Next Article in Journal
Proprioceptive Control of Muscle Activation in Aging: Implications for Balance and Fall Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Haploid Production in Cannabis sativa: Recent Updates, Prospects, and Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Vascular Developmental Toxicity and Underlying Mechanisms of 1-Bromo-3,6-dichlorocarbazole (1-B-36-CCZ) in Zebrafish Larvae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Subtypes I and II of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller: Dominant Green Tide Species in the Southern Yellow Sea and Their Responses to Natural Light and Temperature Conditions

1
Ocean College, Fujian Polytechnic Normal University, Fuqing 350300, China
2
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Basin Environment, Fujian Polytechnic Normal Univeristy, Fuqing 350300, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
5
College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(6), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060702
Submission received: 6 May 2025 / Revised: 6 June 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 15 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Aquatic Ecological Disasters and Toxicology)

Simple Summary

Since 2007, large-scale green tides have persisted in China, causing adverse effects on the ecological environment, aquaculture, coastal landscapes, and the water sports industry. To clarify the morphological, growth, and photosynthetic differences in the dominant green tide species Ulva prolifera across outbreak years, this study compared samples from 2008 and 2021 through molecular identification and comparative culture observations. Results indicate that the dominant species has undergone adaptive changes in environmental tolerance since the initial green tide outbreak. In 2008, seedlings exhibited faster growth rates, greener pigmentation, and more abundant primary branches. In contrast, adult U. prolifera populations in 2021 demonstrated higher branching complexity, enhanced environmental adaptability, and accelerated growth rates. These findings suggest that under the combined influence of natural and anthropogenic forces, U. prolifera has evolved adaptive traits that likely contribute to the expanding scale of green tide outbreaks. This study deepens our understanding of the environmental adaptation mechanisms in green tide-forming species and provides a scientific foundation for developing prevention strategies and elucidating the occurrence mechanisms of U. prolifera blooms.

Abstract

This study systematically investigated two ecotypes of Ulva prolifera, the dominant species responsible for green tides in the Yellow Sea, classified as Subtype I (strain I08-1) and Subtype II (strain QD-7). Both subtypes produce positively phototactic biflagellate gametes with oval/pear-shaped morphology but exhibit distinct cellular dimensions. Subtype I gametes demonstrated significantly larger cell sizes, with long and short axes measuring 6.55 μm and 4.62 μm, respectively, compared to Subtype II’s dimensions of 6.46 μm (long axis) and 3.03 μm (short axis). Developmental analysis revealed striking morphological divergence at the 6-day germling stage: Subtype I attained an average length of 1301.14 μm, more than doubling Subtype II’s 562.25 μm. Superior growth kinetics were observed in Subtype I, exhibiting enhanced specific growth rates (SGRs) across multiple parameters—main stem length (8.58% vs. 3.55%), primary branch elongation (19.17% vs. 12.59%), main stem width expansion (17.29% vs. 5.00%), and biomass accumulation (41.90% vs. 40.96% fresh weight). Chlorophyll quantification confirmed significantly higher pigment content in Subtype I. Pre-co-culture photosynthetic profiling demonstrated Subtype I’s superior quantum efficiency (α = 0.077 vs. 0.045) with marked differences in regulated energy dissipation (YNPQ) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Post-co-culture physiological adaptation was evident in Subtype II, showing significant elevation of non-regulated energy dissipation quantum yield (YNO) and eventual surpassing of maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax) compared to Subtype I. These findings establish that U. prolifera employs robust photoprotective and thermal adaptation strategies under natural photothermal conditions. Crucially, YNO-based analysis revealed Subtype II’s enhanced high-light protection mechanisms and superior adaptability to intense irradiance environments. This research elucidates ecotype-specific environmental adaptation mechanisms in U. prolifera, providing critical insights for optimizing green tide mitigation strategies and advancing ecological understanding of algal bloom dynamics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since 2007, large-scale green tides have persistently occurred along China’s coastlines [1,2,3,4], imposing adverse impacts on the ecological environment, aquaculture, coastal landscapes, and water sports industries [5]. These recurring events have consequently drawn significant attention from the government and relevant authorities. Green tides in this area are primarily driven by multiple factors, including local seawater eutrophication (often linked to organic pollution from anthropogenic sources such as nutrient discharge) [6,7], rising seawater temperatures (associated with global warming) [8,9], and other anthropogenic activities. Upon detaching from substrates, macroalgae such as U. prolifera leverage air sac structures within their thalli to form floating populations. The rapid proliferation and sudden aggregation of thalli then give rise to large-scale floating algae mats, an abnormal ecological phenomenon documented in previous studies [10,11,12]. The onset of green tides not only disrupts marine traffic but also triggers oxygen depletion in seawater through algal respiration and decomposition, which can potentially suffocate aquatic organisms and induce secondary marine disasters. Moreover, large expanses of floating green algae often encroach upon coastal aquaculture areas, reducing mariculture yields [11,13] and causing substantial economic losses.
The oxygen consumption, release of toxic substances/odorous gases, and decay of green algae pose multifaceted threats: they endanger human health, poison aquatic organisms, degrade marine ecosystems, and disrupt the normal functioning of coastal city tourism [14,15,16]. The decomposition of green algae generates sulfur-containing compounds that exacerbate water quality deterioration and environmental harm [14,15,16]. When macroalgae accumulate, sink, and decompose along coastlines or in open oceans, their decay consumes dissolved oxygen, creating localized hypoxic or anoxic zones [17]. Concurrently, this process releases abundant sulfur compounds and other byproducts, causing severe secondary ecological damage and economic losses. Beyond impeding coastal mariculture production [18,19], green macroalgae directly undermine tourism and economic development in coastal cities [20]. Their decomposition also discharges substantial allelochemicals, sulfides, and nutrients into coastal waters [21]. In fish, shrimp, sea cucumber, and shellfish aquaculture zones, green tide algae reduce primary productivity, indirectly destabilizing both aquaculture operations and the marine ecological environment. During decomposition, green tide algae deplete dissolved oxygen, leading to mass mortality of shellfish due to hypoxia [18,19]. While floating algae mats may benefit herbivorous marine invertebrates and suspension-feeding animals, large benthic deposit-feeders and tide-dependent mobile bivalves suffer negative impacts from green tides [22].
Based on Landsat data, floating U. prolifera have been observed in the Southern Yellow Sea since 1999. This phenomenon was first detected by a moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer in 2007 [23], yet it was not until 2008 that U. prolifera green tides began large-scale outbreaks, raising widespread concern. Since then, annually from April to August, green tides drift northward driven by wind currents [24,25]. Combined with suitable temperatures and abundant nutrients in the Yellow Sea, the green tides persistently expand [26], primarily affecting the coastal waters of Shandong and Jiangsu Provinces. Specifically, annual accumulated U. prolifera biomass exceeding 1.5 million tons impacts key areas including Qingdao (Shandong), Rizhao (Shandong), and Lianyungang (Jiangsu). Local governments have implemented a cross-provincial coordination mechanism, allocating over CNY 200 million yearly toward mitigation measures, including early monitoring, mechanical harvesting, and ecological remediation. Consequently, green tide prevention and control have drawn significant research attention [27,28,29,30,31]. Among strategies, source prevention represents the most economical and effective approach [32,33]. Previous studies have identified green tides primarily caused by Ulva species, such as U. prolifera, U. flexuosa, U. lactuca, U. linza, U. pertusa, U. compressa, and U. meridionalis [34,35,36,37], with U. prolifera as the dominant species in the Southern Yellow Sea [38]. Key causative factors include primarily seawater eutrophication, along with suitable temperature, salinity, and light intensity, and the biological traits of U. prolifera. Large-scale outbreaks depend on abundant nitrogen and phosphorus [12]. Variations in temperature and light govern U. prolifera floating and decay, while high light intensity and optimal temperature extend the high-growth period [39,40,41].
Appropriate light intensity facilitates photosynthesis in U. prolifera and promotes its growth, thereby increasing green tide biomass [42]. Ulva is an opportunistic genus with strong nutrient absorption capacity, rapid reproduction, high light-energy utilization efficiency, and robust stress resistance [43,44,45]. Furthermore, the air sac structure of U. prolifera enables it to float. Thus, green tide formation is not only directly linked to seawater eutrophication [6] but also closely associated with rising spring seawater temperatures [46] and U. prolifera’s unique biological traits [47]. As Ulva morphology and phenotype vary across growth stages and environmental conditions [3], molecular marker technology plays a critical role in species identification. Zhang et al. [48] utilized internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and 5S ribosomal intergenic spacers to characterize attached and floating green tide algae in Rudong, Jiangsu Province, China. Aquaculture rafts for Neopyropia yezoensis in the Jiangsu Shoals provide suitable substrates for U. prolifera attachment and germination, thereby enhancing its reproduction [49,50]. To mitigate green tide disasters, the Chinese government has allocated substantial funds and deployed considerable manpower and material resources for source control [28,51].
The dominant species of green tides in the Yellow Sea exhibit population succession patterns and include different Ulva strains. During the early stages of green tide outbreaks in the Southern Yellow Sea, the dominant free-floating green algal species are U. compressa, U. linza, U. prolifera, and U. flexuosa, which are the same as the dominant green algae on Neopyropia rafts. However, only one free-floating alga species, U. prolifera, continues to multiply and grow, leading to large-scale green tide outbreaks [52,53]. Seawater-borne green algal propagules, U. prolifera attached to Neopyropia aquaculture rafts, and the outbreak species U. prolifera all belong to the same ecological type [53]. Thus, the widely accepted view is that U. prolifera originates from Neopyropia aquaculture raft areas in the Southern Yellow Sea. In contrast, a less accepted hypothesis suggests that Yellow Sea green algae may originate from animal aquaculture ponds along the Southern Yellow Sea coast [54,55], the seabed [56], or coastal green algae distribution areas spanning from the south of the Shandong Peninsula to the north of the Yangtze Estuary. Wang et al. [35] revealed that the dominant species of the green tide U. prolifera shifted from strain I to strain II in the Southern Yellow Sea from 2008 to 2015, indicating that the annual dominant species of green tides in this region may vary. With the continuous rise in global temperatures and the increasingly frequent anthropogenic influences, the reproductive growth and stress resistance of U. prolifera is undergoing continuous changes, suggesting the likely existence of multiple strains within this species. However, limited research has been conducted on the actual existence of these strains and the differences between them.
In this study, ITS and 5S molecular marker technologies were employed to identify the dominant green tide species in two distinct years. Meanwhile, the gametophyte morphology of two Ulva strains, as well as the morphology and growth characteristics of their gamete-derived germlings, were systematically observed. Co-culture experiments of two Ulva strains (QD-7 and I08-1) were then performed under natural light and temperature conditions. The morphology, growth patterns, and photosynthetic characteristics of the two strains were monitored to reveal the differences in their photosynthetic physiology across different years. The core objectives are to clarify U. prolifera’s specific reproductive mechanisms, elucidate the formation mechanisms of its ecotypes across different years, and provide a scientific basis for green tide prevention and rational resource utilization. The findings deepen the understanding of U. prolifera’s environmental adaptation, offer data for predicting its response to environmental changes, hold significant implications for formulating green tide control strategies and revealing bloom formation mechanisms, and lay a foundation for future research on Ulva interactions with other organisms and ecological control strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Identification and Thallus Culture

In 2008, U. prolifera strains were collected from the sea surface at 36°2′18″ N, 120°21′33″ E along the coast of Qingdao, Shandong Province, China. In 2021, samples were collected from the sea surface at 36°3′48″ N, 120°23′34″ E in the same region. After the establishment of pure line thalli species, they were named QD-7 and I08-1. Both strains were long-term preserved in the laboratory in the form of adult thalli. The preservation conditions were a temperature of 10 ± 0.5 °C, light intensity of 4 μmol photons·m−2·s−1, and a 12-h light/12-h dark photoperiod. Sterilized seawater supplemented with metal-enriched seawater medium (MES) nutrient solution was used as a culture medium [57,58].
Before the start of the culture experiment, U. prolifera was removed from the tissue cultivation bottle for molecular identification. Previous studies have described the ITS and 5S rDNA non-transcribed spacer sequences of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification reaction system in the molecular identification process [59,60]. The PCR products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis and submitted to MAP Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for sequencing. ITS and 5S rDNA primer sequences of the analyzed samples were obtained. The qualified sequence was copied to the Internal Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; accessed on 1 May 2025) for BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool), and a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA v11.0.13 (MEGA Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) software to identify the species. After the species were determined by molecular techniques, an appropriate number of thalli were cultured separately until they matured to form a gamete sac and released gametes.

2.2. Gamete Collection, Observation, and Cultivation

A small amount (~0.2 g) of adult thalli was transplanted into seawater-filled round glass bottles with a volume of 1 L aerated culture, and the light was set to 100–120 μmol photons·m−2·s−1. The other cultural conditions were the same as described above. Within 48 h, the thalli color changed from green to yellowish brown. The yellowish-brown thalli were removed and transferred into a 10 mL centrifuge tube. They were then rinsed two to three times with sterile seawater containing MES and placed in a culture environment. After a few minutes, the thalli began to release gametes, and the seawater became turbid. The gamete solution was pipetted with a rubber-head dropper to verify phototaxis and make temporary slides. The gamete morphology and flagella number were observed under a microscope, the gamete activity was confirmed, and the gamete size and flagella length were measured. The gamete solution was diluted with sterile seawater to an appropriate concentration (~200 per drop), and three drops of gamete solution were transplanted into seawater-filled round glass bottles with a volume of 250 mL of aerated culture. A total of three bottles were cultured; all of the culture medium was replaced after five days, and the culture was continued. After five days of culture, the young gametophytes were carefully scraped from the wall of the bottle, and 30 healthy and complete thalli were selected and transplanted into sterile seawater-filled round glass bottles with a volume of 1 L for aerating culture. The cultural conditions were the same as those described above.

2.3. Observation and Measurement of Gametophyte Morphology and Growth

Three thalli were randomly selected from each of the two 15-day-old U. prolifera strains, separately. After photographing and measuring the length and width of the main stem and the length of primary branches of the thalli, the thalli of the different strains were transferred into sterile seawater-filled round glass bottles with a volume of 1 L for aerating co-culture. One thallus of each strain was placed into a round glass bottle for co-culture. Three parallel experimental groups were set up and recorded as day 0. They were placed outdoors under natural light and temperature conditions for inflatable culture, and two light and temperature recorders, MX Temp/Light (ONSET Corporation, Cape Cod, MA, USA), were used to record ambient light and temperature changes (Figure 1a,b). Two rechargeable mobile aeratable pumps were alternately used for aeration. The thalli were photographed and measured every 48 h, and the culture medium was replaced with new sterile seawater containing MES. The above steps were repeated for 10 days. The specific growth rate (SGR) was calculated as follows [58,61,62]
S G R = ( I n N I n N 0 ) t
where N is the length (cm), width (cm), or wet weight (g) of the algae measured at a certain time; N0 is the length (cm), width (cm), or wet weight (g) of the algae measured at the previous time; and t (d) is the culture time.

2.4. Determination of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters and Chloroplast Pigment Content

After being cultured for 10 days in the natural light and temperature environment, the algae were photographed, and their growth was measured. A 0.1 g sample of the thallus was taken and subjected to dark adaptation for 15 min. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the algae were then measured using a dual-channel modulated chlorophyll fluorescence meter P700 & Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measuring System Dual-PAM-100 (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Among them, ETR, ETRmax, and YII were measured on thalli collected directly from natural light. Following this, a 0.1 g thallus sample was taken, and the chloroplast pigment was extracted with 95% alcohol. The ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer SP-2500 (Shanghai Spectrometer Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to measure the values of A470, A649, and A665. The contents of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), and carotenoid (Car) were calculated by the following formulae [63]. Three parallel experiments were set up in each experimental group.
C a = 13.95 A 665 6.88 A 649
C b = 24.96 A 649 7.32 A 665
C c a r = 1000 A 470 2.05 C a 114.8 C b 245
where Ca and Cb represent the concentration of Chl a and Chl b, respectively; CCar is the total concentration of Car; and A470, A649, and A665 are the absorbances of the chloroplast pigment extract at 470, 649, and 665 nm, respectively.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used for statistical analysis, recording, editing, calculation, and mapping of the data, and one-way analysis of variance was performed. The statistical values were described as mean ± standard deviation. p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference between groups, and p < 0.01 was considered a highly significant difference between groups.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Ulva prolifera Strains

In the ML phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences, QD-7 and I08-1 were clustered with U. linza (HM584729 and KC411874) and U. prolifera (MG017458 and ON263396), and belonged to the Ulva linza-procera-prolifera (LPP) complex group (Figure 2a), indicating that the ITS region could not resolve the LPP complex group. Therefore, the 5S rDNA spacer was used to distinguish the LPP complex group. QD-7 was clustered with 5S-II-type U. prolifera (HM584786 and HM584772), while I08-1 was clustered with 5S-I-type U. prolifera (KT803025, KT803008, and AB624461), suggesting that I08-1 represents 5S-I-type U. prolifera and QD-7 represents 5S-II-type U. prolifera (Figure 2b).

3.2. Gamete Germling Morphology

Gametes released from strains QD-7 and I08-1 were oval to pear-shaped, possessed two flagella, and exhibited positive phototaxis (Figure 3a,b). In 6-day-old germlings, the main axis grew linearly, with some cells developing lateral primary branches. A subset of QD-7 individuals formed new branches originating from the holdfast region (Figure 3c,d).
The gametes of I08-1 were slightly larger than those of QD-7, and there was no significant difference in the long axis and flagellar lengths of gametes between the two strains. However, the short axis lengths were significantly different, with average values of 4.62 and 3.03 μm, respectively (Figure 4a). There was no significant difference in the main stem width of the gamete germlings of I08-1 and QD-7 strains at 6 days of age, with an average of 23.87 and 23.42 μm, respectively (Figure 4c). However, the thallus length showed a significant difference, with an average of 1301.14 μm and 562.25 μm, respectively (Figure 4b). This indicated that the gamete germlings of I08-1 grew faster than those of QD-7. In addition, there was also a significant difference in the number of new branches on the main stem of the two strains of gamete germlings (one cell bulge, Figure 3c,d), with an average of 10.67 and 8.10 branches per germling, respectively (Figure 4d).

3.3. Adult Thalli Morphology

After the gametes of QD-7 and I08-1 strains were cultured for 15 days at 20 °C, the thalli developed into a “sapling” morphology, with I08-1 appearing greener than QD-7. The thalli of 15-day-old QD-7 were emerald green, with third-order branches. The base of the main stem exhibited distinct holdfasts and well-defined branching. The mid-region of the main stem was flattened and broad, while the basal portion gradually narrowed into a dark green, hollow, tubular structure. The main stem of the tip was not obvious, and the longer primary branch on the main stem was unevenly and sparsely distributed, with more small branches (Figure 5a). The main branch middle part cell surface view is square or polygonal in shape, with a relatively regular cell arrangement, appearing yellow-green. The cell contains one nucleus and a flake-like chromatophore located on the protoplast surface, along with 1 or 2 starch nuclei (Figure 6a). The thalli of I08-1 were dark green, the main branch comprised an irregular cylindrical tube, the base had an obvious holdfast, and the branches near the base were dense and elongated. From the base to the apex, primary branches progressively shortened, and the slender apical region was prone to curling. The main branch was prominent, with primary branches densely arranged along the stem, creating a hairy appearance. These branches frequently intertwined with each other or coiled around the main stem under moving seawater. The thalli also developed second-order branches (Figure 5g). The cells in the middle part of the main branch have a polygonal shape when viewed from the surface. They vary in size and are arranged irregularly. The cells are green in color. Inside each cell, there is one nucleus and a flake-shaped chromatophore located on the surface of the protoplast. Additionally, the cells contain 1 or 2 starch nuclei (Figure 6c).
With the increase in the culturing duration, the thalli of both strains gradually grew upwards. The thalli of QD-7 were yellow-green and cypress-shaped. The main stem was flat and wrinkled, and the longer primary branch became longer. The inward contraction of the base of some branches and the junction of the main stem became smaller and were easier to detach from the main stem, which was consistent with the morphology of floating U. prolifera in the sea area. The branch level was 4–5. The base of the branch growing on the base holdfast had a rhizoid, which was easy to detach from the main stem to become a new individual. There were many small branches on the main stem that could become a new, longer primary branch (Figure 5b–f). After 10 days of cultivation under natural light and temperature conditions, the cells in the middle part of the main branch of the alga also appeared yellow-green when viewed from the surface. Compared to before the co-culture, the cells became smaller, with obvious cell gaps. The cells were yellow-green in color. Inside each cell, there was one nucleus and a flask-shaped chromatophore located on the surface of the protoplast. Additionally, the cells contained 1 or more starch nuclei (Figure 6a,b). In I08-1, the thalli were cypress-shaped and dark green, the branches on the main stem became dense and long, almost completely wrapping the main stem, and the branch level was 2–3. Due to the dense distribution of small branches on the main stem, the main stem began to become rhizoid (Figure 5h–l). After 10 days of cultivation under natural light and temperature conditions, the cells in the middle part of the main branch of the alga appeared long-elliptical in shape when viewed from the surface, with their contours approximating an arc-like shape. They transformed into rhizoid-like cells and became significantly larger than before the co-culture. Inside each cell, there was one nucleus and a flask-shaped chromatophore located on the surface of the protoplast. Additionally, the cells contained one or more starch nuclei (Figure 6c,d). The results showed that the morphology of QD-7 was more adaptable to the environment and that it grew faster compared with I08-1.

3.4. Adult Thalli Growth

Under natural light and temperature conditions, with an increasing number of culture days, the main stem length (Figure 7a), primary branch length (Figure 7c), main stem width (Figure 7e), and fresh weight (Figure 7g) of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains increased, but the increases in the QD-7 strain were significantly greater than those of I08-1. The width change in the two U. prolifera strains was not very large, and the width change in I08-1 was the least obvious (Figure 7e). The young thalli of 15-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 were cultured for another 10 days. The main stem lengths of QD-7 and I08-1 were 21.20 and 13.89 cm (Figure 7a), the primary branch lengths were 9.85 and 4.57 cm (Figure 7c), the main stem widths were 0.25 and 0.07 cm (Figure 7e), and the fresh weights were 1.99 and 1.08 g per thallus, respectively (Figure 7g). In addition, in the 10-day co-culture, except for the SGR of the primary branch length, main stem width, and fresh weight of I08-1 at 8–10 days, and the SGR of fresh weight at 4–6 days being slightly higher than that of QD-7, the SGR of the main stem length, width, primary branch length, and fresh weight of QD-7 was generally higher than that of I08-1. During the 10-day co-culture, the maximum SGRs of the main stem length and width, primary branch length, and fresh weight of QD-7 and I08-1 were 8.58% and 3.55% (Figure 7b), 19.17% and 12.59% (Figure 7d), 17.29% and 5.00% (Figure 7f), and 41.90% and 40.96% (Figure 7h), respectively. These results showed that under natural light and temperature conditions, the 15-day-old QD-7 strain grew significantly faster than the I08-1 strain.

3.5. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

Before the co-culture experiment, the initial slope of the fast light curve related to the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (a), quantum yield of PSII in regulated energy dissipation (YNPQ), and the non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) between the two strains (QD-7 and I08-1) showed highly significant differences. The maximum electron transfer rate (ETRmax) and actual photochemical quantum yield (YII) showed significant differences, while the minimum saturated irradiance (Ik) and maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm) showed no significant difference between strains. After co-culture, only the quantum yield of PSII in non-regulated energy dissipation (YNO) showed a highly significant difference between strains, whereas Fv/Fm, YII, NPQ, ETRmax, Ik, a, and YNPQ showed no significant difference (Figure 8a–g). Before and after co-culture, the Fv/Fm, YNPQ, and a of QD-7 showed highly significant differences compared with I08-1; the NPQ and YNO showed significant differences, while there were no significant differences in YII, ETRmax, and Ik. Before and after co-culture, the Fv/Fm, YII, NPQ, a, and YNPQ of I08-1 showed highly significant differences, while ETRmax, Ik, and YNO showed no significant differences (Figure 8a–g). Compared with QD-7 before co-culture, the Fv/Fm, ETRmax, a, and YNPQ of I08-1 after co-culture were highly significantly different; YII was significantly different; and NPQ, Ik, and YNO were not significantly different. Compared with I08-1 before co-culture, the Fv/Fm, NPQ, a, and YNPQ of QD-7 after co-culture were highly significantly different; YNO was significantly different, while YII, ETRmax, and Ik were not significantly different (Figure 8a–g).
Furthermore, before co-culture, the ETR of I08-1 was higher than that of QD-7. After co-culture, however, the ETR of QD-7’ became higher than that of I08-1’. Notably, the ETR values of both strains (QD-7’ and I08-1’) after co-culture were lower than their respective values before co-culture (Figure 8h). These results revealed that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of QD-7 and I08-1 show significant differences under natural light and temperature conditions, indicating significant differences in photosynthesis between the two.

3.6. Chloroplast Pigment Content

Chl a and Chl b contents of both QD-7 and I08-1 showed highly significant differences before and after co-culture. The Car content of I08-1 showed significant differences before and after co-culture, but there was no significant difference in Car before and after the co-culture of QD-7. Before co-culture, the contents of Chl a, Chl b, and Car highly significantly differed between strains. After co-culture, the contents of Chl a, Chl b, and Car in the two strains were also highly significantly different. Comparing QD-7 before co-culture with I08-1 after co-culture, there was no significant difference in the contents of Chl a and Chl b; however, Car showed a highly significant difference. Comparing I08-1 before co-culture with QD-7 after co-culture, the contents of Chl a, Chl b, and Car showed highly significant differences (Figure 9a).
For QD-7 and I08-1 before co-culture, only Chl a/Chl b significantly differed, whereas there was no significant difference in Chl a/Car or Chl b/Car. After co-culture, there was no significant difference in Chl a/Chl b, Chl a/Car, or Chl b/Car. Comparing before and after co-culture, the Chl a/Car and Chl b/Car of both QD-7 and I08-1 showed highly significant differences. The Chl a/Chl b of I08-1 showed significant differences, but there was no significant difference in the Chl a/Chl b of QD-7. Compared with QD-7 before co-culture and I08-1 after co-culture, Chl a/Chl b, Chl a/Car, and Chl b/Car showed highly significant differences. Compared with I08-1 before co-culture and QD-7 after co-culture, Chl a/Car and Chl b/Car also showed highly significant differences, but there was no significant difference in Chl a/Chl b (Figure 9b).
The chloroplast pigment content of I08-1 was highly significantly higher than that of QD-7 before and after co-culture. Except for Chl a/Chl b before the co-culture of QD-7 being significantly higher than that of I08-1, the ratios of the other chloroplast pigment contents were not significantly different. The physiological mechanism of I08-1 was a greener color than QD-7 and that of QD-7 was a faster growth rate.

4. Discussion

U. prolifera blooms, exhibiting opportunistic dynamics and strong adaptability, are a worldwide ecological issue, predominantly occurring in eutrophic coastal regions. With the advancement of industrialization, and the intensification of global climate change and marine eutrophication, green tides have become a regular occurrence in coastal areas worldwide, including China [60,64,65], the USA [66,67,68], Japan [69], France [67], South Korea [70], Australia [71], the Philippines [72], and South Africa [73], among others, and are generally located in eutrophic waters. The species involved in green tide outbreaks differ among countries, but these events are mainly caused by Ulva green algae. These blooms consistently exhibit the characteristic dynamics of opportunistic macroalgae: rapid biomass accumulation under favorable nutrient and light conditions, followed by mass dispersal or mortality triggered by physical disturbances (e.g., storms, low tides, currents) or self-shading. The recurrent nature of these events across geographically distinct systems underscores U. prolifera’s inherent ecological strategy as a highly adaptable, opportunistic species capable of exploiting nutrient-enriched coastal habitats worldwide. In China, the main species are U. prolifera and U. meridionalis. There are many reasons for the outbreak of green tides, but it mainly involves environmental factors such as seawater eutrophication, light, temperature, salinity, and the biological characteristics of green tide algae. This also involves the genetic variation of U. prolifera populations, interspecific competition, and their interactions with microbial communities. For instance, the metabolic synergy between U. prolifera and symbiotic bacteria may further drive its population to bloom by promoting nutrient cycling or enhancing stress resistance. The core contradiction behind the long-term outbreak of the U. prolifera green tide in China’s Yellow Sea lies in its unique floating migration mechanism. Originating mainly from aquaculture areas in Jiangsu, U. prolifera continues to proliferate in open waters as it migrates with ocean currents. Unlike typical substrate-attached worldwide green tides (such as those in Brittany), this dynamic migration characteristic weakens the effectiveness of local governance and forms a two-stage “open-sea carbon sink/nearshore disaster” pattern through the coupling of terrestrial nutrients and ocean currents (open seas have carbon sequestration potential, while onshore landing may cause ecological degradation). Current strategies mainly mitigate economic losses, but fundamental governance requires coordinated breakthroughs in land–sea bottlenecks: integrating source regulation, path interception, and high-value conversion to build a cross-regional prevention and control system.
In this study, the morphology, growth, and photosynthetic characteristics of floating Ulva in 2008 and 2021 were studied under natural light and temperature conditions. Due to the morphological similarity of Ulva, molecular marker technology plays an important role in the identification of green algae species. The identification and analysis of ITS and 5S molecular marker technology showed that I08-1 was 5S-I type and QD-7 was 5S-II type U. prolifera. Morphological observations showed that the I08-1 strain is dark green and cypress-like, with dense two- to three-level small branches on the main branches. Branches shading each other may cut light-gathering efficiency, intensify intraspecific competition, and slow growth (Figure 5g–l and Figure 7a–h). In contrast, the QD-7 strain has a yellow-green thallus with a flat and wrinkled main branch. Its four- to five-level branches are alternately distributed, creating larger gaps between branches. This structure not only enhances light-capturing efficiency but also increases the surface area, boosting the absorption of nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus (Figure 5a–f and Figure 7a–h). Further microscopic observations revealed that the QD-7 thallus surface has many cellular protuberances resembling “buds”. This may relate to its efficient material exchange and strong vegetative propagation ability.
Our study shows that QD-7 exhibits a more environmentally adaptive morphology, characterized by stronger photosynthetic capacity and faster growth rates. Its unique four- to five-level branching structure and high morphological plasticity likely enhance environmental adaptability. The yellow-green pigmentation improves light energy utilization efficiency. The detachment-prone branch bases (Figure 5b–f) facilitate efficient fragmentation-based reproduction: detached segments (including rhizoids) rapidly develop into new individuals—a trait well-suited to the marine floating niche. Unlike I08-1, where dense branching leads to energy dissipation and the main branch algal cells resemble the basal cells of the algal body, as if about to transform into rhizoids. (Figure 5h–l), QD-7’s sparse main branches minimize frictional damage from water currents. Furthermore, its capacity for small branches to transform into new main branches enables dynamic resource allocation toward highly photosynthetic structures. The hollow tubular basal structure provides dual functionality: anchoring stability and nutrient storage. In contrast, I08-1’s dense branching compromises physiological efficiency. These features confer three key advantages on QD-7 in disturbed environments: (1) fragmentation-driven exponential population expansion, (2) environmental fluctuation buffering through branch redundancy, and (3) rapid algal mat formation via surface coverage. This combination underpins QD-7’s ecological dominance in Yellow Sea green tides.
Photosynthesis is one of the most important metabolic activities in plants [74]. The Fv/Fm represents a theoretical value of the photosynthetic potential of plants and algae, indicating their physiological status [75,76,77,78,79]. Under normal conditions, this parameter generally changes very little and is unaffected by species and growth conditions. However, when plants are subjected to stress, the value of Fv/Fm decreases rapidly, indicating that the efficiency of PSII photochemical conversion decreases. Fv/Fm is an important indicator that has been widely used to determine the magnitude of stress on algae [78]. Ulva’s highly efficient photosynthetic properties allow it to thrive worldwide [80]. In this study, the Fv/Fm experimental values of U. prolifera changed significantly compared with the initial values, suggesting that U. prolifera was stressed by high temperature and high light intensity under natural light and temperature conditions. The Fv/Fm value, which characterizes the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII, decreased significantly under high temperature and light intensity but remained around 0.7 for both Ulva strains. This indicates that Ulva effectively alleviated photosystem damage by activating the NPQ mechanism and antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD). Notably, the YNPQ value of the QD-7 strain was higher than that of the I08-1 strain before and after exposure to high temperature and light intensity, suggesting a more active photoprotection mechanism in QD-7. The effective (actual) light quantum yield YII is also used as an important indicator to evaluate the changes in the photosynthetic activity of algae in different environments [81]. After co-culture under natural high temperature and light intensity, the YII of the two strains of U. prolifera decreased slightly, but there was no significant change, indicating that the YII of the thallus could typically be maintained at a relatively stable level under high temperature and high light stress. U. prolifera was in good health and maintained good photosynthetic activity under high temperatures and high light intensity.
The quantum yield of regulatory energy dissipation at PSII (YNPQ) is an important indicator of photoprotective capacity. After the co-culture experiment, the YNPQ of both strains increased, suggesting that U. prolifera likely received excessive light energy. This observation implies that U. prolifera could protect itself through regulated thermal dissipation, demonstrating a possible high-light protection mechanism. YNO represents the quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation at PSII, serving as an indicator of photodamage susceptibility. The YNO values of QD-7 and I08-1 showed marked divergence after co-culture: QD-7 exhibited a significant decrease, while I08-1 displayed a substantial increase. These differential responses suggest that the photoconversion and photoprotective regulation mechanisms in QD-7 (e.g., thermal dissipation) could effectively process the absorbed light energy, potentially minimizing uncontrolled energy dissipation. However, for I08-1, the incident light intensity likely exceeded its acceptable level, and the algae may have been damaged. The findings suggest that QD-7 likely possesses enhanced photoprotective mechanisms relative to I08-1, potentially conferring greater adaptability to high-light environments.
The relative ETR of plants can reflect their photosynthetic efficiency and the photoprotective effect of dissipating excess light energy [82]. As photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) increased, the ETR typically showed a corresponding rise, suggesting that U. prolifera exhibits adaptability to high-light conditions. Ik can reflect the ability of algae to tolerate high light [83]. High-light-tolerant plants usually have higher maximum photosynthetic rates [84]. An increase in algae light intensity is the main reason for a reduction in photosystem activity [85]. The ETRmax of I08-1 exhibited greater variation than that of QD-7 post-treatment, with significantly lower absolute values observed in I08-1. Nevertheless, both strains maintained elevated ETRmax levels (Figure 8c). After exposure to natural high light and temperature stress, the QD-7 strain exhibited higher ETRmax and Ik values than I08-1. These observations suggest that the photosynthetic apparatus of QD-7 could maintain enhanced electron transport efficiency under high-light conditions. The a of the two strains was also highly significantly different, but both remained at a high level (Figure 8e). This suggests that U. prolifera may have a strong light-harvesting ability, which could be an important factor in its becoming a dominant green tide species.
Following co-culture, the light response curves of both U. prolifera strains exhibited downward shifts in ETR, with I08-1 showing more pronounced suppression. Notably, prior to and post co-culture, ETR in both QD-7 and I08-1 demonstrated progressive increases with rising photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). These patterns suggest that the strains possess substantial adaptive capacity to natural high-temperature and high-light conditions, potentially associated with U. prolifera’s photosynthetic pigment content. Corresponding patterns were observed between ETR dynamics and changes in photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b, and Car) in both strains (Figure 8h and Figure 9a).
The content of photosynthetic pigments in chloroplasts is considered to be one of the important indicators of plant photosynthetic performance. It mainly affects the absorption, transmission, and transformation of light energy, and regulates the conversion and distribution of NADPH and ATP between PSII and PSI, thereby affecting plant photosynthetic efficiency [78,86]. The content of Chl a in plants is not only related to the cyclic electron transport of PSI and the synthesis of ATP in cyclic photosynthetic phosphorylation, but also to the transfer rate of e- and H+ and the reduction in NADP+ in non-cyclic photosynthetic phosphorylation. Chl b is related to the absorption of light energy by chloroplasts and may affect the conversion of light energy into chemical energy by plants, thus affecting ATP synthesis. The Car performs two major functions: light energy capture and light damage defense. In algal photosynthesis, carotenoids protect chlorophyll from oxidation of active substances caused by radiation, and their content is related to the protective ability of the plant photosynthetic system itself [87]. Carotenoids assist in light harvesting and directly protect against photodamage through the xanthophyll cycle, such as via zeaxanthin synthesis. It appears that high chlorophyll content is indicative of a high light-harvesting complex content in PSII. The vegetative cells of U. prolifera contained multiple chloroplasts, the specific site of photosynthesis. The chlorophyll contents of QD-7 and I08-1 before and after co-culture exceeded 590 μg/g (Figure 9a). These findings suggest that both strains exhibit robust capabilities for light energy capture, conversion, and photoprotection. This adaptive competence likely stems from U. prolifera’s long-term evolutionary adaptation to intertidal environments characterized by high temperature and high-light exposure. Beyond its roles in light absorption and energy transfer, Car helps protect U. prolifera chlorophyll from photooxidation. Notably, chlorophyll and Car contents in both strains were generally maintained at elevated levels throughout co-culture (Figure 9a). Under high-light conditions, Car mitigated chlorophyll photooxidation, thereby contributing to photosystem protection and supporting sustained photosynthetic efficiency.
The NPQ can reflect the light protection ability of U. prolifera and its ability to safely dissipate excess light energy into heat energy [88]. It appears that the NPQ values of QD-7 and I08-1 were higher than those before the co-culture experiment, suggesting an increase in heat dissipation and excess light energy (Figure 8b). The Chl a/Chl b ratio may be functionally linked to the modulation of NPQ through xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation mechanisms [89]. Also, this suggests that the dynamic distribution of chloroplasts in Ulva cells, like their migration to the cell periphery under high light, is an important strategy to reduce photodamage. In this study, NPQ in U. prolifera increased as Chl a/Chl b decreased (Figure 8b and Figure 9b), indicating likely enhanced photoprotective capacity in this species. The dynamics of Chl a/Chl b ratios in U. prolifera may reflect coactions between genetic constraints and phenotypic plasticity (Figure 9b). Pre-culture differences between strains QD-7 and I08-1 suggest heritable variation in photosynthetic apparatus configuration, while post-culture ratio shifts appear correlated with NPQ and light-response adjustments under high-temperature/light stress. As a dominant green-tide species, U. prolifera can modulate its Chl a/Chl b ratio to potentially optimize light-energy capture and photoprotection in fluctuating intertidal environments. Such plasticity could represent an evolutionary adaptation strategy facilitating photosynthetic optimization under variable light conditions. Collectively, these findings support viewing Chl a/Chl b as a phenotype of genotype-environment interaction (G × E) within complex photoadaptive mechanisms, warranting further investigation.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study observed the gametophyte morphology and size of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains and the morphology and growth of gamete-germlings in the laboratory. The growth of gamete-germlings of I08-1 was faster than that of QD-7. Following this, the 15-day-old gametophytes of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains were co-cultured under naturally high temperatures and high light intensity. The morphology, growth, and photosynthetic activity of the two strains were observed. The morphology of the adult algae of QD-7 was more adaptable to the environment, and it grew faster compared with I08-1. In the natural light and temperature environment, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of QD-7 and I08-1 showed significant differences, revealing that there were significant differences in photosynthetic efficiency between the two strains. By measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and chloroplast pigment content of the two U. prolifera strains, the algae were shown to be obviously stressed by high temperature and light intensity under natural light and temperature conditions. However, U. prolifera had a good self-protection and adaptation mechanism to high temperature and light, was not severely damaged, and still maintained a high photosynthetic efficiency. The experimental values based on the YNO and ETRmax showed that QD-7 had a stronger high-light protection mechanism and photosynthetic capacity than I08-1, and could better adapt to a high-light environment. These conclusions enhance our understanding of the environmental adaptation mechanism of U. prolifera and reveal differences in morphology, growth, and photosynthesis of the two U. prolifera strains. This is helpful for predicting the response of U. prolifera to changing environments and can provide scientific data reference for the formulation of green tide prevention and control strategies. It also advances the understanding of U. prolifera green tide formation mechanisms.
Overall, this study highlights significant differences in U. prolifera strains in morphology, photosynthesis, and environmental adaptability, offering a foundation for predicting green tide dynamics. Future studies should employ metagenomic approaches to investigate the Ulva–microbiome interaction network and develop ecological control strategies through allelopathic substances or microbial competition. Additionally, given the high-light adaptability of the 5S-II-type Ulva, enhanced satellite-based monitoring is needed to mitigate ecological risks posed by green tides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Methodology, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Software, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Validation, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Formal Analysis, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Investigation, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Data Curation, S.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.Z., J.L. and Z.X.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.Z., J.L., Z.X., J.S., J.Z. and P.H.; Supervision, J.Z. and P.H.; Project Administration, J.Z. and P.H.; Funding Acquisition, J.L. and P.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is a part of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3106004; Grant No. 2022YFC3106001), the Project of Prevention Strategies for Green Tides of Yellow Sea, M.N.R., Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant No. 21ZR1427400), the Project of Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Oceanography (Grant No. 2022-03), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41576163), and Technology Innovation Center for Land Spatial Eco-restoration in Metropolitan Area, MNR (Grant No. CXZX202006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks to those who have helped us on my research journey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xia, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Y.; Cui, Q.; Wu, L.; Gao, S.; Zhang, J.; He, P. Review of the development of the green tide and the process of control in the southern Yellow Sea in 2022. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2024, 302, 108772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, N.; Yu, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, C.; Tian, S. Network and evolutionary analysis of green tide management policies in the Yellow Sea, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 206, 116755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huan, L.; Gu, W.; Wang, X.; Yan, Y.; Tang, Q.; Han, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, K.; Qiu, Q.; Xu, J.; et al. Reproductive traits of floating Ulva prolifera sporophytes and gametophytes and their contribution to the Yellow Sea green tide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 214, 117752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Sun, Z.; Tang, R.; Ma, X.; Feng, Z. Loading of microplastics by two related macroalgae in a sea area where gold and green tides occur simultaneously. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 152809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, K.; Ren, J.; Bai, T.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Wu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y. A dynamic growth model of Ulva prolifera: Application in quantifying the biomass of green tides in the Yellow Sea, China. Ecol. Model. 2020, 428, 109072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, B.; Zhao, X.; Qu, T.; Zhong, Y.; Guan, C.; Hou, C.; Tang, L.; Tang, X.; Wang, Y. The causal link between nitrogen structure and physiological processes of Ulva prolifera as the causative species of green tides. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 953, 176170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, S.; Xu, B.; Yao, Q.; Burnett, W.; Charette, M.; Su, R.; Lian, E.; Yu, Z. Nutrient-rich submarine groundwater discharge fuels the largest green tide in the world. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 770, 144845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chang, H.; Zuo, P.; Yan, Y.; Qin, Y. Approaches, challenges and prospects for modeling macroalgal dynamics in the green tide: The case of Ulva prolifera. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 215, 117897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Glibert, P. Harmful algae at the complex nexus of eutrophication and climate change. Harmful Algae 2020, 91, 101583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Cui, X.; Liang, J.; Song, X. Spatiotemporal patterns and morphological characteristics of Ulva prolifera distribution in the Yellow Sea, China in 2016–2018. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, D.; Gao, Z.; Song, D.; Shang, W.; Jiang, X. Characteristics and influence of green tide drift and dissipation in Shandong Rongcheng coastal water based on remote sensing. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 227, 106335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; Zhou, H.; Guan, W.; Lou, X.; Cao, W.; Shi, A.; Chen, P.; Fan, K.; et al. Long time-series remote sensing analysis of the periodic cycle evolution of the inlets and ebb-tidal delta of Xincun Lagoon, Hainan Island, China. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2020, 165, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, X.; Zhu, A.; Chen, R. China’s algal bloom suffocates marine life. Science 2021, 373, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.; Yu, R.; Zhou, M. Effects of the decomposing green macroalga Ulva (Enteromorpha) prolifera on the growth of four red-tide species. Harmful Algae 2012, 16, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dai, Y.; Lin, Y.; Deng, P.; Chen, J.; Li, W.; Gao, Q.; Shen, H.; Peng, Q.; Chen, M.; Deng, X. Regulation of freshwater filamentous green algae (Cladophora) and its impact on malodorous volatile organic sulfur compound (DMS) by biomanipulation. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 955, 176856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, X.; Wu, M.; Xing, Q.; Song, X.; Zhao, D.; Han, Q.; Zhang, G. Spatio-temporal patterns of Ulva prolifera blooms and the corresponding influence on chlorophyll-a concentration in the Southern Yellow Sea, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Norkko, A.; Bonsdorff, E. Altered benthic prey-availability due to episodic oxygen deficiency caused by drifting algal mats. Mar. Ecol. 1996, 17, 355–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alvarez, S.; Brown, C.; Garcia Diaz, M.; O’Leary, H.; Solís, D. Non-linear impacts of harmful algae blooms on the coastal tourism economy. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 351, 119811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alsaleh, M.; Wang, X. Aquaculture growth and coastal tourism development in the context sustainable blue economy. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 33, 2030–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raha, D.; Davies-Vollum, K.; Hemstock, S.; Boateng, I.; Islam, M.; Pierce, C. We need collaboration and co-creation to address challenges facing coastal communities. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2024, 8, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Conover, J.; Green, L.; Thornber, C. Biomass decay rates and tissue nutrient loss in bloom and non-bloom-forming macroalgal species. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 178, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quillien, N.; Nordström, M.; Guyonnet, B.; Maguer, M.; Le Garrec, V.; Bonsdorff, E.; Grall, J. Large-scale effects of green tides on macrotidal sandy beaches: Habitat-specific responses of zoobenthos. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2015, 164, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, L.; Hu, C.; Barnes, B.; Lapointe, B.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, M. Climate and anthropogenic controls of seaweed expansions in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2022GL098185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Son, Y.; Choi, B.; Kim, Y.; Park, Y. Tracing floating green algae blooms in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea using GOCI satellite data and Lagrangian transport simulations. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 156, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, D.; Gao, Z.; Xu, F. Research on the dissipation of green tide and its influencing factors in the Yellow Sea based on Google Earth Engine. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 172, 112801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; He, P.; Li, H.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Jiao, F.; Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Shi, X.; Su, R.; et al. Ulva prolifera green-tide outbreaks and their environmental impact in the Yellow Sea, China. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Sun, L.; Yu, Z.; Song, X. Investigation on the efficiency of a silicone antifouling coating in controlling the adhesion and germination of Ulva prolifera micro-propagules on rafts. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2017, 60, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, J.; Xia, J.; Zhuang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yu, K.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Y.; Tong, Y.; Xia, L.; Qin, Y.; et al. Controlling the source of green tides in the Yellow Sea: NaClO treatment of Ulva attached on Pyropia aquaculture rafts. Aquaculture 2021, 535, 736378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maggs, C.; Harries, D.; Priatna, D. Indonesian green tides: The problem is also the solution. Indones. J. Appl. Environ. Stud. 2024, 5, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, M.; Cao, S.; Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Liu, J.; Zhuang, M.; Qin, Y.; Gao, S.; Sun, Y.; Kim, J.; et al. Controlling the main source of green tides in the Yellow Sea through the method of biological competition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 177, 113561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, Y.; Xia, Z.; Cao, X.; Tong, Y.; He, R.; Fu, M.; Sun, J.; Xu, H.; Xia, J.; Liu, J.; et al. A mixed acid treatment for the prevention of Ulva prolifera attachment to Neopyropia aquaculture rafts: Laboratory experimentation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 184, 114134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Z.; Liu, M.; Yang, Y. Environmental and economic impacts of different disposal options for Ulva prolifera green tide in the Yellow Sea, China. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 11483–11492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, T.; Effiong, K.; Hu, J.; Li, C.; Xiao, X. Chemical prevention and control of the green tide and fouling organism Ulva: Key chemicals, mechanisms, and applications. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 618950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Cai, C.; He, P. Complete mitochondrial genome of Ulva prolifera, the dominant species of green macroalgal blooms in Yellow Sea, China. Mitochondrial DNA B-Resour. 2016, 1, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, S.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cui, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Lu, Y.; Yu, K.; He, P. Variations of dominant free-floating Ulva species in the source area for the world’s largest macroalgal blooms, China: Differences of ecological tolerance. Harmful Algae 2018, 74, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Han, H.; Fan, S.; Song, W.; Li, Y.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ding, D. The contribution of attached Ulva prolifera on Pyropia aquaculture rafts to green tides in the Yellow Sea. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2020, 39, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cai, C.; Liu, X.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, T.; Jia, R.; He, P. Weakened growth, cell division, and energy metabolism, but enhanced resistance, signaling, and anabolism: Responses of Ulva prolifera to copper elucidated by omics. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 3449–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Z.; Xiao, J.; Fan, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, D. Who made the world’s largest green tide in China?—An integrated study on the initiation and early development of the green tide in Yellow Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2015, 60, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Zhong, J.; Zheng, M.; Zhuo, P.; Xu, N. Photoperiod mediates the effects of elevated CO2 on the growth and physiological performance in the green tide alga Ulva prolifera. Mar. Environ. Res. 2018, 141, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiang, J.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, M.; Liu, N.; Li, Y.; Xu, N. High light might alleviate inhibitory effects of high temperature on growth and physiological parameters of Ulva prolifera. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 2062–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, H.; Liu, Y.; Beardall, J.; Zhong, Z.; Gao, G.; Xu, J. Physiological acclimation of Ulva prolifera to seasonal environmental factors drives green tides in the Yellow Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2022, 179, 105695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, L.; Wu, M.; Cui, Y.; Tian, L.; Yang, P.; Zhao, L.; Xue, M.; Liu, J. What causes the great green tide disaster in the South Yellow Sea of China in 2021? Ecol. Indic. 2022, 140, 108988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bao, M.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Li, B.; Wu, H.; Zang, S.; Yan, F.; Xu, Z.; Liu, N. High-light pronounced the effects of stocking density on photosynthesis and nutrients uptake of the bloom-forming green alga, Ulva linza. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1440734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, X.; Xu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cao, S.; Mou, S.; Ye, N. The effect of nutrient concentrations, nutrient ratios and temperature on photosynthesis and nutrient uptake by Ulva prolifera: Implications for the explosion in green tides. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gu, K.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Cai, C.; Zhao, H.; Liu, X.; He, P. Molecular response of Ulva prolifera to short-term high light stress revealed by a multi-omics approach. Biology 2022, 11, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pan, Y.; Li, P.; Sun, J.; Liu, S.; Xing, L.; Yu, D.; Feng, Q. Potential Impact of Sea Surface Temperature Variability on the 2007 Sudden Bloom of Ulva prolifera in the Southern Yellow Sea. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Pan, C.; Yi, L.; Xu, J.; He, P. Ocean warming enhances the competitive advantage of Ulva prolifera over a golden tide alga, Sargassum horneri under eutrophication. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1440734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Gao, S.; Yang, L.; Zhao, S.; Li, J.; He, P. Seasonal variation of dominant free-floating Ulva species in the Rudong coastal area, China: Differences of ecological adaptability to temperature and irradiance. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2017, 46, 1758–1764. [Google Scholar]
  49. Keesing, J.; Liu, D.; Fearns, P.; Garcia, R. Inter- and intra-annual patterns of Ulva prolifera green tides in the Yellow Sea during 2007–2009, their origin and relationship to the expansion of coastal seaweed aquaculture in China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1169–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miao, X.; Xiao, J.; Pang, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Miao, J.; Li, Y. Effect of the large-scale green tide on the species succession of green macroalgal micro-propagules in the coastal waters of Qingdao, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 126, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Y.; Yao, L.; Liu, J.; Tong, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, S.; Fu, M.; Zhuang, M.; He, P.; et al. Prevention strategies for green tides at source in the Southern Yellow Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 178, 113646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, W.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Tian, X.; Hua, L.; He, Q.; Huo, Y.; Yu, K.; Shi, D.; Ma, J.; et al. Seasonal variation of dominant free-floating and attached Ulva species in Rudong coastal area, China. Harmful Algae 2013, 28, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Q.; Yu, R.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, L.; Wang, Y.; Kong, F.; Geng, H.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, P.; Yan, T.; et al. Genetic evidence in tracking the origin of Ulva prolifera blooms in the Yellow Sea, China. Harmful Algae 2018, 78, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pang, S.; Liu, F.; Shan, T.; Xu, N.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, S.; Chopin, T.; Sun, S. Tracking the algal origin of the Ulva bloom in the Yellow Sea by a combination of molecular, morphological and physiological analyses. Mar. Environ. Res. 2010, 69, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, F.; Pang, S.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C. Quantitative, molecular and growth analyses of Ulva microscopic propagules in the coastal sediment of Jiangsu province where green tides initially occurred. Mar. Environ. Res. 2012, 74, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Mao, Y.; Liang, C.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Ye, N. Somatic cells serve as a potential propagule bank of Enteromorpha prolifera forming a green tide in the Yellow Sea, China. J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 22, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Y. A study on the cultivation of the vegetative cells and protoplasts of Porphyra haitanensis. J. Shanghai Ocean Univ. 1986, 17, 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao, S.; Xia, Z.; Liu, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, J.; He, P. Morphology, growth, and photosynthesis of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller (Chlorophyta, Ulvophyceae) gametophytes, the dominant green tide species in the Southern Yellow Sea. J. Sea Res. 2023, 193, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. He, P.; Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Cai, C. Green Tides of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 1–438. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu, J.; Tong, Y.; Xia, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sun, J.; Zhao, S.; Zhuang, M.; Zhang, J.; He, P.; et al. Ulva macroalgae within local aquaculture ponds along the estuary of Dagu River, Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 174, 113243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stein, J. Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods and Growth Measurements; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1973; pp. 289–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cui, J.; Zhang, J.; Huo, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Q.; Chen, L.; Yu, K.; He, P. Adaptability of free-floating green tide algae in the Yellow Sea to variable temperature and light intensity. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 101, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, H.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, W. Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiment Principle and Technology; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp. 134–137. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  64. Smetacek, V.; Zingone, A. Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise. Nature 2013, 504, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xia, Z.; Yuan, H.; Liu, J.; Zhao, S.; Tong, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, S.; Li, A.; Cao, J.; Xia, J.; et al. Biomass and species composition of green macroalgae in the Binhai Harbor intertidal zone of the Southern Yellow Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nelson, T.; Nelson, A.; Tjoelker, M. Seasonal and spatial patterns of “green tides” (ulvoid algal blooms) and related water quality parameters in the coastal waters of Washington State, USA. Bot. Mar. 2003, 46, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Charlier, R.; Morand, P.; Finkl, C. How Brittany and Florida coasts cope with green tides. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2008, 65, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hughey, J.; Miller, K.; Gabrielson, P. Mitogenome analysis of a green tide forming Ulva from California, USA confirms its identity as Ulva expansa (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta). Mitochondrial DNA B-Resour. 2018, 3, 1302–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yoshida, G.; Uchimura, M.; Hiraoka, M. Persistent occurrence of floating Ulva green tide in Hiroshima Bay, Japan: Seasonal succession and growth patterns of Ulva pertusa and Ulva spp. (Chlorophyta, Ulvales). Hydrobiologia 2015, 758, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kwon, H.; Kang, H.; Oh, Y.; Park, S.; Kim, G. Green tide development associated with submarine groundwater discharge in a coastal harbor, Jeju, Korea. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kirkendale, L.; Saunders, G.; Winberg, P. A molecular survey of Ulva (Chlorophyta) in temperate Australia reveals enhanced levels of cosmopolitanism. J. Phycol. 2013, 49, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Largo, D.; Sembrano, J.; Hiraoka, M.; Ohno, M. Taxonomic and ecological profile of “green tide” species of Ulva (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in central Philippines. Hydrobiologia 2004, 512, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Allanson, B.; Human, L.; Claassens, L. Observations on the distribution and abundance of a green tide along an intertidal shore, Knysna Estuary. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 107, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yang, Y.; Hassan, S.; Awasthi, M.; Gajendran, B.; Sharma, M.; Ji, M.; Salama, E. The recent progress on the bioactive compounds from algal biomass for human health applications. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bartold, M.; Kluczek, M. Estimating of chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm for plant stress detection at peatlands under Ramsar Convention with Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Ecol. Inform. 2024, 81, 102603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tan, L.; Xu, W.; He, X.; Wang, J. The feasibility of Fv/Fm on judging nutrient limitation of marine algae through indoor simulation and in situ experiment. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 229, 106411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Solomonova, E.; Shoman, N.; Akimov, A.; Rylkova, O. Impact of copper oxide nanoparticles on the physiology of different microalgal species. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2023, 66, 103128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hua, L.; He, P.; Qu, X.; Yu, K. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic rate of Ulva compressa. J. Shanghai Ocean Univ. 2014, 23, 215–221. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  79. Xu, L.; Lin, L.; Luo, L.; Zuo, X.; Cao, C.; Jin, X.; Jin, A.; Ma, Z.; Chen, B.; Wu, M. Organic acid treatment for removal of epiphytic Ulva L. attached to Sargassum fusiforme seedlings. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Beer, S. Photosynthetic traits of the ubiquitous and prolific macroalga Ulva (Chlorophyta): A review. Eur. J. Phycol. 2022, 58, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Terada, R.; Vo, T.; Nishihara, G.; Shioya, K.; Shimada, S.; Kawaguchi, S. The effect of irradiance and temperature on the photosynthesis and growth of a cultivated red alga Kappaphycus alvarezii (Solieriaceae) from Vietnam, based on in situ and in vitro measurements. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hupp, J.; McCoy, J.; Millgan, A.; Peers, G. Simultaneously measuring carbon uptake capacity and chlorophyll a fluorescence dynamics in algae. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ralph, P.; Gademann, R. Rapid light curves: A powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity. Aquat. Bot. 2005, 82, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dou, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Chassis engineering for high light tolerance in microalgae and cyanobacteria. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 45, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Levin, G.; Kulikovsky, S.; Liveanu, V.; Eichenbaum, B.; Meir, A.; Isaacson, T.; Tadmor, Y.; Adir, N.; Schuster, G. The desert green algae Chlorella ohadii thrives at excessively high light intensities by exceptionally enhancing the mechanisms that protect photosynthesis from photoinhibition. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lichtenthaler, H.; Ac, A.; Marek, M.; Kalin, J.; Urban, O. Differences in pigment composition, photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence images of sun and shade leaves of four tree species. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Caferri, R.; Guardini, Z.; Bassi, R.; Dall’Osto, L. Assessing photoprotective functions of carotenoids in photosynthetic systems of plants and green algae. Methods Enzymol. 2022, 674, 53–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Mou, S.; Zhang, X.; Dong, M.; Fan, X.; Xu, J.; Cao, S.; Xu, D.; Wang, W.; Ye, N. Photoprotection in the green tidal alga Ulva prolifera: Role of LHCSR and PsbS proteins in response to high light stress. Plant Biol. 2013, 15, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sahay, S.; Grzybowski, M.; Schnable, J.; Głowacka, K. Genotype-specific nonphotochemical quenching responses to nitrogen deficit are linked to chlorophyll a to b ratios. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 297, 154261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Natural temperature (a) and light intensity (b) variations.
Figure 1. Natural temperature (a) and light intensity (b) variations.
Biology 14 00702 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on the maximum likelihood (ML) method. (a) Phylogenetic tree of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region from strains QD-7 and I08-1; (b) phylogenetic tree of the 5S rDNA spacer from strains QD-7 and I08-1.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on the maximum likelihood (ML) method. (a) Phylogenetic tree of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region from strains QD-7 and I08-1; (b) phylogenetic tree of the 5S rDNA spacer from strains QD-7 and I08-1.
Biology 14 00702 g002
Figure 3. Morphology of gametes and germlings in U. prolifera. (a) Gametes of strain QD-7; (b) gametes of strain I08-1; (c) 6-day-old germlings of QD-7; (d) 6-day-old germlings of I08-1.
Figure 3. Morphology of gametes and germlings in U. prolifera. (a) Gametes of strain QD-7; (b) gametes of strain I08-1; (c) 6-day-old germlings of QD-7; (d) 6-day-old germlings of I08-1.
Biology 14 00702 g003
Figure 4. Gamete size, flagellar length, and growth of gamete germlings (n = 30). (a) Gamete size and flagellar length of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (b) germling length of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (c) main stem width of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (d) number of primary branches of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains. Note: In (a), the numbers above histograms denote the average major axis length, minor axis length, and flagellum length of gametes for the two strains (units: μm). In (bd), the numbers above histograms represent the average thalli length, main stem width, and primary branch count of thalli for the two strains (units: μm).
Figure 4. Gamete size, flagellar length, and growth of gamete germlings (n = 30). (a) Gamete size and flagellar length of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (b) germling length of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (c) main stem width of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains; (d) number of primary branches of 6-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 strains. Note: In (a), the numbers above histograms denote the average major axis length, minor axis length, and flagellum length of gametes for the two strains (units: μm). In (bd), the numbers above histograms represent the average thalli length, main stem width, and primary branch count of thalli for the two strains (units: μm).
Biology 14 00702 g004
Figure 5. Morphological photographs of 15-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 co-cultured for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (a,g) Thalli after 15 days of culture at 20 °C with gametes of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains. (bf) Morphology of the gametophytes of the QD-7 strain cultured for 15 days at 20 °C, and then cultured for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (hl) Gametes of the I08-1 strain were cultured for 15 days at 20 °C and then cultured under natural light and temperature conditions for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days. Note: Two biological replicates were performed within the same season, each consisting of three technical replicates. Results showed high consistency between replicates.
Figure 5. Morphological photographs of 15-day-old QD-7 and I08-1 co-cultured for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (a,g) Thalli after 15 days of culture at 20 °C with gametes of the QD-7 and I08-1 strains. (bf) Morphology of the gametophytes of the QD-7 strain cultured for 15 days at 20 °C, and then cultured for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (hl) Gametes of the I08-1 strain were cultured for 15 days at 20 °C and then cultured under natural light and temperature conditions for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days. Note: Two biological replicates were performed within the same season, each consisting of three technical replicates. Results showed high consistency between replicates.
Biology 14 00702 g005
Figure 6. Morphology of the central branch cells of the main branch in QD-7 and I08-1 strains before and after co-culture. (a,c) Morphology of central branch cells in the main branch of QD-7 and I08-1 strains, respectively, cultured at 20 °C for 15 days (corresponding to the thalli in Figure 5a,g). (b,d) Morphology of central branch cells in the main branch of QD-7 and I08-1 strains, respectively, after being cultured at 20 °C for 15 days, followed by 10 days under ambient light and temperature conditions (corresponding to the thalli in Figure 5f,l).
Figure 6. Morphology of the central branch cells of the main branch in QD-7 and I08-1 strains before and after co-culture. (a,c) Morphology of central branch cells in the main branch of QD-7 and I08-1 strains, respectively, cultured at 20 °C for 15 days (corresponding to the thalli in Figure 5a,g). (b,d) Morphology of central branch cells in the main branch of QD-7 and I08-1 strains, respectively, after being cultured at 20 °C for 15 days, followed by 10 days under ambient light and temperature conditions (corresponding to the thalli in Figure 5f,l).
Biology 14 00702 g006
Figure 7. Growth of adult thalli. (a) Changes in the length of the main stem (MSL); (b) specific growth rate (SGR) variation in U. prolifera length; (c) changes in the length of primary branches (PBL); (d) SGR variation in PBL; (e) changes in the width of the main stem (MSW); (f) changes in the SGR of the MSW; (g) change in fresh weight (FW); and (h) SGR of FW. Note: In (a), numbers above the line show the average MSL (cm) of the two strains after 10 days of culture; in (b), numbers adjacent to the line indicate the maximum SGR of MSL within 10 days; in (c), numbers above the line denote the average PBL (cm) after 10 days; in (d), numbers next to the line represent the maximum SGR of PBL within 10 days; in (e), numbers above the line show the average MSW (cm) after 10 days; in (f), numbers close to the line are the maximum SGR of MSW within 10 days; in (g), numbers above the line reflect the average FW of thalli after 10 days; in (h), numbers adjacent to the line indicate the maximum SGR of thalli FW within 10 days.
Figure 7. Growth of adult thalli. (a) Changes in the length of the main stem (MSL); (b) specific growth rate (SGR) variation in U. prolifera length; (c) changes in the length of primary branches (PBL); (d) SGR variation in PBL; (e) changes in the width of the main stem (MSW); (f) changes in the SGR of the MSW; (g) change in fresh weight (FW); and (h) SGR of FW. Note: In (a), numbers above the line show the average MSL (cm) of the two strains after 10 days of culture; in (b), numbers adjacent to the line indicate the maximum SGR of MSL within 10 days; in (c), numbers above the line denote the average PBL (cm) after 10 days; in (d), numbers next to the line represent the maximum SGR of PBL within 10 days; in (e), numbers above the line show the average MSW (cm) after 10 days; in (f), numbers close to the line are the maximum SGR of MSW within 10 days; in (g), numbers above the line reflect the average FW of thalli after 10 days; in (h), numbers adjacent to the line indicate the maximum SGR of thalli FW within 10 days.
Biology 14 00702 g007
Figure 8. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of 15-day-old gametophytes; 15-day-old gametophytes were further cultured for another 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (a) Maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm) and actual photochemical quantum yield (YII); (b) non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ); (c) maximum electron transfer rate (ETRmax); (d) minimum saturated irradiance (Ik); (e) initial slope of the fast light curve related to the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (a); (f) quantum yield of PSII in non-regulated energy dissipation (YNO); (g) quantum yield of PSII in regulated energy dissipation (YNPQ); (h) relative electron transfer rate (ETR) fitting curve. Three parallels (n = 3) were set in each experimental group. QD-7 and I08-1 were the gametophytes of two strains of U. prolifera cultured for 15 days at 20 °C. QD-7’ and I08-1’ were gametophytes of two U. prolifera strains cultured for 15 days at 20 °C and then co-cultured for 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. The different letters and numbers above the line chart indicate that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the two strains were significantly (p < 0.05) and highly significantly (p < 0.01) different before and after co-culture. The same letter or the same Arabic number indicates no significant difference.
Figure 8. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of 15-day-old gametophytes; 15-day-old gametophytes were further cultured for another 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. (a) Maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm) and actual photochemical quantum yield (YII); (b) non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ); (c) maximum electron transfer rate (ETRmax); (d) minimum saturated irradiance (Ik); (e) initial slope of the fast light curve related to the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (a); (f) quantum yield of PSII in non-regulated energy dissipation (YNO); (g) quantum yield of PSII in regulated energy dissipation (YNPQ); (h) relative electron transfer rate (ETR) fitting curve. Three parallels (n = 3) were set in each experimental group. QD-7 and I08-1 were the gametophytes of two strains of U. prolifera cultured for 15 days at 20 °C. QD-7’ and I08-1’ were gametophytes of two U. prolifera strains cultured for 15 days at 20 °C and then co-cultured for 10 days under natural light and temperature conditions. The different letters and numbers above the line chart indicate that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the two strains were significantly (p < 0.05) and highly significantly (p < 0.01) different before and after co-culture. The same letter or the same Arabic number indicates no significant difference.
Biology 14 00702 g008
Figure 9. Chloroplast pigment contents (a) and their content ratios (b) of 15-day-old gametophytes (QD-7 and I08-1) cultured at 20 °C, as well as those of gametophytes (QD-7’ and I08-1’) after an additional 10-day cultivation under natural light and temperature conditions. Different letters and numbers above the histogram indicate a significant (p < 0.05) and highly significant (p < 0.01) difference in chloroplast pigment content and its ratio before and after co-culture between QD-7 and I08-1. The same letter or the same Arabic number indicates no significant difference.
Figure 9. Chloroplast pigment contents (a) and their content ratios (b) of 15-day-old gametophytes (QD-7 and I08-1) cultured at 20 °C, as well as those of gametophytes (QD-7’ and I08-1’) after an additional 10-day cultivation under natural light and temperature conditions. Different letters and numbers above the histogram indicate a significant (p < 0.05) and highly significant (p < 0.01) difference in chloroplast pigment content and its ratio before and after co-culture between QD-7 and I08-1. The same letter or the same Arabic number indicates no significant difference.
Biology 14 00702 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, S.; Liu, J.; Xia, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, J.; He, P. Subtypes I and II of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller: Dominant Green Tide Species in the Southern Yellow Sea and Their Responses to Natural Light and Temperature Conditions. Biology 2025, 14, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060702

AMA Style

Zhao S, Liu J, Xia Z, Sun J, Zhang J, He P. Subtypes I and II of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller: Dominant Green Tide Species in the Southern Yellow Sea and Their Responses to Natural Light and Temperature Conditions. Biology. 2025; 14(6):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Shuang, Jinlin Liu, Zhangyi Xia, Jingyi Sun, Jianheng Zhang, and Peimin He. 2025. "Subtypes I and II of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller: Dominant Green Tide Species in the Southern Yellow Sea and Their Responses to Natural Light and Temperature Conditions" Biology 14, no. 6: 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060702

APA Style

Zhao, S., Liu, J., Xia, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, J., & He, P. (2025). Subtypes I and II of Ulva prolifera O.F. Müller: Dominant Green Tide Species in the Southern Yellow Sea and Their Responses to Natural Light and Temperature Conditions. Biology, 14(6), 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop