Next Article in Journal
Application of Auricularia cornea as a Pork Fat Replacement in Cooked Sausage
Previous Article in Journal
On Soliton Solutions of Perturbed Boussinesq and KdV-Caudery-Dodd-Gibbon Equations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solution-Processed All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices Based on SnO2/NiO doped with Tin

School of Electrical, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education, Cheonan 31253, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(11), 1431; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111431
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 21 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021

Abstract

:
We investigated the photochromic (PC) and electrochromic (EC) properties of tin-doped nickel oxide (NiO) thin films for solution-processable all-solid-state EC devices. The PC effect is shown to be enhanced by the addition of Sn into the precursor NiO solution. We fabricated an EC device with six layers—ITO/TiO2 (counter electrode)/SnO2 (ion-conducting layer)/SiO2 (barrier)/NiO doped with tin (EC layer)/ITO—by a hybrid fabrication process (sputtering for ITO and TiO2, sol–gel spin coating for SnO2 and NiO). The EC effect was also observed to be improved with the Sn-doped NiO layer. It was demonstrated that UV/O3 treatment is one of the critical processes that determine the EC performance of the hydroxide ion-based device. UV/O3 treatment generates hydroxide ions, induces phase separation from a single mixture of SnO2 and silicone oil, and improves the surface morphology of the films, thereby boosting the performance of EC devices. EC performance can be enhanced further by optimizing the thickness of TiO2 and SiO2 layers. Specifically, the SiO2 barrier blocks the transport of charges, bringing in an increase in anodic coloration. We achieved the transmittance modulation of 38.3% and the coloration efficiency of 39.7 cm2/C. We also evaluated the heat resistance of the all-solid-state EC device and found that the transmittance modulation was decreased by 36% from its initial value at 100 °C. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a large-area EC device can be fabricated using slot-die coating without much compromise on EC performance.

1. Introduction

Chromic phenomena such as thermochromism, photochromism, electrochromism, and solvatochromism occur in a material by various external stimuli [1]. Of those, photochromism (PC) can change its optical properties reversibly through interactions with sunlight or UV radiation, and electrochromism (EC) can be obtained through redox reaction under electric field [2,3]. The former phenomenon is commercially applicable in ophthalmics, sensors, optical memory, and switches, and the latter phenomenon is still extensively studied for the applications of car mirrors, smart windows, transparent displays, and solar protection. A typical EC device requires liquid- or gel-type electrolytes due to the inherent advantage of high diffusion rates of ions through fluids. Since the incorporation of those electrolytes may have the issue of leakage and durability, or a limitation in fabricating large-area devices, all-solid-state EC devices are highly demanded for practical applications [4]. A typical all-solid-state EC device consists of a transparent electrode/ion-storage layer/ion-conducting layer(solid-state electrolyte)/EC layer/transparent electrode [5]. For the ion-storage layer serving as a counter electrode, IrO2, TiO2-V2O5, TiO2-CeO2, and Li2O-FeO were used [6,7]. For the ion-conducting layer (solid-state electrolytes), ZrP, Ta2O5, TiO2, ZrO2, LiNbO3, LiAlF4, and LiBSO were usually employed [8,9]. EC materials can be divided into two types: anodically coloring materials (NiO, IrO2, Cr2O5, etc.) and cathodically coloring materials (WO3, MoO3, TiO2, Nb2O5, etc.) [10,11]. Of those, NiO and WO3 have been intensively investigated because of their high coloration efficiency, low material cost, excellent durability, and electrochemical stability [12,13]. EC devices with NiO and WO3 have great benefits in terms of energy savings because of low driving voltage (0–5 VDC), low power consumption, and memory effect by bistability even after the power supply is disconnected [14,15,16,17].
Of many all-solid-state EC devices, a Li+ ion-based device consisting of ITO/WO3/LiBSO/NiO/ITO was reported by Yang et al., which exhibited the transmittance modulation (∆T) of 52.2% and response time of 8 s and 20 s for bleaching and coloring, respectively [18]. Song et al. fabricated an all-solid-state EC device having the structure of ITO/NiO/LiTaO3/WO3/ITO. It showed an excellent transmittance modulation exceeding 67% and response time of 42 s and 85 s for bleaching and coloring states [19]. Moreover, Li et al. reported a novel four-layered structure of ITO/Li-NiO/Li-WO3/ITO fabricated using thermal evaporation to inject lithium ions, which had the modulation of 32% and response time of 1.7 s and 8.6 s for bleaching and coloring [20]. Yoshimura et al. introduced a H+ ion-based EC device where a thin SiO2 film embedded between WO3 (EC layer) and Ta2O5 (solid electrolyte) enhanced not only the transmittance modulation but also the response speed, all of which were fabricated by a sputter in vacuum [21]. Wang et al. prepared an all-solid-state EC device as a multilayer structure of ITO/WO3/Ta2O5/NiO/ITO and the maximum ∆T was 56.7% [22]. So far, most all-solid-state EC devices are based on Li+ or H+ ions using solid electrolytes. There has been some research on all-solid-state EC devices based on the hydroxide ion (OH) [23]. The EC effect occurs by the reaction of hydroxide ions with NiO films. It is greatly affected by the annealing temperature, crystallinity, porous surface, and doping materials in the NiO films [24]. Namely, a porous NiO film doped with Zn, Cu, and Al exhibited higher EC performance. However, most of them were demonstrated using a KOH aqueous electrolyte. To our best knowledge, no extensive study on all-solid-state EC devices based on OH ions has been conducted. In this work, we investigated a hydroxide-ion-based all-solid-state EC device without any aqueous electrolyte included, which consisted of ITO/TiO2 (counter electrode)/SnO2 (ion-conducting layer)/SiO2 (barrier)/NiO doped with tin (EC layer)/ITO. The EC device was fabricated using a hybrid process: sputtering deposition for transparent electrodes including TiO2 and sol-gel deposition for SnO2 and NiO. The sol-gel process enables large-area coatings at a relatively low temperature and cost-effective production. It also allows easy control of the doping concentration [25]. Although NiO thin films have been extensively studied in literature, the use of SnO2 as a dopant is little investigated. It was shown that EC performance can be improved by the addition of tin (Sn) into a NiO solution due to an increase in active sites. It was found that UV/O3 treatment applied after coatings of SnO2 and NiO layers is the most critical process to achieve the EC effect. We also demonstrated that a UV-treated silicon oil mixed into a precursor SnO2 solution is converted into an insulation layer between SnO2 and NiO layers, enhancing EC performance.

2. Materials and Methods

We first fabricated a NiO film using the sol-gel process to investigate the doping effect of Sn on its PC property. Then, we fabricated all-solid-state EC devices with a Sn-doped NiO EC layer using spin and slot-die coatings.

2.1. Fabrication of Sn-Doped NiO Films for Photochromism

The NiO solution was obtained by dissolving 5 wt% of nickel acetate tetrahydrate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98%) in 2-dimethylaminoethanol (Sigma Aldrich, 99.5%) for 2 hrs at 60 °C using a hotplate (MSH-20D, Daihan Scientific, Wonju, Korea). The Sn-doped NiO solutions were obtained by adding Tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (Sigma Aldrich, 92.5–100.0%) into the NiO solution as a dopant. The mixture was then stirred for 20 min. The solution was coated on a glass substrate as large as 25 × 25 mm2, which was cleaned with 2-propanol anhydrous (Sigma Aldrich, 99.5%) for 15 min in an ultrasonic bath (Powersonic 410, Hwashin, Seoul, Korea). Spin coatings were performed at 3000 rpm for 5 s, and the coated films were dried at 80 °C for 1 min and then at 115 °C for 9 min. The photochromic properties of the films were measured using UV-VIS spectrophotometer (T 70+, PG Instruments, Lutterworth, UK) and UV/O3 Cleaner (Model 24, BESSCO, Seoul, Korea). The samples were irradiated with UV light from a mercury lamp (Jelight Inc., Irvine, CA, USA, 35 mW/cm2, 184 nm and 254 nm wavelength) for 70 min while maintaining the plate temperature at 60 °C. The thickness and surface morphology of the NiO films were measured using scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7500F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscope (AFM, XE-100, Park Systems Corp., Suwon, Korea).

2.2. Fabrication of All-Solid-State EC Devices

Presented in Figure 1 is the layer structure and energy band diagram of the all-solid-state EC devices (six layers). The upper part of the rectangle represents the conduction band minimum and the lower part the valence band maximum, and the values below each layer represent the band gap [26]. ITO/TiO2 serves as a counter electrode, SnO2 acts as an ion-conducting layer, SiO2 is a barrier layer, and Sn-doped NiO is the optically functional EC layer. The TiO2 and anodic ITO layers were fabricated using a sputter, and the other layers were formed by the sol–gel process. TiO2 was deposited on the ITO pre-coated glass substrate by RF magnetron sputtering (The1-MSS2, TheONE Science) using a TiO2 target (3″ diameter × 1/8″ thickness, 99.99% purity). The base pressure was 8.0 × 10−6 torr. Argon was utilized as a sputtering gas with a flow rate of 15 sccm, and the working pressure was maintained at 5 × 10−3 torr. The distance between the target and substrate was 7 cm, and the substrate was rotated at 10 rpm. The deposition was carried out for 15 min at the power of 200 W to obtain the 83 nm thick films. Anodic ITO was deposited by direct-current (DC) magnetron sputtering using ITO target (3″ diameter × 1/8″ thickness, 99.99% purity). The flow rate of argon was 15 sccm, and the working pressure was maintained at 2 × 10−3 torr. The deposition was performed for 7 min at a power of 50 W, providing a 100 nm thick ITO film.

2.2.1. Spin Coating

As a precursor for the SnO2 film, 22 wt% of Tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate was dissolved in Xylene (Sigma Aldrich, 98.5%), and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature (Figure 2). In the SnO2 solution, 3 wt% of silicone oil (Esung Materials) was added to form the SiO2 barrier. The solution was spin-coated at 3000 rpm for 5 s onto the TiO2 substrate, and the film was dried on the hotplate at 80 °C for 10 min. Then, the film was exposed to UV light using a UV/O3 Cleaner for 70 min while maintaining the plate temperature at 20 °C using a chiller. NiO was deposited on the SnO2 film in the same way described in Section 2.1.
To enhance the EC properties of the devices, we fabricated them by varying different parameters such as the Sn concentration in the NiO solution, the concentration of silicon oil in the SnO2 solution, and the TiO2 thickness. The electrochemical property of the EC devices was measured by Autolab PGSTAT 302N potentiostat/galvanostat, and the transmittance of colored and bleached states was measured by UV-vis spectrometer within the range of 250–800 nm. The applied voltages for bleaching and coloring were set to be 0 V and 2.5 V, respectively. The layer thickness of the EC device was measured by SEM.

2.2.2. Slot Coating

To investigate the scalability to large-area EC devices, we fabricated the SnO2 and NiO films using a table coater (TSDC-KTEU, DCN), as shown in Figure 3. The table slot coater consists of a moving plate (400 mm × 500 mm) with a plate heater (up to 150 °C), dry unit (NIR lamp up to 400 °C), syringe pump system (flow rate 0.1~10 mL/min), and slot head module (head size: 40 mm × 30 mm × 105 mm, lip length: 20 mm, surface flatness: ±3 µm, coating gap: 3~2000 µm with a resolution of 1 µm). In the slot-die head with the effective coating width of 20 mm, a shim with the thickness of 25 µm was embedded, which was fabricated using a polyimide (PI) film by a laser cutter. To obtain the same layer thickness as fabricated by spin coating, we increased the weight percentage of Tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate in the SnO2 solution to 30 wt%, doubled the weight percentage of Nickel(II) acetate tetrahydrate and Tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate in the NiO solution (the ratio of them remained unchanged), and then performed slot coatings at the coating speed of 5 mm/s, coating gap of 200 μm, and flow rate of 0.02 mL/min.

3. Results

3.1. Photochromic Properties of Sn-Doped NiO Films

We first investigated the photochromic property of the undoped NiO thin film fabricated on a bare glass substrate. As seen in Figure 4, the undoped NiO film exhibits the transmittance of 92% at a wavelength of 550 nm before UV/O3 irradiation, but it is reduced to 85% after UV/O3 treatment. The color of the film was changed to brown, indicating the emergence of the photochromic effect (transmittance modulation of 7%). Photochromism in WO3 is known to be connected to optically excited electron (e)-hole (h+) pairs, which can decompose water incorporated in WO3 [27]. The light-induced decomposition of H2O can be written as H2O + 2h+ ⇔ O + 2H+. The protons together with the optically excited electrons lead to the formation of colored tungsten bronze HxWO3. Meanwhile, the photochromic effect in NiO can be explained as follows [28,29]. Moisture residing on the thin films during UV/O3 irradiation is decomposed into OH and O2 (Equation (1)). The hydroxide ions react with the NiO film, causing NiOOH that is colored into brown (Equation (2)) [30].
O 3 H 2 O + hv     2 OH + O 2
NiO + OH     NiOOH + e
It is well known that UV/O3 treatment reduces the surface energy (change contact angle) of thin films, shifts the Fermi level upward (band alignment), and increases the conductivity of films (i.e., quality of films). As such, it is likely that the UV-treated NiO films have more hydroxyl groups (-OH) involved in oxidization and reduction processes, inducing the photochromic effect. In addition, UV/O3 treatment brings in the sintering effect [31], making the NiO films denser and more uniform. To confirm it, we measured the thickness of NiO films before and after UV/O3 treatment using SEM. As evident in Figure 5, the film thickness was 122 nm before UV/O3 treatment, whereas it was reduced to 50 nm after UV/O3 treatment. Such a dense film is expected to enhance the film conductivity. Although the sintering effect would also appear by thermal annealing, it may degrade the device performance if the annealing temperature is too high (affecting the underlying layers). Therefore, UV/O3 treatment is preferred because it can be performed at a relatively low temperature.
To further enhance the PC effect of the NiO film, we doped Sn into the NiO solution. The doping concentration was varied within the range of between 0.5 wt% and 3 wt%. Presented in Figure 6a are the transmittance spectra of Sn-doped NiO films and in Figure 6b the images of the color change of those films after UV irradiation. At a doping concentration of 2 wt%, we achieved the lowest optical transmittance (63% at 550 nm). By the addition of Sn, the transmittance modulation was improved by 22% (7% to 29%) compared with the undoped NiO film. The enhancement in the PC effect can be explained using the band diagram of NiO, as depicted in Figure 7. Under UV irradiation, electrons are excited from the valence band to the conduction band and then move to the lower side formed by the addition of Sn, where they are more stable. Since NiO is the anodically coloring material, it is colored by charge ejection (oxidization process). By the addition of Sn, such an oxidization process becomes more pronounced, causing an increase in the transmittance modulation. A similar effect can be found in [32], which demonstrated that enhancement of charge-transfer kinetics and cyclic stability can be achieved for complementary WO3-NiO electrochromic devices by incorporating a thin SnOx (~5 nm) interfacial layer. By the doping of Sn, the Fermi level (EF) shifts toward the conduction band of NiO [33].
Figure 8 shows the transmittance spectra of 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO films as a function of UV/O3 irradiation time. When the irradiation time was between 40 and 60 min, a big change in the optical transmittance was observed in the PC effect. Based on this result, we chose the optimum UV irradiation time to be 70 min in the fabrication of the EC device. The doping of Sn also affects the surface morphology of the NiO films. To confirm this, we measured their X-ray diffraction (XRD, Empyrean, Panalytical, Malvern, UK) and surface roughness values and present the results in Figure 9. As evident in Figure 9a showing the XRD patterns of NiO films with and without UV/O3 treatment and with 2 wt% Sn doping, no crystalline peaks were observed regardless of UV/O3 treatment and Sn doping. Namely, NiO films with and without UV/O3 treatment and with Sn doping were completely amorphous with no orientation. The average roughness (Ra) and peak-to-valley roughness (Rpv) of the undoped NiO film were measured to be 1.1 nm and 31 nm, respectively. The average roughness is the average of how far each point on the surface deviates in height from the mean height, and the peak-to-valley roughness value measures the maximum depth of the surface irregularities. They affect the stability of the device because the short-circuit phenomenon would occur if those values were too high compared with the layer thickness. By the addition of 2 wt% Sn, the Ra and Rpv values were reduced to 0.7 nm and 21 nm, respectively. Namely, the surface morphology of the NiO film was enhanced with increasing Sn concentration. A similar result was also observed in [31], showing that the incorporation of the impurity (Sn) into NiOx films annealed at lower temperatures suppressed the grain growth and thus smoother surface. From those results (Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9), it is expected that the addition of Sn into NiO would enhance the EC performance of all-solid-state devices.

3.2. Electrochromic Properties of EC Devices

Presented in Figure 10a is the SEM image showing the layer thickness of the EC device fabricated by spin coating. Even though a hybrid process (sputtering and coating) was employed to fabricate the device, each layer is shown to be well defined. The thickness of the TiO2 and Sn-doped NiO layers was measured to be 83 nm and 32 nm, respectively. In particular, phase separation appeared during UV/O3 irradiation from a single mixture of SnO2 and silicone oil, causing the separated layers of SnO2 (~62 nm) and SiO2 (~10 nm). The thin SiO2 layer was formed atop the SnO2 layer. In fact, such a conversion process was applied to form the SiO2 film [34]. It was demonstrated that ozone and atomic oxygen, produced by exposure of atmospheric oxygen to UV radiation, remove organic portions of siloxane polymers as volatile products and leave a thin silicon oxide surface film. UV/O3 treatment removes up to 89% of the carbon from the resultant surface film, leading to an overall stoichiometry close to that of SiO2. Therefore, UV/O3 treatment can also provide a facile means of generating silicon oxide films. To demonstrate its effect more clearly, we added more silicone oil (from 3 wt% to 12.5 wt%) to the precursor SnO2 solution and spin-coated it under the same condition described in Section 2.2. As evident in Figure 10b, phase separation occurred, and the thickness of the SiO2 layer increased to 93 nm. The thickness of the SnO2 layer also increased because more high-viscosity (450 cSt) silicone oil was added into the precursor SnO2 solution with the viscosity of 306 cSt, by which less solution may be expelled from the substrate during spin coating. UV/O3 treatment may cause the photodiffusion phenomenon (the emergence of a discontinuity or discrete islands of the overcoated layer by the UV-induced diffusion process). As evident in Figure 10, however, such a phenomenon was not observed.
We investigated the EC property of the device with the same structure as in Figure 10a. Figure 11 shows the measured transmittance spectra and response time of the EC device with a 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO film. Summarized in Table 1 is the ∆T value measured at a wavelength of 550 nm for different Sn concentrations. The ∆T value of the EC device with the undoped NiO film was as low as 5.1%, whereas it was increased to 25.7% with the 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO film, a consequence similar to the PC effect in Figure 6. We obtained a transmittance of 77.6% in the bleached state and 51.9% in the colored state at 550 nm. The insets in Figure 11a are photographs of the EC device in bleached and colored states. Compared to the PC properties, the EC device shows a dark gray color rather than brown. One may speculate that it is because the SnO2 layer also acts as an EC layer. In fact, electrochromism was also observed in SnO2 films, and its EC effect was sensitively dependent on their crystallinity and preferred orientations [24]. However, the EC effect was extremely low using an amorphous SnO2 film. Furthermore, no photochromism was observed in the SnO2 film. It seems that the dark gray color is induced by the multi-layer structure. Although there may be some EC effect by the SnO2 layer, the NiO layer is the main EC layer. The response time for bleaching (tb) and coloring (tc), defined as the time required to reach 90% and 10% of the final and initial transmittance values [32], was measured to be 12 s and 20 s, respectively, as evident in Figure 11b, which is close to that (8 s for tb and 20 s tc) of the EC device with LiBSO. Shown in Figure 12a,b is the measured cyclic voltammogram performed between 0 V and 2.5 V at a scan rate of 100 mV/s for different Sn concentrations and optical density (ΔOD) versus charge density for the calculation of the coloration efficiency, respectively. The optical density and coloration efficiency (CE) are expressed as
Δ OD = log t b t c
CE   = Δ OD Q d
where Tb is the optical transmittance in the bleached state, Tc is the transmittance in the colored state, and Qd is the charge density. The current density (CE value) was measured to be 0.08 mA/cm2 (3 cm2/C) with the undoped NiO film, 0.21 mA/cm2 (8.4 cm2/C) with the 1 wt% Sn-doped NiO film, 0.77 mA/cm2 (29.2 cm2/C) with the 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO film, and 0.59 mA/cm2 (16.3 cm2/C) with the 3 wt% Sn-doped NiO film. Namely, the addition of dopants brings in an increment of anodic current density and thus coloration efficiency. Similar to the PC effect, the optimum amount of Sn dopant exhibiting the highest coloration efficiency was 2 wt%.
As depicted in Figure 13, the SnO2 film is an n type and the NiO film is a p type. The hydroxyl protons are generated during UV irradiation on the surface of the SnO2 and NiO films because UV-treated films have more hydroxyl groups (-OH) that modify the surface energy. Under a forward bias, electrons and holes are blocked by the SiO2 barrier, causing a charge accumulation (electrons in the SnO2 layer and holes in the NiO layer). At the same time, electrons are extracted from the NiO layer or trapped to the lower side formed by the addition of Sn (Figure 7), increasing the anodic charge density. Furthermore, the hydroxide ions are transported to the EC layer through SiO2, and thus reaction occurs, causing anodic coloration. It is apparent that Sn doping improves EC performance (anodic coloration) due to an increase in the reaction sites in the EC layer. A similar effect was observed in the CV measurement using an aqueous electrolyte (KOH). In [23], the quantity of ions and electrons extracted from the NiO film increased with increasing doping concentration, indicating that the reaction activity of the Zn-doped NiO thin film was better than the undoped NiO film. In [35], the Al-doped NiO film also showed an increase in the anodic and cathodic peak currents. It was demonstrated that Al doping augmented the specific surface area and active sites, and a moderate amount of Al doping could be conductive for ion transport. In [25], the addition of the dopant (V2O5) caused a significant improvement in charge density values. The anodic charge density increased from 25.5 mC/cm2 for the NiO film to 52.8 mC/cm2 for the 10 mol% V2O5-doped NiO film. The V2O5-doped NiO film also improved the optical properties and kinetics of the insertion and extraction process.
In our device structure, UV/O3 treatment is one of the critical processes that determine EC performance. We found that no EC effect was observed if UV/O3 treatment was removed even once in our fabrication process (first treatment for SnO2 and second treatment for NiO). As discussed above, UV/O3 treatment played a key role in phase separation, forming the separated SiO2 layer on the SnO2 layer. Moreover, it generated the hydroxyl protons that react with the NiO film. It also enhanced the surface morphology of the NiO film. Such positive effects that appeared in the NiO film were also observed in SnO2 films [36]. The intensity of the -OH bond in UV/O3-treated amorphous SnO2 increased, compared with that in amorphous SnO2 without UV/O3 treatment. It indicates that the UV-treated SnO2 films have more hydroxyl groups. Furthermore, the UV-untreated SnO2 film had an irregular surface with distinct valleys, but the UV-treated SnO2 film had a dense and more uniform surface. It was also demonstrated that the UV-treated SnO2 showed better charge transport and less recombination due to the high electronic conductivity and the smooth surface [36]. The EF of UV-treated SnO2 was found to be shifted upward because the UV treatment affected the electron density by the formation of -OH chemisorption. Therefore, the UV/O3-treated SnO2 layer is expected to enhance the EC performance of the device. However, much care should be taken in selecting the UV power and time during the UV/O3 treatment process. For the SnO2 film, the optimum UV power and time were 35 mW/cm2 and 70 min, which was also applied for the NiO film. When the UV power was too high or time was too long, the film was colored and never returned to its original color.
In an attempt to improve the performance of the EC device, we varied the TiO2 layer thickness within the range of between 16 nm and 95 nm, which was done by controlling RF sputtering time. As presented in Figure 14 and Table 2, the ∆T value of the EC device was increased from 21.3% to 38.3% when the TiO2 thickness was decreased from 95 nm to 48 nm. However, when the TiO2 thickness was less than 48 nm, the ∆T value was rather decreased. The optical transmittance of the EC device with the 48 nm thick TiO2 layer was 85.5% in the bleached state and 47.2% in the colored state at 550 nm. The response time for bleaching (tb) and coloring (tc) was measured to be 10 s and 14 s, respectively. It was observed that the response time (tc) was reduced by about 30%, compared to the EC device with the 83 nm thick TiO2 film in Figure 11. Since TiO2 is not only an ion-storage layer but also an insulating material, a thick TiO2 layer reduces the response speed of the EC device. Therefore, the optimum TiO2 thickness in this work was observed to be about 48 nm. Through a comparison between the insets in Figure 11a and Figure 14a, we can see that the color of the device becomes darker in the colored state when the TiO2 layer is thinner. We also measured the chromaticity of the EC device using a spectrophotometer (ColorMate, SCINCO, Seoul, Korea) and present the result in Figure 14c. The chromaticity coordinate lies in the second quadrant (yellow-green region, a* = −8.0275, b* = 4.5311) in the bleached state, showing yellowish-green color. It shifts to the first quadrant (yellow-red region, a* = 8.0468, b* = 5.1983) in the colored state, exhibiting dark grayish-brown color.
For the same purpose, we varied the amount of silicon oil from 0 to 4 wt% in the precursor SnO2 solution. Summarized in Table 3 is the measured ∆T value for different silicon oil concentrations. We found that the EC device without silicone oil had the lowest transmittance modulation of 4.4%. The ∆T value increased as the silicon oil concentration increased. It was due to the fact that the barrier layer prevents electrons from injecting into the EC layer, and at the same time, the accumulated holes in the EC layer promote the transport of the hydroxyl ions into the EC layer (Figure 13). A similar phenomenon (effect) was also demonstrated in a WO3/SiO2/Ta2O5 EC device fabricated by the sputtering process [21]. When the silicone oil concentration exceeds 3 wt% (thicker SiO2 layer), the hydroxide ions do not easily move through the SiO2 layer, degrading EC performance. Therefore, the optimum silicon oil concentration (SiO2 layer thickness) was 3 wt% (~10 nm). With the optimum device structure (NiO doped with 2 wt% Sn, TiO2 = 48 nm, SiO2 = 10 nm), we achieved the transmittance modulation of as high as 38.3% and the coloration efficiency of 39.7 cm2/C. Figure 15 shows the in situ transmittance curve during the continuous potential cycling test of the optimized EC device. The in situ transmittance change gradually degrades and then saturates at about 60,000 s, at which time the transmittance modulation is about 23%.
One of the main advantages of all-solid-state EC devices is their heat resistance. To demonstrate it, we measured the change in the ∆T value of the optimized EC device (TiO2 = 48 nm, SiO2 = 10 nm, NiO doped with 2 wt% Sn), which is induced by the heat applied to the device using a hotplate for 2 hs. As evident in Figure 16, the ∆T value decreased with increasing temperature. The ∆T value was 38.3% at 25 °C, 33.2% at 60 °C, 24.6% at 100 °C, and 2.7% 140 °C. At 100 °C, the ∆T value was decreased by 36% from its initial value.

3.3. Comparison between Spin and Slot Coatings

To demonstrate the scalability to large-area EC devices, we also fabricated the EC devices using slot-die coating under the same process condition described in Section 2.2.2. The thickness of each layer (SnO2 = 61 nm, NiO = 30 nm) fabricated by slot-die coating was almost the same as that (SnO2 = 62 nm, NiO = 32 nm) by spin coating. As shown in Figure 17, ∆T value was measured to be 34.1% (the transmittance of bleached and colored states was 80.7% and 46.6%, respectively), which was very close to that of the spin-coated EC device. We also made a comparison between them in terms of the surface morphology of the coated films. As seen in Figure 18 and Table 4, the surface morphology of the slot-coated SnO2 on TiO2 and NiO on SnO2 was better than that of spin-coated films. The Rpv value (43 nm) of spin-coated SnO2 was reduced to 16 nm by slot-die coating, and a similar effect was observed in the slot-coated NiO film. It was because more coating defects occur in spin coating, as evident in Figure 18e. Such a defect is attributed to that aggregation occurs or the film drying has progressed considerably under centrifugal force during spin coating. Therefore, slot-die coating can be employed in the fabrication of large-area all-solid-state EC devices without much compromise on the EC performance.

4. Conclusions

By a hybrid fabrication process (sputtering and sol-gel spin/slot coatings), we fabricated all-solid-state EC devices with Sn-doped NiO as an optically functional EC layer. It was found that the PC effect was enhanced from 7% to 29% and the EC effect from 5.1% to 25.7% by the addition of 2 wt% Sn into the precursor NiO solution. As a critical process for hydroxide-ion-based EC devices, UV/O3 treatment was shown to enable (1) the formation of high-quality (dense and smooth) films, (2) the generation of hydroxide ions, (3) the conversion (phase separation) of silicon oil into the SiO2 barrier at a low temperature, and (4) the enhancement of the overall device performance. The EC performance was also varied depending sensitively on the thickness of TiO2 and SiO2 layers, and the optimum thickness was 48 nm and 10 nm, respectively. With the optimum device structure (NiO doped with 2 wt% Sn, TiO2 = 48 nm, SiO2 = 10 nm), we achieved the transmittance modulation of 38.3% and the coloration efficiency of 39.7 cm2/C. The EC device also exhibited good heat resistance (36% decrease in the transmittance modulation at 100 °C for 2 h).

Author Contributions

Spin/slot-die coatings and measurement, G.K., S.H., and S.Y.; data analysis, writing, and supervision, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a building project of an innovative display process platform (20006469, “Development of roll to roll based manufacturing process and device application of transmittance variation smart film”) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, D. Optimization of Nickel Oxide-Based Electrochromic Thin Films. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Sciences et Technologies, Bordeaux, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ohko, Y.; Tatsuma, T.; Fujii, T.; Naoi, K.; Niwa, C.; Kubota, Y.; Fujishima, A. Multicolour Photochromism of TiO2 Films Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liptay, W. Electrochromism and Solvatochromism. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English 1969, 8, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effect of Independently Controllable Electrolyte Ion Content on the Performance of All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, K.J.; Bhatt, G.G.; Ray, J.R.; Suryavanshi, P.; Panchal, C.J. All-Inorganic Solid-State Electrochromic Devices: A Review. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aegerter, M.; Kim, C.Y. Dip-Coated TiO2 CeO2 Films as Transparent Counter-Electrode for Transmissive Electrochromic Devices Related Papers. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 1990, 121, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Özer, N.; Sabuncu, S.; Cronin, J. Electrochromic Properties of Sol-Gel Deposited Ti-Doped Vanadium Oxide Film. Thin Solid Films 1999, 338, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azens, A.; Kullman, L.; Vaivars, G.; Nordborg, H.; Granqvist, C.G. Sputter-Deposited Nickel Oxide for Electrochromic Applications. Solid State Ionics 1998, 113–115, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mehmood, A.; Long, X.; Haidry, A.A.; Zhang, X. Trends in Sputter Deposited Tungsten Oxide Structures for Electrochromic Applications: A Review. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 23295–23313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joost, U.; Šutka, A.; Oja, M.; Smits, K.; Döbelin, N.; Loot, A.; Järvekülg, M.; Hirsimäki, M.; Valden, M.; Nõmmiste, E. Reversible Photodoping of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Photochromic Applications. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 8968–8974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pittaluga, M. Eco-efficient Materials for Mitigating Building Cooling Needs; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sta, I.; Jlassi, M.; Hajji, M.; Ezzaouia, H. Structural, Optical and Electrical Properties of Undoped and Li-Doped NiO Thin Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method. Thin Solid Films 2014, 555, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ren, Y.; Chim, W.K.; Guo, L.; Tanoto, H.; Pan, J.; Chiam, S.Y. The Coloration and Degradation Mechanisms of Electrochromic Nickel Oxide. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 116, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nundy, S.; Mesloub, A.; Alsolami, B.M.; Ghosh, A. Electrically Actuated Visible and Near-Infrared Regulating Switchable Smart Window for Energy Positive Building: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 301, 126854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koo, J.; Amoli, V.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, C.; Kim, J.; Park, S.M.; Kim, J.; Ahn, J.M.; Jung, K.J.; Kim, D.H. Low-Power, Deformable, Dynamic Multicolor Electrochromic Skin. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Macrelli, G. Optical Characterization of Commercial Large Area Liquid Crystal Devices. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1995, 39, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Piccolo, A.; Pennisi, A.; Simone, F. Daylighting Performance of an Electrochromic Window in a Small Scale Test-Cell. Sol. Energy 2009, 83, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Wang, C.; Diao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhu, K. A New All-Thin-Film Electrochromic Device Using LiBSO as the Ion Conducting Layer. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2008, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, X.; Dong, G.; Gao, F.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Diao, X. Properties of NiOx and Its Influence upon All-Thin-Film ITO/NiOx/LiTaO3/WO3/ITO Electrochromic Devices Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering. Vacuum 2015, 111, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, D.; Li, X.; Chen, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y. Preparation and Performance of Fast-Response ITO/Li-NiO/Li-WO3/ITO All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices by Evaporation Method. Mater. Lett. 2020, 265, 127464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshimura, H.; Koshida, N. Fast Electrochromic Effect Obtained from Solid-State Inorganic Thin-Film Configuration with a Carrier Accumulation Structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, S.C.; Liu, K.Y.; Huang, J.L. Tantalum Oxide Film Prepared by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering Deposition for All-Solid-State Electrochromic Device. Thin Solid Films 2011, 520, 1454–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, K.H.; Kahuku, M.; Abe, Y.; Kawamura, M.; Kiba, T. Improved Electrochromic Performance in Nickel Oxide Thin Film by Zn Doping. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 4065–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patil, P.S.; Sadale, S.B.; Mujawar, S.H.; Shinde, P.S.; Chigare, P.S. Synthesis of Electrochromic Tin Oxide Thin Films with Faster Response by Spray Pyrolysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 8560–8567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Azevedo, C.F.; Balboni, R.D.C.; Cholant, C.M.; Moura, E.A.; Lemos, R.M.J.; Pawlicka, A.; Gündel, A.; Flores, W.H.; Pereira, M.; Avellaneda, C.O. New Thin Films of NiO Doped with V2O5 for Electrochromic Applications. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2017, 110, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Takaki, H.; Inoue, S.; Matsumura, Y. Requirements for Photochromism in Double-Layer Metal Oxide Films. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 732, 136620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, K.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Chen, G.; Jiang, R.; Tao, K.; Liang, L.; Gao, J.; Cao, H. Unraveling the Role of Water on the Electrochromic and Electrochemical Properties of Nickel Oxide Electrodes in Electrochromic Pseudocapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 113502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sawaby, A.; Selim, M.S.; Marzouk, S.Y.; Mostafa, M.A.; Hosny, A. Structure, Optical and Electrochromic Properties of NiO Thin Films. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2010, 405, 3412–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tachikawa, H.; Abe, S. Spectral Shifts of Ozone Molecule by the Complex Formation with a Water Molecule. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 432, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noonuruk, R.; Wongpisutpaisan, N.; Mukdacharoenchai, P.; Techitdheera, W.; Pecharapa, W. Ozone-Induced Optical Density Change of NiO Thin Films and Their Applicability as Neutral Optical Density Filter. Procedia Eng. 2011, 8, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Méndez, P.F.; Muhammed, S.K.M.; Barea, E.M.; Masi, S.; Mora-Seró, I. Analysis of the UV–Ozone-Treated SnO2 Electron Transporting Layer in Planar Perovskite Solar Cells for High Performance and Reduced Hysteresis. Sol. RRL 2019, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, K.; Qiu, D.; Zhang, H.; Chen, G.; Xie, W.; Tao, K.; Bao, S.; Liang, L.; Gao, J.; Cao, H. Boosting Charge-Transfer Kinetics and Cyclic Stability of Complementary WO3–NiO Electrochromic Devices via SnOx Interfacial Layer. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2021, 6, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, T.; Li, X.; Jang, J. High Performance P-Type NiOx Thin-Film Transistor by Sn Doping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ouyang, M.; Yuan, C.; Muisener, R.J.; Boulares, A.; Koberstein, J.T. Conversion of Some Siloxane Polymers to Silicon Oxide by UV/Ozone Photochemical Processes. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1591–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, J.; Lai, L.; Zhang, P.; Li, H.; Qin, Y.; Gao, Y.; Luo, L.; Lu, J. Aluminum Doped Nickel Oxide Thin Film with Improved Electrochromic Performance from Layered Double Hydroxides Precursor in Situ Pyrolytic Route. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 241, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jung, K.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, J.; Ko, S.; Choi, J.W.; Kim, K.C.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, M.J. Influence of a UV-Ozone Treatment on Amorphous SnO2 Electron Selective Layers for Highly Efficient Planar MAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 59, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Layer structure and energy band diagram of all-solid-state EC device.
Figure 1. Layer structure and energy band diagram of all-solid-state EC device.
Coatings 11 01431 g001
Figure 2. Fabrication process flow of all-solid-state EC device using a spin coater.
Figure 2. Fabrication process flow of all-solid-state EC device using a spin coater.
Coatings 11 01431 g002
Figure 3. Image of a table slot-die coater and slot-die head used for experiments.
Figure 3. Image of a table slot-die coater and slot-die head used for experiments.
Coatings 11 01431 g003
Figure 4. UV-vis spectra of undoped NiO film before and after 70 min UV/O3 irradiation.
Figure 4. UV-vis spectra of undoped NiO film before and after 70 min UV/O3 irradiation.
Coatings 11 01431 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of undoped NiO film (a) before and (b) after UV/O3 treatment.
Figure 5. SEM images of undoped NiO film (a) before and (b) after UV/O3 treatment.
Coatings 11 01431 g005
Figure 6. (a) Transmittance spectra and (b) images of Sn-doped NiO films for different Sn concentrations after 70 min UV/O3 treatment.
Figure 6. (a) Transmittance spectra and (b) images of Sn-doped NiO films for different Sn concentrations after 70 min UV/O3 treatment.
Coatings 11 01431 g006
Figure 7. Energy band diagram showing the effect of Sn doping into NiO.
Figure 7. Energy band diagram showing the effect of Sn doping into NiO.
Coatings 11 01431 g007
Figure 8. UV-vis spectra of 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO films for different UV/O3 treatment times.
Figure 8. UV-vis spectra of 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO films for different UV/O3 treatment times.
Coatings 11 01431 g008
Figure 9. (a) XRD patterns of NiO films and AFM images of (b) undoped, (c) 0.5 wt%, (d) 1 wt%, and (e) 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO films.
Figure 9. (a) XRD patterns of NiO films and AFM images of (b) undoped, (c) 0.5 wt%, (d) 1 wt%, and (e) 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO films.
Coatings 11 01431 g009aCoatings 11 01431 g009b
Figure 10. SEM image of (a) the EC device with 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO layer and (b) SnO2 layer on which the separated SiO2 layer is formed after UV treatment.
Figure 10. SEM image of (a) the EC device with 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO layer and (b) SnO2 layer on which the separated SiO2 layer is formed after UV treatment.
Coatings 11 01431 g010
Figure 11. (a) Transmittance spectra measured after applying a voltage for 2 min and (b) response time of the EC device with 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO film (the dash lines indicate the time required for the transmittance to reach 0% to 90% or 100% to 10%).
Figure 11. (a) Transmittance spectra measured after applying a voltage for 2 min and (b) response time of the EC device with 2 wt% Sn-doped NiO film (the dash lines indicate the time required for the transmittance to reach 0% to 90% or 100% to 10%).
Coatings 11 01431 g011
Figure 12. (a) Measured cyclic voltammogram performed between 0 V and 2.5 V for different Sn concentrations and (b) optical density versus charge density for the calculation of the coloration efficiency.
Figure 12. (a) Measured cyclic voltammogram performed between 0 V and 2.5 V for different Sn concentrations and (b) optical density versus charge density for the calculation of the coloration efficiency.
Coatings 11 01431 g012
Figure 13. Energy band diagram of all-solid-state EC device with SiO2 layer.
Figure 13. Energy band diagram of all-solid-state EC device with SiO2 layer.
Coatings 11 01431 g013
Figure 14. (a) Measured transmittance spectra, (b) response time, (c) chromaticity diagram of the EC device with 48 nm thick TiO2 layer.
Figure 14. (a) Measured transmittance spectra, (b) response time, (c) chromaticity diagram of the EC device with 48 nm thick TiO2 layer.
Coatings 11 01431 g014
Figure 15. In situ transmittance curve during the continuous potential cycling test of the optimized EC device (NiO doped with 2 wt% Sn, TiO2 = 48 nm, SiO2 = 10 nm).
Figure 15. In situ transmittance curve during the continuous potential cycling test of the optimized EC device (NiO doped with 2 wt% Sn, TiO2 = 48 nm, SiO2 = 10 nm).
Coatings 11 01431 g015
Figure 16. Transmittance in the bleached and colored states as a function of temperature.
Figure 16. Transmittance in the bleached and colored states as a function of temperature.
Coatings 11 01431 g016
Figure 17. Transmittance spectra of the EC device fabricated by slot–die coating (the insets are photo images of the bleached and colored states).
Figure 17. Transmittance spectra of the EC device fabricated by slot–die coating (the insets are photo images of the bleached and colored states).
Coatings 11 01431 g017
Figure 18. AFM images of (a) spin-coated SnO2, (b) spin-coated NiO, (c) slot-coated SnO2, (d) slot-coated NiO films, and (e) image of defects in the spin-coated SnO2/NiO films.
Figure 18. AFM images of (a) spin-coated SnO2, (b) spin-coated NiO, (c) slot-coated SnO2, (d) slot-coated NiO films, and (e) image of defects in the spin-coated SnO2/NiO films.
Coatings 11 01431 g018aCoatings 11 01431 g018b
Table 1. Transmittance modulation of the EC device at 550 nm for different Sn concentrations in the NiO layer.
Table 1. Transmittance modulation of the EC device at 550 nm for different Sn concentrations in the NiO layer.
Sn Concentration (wt%)∆T (%)
Non-doped5.1
120.5
225.7
321.0
Table 2. Transmittance modulation of EC devices at 550 nm for different TiO2 thicknesses.
Table 2. Transmittance modulation of EC devices at 550 nm for different TiO2 thicknesses.
TiO2 Thickness (nm)∆T (%)
9521.3
8325.7
6326.9
4838.3
3223.1
1615.4
Table 3. Transmittance modulation of the EC device at 550 nm for different silicon oil concentrations.
Table 3. Transmittance modulation of the EC device at 550 nm for different silicon oil concentrations.
Silicone Oil Concentration (wt%)∆T (%)
04.4
18.4
232.9
338.3
431.5
Table 4. Surface roughness of spin/slot-coated SnO2 on TiO2 and NiO on SnO2.
Table 4. Surface roughness of spin/slot-coated SnO2 on TiO2 and NiO on SnO2.
LayerSpin CoatingSlot Coating
Rpv (nm)Ra (nm)Rpv (nm)Ra (nm)
SnO2431.6160.9
NiO321.3150.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, G.; Hong, S.; Yoo, S.; Park, J. Solution-Processed All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices Based on SnO2/NiO doped with Tin. Coatings 2021, 11, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111431

AMA Style

Kim G, Hong S, Yoo S, Park J. Solution-Processed All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices Based on SnO2/NiO doped with Tin. Coatings. 2021; 11(11):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Gieun, Songeun Hong, Suho Yoo, and Jongwoon Park. 2021. "Solution-Processed All-Solid-State Electrochromic Devices Based on SnO2/NiO doped with Tin" Coatings 11, no. 11: 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop