Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of Phoebe bournei Seeds
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of Plant Material and Sampling Sites
2.2. Polyembryony Identification and Seed Treatment
2.2.1. Observation of Morphology in Polyembryonic Seeds
2.2.2. Polyembryony Rate Statistics
2.2.3. Thousand Grain Weight Measurement
2.2.4. Seed Rooting Treatment
2.3. Transcriptome Sequencing Sample Collection
2.4. Transcriptome Sequencing and Analysis
2.4.1. RNA Extraction, Library Construction, and Sequencing
2.4.2. Sequencing Data Quality Control and Comparison
2.4.3. Gene Expression Quantification and Differential Expression Analysis
2.4.4. Functional Enrichment Analysis of DEGs
2.5. RWP Gene Family Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis
2.5.1. Identification of RWP Gene Family Members in P. bournei Genome
2.5.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Sequence Alignment
2.5.3. Gene Expression Pattern and qRT-PCR Verification
2.6. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Seed Changes and Polyembryony During the Seed Development Process of P. bournei
3.2. Observation on Rooting of P. bournei Seeds
3.3. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Monoembryonic and Polyembryonic Seeds of P. bournei
3.4. Functional Annotation Analysis of DEGs
3.5. Identification and Physicochemical Properties of the RWP Gene Family in P. bournei
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| IAA | Indole-3-acetic acid |
| IBA | Indole-3-butyric acid |
| SA | Salicylic acid |
| qRT-PCR | Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction |
| NGDC | National Genomics Data Center |
| FPKM | Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads |
| DEGs | Differentially expressed genes |
| GO | Gene Ontology |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| CDD | Conserved Domain Database |
| NCBI | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| NJ | Neighbor-joining |
| BP | Biological processes |
| MF | Molecular function |
| CC | Cellular component |
| TFs | Transcription factors |
References
- Ding, X.; Xiao, J.H.; Li, L.; Conran, J.G.; Li, J. Congruent species delimitation of two controversial gold-thread nanmu tree species based on morphological and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing data. J. Syst. Evol. 2019, 57, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, X.Z.; Zhang, M.Z.; Lai, W.F.; Yang, M.M.; Fan, H.H.; Zhang, G.F.; Chen, S.P.; Liu, B. Prediction of potential suitable distribution of Phoebe bournei based on MaxEnt optimization model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 41, 8135–8144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Zhang, J.; Han, S.; Chong, S.L.; Meng, G.; Song, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Liu, C.; Lou, L.; et al. The chromosome-scale genome of Phoebe bournei reveals contrasting fates of terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agapito-Tenfen, S.Z.; Steiner, N.; Guerra, M.P.; Nodari, R.O. Patterns of polyembryony and frequency of surviving multiple embryos of the Brazilian pine Araucaria angustifolia. Aust. J. Bot. 2012, 59, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes-Rodrigues, C.; Oliveira, P.E. Polyembryony in Melastomataceae from Brazilian Cerrado: Multiple embryos in a small world. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleza, P.; Juárez, J.; Ollitrault, P.; Navarro, L. Polyembryony in non-apomictic citrus genotypes. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.; Jia, H.; Wu, X.; Koltunow, A.M.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. Regulation of nucellar embryony, a mode of sporophytic apomixis in Citrus resembling somatic embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 59, 101984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.; Jia, H.; Tan, C.; Wu, X.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. Apomixis: Genetic basis and controlling genes. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michel, M.R.; Aguilar-Zárate, P.; Espinoza-Velázquez, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R. Environmental effects on chemical composition and physical properties of polyembryonic maize grain. TIP Rev. Espec. Cienc. Quím.-Biol. 2020, 23, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Ortiz, J.D.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Espinoza-Velázquez, J.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Nery-Flores, S.D.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R. Morphological, physicochemical, techno-functional, phytochemical, and antioxidant evaluation of polyembryonic and non-polyembryonic maize sprouts. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 47, 102583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, G.A.; Shivashankara, K.S. Metabolite changes during the development of ovaries in monoembryonic and polyembryonic mango (Mangifera indica L.) genotypes. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2023, 28, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kőszegi, D.; Johnston, A.J.; Rutten, T.; Czihal, A.; Altschmied, L.; Kumlehn, J.; Wüst, S.E.J.; Kirioukhova, O.; Gheyselinck, J.; Grossniklaus, U.; et al. Members of the RKD transcription factor family induce an egg cell-like gene expression program. Plant J. 2011, 67, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakuraba, Y.; Zhuo, M.; Yanagisawa, S. RWP-RK domain-containing transcription factors in the Viridiplantae: Biology and phylogenetic relationships. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4323–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waki, T.; Hiki, T.; Watanabe, R.; Hashimoto, T.; Nakajima, K. The Arabidopsis RWP-RK Protein RKD4 Triggers Gene Expression and Pattern Formation in Early Embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1277–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Han, D.; Cheng, D.; Chen, J.; Tian, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, M.; Yuan, L. AtRKD5 inhibits the parthenogenic potential mediated by AtBBM. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2024, 66, 1517–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Duan, Y.; Zheng, H.; Tang, H.; Zheng, L.; Yu, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the RWP-RK Proteins in Zanthoxylum armatum. Genes 2024, 15, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, G.S.; Eltaher, S.; Li, J.; Freeman, B.; Singh, S. GWAS identifies a polyembryony locus in mango: Development of KASP and PACE markers for marker-assisted breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1508027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, M.; Guo, Z.; Gong, S.; Xu, L. Genome-wide analysis of RWP-RK transcription factor family reveals its roles in nitrogen response in rice (Oryza sativa). Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1597029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, X.; Wang, N.; Zhou, Y.; Tian, X.; Xie, Z.; Chai, L.; Wu, X.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Ye, J.; et al. Adventitious embryonic causal gene FhRWP regulates multiple developmental phenotypes in citrus reproduction. Plant J. 2024, 119, 1494–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhyani, A.; Abinlal, K.C.; Bindu, S.; Anilkumar, C.; Joshi, G.; Phartyal, S.S. Polyembryony in Santalum album—A double-edged sword for plant regeneration. Biodiversity 2024, 25, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes-Rodrigues, C.; Caetano, A.P.d.S.; Sampaio, D.S.; Pereira, J.M.; Ribeiro-Oliveira, J.P.; Oliveira, P.E.; Ranal, M.A. Gemellar Competition as a Key Component in Seed–Seedling Transition of Handroanthus chrysotrichus (Mart. ex A. DC.) Mattos (Bignoniaceae). Seeds 2023, 2, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.-P.; Sun, W.-H.; Xiong, Y.-F.; Jiang, Y.-T.; Liu, X.-D.; Liao, X.-Y.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Jiang, S.-Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; et al. The Phoebe genome sheds light on the evolution of magnoliids. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Larralde, M.; Zeller, G. PyHMMER: A Python library binding to HMMER for efficient sequence analysis. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, N.; Ahmad, N.; Khalifa, M.A.S.; Du, Y.; Mandozai, A.; Khattak, A.N.; Piwu, W. Identification and Molecular Characterization of RWP-RK Transcription Factors in Soybean. Genes 2023, 14, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, S.; Nei, M.; Dudley, J.; Tamura, K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Santuari, L.; Wijsman, T.; Wachsman, G.; Haase, H.; Nodine, M.; Scheres, B.; Heidstra, R. Arabidopsis ribosomal RNA processing meerling mutants exhibit suspensor-derived polyembryony due to direct reprogramming of the suspensor. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 2550–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, C.B.; Rozen, A.; Eshed, R.; Ish-Shalom, M.; Faigenboim, A.; Dillon, N.; Bally, I.; Webb, M.; Kuhn, D.; Ophir, R.; et al. Promoter insertion leads to polyembryony in mango—A case of convergent evolution with citrus. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Q.; Chen, X.; Ma, L.; Wei, A.; Fei, X. Inspiration from apomictic species of Rutaceae: AGL11-FIE module induces autonomous development of maize embryo and endosperm without fertilization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2025, 138, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandvain, Y.; Harkness, A.; Pyhäjärvi, T. Reproductive Compensation and Selection among Viable Embryos Drive the Evolution of Polyembryony. Am. Nat. 2023, 201, 694–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidhu, G.S.; Mohanpuria, P.; Gaikwad, P.N.; Kaur, G.; Kaur, H. Polyembryony: A Potential Horticultural Trait, Reveals Complex Mechanism, Role of Molecular Markers and their Application in Fruit Crops. Bot. Rev. 2024, 90, 312–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mácová, K.; Prabhullachandran, U.; Štefková, M.; Spyroglou, I.; Pěnčík, A.; Endlová, L.; Novák, O.; Robert, H.S. Long-Term High-Temperature Stress Impacts on Embryo and Seed Development in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 844292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidhu, G.; Dhaliwal, H.; Gaikwad, P. Vishal Polyembryony and morpho-genetic characterisation of zygotic seedlings through microsatellite markers in ten polyembryonic citrus rootstocks. Seed Sci. Technol. 2024, 52, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidemann, B.; Primetis, E.; Zahn, I.E.; Underwood, C.J. To infinity and beyond: Recent progress, bottlenecks, and potential of clonal seeds by apomixis. Plant J. 2025, 121, e70054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Han, X.; Tian, L.; Wang, K.; Chen, S. Harnessing apomixis: Natural mechanisms and synthetic innovations for advancing crop and forage breeding. Hortic. Res. 2025, 12, uhaf186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, J.; Ji, Y.; Yang, S.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Qian, Q.; Underwood, C.J.; Wang, K. Extending Mendel’s legacy: Application of hawkweed PpPAR for inducing synthetic apomixis in hybrid rice. Plant Commun. 2025, 6, 101387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fei, X.; Shi, Q.; Qi, Y.; Wang, S.; Lei, Y.; Hu, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, T.; Wei, A. ZbAGL11, a class D MADS-box transcription factor of Zanthoxylum bungeanum, is involved in sporophytic apomixis. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Song, X.; Ye, J.; Zhang, S.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, C.; Hu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Cao, S.; et al. Structural variation and parallel evolution of apomixis in citrus during domestication and diversification. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vernet, A.; Meynard, D.; Lian, Q.; Mieulet, D.; Gibert, O.; Bissah, M.; Rivallan, R.; Autran, D.; Leblanc, O.; Meunier, A.C.; et al. High-frequency synthetic apomixis in hybrid rice. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Liu, Q.; Shen, Y.; Hua, Y.; Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Wu, M.; Sun, T.; Cheng, Z.; Mercier, R.; et al. Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Underwood, C.J.; Vijverberg, K.; Rigola, D.; Okamoto, S.; Oplaat, C.; Camp, R.H.M.O.d.; Radoeva, T.; Schauer, S.E.; Fierens, J.; Jansen, K.; et al. A PARTHENOGENESIS allele from apomictic dandelion can induce egg cell division without fertilization in lettuce. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cao, L.; Huang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wu, G.; Tian, S.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; et al. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, L.; Xu, Z.; Fan, R.; Wang, G.; Wang, F.; Qin, X.; Yan, L.; Ji, X.; Meng, M.; Sim, S.; et al. The complex genome and adaptive evolution of polyploid Chinese pepper (Zanthoxylum armatum and Zanthoxylum bungeanum). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 78–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nosaki, S.; Noda, M.; Onoda, H.; Ito, M.; Suzaki, T. The root nodule symbiosis regulator NIN exhibits broad DNA binding specificity conferred by an NLP-inherited motif. Sci. Adv. 2026, 12, eaeb8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chardin, C.; Girin, T.; Roudier, F.; Meyer, C.; Krapp, A. The plant RWP-RK transcription factors: Key regulators of nitrogen responses and of gametophyte development. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5577–5587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Tong, S.; Ma, T.; Xi, Z.; Liu, J. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Sichuan pepper provides insights into apomixis, drought tolerance, and alkaloid biosynthesis. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2021, 21, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purwestri, Y.A.; Lee, Y.S.; Meehan, C.; Mose, W.; Susanto, F.A.; Wijayanti, P.; Fauzia, A.N.; Nuringtyas, T.R.; Hussain, N.; Putra, H.L.; et al. RWP-RK Domain 3 (OsRKD3) induces somatic embryogenesis in black rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Number | Collection Location | East Longitude/E | North Latitude/N | Altitude/m | Tree Height/m | Chest Diameter/cm | Understory Height/m | Crown Width/m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kangfu, Yangkou, Shunchang | 117.51 | 26.44 | 173.4 | 21 | 46.1 | 7.0 | 8 × 12 |
| 2 | Tiantai Mountain, Yangkou, Shunchang | 117.51 | 26.42 | 543.3 | 22 | 69.7 | 6.5 | 7.5 × 11 |
| 3 | Yongji, Guangming, Jiangle | 117.25 | 26.46 | 206.4 | 19 | 48.8 | 4.6 | 8 × 11 |
| 4 | Yongji, Guangming, Jiangle | 117.25 | 26.46 | 216.7 | 22 | 52.8 | 2.3 | 8 × 9.5 |
| 5 | Gekeng, Guangming, Jiangle | 117.24 | 26.46 | 242.6 | 23 | 50.6 | 6.5 | 6 × 9 |
| 6 | Baishakeng, Yangkou, Shunchang | 117.53 | 26.44 | 259.9 | 21 | 37.3 | 9.0 | 6 × 8 |
| 7 | Xiejian, Yangkou, Shunchang | 117.54 | 26.48 | 138.0 | 15 | 34.8 | 4.7 | 7 × 8 |
| 8 | Xibian, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.55 | 26.51 | 163.5 | 19 | 53.5 | 3.0 | 8 × 10 |
| 9 | Nanshan, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.56 | 26.53 | 248.1 | 33 | 135.6 | 3.1 | 16 × 20 |
| 10 | Xialinchang, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.55 | 26.53 | 304.6 | 16 | 26.1 | 7.5 | 4 × 6 |
| 11 | Anxia, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.57 | 26.49 | 133.8 | 25 | 56.0 | 3.7 | 8 × 10 |
| 12 | Hengkeng, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.57 | 26.49 | 158.8 | 22 | 59.2 | 7.0 | 16 × 18 |
| 13 | Xiaohu, Jianxi, Shunchang | 117.54 | 26.53 | 188.4 | 14 | 25.3 | 3.5 | 6 × 8 |
| Number | Thousand Grain Weight/g | Seed Size | Monoembryony | Polyembryony | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length/mm | Width/mm | Perimeter/mm | Area/mm2 | Number | Embryo Rate/% | Number | Embryo Rate/% | ||
| 1 | 199.68 ± 2.23 FG | 11.49 ± 0.08 DE | 5.61 ± 0.01 DE | 28.14 ± 0.16 DEF | 46.67 ± 0.28 EF | 46.00 ± 0.53 AB | 92.00 ± 0.01 AB | 4.00 ± 0.53 DEF | 8.00 ± 0.01 DEF |
| 2 | 204.85 ± 0.60 FG | 11.68 ± 0.02 DE | 5.60 ± 0.03 DE | 28.42 ± 0.07 DEF | 47.71 ± 0.31 EF | 46.00 ± 1.00 AB | 92.00 ± 0.02 AB | 4.00 ± 0.56 DEF | 8.00 ± 0.01 DEF |
| 3 | 217.43 ± 3.10 E | 13.03 ± 0.12 BC | 6.06 ± 0.07 CDE | 31.35 ± 0.29 B | 57.29 ± 1.20 BC | 44.00 ± 0.56 AB | 88.00 ± 0.01 AB | 6.00 ± 1.05 CDE | 12.00 ± 0.02 CDE |
| 4 | 217.36 ± 3.28 E | 12.41 ± 0.05 CD | 6.19 ± 0.05 BCDE | 30.47 ± 0.12 BC | 56.08 ± 0.57 CD | 36.00 ± 0.78 CD | 72.00 ± 0.01 CD | 14.00 ± 1.23 AB | 28.00 ± 0.02 AB |
| 5 | 195.46 ± 3.14 G | 11.08 ± 0.09 E | 5.59 ± 0.04 DE | 27.73 ± 0.54 EF | 46.21 ± 1.41 F | 40.00 ± 1.53 BCD | 80.00 ± 0.03 BCD | 10.00 ± 1.26 BC | 20.00 ± 0.03 BC |
| 6 | 207.34 ± 0.71 EF | 12.01 ± 0.05 CDE | 5.60 ± 0.03 DE | 29.00 ± 0.16 CDE | 49.30 ± 0.36 DEF | 47.00 ± 1.16 A | 94.00 ± 0.02 A | 3.00 ± 0.38 EF | 6.00 ± 0.01 EF |
| 7 | 303.48 ± 3.09 C | 14.69 ± 0.98 A | 6.30 ± 0.03 BCD | 33.13 ± 0.09 A | 64.14 ± 0.49 AB | 47.00 ± 1.47 A | 94.00 ± 0.03 A | 3.00 ± 0.83 EF | 6.00 ± 0.02 EF |
| 8 | 179.03 ± 3.31 H | 10.98 ± 0.05 E | 5.52 ± 0.05 E | 27.21 ± 0.23 F | 44.40 ± 0.41 F | 44.00 ± 1.39 AB | 88.00 ± 0.03 AB | 6.00 ± 0.51 CDE | 12.00 ± 0.01 CDE |
| 9 | 209.88 ± 4.76 EF | 11.91 ± 0.03 CDE | 6.03 ± 0.07 CDE | 29.64 ± 0.31 CD | 53.75 ± 0.58 CDE | 48.00 ± 2.08 A | 96.00 ± 0.04 A | 2.00 ± 0.67 F | 4.00 ± 0.01 F |
| 10 | 208.46 ± 1.27 EF | 12.06 ± 0.05 CDE | 5.65 ± 0.03 CDE | 28.98 ± 0.13 CDE | 49.56 ± 0.51 DEF | 42.00 ± 1.73 ABC | 84.00 ± 0.03 ABC | 8.00 ± 1.13 CD | 16.00 ± 0.02 CD |
| 11 | 329.50 ± 2.83 B | 11.72 ± 0.08 DE | 6.80 ± 0.59 B | 30.36 ± 0.99 BC | 58.94 ± 5.76 BC | 43.00 ± 0.52 AB | 86.00 ± 0.01 AB | 7.00 ± 1.19 CDE | 14.00 ± 0.02 CDE |
| 12 | 346.50 ± 0.05 A | 11.71 ± 0.04 DE | 7.62 ± 0.05 A | 31.64 ± 0.04 B | 66.70 ± 0.35 A | 40.00 ± 1.35 BCD | 80.00 ± 0.05 BCD | 10.00 ± 1.26 BC | 20.00 ± 0.02 BC |
| 13 | 288.80 ± 2.61 D | 14.04 ± 0.04 AB | 6.38 ± 0.04 BC | 33.61 ± 0.12 A | 64.17 ± 0.46 AB | 35.00 ± 1.50 D | 70.00 ± 0.03 D | 15.00 ± 1.14 A | 30.00 ± 0.02 A |
| Sequence ID | Gene Name | Number of Amino Acids | Molecular Weight (kDa) | Isoelectric Point | Instability Index | Aliphatic Index | Hydrophilicity Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker00048578 | PbRWP1 | 1032 | 114.19 | 5.45 | 59.04 | 78.03 | −0.385 |
| Maker00025725 | PbRWP2 | 906 | 101.10 | 7.88 | 48.08 | 76.94 | −0.421 |
| Maker00044782 | PbRWP3 | 1164 | 128.32 | 6.31 | 56.05 | 77.35 | −0.401 |
| Maker00007515 | PbRWP4 | 956 | 106.47 | 5.99 | 51.60 | 77.44 | −0.389 |
| Maker00029939 | PbRWP5 | 201 | 23.00 | 9.80 | 55.93 | 66.57 | −0.864 |
| Maker00044800 | PbRWP6 | 694 | 76.64 | 5.69 | 48.09 | 83.98 | −0.234 |
| Maker00034339 | PbRWP7 | 1037 | 113.35 | 5.30 | 57.61 | 76.34 | −0.311 |
| Maker00019978 | PbRWP8 | 945 | 103.93 | 5.79 | 48.81 | 75.39 | −0.367 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Mei, G.; Wan, L.; Jian, Z.; Chen, B.; Li, X.; Liu, B.; Xiong, J.; Chen, S.; Hu, H. Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of Phoebe bournei Seeds. Biology 2026, 15, 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15120919
Mei G, Wan L, Jian Z, Chen B, Li X, Liu B, Xiong J, Chen S, Hu H. Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of Phoebe bournei Seeds. Biology. 2026; 15(12):919. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15120919
Chicago/Turabian StyleMei, Guoxin, Lulu Wan, Zeping Jian, Baiyou Chen, Xiaowen Li, Bao Liu, Jun Xiong, Shipin Chen, and Haichao Hu. 2026. "Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of Phoebe bournei Seeds" Biology 15, no. 12: 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15120919
APA StyleMei, G., Wan, L., Jian, Z., Chen, B., Li, X., Liu, B., Xiong, J., Chen, S., & Hu, H. (2026). Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of Phoebe bournei Seeds. Biology, 15(12), 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15120919

