Next Article in Journal
Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Spotted Forest Musk Deer (Moschus berezovskii) from Huanglong Mountain, Shaanxi, China, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Moschidae
Previous Article in Journal
Rumen Microbial Diversity and Metabolome Analysis Reveals the Effects of Alkaline Metal Ion Complexes on Muscle Quality of Lambs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biparental Inheritance and Instability of kDNA in Experimental Hybrids of Trypanosoma cruzi: A Proposal for a Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures

1
College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology, Khuzdar 89100, Pakistan
3
Department of Information Technology, University of Modern Sciences, Tando Muhammad Khan 70220, Pakistan
4
School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2025, 14(12), 1792; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121792
Submission received: 11 November 2025 / Revised: 5 December 2025 / Accepted: 10 December 2025 / Published: 16 December 2025

Simple Summary

Malaria is a fatal disease caused by parasites transmitted via mosquito bites, and precise diagnosis is essential for efficient treatment. However, conventional diagnostic techniques, such as microscopy, are labor-intensive and require skilled staff, usually resulting in treatment delays. This article presents a technique utilizing deep learning, specifically transfer learning with cutting-edge convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to automate the detection of malaria parasites in blood smear images. The study examined eight pretrained CNN models, such as ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception, attaining a maximum accuracy of 89%. The research revealed that these models, when optimized with malaria data, provide more accurate and faster diagnoses than conventional methods, rendering them particularly advantageous in resource-limited environments. The findings underscore that transfer learning can markedly decrease training duration while enhancing accuracy, presenting a valuable resource for malaria diagnosis in healthcare facilities. This automated method could significantly influence public health by improving early detection and treatment, hence aiding in the prevention of malaria transmission.

Abstract

Malaria remains a critical global health challenge for doctors and healthcare practitioners, particularly clinicians involved in initial treatment. Inaccurate diagnosis of malaria-infected cells often leads to delayed or inappropriate treatment, increasing the risk of severe complications or death. Traditional microscopic diagnosis is time-consuming and requires expert skills, resulting in variability and inconsistency in results. These challenges are further complicated by the complexity of malaria symptoms, which overlap with other febrile illnesses, making clinical diagnosis unreliable without laboratory confirmation. To address these challenges, this study explores deep-learning-based approaches, particularly leveraging state-of-the-art pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, for automated malaria parasite detection and classification from microscopic blood smear images. Transfer learning is an effective approach to handling issues such as limited labeled data, time-consuming training, and domain-specific variations in medical image classification. By leveraging pretrained models trained on large-scale datasets like ImageNet, transfer learning enables the reuse of learned features, significantly accelerating the adaptation process for malaria detection and other medical imaging tasks. We used eight pretrained models for malaria parasite classification such as VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception. In particular, ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 achieved accuracies of approximately 89%, respectively, while Xception reached around 88% accuracy. In comparison, VGG-16 achieved a lower overall accuracy of about 80% due to a recall trade-off despite high precision. These metrics highlight meaningful improvements over simpler architectures and validate the efficacy of our transfer learning approach for automated malaria detection. The proposed models were fine-tuned on extensive labeled datasets comprising parasitized and uninfected cells. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations were conducted using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, and support. Our experimental results demonstrate that ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception exhibit strong balanced performance with higher accuracy, while VGG-16 shows a trade-off of high precision but lower recall for parasitized cells.
Keywords: medical image analysis; malaria detection; transfer learning; blood smear analysis medical image analysis; malaria detection; transfer learning; blood smear analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laghari, A.A.; Muhammad, W.; Memon, M.L.; Hussain, A.; Kumar, A. Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures. Biology 2025, 14, 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121792

AMA Style

Laghari AA, Muhammad W, Memon ML, Hussain A, Kumar A. Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures. Biology. 2025; 14(12):1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121792

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laghari, Azhar Ali, Wazir Muhammad, Mudasar Latif Memon, Ayaz Hussain, and Akash Kumar. 2025. "Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures" Biology 14, no. 12: 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121792

APA Style

Laghari, A. A., Muhammad, W., Memon, M. L., Hussain, A., & Kumar, A. (2025). Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures. Biology, 14(12), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121792

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop