Next Article in Journal
Fast Identification of Series Arc Faults Based on Singular Spectrum Statistical Features
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Thermal Stress in High-Power Semiconductor Laser Array Packaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
A 5-Transistor CMOS Voltage Reference with Double Supply-Regulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Implementation of Novel DC-DC Converter with Step-Up Ratio and Soft-Switching Technology

by
Kuei-Hsiang Chao
1,* and
Thi-Thanh-Truc Bau
2
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411070, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute, Prospective Technology of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411070, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2025, 14(16), 3335; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163335
Submission received: 20 May 2025 / Revised: 28 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 August 2025 / Published: 21 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons and Recent Advances of Power Electronics)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the development of a high-conversion-efficiency DC/DC boost converter, which features high-voltage boost ratio conversion and employs soft-switching technology to reduce conversion losses. In the proposed design, the conventional energy storage inductor used in traditional boost converters is replaced with a coupled inductor, and an additional boost circuit is introduced. This configuration allows the converter to achieve a higher voltage conversion ratio under the same duty cycle, thereby enhancing the voltage gain of the converter. Additionally, a resonance branch is incorporated into the converter, and by applying a simple switching signal control, zero-voltage switching (ZVS) of the main switch is realized. To decrease the switching losses typically found in hard-switching high-voltage boost ratio converters, the proposed design enhances overall power conversion efficiency. The operation principle of this novel high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter is first examined, followed by the component design process. The converter’s effectiveness is then confirmed through simulation in PSIM. Finally, experimental testing using the TMS320F2809 digital signal processor demonstrates that the main switch achieves ZVS, validating the practical viability of the design. The converter operates under a full load of 340 W, achieving a conversion efficiency of 92.7%, demonstrating the excellent conversion performance of the developed converter.

1. Introduction

In recent years, renewable energy has gained increasing attention, with photovoltaic power generation systems becoming one of the most widely applied forms of renewable energy. These systems are characterized by sustainable energy supply and minimal environmental impact. With advancements in technology, the installation and operational costs of photovoltaic power generation systems have continuously decreased, and their long-term maintenance costs are also relatively low, making them an ideal energy supply option. Additionally, with the rapid development of power electronic technology, converters play a crucial role in photovoltaic power generation systems, as they can significantly improve the energy conversion efficiency of the system. The primary function of a converter is to convert the direct current (DC) generated by the photovoltaic module array into alternating current (AC) or other DC values for use in the power grid or energy storage. Due to the relatively low-voltage output of photovoltaic modules and the need for subsequent applications in high-voltage systems, boost converters [1,2,3] are commonly used in photovoltaic power generation systems. However, boost converters also have certain drawbacks. When the switch is operated within a reasonable duty cycle, in order to prevent overheating and damage to the switch during prolonged operation, the voltage gain of the converter is limited, thus failing to meet the requirement for high output voltage. Moreover, if the switching frequency is too high when operating the switch, it results in significant switching losses. Although soft-switching technologies [4,5,6,7] can reduce switching losses, they increase the size and cost of the converter and still cannot achieve the required higher output voltage. The overall efficiency and economic viability of the photovoltaic power system are impacted by these challenges.
In recent years, many researchers have begun to explore high-voltage boost ratio converters [8,9,10,11] to address the drawbacks of traditional boost converters. High-voltage boost ratio converters can convert the relatively low output voltage from a photovoltaic module array to a higher voltage, thereby reducing energy losses and improving system efficiency. However, this technology also faces several challenges. The design of high-voltage boost ratio converters is more complex and requires advanced electronic components and control techniques, which leads to increased manufacturing costs and greater risks to system reliability. Additionally, high-voltage boost ratio converters operate in high-voltage environments, posing potential voltage breakdown and insulation issues. Therefore, special insulation designs and protection measures are necessary. The boost converter presented in reference [8] demonstrates excellent step-up performance. However, due to the use of a three-winding coupled inductor, which increases the voltage gain through the turns ratio, the converter’s physical size becomes significantly larger. In addition, the main switch in this converter does not achieve soft switching, resulting in higher switching losses during transitions between the on and off states. Furthermore, as the output voltage increases, the main switch must withstand higher voltage and current levels, significantly reducing the switch’s lifespan. Reference [9] employs an integrated transformer and voltage multiplier technique to achieve a higher voltage gain and smoother input current; however, it suffers from significant copper losses in the magnetic components at high-voltage boost ratios and requires a more complex control strategy. Reference [10] presents an inductively coupled soft-switching bidirectional converter, which offers a high-voltage boost ratio and reduces input voltage ripple. However, it requires five switch components and six capacitors, which increases the size and cost of the physical hardware. Reference [11] introduces an interleaved high-voltage ratio boost converter with coupled inductor. However, during the interleaved operation, the inactive converter still transmits some power, which reduces the overall efficiency and causes distortion in the average current. Reference [12] proposed an inductively coupled soft-switching bidirectional converter that also achieves a high voltage boost ratio. However, its main switch components must withstand higher voltage switching stresses, requiring switches with higher voltage ratings.
In response to the limitations of the converters discussed above, this study introduces a high-voltage boost ratio converter with soft-switching capabilities. This converter uses a coupled inductor to replace the conventional energy storage inductor and incorporates a boost circuit, enabling a higher voltage conversion ratio under the same duty cycle, thereby improving the voltage gain of the converter. In addition, this paper incorporates a resonance branch into the converter and uses a simple switch signal control to achieve ZVS of the main switch, reducing switching losses in hard-switching high-voltage boost ratio converters and improving conversion efficiency. First, the circuit architecture of the proposed converter was established using PSIM (Version 9.1) simulation software [13], and its feasibility was verified through simulation analysis. Finally, the implementation was carried out using a TMS320F2809 digital signal processor [14] from Texas Instruments (Dallas, TX, USA), which demonstrated the superior conversion performance of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
This paper is divided into several sections, beginning with Section 2, which elaborates on the proposed high-voltage boost ratio DC-DC converter circuits—both in hard-switching and soft-switching forms—detailing their architecture, operation, and analytical modeling. Section 3 explains the design methodologies and parameter selection for the main components of the converter. Section 4 utilizes PSIM software to perform simulation analyses, verifying the converter’s performance under different load conditions. Section 5 describes the hardware implementation using a TMS320F2809 digital signal processor for experimental testing and provides a performance comparison between the hard-switching and soft-switching high-voltage boost ratio DC-DC converters. Finally, Section 6 summarizes the research findings and suggests potential directions for future work.

2. The Proposed High-Voltage Boost Ratio Converter

2.1. Operating Principle of the High-Voltage Boost Ratio Hard-Switching Converter

Figure 1 depicts the circuit architecture of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter. This design replaces the traditional energy storage inductor with a coupled inductor and incorporates an additional boost circuit formed by D 1 and C 1 . By leveraging the turns ratio of the coupled inductor and the boost circuit, the voltage conversion ratio is significantly enhanced. Furthermore, the converter features a simple circuit structure and ease of control, making it advantageous for practical applications. The working principle of the converter includes two operating modes, corresponding to the switch being either on or off. During the on state, the duty cycle D over one switching period T is described in Equation (1).
D t on T = t on t on + t off
where t on represents the duration of when the switch is in the conducting state within a single switching period, and t off denotes the interval during which the switch is turned off.
(1)
Switch on ( 0 t D T )
When switch S is conducting, diode D 2 is also conducting, while diode D o and D 1 are in the off state. Figure 2 presents the equivalent circuit, and the turns ratio N of the coupled inductor is specified in Equation (2). At this point, inductor voltages v L 1 and v L 2 are expressed by Equations (3) and (4), respectively, while voltage v C 2 across energy storage capacitor C 2 is given by Equation (5).
N = Δ N 2 N 1
v L 1 = V i
v L 2 = N 2 N 1 V i = N V i
v C 2 = v L 2 + v C 1 = V i N + 1 1 D
(2)
Switch off ( D T t T )
When switch S is off, diode D 2 is in the off state, while diodes D o and D 1 are conducting. Figure 3 illustrates the corresponding equivalent circuit, and the inductor voltages v L 1 and v L 2 are given by Equations (6) and (7), respectively.
v L 1 = V i v C 1 = V i D 1 D
v L 2 = V i + v C 2 v L 1 V o = N V i + 2 V i 1 D V o
Based on the volt–second balance theorem for inductor L 2 , Equations (4) and (7) lead to Equation (8). After simplification, the voltage conversion ratio between output voltage V o and input voltage V i can be expressed by Equation (9).
N V i D T + ( N V i + 2 V i 1 D V o ) ( 1 D ) T = 0
G = V o V i = 2 + N 1 D
Based on Equation (9), Table 1 summarizes the relationship between the converter’s voltage gain and the duty cycle. As illustrated in Table 1 and Figure 4, increasing the turns ratio of the coupled inductor leads to a higher voltage conversion ratio at the same duty cycle.

2.2. Operating Principle of High-Voltage Boost Ratio Soft-Switching Converter

The high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter described above can increase the converter’s voltage conversion ratio by utilizing a coupled inductor and an additional boost circuit. However, if the voltage or current cannot be reduced to zero before switching occurs, switching losses will arise, which in turn lowers the overall efficiency of the converter. To improve the conversion efficiency, this paper proposes a high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter with inductive coupling. The circuit architecture of this converter is shown in Figure 5, while Figure 6 illustrates the switching control signals for the converter [15]. The converter achieves a high-voltage conversion ratio through inductive coupling and an additional boost circuit. It also incorporates a resonant branch composed of L r and S r , where C 1 is the capacitor originally used in the hard-switching converter circuit. By controlling the switching signals, the converter enables ZVS for the main switch, thus improving efficiency and reducing switching losses. This paper will analyze the operating modes of the proposed soft-switching converter, which is divided into nine distinct modes. The corresponding switching waveforms for the components are illustrated in Figure 7. Prior to the mode analysis, the following assumptions are introduced:
(1)
The converter operates in continuous conduction mode (CCM), with the circuit assumed to be in a steady-state condition.
(2)
All components are assumed to be ideal, meaning that during conduction, they are treated as short circuits, and during cutoff, as open circuits. Consequently, the voltage drop across the switching devices during conduction is considered zero.
(3)
The input and output voltages are maintained at constant values.
(4)
The currents of energy storage inductors L 1 and L 2 are considered constant (i.e., i L 1 = I L 1 and i L 2 = I L 2 ).
(1) 
Mode ( t 0 ~ t 1 )
Figure 8 presents the equivalent circuit of the converter while operating in Mode 1. In this mode, main switch S is in the off state, while auxiliary switch Sr is turned on first. As a result, resonant capacitor C 1 begins to discharge, and the voltage across resonant inductor L r is v C 1 . The current through resonant inductor i L r rises from zero. Therefore, resonant inductor L r and resonant capacitor C 1 form a resonant tank, and the circuit equations can be expressed by Equation (10). After solving this, i L r and v C 1 are given by Equation (11), while resonant impedance Z o and resonant angular frequency ω o are given by Equation (12). When voltage v C 1 across the resonant capacitor drops to V i , diode D 1 switches from the off state to the on state. The circuit then transitions to Mode 2. The time for this transition is given by Equation (13).
i L r ( t o ) = 0 v C 1 ( t o ) = V i 1 D i C 1 ( t ) = i L r ( t ) v C 1 ( t ) = v L r ( t ) ,   t 0 t t 1
i L r ( t ) = V i ( 1 D ) Z o sin ω o ( t t o ) v C 1 ( t ) = V i 1 D cos ω o ( t t o ) ,   t 0 t t 1
where resonance impedance Z o L r C 1 and resonance frequency
ω o 1 L r C 1
T 1 = t 1 t o = L r C 1 cos 1 1 D
(2) 
Mode 2 ( t 1 ~ t 2 )
Upon entering Mode 2, the corresponding equivalent circuit is illustrated in Figure 9. At this point, the voltage across resonant capacitor v C 1 decreases to V i . At this point, auxiliary switch Sr remains on, and both resonant inductor L r and resonant capacitor C 1 continue to form a resonant circuit. The current through resonant inductor i L r continues to rise, while resonant capacitor C 1 undergoes continuous discharge. The circuit equations for this mode can be expressed as Equation (14). From Equation (14), i L r ( t ) and v C 1 ( t ) can be derived as shown in Equation (15). When the voltage across the resonant v C 1 capacitor drops to zero, at which point ω o ( t t 1 ) = π 2 , resonant inductor current i L r can be calculated from Equation (15) as shown in Equation (16). The operating time for this mode can be derived as shown in Equation (17). At this point, the anti-parallel diode connected to main switch S starts conducting, and the converter proceeds to operate in Mode 3.
i L r ( t ) + C 1 d v C 1 ( t ) d t = I L 1 L r d i L r ( t ) d t = v C 1 ( t ) v C 1 ( t 1 ) = V i ,   t 1 t t 2
i L r ( t ) = I L 1 + V i Z o sin ω o ( t t 1 ) v C 1 ( t ) = V i cos ω o ( t t 1 ) ,   t 1 t t 2
i L r ( t 2 ) = i S r ( t 2 ) = I L 1 + V i Z o
T 2 = t 2 t 1 = π 2 L r C 1
(3) 
Mode 3 ( t 2 ~ t 3 )
During Mode 3, the circuit behaves as illustrated in the equivalent model shown in Figure 10. At this point, the voltage across resonant capacitor v C 1 drops to a very small negative voltage, which causes the anti-parallel diode of main switch S to forward conduct. As a result, the voltage across main switch S is zero. The control of main switch S is then switched from the off state to the on state, achieving ZVS for main switch S. At the same time, auxiliary switch Sr is switched off. The circuit equations for this mode can be expressed as Equation (18). To ensure ZVS for the main switch, delay time t d must satisfy the condition in Equation (19), and typically, t d is 5% to 10% of switching period T. To guarantee the zero-voltage switching (ZVS) of main switch S under heavy load conditions and account for the turn-off delay of auxiliary switch Sr, time delay t α is introduced. Accordingly, conduction time t D S r of the auxiliary switch is defined by Equation (20).
i S ( t 2 ) = I L 1 i L r ( t 2 ) = V i Z o i L r ( t 2 ) = I L 1 + V i Z o ,   t 2 t t 3
t d T 1 + T 2 = L r C 1 π 2 + cos 1 1 D
t D S r t d + t α = L r C 1 π 2 + cos 1 1 D + t α
(4) 
Mode 4 ( t 3 ~ t 4 )
In Mode 4, main switch S is conducting, while auxiliary switch Sr switches off. Diodes D 1 and D 2 are forward-biased, and the equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 11. In this mode, to allow energy storage capacitor C 2 and resonant inductor L r to form a resonant tank, the capacitance of C 2 is chosen to be close to that of C 1 . Additionally, resonant inductor L r and common-mode inductance L 2 both discharge into the energy storage capacitor C 2 . At this point, the current through resonant inductor L r is I L 1 + V i Z o . The circuit equation for this mode can be expressed as Equation (21). Solving for i L r ( t ) and v C 2 ( t ) gives Equation (22). In this working mode, the current through resonant inductor i L r decreases from I L 1 + V i Z o to zero, and diodes D 1 and D 2 switch off. The circuit then transitions into Mode 5.
L r d i L r ( t ) d t = v L 2 ( t ) v C 2 ( t ) C 2 d v C 2 ( t ) d t = i L r ( t ) v L 2 ( t ) = N v L 1 ( t ) = N V i v C 1 ( t 3 ) = 0 i L r ( t 4 ) = 0 ,   t 3 t t 4
i L r ( t ) = I L 1 + V i Z o cos ω o ( t t 3 ) + N V i Z o sin ω o ( t t 3 ) v C 2 ( t ) = N V i 1 + cos ω o ( t t 3 ) + I L 1 + V i Z o sin ω o ( t t 3 )
(5) 
Mode 5 ( t 4 ~ t 5 )
During Mode 5, Figure 12 illustrates the corresponding equivalent circuit. At this point, main switch S remains conducting. The circuit equation for this mode can be expressed as Equation (23). This mode continues until main switch S transitions from conducting to off.
i S ( t ) = I L 1 v C 1 ( t ) = 0 ,   t 4 t t 5
(6) 
Mode 6 ( t 5 ~ t 6 )
In Mode 6, main switch S is turned off and the equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 13. As a result, current I L 1 charges resonant capacitor C 1 , causing the voltage across resonant capacitor v C 1 to gradually increase. The corresponding circuit behavior in this mode can be described using Equation (24). By solving Equation (24), v C 1 ( t ) can be obtained as Equation (25). When resonant capacitor voltage v C 1 reaches V i , this mode ends and transitions into Mode 7. As a result, the duration of this mode can be calculated using Equation (26).
C 1 d v C 1 ( t ) d t = I L 1 ,   t 5 t t 6
v C 1 ( t ) = I L 1 C 1 ( t t 5 )
T 6 = t 6 t 5 = V i C 1 I L 1
(7) 
Mode 7 ( t 6 ~ t 7 )
In Mode 7, the voltage across resonant capacitor v C 1 is V i , and main switch S remains in the off state, while auxiliary switch Sr is also off. As a result, coupled inductor L 2 and energy storage capacitor C 2 transfer energy to the load via diode D o . The circuit equation for this mode is given by Equation (27), and the equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 14. By solving Equation (27), voltage v C 1 across resonant capacitor C 1 can be obtained as Equation (28). At this point, currents flowing through the coupled inductor I L 1 and I L 2 gradually decrease, and when currents I L 1 and I L 2 become equal, the circuit transitions into Mode 8.
C 1 d v C 1 d t = I L 1 I L 2 v C 1 ( t 6 ) = V i ,   t 6 t t 7
v C 1 ( t ) = I L 1 I L 2 C 1 ( t t 6 ) ,   t 6 t t 7
(8) 
Mode 8 ( t 7 ~ t 8 )
In Mode 8, voltage across the resonant capacitor v C 1 is V i / ( 1 D ) , and diode D 1 transitions from the conducting to the off state. Resonant capacitor C 1 stops charging, and both main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr remain off. Consequently, the coupled inductor and energy storage capacitor C 2 continue to transfer energy to the load. The equivalent circuit for this mode is shown in Figure 15, and the circuit equation is given by Equation (29). This mode concludes when the voltage across energy storage capacitor C 2 reaches zero, triggering the circuit to shift into Mode 9.
I L 1 = I L 2 v C 1 ( t 7 ) = V i 1 D ,   t 6 t t 7
(9) 
Mode 9 ( t 8 ~ t 9 )
In Mode 9, voltage across the energy storage capacitor v C 2 is zero, and diode D o transitions from conducting to the off state. Both main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr remain off. The equivalent circuit for this mode is shown in Figure 16, marking the completion of the entire switching cycle analysis. The cycle will repeat once auxiliary switch Sr turns on again, returning to Mode 1 of the next cycle.
In order to validate the performance of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter, it is compared with several other high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching topologies. The comparison is based on voltage gain, switch voltage ratings, the number of switching components, the number of diode components, the number of inductive components, and the number of capacitive components. A summary of the results is presented in Table 2. As shown in the table, the proposed converter achieves a high voltage gain with fewer components and utilizes simple signal control for soft switching, highlighting its key advantages.

3. The Component Design of the Proposed High-Voltage Boost Ratio Converter

The output power of the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter proposed in this paper is 340 W. The relevant circuit parameters and specifications are provided in Table 3.
Assuming the ideal operation of all components, the input power is expected to be equal to the output power, i.e.,
V i I L 1 = V o 2 R
I L 1 = V o 2 V i 2 V i R
Substituting Equation (9) into Equation (31) yields, as expressed in Equation (32).
I L 1 = 2 + N 1 D 2 V i R
where 2 + N 1 D represents the voltage gain of the converter.
When main switch S is turned on, v L 1 can be expressed as
v L 1 = V i = L 1 d i L 1 d t
From Equation (33), it can be observed that when the main switch is turned on, inductor current i L 1 increases linearly, with the conduction time denoted as t on = D T . The variation rate of the inductor current is determined by Equation (34).
Δ i L 1 ( close ) = V i L 1 D T
By applying Equations (32) and (34), the peak and valley values of inductor current i L 1 can be obtained, as shown in Equations (35) and (36) [16].
I L 1 ( max ) = I L 1 + Δ i L 1 2 = 2 + N 1 D 2 V i R + V i D 2 L 1 f
I L 1 ( min ) = I L 1 Δ i L 1 2 = 2 + N 1 D 2 V i R V i D 2 L 1 f
If I L 1 ( min ) = 0 , the inductor can operate at the boundary between CCM and discontinuous conduction mode, which yields
2 + N 1 D 2 V i R = V i D 2 L 1 ( min ) f
From Equation (37), the value of L 1 ( min ) can be calculated as
L 1 ( min ) = D R 2 f 1 D 2 + N 2
Since the coupled inductor structure is similar to the coupled transformer structure, the maximum value of I L 2 can be shown as [16]
I L 2 ( max ) = I L 1 ( max ) 1 + N

3.1. Design of Coupled Inductors

The given scenario involves ensuring that a converter operates in CCM across all duty cycles, with a maximum output power of 340 W, a fixed output voltage of 430 V, and a rated load of 550 Ω. From the relationship between duty cycle D and the D 2 1 D 2 + N 2 function curve shown in Figure 17, it is observed that function D 2 1 D 2 + N 2 reaches its maximum value when D = 1/3. By substituting load resistance R = 550 Ω, the turns ratio of coupled inductors N = 2, switching frequency f = 25 kHz, and duty cycle D = 1/3 into Equation (38), minimum primary inductance L 1 ( min ) of the coupled inductor is calculated to be 102 μH. To ensure that coupling inductor L 1 operates in CCM under both light and heavy load conditions, the calculated inductance value is further multiplied by a safety factor of 1.25. Hence, the selected value of coupling inductor L 1 is 127 μH.

3.2. Design of Capacitors C 1 and C 2

From Figure 1 of the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter, it can be observed that capacitor C 1 , coupled inductor L 1 , main switch S, and diode D 1 form a traditional boost converter. When the duty cycle of main switch S is 0.8, the voltage across capacitor C 1 is approximately 360 V. From Equation (5), under the same operating conditions, the voltage across capacitor C 2 is around 500 V. Therefore, the rated voltage of capacitor C 1 is selected as 400 V, while the rated voltage of capacitor C 2 is 600 V. Based on the analysis of operating Mode 3 in Equation (18) and Figure 7, it is evident that the capacitance value of C 1 influences the reverse current flowing through main switch S. Considering ripple size and component availability, the chosen capacitance value for C 1 is 0.33 μF/400 V. Additionally, from the explanation of operating Mode 4 of this high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter, it is understood that C 2 should have a capacitance value similar to that of C 1 , so C 2 is selected as 0.33 μF/600 V.

3.3. Design of Resonant Inductor L r

Since the conduction time of the auxiliary switch in a typical soft-switching converter is usually designed to be between 5% and 10% of the switching period, let t d = 10 % T = 4   μ s ( T = 1 f = 1 25   kHz = 40   μ s ) and t α = 2 % T = 0.8   μ s represent these values, respectively. From Equation (20), if duty cycle D is set within the range of 0.1 to 0.8, the resonance inductance value can be calculated to vary between 8.08 μH and 17.08 μH. Based on this, the chosen resonance inductance for the converter is 18 μH.

3.4. The Selection of Main Switch S Auxiliary Switch Sr

This paper adopts TK49N65W (650 V/49 A) silicon MOSFETs for both main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr. Although wide-bandgap devices such as GaN and SiC offer advantages like higher switching speed and lower losses at high frequencies (>100 kHz) [10,17,18], the proposed converter operates at a moderate switching frequency of 25 kHz. Under this condition, the ZVS operation significantly reduces switching losses, making the performance of traditional MOSFETs comparable to that of GaN/SiC devices without the added cost and complexity. Moreover, GaN/SiC devices would be underutilized in this frequency range and would not yield a significant efficiency improvement. Therefore, considering cost, availability, and the effective implementation of ZVS, conventional MOSFETs are a practical and sufficient choice for the proposed converter.
After the design of the aforementioned components, the specifications of the components used in the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter are listed in Table 4.

4. Simulation Results

In this paper, PSIM simulation software [13] was utilized to model the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter, aiming to validate its enhanced performance under both light and full load conditions. Figure 18 shows the waveform of the duty cycle, input voltage, and output voltage when the converter operates at full load (p = 340 W). The output voltage of 430 V is obtained when the input voltage is 72 V and the duty cycle is 0.33, as shown in Figure 18. As a result, the converter achieves a high-voltage conversion ratio, which aligns with the voltage gain specified in Table 1. Figure 19 and Figure 20 illustrate the simulated electrical waveforms of main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr under full load operation (p = 340 W). Figure 21 and Figure 22 show the simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr when the converter operates under light load (p = 100 W). From Figure 19 and Figure 21, it can be observed that at both full load (p = 340 W) and light load (p = 100 W), the voltage on main switch S falls to zero prior to the switch turning on. This demonstrates that main switch S achieves ZVS, confirming that the proposed converter enables soft switching for the main switch.

5. Experimental Results

After confirming the proposed converter’s feasibility through PSIM simulations, a practical prototype of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter was developed, using the TMS320F2809 digital signal processor [14] as its control core. The overall hardware circuit setup is shown in Figure 23, and the test platform is depicted in Figure 24. Figure 25 shows the waveforms of the trigger signal for the main switch, S, input voltage, and output voltage of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter under full load operation p = 340 W. From Figure 25, it can be observed that when the duty cycle of the main switch is 0.33 and the input voltage is 72 V, the output voltage reaches 430 V, achieving the expected voltage gain, as shown in Table 1. Figure 26, Figure 27, Figure 28 and Figure 29 show the waveforms of the trigger signals, voltages, and currents for main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr at load conditions of p = 100 W and p = 340 W, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter achieves ZVS for main switch S under both light load (p = 50 W) and full load (p = 340 W) conditions. This helps reduce the switching loss, thereby improving the overall conversion efficiency. Additionally, the measured waveforms of main switch S and auxiliary switch Sr match the simulated waveforms. Figure 30 shows a comparison of the efficiency between the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching and hard-switching converters, with loads ranging from p = 50 W to p = 340 W. The figure demonstrates that the conversion efficiency improves by 3–4% across different load levels.
The experimental prototype, including the heat sink and the voltage and current sensing circuits for the photovoltaic module array, occupies approximately 180 mm × 110 mm of board area, which is about 10–20% smaller than typical multi-winding or interleaved converter designs. The estimated cost of the main components is also approximately 20% lower than the multi-stage or multi-switch topologies reported in [4,5,6,12], making it well suited for compact photovoltaic system applications.
In Figure 26 and Figure 28, the oval-shaped area indicates that when the two-terminal voltage of the main switch drops to zero, the control signal is turned on, allowing the main switch to achieve zero-voltage switching.

6. Conclusions

This paper presents high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter topology.
Through both simulation analysis and experimental results, it has been demonstrated that the converter achieves zero-voltage switching (ZVS) for the main switch. By replacing the traditional energy storage inductor with a coupled inductor and adding a boost circuit, the overall voltage gain of the converter is enhanced, enabling it to achieve a higher voltage output. Additionally, a resonant branch is incorporated to ensure the main switch operates with ZVS, thereby reducing switching losses and switch stress, which in turn improves conversion efficiency. The proposed converter offers advantages such as ease of control via triggering signals, a simple circuit topology, and quantifiable component design parameters. Under different load conditions, the conversion efficiency improves by 3–4%, with a peak efficiency of approximately 93%. Thus, the converter demonstrates excellent conversion performance. This converter is promising for practical applications in photovoltaic module arrays, where it can be used for maximum power point tracking to enhance power generation efficiency.
Furthermore, since the switching frequency of this converter is 25 kHz, which is well below the frequency range where electromagnetic interference (EMI) becomes a critical issue (typically above 150 kHz), it inherently mitigates high-frequency radiated noise problems. At this stage, no dedicated EMI input/output filters have been implemented; however, future work is planned to conduct EMI measurements using a line impedance stabilization network and a spectrum analyzer. This acknowledges the current limitations of this study and clearly outlines future research directions to ensure the converter can better meet practical requirements and comply with international electromagnetic compatibility standards.

Author Contributions

K.-H.C. was in charge of project management and successfully implemented the soft-switching technique for the DC-DC converter. Additionally, K.-H.C. led the project planning and contributed to drafting, revising, and finalizing the manuscript. T.-T.-T.B. carried out the in-depth analysis of the high-voltage boost ratio DC-DC converter and was responsible for software development and verifying the experimental outcomes. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and funding of this project by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, under Grant Number NSTC 113-2221-E-167-035.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of the manuscript declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

Acronyms
ZVSzero-voltage switching
DCdirect current
ACalternating current
CCMcontinuous conduction mode
EMIelectromagnetic interference
Symbols
V i input voltage
V o output voltage
P i input power
P o output power
D duty cycle between [0;1]
T switching period of converter
t o n switch conduction time within one cycle
t off switch off time within one cycle
t d delay time
t α additional time delay
t D S r operating time of auxiliary switch
N turns ratio of coupling inductor
N 1 , N 2 number of turns in first and second coils
G conversion ratio of high-voltage ratio soft-switching converter
f switching frequency
S main switch
i S current through main switch S
v S voltage across main switch S
S r auxiliary switch
i S r current through auxiliary switch Sr
v S r voltage across auxiliary switch Sr
L 1 , L 2 primary side and secondary side of coupled inductor
i L 1 , i L 2 current through primary and secondary sides of coupled inductor
I L 1 , I L 2 constant current through primary and secondary sides of coupled inductor
v L 1 , v L 2 voltage across primary and secondary sides of coupled inductor
L r resonant inductor
i L r current through resonant inductor Lr
v L r voltage across resonant inductor Lr
D o , D 1 , D 2 fast diodes
i D o , i D 1 , i D 2 current through fast diodes D o , D 1 and D 2
C o filter capacitor
C 1 resonant capacitor
i C 1 current through resonant capacitor C 1
v C 1 voltage across resonant capacitor C 1
C 2 energy storage capacitor
i C 2 current through energy storage capacitor C 2
v C 2 voltage across energy storage capacitor C 2
R output load
Z o resonance impedance
ω o resonance frequency

References

  1. Hart, D.W. Introduction to Power Electronics, 2nd ed.; Pearson Educ. Taiwan Ltd.: Taipei, Taiwan, 2002; pp. 211–220. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kumar, M.; Panda, G.; Rao K, D.V.S.K. Analysis of Conventional and Interleaved Boost Converter with Solar Photovoltaic System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Controller and Computing for Smart Power (ICICCSP), Hyderabad, India, 21–23 July 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Masum, S.M.; Louiza, K. Study on the Effects of Dynamic Partial Shading on PV DC-DC Boost and Super-lift Luo Converter. In Proceedings of the Conference on Renewable Energy Technologies and Modern Communications Systems: Future and Challenges, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia, 11–12 December 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sathyan, S.; Suryawanshi, H.M.; Ballal, M.S.; Shitole, A.B. Soft-switching DC–DC Converter for Distributed Energy Sources with High Step-up Voltage Capability. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 7039–7050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hassan, W.; Soon, J.L.; Lu, D.D.; Xiao, W. A High Conversion Ratio and High-efficiency Bidirectional DC–DC Converter with Reduced Voltage Stress. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 11827–11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, Y.; Brown, B.; Xie, W.; Li, S.; Smedley, K. High Step-up DC–DC Converter with Zero Voltage Switching and Low Input Current Ripple. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 9426–9429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panchal, S.; Kulkarni, R.D.; Raja, M.K.; Nataraj, J. Design, Simulation and Hardware Implementation of Soft Switching based Induction Heating System. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Maharashtra, India, 2–4 April 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Luo, P.; Liang, T.J.; Chen, K.H.; Chen, S.M. High Step-up DC–DC Converter with Active Switched Inductor and Voltage Doubler Based on Three-winding Coupled Inductor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Houston, TX, USA, 20–24 March 2022; pp. 731–736. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zaoskoufis, K.; Tatakis, E.C. An Improved Boost-based DC/DC Converter with High-voltage Step-up Ratio for DC Microgrids. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron. 2021, 9, 1837–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santra, S.B.; Chatterjee, D.; Siwakoti, Y. Coupled Inductor Based Soft Switched High Gain Bidirectional DC–DC Converter with Reduced Input Current Ripple. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 70, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, F.; Li, C.; Cao, Y.; Yao, K. Two-phase Interleaved Boost PFC Converter with Coupled Inductor under Single-phase Operation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, L.; Zheng, Z.; Guo, D. High Step-up DC–DC Converter with Active Soft-switching and Voltage-clamping for Renewable Energy Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 9496–9505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Powersim. PSIM User Manual, January 2023. Available online: https://www.slideshare.net/wildersamocastillo/manual-psim#27 (accessed on 30 April 2025).
  14. Texas Instruments. TMS320F2809 Datasheet, September 2022. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tms320f2809.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2025).
  15. Chao, K.H.; Huang, B.Z.; Jian, J.J. An Energy Storage System Composed of Photovoltaic Arrays and Batteries with Uniform Charge/Discharge. Energies 2022, 15, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Narasimharaju, B.L.; Dubey, S.P.; Singh, S.P. Coupled Inductor Bidirectional DC–DC Converter for Improved Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Robotics, Kakinada, India, 27–29 December 2010; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Waradzyn, Z.; Stala, R.; Mondzik, A.; Skała, A.; Penczek, A. GaN-based DC-DC Resonant Boost Converter with Very High Efficiency and Voltage Gain Control. Energies 2020, 13, 6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mishima, T.; Shimizu, S.; Lai, C.M. MHz-driving Current-fed Snubber-less ZCS Multi-resonant DC-DC Converter with High Step-up Voltage Ratio. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Orlando, FL, USA, 19–23 March 2023; pp. 476–483. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A schematic of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio converter utilizing hard switching.
Figure 1. A schematic of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio converter utilizing hard switching.
Electronics 14 03335 g001
Figure 2. The equivalent circuit when main switch S is conducting in the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Figure 2. The equivalent circuit when main switch S is conducting in the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g002
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit when the main switch, S, is non-conducting in the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit when the main switch, S, is non-conducting in the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g003
Figure 4. Voltage gain vs. duty cycle curve for high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Figure 4. Voltage gain vs. duty cycle curve for high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g004
Figure 5. The circuit architecture of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
Figure 5. The circuit architecture of the proposed high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g005
Figure 6. Switching signal diagram of high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter [15].
Figure 6. Switching signal diagram of high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter [15].
Electronics 14 03335 g006
Figure 7. Switching waveforms of each component in the proposed converter under different operating modes.
Figure 7. Switching waveforms of each component in the proposed converter under different operating modes.
Electronics 14 03335 g007
Figure 8. Circuit conduction state in Mode 1.
Figure 8. Circuit conduction state in Mode 1.
Electronics 14 03335 g008
Figure 9. Circuit conduction state in Mode 2.
Figure 9. Circuit conduction state in Mode 2.
Electronics 14 03335 g009
Figure 10. Circuit conduction state in Mode 3.
Figure 10. Circuit conduction state in Mode 3.
Electronics 14 03335 g010
Figure 11. Circuit conduction state in Mode 4.
Figure 11. Circuit conduction state in Mode 4.
Electronics 14 03335 g011
Figure 12. Circuit conduction state in Mode 5.
Figure 12. Circuit conduction state in Mode 5.
Electronics 14 03335 g012
Figure 13. Circuit conduction state in Mode 6.
Figure 13. Circuit conduction state in Mode 6.
Electronics 14 03335 g013
Figure 14. Circuit conduction state in Mode 7.
Figure 14. Circuit conduction state in Mode 7.
Electronics 14 03335 g014
Figure 15. Circuit conduction in Mode 8.
Figure 15. Circuit conduction in Mode 8.
Electronics 14 03335 g015
Figure 16. Circuit conduction state in Mode 9.
Figure 16. Circuit conduction state in Mode 9.
Electronics 14 03335 g016
Figure 17. The relationship curve between duty cycle D and function D 2 1 D 2 + N 2 .
Figure 17. The relationship curve between duty cycle D and function D 2 1 D 2 + N 2 .
Electronics 14 03335 g017
Figure 18. The waveforms of the main switch’s control signal duty cycle, input voltage, and output voltage when the converter operates under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 18. The waveforms of the main switch’s control signal duty cycle, input voltage, and output voltage when the converter operates under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g018
Figure 19. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for main switch S under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 19. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for main switch S under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g019
Figure 20. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for auxiliary switch Sr of the converter when operating under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 20. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for auxiliary switch Sr of the converter when operating under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g020
Figure 21. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for main switch S under light load (p = 100 W).
Figure 21. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for main switch S under light load (p = 100 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g021
Figure 22. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for auxiliary switch Sr of the converter under light load (p = 100 W).
Figure 22. Simulation waveforms of the electrical quantities for auxiliary switch Sr of the converter under light load (p = 100 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g022
Figure 23. The physical layout of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter circuit.
Figure 23. The physical layout of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter circuit.
Electronics 14 03335 g023
Figure 24. Test platform for the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
Figure 24. Test platform for the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g024
Figure 25. The waveform of the trigger signal, input voltage, and output voltage of main switch S when the converter operates under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 25. The waveform of the trigger signal, input voltage, and output voltage of main switch S when the converter operates under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g025
Figure 26. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of main switch S under light load (p = 100 W).
Figure 26. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of main switch S under light load (p = 100 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g026
Figure 27. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of auxiliary switch Sr under full load (p = 100 W).
Figure 27. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of auxiliary switch Sr under full load (p = 100 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g027
Figure 28. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of main switch S under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 28. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of main switch S under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g028
Figure 29. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of auxiliary switch Sr under full load (p = 340 W).
Figure 29. The waveform of the trigger signal, voltage, and current of auxiliary switch Sr under full load (p = 340 W).
Electronics 14 03335 g029
Figure 30. A comparison of the efficiency between the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter and the hard-switching converter.
Figure 30. A comparison of the efficiency between the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter and the hard-switching converter.
Electronics 14 03335 g030
Table 1. Relationship between voltage gain and duty cycle for the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Table 1. Relationship between voltage gain and duty cycle for the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Turns RatioN = 2N = 3N = 4N = 5N = 6
Duty
Cycle
D = 0.1G = 4.4G = 5.6G = 6.7G = 7.8G = 8.9
D = 0.2G = 5G = 6.3G = 7.5G = 8.8G = 10
D = 0.3G = 5.7G = 7.1G = 8.6G = 10G = 11.4
D = 0.4G = 6.7G = 8.3G = 10G = 11.7G = 13.3
D = 0.5G = 8G = 10G = 12G = 14G = 16
D = 0.6G = 10G = 12.5G = 15G = 17.5G = 20
D = 0.7G = 13.3G = 16.7G = 20G = 23.3G = 26.7
D = 0.8G = 20G = 25G = 30G = 35G = 40
Table 2. Component specifications of the high-voltage ratio soft-switching converter adopted.
Table 2. Component specifications of the high-voltage ratio soft-switching converter adopted.
Converter
Topology
Converter
in [4]
Converter
in [5]
Converter
in [6]
Converter
in [12]
Proposed
Converter
Voltage Gain 2 N + 2 N D 1 D 2 + N 1 D 2 + N 1 D 2 N + 2 N D 1 D 2 + N 1 D
Voltage Stress on
MOSFETs
V O 2 N + 2 N D V O 2 + N V O 2 + N V O N V i 1 + 2 N V i 1 D
MOSFETs24222
Diodes30233
Inductors11222
Capacitors44433
Table 3. Parameter specifications of the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
Table 3. Parameter specifications of the high-voltage boost ratio hard-switching converter.
ParameterValue
Input Voltage Vi72 V ± 10%
Output Voltage Vo430 V
Output Power Po340 W
Switching Frequency f25 kHz
Turns Ratio of Coupling Inductor N2
Table 4. Component specifications of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
Table 4. Component specifications of the high-voltage boost ratio soft-switching converter.
ComponentSpecifications
Coupled Inductor L1127 μH
Resonant Inductor Lr18 μH
Main Switch SMOSFET-TK49N65W (650 V/49 A)
Auxiliary Switch SrMOSFET-TK49N65W (650 V/49 A)
Fast Diodes
(Do, D1, D2)
IQBD30E60A1 (600 V/30 A)
Filtering Capacitor Co340 μF/900 V
Resonant Capacitor C10.33 μF/400 V
Energy Storage Capacitor C20.33 μF/600 V
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chao, K.-H.; Bau, T.-T.-T. Design and Implementation of Novel DC-DC Converter with Step-Up Ratio and Soft-Switching Technology. Electronics 2025, 14, 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163335

AMA Style

Chao K-H, Bau T-T-T. Design and Implementation of Novel DC-DC Converter with Step-Up Ratio and Soft-Switching Technology. Electronics. 2025; 14(16):3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chao, Kuei-Hsiang, and Thi-Thanh-Truc Bau. 2025. "Design and Implementation of Novel DC-DC Converter with Step-Up Ratio and Soft-Switching Technology" Electronics 14, no. 16: 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163335

APA Style

Chao, K.-H., & Bau, T.-T.-T. (2025). Design and Implementation of Novel DC-DC Converter with Step-Up Ratio and Soft-Switching Technology. Electronics, 14(16), 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop