Next Article in Journal
Turning Waste into Value: An Eco-Friendly Coating Derived from Magnesium Slag for Oxidation Protection of Mechanical Components During Heat Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Electrodeposition of Ni–Fe Thin Films: Effect of Electrolyte Composition and Current Density on Structure, Morphology and Magnetic Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Wear Properties of Cold Sprayed and HVOF WC-10Co4Cr Coatings on 4340 Steel Substrates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating on H13 Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution

Center of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Electronic Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2026, 16(3), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16030367
Submission received: 29 January 2026 / Revised: 12 March 2026 / Accepted: 12 March 2026 / Published: 13 March 2026

Abstract

A cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating was deposited on an H13 tool steel substrate, and the electrochemical corrosion behavior in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution was experimentally investigated. Electrochemical tests, including open circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization measurements, revealed that the Cr2AlC coating significantly improved the corrosion resistance of H13 steel, exhibiting a more positive open circuit potential and a reduced corrosion current density compared with the bare H13 steel substrate. Post-corrosion surface morphology analysis by scanning electron microscopy showed extensive pitting corrosion on the substrate surface, while no obvious corrosion damage was observed on the coating surface. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis further confirmed the formation of a passive film composed of chromium and aluminum oxides on the coating surface, indicating a protective passivation mechanism. The enhanced corrosion performance is attributed to a synergistic mechanism involving both a physical barrier provided by the coating and surface passivation induced by the Cr/Al-based oxide layer. This work highlights the potential of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating as an effective corrosion protection solution for steel substrates in chloride-containing environments.

1. Introduction

H13 tool steel is widely used in the mold manufacturing industry due to its exceptional strength, toughness, and thermal fatigue resistance [1,2,3]. However, when exposed to humid or chloride-containing environments, such as marine atmospheres or saline cooling conditions, H13 steel is prone to electrochemical corrosion, which can lead to premature surface degradation and reduced service life [4,5]. In particular, chloride ions are known to accelerate localized corrosion by destabilizing passive films on iron-based alloys, resulting in the initiation and propagation of pitting corrosion [6,7].
Surface engineering techniques have been extensively investigated to enhance the corrosion resistance of tool steels [8,9]. Conventional coating technologies, including thermal spraying and laser cladding, etc., can provide protective layers. However, these processes often involve high temperatures that induce phase transformations and oxidation, thereby damaging the intrinsic properties of the coating materials [10,11]. In contrast, cold spraying is a solid-state deposition technique in which particles are accelerated to supersonic velocities and plastically deform upon impact with the substrate, enabling coating formation at relatively low temperatures. As a result, cold-sprayed coating typically exhibit low oxidation levels, dense microstructures, and strong adhesion to metallic substrates, making the technique particularly attractive for corrosion protection applications [12,13,14].
In recent years, MAX phase materials with a general formula of Mn+1AXn (where M is an early transition metal, A is an A-group element, and X is carbon or nitrogen) have gained increasing attention due to their unique combination of metallic and ceramic characteristics [15,16,17,18]. Among them, Cr2AlC is an attractive candidate for corrosion-resistant coating, as it contains chromium and aluminum elements capable of forming protective oxide layers, such as Cr2O3 and Al2O3, under corrosive environments. In addition, Cr2AlC has chemical stability and damage tolerance, which are beneficial for maintaining coating integrity during electrochemical exposure [19]. Compared with other Al-containing MAX phases such as Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2, Cr2AlC exhibits a higher initial oxidation temperature (~800 °C versus ~400 °C for Ti3AlC2), indicating superior high-temperature stability during the spraying process. Furthermore, Cr2AlC possesses a thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) of approximately 11–13.3 × 10−6/K, which closely matches that of steel substrates, thereby minimizing thermal stress and reducing the risk of coating delamination during spraying or subsequent service [19]. Although traditional Cr3C2-NiCr coatings have good wear and corrosion resistance, they do not match the CTE of steel substrates. While Al-based coatings can also form protective alumina scales, their lower mechanical strength and poorer high-temperature stability limit their applications in aggressive environments. Based on these considerations, Cr2AlC is selected in this study as a promising corrosion-resistant coating candidate for H13 steel.
At present, the electrochemical corrosion behavior of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coatings in chloride-containing environments has not been systematically clarified. In particular, the corrosion protection mechanism of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coatings on tool steels such as H13, as well as the relationship between cold-spray-induced microstructure and electrochemical performance, remains insufficiently understood.
Herein, the Cr2AlC coating was deposited on the H13 steel substrate using the cold spraying technique. The electrochemical corrosion behaviors of bare H13 steel and Cr2AlC-coated samples were comparatively investigated in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution by open circuit potential measurements, potentiodynamic polarization tests, and post-corrosion surface morphology analysis. The results provide insight into the role of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in modulating the electrochemical response of H13 steel and clarify the underlying corrosion protection mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Feedstock and Substrate

In the cold spraying process, spherical particles are commonly used to ensure efficient powder flow. The Cr2AlC spherical particles used as feedstock were prepared through spray-drying granulation [20]. Specifically, Cr2AlC powder with a D50 size of 5 μm (China Porcelain Fuchi (Suzhou) High Tech Nano Materials Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) served as the starting material. This powder was mixed with deionized water, dispersant, and binder in specific proportions, and then thoroughly stirred in a mechanical mixer to form a slurry. The slurry was then fed into a centrifugal spray granulation tower, where it was sprayed and dried to produce Cr2AlC spherical particles.
H13 steel plates, with dimensions of 35 mm × 35 mm × 5 mm, were used as the substrate. The chemical composition of the H13 steel was as follows (wt.%): C 0.39, Si 0.83, Mn 0.38, Cr 5.00, Mo 1.22, V 0.86, and Fe as the balance. Prior to deposition, the steel plates were mechanically polished to 1000 mesh and sandblasted under a pressure of 2.0 MPa.

2.2. Cold Spray Deposition of Cr2AlC Coating

The Cr2AlC coating was deposited using an intelligent cold spraying system (DSR3000, Wuxi Dongsheng High-Tech Materials Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China). The main spraying parameters were as follows: the process gas was N2, the gas pressure was 5 MPa, the gas temperature was 800 °C, the nozzle-to-substrate standoff distance maintained at 20 mm, the spray gun angle was 90°, the spray gun traverse speed was controlled at 30 mm/s. The particle velocity was not directly measured in this study. However, based on previous reports under comparable processing conditions, the velocity is expected to exceed the critical deposition velocity of Cr2AlC particles, enabling effective solid-state bonding [21].

2.3. Electrochemical Test

The corrosion resistance of the bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution was tested using a CHI660E electrochemical workstation. A conventional three-electrode system was used, with a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, a platinum plate as the counter electrode, and the sample as the working electrode. All potentials reported in this study are referenced to the SCE. The SCE was periodically calibrated against a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The back of the working electrode was connected to a copper wire and sealed in epoxy resin, leaving a 1 cm2 working area exposed to the NaCl solution.
The test was conducted under natural aeration conditions at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C). Prior to each measurement, samples were ultrasonically cleaned and then immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for 1 h to stabilize open circuit potential (OCP). Subsequently, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed under OCP conditions with a perturbation amplitude of 10 mV over a frequency range from 10−1 Hz to 105 Hz. All EIS data were fitted and analyzed using ZView2 software. Potentiodynamic polarization experiments were conducted at a scan rate of 10 mV/s within the potential range of −1.2 V vs. SCE to 0 V vs. SCE.

2.4. Characterizations

The phase composition of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, SmartLab, Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation. XRD measurements were carried out in the 2θ range of 10–80°. The surface morphology and elemental distribution of the coating and substrate, both before and after corrosion, were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7001F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Chemical analysis of the coating surfaces after corrosion was performed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). High-resolution spectra were recorded under conditions of a pass energy of 50 eV and a step size of 0.1 eV. The binding energy was calibrated by setting the C 1s peak to 284.8 eV, followed by peak fitting.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating

Figure 1a shows the optical photograph of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating deposited on the H13 steel substrate. The coating exhibits a uniform and continuous surface with well-defined edges, indicating effective coverage of the substrate after the cold spraying process. No macroscopic defects, such as peeling or delamination, are observed, suggesting good coating integrity at the macroscopic scale. Figure 1b presents the SEM image of the coated surface along with the corresponding EDS elemental maps. The coating surface displays a relatively homogeneous morphology, free from obvious cracks or large pores. The EDS mappings reveal a uniform distribution of Cr, Al, and C elements across the coating surface, indicating good compositional homogeneity of the deposited Cr2AlC coating.
The cross-sectional morphology of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating is shown in Figure 2a. A continuous coating with a thickness of approximately 5 μm is formed on the H13 steel substrate. The interface between the coating and substrate is dense and well bonded, with no apparent gaps or macro-cracks, demonstrating effective mechanical interlocking upon high-velocity particle impact, as illustrated in Figure 2b. The coating surface displays a slightly undulating morphology, which is consistent with the rough surface characteristics observed in the top-view SEM and profilometry results discussed earlier. Such a morphology is typical for thin cold-sprayed ceramic coatings formed by the accumulation and deformation of agglomerated particles. The phase composition of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating was analyzed by X-ray diffraction, as shown in Figure 2c. The diffraction patterns confirm that the characteristic diffraction peaks of the Cr2AlC MAX phase are retained after cold spraying. No additional peaks corresponding to oxidation or decomposition products were detected within the resolution of the XRD technique.
This result suggests that the solid-state nature of cold spraying effectively preserves the crystal structure of Cr2AlC during deposition, avoiding thermal decomposition that may occur in conventional high-temperature spraying processes. The retention of the Cr2AlC phase provides a reliable material basis for the corrosion behavior observed in the subsequent electrochemical test.

3.2. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution

The electrochemical corrosion behavior of the bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample was evaluated in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution through open circuit potential (OCP) and potentiodynamic polarization curves.
Figure 3a shows the OCP evolution of bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for 1 h. The substrate exhibits an initially negative potential, followed by gradual stabilization at approximately −0.65 V (vs. the reference electrode). This behavior suggests the rapid establishment of an active corrosion state, where iron dissolution dominates and a stable protective passive film is difficult to maintain in chloride-containing environment. In contrast, the Cr2AlC coating shows a significantly higher OCP throughout the entire immersion period, stabilizing at around −0.45 V. The positive shift in OCP indicates that the coating effectively suppresses the electrochemical activity of the underlying H13 steel by acting as a physical barrier and promoting surface passivation [22,23]. The significant difference in OCP behavior between the substrate and the coating indicates that the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating reduces the thermodynamic tendency of H13 steel to corrode in chloride environments.
The potentiodynamic polarization curves of bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution are shown in Figure 3b. The substrate exhibits a relatively negative corrosion potential (Ecorr) and high corrosion current density, indicating that the naturally formed iron oxide layer on H13 steel is unstable and readily disrupted by chloride ions, thereby accelerating corrosion processes. By comparison, the Cr2AlC coating displays a more positive corrosion potential (Ecorr) and a markedly reduced corrosion current density (Icorr). Both the anodic and cathodic branches of the polarization curve are shifted toward lower current densities, implying that the coating suppresses both anodic metal dissolution and cathodic reduction reactions. This behavior is characteristic of a barrier-type protective coating that limits electrolyte penetration, as observed in similar corrosion-resistant coating [22,24]. This behavior also can be attributed to the presence of chromium and aluminum in the Cr2AlC phase, which are known to promote the formation of protective oxide films under electrochemical exposure [25].
Figure 4 displays electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots of the bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Figure 4a shows the Nyquist plots, where the Cr2AlC-coated sample (blue) exhibits a significantly larger semicircle diameter than the bare substrate (black), indicating a higher charge transfer resistance and superior corrosion resistance. Figure 4b shows the corresponding Bode plots. The Cr2AlC coating displays a higher impedance moduli (|Z|) within the measured frequency range (especially in the low-frequency region) compared to the bare substrate, reflecting a significantly hindered penetration of corrosive media and transfer of charges, thereby enhancing the overall corrosion resistance. In addition, the maximum phase angle of the Cr2AlC coating is slightly lower than that of the bare substrate in Figure 4b. However, the phase angle plateau of the coating in the mid-frequency region is significantly wider, indicating that the capacitive response related to the passive oxide film formation on the coating is more stable. In contrast, the H13 steel substrate shows a relatively narrow peak in the phase angle, consistent with the occurrence of localized corrosion and active dissolution.
These EIS results are consistent with OCP and potentiodynamic polarization measurements, confirming that the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating significantly enhances the corrosion resistance of H13 steel substrate by providing a physical barrier and promoting surface passivation, thereby effectively mitigating localized corrosion in chloride-containing environments. To further clarify the origin of the improved electrochemical performance, post-corrosion surface morphologies were subsequently examined.

3.3. Post-Corrosion Surface Morphology

Figure 5 shows the surface morphologies of the bare H13 steel substrate and the Cr2AlC-coated sample after electrochemical corrosion testing in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Low and high magnification SEM images of the corroded H13 steel surface are presented in Figure 5a and Figure 5b, respectively. Numerous corrosion pits are clearly visible on the substrate surface, indicating severe localized corrosion. These pits exhibit irregular shapes and varying sizes, which are characteristic of chloride-induced pitting corrosion in tool steels. The formation of these pits suggests the breakdown of surface films and the preferential dissolution of the steel substrate in the aggressive chloride environment.
The interior of pits appears rough and layered, suggesting progressive dissolution of the matrix and repeated breakdown of corrosion products, as shown in Figure 6a. To further clarify the elemental distribution within the pit region, an EDS line scan was performed across the pit (0–120 μm), as shown in Figure 6b. The results reveal significant fluctuations in O and Fe signals within the pit area, while the Cr signal remains relatively low and stable throughout the scanned distance. Specifically, the oxygen (O) intensity in the uneven areas has significantly increased, indicating the accumulation of corrosion products (such as iron oxide or iron hydroxide). In addition, the iron (Fe) signal shows a drastic change, which may be caused by local matrix dissolution and the uneven deposition of corrosion products.
In contrast, the surface morphologies of the Cr2AlC coating after corrosion are shown in Figure 5c,d. It can be found that the coating surface remains morphologically stable, exhibiting no evident corrosion pits or localized attack features. The overall surface appearance reflects only the inherent surface roughness associated with the cold spraying process, with no significant degradation or surface damage detected after exposure to the NaCl solution.
The pronounced difference in post-corrosion surface morphologies between the bare substrate and the coated sample demonstrates that the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating effectively suppresses pitting corrosion of the H13 steel substrate. The absence of localized corrosion features on the coated surface indicates that the coating acts as an efficient protective layer, limiting direct contact between the corrosive electrolyte and the underlying steel.

3.4. Surface Chemical States of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating After Corrosion

To further clarify the chemical mechanism of the enhanced corrosion resistance of the Cr2AlC coating, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted on the coating surface after electrochemical testing in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. The high-resolution XPS spectra of Al 2p, O 1s, Cr 2p and C 1s are presented in Figure 7. The Al 2p and O 1s spectra both reveal a dominant peak corresponding to aluminum oxide, indicating the formation of Al2O3 on the coating surface after corrosion. Similarly, the Cr 2p spectrum displays characteristic features attributed to chromium oxide, confirming the presence of Cr2O3. Moreover, the C 1s spectrum reveals Cr-C bond at 282.8 eV and Al-C bond in Al 2p spectrum, consistent with the presence of Cr2AlC in the cold-sprayed coating [26,27].
The co-existence of aluminum oxide and chromium oxide on the coating surface suggests a mixed Cr/Al-based oxide layer formed during corrosion exposure. These oxides are known for their chemical stability and low solubility in chloride environments, and their formation is commonly associated with passive film development on corrosion-resistant materials. Thus, the presence of these oxides on the Cr2AlC coating indicates that surface passivation occurred during immersion in NaCl solution.
The resulting Cr/Al oxide film can effectively hinder charge transfer and limit the penetration of aggressive chloride ions, thereby suppressing localized corrosion processes. Therefore, the XPS results provide direct chemical evidence supporting the improved corrosion resistance and surface stability of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating.

3.5. Corrosion Protection Mechanism

The corrosion protection mechanism of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating on H13 steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution is illustrated schematically in Figure 8, which highlights the distinct corrosion behaviors of H13 steel with and without Cr2AlC coating. As shown in Figure 8a, the bare H13 steel substrate is directly exposed to the chloride-containing electrolyte. Chloride ions readily penetrate the naturally formed iron oxide film, which is thermodynamically unstable in chloride environments, causing its breakdown. This leads to localized anodic dissolution of iron (Fe → Fe2+ + 2e) and the initiation of pitting corrosion, consistent with the extensive corrosion pits observed on the substrate surface after immersion.
In Figure 8b, cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating acts as a dense physical barrier, significantly restricting the penetration of Cl ions toward the substrate. More importantly, XPS analysis confirms the formation of a Al2O3/Cr2O3 passive film on the coating surface after corrosion exposure. This chemically stable oxide layer further suppresses electrochemical reactions at the coating/electrolyte interface and limits localized corrosion processes.
Thus, the improved corrosion resistance stems from the synergistic effect of the physical barrier provided by the Cr2AlC coating and the surface passivation induced by the oxides of Cr and Al, effectively protecting the H13 steel substrate in chloride-rich environments.

4. Conclusions

Electrochemical corrosion behaviors of H13 steel with and without a cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in a 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution were investigated. The main conclusions are summarized as follows:
  • A Cr2AlC coating was successfully deposited on the H13 steel substrate via cold spraying, resulting in a uniform coating with effective surface coverage.
  • Electrochemical tests indicated that the Cr2AlC coating exhibited a more positive open circuit potential (OCP) and corrosion potential (Ecorr), as well as a lower corrosion current density (Icorr), compared with the bare H13 steel substrate.
  • Post-corrosion morphological analysis confirmed severe pitting corrosion on the surface of bare H13 steel, whereas no obvious pitting or localized attack was observed on the Cr2AlC-coated surface, demonstrating an effective suppression of localized corrosion by the coating.
  • XPS analysis revealed the formation of a Cr/Al-based oxide layer on the coating surface, further improving its corrosion resistance compared to the uncoated H13 steel substrate by reducing electrochemical activity.
  • The corrosion protection mechanism of the Cr2AlC coating is attributed to a synergistic combination of its role as a physical barrier and the formation of an oxide layer, ensuring effective suppression of localized corrosion in chloride-containing environments.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, X.Z. and W.Z.; investigation, X.Z., S.Z. and Y.Z.; data curation, X.Z. and Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; supervision, S.L.; funding acquisition, X.Z. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2025YJS189) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52275171).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fernandes, F.A.P.; Heck, S.C.; Picone, C.A.; Casteletti, L.C. On the Wear and Corrosion of Plasma Nitrided AISI H13. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 381, 125216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, X.; Wang, Y.; Lang, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Yang, J. Wettability and Lubricity of Borosilicate Glass to H13 Steel and TZM Alloy at 900 °C. Tribol. Int. 2025, 202, 110360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, J.; Wang, G.; Qi, H.; Ma, H.; Huang, Z. Excellent Isotropic Mechanical Properties of Electron Beam Melted H13 Tool Steel: Process Optimization and Microstructural Control. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2025, 343, 118980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wen, Z.; Dejun, K. Effect of Low Temperature Plasma Nitriding on Salt Spray Corrosion and Electrochemical Corrosion of H13 Hot Work Mould Steel. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 8376–8387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, R. Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviors of in Situ NbC-Reinforced AISI H13 Composites: Experimentation and First-Principles Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 684, 161858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, R.; Singh, A. Mechanisms of Corrosion and Effect of Spacing in Nano-Pearlitic Steel on Prolonged Immersion in an Aqueous Chloride Environment. Mater. Charact. 2025, 230, 115826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zekri, A.; Liu, Q.; Hassan, O.A.; Shetty, A.R.; Samara, A.; Aissa, B.; Mansour, S. Mechanisms and Evidence of Chloride-Accelerated Pitting in Gas Pipeline Steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2025, 181, 109944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Telasang, G.; Dutta Majumdar, J.; Padmanabham, G.; Manna, I. Wear and Corrosion Behavior of Laser Surface Engineered AISI H13 Hot Working Tool Steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 261, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, Q.; Ye, L.; Chen, M. Improvement of the Wear and Corrosion Resistance of Nitrocarburized H13 Steel Using Hydrothermal-Synthesized Zeolite Coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 447, 128866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Lim, S.H.; Chai, J.; Lai, D.M.Y.; Cheong, A.K.H.; Cheong, K.L.; Wang, S.J.; Jin, H.; Pan, J.S. Plasma Spray of Ti2AlC MAX Phase Powders: Effects of Process Parameters on Coatings’ Properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 325, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Richardson, P.; Cuskelly, D.; Brandt, M.; Kisi, E. Microstructural Analysis of In-Situ Reacted Ti2AlC MAX Phase Composite Coating by Laser Cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 385, 125360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gutzmann, H.; Gärtner, F.; Höche, D.; Blawert, C.; Klassen, T. Cold Spraying of Ti2AlC MAX-Phase Coatings. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2013, 22, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ion, A.; Sallot, P.; Badea, V.; Duport, P.; Popescu, C.; Denoirjean, A. The Dual Character of MAX Phase Nano-Layered Structure Highlighted by Supersonic Particles Deposition. Coatings 2021, 11, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rech, S.; Surpi, A.; Vezzù, S.; Patelli, A.; Trentin, A.; Glor, J.; Frodelius, J.; Hultman, L.; Eklund, P. Cold-Spray Deposition of Ti2AlC Coatings. Vacuum 2013, 94, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barsoum, M.W. The MN+1AXN Phases: A New Class of Solids; Thermodynamically Stable Nanolaminates. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2000, 28, 201–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Jia, R.; Tan, K.B.; Li, J.; Xu, S.; Ying, G.; Han, W.; Lu, M. A Review of MAX Series Materials: From Diversity, Synthesis, Prediction, Properties Oriented to Functions. Nano-Micro Lett. 2025, 17, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Ma, Y.; Yu, W.; Liu, J.; Du, B.; Ao, X. High Cavitation Resistance Performance of Al0.3CoCrFeNi Coating Reinforced by Ternary Cr2AlC Compound. Coatings 2025, 15, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shamsipoor, A.; Mousavi, B.; Razavi, M.; Bahamirian, M.; Farvizi, M. Cr2AlC MAX Phase: A Promising Bond Coat TBC Material with High Resistance to High Temperature Oxidation. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 6439–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Bei, G. Recent Progress in Preparation, Microstructure and Properties of Cr2AlC MAX Phase Coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 45, 117555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Fan, S.; Bei, G. Preparation and Characterization of Cr2AlC Microspheres Prepared by Spray-Drying Granulation. Powder Technol. 2024, 437, 119521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Go, T.; Sohn, Y.J.; Mauer, G.; Vaßen, R.; Gonzalez-Julian, J. Cold Spray Deposition of Cr2AlC MAX Phase for Coatings and Bond-Coat Layers. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rui, S.; Dejun, K. Laser Cladded Co08–xTi3AlC2 Coatings: Microstructure, Corrosive–Wear and Electrochemical Corrosion. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 39, 109354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Dai, R.; Shao, L.; Tu, Z.; Zhu, D.; Xu, Z.; Dai, S.; Zhu, L. Wear and Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviors of Cu Matrix WC-Co Reinforced Composite Coating Prepared by Cold Spray. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 488, 131001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, L.; Ji, L.; Jiang, A.; Han, Y.; Wu, Q. Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Cast Iron Surfaces by Cold Spraying Al and Al/Ni Coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2025, 512, 132327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ke, P.; Wang, A. Electrochemical Corrosion Inhibition of Cr2AlC MAX Phase Coatings via Mo Solid Solution: Comprehensive Experimental and Simulation Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 3916–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gan, L.; Jiang, C.; Peng, Y.; Han, L.; Qiu, W.; Ren, Y.; Zhao, Y. Highly Anticorrosive Cr2AlC Coatings on 304 Stainless Steels as Bipolar Plates for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 685, 162018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, S.; Liu, T.; Fan, J. Effect of Suspension Plasma Spraying Power on the Microstructure and Properties of Cr2AlC Coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 648, 159034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Optical photograph of a Cr2AlC coating deposited on the H13 steel substrate, and (b) SEM image of the coating surface and the corresponding EDS elemental maps of Cr, Al, and C, showing the surface morphology and elemental distribution of the cold-sprayed coating.
Figure 1. (a) Optical photograph of a Cr2AlC coating deposited on the H13 steel substrate, and (b) SEM image of the coating surface and the corresponding EDS elemental maps of Cr, Al, and C, showing the surface morphology and elemental distribution of the cold-sprayed coating.
Coatings 16 00367 g001
Figure 2. (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of Cr2AlC coating, and (b) Interface between the coating and the substrate, and (c) XRD patterns of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating and H13 steel substrate.
Figure 2. (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of Cr2AlC coating, and (b) Interface between the coating and the substrate, and (c) XRD patterns of the cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating and H13 steel substrate.
Coatings 16 00367 g002
Figure 3. (a) Open circuit potential curves, and (b) potentiodynamic polarization curves of the H13 steel substrate and cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Figure 3. (a) Open circuit potential curves, and (b) potentiodynamic polarization curves of the H13 steel substrate and cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Coatings 16 00367 g003
Figure 4. EIS plots of the H13 steel substrate and cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution: (a) Nyquist plots, and (b) Bode plots.
Figure 4. EIS plots of the H13 steel substrate and cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution: (a) Nyquist plots, and (b) Bode plots.
Coatings 16 00367 g004
Figure 5. Surface morphologies of (a) substrate, and (c) cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating after corrosion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. (b) and (d) are magnified images taken from (a) and (c), respectively.
Figure 5. Surface morphologies of (a) substrate, and (c) cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating after corrosion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. (b) and (d) are magnified images taken from (a) and (c), respectively.
Coatings 16 00367 g005
Figure 6. (a) Typical corrosion pit morphology of uncoated H13 steel observed by SEM, and (b) EDS line-scan elemental distribution across the corrosion pit region.
Figure 6. (a) Typical corrosion pit morphology of uncoated H13 steel observed by SEM, and (b) EDS line-scan elemental distribution across the corrosion pit region.
Coatings 16 00367 g006
Figure 7. High-resolution XPS spectra of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating after corrosion: (a) Al 2p, (b) O 1s, (c) Cr 2p, and (d) C 1s.
Figure 7. High-resolution XPS spectra of cold-sprayed Cr2AlC coating after corrosion: (a) Al 2p, (b) O 1s, (c) Cr 2p, and (d) C 1s.
Coatings 16 00367 g007
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the corrosion mechanisms of (a) bare H13 steel, and (b) cold-sprayed Cr2AlC-coated H13 steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the corrosion mechanisms of (a) bare H13 steel, and (b) cold-sprayed Cr2AlC-coated H13 steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Coatings 16 00367 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Zuo, S.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, Y. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating on H13 Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution. Coatings 2026, 16, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16030367

AMA Style

Zhang X, Li S, Zhang W, Zuo S, Zhang Y, Meng Y. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating on H13 Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution. Coatings. 2026; 16(3):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16030367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuejin, Shibo Li, Weiwei Zhang, Shengshu Zuo, Yixiong Zhang, and Yage Meng. 2026. "Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating on H13 Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution" Coatings 16, no. 3: 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16030367

APA Style

Zhang, X., Li, S., Zhang, W., Zuo, S., Zhang, Y., & Meng, Y. (2026). Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cold-Sprayed Cr2AlC Coating on H13 Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl Solution. Coatings, 16(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16030367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop