Next Article in Journal
Impact of Electric Water-Heater Control Granularity on Self-Consumption and Economic Performance of Residential Photovoltaic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
CUBAT-AKA-Collaborative UAV Batch Authentication and Tree-Based Key Agreement
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Agent-Based Model of a Controlled Detonation System for Sandbox Analysis of Suspicious Software
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Technology-Centric Cyber Resilience Evaluation Framework Using MITRE D3FEND for Bridging the Policy Technology Gap in Financial and Enterprise Environments

1
Department of Computer Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drones, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
3
Defense AI Cyber Convergence Research Institute, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2026, 15(12), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122554 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 May 2026 / Revised: 16 May 2026 / Accepted: 1 June 2026 / Published: 9 June 2026

Abstract

Existing Cyber Resilience Assessment Guidelines, including those of the Bank of Korea (BoK), focus on governance-oriented compliance and lack quantitative criteria for measuring the operational effectiveness of security technologies—a Policy–Technology Gap also common in general enterprise settings. To address this gap, this study proposes D3-CREF, a technology-centric cyber resilience evaluation framework that maps the MITRE D3FEND taxonomy to financial security domains and introduces a Normalized Resilience Index (NRI) aggregating four dimensions—Coverage, Maturity, Automation, and Timeliness—via a closed-form weighted geometric mean with AHP-elicited weights (consistency ratio CR = 0.04). All NRI indicators are anchored to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and exemplar CVE entries, enabling threat-informed measurement. The framework was validated through a three-round Delphi study with 50 experts (Kendall’s W = 0.78, p < 0.001; Cronbach’s α = 0.89; CVR 0.68–0.92) and a Cyber Range-based simulation. For three institutions with identical BoK scores (92/100), NRI yielded discriminative values of 0.83, 0.44, and 0.09 (CV = 0.68 vs. 0.00 for the baseline), confirming a shift from compliance-based to performance-driven assessment.
Keywords: cyber resilience; MITRE D3FEND; MITRE ATT& CK; Normalized Resilience Index; risk management; security assessment; financial cybersecurity cyber resilience; MITRE D3FEND; MITRE ATT& CK; Normalized Resilience Index; risk management; security assessment; financial cybersecurity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahn, G.; Shin, D. A Technology-Centric Cyber Resilience Evaluation Framework Using MITRE D3FEND for Bridging the Policy Technology Gap in Financial and Enterprise Environments. Electronics 2026, 15, 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122554

AMA Style

Ahn G, Shin D. A Technology-Centric Cyber Resilience Evaluation Framework Using MITRE D3FEND for Bridging the Policy Technology Gap in Financial and Enterprise Environments. Electronics. 2026; 15(12):2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahn, GwangHyun, and Dongkyoo Shin. 2026. "A Technology-Centric Cyber Resilience Evaluation Framework Using MITRE D3FEND for Bridging the Policy Technology Gap in Financial and Enterprise Environments" Electronics 15, no. 12: 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122554

APA Style

Ahn, G., & Shin, D. (2026). A Technology-Centric Cyber Resilience Evaluation Framework Using MITRE D3FEND for Bridging the Policy Technology Gap in Financial and Enterprise Environments. Electronics, 15(12), 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop