Insights into the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Comparative Study of Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. UATR Analysis
2.2. Thermoanalytical Profile
2.3. The Kinetic Analysis
3. Materials and Methods
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kryukov, T.V.; Feofanova, М.А.; Skobin, M.I.; Ivanova, A.I. Synthesis and Physicochemical Study of the Cerium and Cefazolin Metal Complex. Phys. Chem. Asp. Study Clust. Nanostruct. Nanomater. 2021, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masoud, M.S.; Ali, A.E.; Elasala, G.S. Synthesis, Spectral, Computational and Thermal Analysis Studies of Metalloceftriaxone Antibiotic. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1084, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takeuchi, Y.; Takebayashi, Y.; Sunagawa, M.; Isobe, Y.; Hamazume, Y.; Uemura, A.; Noguchi, T. The Stability of a Novel Carbapenem Antibiotic, Meropenem (SM-7338), in a Solid State Formulation for Injection. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993, 41, 1998–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, F.; Huang, T.; Pan, M.; Huang, H. Multiaction Antimicrobial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Prohealing Hydrogel as a Novel Strategy for Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula. Biomater. Res. 2025, 29, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asfaw, B.A.; Yigzaw, K.T.; Bhatta, O.P.; Asfaw, Y.A.; Fenta, B.A.; Wassie, M.T. Gangrenous Small Bowel Volvulus Due to Ascariasis in a 9-Year-Old Female: A Case Report. J. Pediatr. Surg. Case Rep. 2025, 112, 102936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuliaş, A.; Doca, N.; Vlase, G.; Tiţa, B.; Tiţa, D.; Vlase, T. Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Cefadroxil. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2011, 56, 967–973. [Google Scholar]
- Fuliaş, A.; Vlase, G.; Vlase, T.; Soica, C.; Heghes, A.; Craina, M.; Ledeti, I. Comparative Kinetic Analysis on Thermal Degradation of Some Cephalosporins Using TG and DSC Data. Chem. Cent. J. 2013, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jana, S. Evaluation of the Physicochemical and Thermal Properties of Consciousness Energy Healing Treated Cefazolin Sodium. Org. Med. Chem. Int. J. 2019, 8, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza, N.A.B.; de Souza, F.S.; Basílio, I.D.; Medeiros, A.C.D.; Oliveira, E.J.; Santos, A.F.O.; Macwdo, R.O.; Macędo, R.O. Thermal Stability of Metronidazole Drug and Tablets. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2003, 72, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawakami, K. Pharmaceutical Applications of Thermal Analysis. In Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 6, pp. 613–641. [Google Scholar]
- Khawam, A.; Flanagan, D.R. Basics and Applications of Solid-State Kinetics: A Pharmaceutical Perspective. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 95, 472–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodante, F.; Catalani, G.; Vecchio, S. Kinetic Analysis of Single or Multi-Step Decomposition Processes; Limits Introduced by Statistical Analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2002, 68, 689–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverstein, R.M.; Webster, F.X.; Kiemle, D.J.; Bryce, D.L. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 8th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-0-470-61637-6. [Google Scholar]
- Pretsch, E.; Bühlmann, P.; Badertscher, M. Structure Determination of Organic Compounds; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-3-662-62438-8. [Google Scholar]
- Ragnoni, E.; Catalini, S.; Becucci, M.; Lapini, A.; Foggi, P. Linear and Non-Linear Middle Infrared Spectra of Penicillin G in the CO Stretching Mode Region. Symmetry 2021, 13, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Center for Biotechnology Information Cefazolin. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/33255 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
- Chen, W.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Ouyang, S.-M.; Lee, Y.-R. Effect of Relative Humidity on the Emission Height and Reaction Force of Single-Tube Fireworks. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023, 148, 4997–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedman, H.L. New Methods for Evaluating Kinetic Parameters from Thermal Analysis Data. J. Polym. Sci. Part B 1969, 7, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozawa, T. A New Method of Analyzing Thermogravimetric Data. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1965, 38, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flynn, J.H.; Wall, L.A. A Quick, Direct Method for the Determination of Activation Energy from Thermogravimetric Data. J. Polym. Sci. Part B 1966, 4, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coats, A.W.; Redfern, J.P. Kinetic Parameters from Thermogravimetric Data. Nature 1964, 201, 68–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbanovici, E.; Popescu, C.; Segal, E. Improved Iterative Version of the Coats-Redfern Method to Evaluate Non-Isothermal Kinetic Parameters. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 1999, 58, 683–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Liu, N. Kinetic Analysis Based on the Kinetic Compensation Effect and Optimization Calculation. Thermochim. Acta 2020, 690, 178686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, A. The Kinetics of Solid-state Reactions toward Consensus—Part I: Uncertainties, Failures, and Successes of Conventional Methods. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2001, 33, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyazovkin, S.; Chrissafis, K.; Di Lorenzo, M.L.; Koga, N.; Pijolat, M.; Roduit, B.; Sbirrazzuoli, N.; Suñol, J.J. ICTAC Kinetics Committee Recommendations for Collecting Experimental Thermal Analysis Data for Kinetic Computations. Thermochim. Acta 2014, 590, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maniruzzaman, M. Pharmaceutical Applications of Hot-Melt Extrusion: Continuous Manufacturing, Twin-Screw Granulations, and 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erceg, M.; Krešić, I.; Vrandečić, N.S.; Jakić, M. Different Approaches to the Kinetic Analysis of Thermal Degradation of Poly(Ethylene Oxide). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 131, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| API | TG | Δm/% | DTG | DSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonset/°C | Toffset/°C | Tpeak/°C | Tpeak/°C | ||
| NaCFZ | 50 | 150 | 3 | 65 | 90 (endo); 170 (endo) |
| 180 | 275 | 36 | 193 | ||
| 275 | 500 | 20.5 | 307 | ||
| MER | 50 | 132 | 11.5 | 104 | 142 (endo) |
| 135 | 194 | 7.09 | 173 | ||
| 194 | 406 | 32.5 | 231; 283 | ||
| NaCFX | 35 | 150 | 7.7 | 80; 145 | 261 (exo) |
| 230 | 250 | 18.4 | 260 | ||
| 250 | 500 | 35.2 | 363 | ||
| Ea (kJ∙mol–1) vs. α for | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium Cefazolin | Sodium Ceftriaxone | Meropenem | ||||
| α | FWO | FR | FWO | FR | FWO | FR |
| 0.05 | 79.0 ± 0.7 | 136.9 ± 1.2 | 198.1 ± 0.5 | 304.0 ± 20.1 | 143.9 ± 7.6 | 114.3 ± 4.8 |
| 0.10 | 98.7 ± 0.7 | 174.1 ± 0.9 | 221.3 ± 1.8 | 322.9 ± 6.0 | 138.4 ± 6.6 | 128.3 ± 8.1 |
| 0.15 | 112.9 ± 0.7 | 187.2 ± 1.1 | 234.2 ± 1.9 | 310.8 ± 3.3 | 137.0 ± 6.6 | 131.6 ± 6.7 |
| 0.20 | 125.6 ± 0.9 | 203.5 ± 1.6 | 241.2 ± 1.5 | 296.3 ± 2.4 | 137.1 ± 6.6 | 136.9 ± 7.1 |
| 0.25 | 137.9 ± 1.1 | 211.3 ± 2.5 | 244.2 ± 1.0 | 272.6 ± 4.8 | 137.2 ± 6.6 | 137.9 ± 7.5 |
| 0.30 | 149.2 ± 1.4 | 217.3 ± 3.0 | 244.3 ± 0.6 | 262.7 ± 5.0 | 137.6 ± 6.5 | 141.5 ± 5.7 |
| 0.35 | 159.4 ± 1.8 | 218.2 ± 4.1 | 243.4 ± 0.4 | 253.1 ± 4.8 | 138.4 ± 6.5 | 147.8 ± 7.0 |
| 0.40 | 167.9 ± 2.5 | 219.3 ± 6.2 | 242.4 ± 0.3 | 238.8 ± 7.2 | 139.6 ± 6.6 | 154.6 ± 6.8 |
| 0.45 | 174.4 ± 3.3 | 215.9 ± 9.1 | 242.1 ± 0.3 | 236.7 ± 6.9 | 141.4 ± 6.7 | 161.2 ± 7.1 |
| 0.50 | 179.5 ± 4.8 | 214.0 ± 11.9 | 242.5 ± 0.5 | 234.8 ± 6.7 | 143.8 ± 6.9 | 169.1 ± 7.7 |
| 0.55 | 184.4 ± 6.0 | 212.8 ± 14.4 | 243.0 ± 0.7 | 232.3 ± 6.3 | 146.6 ± 7.2 | 176.6 ± 7.8 |
| 0.60 | 188.7 ± 7.3 | 213.1 ± 15.4 | 243.2 ± 1.1 | 226.9 ± 6.6 | 149.3 ± 7.5 | 177.7 ± 8.4 |
| 0.65 | 191.5 ± 8.7 | 216.9 ± 16.0 | 242.4 ± 1.5 | 229.3 ± 3.7 | 152.1 ± 7.9 | 180.2 ± 9.1 |
| 0.70 | 194.9 ± 10.5 | 224.3 ± 16.9 | 240.7 ± 2.0 | 210.0 ± 6.9 | 154.4 ± 8.2 | 177.7 ± 10.2 |
| 0.75 | 200.2 ± 12.3 | 230.9 ± 17.8 | 237.2 ± 2.3 | 201.5 ± 4.8 | 156.2 ± 8.6 | 173.2 ± 11.0 |
| 0.80 | 205.0 ± 14.5 | 232.9 ± 18.6 | 231.3 ± 2.4 | 180.0 ± 8.6 | 157.2 ± 8.9 | 165.8 ± 11.3 |
| 0.85 | 210.8 ± 15.5 | 220.1 ± 14.2 | 222.1 ± 2.9 | 179.7 ± 13.5 | 157.2 ± 9.1 | 155.4 ± 11.3 |
| 0.90 | 214.2 ± 12.3 | 207.8 ± 4.2 | 212.9 ± 4.1 | 180.8 ± 21.4 | 156.9 ± 8.8 | 149.0 ± 9.8 |
| 0.95 | 202.7 ± 6.1 | 147.4 ± 4.9 | 201.2 ± 7.1 | 185.4 ± 26.1 | 155.3 ± 8.4 | 140.7 ± 8.5 |
| a (kJ∙mol–1) | 167.2 ± 7.9 | 205.5 ± 46.8 | 233.0 ± 10.3 | 239.9 ± 47.3 | 146.3 ± 32.8 | 153.7 ± 36.6 |
| Model Name | g(α) (Integral Form) | MER | NaCFX | NaCFZ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ea ± SD | lnA ± SD | R2 | Ea ± SD | lnA ± SD | R2 | Ea ± SD | lnA ± SD | R2 | |||
| F1 | First-order reaction | −ln(1 − α) | 114.8 ± 16.0 | 29.7 ± 4.7 | 0.966 | 153.9 ± 16.4 | 32.9 ± 4.0 | 0.904 | 85.4 ± 4.9 | 19.9 ± 1.6 | 0.947 |
| F2 | Second-order reaction | (1/(1 − α))−1 | 166.4 ± 23.8 | 44.5 ± 6.8 | 0.994 | 230.5 ± 25.0 | 50.8 ± 5.9 | 0.966 | 128.4 ± 9.8 | 31.6 ± 2.8 | 0.989 |
| F3 | Third-order reaction | ((1 − α)−2 − 1)/2 | 230.6 ± 33.7 | 62.6 ± 9.5 | 0.996 | 326.5 ± 35.9 | 73.0 ± 8.2 | 0.988 | 182.4 ± 16.3 | 46.2 ± 4.4 | 0.999 |
| D1 | One-dimensional diffusion (parabolic law) | α2 | 163.0 ± 21.5 | 41.8 ± 6.1 | 0.909 | 209.5 ± 21.1 | 44.3 ± 5.0 | 0.808 | 118.2 ± 4.2 | 27.3 ± 1.3 | 0.869 |
| D2 | Two-dimensional diffusion | (1 − α)ln(1 − α) + α | 183.3 ± 24.2 | 46.9 ± 6.9 | 0.931 | 238.5 ± 24.1 | 50.4 ± 5.7 | 0.842 | 134.5 ± 5.5 | 31.1 ± 1.7 | 0.898 |
| D3 | Three-dimensional diffusion (Jander equation) | (1 − (1 − α)1/3)2 | 209.2 ± 27.9 | 52.8 ± 7.9 | 0.952 | 276.1 ± 28.2 | 57.7 ± 6.5 | 0.880 | 155.7 ± 7.4 | 35.3 ± 2.2 | 0.929 |
| D4 | Three-dimensional diffusion (Ginstling–Brounshtein) | 1 − 2α/3 −(1 − α)2/3 | 191.8 ± 25.4 | 47.8 ± 7.2 | 0.939 | 250.8 ± 25.5 | 51.8 ± 5.9 | 0.856 | 141.5 ± 6.1 | 31.5 ± 1.8 | 0.909 |
| A2 | Avrami–Erofeev (nucleation and growth, n = 2) | [−ln(1 − α)]1/2 | 53.7 ± 8.0 | 12.7 ± 2.6 | 0.961 | 72.4 ± 8.2 | 14.2 ± 2.3 | 0.893 | 38.7 ± 2.4 | 7.5 ± 1.0 | 0.935 |
| A3 | Avrami–Erofeev (nucleation and growth, n = 3) | [−ln(1 − α)]1/3 | 33.3 ± 5.3 | 6.8 ± 1.9 | 0.955 | 45.3 ± 5.4 | 7.8 ± 1.7 | 0.879 | 23.1 ± 1.6 | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 0.920 |
| A4 | Avrami–Erofeev (nucleation and growth, n = 4) | [−ln(1 − α)]1/4 | 23.1 ± 4.0 | 3.7 ± 1.6 | 0.947 | 31.7 ± 4.1 | 4.5 ± 1.4 | 0.863 | 15.4 ± 1.2 | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 0.899 |
| R2 | Contracting area | 1 − (1 − α)1/2 | 94.5 ± 13.0 | 23.1 ± 3.9 | 0.938 | 124.3 ± 13.1 | 25.2 ± 3.3 | 0.854 | 68.7 ± 3.2 | 14.6 ± 1.2 | 0.906 |
| R3 | Contracting volume | 1 − (1 − α)1/3 | 100.9 ± 14.0 | 24.6 ± 4.2 | 0.949 | 133.5 ± 14.1 | 27.0 ± 3.5 | 0.872 | 73.9 ± 3.7 | 15.6 ± 1.3 | 0.921 |
| P2 | Power law (n = 2) | α1/2 | 35.2 ± 5.3 | 7.1 ± 1.9 | 0.880 | 45.6 ± 5.2 | 7.6 ± 1.6 | 0.759 | 23.6 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 0.806 |
| P3 | Power law (n = 3) | α1/3 | 21.0 ± 3.6 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 0.853 | 27.4 ± 3.5 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 0.718 | 13.0 ± 0.7 | −0.1 ± 0.6 | 0.740 |
| P4 | Power law (n = 4) | α1/4 | 13.9 ± 2.7 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 0.816 | 18.3 ± 2.6 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 0.667 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | −1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.641 |
| API | a | b | Tiso (°C) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaCFX | 0.2255 | −2.7582 | 260.0 | 0.9979 |
| NaCFZ | 0.2385 | −3.3983 | 190.0 | 0.9986 |
| MER | 0.2732 | −2.5978 | 167.3 | 0.9973 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ghirlea, O.; Ridichie, A.; Voicu, M.; Ledeți, A.; Bîtcan, I.; Sbârcea, L.; Dreavă, D.; Ledeți, I.; Trandafirescu, C.; Murariu, M. Insights into the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Comparative Study of Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem. Antibiotics 2026, 15, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15060540
Ghirlea O, Ridichie A, Voicu M, Ledeți A, Bîtcan I, Sbârcea L, Dreavă D, Ledeți I, Trandafirescu C, Murariu M. Insights into the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Comparative Study of Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem. Antibiotics. 2026; 15(6):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15060540
Chicago/Turabian StyleGhirlea, Ovidiu, Amalia Ridichie, Mirela Voicu, Adriana Ledeți, Ioan Bîtcan, Laura Sbârcea, Diana Dreavă, Ionuț Ledeți, Cristina Trandafirescu, and Marius Murariu. 2026. "Insights into the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Comparative Study of Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem" Antibiotics 15, no. 6: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15060540
APA StyleGhirlea, O., Ridichie, A., Voicu, M., Ledeți, A., Bîtcan, I., Sbârcea, L., Dreavă, D., Ledeți, I., Trandafirescu, C., & Murariu, M. (2026). Insights into the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Comparative Study of Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem. Antibiotics, 15(6), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15060540

