Sustainable Fertilization with Iron-Enriched Montmorillonite and Sanitary Sludge Enhances Germination and Growth of Zea mays L.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection of Samples
2.2. Physicochemical Characterization
2.2.1. Elemental Analysis and X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
2.2.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
2.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)
2.3. Experiment 1
2.3.1. Plant Materials and Germination Test
2.3.2. Germination-Related Traits
2.4. Experiment 2
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Experimental Soils
3.2. Elemental Analysis and X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
3.3. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)


3.4. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
3.5. Experiment 1
3.5.1. Germination Parameters

3.5.2. Radicle and Mesocotyl Elongation

3.6. Experiment 2
3.6.1. Germination Time and Emergence Time of First Leaf
3.6.2. Shoot and Root Growth
3.6.3. Growth Dynamics

3.6.4. Physiological State and Pigment Content
3.7. Principal Component Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Experiment 1
4.2. Experiment 2
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO Statistical Database [Internet]; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023; Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Bangarwa, S.; Dubey, R. Standard heterosis for de-husked cob yield in baby corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 3550–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Lawit, S.; Weers, B.; Sun, J.; Mongar, N.; Van Hemert, J.; Melo, R.; Meng, X.; Rupe, M.; Clapp, J.; et al. Overexpression of zmm28 increases maize grain yield in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23850–23858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egli, D. Yield improvement and yield components: A comparison of corn and soybean. Crop Sci. 2023, 63, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assefa, Y.; Prasad, P.; Carter, P.; Hinds, M.; Bhalla, G.; Schon, R.; Jeschke, M.; Paszkiewicz, S.; Ciampitti, I.A. A new insight into corn yield: Trends from 1987 through 2015. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 2799–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentry, L.; Ruffo, M.; Below, F. Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Killeen, P.; Kiringa, I.; Yeap, T.; Branco, P. Corn grain yield prediction using UAV-based high spatiotemporal resolution imagery, machine learning, and spatial cross-validation. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y.; Li, Q.; Du, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Shi, G.; Wei, M. Analysis of corn yield prediction potential at various growth phases using a process-based model and deep learning. Plants 2023, 12, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, G.; Shuai, Y.; Shao, C.; Peng, X.; Huang, J. County-scale corn yield estimation based on multi-source data in Liaoning province. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, N.; Meng, Q.; Feng, P.; Qu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Liu, D.; Müller, C.; Wang, P. China can be self-sufficient in maize production by 2030 with optimal crop management. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 38355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramburu-Merlos, F.; Tenorio, F.; Mashingaidze, N.; Sananka, A.; Aston, S.; Ojeda, J.; Grassini, P. Adopting yield-improving practices to meet maize demand in Sub-Saharan Africa without cropland expansion. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 48859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, N.; Galindo, F.; Gazola, R.; Dupas, E.; Rosa, P.; Mortinho, E.; Filho, M.C.M.T. Corn yield and phosphorus use efficiency response to phosphorus rates associated with plant growth-promoting bacteria. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.Y.; Zhao, R.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, F. The effect of nutrient deficiencies on the annual yield and root growth of summer corn in a double-cropping system. Plants 2024, 13, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissler, B.; Steiner, G.; Mew, M.C. Clearing the fog on phosphate rock data: Uncertainties, fuzziness, and misunderstandings. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission. 20 Critical Raw Materials: Major Challenge for EU Industry [Internet]; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_14_599 (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Richardson, K.; Steffen, W.; Lucht, W.; Bendtsen, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Donges, J.F.; Drüke, M.; Fetzer, I.; Bala, G.; von Bloh, W.; et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadh2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordell, D.; Drangert, J.O.; White, S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 2009, 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouras, H.; Bouaziz, A.; Choukr-Allah, R.; Hirich, A.; Devkota, K.; Bouazzama, B. Phosphorus fertilization enhances productivity of forage corn (Zea mays L.) irrigated with saline water. Plants 2021, 10, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, M.; Petropoulos, S.; Selim, D.; Elbagory, M.; Othman, M.; Omara, A.; Mohamed, M.H. Plant growth, yield and quality of potato crop in relation to potassium fertilization. Agronomy 2021, 11, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, G.; Lao, Q.; Jin, G.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, F. Increasing eutrophication driven by the increase of phosphate discharge in a subtropical bay in the past 30 years. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1184421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egle, L.; Rechberger, H.; Krampe, J.; Zessner, M. Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater: An integrated comparative technological, environmental and economic assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 522–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Suhaibani, N.; Seleiman, M.F.; El-Hendawy, S.; Abdella, K.; Alotaibi, M.; Alderfasi, A. Integrative effects of treated wastewater and synthetic fertilizers on productivity, energy characteristics, and element uptake of potential energy crops in an arid agro-ecosystem. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmuck, J.; Reno, U.; Regaldo, N.; Romero, N.; Polla, W.; Gagneten, A.M. Current challenges of municipal urban wastewater bioremediation and biorefinery with microalgae: A review. In Biorefinery of Wastewater Treatment: Way to Generate Waste to Value; Shah, M.P., Sarkar, A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2024; ISBN 9780323956710. [Google Scholar]
- Bouzas, A.; Martí, N.; Grau, S.; Barat, R.; Mangin, D.; Pastor, L. Implementation of a global P-recovery system in urban wastewater treatment plants. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmuck, J.; Reno, U.; Márquez, V.E.; Regaldo, L.; Hernández, S.R.; Gagneten, A.M. Chlorella vulgaris-mediated bioremediation and valorization of urban wastewater from a circular economy approach. J. Appl. Phycol. 2025, 37, 1795–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chojnacka, K.; Moustakas, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 295, 122223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mañas, P.; De las Heras, J. Phytotoxicity test applied to sewage sludge using Lactuca sativa L. and Lepidium sativum L. seeds. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, E.R.; Nguyen, N.D.; Celi, L.; Condron, L.M.; Fraser, T.D.; George, T.S.; Mora, M.d.L.L.; Raymond, N.S. Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: An update on current research and future directions. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 25, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Yang, Y.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Gao, B. Recovery of phosphorus from wastewater: A review based on current phosphorous removal technologies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 53, 1148–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lino, A.C.; Buzetti, S.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M.; Galindo, F.S.; Maestrelo, P.R.; Rodrigues, M.A.C. Effect of phosphorus applied as monoammonium phosphate-coated polymers in corn culture under no-tillage system. Cienc. Agrar. 2018, 39, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, K.; Kamboj, E.; Sharma, A.; Dhaka, B.K. Effect of phosphorus application on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): A review. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2023, 35, 1536–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odoom, A.; Ofosu, W. Role of phosphorus in the photosynthetic dark phase biochemical pathways. In Phosphorus in Soils and Plants; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. EPA. Method 6010D (SW-846): Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, Revision 4; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
- APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; Method 4500-P: Phosphorus; APHA: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Lipps, W.C.; Baxter, T.E.; Braun-Howland, E. (Eds.) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th ed.; APHA Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Van Raij, B.; Andrade, J.C.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A. Análise Química para Avaliação da Fertilidade de Solos Tropicais; Instituto Agronômico: Campinas, Brazil, 2001; p. 285.
- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regras para Análise de Sementes; MAPA: Brasília, Brazil, 2009. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/arquivos-publicacoes-insumos/2946_regras_analise__sementes.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maguire, J.D. Speed of germination—Aids in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Sci. 1962, 2, 176–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belo, S.R.S. Avaliação de Fitotoxicidade Através de Lepidium sativum no Âmbito de Processos de Compostagem. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2011. Available online: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/handle/10316/20257 (accessed on 5 May 2026).
- Shafique, I.; Andleeb, S.; Aftab, M.S.; Naeem, F.; Ali, S.; Yahya, S.; Ahmed, F.; Tabasum, T.; Sultan, T.; Shahid, B.; et al. Efficiency of cow dung-based vermicompost on seed germination and plant growth parameters of Tagetes erectus. Heliyon 2021, 7, e05895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- São Bernardo do Campo Climate Data. Available online: https://pt.climate-data.org/america-do-sul/brasil/sao-paulo/sao-bernardo-do-campo-9602/ (accessed on 28 March 2025).
- Yan, J.; Zhu, W.; Wu, D.; Chen, X.; Yang, S.; Xue, Y.; Liu, Y. Mechanisms of aluminum toxicity impacting root growth in Shatian pomelo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caglar, B.; Afsin, B.; Koksal, E.; Tabak, A.; Eren, E. Characterization of Unye bentonite after treatment with sulfuric acid. Quim. Nova 2013, 36, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Yin, S.S.; Zhang, L.D.; Song, X. Manufacture of sustainable fired shale bricks using sewage sludge as raw material. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 095510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azarhomayun, F.; Haji, M.; Kioumarsi, M.; Kheyroddin, A. Combined use of sewage sludge ash and silica fume in concrete. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2023, 17, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arai, Y.; Sparks, D.L. ATR–FTIR spectroscopic investigation on phosphate adsorption mechanisms at the ferrihydrite–water interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 241, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahgat, N.T.; Siddiqui, A.; Wilfert, P.; Korving, L.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C. FePO4·2H2O recovery from acidic phosphate-rich waste streams. Water Res. 2024, 260, 121905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, A.R.B.; Camilotti, F. Risks of heavy metals contamination of soil–plant system by land application of sewage sludge: A review with data from Brazil. In Environmental Risk Assessment of Soil Contamination; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tayyab, M.; Islam, W.; Zhang, H. Promising role of silicon to enhance drought resistance in wheat. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 2932–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharf-Eldin, A.A.; Alwutayd, K.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; El-Betlagi, H.S.; Alharbi, B.M.; Eis, M.A.M.; Alqurashi, M.; Sharaf, M.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Al-Qahtani, S.M.; et al. Response of maize seedlings to silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) under drought stress. Plants 2023, 12, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alghanem, S.M.S.; Alnusaire, T.S.; Al-Balawi, S.M.; Alayafi, A.; Alharbi, B.M.; Abdulmajeed, A.M.; Alrashidi, A.A.; Anazi, H.K.; Alharbi, K.; Soliman, M.H. Potassium silica nanoparticles enhanced growth, yield, and stress tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.) under drought conditions. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 25, 3615–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanizadeh, P.; Mumivand, H.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Maggi, F. Application of Fe2O3 nanoparticles improves the growth, antioxidant power, flavonoid content, and essential oil yield and composition of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1475284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, S.; Patel, A.; Pandey, N.; Raju, A.D.; Singh, M.; Prasad, S.M. Deficiency of essential elements in crop plants. In Sustainable Solutions for Elemental Deficiency and Excess in Crop Plants; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 19–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Moustakas, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Mikula, K.; Loizidou, M. A transition from conventional irrigation to fertigation with reclaimed wastewater: Prospects and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 130, 109959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammeri, R.W.; Yassine, H.; Maroua, O.; Saieffedine, E.; Najla, S.Z.; Abdenaceur, H. Impact of phosphorus biofertilization on arid Tunisian soils irrigated with treated wastewater. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 25, 3040–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, W.; Schmuck, J.; Xavier, G.; Romero, N.; Fadini, P.; Gagneten, A.M. Seed germination and urban wastewater remediation using micro-Fe-modified montmorillonite. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 46769–46779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sichler, T.C.; Montag, D.; Barjenbruch, M.; Mauch, T.; Sommerfeld, T.; Ehm, J.-H.; Adam, C. Variation of the element composition of municipal sewage sludges in the context of new regulations on phosphorus recovery in Germany. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022, 34, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saoude, M.A.; Dabert, P.; Vedrenne, F.; Daumer, M.L. Mechanisms governing the dissolution of phosphorus and iron in sewage sludge by the bioacidification process and its correlation with ion phosphate speciation. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarenga, E.; Ogaard, A.F.; Vrale, L. Effect of aerobic digestion and liming on plant availability of phosphorus in iron- and aluminium-precipitated sewage sludge from primary wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 1743–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, J.B.; Lima, R.S.; Resende, P.R.; Rosa, A.H.; Afonso, A.M.; Morais, L.C. Characterization of phosphorus recovered from sewage sludge ash: A Brazil case study. Resources 2026, 15, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bettiol, W.; Ghini, R. Impacts of sewage sludge in tropical soil: A case study in Brazil. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2011, 2011, 212807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streck, N.E.; Langner, J.A.; Lago, I. Maize leaf development under climate change scenarios. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2010, 45, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Title 40 CFR Part 503—Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
- European Commission. Council Directive 86/278/EEC on the protection of the environment, particularly of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1986, L181, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilizing products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, L170, 1–114. [Google Scholar]
- Pusz, A.; Rogalski, D.; Kamiński, A.; Knosala, P.; Wiśniewska, M. Chelator-Assisted Phytoextraction and Bioenergy Potential of Brassica napus L. and Zea mays L. on Metal-Contaminated Soils. Resources 2026, 15, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Component (mg kg−1) | SC | ST |
| Total Aluminum | 259.3 ± 52.0 | 226.4 ± 45.3 |
| Total Nitrogen | 200.2 ± 30.0 | 367.3 ± 55.1 |
| Total Iron | 41.1 ± 8.2 | 54.7 ± 10.9 |
| Total Phosphorus | 94.5 ± 23.6 | 97.7 ± 24.4 |
| Total Potassium | <50 | 61.9 ± 15.5 |
| Kjeldahl Nitrogen | 185.0 ± 27.8 | 355.7 ± 53.4 |
| Nitrogen as nitrate | 15.2 ± 4.6 | 11.6 ± 3.5 |
| Nitrogen as nitrite | <10 | <10 |
| Component (%) | SC | ST |
| Fixed Solids | 46.7 ± 4.7 | 42.0 ± 4.2 |
| Total Solids | 0.5 ± 0.08 | 1.6 ± 0.24 |
| Volatile Solids | 53.3 ± 5.3 | 58.0 ± 5.8 |
| Parameter | Initial | Post-Liming |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 4.1 ± 0.12 | 6.8 ± 0.20 |
| Organic matter (g L−1) | 21.0 ± 3.2 | 23.0 ± 3.5 |
| Resin-P (mg L−1) | <2 | 7.0 ± 2.8 |
| K (mmol L−1) | 0.7 ± 0.18 | 0.8 ± 0.20 |
| Ca (mmol L−1) | 3.0 ± 0.06 | 51.0 ± 10.2 |
| Mg (mmol L−1) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 34.0 ± 6.8 |
| H+Al (mmol L−1) | 61.0 ± 9.2 | 15.0 ± 2.3 |
| Al (mmol L−1) | 19.4 ± 3.9 | <1.0 |
| SB (mmol L−1) | 4.7 ± 0.66 | 85.8 ± 12.3 |
| CEC (mmol L−1) | 66.0 ± 9.2 | 101 ± 12.5 |
| V% | 7.1 ± 1.4 | 85.0 ± 16.1 |
| M% | 80.0 ± 8.0 | <1.0 |
| Element | Control | SC | ST |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1.79 ± 0.02 | 22.62 ± 0.87 | 20.46 ± 0.65 |
| H | - | 4.25 ±0.07 | 3.91 ± 0.04 |
| N | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 2.97 ±0.06 | 3.29 ± 0.05 |
| MgO | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.06 | 1.44 ± 0.18 |
| Al2O3 | 37.79 ± 0.29 | 23.58 ± 0.58 | 23.23 ± 0.14 |
| SiO2 | 39.58 ± 0.10 | 23.39 ± 0.48 | 24.24 ± 0.21 |
| P2O5 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 6.77 ± 0.17 | 8.28 ± 0.27 |
| SO3 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 4.24 ± 0.07 | 4.34 ± 0.02 |
| K2O | 3.76 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.08 |
| CaO | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 4.99 ± 0.16 | 4.29 ± 0.20 |
| TiO2 | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ± 0.01 |
| Fe2O3 | 13.63 ± 0.06 | 4.39 ± 0.09 | 4.78 ± 0.03 |
| Cl | - | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| ZnO | - | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| MnO | - | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Carvalho, W.A.; Urzedo, A.L.; Romero, N.; Regaldo, L.; Machado, L.F.L.; Gagneten, A.M. Sustainable Fertilization with Iron-Enriched Montmorillonite and Sanitary Sludge Enhances Germination and Growth of Zea mays L. Resources 2026, 15, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15050067
Carvalho WA, Urzedo AL, Romero N, Regaldo L, Machado LFL, Gagneten AM. Sustainable Fertilization with Iron-Enriched Montmorillonite and Sanitary Sludge Enhances Germination and Growth of Zea mays L. Resources. 2026; 15(5):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15050067
Chicago/Turabian StyleCarvalho, Wagner Alves, Alessandro Lamarca Urzedo, Natalí Romero, Luciana Regaldo, Leticia Ferreira Lima Machado, and Ana Maria Gagneten. 2026. "Sustainable Fertilization with Iron-Enriched Montmorillonite and Sanitary Sludge Enhances Germination and Growth of Zea mays L." Resources 15, no. 5: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15050067
APA StyleCarvalho, W. A., Urzedo, A. L., Romero, N., Regaldo, L., Machado, L. F. L., & Gagneten, A. M. (2026). Sustainable Fertilization with Iron-Enriched Montmorillonite and Sanitary Sludge Enhances Germination and Growth of Zea mays L. Resources, 15(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15050067

