCB leakage and ambient backscatter behavior. Section 4 describes a software-only CFO correction and backscatter recovery method for homodyne receivers operating under dominant SI, using digital processing to extract weak signals without hardware synchronization or prior knowledge of the modulation. Section 5 explains the measurement setup and experimental validation, and the paper concludes with key findings.

2. Related Work

Ambient backscatter communication has become a promising approach for enabling ultra-low-power sensing and data transfer by utilizing existing RF signals in the environment. Initial research showed that ambient backscatter is feasible through the use of intentional tags that encode information by altering their antenna impedance states, thus reflecting incident RF signals without the need for active RF transmission or batteries [5]. Subsequent studies expanded this concept to Wi-Fi backscatter and other ambient RF sources, emphasizing cooperative tag designs and regulated modulation schemes [6]. Comprehensive surveys have further summarized developments in ambient backscatter systems, emphasizing applications in IoT, RFID, and passive sensing, while mainly assuming intentionally designed tag antennas and known modulation parameters [8]. In these works, SI is often reduced through antenna isolation, geometric separation, or simplified signal models, and hardware impairments such as CFO are usually ignored or idealized.
From an electromagnetic compatibility and side-channel perspective, several studies demonstrate that PCB traces and interconnects can serve as unintended antennas, radiating or scattering signals that carry information due to switching activity in digital circuits. These unintentional emissions are widely examined in terms of electromagnetic interference (EMI) and data leakage, showing that sensitive information can be coupled into free space without a dedicated RF front end. Such findings indicate that backscattered signals can be produced and detected even when a device does not have a specific antenna. Recently, research has started to investigate how these phenomena affect wireless sensing and security-focused communication systems. While existing work confirms the presence of backscatter and leakage from unintended structures, most studies assume relatively harmless interference conditions or are focused on controlled laboratory environments. In practical ambient backscatter systems, however, the received signal is often overwhelmed by strong direct-path interference from the transmitter, which can obscure the weak backscattered signal and make signal recovery much more challenging.
Meanwhile, extensive research on full-duplex and direct-conversion receivers has explored how SI, CFO, and phase noise affect weak signal detection [11,12]. These studies show that even minor frequency mismatches between transmitter and receiver oscillators can lead to significant SI spreading in the baseband spectrum, greatly reducing receiver sensitivity. While ambient backscatter has been widely studied in RFID, IoT, and passive sensing, most existing research assumes intentional tag antennas, cooperative modulation techniques, or controlled impedance switching. In contrast, this work explores a significantly different and mostly uninvestigated scenario: ambient backscatter leakage from non-cooperative off-the-shelf PCBs that lack intentionally designed antennas. The backscattered signals in such systems are very weak, unstructured, and heavily masked by strong direct-path SI. Additionally, practical measurement hardware introduces unavoidable CFO and phase noise, which further disperses the SI in baseband and makes the leakage signal more difficult to detect examines a fundamentally different and mostly unexplored scenario.
To address these challenges, this paper presents a software-based post-processing framework that leverages the complex baseband representation provided by a homodyne receiver to simultaneously manage the carrier, SI, and backscattered components. Unlike previous methods that depend on antenna-level isolation, RF cancellation, or prior knowledge of modulation parameters, the proposed approach functions entirely in post-processing and does not require understanding the target signal structure or bit rate. Experimental results from a realistic bistatic measurement setup demonstrate that the CFO correction and baseband recovery pipeline markedly improve the detectability of weak ambient backscattered signals from unintentional PCB radiators.
To clearly position the contribution of this work. Table 1 summarizes a comparison with representative recent ambient backscatter systems, highlighting differences in synchronization strategy, interference mitigation, hardware configuration, and experimental validation methodology. Unlike prior studies, the proposed approach enables ambient backscatter signal recovery without a shared reference clock and compensates residual CFO entirely in post-processing, while maintaining a practical bistatic experimental setup. Motivated by the identified limitations, the proposed framework introduces a fully asynchronous bistatic recovery approach with post-processing-based CFO compensation, as detailed in the following section.

3. System Modeling and Analysis

To assess the ambient backscatter leakage from off-the-shelf PCBs and capture the complex interactions between electromagnetic radiation, circuit-level behavior, and bistatic backscatter mechanisms, a hierarchical subsystem-based modeling approach is used. Because of the limitations of any single simulation tool in simultaneously handling full-wave electromagnetic propagation and time-varying circuit behavior, the overall system is broken down into multiple subsystems, each modeled and analyzed with the most suitable dedicated simulation environment, as shown in Figure 2.
After characterizing each individual subsystem, a dynamic EM/Circuit co-simulation framework is employed to integrate the electromagnetic and circuit domains into a unified system-level model within the Ansys Electronics Desktop (AEDT) circuit simulator, as shown in Figure 3. The workflow begins with exporting the PCB model from SIwave to HFSS. In HFSS, a bistatic simulation is configured using two identical dedicated antennas, positioned as transmit (Tx) and receive (Rx), and oriented toward the PCB. The Tx antenna illuminates the PCB, enabling frequency-domain characterization of the backscattered and reradiated responses under the bistatic setup. The frequency-domain response is exported as a three-terminal S-parameter (S3P) model, where terminal 1 is the Tx input, terminal 2 the PCB input, and terminal 3 the Rx output. The referenced labels (GND.1, GND.2, and GND.3) indicate the corresponding signal return paths within the co-simulation structure. For transient (time-domain) analysis assigns each terminal to the appropriate source and voltage probe within the AEDT Circuit Simulator. In operation, the Tx antenna illuminates the PCB with a continuous-wave RF signal, as shown in Figure 4a, where the dense sinusoidal pattern depicts the continuous RF carrier, with an overlaid sinusoid for visual clarity.
In this simulation, the Tx input is set as a 1.5505 GHz carrier with an amplitude of 3.9 V, aligning with practical measurement setups. This CW excitation couples into the PCB structure, inducing a weak reradiated (backscattered) component that carries the corresponding baseband signal propagating along the PCB trace. For demonstration, a 0.6 V amplitude baseband signal at 10 kHz is applied along the PCB trace, as shown in Figure 4b. These values are chosen to ensure clear time-domain visualization of the induced baseband variation while remaining within practical operating conditions, without altering the general leakage mechanism being modeled. This methodology enables realistic evaluation of ambient bistatic backscatter generation and reradiation under typical operating conditions, effectively bridging the gap between isolated subsystem simulations. By leveraging the strengths of SIwave, HFSS, and circuit-level simulation, the proposed modeling framework offers a comprehensive and efficient platform for analyzing unintentional electromagnetic leakage mechanisms in complex PCB-based systems.
This co-simulation framework replicates the physical illumination and PCB backscattering mechanisms of the experimental setup. While the simulation uses virtual connections between SIwave, HFSS, and the circuit simulator, it accurately models the fundamental physical interactions, including electromagnetic propagation from the Tx antenna, reflection and reradiation by the PCB, and reception at the Rx antenna. The only difference is that, in the simulation, signals pass through modeled components instead of real hardware, whereas in the experiment these interactions occur in the physical domain with actual devices, as explained later in Section 5. A key challenge in this ambient bistatic backscatter EM/Circuit co-simulation scenario is that the receiver simultaneously captures a strong direct-path component from the transmitter, commonly referred to as SI. Because this direct-path SI can be orders of magnitude stronger than the weak backscattered signal from the PCB, it can dominate the received waveform and mask the modulation of interest, as shown in Figure 4c. This large power disparity significantly reduces the effective SNR and makes it difficult to isolate and recover the backscattered information, particularly when the backscattered amplitude is further attenuated by propagation loss and imperfect coupling. Therefore, effective suppression of the dominant SI together with appropriate post-processing to enhance the weak backscattered component is essential for reliable baseband recovery at the receiver.

3.1. Direct Conversion (Zero-IF) Receiver

An important observation in bistatic backscatter systems is that both the SI and the desired backscattered signal occupy the same carrier frequency. This frequency coherence can be advantageously exploited at the receiver by employing a direct-conversion (homodyne receiver) in which the received RF signal is mixed directly to baseband using a local oscillator (LO) tuned to the carrier frequency. As illustrated in Figure 5a the receiver LO is intentionally aligned with the transmitted carrier to enable coherent downconversion. Figure 5b shows a retaken view of Figure 4c, presenting the simulated received RF waveform in which the weak backscattered PCB component is heavily dominated by SI. At the RF stage, the desired signal is not visually distinguishable due to the large amplitude disparity. By applying the direct-conversion process, the received RF signal is mixed with the synchronized LO. Because the SI shares the same carrier frequency, it is effectively derotated to DC after mixing. As a result, the dominant SI component is translated to a near-constant (DC) term in the baseband domain. This property allows the SI to be efficiently mitigated using standard DC-offset removal techniques without requiring complex adaptive cancellation. The resulting downconverted signal is shown in Figure 5c, where the desired backscattered variation becomes observable in the baseband waveform. This demonstrates that coherent direct conversion transforms the SI problem from a high-power RF interference issue into a manageable DC-offset suppression task in baseband processing. While coherent direct conversion facilitates observation of the backscattered signal in baseband, several practical challenges remain in implementing such receivers, especially in the case of dominant SI scenarios. The following subsection discusses these challenges in detail, focusing on the practical limitations of direct-conversion architectures in ambient backscatter systems.

Challenges

While homodyne receivers offer significant advantages for bistatic backscatter systems, their performance is inherently sensitive to CFO between the transmitter and the receiver. CFO arises from inevitable mismatches between the local oscillators of the RF source and the receiver, as well as from phase-locked loop (PLL) imperfections and frequency drift. In direct-conversion architectures, this offset manifests directly at baseband as a time-varying phase rotation, affecting both SI and the desired backscattered signal. In the presence of dominant SI, even a small CFO can have a pronounced impact on the received baseband signal. Specifically, CFO causes the strong SI component to spread in the baseband spectrum, generating low-frequency oscillations and spectral leakage that can overlap with the frequency band of the weak backscattered signal. As a result, the modulation carried by the backscattered component is masked or distorted, significantly degrading the SNR and complicating subsequent detection and thresholding processes, as shown in Figure 6.
The mathematical description of CFO effects in a homodyne backscatter receiver. Let the transmitted CW excitation be given by (1)
x ( t ) = A t x e j ( 2 π f c t )
where A t x , f c are amplitude and carrier frequency respectively. In a bistatic backscatter setup, the receiver detects a combination of a strong direct-path SI and a weak backscattered component, which can be represented as (2)
r ( t ) = h SI x ( t τ SI ) + h BS m ( t ) x ( t τ BS ) + n ( t )
where h SI and h BS denote the complex channel coefficients of the SI and backscatter paths, respectively, τ SI and τ BS are the corresponding propagation delays, m ( t ) is the baseband modulation signal, and n ( t ) represents complex Gaussian noise. For analytical tractability, the backscattering channel is modeled using a single complex coefficient h BS , representing the effective amplitude attenuation at the selected operating frequency.This single coefficient provides a reasonable first-order approximation, while the experimental measurements inherently account for any residual propagation effects present in the environment. In this work, the noise term is modeled as complex Gaussian noise, which is a standard assumption for initial system-level analysis. Alternative non-Gaussian distributions were not explicitly considered because the received signal is dominated by SI and residual CFO. Under these conditions, system performance is primarily limited by SI and CFO rather than the specific statistical properties of the noise. Nevertheless, in environments with strong impulsive interference or non-Gaussian disturbances, alternative noise models could be incorporated to further refine the analysis. In a direct-conversion receiver, r(t) is mixed by an LO as shown in (3)
( t ) = e j ( 2 π f LO t )
where f LO is the receiver local oscillator (LO) frequency. After low-pass filtering, the complex baseband signal can be expressed as (4)
y ( t ) = LPF { r ( t ) ( t ) } e j 2 π Δ f t h SI A t x e j 2 π f c τ SI + h BS A t x m ( t ) e j 2 π f c τ BS + n ˜ ( t )
where Δ f = f c f LO denotes the CFO, and n ˜ ( t ) represents the down-converted noise. This expression highlights that CFO introduces a common time-varying phase rotation e j 2 π Δ f t that multiplies both the SI and backscattered components. When | h SI | | h BS | , the received baseband is dominated by the SI term, and the CFO-induced rotation makes the SI appear nonstationary at baseband. In practice, this results in spectral leakage and low-frequency oscillations that can overlap with the modulation bandwidth of m ( t ) , thereby masking the weak backscattered information. In magnitude-based demodulation (envelope detection), the observed signal envelope is given by (5).
| y ( t ) | h SI A t x + h BS A t x m ( t )
showing that the weak backscattered modulation is embedded as a small perturbation on top of the dominant SI amplitude by ignoring noise and small delay differences.From this analysis any residual CFO/phase-noise-induced fluctuations of the strong SI term can directly degrade the detectability of the backscattered signal, motivating explicit CFO estimation/compensation prior to SI suppression and baseband recovery. Therefore, accurate estimation and compensation of CFO are essential for effective SI suppression.

4. CFO Correction and Backscattered Signal Recovery Under Dominant SI via Post-Processing

As discussed in the previous subsection, CFO plays a critical role in degrading the performance of homodyne backscatter receivers under dominant SI. In practical bistatic measurement environments, pre-correction or hardware-level synchronization of frequency offsets is often infeasible due to inherent non-idealities of the measurement setup. Specifically, CFO may arise from multiple sources, including (i) independent and unsynchronized local oscillators at the transmitter and receiver with parts-per-million (ppm) frequency mismatch, (ii) the absence of a shared reference clock such as a common 10 MHz reference or GPS-disciplined oscillator (GPSDO), (iii) Doppler shifts caused by relative motion between system components, (iv) sampling clock offsets in the ADC/DAC stages, and (v) small frequency mis-tuning or drift in down-conversion hardware. Even when these offsets are small in absolute terms, their impact is amplified in bistatic backscatter systems due to the extreme power imbalance between the dominant SI and the weak backscattered signal.
Since these impairments stem from hardware imperfections and environmental factors, they cannot be fully eliminated through analog or RF design alone. Therefore, digital post-processing CFO correction becomes crucial. In our proposed algorithm, CFO is directly estimated from the measured complex baseband signal acquired from the homodyne receiver. Due to the dominance of the SI component, the frequency offset appears as a strong spectral peak near DC in the baseband spectrum. By applying a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the received I/Q data, the residual frequency shift can be precisely identified without prior knowledge of the backscattered signal’s characteristics. Once the CFO is estimated, digital frequency correction is applied by mixing the received baseband signal with a locally generated complex exponential at the estimated offset frequency. This process effectively removes the time-varying phase rotation caused by CFO and restores stationarity to the SI component in the baseband domain. After CFO correction, low-pass filtering suppresses out-of-band noise and residual high-frequency artifacts, allowing clearer observation of the envelope modulation caused by the backscattered signal. To further improve the detection of the weak backscattered component, envelope detection is performed on the CFO-corrected signal, followed by DC offset removal to eliminate the dominant constant component associated with residual SI. Finally, an adaptive thresholding scheme distinguishes between high and low modulation states in the recovered baseband waveform. This fully digital processing chain enables reliable extraction of the weak backscattered information despite severe SI and hardware-induced frequency offsets. Algorithm 1 summarizes the software-based CFO correction and baseband recovery process implemented entirely in post-processing, without the need for hardware synchronization between the transmitter and receiver.
This approach lies in its software-only correction framework, which does not rely on synchronized clocks, specialized RF cancellation hardware, or prior knowledge of the backscattered modulation parameters. Unlike conventional CFO correction scenarios, where the desired signal is directly observable or supported by pilot symbols [30], the present work operates under extreme SI dominance, with the weak ambient backscatter deeply buried beneath the CFO-broadened SI. Consequently, even small residual CFO errors prevent sufficient spectral re-concentration of the SI component and hinder successful envelope recovery. The effectiveness of Algorithm 1 therefore lies in exploiting the dominant SI component itself for accurate digital frequency alignment, enabling recovery of the buried leakage signal through purely digital post-processing without any hardware modification. By leveraging the inherent properties of the dominant SI in a homodyne bistatic receiver, the proposed method enables practical recovery of weak ambient backscattered signals under realistic measurement conditions, making it well suited for experimental and sensing-oriented backscatter systems. Based on the proposed CFO correction and baseband recovery framework, experimental measurements were conducted using a bistatic backscatter setup with a homodyne receiver. The measured I/Q data were processed entirely in software, following the steps outlined in Algorithm 1. The experimental results presented in the next section demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in suppressing dominant SI, compensating hardware-induced frequency offsets, and recovering weak backscattered baseband signals under realistic measurement conditions.
Algorithm 1: Software-Based CFO Correction and Ambient Backscattered Signal Recovery under Dominant SI
Input: Measured complex baseband signal y [ n ] , sampling frequency F s , CFO
            search bandwidth B, DC guard Δ , LPF cutoff frequency f c
Output: Recovered digital baseband signal b ^ [ n ]
 1 Initialization:
 2  N length ( y ) ,    n { 0 , 1 , , N 1 } ;
 3 Step 1: DC Offset Removal
 4  y 0 [ n ] y [ n ] 1 N k = 0 N 1 y [ k ] ;
 5 Step 2: FFT-Based CFO Estimation
 6  y w [ n ] y 0 [ n ] · w [ n ] ; // Windowing
 7  Y [ k ] FFT { y w [ n ] } ; // Spectrum
 8  f [ k ] k N 1 2 F s ; // Freq. axis
 9  K { k : | f [ k ] | B | f [ k ] | Δ } ; // Search region
10  k arg max k K | Y [ k ] | ;
11  f ^ CFO f [ k ] ;
12 Step 3: Digital CFO Compensation
13  y cfo [ n ] y 0 [ n ] · e j 2 π f ^ CFO n / F s ;
14 Step 4: Complex Baseband Low-Pass Filtering
15  y lpf [ n ] LPF { y cfo [ n ] ; f c } ;
16 Step 5: Envelope Extraction
17  e [ n ] | y lpf [ n ] | ;
18 Step 6: Envelope DC Removal and Smoothing
19  e 0 [ n ] e [ n ] 1 N k = 0 N 1 e [ k ] ;
20  e ˜ [ n ] Smooth { e 0 [ n ] } ;
21 Step 7: Adaptive Thresholding and Bit Recovery
22 Compute adaptive threshold τ from e ˜ [ n ] ;
23  b ^ [ n ] I { e ˜ [ n ] > τ } ;
24 return  b ^ [ n ] ;

5. Measurement Setup and Experimental Validation

To validate the proposed software-based CFO correction and baseband recovery framework under realistic conditions, a bistatic backscatter measurement setup was implemented, as illustrated in Figure 7. The experimental configuration closely follows the simulation framework described in the previous section while incorporating practical hardware non-idealities commonly encountered in real ambient backscatter systems.
The measurement system includes two identical horn antennas, one acting as the transmitter (Tx) and the other as the receiver (Rx), along with a Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) configured as a homodyne (direct-conversion) receiver. The Tx and Rx antennas are separated and positioned to face an off-the-shelf printed circuit board (PCB), which functions as the target device for ambient backscattering. In this setup, the distance between the Tx antenna and the PCB, as well as between the PCB and the Rx antenna, is adjustable from 30 cm to 1 m. The Tx antenna continuously transmits a single-tone RF carrier at a maximum power of 20 dBm, illuminating the PCB. The incident RF signal couples into the PCB and interacts with its internal circuitry, generating a weakly modulated backscattered signal that is reradiated into free space. This scattered signal, which contains leaked baseband information, is then captured remotely by the Rx antenna.
The experiments were conducted at a carrier frequency of 1.5505 GHz using a signal generator (SG) to generate the transmitted signal, and a USRP X300 was used as the receiver operating at a sampling rate of 1 MS/s. Standard horn antennas (HRN-0118) were arranged in a bistatic configuration. No shared external reference clock was employed between the SG and the USRP receiver; residual CFO was compensated digitally using Algorithm 1. The experimental equipment is listed in Table 2, and the corresponding measurement parameters are summarized in Table 3.
Figure 8a presents the signal measured at the receiver, where the weak backscattered component is completely obscured by the strong direct-path SI and further distorted by the residual carrier frequency offset (CFO). As a result, no discernible baseband information can be identified in the raw waveform. To reveal the weak backscattered component masked by SI, software-based CFO compensation is applied to the measured I/Q data. After CFO correction, the extracted envelope exhibits clear amplitude transitions, indicating the presence of the underlying backscattered baseband information, which is not observable in the raw waveform, as shown in Figure 8b. Finally, the CFO-corrected envelope is filtered by low-pass filtering, and DC-offset removal is applied to suppress residual harmonics and baseline bias, producing a cleaner recovered baseband waveform, as shown in Figure 8c. The resulting waveform exhibits distinct high and low states, demonstrating that weak backscattered information can be successfully extracted from an off-the-shelf PCB despite severe SI and hardware-induced impairments. These results correspond to the measurement setup in which the target PCB is located 30 cm from both the transmitter and the receiver.
To further demonstrate the proposed leakage-recovery framework, additional measurements were conducted with both the Tx–PCB and PCB–Rx separation distances set to 1 m. In this case, instead of using an ideal digital pattern with equal high- and low-state durations, a real ASCII plain-text sequence was transmitted. At this distance, the backscattered component experiences significant path loss and decreased coupling, resulting in an extremely weak leakage signal at the receiver. Nevertheless, by applying the proposed post-processing algorithm, the recovered waveform shows clear transitions corresponding to the intended signal. The related results are shown in Figure 9b–d. These results confirm that leakage information can still be extracted even when the scattered signal is severely attenuated, highlighting the practical applicability of the proposed method in realistic ambient bistatic backscatter scenarios. Overall, the 1 m measurement demonstrates that reliable baseband recovery is achievable beyond short-range coupling conditions, as long as dominant SI and frequency-offset effects are properly mitigated in the digital domain. The results confirm that, despite dominant SI and residual CFO, the proposed post-processing framework can recover the ambient backscattered signal from an unintentional radiator PCB under controlled conditions, demonstrating the feasibility of the approach approach.

5.1. Performance Evaluation

The proposed SI-dominated backscatter system relies on accurate CFO compensation for reliable demodulation. Residual frequency offset leads to continuous phase rotation, spectral leakage, and distortion of the weak backscattered signal. Therefore, CFO estimation accuracy is the main factor affecting overall system performance. To evaluate the CFO estimator under realistic conditions, a measured composite waveform captured with a USRP receiver was used. Since the received signal includes a dominant SI and a weak backscattered signal sharing the same carrier frequency offset, the CFO is mainly determined by the strong SI tone. For performance assessment, the measured waveform is treated as the clean reference signal. Controlled additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is synthetically added to create a desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The SNR is defined as (6)
SNR = P signal P AWGN
where P signal denotes the total received signal power, and P AWGN is the variance of the injected noise. Since the SI power significantly exceeds the backscattered signal power, the total signal power is effectively dominated by the SI component.
For each SNR value, multiple Monte Carlo trials are conducted. In each trial, independent AWGN is added to the measured waveform, the CFO is re-estimated, and the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) is calculated based on the CFO estimated from the original measurement. This process isolates the noise sensitivity of the CFO estimator while maintaining the realistic SI-dominated signal structure of the hardware measurement. Figure 10 illustrates the RMSE of the CFO estimator as a function of the SNR. The figure shows that the estimator’s accuracy improves as the SNR increases, indicating the reduced noise influence on the CFO estimation. This confirms the robustness of the proposed method under realistic SI-dominated measurement conditions. To evaluate practical feasibility further, the computational complexity of the post-processing algorithm is examined. The dominant operation is frequency estimation, which has a theoretical complexity of O ( N log N ) for the FFT-based implementation, while memory usage scales linearly as O ( N ) .

5.2. Limitation

While the FFT-peak CFO estimator effectively recovers weak PCB-originated backscatter in scenarios dominated by a single SI tone, its performance may decline under more challenging conditions. Excessive transmitter or receiver phase noise can broaden the SI spectrum and reduce peak sharpness. Multipath propagation may create multiple comparable SI tones, and receiver impairments such as IQ imbalance or DC offset can distort the baseband spectrum. When no single dominant SI tone exists or the leakage signal approaches the noise floor, the estimator may fail, highlighting the operational limits of the current method. Future work will explore advanced multi-tone or iterative frequency refinement techniques to develop a more robust framework for SI-dominated backscatter.

6. Conclusions

This work examined ambient bistatic backscatter leakage from an off-the-shelf PCB under dominant self-interference (SI) conditions using a homodyne receiver architecture. A realistic bistatic setup, with separated transmitter and receiver antennas and an off-the-shelf PCB target, was used to simulate practical measurement scenarios. Because the target PCB has no intentionally designed antenna, the received backscattered signal was heavily masked by strong direct-path SI and was affected by residual carrier frequency offset (CFO) caused by hardware nonidealities. To address these challenges, we proposed a software-based post-processing framework that performs FFT-based CFO estimation and compensation directly in the complex baseband, followed by low-pass filtering, envelope extraction, DC-offset removal, and adaptive thresholding, exploiting the direct-conversion architecture. Experimental results from a realistic bistatic measurement setup demonstrate that the proposed processing pipeline can effectively mitigate the impact of CFO and dominant SI, enabling the recovery of baseband information that is otherwise hidden in the raw I/Q data. These results demonstrate that, even without intentionally designed antennas or cooperative tags, meaningful information can leak and be recovered from PCB structures that unintentionally act as radiators when appropriate signal-processing techniques are employed. This underscores the security risks of ambient backscatter channels in real-world electronic systems and highlights the importance of considering electromagnetic leakage paths in system design and assessment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-Y.C.; methodology, G.F.D.; software, G.F.D.; validation, G.F.D.; formal analysis, G.F.D.; investigation, G.F.D.; resources, J.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.F.D.; writing—review and editing, G.F.D.; visualization, G.F.D.; supervision, J.-Y.C.; project administration, J.-Y.C.; funding acquisition, J.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2025-24533283)) and in part by the Basic Science Research Program of NRF (funded by the Ministry of Education (RS-2019-NR040071)).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-5) and Grammarly (v1.2.240.1850) to assist with language refinement. All content was carefully reviewed, edited, and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nikitin, P.V.; Rao, K.V.S. Antennas and Propagation in UHF RFID Systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on RFID, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 16–17 April 2008; pp. 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahsan, K.; Shah, H.; Kingston, P. RFID Applications: An Introductory and Exploratory Study. arXiv 2010, arXiv:1002.1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, G.; Ho, C.K.; Guan, Y.L. Multi-antenna Wireless Energy Transfer for Backscatter Communication Systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2015, 33, 2974–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yao, C.; Liu, Y.; Wei, X.; Wang, G.; Gao, F. Backscatter technologies and the future of internet of things: Challenges and opportunities. Intell. Converg. Netw. 2020, 1, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, V.; Parks, A.N.; Talla, V.; Gollakota, S.; Wetherall, D.; Smith, J.R. Ambient backscatter: Wireless communication out of thin air. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM, Hongkong, China, 12–16 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kellogg, B.; Parks, A.; Gollakota, S.; Smith, J.R.; Wetherall, D. Wi-fi backscatter: Internet connectivity for RF-powered devices. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 2014, 44, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; Zheng, H.; He, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Backscatter Communication for Data Transmission. Electronics 2024, 13, 3702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van Huynh, N.; Hoang, D.T.; Lu, X.; Niyato, D.; Wang, P.; Kim, D.I. Ambient Backscatter Communications: A Contemporary Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2018, 20, 2889–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z. A Survey on Ambient Backscatter Communications: Principles, Systems, Applications, and Challenges. Comput. Netw. 2022, 216, 109235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Korpi, D.; Anttila, L.; Syrjälä, V.; Valkama, M. Widely-Linear Digital Self-Interference Cancellation in Direct-Conversion Full-Duplex Transceiver. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2014, 32, 1674–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sabharwal, A.; Schniter, P.; Guo, D.; Bliss, D.W.; Rangarajan, S.; Wichman, R. In-Band Full-Duplex Wireless: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ayesha, A.; Rahman, M.; Haider, A.; Majeed Chaudhry, S. On Self-Interference Cancellation and Non-Idealities Suppression in Full-Duplex Radio Transceivers. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Z.; Dong, Y.; Wei, T.; Tang, X.; Zhang, X.P.; Liu, Z. B-ISAC: Backscatter Integrated Sensing and Communication for IoE Applications. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.19235v2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaushik, A.; Singh, R.; Li, M.; Luo, H.; Dayarathna, S.; Senanayake, R.; An, X.; Stirling-Gallacher, R.A.; Shin, W.; Di Renzo, M. Integrated Sensing and Communications for IoT: Synergies with Key 6G Technology Enablers. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2024, 7, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paul, B.; Chiriyath, A.R.; Bliss, D.W. Survey of RF Communications and Sensing Convergence Research. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 252–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, F.; Cui, Y.; Masouros, C.; Xu, J.; Han, T.X.; Eldar, Y.C.; Buzzi, S. Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2022, 40, 1728–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chiriyath, A.R.; Paul, B.; Bliss, D.W. Radar-Communications Convergence: Coexistence, Cooperation, and Co-Design. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2017, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, G.; Wu, W. Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveform Design: A Survey. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 1930–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cinque, E.; Valentini, F.; Persia, A.; Chiocchio, S.; Santucci, F.; Pratesi, M. V2X Communication Technologies and Service Requirements for Connected and Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), Turin, Italy, 18–20 November 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Spitalova, Z. Vehicle-to-Everything Communication. Commun.-Sci. Lett. Univ. Zilina 2023, 25, C24–C35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nawaz, H.; Shoaib, N.; Niazi, A.U.; Chaudhry, S.M. A Compact, Bistatic Antenna System with Very High Interport Isolation for 2.4 GHz In-Band Full Duplex Applications. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2021, 2021, 8855726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nawaz, H.; Tekin, I. Dual-Polarized, Differential Fed Microstrip Patch Antennas With Very High Interport Isolation for Full-Duplex Communication. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 7355–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaudhary, G.; Jeong, J.; Jeong, Y. Differential Fed Antenna with High Self-Interference Cancellation for In-Band Full-Duplex Communication System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 45340–45348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, X.; Guo, Y.J. Radio Frequency Self-Interference Cancellation With Analog Least Mean-Square Loop. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 3336–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Le, A.T.; Tran, L.C.; Huang, X.; Guo, Y.J. Analog Least Mean Square Loop for Self-Interference Cancellation: A Practical Perspective. Sensors 2020, 20, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Niu, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Feng, Z. Interference Management for Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 8110–8134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Devineni, J.K.; Dhillon, H.S. Non-coherent Detection and Bit Error Rate for an Ambient Backscatter Link in Time-Selective Fading. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 602–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, G.; Gao, F.; Fan, R.; Tellambura, C. Ambient Backscatter Communication Systems: Detection and Performance Analysis. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2016, 64, 4836–4846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hara, T.; Takahashi, R.; Ishibashi, K. Ambient OFDM Pilot-Aided Backscatter Communications: Concept and Design. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 89210–89221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, S.; Joshi, S. Non-pilot based carrier frequency offset estimation and reflection coefficient optimization for RIS-assisted OFDM systems. Phys. Commun. 2024, 66, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram illustrating the ambient bistatic backscatter leakage mechanism from an off-the-shelf PCB under dominant conditions of self-interference (SI).
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram illustrating the ambient bistatic backscatter leakage mechanism from an off-the-shelf PCB under dominant conditions of self-interference (SI).
Electronics 15 01215 g001
Figure 2. Multi-domain EM/circuit co-simulation framework integrating SIwave-based PCB modeling, HFSS-based antenna and bistatic propagation analysis, and circuit-level transient simulation for realistic evaluation of ambient bistatic backscatter leakage.
Figure 2. Multi-domain EM/circuit co-simulation framework integrating SIwave-based PCB modeling, HFSS-based antenna and bistatic propagation analysis, and circuit-level transient simulation for realistic evaluation of ambient bistatic backscatter leakage.
Electronics 15 01215 g002
Figure 3. EM/circuit co-simulation workflow for the PCB backscatter study involves exporting the PCB model from SIwave to HFSS, where bistatic simulations with dedicated Tx and Rx antennas are conducted. The resulting three-terminal S-parameter model (terminal 1: Tx input, terminal 2: PCB input, terminal 3: Rx output) is then imported into Ansys Electronics Desktop (AEDT) Circuit Simulator for transient (time-domain) analysis, with sources and voltage probes assigned to each terminal. GND.1– GND.3 correspond to the return paths of the Tx signal, PCB signal, and Rx.
Figure 3. EM/circuit co-simulation workflow for the PCB backscatter study involves exporting the PCB model from SIwave to HFSS, where bistatic simulations with dedicated Tx and Rx antennas are conducted. The resulting three-terminal S-parameter model (terminal 1: Tx input, terminal 2: PCB input, terminal 3: Rx output) is then imported into Ansys Electronics Desktop (AEDT) Circuit Simulator for transient (time-domain) analysis, with sources and voltage probes assigned to each terminal. GND.1– GND.3 correspond to the return paths of the Tx signal, PCB signal, and Rx.
Electronics 15 01215 g003
Figure 4. EM/Circuit co-simulation results illustrating the interaction between the transmitted RF signal, PCB digital activity, and the received signal under dominant self-interference (SI). (a) Continuous-wave (CW) RF signal applied to the Tx antenna illuminates the PCB to enable backscattering. (b) Digital signal propagating through the PCB trace. (c) Rx antenna output showing the weak AM backscattered component superimposed on the dominant SI.
Figure 4. EM/Circuit co-simulation results illustrating the interaction between the transmitted RF signal, PCB digital activity, and the received signal under dominant self-interference (SI). (a) Continuous-wave (CW) RF signal applied to the Tx antenna illuminates the PCB to enable backscattering. (b) Digital signal propagating through the PCB trace. (c) Rx antenna output showing the weak AM backscattered component superimposed on the dominant SI.
Electronics 15 01215 g004
Figure 5. (a) Direct RF-to-baseband conversion using an LO tuned to the carrier frequency. (b) Received RF waveform containing a weak backscattered component superimposed on a dominant self-interference (SI) signal. (c) Direct-converted baseband output, where the dominant SI is shifted to a near-DC component, resulting in an elevated DC level offset.
Figure 5. (a) Direct RF-to-baseband conversion using an LO tuned to the carrier frequency. (b) Received RF waveform containing a weak backscattered component superimposed on a dominant self-interference (SI) signal. (c) Direct-converted baseband output, where the dominant SI is shifted to a near-DC component, resulting in an elevated DC level offset.
Electronics 15 01215 g005aElectronics 15 01215 g005b
Figure 6. Direct conversion receiver with CFO and dominant SI.
Figure 6. Direct conversion receiver with CFO and dominant SI.
Electronics 15 01215 g006
Figure 7. Bistatic measurement setup. Experimental configuration used to evaluate the ambient backscatter recovery method. A dedicated transmit (Tx) antenna radiates a continuous-wave carrier toward the target PCB, while a separate receive (Rx) antenna captures the backscattered signal in a bistatic arrangement. The Tx and Rx antennas are positioned with direct line-of-sight to the PCB at the specified separation distance. The detailed equipment specifications are provided in Table 2, and the corresponding measurement parameters are summarized in Table 3.
Figure 7. Bistatic measurement setup. Experimental configuration used to evaluate the ambient backscatter recovery method. A dedicated transmit (Tx) antenna radiates a continuous-wave carrier toward the target PCB, while a separate receive (Rx) antenna captures the backscattered signal in a bistatic arrangement. The Tx and Rx antennas are positioned with direct line-of-sight to the PCB at the specified separation distance. The detailed equipment specifications are provided in Table 2, and the corresponding measurement parameters are summarized in Table 3.
Electronics 15 01215 g007
Figure 8. Measurement results. (a) Raw measured I/Q data in the presence of residual carrier frequency offset (CFO) and self-interference (SI), where the weak backscattered signal is masked by a strong sinusoidal component, (b) Extracted signal envelope after digital CFO correction, showing suppression of the dominant frequency offset component and improved visibility of the underlying modulation, and (c) Recovered baseband signal after LPF and DC offset removed, clearly revealing the backscattered information signal following post-processing.
Figure 8. Measurement results. (a) Raw measured I/Q data in the presence of residual carrier frequency offset (CFO) and self-interference (SI), where the weak backscattered signal is masked by a strong sinusoidal component, (b) Extracted signal envelope after digital CFO correction, showing suppression of the dominant frequency offset component and improved visibility of the underlying modulation, and (c) Recovered baseband signal after LPF and DC offset removed, clearly revealing the backscattered information signal following post-processing.
Electronics 15 01215 g008
Figure 9. Measurement results for the extended separation distance of 1 m. (a) Raw measured I/Q data in the presence of SI and residual CFO, (b) Signal envelope after digital CFO correction. Due to the increased separation distance, the received backscattered component is further attenuated, (c) Recovered baseband waveform after LPF and DC offset removal, where the backscattered modulation becomes distinguishable despite the reduced signal strength, and (d) Final recovered digital signal, demonstrating reliable extraction of the transmitted information after the complete post-processing chain.
Figure 9. Measurement results for the extended separation distance of 1 m. (a) Raw measured I/Q data in the presence of SI and residual CFO, (b) Signal envelope after digital CFO correction. Due to the increased separation distance, the received backscattered component is further attenuated, (c) Recovered baseband waveform after LPF and DC offset removal, where the backscattered modulation becomes distinguishable despite the reduced signal strength, and (d) Final recovered digital signal, demonstrating reliable extraction of the transmitted information after the complete post-processing chain.
Electronics 15 01215 g009aElectronics 15 01215 g009b
Figure 10. Evaluation of CFO estimation accuracy under realistic hardware measurement conditions. Results are obtained using measured SI-dominated waveforms with synthetic additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) injection, and multiple Monte Carlo trials are performed for each SI-to-noise ratio (SNR) value.
Figure 10. Evaluation of CFO estimation accuracy under realistic hardware measurement conditions. Results are obtained using measured SI-dominated waveforms with synthetic additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) injection, and multiple Monte Carlo trials are performed for each SI-to-noise ratio (SNR) value.
Electronics 15 01215 g010
Table 1. Comparison of representative ambient backscatter studies in terms of CFO handling, SI mitigation, reference signal requirement, and implementation type.
Table 1. Comparison of representative ambient backscatter studies in terms of CFO handling, SI mitigation, reference signal requirement, and implementation type.
Ref.CFOSIReference SignalImplementation
[8]Not addressedReviewYesSurvey
[27]Ideal sync.Analog/DigitalYesHW-assisted
[28]Not addressedIsolation + DSPPartialSDR
[29]Estimation methodsN/AYesDSP
This WorkResidual comp.Post-processingNoSoftware-only
Table 2. List of experimental devices.
Table 2. List of experimental devices.
ComponentModelFunction
Signal GeneratorSGT100A (Rohde & Schwarz, Munich, Germany)CW carrier generation
Power AmplifierZHL-5W-63-S+ (Mini-Circuits, Brooklyn, NY, USA)Tx amplification
Tx AntennaHRN-0118 (TDK Corporation, TX, USA)PCB illumination
Rx AntennaHRN-0118 (TDK Corporation, TX, USA)Backscatter reception
SDR ReceiverUSRP X300 (Ettus Research, Austin, TX, USA)data acquisition
Table 3. Measurement parameters.
Table 3. Measurement parameters.
ParameterValue
Carrier frequency1.5505 GHz
Sampling rate1 MS/s
ConfigurationBistatic, line-of-sight
separation distance0.3 m, 1 m
Transmit power10 dBm, 20 dBm
Reference clockIndependent (no shared reference)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Degefa, G.F.; Chung, J.-Y. Recovery of Weak Ambient Backscattered Signals from Off-the-Shelf PCB Under Dominant Self-Interference. Electronics 2026, 15, 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061215

AMA Style

Degefa GF, Chung J-Y. Recovery of Weak Ambient Backscattered Signals from Off-the-Shelf PCB Under Dominant Self-Interference. Electronics. 2026; 15(6):1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Degefa, Gosa Feyissa, and Jae-Young Chung. 2026. "Recovery of Weak Ambient Backscattered Signals from Off-the-Shelf PCB Under Dominant Self-Interference" Electronics 15, no. 6: 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061215

APA Style

Degefa, G. F., & Chung, J.-Y. (2026). Recovery of Weak Ambient Backscattered Signals from Off-the-Shelf PCB Under Dominant Self-Interference. Electronics, 15(6), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop