Next Article in Journal
High Dynamic Range Photocurrent Sensory Circuit with a Multi-Transistor Background Light Cancellation Loop for Photoplethysmography Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Design and Optimization of Microwave Sensor for the Non-Contact Measurement of Pure Dielectric Materials
Previous Article in Journal
No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Based on Benford’s Law and Perceptual Features
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Optimization Algorithm Based on the Fungi Kingdom Expansion Behavior for Antenna Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of Low-Profile Single- and Dual-Band Antennas for IoT Applications

by
Wazie M. Abdulkawi
*,
Abdel Fattah A. Sheta
,
Ibrahim Elshafiey
and
Majeed A. Alkanhal
Department of Electrical Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2021, 10(22), 2766; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222766
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 9 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RF/Microwave Circuits for 5G and Beyond)

Abstract

:
This paper presents novel low-cost single- and dual-band microstrip patch antennas. The proposed antennas are realized on a square microstrip patch etched symmetrically with four slots. The antenna is designed to have low cost and reduced size to use in Internet of things (IoT) applications. The antennas provide a reconfigurable architecture that allows operation in different wireless communication bands. The proposed structure can be adjusted to operate either in single band or in dual-band operation. Two prototypes are implemented and evaluated. The first structure works at a single resonance frequency (f1 = 2.4 GHz); however, the second configuration works at two resonance frequencies (f1 = 2.4 GHz and f2 = 2.8 GHz) within the same size. These antennas use a low-cost FR-4 dielectric substrate. The 2.4 GHz is allotted for the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band, and the 2.8 GHz is allocated to verify the concept and can be adjusted to meet the user’s requirements. The measurement of the fabricated antennas closely matches the simulated results.

1. Introduction

Lately, technology growth has been increasing rapidly. Most things in the world and human life will be affected by the Internet. Therefore, the Internet of things (IoT) received extensive consideration in observing and sensing applications [1,2]. The IoT consists of the observation region for sensing data, network region for transmitting data, and application region for connecting the objects and the cloud network. In the IoT, numeral devices, sensors, equipment, and things communicate with others through the cloud network [3]. Many antenna configuration types for IoT applications have been presented in recent years [4,5,6].
Single-band antennas can be used in some general equipment. However, modern systems need multi-functionally and smart antennas, which demonstrate higher efficiency and are compact. As technology rapidly grows, modern wireless systems (IoT devices) exhibit various functions and require operation at more than one frequency without increasing the antenna size [7,8,9,10]. In the literature, different shapes of the single-band and multi-band monopole antennas have been developed, such as H-shaped [11], circular-shaped [12], U-shaped open stub [13], M-shaped open stub [14], L-shape with coupled branch strip [9], L-shaped stub folded into U-shaped [4], D-shaped [15], U-shaped with rectangular patch inside [16], square spiral loop [17], tapered rectangular patch antenna [5], and symmetric bow-tie circular patch antenna [18]. Dual-band or multi-band operations can be obtained by etching some slots either in the radiating elements [3,18,19,20,21,22], in the ground plane of the antennas [23,24,25,26], or both [9,27,28]. A square microstrip patch etched with four symmetrical slots [29,30,31,32,33] has been proposed for nondegenerate dual-mode filter applications.
Table 1 shows the performance comparison for previously published single-, dual-, and multi-band antennas. In this table, three of the proposed structures with good performance are included.
This study proposes a slotted square patch antenna for IoT applications. The antenna is designed to have low cost and reduced size to allow use in IoT applications. The antenna provides a reconfigurable architecture that allows operation in receive or transmit modes at the specified frequency. In addition, the antenna can be used in a full-duplex system transmitting and receiving at different frequencies. This study can reduce the interference with other nodes in the IoT network. The proposed antenna can operate at dual resonant frequencies. Two prototypes are designed and fabricated on low-cost FR-4 substrate (εr = 4.3, tan σ = 0.025, and h = 1.6 mm). The first configuration works at a single resonance frequency (f1 = 2.4 GHz); however, the second configuration was developed to work at two resonance frequencies (f1 = 2.4 GHz and f2 = 2.8 GHz) within the same size. The two prototypes are fabricated, and the results are validated. The measured results correlate well with the simulated one.
The study is scheduled as follows. The non-slotted and slotted square patch antennas are discussed in Section 2 and Section 3, respectively. In Section 4, the single-band antenna is designed and explained. The dual-band antenna is discussed in Section 5. In Section 6, the bandwidth improvement is discussed. Section 7 displays the simulated and measured results for both antennas. The conclusion and discussions are presented in Section 8.

2. Non-Slotted Square Patch

The square patch resonator can be considered as a square cavity with magnetic walls. The field inside the square cavity matches those of TM mn 0 z modes [37]. The consequential modes of the square patch type ( TM mn 0 z ) can be calculated using the same method as described in [29]. The resonance frequencies of the resultant modes for the non-slotted square patch can be obtained using [38]:
f m ,   n = 150 α ε e f f m 2 + n 2   GHz ,
where m and n are the nonnegative integer numbers and the effective relative permittivity ( ε eff ) is given using
ε e f f = { ε e f f ( w )                                                                     i f   m = 0   ε e f f ( w )                                                                     i f   n = 0     ε 2 e f f ( w ) ε r                                                                   o t h e r w i s e
ε e f f ( w ) = 1 2 ( ε r + 1 + ( ε r 1 ) ( 1 + 10 h w ) )
where w is the square width in mm, and α is the effective width of the square, given as:
α = w + 2 | Δ w |   mm
Δ w = 0.412 h ε e f f ( w ) + ( 0.3 w h ) + 0.264 ε e f f ( w ) ( 0.258 w h ) + 0.8 ,
where h is the substrate thickness in mm.
The performance of a microstrip antenna is affected by fringing fields. The strength of the fringing field is mainly dependent on the patch’s dimensions and the substrate’s height. Due to the fringing field, the physical dimensions of the square patch appear smaller than its effective electrical dimensions [39]. Because of the fringing field, the effective width (α) increased by 2∆w.
In our design, the 20 mm long non-slotted square patch is designed on the top of the low-cost FR-4 substrate with relative permittivity (εr = 4.3) and thickness of h = 1.6 mm. Here, the resonance frequencies of the first two fundamental modes (degenerate modes), TM100 and TM010, are equal (f100 = f010 = 2.805 GHz). For the TM110 mode, the resonance frequency is f110 = 3.966 GHz. Modes’ resonance frequencies depend on the current distribution of each mode. As an example, the current parallel to the X-direction excites only the TM100 mode, the current parallel to Y-direction excites only the TM010 mode, and the current parallel to the diagonal excites the three modes. The feeding mechanism mainly determines the current in the patch. Therefore, appropriate feeding can control the excited modes and thus the resonance frequencies of the patch. The symmetric feed lines are used to excite the single dominant mode; however, asymmetrical feed lines are used to excite the two degenerate modes [29]. In addition to that, differential excitation is used to excite the modes, such as the TM10 and TM30 modes for rectangular patch [40,41], and TM10 and TM11 modes for an equilateral triangular microstrip patch antenna [42].

3. Slotted Square Patch

Figure 1 illustrates the geometry of the proposed slotted square patch antenna. The main building block of the proposed antenna is a microstrip square patch with length L. The square patch is etched with four symmetrical slots along X- and Y-axes, as shown in the figure. All slots have the same length (LS) and width (WS).
For the slotted square patch in Figure 1, the vertical slots (along the Y-axis) cut the current parallel to the X-axis and increase the effective length of the TM100 mode and decrease its resonance frequency. Similarly, the horizontal slots cut the contemporary parallel to the Y-axis and increase the effective length of the TM010 mode that reduces its resonance frequency. For symmetrical slots, both the TM100 and TM010 are affected simultaneously in the same manner, and therefore they have the same resonance frequency denoted f1. The resonance frequencies of these two modes decrease as the lengths of the slots Ls increase. These two modes can be excited simultaneously, or only one of them can be excited according to the feeding mechanism. The vertical and horizontal slots cut the current of the TM110 mode, and thus, its resonance frequency, denoted as f2, decreases faster with the lengths of the slots Ls. The slots’ resultant modes can be considered distorted types of those described in the above section. The effect of the length of the slot Ls and width Ws on the resonance frequencies of the modes TM100, TM010, and TM110, is studied using the patch of side L = 20 mm on low-cost FR-4 substrate with εr = 4.3, thickness h = 1.6 mm, and loss tangent of 0.025. The resonance frequencies f1 and f2 generated by computer simulation technology (CST) simulators using the same technique presented in [29] are shown in Figure 2. The resonance frequencies f1 and f2 decrease as the slots’ Ls lengths increase, but f2 decreases faster since it is affected by both vertical and horizontal slots. It has to be shown that these frequencies are also affected by the width of the slots, and this can be used to add more fine control of the resonance frequencies of each mode, as will be seen in the next section. Figure 2 can be generated for any other patch length L and any other dielectric material.

4. Single-Band Antenna Design

The same patch size of length L = 20 mm is considered in this design. Only one of the two modes, TM100 and TM010, can be excited by the inset feed. The TM100 mode is the only exciting mode if the feeder is positioned along the X-axis as shown in Figure 3. The width of the feed line can be optimized for matching purposes. The single band operation at the specific frequency of this antenna can be adjusted by the appropriate selection of the slot’s length and width. The characteristics of the designed antenna were simulated and calculated using a CST simulator. Figure 4a,b shows the effect of the dimensions of the slot on S11 performance of the antenna. First, Figure 4a shows the result of the LS variation on the resonance frequency f1 when the slot width is 1 mm.
As slot length increases, the resonance frequency f1 decreases. The effect of slots width Ws on the resonance frequency f1 is observed in Figure 4b for slot length = 8.5 mm. The slot’s width can be used for fine adjustment of f1. As slot width increases, the resonance frequency f1 decreases.
The single band antenna design is selected to operate at 2.4 GHz, corresponding to slot length 8.5 mm and width 1 mm. The simulated S11 is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 6 shows the surface current distribution for the developed single-band antenna at 2.4 GHz. It is observed from this figure that the current along the X-axis turned around the vertical slots and increased the effective length of the patch.
In addition, the simulated 2D and 3D radiation patterns at 2.4 GHz are shown in Figure 7. It has been noted that the proposed antenna gain with FR-4 substrate is less than 0 dB, while the directivity = 4.72 dB. This gain reduction is due to the low performance of the low-cost FR-4 substrate. The low gain can be overcome using high-quality dielectric material such as RT Duroid 5880. Another antenna is designed on this substrate with the parameters: εr = 2.2, thickness = 1.6 mm, and loss tangent = 0.0009 to prove the concept. The patch dimensions are optimized to operate at the same 2.4 GHz frequency as: patch length = 24 mm, slot length = 9.4 mm, and slot width = 4.5 mm. A little increase in the patch length is observed due to the decrease in the dielectric constant. The simulated S11 and 2D radiation patterns of this antenna are shown in Figure 8. A significant increase of 3.95 dB in the gain is observed.

5. Dual-Band Antenna Design

Figure 9 shows the dual-mode slotted patch antenna with a coaxial probe feeder. By using this feeding technique, the three modes are excited. The degenerate modes TM100 and TM010 have the same resonance frequency f1, and the TM110 mode has resonance frequency f2. The probe position is selected by trials to match all modes. The dual-frequency of operation can be chosen directly from Figure 2 at a specific slot length when the width of the slot is 1 mm. More analysis can also be added for more design flexibility. Figure 10a,b shows the effect of the dimensions of the slot on S11 performance of the dual-band antenna. Figure 10a shows the effect of Ls for constant Ws = 1 mm, and Figure 10b illustrates the effect of Ws for Ls = 8.5 mm. The slot’s width can be used for fine adjustment of f1 and f2. As the slot width increases, the resonance frequencies f1 and f2 decrease.
The dual-band antenna design is selected to operate at 2.4 GHz and 2.8 GHz, corresponding to slot length 8.5 mm and width 1 mm. Figure 11 shows the simulated S11 of the proposed dual-band antenna.
Figure 12a,b shows the current distribution at these two resonance frequencies, respectively. It is observed from the distributions that the vertical and horizontal slots will affect the resonance frequency of the TM100 and TM010 modes, respectively. However, the TM110 mode has currents in both X and Y directions. Thus, its resonance frequency will be affected by both vertical and horizontal slots. Figure 13 shows the 3D radiation pattern at f1 and f2. The gain of the proposed dual-band antenna with FR-4 substrate is still less than 0 dB. This issue is due to the low performance of the low-cost FR-4 substrate. However, the gain can be improved by using any other high-performance substrate. For example, the simulation of the same dual-band antenna with RT Duroid 5880 substrate shows that the gain can be increased to about 3.45 dB and 3.2 dB at 2.4 GHz and 2.8 GHz, respectively. The radiation patterns of the dual-band slotted square patch antenna are shown in Figure 14. It is observed that a maximum gain of 3.45 dB (at 2.4 GHz) and 3.2 dB (at 2.8 GHz) are in the broadside direction.

6. Bandwidth Enhancement

Conventional microstrip antenna structures are narrowband and their impedance bandwidth is typically 1–2%. However, the bandwidth can be improved by either increasing the substrate thickness, decreasing the dielectric constant (εr) of the substrate [43,44,45,46,47], or both. Other techniques, such as proximity coupled feed [48], aperture-coupled feed [49,50], and L-shaped feeding probe [51,52], can also be used. Some other configurations are suggested, such as slotted antenna [53,54], log-periodic array [55], E-shaped patch [56], circularly polarized patches [57,58], and defected ground method [59,60].
In this paper, bandwidth enhancement is attained for the same proposed structure by increasing the substrate thickness and decreasing the dielectric constant (εr). This arrangement is developed by adding foam substrate between the ground and the upper FR-4 substrate. For the matching purpose, a slot of size 6 × 6 mm2 is etched at the center of the radiating patch. The modified structure is shown in Figure 15. Figure 16 shows the simulated S11 of the modified structure. As observed from this figure, significant bandwidth improvements with –10 dB bandwidth of 220 MHz (2.33–2.54 GHz) are achieved.
The simulation of this structure shows a significant increase in the gain of the antenna. The maximum gain of the antenna with FR-4 is less than 0 dB, while this structure gain is increased to 1.87 dB.

7. Experimental Results

Two prototypes for this antenna are fabricated and evaluated: one for a single-fed single-band antenna and the other for a single-fed dual-band antenna. Figure 17 shows photographs of the fabricated slotted square patch antennas. Both antennas are designed and simulated using CST simulators. However, experimental validation was conducted using the Anritsu Vector Network Analyzer (Anritsu VNA 37369C). Figure 18 shows the simulated and measured S11 for the fabricated single-band antenna. Further, Figure 19 shows the comparison between the simulated and measured S11 for the dual-band antenna. The figures show that the simulation and measured results closely match.
In addition, a time-domain antenna measurement system GEOZONDAS (GEOZONDAS-TDAMS) [61] is used to measure the radiation patterns for the proposed antenna. A measurement setup was established to validate the far-field radiation pattern of the antenna, as shown in Figure 20. The antenna under test was placed on the top of the rotor, as shown in Figure 21. Figure 22 and Figure 23 illustrate the simulated and measured radiation patterns of the single band antenna on xz-plane with FR-4 substrate and RT Duroid 5880 substrate, respectively.

8. Conclusions

This study demonstrated a novel single-fed single-band and dual-band microstrip patch antenna. This antenna was realized on a square microstrip patch etched symmetrically with four slots. The antenna was designed to have low cost and reduced size to allow use in IoT applications. This antenna provides a reconfigurable architecture that allows operation in receive or transmit modes at the specified frequency. In addition, the antenna can be used in a full-duplex system sending and receiving at different frequencies, which can reduce the interference with other nodes in the IoT network. The proposed antenna operates at dual operating frequency bands of 2.4 GHz and 2.8 GHz that have been specified for the upcoming IoT technology. Two prototypes were fabricated with low-cost FR-4 substrate and tested. The first antenna works at a single resonance frequency (f1 = 2.4 GHz); however, the second structure works at two resonance frequencies (f1 = 2.4 GHz and f2 = 2.8 GHz) within the same size. The 2.4 GHz is allotted for the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band, and the 2.8 GHz is allocated to verify the concept and can be adjusted to meet the user’s requirements. The results were successfully demonstrated regarding return loss, radiation, and gain. The maximum gain achieved by the dual-band antenna is 3.45 dB and 3.2 dB at 2.4 GHz and 2.8 GHz, respectively. The measurement of the fabricated antennas closely matched the simulated results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.A.S. and M.A.A.; methodology, W.M.A., A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; software, W.M.A.; validation, W.M.A.; formal analysis, W.M.A., A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; investigation, A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; resources, A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; data curation, W.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M.A.; writing—review and editing, W.M.A., A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; visualization, W.M.A. and A.F.A.S.; supervision, A.F.A.S., I.E. and M.A.A.; project administration, A.F.A.S.; funding acquisition, A.F.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology, and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Award Number (15-ELE5017-02).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, M.; Yang, L.; Shi, Y. A Dual-port Microstrip Rectenna for Wireless Energy Harvest at LTE Band. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 126, 153451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, N.; Khanna, R. A compact multi-band multi-input multi-output antenna for 4G/5G and IoT devices using theory of characteristic modes. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goswami, P.K.; Goswami, G. Truncated T parasite staircase fractal U-slot antenna for multiple advance internet of things applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2020, 62, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mao, Y.; Guo, S.; Chen, M. Compact dual-band monopole antenna with defected ground plane for Internet of things. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2018, 12, 1332–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jha, K.R.; Bukhari, B.; Singh, C.; Mishra, G.; Sharma, S.K. Compact Planar Multistandard MIMO Antenna for IoT Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 3327–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.; Xing, Y. Design of Low-profile Dual-band Antenna for IoT Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering (EITCE), Xiamen, China, 18–20 October 2019; pp. 1805–1809. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, S.; Dong, D.; Liao, Z.; Cai, Q.; Liu, G. Compact wideband and dual-band antenna for TD-LTE and WLAN applications. Electron. Lett. 2014, 50, 1111–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, H.; Ren, D.; Choi, J.H. Dual-Band and Polarization-Flexible CRLH Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Resonant Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 1469–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chung, M.-A. A miniaturized triple band monopole antenna with a coupled branch strip for bandwidth enhancement for IoT applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2018, 60, 2336–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdulkawi, W.; Malik, W.; Rehman, S.; Aziz, A.; Sheta, A.; Alkanhal, M. Design of a Compact Dual-Band MIMO Antenna System with High-Diversity Gain Performance in Both Frequency Bands. Micromachines 2021, 12, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abdulkawi, W.M.; Sheta, A.-F.A.; Malik, W.A.; Rehman, S.U.; Alkanhal, M.S. RF MEMS Switches Enabled H-Shaped Beam Reconfigurable Antenna. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2019, 34, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abdulkawi, W.M.; Malik, W.A.; Sheta, A.F.A.; Alkanhal, M.A. A compact dual circular patch pattern reconfigurable antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2018, 60, 2762–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, J.N.; Kim, J.H.; Park, J.K.; Kim, J.S. Design of dual-band antenna with U-shaped open stub for WLAN/UWB applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2009, 51, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, S.Y.; Park, J.K.; Kim, J.S. Dual-band antenna design using M-shaped open stub. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2011, 53, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Ping, Y.; Han, L.; Zhang, W. Design of a Dual-band Monopole Antenna for WLAN Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 Computing, Communications and IoT Applications (ComComAp), Shenzhen, China, 26–28 October 2019; pp. 167–169. [Google Scholar]
  16. Eltresy, N.; Elsheakh, D.N.; Abdallah, E.A.; Elhennawy, H.M. Multi band dual linearly polarized 2 × 2 antenna array for powering sensors in IoT systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Internet of Things (GCIoT), Alexandria, Egypt, 5–7 December 2018; pp. 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Romputtal, A.; Phongcharoenpanich, C. IoT-Linked Integrated NFC and Dual Band UHF/2.45 GHz RFID Reader Antenna Scheme. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 177832–177843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Darimireddy, N.K.; Reddy, R.R.; Prasad, A.M. Asymmetric and symmetric modified bow-tie slotted circular patch antennas for circular polarization. ETRI J. 2018, 40, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.-Y.; Jiao, Y.-C.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, F.; Liao, Z.-L.; Tian, Y. Dual-Band Dual-Sense Circularly Polarized Slot Antenna With a C-Shaped Grounded Strip. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 915–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Zhang, G.-X.; Yin, Y.; Wu, J. Design of a Dual-Band High-Gain Antenna Array for WLAN and WiMAX Base Station. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 1721–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, Z.; Yin, Y. Differentially Fed, Dual-Band Dual-Polarized Filtering Antenna with High Selectivity for 5G Sub-6 GHz Base Station Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 3231–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Darimireddy, N.K.; Reddy, R.R.; Prasad, A.M. Asymmetric triangular semi-elliptic Slotted Patch antennas for wireless applications. Radioengineering 2018, 27, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H.; Liu, S.-F.; Zhang, L.; Li, P.; Chen, L.; Shi, X.-W. Compact wideband and dual-band antenna with directional patterns. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2015, 57, 2742–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhou, L. A Compact Triple-Band Printed Monopole Antenna for WLAN/WiMAX Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1853–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.-S.; Yang, C.-K.; Lin, G.-Q. Compact design of printed antenna with a ground slot for USB applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 26–29 July 2016; pp. 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saxena, S.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Dwari, S.; Kumar, S.; Tiwari, R. A compact microstrip fed dual polarised multiband antenna for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax applications. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017, 72, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tan, M.-T.; Wang, B.-Z. A Compact Dual-Band Dual-Polarized Loop-Slot Planar Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 1742–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhuo, L.; Han, H.; Shen, X.; Zhao, H. A U-shaped wide-slot dual-band broadband NB-IoT antenna with a rectangular tuning stub. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chongqing, China, 12–14 June 2020; Volume 1, pp. 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheta, A.; Dib, N.; Mohra, A. Investigation of new nondegenerate dual-mode microstrip patch filter. IEE Proc. Microw. Antennas Propag. 2006, 153, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Alkanhal, M.; Sheta, A.F. A novel dual-band reconfigurable square-ring microstrip antenna. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2007, 70, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sheta, A.F. A small size dual-mode patch filter. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2008, 28, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sheta, A.F.; Al-Eshaikh, M.A. A New Small Size Non-degenerate Dual-mode Patch Filter. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2011, 25, 1504–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Yasir, Y.I.A.; Alkhafaji, M.K.; Alhamadani, H.A.; Parchin, N.O.; Elfergani, I.; Saleh, A.L.; Rodriguez, J.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A. A New and Compact Wide-Band Microstrip Filter-Antenna Design for 2.4 GHz ISM Band and 4G Applications. Electronics 2020, 9, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Islam, M.S.; Ullah, A.; Beng, G.K.; Amin, N.; Misran, N. A Modified Meander Line Microstrip Patch Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth for 2.4 GHz ISM-Band Internet of Things (IoT) Applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 127850–127861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saghati, A.P.; Azarmanesh, M.; Zaker, R. A Novel Switchable Single- and Multifrequency Triple-Slot Antenna for 2.4-GHz Bluetooth, 3.5-GHz WiMax, and 5.8-GHz WLAN. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2010, 9, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kulkarni, J. Multi-band printed monopole antenna conforming bandwidth requirement of GSM/WLAN/WiMAX standards. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2020, 91, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mansour, R. Design of superconductive multiplexers using single-mode and dual-mode filters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1994, 42, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, Z.; Gong, K.; Fu, J.; Gao, B. Analysis of microstrip fractal patch antenna for multi-band communication [by FDTD]. Electron. Lett. 2001, 37, 805–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elrashidi, A.; Elleithy, K.; Bajwa, H. Performance Analysis of a Microstrip Printed Antenna Conformed on Cylindrical Body at Resonance Frequency 4.6GHz for TM01 Mode. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2012, 10, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, N.-W.; Zhu, L.; Choi, W.-W.; Zhang, J.-D. A Novel Differential-Fed Patch Antenna on Stepped-Impedance Resonator with Enhanced Bandwidth under Dual-Resonance. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 4618–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, N.-W.; Zhu, L.; Choi, W.-W. A Differential-Fed Microstrip Patch Antenna with Bandwidth Enhancement under Operation of TM10and TM30Modes. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 1607–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, L. Bandwidth Enhancement of a Differential-Fed Equilateral Triangular Patch Antenna via Loading of Shorting Posts. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 65, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Parizi, S.A.R. Bandwidth Enhancement Techniques. In Trends in Research on Microstrip Antennas; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kumar, A.; Gupta, N.; Gautam, P.C. Gain and Bandwidth Enhancement Techniques in Microstrip Patch Antennas—A Review. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2016, 148, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Elsagheer, R.M. Study on bandwidth enhancement techniques of microstrip antenna. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2016, 3, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Waterhouse, R. Microstrip Patch Antennas: A Designer’s Guide; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kumar, G.; Ray, K.P. Broadband Microstrip Antennas; Artech House: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kushwaha, R.K.; Karuppanan, P. Proximity-coupled high gain graphene patch antenna using holey dielectric superstrate for terahertz applications. Optik 2021, 240, 166793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Swetha, R.; Anjaneyulu, L. Novel Design and Characterization of Wide Band Hook Shaped Aperture Coupled Circularly Polarized Antenna for 5G Application. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2021, 113, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosado-Sanz, J.; Jarabo-Amores, M.; Mata-Moya, D.; Gómez-Del-Hoyo, P.; Del-Rey-Maestre, N. Broadband modified-circle-shape patch antenna with H-aperture feeding for a passive radar array. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 106445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, J.; Luk, K.-M. A Circularly Polarized Water Patch Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 926–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lin, W.; Wong, H. Wideband Circular-Polarization Reconfigurable Antenna with L-Shaped Feeding Probes. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 2114–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sumithra, P.; Kannadassan, D. Bandwidth Enhancement of Low-Profile Slot Antennas using Theory of Characteristic Modes. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 138, 153868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moussa, K.; Amar, A.; Mabrouk, M.; Mohamed, H. Slotted E-Shaped Meta-Material Decoupling Slab for Densely Packed MIMO Antenna Arrays. Micromachines 2021, 12, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mistry, K.K.; Lazaridis, P.I.; Zaharis, Z.D.; Loh, T.H. Design and Optimization of Compact Printed Log-Periodic Dipole Array Antennas with Extended Low-Frequency Response. Electronics 2021, 10, 2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gatti, R.V.; Rossi, R.; Dionigi, M. Single-Layer Line-Fed Broadband Microstrip Patch Antenna on Thin Substrates. Electronics 2020, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tran, H.H.; Bui, C.D.; Nguyen-Trong, N.; Nguyen, T.K. A Wideband Non-Uniform Metasurface-Based Circularly Polarized Reconfigurable Antenna. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 42325–42332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Elahi, M.; Trinh-Van, S.; Yang, Y.; Lee, K.-Y.; Hwang, K.-C. Compact and High Gain 4 × 4 Circularly Polarized Microstrip Patch Antenna Array for Next Generation Small Satellite. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Cui, W.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, R.; Wang, M.; Fan, C.; Zheng, H.; Li, E. Design of Wideband Antenna Array with Dielectric Lens and Defected Ground Structure. Electronics 2021, 10, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peng, H.; Zhi, R.; Yang, Q.; Cai, J.; Wan, Y.; Liu, G. Design of a MIMO Antenna with High Gain and Enhanced Isolation for WLAN Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Geozandas. Time-Domain Antenna Measurement Systems. Available online: https://geozondas.com/main_page.php?pusl=12 (accessed on 10 October 2021).
Figure 1. The geometry of the proposed slotted square patch (L = 20 mm).
Figure 1. The geometry of the proposed slotted square patch (L = 20 mm).
Electronics 10 02766 g001
Figure 2. Resonance frequencies (f1 and f2) variations with LS at WS = 1 mm.
Figure 2. Resonance frequencies (f1 and f2) variations with LS at WS = 1 mm.
Electronics 10 02766 g002
Figure 3. The slotted antenna with inset fed along the X-axis.
Figure 3. The slotted antenna with inset fed along the X-axis.
Electronics 10 02766 g003
Figure 4. Frequency responses of slotted square patch antenna (single-band) (a) for different LS values, with WS = 1 mm, and (b) for different WS values, with LS = 8.5 mm.
Figure 4. Frequency responses of slotted square patch antenna (single-band) (a) for different LS values, with WS = 1 mm, and (b) for different WS values, with LS = 8.5 mm.
Electronics 10 02766 g004
Figure 5. Simulated return loss (S11) of the single-band slotted square antenna.
Figure 5. Simulated return loss (S11) of the single-band slotted square antenna.
Electronics 10 02766 g005
Figure 6. Current distribution for single-band slotted square patch antenna at 2.4 GHz.
Figure 6. Current distribution for single-band slotted square patch antenna at 2.4 GHz.
Electronics 10 02766 g006
Figure 7. The simulated directivity of the proposed antenna with FR-4 substrate at 2.4 GHz (a) 3D and (b) 2D.
Figure 7. The simulated directivity of the proposed antenna with FR-4 substrate at 2.4 GHz (a) 3D and (b) 2D.
Electronics 10 02766 g007
Figure 8. (a) The simulated results of the proposed antenna with RT-Duroid 5880 substrate at 2.4 GHz (a) S11 response and (b) 2D radiation pattern.
Figure 8. (a) The simulated results of the proposed antenna with RT-Duroid 5880 substrate at 2.4 GHz (a) S11 response and (b) 2D radiation pattern.
Electronics 10 02766 g008
Figure 9. Dual-band antenna geometry.
Figure 9. Dual-band antenna geometry.
Electronics 10 02766 g009
Figure 10. Frequency responses of slotted square patch antenna (dual-band) (a) for different Ls values, with Ws = 0.2 mm, and (b) for different Ws values, with Ls = 8.5 mm.
Figure 10. Frequency responses of slotted square patch antenna (dual-band) (a) for different Ls values, with Ws = 0.2 mm, and (b) for different Ws values, with Ls = 8.5 mm.
Electronics 10 02766 g010
Figure 11. Simulated S11 for slotted patch antenna.
Figure 11. Simulated S11 for slotted patch antenna.
Electronics 10 02766 g011
Figure 12. Current distribution for dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Figure 12. Current distribution for dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Electronics 10 02766 g012
Figure 13. 3D radiation patterns of the dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Figure 13. 3D radiation patterns of the dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Electronics 10 02766 g013
Figure 14. 2D radiation patterns of the dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Figure 14. 2D radiation patterns of the dual-band slotted square patch antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 2.8 GHz.
Electronics 10 02766 g014
Figure 15. The modified single band antenna (a) top view and (b) side view (units: mm).
Figure 15. The modified single band antenna (a) top view and (b) side view (units: mm).
Electronics 10 02766 g015
Figure 16. The simulated S11 of the modified single band antenna.
Figure 16. The simulated S11 of the modified single band antenna.
Electronics 10 02766 g016
Figure 17. Photographs of the slotted square patch antenna in the (a) single-band and (b) dual-band.
Figure 17. Photographs of the slotted square patch antenna in the (a) single-band and (b) dual-band.
Electronics 10 02766 g017
Figure 18. Simulated and measured return loss (S11) of the single-fed single-band slotted square antenna.
Figure 18. Simulated and measured return loss (S11) of the single-fed single-band slotted square antenna.
Electronics 10 02766 g018
Figure 19. Simulated and measured return loss (S11) of the single-fed dual-band slotted square antenna.
Figure 19. Simulated and measured return loss (S11) of the single-fed dual-band slotted square antenna.
Electronics 10 02766 g019
Figure 20. The measurement setup of the antenna radiation pattern.
Figure 20. The measurement setup of the antenna radiation pattern.
Electronics 10 02766 g020
Figure 21. The antenna under test with (a) FR-4 substrate and (b) RT Duroid 5880 substrate.
Figure 21. The antenna under test with (a) FR-4 substrate and (b) RT Duroid 5880 substrate.
Electronics 10 02766 g021
Figure 22. The simulated and measured radiation pattern of the single band antenna (using low-cost FR-4 substrate) at 2.4 GHz on (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.
Figure 22. The simulated and measured radiation pattern of the single band antenna (using low-cost FR-4 substrate) at 2.4 GHz on (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.
Electronics 10 02766 g022
Figure 23. The simulated and measured radiation pattern of the single band antenna (using RT Duroid substrate) at 2.4 GHz on (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.
Figure 23. The simulated and measured radiation pattern of the single band antenna (using RT Duroid substrate) at 2.4 GHz on (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.
Electronics 10 02766 g023
Table 1. Comparison of the proposed antenna with another state-of-the-art.
Table 1. Comparison of the proposed antenna with another state-of-the-art.
Ref.Antenna TypeSubstrateNo. of PortsResonance Frequencies (GHz)Dimensions (mm2)Maximum Gain (dB)Bandwidth (MHz)
[1]Slotted patchFR-421.73 and 2.53 48 × 48−3.8 and 1.930
[4]U-shapedRogers RO400313.514 × 141.42200
[5]Slotted patchFR-450.9, 1, 1.72, 2.18, 5 and 5.5 120 × 650.53, −0.96, 1.97, 3.75, 2.46, and 4.9150
[6]PIFAFR-411.8 and 2.445 × 321.6 and 1.8 50
[11]H-shapedRogers RT588011.872 × 175.540
[12]Slotted circular patchFR-411.824 × 401.9180
[34]Meander lineFR-412.440 × 101.35146
[35]SlottedFR-412.4, 3.5, and 5.8 80 × 802.33, 3.14, and 2.89140
[36]C-shapedFR-411.8, 2.4, and 5209 × 2604.40, 4.75, and 5.25100
[15]MonopoleFR-412.4 and 534 × 262.2 and 2220
This workSlotted squareRogers RT588012.441.5 × 38.53.3918
2.4 and 2.838.5 × 38.53.45 and 3.220
Wideband slotted squareFR-42.436.4 × 36.42.45220
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdulkawi, W.M.; Sheta, A.F.A.; Elshafiey, I.; Alkanhal, M.A. Design of Low-Profile Single- and Dual-Band Antennas for IoT Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222766

AMA Style

Abdulkawi WM, Sheta AFA, Elshafiey I, Alkanhal MA. Design of Low-Profile Single- and Dual-Band Antennas for IoT Applications. Electronics. 2021; 10(22):2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdulkawi, Wazie M., Abdel Fattah A. Sheta, Ibrahim Elshafiey, and Majeed A. Alkanhal. 2021. "Design of Low-Profile Single- and Dual-Band Antennas for IoT Applications" Electronics 10, no. 22: 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222766

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop