Next Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Learning-Based Disturbance Observer for Pulsed Superconducting Cavity Field Control
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostics and Fault Tolerance in DC–DC Converters and Related Industrial Electronics Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Encrypted Watermarking Algorithm for Medical Images Based on DCT and Improved DarkNet53
Previous Article in Special Issue
Open-Circuit Switch Fault Diagnosis and Accommodation of a Three-Level Interleaved Buck Converter for Electrolyzer Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

GaN and SiC Device Characterization by a Dedicated Embedded Measurement System

Electronics 2023, 12(7), 1555; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071555
by Alberto Vella 1, Giuseppe Galioto 1, Gianpaolo Vitale 2,*, Giuseppe Lullo 1 and Giuseppe Costantino Giaconia 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(7), 1555; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071555
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 23 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript presents a comparison of the main parameters of GaN and SiC devices, which were measured using a dedicated and low-cost embedded system designed for this purpose and employing a STM32 microcontroller. There are a few typos, such as line 95: “cascode structure shown in Figure 7.” Once corrected, the manuscript should be published as it is. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

In the presented article the authors report a development of a microcontroller-based measurement system for power switching devices characterization. Measurements of threshold voltage, on-resistance and input capacitance have been conducted for GaN enhancement-mode HEMT, GaN Cascode HEMT, and SiC MOSFET devices. Below are the points that should be addressed to improve the quality of the article:

1) It will be useful to add more information about the tested devices. The device characteristics depend on geometric dimensions and fabrication technology. It will be also useful to compare the measured characteristics with existing literature data.

2) Description of the error analysis on the page 10 is unclear. Does the equation 6 express the uncertainty of a function of several variables? What is the meaning of the index i in the equation 7? Is a square root sign missing in the equation 7? What is the difference between the measured mean values of the considered quantities for the different measuring systems?

3) Copyright permission may be need for the figures 1 and 2, which are taken from the refs 11 and 12.

4) Page 1, line 34. The abbreviation "EMI" appears without definition.

5) Page 3, line 95. There is a misprint in the figure number.

6) In the figures 8,9 10a and 11 the font size for axis labels is very small.

7) Are there different voltage scales for switching gate and drain voltages in the figure 9?

8) In the figure 10b there is a misprint in the label "Gate Voltage".

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop