Next Article in Journal
From Water to Land: The Structural Construction and Molecular Switches in Lungs during Metamorphosis of Microhyla fissipes
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Xylo-Oligosaccharides and Glucose-Enriched Doughs Fermented with BB-12
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Age and Acute-Moderate Intensity Exercise on Biomarkers of Renal Health and Filtration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Absorption and Transport Characteristics and Mechanisms of Carnosic Acid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/biology11040529
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis and Structural Modeling of Elaeis oleifera FAD2, a Fatty Acid Desaturase Involved in Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition of American Oil Palm

by
Rayda Ben Ayed
1,*,
Tejas Chirmade
2,3,
Mohsen Hanana
4,
Khalil Khamassi
5,
Sezai Ercisli
6,
Ravish Choudhary
7,
Narendra Kadoo
2,3 and
Rohini Karunakaran
8,*
1
Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Screening Processes, Center of Biotechnology of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sidi Mansour Road, P.O. Box 1177, Sfax 3018, Tunisia
2
CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India
3
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
4
Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cédria, B.P. 901, Hammam Lif 2050, Tunisia
5
Field Crop Laboratory (LR16INRAT02), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie (INRAT), University of Carthage, Tunis 1004, Tunisia
6
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
7
Division of Seed Science and Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
8
Unit of Biochemistry, Centre of Excellence for Biomaterials Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, AIMST University, Semeling, Bedong 08100, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(4), 529; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040529
Submission received: 23 January 2022 / Revised: 13 March 2022 / Accepted: 23 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Foods: Bioactivity, Bioavailability, and Biological Characteristics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Palm oil has become the world’s most important vegetable oil in terms of production quantity, and its overall demand is exponentially growing with the global population. The fatty acid composition and particularly the oleic/linoleic acid ratio are major factors influencing palm oil quality. In this study, we focused on FAD2, a fatty acid desaturase enzyme involved in the desaturation and conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid in Elaeis oleifera, identified through in silico annotation analysis. Our phylogenetic and comparative studies revealed two SNP markers, SNP278 and SNP851, significantly correlated with the oleic/linoleic acid contents. Our study provides fundamental insights into the mechanism of fatty acids synthesis in oil palm and could support the application of molecular biology techniques to enhance the enzymatic activity and substrate affinity of EoFAD2.

Abstract

American oil palm (Elaeis oleifera) is an important source of dietary oil that could fulfill the increasing worldwide demand for cooking oil. Therefore, improving its production is crucial and could be realized through breeding and genetic engineering approaches aiming to obtain high-yielding varieties with improved oil content and quality. The fatty acid composition and particularly the oleic/linoleic acid ratio are major factors influencing oil quality. Our work focused on a fatty acid desaturase (FAD) enzyme involved in the desaturation and conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid. Following the in silico identification and annotation of Elaeis oleifera FAD2, its molecular and structural features characterization was performed to better understand the mechanistic bases of its enzymatic activity. EoFAD2 is 1173 nucleotides long and encodes a protein of 390 amino acids that shares similarities with other FADs. Interestingly, the phylogenetic study showed three distinguished groups where EoFAD2 clustered among monocotyledonous taxa. EoFAD2 is a membrane-bound protein with five transmembrane domains presumably located in the endoplasmic reticulum. The homodimer organization model of EoFAD2 enzyme and substrates and respective substrate-binding residues were predicted and described. Moreover, the comparison between 24 FAD2 sequences from different species generated two interesting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the oleic/linoleic acid contents.

1. Introduction

In a healthy human diet, oil can have a major influence on an individual’s overall well-being. In particular, the types and the amounts of fatty acids consumed on a daily basis impact the long-term health of an individual [1,2,3]. In the last few years, palm oil has become the world’s most important vegetable oil in terms of production quantity, reaching almost 75 million metric tons in 2020 [4], and the overall demand for palm oil is exponentially growing with the increasing global population. Fatty acids are of increasing interest as they pertain to health issues and comprise the omega ω-6 and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [5,6]. Unsaturated fatty acids have one or more double bonds, with the (final) double bond occurring either six carbons (ω-6) or three carbons (ω-3) from the methyl (ω) end of the molecule. They may or may not contain functional groups on the same molecule [7]. Fatty acids in organisms, especially in plants, are the main structural constituents of organic membranes (phospholipid bilayers) and storage oils (neutral lipids) [8]. The fatty acid biosynthesis pathway is the primary metabolic pathway, since it is necessary for growth and development. The most important membrane phospholipids in all plant tissues are assembled using palmitate (C16:0) and oleate (C18:1) acyl groups [9].
Membrane glycerolipids have fatty acids connected to both the sn-1 and sn-2 positions of the glycerol backbone and a polar headgroup attached to the sn-3 position [10]. The mixture of nonpolar fatty acyl chains and a polar headgroup leads to the amphipathic physical properties of glycerolipids, which are indispensable for constructing membrane bilayers [11,12]. The fatty acid desaturases initiate the formation of a double bond into an acyl chain, involving the reduction of a molecule of O2 with the product being a fatty acid with a new double bond and water. At each double bond generated, the first hydrogen abstraction happens at the carbon atom closer to the carboxyl end. This is the rate-limiting step of desaturation [13]. The resulting double bond is naturally of cis conformation, although little quantities of trans conformation can happen [14]. The desaturation of fatty acids in the chloroplast and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane complex lipids is also performed by the FADs (designated from FAD2 to FAD8) [15,16]. The FAD2 enzyme is an integral membrane phosphatidylcholine desaturase in the ER, acting on fatty acids at the sn-1 position [17,18]. The important function of FAD2 (also known as 18:1 desaturase) is to provide 18:2 and (following additional desaturation) 18:3, which are needed for the correct assembly of cellular membranes throughout the plant. Another essential role of this enzyme is synthesizing the polyunsaturated fatty acids in vegetable oils, which are the main source of essential fatty acids in humans [19,20,21]. The FADs are membrane proteins, supposed to include two iron atoms in their active site [22,23]. While several FAD2 cDNA configurations have been studied, only a few actual FAD2 gene sequences have been verified, the first being the single-copy Arabidopsis FAD2 gene [24].
Elaeis oleifera (Kunth) Cortés, also known as American oil palm, is an evergreen diploid tree species (2n = 32) native to South and Central America, and is commonly planted and used for edible oil production [25,26]. Improving palm oil as a source of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids for human health requires genetic knowledge of the palm, which producers can exploit. The biggest challenge is that the palm genome has not yet been fully annotated. Consequently, interest should be oriented to the genetic mechanisms underlying ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acid biosynthesis in the palm [27,28]. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize at the molecular and structural levels the putative genes responsible for encoding the fatty acid desaturase that most likely confers catalytic mechanisms in palm Elaeis oleifera, Δ12 fatty acid desaturase (EoFAD2).
Gene annotation is the identification, characterization, and localization of the functional genetic elements present within the genes, notably the coding regions, to allow the prediction of certain protein functions. There are two gene annotation methods, extrinsic and intrinsic. The intrinsic approach involves the evaluation of certain properties of the gene sequence without explicit comparison with other sequences. The relevant properties may include the ORF length, the presence or absence of ribosome-binding sites at the suitable distance upstream of the initiation codon, codon usage, and various statistical parameters that have been found to be typical of known genes. Conversely, the extrinsic approach includes the comparison of the putative amino acid sequence of the gene with protein sequence databases, as well as identifying functional motifs in the gene sequence using database searches. If the translated amino acid sequence of a putative ORF exhibits significant sequence homology to one or more proteins in the database, it is almost certain that the ORF in question is a real gene [29].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. FAD2 Sequence Identification, Annotation, and Collection

Both the extrinsic and intrinsic methods of gene annotation were used and combined in our study. Among the extrinsic search methods that allow gene annotation, the “BLAST” search method (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (accessed on 12 May 2021) was applied to find the partial fad2 gene sequence of Elaeis oleifera as a query to obtain significant hits of similar sequences from other species. We used the BLASTX and TBLASTN programs to search the partial nucleic acid sequence of EoFAD2 with the nr protein database. Then, we applied the intrinsic method to predict coding structures using the DNA sequence that translates into protein. To achieve this, we used the program “MEME” (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation; version 4.9, http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 12 May 2021), which discovers novel, ungapped motifs or conserved regions in target sequences. It identifies functional sites in a protein, which could be an active site, an interaction-binding site, etc. [30]. The final step of this in silico annotation was to manually verify and correct this annotation to justify the obtained results. Twenty-four gene sequences of FAD2 belonging to different oilseed species were collected from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov, accessed on 12 May 2021) (Table 1). Eight oilseed crops were considered, namely American oil palm (Elaeis oleifera), soybean (Glycine max), colza (Brassica napus), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), peanut (Arachis hypogaea and Arachis monticola), corn (Zea mays), and sesame (Sesamum indicum).

2.2. Physico-Chemical Properties of the FAD2 Protein

The protein sequences of fad2 genes were analyzed using several bioinformatics tools. Comparative and bioinformatics analyses of FAD2 protein sequences were performed online on the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov, accessed on 12 May 2021) and EXPASY (http://expasy.org/tools, accessed on 12 May 2021) platforms. The MEME webserver (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 12 May 2021) was used to find conserved domains or sequence patterns often associated with a biological role [30]. Selected parameters of the MEME search were as follows: minimum width for each motif, 6; maximum width for each motif, 50; maximum number of motifs to find, 10; and occurrence of each motif, 0 or 1 per sequence. A multiple sequence alignment of the downloaded FAD2 protein sequences was performed using ClustalW with default parameters. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA version 11 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis; https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 12 May 2021) based on aligned sequences of FAD2 proteins [31].

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis, Three-Dimensional (3D) Protein Structure Modeling, and Docking Analysis

The 3D structure of the EoFAD2 protein was predicted de novo, as there were no experimentally determined structures for FAD2 homologs in the PDB database. The I-TASSER (Iterative TASSER) webserver tool (https://zhanggroup.org/I-TASSER/, accessed on 12 May 2021) was used to predict the structure of EoFAD2 de novo [32]. Multiple threading alignments of different PDB templates were performed using LOMETS2 to model the protein in parts based on structural conservation [33]. Transmembrane domain prediction was performed using TMHMM [34] and TMPred [35]. Protein–protein interactions to form a homodimer were predicted using ClusPro2.0 [36]. The PyMol Molecular Graphics System v1.7.4.4 Edu (https://pymol.org/support-platforms.html, accessed on 12 May 2021) was used to visualize the protein structures. Local quality assessment was performed using QMEANBrane in the SWISS-MODEL workspace [37].
Molecular protein docking of oleoyl glycerol as the ligand and the predicted structure of EoFAD2 from Elaeis oleifera as the receptor was performed using AutoDock Vina v1.2 [38]. The amino acid residues predicted to interact with the fatty acyl glycerol were incorporated in the grid box. The conformation with the highest predicted affinity was considered further. FAD2 protein sequences from other species were also analyzed for amino acid substitutions predicted to be involved in the substrate binding. Molecular docking was performed using the substituted amino acid.
Molecular modeling and docking analyses were combined to study the structure–function relationship of the poorly structurally characterized integral membranes of FAD2. The findings allowed us to investigate the role of each substitution within the fad2 gene sequences of the studied oilseeds species.

2.4. Interspecific FAD2 SNPs Identification

Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw, accessed on 12 May 2021) [39] to investigate the presence of polymorphisms, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), among the FAD2 sequences of different oilseed species.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The correlation confirmation between two predicted interspecific SNPs and the synthesis of the two fatty acids, oleic (C18:1) and linoleic (C18:2), was performed using Fisher’s exact test. This test is used for the comparison of proportions in randomized trials. Fisher’s exact test can be particularly conservative, especially when the sample sizes are small or when the observed ratios are close to 0. The test was carried out using the exact2x2 R package (https://cran.r-project.org/, accessed on 12 May 2021).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. EoFAD2 Identification and Annotation

EoFAD2 was identified and annotated following the described procedure, as indicated above in Section 2. The EoFAD2 mRNA sequence was 1173 nucleotides long and encoded a protein of 390 amino acids that shared similarities with other FADs. Both nucleotide and peptide sequences were submitted to the Genbank database under the accession numbers KY006847.1 and APO15326.1, respectively.
Several biological roles and functions have been attributed to FAD2, namely their key role in fatty acids biosynthesis (mainly linoleic acid), plant development (vegetative growth, germination, and anther development), and abiotic stress tolerance (salinity, drought, and cold) as mentioned for several species in Table 2.

3.2. Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic Study of fad2 Genes from Several Oilseed Species

The study included 24 fad2 gene sequences from eight oilseed species: American oil palm, soybean, canola, sunflower, peanut (cultivated and wild relative), maize, and sesame (Table 1). The multiple sequence alignment of the FAD2 sequences performed using ClustalW made the drawing of the phylogenetic tree possible. Indeed, the phylogenetic analysis revealed the differences and similarities in structural organization among the different sequences. The tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) distance method highlighted three distinct groups (Figure 1):
(a)
The first group contained FAD2 members of six species: Glycine max, Arachis hypogaea, Arachis monticola, Helianthus annuum, and Sesamum indicum;
(b)
The second group corresponded to a single species: Brassica napus;
(c)
The third group included Zea mays with Elaeis oleifera.
In addition, the conserved motifs of FAD2 proteins were obtained by MEME analysis, and are represented in different colored boxes that are described in Figure 1. Ten motifs (named motif 1 to motif 10) were detected (Figure 1). Particularly, H. annuus, S. indicum, Z. mays, and E. oleifera lack motifs one and two in comparison with the other species.
The ZmFAD2 sequence corresponded to a cDNA of the fad2 gene of Zea mays, and the predicted sequence “KY006847.1” was well separated from the other groups. This could be explained by the membership of Zea mays and Elaeis oleifera to the monocotyledonous class, unlike the other species that were dicotyledonous. The first and the second groups of dicotyledonous plants, which represented the majority of studied accessions, could be divided into three major subgroups: A, B, C, which mainly included Leguminosae (Glycine max and Arachis), Pedaliaceae (Sesamum indicum), and Asteraceae (Helianthus annuus), respectively (Figure 1A). From this phylogenetic analysis, it can be deduced that the study of the genetic relationship and the molecular evolution of species could be exploited to understand the genes implicating in metabolic pathways, such as the genes involved in the metabolism of fatty acids. Therefore, we carried out a study on the fad2 gene of Elaeis oleifera, responsible for the transformation of the monounsaturated fatty acid (C18:1) into polyunsaturated fatty acid (C18:2), to understand the relationship between the acidic composition of the various vegetable oils and their nucleotide and protein sequences of the fad2 gene.

3.3. Estimate of Evolutionary Divergence among the Sequences

We carried out a progressive alignment of the iterative construction of the multiple alignments by grouping the pairwise alignments of the fad2 gene sequences of the studied species. This analysis was performed through three main steps: the first step consisted of the alignment of all possible pairs and establishing a distance matrix based on alignments scores (Table 3). The second step was the construction of a guide shaft using the previously calculated alignment distances. The third step was to realign the sequences or groups of sequences in the order determined by the guide shaft. The mean pairwise distance value between the aligned sequences was 0.30, with a very small value (near 0) between the sequences belonging to the same species and a maximum value of 0.57 between the sequences of the species Glycine max and the sequence of the species Zea mays. This was probably due to the fact that the two species are distantly related. Indeed, maize is a monocot, whereas soybean is a dicot. However, this similarity analysis revealed that the fad2 gene is conserved across taxa, as it is involved in fatty acid synthesis, which is an essential pathway.
In addition, we note from Table 3 that the two π and θw values were slightly distant. This indicates a low nucleotide diversity (π = 0.26) in the coding region of the fad2 gene of the predicted sequence and the sequence from Zea mays. This value was higher than observed values for other plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana (π = 0.0079) [79]. From these results, we can suggest that the level of nucleotide polymorphism was strictly affected by the genetic origin of the population on the one hand and the number and nature of the selected gene on the other hand. In addition, we noticed that the value of π = 0.26 was higher than that of θw (0.16), indicating no significant difference, and, subsequently, the polymorphism of the coding region of the fad2 gene fitted into the neutral mutation hypothesis. In addition, the non-significant value of the D statistic (2.57) of the Tajima test (p > 0.05) reported for this gene also tended to confirm this hypothesis.

3.4. Comparative Analysis between Interspecific FAD2 SNPs

3.4.1. In Silico SNP Prediction

The annotation of the studied sequences allowed us to discover two SNPs considered interesting in the involvement of the fad2 gene for the conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid. The first SNP373 was a transition (conversion from T to C). The ‘T’ variant was detected in the nucleotide sequences of two species (sunflower and sesame), while the other variant with ‘C’ was detected in three other species, namely corn, peanut, and American oil palm. The change of T to C nucleotides in the nucleotide sequences of the fad2 gene of Elaeis oleifera resulted in the substitution of the hydrophilic amid amino acid Q (Glutamine) to the hydrophilic hydroxyl amino acid S (Serine). The second SNP718 was also a transition (conversion from A to G). The ‘G’ variant was detected in the nucleotide sequences of three species (American oil palm, peanut, and corn). In comparison, the other ‘A’ variant was detected in the sunflower and sesame species. The change of the A to G nucleotide in the fad2 gene did not result in a change of the serine amino acids. An intraspecific FAD2 polymorphism study in Olea europaea identified an interesting correlation between some SNPs and the oleic/linoleic acid ratio [80].

3.4.2. Genotype/Phenotype Association Study of Predicted SNPs

To confirm the correlation between these two SNPs and the synthesis of the oleic (C18:1) and linoleic (C18:2) acids, we performed statistical analyses using Fisher’s exact test. This test is used for the comparison of proportions in randomized trials. Fisher’s exact test can be particularly conservative, especially when the sample sizes are small or when the observed ratios are close to 0. Thus, we were able to show two highly significant associations of the first SNP373 with the accumulation of the two unsaturated fatty acids, oleic acid (p = 0.006) and linoleic acid (p = 0.013). Indeed, the contents of monounsaturated fatty acids (C18:1) were significantly high (average of 54.10 ± 11.95) in species carrying the homozygous CC genotype at SNP373, which included peanut. The content of monounsaturated fatty acids was also high in sesame, corn, and American oil palm, which had the heterozygous TC genotype. On the other hand, the level of polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2) was significantly high (average of 57.43 ± 5.75) in species carrying the homozygous TT genotype at SNP373, which included sunflower, as well as the heterozygous TC genotype found in sesame and corn. Indeed, we can suggest that peanuts carrying the CC homozygous allele would synthesize the most monounsaturated fatty acid (C18:1) compared to the TT homozygous species (sunflower) and the TC heterozygous species (sesame, corn, and American oil palm).
Similarly, the species with the TT genotype at the SNP373 marker accumulated less linoleic fatty acid (C18:2) than the other CC and TC species (Table 4). Moreover, we were able to derive two highly significant associations of the second SNP718 with the accumulation of the two unsaturated fatty acids: oleic acid (C18:1; p = 0.007) and linoleic acid (C18:2; p = 0.002). Indeed, the monounsaturated fatty acid content (C18:1) was significantly high in species carrying the homozygous GG genotype, with a mean of 58.70 ± 9.34, which included peanut (Arachis hypogaea and Arachis monticola), while the polyunsaturated fatty acid content (C18:2) was significantly high in species carrying the homozygous AA and AG genotypes, with a mean of 53.75 ± 8.74, which included sunflower, corn, and sesame (Table 4). Both these markers are located within the fad2 gene, which is involved in the synthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids and, more specifically, in the transformation of oleic acid (C18:1) to linoleic acid (C18:2) (Vance et al., 2001). Thus, this suggests a direct effect of the allelic variation of the markers SNP373 and SNP718 on the fatty acid composition, namely oleic acid and linoleic acid, for each species studied. For the remaining saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, the comparison of means tests between species showed no significant association with SNP373 or SNP718. This suggests the hypothesis that these two polymorphisms are substitutions that are directly involved in protein functions, which explains the variation in the contents of C18:1 and C18:2 (Table 4).

3.5. EoFAD2 Protein Features, 3D Structure Prediction, and Docking Analysis

3.5.1. Structure Prediction

FAD2 is a membrane-bound protein found in the endoplasmic reticulum of plant cells. EoFAD2 has a size of 44.1 kD and a pI of 8.4 (Table 5). The protein is predicted to be organized in an α-helix structure (28%), extended strand (21%), and has 51% random coil structure (Table 5). As shown in Table 6, leucine, alanine, valine, and proline are the most abundant aa in EoFAD2. The 3D structure of this enzyme was predicted de novo using the I-TASSER server, since there is no structure homologous to the FAD2 present in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The I-TASSER tool usually predicts more than one structure for the query sequence, and, in this study, five models were predicted (Figure S1). Of the five, the best model (Figure 2A,C) was selected based on the C-score, positions of the transmembrane domains (Figure 2B), and structure assessment using PROCHECK. Energy minimization using OPLS-AA was performed on the initial structure obtained from I-TASSER to correct any bond clashes and refine the stereochemistry of the predicted protein (Figure S2). The PROCHECK tool was used to assess the stereological quality of the structure. The Ramachandran plot for the structure showed 91.2% of the total residues (including glycine and proline) located in the core and additionally allowed regions, with 6.3% of the residues in the generously allowed region, and only 2.5% were marked as outliers.
FAD2 enzymes in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane usually form heterodimers and homodimers for their function [81]. We further predicted the homodimer structure of EoFAD2 using the ClusPro2.0 tool, considering the hydrophobic interactions (Figure 3A). TMPred and TMHMM tools were used to predict the transmembrane domains present in the protein. Both tools provided similar results indicating overlapping regions as transmembrane domains. Five transmembrane domains were identified with about 19–23 residues in each transmembrane domain, and the results are summarized in Table 7. The estimation of the local quality of the predicted membrane protein was evaluated using QMEANBrane, and the membrane insertion energy was found within the limits (Figure S2). I-TASSER also provided preliminary predictions of the possible substrates and respective substrate-binding residues. The residues 111, 117, 149, 152, 153, 281, 322, 325, and 326 were predicted to be involved in metal ion binding. FAD2 enzymes are metal ion-binding proteins and contain ferrous ions. However, the total number of metal ions in a monomer is unknown. The residues 114, 118, 120, 121,122, 127, and 142 were predicted to be for oleoyl–glycerol-binding (Figure 3B). Moreover, Figure 3C illustrates the substrate oleoyl glycerol docked with the predicted structure of Elaeis oleifera FAD2. In fact, the amino acid residues represented in the figure are the predicted interacting residues with the substrate, meaning that the residues predicted in binding with oleoyl glycerol were considered to predict the binding pocket during the molecular docking studies. The best binding affinity was predicted to be −5.9 kcal/mol for the conformation represented in Figure 3C.

3.5.2. Docking Analysis between Oilseed Species

The sequence alignment of the five species—sunflower, corn, sesame, peanut, and American oil palm—showed numerous substitutions, but, in structural analysis, only nine could be studied. The amino acids at positions 114, 118, 120, 121, 122, 127, 142, and 240 were conserved throughout the different species. The only notable change was at position S124Q. The docking results are shown in Figure 4 with the change in the amino acid. In fact, the differences in substrate binding may be influenced by amino acids other than the substrate-binding pocket.
FAD2 sequences from other species (Figure 4A,B) were also analyzed to identify any changes in the residues predicted for interacting with the substrate. However, the residues were conserved throughout the sequences, and any change in the substrate specificity or affinity may be attributed to the differences in the amino acid sequence other than the binding pocket.

4. Conclusions

The identification and characterization of EoFAD2, a fatty acid desaturase enzyme involved in the desaturation and conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid, is the first and a preliminary step for American oil palm improvement. The phylogenetic and comparative studies showed similarities and variability among the fad2 gene sequences obtained from eight oilseed species. Interestingly, two SNP markers, SNP373 and SNP718, associated with the oleic/linoleic acid contents were identified. The homodimer structures of EoFAD2 and oleoyl–glycerol substrate-binding residues were predicted and described. Docking analysis was used to study structure-function relationship of the poorly structurally characterized integral membrane protein FAD2. The findings allowed us to investigate the role of the substitution S124Q among the FAD2 sequences of the studied oilseed species. The results suggested the fundamental role of this genetic substitution in reducing or enhancing the FAD2 activity to obtain more or less oleic acid content, respectively.
Altogether, these results enhanced our understanding of the mechanism of fatty acids synthesis in American palm and could facilitate the use of molecular biology techniques to improve the enzymatic activity and substrate affinity of EoFAD2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11040529/s1, Figure S1: Five models were predicted using the I-TASSER tool; Figure S2: Energy minimization using OPLS-AA was performed on the initial structure obtained from I-TASSER to correct any bond-clashes and refine the stereochemistry of the predicted best protein model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, R.B.A., T.C. and N.K.; data curation, R.B.A., T.C., N.K. and M.H.; investigation, R.B.A., T.C., N.K., M.H., S.E., K.K., R.K. and R.C.; writing—original draft, R.B.A., M.H., T.C. and N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All new research data were presented in this contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Field, C.J. FATTY ACIDS|Dietary Importance. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 2317–2324. ISBN 978-0-12-227055-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaur, N.; Chugh, V.; Gupta, A.K. Essential Fatty Acids as Functional Components of Foods—A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2289–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Visioli, F.; Poli, A. Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Risk. Evidence, Lack of Evidence, and Diligence. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Global Production Volume Palm Oil 2012–2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/613471/palm-oil-production-volume-worldwide/ (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  5. Balić, A.; Vlašić, D.; Žužul, K.; Marinović, B.; Bukvić Mokos, Z. Omega-3 Versus Omega-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in the Prevention and Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. D’Angelo, S.; Motti, M.L.; Meccariello, R. ω-3 and ω-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Obesity and Cancer. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brondz, I. LIPIDS|Fatty Acids. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 2nd ed.; Worsfold, P., Townshend, A., Poole, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 76–88. ISBN 978-0-12-369397-6. [Google Scholar]
  8. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Caramujo, M.J. The Various Roles of Fatty Acids. Molecules 2018, 23, 2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aid, F. Plant Lipid Metabolism. In Advances in Lipid Metabolism; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Blanco, A.; Blanco, G. Chapter 5—Lipids. In Medical Biochemistry; Blanco, A., Blanco, G., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 99–119. ISBN 978-0-12-803550-4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walter, P. The Lipid Bilayer. In Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed.; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  12. van Meer, G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane Lipids: Where They Are and How They Behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li-Beisson, Y.; Shorrosh, B.; Beisson, F.; Andersson, M.X.; Arondel, V.; Bates, P.D.; Baud, S.; Bird, D.; DeBono, A.; Durrett, T.P.; et al. Acyl-Lipid Metabolism. Arab. Book 2013, 11, e0161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Brash, A.; Schneider, C.; Hamberg, M. Applications of Stereospecifically-Labeled Fatty Acids in Oxygenase and Desaturase Biochemistry. Lipids 2012, 47, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. He, M.; Qin, C.-X.; Wang, X.; Ding, N.-Z. Plant Unsaturated Fatty Acids: Biosynthesis and Regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Review on Fatty Acid Desaturases and Their Roles in Temperature Acclimatisation. Available online: https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=jas.2017.282.295 (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  17. Dar, A.A.; Choudhury, A.R.; Kancharla, P.K.; Arumugam, N. The FAD2 Gene in Plants: Occurrence, Regulation, and Role. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Schmid, K.M. Chapter 4—Lipid Metabolism in Plants. In Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes, 7th ed.; Ridgway, N.D., McLeod, R.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 121–159. ISBN 978-0-12-824048-9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dong, C.-J.; Cao, N.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Shang, Q.-M. Characterization of the Fatty Acid Desaturase Genes in Cucumber: Structure, Phylogeny, and Expression Patterns. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hajiahmadi, Z.; Abedi, A.; Wei, H.; Sun, W.; Ruan, H.; Zhuge, Q.; Movahedi, A. Identification, Evolution, Expression, and Docking Studies of Fatty Acid Desaturase Genes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Raboanatahiry, N.; Yin, Y.; Chen, K.; He, J.; Yu, L.; Li, M. In Silico Analysis of Fatty Acid Desaturases Structures in Camelina Sativa, and Functional Evaluation of Csafad7 and Csafad8 on Seed Oil Formation and Seed Morphology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Robin, J.; Gueroult, M.; Cheikhrouhou, R.; Guicherd, M.; Borsenberger, V.; Marty, A.; Bordes, F. Identification of a Crucial Amino Acid Implicated in the Hydroxylation/Desaturation Ratio of CpFAH12 Bifunctional Hydroxylase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 2451–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shanklin, J.; Guy, J.E.; Mishra, G.; Lindqvist, Y. Desaturases: Emerging Models for Understanding Functional Diversification of Diiron-Containing Enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 18559–18563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Okuley, J.; Lightner, J.; Feldmann, K.; Yadav, N.; Lark, E.; Browse, J. Arabidopsis FAD2 Gene Encodes the Enzyme That Is Essential for Polyunsaturated Lipid Synthesis. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elaeis oleifera American Oil Palm PFAF Plant Database. Available online: https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Elaeis+oleifera (accessed on 9 December 2021).
  26. Goh, K.J.; Wong, C.K.; Ng, P.H.C. Oil Palm. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, 2nd ed.; Thomas, B., Murray, B.G., Murphy, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 382–390. ISBN 978-0-12-394808-3. [Google Scholar]
  27. Murphy, D.J. Using Modern Plant Breeding to Improve the Nutritional and Technological Qualities of Oil Crops. OCL 2014, 21, D607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Murphy, D.J. 12—Plant Breeding to Change Lipid Composition for Use in Food. In Modifying Lipids for Use in Food; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Gunstone, F.D., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 273–305. ISBN 978-1-85573-971-0. [Google Scholar]
  29. Borodovsky, M.; Rudd, K.E.; Koonin, E.V. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Approaches for Detecting Genes in a Bacterial Genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4756–4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zheng, W.; Zhang, C.; Bell, E.W.; Zhang, Y. I-TASSER Gateway: A Protein Structure and Function Prediction Server Powered by XSEDE. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 99, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, W.; Zhang, C.; Wuyun, Q.; Pearce, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. LOMETS2: Improved Meta-Threading Server for Fold-Recognition and Structure-Based Function Annotation for Distant-Homology Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W429–W436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L. Predicting Transmembrane Protein Topology with a Hidden Markov Model: Application to Complete Genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hofmann, K.; Stoffel, W. Tmbase-A Database of Membrane Spanning Protein Segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 1993, 346, 166. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kozakov, D.; Hall, D.R.; Xia, B.; Porter, K.A.; Padhorny, D.; Yueh, C.; Beglov, D.; Vajda, S. The ClusPro Web Server for Protein-Protein Docking. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Studer, G.; Biasini, M.; Schwede, T. Assessing the Local Structural Quality of Transmembrane Protein Models Using Statistical Potentials (QMEANBrane). Bioinformatics 2014, 30, i505–i511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Eberhardt, J.; Santos-Martins, D.; Tillack, A.F.; Forli, S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 3891–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Higgins, D.G. Multiple Sequence Alignment Using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2003, 1, 2.3.1–2.3.22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Sun, J.; Li, B.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, S.; Zhang, H. Arabidopsis Fatty Acid Desaturase FAD2 Is Required for Salt Tolerance during Seed Germination and Early Seedling Growth. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Miquel, M.; James, D.; Dooner, H.; Browse, J. Arabidopsis Requires Polyunsaturated Lipids for Low-Temperature Survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 6208–6212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Luisa Hernández, M.; Dolores Sicardo, M.; Arjona, P.M.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M. Specialized Functions of Olive FAD2 Gene Family Members Related to Fruit Development and the Abiotic Stress Response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hernández, M.L.; Mancha, M.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Genes Encoding Two Microsomal Oleate Desaturases (FAD2) from Olive. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1417–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hernández, M.L.; Padilla, M.N.; Sicardo, M.D.; Mancha, M.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M. Effect of Different Environmental Stresses on the Expression of Oleate Desaturase Genes and Fatty Acid Composition in Olive Fruit. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hernández, M.L.; Sicardo, M.D.; Belaj, A.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M. The Oleic/Linoleic Acid Ratio in Olive (Olea europaea L.) Fruit Mesocarp Is Mainly Controlled by OeFAD2-2 and OeFAD2-5 Genes Together With the Different Specificity of Extraplastidial Acyltransferase Enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. D’Angeli, S.; Altamura, M.M. Unsaturated Lipids Change in Olive Tree Drupe and Seed during Fruit Development and in Response to Cold-Stress and Acclimation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saeki, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Kinoshita, M.; Suzuki, I.; Tasaka, Y.; Kano, K.; Taguchi, Y.; Mikami, K.; Hirabayashi, M.; Kashiwazaki, N.; et al. Functional Expression of a Δ12 Fatty Acid Desaturase Gene from Spinach in Transgenic Pigs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6361–6366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cao, S.; Zhou, X.-R.; Wood, C.; Green, A.; Singh, S.; Liu, L.; Liu, Q. A Large and Functionally Diverse Family of Fad2 Genes in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Miao, X.; Zhang, L.; Hu, X.; Nan, S.; Chen, X.; Fu, H. Cloning and Functional Analysis of the FAD2 Gene Family from Desert Shrub Artemisia Sphaerocephala. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yu, S.; Pan, L.; Yang, Q.; Min, P.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, H. Comparison of the Δ12 Fatty Acid Desaturase Gene between High-Oleic and Normal-Oleic Peanut Genotypes. J. Genet. Genom. 2008, 35, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Janila, P.; Pandey, M.K.; Shasidhar, Y.; Variath, M.T.; Sriswathi, M.; Khera, P.; Manohar, S.S.; Nagesh, P.; Vishwakarma, M.K.; Mishra, G.P.; et al. Molecular Breeding for Introgression of Fatty Acid Desaturase Mutant Alleles (AhFAD2A and AhFAD2B) Enhances Oil Quality in High and Low Oil Containing Peanut Genotypes. Plant Sci. 2016, 242, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fan, R.; Li, L.; Cai, G.; Ye, J.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Li, Z. Molecular Cloning and Function Analysis of FAD2 Gene in Idesia Polycarpa. Phytochemistry 2019, 168, 112114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Traore, S.M.; He, G. Soybean as a Model Crop to Study Plant Oil Genes: Mutations in FAD2 Gene Family; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; ISBN 978-1-83969-750-0. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lakhssassi, N.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, S.; Colantonio, V.; AbuGhazaleh, A.; Meksem, K. Characterization of the FAD2 Gene Family in Soybean Reveals the Limitations of Gel-Based TILLING in Genes with High Copy Number. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cheng, J.; Salentijn, E.; Huang, B.; Krens, F.; Dechesne, A.; Visser, R.; Van Loo, E.N. Isolation and Characterization of the Omega-6 Fatty Acid Desaturase (FAD2) Gene Family in the Allohexaploid Oil Seed Crop Crambe Abyssinica Hochst. Mol. Breed. 2013, 32, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Celik Altunoglu, Y.; Unel, N.M.; Baloglu, M.C.; Ulu, F.; Can, T.H.; Cetinkaya, R. Comparative Identification and Evolutionary Relationship of Fatty Acid Desaturase (FAD) Genes in Some Oil Crops: The Sunflower Model for Evaluation of Gene Expression Pattern under Drought Stress. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018, 32, 846–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Dehghan Nayeri, F.; Yarizade, K. Bioinformatics Study of Delta-12 Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (FAD2) Gene in Oilseeds. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 5077–5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Luo, J.; Liu, L.; Konik-Rose, C.; Tian, L.; Singh, S.; Howitt, C.A.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q. Down-Regulation of FAD2-1 Gene Expression Alters Lysophospholipid Composition in the Endosperm of Rice Grain and Influences Starch Properties. Foods 2021, 10, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pirtle, I.L.; Kongcharoensuntorn, W.; Nampaisansuk, M.; Knesek, J.E.; Chapman, K.D.; Pirtle, R.M. Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of the Gene for a Cotton Δ-12 Fatty Acid Desaturase (FAD2). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1522, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, F.; Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xue, F.; Nie, X.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, J. GhFAD2-3 Is Required for Anther Development in Gossypium Hirsutum. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kargiotidou, A.; Deli, D.; Galanopoulou, D.; Tsaftaris, A.; Farmaki, T. Low Temperature and Light Regulate Delta 12 Fatty Acid Desaturases (FAD2) at a Transcriptional Level in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2043–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, P.-Y.; Hsieh, M.-J.; Tsai, Y.-T.; Chung, H.-H.; Shyur, L.-F.; Hsieh, C.-H.; To, K.-Y. Transformation and Characterization of Δ12-Fatty Acid Acetylenase and Δ12-Oleate Desaturase Potentially Involved in the Polyacetylene Biosynthetic Pathway from Bidens Pilosa. Plants 2020, 9, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, K.; Zhao, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. Identification and Analysis of the FAD Gene Family in Walnuts (Juglans regia L.) Based on Transcriptome Data. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, M.; Liu, M.; Li, D.; Wu, J.; Li, X.; Yang, Y. Overexpression of FAD2 Promotes Seed Germination and Hypocotyl Elongation in Brassica Napus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 102, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, Z.; Wang, M.-J.; Zhao, S.-T.; Hu, J.-J.; Lu, M.-Z. Changes in Freezing Tolerance in Hybrid Poplar Caused by Up- and down-Regulation of PtFAD2 Gene Expression. Transgenic Res. 2010, 19, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zeng, F.; Roslinsky, V.; Cheng, B. Mutations in the Promoter, Intron and CDS of Two FAD2 Generate Multiple Alleles Modulating Linoleic Acid Level in Yellow Mustard. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Sun, R.; Gao, L.; Yu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, X. Identification of a Δ12 Fatty Acid Desaturase from Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Involved in the Biosynthesis of Linoleic Acid by Heterologous Expression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Gene 2016, 591, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jadid, N.; Prasetyowati, I.; Rosidah, N.L.A.; Ermavitalini, D.; Nurhatika, S.; Nurhidayati, T.; Purnobasuki, H. In Silico Analysis of Partial Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 CDNA From Reutealis trisperma (Blanco) Airy Shaw. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2021, 15, 11779322211005748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sequence Variations in the FAD2 Gene in Seeded Pumpkins. Available online: https://www.geneticsmr.com/articles/5754 (accessed on 25 February 2022).
  70. Kim, H.; Go, Y.S.; Kim, A.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.-N.; Lee, G.-J.; Kim, G.-J.; Suh, M. Isolation and Functional Analysis of Three Microsomal Delta-12 Fatty Acid Desaturase Genes from Camelina Sativa (L.) Cv. CAME. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kang, J.; Snapp, A.R.; Lu, C. Identification of Three Genes Encoding Microsomal Oleate Desaturases (FAD2) from the Oilseed Crop Camelina Sativa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lei, N.; Peng, S.; Niu, B.; Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; Tang, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, F. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Microsomal Oleate Desaturase Gene DiFAD2 from Davidia Involucrata Baill. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Suresha, G.S.; Santha, I. Molecular Cloning, Expression Analysis and Growth Temperature Dependent Regulation of a Novel Oleate Desaturase Gene (Fad2) Homologue from Brassica Juncea. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2012, 6, 296–308. [Google Scholar]
  74. Suresha, G.S. Molecular Cloning and In Silico Analysis of Novel Oleate Desaturase Gene Homologues from Brassica Juncea through Sub-Genomic Library Approach. Plant Omics 2013, 6, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mikkilineni, V.; Rocheford, T.R. Sequence Variation and Genomic Organization of Fatty Acid Desaturase-2 (Fad2) and Fatty Acid Desaturase-6 (Fad6) CDNAs in Maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106, 1326–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tao, F.; Zhu, S.-W.; Fan, J.; Cheng, B.-J. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Maize FAD2 Gene. Zhi Wu Sheng Li Yu Fen Zi Sheng Wu Xue Xue Bao 2006, 32, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Utomo, C.; Subroto, A.P.; Darmawan, C.; Setyobudi, R.H.; Nugroho, Y.A.; Liwang, T. Construction for Δ-12 Fatty Acid Desaturase (FAD2) Silencing to Improve Oil Quality of Jatropha Curcas Linn. Energy Procedia 2015, 65, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zhang, Y.M.; Wang, C.C.; Hu, H.H.; Yang, L. Cloning and Expression of Three Fatty Acid Desaturase Genes from Cold-Sensitive Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nordborg, M.; Hu, T.T.; Ishino, Y.; Jhaveri, J.; Toomajian, C.; Zheng, H.; Bakker, E.; Calabrese, P.; Gladstone, J.; Goyal, R.; et al. The Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis Thaliana. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ben Ayed, R.; Moreau, F.; Ben Hlima, H.; Rebai, A.; Ercisli, S.; Kadoo, N.; Hanana, M.; Assouguem, A.; Ullah, R.; Ali, E.A. SNP Discovery and Structural Insights into OeFAD2 Unravelling High Oleic/Linoleic Ratio in Olive Oil. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1229–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lou, Y.; Schwender, J.; Shanklin, J. FAD2 and FAD3 Desaturases Form Heterodimers That Facilitate Metabolic Channeling in Vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17996–18007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biology 11 00529 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Phylogenetic tree of 24 FAD2 protein sequences from eight oilseed species studied using the MEGA program and neighbor-joining analysis with the schematic representation of their conserved motifs identified by the MEME server, described in (B).
Figure 1. (A) Phylogenetic tree of 24 FAD2 protein sequences from eight oilseed species studied using the MEGA program and neighbor-joining analysis with the schematic representation of their conserved motifs identified by the MEME server, described in (B).
Biology 11 00529 g001
Biology 11 00529 g002 550
Figure 2. (A,C) 3D predicted model of the EoFAD2 protein; (B) Predicted transmembrane domains in FAD2 by TMHMM server (CBS; Denmark).
Figure 2. (A,C) 3D predicted model of the EoFAD2 protein; (B) Predicted transmembrane domains in FAD2 by TMHMM server (CBS; Denmark).
Biology 11 00529 g002
Biology 11 00529 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) EoFAD2 homodimer organization taking into account the hydrophobic interactions; (B) Potential substrates and substrate-binding residues; (C) Substrate oleoyl glycerol docked with the predicted structure of Elaeis oleifera FAD2.
Figure 3. (A) EoFAD2 homodimer organization taking into account the hydrophobic interactions; (B) Potential substrates and substrate-binding residues; (C) Substrate oleoyl glycerol docked with the predicted structure of Elaeis oleifera FAD2.
Biology 11 00529 g003
Biology 11 00529 g004 550
Figure 4. Molecular docking of oleoyl glycerol as the ligand and the predicted structure of EoFAD2 from Elaeis olifera as the receptor (A) and the other studied oilseed species (B) performed using AutoDock Vina v1.2.
Figure 4. Molecular docking of oleoyl glycerol as the ligand and the predicted structure of EoFAD2 from Elaeis olifera as the receptor (A) and the other studied oilseed species (B) performed using AutoDock Vina v1.2.
Biology 11 00529 g004
Table
Table 1. GenBank accession numbers of 24 FAD2 gene sequences from eight oilseeds species.
Table 1. GenBank accession numbers of 24 FAD2 gene sequences from eight oilseeds species.
SpeciesAccession NumberCode
Elaeis oleiferaKY006847.1EoFAD2
Glycine maxAY611472.1Gm1FAD2-1
L43920.1Gm2FAD2-1
EU908061.1Gm1FAD2-1B
EU908062.1Gm2FAD2-1B
DQ532370.1Gm3FAD2-1B
Brassica napusFJ907397.1BnFAD2-1
FJ907399.1BnFAD2-3
FJ907401.1BnFAD2-4
FJ907400.1BnFAD2-5
AF243045.1Bn1FAD2
DQ767949.1Bn2FAD2
AY577313.1Bn3FAD2
AY592975.1Bn4FAD2
Helianthus annuusAY800245.1HaFAD2-1
AY803008.1HaFAD2-3
AY802997.1Ha1FAD2-2
AY802995.1Ha2FAD2-2
Arachis hypogaeaAF030319.1AhFADs
DQ019933.1Ah1FAD2
AF248739.1Ah2FAD2
Arachis monticolaAY900663.1AmFAD2
Zea maysAB257309.1ZmFAD2
Sesamum indicumAF192486.1SiFAD2
Table
Table 2. Different functions and biological roles attributed to FAD2 enzymes within several species through biological engineering and polymorphism studies.
Table 2. Different functions and biological roles attributed to FAD2 enzymes within several species through biological engineering and polymorphism studies.
Gene ID/NameSpeciesFunctionReference
L26296Arabidopsis thalianaPolyunsaturated lipid synthesis, salt tolerance during seed germination and early seedling growth, and vegetative growth[24,40,41]
AY733076,
AY733077		Olea europaeaLinoleic acid synthesis, wounding response of olive fruit mesocarp, cuticle formation, and cold-acclimation, and abiotic stresses (drought/cold) response[42,43,44,45,46]
AB094415Spinacia oleraceaLinoleic acid synthesis[47]
CtFAD2-1-11Carthamus tinctoriusLinoleic acid synthesis and crepenynic acid synthesis (with C16:1 as a substrate)[48]
AsFAD2-1-24ArtemisiasphaerocephalaLinoleic and palmitolinoleic acid biosynthesis[49]
EF186911Arachis hypogaeaEnhancement of peanut oil quality[50,51]
MF 693460Idesia polycarpaLinoleic acid accumulation[52]
GmFAD2–1a GmFAD2–1bGlycine maxIncreased oleic acid content in mutant lines[53,54]
JX964741, JX964747Crambe abyssinicaPolyunsaturated fatty acids biosynthesis[55]
HaFAD2-1-11Helianthus annuusLinoleic acid synthesis and storage oil desaturation in seed[56]
AAX11454, ACP39503, ACF49507, ABK59093, AAS19533, AEI60129, ACZ06072, AAN87573,
AAF04094		Sesamum indicum, Brassica napus, Linum usitatissinum, Ricinus communis, Cucurbita pepo,
Vitis labrusca,
Arachis hypogaea, Vernicia fordii, Vernonia galamensis		Linoleic acid synthesis and storage oil desaturation in seed[57]
OsFAD2-1 RNAiOrysa sativaAlteration of lysophospholipid composition in the endosperm of rice grain and influence on starch properties[58]
AF331163Gossypium hirsutumLinoleic acid accumulation, anther development, and cold and light responsiveness[59,60,61]
MF318524Bidens pilosaPolyacetylene biosynthesis[62]
XM_019004668.1, XM_019004667.1, XM_018993369.1, XM_018993367.1Juglans regiaLinoleic acid synthesis[63]
AF243045Brassica napusPromotion of seed germination and hypocotyl elongation[64]
DQ31678Populus tomentosaFreezing tolerance[65]
SalFAD2.LIA1, SalFAD2.LIA2Sinapis albaLinoleic acid accumulation[66]
KT023602Elaeis guineensisLinoleic acid synthesis[67]
Partial RtFAD2Reutealis trispermaRegulation of fatty acid desaturation[68]
Csa3M808360, Csa4M286360Cucumis sativusTemperature stress responsiveness[19]
FAD2 (SNPs)Cucurbita moschata, Cucurbita maxima, Cucurbita pepo, and Cucurbita ficifoliaLinoleic acid synthesis[69]
CsFAD2 (SNPs)Camelina sativaLinoleic acid synthesis and storage oil desaturation in seed[70,71]
EU275211Davidia involucrataLinoleic acid synthesis[72]
X91139, EF639848, FJ696650, FJ696651, FJ696652Brassica junceaBiosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids in seeds and cold responsiveness[73,74]
DQ496227,
ZmFAD2 (SNPs)		Zea maysRatio of oleic/linoleic acid[75,76]
GU353167Jatropha curcasConversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid in the seed[77]
HQ171179,
HQ171180		Phaseolus lunatusCold, drought, and salt stress responsiveness[78]
Table
Table 3. Overview of the relationship between all studied sequences of the fad2 gene; (detect deviations from the neutral model).
Table 3. Overview of the relationship between all studied sequences of the fad2 gene; (detect deviations from the neutral model).
SequencesRegionnsπDθw
All Sequences1–1172240.600.262.570.16
n = number of sequences; s: substitution, π: the level of nucleotide diversity over the entire sequence; θw: the level of nucleotide diversity per site; D: the D statistic of the Tajima test.
Table
Table 4. Association between predicted SNPs (SNP373 and SNP718) and the composition of fatty acids for the studied vegetable oils.
Table 4. Association between predicted SNPs (SNP373 and SNP718) and the composition of fatty acids for the studied vegetable oils.
C18:0 C18:1 C18:2 C18:3
Mean ± SDp-ValueMean ± SDp-ValueMean ± SDp-ValueMean ± SDp-Value
SNP373
C2.972 ± 1.1540.75454.100 ± 11.9480.00623.747 ± 14.1950.0132.6150 ± 4.6740.902
T3.283 ± 1.33821.333 ± 3.66657.433 ± 5.7493.053 ± 4.030
SNP718
G2.530 ± 0.9070.28258.700 ± 9.3370.00717.430 ± 7.9250.0023.486 ± 5.3110.735
A3.537 ± 1.20526.075 ± 9.94453.750 ± 8.7352.29 ± 3.627
p: p-value Fisher’s test; SD: Standard deviation. Italic format: the p-value; Italic and bold formats: p-value < 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Peptidic composition and physico-chemical features of the EoFAD2 protein.
Table 5. Peptidic composition and physico-chemical features of the EoFAD2 protein.
PropertiesLength (aa)MW (kD)pITM Regionsα-Helix Structure (%)Extended Strand Structure (%)Random Coil Structure (%)
EoFAD239044.18.45282151
Table
Table 6. Most frequent aa in the EoFAD2 protein.
Table 6. Most frequent aa in the EoFAD2 protein.
Aa (%)LeuAlaValProSerArgGlyTyrHis
EoFAD2109.77.77.46.46.26.25.45.1
Table
Table 7. Transmembrane domains as predicted by TMPred.
Table 7. Transmembrane domains as predicted by TMPred.
TM PositionLengthOrientation
61–8519o-i
94–11421i-o
128–14821o-i
190–20920i-o
257–27923o-i
i = inside, o = outside.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben Ayed, R.; Chirmade, T.; Hanana, M.; Khamassi, K.; Ercisli, S.; Choudhary, R.; Kadoo, N.; Karunakaran, R. Comparative Analysis and Structural Modeling of Elaeis oleifera FAD2, a Fatty Acid Desaturase Involved in Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition of American Oil Palm. Biology 2022, 11, 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040529

AMA Style

Ben Ayed R, Chirmade T, Hanana M, Khamassi K, Ercisli S, Choudhary R, Kadoo N, Karunakaran R. Comparative Analysis and Structural Modeling of Elaeis oleifera FAD2, a Fatty Acid Desaturase Involved in Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition of American Oil Palm. Biology. 2022; 11(4):529. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben Ayed, Rayda, Tejas Chirmade, Mohsen Hanana, Khalil Khamassi, Sezai Ercisli, Ravish Choudhary, Narendra Kadoo, and Rohini Karunakaran. 2022. "Comparative Analysis and Structural Modeling of Elaeis oleifera FAD2, a Fatty Acid Desaturase Involved in Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition of American Oil Palm" Biology 11, no. 4: 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop