Next Article in Journal
Epichloë Endophyte Alters Bacterial Nitrogen-Cycling Gene Abundance in the Rhizosphere Soil of Perennial Ryegrass
Previous Article in Journal
Immunological Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Therapies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Diet on the Biological Characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786

1
Faculty of Biology, Agriculture and Environmental Science, The University of Da Nang—University of Science and Education, 459 Ton Duc Thang St., Danang 550000, Vietnam
2
Environment & Biological Resource (DN-EBR), University of Science and Education, Danang 550000, Vietnam
3
Institute of Life Science (ILS), 9/621 Vo Nguyen Giap St, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc City, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(7), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070878
Submission received: 11 May 2025 / Revised: 18 June 2025 / Accepted: 18 June 2025 / Published: 18 July 2025

Simple Summary

Tiny aquatic animals known as rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) are a crucial food source for young fish and shrimp in aquaculture, a form of fish farming. However, their growth and reproduction can vary significantly depending on their living conditions. This study examined the impact of salt levels in the water, water temperature, and diet on the health and reproductive ability of these organisms. We found that rotifers produced the most offspring in low-salinity water (5 ppt), but lived the longest in saltier water (35 ppt). Warmer temperatures (35 °C) made them grow up faster, while cooler temperatures (20 °C) helped them live longer. Diet also played a role: a specific algae (Chlorella vulgaris) boosted offspring numbers, whereas a mixed algae diet helped them live the longest. These findings help fish farmers create the ideal conditions for growing large quantities of healthy rotifers, which in turn makes fish farming more efficient and sustainable, ultimately supporting our food supply.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of salinity, temperature, and diet on the biological characteristics of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, an essential live feed in aquaculture. The results indicate that environmental factors have a significant influence on reproductive traits and survival. At a salinity of 5 ppt, B. plicatilis achieved the highest fecundity (25.50 ± 0.58 inds.), while the longest lifespan (273.00 ± 72.52 h) was observed at 35 ppt. The temperature had a strong influence on developmental rates, with the shortest juvenile period recorded at 35 °C (8.00 ± 0.00 h) and the longest lifespan at 20 °C (270.62 ± 30.38 h). The diet also played a critical role, with Chlorella vulgaris supporting maximum fecundity, whereas mixed diets prolonged lifespan to 290.50 ± 62.83 (h). These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing rotifer culture systems to improve aquaculture productivity and sustainability.

1. Introduction

Rotifers, particularly Brachionus plicatilis, play a vital role in aquatic ecosystems, serving as a key link in the food web by transferring energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels. These microscopic zooplankton are widely distributed across freshwater, brackish, and saltwater environments and contribute significantly to the biological productivity of natural water bodies [1,2]. In aquaculture, rotifers are indispensable as live feed for the larval stages of marine fish and crustaceans. Their small size, high nutritional value—including essential amino acids, fatty acids, and proteins—and ease of cultivation make them ideal for meeting the dietary needs of aquatic larvae, especially during critical developmental stages [3,4]. Studies show that B. plicatilis can produce a substantial number of offspring per female under optimal conditions, ensuring a reliable supply of live feed for aquaculture systems [5].
Environmental factors such as salinity, temperature, and diet profoundly affect the growth and reproduction of rotifers [6,7,8]. For instance, B. plicatilis exhibits optimal reproductive performance within specific salinity ranges, while extreme salinity levels inhibit their survival and fecundity [9]. Temperature also significantly influences their life cycle and metabolic rates, with different strains often showing distinct thermal preferences for optimal development and reproduction [10,11]. Furthermore, adequate food quality, such as that provided by nutritionally rich microalgae, significantly enhances their growth and reproduction, with high feeding rates often observed under favorable nutritional conditions [12,13,14]. Understanding the intricate biological and ecological responses of rotifers to these environmental variables is crucial for optimizing their cultivation in aquaculture systems.
While comprehensive studies have elucidated the general influence of environmental factors on rotifer biology, there remains a need for more localized investigations that account for unique strain-specific or regional adaptations [15,16]. For native strains, such as the one in this study, critical knowledge gaps remain regarding their precise physiological and demographic responses to varying salinity, temperature, and dietary compositions. This lack of specific data is a significant bottleneck for maximizing their productivity and reliability as a live feed. Therefore, this study systematically quantifies the specific biological responses of this native B. plicatilis strain across these environmental parameters, providing crucial region-specific insights and refining our understanding of its adaptive plasticity. Such a foundational baseline is essential for optimizing its culture under local aquaculture conditions, enhancing the overall efficiency and sustainability of aquaculture systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. B. plicatilis Culturing

The large-type B. plicatilis strain was obtained from the Laboratory of Plankton, Department of Biology and Environment, University of Science and Education—The University of Danang. The rotifers were maintained under static culture conditions at 25 ± 1 °C, with a light intensity of 1000 lux and a 16:8 h light–dark photoperiod. This lighting condition is maintained throughout all experiments. The cultures were grown in EPA medium, as described by Peltier and Weber (1985) [17], containing 96 mg NaHCO3, 60 mg CaSO4, 60 mg MgSO4, and 4 mg KCl per liter of distilled water. Sterilized seawater was added to adjust the salinity to the desired level, and the pH was maintained between 7.0 and 7.5. The culture medium was refreshed every two days. Rotifers were fed Chlorella vulgaris at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL.
C. vulgaris was cultured separately in Bold’s Basal Medium (BBM) [18] under the same light–dark cycle until reaching a density of approximately 20 × 106 cells/mL. Algal cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min and stored at 4 °C until use. C. vulgaris served as the sole food source for all salinity and temperature experiments, excluding the diet-specific trials. The rotifer cultures were maintained over multiple generations under consistent laboratory conditions prior to experimentation. The temperature was regulated using an air conditioning system, and the lighting was controlled via an automated timer system.

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiments were designed following the methodology of Yin & Zhao (2008) [6], using a 96-well cell culture tray. Each well contained 1 mL of volume, comprising 0.3 mL of culture medium and one young B. plicatilis individual, less than 2 h old. A total of 56 young rotifers were included in the experiments, which tested six salinity treatments (5, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 parts per thousand (ppt); four temperature treatments (20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, and 35 °C); and four diet treatments (0%, 20%, 50%, and 100% microalgae), with four replicates each. The salinity, temperature, and diet experiments were conducted independently.
Samples were examined every 2 h under a stereomicroscope (Leica S9i, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) to record individual biological characteristics. Observations continued until all rotifers had died. The observed parameters included the juvenile period, embryonic development time, spawning times, spawning interval, fecundity, and lifespan [19]. The juvenile period (h) was defined as the duration from birth until the first appearance of reproductive eggs, indicating the onset of sexual maturity. The embryonic development time (h) refers to the interval between the moment a female begins carrying eggs and the successful hatching of offspring. Spawning times (h) represented the duration (in hours) between the first and the last egg-carrying event during the female’s lifespan. The spawning interval (h) was calculated as the time between two consecutive spawning events. Fecundity (individuals per female) was determined as the total number of neonates produced by an individual female over her entire life. Lastly, the lifespan period (h) was recorded as the total duration from birth to natural death of each individual.

2.3. Culture Conditions According to Salinity, Temperature, and Diet

Salinity experiment: To investigate the effects of salinity on B. plicatilis, individuals were cultured under six salinity levels: 5, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 ppt. All treatments were maintained at a constant temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, pH 7.0. Rotifers were fed exclusively with Chlorella vulgaris at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL throughout the experiment.
Temperature experiment: The effects of temperature were examined by culturing B. plicatilis at four different temperatures: 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, and 35 °C. Culture trays were placed inside a Memmert incubator (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) to ensure precise thermal regulation. Based on the results from the salinity experiment, the salinity was fixed at 5 ppt, with the pH maintained at 7.0. Rotifers were provided with C. vulgaris at 1 × 106 cells/mL as the sole food source.
Diet experiment: To assess the impact of dietary composition, rotifers were subjected to four feeding treatments: (1) 100% Chlorella (100A), (2) 50% baker’s yeast and 50% Chlorella (50Y:50A), (3) 80% baker’s yeast and 20% Chlorella (80Y:20A), and (4) 100% baker’s yeast (100Y). Concentrated C. vulgaris was diluted to 10 × 106 cells/mL for the 100A treatment, and fresh baker’s yeast was similarly prepared for the 100Y treatment. Mixed diets were formulated by combining 100A and 100Y in ratios of 1:1 and 1:4 to create the 50Y:50A and 80Y:20A treatments, respectively. The concentrations of both C. vulgaris and yeast cells were quantified using a counting chamber (0.1 mm, 1/400 mm2, Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany). Environmental conditions for the diet experiment were standardized across treatments: a salinity of 5 ppt, a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, and a pH of 7.0.

2.4. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to assess differences in the mean values of biological characteristics across treatments. Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was applied as a post hoc analysis to identify statistically significant pairwise differences between treatment groups. All statistical analyses were conducted using RStudio software (2025.05.1-513) [20].
To visually represent the trade off strategy between the fecundity and lifespan of B. plicatilis under various cultural conditions, the average values of each treatment were normalized to 0–1 values using min–max scaling. The normalization formula applied was as follows:
X n o r m a l i z e d = X X m i n X m a x X m i n
Xnormalized represents the normalized value, X is the original observed value for the characteristic (fecundity or lifespan), and Xmax and Xmin are the maximum and minimum value of that characteristic across the entire dataset (all treatments combined).
Subsequently, a bidirectional bar chart was generated, with normalized fecundity values plotted in the positive direction and normalized lifespan values plotted in the negative direction.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Salinity on B. plicatilis

In general, increasing salinity tends to prolong the juvenile period, embryonic development time, spawning times, spawning interval, and lifespan while reducing fecundity, indicating that salinity significantly influences the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis.
Specifically, the juvenile period of B. plicatilis was shortest at 5 ppt salinity (14.96 ± 0.25 h) and progressively increased with higher salinity, reaching its maximum at 35 ppt (67.33 ± 5.77 h) (Figure 1A). Significant differences were observed among the treatments (p < 0.001), with longer juvenile periods recorded at salinities of 25 ppt, 30 ppt, and 35 ppt compared with 5 ppt and 15 ppt (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). This indicates that increasing salinity prolongs the juvenile period.
The embryonic development time initially decreased from 5 ppt (12.04 ± 0.25 h) to 20 ppt (10.33 ± 0.50 h) but increased at salinities above 20 ppt, peaking at 35 ppt (22.00 ± 0.87 h) (Figure 1B). Statistically significant differences were observed among the treatments (p < 0.001), with a general trend of longer embryonic development times at higher salinities. The spawning times were shortest at 5 ppt salinity (58.04 ± 3.79 h) and increased with rising salinity, reaching 181.67 ± 53.31 h at 35 ppt (p < 0.01) (Figure 1C). The 5 ppt treatment was significantly different from 25 ppt, 30 ppt, and 35 ppt (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between 5 ppt and 15 ppt or 20 ppt (p > 0.05). This trend demonstrates that higher salinity extends spawning times. The spawning interval was shortest at 5 ppt (2.28 ± 0.14 h) and increased significantly with higher salinities, reaching 20.57 ± 5.36 h at 35 ppt (p < 0.001) (Figure 1D).
The lower salinity levels favored higher and more stable fecundity. This parameter was recorded at its highest level at 5 ppt (25.50 ± 0.58 individuals) and decreased significantly with increasing salinity, dropping to 9.00 ± 4.69 individuals at 30 ppt and 9.67 ± 5.03 individuals at 35 ppt (p < 0.001) (Figure 1E). In contrast, lifespan positively correlated with salinity and was strongly associated with spawning times (p < 0.001, R = 0.74). Lifespan increased from 134.00 ± 19.60 h at 5 ppt to 273.00 ± 72.52 h at 35 ppt, with significant differences observed among the treatments (p < 0.01) (Figure 1F). Higher salinities generally resulted in longer lifespans.

3.2. Effects of Temperature on B. plicatilis

The significant effects of temperature on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis are shown in Figure 2. The juvenile period of B. plicatilis was longest at 20 °C (33.38 ± 4.52 h) and decreased significantly with increasing temperature, reaching its shortest duration within the range of 30–35 °C (p < 0.001) (Figure 2A). Similarly, the embryonic development time decreased with increasing temperature (Figure 2B). The embryonic development time was shortest and stabilized at 30 °C and 35 °C (8.00 ± 0.00 h) and was significantly longer at 20 °C (19.62 ± 4.55 h) and 25 °C (12.04 ± 0.25 h) (p < 0.001).
The spawning times significantly decreased with rising temperature, from 191.12 ± 16.45 h at 20 °C to 58.04 ± 3.79 h at 25 °C (p < 0.001) (Figure 2C). While no significant difference was observed between 30 °C (73.75 ± 7.23 h) and 35 °C (52.00 ± 6.53 h) (p > 0.05), the overall trend indicates a substantial reduction in spawning times at temperatures above 25 °C. The spawning interval was longest at 20 °C (8.05 ± 0.66 h) and progressively shortened as temperature increased, reaching 2.17 ± 0.17 h at 35 °C. Significant differences were observed among the treatments (p < 0.001). The spawning interval remained short and stable between 25 °C and 35 °C but increased substantially at temperatures below 25 °C (Figure 2D).
Fecundity was lowest at 20 °C (23.75 ± 0.96 individuals), increased to 26.75 ± 0.50 individuals at 30 °C, and slightly declined at 35 °C (24 ± 3.16 individuals). The differences in fecundity among the treatments were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Figure 2E). The lifespan of B. plicatilis decreased significantly with increasing temperature, from 270.62 ± 30.38 h at 20 °C to 71.00 ± 12.73 h at 35 °C (p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant influence of temperature on lifespan, with higher temperatures resulting in shorter lifespans (Figure 2F).

3.3. Effects of Diet on B. plicatilis

The experimental results demonstrated that dietary treatments had a significant influence on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis, as shown in Figure 3. As mentioned above, the feeding regimes tested for rotifers included 100% baker’s yeast (100Y), an 80% baker’s yeast and 20% Chlorella mixture (80Y:20A), a 50% baker’s yeast and 50% Chlorella mixture (50Y:50A), and 100% Chlorella (100A).
The juvenile period of B. plicatilis was shortest when fed exclusively on C. vulgaris algae (100A: 14.96 ± 0.25 h) and longest when fed yeast-based diets or mixtures (16.50 ± 0.00 h for 100Y, 80Y:20A, and 50Y:50A). The differences in the juvenile period between 100A and yeast-containing diets were statistically significant (p < 0.001), indicating that feeding entirely on C. vulgaris algae optimizes the juvenile period (Figure 3A). Conversely, the embryonic development time was shortest at 100Y or in mixed diets (80Y:20A and 50Y:50A, 10.00 ± 0.00 h each) and longest at 100A (12.04 ± 0.25 h). These differences were highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that yeast-based diets reduce embryonic development time compared with the C. vulgaris algae alone diet (Figure 3B).
The spawning times were longest in the 80Y:20A treatment (226.50 ± 30.28 h) and shortest with 100A (58.04 ± 3.79 h). Intermediate values were observed for 100Y (119.00 ± 32.04 h) and 50Y:50A (141.25 ± 47.05 h). The differences between diets were statistically significant (p < 0.001), indicating that mixed diets prolong spawning times (Figure 3C). The spawning interval was shortest with 100A (2.28 ± 0.14 h) and progressively increased with yeast-based diets, being longest in the 80Y:20A treatment (10.84 ± 1.70 h). The significant differences among the treatments (p < 0.001) indicate that a diet of C. vulgaris algae alone provides the most stable and shortest spawning intervals (Figure 3D).
Fecundity was highest in the 100A treatment (25.50 ± 0.58 individuals) and declined with increasing yeast proportions, with 80Y:20A (21 ± 1.73 individuals) exhibiting higher fecundity than 100Y and 50Y:50A (18.67 ± 1.15 individuals and 16.75 ± 4.35 individuals, respectively). The differences in fecundity among the diets were statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Figure 3E). The lifespan of B. plicatilis was longest at 80Y:20A (290.50 ± 62.83 h) and reduced in 50Y:50A (172.13 ± 38.64 h), 100Y (156.83 ± 55.14 h), and 100A (134.00 ± 19.60 h). The lifespan differences among the treatments were significant (p < 0.01), indicating that mixed diets prolong the lifespan, while single-source diets (algae or yeast alone) reduce it (Figure 3F).
Following the analysis of the individual effects of temperature, salinity, and diet on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis, an integrated visualization was constructed to illustrate the relative trade offs between lifespan and fecundity across all tested conditions (Figure 4). The values were normalized against the highest recorded values within each trait group, allowing for a direct comparison of trade off patterns under each condition.
In salinity treatments (blue bars), B. plicatilis displayed a consistent trade off between lifespan and fecundity. As salinity increased, lifespan extended gradually, from 134.00 h at 5 ppt to 273.00 h at 35 ppt, while fecundity showed a declining trend, dropping from 25.50 to just 9.67 individuals. The most pronounced contrast occurred between these two extremes, where the individuals lived significantly longer but reproduced at a markedly lower rate. In the temperature treatments (red bars), an opposite pattern emerged. Lifespan shortened as temperature increased, falling from 270.63 h at 20 °C to 71.00 h at 35 °C. Meanwhile, fecundity generally rose, peaking at 30 °C with 26.75 individuals. Although a slight drop in fecundity was observed at 35 °C (in 24 individuals), the values remained relatively high across this temperature range. The dietary treatments (green bars) revealed more variation. The 80Y:20A combination supported the longest lifespan (290.50 h) along with relatively high fecundity (21 individuals). In contrast, the 100A group exhibited one of the shortest lifespans (134.00 h) but maintained high reproductive output (25.50 individuals). The 50Y:50A diet resulted in intermediate values for both traits (172.13 h and 16.75 individuals), without extreme shifts in either direction.
These results reveal distinct patterns of life history modulation by the cultural factors. Salinity induced a strongly antagonistic relationship between the two traits, promoting longevity while suppressing fecundity. Temperature was found to regulate a relatively linear trade off between lifespan and reproductive output. Diet, on the other hand, exerted nonlinear effects, with specific combinations enhancing or impairing both traits in a highly condition-dependent manner. These differential responses underscore the complexity of cultural influence on rotifer biology and the importance of multifactorial analyses in understanding organismal performance.

4. Discussion

Cultural factors play a pivotal role in shaping the biological performance of aquatic organisms, with rotifers presenting a particularly intriguing model for understanding adaptive strategies in dynamic ecosystems. The research across various ecological contexts has consistently demonstrated the sensitivity of aquatic microorganisms to environmental parameters, emphasizing the need to understand species-specific responses [21,22,23,24]. Building on this foundational ecological research, our experimental investigation of B. plicatilis reveals nuanced interactions between specific environmental parameters and biological performance. Through a systematic examination, a comprehensive summary of these physiological responses under defined environmental gradients has been produced, outlining how salinity, temperature, and nutritional conditions modulate energy allocation, life history strategies, and overall biological performance in B. plicatilis (Table 1). To gain deeper insights into the observed biological trends, we analyzed them using established ecological theoretical frameworks, integrating the dynamic energy budget (DEB) framework and r/K selection theory to elucidate the complex energy allocation strategies of B. plicatilis [25,26,27,28,29,30]. The DEB framework was systematically applied to illuminate the hierarchical partitioning of finite energy resources across fundamental biological processes [31,32]. Energy flow was meticulously tracked from nutritional intake through metabolic maintenance, growth, and reproductive outputs [33]. Consequently, hierarchical energy allocation was observed to prioritize metabolic maintenance mechanisms before investment in growth and reproductive processes [34,35]. In the specific context of B. plicatilis, a sophisticated energy redistribution mechanism was identified, wherein organismal energy allocation was dynamically modulated in response to environmental stressors, enabling strategic reallocation between survival and reproductive strategies [36]. Complementary insights were derived from r/K selection theory, which provided a comprehensive explanation of the diverse reproductive strategies that exist along a continuum between r-selected traits (characterized by rapid reproduction, high fecundity, and abbreviated lifespans) and K-selected traits (distinguished by measured reproduction, extended longevity, and enhanced survival investment) [21,37].

4.1. Effects of Salinity on Physiological Mechanisms

Salinity constitutes a pivotal environmental factor that imposes complex physiological demands on B. plicatilis, initiating a series of coordinated molecular and cellular adaptive responses [38]. The species’ ability to endure a broad salinity spectrum is underpinned by a robust oxidative stress management system that significantly influences its life history trajectory [39]. This adaptability is reflected in empirical observations. At 5 ppt, B. plicatilis exhibits optimal reproductive performance, with a juvenile period of 14.96 ± 0.25 h, embryonic development of 12.04 ± 0.25 h, and fecundity reaching 25.50 ± 0.58 individuals (Figure 1A,B,E). However, under high-salinity conditions (35 ppt), substantial physiological shifts are evident, as indicated by the extension of the juvenile period to 67.33 ± 5.77 h, prolonged embryonic development to 22.00 ± 0.87 h, and a notable reduction in fecundity to 9.67 ± 5.03 individuals (Figure 1A,B,E).
At the molecular level, the exposure to elevated salinity (25–35 ppt) results in increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), activating a dynamic antioxidant defense system [40]. This response involves a tightly regulated enzymatic mechanism that mitigates oxidative damage, functioning not merely as a passive defense but as an active strategy for physiological adjustment under osmotic stress. These molecular adaptations are accompanied by shifts in energy allocation that align with r/K selection theory [41,42]. At lower salinities, such as 5 ppt, B. plicatilis adopts an r-selected strategy, characterized by rapid development and high fecundity. In contrast, under high-salinity conditions (25–35 ppt), the species transitions towards a K-selected strategy, favoring an extended lifespan and a reduced reproductive output.
Despite delayed population growth and reduced reproductive success at extreme salinities, B. plicatilis exhibits remarkable phenotypic plasticity [43]. The maximum recorded lifespan of 273.00 ± 72.52 h at 35 ppt illustrates a metabolic reconfiguration oriented towards survival, in which energy is diverted from reproduction to somatic maintenance. This adjustment ensures persistence under environmentally challenging conditions [44,45,46].
Our findings are consistent with the substantial body of literature that demonstrates the significant impact of salinity on rotifer life history traits. Supporting these findings, previous studies have consistently reported the detrimental effects of salinity fluctuations on rotifer performance. In B. plicatilis, complete mortality was observed at both 0 and 40 ppt, with reproductive output peaking at lower salinities (5–10 ppt) and decreasing significantly at 20–35 ppt [47]. Similarly, B. koreanus displayed a marked reduction in cumulative offspring production at 25 and 35 ppt [48,49], and in Synchaeta littoralis, fecundity was lower at 30 and 35 ppt compared with 25 ppt [50]. Collectively, these results underscore the influence of salinity on rotifer physiological mechanisms and highlight the importance of species-specific salinity optimization for enhancing reproductive efficiency and sustaining ecological performance under variable environmental conditions.

4.2. Effects of Temperature on Physiological Mechanisms

The remarkable stability of fecundity in B. plicatilis across varying temperatures provides compelling evidence for metabolic acceleration as a primary physiological response rather than environmental stress (Figure 4). At the molecular level, this adaptive capacity is mediated through a sophisticated network of cellular mechanisms, primarily orchestrated by heat shock proteins (HSPs) and antioxidant defense systems that transform temperature variations from potential stressors into signals for metabolic optimization [51]. As temperatures increase from 20 °C to 30 °C, the species demonstrates a capacity for metabolic optimization, with egg production remaining remarkably stable at approximately 25 eggs, despite significant changes in other physiological parameters. This stability is underpinned by a complex molecular response involving the precise regulation of gene expression, particularly heat shock proteins and antioxidant-related genes [52].
The heat shock protein system, particularly hsp40, hsp60, and hsp70, plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular proteostasis, acting as molecular chaperones that protect and refold proteins during thermal transitions [53,54]. The progressive acceleration of metabolic processes is evident in the dramatic reduction in time required for juvenile and embryonic development. At 20 °C, the juvenile period spans 33.38 ± 4.52 h, with embryonic development taking 19.62 ± 4.55 h (Figure 4). This progressively decreases to 9.00 h for the juvenile period and 8.00 h for embryonic development at 30 °C, suggesting an efficient metabolic adaptation rather than a stress response [55,56]. Simultaneously, the organism’s antioxidant defense system undergoes precise modulation. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) are dynamically regulated to manage reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, preventing oxidative damage while supporting metabolic acceleration [57]. This is not a passive defensive mechanism but an active metabolic recalibration strategy, enabling the rotifer to perceive temperature as an informational signal rather than a threat [58].
Previous research supports this interpretation of thermal-induced metabolic optimization. Studies on the Brachionus species have demonstrated that temperature modulates metabolic rates without compromising reproductive potential, a characteristic that aligns with the dynamic energy budget (DEB) theoretical frameworks [59]. This ability to maintain consistent fecundity while accelerating internal processes reflects an evolutionary adaptation to thermal variability. Only at 35 °C does a critical threshold emerge, where all physiological parameters simultaneously decline. This suggests a specific thermal limit rather than a generalized stress response, indicating that B. plicatilis possesses a remarkable range of metabolic plasticity [60]. The consistent egg production across temperatures, varying only between 23.75 ± 0.96 and 26.75 ± 0.50 eggs, provides direct evidence of the organism’s ability to maintain reproductive output despite the changing metabolic conditions. From an evolutionary perspective, this metabolic strategy aligns with r/K selection theory, demonstrating how aquatic microorganisms can dynamically reallocate energy resources to optimize survival and reproduction under varying environmental conditions [61,62]. The findings challenge simplistic environmental stress models, instead revealing temperature as a nuanced metabolic regulator that drives physiological optimization. Comparative studies on Euchlanis dilatata and other Brachionus species further substantiate this interpretation, showing similar patterns of metabolic acceleration and reproductive stability across thermal gradients [37]. This suggests a broader adaptive mechanism among aquatic microorganisms that enables efficient energy reallocation in response to environmental temperature fluctuations.

4.3. Effects of Diet on Physiological Mechanisms

Diet plays a pivotal role in determining the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis. Our results demonstrated that feeding on 100% C. vulgaris algae resulted in the highest fecundity (25.50 ± 0.58 inds.) but was associated with a shorter lifespan (134.00 ± 19.60 h) (Figure 4). This supports the findings of Sun et al. (2017), who also observed reduced lifespans in rotifers fed exclusively on C. vulgaris [63]. Conversely, the diets incorporating yeast or a mixture of yeast and algae extended lifespan, with the longest lifespan observed in the 80Y:20A treatment (290.50 ± 62.83 h). This trend aligns with the findings of Sun et al. (2017) [63], which indicated that the lifespan of B. plicatilis was extended when it was fed a mixed diet consisting of 50% C. vulgaris and 50% P. globosa [22]. Furthermore, the embryonic development time was also shorter when yeast-based diets were used, suggesting that yeast may accelerate metabolic processes. However, fecundity decreased when yeast was included in the diet, reflecting a trade off between longevity and reproductive output. These findings emphasize the importance of diet composition in optimizing rotifer cultures, with mixed diets offering a balance between extended lifespan and moderate fecundity.
Nutrient-dense diets, particularly those high in essential fatty acids and proteins, can enhance fecundity but may reduce lifespan. For instance, studies on B. plicatilis reveal that those fed protein-rich algae, such as Isochrysis galbana, produced more offspring, yet had shorter lifespans. Mechanistically, the trade off between reproduction and lifespan can be explained through oxidative stress and nutrient signaling pathways. According to [30,64], diets that promote reproduction often increase oxidative damage due to heightened metabolic activity, resulting in shorter lifespans. In contrast, energy-efficient diets reduce oxidative stress, enabling longer survival but at the expense of reduced fecundity. This balance is further modulated by environmental stressors, such as salinity and temperature, which affect metabolic rates, osmoregulatory demands, and the biochemical composition of rotifers.
This balance between survival and reproduction can be further understood within the r/K selection framework. Rotifers, as opportunistic organisms, exhibit r-selected traits in unstable environments, favoring rapid reproduction, short lifespans, and high fecundity to maximize fitness before conditions become unfavorable. For instance, studies on B. plicatilis and B. manjavacas demonstrate that these species adjust their reproductive strategies in response to environmental fluctuations, with higher salinity and temperature often accelerating reproductive rates but shortening lifespan [36]. Conversely, under more stable conditions, K-selected traits emerge, such as slower reproduction, longer lifespans, and increased energy investment in diapause eggs, ensuring persistence through adverse periods [36]. Moreover, the trade offs between egg size and reproductive output are a key determinant of rotifer life history strategies. For example, species like Euchlanis dilatata produce larger eggs at lower temperatures, favoring offspring survival over immediate reproductive success [30]. In contrast, B. plicatilis populations experiencing food limitation shift their strategy by producing fewer but higher quality eggs or investing in diapause, ensuring long-term persistence [56]. Such trade offs highlight phenotypic plasticity in energy allocation, where reproductive effort is modulated in response to resource availability and environmental predictability. Our findings align with this dynamic, highlighting how specific environmental conditions (e.g., salinity, temperature, and diet) influence the strategic trade off between reproduction and survival in B. plicatilis. Understanding these trade offs is essential for optimizing rotifer culture systems in aquaculture, where specific traits (e.g., high fecundity for rapid population growth or extended lifespan for sustained culture) can be targeted based on environmental and nutritional conditions. Further research into the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying these trade offs will provide deeper insights into the adaptability and resilience of rotifers under varying conditions.
The influence of various environmental factors, such as temperature, salinity, and diet, on metabolic processes, cellular responses, gene expression, and physiological outcomes in aquatic microorganisms is summarized in Table 2. The table indicates that temperature increases metabolic rates and enhances energy allocation to growth and reproduction at moderate levels, whereas high temperatures lead to faster development but shorter lifespans. Salinity, on the other hand, triggers osmotic regulation mechanisms and shifts energy allocation from reproduction to survival at high salinity, with the corresponding upregulation of stress-related genes. Diet plays a significant role in growth efficiency, with Chlorella-based diets enhancing protein synthesis and growth, while yeast-based diets extend lifespan by redistributing energy. Additionally, dietary composition influences gene expression, with growth-related genes being upregulated with algae diets and reproductive genes being downregulated in yeast-rich diets.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the significant influence of salinity, temperature, and diet on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis, providing valuable insights for aquaculture optimization. Specifically, at 5 ppt salinity, B. plicatilis achieved the highest fecundity (25.50 ± 0.58 individuals), while the longest lifespan (273.00 ± 72.52 h) was observed at 35 ppt, indicating salinity-dependent energy allocation. Similarly, the temperature profoundly affected biological traits, with rapid juvenile development at 35 °C (8.00 ± 0.00 h) and extended lifespan at 20 °C (270.62 ± 30.38 h). Furthermore, diet quality was crucial, with C. vulgaris supporting maximum fecundity, whereas mixed diets, such as 80% yeast and 20% C. vulgaris, extended lifespan (290.50 ± 62.83 h), highlighting a trade off between reproduction and longevity. These findings highlight the importance of precise environmental management in tailoring rotifer cultures to meet specific aquaculture needs, thereby balancing reproduction and survival. Future research should focus on the underlying molecular mechanisms to refine strategies for maximizing productivity and sustainability in rotifer-based systems.

Author Contributions

Q.-A.T.-N.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization, Data curation, and Conceptualization. T.N.P.: Literature search, Writing—original draft, and Visualization. Q.-A.T.: Literature search, Writing—original draft, and Visualization. H.T.M.: Literature search, Writing—original draft, and Visualization. T.L.P.T.: Literature search, Writing—original draft, and Visualization. D.D.P.: Literature search and Visualization. M.T.-D.: Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, and Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam, under project number B2023.DNA.20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Faculty of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Science and Education—The University of Da Nang, for providing research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Schmid-Araya, J.R.B. Rotifera. Volume 1: Biology, Ecology and Systematics. Second Edition. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, Volume 23; Wallace, R.L., Snell, T.W., Ricci, C., Nogrady, T.Q., Eds.; Backhuys Publishers and Ghent: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 82, pp. 431–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kostopoulou, V.; Carmona, M.J.; Divanach, P. The rotifer Brachionus plicatilis: An emerging bio-tool for numerous applications. J. Biol. Res. 2012, 17, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lubzens, E.; Zmora, O.; Barr, Y. Biotechnology and Aquaculture of Rotifers. Hydrobiologia 2001, 446, 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dhert, P.; Rombaut, G.; Suantika, G.; Sorgeloos, P. Advancement of rotifer culture and manipulation techniques in Europe. Aquaculture 2001, 200, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kailasam, M.; Thirunavukkarasu, A.R.; Ponniah, A.G.; Selvaraj, S.; Stalin, P. Recent Advances in Rotifer Culture and Its Application for Larviculture of Finfishes. In Advances in Marine and Brackishwater Aquaculture; Perumal, S., Thirunavukkarasu, A.R., Pachiappan, P., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yin, X.W.; Zhao, W. Studies on life history characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis O.F. Müller (Rotifera) in relation to temperature, salinity and food algae. Aquat. Ecol. 2008, 42, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Snell, T.W. Effect of Temperature, Salinity and Food Level on Sexual and Asexual Reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Mar. Biol. 1986, 92, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yoo, H.-K.; Kim, S.-S.; Lee, K.-W.; Lee, S.-Y.; Jung, M.-M.; Woo, S.-J. Determination of the Optimal Conditions for the Mass Culture of Large-Type Rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) at Low Temperatures. Water 2023, 15, 3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lubzens, E.; Hamo, R.; Blais, I.; Jeries, S.; Almog-Gabai, O.; Assaraf, Y.G. Rotifer Resting Eggs: An Alternative for Rotifer Mass Cultures in Fish Farms—Lessons from a Comprehensive Study on Production, Storage and Hatching of Resting Eggs. Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, J.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, J.C.; Hagiwara, A.; Lee, K.-W.; Lee, J.-S. Effects of Temperature Changes on Life Parameters, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidant Defense System in the Monogonont Marine Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 155, 111062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kauler, P.; Enesco, H.E. The Effect of Temperature on Life History Parameters and Cost of Reproduction in the Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. J. Freshw. Ecol. 2011, 26, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sayegh, F.A.Q.; Radi, N.; Montagnes, D.J.S. Do Strain Differences in Microalgae Alter Their Relative Quality as a Food for the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis? Aquaculture 2007, 273, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eryalçın, K.M. Nutritional value and production performance of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786 cultured with different feeds at commercial scale. Aquac. Int. 2019, 27, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Planas, M.; Estévez, A. Effects of diet on population development of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in culture. Helgol. Meeresunters. 1989, 43, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Campillo, S.; García-Roger, E.M.; Carmona, M.J.; Serra, M. Local adaptation in rotifer populations. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 25, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lavens, P.; Sorgeloos, P. (Eds.) Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture; FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 361; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1996; 295p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peltier, W.H.; Weber, C.I. (Eds.) Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms; EPA 600/4-85/013; Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1985; pp. 126–137.
  18. Alalayah, W.M.; Alhamed, Y.A.; Al-Zahrani, A.; Edris, G. Experimental investigation parameters of hydrogen production by algae Chlorella vulgaris. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Chemical, Environment & Biological Sciences (CEBS-2014), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 17–18 September 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Allan, J.D. Life History Patterns in Zooplankton. Am. Nat. 1976, 110, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2024; Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 6 June 2025).
  21. Walz, N. Life History Strategies of Rotifers. In Plankton Regulation Dynamics: Experiments and Models in Rotifer Continuous Cultures; Walz, N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; pp. 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Geng, Y.; Li, M.; Yu, R.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L.; Sun, L.; Lv, C.; Xu, J. Response of Planktonic Diversity and Stability to Environmental Drivers in a Shallow Eutrophic Lake. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miracle, M.R.; Serra, M. Salinity and Temperature Influence in Rotifer Life History Characteristics. Hydrobiologia 1989, 186, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yin, L.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chong, L.; Chen, L. Rotifer Community Structure and Its Response to Environmental Factors in the Backshore Wetland of Expo Garden, Shanghai. Aquac. Fish. 2018, 3, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stelzer, C.-P. Evolution of Rotifer Life Histories. Hydrobiologia 2005, 546, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Parry, G.D. The meanings of r- and K-selection. Oecologia 1981, 48, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Troost, T.A. Quantitative Steps in the Evolution of Metabolic Organisation as Specified by the Dynamic Energy Budget Theory. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82, 113–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Applebaum, S.L.; Pan, T.-C.F.; Hedgecock, D.; Manahan, D.T. Separating the nature and nurture of the allocation of energy in response to global change. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2014, 54, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pan, T.-C.F.; Applebaum, S.L.; Manahan, D.T. Experimental ocean acidification alters the allocation of metabolic energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4696–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wenjie, L.; Binxia, L.; Cuijuan, N. Effects of Temperature on Life History Strategy of the Rotifer Euchlanis dilatata. Zoolog. Sci. 2019, 36, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kooijman, B. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Debelgarric, M.; Récapet, C. Exploring Physiological Constraints on Life-History Traits Using Dynamic Energy Budgets. Ecol. Model. 2025, 501, 110993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, L.; Jiang, B.; Zheng, X.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Z. Application of a Dynamic Energy Budget Model to the Blood Clam, Tegillarca granosa, Reared in Culture Pond. Aquac. Rep. 2025, 40, 102602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ren, J.S.; Jin, X.; Yang, T.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Shan, X. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Small Yellow Croaker Larimichthys polyactis: Parameterisation and Application in Its Main Geographic Distribution Waters. Ecol. Model. 2020, 427, 109051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Speakman, J.R.; Colin, S.; McLaren, J.S.; Harper, E.J. Living Fast, Dying When? The Link between Aging and Energetics. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 1583S–1597S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gabaldón, C.; Montero-Pau, J.; Carmona, M.J.; Serra, M. Life-history variation, environmental fluctuations and competition in ecologically similar species: Modeling the case of rotifers. J. Plankton Res. 2015, 37, 953–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Walker, K.F. 13. A Synopsis of Ecological Information on the Saline Lake Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Müller 1786. Hydrobiologia 1981, 81, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lowe, C.D.; Kemp, S.J.; Bates, A.D.; Montagnes, D.J.S. Evidence That the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Is Not an Osmoconformer. Mar. Biol. 2005, 146, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.-N.; Wang, A.-L.; Wang, J.-M.; Sun, R.-Y. Effects of Dietary Vitamin E Supplementation on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) Exposed to Acute Salinity Changes. Aquaculture 2007, 265, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Litchman, E.; Ohman, M.D.; Kiørboe, T. Trait-based approaches to zooplankton communities. J. Plankton Res. 2013, 35, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huntley, M.E.; Lopez, M.D.G. Temperature-Dependent Production of Marine Copepods: A Global Synthesis. Am. Nat. 1992, 140, 201–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gilbert, J.J. Morphological variation and its significance in a polymorphic rotifer: Environmental, endogenous, and genetic controls. BioScience 2018, 68, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, H.-J.; Ohtani, M.; Kakumu, A.; Sakakura, Y.; Hagiwara, A. External Factors That Regulate Movement in the Marine Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Fish. Sci. 2020, 86, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, H.-J.; Hagiwara, A. Effect of Salinity during Resting Egg Formation and Hatching on Descendent Reproduction in the Rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff. J. Plankton Res. 2011, 33, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gabaldón, C.; Serra, M.; Carmona, M.J.; Montero-Pau, J. Life-History Traits, Abiotic Environment and Coexistence: The Case of Two Cryptic Rotifer Species. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2015, 465, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Joshi, P.S. Influence of Salinity on Population Growth of a Rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis (Mullen). J. Indian Fish. Assoc. 1988, 18, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee, Y.H.; Kim, D.-H.; Kang, H.-M.; Wang, M.; Jeong, C.-B.; Lee, J.-S. Adverse Effects of Methylmercury (MeHg) on Life Parameters, Antioxidant Systems, and MAPK Signaling Pathways in the Rotifer Brachionus koreanus and the Copepod Paracyclopina nana. Aquat. Toxicol. 2017, 190, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, M.-C.; Park, J.C.; Kim, D.-H.; Kang, S.; Shin, K.-H.; Park, H.G.; Han, J.; Lee, J.-S. Interrelationship of Salinity Shift with Oxidative Stress and Lipid Metabolism in the Monogonont Rotifer Brachionus koreanus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2017, 214, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bosque, T.; Hernández, R.; Pérez, R.; Todolí, R.; Oltra, R. Effects of Salinity, Temperature and Food Level on the Demographic Characteristics of the Seawater Rotifer Synchaeta littoralis Rousselet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2001, 258, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feder, M.E.; Hofmann, G.E. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: Evolutionary and Ecological Physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1999, 61, 243–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sørensen, J.G.; Kristensen, T.N.; Loeschcke, V. The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Singh, M.K.; Shin, Y.; Han, S.; Ha, J.; Tiwari, P.K.; Kim, S.S.; Kang, I. Molecular Chaperonin HSP60: Current Understanding and Future Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Singh, M.K.; Han, S.; Ju, S.; Ranbhise, J.S.; Ha, J.; Yeo, S.G.; Kim, S.S.; Kang, I. Hsp70: A Multifunctional Chaperone in Maintaining Proteostasis and Its Implications in Human Disease. Cells 2025, 14, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yúfera, M. Effect of Algal Diet and Temperature on the Embryonic Development Time of the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in Culture. Hydrobiologia 1987, 147, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dhert, P.; Lim, L.C.; Candreva, P.; Van Duffel, H.; Sorgeloos, P. Possible Applications of Modern Fish Larviculture Technology to Ornamental Fish Production. Aquar. Sci. Conserv. 1997, 1, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, J.; Dong, S.; Jiang, Q.; Si, Q.; Liu, X.; Yang, J. Characterization and expression of cytoplasmic Copper/Zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZn SOD) gene under temperature and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Gene 2013, 518, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kültz, D. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2005, 67, 225–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Paraskevopoulou, S.; Dennis, A.B.; Weithoff, G.; Tiedemann, R. Temperature-dependent life history and transcriptomic responses in heat-tolerant versus heat-sensitive Brachionus rotifers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Walczyńska, A.; Serra, M. Inter- and intraspecific relationships between performance and temperature in a cryptic species complex of the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 2014, 734, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Deng, L.; Xu, D. Survival strategies of Phytoplankton functional groups to environmental factors in a drinking water reservoir, Central China. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Limnol. 2021, 57, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vadstein, O.; Attramadal, K.J.K.; Bakke, I.; Olsen, Y. K-selection as microbial community management strategy: A method for improved viability of larvae in aquaculture. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, Y.; Hou, X.; Xue, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, X.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z. Trade-off between Reproduction and Lifespan of the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis under Different Food Conditions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jomova, K.; Raptova, R.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Chronic diseases and aging. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 2499–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Loureiro, C.; Castro, B.B.; Cuco, A.P.; Pedrosa, M.A.; Gonçalves, F. Life-History responses of salinity-tolerant and salinity-sensitive lineages of a stenohaline Cladoceran do not confirm clonal differentiation. Hydrobiologia 2013, 702, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sarma, S.; Beladjal, L.; Nandini, S.; Cerón-Martínez, G.; Tavera-Briseño, K. Effect of salinity stress on the life history variables of Branchipus schaefferi Fisher, 1834 (Crustacea: Anostraca). Saline Syst. 2005, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Snell, T.W.; Janssen, C.R. Rotifers in ecotoxicology: A review. Hydrobiologia 1995, 313, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Smith, H.A.; Burns, A.R.; Shearer, T.L.; Snell, T.W. Three heat shock proteins are essential for rotifer thermotolerance. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2012, 413, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jeong, H.; Byeon, E.; Lee, J.-S.; Kim, H.S.; Sayed, A.E.-D.H.; Bo, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.-Z.; Park, H.G.; Lee, J.-S. Single and combined effects of increased temperature and methylmercury on different stages of the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 466, 133448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rezeq, T.A.; James, C.M. Production and nutritional quality of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis fed marine Chlorella sp. at different cell densities. Hydrobiologia 1987, 147, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, Y.; Gu, L.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z. Changes in key life-history traits and transcriptome regulations of marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in eliminating harmful algae Phaeocystis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 445, 130540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hirayama, K.; Nakamura, K. Fundamental studies on the physiology of Rotifers in mass culture—V. Dry Chlorella powder as a food for Rotifers. Aquaculture 1976, 8, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Latta, L.C.; Tucker, K.N.; Haney, R.A. The relationship between oxidative stress, reproduction, and survival in a bdelloid rotifer. BMC Ecol. 2019, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of salinity on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of salinity on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Biology 14 00878 g001
Figure 2. Effect of temperature on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of temperature on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments according to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Biology 14 00878 g002
Figure 3. Effect of diet on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments ac-cording to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of diet on the biological characteristics of B. plicatilis: (A) juvenile period, (B) embryonic development time, (C) spawning times, (D) spawning interval, (E) fecundity, and (F) lifespan. Data are presented as mean ± standard error based on four replicates. Different lowercase letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among treatments ac-cording to Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Biology 14 00878 g003
Figure 4. Trade offs between fecundity and lifespan in B. plicatilis under varying environmental conditions.
Figure 4. Trade offs between fecundity and lifespan in B. plicatilis under varying environmental conditions.
Biology 14 00878 g004
Table 1. Environmental factors and their impact on biological performance and r/K selection strategies.
Table 1. Environmental factors and their impact on biological performance and r/K selection strategies.
Environmental FactorSub-Optimal ConditionOptimal ConditionAdverse ConditionReferences
SalinityLow salinity
(5 ppt)
Moderate salinity
(10–20 ppt)
High salinity
(25–35 ppt)
Figure 1
TemperatureHigh temperature
(30–35 °C)
Moderate temperature (20–25 °C)Low temperature
(<20 °C)
Figure 2
Nutritional Conditions80% baker’s yeast–20% C. vulgaris (80Y:20A)50% baker’s yeast–50% C. vulgaris (50Y:50A)100% C. vulgaris
(100A)
Figure 3
DEB StrategyOptimal energy uptake → high reproductive potentialBalanced energy allocationEnergy redirection to survival[32]
r/K selectionr-selection dominanceIntermediate r/K strategyK selection prominence[27,31]
Biological PerformanceAccelerated reproductionBalanced growth and reproductionReduced reproduction, extended survival[22]
Table 2. Summary of the effects of environmental factors on metabolic, cellular, and physiological responses in rotifers.
Table 2. Summary of the effects of environmental factors on metabolic, cellular, and physiological responses in rotifers.
Environmental FactorMetabolic ProcessesCellular ResponsesGene ExpressionPhysiological OutcomesReferences
Salinity
-
Osmotic regulation mechanisms are activated
-
Shift in energy allocation from reproduction to survival at high salinity

-
Ion transport adjustments via Na+/K+ pumps
-
Increased antioxidant activity at extreme salinity levels

-
Upregulation of SOD, CAT, HSPs at high salinity
-
Enhanced expression of stress response genes

-
High fecundity at low salinity (5–15 ppt)
-
Extended lifespan at high salinity (25–35 ppt) due to stress adaptation

[39,65,66]
[22,67]
[15,45]
Temperature
-
Increased metabolic rate at higher temperatures
-
Enhanced energy allocation to growth and reproduction at moderate temperatures

-
Heat shock protein (HSP) activation
-
Antioxidant enzyme regulation (SOD, CAT, GST)

-
Upregulation of hsp40, hsp60, hsp70
-
Enhanced expression of antioxidant-related genes

-
Faster development at 30–35 °C
-
Shorter lifespan at high temperatures
-
Increased fecundity at optimal temperatures


[21,23,68]
[69]
[10,30]
Diet
-
High protein synthesis with Chlorella-based diets
-
Energy redistribution with yeast-based diets

-
Improved growth efficiency with Chlorella
-
Extended lifespan with yeast-rich diets

-
Upregulation of growth-related genes with algae diets
-
Downregulation of reproductive genes in yeast-dominant diets

-
Maximum fecundity with 100A
-
Longer lifespan with 80Y:20A
-
Faster embryonic development in yeast-rich diets


[70,71]
[14]
[72,73]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tran-Nguyen, Q.-A.; Phan, T.N.; Tran, Q.-A.; Mai, H.T.; Thi, T.L.P.; Phan, D.D.; Trinh-Dang, M. Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Diet on the Biological Characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786. Biology 2025, 14, 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070878

AMA Style

Tran-Nguyen Q-A, Phan TN, Tran Q-A, Mai HT, Thi TLP, Phan DD, Trinh-Dang M. Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Diet on the Biological Characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786. Biology. 2025; 14(7):878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tran-Nguyen, Quynh-Anh, Truong Nhat Phan, Quang-Anh Tran, Hong Thi Mai, Thao Linh Phan Thi, Dang Doan Phan, and Mau Trinh-Dang. 2025. "Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Diet on the Biological Characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786" Biology 14, no. 7: 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070878

APA Style

Tran-Nguyen, Q.-A., Phan, T. N., Tran, Q.-A., Mai, H. T., Thi, T. L. P., Phan, D. D., & Trinh-Dang, M. (2025). Effects of Salinity, Temperature, and Diet on the Biological Characteristics of Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786. Biology, 14(7), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop