Next Article in Journal
Whitening Agents from Reseda luteola L. and Their Chemical Characterization Using Combination of CPC, UPLC-HRMS and NMR
Next Article in Special Issue
Macroalgae-Derived Ingredients for Cosmetic Industry—An Update
Previous Article in Journal
Large Melanosome Complex Is Increased in Keratinocytes of Solar Lentigo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Targeted Secondary Metabolite Profile Study for Deciphering the Cosmeceutical Potential of Red Marine Macro Alga Jania rubens—An LCMS-Based Approach
Article

Castanea sativa Bur: An Undervalued By-Product but a Promising Cosmetic Ingredient

LAQV/REQUIMTE (Rede de Química e Tecnologia), Department of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2017, 4(4), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics4040050
Received: 25 October 2017 / Revised: 17 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 November 2017 / Published: 24 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts in Skin Care Products)
Castanea sativa fruit processing generates high amounts of by-products, mostly bur. Currently, the cosmetic industry has a great interest in natural extracts as antioxidant sources. In the present study, C. sativa bur extract was used as the active ingredient, in different amounts, in topical hydrogels. The formulations were characterized regarding total phenolic and flavonoid contents (TPC and TFC, respectively), antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging capacity and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)) and technological and microbiological properties. The same parameters were evaluated after 30 days of storage at 4 °C (T30/4 °C) and 20 °C (T30/20 °C). At time 0 (T0), the TPC ranged between 0.79 and 9.65 mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g gel, while TFC varied from 0.05 to 1.23 mg of catechin equivalents (CAE)/g gel. Antioxidant activity was high for both assays, with values at T0 ranging between 98.41 and 1013.43 µmol of ferrous sulphate equivalents (FSE)/g gel and varying between 431.96 and 990.84 µg of Trolox equivalents (TE)/g gel for FRAP and DPPH assays, respectively. No formulation exceeded the defined criteria in microbiological counts. All formulations showed similar technological profiles but particular attention should be given to pH. The gel with 50% of extract (F3) was selected as the best one for potential cosmetic applications. View Full-Text
Keywords: Castanea sativa bur; chestnut by-product; antioxidants; skin-oxidative stress; hydrogels Castanea sativa bur; chestnut by-product; antioxidants; skin-oxidative stress; hydrogels
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinto, D.; Braga, N.; Rodrigues, F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Castanea sativa Bur: An Undervalued By-Product but a Promising Cosmetic Ingredient. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics4040050

AMA Style

Pinto D, Braga N, Rodrigues F, Oliveira MBPP. Castanea sativa Bur: An Undervalued By-Product but a Promising Cosmetic Ingredient. Cosmetics. 2017; 4(4):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics4040050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinto, Diana, Nair Braga, Francisca Rodrigues, and M. B.P.P. Oliveira 2017. "Castanea sativa Bur: An Undervalued By-Product but a Promising Cosmetic Ingredient" Cosmetics 4, no. 4: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics4040050

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop