Next Article in Journal
A Synthesis of Pulse Influenza Vaccination Policies Using an Efficient Controlled Elitism Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (CENSGA)
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimating the Value of Airport Access Time in Developing Countries with a Case Study of Nanjing, China
Previous Article in Journal
Holding on to Compliance While Adopting DevSecOps: An SLR
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fast L2 Calibration for Inexact Highway Traffic Flow Systems

Electronics 2022, 11(22), 3710; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223710
by Jingru Huang 1, Yan Wang 1,* and Mei Han 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Electronics 2022, 11(22), 3710; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223710
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 12 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper proposes a fast L 2 calibration framework for an inexact traffic flow model, Greenshields. The topic is interesting, and the paper is well-written. I have some questions about the paper, please see the following comments.

1. What are x_i and y_i in equation 2?

2. What is k in equation 4?

3. Page 7, line 206, typo: “table 2”.

4. Is the speed in figure 3 the average of the whole loop of M25?

5. From the results shown in figure 2, LS seems to be very efficient, which could make it real-time applicable (maybe to solve the periodicity problem). Is there any way that L2’s speed can be further improved?

Author Response

Dear Editor:

Please see the attachment.

Special thanks to you for your good comments!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting study to develop a calibration framework for the inexact traffic flow system. With this approach the computational time reduces with accurate results. Below are some of my suggestions to improve the paper:

1. Ln 53: needs more background and literature about the L2 calibration method by adding other studies referring the benefits of the method.

2. Ln 189: the busiest motorway in the UK sentence should be supported with numbers or references

3. Ln 199: Figure 2 does not have the locations of loop detectors

4. Ln 201: Not both figures highlight the density and vehicle speed correlation, it is only Figure 3.

5. Ln 201: what authors meant by physical observations? did they collect data in the field?

6. Figure 2: needs to add loop detectors, scale, north arrow and with the loop detectors a legend.

7. Ln 206: needs to be Table 1

8. the comparison of the models need to be expanded. It would be better to show how accurate the findings of the new approach.

Author Response

Dear Editor:

Please see the attachment.

Special thanks to you for your good comments!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop