Analysis of Modern Challenges and Technological Solutions in Natural Gas Production at Fields with Complex Geological Structure: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Methodology
- Comprehensive analysis of scientific and technical literature. The goal of this stage is to identify the current state of research in the field of unconventional reservoir development. The analysis is based on publications in scientific journals and international conference proceedings, as well as company technical reports and patents. Literature retrieval was conducted using international scientometric databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Lens.org) covering the last 10–15 years. Publications were included if they addressed challenges, influencing factors, or technological solutions related to gas production from structurally complex reservoirs at the pore, layer, or field scales. The selected studies were subsequently subjected to qualitative analysis and synthesis to classify key challenges, identify dominant factors, and generalise approaches to their mitigation, as illustrated in Figure 1. The search was structured around four thematic groups of keywords:
- gas production and recovery (e.g., “gas production”, “gas recovery factor”);
- complex geological structure (e.g., “reservoir heterogeneity”, “tight reservoirs”);
- pressure- and flow-related processes (e.g., “pressure decline”, “interlayer interaction”);
- operational and monitoring aspects (e.g., “well flooding”, “digital twin”).
- Classification of production challenges. The aim is to systematise the main challenges that arise during the development of deposits with complex geological structures. Research methods: literature analysis and synthesis, comparative analysis, and systematisation and generalisation;
- Review of existing systems and technologies. This stage aims to identify existing approaches to solving the challenges identified in the second stage;
- Identifying aspects that require modernisation and promising areas. This stage is characterised by identifying promising areas for future research related to the extraction of deposits with complex geological structures;
- This stage also involves formulating conclusions and recommendations. The goal of this stage is to systematise the research and formulate recommendations on areas and methods for further research.
3. Challenges of Gas Production from Structurally Complex Deposits
3.1. Causes of Uneven Reservoir Pressure Decline and Difficulties in Its Prediction: Reservoir Heterogeneity, Complex Tectonics, and Geomechanical Effects
3.1.1. Studies of Heterogeneity in Reservoir Properties
3.1.2. Modelling of Gas Particle Transport in Reservoirs with Complex Geological Structures
3.1.3. Modelling of Pressure Dynamics in Multilayer Reservoirs
3.1.4. Studies of the Impact of Geomechanical Effects on Reservoir Properties and the Operation of Structurally Complex Reservoirs
3.2. Studies on the Consequences of Reservoir Pressure Decline
3.3. Studies of the Consequences of Uneven Reservoir Pressure Decline: Depression Cones, Premature Well Water Encroachment, and Condensate Formation
3.3.1. Formation of Depression Cones
3.3.2. Studies in the Field of Well Water Encroachment and Condensate Formation Issues
3.4. Conclusions for the Section
4. Existing Approaches to Solving the Challenges of Gas Production from Structurally Complex Deposits
- Injection of reservoir pressure maintenance agents;
- Aquifer isolation methods;
- Intelligent systems enabling remote control of well inflows;
- Combined interlayer production schemes;
- Optimisation of operating modes;
- Implementation and development of automated process control systems and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems.
4.1. Adjustment of Operating Regimes
4.2. Review of Models Used for Forecasting and Optimising Production
4.3. Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods
4.4. Approaches Based on the Injection of Agents into the Reservoir
4.5. Approaches in the Field Development and Infrastructure Design
4.6. Review of Patented Developments
4.7. Conclusions for the Section
5. Unsolved Challenges and Research Gaps
5.1. Field Scale
5.2. Reservoir Scale
5.3. Pore Scale
- The effect of gas slippage in pores;
- Sensitivity of permeability to pressure dynamics;
- High-velocity flows that do not conform to Darcy’s law in a fracture system.
6. Discussion
- Geological conditions (reservoir heterogeneity, changes in permeability, abnormal reservoir pressures);
- Technological factors (complexity of mathematical reservoir models and control processes, large vector dimensions for point impacts over large areas, changes in reservoir parameters over time and control actions, long response times to control actions due to the low transmission rate of hydrodynamic impacts in the reservoir, and errors in wellbore pressure determination).
7. Conclusions
- The main challenges characteristic of gas production from structurally complex fields are related to reservoir pressure decline, reservoir heterogeneity and complex tectonics, depression cones, well flooding and condensate formation, and geomechanical effects;
- Despite the extensive development of the oil and gas industry, there are a significant number of issues and challenges for which optimal solutions have not been found;
- Modern technologies that offer significant advantages in data processing require significant investment for implementation. This requires the development of cost-effective technical solutions;
- The key parameter determining the GRF is the distribution of reservoir pressure during production. One of the most promising directions in this area is the application of distributed parameter systems theory to the implementation of distributed algorithms and adaptive control.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Volkov, P.V.; Zyatikov, P.N.; Malshakov, E.N.; Mazitov, R.F. Application of physico-chemical methods of increasing oil recovery with joint periodic shutdown of injection wells and changing the operating mode at the producing fund in order to involve non-drained oil reserves in operation. Bull. Tomsk. Polytech. Univ. Geo Assets Eng. 2025, 336, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiraslanli, N. The Exploitation Potential and Economic Efficiency of Gas Reserves. Sci. Work. 2025, 19, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa Da Silva, N.V.; Albuquerque Pontes, F.; Santos Da Silva, M.; Cagide Fialho, B.; Eleutério Delesposte, J.; Garcia Borges De Souza, D.; De Oliveira Chaves, L.A.; Cardoso, R. Leveraging FMMEA for Digital Twin Development: A Case Study on Intelligent Completion in Oil and Gas. Sensors 2025, 25, 5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Sheng, J.; Wu, D.; Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; He, Y. A Critical Review of Limited-Entry Liner (LEL) Technology for Unconventional Oil and Gas: A Case Study of Tight Carbonate Reservoirs. Energies 2025, 18, 5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toscano, A.; Bilotti, F.; Asdrubali, F.; Guattari, C.; Evangelisti, L.; Basilicata, C. Recent Trends in the World Gas Market: Economical, Geopolitical and Environmental Aspects. Sustainability 2016, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, Z.; Mahmoud, M.; Abdulraheem, A.; Al-Nakhli, A.; BaTaweel, M. An experimental study to reduce the breakdown pressure of the unconventional carbonate rock by cyclic injection of thermochemical fluids. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 187, 106859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Yu, Y.; Sun, Q. Progress, Challenges, and Strategies for China’s Natural Gas Industry Under Carbon-Neutrality Goals. Processes 2024, 12, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litvinenko, V. The Role of Hydrocarbons in the Global Energy Agenda: The Focus on Liquefied Natural Gas. Resources 2020, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shklyarskiy, Y.; Andreeva, I.; Sutikno, T.; Jopri, M.H. Energy management in hybrid complexes based on wind generation and hydrogen storage. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2024, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhukovskiy, Y.; Tsvetkov, P.; Koshenkova, A.; Skvortsov, I.; Andreeva, I.; Vorobeva, V. A Methodology for Forecasting the KPIs of a Region’s Development: Case of the Russian Arctic. Sustainability 2024, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Zou, C.; Jia, A.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, R.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z. Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhou, D.-H.; Wang, W.-H.; Jiang, T.-X.; Xue, Z.-J. Development of unconventional gas and technologies adopted in China. Energy Geosci. 2020, 1, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tang, X. Unconventional natural gas accumulation system. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2022, 9, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; Pang, X.; Song, Y. The mechanism of unconventional hydrocarbon formation: Hydrocarbon self-sealing and intermolecular forces. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2021, 48, 507–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Cao, Q.; Bai, Y.; Wu, W.; Ma, Y. Quasi-continuous hydrocarbon accumulation: An alternative model for the formation of large tight oil and gas accumulations. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 174, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prishchepa, O.M.; Lutskii, D.S.; Kireev, S.B.; Sinitsa, N.V. Thermodynamic modelling as a basis for forecasting phase states of hydrocarbon fluids at great and super-great depths. J. Min. Inst. 2024, 269, 815–832. [Google Scholar]
- Nefedov, Y.V.; Yashmolkin, A.M.; Vostrikov, N.N. Identification of Facies Zonation Features of Aptian Deposits in Pokur Suite Using Seismic Data, Well Logging, and Core Sedimentological Analysis. Int. J. Eng. 2025, 38, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nefedov, Y.V.; Vostrikov, N.N.; Yashmolkin, A.M. Impact of Tectono-sedimentation Factor on Prospects of Oil and Gas Potential of Sakhalin Offshore of Okhotsk Oil and Gas Province Established through Stochastic Seismic Data Inversion and Constructed Digital Paleotectonic Model. Int. J. Eng. 2025, 38, 1726–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Hou, J.; Sarma, H.; Guo, W.; Liu, Y.; Xie, P.; Dou, L.; Chen, R.; Zhang, Z. Pore throat heterogeneity of different lithofacies and diagenetic effects in gravelly braided river deposits: Implications for understanding the formation process of high-quality reservoirs. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 221, 111309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Qiang, K.; Zhang, B.; Liu, J.; Wei, Q.; Wang, R. Research on Intelligent Production Optimization of Low-Permeability Tight Gas Wells. Symmetry 2025, 17, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olhin, A.; Vishnyakov, A. Pore Structure and Permeability of Tight-Pore Sandstones: Quantitative Test of the Lattice–Boltzmann Method. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlov, D.; Ebadi, M.; Muravleva, E.; Volkhonskiy, D.; Erofeev, A.; Savenkov, E.; Balashov, V.; Belozerov, B.; Krutko, V.; Yakimchuk, I.; et al. Different methods of permeability calculation in digital twins of tight sandstones. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2021, 87, 103750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Lin, L.; Zhai, C.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Deng, X. Impacts of lithologic characteristics and diagenesis on reservoir quality of the 4th member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation tight gas sandstones in the western Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 107, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punanova, S.A. Hydrocarbon accumulations of the Achimov deposits of the northern regions of Western Siberia. E’Kspoziciya Neft’ Gaz 2020, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Xie, Q.; Lobusev, A.V.; Lobusev, M.A.; Liang, X. Overview of Lower Cretaceous Achimov Formation: Physical Properties and Their Distribution Pattern in West Siberian Basin, Russia. Geofluids 2021, 2021, 5560117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, G.; Gao, J.; Liu, J.; Ostadhassan, M. Accumulation and Distribution of Natural Gas Reservoir in Volcanic Active Area: A Case Study of the Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in the Dehui Fault Depression, Songliao Basin, NE China. Geofluids 2021, 2021, e2900224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.; He, X.; Wu, J.; Su, S. Shale Gas Transport in Nanopores: Contribution of Different Transport Mechanisms and Influencing Factors. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 2033–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Dong, C.; Lin, C.; Wu, Y.; Tian, S.; Zhang, X.; Lin, J. Analyzing the effects of multi-scale pore systems on reservoir Properties—A case study on Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin, China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 203, 108609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereponov, D.; Kazaku, V.; Scerbacova, A.; Avdonin, A.; Tarkhov, M.; Rykov, A.; Filippov, I.; Krutko, V.; Maksyutin, A.; Cheremisin, A.; et al. Digital core on a chip: Surfactant flooding in low-permeability reservoir. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 414, 126073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Dong, D.; Zhang, J.; Zou, C.; Tian, C.; Rui, Y.; Liu, D.; Jiao, P. Optimization of key parameters for porosity measurement of shale gas reservoirs. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2021, 8, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Gao, S.; Xiong, W.; Ye, L.; Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Mu, Y.; Niu, W. Physical and Numerical Simulation of Tight Gas Flow at the Microscale. Energies 2023, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Tang, H.; Xiong, Y.; Guo, J.; Shan, B. Laws of gas and water flow and mechanism of reservoir drying in tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2021, 8, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, W.; Yuliang, S.; Wendong, W.; Guanqun, L.; Qi, Z. Simulation on liquid flow in shale nanoporous media based on lattice Boltzmann method. Acta Pet. Sin. 2023, 44, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhi, J. Three-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann simulation of gas-water transport in tight sandstone porous media: Influence of microscopic surface forces. Energy Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 1924–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.; Su, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Li, D. Productivity model with mechanisms of multiple seepage in tight gas reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 209, 109825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, N.; Zuping, X.; Xianshan, L.; Zhijun, L.; Zhonghua, C.; Bocai, J.; Xin, Z.; Huan, T.; Xiaolong, C. Production prediction method of horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs considering threshold pressure gradient and stress sensitivity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 187, 106750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agaie, B.G.; Mbaya, J.H.; Ibrahim, A.; Sani, U. Modelling and simulation of transient flow characteristics in a producing gas well. Sci. World J. 2020, 15, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Nie, R.-S.; Fan, X.; Li, M.; Chen, Z.; Deng, Q.; Lu, C.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Jiang, D.-W.; Zhan, J. Modeling transient flow behavior with the high velocity non-Darcy effect in composite naturally fractured-homogeneous gas reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2021, 96, 104269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Zhang, T.; Jia, C.; Li, X.; Wu, K.; He, M. Numerical simulation on natural gas migration and accumulation in sweet spots of tight reservoir. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 81, 103454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Jia, C.; Song, Y.; Li, X.; Hou, L.; Jiang, L. Dynamic mechanisms of tight gas accumulation and numerical simulation methods: Narrowing the gap between theory and field application. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2023, 8, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bera, A.; Kumar, S.; Foroozesh, J.; Gharavi, A. Multiphysics gas transport in nanoporous unconventional reservoirs: Challenges of mathematical modelling. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2022, 103, 104649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namdari, S.; Baghbanan, A.; Hashemolhosseini, H. Investigation of the effect of the discontinuity direction on fluid flow in porous rock masses on a large-scale using hybrid FVM-DFN and streamline simulation. Rud.-Geološko-Naft. Zb. 2021, 36, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, H.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, G.; Yang, C.; Deng, H.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Song, L.; Cao, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Pore-throat structure characteristics and fluid mobility analysis of tight sandstone reservoirs in Shaximiao Formation, Central Sichuan. Geol. J. 2023, 58, 4243–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Duan, Y.; Wang, K. Productivity Model Study of Water-Bearing Tight Gas Reservoirs Considering Micro- to Nano-Scale Effects. Processes 2024, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhaj, H.; Qaddoura, R.; Ghosh, B.; Saqer, R. Modeling Fluid Flow in Tight Unconventional Reservoirs: Nano Scale Mobility/Trapability Mechanistic Approach! In Proceedings of the SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21–23 October 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Li, J.; Duan, D.; Liu, B.; Shang, X.; Li, W.; Xu, Z.; Du, Z.; Xu, C. Driving Forces of Natural Gas Flow and Gas–Water Distribution Patterns in Tight Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study of NX Gas Field in the Offshore Xihu Depression, East China. Energies 2023, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.E.; Xu, D.; Jo, H.; Landry, C.J.; Prodanović, M.; Pyrcz, M.J. PoreFlow-Net: A 3D convolutional neural network to predict fluid flow through porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 2020, 138, 103539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Yu, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D. Research on Quantitative Evaluation Methods and Influencing Factors of Natural Gas Reservoir Development. Shock. Vib. 2021, 2021, 1684178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alotaibi, M.; Alotaibi, S.; Weijermars, R. Stream and Potential Functions for Transient Flow Simulations in Porous Media with Pressure-Controlled Well Systems. Fluids 2023, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Zhao, P.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Chang, Y.; Wen, L.; Yuan, K.; Du, Y.; et al. Tight Reservoir Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Yongfeng Sub-Sag, Chaiwopu Sag. Processes 2023, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, H.; Yan, L.I.U.; Jianhua, H.E.; Tairan, Y.E.; Hucheng, D.; Ruixue, L.I.; Kesai, L.I.; Jiawei, Z. Evaluation method and engineering application of in−situ stress of deep tight sandstone reservoir in the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Xiaoquan−Fenggu area, western Sichuan. Geol. China 2024, 51, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, D.; Pang, X.; Jiang, F.; Liu, T.; Shao, X.; Huyan, Y. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Upper Paleozoic strata of Linxing area in the Ordos Basin, China. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 75, 103135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Wang, B.-R.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Zhang, L.-H.; Qiao, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.; Guo, J.-J.; Thanh, H.V. Inter-layer interference for multi-layered tight gas reservoir in the absence and presence of movable water. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 1751–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.-W.; Jia, C.-S.; Peng, X.-L.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, S.-Y.; Sun, H.-S.; Zhang, J. Effects of wellbore interference on concurrent gas production from multi-layered tight sands: A case study in eastern Ordos Basin, China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 179, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, X.; Tian, L.; Dong, P.; Wang, C.; Peng, L.; Wang, H. Study on recovery factor and interlayer interference mechanism of multilayer co-production in tight gas reservoir with high heterogeneity and multi-pressure systems. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 210, 109699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oloruntobi, O.; Butt, S. Energy-based formation pressure prediction. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 173, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, J.; Yan, C.; He, Y.; Wang, C. Secondary formation damage of low-pressure layer during commingled production in multilayered tight gas reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerke, K.M.; Korost, D.V.; Karsanina, M.V.; Korost, S.R.; Vasiliev, R.V.; Lavrukhin, E.V.; Gafurova, D.R. Modern approaches to pore space scale digital modeling of core structure and multiphase flow. Georesur. Georesour 2021, 23, 197–213. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Fan, D.; Sheng, G.; Chen, Z.; Su, Y. A review of analytical and semi-analytical fluid flow models for ultra-tight hydrocarbon reservoirs. Fuel 2019, 256, 115737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.-H.; Chen, K.-P.; Jin, Y.; Li, H.-D.; Xie, Q. An approximate analytical solution for transient gas flows in a vertically fractured well of finite fracture conductivity. Pet. Sci. 2022, 19, 3059–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Chen, G.; Lou, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ge, D. A novel productivity evaluation approach based on the morphological analysis and fuzzy mathematics: Insights from the tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Ordos Basin, China. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2020, 10, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Li, S.; Tong, B.; Jiang, L.; Lv, P.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Y. Wettability and capillary behavior in a CO2–oil–solid system under near-miscible conditions: A pore-scale study. Fuel 2024, 364, 131164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Li, C.; Guo, Y. The Variation Law of Fracture Conductivity of Shale Gas Reservoir Fracturing–Flowback Integration. Processes 2024, 12, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daramola, G.O.; Jacks, B.S.; Ajala, O.A.; Akinoso, A.E. AI Applications in Reservoir Management: Optimising Production and Recovery in Oil and Gas Fields. Comput. Sci. IT Res. J. 2024, 5, 972–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, T.; Yan, L.; Fan, T.; Guo, X.; Fan, F.; Zhang, Y. Numerical Simulation Study of Pressure Transfer Based on the Integration of Fracturing, Shut-in and Production in Tight Reservoirs. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, B.; Nie, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, J.; Shayireatehan, R.; Ning, P.; Deng, D.; Cao, Y. Productivity Equation of Fractured Vertical Well with Gas–Water Co-Production in High-Water-Cut Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoir. Processes 2023, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Lu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, F.; Guo, T.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Qiu, L. Concept and key technology of “multi-scale high-density” fracturing technology: A case study of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the western Sichuan Basin. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2023, 10, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Liao, X.; Yu, W. A semianalytical well-testing model of fracture-network horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs with multiple discretely natural fractures. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2020, 7, 567–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorhjie, D.B.; Yusupov, R.; Krutko, V.; Cheremisin, A. Deviation from Darcy Law in Porous Media Due to Reverse Osmosis: Pore-Scale Approach. Energies 2022, 15, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, X.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, L.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Xie, Y.; Liu, L. The characteristics and influencing factors of permeability stress sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 191, 107221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Mei, S.; Tao, Z.; Hou, S. An experimental investigation of gas permeability of a low permeability sandstone under deviatoric loading with loading/unloading cycles. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 2023, 9, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afagwu, C.; Alafnan, S.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Patil, S. Permeability model for shale and ultra-tight gas formations: Critical insights into the impact of dynamic adsorption. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 3302–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afagwu, C.; Abubakar, I.; Kalam, S.; Al-Afnan, S.F.; Awotunde, A.A. Pressure-transient analysis in shale gas reservoirs: A review. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 78, 103319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Jiang, R.; Xu, X.; Sun, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Ma, K.; Jiang, B.; Kang, B.; Chen, G.; Li, C. The Pressure Buildup Well Test Analysis considering Stress Sensitivity Effect for Deepwater Composite Gas Reservoir with High Temperature and Pressure. Geofluids 2021, 2021, e5054246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martyushev, D.A.; Ponomareva, I.N.; Galkin, V.I. Estimation of the reliability of determination of filtering parameters of productive formations using multi-dimensional regression analysis. SOCAR Proc. 2021, 1, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horsfall, O.I.; Akpan, M.J.; George, N.J. Reservoir characterization of GABO field in the niger delta basin using facies and petrophysical analyses. Results Earth Sci. 2024, 2, 100038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idudje, H.; Adewole, S. A Method of Estimating Reservoir Pressure using Drawdown Test Data. In Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Virtual, 11–13 August 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Harmelen, A.; Weijermars, R. Complex analytical solutions for flow in hydraulically fractured hydrocarbon reservoirs with and without natural fractures. Appl. Math. Model. 2018, 56, 137–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, R.; Zuo, L.; Weijermars, R.; Crowdy, D. Applying improved analytical methods for modelling flood displacement fronts in bounded reservoirs (Quitman field, east Texas). J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 166, 1018–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharov, L.A.; Martyushev, D.A.; Ponomareva, I.N. Predicting dynamic formation pressure using artificial intelligence methods. J. Min. Inst. 2022, 253, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zhan, L.; Lu, H. Mechanisms for Overpressure Development in Marine Sediments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Cheng, L.; Wang, X.; Lyu, C.; Cao, R. Pore network modelling of fluid flow in tight formations considering boundary layer effect and media deformation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 180, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, D.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X. On the Development of an Effective Pressure Driving System for Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 2021, 17, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Yue, M.; Kong, D. Study on Pressure Propagation in Tight Oil Reservoirs with Stimulated Reservoir Volume Development. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 2589–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, F.; Bo, L.; Zhang, S.; Sun, Y. Nonlinear flow in low permeability reservoirs: Modelling and experimental verification. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2019, 3, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharavi, A.; Abbas, K.A.; Hassan, M.G.; Haddad, M.; Ghoochaninejad, H.; Alasmar, R.; Al-Saegh, S.; Yousefi, P.; Shigidi, I. Unconventional Reservoir Characterization and Formation Evaluation: A Case Study of a Tight Sandstone Reservoir in West Africa. Energies 2023, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutter, E.; Mecklenburgh, J.; Bashir, Y. Matrix gas flow through “impermeable” rock–shales and tight sandstone. Solid Earth 2022, 13, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, R.-S.; Zhou, H.; Chen, Z.; Guo, J.-C.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, Y.-Y.; He, W.-F. Investigation radii in multi-zone composite reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 182, 106262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirota, D.D. Development of a computer model of unsteady gas filtration taking into account the heterogeneity of the filtration properties of the reservoir. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–29 May 2020; Volume 1, pp. 193–197. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, X.; Tang, S.; Fu, X.; Dong, X.; Li, Z.; Deng, Z.; Meng, Y. A Semianalytical Model for Advanced Description of Pressure Drop Funnel during Coalbed Methane Production. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 32210–32225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Chai, X.; Tian, L. A new dynamic model of supply boundary at low pressure in tight gas reservoir. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Wan, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, M.; Niu, L. Physical simulation on gas percolation in tight sandstones. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2013, 40, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, L.; Qiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y. Calculation Model of Drainage Radius of Single-Layer/Multi-Layer Commingled Gas Production Wells in a Closed Constant-Volume Gas Reservoir and Its Application. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roozshenas, A.A.; Hematpur, H.; Abdollahi, R.; Esfandyari, H. Water Production Problem in Gas Reservoirs: Concepts, Challenges, and Practical Solutions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9075560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Zhong, B.; Yang, X.; Deng, H. Effective water influx control in gas reservoir development: Problems and countermeasures. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2015, 2, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Wang, Z.; Fu, S.; Li, A.; Zhong, J. Research on Transformation of Connate Water to Movable Water in Water-Bearing Tight Gas Reservoirs. Energies 2023, 16, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, T.; Fu, D.; Xiong, L.; Wang, Y. The investigation of microporous structure and fluid distribution mechanism in tight sandstone gas reservoirs: A case study on the second member of Xujiahe gas reservoirs in Yuanba area. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 974655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Chen, S.; Huang, F.; Gao, Y.; Song, T.; Wang, S.; Jia, P.; Liu, C. Micro-occurrence of formation water in tight sandstone gas reservoirs of low hydrocarbon generating intensity: Case study of northern Tianhuan Depression in the Ordos Basin, NW China. J. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2021, 6, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, M.; Xue, B.; Guo, W.; Li, J.; Guan, B. Novel calculation method to predict gas–water two-phase production for the fractured tight-gas horizontal well. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2024, 14, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Meng, F.; Jia, A.; Dong, S.; Yan, H.; Zhang, H.; Tong, G. Production behavior evaluation on multilayer commingled stress-sensitive carbonate gas reservoir. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2021, 39, 86–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sleptsov, A.; Medvedeva, L.; Marinina, O.; Savenok, O. Feasibility Study on the Applicability of Intelligent Well Completion. Processes 2024, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.-Z.; Ju, B.; Zhang, M.-L.; Guo, P.; Du, J.-F. Development strategies of a gas condensate reservoir with a large gas cap, thin oil rim, strong bottom water, and natural barriers. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, S1995822625002250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Bi, C.; Fu, C.; Xu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tong, L.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Q. Controls on the Hydrocarbon Production in Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs of Rift Lake Basins. Processes 2025, 13, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, P.K.P.; Carvalho, M.S. Pore-scale analysis of gas injection in gas-condensate reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 212, 110189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajbhiye, R. Impact of gas composition, pressure, and temperature on interfacial Tension dynamics in CO2-Enhanced oil recovery. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Kang, Y.; Wang, D.; You, L.; Chen, M.; Yan, X. Liquid phase blockage in micro-nano capillary pores of tight condensate reservoirs. Capillarity 2022, 5, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhoodi, S.; Sadeghnejad, S.; Saeedi Dehaghani, A.H. Simultaneous effect of geological heterogeneity and condensate blockage on well test response of gas condensate reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2019, 66, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidorenko, A.A.; Sirenko, Y.G.; Sidorenko, S.A. An assessment of multiple seam stress conditions using a 3-D numerical modelling approach. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1333, 032078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nevskaya, M.; Shabalova, A.; Nikolaichuk, L.; Kirsanova, N. Development of a Quantitative Assessment Algorithm for Operational Risks in Mining Engineering. Resources 2025, 14, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bratskikh, D.S.; Konopelko, A.Y.; Nikolaychuk, L.A. Model of supply chain management in the oil and gas industry using digital technologies. Neft. Khozyaystvo Oil Ind. 2024, 7, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenova, T.; Sokolov, I. Theoretical Substantiation of Risk Assessment Directions in the Development of Fields with Hard-to-Recover Hydrocarbon Reserves. Resources 2025, 14, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsvetkov, P.; Andreichyk, A. The Analysis of Goals, Results, and Trends in Global Climate Policy Through the Lens of Regulatory Documents and Macroeconomics. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoianova, A.D.; Trofimets, V.Y.; Stoianova, O.V.; Matrokhina, K.V. Structural model of decision support system for sustainable development of oil and gas companies. Int. J. Eng. 2025, 38, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukeev, D.L.; Afanaseva, O.V.; Tulyakov, T.F. Realization of Statistical Models Based on Symmetric Unimodal Distributions. Int. J. Eng. 2026, 39, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safiullin, R.N.; Zalyubovskiy, A.F.; Safiullin, R.R.; Sorokin, K.V.; Avksentiev, S.Y. An Algorithm to Process Big Data of Remote Technical Condition Assessment System for Mining Machines. Int. J. Eng. 2026, 39, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safiullin, R.; Safiullin, R.; Ungefuk, A.; Sorokin, K. Method of optimising charge-discharge modes taking into account various compositions of lithium-ion power sources of mining machines. Sustain. Dev. Mt. Territ. 2025, 17, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarychev, A.; Iliev, I.; Manukian, D.; Beloev, H.; Suslov, K.; Beloev, I. Review of Operating Conditions, Diagnostic Methods, and Technical Condition Assessment to Improve Reliability and Develop a Maintenance Strategy for Electrical Equipment. Energies 2025, 18, 5832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasibova, G.J.; Gasimov, E.E.; Ganbarova, S.A.; Karimov, V.M.; Zimina, D.A.; Davardoost, H.; Viktorovich, S.A. Structural Dynamics and Resource Potentional of South Caspian Megadepression: Insights from Mud Volcanism and Oil-Gas Exploration. Int. J. Eng. 2025, 38, 1010–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponomarenko, T.V.; Gorbatyuk, I.G.; Cherepovitsyn, A.E. Industrial clusters as an organizational model for the development of Russia petrochemical industry. J. Min. Inst. 2024, 270, 1024–1037. [Google Scholar]
- Talanov, N.A.; Khloponina, V.S.; Fedorov, M.C. Systematic and Analytical Research of Methods for Analysing and Identifying the Technical Condition of Complex Technical Systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 V International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS), St. Petersburg, Russia, 26–28 September 2023; pp. 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maksarov, V.V.; Sinyukov, M.S. Methods of Ensuring the Quality of Assembly of Non-removable Joints from Dissimilar Materials. Int. J. Eng. 2026, 39, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barykin, S.E.; Sergeev, S.M.; Vasilyevich Provotorov, V.; Lavskaya, K.; Shidlovskaya, K.A.; Dedyukhina, N.; Mikhov, O.; Buniak, V.; Dzhamaludinova, M.Y. Sustainability Analysis of Energy Resources Transport Based on A Digital N-D Logistics Network. Eng. Sci. 2024, 29, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Ma, J.; Khan, M.A.; Repnikova, V.; Shidlovskaya, K.; Barykin, S.; Ahmad, M.S. The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Foreign Direct Investment in the Era of Global Value Chain: Evidence from the Asian Countries. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eremeeva, A.M.; Chumachenko, Y.A.; Khasanov, A.F.; Oleynik, I.L. Advanced hydroprocessing technology for sustainable diesel: Hydrotreatment of renewable and fossil feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2026, 33, 102499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, S. Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects. Energies 2025, 18, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, M.; Su, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.; Deng, Y.; Xian, Y.; Jia, C. Bidirectional Coupling Simulation of Pressure-Saturation Decoupling to Enhance Fracturing-Flooding Performance in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. In Proceedings of the Middle East Oil, Gas and Geosciences Show (MEOS GEO), Manama, Bahrain, 16–18 September 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Hu, Z.; Duan, X.; Chang, J. Pressure Drawdown Management Strategies for Multifractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Review. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 14516–14526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belyadi, H.; Fathi, E.; Belyadi, F. Managed Pressure Drawdown in Utica/Point Pleasant with Case Studies. In Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, OH, USA, 13–15 September 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Qiao, X.; Mi, N.; Wang, R. Technologies for the benefit development of low-permeability tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Yan’an Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2019, 6, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palyanitsina, A.; Sukhikh, A. Peculiarities of assessing the reservoir properties of clayish reservoirs depending on the water of reservoir pressure maintenance system properties. J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 2020, 18, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hong, L.; Jin, P.; Xiaolu, W.; Xinan, Y.; Qing, L. Analysis of Interlayer Interference and Research of Development Strategy of Multilayer Commingled Production Gas Reservoir. Energy Procedia 2012, 16, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei-yao, Z.H.U.; Zhen, C.; Xin-chun, S. Multiphysical field coupling in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. Chinese Journal of Engineering 2023, 45, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Xu, Q.; Lei, C.; Yang, X.; Zheng, X. The investigation of fracture pattern effect on fluid transport and production prediction in M field. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2021, 39, 1770–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.; Zuo, L.; Wang, B. Methods of Decline Curve Analysis for Shale Gas Reservoirs. Energies 2018, 11, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, A.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, G.; Meng, D.; Huang, S. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2022, 9, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, P.; Geng, S.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Zhu, R.; He, X. A three-dimensional numerical pressure transient analysis model for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs. J. Hydrol. 2023, 620, 129545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, X.; Yang, J.; Geng, S.; Li, K. Study on new method for evaluating reservoir formation pressure by wellhead pressure. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 384, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Ding, Y.; Sun, H.; Fan, D.; Wang, M.; Jia, C. Productivity Analysis of Fractured Horizontal Wells in Tight Gas Reservoirs Using a Gas–Water Two-Phase Flow Model with Consideration of a Threshold Pressure Gradient. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 8190–8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, W. Production Simulation of Stimulated Reservoir Volume in Gas Hydrate Formation with Three-Dimensional Embedded Discrete Fracture Model. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Pervukhin, D.A. Enhancing operational efficiency in coal enterprises through capacity layout optimisation: A cost-effectiveness analysis. ORESTA 2024, 7, 144–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pervukhin, D.A.; Neyrus, S.K. Improving the Efficiency of the Bunkering Enterprise on the Basis of Simulation Modelling. In Research Perspectives on Software Engineering and Systems Design, Proceedings of the CoMeSySo 2024, Chengdu, China, 12–14 October 2024; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2025; pp. 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afanaseva, O.; Pervukhin, D.; Khatrusov, A. Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring of Diesel Engines in Industrial Energy Applications: A Scoping Review. Energies 2025, 18, 5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.; Jin, X.; Li, W.; Fu, Z. Research Progress of Three-dimensional Geological Modeling and Multi-field Coupling of Fractured Oil and Gas Reservoirs. Acad. J. Sci. Technol. 2024, 12, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martyushev, D.A.; Ponomareva, I.N.; Shen, W. Adaptation of transient well test results. J. Min. Inst. 2023, 264, 919–925. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.; Li, C. Mining and Analysis of Production Characteristics Data of Tight Gas Reservoirs. Processes 2023, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Z.-S.; Han, G.-Q.; Jia, Y.-L.; Tian, W.; Gong, H.-F.; Jiang, W.-B.; Mai, P.-D.; Liang, X.-Y. Optimization of plunger lift working systems using reinforcement learning for coupled wellbore/reservoir. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 2154–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pachalieva, A.; O’Malley, D.; Harp, D.R.; Viswanathan, H. Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaev, A.A.; Levitina, E.E. Integrated approach to determining the effectiveness of the reservoir pressure maintenance system in carbonate reservoirs. Bull. Tomsk. Polytech. Univ. Geo Assets Eng. 2024, 335, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Liu, D.; Zhu, X.; Huang, W.; Cheng, L. Experimental Investigation on the Pressure Propagation Mechanism of Tight Reservoirs. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 2020, 16, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Wei, Y.; Gao, S.; Ye, L.; Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Han, D. Current Progress and Development Trend of Gas Injection to Enhance Gas Recovery in Gas Reservoirs. Energies 2024, 17, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Li, J.; Liu, P.; Yang, Z.; Fu, B.; Liao, X. Study on Main Controlling Factors of CO2 Enhanced Gas Recovery and Geological Storage in Tight Gas Reservoirs. Processes 2025, 13, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syah, R.; Alizadeh, S.M.; Nurgalieva, K.S.; Grimaldo Guerrero, J.W.; Nasution, M.K.M.; Davarpanah, A.; Ramdan, D.; Metwally, A.S.M. A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection. Sustainability 2021, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Zhao, W.; Wang, S.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Jiang, L.; Lv, P.; Zhang, L. Representative Volume and Seepage in Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sands: Insights from Improved Pore Network Modeling. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 8073–8085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; Dong, H.; Lv, P. Gas Production and Storage Using Hydrates Through the Replacement of Multicomponent Gases: A Critical Review. Energies 2025, 18, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.; Abdalla, M.; Mahmoud, M.; Glatz, G.; Al-Majed, A.; Al-Nakhli, A. Condensate-Banking Removal and Gas-Production Enhancement Using Thermochemical Injection: A Field-Scale Simulation. Processes 2020, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, M.; Xue, W.; Guo, Z.; Hou, M.; Wang, C. Development of Large-Scale Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs and Recommendations for Stable Production—The Example of the Sulige Gas Field in the Ordos Basin. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Pan, L.; Wu, R.; Shi, M.; Ma, L. Evaluation of shale gas reservoir reserves and production capacity based on Arps regression. Geosyst. Eng. 2024, 27, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soage, A.; Ramirez, L.; Juanes, R.; Cueto-Felgueroso, L.; Colominas, I. Statistical assessment of the financial performance of shale-gas wells coupling stochastic and numerical simulation. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 4497–4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pershin, I.M.; Tsapleva, V.V.; Malkov, A.V.; Pomelyaiko, I.S. Design of a distributed well cluster control system. In Proceedings of the XII All-Russian Scientific Conference “System Synthesis and Applied synergetics”, Novosibirsk, Russia, 23–29 September 2024; pp. 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Cheng, S.; Wu, K.; Xin, C.; Song, J.; Zhang, T.; Xie, X.; Zhao, Z. A Full-Stage Productivity Equation for Constant-Volume Gas Reservoirs and Its Application. Processes 2024, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, M.; Zhang, J.; Yan, Z.; Wang, J. Prediction of interwell connectivity and interference degree between production wells in a tight gas reservoir. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2021, 11, 3301–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, G.; Jia, A.; Meng, D.; Guo, Z.; Wang, G.; Cheng, L.; Zhao, X. Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight gas field: A case study of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Pang, K.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Min, C.; Ding, X. Control Method and System for Unconventional Oil and Gas Reservoir Production Optimization Problem. Patent No. CN112580861, 11 December 2020. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/ru/detail.jsf?docId=CN321739796&_cid=P11-LV17OT-64670-1 (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Liu, M.; Deng, X.; Zeng, W.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.; Meng, Z. Intelligent Pressure Control System and Pressure Control Method for Unconventional Gas Well. Patent No. CN114673476, 24 April 2022. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/ru/detail.jsf?docId=CN368375390&_cid=P11-LV17OT-64670-1 (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Kozyrev, N.D. Software Implementation of Adaptive Depression Control for Production Wells When Predicting Process Development Parameters in Tempest More 8.6 (ROXAR) Software. Patent No. RU2021661506, 5 July 2021. Available online: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46482630 (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Zakirov, S.N.; Indrupskyi, I.M.; Zakirov, E.S.; Anikeev, D.P.; Lysenko, A.D.; Boganova, M.N.; Spesivtsev Yu, N. A Method for Developing Hydrocarbon Deposits in Low-Permeability Sediments. Patent No. RU2625829C2, 19 July 2017. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2625829C2/ru (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Lifantyev, A.V.; Osnos, V.B. Method for Developing a Productive Low-Permeability Formation. Patent No. RU2732936C2, 24 September 2020. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2732936C2/ru (accessed on 9 September 2025).
- Yu, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Tang, L.; Wang, J.; Shu, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Integrated Simulation and Optimization of Reservoir-Wellbore-Surface Systems in Ultrahigh Water Cut Oil Fields. Energy Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 3503–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, C.; Dai, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Q. Advances and outlook of integrated reservoir-wellbore-pipe network simulation technology. Energy Geosci. 2024, 5, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.; Yu, C.; Dong, L.; Fu, Y.; Shuai, C.; Sun, H.; Zhu, X. Review of intelligent well technology. Petroleum 2020, 6, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuk, E.; Stopa, J.; Kuk, M.; Janiga, D.; Wojnarowski, P. Petroleum Reservoir Control Optimization with the Use of the Auto-Adaptive Decision Trees. Energies 2021, 14, 5702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Ye, L.; Wen, Z.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, C. A new method for well pattern density optimization and recovery efficiency evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2020, 7, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Ye, L.; Wu, H.; Zhu, W.; An, W. Well network optimization and recovery evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 196, 107705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, B.; Nie, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, J.; Shayireatehan, R.; Ning, P.; Deng, D.; Xiong, J. Zoning Productivity Calculation Method of Fractured Horizontal Wells in High-Water-Cut Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs under Complex Seepage Conditions. Processes 2023, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Song, X.; Tian, S.; Zhu, Z. Intelligent Drilling and Completion: A Review. Engineering 2022, 18, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Shi, J.; Dai, H.; Jia, X.; Feng, G.; Yang, B.; Li, W. Phase Behavior and Rational Development Mode of a Fractured Gas Condensate Reservoir with High Pressure and Temperature: A Case Study of the Bozi 3 Block. Energies 2024, 17, 5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, M.; Wang, Z.; Li, A.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, Z. Simulation of Gas-Water Two-Phase Flow in Tight Gas Reservoirs Considering the Gas Slip Effect. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 2022, 19, 1269–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, M.; Yue, X.; Shi, X.; Ling, S.; Zhang, B.; Li, X. Effect of dynamic pseudo threshold pressure gradient on well production performance in low-permeability and tight oil reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 173, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jefferson, O.A.; Jaffe, A.; Ashton, D.; Warren, B.; Koellhofer, D.; Dulleck, U.; Ballagh, A.; Moe, J.; DiCuccio, M.; Ward, K.; et al. Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afanaseva, O.V.; Tulyakov, T.F. A methodology to develop an information and control system to monitor the technical state of power transmission lines. Elektrotehniski Vestn. 2025, 92, 221–228. [Google Scholar]
- Ilyushin, Y.V.; Boronko, E.A. Analysis of Energy Sustainability and Problems of Technological Process of Primary Aluminum Production. Energies 2025, 18, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martirosyan, A.V.; Martirosyan, K.V.; Chernyshev, A.B. Investigation of Popov’s Lines’ Limiting Position to Ensure the Process Control Systems’ Absolute Stability. In Proceedings of the 2023 XXVI International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), St. Petersburg, Russia, 24–26 May 2023; pp. 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afanaseva, O.V.; Ilyushin, Y. Analysis and synthesis of distributed icedrill heating control system of mountain reconnaissance drilling rig. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management SGEM 2018, Albania, Bulgaria, 3–8 July 2018; Volume 18, pp. 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, Y.V.; Boronko, E.A. Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electromagnetic Field Formation Process Based on System Analysis Methods. Mathematics 2026, 14, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khasanov, A.F.; Eremeeva, A.M. Creation of Artificial Aeration System to Improve Water Quality in Reservoirs. Hydrology 2025, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, V.V.; Sidorenko, S.A. Transportless mining systemin developing the suite of three horizontal seams carbonate rocks. Int. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016, 8, 27216–27224. [Google Scholar]
- Ilyushin, Y.; Golovina, E.I. Stability of temperature field of the distributed control system. Arpn J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2020, 15, 664–668. [Google Scholar]
- Asadulagi, M.-A.M.; Pershin, I.M.; Tsapleva, V.V. Research on Hydrolithospheric Processes Using the Results of Groundwater Inflow Testing. Water 2024, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, Y.V.; Asadulagi, M.-A.M. Development of a Distributed Control System for the Hydrodynamic Processes of Aquifers, Taking into Account Stochastic Disturbing Factors. Water 2023, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, Y.V.; Nosova, V.A. Methodology to Increase the Efficiency of the Mineral Water Extraction Process. Water 2024, 16, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pershin, I.M.; Pervukhin, D.A.; Ilyushin, Y.V.; Afanaseva, O.V. Design of distributed systems of hydrolithospere processes management. Selection of optimal number of extracting wells. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Prague, Czech Republic, 11–15 September 2017; Volume 87, p. 032030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igwe, J.U. Strategic Reservoir Management for Sustainable Tight Gas Extraction: Navigating Future Prospects and Challenges in Exploration. In Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, 5–7 August 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| № | Challenge | Mechanism of Negative Impact on GRF | Scale | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heterogeneity of reservoirs, complex tectonics, and geomechanical effects | Uneven distribution of pressure and permeability | Pore scale, reservoir scale, interlayer interaction | [19,20,36,37,43,44,108] |
| 2 | Maintaining reservoir pressure | Reduction in the driving force for gas filtration due to pressure decline | Reservoir scale, field scale | [70,71,72,77,83,84] |
| 3 | Depression cones, flooding, and condensate formation | Local pressure decline causing water or condensate inflow into the near-wellbore zone | Reservoir scale, interlayer interaction | [89,95,96,101,102,103,104] |
| 4 | Economic and organizational issues | Limitations in the implementation of monitoring and control technologies | Field scale | [109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124] |
| Challenge Name | Solution Approaches | Unsolved Issues within the Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Heterogeneity of layers and complex tectonics |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Reservoir pressure drop |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| Flooding of wells, formation of condensate and formation of depression cones |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ||
| Geomechanical effects |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| ||
| ||
| Economic and organizational constraints |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kukharova, T.; Maltsev, P.; Abramkin, S.; Novozhilov, I. Analysis of Modern Challenges and Technological Solutions in Natural Gas Production at Fields with Complex Geological Structure: A Review. Resources 2026, 15, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15020032
Kukharova T, Maltsev P, Abramkin S, Novozhilov I. Analysis of Modern Challenges and Technological Solutions in Natural Gas Production at Fields with Complex Geological Structure: A Review. Resources. 2026; 15(2):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15020032
Chicago/Turabian StyleKukharova, Tatyana, Pavel Maltsev, Sergey Abramkin, and Igor Novozhilov. 2026. "Analysis of Modern Challenges and Technological Solutions in Natural Gas Production at Fields with Complex Geological Structure: A Review" Resources 15, no. 2: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15020032
APA StyleKukharova, T., Maltsev, P., Abramkin, S., & Novozhilov, I. (2026). Analysis of Modern Challenges and Technological Solutions in Natural Gas Production at Fields with Complex Geological Structure: A Review. Resources, 15(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15020032

