Next Article in Journal
The Application of Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques for the Determination of Wooden Pellet Length as an Alternative to ISO 17829
Next Article in Special Issue
Surimi Production from Tropical Mackerel: A Simple Washing Strategy for Better Utilization of Dark-Fleshed Fish Resources
Previous Article in Journal
Biosolids-Derived Biochar Improves Biomethane Production in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Efficacy of Hungarian Propolis against Bacteria, Yeast, and Trichomonas gallinae Isolated from Pigeons—A Possible Antibiotic Alternative?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Emerging Role of Plant-Based Building Materials in the Construction Industry—A Bibliometric Analysis

Resources 2023, 12(10), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100124
by Anita Boros 1,2 and Dávid Tőzsér 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Resources 2023, 12(10), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100124
Submission received: 19 September 2023 / Revised: 11 October 2023 / Accepted: 17 October 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Use of Biological Resources)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper evaluated the role of plant-based biological resources in the development of green building materials using bibliometric analysis. There are some comments for the author's reference:

1. The conclusion section only summarizes the bibliometric results without forming specific suggestions, which needs to be strengthened.

2. The clarity of Figure 8 needs to be improved.

Author Response

Reviewer 1

 

This paper evaluated the role of plant-based biological resources in the development of green building materials using bibliometric analysis. There are some comments for the author's reference:

1. The conclusion section only summarizes the bibliometric results without forming specific suggestions, which needs to be strengthened.

ANSWER

Thank you for your work. We marked the modifications and corrections in the manuscript according to your suggestions in blue.

We reworked the Conclusions and complemented the section with specific suggestions and potential actions to promote the spread of plant-based materials in the construction industry.

 

2. The clarity of Figure 8 needs to be improved.

ANSWER

We modified Figure 8 to enable a better interpretation of the results; we increased font size and rearranged the presented content.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study employs a bibliometric analysis to figure out how the knowledge on green building materials has been accumulated over time. Given that sustainability is an essential part of the construction industry, this study can provide valuable implications and insights. Also, I appreciate all the efforts for the analyses. Let me point out two things which may help further develop this paper. 

 

1. Introduction

The authors may want to rearrange the introduction part. It seems that this study draws conclusions of the bibliometric analyses. As findings, three different terms come out: green building materials, biobased materials, and plant-based resources. While these terms are well-explained in the results part, it is not crystal clear what this study actually looks into until I read the result part. Perhaps, the authors may want to elaborate how the sustainability logic has been incarnated into the construction industry and how scholars and researchers respond to this environmental change. With that, the three terms (i.e. green building materials, biobased building materials, and plant-based resources) could be briefly introduced (and defined) in the introduction section. The definitions would be helpful to understand how the authors designed its empirical analyses, extracted data, and employed certain methods. 

 

2. Methods

The methods section could be further elaborated. Specifically, the procedures of the analyses in the flow chart (i.e. science mapping-based analysis,. classification of publications based on the list of literature integrated, and cluster analysis of topics addressed) could be specified.  

 

3. Topic modeling

This is a suggestion; the authors may want to conduct a topic modeling with the abstracts they extracted from the database. This may show more interesting results. 

 

That's all the comments from me. Hope these comments help to develop the paper. 

Author Response

Reviewer 2

 

This study employs a bibliometric analysis to figure out how the knowledge on green building materials has been accumulated over time. Given that sustainability is an essential part of the construction industry, this study can provide valuable implications and insights. Also, I appreciate all the efforts for the analyses. Let me point out two things which may help further develop this paper.

1. Introduction

The authors may want to rearrange the introduction part. It seems that this study draws conclusions of the bibliometric analyses. As findings, three different terms come out: green building materials, biobased materials, and plant-based resources. While these terms are well-explained in the results part, it is not crystal clear what this study actually looks into until I read the result part. Perhaps, the authors may want to elaborate how the sustainability logic has been incarnated into the construction industry and how scholars and researchers respond to this environmental change. With that, the three terms (i.e. green building materials, biobased building materials, and plant-based resources) could be briefly introduced (and defined) in the introduction section. The definitions would be helpful to understand how the authors designed its empirical analyses, extracted data, and employed certain methods.

ANSWER

Thank you for your detailed review. We marked the modifications and corrections in the manuscript according to your suggestions in green.

We prepared a new paragraph and inserted explanations/definitions for the three terms as proposed.

 

2. Methods

The methods section could be further elaborated. Specifically, the procedures of the analyses in the flow chart (i.e. science mapping-based analysis, classification of publications based on the list of literature integrated, and cluster analysis of topics addressed) could be specified.

ANSWER

We added a new paragraph explaining each specific step. Please find it below the Figure 1.

 

3. Topic modeling

This is a suggestion; the authors may want to conduct a topic modeling with the abstracts they extracted from the database. This may show more interesting results.

ANSWER

To present the main topics addressed in the abstracts of the papers studied, we prepared scientific clusters demonstrated in Figure 6. Additionally, the re-edited Figure 8. shows yearly progress in the relevant trend.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer 3

 

The following are my comments on the manuscript:

1. Title: Consider modifying the title. Make it crisp.

ANSWER

Thank you for your thorough review. We marked the modifications and corrections in the manuscript according to your suggestions in yellow.

We modified the title as proposed.

 

2. Abstract: Needs revision. Keywords must be relevant to the study.

ANSWER

We revised the Abstract and changed the keywords to conform better to the study.

 

3. Introduction: First line seems confusing Has the expansion for GHG provided earlier? Looks deviated. Weather the study focuses on the need of green building or energy demand made by the construction industry.

ANSWER

We rephrased the first sentence to promote an unambiguous understanding of the core findings.

 

4. Material and Methods: Why WoS was preferred over the Scopus database The authors have mentioned after data cleaning. Explain what is data cleaning and how it is done.

ANSWER

The database of the Web of Science provides a great overview of studies with many bibliometric parameters that are in the range of our research interest. Additionally, the extensive filter opportunities and export options enable the use of gathered data in basic statistical platforms such as R. Therefore, we have also used WoS as our primary source of data during the preparation of several manuscripts (TÅ‘zsér et al., 2017, TÅ‘zsér et al., 2023).

TÅ‘zsér, D.; Magura, T.; Simon, E. Heavy metal uptake by plant parts of willow species: a meta-analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 336, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.068

TÅ‘zsér, D.; Horváth, R.; Simon, E.; Magura, T. Heavy metal uptake by plant parts of Populus species: a meta‑analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2023, 30, 69416–69430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27244-2

Further, in the Materials and Methods, we added short explanations to each specific step (e.g., data cleaning) introduced in Figure 1.

 

5. Results and Discussion: Figures and Tables provided in this section need to be discussed elaborately

ANSWER

We inserted additional interpretations and complementations to the figures and tables.

 

6. Conclusions: Provide the major contributions of this study Mention the future scope of the study.

ANSWER

We complemented the Conclusions section with suggestions and future implication opportunities as proposed.

 

7. References: Consider latest articles.

ANSWER

We inserted new references published in 2023 into the manuscript. (See references Nr. 1, 2, 3, and 21.)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The comments given earlier have been addressed. Hence, the manuscript can be considered for possible publication in the journal. 

Back to TopTop