Next Article in Journal
A Study of HiPIMS Process Characteristics in SiO2 Deposition
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Corrosion Inhibition Mechanism of HEDP and Mechanical Performance Degradation of HSGPSW Under Tensile Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Submicron Ni-, Co-, and Fe-Doped ZnO Fibers Fabricated by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition

1
Institute of Solid State Physics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72 Tsarigradsko Chaussee, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72 Tsarigradsko Chaussee, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
“National Centre of Excellence Mechatronics and Clean Technologies”, Kl. Ohridski Blvd, 8, Bl. 8, BG-1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
5
Institute of Optical Materials and Technologies “Acad. Jordan Malinowski”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Coatings 2025, 15(9), 1022; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091022
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 25 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Surface Characterization, Deposition and Modification)

Abstract

Hollow coaxial double-shell submicron fibers were fabricated by combining electrospinning and atomic layer deposition (ALD). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers were electrospun to serve as templates for the subsequent atomic layer deposition (ALD) of ZnO doped with transition metals (TM: Ni, Co, and Fe). An inner shell of amorphous Al2O3 was first deposited at low-temperature ALD to protect the polymer template. The PVA core was then removed through high-temperature annealing in air. Finally, a top shell of TM-doped ZnO was deposited at an elevated temperature within the ALD window for ZnO. The morphology, microstructure, elemental composition, and crystallinity of these submicron hollow double-shell fibers were thoroughly investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The field of nanomaterials and nanotechnology holds significant importance in contemporary scientific investigations. These materials find applications across various aspects of life, while their practical performance is determined by their nanostructural architecture and the constituent materials.
The partially filled d-orbitals of transition metal ions and the high electronegativity of oxygen atoms in transition metal oxides (TMOs) account for their intriguing and diverse properties, making them a widely investigated class of materials. These unique electronic structures are manifested in a range of phenomena, including colossal magnetoresistance (CMR), high-temperature superconductivity, electrocatalytic and photocatalytic activity, as well as ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, ferroelastic, thermoelectric, multiferroic, and gas-sensing capabilities [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Nanomaterials are a class of materials characterized by having at least one dimension in the range of 1 to 100 nm. Based on the number of nanosized dimensions, the architecture of nanomaterials can be categorized into four main groups: 0D (nanoparticles, quantum dots); 1D (nanorods, nanowires, nanofibers); 2D (nanosheets, graphene, other 2D materials); and 3D (nanospheres, nanoprisms, nanotubes, nanoporous materials). Two primary approaches exist for the production of diverse nanomaterials: top-down and bottom-up. The top-down approach is a subtractive method involving the breakdown of a bulk material into nanomaterials (e.g., nanolithography, mechanical milling, laser ablation, sputtering, electron explosion, arc discharge, electrospinning, and thermal decomposition). In contrast, the bottom-up approach entails the assembly of nanostructures from atomic or molecular precursors through methods, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), atomic layer deposition (ALD), sol–gel processing, spin coating, and pyrolysis [7,8,9].
Nanotubular fibers represent a promising class of three-dimensional (3D) nanomaterials for applications in batteries, catalysis, and gas sensing, primarily due to their high specific surface area. Several fabrication methods have been developed, among which electrospinning is particularly versatile. This technique encompasses configurations, such as single-nozzle, coaxial, triaxial, microfluidic, and emulsion electrospinning, along with hybrid approaches that integrate electrospinning and atomic layer deposition [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The properties of submicron fibers fabricated via electrospinning are frequently enhanced by doping the primary material with a secondary element [16,17,18]. For instance, doping zinc oxide (ZnO) nanofibers with cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) modifies their morphology and alters their optical, electrical, and magnetic properties, including the material’s band gap [18]. Given their similar ionic radii (Zn 0.72 Å, Co 0.745 Å, Ni 0.69 Å), Ni2+ and Co2+ ions can be effectively incorporated into the ZnO crystal lattice, either by substituting Zn2+ ions or by occupying interstitial sites. This doping process increases the concentration of charge carriers, thereby enhancing the conductivity of the nanofibers. Consequently, the structural, electrical, optical, and magnetic properties of ZnO nanofibers can be precisely tuned by adjusting the concentration of these transition metal dopants.
Numerous research groups have utilized a combination of electrospinning and ALD to fabricate various fiber structures [19,20,21,22,23]. In the conventional approach, a low-temperature ALD process is employed following electrospinning to coat the polymer fibers with different thin films, thereby preventing polymer degradation. However, at these reduced temperatures, some deposited films exhibit non-ideal, non-self-limiting growth behaviour, as the process often operates outside the optimal ALD temperature window. Furthermore, in certain cases, post-deposition annealing of such structures can induce the Kirkendall effect, resulting in the disruption of the microtubular morphology. In our previous research, we extensively discussed the potential problems with the conventional approach [15].
To overcome these challenges, we adopted a modified novel approach. First, the polymer fibers were coated with Al2O3 via low-temperature ALD. Owing to its thermal and chemical stability, Al2O3 acts as an inert structural matrix. Subsequent thermal annealing was performed to burn-out the polymer core, thus obtaining hollow Al2O3 fibers. Through this sequence, the desired functional active films were deposited by thermal ALD at elevated temperatures within their optimal ALD windows, which ensured enhanced film quality.
In this study, two-layered hollow submicron fibers were produced by combining electrospinning and ALD. The inner shell consisted of amorphous Al2O3, while the outer shell was ZnO doped with Co, Fe, or Ni. The morphology and elemental composition of the resulting hollow double-shell fibers were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. The crystalline structure was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the surface chemical states and elemental composition were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation Method

ZnO:TM/Al2O3 hollow fibers were fabricated using a combination of electrospinning and atomic layer deposition (ALD), where TM represents the transition metals cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), or nickel (Ni), and ALO refers to aluminum oxide (Al2O3). The synthesis followed a previously established multi-step procedure [15]: electrospinning of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) polymer, low-temperature ALD of Al2O3, high-temperature annealing for the removal of the PVA template, and thermal ALD of ZnO doped with the respective transition metal. Detailed parameters and procedures for each of these techniques are provided in the subsequent sections.

2.1.1. Electrospinning

Template fibers were fabricated using electrospinning from an 8-wt% aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, VALERUS, 93.5% purity, 7200 MW). This solution was prepared by continuous stirring at 60 °C until achieving the viscoelastic properties needed for electrospinning. For the electrospinning process, the PVA solution was loaded into a syringe fitted with a stainless-steel needle. It was then dispensed at a flow rate of 1 mL/hour within custom-built electrospinning equipment, where it was subjected to an electric field with a strength of 1.4 kV/cm at an ambient temperature of approximately 24 °C. The resulting PVA fiber mat demonstrated good adhesion to the surface of flat glass substrates.

2.1.2. Low-Temperature ALD

Conformal amorphous aluminum oxide (Al2O3, ALO) films were deposited onto the PVA fibers using ALD within a Beneq TFS-200 reactor (Beneq Oy, Espoo, Finland). A low deposition temperature of 60 °C was maintained to ensure the integrity of the polymer fibers. The ALD cycle involved a 300 ms pulse of trimethylaluminum (Al2(CH3)6, TMA) as the aluminum precursor, followed by a 5 s nitrogen (N2, 99.999% purity) purge. Subsequently, deionized water (DI H2O) was introduced as the oxygen precursor, also followed by a 5 s nitrogen purge. This sequence was repeated for 150 cycles to achieve the desired ALO film thickness.

2.1.3. High-Temperature Annealing

The polymer template was removed from the fiber structures by annealing in air using a Carbolite horizontal tube furnace (Carbolite, Hope, Derbyshire, UK) equipped with a Eurotherm 3508 temperature controller (Eurotherm Watlow, Worthing, UK). The thermal treatment consisted of a heating ramp from ambient temperature to 500 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, followed by an isothermal dwell at 500 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, the furnace was cooled to room temperature at the same controlled rate of 5 °C/min.

2.1.4. Thermal ALD

Following the successful synthesis of hollow Al2O3 (ALO) fibers, transition metal oxide (TMO) films were deposited at an elevated temperature within the optimal ALD window to ensure optimal stoichiometry and crystallinity. ZnO films doped with transition metals (TM) were deposited onto the ALO tubular fibers via ALD supercycles (Figure 1). Each supercycle comprised two subcycles: one for ZnO and one for TMO deposition. ZnO was deposited using sequential pulses of diethylzinc ((C2H5)2Zn, DEZ) and deionized H2O precursors, each with a 0.3 s pulse duration separated by a 5 s nitrogen purge. For TMO deposition, sequential 2 s pulses of metallocene ((C5H5)2M, MeCp2) and 1 s pulses of ozone (O3) were utilized, separated by a 5 s nitrogen purge. The metallocenes employed were cobaltocene (Co(C5H5)2, Cp2Co), ferrocene (Fe(C5H5)2, Cp2Fe), or nickelocene (Ni(C5H5)2, Cp2Ni). These metallocene powder precursors, placed in a hot source (HS) container, required heating for evaporation. Due to the inherently low reaction rate of MeCp2 with H2O, ozone was selected as the oxidant instead of water, owing to its higher reactivity. To optimize the film deposition, two series of ZnO:TMO films were prepared with varying temperatures and cycle numbers (Table 1).

2.2. Sample Characterization Techniques

Comprehensive characterization of the microstructure, elemental composition, and crystallinity was performed on two series of double-layered tubular ZnO:TM/ALO fibers (TM = Co, Fe, or Ni) synthesized on glass substrates. These analyses employed scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

2.2.1. SEM and EDX

A JSM T 200 (Jeol, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) and a TESCAN LYRA (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to investigate the morphology of the films. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) carried out by a Bruker Quantax EDS (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) detector provided identification and quantification of their elemental composition.

2.2.2. XRD

The X-ray diffraction study was performed on a Bruker D8 Advance Bragg–Brentano diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with a copper anode X-ray tube operated at 40 kV/40 mA and a LynxEye position-sensitive detector. The X-ray patterns were collected in the angular range 10–70° 2Θ with a step of 0.04° 2Θ and integrated total counting time of 4 s/step.

2.2.3. XPS

The X-ray photoelectron spectra were obtained using achromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation in a VG ESCALAB MK II electron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) under base pressure of 1 × 10−8 Pa. The spectrometer resolution was calculated from the Ag3d5/2 line with an analyzer transmission energy of 20 eV. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of this line was 1 eV. The spectrometer was calibrated against the Au4f7/2 line (84.0 eV) and the samples charging was estimated from C1s (285 eV) spectra from natural hydrocarbon contamination on the surface. The accuracy of the BE measured was 0.2 eV. The photoelectron spectra of C1s, O1s, Al2p, and Zn2p as well as Co2p, Fe2p, and Ni2p were recorded and corrected by subtracting a Shirley-type background and quantified using the peak area and Scofield’s photoionization cross-sections.

3. Results and Discussions

High-quality double-layered hollow ZnO:TM/ALO fibers were successfully synthesized; they exhibited uniform distribution, well-defined shapes, and smooth, defect-free surfaces (Figure 2). The fiber thickness and fiber-wall thickness were directly determined from SEM images, with these findings corroborated by ellipsometry measurements on films deposited on p-Si(100) reference substrates. The ellipsometry consistently showed 2–3 nm thinner films, likely due to a slower initial reaction rate on Si compared to the OH-rich PVA surface.
The outer fiber diameters varied from 340 to 550 nm depending on the ALD regime (Table 1 and Table 2). The mean fiber diameter (D) was determined by analyzing statistically measurements from SEM images. The value for D represents the average of a total of N measured fiber diameters, with the standard deviation (St. Dev.) used to quantify the dispersion of the data. The fiber thickness distribution is provided in the Supplementary Materials. The resulting ZnO/Al2O3 fibers had smaller diameters than expected, which is attributed to shrinkage during the ALD and annealing processes [15]. Notably, the pure ZnO/ALO and ZnO:Ni/ALO fibers in both series (s1 and s2) displayed larger diameters. The increased diameter in ZnO/ALO-s1 is attributed to the higher number of ZnO ALD cycles compared to its doped counterparts (Table 1). Significantly, the ZnO:Ni/ALO-s1 was the only sample in its series where nickel (Ni) was detected via EDX and XPS analysis (see below). This observation suggests a faster reaction kinetic for nickelocene compared to ferrocene and cobaltocene within this specific ALD regime. ALD regime for series 2 is distinguished by more TMO cycles and higher precursor and reactor temperatures. Increasing the temperatures accelerates the kinetic reaction of metallocenes and ozone and, therefore, Ni and Fe dopants are detected in this series. On the other hand, the higher temperature reduces the ZnO growth rate, since it is moved outside the ALD window [24,25,26,27].
The thickness of the fiber walls, i.e., the ZnO:TM/ALO films, was determined from SEM images (Figure 3, Table 2) as well as from ellipsometry measurements performed on the same films deposited on p-Si(100) reference substrates. Both methods yielded comparable wall thicknesses between 60 and 140 nm. The wall thickness variation within each series is attributed to differences in the initial growth rate.
It should be noted that the Ni-doped ZnO fibers exhibit a clearly visible grain structure with mean grain diameters of approximately 50 nm (Figure 3c–e). Furthermore, in some samples, Series 2, clogged fibers were observed (Figure 3e). This is attributed to the non-self-limiting ALD regime in Series 2, which results in a mixed CVD-ALD growth for ZnO and, consequently, the occlusion of some hollow fibers.
Figure 4 presents an EDX analysis of ZnO:TM/ALO-s2 hollow fibers fabricated on glass substrates. In all samples, zinc (Zn) and aluminum (Al), originating from the ZnO/Al2O3 fibers, are clearly visible. Given the fibrous mesh structure, elements from the underlying glass substrate, such as calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), and magnesium (Mg), are also detectable. For the doped fibers, nickel (Ni) and iron (Fe) elements are clearly observed. However, cobalt (Co) could not be detected in either series, which may be attributed to its concentration falling close to the detection limit of the analysis (Supplementary Materials).
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses shown in Figure 5 revealed a polycrystalline hexagonal phase with a wurtzite-type structure for the ZnO:TM top shell of the hollow ZnO:TM/ALO fibers obtained. Table 3 summarizes the corresponding ZnO crystallite sizes. During ALD, sequential layers of ZnO and TMO were deposited. This growth mechanism, which depends on the reactor temperature (Figure 1), significantly influences the nanostructure of the resulting films. Pure and Ni-doped ZnO samples from Series 1 exhibit a strong, predominantly c-axis-oriented crystal structure and the largest crystallite sizes. Under regime 1, a reactor temperature of 200 °C provides an indispensable ALD window, resulting in relatively smooth and conformal ZnO films. Conversely, at an elevated temperature (230 °C), which is outside the optimal ALD window for ZnO, the growth mechanism transitions from pure ALD to a mixed CVD-ALD regime. This transition is defined at approximately 200 °C in our previous investigations, consistent with findings from other authors [24,25,26,27]. This results in highly uneven coatings with decreased ZnO crystallinity–the ZnO/ALO and ZnO:Co/ALO films reveal no significant crystallization. On such surfaces, an increased density of initial growth points leads to a larger number of crystallites but, simultaneously, a reduced overall size. For the Ni-doped ZnO fiber structures, continuous nickel oxide sublayers were obtained in both ALD regimes (as observed in the XPS analysis below), which slightly affected the crystallographic orientation and size of the crystallites. At lower deposition temperatures, in the Co- and Fe-doped ZnO fiber structures, the reaction between metallocene and ozone proceeds very slowly or is even absent, leading to the formation of numerous defects that impair the crystal structure. As the temperature is raised, the reaction of ferrocene and ozone accelerates, enabling the formation of iron oxide sublayers and a corresponding increase in crystallite sizes. In these specific structures, an increase in the ab-oriented growth of ZnO is observed. It should be noted that the c-axis reflection (002) for the doped ZnO fibers is shifted to a higher 2θ angle compared to the pure ZnO fibers. Such a shift is attributed to the incorporation of TM ions (Ni, Fe, Co) at Zn sites into the ZnO lattice. This shift is most pronounced in the Ni-doped ZnO fibers. Furthermore, we exclude the segregation of TM ions and the formation of TM-related phases because the XRD patterns show no diffraction peaks other than those belonging to ZnO.
The XPS analysis detected the presence of C1s, O1s, and Zn2p signals on the surface of the ZnO:TM/ALO fiber structures. No Al2p signal was detected, primarily because XPS is a surface-sensitive technique with a typical X-ray penetration depth of only 3–5 nm. The observed C1s signal is attributed solely to surface contamination [15]. Notably, only nickel (Ni) and iron (Fe) were detected as doping elements (further explanation provided below). In the Zn2p region, zinc appeared as a characteristic doublet, Zn2p3/2 and Zn2p1/2, with a spin–orbit splitting of 23.1 eV, consistent with ZnO (Figure 6).
The O1s photoelectron line, centered at approximately 530.0 eV, is characteristic of oxygen within metal oxides. A smaller shoulder at the higher binding energy of 531.5 eV was consistently observed across all studied samples (Figure 7), which is attributed to the formation of oxygen vacancies in the ZnO lattice [28]. Consequently, the O1s photoelectron spectra provide valuable insights into the changes occurring in ZnO after doping with Co, Fe, or Ni. For ZnO doped with Co, Fe, and Ni at a lower ALD temperature (Series 1), a slight increase in the oxygen vacancy formation was observed compared to the pure ZnO fibers deposited under the same conditions. At this deposition temperature, only Ni was identifiable as a dopant in the Ni2p region. The fibers deposited at higher temperatures exhibited a lower concentration of oxygen vacancies. Doping pure ZnO with Co, Fe, and Ni again resulted in modifications in the number of oxygen vacancies. Specifically, Co and Fe doping of ZnO reduced the oxygen vacancies, while Ni doping caused an increase. It is important to note that in this higher temperature ALD regime (Series 2), only Fe and Ni were detected on the surface of the studied fibers. Overall, ZnO and Co, Fe, and Ni-doped ZnO deposited at higher temperatures and with more cycles exhibited a lower number of oxygen vacancies than those deposited at lower temperatures and with fewer cycles.
The Ni2p core-level spectra for both deposition temperatures show nickel in a Ni2+ oxidation state around 855.5 eV consistent with the presence of NiO or Ni(OH)2 (Figure 8a) [29]. Conversely, iron (Fe) was detected only in the sample prepared at the higher deposition temperature (Series 2). The Fe2p signal overlaps significantly with the Zn Auger peaks (Figure 8b), making the precise determination of the Fe2p peak positions challenging. Future investigations with Mg K-alpha source could solve this problem as the 233 eV difference in photon energy shifts the Auger lines, allowing for a clearer separation of the signals. Nevertheless, the Fe2p3/2 peak is discernible between the Zn Auger peaks at approximately 712 eV for ZnO:Fe/ALO-2s fibers. Due to the close binding energies of Fe2+ and Fe3+ oxidation states in various iron oxides (Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FeO, and FeO(OH)) [30] and the overlap observed, identifying precisely the specific type of iron oxide in this study proved difficult.

4. Conclusions

This study introduces a robust method for fabricating customizable double-shell ZnO:TM/Al2O3 fibers using an approach combining electrospinning and ALD. The findings demonstrate that process parameters, such as temperature and cycle count, are critical for tuning precisely the crystal orientation, growth regime, and dopant incorporation. These results provide a valuable pathway for controlling the final material properties of these complex nanostructures. To fully realize the potential of these materials, future work should focus on two key areas. First, the well-developed large surface area of these structures makes them particularly promising for implementation in gas-sensing devices, a potential that should be validated through rigorous testing of their gas-sensing properties. Second, a deeper understanding of the pure ALD and mixed ALD-CVD growth mechanisms is required to further optimize the dopant ratios and achieve an even finer control over the final material characteristics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings15091022/s1. Figure S1: Fiber thickness distribution; Figure S2: EDX Data for ZnO:Co/ALO-2s; Figure S3: EDX Data for ZnO:Fe/ALO-2s; Figure S4: EDX Data for ZnO:Ni/ALO-2s; Figure S5: EDX Data for ZnO/ALO-2s; Figure S6: XRD of ZnO fibers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S.B. and B.G.; methodology, B.S.B., B.G., K.S., N.S., K.B., V.M., L.S., D.S. and A.P.; validation, B.S.B. and B.G.; formal analysis, B.S.B. and B.G., investigation, B.S.B., B.G., I.A., P.T. (Peter Tzvetkov), K.S., N.S., K.B., V.M., L.S., P.T. (Penka Terziyska), D.S. and A.P.; resources, B.S.B.; data curation, B.S.B. and B.G.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S.B. and B.G.; writing—review and editing, B.S.B., B.G., I.A., P.T. (Peter Tzvetkov), and A.P.; visualization, B.S.B. and B.G.; supervision, B.S.B.; project administration, B.S.B.; funding acquisition, B.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been financially supported by the Bulgarian National Scientific Fund, Project KP-06-H88/7.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets that support the findings in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Bulgarian National Science Fund under Project KP-06-Н88/7. We also extend our sincere gratitude to Chavdar Ghelev (Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) for his valuable assistance and constructive comments, which have significantly contributed to the development of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sahoo, S.; Wickramathilaka, K.Y.; Njeri, E.; Silva, D.; Suib, S.L. A review on transition metal oxides in catalysis. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1374878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Goodenough, J.B. A Perspective on Engineering Transition-Metal Oxides. Chem. Mater. 2013, 26, 820–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lany, S. Semiconducting transition metal oxides. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 283203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rao, C.N.R. Transition metal oxides. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1989, 40, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tokura, Y.; Nagaosa, N. Orbital physics in transition-metal oxide. Science 2000, 288, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, Z.; Liao, T.; Dou, Y.; Hwang, S.M.; Park, M.-S.; Jiang, L.; Kim, J.H.; Dou, S.X. Generalized self-assembly of scalable two-dimensional transition metal oxide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baig, N.; Kammakakam, I.; Falath, W. Nanomaterials: A review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 1821–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Byakodi, M.; Shrikrishna, N.S.; Sharma, R.; Bhansali, S.; Mishra, Y.; Kaushik, A.; Gandhi, S. Emerging 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D nanostructures for efficient point-of-care biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 12, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mekuye, B.; Abera, B. Nanomaterials: An overview of synthesis, classification, characterization, and applications. Nano Select 2023, 4, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xia, X.; Dong, X.J.; Wei, Q.F.; Cai, Y.B.; Lu, K.Y. Formation mechanism of porous hollow SnO2 nanofibers prepared by one-step electrospinning. Express Polym. Lett. 2012, 6, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Wei, Z.; Xu, L.; Peng, S.; Zeng, W. Synthesis of Hollow Nanofibers and Application on Detecting SF6 Decomposing Products. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, W.-S.; Lee, B.-S.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, H.-C.; Yu, W.-R.; Hong, S.-H. SnO2 nanotubes fabricated using electrospinning and atomic layer deposition and their gas sensing performance. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 245605. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, L.; Peng, S.; Lee, J.K.Y.; Ji, D.; Srinivasan, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun hollow nanofibers for advanced secondary batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 39, 111–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Homaeigohar, S.; Davoudpour, Y.; Habibi, Y.; Elbahri, M. The Electrospun Ceramic Hollow Nanofibers. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blagoev, B.S.; Georgieva, B.; Starbova, K.; Starbov, N.; Avramova, I.; Buchkov, K.; Tzvetkov, P.; Stoykov, R.; Terziyska, P.; Delibaltov, D.; et al. A Novel Approach to Obtaining Metal Oxide HAR Nanostructures by Electrospinning and ALD. Materials 2023, 16, 7489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bifulco, A.; Climaco, I.; Casciello, A.; Passaro, J.; Battegazzore, D.; Nebbioso, V.; Russo, P.; Imparato, C.; Aronne, A.; Malucelli, J. Prediction and validation of fire parameters for a self-extinguishing and smoke suppressant electrospun PVP-based multilayer material through machine learning models. J. Mater. Sci. 2025, 60, 1019–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Song, G.-L.; Lian, X.-X. Co-doped ZnO nanofibers fabricated via electrospinning for rapid and ppb-level detection of listeria biomarker 3-hydroxy-2-butanone. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 50418–50426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vieii, F.H.; Roya Shokrani Havigh, R.S.; Chenari, H.M. Electrospun preparation of nickel and Cobalt-doped ZnO fibers: Study on the physical properties. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 10898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vempati, S.; Ranjith, K.S.; Topuz, F.; Biyikli, N.; Uyar, T. Electrospinning combined with atomic layer deposition to generate applied nanomaterials: A review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 6186–6209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szilágyi, I.M.; Santala, E.; Heikkila, M.; Pore, V.; Kemell, M.; Nikitin, T.; Teucher, G.; Firkala, T.; Khriachtchev, L.; Räsänen, M.; et al. Photocatalytic properties of WO3/TiO2 core/shell nanofibers prepared by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2013, 19, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kéri, O.; Kocsis, E.; Karajz, D.A.; Nagy, Z.K.; Parditka, B.; Erdélyi, Z.; Szabó, A.; Hernádi, K.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic crystalline and amorphous TiO2 nanotubes prepared by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition. Molecules 2021, 26, 5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kayaci, F.; Ozgit-Akgun, C.; Biyikli, N.; Uyar, T. Surface-decorated ZnO nanoparticles and ZnO nanocoating on electrospun polymeric nanofibers by atomic layer deposition for flexible photocatalytic nanofibrous membranes. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6817–6820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peng, Q.; Sun, X.-Y.; Spagnola, J.C.; Saquing, C.; Khan, S.A.; Spontak, R.J.; Parsons, G.N. Bi-directional Kirkendall effect in coaxial microtube nanolaminate assemblies fabricated by atomic layer deposition. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guziewicz, E.; Godlewski, M.; Wachnicki, L.; Krajewski, T.A.; Luka, G.; Gieraltowska, S.; Jakiela, R.; Stonert, A.; Lisowski, W.; Krawczyk, M.; et al. ALD grown zinc oxide with controllable electrical properties. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2012, 27, 074011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tapily, K.; Gu, D.; Baumgart, H.; Namkoong, G.; Stegall, D.; Elmustafa, A.A. Mechanical and structural characterization of atomic layer deposition-based ZnO films. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2011, 26, 115005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Janocha, E.; Pettenkofer, C. ALD of ZnO using diethylzinc as metal-precursor and oxygen as oxidizing agent. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 10031–10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xia, B.; Ganem, J.J.; Briand, E.; Steydli, S.; Tancrez, H.; Vickridge, I. The carbon and hydrogen contents in ALD-grown ZnO films define a narrow ALD temperature window. Vacuum 2021, 190, 110289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, S.-M.; Ikegami, T.; Ebihara, K. Effects of substrate temperature on the properties of Ga-doped ZnO by pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Film. 2006, 513, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Dai, R.; Ma, H.; Lin, Z.; Li, Y.; Xi, B. Atomic Layer Deposition of Nickel Oxides as Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamashita, T.; Hayes, P. Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Supercycle. This diagram illustrates a typical supercycle composed of separate subcycles for ZnO and a transition metal oxide (TMO). The ZnO subcycle consists of sequential diethylzinc (DEZ) and water (H2O) precursor pulses, each followed by a nitrogen (N2) purge. The TMO subcycle utilizes metallocene (MeCp2) and ozone (O3) precursors, along with a nitrogen purge after each pulse. The entire supercycle can be repeated multiple times to achieve the desired film properties.
Figure 1. Schematic of the Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Supercycle. This diagram illustrates a typical supercycle composed of separate subcycles for ZnO and a transition metal oxide (TMO). The ZnO subcycle consists of sequential diethylzinc (DEZ) and water (H2O) precursor pulses, each followed by a nitrogen (N2) purge. The TMO subcycle utilizes metallocene (MeCp2) and ozone (O3) precursors, along with a nitrogen purge after each pulse. The entire supercycle can be repeated multiple times to achieve the desired film properties.
Coatings 15 01022 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) pure polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers, and ZnO:TM/ALO fibers from Series 1, where TM represents (b) cobalt, (c) iron, and (d) nickel.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) pure polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers, and ZnO:TM/ALO fibers from Series 1, where TM represents (b) cobalt, (c) iron, and (d) nickel.
Coatings 15 01022 g002
Figure 3. SEM images illustrating the morphology of fabricated fibers. Series 1: (a) ZnO:Co/ALO, (b) ZnO/ALO, and (c,d) ZnO:Ni/ALO. Series 2: (e) ZnO:Ni/ALO and (f) ZnO:Fe/ALO.
Figure 3. SEM images illustrating the morphology of fabricated fibers. Series 1: (a) ZnO:Co/ALO, (b) ZnO/ALO, and (c,d) ZnO:Ni/ALO. Series 2: (e) ZnO:Ni/ALO and (f) ZnO:Fe/ALO.
Coatings 15 01022 g003
Figure 4. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of ZnO:TM/ALO hollow fibers from Series 2 on a glass substrate. The figures show EDX spectra for fibers doped with (a) cobalt (Co), (b) iron (Fe), and (c) nickel (Ni). Image (d) presents the EDX analysis of a pure ZnO/ALO fiber for comparison.
Figure 4. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of ZnO:TM/ALO hollow fibers from Series 2 on a glass substrate. The figures show EDX spectra for fibers doped with (a) cobalt (Co), (b) iron (Fe), and (c) nickel (Ni). Image (d) presents the EDX analysis of a pure ZnO/ALO fiber for comparison.
Coatings 15 01022 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers.
Coatings 15 01022 g005
Figure 6. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers.
Figure 6. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers.
Coatings 15 01022 g006
Figure 7. XPS O 1s core-level spectra of ZnO:TM/Al2O3 fibers. Peak 1 corresponds to oxygen within the ZnO lattice, while peak 2 is associated with oxygen vacancies.
Figure 7. XPS O 1s core-level spectra of ZnO:TM/Al2O3 fibers. Peak 1 corresponds to oxygen within the ZnO lattice, while peak 2 is associated with oxygen vacancies.
Coatings 15 01022 g007aCoatings 15 01022 g007b
Figure 8. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers. The figure shows the Ni 2p3/2 spectrum for the ZnO:Ni/ALO sample (a) and the Fe 2p spectrum for the ZnO:Fe/ALO sample (b).
Figure 8. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of ZnO:TM/ALO fibers. The figure shows the Ni 2p3/2 spectrum for the ZnO:Ni/ALO sample (a) and the Fe 2p spectrum for the ZnO:Fe/ALO sample (b).
Coatings 15 01022 g008
Table 1. ALD growth parameters.
Table 1. ALD growth parameters.
SeriesNumber of CyclesTemperatures, °CHollow Fiber Structures
ZnOTMO 1supercycleReactorHS 2
116
150
5
0
8
0
20080
0
ZnO:TM/ALO-1s
ZnO/ALO-1s
26
150
20
0
25
0
23090
0
ZnO:TM/ALO-2s
ZnO/ALO-2s
1 TMO—Co, Fe, Ni oxides; 2 HS—Hot Source temperature; ALO–Al2O3.
Table 2. Hollow fiber parameters of Series 1 (1s) and Series 2 (2s) obtained by SEM. The mean fiber diameter (D) was calculated statistically from a total of N measured diameters on SEM images. The standard deviation (St. Dev.) is provided as a measure of the data’s dispersion.
Table 2. Hollow fiber parameters of Series 1 (1s) and Series 2 (2s) obtained by SEM. The mean fiber diameter (D) was calculated statistically from a total of N measured diameters on SEM images. The standard deviation (St. Dev.) is provided as a measure of the data’s dispersion.
Fiber StructureD, nmNSt. Dev., nmwall, nm
PVA33820046-
ZnO:Co/ALO-1s3621103559
ZnO:Fe/ALO-1s3643463258
ZnO:Ni/ALO-1s5512007072
ZnO/ALO-1s5002007573
ZnO:Co/ALO-2s3701506496
ZnO:Fe/ALO-2s3801504589
ZnO:Ni/ALO-2s44015038137
ZnO/ALO-2s3701503981
Table 3. Crystallite sizes of ZnO.
Table 3. Crystallite sizes of ZnO.
Fiber StructureD, nm
ZnO:Co/ALO-1s7.5 (3)
ZnO:Fe/ALO-1s7.3 (3)
ZnO:Ni/ALO-1s14.6 (6)
ZnO/ALO-1s12.7 (5)
ZnO:Co/ALO-2s9.7 (8)
ZnO:Fe/ALO-2s11.8 (2)
ZnO:Ni/ALO-2s8.3 (3)
ZnO/ALO-2s7.1 (5)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Blagoev, B.S.; Georgieva, B.; Paskaleva, A.; Avramova, I.; Tzvetkov, P.; Starbova, K.; Starbov, N.; Buchkov, K.; Mehandzhiev, V.; Slavov, L.; et al. Characterization of Submicron Ni-, Co-, and Fe-Doped ZnO Fibers Fabricated by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Coatings 2025, 15, 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091022

AMA Style

Blagoev BS, Georgieva B, Paskaleva A, Avramova I, Tzvetkov P, Starbova K, Starbov N, Buchkov K, Mehandzhiev V, Slavov L, et al. Characterization of Submicron Ni-, Co-, and Fe-Doped ZnO Fibers Fabricated by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Coatings. 2025; 15(9):1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blagoev, Blagoy Spasov, Borislava Georgieva, Albena Paskaleva, Ivalina Avramova, Peter Tzvetkov, Kirilka Starbova, Nikolay Starbov, Krastyo Buchkov, Vladimir Mehandzhiev, Lyubomir Slavov, and et al. 2025. "Characterization of Submicron Ni-, Co-, and Fe-Doped ZnO Fibers Fabricated by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition" Coatings 15, no. 9: 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091022

APA Style

Blagoev, B. S., Georgieva, B., Paskaleva, A., Avramova, I., Tzvetkov, P., Starbova, K., Starbov, N., Buchkov, K., Mehandzhiev, V., Slavov, L., Terziyska, P., & Spasov, D. (2025). Characterization of Submicron Ni-, Co-, and Fe-Doped ZnO Fibers Fabricated by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Coatings, 15(9), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop