Next Article in Journal
Monooxygenases and Antibiotic Resistance: A Focus on Carbapenems
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Tetrabromobisphenol A Exposure Induces Gut Microbiota Imbalance and Metabolic Disorders via the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Regenerated Gut of Apostichopus japonicus
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNAs Signature Panel Identifies Heavy Drinkers with Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis from Heavy Drinkers without Liver Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Gill-Associated Bacterial Community Is More Affected by Exogenous Chlorella pyrenoidosa Addition than the Bacterial Communities of Water and Fish Gut in GIFT Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Aquaculture System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Impact of Anthropic Pressures on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: A Functional Trait Approach in the Irtysh River Watershed

1
Tarim Research Center of Rare Fishes, College of Life Sciences and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
2
Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
3
College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2023, 12(10), 1315; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101315
Submission received: 28 August 2023 / Revised: 1 October 2023 / Accepted: 3 October 2023 / Published: 8 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Relationship between Water Quality and Aquatic Organisms)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigates the evolutionary dynamics of macroinvertebrate functional traits within the Irtysh River Basin under the influence of urbanization. Through comprehensive field assessments and data analysis, we document a significant transition process toward pollution-tolerant functional characteristics in macroinvertebrates, coinciding with the rapid pace of urban development. Simultaneously, the community undergoes a gradual transition, marked by an increase in pollution-tolerant taxa. Urbanization-induced environmental pollution and waste discharge emerge as prominent catalysts, accelerating the observed changes in macroinvertebrate communities and functional traits. Our findings underscore the critical role of anthropogenic factors in aquatic ecosystems and highlight the imperative of strategic management strategies to mitigate these effects. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay among urbanization, environmental change, and benthic organism responses, providing essential insights for sustainable river management amidst urban expansion.

Abstract

Little is known about how changes in the biodiversity and functional traits of macroinvertebrates in rivers respond to the responses of anthropic pressures and their driving factors. Macroinvertebrates were sampled at 17 sites in the Irtysh River Basin and classified macroinvertebrates into 10 traits and 38 categories between May and August 2022. Then, we performed R-mode linked to Q-mode (RLQ) analysis and calculated functional richness, evenness, divergence, and Rao’s quadratic entropy (RaoQ) for each site and community-weighted means for each trait category. Our results indicated that there were pronounced alterations in species variability in the urban region. Functional divergence indicated fierce competition among species and considerable niche overlap in the urban region. Functional evenness indicated that species abundance distribution and interspecific functional distance were not uniform in the urban region. Functional richness indicated that the urban region was the strongest region in terms of niche occupation, resource utilization, and buffering capacity for environmental fluctuations. Rao’s quadratic entropy showed that the trait difference of macroinvertebrates was the largest in all regions, which was caused by the gradient environmental difference. Research has revealed that urbanization significantly influences the evolutionary trajectory of macroinvertebrate fauna, culminating in an upsurge in pollution-tolerant species and a convergence of functional traits. We recommend strengthening the control of urban and industrial pollution and wise planning and management of land and water resources to mitigate the impact of anthropogenic destruction on habitat fragmentation in the Irtysh River Basin.

1. Introduction

Over the past 100 years, anthropic activity has significantly threatened riverine ecological integrity worldwide [1,2]. Stream ecosystems are confronted with increasing challenges due to the continuous expansion of anthropic activities, including the discharge of domestic sewage, elevated agricultural water consumption, industrial development, and the establishment of hydrological junctions [3,4,5,6]. Additionally, industrial, agricultural, and municipal wastewater have produced river eutrophication and organic compound pollution [7,8]. Therefore, the biological habitat gradually tends to a state of degradation [9]. Moreover, there has been an increase in the ecological stress index caused by the miniaturization and homogenization of the composition of biological communities [10,11,12]. Understanding the factors controlling the health of stream ecosystems is essential for conserving aquatic biodiversity and promoting a harmonious coexistence between humans and nature.
The Irtysh River Basin (IRB) originates from Zigertaidaban, north of Fuyun County, and flows to Kazakhstan after leaving the southern bay of Habahe County. It is the only cross-border river in China that flows into the Arctic Ocean. The IRB is a continental north-temperate cold basin with unique geographical and natural conditions. It maintains a relatively primitive aquatic ecological environment and is a suitable habitat for alpine cold aquatic organisms. The average annual temperature is only 4 °C, and the extreme temperatures in the basin can reach 40 °C and −51.5 °C. The annual sunshine hours of the IRB are approximately 2900 h, and the value has decreased in the past thirty years [13]. The airflow from the Atlantic Ocean entering the basin is uplifted by the mountains to form abundant precipitation. The rainfall is mainly concentrated in summer and autumn, accounting for 56% to 60% of the annual rainfall. Abundant water resources and precipitation improve the development of agricultural and animal husbandry resources along the river basin, which have grown into a primary source of local finance [14,15]. Moreover, the abundant water resources of the IRB can be widely used for hydroelectricity. Large water conservancy projects provide an essential electricity source for Xinjiang Province and broader regions, supporting industrial development and urbanization [16]. However, the construction of water conservancy facilities has reduced the flow and velocity in the IRB. Furthermore, overgrazing has reduced riparian vegetation cover and altered land utilization types, which has affected stream ecosystems by destabilizing the water circulation due to urbanization. Moreover, some cities, such as Beitun city and Altay city, near watercourses, which need large amounts of water resources in the context of accelerated urbanization needs, will accelerate the rate of watercourses drying up, the degradation of wetlands and the decline of aquatic biodiversity [17,18,19]. As one of the most critical Asian streams, the negative impact of anthropic activity on the aquatic ecosystem in the IRB remains to be comprehensively studied and evaluated.
As an important indicator used to measure the health and function of aquatic ecosystems, macroinvertebrates play a crucial role in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and sediment stability. The presence or absence of critical macroinvertebrates will have a combined effect on the entire ecosystem, affecting the abundance and distribution of other taxa [20,21]. Many researchers have reported establishing pollution tolerance values and studying the biodiversity of macroinvertebrates to scientifically evaluate stream system health [22,23]. They found that the extent of human interference in stream ecosystems is inversely proportional to the biodiversity of macroinvertebrate communities in freshwater ecosystems [24]. However, the index of abundance as a measure of biodiversity considers all groups equally, so this single index cannot identify subtle differences between hydrological units [25]. To avoid this problem, some researchers have proposed a method of functional diversity using biological traits such as habits, feeding behavior, and body size of macroinvertebrates to replace single indicators of biodiversity assessment [26,27]. Functional diversity refers to the value and range of species functional traits in a given community or ecosystem, and functional traits can reflect the difference in species functional diversity in biological communities [28,29]. Nevertheless, changes in environmental factors caused by anthropic disturbances are the leading cause of differences in the functional traits of macroinvertebrates. It was found that different levels of anthropic disturbance have different effects on macroinvertebrate community composition. For example, species of EPT taxonomic units decreased with increased anthropic activities, while pollution-tolerant species such as Chironominae increased [30,31]. In addition, the extent and type of macroinvertebrate communities affected by anthropic activities were related to geographic location and ecosystem characteristics, with macroinvertebrate communities in highly urbanized regions exhibiting lower diversity and abundance [32,33]. Therefore, we investigated macroinvertebrate community traits to further understand the complex interactions between macroinvertebrate taxa and their environment. Ultimately, it can lead to the designation of effective conservation strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of anthropic activity on aquatic ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Sampling and Data Acquisition

We studied the IRB located in Altay city, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China. The main stream is 4248 km long, with a total length of 633 km in China and a basin area of 5.7 × 104 km2 [19]. Considering the geographical and environmental characteristics, this study set up seventeen sampling sites in the IRB (Figure 1). Three sampling events were conducted at each site between May and August in 2022. On each sampling occasion, we measured the water temperature (WT, °C), atmospheric pressure (AP, Pa), dissolved oxygen (DO, mg/L), specific conductance (SPC, μs/cm), conductivity (C, μs/cm), salinity (SAL, ‰), pH, and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP, mV) in triplicate with a Multi-Parameter water quality Sonde (YSI 556MPS). According to the “Analytical Methods for Water and Wastewater Monitoring (4th edition)” standard, a 1 L plexiglass water collector was used to collect water quality samples. Additionally, we collected water samples for the analysis of total phosphorus (TP, mg/L), total nitrogen (TN, mg/L), and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a, μg/L) determinations [34].
We collected the river substrate using a D-shaped net (0.3 m mesh width, 500 μm mesh aperture) for 0.3 m3 at each sampling site. Samples were fixed in the field with 4% formaldehyde and sieved in the laboratory through a 60-mesh sieve. Samples were preserved in 70% ethanol, and macroinvertebrates were identified to at least the family or subfamily level [35].
By consulting published books and literature, we selected ten continuous biological traits to reflect the life history, resistance to the outside world, and physiological characteristics of macroinvertebrates [36,37,38]. These traits included trophic habit, habitat, stain resistance value, maximum size, reproduction, respiration technique, swimming ability, armoring, shape, and thermal preference. They were used to divide macroinvertebrates into 38 functional groups (Table 1). We utilized the fuzzy coding system to score the affinity of each trait unit. Each trait unit was assigned a score to describe the affinity of different forms in different variables. The score was proportional to the affinity, ranging from zero to three. For some families identified at a lower resolution level in taxonomy, we calculated the affinity score by adding the genus-level affinity scores that appeared in the region and readjusting the results from zero to three. We divided the subfamily or subfamily relationship of the family when we could not identify the family’s information in Diptera, Oligochaeta, and Hirudinae.

2.2. Data Analysis

We analyzed the data using a comprehensive approach comprising two methods to assess the macroinvertebrate functional traits. First, we performed R-mode linked to Q-mode (RLQ) analysis to assess the relationships between biological traits and environmental factors [36]. Second, we used community-weighted mean (CWM) analysis to identify the general distribution of functional biological shapes across each sampling site [37,38]. Finally, we used the functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve), and functional divergence (FDiv) indexes and Rao’s quadratic entropy (RaoQ) analysis to evaluate the functional diversity [39,40].

2.2.1. Physico-Chemical, Biological and Trait Analysis

We used the Pearson correlation method and the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) adjustment to analyze the relationships between environmental factors and the family distribution of macroinvertebrates. First, we created two correlation coefficient matrices for species distribution and environmental factors at each point. Second, we adjusted the p value by the BH. Correlation was considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05. We decided to determine the association between the biological traits of macroinvertebrates by the association analysis (r > 0.85, p < 0.05). A data matrix was constructed using 38 functional group variables, and then we used association analysis.

2.2.2. Functional Diversity and Community-Weighted Means

We utilized functional richness, functional evenness, and functional divergence to assess functional diversity. FEve represents the degree to which the functional traits of a single individual are evenly distributed over the ecological space. It is proportional to the degree of utilization of adequate resources within the ecological space. FDiv refers to the difference in the functional trait of individuals within the biological community, directly proportional to the degree of complementarity of the ecological niche and inversely proportional to the degree of resource competition. The distance variation between species was expressed by RaoQ analysis. The macroinvertebrate functional trait values were calculated from the community-weighted average trait index with the following equation:
C W M = i = 1 n P i T r a i t i
where P i is the abundance of taxon i in the community, and T r a i t i is the trait value of taxon i . This indicator holds that the functional trait of the most abundant species largely determines the functional trait of the community.
To assess the relationship between functional traits and environmental factors, we conducted RLQ analysis. For the subsequent statistical analysis of data, three data matrices were created: a matrix of water environmental variables (the R matrix), a macroinvertebrate taxa richness matrix (the L matrix), and a taxa functional trait matrix (the Q matrix). Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the association among water environmental variables. When the Pearson associated coefficient reaches a certain threshold (r > 0.85, p < 0.05), the environmental factors associated with the coefficient must be eliminated. Before analysis, Hellinger’s transformation of the L matrix was required to reduce the influence of significant species and transform the data from the Q matrix to a log(x + 1) pattern. The R matrix was calculated by principal component analysis. The L matrix was analyzed by correspondence analysis, and the Q matrix was ranked using Hill–Smith. Finally, the covariates between environmental variables and species traits were maximized by RLQ ranking.
All analyses were performed in “R” version 3.5.1 (R Development Core Team, 2018). We used the following packages: ADE-4 for the RLQ analysis [41,42]; the PRIMER 7 package was used for the functional diversity index and CWM analysis [43]; and the “ideal” package was used for the indicator species analysis was implemented through the lands function.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Factors and Family Distribution

A total of 2726 macroinvertebrate individuals belonging to 12 orders and 49 families were collected in this study, with Ephemeroptera accounting for 36.28% of the total sample size, followed by Diptera at 29.35%. The Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichopetra (EPT) taxonomic units represented most species in the basin, accounting for 57.96%. Regarding taxonomic orders, Diptera was the richest, consisting of nine families, followed by Trichoptera, with eight families. The correlation analysis of taxon abundance and environmental factors (Figure 2) showed that Corduliidae of Odonata was significantly correlated with pH at 0.05. Chloroperlidae of Plecoptera, and Limoniidae and Orthocladiinae of Diptera were significantly positively correlated with SPC, C, and Sal at 0.05; Perlidae of Plecoptera was significantly positively correlated with SPC and C at 0.05. Hirudidae and Hemiclepsis of Rhynchobdellida and Ephemerellidae of Ephemeroptera were significantly positively correlated with TP at 0.05; Libellulidae of Odonata was significantly positively correlated with TN at 0.05. Simuliidae and Tipulidae of Diptera and Nemouridae of Plecoptera were significantly positively correlated with WT. Tipulidae and Cetatqogoridae of Diptera, Baetidae of Ephemeroptera, and Rhyacophilidae of Trichoptera all had highly significant positive correlations with AP at p values from 0.001 to 0.01. Psychomyiidae and Brachycentridae of Trichoptera, Siphlonuridae of Ephemeroptera, and Elmidae of Coleoptera were significantly positively correlated with Chl-a at 0.05. Heptageniidae of Ephemeroptera was significantly negatively correlated with ORP at 0.05.

3.2. Biological Traits

The proportion of functional traits of macroinvertebrate communities in different regions of the IRB was analyzed (Figure 3). By comparing the four areas and finding that the trophic habit in the original ecological region was mostly scrapers, the habitat tended to clinger; the maximum size was 20–40 mm; the spawning type was mainly spawning; they mostly used gills as respiration, and the swimming ability was also between weak and medium. The trophic habits of macroinvertebrates in the agricultural and pastoral regions were mostly shredders; the habitat tended to clinger, similar to the original ecological region; the stain-resistant taxa and armor strength accounted for the highest proportion; and most of the reproduction types in the agricultural and pastoral regions were fixed states of isolated eggs. Most of the macroinvertebrates in the hydropower dam region were pastoral food collectors, which were sprawlers, swimmers, and divers in habitat preference. The maximum size was mainly distributed in the two intervals of 10–20 mm and greater than 40 mm. The swimming ability was the weakest, and the body type was primarily nonstreamline. The functional traits of macroinvertebrates in the urban region were more prominent, reflected as parasites, predators, and collector-filterers in trophic habits. Regarding the habitat preferences expressed as burrowers and climbers, it is worth noting that the region had primarily sensitive groups; the maximum size was distributed chiefly within 5–10 mm.
Figure 4 showed that parasites, collectors, and predators were positively associated with air respiration. Shredders were positively associated with tegument respiration, and the trophic habit gradually changed from air respiration to tegument respiration. Regarding feeding habits, the clingers and climbers were positively associated with the predators and shredders, and the scrapers were positively associated with the swimmers. There was a positive association between reproduction and swimming ability, and when swimming ability increased, reproduction tended to change from being free of isolated eggs to being cemented by isolated spawning. Notably, aquatic spawning had a solid positive association with all types of locomotion and attachment to substrates. Isolated eggs in the freestyle zone were negatively associated with parasites and air respiration in the trophic habit but were free of isolated eggs, and cemented isolated eggs were positively associated with gill respiration. Groups with maximum sizes in the five-to-ten-millimeter range were more suitable for narrow-temperature environments. When the maximum size was less than twenty millimeters, swimming ability was proportional to the maximum size. In comparison, when the maximum size was more than twenty millimeters, swimming ability was inversely proportional to the maximum size, and feeding habits were proportional to the maximum size. The pollution-tolerant organisms had a solid negative association with swimmers; pollution-sensitive organisms were positively associated with stenothermy; and with the increase in pollution resistance, the negative association with eurytherms also showed a state of gradual weakening.

3.3. Functional Diversity and Community Weighted Means

For all the functional diversity indicators, the dot plot more intuitively shows the clustering of response variables (Figure 5). The results of FDiv showed that the top three sites with minimum sorts were FUDQ, BTDQ, and KNSH, while the sites with maximum sorts were KLSK, KUYETSH, and QBEZ. The FEve results indicated that the four sites with minimum sorts were BTDQ, KAYETSH, CHEC, and KKTHSK. In comparison, the maximum sites were KLSK, KNSH, and XDG, which decreased from agricultural and pastoral regions to hydroelectric dams and urban regions. The FRic results indicated that the top three sites with minimum values were KLSK, CHEC, and KAYETSH. In comparison, the maximum ranked values were at KLH, HMQ, and KKTHSKA. The value showed an increasing trend from agricultural and pastoral regions to hydroelectric dams and urban regions. The three sites with the maximum values were KLH, HMQ, and KKTHSKA, increasing from agricultural and pastoral regions to hydroelectric dams and urban regions. The three sites from RaoQ analysis rankings were BX635, FUDQ, and KLSK. The maximum rankings were found for XDG, T185, and KKTHSK, and the values fluctuated considerably between transition regions.
We performed RLQ analysis sorting to explore the distribution pattern of macroinvertebrate functional traits in the IRB. The total slope inertia of the RLQ analysis was 1.679, and the first two axes extracted 64.6% of the initial total inertia. They indicated that the eigenvalues have a significant representation. The positive direction of axis 1 indicated changes in water environment variables such as TP, TN, DO, and SAL, which were primarily distributed among species of the taxonomic orders Libellulidae, Lymnaeidae, Aphelocheiridae, and Corixidae. The positively associated functional traits included shredders, isolated eggs and fixed state, medium stain resistance, and burrowers. Along axis I, the negative direction of the environment changed, mainly distributing taxonomic order species such as Polichopudidae, Simuliidae, Tanypodinae, Orthocladiinae, and Chironominae. Axis II was predominantly characterized by Chl-a, pH, and WT as the environmental gradient (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the functional traits of macroinvertebrates in four regions of the IRB. Our results indicated that anthropic activity accelerated the evolution of macroinvertebrate functional traits in the urban rural and hydraulic engineering regions. In contrast, macroinvertebrates in the original ecological region showed richer functional diversity, and the traits in this region were less disturbed.
Physicochemical variables within the aquatic environment hold promise as potential indicators for predicting community changes during assessments of the impacts of urbanization and habitat succession on macroinvertebrates [35,44]. We found that the Trichoptera was most abundant in the original ecological region and the hydraulic engineering region. Physicochemical variables showed the characteristics of low water temperature in original ecological region and high dissolved oxygen content in hydraulic engineering region. Based on the above, we predicted that low water temperature and high dissolved oxygen were the main factors that determine the density distribution of Trichopetra. This was consistent with a large number of typical studies [45,46]. Additionally, the density of EPT taxonomic units (Heptageniidae, Trichoptera, and Plecoptera) were reduced from the original ecological region to the urban region. Numerous studies have unequivocally demonstrated that urbanization processes pose significant threats to the ecological integrity of stream ecosystems within watersheds, resulting in the reduced presence of sensitive species, homogenization of food sources for higher trophic levels, and compromised stability of biological communities [47,48,49]. Simultaneously, the incremental expansion of the river channel in urban locales yielded diminished transparency and heightened sedimentation [50,51]. Jiang pointed out that using nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides is one of the critical factors contributing to river water quality pollution [50]. The elevation of TP and TN contents heightened stress resilience among macroinvertebrates, leading to the trend of increasing the population of fouling-tolerant species from the original ecological region to the urban region. This observation suggested an accelerated shift in the macroinvertebrate community owing to heightened human activities. Research has revealed that urbanization significantly influences the evolutionary trajectory of macroinvertebrate fauna, culminating in an upsurge in pollution-tolerant species and a convergence of functional traits [52,53].
The original ecological region exhibited distinctive functional traits among macroinvertebrate organisms, including scrapers, sprawlers, size of maturity at 5–10 mm, monoecious/asexual reproduction, pneumatic respiration, strong swimming ability, good armoring, streamlined shape, and eurythermal properties. Serving as a representative indicator of the river’s macroinvertebrate community health, scraper remained related to water quantity and water quality [54,55]. The prevalence of scraper-related functional traits in this region implied a correlation between the functional attributes of macroinvertebrate scrapers and the favorable environmental state, alongside the absence of pollution, in the water in the ecological region. This result coincides with the small proportion of Diptera and Coleoptera in this region. The sites within the original ecological region were situated at higher elevations, predominantly upstream of the IRB. Consequently, the cooler water temperatures prevailing in the upper river reaches, influenced by meltwater, aligned with the region’s prevalence of cold-adapted biological traits. Based on the above findings, we propose that there was an inevitable link between the speed of the species’ response to environmental pollution and water temperature. And when the water temperature increased, the response speed tended to decrease. At the same time, the content of eutrophication substances also confirm the conclusion.
In the agricultural and pastoral region, prevailing functional traits include shredders, strong swimming ability, size of maturity at 10–20 mm, aquatic spawning, gill respiration, good armoring, no streamlined shape, and stenothermy. The occurrence of pollution-tolerant taxa, notably Perlodidae and Orthocladiinae, indicated a moderate level of water pollution within the region. Furthermore, analyses of physico-chemical indicators within the agricultural and pastoral domains revealed elevated nitrogen and phosphorus levels attributable to the local livestock industry’s advancement. Specific locations, such as the QBEZ, lie near human habitation zones, where the release of domestic sewage compounds pollutes river segments [56,57]. However, the elevated abundance of avian species within agricultural and pastoral regions may stem from the heightened nutrient concentration in these waters, fostering algal and zooplankton proliferation and subsequently amplifying bird populations [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Smakhtin similarly identified an augmented prevalence of avian species within the macroinvertebrate fauna of urban rivers, typically correlated with water pollution and anthropogenic disruptions [64]. The mechanism through which functional traits react to environmental disturbances remains unclear and warrants further evaluation to refine the development of precise management strategies.
The functional traits within urban environments were predominantly characterized by shredders, sprawlers, medium stain resistance, size of maturity at 10–20 mm, aquatic spawning, gill respiration, strong swimming ability, good armoring, streamlined shape, and stenothermy. Multiple studies have demonstrated a close connection between numerous swimming macroinvertebrate organisms and urban industrial pollution. Given organisms’ heightened sensitivity to alterations in the aquatic environment, swimming macroinvertebrates can promptly evade polluted water sources [53,65,66]. Nonetheless, the current study challenges these conclusions, as strong swimming traits were prevalent across all four regions. Consequently, a hypothesis emerged that the elevated proportion of strong swimming in urban areas aligns with species adept at waterborne mobility. Moreover, a study by Utz revealed shifts in macroinvertebrate community structure attributed to water pollution and habitat degradation stemming from urbanization [67]. Nonetheless, instances arise where some macroinvertebrates displaying robust swimming traits emerge as the exclusive dominant species. This alignment coincides with the present study’s findings, demonstrating that robust swimming ability within macroinvertebrate organisms cannot singularly serve as an indicator for assessing water body pollution. Furthermore, macroinvertebrate organisms with robust swimming skills can harness energy to propel water currents through high-speed swimming, facilitating enhanced oxygen intake. This behavior is correlated with the diminished dissolved oxygen levels often observed in urban areas. Presently, both domestic and international researchers frequently employ pollution tolerance values as pivotal reference criteria for water environmental monitoring and assessment of water pollution status [68,69,70,71,72]. Regarding maturity, the biomass of pollution-tolerant moderate and high taxa within urban areas significantly surpassed that of the remaining three regions. Concurrently, an augmentation in pollution-tolerant taxa, exemplified by Tanyctolidae, Ophiuroidea, and additional pollution-indicator taxa, was observed at the FUDQ and BTDQ sites within urban areas. This overall trend implied heightened pollution levels within urban water. Urbanization has engendered a decline in diversity and tolerance among riverine macroinvertebrate fauna, primarily attributed to escalated nutrient concentrations and diminished substrate roughness [73].
The present study illustrated the functional traits of macroinvertebrates within the IRB with the acceleration of urbanization. The community has progressively transitioned into an ecological setting characterized by a prominent presence of pollution-tolerant taxa. Environmental pollution and waste discharge from urbanization processes have significantly influenced the acceleration of macroinvertebrate community transformation and the shaping of functional traits.

5. Conclusions

This study used RLQ analysis to assess the effect of anthropic activity on macroinvertebrate functional traits in the IRB. We found that the taxon composition of macroinvertebrates differed in regions disturbed by heavy anthropic activity compared with that in undisturbed regions. These species typically exhibited changes in functional traits associated with spawning and environmental adaptation. This was the first study of functional traits and environmental factors in macroinvertebrates within the Irtysh River basin in China. The results of our study can provide valuable information for the management and conservation of the IRB, and we can enhance watershed management by monitoring and assessing the impacts of anthropic activity on aquatic biodiversity. In addition, more effective methods for protecting and restoring damaged ecosystems can be explored. Examples include reducing pollutant discharge and human disturbance to restore aquatic habitats. Notably, we considered only the functional traits of macroinvertebrates without considering other biological taxa or ecosystem-level factors. Therefore, there may be some limitations in our study. To more deeply explore the impact of anthropic activity on ecosystems, future research can consider using multiple biological factors and multiple environmental factors to more fully assess ecosystem health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.; methodology, B.H. and B.W.; software, F.Z. and H.Z.; validation, B.W., F.Z. and F.L.; formal analysis, F.L. and F.Z.; investigation, X.W., C.W. and J.G.; resources, S.C.; data curation, F.L. and F.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L. and F.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.C. and B.W.; visualization, F.Z. and F.L.; supervision, S.C.; project administration, S.C. and H.Z.; funding acquisition, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program (Nos. 2021xjkk0600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31360635), and the Key Research Project of Science and Technology Bureau of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (Nos. 2022DB019).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Taxa-level Latin names and visualization of macroinvertebrate coding.
Table A1. Taxa-level Latin names and visualization of macroinvertebrate coding.
NumberSection
SP1Lymnaeidae
SP2Elmidae
SP3Ephemerellidae
SP4Siphlonuridae
SP5Tipulidae
SP6Gammaridae
SP7Orthocladiinae
SP8Leptoceridae
SP9Chironominae
SP10Lumbriculidae
SP11Leptophlebiidae
SP12Baetidae
SP13Haplotaxidae
SP14Ephemeridae
SP15Psychomyiidae
SP16Heptageniidae
SP17Planorbidae
SP18Hemiclepsis
SP19Nemouridae
SP20Taeniopterygidae
SP21Philopotamidae
SP22Brachycentridae
SP23Polycentropodidae
SP24Psychodidae
SP25Aphelocheiridae
SP26Muscidae
SP27Potamanthidae
SP28Capniidae
SP29Corixidae
SP30Ameletidae
SP31Perlidae
SP32Dytiscidae
SP33Chloroperlidae
SP34Cetatqogoridae
SP35Libellulidae
SP36Simuliidae
SP37Caropterygldae
SP38Glossosomatidae
SP39Glossiphoniidae
SP40Erpobdellidae
SP41Hirudidae
SP42Perlodidae
SP43Corduliidae
SP44Hydropsychidae
SP45Rhyacophilidae
SP46Polichopudidae
SP47Tanypodinae
SP48Limoniidae
SP49Arachnida

References

  1. García–Girón, J.; Tolonen, K.T.; Soininen, J.; Snåre, H.; Pajunen, V.; Heino, J. Antropogenic landuse inpacts on the size structure of macroinvertebrate assemblages are jointly modulated by local conditions and spatial processes. Environ. Res. 2022, 204 Pt B, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, Q.; Endo, K.N.; Cheng, G.D. Towards sustainable development of the environmentally degraded arid rivers of China—A case study from Tarim River. Environ. Geol. 2001, 41, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Strayer, D.L.; Dudgeon, D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2010, 29, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bian, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Han, B. Spatiotemporal changes of soil salinization in the Yellow River Delta of China from 2015 to 2019. Sustainability 2021, 13, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Li, D. Water use characteristics and impact factors in the Yellow River Basin, China. Water Int. 2021, 28, 148–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shuai, F.M.; Li, X.H.; Liu, Q.F.; Li, Y.F.; Yang, J.P.; Li, J.; Chen, F.C. Spatial patterns of fish diversity and distribution in the Pearl River. Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2017, 37, 3182–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, R.; Kuriqi, A.; Abubaker, S.; Kisi, O. Hydrologic alteration at the upper and middle part of the Yangtze River, China: Towards sustainable water resource management under increasing water exploitation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gaglio, M.; Aschonitis, V.G.; Gissi, E.; Castaldelli, G.; Fano, E.A. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands: Case study in Volano–Mesola–Goro in Poriver delta (Italy). Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 2017, 25, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gál, B.; Szivák, I.; Heino, J.; Schmera, D. The effrcts of urbanization on freshwater macroinvertebrates knowledge gaps and future research directions. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Han, R.; Qi, J.; Lu, X.; Li, S.; Feng, C.; Liang, S. Spatial-temporal analysis of selected industrial aquatic heavy metal pollution in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, S.; Hao, H.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liang, R.; Li, K. Influence of socioeconomic development on river water quality: A case study of two river basins in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 53857–53871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yan, J.; Wang, M.; Su, F.; Zhang, X.; Gao, S.; Xu, M. Changes in land cover and ecological stress in Borneo based on remote sensing and an ecological footprint method. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 16, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, Z.F.; Huo, T.B. Survey and Study on the Aquatic Species Resources in Irtysh River, Tarim River and Ulungur Lake in Xinjiang Urgur Autonomous Region; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 24–127. ISBN 978-7-5111-1475-4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, D.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Gu, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, X. Ecohydrological variation and multi-objective ecological water demand of the Irtysh River Basin. Water 2022, 14, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ullrich, S.M.; Ilyushchenko, M.A.; Kamberov, I.M.; Tanton, T.W. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of a derelict chlor-alkali plant. Part I: Sediment and water contamination of Lake Balkyldak and the River Irtysh. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 381, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, L.; Huang, Q.; Liu, D.; Deng, M.; Zhang, H.; Pan, B.; Zhang, H. Long-term and mid-term ecological operation of cascade hydropower plants considering ecological water demands in arid region. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 1235999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dittrich, A.; Buerkert, A.; Brinkmann, K. Assessment of land use and land cover changes during the last 50 years in oases and surrounding rangelands of Xinjiang, NW China. J. Agric. Rural. Dev. Trop. 2010, 111, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.X.; Wang, F.; Tang, Z.; He, H. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of drought and its relationship with meteorological factors in Xinjiang in last 17 years. Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2020, 40, 1077–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gusev, E.M.; Nasonova, O.N.; Shurkhno, E.A.; Dzhogan, L.Y. Scenario forecasting of changes in water balance components in the Ob–Irtysh Basin in the context of possible climate change. Water Resour. 2019, 46, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Urbanič, G.; Mihaljević, Z.; Petkovska, V.; Urbanič, M.P. Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors on large rivers using benthic invertebrates-a study of southeastern European large rivers with implications for management. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 2020, 12, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Desrosiers, M.; Usseglio-Polatera, P.; Archaimbault, V.; Larras, F.; Méthot, G.; Pinel-Alloul, B. Assessing anthropic pressure in the St. Lawrence River using traits of benthic macroinvertebrates. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, F.; Han, D.; Yan, L.; Yan, S.; Zha, J.; Shen, J. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806 Pt 2, 150587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vitecek, S.; Johnson, R.K.; Poikane, S. Assessing the ecological status of European rivers and lakes using benthic invertebrate communities: A practical catalogue of metrics and methods. Water 2021, 13, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vaate, A.B.D.; Pavluk, T.I. Practicability of the index of trophic completeness for running waters. Hydrobiologia 2004, 519, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thomas, J.F.; Hall, T.J. A comparison of three methods of evaluating aquatic community impairment in streams. J. Freshw. Ecol. 2006, 21, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bady, P.; Doledec, S.; Fesl, C.; Gayraud, S.; Bacchi, M.; Scholl, F. Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: The effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshw. Biol. 2005, 50, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leah-Bêche, A.; Statzner, B. Richness gradients of stream invertebrates across the USA: Taxonomy and trait-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv. 2009, 18, 3909–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Magliozzi, C.; Usseglio-Polatera, P.; Meyer, A.; Grabowski, R.C. Functional traits of hyporheic and benthic invertebrates reveal importance of wood-driven geomorphological processes in rivers. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 1758–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bendary, R.E.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Goher, M.E.; Elsaied, H.E.; El Shabrawy, G.M.; El Mordy, M.A.; Khalil, M.T. Taxonomic and functional structure of macrobenthic invertebrate communities and their response to environmental variables along the subbranches of the Nile River (rayahs), Egypt. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 28803–28817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Brooks, A.J.; Bray, J.; Nichols, S.J.; Shenton, M.; Kaserzon, S.; Mac Nally, R.; Kefford, B.J. Sensitivity and specificity of macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of multiple agricultural stressors. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, X.H.; Wang, Z.Y.; Xu, M.Z. Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Application in the Assessment of Streamecology; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 113–167. ISBN 978-7-302-21860-9. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fekadu, M.B.; Agembe, S.; Kiptum, C.K.; Mingist, M. Impacts of anthropic activities on the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages during the wet season in Kipsinende River, Kenya. Turk. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2022, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sudarso, J.; Suryono, T.S.T.; Yoga, G.P.; Imroatusshoolikhah, I.; Ibrahim, A.; Sari, L.S.L.; Badjoeri, M.B.M.; Samir, O.S.O. Effect of anthropic activity on benthic macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in small streams of west Sumatra, Indonesia. Sains Malays. 2022, 51, 3551–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. The State environmental protection administration the water and wastewater monitoring analysis method editorial board. In Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis Methods, 4th ed.; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002; pp. 56–79. ISBN 978-7-8016-3400-9.
  35. Tachet, H.; Richoux, P.; Bournaud, M.; Usseglio-Polatera, P. The Invertebresd’eau Douce Systématique, Biologie, Écologie; China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press: Beijing, China, 2015; pp. 17–158. ISBN 978-7-5170-3003-4. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pallottini, M.; Cappelletti, D.; Fabrizi, A.; Gaino, E.; Goretti, E.; Selvaggi, R.; Céréghino, R. Macroinvertebrate functional trait responses to chemical pollution in agricultural-industrial landscapes. River Res. Appl. 2017, 33, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mokany, K.; Ash, J.; Roxburgh, S. Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Somerfield, P.J.; Clarke, K.R.; Warwick, R.M.; Dulvy, N.K. Average functional distinctness as a measure of the composition of assemblages. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 65, 1462–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Villéger, S.; Mason, N.W.; Mouillot, D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 2008, 89, 2290–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rao, C.R. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1982, 21, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maechler, M.; Rousseeuw, P.; Struyf, A.; Hubert, M.; Hornik, K.; Studer, M.; Roudier, P.; Gonzalez, J.; Kozlowski, K.; Schubert, E.; et al. Finding Groups in Data: Cluster Analysis Extensions Rousseeuw etal. The Comprehensive R Archive Network Home Page. Available online: https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/cluster/ (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  42. Dray, S.; Pettorelli, N.; Chessel, D. Matching data sets from two different spatial samplings. J. Veg. Sci. 2002, 13, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Laliberté, E.; Legendre, P.; Shipley, B. Measuring Functional Diversity (FD) from Multiple Traits, and Other Tools for Functional Ecology. The Comprehensive R Archive Network Home Page. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FD/ (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  44. Chung, N.; Bae, M.-J.; Li, F.; Kwon, Y.-S.; Kwon, T.-S.; Kim, J.-S.; Park, Y.-S. Habitat characteristics and trophic structure of benthic macroinvertebrates in a forested headwater stream. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2012, 15, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ow, L.F.; Whitehead, D.; Walcroft, A.S.; Turnbull, M.H. Seasonal variation in foliar carbon exchange in Pinus radiata and Populus deltoides: Respiration acclimates fully to changes in temperature but photosynthesis does not. Global Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bolam, S.; Garcia, C.; Eggleton, J.; Kenny, A.; Buhl-Mortensen, L.; Gonzalez-Mirelis, G.; van Kooten, T.; Dinesen, G.; Hansen, J.; Hiddink, J.; et al. Differences in biological traits composition of benthic assemblages between unimpacted habitats. Mar. Environ. Res. 2017, 126, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paz, L.; Rodriguez, M.; Gullo, B.; Capítulo, A.R. Impacts of urban and industrial pollution on functional traits of benthic macroinvertebrates: Are some traits advantageous for survival? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807 Pt 2, 150650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weigel, B.; Blenckner, T.; Bonsdorff, E. Maintained functional diversity in benthic communities in spite of diverging functional identities. Oikos 2016, 125, 1421–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lizarralde, Z.I.; Pittaluga, S.; Peronism, M. Changes of benthic macrofaunal composition on a tidal flat of Rio Gallegos estuary, argentina. Thalassas 2018, 34, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiang, S.; Ren, L.; Yong, B.; Singh, V.P.; Yang, X.; Yuan, F. Quantifying the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff from the Laohahe Basin in northern China using three different methods. Hydrol. Processes 2011, 25, 2492–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, S.; Wang, M.; Ren, L.; Xu, C.; Yuan, F.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Shen, H. A framework for quantifying the impacts of climate change and human activities on hydrological drought in a semiarid basin of northern China. Hydrol. Processes 2019, 33, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Llanos, E.N.; Jaubet, M.L.; Rodolfo, E. The intertidal benthic community of SW Atlantic as an environmental indicator of 50 years of human-mediated changes. Mar. Biol. Res. 2019, 15, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gadawski, P.; Riss, H.W.; Płóciennik, M.; Meyer, E.I. City channel chironomids-benthic diversity in urban conditions. River Res. Appl. 2016, 32, 1978–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, X.; Ren, L.; Yuan, F.; Singh, V.P.; Fang, X.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, W. Quantifying the effect of land use and land cover changes on green water and blue water in northern part of China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 13, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; He, R.; Jiang, N.; Jing, X. Runoff reduction due to environmental changes in the Sanchuanhe River Basin. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2008, 23, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, C.W.; Kang, L. A new modified tennant method with spatial-temporal variability. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 4911–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mezgebu, A.; Lakew, A.; Lemma, B. Water quality assessment using benthic macroinvertebrates as bioindicators in streams and rivers around Sebeta, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2019, 44, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Habersack, H.; Haspel, D.; Kondolf, M. Large rivers in the anthropocene: Insights and tools for understanding climatic, land use, and reservoir influences. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50, 3641–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Oliveira, J.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Weber, G.; Bertocci, I. Urban vs. extra-urban environments: Scales of variation of intertidal benthic assemblages in north portugal. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 97, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Drury, B.; Rosi-Marshall, E.; Kelly, J.J. Wastewater treatment effluent reduces the abundance and diversity of benthic bacterial communities in urban and suburban rivers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1897–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Barros, M.P.; Gayeski, L.M.; Tundis, J.G. Benthic macroinvertebrate community in the Sinos River drainage basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 2016, 76, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Qu, X.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Peng, W. Sediment heavy metals and benthic diversities in Hun-Tai River, northeast of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 10662–10673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tlig-Zouari, S.; Mami, T.; Maamouri, F. Structure of benthic macroinvertebrates and dynamics in the northern lagoon of Tunis. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2009, 89, 1305–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Smakhtin, V.U.; Shilpakar, R.L.; Hughes, D.A. Hydrology-based assessment of environmental flows: An example from Nepal. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2006, 51, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gao, Y.; Vogel, R.M.; Kroll, C.N.; Poff, N.L.; Olden, J.D. Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. J. Hydrol. 2009, 374, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haghighi, T.A.; Klove, B. Development of a general river regime index (RRI) for intra-annual flow variation based on the unit river concept and flow variation end-points. J. Hydrol. 2013, 503, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Utz, M.R.; Hilderbrand, R. Interregional variation in urbanization-induced geomorphic change and macroinvertebrate habitat colonization in headwater streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2011, 30, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thorne, R.; Williams, P. The response of benthic macroinvertebrate to pollution in developing countries: A multi-metric system of bioassessment. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 37, 671–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yong, B.; Ren, L.; Hong, Y.; Gourley, J.J.; Chen, X.; Dong, J.; Wang, W.; Shen, Y.; Hardy, J. Spatial temporal changes of water resources in a Typical Semiarid Basin of north China over the past 50 years and assessment of possible natural and socioeconomic causes. J. Hydrometeorol. 2013, 14, 1009–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sellami, H.; Benabdallah, S.; La Jeunesse, I.; Vanclooster, M. Quantifying hydrological responses of small mediterranean catchments under climate change projections. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 543 Pt B, 924–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Arman, N.Z.; Salmiati, S.; Said, M.I.M.; Aris, A. Development of macroinvertebrate based multimetric index and establishment of biocriteria for river health assessment in malaysia science direct. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, C.; Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Xiang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Mitrovic, S. Predicting future river health in a minimally influenced mountainous area under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yu, M.; Wood, P.; van de Giesen, N.; Liu, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhang, J. Enhanced potential ecological risk induced by a large scale water diversion project. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A 2020, 34, 2125–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study sites showing the main land uses, the location of the sampling sites, and the IRB in China. The triangle indicates the original ecological region; the square indicates the region of hydraulic engineering; the asterisks indicate the agricultural and pastoral region; the circle indicates the urban region.
Figure 1. Map of the study sites showing the main land uses, the location of the sampling sites, and the IRB in China. The triangle indicates the original ecological region; the square indicates the region of hydraulic engineering; the asterisks indicate the agricultural and pastoral region; the circle indicates the urban region.
Biology 12 01315 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the two sides of Pearson correlations between taxa abundance composition and environmental factors. p values were adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery correction; * Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; ** Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; *** Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the two sides of Pearson correlations between taxa abundance composition and environmental factors. p values were adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery correction; * Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; ** Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; *** Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p < 0.001.
Biology 12 01315 g002
Figure 3. The percentage of categories in macroinvertebrate functional traits. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Figure 3. The percentage of categories in macroinvertebrate functional traits. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Biology 12 01315 g003
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between 38 categories of macroinvertebrate functional traits in the Irtysh River. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between 38 categories of macroinvertebrate functional traits in the Irtysh River. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Biology 12 01315 g004
Figure 5. Functional diversity index and error distribution of each sample point in different regions. See Figure 1 for the classification of sampling sites.
Figure 5. Functional diversity index and error distribution of each sample point in different regions. See Figure 1 for the classification of sampling sites.
Biology 12 01315 g005
Figure 6. RLQ analysis results of functional traits of macroinvertebrates on the gradient of water environment variables. See Appendix A for codes of taxa-level Latin names. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Figure 6. RLQ analysis results of functional traits of macroinvertebrates on the gradient of water environment variables. See Appendix A for codes of taxa-level Latin names. See Table 1 for category abbreviations.
Biology 12 01315 g006
Table 1. Binary biological trait variables and categories of macroinvertebrate communities.
Table 1. Binary biological trait variables and categories of macroinvertebrate communities.
TraitCategoryCodeAbb
Trophic habitParasites1Trop1
Predator2Trop2
Collector-gatherer3Trop3
Collector-filterer4Trop4
Scraper5Trop5
Shredder6Trop6
HabitBurrower1Habi1
Clinger2Habi2
Climber3Habi3
Sprawler4Habi4
Swimmer5Habi5
Divers6Habi6
Stain resistance valuePollution-sensitive organisms < 31Stai1
Semi-tolerant to pollution 3–72Stai2
Pollution-tolerant organisms > 73Stai3
Maximum size (mm)5–10 mm1Size1
10–20 mm2Size2
20–40 mm3Size3
40–80 mm4Size4
>80 mm5Size5
ReproductionIsolated eggs, free1Spaw1
Isolated eggs, cemented2Spaw2
Spawning3Spaw3
Aquatic spawning4Spaw4
Monogamy/Asexual reproduction5Spaw5
Respiration techniqueTegument1Resp1
Gill2Resp2
Air (spiracles, tracheae, plastrons)3Resp3
Swimming abilityWeak1Swim1
Poor2Swim2
strong3Swim3
ArmoringNone1Arm1
Poor2Arm2
Good3Arm3
ShapeStreamlined1Shpe1
Not streamlined2Shpe2
Thermal preferenceStenothermy1Ther1
Eurytherm2Ther2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Zi, F.; Wang, X.; Zeng, H.; Huo, B.; Wang, C.; Ge, J.; Chen, S.; Wang, B. Assessing the Impact of Anthropic Pressures on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: A Functional Trait Approach in the Irtysh River Watershed. Biology 2023, 12, 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101315

AMA Style

Liu F, Zi F, Wang X, Zeng H, Huo B, Wang C, Ge J, Chen S, Wang B. Assessing the Impact of Anthropic Pressures on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: A Functional Trait Approach in the Irtysh River Watershed. Biology. 2023; 12(10):1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Fei, Fangze Zi, Xinyue Wang, Honghui Zeng, Bin Huo, Chengxin Wang, Jianmin Ge, Shengao Chen, and Baoqiang Wang. 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Anthropic Pressures on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: A Functional Trait Approach in the Irtysh River Watershed" Biology 12, no. 10: 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101315

APA Style

Liu, F., Zi, F., Wang, X., Zeng, H., Huo, B., Wang, C., Ge, J., Chen, S., & Wang, B. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Anthropic Pressures on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: A Functional Trait Approach in the Irtysh River Watershed. Biology, 12(10), 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12101315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop