Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Film Thickness Uniformity of X-Ray Telescope Mirror Based on Off-Axis Biaxial Rotation Coating Method
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Valorization of Electroplating Sludge and Water-Washed MSWI Fly Ash for the Preparation of Black Ceramic Glaze
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism and Corrosion Protection of Phytic Acid Conversion Coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al Surfaces: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study

1
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education of China, School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2
Chongqing Engineering Research Center of New Energy Storage Devices and Applications, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China
3
Sichuan Province International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Functional Materials, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
4
Special Glass Key Laboratory of Hainan Province, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2026, 16(7), 819; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070819
Submission received: 17 June 2026 / Revised: 3 July 2026 / Accepted: 5 July 2026 / Published: 9 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Corrosion, Wear and Erosion)

Abstract

This study explores the surface interaction mechanism of phytic acid (PA) on Fe, Cu, and Al metals and its applicability in green anticorrosion surface treatment through a combination of quantum chemical calculations, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and electrochemical measurements. Quantum chemical calculations identified the nucleophilic/electrophilic active sites of PA via HOMO-LUMO and Fukui functions. MD simulations then constructed solution-metal interface models, calculating adsorption energies, radial distribution functions, and the diffusion behavior of H2O and Cl to elucidate PA’s adsorption configurations and its inhibition of corrosive species diffusion. Based on these theoretical insights, PA conversion coatings were in situ constructed on Fe, Cu, and Al substrates. Potentiodynamic polarization tests confirmed that these coatings effectively enhanced the corrosion resistance of the metals in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution, achieving inhibition efficiencies of 92% for Fe, 86.5% for Al, and 26% for Cu. This work provides a comprehensive mechanistic interpretation from molecular adsorption to surface film formation, offering theoretical and experimental support for PA—based green surface treatment technologies.

1. Introduction

Metal corrosion is a ubiquitous electrochemical deterioration process that critically constrains modern industry and materials science, causing annual economic losses of approximately 3%–5% of global GDP [1,2,3,4,5,6]. To address corrosion in atmospheric [7], aqueous [8] and industrial media [9], corrosion inhibition research has become a major focus in materials chemistry, especially for the energy, construction, marine and aerospace sectors that heavily rely on iron-based [10], copper-based [11,12] and aluminum-based [13,14] materials.
Among existing protection strategies, corrosion inhibitors offer simple application, low cost, and good adaptability [15,16,17]. However, traditional chromate and phosphate inhibitors contain heavy metals and persistent toxic substances, and they are facing increasing environmental restrictions [18,19]. Chemical passivation, which forms a dense passivation film (e.g., chromate conversion coating) on the metal surface to physically block corrosive media, also suffers from pollution, complex procedures, and limited universality across metals. Against this backdrop, developing renewable, eco-friendly systems that combine inhibition and film-forming capabilities is highly desired [20,21].
Phytic acid (PA) [22], a natural, eco-friendly, water-soluble compound abundant in plant seeds [23], possesses six phosphate groups that confer strong chelating ability and multiple active sites [24,25,26,27]. Its adsorption, film-forming, pH-responsive and biocompatible properties make it promising for corrosion protection. Kaghazchi et al. [28] examined the synergistic corrosion inhibition between PA and Zn2+ in 3.5 wt% NaCl. They confirmed that the chelate formed by PA and Zn2+ deposits on mild steel, providing enhanced protection. Separately, Li et al. [29] first employed an electrolysis method to prepare PA conversion films on copper foil, demonstrating that films formed under an applied electric field exhibit superior corrosion resistance. Shi et al. [30] studied an environmentally friendly PA conversion coating on 2024-T3 aluminum alloy. The coating was prepared in PA solutions with pH values ranging from 3 to 5.5, and characterized by SEM, EDS, ATR-FTIR, and electrochemical tests. The results indicate that the film formed within this pH range provides excellent corrosion resistance.
Despite these advances, most studies rely on macroscopic electrochemical tests or static surface characterization [31,32,33], failing to reveal the dynamic evolution of adsorption configurations, stability, and film formation kinetics at the atomic/molecular scale. Given the wide applications of Fe, Cu, and Al in fields such as construction, marine industry, and aerospace, where they are exposed to similar corrosive environments [34,35,36,37], this paper systematically investigates the adsorption thermodynamics, kinetics, and structure—activity relationship of PA molecules on the surfaces of metals Fe, Cu, and Al through quantum chemical calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. PA conversion films are then prepared by a controlled immersion method, and their long-term protective performance in 3.5 wt% NaCl is quantitatively evaluated by electrochemical polarization. The findings provide both theoretical and experimental support for a chromium-free, low-toxicity, scalable PA-based anticorrosion technology.

2. Calculation Method and Materials

2.1. Quantum Chemical Calculations

Quantum chemical calculations can effectively predict the chemical reactivity of molecules and are widely used in structure-activity relationship studies of corrosion inhibitors. In this work, the Gaussian 09 software package [38] was employed, utilizing the B3LYP functional combined with the 6-311G++(d,p) basis set to perform geometry optimization, obtaining the most stable molecular conformation on the potential energy surface. The electronic structure of the optimized PA molecule was then analyzed and visualized using Multiwfn [39,40], developed by Lu et al. [41], and Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) [42]. The highest occupied molecular orbital energy ( E H O M O ) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy ( E L U M O ) were obtained from the calculations. Other quantum chemical descriptors based on E H O M O and E L U M O , such as the energy gap ( E ), electronegativity ( χ ), chemical potential ( μ ), hardness ( η ), and softness ( S ), were calculated using the following formulas:
E = E L U M O E H O M O
μ = χ = E L U M O + E H O M O 2
η = E L U M O E H O M O 2
S = 1 η
To analyze the local reactivity of PA molecules, the electrostatic potential and Fukui functions of the molecule were calculated. The Fukui function f ( r ) is defined as the first partial derivative of the electron density ρ ( r ) with respect to the number of electrons N .
f ( r ) = ( ρ ( r ) N ) v ( r )
Using the finite difference approximation, the Fukui function f ( r ) can be expressed as:
f + ( r ) = q ( N + 1 ) q ( N )
f ( r ) = q ( N ) q ( N 1 )
Here, q ( N + 1 ) , q ( N ) , and q ( N 1 ) represent the atomic charges in systems with electron numbers N + 1 , N , and N 1 , respectively. These indices reflect the propensity of an atom to gain or lose electrons. A larger f + value indicates a stronger ability of the atom to gain electrons, suggesting it is more susceptible to nucleophilic attack. Conversely, a larger f value signifies a stronger tendency of the atom to lose electrons, implying it is more prone to electrophilic attack.

2.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed using the Forcite module in the Materials Studio 2020(MS) software package. In this study, the relatively stable Fe(110), Cu(111), and Al(111) surfaces were selected as substrates for the simulations. Four solution models were constructed using the Amorphous Cell module, with their compositions and designations summarized in Table 1.
A three-layer periodic adsorption model was constructed by combining the solution with the metal substrate: the first layer consisted of the metal, the second layer comprised the solution, and the remaining region was set as the vacuum layer, as shown in Figure 1.
Atomic and molecular interactions were described using the COMPASSIII force field. As an ab initio force field, COMPASS [43] can predict properties of both gaseous and condensed phases, making it suitable for a wide range of organic and inorganic systems. It allows for the unified treatment of different material systems and provides reasonable descriptions of their mixtures. Geometry optimization of the initial model was performed by sequentially applying the steepest descent and conjugate gradient methods. The metal substrate was kept fixed throughout the optimization, with a maximum of 105 iterations. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the optimized initial model, with the atoms in the top two layers of the metal substrate released. The simulations were conducted under the NVT ensemble at room temperature (298 K) for a duration of 2000 ps to allow the adsorption model to reach an equilibrium state. During MD simulations, fluctuations in temperature and energy within 5% to 10% of their average values typically indicate that the system has achieved equilibrium. Figure 2 shows that both temperature and energy fluctuations in the system remain within this range, indicating that a simulation duration of 2000 ps is sufficient for the system to reach equilibrium.
The MD simulations were performed with a time step of 1 fs and a cutoff radius of 12.5 Å. The atom-based method was employed for van der Waals interactions, while the Ewald method was used for electrostatic interactions. The Andersen thermostat and Berendsen barostat were selected for temperature and pressure control, respectively.

2.3. Experimental Materials

The substrate materials were high-purity metal discs (99.99% purity) of Fe, Cu, and Al, with a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. Chemical reagents: phytic acid solution (C6H18O24P6, PA, 50 wt%), sodium chloride (NaCl), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were all supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Prior to modification, all metal substrates were ground with SiC abrasive paper (400 to 1200 mesh) and polished to a mirror finish. The polished samples were then degreased by ultrasonication in acetone, absolute ethanol, and deionized water for 10 min each, followed by natural drying.
A 1 wt% PA working solution was obtained by diluting the as-received 50 wt% PA solution with deionized water, and its pH was adjusted to 6.0 by dropwise addition of NaOH solution.
The cleaned metal samples were immersed in this PA solution for 1 h at ambient temperature, subsequently rinsed with deionized water for 60 s, and finally dried in air for 10 min.
A 3.5 wt% NaCl solution was also prepared for subsequent corrosion tests.

2.4. Electrochemical Testing

The corrosion behavior of bare and PA-treated Fe, Cu, and Al samples was evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution (pH ≈ 6.8) at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C) using an electrochemical workstation (Corrtest CS2350M, Wuhan, China). A conventional three-electrode setup was employed, which consisted of a saturated calomel reference electrode, a platinum auxiliary electrode, and the test sample as the working electrode. Before each measurement, the open-circuit potential was recorded for 30 min to ensure the system’s stabilization.
Polarization curves were then obtained by sweeping the potential from −0.5 V to 1 V vs. SCE at a scan rate of 1 mV/s, with the area of the working electrode fixed at 0.5 cm2. The corrosion current density and corrosion potential were derived from the polarization curves using the Tafel extrapolation method.

2.5. Film Composition and Morphology Characterization

The surface morphology and elemental composition of Fe, Cu, and Al samples before and after treatment were characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) (JSM-IT500, Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (NICOLET5700FT-IP, Waltham, MA, USA) was employed to identify the functional groups of the conversion films formed on the metal surfaces.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Quantum Chemical Calculation of PA Molecule Activity

Figure 3a displays the fully optimized geometry of the PA molecule at the B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) level. The corresponding electrostatic potential (ESP) map is shown in Figure 3b. ESP mapping visualizes the charge distribution across the molecular surface, with blue and red regions denoting negative (electrophilic) and positive (nucleophilic) potential areas, respectively. The fitted ESP values range from a minimum of −45.93 kcal/mol to a maximum of 82.14 kcal/mol.
The frontier molecular orbitals—HOMO and LUMO—were analyzed to understand PA’s adsorption behavior on metal surfaces. Figure 3c,d show the HOMO and LUMO distributions, which correspond to the negative (blue) and positive (red) ESP regions, respectively. HOMO electron density is concentrated on oxygen atoms of two phosphate groups, enabling electron donation to metal unoccupied orbitals. LUMO density resides on the inositol ring and remaining phosphate groups, facilitating electron acceptance from metal filled orbitals. Generally, higher E H O M O favors electron donation, while lower E L U M O favors electron acceptance. Table 2 lists E H O M O , E L U M O , and related quantum chemical parameters, which can be compared with other inhibitors to predict inhibition performance. For instance, inhibitor molecules with a smaller E value tend to adsorb more readily to form films, while higher electronegativity (χ) and lower hardness (η) indicate better inhibition efficiency.
Global parameters alone cannot pinpoint specific reactive sites; thus, Fukui function analysis was conducted to identify PA’s electrophilic and nucleophilic centers. Figure 4a,b reveal that the most favorable adsorption sites are located on oxygen and hydrogen atoms. The Fukui index quantifies atomic electron donation/acceptance: higher f values indicate stronger electron-donating ability, while higher f + values indicate stronger electron-accepting ability. Table 3 lists atoms with prominent Fukui indices. The results show that O22, O31, and O34 are electrophilic centers prone to losing electrons, whereas H43, H48, and P15 are nucleophilic centers with strong electron—accepting capabilities. These atoms exhibit high chemical reactivity and readily participate in electronic interactions with metals, promoting stable adsorption.

3.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Results

3.2.1. Adsorption Configuration of PA Molecules on Metal Surfaces

Molecular dynamics simulations provide microscopic insights into molecular adsorption behavior on metal surfaces, elucidating the film formation mechanism. Figure 5 presents the adsorption configurations of PA molecules on Fe(110), Cu(111), and Al(111) surfaces in both PA aqueous solution and 3.5 wt% NaCl/PA mixed solution environments. PA molecules exhibit two primary adsorption configurations on metal surfaces: parallel adsorption and perpendicular adsorption relative to the metal surface. The adsorption configuration of PA molecules is determined by the chemical reactive sites within the molecule. Based on the analysis of the HOMO and LUMO orbital diagrams in Figure 3, the perpendicular adsorption configuration arises from interactions between the electron-donating phosphate groups of PA molecules and the metal surface, whereas the parallel adsorption configuration results from interactions between the electron-accepting moieties of PA molecules and the metal surface. As evident from Figure 5, the adsorption of PA molecules on metal surfaces effectively hinders the contact of water molecules and Cl ions with the metal surface, forming an adsorption film that can significantly mitigate metal corrosion.

3.2.2. Adsorption Stability of PA Films

To investigate the stability of the adsorption films formed by PA molecules on the three metal surfaces, the adsorption energies of PA molecules on these surfaces in different solutions were calculated using the following formula:
E a d s o r p t i o n = E t o t a l ( E P A + E s u r f a c e )
Here, E a d s o r p t i o n represents the adsorption energy of PA on the metal surface; E t o t a l is the total energy of the combined PA–metal system; E P A denotes the energy of the isolated PA molecule; and E s u r f a c e is the energy of the bare metal surface. The obtained values are summarized in Table 4.
In the PA aqueous solution (denoted as PA in the table) and the NaCl/PA hybrid solution (denoted as NaClPA in the table), the adsorption energies of PA molecules on Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces are all negative, indicating that PA molecules can spontaneously adsorb onto the three metal surfaces, thereby preventing corrosive species from adhering to the metal surface. The adsorption stability of PA molecules on the substrate surfaces can be evaluated by the absolute value of the adsorption energy: a larger absolute value corresponds to stronger adsorption of the molecule on the substrate and better corrosion protection effectiveness. In both solutions, the order of absolute adsorption energies of PA molecules on the three metal surfaces is consistently Fe > Cu > Al, demonstrating that the corrosion protection film formed by PA on the Fe surface exhibits the highest stability. Upon the addition of NaCl, the increased number of corrosive species in the PA/NaCl hybrid solution (NaClPA) leads to a decrease in the absolute values of the adsorption energies of PA molecules on the metal surfaces. Based on the absolute values of adsorption energies, the incorporation of NaCl has the least influence on the adsorption energy of PA on the Fe surface, a moderate effect on that of the Cu surface, and the most pronounced impact on that of the Al surface.

3.2.3. Distribution of Particles on Metal Surfaces

To further elucidate the interaction mechanism of PA molecules on metal surfaces, the radial distribution functions (RDF) of water molecules, PA molecules, and Cl ions on the metal surfaces were calculated in both PA solution and NaClPA solution environments, with the results presented in Figure 6. The radial distribution function characterizes the spatial distribution density of one type of particle around another within the structural environment, and its calculation formula is as follows:
g ( r ) = d N 4 π ρ 2
where d N is the number of B particles located at a distance between r and r + d r from particle A, and ρ is the average density of particle B.
PA molecules exhibit a distinct first sharp peak within the range of r < 3.5 Å on all three metal substrate surfaces. This indicates that PA molecules can form chemical bonds with the three metal atoms. Consequently, PA molecules adsorb onto the metal surfaces via chemical bonding to form an adsorption film. This finding will be corroborated in the subsequent experimental section. The height of the RDF peak reflects the probability of occurrence at that specific distance. In both solution environments, PA molecules display the highest probability of occurrence on the Fe surface, demonstrating that PA molecules most readily adsorb onto the Fe surface, which is consistent with the calculated adsorption energies of PA molecules on metal surfaces. Due to the abundant hydroxyl groups present in PA molecules, hydrogen bonding interactions occur between water molecules and PA molecules, resulting in the appearance of peaks in the RDF curves of water molecules near the metal surface. In other regions of the solution, water molecules are uniformly distributed. The strong adsorption interaction between PA molecules and the metal surface causes Cl ions to begin appearing at positions farther from the metal surface, primarily distributed in the middle region of the solution layer, indicating that the adsorption of PA molecules effectively blocks corrosive species.
In aqueous environments, the presence of water molecules and Cl ions constitutes a significant factor contributing to metal corrosion. Therefore, obtaining dynamic information regarding the corrosion inhibition mechanism necessitates investigating the diffusion coefficients of water molecules and Cl ions. The diffusion coefficient serves as a quantitative indicator characterizing the diffusion capability of corrosive particles. In MD simulations, diffusion coefficients are calculated by fitting the mean square displacement (MSD) curves, with the calculation formula presented as follows:
M S D = < | r ( t ) r ( 0 ) | 2 >
The particles in the system continuously move from their initial positions. Let r ( 0 ) denote the initial position of a particle and r ( t ) denote its position at time t , where the angle brackets <> represent the ensemble average. According to the Einstein diffusion equation, the diffusion coefficient of a given species can be calculated as:
D = lim t < | r ( t ) r ( 0 ) | 2 > 6 t
That is, under equilibrium conditions, the diffusion coefficient is obtained by dividing the slope of the mean square displacement (MSD) curve by a factor of 6. The calculated diffusion coefficients are presented in Table 5 and Table 6.
Compared with the blank solution (PA-free solution), the introduction of PA molecules effectively reduced the diffusion coefficients of water molecules and Cl ions in the solution, thereby restricting their motion and making it more difficult for corrosive species to contact the metal surface. This phenomenon primarily arises from the steric hindrance effect and interfacial adsorption behavior induced by PA molecules as macromolecular additives. Previous studies [44] have confirmed that PA molecules, owing to their abundant hydroxyl groups, form hydrogen-bonding networks with water molecules. This not only increases the physical resistance to diffusion of H2O and Cl in the solution but also consumes active sites on the metal surface through preferential interfacial adsorption of PA itself, thereby hindering the access of water molecules and Cl ions to the metal substrate and kinetically delaying both the initiation and propagation of corrosion.
To further elucidate the corrosion inhibition mechanism of PA molecules on the three metals, the relative concentration distributions of PA molecules, water molecules, and Cl ions along the (001) direction in both PA solution and NaClPA solution were calculated, with the resulting profiles presented in Figure 7. Owing to the approximate thickness of 16 Å for the metal surface layer in the model, the relative concentration of all species within this region is zero. PA molecules are predominantly distributed in the vicinity of the metal surface, with no PA distribution observed beyond approximately 25 Å in the adsorption model, indicating that PA molecules primarily adsorb onto the metal surface to form a protective film. Water molecules, due to their interactions with PA, exhibit a peak following the first PA peak, after which they become uniformly distributed throughout the remaining solution. Cl ions begin to appear at around 20 Å. Specifically, on Cu and Al surfaces, the maximum peak of the Cl relative concentration profile occurs at approximately 22 Å, whereas on the Fe surface, this maximum appears at around 29 Å. In all cases, these Cl peaks are located after the first peaks of both PA and water molecules, demonstrating that the adsorption of PA effectively blocks Cl ions.

3.3. Compositional and Morphological Characterization of PA Conversion Films

The preceding quantum chemical calculations and molecular dynamics simulations have provided predictions at the atomic/molecular level regarding the adsorption behavior and inhibition mechanisms of PA molecules on Fe, Cu, and Al metal interfaces. The validity of these theoretical predictions, as well as the film-formation behavior under realistic conditions, requires macroscopic experimental validation.
To this end, PA conversion coatings were prepared on Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces via an immersion method. Their surface morphology and chemical composition were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
Figure 8 presents the morphological evolution and compositional changes of Fe, Cu, and Al surfaces before and after immersion in PA solution for 1 h, including corresponding SEM micrographs and EDS spectra of selected regions. Comparison of the SEM images before and after immersion reveals that a relatively uniform covering layer—identified as the PA conversion coating—is formed on all three metal surfaces following PA solution treatment. To ensure high-quality SEM observation and avoid sample charging effects, all specimens were sputtered with a thin gold (Au) layer prior to analysis.
The corresponding EDS compositional analysis reveals the presence of characteristic elements, including C, O, P, and Na, on all three metal surfaces after treatment. Notably, the prominent C, O, and P signal peaks directly correspond to the elemental constituents of PA molecules, confirming that the surface covering layer formed on the metals is indeed the intended PA conversion coating. Meanwhile, the detected Na signal originates from the NaOH reagent added during experimental preparation to adjust the pH of the PA solution, indicating residual Na+ ions present on the conversion coating surface or embedded within the film structure. These results, which encompass both microstructural morphology and chemical composition, provide preliminary confirmation that phytic acid effectively forms conversion coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al surfaces.
To confirm the successful formation of PA conversion coatings from the perspective of chemical bonding, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to analyze the surfaces of Fe, Cu, and Al substrates before and after treatment with the PA solution. As shown in Figure 9, comparison of the FTIR spectra of the three metals before and after immersion reveals that significant characteristic absorption peaks appear exclusively on the Fe, Cu, and Al surfaces after PA solution immersion, located at approximately 1135 cm−1, 1045 cm−1, 1140 cm−1, and 1650 cm−1. These peaks can be definitively assigned to the stretching vibration of P=O bonds and the bending vibration of P–OH groups within PA molecules, respectively [28], indicating that PA interacts with different metal surfaces through the same active functional groups. This finding is consistent with literature reports [29,30,32] documenting the chelation and coordination bonding between phosphate groups and metal ions. These results not only confirm the formation of conversion coatings from a chemical composition perspective but also preliminarily elucidate the universal film formation mechanism, namely that PA establishes a stable surface protective layer primarily through specific chemical adsorption via its phosphate groups with the metals. The concurrent appearance of these characteristic functional group signals provides direct evidence that PA molecules undergo stable chemical interactions with each metal surface through their phosphate groups, rather than merely physical adsorption.

3.4. Polarization Results

Figure 10 presents the polarization curves obtained for the three metals in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution before and after treatment with PA solution. Each polarization curve was analyzed using the Tafel extrapolation method to derive the corresponding corrosion current density ( I c o r r ) and corrosion potential ( E c o r r ). The inhibition efficiency ( η ) was calculated using the following formula [10,45]:
η = ( I c o r r 0 I c o r r I c o r r 0 ) × 100 %
where I c o r r 0 and I c o r r represent the corrosion current densities of the metal surface in the absence and presence of the PA conversion coating, respectively. The calculated results are summarized in Table 7.
The polarization test results indicate that after treatment with PA solution, the corrosion current densities of Fe, Cu, and Al all decrease, demonstrating that the PA conversion coating provides universal corrosion inhibition. However, significant differences in inhibition efficiency (calculated from corrosion current densities) were observed among the different metals: Fe and Al achieved excellent inhibition efficiencies of 92% and 86.5%, respectively, while Cu exhibited a relatively low inhibition efficiency of only 26%.
In-depth analysis suggests that the limited protective performance on Cu primarily arises from the combined effect of its unique electrochemical characteristics and the constrained treatment time. The standard reduction potential of Cu2+/Cu is +0.34 V vs. SHE, which is significantly higher than those of Fe2+/Fe (−0.44 V vs. SHE) and Al3+/Al (−1.66 V vs. SHE). This relatively high reduction potential makes direct oxidative dissolution of copper via hydrogen evolution difficult in H+-containing environments; its corrosion process predominantly relies on oxygen-reduction cathodic reactions involving dissolved oxygen, resulting in a relatively slow anodic dissolution rate [29]. This sluggish dissolution kinetics limits the effective accumulation of copper ions (Cu2+) at the metal/solution interface, thereby weakening the driving force for coordination deposition of PA molecules to form a conversion coating. Within the uniformly applied immersion time of 1 h in this experiment, compared to Fe and Al, which rapidly dissolve and provide high concentrations of Fe2+/Al3+ ions, the copper surface fails to develop a sufficiently thick, dense, and continuous PA conversion coating. This inadequacy compromises its barrier capability against corrosive species such as Cl and H2O, ultimately manifesting as the observed lower corrosion inhibition efficiency.

4. Conclusions

This study systematically investigated the mechanism of PA on Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces by integrating quantum chemical calculations, molecular dynamics simulations, and experimental methods. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
Quantum chemical calculations identified the active sites of PA molecules, which, in combination with MD simulation results, revealed two adsorption configurations of PA on metal surfaces: perpendicular adsorption and parallel adsorption.
(2)
The negative adsorption energies of PA on all three metal surfaces indicate spontaneous and stable adsorption. The adsorbed PA film effectively inhibits the interfacial diffusion of corrosive species (H2O and Cl) through steric hindrance, elucidating the physical barrier protection mechanism of the PA film at the atomic/molecular level.
(3)
PA conversion coatings were successfully fabricated on the three metal surfaces via a simple immersion method. Electrochemical tests confirmed that these coatings enhance the corrosion resistance of the metals. Under identical immersion conditions (1 h), the protection efficiency of the conversion coating on the Cu surface was relatively low, attributed to the slow oxidation process of Cu involving dissolved oxygen. Therefore, prolonged treatment time or the addition of oxidation promoters is recommended to facilitate PA conversion coating formation on Cu surfaces.
This work provides systematic theoretical and experimental support for the development of green and universally applicable surface treatment technologies based on natural products. It holds significant scientific importance and engineering application value for promoting environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional toxic passivation processes.
Based on the above findings, future work will focus on the following aspects:
(1)
Exploring process optimization strategies, such as extending the treatment time and introducing oxidation promoters for Cu-based materials, to improve the film quality and protection performance of PA conversion coatings.
(2)
Investigating the long-term protection performance of PA conversion coatings in other corrosive media (e.g., acidic and alkaline environments) and under complex service conditions to advance their engineering applications.

Author Contributions

M.G.: Writing–original draft, Simulation, Investigation. X.W.: Visualization, Formal analysis. F.J.: Resources, Data curation. D.X.: Conceptualization, Writing–review & editing, Supervision. F.W.: Software, Data curation. Y.L.: Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 52571273).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Analytical and Testing Center of Southwest Jiaotong University for the FTIR and SEM evaluations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Popoola, L.T. Organic green corrosion inhibitors (OGCIs): A critical review. Corros. Rev. 2019, 37, 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Obot, I.B.; Solomon, M.M.; Umoren, S.A.; Suleiman, R.; Elanany, M.; Alanazi, N.M.; Sorour, A.A. Progress in the development of sour corrosion inhibitors: Past, present, and future perspectives. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 79, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, Z.L. A review of corrosion inhibitors for rust preventative fluids. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019, 23, 100759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, Y.; Free, M.L.; Woollam, R.; Durnie, W. A review of surfactants as corrosion inhibitors and associated modeling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 159–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goulart, C.M.; Esteves-Souza, A.; Martinez-Huitle, C.A.; Ferreira Rodrigues, C.J.; Medeiros Maciel, M.A.; Echevarria, A. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of semicarbazones and thiosemicarbazones as organic corrosion inhibitors. Corros. Sci. 2013, 67, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Verma, C.; Ebenso, E.E.; Quraishi, M.A. Ionic liquids as green and sustainable corrosion inhibitors for metals and alloys: An overview. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 233, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kusmierek, E.; Chrzescijanska, E. Atmospheric corrosion of metals in industrial city environment. Data Brief 2015, 3, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wiener, M.S.; Salas, B.V. Corrosion of the marine infrastructure in polluted seaports. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Verma, C.; Ebenso, E.E.; Quraishi, M.A.; Hussain, C.M. Recent developments in sustainable corrosion inhibitors: Design, performance and industrial scale applications. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 3806–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boudellioua, H.; Hamlaoui, Y.; Tifouti, L.; Pedraza, F. Effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel by cerium nitrate in chloride solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, C.C.; Guo, X.Y.; Shen, S.; Song, P.; Xu, T.; Wen, Y.; Yang, H.F. Adsorption and corrosion inhibition of phytic acid calcium on the copper surface in 3 wt% NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 2014, 83, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, G.; Jiang, M.; Wang, S.; Fu, L.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, G.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, L. Enhancement of copper metal dissolution in sulfuric acid solution with oxygen and ultrasound. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 5016–5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, C. Facile fabrication of nickel–cobalt phosphate-based fluorine-free superhydrophobic film with anti-corrosion and self-cleaning properties on Al alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 60, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohammadi, I.; Shahrabi, T.; Mahdavian, M.; Izadi, M. Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate as a novel corrosion inhibitor to mitigate corrosion of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 307, 112965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahangar, M.; Izadi, M.; Shahrabi, T.; Mohammadi, I. The synergistic effect of zinc acetate on the protective behavior of sodium lignosulfonate for corrosion prevention of mild steel in 3.5 wt% NaCl electrolyte: Surface and electrochemical studies. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raja, P.B.; Ismail, M.; Ghoreishiamiri, S.; Mirza, J.; Ismail, M.C.; Kakooei, S.; Rahim, A.A. Reviews on Corrosion Inhibitors: A Short View. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2016, 203, 1145–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wazzan, N.A.; Obot, I.B.; Kaya, S. Theoretical modeling and molecular level insights into the corrosion inhibition activity of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole and its 5-alkyl derivatives. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 221, 579–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, C.; Liu, B.; Yu, B.; Lu, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, T.; Mol, J.M.C.; Wang, F. Influence of surface pretreatment on phosphate conversion coating on AZ91 Mg alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 359, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balgude, D.; Sabnis, A. Sol-gel derived hybrid coatings as an environment friendly surface treatment for corrosion protection of metals and their alloys. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2012, 64, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verma, C.; Hussain, C.M.; Quraishi, M.A.; Alfantazi, A. Green surfactants for corrosion control: Design, performance and applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 311, 102822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Quraishi, M.A.; Chauhan, D.S.; Saji, V.S. Heterocyclic biomolecules as green corrosion inhibitors. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 341, 117265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, F.; Wang, X.Y.; Xu, X.J.; Li, L.D. Phytic acid doped nanoparticles for green anticorrosion coatings. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 369, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaghazchi, L.; Naderi, R.; Ramezanzadeh, B. Improvement of the dual barrier/active corrosion inhibition function of the epoxy composite filled with zinc doped-phytic acid-modified graphene oxide nanosheets. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 168, 106884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, L.L.; Zhang, C.H.; Zhang, M.L.; Huang, X.M.; Jiang, X. Phytic acid conversion coating on Mg-Li alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 485, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Su, J.; Wu, X.L.; Yang, C.P.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.; Guo, Y.G. Self-Assembled LiFePO4/C Nano/Microspheres by Using Phytic Acid as Phosphorus Source. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 5019–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, J.; Song, Y.W.; Shan, D.Y.; Han, E.H. Modifications of the hydrotalcite film on AZ31 Mg alloy by phytic acid: The effects on morphology, composition and corrosion resistance. Corros. Sci. 2013, 74, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cui, X.F.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.F.; Jin, G.; Ding, M.H.; Wang, F.H. Influence of phytic acid concentration on performance of phytic acid conversion coatings on the AZ91D magnesium alloy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 111, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaghazchi, L.; Naderi, R.; Ramezanzadeh, B. Synergistic mild steel corrosion mitigation in sodium chloride-containing solution utilizing various mixtures of phytic acid molecules and Zn2+ ions. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 323, 114589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Q.-W.; Liu, X.-f.; Wang, W.-j. Corrosion resistance and forming mechanism of phytic acid conversion film on copper foil prepared by electrolysis. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 704, 135504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, H.; Han, E.-H.; Liu, F.; Kallip, S. Protection of 2024-T3 aluminium alloy by corrosion resistant phytic acid conversion coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 280, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, X.; Zhao, C.C.; Lu, H.F.; Gao, F.; Ma, H.Y. Influence of phytic acid on the corrosion behavior of iron under acidic and neutral conditions. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 150, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, L.; Zheng, H.P.; Shao, Y.W.; Wang, Y.Q.; Liu, B.; Meng, G.Z. Effect of phytic acid/rust conversion layer on corrosion protection of rusty mild steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 492, 131243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, X.H.; Du, K.Q.; Guo, Q.Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, F.H. Effect of phytic acid on the corrosion inhibition of composite film coated on Mg-Gd-Y alloy. Corros. Sci. 2013, 76, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Usman, B.J.; Curioni, M. Influence of temperature on the corrosion testing of anodized aerospace alloys. Corros. Sci. 2021, 192, 109772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yan, L.D.; Xiao, K.; Yi, P.; Dong, C.F.; Wu, J.S.; Bai, Z.H.; Mao, C.L.; Jiang, L.; Li, X.G. The corrosion behavior of PCB-ImAg in industry polluted marine atmosphere environment. Mater. Des. 2017, 115, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Natesan, M.; Selvaraj, S.; Manickam, T.; Venkatachari, G. Corrosion behavior of metals and alloys in marine-industrial environment. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 045002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Santa, A.C.; Tamayo, J.A.; Correa, C.D.; Gómez, M.A.; Castaño, J.G.; Baena, L.M. Atmospheric corrosion maps as a tool for designing and maintaining building materials: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu, T.; Chen, F.W. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lu, T.; Chen, F.W. Calculation of Molecular Orbital Composition. Acta Chim. Sin. 2011, 69, 2393–2406. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lu, T. A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists. Multiwfn. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161, 082503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, H. COMPASS: An ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications—Overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7338–7364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, W.; Fu, X.; Cao, L.; Gao, S.; Wan, Y. Ultralow friction of copper by a green water-based lubricant containing phytic acid. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 338, 116704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, S.; Du, J.; Guo, X.Y.; Wen, Y.; Yang, H.F. Adsorption behavior of pH-dependent phytic acid micelles at the copper surface observed by Raman and electrochemistry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 327, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Establishment of the adsorption model.
Figure 1. Establishment of the adsorption model.
Coatings 16 00819 g001
Figure 2. (a,c,e) Temperature and (b,d,f) energy evolution during MD simulations for Fe, Cu, and Al, respectively.
Figure 2. (a,c,e) Temperature and (b,d,f) energy evolution during MD simulations for Fe, Cu, and Al, respectively.
Coatings 16 00819 g002
Figure 3. (a) Optimized structure, (b) electrostatic potential map, (c) HOMO orbital diagram, and (d) LUMO orbital diagram of the PA molecule.
Figure 3. (a) Optimized structure, (b) electrostatic potential map, (c) HOMO orbital diagram, and (d) LUMO orbital diagram of the PA molecule.
Coatings 16 00819 g003
Figure 4. Fukui function for (a) electrophilic attack and (b) nucleophilic attack.
Figure 4. Fukui function for (a) electrophilic attack and (b) nucleophilic attack.
Coatings 16 00819 g004
Figure 5. Adsorption configurations of PA on Fe, Cu, and Al surfaces: (ac) in PA aqueous solution; (df) in 3.5 wt% NaCl/PA hybrid solution.
Figure 5. Adsorption configurations of PA on Fe, Cu, and Al surfaces: (ac) in PA aqueous solution; (df) in 3.5 wt% NaCl/PA hybrid solution.
Coatings 16 00819 g005
Figure 6. Radial distribution functions under different solution environments: (ac) OP (oxygen in PA) and OW (oxygen in water) in PA solution; (df) OP, OW, and Cl in NaClPA solution.
Figure 6. Radial distribution functions under different solution environments: (ac) OP (oxygen in PA) and OW (oxygen in water) in PA solution; (df) OP, OW, and Cl in NaClPA solution.
Coatings 16 00819 g006
Figure 7. Relative concentration distributions under different solution environments: (ac) OP and OW in PA solution; (df) OP, OW, and Cl ions in NaClPA mixed solution.
Figure 7. Relative concentration distributions under different solution environments: (ac) OP and OW in PA solution; (df) OP, OW, and Cl ions in NaClPA mixed solution.
Coatings 16 00819 g007
Figure 8. (a,d,g) SEM images of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces before PA solution treatment; (b,e,h), SEM images of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces after immersion in PA solution for 1 h; (c,f,i), corresponding EDS spectra.
Figure 8. (a,d,g) SEM images of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces before PA solution treatment; (b,e,h), SEM images of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces after immersion in PA solution for 1 h; (c,f,i), corresponding EDS spectra.
Coatings 16 00819 g008
Figure 9. FTIR spectra of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces before and after immersion in PA solution for 1 h.
Figure 9. FTIR spectra of Fe, Cu, and Al metal surfaces before and after immersion in PA solution for 1 h.
Coatings 16 00819 g009
Figure 10. Polarization curves of Fe, Cu, and Al metals in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution before and after treatment with PA solution: (a) Fe, (b) Cu, (c) Al.
Figure 10. Polarization curves of Fe, Cu, and Al metals in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution before and after treatment with PA solution: (a) Fe, (b) Cu, (c) Al.
Coatings 16 00819 g010
Table 1. Physical properties and components of the solution models.
Table 1. Physical properties and components of the solution models.
Solution
Type
Density
ρ (g/cm3)
Num. of Water Molecules (nw)Num. of PA Molecules (nPA)Num. of Cl Ions (nCl)Num. of Na+ Ions (nNa+)
Pure water1.0001000000
PA1.0211000300
NaCl1.025100001111
NaClPA1.030100031111
Table 2. Global reaction parameters of PA molecules.
Table 2. Global reaction parameters of PA molecules.
Molecule E H O M O (eV) E L U M O (eV) E (eV) μ (eV) χ (eV) η (eV) S (eV)
PA−7.567−0.7206.847−4.1434.1433.4230.292
Table 3. Fukui indices of selected atoms in the PA molecule.
Table 3. Fukui indices of selected atoms in the PA molecule.
MoleculePA
f ( r ) O11P17O22O31O34
0.06350.06190.07910.16330.0755
f + ( r ) P13P15O27H43H48
0.03870.04950.04350.05050.0795
Table 4. Adsorption energies of PA on metallic surfaces in PA solution and NaCl/PA hybrid solution.
Table 4. Adsorption energies of PA on metallic surfaces in PA solution and NaCl/PA hybrid solution.
Metal TypePA
E a d s (kcal/mol)
NaClPA
E a d s (kcal/mol)
Fe−514.317−504.516
Cu−268.598−232.502
Al−235.568−167.778
Table 5. Diffusion coefficients of water molecules in pure water solution and PA solution.
Table 5. Diffusion coefficients of water molecules in pure water solution and PA solution.
Substrate TypePure Water (H2O)
D (Å2/ps)
PA (H2O)
D (Å2/ps)
Fe0.2550.238
Cu0.2750.265
Al0.2850.254
Table 6. Diffusion coefficients of Cl in NaCl solution and NaClPA solution.
Table 6. Diffusion coefficients of Cl in NaCl solution and NaClPA solution.
Substrate TypeNaCl (Cl)
D (Å2/ps)
NaClPA (Cl)
D (Å2/ps)
Fe0.1040.069
Cu0.1510.112
Al0.1780.043
Table 7. Electrochemical fitting parameters derived from the polarization curves.
Table 7. Electrochemical fitting parameters derived from the polarization curves.
Samples I c o r r (A/cm2) E c o r r (V/SCE) η
Fe2.72 × 10−5−0.66---
Fe-PA2.12 × 10−6−0.6192
Cu1.54 × 10−5−0.24---
Cu-PA1.14 × 10−5−0.2226
Al8.05 × 10−6−0.71---
Al-PA1.09 × 10−6−0.7786.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guan, M.; Wang, X.; Xie, D.; Jing, F.; Wen, F.; Leng, Y. Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism and Corrosion Protection of Phytic Acid Conversion Coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al Surfaces: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Coatings 2026, 16, 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070819

AMA Style

Guan M, Wang X, Xie D, Jing F, Wen F, Leng Y. Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism and Corrosion Protection of Phytic Acid Conversion Coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al Surfaces: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Coatings. 2026; 16(7):819. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guan, Min, Xiaoting Wang, Dong Xie, Fengjuan Jing, Feng Wen, and Yongxiang Leng. 2026. "Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism and Corrosion Protection of Phytic Acid Conversion Coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al Surfaces: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study" Coatings 16, no. 7: 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070819

APA Style

Guan, M., Wang, X., Xie, D., Jing, F., Wen, F., & Leng, Y. (2026). Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism and Corrosion Protection of Phytic Acid Conversion Coatings on Fe, Cu, and Al Surfaces: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Coatings, 16(7), 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop