Next Article in Journal
Identification of Additional Anti-Persister Activity against Borrelia burgdorferi from an FDA Drug Library
Next Article in Special Issue
Focus on the Outer Membrane Factor OprM, the Forgotten Player from Efflux Pumps Assemblies
Previous Article in Journal
Short, Synthetic Cationic Peptides Have Antibacterial Activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis by Forming Pores in Membrane and Synergizing with Antibiotics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Transcriptional Repressor, MtrR, of the mtrCDE Efflux Pump Operon of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Can Also Serve as an Activator of “off Target” Gene (glnE) Expression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multidrug Efflux Systems in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria

1
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
2
Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 1-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2015, 4(3), 379-396; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4030379
Submission received: 26 June 2015 / Revised: 11 August 2015 / Accepted: 13 August 2015 / Published: 28 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-drug Efflux and Drug Permeation)

Abstract

:
Active drug efflux constitutes an important mechanism of antibiotic and multidrug resistance in bacteria. Understanding the distribution, expression, and physiological functions of multidrug efflux pumps, especially under physiologically and clinically relevant conditions of the pathogens, is the key to combat drug resistance. In animal hosts, most wounded, infected and inflamed tissues display low oxygen tensions. In this article, we summarize research development on multidrug efflux pumps in the medicinally relevant microaerobic and anaerobic pathogens and their implications in the effort to combat drug-resistant infections.

1. Introduction

Since the first antibiotic, penicillin, was put into clinical practice in the early 20th century, hundreds of antibiotics have been developed and applied in clinical medicine. However, bacterial infectious diseases remain a major problem in public health [1]. An important reason for this ineptness is the emergence and prevalence of bacterial multidrug resistance (MDR). Thus far, four general strategies bacteria utilize to develop resistance have been identified, prevention of drug entry, active drug efflux, modification of drug targets, and inactivation of drugs by hydrolyzation or enzymatic modification. Among them, active drug extrusion, which is carried out by a class of membrane proteins called multidrug efflux pumps, is the major reason for bacterial simultaneous resistance to multiple antibiotics, i.e., multidrug resistance, and is frequently associated with clinically isolated resistance [2,3]. To combat multidrug resistance, it is necessary to investigate the distribution, expression, and physiological functions of multidrug efflux pumps in bacteria, especially under the physiologically and medically relevant conditions.
In animal hosts, most wounded, infected, and inflamed tissues display low oxygen tensions. Examples include inflamed gut, Schistosoma mansoni-infected tissue, Streptococcus pyogenes- and Leishmania amazonensis-infected skin, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis- or Aspergillus fumigatus-infected lung tissue [4]. In addition, facultative anaerobes including all major pathogens that infect the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract constantly encounter oxygen fluctuations [5]. Although significant developments on the identification, expression, and physiological functions of bacterial multidrug efflux pumps under ordinary laboratory conditions and in model bacterial species have been achieved in the past decades, those in the physiologically and clinically relevant microaerobic and anaerobic niches of pathogens have not been extensively studied. In this article, we focus on the recent research development on bacterial multidrug efflux pumps in microaerobic and obligate anaerobic niches of pathogens (Table 1) and their implications in combating drug resistance.

2. Classification of Efflux Pumps and Their Regulation

Multidrug efflux pumps exist in almost all bacterial species. According to their different compositions, energy sources, substrates, and number of transmembrane domains, multidrug efflux pumps are divided into five classes: (i) the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS); (ii) the Resistance-Nodulation-Division (RND) family; (iii) the ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) superfamily; (iv) the Small Multidrug Resistance (SMR) family; and (v) the Multidrug And Toxic compound Extrusion (MATE) family [1,6,7]. In addition to antibiotics, multidrug efflux pumps are also found to expel a broad range of environmental and physiological toxic compounds, such as dyes, detergents, bile acids, hormones, organic acids, etc. Thus, they are also referred to as xenobiotic pumps or transporters.
Although ubiquitously encoded in bacterial genomes, except for a handful of housekeeping systems, the production levels of the majority of efflux pumps are low and their expression is often under the strict control of multiple regulators. Currently, efflux pump regulators are mainly categorized into three groups (Figure 1) [6]: (i) local repressors, which usually are located adjacent to the regulated efflux genes to repress their expression. They often belong to the MarR, MerR, or TetR transcription factor superfamily, such as AcrR, which represses the expression of acrAB in Salmonella [8,9,10]; (ii) global response regulators, which are often activated in response to certain stimuli and regulate a large scale of gene expression in addition to that of efflux pumps such as SoxS, which regulates acrAB expression in response to superoxide stress in Salmonella [11]; and (iii) two component systems (TCSs), which are consisted of a sensor kinase and a cognate response regulator. Examples include the BaeSR TCS, which activates the expression of mdtABCD [12,13]. All these three regulatory patterns which have been identified in the efflux pump expression in aerobic bacteria are also present in microaerobic and anaerobic pathogens.
Table 1. A summary of the distribution, substrate spectrum, and regulation of bacterial efflux systems in microaerobic or anaerobic niches.
Table 1. A summary of the distribution, substrate spectrum, and regulation of bacterial efflux systems in microaerobic or anaerobic niches.
SpeciesMajor Efflux PumpsRegulatorsAntimicrobial Agents Being PumpedReference
Microaerobic niches
Campylobacter spp.CmeABC (RND)CmeR (TetR) Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Cefotaxime, Fusidic Acid, Erythromycin[14,15,16]
CosR (OmpR)
CmeDEF (RND) Ampicillin, Polymyxin B, Ethidium Bromide [14]
CmeG (MFS) Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Gentamicin, Tetracycline, Rifampicin, Ethidium Bromide, Cholic Acid, Hydrogen Peroxide[17]
NhaA1/NhaA2 (cation/proton antiporters) Trisodium Phosphate[18]
Helicobacter pyloriHefABC (RND) Metronidazole, Tetracycline, Erythromycin, Penicillin G, Ciprofloxacin[19,20]
HefDEF (RND) [19]
HefGHI (RND) [19]
Staphylococcus aureusNorBMgrA (MarR)Moxifloxacin, Sparfloxacin[21]
Anaerobic niches
Bacteroides fragilisBmeABC1-16 (RND)BmeR (TetR)Cephems, Polypeptide Antibiotics, Fusidic Acid, Novobiocin, Puromycin Ampicillin, Cefoxitin, Cefoperazone, Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole, Imipenem, Ethidium Bromide, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate.[22,23]
BexA Fluoroquinolone[24]
Clostridium perfringensbcrABDbcrRPhenotypic Bacitracin[25]
Escherichia coliMdtEF (RND)ArcAB Indole Nitrosative Derivatives erythromycin[26,27]
(TCS)
MnmE
H-NS
CusCBA (RND)CusSR (TCS)Cu(I)[28]
Porphyromonas gingivalisXepCAB (RND) Rifampin, Puromycin, Ethidium Bromide[29]
Salmonella entericaAcrAB (RND) [30]
TolC [31]
TetA Etracycline, Ethidium Bromide[31]
Staphylococcus aureusMnhF Bile Salts[32]
Figure 1. Regulatory patterns of multidrug efflux pumps (using those in Salmonella typhimurium as an example). (a) Local repressor and global regulators: local regulator AcrR inhibits the expression of acrAB operon and global regulators MarA, SoxS, and Rob act as inducers of acrAB in response to different signals; (b) Two component system (TCS): BaeRS activates expression of the mdt operon, acrD, and tolC. Figures are adopted and modified based on those by Nishino et al. and Blair et al. [33,34].
Figure 1. Regulatory patterns of multidrug efflux pumps (using those in Salmonella typhimurium as an example). (a) Local repressor and global regulators: local regulator AcrR inhibits the expression of acrAB operon and global regulators MarA, SoxS, and Rob act as inducers of acrAB in response to different signals; (b) Two component system (TCS): BaeRS activates expression of the mdt operon, acrD, and tolC. Figures are adopted and modified based on those by Nishino et al. and Blair et al. [33,34].
Antibiotics 04 00379 g001

3. Drug Efflux Pumps in Microaerobic Niches

3.1. Campylobacter spp. Efflux Pumps

Campylobacter spp. are the major foodborne, gram-negative, microaerophilic pathogens that can cause diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and fever in humans [35]. Antibiotics such as erythromycin or ciprofloxacin are utilized to treat severe cases, although the infections of Campylobacter are often clinically mild and self-limiting [36]. In the past decades, however, Campylobacter spp. Isolates, which display high tolerance to multiple antibiotics, have been isolated and the resistance was found to be largely achieved by multidrug efflux pumps [37].
CmeABC and CmeDEF are the two major RND efflux systems responsible for intrinsic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) (Table 1), the most common human pathogen among Campylobacter species. Both of them have been reported to contribute to the resistance of C. jejuni to various antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide, and tetracycline [14,38,39]. Expression of cmeABC was reported to be under the control of CmeR, a repressor belonging to the TetR family transcription factors. CmeR binds to the promoter region of cmeABC, specifically to the inverted repeat (IR) sequences, and represses its transcription. cmeR deletion mutant was shown to display high resistance to various antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and fusidic acid (two- to four-fold in MICs) [15]. Another regulator named CosR, an OmpR-type oxidative stress response regulator, was also found to be a repressor of cmeABC, and cosR deletion also led to high transcriptional levels of cmeABC [16,40]. It has been found that the binding of CmeR to the promoter region of cmeABC can be inhibited by bile salts [41]. Since bile salts are the detergent molecules generated by the liver and secreted into the small intestine in the host that are harmful to bacteria, the increased cmeABC expression by bile salts not only promoted the survival of C. jejuni in the human intestinal tract but also led to enhanced resistance to multiple antibiotics [41,42]. Salicylate, which is often present in humans as the major metabolite of aspirin, a widely used medicine, was also reported to be able to induce the expression of cmeABC by inhibiting the function of CmeR in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and cause resistance to fluoroquinolones [43,44].
In addition to CmeABC and CmeDEF, other efflux systems existing in C. jejuni were also found to contribute to antibiotic resistance (Table 1) [37]. For example, CmeG, a putative efflux pump of the MFS family, was found to be involved in antibiotic resistance and oxidative stress response in C. jejuni. A cmeG deletion mutant showed increased susceptibility to a broad range of antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, etc. [17]. In addition, NhaA1/NhaA2 cation/proton antiporters and several as-yet uncharacterized RND multidrug efflux pumps were found to contribute to the tolerance of C. jejuni to sub-lethal concentrations of trisodium phosphate (TSP) [18], an antimicrobial agent that can disrupt the cytoplasmic and outer membranes of cells and is used frequently for food decontamination [45,46].

3.2. Helicobacter pylori Efflux Pumps

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is another common gram-negative, microaerophilic pathogen that inhabits the human stomach and duodenum [37]. H. pylori is associated with various diseases including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, noncardiac gastric adenocarcinoma, and other gut diseases [47]. Different kinds of antibiotics have been used to treat H. pylori infection. Among those, clarithromycin (CLR) was considered as the most common and effective drug. Unfortunately, antibiotic resistance is increasingly being identified in H. pylori and efflux pumps were reported to play an important role [48,49].
Studies revealed that H. pylori contains three putative RND efflux operons, namely hefABC, hefDEF, and hefGHI (Table 1) [19]. However, so far most studies have focused on hefA and hefC. An amoxicillin-resistant Helicobacter hepaticus (H. hepaticus) strain demonstrated a bile salt-induced resistance profile similar to that which occurs in C. jejuni [41,50]. Such induction resulted in antibiotic resistance in H. hepaticus and its adaptation to the host intestinal tract [50]. In addition to bile salts, expression of hefA could also be induced by other antibiotics, resulting in efflux-mediated resistance to different antibiotics. For example, the relative expression level of hefA in chloramphenicol-induced H. pylori strains was found to be higher than that in the wild-type strain, and MICs of these strains to metronidazole, tetracycline, erythromycin, penicillin G, and ciprofloxacin were significantly increased (≥four-fold) [20]. In another H. pylori strain that was exposed to metronidazole (Mtz), hefA expression was also induced significantly. This may explain the high Mtz resistance among clinical isolates of H. pylori due to the frequent application of Mtz in medicine [51]. H. pylori efflux pumps were also proposed to be involved in resistance to CLR, since the typical efflux pumps inhibitor (EPI) Phe-Arg β-naphthylamide dihydrochloride (PaβN) reduced the MIC of 14 out of 15 H. pylori strains analyzed to CLR with a four-fold or greater extent in the studies carried out by Kenro et al. [49]. Furthermore, it was found that biofilm could induce the expression of efflux pump genes and consequently enhance the resistance of H. pylori to CLR, since compared to the planktonic cells, a four-fold elevation of MIC to CLR was observed in H. pylori TK1402 biofilms [52]. Since biofilm of H. pylori has been detected in the gastric mucosa of certain patients infected with the pathogen [53], this result implied that specific efflux inhibition might need to be considered in the treatment of the infection.

3.3. Staphylococcus aureus Efflux Pumps

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a gram-positive, facultative bacterium which can grow under oxygen-limited condition by fermentation or nitrate respiration [54]. It can cause a broad range of infectious diseases in humans, ranging from minor skin infections such as pimples, to life-threatening diseases such as pneumonia, toxic shock syndrome (TSS), blood infections, and sepsis. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus pathogen, e.g., Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is associated with increased expression of norA, has been a worldwide problem in clinical medicine. It was reported that in S. aureus N315, there are at least 30 genes encoding putative drug efflux pumps, and most of them are major facilitator superfamily (MFS) proteins (Table 1) [55].
Given that in hosts different infection sites have different oxygen tensions (for example, the abscess of skin infection can create completely anaerobic conditions), studies to examine gene expression changes in S. aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions have been conducted [54]. MgrA, a MarR family transcription factor, is a global regulator of S. aureus that negatively controls the expression of efflux pump genes norB and norC [56]. It was demonstrated that under reduced aeration, the dimeric DNA-binding form of MgrA was disrupted by posttranslational modification and only the monomeric form was observed. Consequently, norB transcription was de-repressed and the resistance of S. aureus to moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin (four-fold in MICs) was elevated [21]. Furthermore, deletion of mgrA was also found to promote the formation of biofilm [57], which might further enhance efflux-mediated multidrug resistance under anaerobic condition [52]. Under anaerobic conditions, it was reported that MnhF, a mammalian bile salt transporter homologue, was induced and contributed to the resistance of S. aureus to bile salts in the host [32]. mnhF deletion mutant led to decreased survival of S. aureus in an anaerobic three-stage continuous-culture model of the human colon (gut model) [32,58].

4. Drug Efflux Pumps in Anaerobic Niches

Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) is a common obligate anaerobe, which is usually considered as a friendly commensal in human. However, it is also the most commonly isolated anaerobic pathogen [59,60]. In recent years, increasing cases of MDR B. fragilis have been reported worldwide [61].
Among the different factors that cause multidrug resistance in B. fragilis, efflux pumps were proposed to be one of the culprits, because in the case of fluoroquinolones, treatment with efflux pump inhibitor carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) led to a significant (five-fold) increase of ciprofloxacin accumulation in B. fragilis [62]. Subsequently, 16 homologues of P. aeruginosa MexAB-OprM system were identified in B. fragilis and named BmeABC1–16 (Table 1), where A, B, and C represent the membrane fusion protein, cytoplasmic efflux transporter protein, and outer membrane channel protein, respectively [22]. It was found that all 16 genes of bmeB1–16 were constitutively expressed in B. fragilis and at least seven efflux pumps were responsible for transporting antibiotics with overlapping substrates [63]. Using the BmeABC5 system as an example, BmeR5 was proposed as a TetR family regulator that could specifically bind to the bmeR5–bmeC5 intergenic region (IT1) to repress the expression of bmeABC5 operon [23]. A bmeR5 deletion mutation led to increased expression of bmeA5, bmeB5, and bmeC5, and two-fold increase in MICs to multiple chemicals such as ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefoperazone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, metronidazole, ethidium bromide (EB), and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) [23]. In addition to Bme, 7.5% of moxifloxacin-resistant B. fragilis strains isolated from different European countries were found to possess additional efflux pump BexA to extrude fluoroquinolone [24].

5. Physiological Roles of Efflux Pumps during the Anaerobic Adaptation of Facultative Bacteria

Facultative bacterial pathogens can live under both low and high oxygen tensions and consequently are present in a broad range of human infections. Efflux systems in several of the model organisms in this group, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc., have been studied extensively. In this section, we focus on those efflux systems whose expression is altered in response to low oxygen tension in the anaerobic life style of these bacteria.

5.1. Escherichia coli Efflux Pumps

The model organism Escherichia coli (E. coli), a gram-negative facultative anaerobe, contains at least 20 drug efflux systems [64]. Except for the housekeeping efflux pump AcrAB-TolC, expression of the rest of the efflux systems is low under ordinary laboratory conditions with sufficient oxygen. Studies from our group demonstrated that under anaerobic conditions, the typical environment of the human gut, expression of the RND efflux pump MdtEF was induced more than 20-fold and the induction was dependent on the anaerobic global regulator ArcA and a GTP binding protein MnmE [26,27]. It was shown that ArcA antagonized H-NS-mediated repression of the gadE-mdtEF operon and consequently increased its expression [27]. Interestingly, this anaerobically upregulated expression of MdtEF promoted the growth of E. coli during anaerobic respiration of nitrate by removing nitrosyl indole derivatives, a metabolic byproduct generated under this physiological condition, and simultaneously enhanced the resistance of E. coli to erythromycin and Rhodamine 6G [26].
In addition to antibiotics, metal ions represent another class of ancient antimicrobial agent and metal efflux systems are broadly distributed in bacterial genomes or plasmids. Recently, transition metals were also reported to act as an important immune defense strategy used by the animal host to combat pathogens [65]. For example, it was demonstrated that copper concentration was increased at pulmonary tissues infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) [66]. Copper could also delay the growth of Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1 under anaerobic conditions synergistically with iron [67]. In addition, copper supplementation could protect dairy cattle from E. coli-induced mastitis [68]. In E. coli, copper can cause cellular toxicity by eliciting a Fenton reaction, which results in the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and by damaging the iron–sulfur [Fe-S] cluster enzymes [65,69]. The RND pump CusCBA is dedicated to copper efflux in E. coli. Studies from our group have demonstrated that CusCBA was induced under anaerobic amino acid limited conditions without exogenous Cu supplement. The induced CusCBA protected Fe-S cluster enzymes and their biosynthesis to facilitate bacterial adaptation to this physiological condition and led to enhanced Cu and Ag tolerance in the bacterium under this condition [28].

5.2. Salmonella enterica Efflux Pumps

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. enterica serovar Typhimurium) is a pathogen of human and animals that possesses nine potential drug transporters associated with drug resistance [70]. As in E. coli, AcrAB is the housekeeping RND family efflux pump that confers resistance to a variety of antibiotics, dyes, and detergents (Table 1) [71,72]. The AcrAB-TolC efflux pump has also been reported to be involved in invasion of host epithelial cells and macrophages in vitro, and colonization of the bacterium in poultry [73]. Under aerobic conditions, it has been reported that several regulators including AcrR, MarA, SoxS, and RamA can regulate the expression of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump [74,75,76]. Expression of the efflux systems under anaerobic conditions has not been studied. However, it was reported that under anaerobic conditions, deletion of acrA, acrB, and tolC affected transcription of 115, 569, and 171 genes, respectively, including those involved in pathogenicity, thereby indicating the relationship between anaerobic adaptation, antibiotics resistance, and pathogenicity [30]. It was also reported that expression of the multidrug efflux protein TolC and tetracycline efflux protein TetA were induced when S. enterica serovar Typhimurium CCARM 8009 was exposed to bile salts under anaerobic conditions, which resulted in enhanced antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis [31].

5.3. Role of Efflux Pumps in the Anaerobic Niches of Bacterial Communities

Another ecological and physiological environment with significant low oxygen tension is bacterial biofilm, which is defined as a matrix-enclosed bacterial population adherent to an abiotic or biotic surface [77]. Oxygen concentration decreases from the top of the biofilm to the bottom and this oxygen limitation in one species’ biofilm can promote the growth of other anaerobic bacteria when they coexist in the oxic areas of the host [78]. In the community of bacterial biofilms, a diverse range of metabolites are produced and secreted, including certain “antibiotics,” which belong to a class of microbial secondary metabolites produced by certain species but cytotoxic to the surrounding species. These “antibiotics” often have important physiological roles for those species that produce them [79]. For example, phenazines, a class of secondary metabolite produced primarily by the species of Pseudomonads, were recently found to play important roles in signaling, iron acquisition, community development, and anaerobic survival of P. aeruginosa [79,80,81]. Two such phenazine compounds, phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) and pyocyanin (PYO), have been shown to facilitate the biofilm formation and anaerobic growth of P. aeruginosa [82]. Although it has not been proved directly, efflux pumps are speculated to play a role in exporting these antibiotic phenazines out of producing cells, allowing their redox exchange with extracellular compounds to promote electron shuttling and iron acquisition [81]. A promising efflux pump for this physiological role is the MexGHI-OpmD in P. aeruginosa PAO1 since genes encoding this system are located immediately downstream of the phenazine biosynthetic operon in the bacterium and their expression is induced by PYO [83].

6. Other Efflux Systems

Expression of efflux pumps and their contribution to antibiotic resistance in the anaerobic niches of several other species have also been explored (Table 1). For instance, in the gram-negative pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), it was reported that anaerobic incubation increased MICs of the bacterium to tobramycin, amikacin, and aztreonam by approximately seven-, four-, and six-fold, respectively, compared to under aerobic condition [84], which was proposed to be mediated by efflux pump systems. Studies that analyzed the expression of the membrane fusion protein component of the RND efflux system under anaerobic condition proposed that anaerobiosis-induced antibiotic resistance might be due to the alteration of the expression of membrane fusion protein, which shifted the formation of RND efflux pumps to a dominance of the active MexEF-OprN pump [85]. In the dairy species Streptococcus thermophiles, the efflux pump TetA was reported to play a role in detoxification of several cytotoxic compounds, including tetracycline and ethidium bromide [86]. In Porphyromonas gingivalis, a gram-negative obligate anaerobe, a RND family efflux pump XepCAB was responsible for transporting multiple agents including rifampin, puromycin, and ethidium bromide and enhanced the resistance of the bacterium to these compounds [29]. In Clostridium perfringens, the bcrABD operon, together with its regulator bcrR, was shown to contribute to the resistance to bacitracin, which was confirmed by using EPI thioridazine [25]. Another obligate anaerobic pathogenic species, Prevotella spp., also contains RND family efflux pumps that enhance their resistance to tetracycline [87].

7. Inhibition of Drug Efflux in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Niches

Considerable studies have demonstrated that bacterial multidrug efflux pumps play important roles in the drug resistance of pathogens in their microaerobic and anaerobic niches. Given that most infection sites in hosts are hypoxic [4], it is necessary to develop efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) to restrain efflux activities under this physiological environment [88]. It was reported that C. jejuni NCTC11168 treated by PaβN decreased its resistance to trisodium phosphate (TSP) [18]. Given that CmeABC in C. jejuni mediates resistance to multiple drugs, inhibition of CmeABC using efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) PaβN serves as a potential means to decrease the efflux pump-associated antibiotic resistance [89]. EPIs have also been shown to be effective against multidrug-resistant H. pylori. It was demonstrated that antibiotic susceptibilities of a chloramphenicol-induced, hefA-dependent multidrug resistant H. pylori strain could be partially restored by carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) and pantoprazole, two different types of EPIs. A four- to 19-fold decrease in the MICs of a H. pylori strain to nine tested antibiotics such as erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, etc. was observed following the treatment of these two EPIs [90]. Recently, four chemicals from herbal extracts, namely emodin, baicalin, schizandrin, and berberine, were reported to reduce the resistance of H. pylori to amoxicillin and tetracycline (one- to two-fold) through inhibition of hefA expression [91], indicating a novel intervention in drug-resistant infections using natural products.

8. Conclusions

Antibiotic resistance has been a public health threat worldwide. Drug efflux constitutes an important mechanism of multidrug resistance that is frequently isolated from clinical settings. In the past several decades, significant advancement in the distribution, expression, and substrate profiles of drug efflux pumps has been achieved [6]. However, less attention has been focused on the study of the pathogens present in microaerobic and strict anaerobic niches, which represent the conditions in wounded, infected, and inflamed tissues within a human host [4].
The fact that efflux genes ubiquitously exist in bacterial genomes prior to antibiotic development and application suggested that they have physiological functions and efflux-mediated drug resistance is perhaps merely a side effect of their over-expression under certain inducing conditions. Indeed, increasing evidence on the roles of efflux pumps in the general detoxification and physiological adaptation in bacteria has been reported in recent years. Specific physiological roles of efflux pumps in microaerobic and anaerobic pathogens are also starting to be revealed (Table 1). Understanding their regulation and physiological functions not only promotes our understanding of the emergence and prevalence of drug resistance but also their prediction and prevention. Furthermore, the role of efflux in bacterial communities represents an emerging research topic in the area, given that naturally produced antibiotics not only can inhibit bacterial growth but also can function as signals to affect the establishment and maintenance of community dynamics in complex environments, especially at low concentrations [92]. An interesting example is indole, a common secondary metabolite produced by E. coli recently found to be able to serve as a signal to turn on the efflux pumps of antibiotic-susceptible sister cells and promote the survival of the entire population [93]. Study of efflux pump expression in the context of populations such as in biofilms or polymicrobial communities, as well as in the presence of antibiotics, is necessary to explore their corresponding physiological significances.
In recent decades, efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) have emerged as a potential approach to circumvent efflux activities by means of energy supply disruption, antagonizing the substrate binding, substrates modification, etc. [88]. A number of EPIs have been intensively studied but no clinical EPIs are available currently [94]. In addition to EPIs, antibiotic drugs ineffectual against specific antibiotic-resistant pathogens could be considered as a second choice behind clearing other types of pathogens in order to preserve the current antibiotics pipeline. For example, fosfomycin and rifampin have been recently reported to have a better effect on eradicating H. pylori than CLR and Mtz, owing to their lower MICs [95]. Further studies on both the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and the development of EPIs using synthetic tools and natural sources, especially under physiologically and clinically relevant conditions, are required to combat antibiotic and multidrug resistance.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the funding support from the Hong Kong University Grants Council General Research Fund HKU781509M and the Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) 13120662 (both to Aixin Yan).

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed to the design, development, writing, and editing of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABC
the ATP (adenosine triphosphate)-binding cassette superfamily
CCCP
carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone
CLR
clarithromycin
EB
ethidium bromide
EPI
efflux pump inhibitor
MATE
the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family
MFS
the major facilitator superfamily
MIC
minimum inhibitory concentration
Mtz
metronidazole
PaβN
Phe-Arg β-naphthylamide dihydrochloride
RND
the resistance-nodulation-division family
SDS
sodium dodecyl sulfate
SMR
the small multidrug resistance family
TCS
two component system
TSP
trisodium phosphate

References

  1. Poole, K. Efflux pumps as antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Ann. Med. 2007, 39, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hirakawa, H.; Inazumi, Y.; Senda, Y.; Kobayashi, A.; Hirata, T.; Nishino, K.; Yamaguchi, A. N-Acetyl-d-Glucosamine induces the expression of multidrug exporter genes, mdtEF, via catabolite activation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5851–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Piddock, L.J. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps—Not just for resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 4, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jantsch, J.; Schodel, J. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in myeloid cell-driven host defense and tissue homeostasis. Immunobiology 2015, 220, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marteyn, B.; Scorza, F.B.; Sansonetti, P.J.; Tang, C. Breathing life into pathogens: The influence of oxygen on bacterial virulence and host responses in the gastrointestinal tract. Cell Microbiol. 2011, 13, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Yan, A. Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Putman, M.; Veen, H.W.; Konings, W. Molecular properties of bacterial multidrug transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 672–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Perera, I.C.; Grove, A. Molecular mechanisms of ligand-mediated attenuation of DNA binding by MarR family transcriptional regulators. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 2, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brown, N.L.; Stoyanov, J.V.; Kidd, S.P.; Hobman, J.L. The MerR family of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramos, J.L.; Martinez-Bueno, M.; Molina-Henares, A.J.; Teran, W.; Watanabe, K.; Zhang, X.; Gallegos, M.T.; Brennan, R.; Tobes, R. The TetR family of transcriptional repressors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69, 326–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nikaido, E.; Shirosaka, I.; Yamaguchi, A.; Nishino, K. Regulation of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in response to indole and paraquat. Microbiology 2011, 157, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hoch, J.A. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2000, 3, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baranova, N.; Nikaido, H. The BaeSR two-component regulatory system activates transcription of the yegMNOB (mdtABCD) transporter gene cluster in Escherichia coli and increases its resistance to novobiocin and deoxycholate. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4168–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Akiba, M.; Lin, J.; Barton, Y.W.; Zhang, Q. Interaction of CmeABC and CmeDEF in conferring antimicrobial resistance and maintaining cell viability in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2006, 57, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, J.; Akiba, M.; Sahin, O.; Zhang, Q. CmeR functions as a transcriptional repressor for the multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hwang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Ryu, S.; Jeon, B. Transcriptional regulation of the CmeABC multidrug efflux pump and the KatA catalase by CosR in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6883–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jeon, B.; Wang, Y.; Hao, H.; Barton, Y.W.; Zhang, Q. Contribution of CmeG to antibiotic and oxidative stress resistance in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Riedel, C.T.; Cohn, M.T.; Stabler, R.A.; Wren, B.; Brondsted, L. Cellular Response of Campylobacter jejuni to Trisodium Phosphate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 78, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bina, J.E.; Alm, R.A.; Uria-nichelsen, M.; Thomas, S.R.; Trust, T.J.; Hancock, R.E.W. Helicobacter pylori uptake and efflux: Basis for intrinsic susceptibility to antibiotics in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, Z.Q. Efflux pump gene hefA of Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in multidrug resistance. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 5217–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Truong-Bolduc, Q.C.; Hsing, L.C.; Villet, R.; Bolduc, G.R.; Estabrooks, Z.; Taguezem, G.F.; Hooper, D.C. Reduced aeration affects the expression of the NorB efflux pump of Staphylococcus aureus by posttranslational modification of MgrA. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 1823–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ueda, O.; Wexler, H.M.; Hirai, K.; Shibata, Y.; Yoshimura, F.; Fujimura, S. Sixteen homologs of the mex-type multidrug resistance efflux pump in Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2807–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pumbwe, L.; Chang, A.; Smith, R.L.; Wexler, H.M. BmeRABC5 is a multidrug efflux system that can confer metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides fragilis. Microbiol. Drug Resist. 2007, 13, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Eitel, Z.; Soki, J.; Urban, E.; Nagy, E. Infection ESGoA. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in Bacteroides fragilis group strains isolated in different European countries. Anaerobe 2013, 21, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Charlebois, A.; Jalbert, L.A.; Harel, J.; Masson, L.; Archambault, M. Characterization of genes encoding for acquired bacitracin resistance in Clostridium perfringens. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Horiyama, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Nishino, K.; Yan, A. The multidrug efflux pump MdtEF protects against nitrosative damage during the anaerobic respiration in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 26576–26584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Deng, Z.; Shan, Y.; Pan, Q.; Gao, X.; Yan, A. Anaerobic expression of the gadE-mdtEF multidrug efflux operon is primarily regulated by the two-component system ArcBA through antagonizing the H-NS mediated repression. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, e194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fung, D.K.C.; Lau, W.Y.; Chan, W.T.; Yan, A. Copper efflux is induced during anaerobic amino acid limitation in Escherichia coli to protect iron-sulfur cluster enzymes and biogenesis. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 4556–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ikeda, T.; Yoshimura, F. A resistance-nodulation-cell division family xenobiotic efflux pump in an obligate anaerobe, Porphyromonas gingivalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3257–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Webber, M.A.; Bailey, A.M.; Blair, J.M.; Morgan, E.; Stevens, M.P.; Hinton, J.C.; Ivens, A.; Wain, J.; Piddock, L.J. The global consequence of disruption of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in Salmonella enterica includes reduced expression of SPI-1 and other attributes required to infect the host. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 4276–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. He, X.; Ahn, J. Assessment of efflux-mediated antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 64, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sannasiddappa, T.H.; Hood, G.A.; Hanson, K.J.; Costabile, A.; Gibson, G.R.; Clarke, S.R. Staphylococcus aureus MnhF mediates cholate efflux and facilitates survival under human colonic conditions. Infect Immun. 2015, 83, 2350–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nishino, K.; Nikaido, E.; Yamaguchi, A. Regulation and physiological function of multidrug efflux pumps in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1794, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Blair, J.M.; Webber, M.A.; Baylay, A.J.; Ogbolu, D.O.; Piddock, L.J. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blaser, M.J. Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 176, S103–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bolton, D.; Patriarchi, A.; Fox, Á.; Fanning, S. A study of the molecular basis of quinolone and macrolide resistance in a selection of Campylobacter isolates from intensive poultry flocks. Food Control. 2013, 30, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, X.; Nikaido, H. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria: An update. Drugs 2009, 69, 1555–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jeon, B.; Zhang, Q. Sensitization of Campylobacter jejuni to fluoroquinolone and macrolide antibiotics by antisense inhibition of the CmeABC multidrug efflux transporter. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2009, 63, 946–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gibreel, A.; Wetsch, N.M.; Taylor, D.E. Contribution of the CmeABC efflux pump to macrolide and tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3212–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hwang, S.; Kim, M.; Ryu, S.; Jeon, B. Regulation of oxidative stress response by CosR, an essential response regulator in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lin, J.; Cagliero, C.; Guo, B.; Barton, Y.W.; Maurel, M.C.; Payot, S.; Zhang, Q. Bile salts modulate expression of the CmeABC multidrug efflux pump in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 7417–7424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Thanassi, D.G.; Cheng, L.W.; Nikaido, H. Active efflux of bile salts by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 2512–2518. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hartog, E.; Menashe, O.; Kler, E.; Yaron, S. Salicylate reduces the antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin against extracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, but not against Salmonella in macrophages. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shen, Z.; Pu, X.Y.; Zhang, Q. Salicylate functions as an efflux pump inducer and promotes the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni mutants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7128–7133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Oyarzabal, O.A. Reduction of Campylobacter spp. by commercial antimicrobials applied during the processing of broiler chickens: A review from the United States Perspective. J. Food Protect. 2005, 68, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sampathkumar, B.; Khachatourians, G.G.; Korber, D.R. High pH during trisodium phosphate treatment causes membrane damage and destruction of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Suzuki, H.; Hibi, T.; Marshall, B.J. Helicobacter pylori: Present status and future prospects in Japan. J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 42, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Qureshi, W.A.; Graham, D.Y. Antibiotic-resistant H. pylori infection and its treatment. Curr. Pharm. Design. 2000, 6, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hirata, K.; Suzuki, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Tsugawa, H.; Muraoka, H.; Saito, Y.; Matsuzaki, J.; Hibi, T. Contribution of efflux pumps to clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J. Gastroen. Hepatol. 2010, 25, S75–S79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Belzer, C.; Stoof, J.; Breijer, S.; Kusters, J.G.; Kuipers, E.J.; van Vliet, A.H.M. The Helicobacter hepaticus hefA gene is involved in resistance to amoxicillin. Helicobacter 2009, 14, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tsugawa, H.; Suzuki, H.; Muraoka, H.; Ikeda, F.; Hirata, K.; Matsuzaki, J.; Saito, Y.; Hibi, T. Enhanced bacterial efflux system is the first step to the development of metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 404, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yonezawa, H.; Osaki, T.; Hanawa, T.; Kurata, S.; Ochiai, K.; Kamiya, S. Impact of Helicobacter pylori biofilm formation on clarithromycin susceptibility and generation of resistance mutations. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Carron, M.A.; Tran, V.R.; Sugawa, C.; Coticchia, J.M. Identification of Helicobacter pylori biofilms in human gastric mucosa. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2006, 10, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fuchs, S.; Pane-Farre, J.; Kohler, C.; Hecker, M.; Engelmann, S. Anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 4275–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kosmidis, C.; Schindler, B.D.; Jacinto, P.L.; Patel, D.; Bains, K.; Seo, S.M.; Kaatz, G.W. Expression of multidrug resistance efflux pump genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Truong-Bolduc, Q.C.; Strahilevitz, J.; Hooper, D.C. NorC, a new efflux pump regulated by MgrA of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1104–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Trotonda, M.P.; Tamber, S.; Memmi, G.; Cheung, A.L. MgrA Represses biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2008, 76, 5645–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sannasiddappa, T.H.; Costabile, A.; Gibson, G.R.; Clarke, S.R. The influence of Staphylococcus aureus on gut microbial ecology in an in vitro continuous culture human colonic model system. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Teixeira, F.L.; Silva, D.N.; Pauer, H.; Ferreira, L.Q.; Ferreira Ede, O.; Domingues, R.M.; Lobo, L.A. The role of BmoR, a MarR family regulator, in the survival of Bacteroides fragilis during oxidative stress. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 303, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wexler, H.M. Bacteroides: The good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 593–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Urban, E.; Horvath, Z.; Soki, J.; Lazar, G. First Hungarian case of an infection caused by multidrug-resistant Bacteroides fragilis strain. Anaerobe 2015, 31, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Herin, O.; Hedberg, M.; Edlund, C. Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis Group. Anaerobe 2002, 8, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pumbwe, L.; Ueda, O.; Yoshimura, F.; Chang, A.; Smith, R.L.; Wexler, H.M. Bacteroides fragilis BmeABC efflux systems additively confer intrinsic antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nishino, K.; Yamaguchi, A. Analysis of a complete library of putative drug transporter genes in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 5803–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Braymer, J.J.; Giedroc, D.P. Recent developments in copper and zinc homeostasis in bacterial pathogens. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hood, M.I.; Skaar, E.P. Nutritional immunity: Transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bird, L.J.; Coleman, M.L.; Newman, D.K. Iron and copper act synergistically to delay anaerobic growth of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3619–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. White, C.; Lee, J.; Kambe, T.; Fritsche, K.; Petris, M.J. A role for the ATP7A copper-transporting ATPase in macrophage bactericidal activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 33949–33956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Macomber, L.; Imlay, J.A. The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 8344–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nishino, K.; Latifi, T.; Groisman, E.A. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Eaves, D.J.; Ricci, V.; Piddock, L.J.V. Expression of acrB, acrF, acrD, marA, and soxS in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium: Role in multiple antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ricci, V.; Tzakas, P.; Buckley, A.; Piddock, L.J. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains are difficult to select in the absence of AcrB and TolC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Buckley, A.M.; Webber, M.A.; Cooles, S.; Randall, L.P.; la Ragione, R.M.; Woodward, M.J.; Piddock, L.J. The AcrAB-TolC efflux system of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium plays a role in pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nikaido, E.; Yamaguchi, A.; Nishino, K. AcrAB multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 24245–24253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Balleste-Delpierre, C.; Sole, M.; Domenech, O.; Borrell, J.; Vila, J.; Fabrega, A. Molecular study of quinolone resistance mechanisms and clonal relationship of Salmonella enterica clinical isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 43, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Olliver, A.; Valle, M.; Chaslus-Dancla, E.; Cloeckaert, A. Role of an acrR mutation in multidrug resistance of in vitro-selected fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 238, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Costerton, J.W.; Lewandowski, Z.; Caldwell, D.E.; Korber, D.R.; Lappin-Scott, H.M. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995, 49, 711–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fox, E.P.; Cowley, E.S.; Nobile, C.J.; Hartooni, N.; Newman, D.K.; Johnson, A.D. Anaerobic bacteria grow within Candida albicans biofilms and induce biofilm formation in suspension cultures. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2411–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, Y.; Kern, S.E.; Newman, D.K. Endogenous phenazine antibiotics promote anaerobic survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via extracellular electron transfer. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Price-Whelan, A.; Dietrich, L.E.P.; Newman, D.K. Rethinking “secondary” metabolism: Physiological roles for phenazine antibiotics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Dietrich, L.E.P.; Teal, T.K.; Price-Whelan, A.; Newman, D.K. Redox-active antibiotics control gene expression and community behavior in divergent bacteria. Science 2008, 321, 1203–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, Y.; Wilks, J.C.; Danhorn, T.; Ramos, I.; Croal, L.; Newman, D.K. Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid promotes bacterial biofilm development via ferrous iron acquisition. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3606–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dietrich, L.E.P.; Price-Whelan, A.; Petersen, A.; Whiteley, M.; Newman, D.K. The phenazine pyocyanin is a terminal signalling factor in the quorum sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 1308–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. King, P.; Citron, D.M.; Griffith, D.C.; Lomovskaya, O.; Dudley, M.N. Effect of oxygen limitation on the in vitro activity of levofloxacin and other antibiotics administered by the aerosol route against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. Diagn. Micr. Infec. Dis. 2010, 66, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Schaible, B.; Taylor, C.T.; Schaffer, K. Hypoxia increases antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through altering the composition of multidrug efflux pumps. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2114–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Arioli, S.; Guglielmetti, S.; Amalfitano, S.; Viti, C.; Marchi, E.; Decorosi, F.; Giovannetti, L.; Mora, D. Characterization of tetA-like gene encoding for a major facilitator superfamily efflux pump in Streptococcus thermophilus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 355, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sherrard, L.J.; Schaible, B.; Graham, K.A.; McGrath, S.J.; McIlreavey, L.; Hatch, J.; Wolfgang, M.C.; Muhlebach, M.S.; Gilpin, D.F.; Schneiders, T.; et al. Mechanisms of reduced susceptibility and genotypic prediction of antibiotic resistance in Prevotella isolated from cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 2690–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bhardwaj, A.K.; Mohanty, P. Bacterial efflux pumps involved in multidrug resistance and their inhibitors: rejuvinating the antimicrobial chemotherapy. Recent Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 2012, 7, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lin, J.; Martinez, A. Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on bile resistance and in vivo colonization of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, Z. Influence of efflux pump inhibitors on the multidrug resistance of Helicobacter pylori. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Huang, Y.Q.; Huang, G.R.; Wu, M.H.; Tang, H.Y.; Huang, Z.S.; Zhou, X.H.; Yu, W.Q.; Su, J.W.; Mo, X.Q.; Chen, B.P.; et al. Inhibitory effects of emodin, baicalin, schizandrin and berberine on hefA gene: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori-induced multidrug resistance. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 4225–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yim, G.; McClure, J.; Surette, M.G.; Davies, J.E. Modulation of Salmonella gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of quinolones. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lee, H.H.; Molla, M.N.; Cantor, C.R.; Collins, J.J. Bacterial charity work leads to poplation-wide resistance. Nature 2010, 467, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nakashima, R.; Sakurai, K.; Yamasaki, S.; Hayashi, K.; Nagata, C.; Hoshino, K.; Onodera, Y.; Nishino, K.; Yamaguchi, A. Structural basis for the inhibition of bacterial multidrug exporters. Nature 2013, 500, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Boyanova, L.; Davidkov, L.; Gergova, G.; Kandilarov, N.; Evstatiev, I.; Panteleeva, E.; Mitov, I. Helicobacter pylori susceptibility to fosfomycin, rifampin, and 5 usual antibiotics for H. pylori eradication. Diagn. Micr. Infec. Dis. 2014, 79, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Yan, A. Multidrug Efflux Systems in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria. Antibiotics 2015, 4, 379-396. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4030379

AMA Style

Xu Z, Yan A. Multidrug Efflux Systems in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria. Antibiotics. 2015; 4(3):379-396. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4030379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zeling, and Aixin Yan. 2015. "Multidrug Efflux Systems in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria" Antibiotics 4, no. 3: 379-396. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4030379

APA Style

Xu, Z., & Yan, A. (2015). Multidrug Efflux Systems in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria. Antibiotics, 4(3), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4030379

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop