Next Article in Journal
Effects of Coating Materials as a Cleaning Agent on the Performance of Poly-Crystal PV Panels
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen and Deuterium Incorporation in ZnO Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/coatings11050543
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Properties of Pinus Massoniana Wood

by
Zhigang Wu
1,
Xue Deng
1,
Lifen Li
1,
Xuedong Xi
2,3,
Meifen Tian
1,
Liping Yu
1,* and
Bengang Zhang
2,*
1
College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
ENSTIB-LERMAB, University of Lorraine, 88051 Epinal, France
3
Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Wood Adhesives and GluedProducts, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(5), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050543
Submission received: 23 March 2021 / Revised: 1 May 2021 / Accepted: 3 May 2021 / Published: 5 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Understanding the interfacial changes of wood during heat treatment can facilitate the improvement of the bonding and coating processes of heat-treated wood. Steam was used as the medium to modify Pinus massoniana wood through heat treatment at 160, 180, 200, and 220 °C. Changes to the surface characteristics after heat treatment were characterized by Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and contact angle measurement. The results showed that: (1) hemicelluloses were the first to experience degradation at 160 °C, and this degradation was the most intense at 200 °C. The cellulose started experiencing obvious degradation at 200 °C, while there was less degradation of lignin at this temperature. (2) Oxygen-containing groups like hydroxyl and carbonyl were gradually reduced as temperature increased with deepened color and passivated surface. (3) Cellulose crystallinity presented a variable trend of increasing–decreasing–increasing. (4) Surface porosity and roughness of Pinus massoniana wood both increased after heat treatment. (5) The Pinus massoniana wood interface turned from hydrophilic to hydrophobic, and 180 °C was a turning point for the wettability of the Pinus massoniana wood interface.

1. Introduction

Artificial forests, which are characterized by short production cycles, high growth rates, and high yields, have relieved pressure on wood demand. Most plantations are fast-growing trees, such as Populus alba, Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook., Larixgmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen., Eucalyptus robusta Smith, Pinus massoniana Lamb., and so on, all of which usually contain a high content of juvenile wood, along with numerous defects such as loose texture, low density, low strength, poor corrosion resistance, and inflammability [1,2,3,4], so it is especially important to conduct functional improvement of fast-growing woods in plantations. Wood modification methods mainly include acetylation, impregnation, compression, fire-retarding, and heat treatment, among which heat treatment-assisted wood modification has been extensively studied [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Hemicelluloses are degraded first during heat treatment, and the degradation products are mainly water, acetic acid, formic acid, methanol and furfural. With the increase of treatment temperature and time, the concentration of formic acid and acetic acid increased [16,17]. The thermal stability of cellulose was very high, but hemicelluloses degradation in acidic condition also had a certain influence on the stability of cellulose due to the intertwining of cellulose and hemicelluloses. The degradation products of cellulose were mainly levoglucosan. Lignin had good hydrophobicity and chemical reaction inertia due to the small content of hydroxyl groups, but it contained methoxy groups, so the ether bond in lignin was very easy to break during pyrolysis and degradation products were mainly carbonyl groups [18,19,20,21,22]. Gokhan found decreased compressive strength and hardness of hornbearn after heat treatment was correlated with the degree of density loss, and both compressive strength and hardness were reduced with increasing treatment temperature and lengthening treatment time [23]. Percin indicated that heat treatment resulted in large weight and density loss of Fagus longipetiolata, but contributed to improve dimensional stability [24]. Borůvka stated that increased treatment temperature reduced the strength of Betula platyphylla Suk., but improved its dimensional stability [25]. Obataya mentioned that the dynamic elasticity modulus, maximum bending stress, and bending strain of wood were gradually reduced with increased temperature and time [26]. Yildiz found that increased treatment temperature and time, parallel-to-grain compressive strength with temperature was a more significant influence than time [27]. Kamdem showed that heat treatment improved durability of wood, but reduced its mechanical strength, and hardwood was more sensitive to changes in heat treatment temperature than softwood [28]. Sundqvist found that the color change before the heat treatment of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook and pine was aggravated with the rising treatment temperature and lengthened treatment time [29]. Suleyma showed that wood density, water absorption, and surface roughness were reduced with the rise in treatment temperature and lengthening of treatment time [30]. Chu stated that heat treatment reduced the surface wettability of cottonwood, and increased the surface brittleness, which became more obvious with increased temperature [31]. Gérardin indicated that the heat treatment changed the acidity, wettability, and surface free energy of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook. and Fagus longipetiolata [32]. To sum up, heat treatment can not only improve the dimensional stability of wood but also enhance its corrosion resistance and durability, so it has been widely applied and welcomed to garden furniture in architectural engineering, windows and doors, musical instruments, the shipbuilding industry, and so on.
Heat treatment-based wood modification also has a great effect on the wettability of the wood surface, which influence wettability, spreading, diffusion, permeation, and adhesion on the wood surface. Good wettability of wood surfaces is a necessary precondition for realizing favorable adhesion properties [33,34]. Fast-growing Pinus massoniana wood was taken as the study object and water vapor as medium. The mainly study was focused on the changes in Pinus massoniana wood surface characteristics at different heat treatment temperatures. The novelty of this work is discussing in detail heat treatment temperatures range from 160–220 °C on the surface characteristics of Pinus massoniana wood from plantation forest, and the aim is to lay the foundation for the bonding and coating of Pinus massoniana glued wood structures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Reagent grade 37% formaldehyde was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Pinus massoniana wood with a dimension of 2200 mm (length) × 130 mm (width) × 10 mm (thickness) and moisture content 10–14% was purchased from Rongjiang Guizhou, China, and after drying, knotless, and normally grown sapwood (without reaction wood, decay or insect or fungal damage) materials were selected. All other chemicals mentioned in this work were reagent grade.

2.2. Preparation of Melamine-Urea-Formaldehyde Resin

To lay the foundation for the later preparation of Pinus massoniana glued wood structures, melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) resin was prepared and was to determine contact angle. MUF resin with a molar ratio (M + U)/F = 1:1.5 was prepared in the lab. Melamine accounted for 13% by weight. The MUF was prepared as follows: 121.6 parts of formaldehyde (37 wt %) was charged to a three-neck 500 mL flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, thermometer and condenser, and the pH was adjusted to 9.0 with NaOH 30% solution. The first urea (42.72 parts) were then charged to the rapidly stirring solution, and then the temperature was increased and kept to 90 °C. The pH was adjusted to 5.0–5.2 with formic acid 10%, and 13.86 parts melamine were added to the mixture. After the water tolerance of mixture reached about 100%, the pH was adjusted to 9.0 immediately and cooled to 50 °C. The second urea (10.68 parts) was then charged and kept for 10min.The pH was adjusted to 8.0–8.5, and the resin was cooled to room temperature. The MUF resin had a solid content of 52% and viscosity of 12.26 s.

2.3. Preparation of Pinus Massoniana Heat-Treated Wood

Pinus massoniana wood with a size of 130 mm (length) × 50 mm (width) × 10 mm (thickness) without cracks, decay or allochromatic defects was chosen [35]. Steam (0.50 MPa) was the medium, and the wood samples were dried at 95 °C for 4 days before the heat-treatment. The dry-bulb temperature was raised to 85 °C and kept for 1h. Next, the temperature was increased to the target temperature (160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C or 220 °C) at a rate of 10 °C/h and then kept for 1h, followed by cooling and humidity adjustment. The wet-bulb temperature was adjusted to 70 °C and then it was adjusted to and kept at 95 °C when the dry-bulb temperature exceeded 100 °C. The heat-treated wood was removed when the temperature was lower than 40 °C. The experiment was repeated five times for each temperature. The main chemical components of Pinus massoniana wood were measured according to previously described procedures [36].

2.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

1 mg of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood power was mixed with 1g KBr to prepare a pill. The pill was then subjected to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR; Scimitar1000, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and the data were acquired within the range of 400–4000 cm−1 at 4 cm−1 resolution using 32 scans. Five samples were analyzed for per treatment.

2.5. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

The crystalline structures of heat-treated Pinus massoniana were analyzed using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrometer (Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (Cu Kα, λ = 1.5406 Å) operated at 12.5 kV and 120 mA at the range of 5~80° with a scanning speed of 6° min−1.

2.6. Scanning ElectronMicroscopy(SEM)

The surface of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood was examined using a Hitachi S-3400N emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 12.5 kV to investigate the morphological features.

2.7. Contact Angle Measurement

A static droplet method was used to determine the contact angle of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood [35]. A droplet of MUF resin liquid was dropped on a heat-treated wood, then the image of the droplet was immediately taken after 2 s using a JC2000A static drop contact angle measuring instrument from Zhongchen Digital Technology Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Contact angle was analyzed by Newjce2000 software. The reported contact angle was the mean of 8–10 specimens, the maximum and minimum values were deleted, and then the rest of the samples were averaged. The standard deviation was less than 5%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Heat Treatment on Contents of Pinus Massoniana Wood

The main components of wood are cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin, besides which other components account for 20–30% of mass, such as extractives, pigment, tannins, resins, and so on. The effects of heat treatment on the contents of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin of Pinus massoniana wood are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 and Table 1. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, the cellulose content in Pinus massoniana wood not treated and treated at 160 °C were 42.6% and 41.2%, respectively, and the difference was not large, indicating that the thermal stability of cellulose structure was better at this temperature. The cellulose contents reached 39.0% and 33.5%, respectively, at 180 and 200 °C, showing that the cellulose started prominent pyrolysis when the temperature reached 200 °C. At 220 °C, the cellulose content was reduced to 29.4%, with the decrease in amplitude reaching as high as 31.0%, and the cellulose degradation was the most acute in this phase. As shown in Figure 2 and Table 1, hemicelluloses content in untreated Pinus massoniana wood were 13.1%. With the increase of temperature, the hemicelluloses content decreased linearly and were 11.3% and 8.8%, respectively, at 160 and 180 °C, with those at 200 and 220 °C 4.5% and 1.0%, respectively. This showed that the hemicelluloses structure, which was quite unstable, was prone to degradation during the heat treatment, and the degradation was the most acute within 200–220 °C. This was because hemicelluloses were heterogenous glycan consisting of different types of monosaccharide unit, with many branch structures; the bonding force between different monosaccharide units was weak, so they could be easily degraded in the heat treatment process; and the degradation products were mainly acids [16,19]. Seen from Figure 3 and Table 1, lignin content was gradually elevated with increased treatment temperature, the content was increased not obviously within 160–180 °C, but quite obviously within 200–220 °C.
Hemicelluloses were the first to degrade and could most easily experience pyrolysis during the heat treatment; the cellulose would undergo pyrolysis to a certain extent, too, but the lignin would not. According to the dynamic changes of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin in Pinus massoniana wood during the heat treatment, the wood properties under the heat treatment could be forecast as follows: (i) the cell wall became thinner and cell cavity became large, which resulted in the density reduce and acidity increase of wood; (ii) the wood properties like toughness and flexural behaviors were degraded; (iii) the elasticity modulus and hardness of the wood were increased by a large margin (because the lignin content was positively correlated with the elasticity modulus and hardness of cell walls); (iv) the dimensional stability became better. Pinus massoniana wood belongs to Pinaceae plant from which many extracts such as resin, essential oil, and tannin can be extracted, especially the high-content weak acid resin [4,21]. During heat treatment, these extracts may be degraded and oxidized into acids, which were migrated to the wood surface by virtue of high temperature and moisture, thus further enhancing the acidity of the wood.

3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR)Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure 4 shows the FT-IR results of Pinus massoniana wood before and after heat treatment. Peaks at 3393.3 cm−1, 2918.8 cm−1, 1733.6 cm−1, 1647.6 cm−1, 1510.4 cm−1, 1459.2 cm−1, 1317.5~1428.8 cm−1, and 1265.7 cm−1 were the O–H stretching vibration peak, C–H stretching vibration peak, non-conjugating C=O stretching vibration peak of hemicelluloses (xylose), conjugating C=O stretching vibration peak of lignin, C–C vibration peak of lignin benzene ring skeleton, C–H bending vibration peak of cellulose, C-H bending vibration peak of cellulose and hemicelluloses, and C–O bending vibration peak of lignin, respectively [36]. The ether bond C–O–C stretching vibration peaks of cellulose and hemicelluloses appeared at 1162.6 and 1115.8 cm−1, respectively. C–O stretching vibration peaks of cellulose and hemicelluloses existed at 1060.2 and 1025.4 cm−1, respectively. At 897.0 cm−1 was the C–H bending vibration peak of cellulose and hemicelluloses. At 811.0 cm−1 was C–H out-of-plane bending vibration peak, and it was mannose structure of coniferous wood. The C–H bending vibration peak of lignin benzene ring skeleton appeared within 557.5–673.8 cm−1.
The main components of hemicelluloses in Pinus massoniana are poly O-acetyl galactose glucose mannose and araban-4-O-methyl glucuronic acid xylose, where the content of the former is higher [37]. As shown in Figure 4, the hydroxyl absorption peak at 3393.3 cm−1, carbonyl absorption peak at 1733.6 cm−1, and mannose absorption peak at 811.0 cm−1 presented weakened intensity. During heat treatment, (i) acetyl of hemicelluloses disconnect from the main chain to generate acetic acids, (ii) the hemicelluloses itself was degraded to generate acetic acids and propionic acids, (iii) the acids would go through esterification reactions with side lignin chains, and the hydroxyl content was reduced, and (iv) the water was dehydrated out between the hydroxyls on the molecular chain in the cellulose amorphous region, and so the quantity of free hydroxyls was reduced. After heat treatment, the Pinus massoniana wood surface would be passivated, in other words, the interaction between wood and resin was decreased.

3.3. XRD Analysis

Cellulose crystallinity represents the percentage occupied by the crystalline region of the cellulose microfiber and can reflect the degree of crystal formation during the cellulose condensation. Crystallinity is closely related to elasticity modulus, impact toughness, and mechanical properties. The effects of heat treatment on the 2θ diffraction angle and degree of crystallinity of Pinus massoniana wood are shown in Figure 5 and Table 2. Within the scanning interval of 0–80°, two significant peaks appeared on the curve, where the first one was located at about 2θ = 18°, representing the scattering intensity of the diffraction angle in the amorphous region. The second one appeared near 2θ=22°, denoting the maximum strength (I002) of the diffraction angle in the crystalline region. The I002 diffraction angles of untreated Pinus massoniana wood and that going through heat treatment were both about 22°, indicating that this heat treatment condition did not generate any obvious effect on the crystalline region of the wood. The degree of crystallinity of untreated Pinus massoniana wood cellulose was 45.8%. At the treatment temperatures of 160, 180, 200, and 220 °C, the degrees of crystallinity of cellulose were 46.5%, 47.3%, 44.8%, and 50.5%, respectively, which were increased by 0.7%, 1.5%, −2.8%, and 4.7%, respectively, manifesting that the degree of cellulose crystallinity presented the variation trend of increasing-decreasing-increasing with the increase in the heat treatment temperature. This result was consistent with the research conclusions of Mehnet [38] and Li [39].
Hemicelluloses were the first one to degrade, and could most easily experience pyrolysis during the heat treatment, the acids generated by the pyrolysis or the hot would degrade the amorphous region of cellulose and even microfibril in the crystalline region, and degrade the glucose units into a short-chain structure, so the degree of cellulose crystallinity was reduced. Meanwhile, the water would be dehydrated between hydroxyls on the molecular chain of the amorphous region of cellulose to generate an ether bond, and as a result, the microfibrils in the amorphous region were rearranged in an orderly and crystallized manner, and then the degree of cellulose crystallinity was elevated.
The hydrolysis of cellulose was not acute within the temperature range of 160–180 °C, what mainly took place during this process was transformation of amorphous region of cellulose into crystalline region, so the degree of crystallinity was increased in this phase. At 200 °C, the hemicelluloses degradation became acute, the generated acids would exert an effect on degrading the whole cellulose chain (the reduction amplitude in degree of cellulose crystallinity caused by this was much higher than that caused by the transformation of amorphous region into crystalline region) and, consequently, the degree of crystallinity was the minimum in this phase. The degree of cellulose crystallinity was increased at 220 °C, and the degree of crystallinity at the time was the highest in comparison with those at other treatment temperatures, which might be ascribed to the following aspects: (1) poly O-acetyl galactose glucose mannose and araban-4-O-methyl glucuronic acid xylose in hemicelluloses were degraded and crystallized; (2) the degraded microfibrils in the amorphous region of cellulose were crystallized again; (3) under the high-temperature environment, the water vapor might generate a certain degrading effect on lignin, and the lignin after all acetyls were stripped off become a monocrystal.

3.4. Color Change of Pinus Massoniana Wood

Wood color is directly related to its chemical components. Specifically, wood color is associated with unsaturated functional groups of chemical compounds, which, under visible light, will generate absorption peaks and result in the color development of chemical compounds, including vinyl, carbonyl, phenol, quinone, and diaromatic rings [29,32,40]. Lignin is the main source of wood color, followed by extractives, pigment, tannins, and resins. As shown in Figure 6, wood color was gradually darkened with increased treatment temperature, which was ascribed to the following aspects: (1) cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin experienced degradation to different degrees, and oxygen-containing groups like acetyl and carboxyl were gradually degraded, leading to increased carbon content; (2) Pinus massoniana wood extract contained various phenolic substances. Accompanied by the degradation of hemicelluloses and cellulose, these phenolic substances would go through redox reactions with increasing concentration in the heat treatment process, and as a result, the wood color was darkened; (3) As the heat treatment temperature was elevated, the lignin would be degraded and thus experience condensation reactions, the color chromophore groups in the conjugate of lignin were lengthened, and increased in quantity.

3.5. SEM Analysis

The apparent morphologies of untreated Pinus massoniana wood and treated Pinus massoniana wood at heat treatment temperatures of 160 (b) and 220 °C (c) are shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, the surface of untreated Pinus massoniana wood was smooth with clear and compact texture, and greasy pits could also be clearly observed (A). At 160 °C, the surface of Pinus massoniana wood started becoming rough, accompanied by slight fiber tearing phenomenon (B). At a temperature of 220 °C, the fiber tearing phenomenon was very apparent (C) on the surface of Pinus massoniana wood, the resin particles in the pits were obviously degraded or dissolved and migrated, and the pit membranes were exposed and cracked, so the pits became hollow, narrow and long with decreasing pore diameter (D). During the heat treatment, the degradation of cellulose, especially hemicelluloses, reduced the toughness of Pinus massoniana wood, the internal stress would be released from the wood during the moisture migration, so the surface of cell walls went through the fiber tearing phenomenon; the cell walls became thinner and the cell cavity was enlarged, giving rise to the collapse and shrinking of the pit border of the cell walls. In conclusion, the porosity and roughness of the surface of Pinus massoniana wood were obviously observed after the heat treatment.

3.6. Contact Angle Analysis

The contact angle is useful for judging the wettability of wood. The larger the contact angle, the poorer the wettability will be. Generally speaking, the wettability of solid surfaces is poor, and the liquid cannot wet the solid when the contact angle is larger than 90° [41]. Contact angle measurements of MUF resin on Pinus massoniana wood are displayed in Figure 8. Under the heat treatments of 160 and 180 °C, the contact angles were 81.5° and 86.5°, respectively, indicating that the surface of Pinus massoniana wood was hydrophilic, and the MUF resin spread on the surface and permeated into the wood. When the treatment temperatures were 200 and 220 °C, the contact angleswere 98.0° and 110.5°, respectively, and the surface became hydrophobic. The change of MUF-based contact angles on Pinus massoniana wood is consistent with that for water-based contact angles [33,42,43]. Therefore, the heat treatment temperature 180 °C was a turning point for the interfacial wettability of Pinus massoniana wood. Below the temperature of 180 °C, the interface was hydrophilic, and it could be effectively bound by conventional wood adhesives—formaldehyde-based resins. However, when the temperature was above 180 °C, the interface became hydrophobic, which would change alternative adhesives. The interface could be fully glued only by using phenolic resin, isocyanate and polyurethane, but their preparation cost was higher.

4. Conclusions

Heat treatment endowed wood with superior dimensional stability, corrosion resistance and durability. Therefore, understanding the interfacial changes of wood during the heat treatment can facilitate the improvement of bonding and coating processes of heat-treated wood. The novelty of this work was discussing in detail heat treatment temperatures ranging from 160 to 220 °C on the surface characteristics of Pinus massoniana wood from plantation forest, and the aim was to lay the foundation for the bonding and coating of Pinus massoniana glued wood structures. The results showed that hemicelluloses were the first to experience degradation at 160 °C, the cellulose experiencing obvious degradation at 200 °C, while there was less degradation of lignin. Pinus massoniana wood turned darkened color and passivated surface (accompanied with porosity and roughness). The Pinus massoniana wood interface turned from hydrophilic to hydrophobic, and 180 °C was a turning point for its wettability.

Author Contributions

Z.W. contributed the analysis of the results and the design of the experiment, X.D. and L.L. contributed the preparation of the samples and the testing of FT-IR and XRD, X.X. and M.T. contributed the testing and the analysis of contact angles, L.Y. and B.Z. contributed the edit of the paper and the analysis of the SEM results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Science-technology Support Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (Nos. [2019]2308, ZK [2021]162, [2020]1Y125 and NY [2015]3027), Cultivation Project of Guizhou University of China (No. [2019]37), Forestry Department Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (No. [2018]13).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are provided in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors highly appreciate the program from Science-technology Support Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (No. [2019]2325). The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kržišnik, D.; Lesar, B.; Thaler, N.; Humar, M. Influence of natural and artificial weathering on the colour change of different wood and wood-based materials. Forests 2018, 9, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ramage, M.H.; Burridge, H.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Fereday, G.; Reynolds, T.; Shah, D.U.; Wu, G.; Yu, L.; Fleming, P.; Densley-Tingley, D.; et al. The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ni, Z.; Zhou, P.; Xu, M.; Xu, L. Development and characterization of chloroplast microsatellite markers for Pinus massoniana and their application in Pinus (Pinaceae) species. J. Genet. 2018, 97, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, T.; Xie, Y.; Wei, Q.; Wang, X.; Hagman, O.; Karlsson, O.; Liu, J. Effect of refining on physical properties and paper strength of Pinus massoniana and China fir cellulose fibers. BioRes 2016, 11, 7839–7848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Esteves, B.; Pereira, H. Wood modification by heat treatment: A review. BioRes 2009, 4, 370–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nhacila, F.; Sitoe, E.; Uetimane, E.; Manhica, A.; Egas, A.; Möttönen, V. Effects of thermal modification on physical and mechanical properties of Mozambican Brachystegia spiciformis and Julbernardia globiflora wood. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 78, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korkut, S.; Alma, M.; Elyildirim, Y. The effects of heat treatment on physical and technological properties and surface roughness of European Hophornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) wood. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 820, 5316–5327. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wikberg, H.; Liisamaunu, S. Characterisation of thermally modified hard- and softwoods by 13C CPMAS NMR. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 58, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, Y.; Lu, J.; Huang, R.; Jiang, J. Increased dimensional stability of Chinese fir through steam-heat treatment. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2011, 70, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yu, Q. New research progress of functional wood. J. For. Eng. 2019, 4, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mantanis, G.I. Chemical modification of wood by acetylation or furfurylation: A review of the present scaled-up technologies. BioRes 2017, 12, 4478–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fodor, F.; Nemeth, R.; Lankveld, C.; Hofmann, T. Effect of acetylation on the chemical composition of hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) in relation with the physical and mechanical properties. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 13, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Iida, I.; Guo, J. Studies on pre-treatment by compression for wood impregnation I: Effects of compression ratio, compression direction, compression speed and compression-unloading place on the liquid impregnation of wood. J. Wood Sci. 2018, 64, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Iida, I.; Guo, J. Studies on pre-treatment by compression for wood impregnation II: The impregnation of wood compressed at different moisture content conditions. J. Wood Sci. 2019, 65, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Deng, X.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, B.; Xi, X.; Yu, L.; Li, L. Improvements in fire resistance, decay resistance, anti-mold property and bonding performance in plywood treated with manganese chloride, phosphoric acid, boric acid and ammonium chloride. Coatings 2021, 11, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bytner, O.; Laskowska, A.; Drożdżek, M.; Kozakiewicz, P.; Zawadzki, J. Evaluation of the dimensional stability of black poplar wood modified thermally in nitrogen atmosphere. Materials 2021, 14, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kozakiewicz, P.; Drożdżek, M.; Laskowska, A.; Grześkiewicz, M.; Bytner, O.; Radomski, A.; Zawadzki, J. Effects of thermal modification on the selected physical properties of sapwood and heartwood of black poplar (Populusnigra). BioRes 2019, 14, 8391–8404. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Sun, W. New perspective on wood thermal modification: Relevance between the evolution of chemical structure and physical-mechanical properties, and online analysis of release of VOCs. Polymers 2019, 11, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Čabalová, I.; Kačík, F.; Lagaňa, R.; Výbohová, E.; Bubeníková, T.; Čaňová, I.; Ďurkovič, J. Effect of thermal treatment on the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) wood. BioRes 2018, 13, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bremer, M.; Fischer, S.; Nguyen, T.C.; Wagenführ, A.; Phuong, L.X.; Dai, V.H. Effects of thermal modification on the properties of two vietnamese bamboo species. Part II: Effects on chemical composition. BioRes 2013, 8, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Windeisen, E.; Strobel, C.; Wegener, G. Chemical changes during the production of thermo-treated beech wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sundqvist, B.; Karlsson, O.; Westermark, U. Determination of formic-acid and acetic acid concentrations formed during hydrothermal treatment of birch wood and its relation to colour, strength and hardness. Wood Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gokhan, G.; Suleyman, K.; Deniz, A.; Llter, B. The density, compression strength and surface hardness of heat treated Hornbeam (Carpinusbetulus L.) wood. Cienc. Tecnol. 2009, 11, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  24. Percin, O.; Hüseyin, P.; Atlgan, A. The effect of heat treatment on the some physical and mechanical properties of beech (Fagus orientalislipsky) wood. Wood Res. 2016, 61, 443–456. [Google Scholar]
  25. Borůvka, V.; Dudík, R.; Zeidler, A.; Holeček, T. Influence of site conditions and quality of birch wood on its properties and utilization after heat treatment. Part I—Elastic and strength properties, relationship to water and dimensional stability. Forests 2019, 10, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Obataya, E.; Shibutani, S.; Hanata, K.; Doi, S. Effects of high temperature kiln drying on the practical performances of Japanese cedar wood (Cryptomeria japonica) II: Changes in mechanical properties due to heating. J. Wood. Sci. 2006, 52, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yildiz, S.; Gezer, E.D.; Yildiz, U.C. Mechanical and chemical behavior of spruce wood modified by heat. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1762–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kamdem, D.P.; Pizzi, A.; Jermannaud, A. Durability of heat-treated wood. Holzalsroh. Werkst. 2002, 60, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Simdqvist, B. Colour changes and acid formation in wood during heating. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Suleyman, K.; Budakci, M. The effects of high-temperature heat-treatment on physical properties and surface roughness of rowan (Sorbus aucuparial.) wood. Wood Res. 2010, 55, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chu, D.; Xue, L.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, L. Surface characteristics of poplar wood with high-temperature heat treatment: Wettability and surface brittleness. BioRes 2016, 11, 6948–6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gérardin, P.; Petrič, M.; Petrissans, M.; Lambert, J.; Ehrhrardt, J. Evolution of wood surface free energy after heat treatment. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ju, S.; Li, X.; Luo, T.; Li, M. Anisotropic propagation of acoustic emission signal on surface of Pinus massoniana Lamb. glulam. J. For. Eng. 2019, 4, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, X.; Meng, J.; Cheng, Z.; Guan, H. Research progress of durable superhydrophobic wood surface. J. For. Eng. 2020, 5, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu, Z.; Chen, S.; Tian, M.; Li, L.; Yu, L.; Xi, X.; Liang, J.; Zhang, B.; Lei, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. Effects of heat-treatment on bonding performance of Betula alnoides. Wood Res. 2019, 64, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cheng, F.; Zhao, X.; Hu, Y. Lignocellulosic biomass delignification using aqueous alcohol solutions with the catalysis of acidic ionic liquids: A comparison study of solvents. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 969–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gu, L.; Ding, T.; Jiang, N. Development of wood heat treatment research and industrialization. J. For. Eng. 2019, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehnet, A.; Esat, G.; Suleyman, K. Crystalline structure of heat- treated Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Uludag fir (Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) subsp. Bornmuelleriana (Mattf.)) wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Yi, S.; Wu, Z. Characteristics of FTIR and XRD for wood with high-temperature heating treatment. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2009, 31, 104–107. [Google Scholar]
  40. Boonstra, M.J.; van Acker, J.; Kegel, E.; Stevens, M. Optimisation of a two-stage heat treatment process: Durability aspects. Wood Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 31–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Tang, R.; Bao, B.; Sun, H. Mechanical properties and dimensional stability of heat-treated Chinese fir. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2010, 32, 232–236. [Google Scholar]
  42. Xie, G.; Li, L.; Li, X. Study on the surface characteristics of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood. For. Environ. Sci. 2018, 34, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lu, J.; Jiang, P.; Chen, Z.; Li, L. Characteristic analysis of flame retardant particleboard using three methods of combustion performance evaluation. J. For. Eng. 2020, 5, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
Coatings 11 00543 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of heat treatment on cellulose content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Figure 1. Effects of heat treatment on cellulose content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Coatings 11 00543 g001
Coatings 11 00543 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of heat treatment on hemicelluloses content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Figure 2. Effects of heat treatment on hemicelluloses content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Coatings 11 00543 g002
Coatings 11 00543 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of heat treatment on lignin content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Figure 3. Effects of heat treatment on lignin content of Pinus massoniana wood.
Coatings 11 00543 g003
Coatings 11 00543 g004 550
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood, (a) control, (b) 160 °C, (c) 180 °C, (d) 200 °C, (e) 220 °C.
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood, (a) control, (b) 160 °C, (c) 180 °C, (d) 200 °C, (e) 220 °C.
Coatings 11 00543 g004
Coatings 11 00543 g005 550
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) curves of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) curves of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Coatings 11 00543 g005
Coatings 11 00543 g006 550
Figure 6. The appearance of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Figure 6. The appearance of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Coatings 11 00543 g006
Coatings 11 00543 g007 550
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood, (a) control; (b) 160 °C; (c) 220 °C.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood, (a) control; (b) 160 °C; (c) 220 °C.
Coatings 11 00543 g007
Coatings 11 00543 g008 550
Figure 8. Effects of thermal treatment on melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) contact angle on Pinus massoniana.
Figure 8. Effects of thermal treatment on melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) contact angle on Pinus massoniana.
Coatings 11 00543 g008
Table
Table 1. Effects of heat treatment on contents of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Table 1. Effects of heat treatment on contents of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Treatment TemperatureCellulose/%Hemicelluloses/%Lignin/%
control42.6 (3.3)13.1 (1.2)21.1 (3.2)
160 °C41.2 (2.5)11.4 (0.9)25.1 (3.9)
180 °C39.0 (3.7)8.8 (0.8)26.3 (3.6)
200 °C33.5 (2.5)4.5 (0.5)33.4 (3.5)
220 °C29.4 (3.1)1.1 (0.3)37.7 (3.3)
Note: () means standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Diffraction angle and relative degree of crystallinity of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Table 2. Diffraction angle and relative degree of crystallinity of Pinus massoniana heat-treated wood.
Treatment Temperature2θ/°Relative Degree of Crystallinity/%
control22.545.8%
160 °C22.346.5%
180 °C22.047.3%
200 °C22.143.8%
220 °C22.150.5%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Z.; Deng, X.; Li, L.; Xi, X.; Tian, M.; Yu, L.; Zhang, B. Effects of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Properties of Pinus Massoniana Wood. Coatings 2021, 11, 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050543

AMA Style

Wu Z, Deng X, Li L, Xi X, Tian M, Yu L, Zhang B. Effects of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Properties of Pinus Massoniana Wood. Coatings. 2021; 11(5):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Zhigang, Xue Deng, Lifen Li, Xuedong Xi, Meifen Tian, Liping Yu, and Bengang Zhang. 2021. "Effects of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Properties of Pinus Massoniana Wood" Coatings 11, no. 5: 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050543

APA Style

Wu, Z., Deng, X., Li, L., Xi, X., Tian, M., Yu, L., & Zhang, B. (2021). Effects of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Properties of Pinus Massoniana Wood. Coatings, 11(5), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop