3.1. Surface Morphology
As shown in
Figure 3a, the surface morphology of 316 stainless steel pipes is chaotic, with crisscrossing grooves and numerous defects. As shown in
Figure 3b–d, the flatness is improved after rough turning and finish turning, but micro-protrusions and micro-burrs still exist. These micro-defects can be contributed due to severe plastic deformation between the tool flank face and the machined surface.
Figure 4 shows the surface morphology and contour curves of the URSP, TUBP-RF, and TUBP-FF at a feed rate of 0.1 mm/r. As shown in
Figure 4a, the surface URSP is relatively regular, and the micro-textures of the machined surface form an array of grooves. The defects on the finished surface are compacted by the burnishing ball along the burnishing speed direction. With the continuous contact and separation between the burnishing head and the workpiece surface, a regular texture is formed on the surface. As shown in
Figure 4b, the micro-textures on the surface produced by TUBP-RF transformed into two dimensions. The processing in two different feed directions makes the protrusions on the machined surfaces more obvious. The excessively dense impacts damage the surface, and the resulting surface protrusions are too messy. This is because the regular grooves and hardened layer formed during the first burnishing process are subjected to plastic stress in different directions during the second reverse burnishing. When the stress paths of the two deformations are misaligned, stress concentration and material pile-up are prone to occur on the surface, leading to the formation of disordered two-dimensional protrusions. As shown in
Figure 4c, the surface produced by TUBP-FF appears smoother and processes the micro-protrusions in the reverse direction. The second pass of burnishing further eliminates the micro-protrusions generated by finish turning and the first pass of ultrasonic burnishing, which can better ensure the integrity of the machined surface.
As shown in
Figure 5a, the groove spacing generated by the burnishing balls is larger when the feed rate is increased to 0.7 mm/r. It is noteworthy that under these processing parameters, the machined surface begins to show unfinished surfaces, i.e., gaps, thus affecting the uniformity of the surface morphology. This is because in SUBP, surface integrity depends on the relationship between the effective indentation width of the burnishing tool and the feed rate. When the feed rate exceeds the effective plastic deformation width of the burnishing ball on the material, regions of material not subjected to plastic deformation, i.e., gaps, will appear between adjacent burnishing trajectories. In undeformed areas, the original state or the post-finish turning morphology is retained, leading to a decrease in surface uniformity. As shown in
Figure 5b, the over-processing observed in TUBP-RF is significantly improved under these feed parameters, and the interlacing phenomenon of the burnishing texture can be clearly observed on the machined surface. The reverse feed in the second pass reverses the peaks from the first pass as the feed increases, further increasing the peak height Rp of the surface micro-textures and resulting in sharper protrusions. As shown in
Figure 5c, in the TUBP-FF group, the surface contour is smoother, the transition between surface peaks and valleys is smooth, and the overall morphology is highly uniform. Despite the increase in feed rate, the optimization effect of same direction feed still prevails in the surface formation process, thereby resulting in a high-quality surface characterized by smooth transitions and overall uniformity.
As shown in
Figure 6a, the groove spacing on the surface of the SUBP group becomes wider when the feed rate increases to 1.5 mm/r. This occurs because an excessively high feed prevents a single burnishing pass fully covering the machining surface. Consequently, the proportion of un-machined area increases, which hinders the formation of continuous micro-textures. This indicates that excessively high feed rates can introduce macroscopic surface inhomogeneities due to insufficient machining coverage in the SUBP, which is detrimental to obtaining a stable surface. As shown in
Figure 6b, the superposition of two intense plastic deformations in different directions causes significant damage to the material surface in the TUBP-RF, resulting in obvious defects such as excessive protrusion and localized surface peeling. These highly irregular and sharp defect features objectively increase the complexity of the surface but also introduce instability. The profile curve also shows violent and chaotic fluctuations, confirming the severe surface irregularity. As shown in
Figure 6c, due to the high overlap between the two passes, the surface is macroscopically the smoothest and most uniform, with a relatively low overall height and gentle fluctuations in the profile curve. However, a significant gap area still exists after two passes at a high feed. As a result, the TUBP-FF surface forms a composite morphology of alternating burnished and un-machined zones. Although this morphology has small fluctuations, the presence of a large hydrophilic gap and the low average curvature of the peak are actually detrimental to improving hydrophobic properties.
3.2. RSm, Rp, Sdr and Ra
Figure 7a shows the trend of peak spacing RSm with feed rate under three different processing methods. The SUBP group curves show an overall trend of first increasing and then decreasing. This is because the ultrasonic burnishing process has a longer interaction time with the surface at low feed rates, resulting in more sufficient plastic flow of the material and leading to smaller and more compact peak spacing RSm. As the feed rate increases, the formation of gaps affects peak formation, making the surface structure unstable. The peak spacing RSm of the surface in the TUBP-RF shows a similar trend to that of the SUBP group, but the peak spacing RSm decreases significantly at high feed rates. This is because the second pass further compacts and refines the structure, which may help form finer and more regular micro-textures, thereby reducing the peak spacing RSm and making the micro-textures denser. The TUBP-FF also shows smaller peak spacing RSm, and the peak spacing RSm tends to stabilize overall with the feed rate. This indicates that the two-pass burnishing with forward feed direction has a strong smoothing effect, forming uniform and smooth micro-textures.
As shown in
Figure 7b, all three sets of curves generally show an upward trend with increasing feed rate. In the SUBP at low feed rates, the burnishing trajectory overlap is high, resulting in a significant material accumulation effect, forming deep grooves and high protrusions, thus leading to a large average peak–valley height difference. After the gap appears, the peak–valley height difference gradually reaches a high level and tends to flatten out. Furthermore, the increasing feed rate leads to a gradual increase in tangential force, resulting in a slow increase in peak height Rp. In the TUBP-RF process, the second pass has little impact on the peak–valley height difference at low feed rates. However, with increasing feed rate, the second-pass burnishing process further compresses the protrusions formed in the first pass, producing a sharper array of protrusions and exhibiting a larger peak–valley height difference. At high feed rates, although microscopic defects may appear on the surface, this interlaced sharp texture remains relatively compact in the height direction; thus, the peak–valley height change is gradual. The TUBP-FF process, due to its smoothing effect, consistently produces the lowest and most stable peak and valley heights, with minimal surface undulations. Together with its extremely small average peak spacing RSm, it constitutes a highly homogenized three-dimensional morphological feature.
As shown in
Figure 7c, the Sdr values of all three groups show a trend of first decreasing and then increasing with increasing feed rate. In the SUBP group at lower feed rates, the overlap rate of the burnishing tracks is high, and the repeated burnishing effect of the burnishing ball on the edge of the previous indentation is obvious, increasing the surface irregularity and actual area, thus resulting in a higher Sdr value of 3.089 μm. As the feed rate increases, the burnishing gap increases, and the shape of each groove formed by each burnishing is more independent, improving the regularity of the overall surface morphology and thus reducing the Sdr value to 1.639 μm. As the feed rate further increases, the gap width continuously increases, resulting in an even higher Sdr value. TUBP-RF introduces higher surface complexity through two-pass staggered burnishing. At low feed rates, the strong superposition effect of the two burnishing passes causes excessive material accumulation and surface disorder, with an Sdr value of 2.337 μm. As the feed rate increases, the two-pass processing forms a regular, sharp, staggered peak texture. Although this structure is sharp, the actual increase in surface area is relatively low, with an Sdr value of 1.534 μm. At high feed rates, although the gap is compensated for by the second pass, the intense plastic deformation leads to surface defects. These defects increase surface irregularities and the actual area, causing the Sdr value to rise again. At low feed rates, TUBP-FF has a smoothing effect, smoothing out the marks from the first pass of ultrasonic burnishing and finishing, resulting in a low Sdr value. At medium feed rates, it produces very uniform and smooth micro-textures, with a low Sdr value. At high feed rates, it also faces the problem of insufficient coverage leading to gaps, and the Sdr value slightly increases. As shown in
Figure 7d, SUBP has the highest Ra value among the three processes. At low feed rates, Ra is approximately 4.5 μm, then increases to around 5.5 μm with increasing feed rate, before gradually decreasing and leveling off at around 4.7 μm at high feed rates. This is because at low feed rates, the burnishing trajectory overlap is high, resulting in large longitudinal undulations in the profile. As the feed rate increased, the burnishing gap increases, the shape of individual grooves became more independent, and the groove height reaches its maximum; thus, Ra gradually increases to its maximum value. With further increases in feed rate, smoother gaps appear, and the Ra value gradually decreases. In the Ra curves of TUBP-RF and TUBP-FF, the superposition of the two processing trajectories results in a lower overall Ra value. In the TUBP-RF group, the Ra curve shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, eventually leveling off. The two reverse processing steps create sharp, interlaced micro-textures. Compared to SUBP, TUBP-RF forms sharper protrusions, resulting in a relatively lower Ra value. At high feed rates, the surface integrity is compromised due to severe deformation, but Ra does not significantly recover, indicating that the texture formed has a certain degree of stability in the height direction. The Ra value of TUBP-FF is consistently the lowest among the three, and its curve is the flattest. This directly reflects the peak-shaving, valley-filling, and surface-smoothing effects of this process. The second pass’s co-directional flattening of the first pass’s marks greatly suppresses longitudinal undulations, thus maintaining a low and stable Ra value regardless of changes in feed rate.
3.3. Contact Angle
Figure 8 shows the contact angle under three methods at different feed rates. The average contact angle of the original surface was 52°, indicating obvious hydrophilicity. The average contact angle of the finished surface was 65°, showing a slight improvement but still not reaching hydrophobic levels. After ultrasonic burnishing treatment, all three processing techniques improved the surface hydrophobicity to varying degrees, indicating that the micro-textures prepared by ultrasonic burnishing can effectively control surface hydrophobicity. Under the three different processing methods, with the increase in feed rate, the contact angle showed a typical nonlinear trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The result show a strong correlation with surface texture and surface roughness, especially a positively correlation with RSM and a negative correlation with Sdr. It can be seen that the feed rate can be used to control texture parameters, thereby controlling surface hydrophobicity.
In the SUBP group, the contact angle value increased to over 90° at a feed rate of 0.7 mm/r, indicating that the surface achieved a transition from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. In the TUBP-RF group, the contact angle measurements were greater than 90° at feed rates of 0.5–0.9 mm/r, showing a wider hydrophobic range. Furthermore, the average contact angle reached a maximum of 108° at a feed rate of 0.7 mm/r. Under the TUBP-FF process, the contact angle values were also greater than 90° at feed rates of 0.5 mm/r and 0.7 mm/r, achieving a similar hydrophobic level. The comparison of average contact angle results shows that the TUBP-RF process exhibited the highest average contact angle, followed by TUBP-FF, while SUBP has the lowest overall. This indicates that multi-pass processing, especially the TUBP-RF process involving feeds in different directions, produces sharp, high-curvature, and staggered peak-shaped micro-textures, thereby improving hydrophobicity. The TUBP-RF process, due to its smoothing effect, forms a low-undulation surface. The hydrophobicity level is close to that of SUBP, indicating that although two ultrasonic burnishing in the same direction can improve morphological uniformity, the changes in micro-texture depth and periodicity are not as significant as in TUBP-RF. Therefore, the reduction in solids fraction is limited, and the hydrophobic enhancement effect is relatively mild.
From the error analysis, different processing paths have a significant impact on the consistency and stability of the surface micro-textures. In the SUBP, when the feed rate is low, the standard deviation of the contact angle measurement is small, and the surface micro-textures formation is relatively stable. However, at high feed rates, the appearance of gaps disrupts surface integrity, leading to a significant increase in the standard deviation. This indicates that excessively high feed rates in the SUBP introduce instability into the surface micro-textures. In the TUBP-RF process, due to the reverse feed in the machining trajectory, the two feeds in different directions during micro-textures formation change the direction of surface force, resulting in poor surface morphology uniformity. Consequently, the overall error bars are generally larger than those of SUBP and TUBP-FF. In contrast, the error bars of TUBP-FF are the most convergent, indicating that the two feeds in the same direction largely offset irregular protrusions on the surface, resulting in a more uniform workpiece surface.
In all experiments, the average contact angle measured for TUBP-RF was higher than that of SUBP and TUBP-FF. All three ultrasonic burnishing processes can control surface wettability by changing the micro-texture arrangement period, but the machining trajectory and feed method have fundamental differences in controlling the stability, repeatability, and hydrophobic properties of the micro-textures. Among them, the TUBP-RF process has the most significant advantages in shaping high contact angles and constructing effective air gaps, while TUBP-FF performs better in ensuring texture consistency and repeatability.
To confirm the regulatory effect of two-pass ultrasonic burnishing with reverse feed direction on contact angle, the Spearman correlation coefficient between surface roughness and contact angle was obtained, where a coefficient greater than 0.8 indicates a strong correlation and 0.5–0.8 indicates a moderate correlation. As shown in
Table 2, it can be seen that RSm exhibits a strong positive correlation, while Sdr shows a strong negative correlation. There is more space under the droplet occupied by air when RSm is large (sparse structure). According to the Cassie model, the contact angle increases as the contact ratio between the droplet and air increases. However, a higher Sdr means that the surface is too complex, with “pits” or sharp edges, which actually destroy the stability of the air cushion and reduces the contact angle.
The correlation coefficient was used as an index to establish the relationship between contact angle and various surface roughness. As shown in
Figure 9, it can be seen that there is a linear correlation between the contact angle and the evaluation value of surface roughness, which indicates that the two-pass ultrasonic burnishing with reverse feed direction method proposed in this study can effectively control surface texture and surface hydrophobicity.
3.4. Water Droplet Sliding
Figure 10 shows water droplet sliding on the original surface of the steel pipe and on the surface after TUBP-RF at a feed rate of 0.7 mm/r. As shown in
Figure 10a,d, the water droplets on the original surface spread out when the water droplets just contact the workpiece surface, i.e., at t = 0 s, while the droplets on the surface after TUBP-RF processing are significantly fuller than those on the original surface. After TUBP-RF, the surface forms an array of high-curvature, interlaced sharp micro-protrusions, which increases the apparent contact angle and cause droplets to remain in the Cassie–Baxter hydrophobic state under static conditions. A substantial amount of air is trapped beneath the droplets, reducing the actual solid–liquid contact area. The liquid–gas interfacial tension dominates the droplet morphology, resulting in a fuller, more spherical appearance.
Figure 10b,e show that when the droplets slide off the original surface, a distinct liquid film remains on the workpiece surface, while the droplets on the surface after TUBP-RF treatment maintain a full droplet shape during the sliding process, and the residual droplet size is significantly lower. As shown in
Figure 10c,f, when the droplets on the original surface slide to the bottom, the remaining droplets are ellipsoidal, while the droplets remaining at the bottom of the surface after TUBP-RF treatment are hemispherical. This shape of residual droplet is more likely to detach from the steel pipe surface due to gravity, which is more conducive to direct contact between gas and solid in the thermal energy system, thereby improving heat transfer efficiency. The time taken for the water droplets to slide from top to bottom on the two surfaces is 0.94 s and 0.36 s, respectively. Under the optimal TUBP-RF parameters, the water droplet sliding time is reduced by 61.7% compared with the original surface, further demonstrating that the ultrasonic burnishing process under medium parameters can improve the hydrophobic properties of the material surface.