Next Article in Journal
Population Dynamics of Bigeye Grunt Brachydeuterus auritus (Valenciennes, 1831) in the Coastal Waters of Sierra Leone: A Near-Threatened Species on the IUCN Red List
Previous Article in Journal
Can We Use CAR-T Cells to Overcome Immunosuppression in Solid Tumours?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Host Shaping Associated Microbiota in Hydrothermal Vent Snails from the Indian Ocean Ridge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Abundance Heterotrophic Bacteria Inhabit the 85° E Hydrothermal Plume of the Explosive Volcanic Zone at Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean

1
Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Submarine Geoscience, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(8), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081036
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 7 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 12 August 2025

Simple Summary

Under-ice submarine volcanic-hydrothermal systems serve as a pivotal environment for investigating the limits of extremophiles and advancing our understanding of biogeochemical processes. Evidence of hydrothermal activities and explosive volcanic events was detected at 85° E on the Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. A systematic analysis of microbial diversity and metabolic potential was conducted in the hydrothermal plumes and surface sediments. The results indicated that, in addition to the prevalence of chemolithoautotrophic microbes in hydrothermal plume, a significant abundance of heterotrophic bacteria, such as Alcanivorax, was observed. These heterotrophic bacteria are likely involved in the decomposition of hydrocarbons and complete mineralization into CO2. We speculate that this phenomenon is linked to the release of sedimentary organic carbon into the water column, a consequence of the recent explosive volcanic activity.

Abstract

While under-ice submarine hydrothermal systems provide critical insights into extremophile adaptations, the ecological impacts of explosive volcanism on these ecosystems remain poorly constrained. We successfully detected evidence of hydrothermal activities and explosive volcanism at 85° E, the eastern volcanic zone, ultra-slow spreading Gakkel Ridge. Hydrothermal plume, surface sediments, and volcanic glass samples were systematically collected to investigate the diversity of microbial communities. Our results revealed two distinct microbial regimes in hydrothermal plume: (1) chemoautotrophic bacteria (Sulfurimonas and SUP05_cluster), prevalent in global basaltic hydrothermal systems, potentially involved in carbon fixation through the CBB and rTCA cycles and (2) Alcanivorax (up to 82.5%), known for degrading hydrocarbons. Sediment profiles showed a depth-dependent decline of Alcanivorax, tightly coupled with TOC (1.05% to 0.45%, r = 0.75, p < 0.05). Additionally, the Alcanivorax MAGs demonstrated their potential in degrading various types of organic carbon, especially in alkane degradation. Strikingly, this pattern contrasts with hydrothermal plumes from effusive volcanic zones (Aurora and Polaris regions), where Alcanivorax was undetectable. We speculate that the surge of Alcanivorax in the 85° E hydrothermal plume was associated with the violent disturbances caused by explosive volcanism. This mechanism accelerates microbial-mediated carbon turnover rates compared to a stable hydrothermal ecosystem.

1. Introduction

The Arctic Ocean, as an amplifier of global climate change, provides a distinctive and crucial setting for investigating the interactions between the lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and atmosphere [1,2]. However, the perennial ice cover of the Arctic Ocean has limited our understanding of the deep-sea mass and energy exchanges between the spheres, as well as their impacts on the ecosystem and geochemical processes. The Gakkel Ridge (approximately 1800 km long), lying beneath the Arctic Ocean, represents a critical yet understudied node in global plate tectonics, with its distinct ecological systems also remaining poorly studied [3,4,5,6]. Despite its ultra-slow spreading rate (6–13 mm/year), the Gakkel Ridge has been found to exhibit significant evidence of volcanism and hydrothermal activity during decades of exploration, showcasing unique tectono-magmatic processes [6,7,8,9,10]. In the ice-covered Arctic deep-sea environment, life forms exhibit remarkable survival strategies, thriving under extreme conditions such as frequent volcanic activity and subzero temperatures [8,11,12]. Investigating the energy acquisition and adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of microbes in this environment will contribute to understanding deep-sea biogeological puzzles, the limits of life on Earth, and will also provide potential analogs for extraterrestrial life searches, such as on Saturn’s moon Enceladus [13,14].
Deep-sea hydrothermal plumes typically maintain stable microbial networks fueled by inorganic energy sources [15,16]. Dominant groups often include Gammaproteobacteria (SUP05), Campylobacteria (Such as Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum), Deltaproteobacteria (SAR324), Alphaproteobacteria (SAR11), and Thaumarchaeota (Marine Group I) [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Chemosynthetic microorganisms obtain energy by oxidizing reductive substances such as H2S, H2, CH4, Fe, and Mn to fix CO2 [16,23]. On the southern part of the Gakkel Ridge (82.5° N), the Aurora Vent Field, the only confirmed hydrothermal vent field currently (visually confirmed in 2014), exemplifies this paradigm, dominated by sulfur/hydrogen-oxidizing chemoautotrophs that drive carbon fixation [11,24]. Previous studies have investigated microbial community structures and metabolic characteristics in hydrothermal systems in relatively stable environments [25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, how local geological events, such as volcanic eruptions, influence hydrothermal microbial ecosystems remains unclear and warrants further investigation.
The 85° E segment is located in the eastern volcanic zone of the Gakkel Ridge, where explosive volcanism has been shown to occur relatively more frequently than in the western volcanic zone (where the Aurora Field was found). Edmonds et al. reported a relatively thick nonbuoyant hydrothermal plume (up to 1400 m) at the 85° E segment [8,31,32,33]. However, it remains unclear whether the structure, energy acquisition, and adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of the microbial communities at the 85° E segment are similar to those of the Aurora Field. We hypothesize that local geological environments or events, such as volcanic eruptions, may shape or disrupt microbial communities and hydrothermal ecosystems.
During the Joint Arctic Scientific Middle-Ocean Ridge Insight Expedition (JASMInE) in 2021, hydrothermal plume anomalies were detected, as well as seafloor hydrothermal microbial mats and volcanic ash, at the 85° E segment of the Gakkel Ridge. We systematically collected hydrothermal plume and surface sediments samples to analyze the microbial diversity, metabolic potential and their relationships with environmental factors, testing the hypothesis that explosive volcanism shapes distinct microbial community structures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hydrothermal Plume Detection and Near-Bottom Optical Survey

Hydrothermal plume signals were detected at CTD 01 station (85.63° N, 85.14° E) on the Gakkel Ridge during JASMInE aboard the icebreaker “Xuelong 2” in August 2021 (Figure 1A). The SBE-32 carousel water sampler, integrated with conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profilers and turbidity sensor for detecting hydrothermal plume anomalies. The turbidity profiles revealed the presence of two anomaly layers: one at depths between 3300 and 3500 m, and another below 3500 m (not reaching the seafloor). The peak anomalies occurred at approximately 3400 m (0.02 NTU) and 3550 m (0.03 NTU) after background subtraction (Figure 2A). The near-bottom optical survey (TV-Grab) showed the presence of volcanic ash and hydrothermal microbial mats at stations TVG 05 and TVG 01, situated at approximately 1 km and 3 km away from CTD 01 station, respectively (Figure 1B).

2.2. Sampling and Physicochemical Analysis

Seawater and hydrothermal plume water samples were collected at CTD 01 station using an SBE-32 carousel water sampler. 4 L volumes of water samples were collected at depths of 3000 m, 3200 m, 3250 m, 3300 m, 3350 m, 3400 m, and 3500 m (Table S1). The samples were filtered through 0.22 μm pore size polycarbonate membranes (47 mm diameter, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) to collect particulates. The filter membranes and filtrate were stored at −80 °C for subsequent genomic and geochemical analysis, respectively. Fresh volcanic glass fragments and volcaniclastic material were grabbed at TVG 01 station and TVG 06 station (Figure 1B-2,B-4). Surface sediments were collected at GC 01 station, approximately 5 km away from the CTD 01 station (Figure 1A). The sedimentary core was carefully subdivided into thin layers at intervales of 2–3 cm and stored at −80 °C for subsequent genomic and geochemical analysis (Table S1). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its δ13CDIC isotope in water samples were measured using a Delta V advantage isotope mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was quantified with a TOC-L CPH (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (C10–C40) were measured by gas chromatograph (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). The total organic carbon (TOC) in sediments was determined using the combustion oxidation nondispersive infrared absorption method.

2.3. DNA Extraction, 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Analysis

DNA was extracted from particulate samples and sediment core samples using the DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA quality was assessed by NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and concentration was measured by Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pair 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAA-3′) [34]. PCR reactions were performed in 20 μL reactions, each containing 0.8 μL (5 μM concentration) of forward and reverse primers, 10 μL Pro Taq, and 2 μL of genomic community DNA as a template. Each sample was amplified in triplicate and mixed after PCR amplification to reduce potential amplification bias. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 29 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, with final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified gene libraries were sequenced using the Hiseq PE250 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to obtain raw sequences. All bioinformatics analyses were performed using QIIME2 [35]. Raw demultiplexed sequences were denoised and dereplicated using DADA2 [36]. The taxonomic assignment of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was performed using the SILVA 138 database [37]. Additionally, 14 publicly available 16S rRNA datasets generated from Aurora and Polaris hydrothermal plume samples (Table S1) were downloaded from the European Nucleotide Archive under project number PRJNA82185.

2.4. Metagenomic Sequencing and Analysis

Metagenomic sequencing analysis was performed on particulate samples collected from depths of 3300 m and 3500 m at CTD 01 station. The environmental DNA was fragmented to construct a gene library, which was then sequenced using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The raw reads were trimmed and quality filtered using fastp software (V. 0.23.0) [38]; clean reads were then assembled using Megahit [39]. The metagenomic assemblies were analyzed with Prodigal v.2.6.3 to predict protein coding sequences [40] and annotated with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [41] using the Blastp program (with an e-value cut-off of 1 × 10−5) [42]. To compare differences in gene abundance between samples, transcripts per million (TPM) was employed as a normalization method to eliminate the effect of gene length and sequencing depth on the results [43].

2.5. Metagenomic Binning and Metagenome-Assembled Genome (MAG) Classification

Contigs larger than 1000 bp from the final assemblies were binned into draft MAGs with Metabat 2 [44], and the completeness and contamination of bins were evaluated by CheckM [45]. The high- and medium-quality MAGs (completeness ≥ 50% and contamination ≤ 10%) were subsequently subjected to downstream analysis. A dereplication was conducted using FastANI, based on a 95% average nucleotide identity (ANI) [46], and the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) analysis was employed to ascertain whether the MAGs belonged to different genera (<50%) [47]. MAGs were classified using the GTDB-T classify workflow [48] and with the NCBI taxonomy browser. Use Prodigal v.2.6.3 to predict protein coding sequences [40], and functional annotations were conducted based on comparisons with KEGG [41], Pfam, and P450 databases [49].

3. Results

3.1. Physicochemical Characteristics of Water Column and Sediments

The concentration of DIC ranged from 9. 60 to 28.57 mg/L, with δ13CDIC varying between −9.04 and −0.73‰. Notably, at depths of 3300 m and 3400 m, the highest and lowest values of δ13CDIC were observed, which occurred in parallel with the highest and lowest concentrations of DIC, respectively (Figure 2B). The concentrations of DOC and C10–C40 ranged from 1.01 to 1.43 mg/L and 0.54 to 0.59 mg/L, with the lowest concentration of them both observed at 3300 m (Figure 2C). The TOC content in the sediment samples ranged from 0.45% to 1.05%, and a downcore decreasing trend was observed (Figure 3E).
Figure 2. Environmental parameters in 85° E hydrothermal plume and background seawater (AC). (A) Turbidity values, with blue filled circles on the Y-axis representing the depths at which samples were taken. (B) DIC concentrations and δ13CDIC. (C) DOC and C10–C40 concentrations.
Figure 2. Environmental parameters in 85° E hydrothermal plume and background seawater (AC). (A) Turbidity values, with blue filled circles on the Y-axis representing the depths at which samples were taken. (B) DIC concentrations and δ13CDIC. (C) DOC and C10–C40 concentrations.
Biology 14 01036 g002

3.2. Microbial Diversity and Its Correlation with Environmental Factors

The sequences were rarefied to the lowest amplification sequence number (120,713), obtained 844,911 valid reads, which were clustered into 3619 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). The results showed that the dominant taxa in the 85° E hydrothermal plume influence zone were as follows: Gammaproteobacteria (21.2–86.0%), with the highest relative abundance at 3500 m; Campylobacteria (1.0–51.9%), peaking at 3300 m and the lowest in background seawater (3000 m); and Desulfuromonadia (0.1–45.3%), Alphaproteobacteria (1.4–15.8%), and Nitrososphaeria (1.0–14.4%) (Figure 3A). At the genus taxonomic level, the dominant taxa were as follows: Sulfurimonas (1.0–51.8%) and SUP05_cluster (0.9–7.6%), both maximized at 3300 m with decreasing abundance toward shallower/deeper depths; Alcanivorax (up to 82.5%), which had the highest relative abundance at 3500 m (After normalization by RPKM in metagenomic analysis, the highest abundance reached 82.9%, Figure S1); and Mycobacterium (up to 11.5%), Acinetobacterium (up to 8.2%), and Alteromonas (up to 7.1%) (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Microbial community composition at class level (A) and genus level (BD). (A) 85° E samples, relative abundances below 1% were classified as “others”. (B) 85° E samples, taxa with relative abundances below 2% were classified as “others“; (C) Aurora and Polaris hydrothermal plume samples, taxa with relative abundances below 2% were classified as “others“; (D) Relative abundance of Alcanivorax in hydrothermal plume (CTD 01) and surface sediments (GC 01) at 85° E area. (E) The abundance of Alcanivorax and the content of TOC in sediments, and their correlation, * is the Pearson correlation coefficient was statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Microbial community composition at class level (A) and genus level (BD). (A) 85° E samples, relative abundances below 1% were classified as “others”. (B) 85° E samples, taxa with relative abundances below 2% were classified as “others“; (C) Aurora and Polaris hydrothermal plume samples, taxa with relative abundances below 2% were classified as “others“; (D) Relative abundance of Alcanivorax in hydrothermal plume (CTD 01) and surface sediments (GC 01) at 85° E area. (E) The abundance of Alcanivorax and the content of TOC in sediments, and their correlation, * is the Pearson correlation coefficient was statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Biology 14 01036 g003
As a comparison, the samples from the Aurora and Polaris hydrothermal plumes were significantly enriched Sulfurimonas (0–20.9% and 2.2–67.5%, respectively) and SUP05_cluster (5.0–13.6% and 1.7–24.3%, respectively) [24], which were sort of similar to those in the 85° E hydrothermal plume. Whereas, notably, Alcanivorax was virtually undetectable in the Aurora nor Polaris plumes, contrasting with the high relative abundance in the 85° E hydrothermal plume (Figure 3C). Furthermore, in the 85° E sediments, Alcanivorax exhibited a high relative abundance (up to 6.5%) in the upper sedimentary layers, decreasing with depth (Figure 3D). The abundance of Alcanivorax and the content of TOC in sediments have a significant positive correlation (Figure 3E, r = 0.75, p < 0.05).

3.3. Carbon Fixation and Sulfur Oxidation Potential

The metagenomic sequencing data of the hydrothermal plume samples collected at water depths of 3300 m and 3500 m were analyzed, and complete SOX systems (thiosulfate oxidase systems) genes were identified (Figure 4B). Furthermore, the genes encoding for multiple carbon fixation pathways, including the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, Reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle, Wood–Ljungdahl (WL) pathway, 3-hydroxypropionate (3HP) cycle, Hydroxypropionate/Hydroxybutyrate (HP/HB) cycle, and Dicarboxylate/Hydroxybutyrate (DC/HB) cycle (Figure 4C,D and Figure S2). After TPM (transcripts per million) normalization, the gene abundance results showed that the key enzyme gene (cbb) involved in the CBB cycle was significantly more abundant than those of other carbon fixation pathways, closely followed by the rTCA cycle (acl). In addition, the abundance of key enzyme genes associated with the CBB, rTCA, and sulfur oxidation pathways was significantly higher at 3300 m than at 3500 m (Figure 4A).

3.4. Organic Carbon Degradation Potential and Alcanivorax-Associated MAGs

The genes encode for multiple organic carbon degradation metabolic pathways, including those for alkane/fatty acid degradation, glycolysis, pyruvate degradation, amino acid degradation, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). The results of normalized abundance of key enzyme genes revealed that the degradation potential for alkanes (alkB, adh, and aldh) exhibited higher potential than that for glycolysis (hk, pfk, and pyk), pyruvate metabolism (pdh), and amino acid degradation (put, pcd, and sd). Except for amino acid degradation, the abundance of other organic carbon degradation-related enzyme genes at 3300 m was significantly lower compared to 3500 m (Figure 5A). We assembled the dominant Alcanivorax genome and analyzed its potential for degrading organic carbon.
We assembled the dominant Alcanivorax genome and analyzed its organic carbon degradation potential. A total of four Alcanivorax-related MAGs were recovered (Alc-1 to Alc-4), with a completeness of ≥50% and a contamination of <5% (Table S2). Alc-1, Alc-3, and Alc-4 were identified as Alcanivorax sp014762765, Alcanivorax venustensis, and Alcanivorax borkumensis, respectively. Alc-2 was identified at the genus Alcanivorax. Pairwise PCOP analysis between each of the Alcanivorax-related MAGs (Alc-1 to Alc-4) and the cultivated species Alcanivorax borkumensis, revealed protein sequence similarities exceeding 50% in all cases. This indicated that they belong to the same genus (Figure S3). All MAGs contained genes encoding alkane transport (ompT) and alkane monooxygenase (alkB), alcohol dehydrogenase (adh), and cytochrome P450 (cyp136), which are involved in the degradation of short-to-medium chain alkanes (C5–C17). Putative flavin-dependent monooxygenases responsible for the degradation of long alkanes (almA) (C32+) were encoded in all MAGs. For fatty acid metabolism, fatty acids are broken down via β-oxidation to acetyl CoA, which then enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The initial step in the TCA cycle is the condensation of acetyl CoA with oxaloacetate, catalyzed by citrate synthase (cs), to form citrate. In this cycle, each molecule of acetyl CoA undergoes four dehydrogenation reactions, producing three molecules of NADH+H+ and one molecule of FADH2, accompanied by two decarboxylation reactions releasing CO2. However, the gene encoding citrate synthase, which is one of the key enzymes in the TCA cycle, was not detected in any of the MAGs studied. All MAGs encode partial genes for glycolysis and amino acid metabolism but lack the first enzyme-coding gene of glycolysis (hexokinase, hk) (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

4.1. Chemosynthetic Taxa and Energy Metabolism Potential

Sulfurimonas and SUP05_cluster are typically the dominant taxa found in basalt-hosted hydrothermal plumes, fixing carbon via autotrophic sulfur oxidation, and serving as the cornerstone of the hydrothermal ecosystem [24,50,51]. In the 85° E hydrothermal plume, their relative abundance covaried with turbidity and peaked at 3300 m, coinciding maxima in DIC and δ13CDIC. Previous studies have shown that the δ13CDIC values decrease with water depth due to heterotrophic remineralization of sinking particulate organic matter [52,53,54]. It was thus inferred that the elevated δ13CDIC at 3300 m indicates hydrothermal input of 13C-enriched DIC. Hydrothermal inputs generated a multi-source carbon mixing signature, influencing the overall concentration of DIC and its isotopic composition.
Concurrently, the input of reduced compound such as sulfides from hydrothermal fluids stimulated proliferation of autotrophic groups such as Sulfurimonas and SUP05_cluster. Campylobacteria (e.g., Sulfurimonas) are typically found in low-oxygen and high-sulfide environments, Gammaproteobacteria (e.g., SUP05_cluster) are typically found in high-oxygen and low-sulfide environments [55,56]. The relative abundance of Sulfurimonas was lower than that of the SUP05_cluster at the depth of 3000 m (near background seawater) in the 85° E hydrothermal plume. At other depths, the relative abundance of Sulfurimonas was higher than that of the SUP05_cluster. It implied that the oxygen content in the water closer to the background seawater was higher than in the hydrothermal plume layer, while the sulfide content was lower. Therefore, the relative abundance of SUP05_cluster was higher than Sulfurimonas in the background seawater.
Metagenomic analysis indicated that microbial carbon fixation in the 85° E hydrothermal plume may mainly be via the CBB cycle, with the rTCA cycle serving as a secondary pathway, consistent with findings in global deep-sea hydrothermal vents reported by others [57,58]. Chemolithoautotrophic microbes using the CBB cycle for carbon fixation are mainly classified into Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexi [59]. In the 85° E hydrothermal plume, the SUP05_cluster may have used the CBB cycle for carbon fixation. The metabolic potential for carbon fixation and sulfur oxidation at 3300 m was significantly higher than at 3500 m, indicating intense chemosynthetic activity within the center layer of nonbuoyant hydrothermal plume. The chemosynthetic carbon fixation process exhibited high consistency with global basalt-hosted hydrothermal systems [26]. This finding provides data support for global hydrothermal system models, further enriching our understanding of the operating mechanisms of hydrothermal ecosystems.

4.2. Explosive Volcanism as a Potential Driver of Heterotrophic Bacteria Bloom Represented by Alcanivorax

Alcanivorax, known for its ability to degrade hydrocarbons, occupied a very high abundance in oil-contaminated marine ecosystems across the globe earth [60,61,62]. However, the abundance of Alcanivorax at the water depth of 3500 m in the 85° E hydrothermal plume reached 82.9% (Figure 3B), which is even higher than that documented in oil spills. The significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of Alcanivorax and the content of TOC in surface sediments, indicates that the distribution and abundance of Alcanivorax are closely related to the organic carbon (Figure 3E). It is known that young crust and sediments on the mid-ocean ridges lead no potential oil or gas reservoirs, especially in the axial valley [63,64,65]. Thus, it can be suggested that the hydrocarbons feeding high abundance Alcanivorax should come from other than oil-contaminated environments.
As the ultra-slow spreading ridge, the Gakkel Ridge has ample time to accumulate terrestrial and glacially transported sediments, resulting in the formation of a relatively thick sedimentary layer rich in organic matter [66,67,68]. Our cruise confirmed that the TOC content of surface sediment can reach up to 1.05% (JASMInE, 2021). However, Alcanivorax was barely detectable in hydrothermal plumes of the Aurora or Polaris field located in the western and central end of the Gakkel Ridge, respectively, where the volcanically-hosted hydrothermal systems or seabed sedimentary conditions show almost no difference compared to 85° E [11,24,68,69]. This implies that the excess supply of hydrocarbons for the remarkably abundant Alcanivorax in the 85° E hydrothermal plume could be provided by the seabed organic-rich sediment, but not through the process of submarine hydrothermal circulation.
Through the near-bottom optical survey, we found fresh volcaniclastic deposits (>10 cm thick) on the flank of Oden volcano (2–3 km south-east of our sampling site), indicating that Oden volcano may have experienced a relatively intense explosive eruption shortly before the cruise survey. This contrasts with the effusive-dominated volcanism at the Aurora hydrothermal field [10,12]. Unlike the effusive volcanic activity, explosive volcanic eruptions often involve a rapid release of energy, causing severe disturbance to the local oceanic crust, overlying sediments, and water bodies [70].
The high abundance of Alcanivorax has been reported in hydrothermal plumes over the Tonga Arc, where active volcanism occurs. It was hypothesized that volcanic-induced hydrocarbon leakage fuels these Alcanivorax populations [71]. Additionally, high abundance of Alcanivorax was also found in the surface sediments approximately 5 km north-east of our sampling site. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that the explosive volcanic eruption triggered the release of buried organic carbon into the overlying water column and entrained by the hydrothermal plume. This process most likely caused the surge in Alcanivorax in the 85° E hydrothermal plume.

4.3. Effects on Carbon Cycling in the Deep Ocean

In the Gakkel Ridge 85° E ecosystem, chemoautotrophic populations facilitate the conversion of inorganic carbon released from volcanic and hydrothermal activities into organic carbon through metabolic pathways, including the CBB cycle and the rTCA cycle. At a depth of 3500 m (near the seafloor), there was a high abundance of genes related to the degradation of organic carbon, including hydrocarbons, sugars, and amino acids. Genes related to hydrocarbon degradation were more abundant than that for others. The variation in dissolved C10–C40 compounds and DOC content with depth showed a consistent pattern, suggesting that DOC may consist mainly of petroleum hydrocarbons. We propose that explosive volcanic eruption, as a violent geological phenomenon, has the capacity to disrupt the stability of sedimentary layers, leading to the release of previously sequestered hydrocarbons into the adjacent seawater (Figure 6). This process perturbs the balance between burial and release of deep-sea carbon along mid-ocean ridges. The high selective pressure exerted by hydrocarbons from sedimentary layers leads to rapid shifts in microbial populations in the seawater, thereby reducing the diversity of the microbial community [72]. At this stage, the metabolic processes of microorganisms such as Alcanivorax become particularly important, as they can accelerate the mineralization of these organic carbon compounds. The four MAGs of Alcanivorax from 85° E hydrothermal plume not only contain encode alkB and cytochrome P450 genes for the degradation of short- and medium-chain hydrocarbons but also encode the almA gene capable of degrading long-chain hydrocarbons. AlkB is a transmembrane metal enzyme, in the initial stage of microbially mediated alkane degradation, facilitates the conversion of water-insoluble straight-chain alkanes into more biodegradable alcohols [73]. AlmA is capable of oxidizing alkanes at the terminal end and initiating the degradation of long-chain alkanes through subterminal oxidation [74]. Subterminal oxidation is a more effective method of attacking long-chain hydrocarbon molecules, initiating and accelerating the complete degradation process. All MAGs of Alcanivorax in our research have the potential to complete the final step of hydrocarbon degradation, which involves converting organic carbon into CO2 through the TCA cycle (Figure 6). Lin et al. [75] also demonstrated that Alcanivorax can mineralize medium-chain alkanes to CO2.
The explosive volcanism at the 85° E segment was a regional, transient geological event that caused the release of organic matter from sediments and reshaped the structure of microbial communities. However, given the vast length of global mid-ocean ridges (—65,000 km) and the numerous volcanic activities that remain undiscovered [76,77], the explosive volcanic effects represent a universal and non-negligible biogeochemical processes in the entire ocean and throughout Earth’s history. The focus of carbon cycling research has long been on Earth’s surface systems, whereas the lithosphere is the largest carbon reservoir [78,79]. Up to now, there is still a lack of in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of the deep carbon cycling, especially on the patterns of carbon exchange between the oceanic crust lithosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere [80,81].
This study highlights an often-overlooked phenomenon: intense geological activity may trigger the release of carbon from deep-sea sedimentary layers serving as vital carbon sinks. The released carbon re-enters the fast carbon cycle, with microbes playing a significant role in the process. This insight enhances our comprehensive understanding of the operating mechanisms of the deep ocean carbon cycling, which is influenced by the interplay of geological events, hydrothermal systems, and microbiomes.

5. Conclusions

The explosive volcanism and hydrothermal activity along the eastern segment of the Gakkel Ridge provided a harsh and dynamic habitat for life. We found that the main chemosynthetic groups and carbon fixation pathways in 85° E are consistent with those of global basaltic hydrothermal systems. It is noteworthy that Alcanivorax was significantly enriched in both the hydrothermal plume near the seafloor and the sediments, potentially degrading hydrocarbons and releasing CO2. We speculate that the proliferation of heterotrophic bacteria is associated with the release of sedimentary organic matter into the overlying water column as a result of recent explosive volcanic activity, based on the evidence of volcanic eruptions observed on the seafloor. These findings support the hypothesis that local geological events shape microbial communities. Our study revealed the microbial diversity and metabolic mechanisms of this unique environment, providing new insights into the interactions between geological activities and microbial communities, and highlighted that heterotrophic microbial communities play a significant role in accelerating the slow carbon cycle within geologically active areas. Future research could consider monitoring of geological events and conducting periodic microbial sampling to further investigate the long-term interactions between geological activities and the carbon cycle.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology14081036/s1, Figure S1: Relative abundance of Alcanivorax after normalization by RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase Million) based on metagenomic results; Figure S2: Carbon fixation pathways in 85° E samples. (A) WL cycle; genes: acetyl-CoA synthase (key gene, acs), anaerobic carbon-monoxide dehydrogenase catalytic (coo), formate dehydrogenase (fdh), formate-tetrahydrofolate (fhs), methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (fol), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (met). (B) 3HP cycle; genes: propionyl-CoA carboxylase (key gene, pcc), methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (mut), malyl-CoA (mcl), 3-methylfumaryl-CoA hydratase (meh). (C) HP/HB and DC/HP cycle; genes: 4-hydroxybutyrate-CoA ligase (key enzyme, hbl), acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase (key gene, acat), methylmalonyl-CoA/ethylmalonyl-CoA epimerase (mcee), methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (mut), pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (por), pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase (ppd), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), malate dehydrogenase (mdh), fumarate hydratase (fum); Figure S3: The PCOP analysis of MAGs of Alcanivorax in this study; Table S1: Samples analyzed in this study; Table S2: The statistics to the MAGs of Alcanivorax retrieved in this study.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, J.Y. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, X.H. and J.L.; investigation, Y.W., T.Z., W.D., C.Y. and Y.F.; project administration, J.L.; visualization, J.Y.; writing—original draft, J.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., X.H. and H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No.: 2021YFF0501304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 92351304) and the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development Project (2021–2030): Arctic Deep Observation for Multi-Sphere Cycling (ADOMIC).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the raw 16S rRNA and metagenomic data generated in this study are publicly available in the NCBI BioProject with the accession PRJNA1279799.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the captain and crew of the icebreaker “Xuelong 2” for a successful cruise. Thank you to Fengping Wang from the School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rantanen, M.; Karpechko, A.Y.; Lipponen, A.; Nordling, K.; Hyvärinen, O.; Ruosteenoja, K.; Vihma, T.; Laaksonen, A. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chemke, R.; Polvani, L.M.; Kay, J.E.; Orbe, C. Quantifying the role of ocean coupling in Arctic amplification and sea-ice loss over the 21st century. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Delaney, J.R.; Kelley, D.S.; Lilley, M.D.; Butterfield, D.A.; Baross, J.A.; Wilcock, W.S.D.; Embley, R.W.; Summit, M. The quantum event of oceanic crustal accretion: Impacts of diking at mid-ocean ridges. Science 1998, 281, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cannat, M.; Daniel, S.; Luc, L.; Manon, B.; Ekéabino, M.; Sylvie, L. On spreading modes and magma supply at slow and ultraslow mid-ocean ridges. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019, 519, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dick, G.J. The microbiomes of deep-sea hydrothermal vents: Distributed globally, shaped locally. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, T.; Li, J.B.; Niu, X.W.; Ding, W.W.; Fang, Y.X.; Lin, J.; Wang, Y.J.; Zha, C.C.; Tan, P.C.; Kong, F.S.; et al. Highly variable magmatic accretion at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge. Nature 2024, 633, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stubseid, H.H.; Bjerga, A.; Haflidason, H.; Pedersen, L.E.R.; Pedersen, R.B. Volcanic evolution of an ultraslow-spreading ridge. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Edmonds, H.N.; Michael, P.J.; Baker, E.T.; Connelly, D.P.; Snow, J.E.; Langmuir, C.H.; Dick, H.J.B.; Mühe, R.; German, C.R.; Graham, D.W. Discovery of abundant hydrothermal venting on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge in the Arctic Ocean. Nature 2003, 421, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Michael, P.J.; Thiede, J.; Dick, H.J.; Goldstein, S.L.; Graham, D.; Jokat, W.; Langmuir, C.H.; Muhe, R.; Snow, J.E. The Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge Expedition-AMORE 2001: Seafloor spreading at the top of the world. EOS 2001, 82, F1097. [Google Scholar]
  10. Michael, P.J.; Langmuir, C.H.; Dick, H.J.B.; Snow, J.E.; Goldstein, S.L.; Graham, D.W.; Lehnert, K.; Kurras, G.; Jokat, W.; Mühe, R.; et al. Magmatic and amagmatic seafloor generation at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature 2003, 423, 956–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ramirez-Llodra, E.; Argentino, C.; Baker, M.C.; Boetius, A.; Costa, C.; Dahle, H.; Denny, E.; Dessandier, P.-A.; Eilertsen, M.; Ferre, B.; et al. Hot vents beneath an icy ocean: The Aurora Vent Field, Gakkel Ridge, revealed. Oceanography 2022, 36, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. German, C.R.; Reeves, E.P.; Türke, A.; Diehl, A.; Albers, E.; Bach, W.; Purser, A.; Ramalho, S.P.; Stefano, S.; Mertens, C.; et al. Volcanically hosted venting with indications of ultramafic influence at Aurora hydrothermal field on Gakkel Ridge. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsu, H.W.; Postberg, F.; Sekine, Y.; Shibuya, T.; Kempf, S.; Horányi, M.; Juhász, A.; Altobelli, N.; Suzuki, K.; Masaki, Y.; et al. Ongoing hydrothermal activities within Enceladus. Nature 2015, 519, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Waite, J.H.; Glein, C.R.; Perryman, R.S.; Teolis, B.D.; Magee, B.A.; Miller, G.; Grimes, J.; Perry, M.E.; Miller, K.E.; Bouquet, A.; et al. Cassini finds molecular hydrogen in the Enceladus plume: Evidence for hydrothermal processes. Science 2017, 356, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reed, D.C.; Breier, J.A.; Jiang, H.S.; Anantharaman, K.; Klausmeier, C.A.; Toner, B.M.; Hancock, C.; Speer, K.; Thurnherr, A.M.; Dick, G.J. Predicting the response of the deep-ocean microbiome to geochemical perturbations by hydrothermal vents. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1857–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zeng, X.; Alain, K.; Shao, Z.Z. Microorganisms from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2021, 3, 204–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anantharaman, K.; Breier, J.A.; Sheik, C.S.; Dick, G.J. Evidence for hydrogen oxidation and metabolic plasticity in widespread deep-sea sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Anantharaman, K.; Breier, J.A.; Dick, G.J. Metagenomic resolution of microbial functions in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes across the Eastern Lau Spreading Center. ISME J. 2016, 10, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheik, C.S.; Jain, S.; Dick, G.J. Metabolic flexibility of enigmatic SAR324 revealed through metagenomics and meta transcriptomics. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sheik, C.S.; Anantharaman, K.; Breier, J.A.; Sylvan, J.B.; Edwards, K.J.; Dick, G.J. Spatially resolved sampling reveals dynamic microbial communities in rising hydrothermal plumes across a back-arc basin. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1434–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.T.; Zhou, H.Y.; Fang, J.S.; Wu, Z.J.; Peng, X.T. Microbial distribution in a hydrothermal plume of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Geomicrobiol. J. 2016, 33, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, J.T.; Yang, J.Y.; Sun, M.X.; Su, L.; Wang, H.; Gao, J.Q.; Bai, S.J. Distribution and Succession of Microbial Communities Along the Dispersal Pathway of Hydrothermal Plumes on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 581381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Correa, S.S.; Schultz, J.; Lauersen, K.J.; Rosado, A.S. Natural carbon fixation and advances in synthetic engineering for redesigning and creating new fixation pathways. J. Adv. Res. 2022, 47, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Molari, M.; Hassenrueck, C.; Laso-Pérez, R.; Wegener, G.; Offre, P.; Scilipoti, S.; Boetius, S. A hydrogenotrophic Sulfurimonas is globally abundant in deep-sea oxygen-saturated hydrothermal plumes. Nat. Microbiol. 2023, 8, 651–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amend, J.P.; McCollom, T.M.; Hentscher, M.; Bach, W. Catabolic and anabolic energy for chemolithoautotrophs in deep-sea hydrothermal systems hosted in different rock types. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75, 5736–5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Früh-Green, G.L.; Kelley, D.S.; Lilley, M.D.; Lilley, M.D.; Cannat, M.; Chavagnac, V.; Baross, J.A. Diversity of magmatism, hydrothermal processes and microbial interactions at mid-ocean ridges. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 852–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cathalot, C.; Roussel, E.G.; Perhirin, A.; Creff, V.; Donval, J.P.; Guyader, V.; Roullet, G.; Gula, J.; Tamburini, C.; Garel, M.; et al. Hydrothermal plumes as hotspots for deep-ocean heterotrophic microbial biomass production. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, W.P.; Li, Z.Y.; Zeng, L.Y.; Dong, C.M.; Shao, Z.Z. The oxidation of hydrocarbons by diverse heterotrophic and mixotrophic bacteria that inhabit deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems. ISME J. 2020, 14, 1994–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, M.; Jain, S.; Dick, G.J. Genomic and transcriptomic resolution of organic matter utilization among deep-sea bacteria in Guaymas Basin hydrothermal plumes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fisher, C.R.; Takai, K.; Bris, N. Hydrothermal vent ecosystems. Oceanography 2007, 20, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tolstoy, M.; Bohnenstiehl, D.R.; Edwards, M.H.; Kurras, G.J. Seismic character of volcanic activity at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge. Geology 2001, 29, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Edwards, M.H.; Kurras, G.J.; Tolstoy, M.; Bohnenstiehl, D.R.; Coakley, B.J.; Cochran, J.R. Evidence of recent volcanic activity on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge. Nature 2001, 409, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sohn, R.A.; Willis, C.; Humphris, S.; Shank, T.M.; Singh, H.; Edmonds, H.N.; Kunz, C.; Hedman, U.; Helmke, E.; Jakuba, M.; et al. Explosive volcanism on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature 2008, 453, 1236–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, J.Z.; Deng, Y.; Shen, L.N.; Wen, C.Q.; Yan, Q.Y.; Ning, D.L.; Qin, Y.J.; Xue, K.; Wu, L.Y.; He, Z.L.; et al. Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, S.F.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.R.; Gu, J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, D.H.; Liu, C.M.; Luo, R.B.; Sadakane, K.; Lam, T. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1674–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.L.; LoCascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ogata, H.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheng, R.L.; Li, X.F.; Jiang, L.J.; Gong, L.F.; Geslin, C.; Shao, Z.Z. Virus diversity and interactions with hosts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Microbiome 2022, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qin, J.J.; Li, Y.R.; Cai, Z.M.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liang, S.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; Shen, D.; et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kang, D.D.; Li, F.; Kirton, E.; Thomas, A.; Egan, R.; An, H.; Wang, Z. MetaBAT 2: An adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 2019, 7, 7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hölzer, M. POCP-nf: An automatic Next flow pipeline for calculating the percentage of conserved proteins in bacterial taxonomy. Bioinformatics 2024, 40, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chaumeil, P.A.; Mussig, A.J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Parks, D.H. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2019, 36, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Han, C.; Shi, C.P.; Liu, L.M.; Han, J.C.; Yang, Q.Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.D.; Fu, W.Y.; Gao, H.; Huang, H.S.; et al. Majorbio Cloud 2024: Update single-cell and multiomics workflows. iMeta 2024, 3, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Morris, R.M.; Spietz, R.L. The Physiology and Biogeochemistry of SUP05. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2022, 14, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dede, B.; Hansen, C.T.; Neuholz, R.; Schnetger, B.; Kleint, C.; Walker, S.; Bach, W.; Amann, R.; Meyerdierks, A. Niche differentiation of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SUP05) in submarine hydrothermal plumes. ISME J. 2022, 16, 1479–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ge, T.T.; Luo, C.L.; Ren, P.; Zhang, H.M.; Fan, D.; Chen, H.T.; Chen, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.C. Stable carbon isotopes of dissolved inorganic carbon in the Western North Pacific Ocean: Proxy for water mixing and dynamics. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 998437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ge, T.T.; Wang, X.C.; Zhang, J.; Luo, L.C.; Xue, Y.J. Dissolved Inorganic Radiocarbon in the Northwest Pacific Continental Margin. Radiocarbon 2016, 58, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. McNichol, A.P.; Druffel, E.R. Variability of the δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon at a site in the North Pacific Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1992, 56, 3589–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yamamoto, M.; Takai, K. Sulfur metabolisms in epsilon- and gamma-proteobacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal fields. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Berg, A. Ecological aspects of the distribution of different autotrophic CO2 fixation pathways. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1925–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Campbell, B.J.; Engel, A.S.; Porter, M.L.; Takai, K. The versatile ε-proteobacteria: Key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nakagawa, S.; Takai, K. Deep-sea vent chemoautotrophs: Diversity, biochemistry, and ecological significance. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 65, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hügler, M.; Sievert, S.M. Beyond the Calvin cycle: Autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2010, 3, 261–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brooijmans, R.J.W.; Pastink, M.I.; Siezen, R.J. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria: The oil-spill clean-up crew. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hara, A.; Syutsubo, K.; Harayama, S. Alcanivorax which prevails in oil-contaminated seawater exhibits broad substrate specificity for alkane degradation. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schneiker, S.; Santos, V.; Bartels, D.; Bekel, T.; Brecht, M.; Buhrmester, J.; Chernikova, T.N.; Denaro, R.; Ferrer, M.; Gertler, C.; et al. Genome sequence of the ubiquitous hydrocarbon-degrading marine bacterium Alcanivorax borkumensis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moore, T.E.; Bird, K.J.; Pitman, J.K. Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Lomonosov-Makarov Province, 2008, Chap. CC. In The 2008 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1824; Moore, T.E., Gautier, D.L., Eds.; United States Geological Survey, USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2019; 43p. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tennyson, M.E.; Pitman, J.K. Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Sverdrup Basin Province, Arctic Canada, 2008, Chap. I. In The 2008 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1824; Moore, T.E., Gautier, D.L., Eds.; United States Geological Survey, USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2020; 21p. [Google Scholar]
  65. Houseknecht, D.W.; Bird, K.J.; Garrity, C.P. Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Arctic Alaska Province, 2008, Chap. E. In The 2008 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1824; Moore, T.E., Gautier, D.L., Eds.; United States Geological Survey, USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2019; 25p. [Google Scholar]
  66. Rusakov, V.Y.; Levitan, M.A.; Roshchina, I.A.; Spielhagen, R.F.; Gebhardt, K. Chemical composition of late Pleistocene-Holocene pelagic sediments in Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Geochem. Int. 2010, 48, 999–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rekant, P.V.; Gusev, E.A. Sediments in the Gakkel Ridge rift zone (Arctic Ocean): Structure and history. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 57, 1283–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rekant, P.V.; Petrov, O.V.; Gusev, E.A. Model of Formation of the Sedimentary System of the Eurasian Basin, the Arctic Ocean, as a Basis for Reconstructing Its Tectonic Evolution. Geotectonics 2021, 55, 676–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baker, E.T.; Edmonds, H.N.; Michael, P.J.; Bach, W.; Dick, H.J.B.; Snow, J.E.; Walker, S.L.; Banerjee, N.R.; Langmuir, C.H. Hydrothermal venting in magma deserts: The ultraslow-spreading Gakkel and Southwest Indian Ridges. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2004, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rubin, K.H.; Chadwick, W.; Fornari, D.; Clague, D.; Embley, R.; Baker, E.; Perfit, M.; Caress, D.; Dziak, R. Volcanic Eruptions in the Deep Sea. Oceanography 2012, 25, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dede, B.; Priest, T.; Bach, W.; Walter, M.; Amann, R.; Meyerdierks, A. High abundance of hydrocarbon-degrading Alcanivorax in plumes of hydrothermally active volcanoes in the South Pacific Ocean. ISME J. 2023, 17, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Truskewycz, A.; Gundry, T.D.; Khudur, L.S.; Kolobaric, A.; Taha, M.; Aburto-Medina, A.; Ball, A.S.; Shahsavari, E. Petroleum Hydrocarbons Contamination in Terrestrial Ecosystem- Fate and Microbial Responses. Molecules 2019, 24, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, X.; Zhang, J.X.; Han, L.; Lee, J.; Williams, S.C.; Forsberg, A.; Xu, Y.; Austin, R.N.; Feng, L. Structure and mechanism of the alkane-oxidizing enzyme AlkB. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Minerdi, D.; Zgrablic, I.; Sadeghi, S.J.; Gilardi, G. Identification of a novel Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenase from Acinetobacter radioresistens: Close relationship to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis prodrug activator EtaA. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 5, 700–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lin, H.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, Y. High hydrostatic pressure stimulates n-C16 mineralization to CO2 by deep-ocean bacterium Alcanivorax xenomutans A28. Commun. Biol. 2025, 8, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, J.B.; Ding, W.W. How does Carbon Cycle in the Mid-Ocean Ridge Deep? Earth Sci. 2022, 47, 3924–3925. [Google Scholar]
  77. Clague, D.A.; Paduan, J.B.; Davis, A.S. Widespread strombolian eruptions of mid-ocean ridge basalt. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2009, 180, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Spotlight on deep carbon research. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4800. [CrossRef]
  79. Foley, S.F.; Fischer, T.P. An essential role for continental rifts and lithosphere in the deep carbon cycle. Nat. Geosci. 2017, 10, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. D’Hondt, S.; Pockalny, R.; Fulfer, V.M.; Spivack, A.J. Subseafloor life and its biogeochemical impacts. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, M.L.; Xu, S.; Sano, Y.J. Deep carbon recycling viewed from global plate tectonics. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, 089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling sites and seafloor observations at the 85°E segment, Gakkel Ridge. (A) Location of sampling stations. (B) Seafloor observations and samples on board, (B-1) microbial mats observed by TV-Grab at TVG 01 station; (B-2) volcanic glass chips grabbed at TVG 01 station. The thickness of volcaniclastic deposits exceeds 10 cm; (B-3) explosive volcanic ash observed at TVG 05 station; (B-4) fresh volcanic glass fragments recovered at TVG 06 station.
Figure 1. Sampling sites and seafloor observations at the 85°E segment, Gakkel Ridge. (A) Location of sampling stations. (B) Seafloor observations and samples on board, (B-1) microbial mats observed by TV-Grab at TVG 01 station; (B-2) volcanic glass chips grabbed at TVG 01 station. The thickness of volcaniclastic deposits exceeds 10 cm; (B-3) explosive volcanic ash observed at TVG 05 station; (B-4) fresh volcanic glass fragments recovered at TVG 06 station.
Biology 14 01036 g001
Figure 4. Carbon fixation and thiosulfate oxidation pathways and the abundances of their key enzyme genes in 85° E samples. (A) Heat map shows the normalized abundance of key enzyme genes. (B) SOX pathway: L-cysteine S-thiosulfotransferase (soxAX), S-sulfosulfanyl-L-cysteine sulfohydrolase (soxB), sulfane dehydrogenase (soxC), S-disulfanyl-L-cysteine oxidoreductase (soxD), and sulfur-oxidizing protein (soxYZ). (C) Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle: ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (key gene, cbb), phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), transketolase (tkt), ribose 5-phosphate isomerase (rpi), and phosphoribulokinase (prk). (D) Reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle: ATP-citrate lyase (key gene, acl), pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (por), pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase (ppd), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), malate dehydrogenase (mdh), fumarate hydratase (fum), NADH-dependent fumarate reductase (key gene, frd), succinyl-CoA synthetase (suc), 2-oxoglutarate/2-oxoacid ferredoxin oxidoreductase (kor), isocitrate dehydrogenase (idh), and aconitate hydratase (acn). The red star marks key enzyme genes.
Figure 4. Carbon fixation and thiosulfate oxidation pathways and the abundances of their key enzyme genes in 85° E samples. (A) Heat map shows the normalized abundance of key enzyme genes. (B) SOX pathway: L-cysteine S-thiosulfotransferase (soxAX), S-sulfosulfanyl-L-cysteine sulfohydrolase (soxB), sulfane dehydrogenase (soxC), S-disulfanyl-L-cysteine oxidoreductase (soxD), and sulfur-oxidizing protein (soxYZ). (C) Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle: ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (key gene, cbb), phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), transketolase (tkt), ribose 5-phosphate isomerase (rpi), and phosphoribulokinase (prk). (D) Reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle: ATP-citrate lyase (key gene, acl), pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (por), pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase (ppd), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), malate dehydrogenase (mdh), fumarate hydratase (fum), NADH-dependent fumarate reductase (key gene, frd), succinyl-CoA synthetase (suc), 2-oxoglutarate/2-oxoacid ferredoxin oxidoreductase (kor), isocitrate dehydrogenase (idh), and aconitate hydratase (acn). The red star marks key enzyme genes.
Biology 14 01036 g004
Figure 5. Metabolic potential for organic carbon degradation in 85°E hydrothermal samples. (A) Normalized abundance of key enzyme genes for organic carbon degradation metabolism pathways. (B) Organic carbon degradation potential in MAGs of Alcanivorax; alkane/fatty acid degradation, genes: outer membrane transport protein (key gene, ompT), alkane monooxygenase (key gene, alkB), flavin-binding monooxygenase (almA), cytochrome P450 (key gene, cyp136), alcohol dehydrogenase (adh), aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) (aldh), acyl-CoA synthetase (acsl), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (keygene, acd), enoyl-CoA hydratase (echA), 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (hadh), β-Ketothiolase (ktl); glycolysis, genes: hexokinase (Key gene, hk), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (gpi), 6-phosphofructokinase (pfk), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (fba), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA), phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk), phosphoglycerate mutase (pgm), enolase (eno), pyruvate kinase (pyk); pyruvate degradation, genes: pyruvate dehydrogenase (key gene, pdh); TCA cycle, genes: citrate synthase (key gene, cs), aconitate hydratase (acn), isocitrate dehydrogenase (key gene, idh), alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (key gene, kgd), succinyl-CoA synthetase (suc), succinate dehydrogenase (sdh), fumarate hydratase (fum), malate dehydrogenase (mdh); amino acid metabolism, genes: proline dehydrogenase (put), 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (key gene, pcd), glutamate dehydrogenase (gud), threonine aldolase (ta), glycine hydroxymethyltransferase (gly), and L-serine dehydratase (key gene, sd). Red stars denote key enzyme genes.
Figure 5. Metabolic potential for organic carbon degradation in 85°E hydrothermal samples. (A) Normalized abundance of key enzyme genes for organic carbon degradation metabolism pathways. (B) Organic carbon degradation potential in MAGs of Alcanivorax; alkane/fatty acid degradation, genes: outer membrane transport protein (key gene, ompT), alkane monooxygenase (key gene, alkB), flavin-binding monooxygenase (almA), cytochrome P450 (key gene, cyp136), alcohol dehydrogenase (adh), aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) (aldh), acyl-CoA synthetase (acsl), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (keygene, acd), enoyl-CoA hydratase (echA), 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (hadh), β-Ketothiolase (ktl); glycolysis, genes: hexokinase (Key gene, hk), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (gpi), 6-phosphofructokinase (pfk), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (fba), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA), phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk), phosphoglycerate mutase (pgm), enolase (eno), pyruvate kinase (pyk); pyruvate degradation, genes: pyruvate dehydrogenase (key gene, pdh); TCA cycle, genes: citrate synthase (key gene, cs), aconitate hydratase (acn), isocitrate dehydrogenase (key gene, idh), alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (key gene, kgd), succinyl-CoA synthetase (suc), succinate dehydrogenase (sdh), fumarate hydratase (fum), malate dehydrogenase (mdh); amino acid metabolism, genes: proline dehydrogenase (put), 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (key gene, pcd), glutamate dehydrogenase (gud), threonine aldolase (ta), glycine hydroxymethyltransferase (gly), and L-serine dehydratase (key gene, sd). Red stars denote key enzyme genes.
Biology 14 01036 g005
Figure 6. Dominant microbial genera and their carbon conversion potential in 85° E hydrothermal plume of the explosive volcanic zone at Gakkel Ridge.
Figure 6. Dominant microbial genera and their carbon conversion potential in 85° E hydrothermal plume of the explosive volcanic zone at Gakkel Ridge.
Biology 14 01036 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, T.; Ding, W.; Yang, C.; Fang, Y.; Li, J. High-Abundance Heterotrophic Bacteria Inhabit the 85° E Hydrothermal Plume of the Explosive Volcanic Zone at Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Biology 2025, 14, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081036

AMA Style

Yu J, Wang Y, Han X, Wang H, Zhang T, Ding W, Yang C, Fang Y, Li J. High-Abundance Heterotrophic Bacteria Inhabit the 85° E Hydrothermal Plume of the Explosive Volcanic Zone at Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Biology. 2025; 14(8):1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Juan, Yejian Wang, Xiqiu Han, Hanlin Wang, Tao Zhang, Weiwei Ding, Chi Yang, Yinxia Fang, and Jiabiao Li. 2025. "High-Abundance Heterotrophic Bacteria Inhabit the 85° E Hydrothermal Plume of the Explosive Volcanic Zone at Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean" Biology 14, no. 8: 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081036

APA Style

Yu, J., Wang, Y., Han, X., Wang, H., Zhang, T., Ding, W., Yang, C., Fang, Y., & Li, J. (2025). High-Abundance Heterotrophic Bacteria Inhabit the 85° E Hydrothermal Plume of the Explosive Volcanic Zone at Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Biology, 14(8), 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop