Next Article in Journal
Facile Fabrication of Moderate Sensitivity SERS Substrate Using Cu-Plasma Polymer Fluorocarbon Nanocomposite Thin Film
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Thermal Oxidation Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Magnetron-Sputtered NbN Coating Produced on AISI 316L Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Direct Regeneration of Spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes by Utilizing Eutectic Lithium Salts for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

1
Fujian Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Engineering for High Performance Materials, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2
XMU-JA United R & D Lab, Jingao (WUXI) Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd., Wuxi 214000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2026, 16(1), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010107
Submission received: 17 December 2025 / Revised: 8 January 2026 / Accepted: 10 January 2026 / Published: 13 January 2026

Abstract

With the wide application of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), many spent LIBs will face the problem of recycling and treatment in the future. The recycling of valuable substances from battery materials is particularly important. In this paper, the spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (S-NCM523) cathode material from used LIBs was regenerated by using the eutectic lithium salt of Li2CO3/LiOH. The lithium element lost by S-NCM523 was supplemented through solid–liquid contact with the molten lithium salt, restoring the layered structure at high temperatures. The successful repair of the regenerated material was verified by various characterization methods, including the elimination of the rock salt phase and the lower Li+/Ni2+ disorder. This research shows that the regenerated cathode material still has a high specific discharge capacity of 146.8 mAh/g after 100 cycles, with a capacity retention rate of 96.0%. The excellent electrochemical performance of the regenerated material demonstrates the feasibility of directly regenerating spent NCM using the molten salt method.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the rapid expansion of the market has led the global LIB recycling market to reach over 18 billion dollars by 2030, demonstrating the considerable scale of industrial development [1]. While stringent global regulations (e.g., EU Battery Regulation, China’s power battery recycling policies) mandating high material recovery rates and low-carbon processes further amplify the urgency of advancing efficient recycling technologies. Considering the reduction in the hazards of harmful substances in used batteries and the economic benefits of recycling valuable metals from them, the recycling and treatment of used batteries are extremely urgent [2,3]. Currently, commercial pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recycling mainly extract valuable metals and lithium salts. However, these two traditional recycling methods either consume high energy or involve complex processes and generate large amounts of acidic and alkaline waste liquids, all of which limit recycling efficiency [4,5]. In contrast, the direct regeneration method for repairing the cathode materials of used batteries does not require the extraction of metal elements but instead restores their performance. Due to its low energy consumption, high efficiency, and environmental friendliness, direct recycling is considered an important development direction for LIB recycling [6]. Generally, lithium loss from the cathode materials of ternary lithium-ion batteries during cycling is the primary cause of their failure [7]. The loss of lithium leads to lithium-ion vacancies in the cathode materials, and Ni2+ fills these vacancies, making the deintercalation and intercalation of lithium ions difficult and further exacerbating the loss of lithium ions [8]. At the same time, the loss of lithium generates stress, causing microcracks on the surface of the particles, and simultaneously produces by-products such as spinel and rock salt phases, which continuously reduce the capacity of the cathode materials. Furthermore, under high voltage, the release of oxygen also causes the migration of transition metals, leading to structural degradation, as well as fast charging, causing the electrolyte to accelerate side reactions, resulting in an increase in impedance [5]. Therefore, the direct regeneration strategy focusing on lithium replenishment and structural restoration provides a key approach for effective positive electrode recovery.
Regarding the performance degradation issue of spent ternary lithium-ion batteries, researchers have conducted various explorations. Fan et al. repaired the spent NCM materials through solid-phase sintering. They mixed an excess amount of Li2CO3 with the spent NCM and heated it at 850 °C for 12 h. The results showed that the direct solid-phase sintering method was effective [9]. Shi et al. used a hydrothermal lithiumization method to repair degraded NCM materials, thereby obtaining positive electrode materials with excellent electrochemical performance [10]. Chen et al. compared the solid–liquid regeneration environment after molten salt melting with the traditional solid–solid repair method and achieved good performance [11]. Based on this, two or more lithium salts were combined to form a eutectic system, reducing the melting point to enable the molten salt to encapsulate the cathode materials and promote the diffusion of lithium ions, thereby better compensating for lithium loss and structural deterioration. This molten salt method is not only efficient for repairing the structure of the spent cathode but also has lower costs and energy consumption.
Based on the above research, this paper directly recycles spent ternary lithium-ion battery cathode materials using a two-stage sintering method with a eutectic lithium salt of Li2CO3 and LiOH (molar ratio LiOH:Li2CO3 = 7:3). Both LiOH and Li2CO3 prevent the generation of toxic halogenated or sulfurous gases that are commonly produced by other lithium sources. The composition of the molten salt can balance cost and regeneration performance. Once a specific temperature is reached, the lithium salt melts, forming a liquid that encapsulates the spent NCM and replenishes the lithium ions lost. Subsequently, it is annealed at a higher temperature to restore its layered structure, reducing defects such as spinel, rock salt phase, and lithium-nickel mixed arrangement, and yielding a regenerated cathode material with better performance. In summary, this paper provides reference values for revealing the degradation mechanism of spent NCM cathode materials and improving the direct regeneration method using molten salt.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Method

Processing of cathode materials in spent batteries: After cleaning the surface of the retired pouch battery (NCM523), it was placed in a 5% concentration saltwater solution for discharge for 24 h. Then, the battery was manually disassembled in a fume hood, and the cathode sheet, anode sheet, and separator were extracted separately. The cathode sheet was immersed in DMC organic solvent to remove residual electrolyte. The cathode sheet was dried and cut into small pieces of approximately 3 × 3 cm. These small pieces were sintered in a muffle furnace at 400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C, with sintering times of 1, 2, and 3 h. In this thermal treatment process, the cathode powder was peeled from the aluminum foil (Al foil) and recorded as S-NCM523.
Direct regeneration of cathode materials: The S-NCM523 powder was mixed with the molten salt (LiOH and Li2CO3 in a molar ratio of 7:3) at molar ratios of 1:0.2, 1:0.3, and 1:0.4, and ground evenly. The mixed sample was pre-sintered at 500 °C in an oxygen atmosphere for 5 h, cooled to room temperature, and then fully ground. Then, it was subjected to a second sintering in an oxygen atmosphere at 800 °C for 6 h (heating rate of 5 °C/min). The regenerated samples were recorded as R-20, R-30, and R-40.

2.2. Materials Characterization

The elemental composition of the samples was determined by ICP-OES (iCAP7400, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The thermogravimetric analysis was conducted in air at a heating rate of 5 °C/min within the temperature range of 25 °C to 800 °C (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) to assess the optimum sintering temperature. The crystal structure of the samples was characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8-A25, Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany), with the test range set at 10–80 ° (2θ angle), and a continuous scanning mode was performed at a step speed of 1°/min. The original XRD data were refined using Rietveld refinement. The chemical state of the material’s surface was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For microscopic morphology characterization, observations were performed using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (HITACHI S-4800, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Mix the cathode powder, polyvinylidene fluoride (binding agent) and acetylene black (conductive agent) in a mass ratio of 8:1:1 in the NMP solvent and stir thoroughly. Apply the prepared slurry evenly onto the aluminum foil, then dry it in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 12 h. Use a cutting machine to shape the cathode sheet into a 12 mm diameter circle, with an active material loading of approximately 3–4 mg. Assemble a 2025-type button cell (H2O ≤ 0.1 ppm, O2 ≤ 0.1 ppm) in a glove box filled with argon gas. The materials used include a 2025-type cathode shell, a cathode sheet, a Celgard 2325 separator, 502A electrolyte, a lithium metal sheet (16 mm × 1.5 mm), a 0.8 mm spacer, and a 2025-type anode shell. Then conduct charge–discharge, rate and cycle performance tests on the NEWARE battery testing system. The working voltage of the button cell is set at 2.8–4.3 V (relative to Li+/Li), for long-term cycle testing (current density of 0.5 C) and rate testing (current densities of 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, 2 C, 3 C, 5 C, 10 C, 0.2 C), where 1 C = 160 mAh/g. Test its cyclic voltammetry (CV) performance and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on the electrochemical workstation (CHI660E). Perform CV tests at a scan rate of 1 mV/S, with a voltage range of 2.5–4.6 V (relative to Li+/Li). The EIS test frequency is within the range of 100 kHz–0.01 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

To explore the optimal extraction efficiency of the cathode powder, the cathode sheets were cut into small pieces for subsequent sintering research. Figure S1 shows the comparison of electrode sheets and Al foil after sintering at different temperatures and times. The left side of each group of pictures is the unsintered electrode sheet, and the right side is the Al foil after sintering and the separation of the cathode powder. The experimental results indicate that when the sintering temperature reaches 500 °C or the sintering time exceeds 2 h, the separation effect of the cathode powder from the Al foil is better. Figure 1a presents the thermogravimetric analysis results of the electrode sheet. The reduction in electrode sheet mass is mainly due to the thermal decomposition of organic components (residual electrolyte, binder, and conductive agent). The results show that when the temperature reaches 450 °C, the electrode sheet mass slightly decreases. As the temperature rises to 574 °C, the electrode sheet mass decreases significantly, indicating that the organic components (binder and conductive agent) undergo extensive decomposition, which is conducive to the separation of the cathode sheet from the Al foil. When the temperature exceeds 574 °C, although the electrode sheet mass continues to decrease, the excessively high temperature significantly increases the cost. Figure 1b shows the extraction rate of the S-NCM523 cathode, that is, the ratio of cathode active materials mass to cathode sheet mass. The experimental results show that under sintering conditions of 500 °C for 2 h and 600 °C for 3 h, the cathode extraction rate reaches 72%. Combining thermogravimetric analysis and extraction rate data, it is determined that 500 °C for 2 h is the optimal process condition, which also considers the economic and efficiency of the process.
The elements in the S-NCM523 and regenerated samples were tested using ICP-OES. Table S1 indicates that the contents of Ni, Co, and Mn elements in the four samples all conform to the molecular formula ratio of NCM523. S-NCM523 has approximately 4% loss of lithium ions. After sintering with the melted lithium salt, the lithium ions in the samples are replenished. Among them, the lithium content in the R-30 sample is the highest, while the lithium content in the R-40 sample, which has the largest amount of added lithium salt, actually decreases. This indicates that too many lithium ions cannot be added to the crystal lattice of S-NCM523. Samples regenerated with an appropriate amount of lithium salt can restore performance while also considering cost.
The phase structure of the samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Figure 2a shows that both S-NCM523 and the regenerated samples exhibit the hexagonal crystal structure of α-NaFeO2, space group R-3m, which is consistent with the standard PDF card (PDF#87-1564). However, there are still specific differences in the structure between the S-NCM523 sample and the regenerated sample. When the ratio of the (003) peak to the (104) peak in the XRD spectrum is greater than 1.2, it is considered that the Li+/Ni2+ intermixing is relatively small [12,13]. Figure 2b and Table S2 indicate that the intensity of the (003) peak of the S-NCM523 sample is relatively low, and the intensity ratio of the (003) peak to the (104) peak is 1.17, indicating that Li+/Ni2+ is intermixing in the sample, and its crystal structure has been disrupted. In contrast, the intensity ratio of the (003) peak and the (104) peak of the regenerated sample is greater than 1.2, indicating that the Li+/Ni2+ intermixing degree of the regenerated sample is reduced and its crystal structure has been effectively improved. At the same time, the splitting degree of the two pairs of peaks, (006) peak and (102) peak, as well as (108) peak and (110) peak, can be used to determine the structural changes in the ternary material [14,15]. As shown in Figure 2c, the two sets of peaks of the regenerated sample are split to a certain extent, and the (108) peak and (110) peak of this sample have a slightly larger angle compared to other samples, which is basically consistent with the standard PDF card. From Figure 2b, the (003) peak and the (104) peak of R-30 are higher in angle compared to other samples. During the battery charging process, the formation of lithium vacancies induces local stress in the lattice. This stress further triggers lattice distortion along the c-axis direction, causing the (003) peak in the XRD spectrum to shift to a lower angle direction [10,16]. After the regeneration treatment, it can be observed that the (003) peak of the R-30 sample returns to a higher angle position, indicating that its crystal structure repair is the best.
The lattice parameters and ion disordering changes were analyzed using Rietveld refinements, as shown in Figure 2d–g and Table S3. From the table, due to the loss of lithium ions, S-NCM523 exhibited severe Li+/Ni2+ disordering and c-parameter expansion (14.2440 Å). The Li+/Ni2+ disordering in the four samples was 15%, 9%, 4%, and 6%, respectively, indicating that the degree of Li+/Ni2+ disordering in the regenerated samples was improved. Among them, the R-30 sample had the best disordering degree and lattice distortion repair effect (14.1987 Å).
The surface morphology and microstructure of the samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure S2 shows that the basic morphology of the secondary particles of S-NCM523 is still spherical. Still, there are more fragmented small particles, indicating that some S-NCM523 particles split into smaller particles after cyclic degradation. However, the small particles in the regenerated samples are significantly reduced.
The valence states of transition metals in S-NCM523 and R-30 were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 3a shows the full spectra of S-NCM523 and R-30. Figure 3b is the detailed spectrum of Ni 2p, where the binding energies at 854.8 eV and 872.4 eV correspond to the characteristic peaks of Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 [17,18]. The binding energy of Ni3+ is 854.6 eV, and that of Ni2+ is 855.7 eV [19]. The proportion of Ni2+ ions in S-NCM523 and R-30 obtained by fitting is 58.26% and 48.77%, respectively. After regeneration treatment, the proportion of Ni2+ in the R-30 sample decreased by 9.49%, confirming that the degree of lithium-nickel ion disorder in the crystal structure has significantly decreased, which is consistent with the XRD refinement results. For the detailed spectrum of Co 2p (Figure 3c), the binding energies at 779.0 eV and 794.1 eV correspond to the characteristic peaks of Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, indicating that the Co element in the sample is still in the +3 valence state [20]. Meanwhile, in Figure 3d, the binding energies at 642.1 eV and 653.9 eV correspond to the characteristic peaks of Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2, indicating that the Mn element in the sample is in the +4 valence state [21]. In summary, the regenerated sample R-30 significantly reduces the proportion of Ni2+ ions in S-NCM523 while maintaining Co and Mn in the +3 and +4 valence states, respectively.
Figure 4a shows that the four samples have relatively gentle charging and discharging platforms ranging from 3.7 V to 4 V, consistent with the redox process of Ni ions [22]. This indicates that the materials in the four samples exhibit typical electrochemical behavior of a ternary lithium-ion battery. At 0.2 C, the first-round specific discharge capacity of the four samples is 113.4, 139.0, 166.2, and 145.9 mAh/g, and the Coulomb efficiency is 70.9%, 84.2%, 87.2%, and 85.8%, respectively. After regeneration, the specific discharge capacity of the samples significantly increases, and the Coulomb efficiency also rises above 80%. Figure 4b is the rate performance diagram of different samples. After cycling at the maximum rate of 10 C and returning to 0.2 C, the average specific discharge capacity of S-NCM523 at 0.2 C changes from the original 96.2 mAh/g to 75.1 mAh/g, while the R-30 sample changes from 154.9 mAh/g to 146.7 mAh/g, which is 94.7% of the original. In contrast, the repaired R-30 sample shows excellent capacity and rate performance. To compare the electrochemical kinetic properties of the materials after regeneration, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed, and the results are shown in Figure 4c. There is a semicircle in the high-frequency region. The intersection point with the X-axis represents the ohmic impedance (Rs), and the diameter of the semicircle is related to the interface charge transfer impedance (Rct), which is in the low-frequency region as a straight line with a slope related to the diffusion of Li+ in the active material (the Warburg impedance) [23]. The fitting results of the samples are shown in Table S4. The Rct values for the four samples are 142.40 Ω, 128.60 Ω, 76.96 Ω, and 110.20 Ω, respectively. R-30 shows the lowest Rct, which is almost half of S-NCM523. The lower charge transfer resistance indicates a faster ionic conductivity between the electrolyte and the electrode, which is due to the repair of the layered structure of R-30, reducing the defects that hinder the migration of Li+/Ni2+. The long-cycle performance of the four samples at 0.5 C is shown in Figure 4d. The initial discharge specific capacities of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, and R-40 are 96.5 mAh/g, 120.3 mAh/g, 152.9 mAh/g, and 135.1 mAh/g, respectively. After 100 cycles, the capacity retention rates of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, and R-40 are 64.8%, 79.9%, 96.0%, and 95.4%, respectively. The R-30 shows excellent specific discharge capacity and a high capacity retention rate, indicating that lithium ions have been replenished in the regenerated samples, the structure has been restored, and its electrochemical performance has been improved. Figure 4e–h show the CV curves of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, and R-40, respectively. The phase transformation of the samples from the hexagonal (H1) phase to the monoclinic (M) phase occurs, and a similar phase transformation (H1→M→H1) occurs during the delithiation/lithiation process of the samples, indicating that the regenerated samples have good phase transformation reversibility [24]. The oxidation peak potential (Eoxidation), reduction peak potential (Ereduction), and potential difference (ΔE = Eoxidation − Ereduction) of the samples are shown in Table S5. R-30 has a lower potential difference compared to S-NCM523, indicating smaller electrode polarization and better cycle reversibility.
To explore the structural evolution of the materials after cycling, S-NCM523 and regenerated samples were assembled into a button cell and cycled for 100 times before being disassembled. Figure 5a shows the XRD spectra of the samples after cycling, indicating that both S-NCM523 and regenerated samples maintained a relatively good crystal structure of α-NaFeO2 in the hexagonal crystal system. Figure 5b shows that the ratios of the (003) peak and (104) peak of the samples have decreased, which may be related to the slight Li+/Ni2+ intercalation in the samples after cycling. In Figure 5c, the four peaks of (006), (102), (108), and (110) of the samples are well separated, but the intensities of the first three peaks have decreased, while the intensity of the (110) peak has increased, which is consistent with the structural degradation mechanisms such as Li+/Ni2+ intercalation and the formation of rock salt phase. Figure 5d–g show the SEM images of the samples after cycling. The secondary particles of the regenerated samples all exhibited different degrees of structural degradation, and the spherical structure decomposed into smaller, irregular fragments. In contrast, the secondary particles of the R-30 maintained a relatively intact morphology and structure after cycling. Figure S3 shows the lithium sheet images of the battery after 100 cycles. The lithium sheet of the R-30 sample has the cleanest surface and the smallest black-region area, indicating that it generated the fewest by-products during cycling, which ensures its structural stability and excellent electrochemical performance during charging and discharging.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the co-melting salt method was employed for the solid-state sintering of S-NCM523 to replenish lost lithium ions and restore its degraded structure, thereby enhancing its electrochemical performance. The low-temperature pyrolysis method was utilized to investigate the optimal process parameters for cathode stripping. A mixed lithium salt comprising LiOH and Li2CO3 served as the lithium source for S-NCM523 regeneration, with a gradient of lithium salt addition implemented to optimize the regeneration process.
The effects of lithium supplementation and the repair of damaged secondary particles and rock salt phases during regeneration were characterized using ICP-OES, SEM, XRD, and XPS analyses. Results confirmed that regenerated samples exhibited improved layered structures and reduced Li+/Ni2+ disorder, indicating the effective restoration of the material’s degraded structure through the proposed regeneration strategy.
Electrochemical performance tests verified that the regenerated samples achieved enhanced electrochemical properties, among which the sample designated R-30 demonstrated the best electrochemical performance; after 100 cycles at 0.5 C, it retained a discharge capacity of 146.8 mAh/g, corresponding to a capacity retention rate of 96.0%. Furthermore, this direct regeneration technique for used lithium-ion batteries presents advantages of simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability, offering a promising approach for industrial recycling of spent batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings16010107/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of electrode sheets and aluminum foil (Al foil) after sintering at different temperatures and times; Figure S2: SEM images of SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40; Figure S3: Lithium sheet images of the battery after 100 cycles; Table S1: The ICP results of SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40; Table S2: The intensity ratio of I(003)/I(104) for SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40; Table S3: XRD refinement parameters of SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40; Table S4: The impedance fitting results of SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40; Table S5: Oxidation peak Potential (Eoxidation), reduction peak potential (Ereduction) and potential difference (ΔE = Eoxidation − Ereduction) of SNCM, R-20, R-30 and R-40;

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.X.; formal analysis, S.L.; investigation, Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.L.; supervision, Z.Z. and G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (nos. 2023J01033 and 2024J01038); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51971184 and 51931006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Xiamen University: no. 20720200068).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Guanghui Yue is employed by Jingao (WUXI) Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd., and the remaining authors declare no commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Srinivasan, S.; Shanthakumar, S.; Ashok, B. Sustainable lithium-ion battery recycling: A review on technologies, regulatory approaches and future trends. Energy Rep. 2025, 13, 789–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peters, J.F.; Baumann, M.; Zimmermann, B.; Braun, J.; Weil, M. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2017, 67, 491–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Richa, K.; Babbitt, C.W.; Gaustad, G.; Wang, X. A future perspective on lithium-ion battery waste flows from electric vehicles. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tembo, P.M.; Dyer, C.; Subramanian, V. Lithium-ion battery recycling-a review of the material supply and policy infrastructure. NPG Asia Mater. 2024, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Asheh, S.; Aidan, A.; Allawi, T.; Hammoud, F.; Al Ali, H.; Al Khamiri, M. Treatment and recycling of spent lithium-based batteries: A review. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2024, 26, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, J.H.; Zhou, X.; Yu, W.H.; Shang, Z.; Xu, S.M. Towards Greener Recycling: Direct Repair of Cathode Materials in Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2024, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.; Wu, G.B.; Jiang, H.B.; Wang, J.F.; Chen, T.T.; Han, C.Y.; Wang, W.W.; Yang, R.C.; Zhao, J.H.; Tang, Z.H.; et al. External Li supply reshapes Li deficiency and lifetime limit of batteries. Nature 2025, 638, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, X.Y.; Jiang, W.J.; Mauger, A.; Qilu; Gendron, F.; Julien, C.M. Minimization of the cation mixing in Li1+x(NMC)1−xO2 as cathode material. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, M.; Meng, X.H.; Guo, H.; Xin, S.; Chang, X.; Jiang, K.C.; Chen, J.C.; Meng, Q.H.; Guo, Y.G. Reviving Fatigue Surface for Solid-State Upcycling of Highly Degraded Polycrystalline LiNi1−x−yCoxMnyO2 Cathodes. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, Y.; Chen, G.; Liu, F.; Yue, X.J.; Chen, Z. Resolving the Compositional and Structural Defects of Degraded LiNixCoyMnzO2 Particles to Directly Regenerate High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Kou, W.; Ji, H.; Yang, G. Comparison study on regeneration of spent ternary materials by molten salt solid-liquid method and traditional solid-solid method. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 900, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, X.-J.; Li, Y.-X.; Zheng, M.; Zheng, J.-M.; Li, J.; Gong, Z.-L.; Yang, Y. Structural and electrochemical characterization of xLi[Li1/3Mn2/3]O2·(1 − x)Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.9) as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2008, 184, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, X.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, Q.; Peng, W. Structural and electrochemical characterization of NH4F-pretreated lithium-rich layered Li[Li0.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54]O2 cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14370–14376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, F.; Wang, M.; Su, Y.; Bao, L.; Chen, S. A novel method for synthesis of layered LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 as cathode material for lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2362–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, B.; Chen, G.; Xu, P.; Li, C. Effect of equivalent and non-equivalent Al substitutions on the structure and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2. J. Power Sources 2008, 176, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, Y.; Zhang, M.; Meng, Y.; Chen, Z. Ambient-Pressure Relithiation of Degraded LixNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (0 < x < 1) via Eutectic Solutions for Direct Regeneration of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, D.; Shi, Y.; Tornheim, A.; Bareno, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Burrell, A.; Luo, H. Nanoscale LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode materials for lithium ion batteries via a polymer-assisted chemical solution method. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 16, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, F.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Bao, L.; Chen, S.; Su, Y. Improving the Structure Stability of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 by Surface Perovskite-like La2Ni0.5Li0.5O4 Self-Assembling and Subsurface La3+ Doping. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 36751–36762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Xia, L.; Yang, H.; Zhan, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Duan, J. Solid-state synthesis of lanthanum-based oxides Co-coated LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 for advanced lithium ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 832, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hao, J.; Yu, Z.; Liu, H.; Song, W.; Liu, J.; Kong, L.; Li, C. Enhancing electrochemical performances of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode materials derived from NiF2 artificial interface at elevated voltage. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 806, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ilton, E.; Post, J.; Heaney, P.; Ling, F.; Kerisit, S. XPS determination of Mn oxidation states in Mn (hydr)oxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 366, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Jin, S.; Zhang, R.; Jin, M. Comparative study of the electrochemical performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 and LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Solid State Ion. 2018, 327, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Y.; Yao, W.; Lei, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zhong, S.; Yan, Z. Ni-Rich Oxide LiNi0.85Co0.05Mn0.1O2 for Lithium Ion Battery: Effect of Microwave Radiation on Its Morphology and Electrochemical Property. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A1300–A1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ryu, H.; Park, G.; Yoon, C.; Sun, Y. Microstructural Degradation of Ni-Rich Li[NixCoyMn1−x−y]O2 Cathodes During Accelerated Calendar Aging. Small 2018, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Thermogravimetric curve of S-NCM523 cathode sheets, (b) Mass extraction rate of positive powder.
Figure 1. (a) Thermogravimetric curve of S-NCM523 cathode sheets, (b) Mass extraction rate of positive powder.
Coatings 16 00107 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, R-40 samples: (a) 10°–80°, (b) 18°–45.5° and (c) 37.5°–66°. Rietveld refinements of (d) S-NCM523, (e) R-20, (f) R-30, and (g) R-40.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, R-40 samples: (a) 10°–80°, (b) 18°–45.5° and (c) 37.5°–66°. Rietveld refinements of (d) S-NCM523, (e) R-20, (f) R-30, and (g) R-40.
Coatings 16 00107 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra for: (a) the full XPS spectrum, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, (d) Mn 2p of S-NCM523 and R-30.
Figure 3. XPS spectra for: (a) the full XPS spectrum, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, (d) Mn 2p of S-NCM523 and R-30.
Coatings 16 00107 g003
Figure 4. Electrochemical performances of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40. (a) The first-cycle charge–discharge curves. (b) Rate performance. (c) Nyquist plots before cycling. (d) Cycling performance at 0.5 C. (eh) CV curves of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40 at 0.1 mV s−1.
Figure 4. Electrochemical performances of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40. (a) The first-cycle charge–discharge curves. (b) Rate performance. (c) Nyquist plots before cycling. (d) Cycling performance at 0.5 C. (eh) CV curves of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40 at 0.1 mV s−1.
Coatings 16 00107 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, R-40 samples after 100 cycles: (a) 10°–80°, (b) 18°–45.5° and (c) 37.5°–66°. (dg) SEM images of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40 after 100 cycles.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30, R-40 samples after 100 cycles: (a) 10°–80°, (b) 18°–45.5° and (c) 37.5°–66°. (dg) SEM images of S-NCM523, R-20, R-30 and R-40 after 100 cycles.
Coatings 16 00107 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, J.; Xia, Y.; Lin, S.; Du, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Li, J.; Yue, G. Direct Regeneration of Spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes by Utilizing Eutectic Lithium Salts for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Coatings 2026, 16, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010107

AMA Style

Yan J, Xia Y, Lin S, Du Y, Zhou Z, Li J, Yue G. Direct Regeneration of Spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes by Utilizing Eutectic Lithium Salts for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Coatings. 2026; 16(1):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Jian, Yongji Xia, Sheng Lin, Yingpeng Du, Zhidong Zhou, Jintang Li, and Guanghui Yue. 2026. "Direct Regeneration of Spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes by Utilizing Eutectic Lithium Salts for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries" Coatings 16, no. 1: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010107

APA Style

Yan, J., Xia, Y., Lin, S., Du, Y., Zhou, Z., Li, J., & Yue, G. (2026). Direct Regeneration of Spent LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes by Utilizing Eutectic Lithium Salts for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Coatings, 16(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16010107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop