Next Article in Journal
A Risk Model Incorporating the Novel Inflammatory Biomarker CD64 for Predicting Bloodstream Infection in Suspected Cases
Previous Article in Journal
Balancing Speed and Cost: Economic Insights from Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Bloodstream Infections
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/antibiotics15030321
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Chemical Scaffold with Antimicrobial Activity Identified in a Screening of Industrial Photoactive Compounds

by
José Manuel Ezquerra-Aznárez
1,2,*,
Raquel Alonso-Román
1,2,†,
Ainhoa Lucía
1,2,3,
Raquel Andreu
4,5,
Santiago Franco
4,5,*,
José A. Aínsa
1,2,3 and
Santiago Ramón-García
1,2,3,6
1
Department of Microbiology, Pediatrics, Radiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Spanish Network for Research on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
5
Institute of Nanoscience and Materials of Aragon (INMA), Faculty of Science, CSIC-University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
6
Research and Development Agency of Aragon Foundation (Fundación ARAID), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Antibiotics 2026, 15(3), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15030321
Submission received: 11 February 2026 / Revised: 18 March 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Novel Antimicrobial Agents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The emergence of antimicrobial resistance threatens advances achieved by medicine in the last century. This situation has been exacerbated by the suboptimal outcome of screening campaigns to provide novel antimicrobials. Methods: An alternative strategy was employed to identify new chemical scaffolds with antimicrobial activity. A collection of photoactive compounds originally synthesized for industrial purposes was screened for antibacterial activity. Results: 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes were identified as active against Gram-positive bacteria. Compounds belonging to this family displayed dose-dependent bactericidal activity against both wild-type and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. No cytotoxicity was observed in the HepG2 hepatic cell line at the concentrations required for antimicrobial activity against S. aureus. Resistance to 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes in S. aureus was associated with point mutations in the rny locus, which encodes for a ribonuclease that plays a key role in RNA homeostasis. Conclusions: These findings indicate that chemical libraries not originally intended for drug discovery can be an innovative source of chemical diversity for the development of novel antimicrobials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The discovery of antimicrobials was one of the milestones of humankind in the 20th century. Their introduction brought unprecedented success in the treatment of infectious diseases and contributed to the development of other areas of medicine, such as invasive surgery and cancer chemotherapy. The current antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis threatens all these advances [1]. In 2021, there were an estimated 4.71 million deaths associated with AMR, including 1.14 million directly attributable to it, and it is projected that in 2050, at the current pace, there will be 1.91 million deaths directly attributable to AMR and 8.22 million deaths associated with it [2]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover and develop new antimicrobials.
Most of the currently available antimicrobial families were discovered in the mid-20th century, during a period known as the Golden Age of antimicrobial discovery. During that time, new antimicrobials were identified by screening soil-dwelling microorganisms for activity against pathogenic bacteria. This platform eventually collapsed when screening efforts repeatedly rediscovered known antibiotics or yielded molecules with significant toxicity issues [3]. The paradigm shifted at the end of the 20th century when the first bacterial genomes became available [4]. Genomic information allowed the identification of essential targets conserved across different bacterial species, and target-based approaches were developed to find active molecules against them. However, these approaches have had limited success in identifying new classes of antimicrobials [5,6], although notable exceptions exist. For example, the recently approved gepotidacin was discovered through screening of topoisomerase inhibitors [7,8]. Moreover, revisiting the Golden Age approach has yielded promising candidates such as teixobactin [9]. Continued discovery of new antimicrobial classes remains essential to ensure that the threat posed by AMR can be effectively managed.
Several factors can explain the failure of identifying new molecules through target-based approaches to inhibit microbial growth. First, the bacterial cell wall is a formidable barrier that protects bacteria from environmental threats, including antimicrobials [10]. Because of this, molecules that are good inhibitors of cytosolic targets might not be active against whole bacteria, thus limiting the success of target-based approaches in bacteria. An additional problem is the design of chemical libraries, which has been strongly influenced by Lipinski’s Rule of Five in order to improve the likelihood of the compounds having good oral bioavailability. Lipinski’s Rule of Five states that a potential drug should not violate more than one of these conditions: molecular weight under 500 Da, LogP below 5, fewer than five hydrogen bond donors, and fewer than 10 hydrogen bond acceptors. However, antimicrobials as a group represent an exception to these rules, displaying higher molecular weights and polarity [11]. Thus, chemical libraries used to run high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns (either as target-based approaches or as whole cell screenings) for antimicrobial discovery have been conducted using libraries that did not fully reflect the chemical diversity of current antimicrobial families [12,13,14].
In this study, an unconventional approach for finding novel antimicrobials was taken, and unexplored chemical diversity was sought by screening a collection of photoactive organic dyes containing a 4H-pyranylidene moiety against a panel of pathogenic bacteria from the World Health Organization (WHO) priority list of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens [15]. Photoactive compounds are molecules capable of absorbing light and undergoing electronic excitation and charge-transfer processes, typically associated with extended π-conjugated systems. Organic dyes used in photochemical and optoelectronic applications encompass several well-known structural families, including xanthenes, phenothiazinums, triarylmethanes, and cyanines. In comparison with these classical dye scaffolds, 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives also belong to the broader class of π-conjugated organic dyes but display a distinct structural framework and substitution pattern. The 4H-pyranylidene unit is a proaromatic electron donor that becomes aromatic upon charge transfer [16]. This enhanced aromatic stabilization strengthens its electron-donating capability, and its chemical structure can be readily modified through organic synthesis. Notably, representative compounds within this family comply with Lipinski’s Rule of Five, suggesting that this scaffold occupies a chemical region closer to drugs than purely dye-like compounds. For this reason, it is frequently employed as a key component in the development of π-conjugated systems across various fields, including dye-sensitized solar cells [17,18], second-order nonlinear optic applications [19], or photoinitiators for two-photon induced photopolymerization [20]. It was reasoned that the structural and electronic diversity of these photoactive molecular materials could provide access to unexplored chemical diversity, and it was found that 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives were active against Gram-positive bacteria. Compounds belonging to this family were bactericidal to Staphylococcus aureus, including an MRSA strain, and non-toxic to mammalian cells.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of Antimicrobial Compounds in a Panel of Photoactive Molecular Materials

A single-dose activity assay was conducted using a set of 39 compounds of the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene family (see Table S1 for the chemical structure of Compounds 01–39) from the photoactive molecular material (PMM) collection against a panel of relevant Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and mycobacterial strains (Table S2). Thirteen PMM compounds were active against at least one bacterial species at 50 µM (Tables S1 and S2).
The activity of the 13 compounds identified as active against any of the bacterial strains tested was then validated using a dose–response assay, from which their Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were found (Table 1). Four of the compounds selected from single-shot assay—04, 15, 28, and 36—were inactive against all Gram-positive strains in the dose–response assays and, hence, were considered false-positives; these were discarded for further assays. The nine remaining compounds were validated as active and divided into two different groups according to their spectrum of activity. Five compounds—02, 11, 18, 19, and 27—were active against multiple Gram-positive species (Figure 1), and the other four—05, 07, 13, and 39—were only active against one of the six Gram-positive strains tested (Table 1). MBC matched MIC values in most cases, strongly suggesting that 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives were bactericidal to Gram-positive bacteria.
In order to test whether the lack of activity in Gram-negative bacteria was due to efflux, the susceptibility of E. coli strains lacking some of the major efflux systems to Compounds 02, 18, and 19 was evaluated. The MIC of these compounds was >50 µM against individual knockouts of the efflux pumps Smr, EmrE, MdrA and AcrAB-TolC as well as selected combinations (∆emrE ∆mdrA; ∆emrE ∆acrB; and ∆emrE ∆mdrA ∆acrB). Therefore, the deletion of these major efflux systems was insufficient to overcome E. coli’s intrinsic resistance to these compounds.

2.2. Compound 18 Is Bactericidal to S. aureus

In order to confirm the potential bactericidal activity of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives suggested by the dose–response MIC and MBC assays, time–kill kinetic assays (TKAs) of Compound 18 against two S. aureus strains were conducted: ATCC 29213 (methicillin-susceptible, MSSA, MIC = 25 µM) and ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant, MRSA, MIC = 6.25 µM) were conducted. Indeed, Compound 18 exhibited bactericidal activity against both strains, achieving maximal killing at the 6 h timepoint for concentrations equal to or greater than the MIC for the MSSA strain (Figure 2). Subinhibitory concentrations were also able to reduce the bacterial population at earlier timepoints, but growth soon restarted. On the other hand, Compound 18 was more potent against the MRSA strain, which was rapidly killed at all concentrations tested.
In order to evaluate whether the MSSA outgrowth was caused by the emergence of stable genetic resistance or transient phenotypic adaptations, the population exposed to 25 µM Compound 18 was sub-cultured in Compound 18-free media and subsequently tested its susceptibility to Compound 18. MIC determination using standard broth microdilution showed an increase in the MIC from 25 µM to 100 µM, indicating the emergence of a subpopulation with decreased susceptibility to Compound 18.

2.3. Mutations in the rny Locus Confer S. aureus Resistance to Compound 18

S. aureus MSSA mutants resistant to Compound 18 were isolated from two independent experiments. First, cells were treated with 25 µM (1× MIC) of Compound 18 for 24 h and, subsequently, exposed to 100 µM (4× MIC) of Compound 18 for a further 24 h. Then, the culture was inoculated onto compound-free plates, and individual clones were selected for MIC assays. Second, mutants were selected directly by seeding a culture onto plates containing 100 µM of Compound 18. The frequency of mutation of S. aureus MSSA to Compound 18 was 7·10−7. In both cases, mutants with MIC increases of 4-fold or higher (i.e., 100 µM) were isolated. Their resistant phenotype was then validated using a drop-dilution assay to confirm that the mutants were able to grow in the presence of up to 200 µM of Compound 18 (Figure 3 and Figure S1). In contrast, multiple independent attempts to isolate resistant mutants in the MRSA background did not yield clones with stable MIC increases. Although colonies were recovered under selection, none displayed changes in their MIC upon retesting.
The genome of 17 mutants—15 isolated from liquid cultures and 2 from agar plates—that were able to grow in the presence of 50–200 µM of Compound 18 was sequenced. Those mutations identified, which were selected in two independent experiments, suggest a potential role of RNase Y in the susceptibility of S. aureus to Compound 18 (Table S4). Therefore, two nonsynonymous mutations (P280L and G240D) in the rny locus were genetically validated. Both engineered mutants displayed an increased MIC to Compound 18 compared to the engineered strain in which the wild-type allele was replaced by itself, confirming its role in S. aureus susceptibility (Table 2).
These results were subsequently validated by TKA. Surprisingly, it was found that the killing kinetics of the engineered mutants resembled that of the strain engineered with the wild-type allele, with a rapid phase of initial killing followed by a rebound. However, the proportion of the population that survived the killing was higher in the mutant strains compared to the wild-type control, leading to a quicker recovery after the initial killing (Figure 4). It was also observed that the G240D mutation caused growth defects during the early phase of growth.

2.4. 4H-Pyran-4-ylidene Derivatives Are Not Cytotoxic to HepG2 Cells

The cytotoxicity of compounds 02, 11, 18, 19, and 27 against the HepG2 cell line was determined using the neutral red assay. All five compounds were not cytotoxic at the concentrations at which antimicrobial activity was observed, with selectivity indices ranging between 4.16 and 74.26 (Table 3).

2.5. Structure–Activity Relationships Studies

After comparing data gathered from the dose–response assays with the structure of the compounds (Table S1), some features related to their antimicrobial activity were observed. Based on these preliminary observations, a small set of additional derivatives (Compounds 40–47; Table S1) was designed and synthesized to probe the structural requirements of the scaffold: (i) the role of the tert-butyl substituents, (ii) the presence of the carboxyl group, and (iii) the influence of different heterocyclic or bulky substituents on antimicrobial activity. After testing these compounds against Gram-positive strains (Table 4), some essential features to the 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes’ activity were inferred. First, tert-butyl substituents in the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene ring appear to be necessary for antimicrobial activity, as their replacement by phenyl groups rendered compounds inactive. Second, carboxyl groups and the presence of a five-member heterocycle were essential for activity against Gram-positive bacteria; when removed, activity was also lost. Bulky substituents, on the other hand, were not critical for antimicrobial activity (Figure 5). However, given the small number of molecules tested, their specific contributions to potency remain to be defined.
Based on the structure–activity relationship (SAR) trends observed across this series, a preliminary pharmacophore was proposed comprising the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene ring, two tert-butyl substituents, a five-membered heterocycle positioned to preserve conjugation, and a carboxyl group. Disruption of any of these features was associated with reduced potency, suggesting that both electronic and steric contributions from these groups are critical for antibacterial activity.

3. Discussion

Only six new classes of antibacterial compounds have been introduced in the last five decades. This is in stark contrast to the prolific decades of the Golden Era of antibiotic discovery. The paucity of novel antimicrobials illustrates the limited success of efforts after the Waksman platform [23]. The latest WHO report on antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development highlighted that most of the clinical candidates belong to pre-existing classes, underscoring the need for new antimicrobial families [24]. Simultaneously, bacterial strains have emerged resistant to virtually every antimicrobial, with mortality rates close to the pre-antibiotic era [25].
To address the growing AMR crisis, multiple innovative approaches have attempted to tackle this stagnation. These include screening under conditions that mimic the in vivo environment [26], designing chemical libraries enriched for properties that enhance bacterial penetration [13,27], and leveraging advances in culturing techniques to access previously unculturable microbes. The development of in situ culture systems and sequencing and bioinformatics tools has yielded new antimicrobial candidates with novel mechanisms of action, such as teixobactin and darobactin [9,28]. More recently, artificial intelligence and machine learning have emerged as powerful tools for accelerating antimicrobial discovery, identifying both small molecules and antimicrobial peptides with promising activity [29,30].
In this study, a different approach which involved seeking novel antimicrobial scaffolds from an unconventional chemical space was used. Rather than focusing on molecules designed for biological activity, we screened the in-house PMM (Photoactive Molecular Materials) collection of compounds, originally designed to be part of solar cells. This screening led to the identification of a novel family, the 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes, which exhibits activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Five of these compounds were active against multiple species, with MIC and MBC values ranging from 1.56 to 25 µM (Table 1). A structural similarity search using the SwissSimilarity tool [31] against the ZINC database revealed no analogous compounds, suggesting that this is a chemically distinct scaffold that could offer a new path for antimicrobial discovery. Given the absence of detectable activity against both wild-type E. coli and efflux deficient mutants, the present study prioritized characterization in Gram-positive pathogens. Notably, Compound 18 exhibited a lower MIC against MRSA than MSSA and did not give rise to resistant mutants in the MRSA background. The difference in potency may arise from differences in cell envelope organization or physiological adaptations associated with methicillin resistance, which could enhance penetration of Compound 18, although further work is needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms.
Mutations in the rny locus, encoding the RNase Y enzyme, conferred decreased susceptibility of S. aureus to Compound 18, one of the five 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes with activity against multiple Gram-positive bacterial species (Table 2). In Gram-positive bacteria, RNaseY plays a central role in RNA homeostasis, contributing to mRNA degradation and therefore, overall RNA stability. This effect is achieved in coordination with other RNases, which together form the degradosome [32]. RNase Y is not essential in S. aureus, but its deletion stabilizes several tens of mRNAs and decreases virulence, highlighting the broad impact of its deletion in gene expression regulation [33]. Whole genome sequencing of independently selected resistant mutants revealed recurrent mutations in rny. Importantly, introducing these mutations in the wild-type background resulted in increased MIC. Notably, rather than complete resistance, mutations in rny appear to increase the fraction of S. aureus surviving initial drug exposure, suggesting a mechanism of tolerance rather than strict resistance (Figure 4). It is, therefore, proposed that these mutations partially impair RNase Y activity and, consequently, change the stability of multiple mRNAs, increasing the fraction of bacteria able to endure Compound 18 exposure. A conceptually similar drug tolerance mechanism has previously been described in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, where the loss of RNase J—homologous to the RNase J1 and RNase J2 enzymes of the Gram-positive degradosome [34]—enhances survival in the presence of multiple anti-TB drugs [35]. Given that RNase Y is absent in Gammaproteobacteria (the class including all Gram-negative strains tested in this study) and mycobacteria and it is non-essential in S. aureus [36], it is unlikely to be the direct target of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes but rather involved in its mechanism of resistance. Future work can focus on transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to evaluate S. aureus response to 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes.
Two main hypotheses can explain the lack of activity of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes against the Gram-negative and mycobacterial strains tested: (i) the target of these compounds is unique to Gram-positive bacteria; and (ii) the differences in cell envelope architecture prevent intracellular accumulation of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes. Regarding the second hypothesis, 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes were not active against E. coli strains lacking major efflux systems (AcrAB-TolC, EmrE, MdrA and combinations thereof) in standard broth microdilution assays. However, the possibility of other efflux systems contributing to their lack of activity cannot be excluded.
Preliminary toxicity studies in the HepG2 cell line provided selectivity indices between 4.16 and 74.26 (Table 3), indicating preferential antibacterial activity over mammalian cytotoxicity. While there is not a clear universal threshold to define a compound as safe, selective indices above 10 are considered favorable in early drug development [37]. This value was generally achieved for all compounds and bacterial strains tested, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus but not for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.
SAR studies showed that three substituents are required for the antibacterial activity of the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene family: (1) a tert-butyl group, (2) carboxyl groups, and (3) a five-membered heterocycle (Figure 5). While these elements appear necessary for activity in the current dataset, the limited chemical space explored precludes definitive conclusions regarding their mechanistic roles or contribution to overall potency. Notably, this structural framework is distinct from the current antimicrobials in use against Gram-positive infections, such as β-lactams, glycopeptides, lipopeptides, or oxazolidinones, highlighting the novelty of this scaffold. Such structural divergence may represent an advantage in the context of antimicrobial resistance, as cross resistance with existing drug classes may be less likely. From a medicinal chemistry perspective, several of these features may represent structural alerts and liabilities for further development. Tert-butyl groups are usually susceptible to cytochrome P450 oxidation, potentially reducing metabolic stability of the compounds in which they are present, although this feature is not a limiting factor [38]. Carboxylic acid groups are also associated with poor pharmacological properties due to the limited membrane permeability of charged molecules, metabolic instability, and toxicity arising from the chemical reactivity of their degradation products; these issues are usually solved by replacing them with bioisosteres with better pharmacological properties [39]. Finally, the thiophene moiety is viewed as a double-edged sword, providing a versatile scaffold; however, it is also susceptible to cytochrome P450 metabolism, which can lead to the formation of toxic metabolites [40]. Compared with current antibacterial drugs, which have undergone extensive characterization for chemical use, the present scaffold remains at an early stage. While its potential liabilities are well recognized, future work could include the design of analogs to mitigate them; however, the development of a 4H-pyran-4-ylidene lead candidate was beyond the scope of this work, which is exploratory in nature. A better understanding of the mechanism of action will also help refine the SAR, leading to optimized derivatives with potency and selectivity comparable to current therapies used to treat S. aureus infections.
S. aureus remains a major global health concern, causing an array of diseases that range from superficial skin infections to fatal bacteriemia. MRSA is currently one of the most prevalent antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and is classified as a high-priority target for antimicrobial development [15]. The main current therapeutic options for MRSA are vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid, although the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant strains threatens its future availability as an option [41]. Given the scarcity of new antibacterials in the development pipeline, a novel approach exploring chemical diversity originally intended for non-biological applications could represent an untapped source of innovation. While further investigation is needed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes, these findings support the original hypothesis that expanding screening efforts beyond traditional drug-like molecules can lead to the identification of novel antimicrobial scaffolds.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table S2. Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were propagated in Müller–Hinton broth (Panreac AppliChem, Barcelona, Spain) with 22 mg/L Ca2+ and 12 mg/L Mg2+ (Müller–Hinton II). Corynebacterium diphtheriae was grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA). Mycobacterial strains were propagated in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) Middlebrook ADC (Difco) and 0.05% Tween 80 (Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain). For CFU enumeration, Gram-positive bacteria were seeded onto LB agar (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl, and 17 g/L agar).

4.2. Compounds

Compounds belonging to the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene family were synthesized and characterized in-house following the schemes described in the Supplementary Materials or previously published studies. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 4 mM and stored at −20 °C. Secondary stocks for single-shot and dose–response assays were prepared in 96-well V-bottomed plates at 40-fold the final concentration in the assay plate. For subsequent assays, Compounds 02, 11, 18, 19, and 27 were dissolved in DMSO at 10 mM.

4.3. Screening of the Photoactive Molecular Material (PMM) Compound Library

Antimicrobial activity was evaluated following a two-step process. First, a single-shot assay was performed with compounds being tested at a final concentration of 50 µM against strains described in Table S2. Compounds active at 50 µM were subsequently tested in dose–response assays in two-fold serial dilutions of the compounds, starting from 50 µM. To perform each assay, compounds were prepared in plates at 40-fold the final concentration. Then, 5 µL was transferred onto 96-well flat-bottomed plates containing 195 µL of the corresponding bacterial suspension at a final density of 105 CFU/mL. Growth controls were treated with the equivalent volume of DMSO (2.5% final concentration). Plates were incubated for 24–144 h depending on the bacterial species (Table S2) before the addition of 30 µL of a solution containing Tween 80 (10%, v/v) and MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (2.5 mg/mL) (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) as a reporter of bacterial growth. Optical density measures at 580 nm after 1 h incubation (overnight for M. tuberculosis) were used to define the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), which was the lowest compound concentration that inhibited 90% MTT conversion to formazan. To minimize potential optical interference from the test compounds in the single-shot assay, compound activity was also evaluated using an agar-based readout. Briefly, five microliters of each well was seeded onto agar plates and incubated for an additional 24–72 h. Compounds were considered active if neither bacterial growth nor resazurin reduction was observed on the agar surface.
For S. aureus MSSA and MRSA dose–response assays, performance was validated by MIC determinations for reference antibiotics oxacillin (0.12 µg/mL and 4 µg/mL, respectively; the latter is consistent with the breakpoints defined for resistance) and rifampicin (0.006 µg/mL), which matched the values reported in CLSI M100 [42].
In order to determine the Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), before the addition of the MTT solution in a conventional MIC assay, 5 µL of each well was transferred to 96-well plates containing LB-agar before the addition of the MTT solution and incubated for a further 24 h. The readout was performed after the addition of 30 µL of a 0.1 mg/mL resazurin solution (Sigma) to each well and color changes from blue to pink were visually evaluated.

4.4. Time-Kill Kinetic Assays

A starting inoculum of 105 CFU/mL of S. aureus was treated with 50, 25, 10, 5 µM of Compound 18 (corresponding to 2-, 1-, 0.4-, and 0.2-fold the MIC against S. aureus ATCC 29213). The growth control was treated with the concentration of DMSO corresponding to the amount present in the 50 µM culture (0.5% final concentration). Then, 10-fold serial dilutions in PBS were seeded onto LB agar plates at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h, and CFUs enumerated after 24 h incubation at 37 °C. Following exposure to 25 µM of Compound 18, MSSA cells were diluted 1:1000 in fresh medium and incubated overnight. Following this passage, Compound 18 MIC was determined using broth microdilution as described above. Each biological duplicate was tested in technical duplicates. The parental strain was included in parallel as a control.
For TKA performed with the engineered S. aureus strains, Compound 18 was tested at 100, 25, 10, 2.5, and 1 µM. The corresponding growth controls were treated with 1% DMSO, which represented the highest solvent concentration present in the assay, to account for potential solvent effects.

4.5. Mutant Isolation Assays

S. aureus ATCC 29213 cultures were treated with 25 µM of Compound 18 for 24 h and subsequently treated with 100 µM of Compound 18 and incubated overnight before seeding 10-fold serial dilutions onto drug-free LB agar plates. Twenty-three colonies were selected for subsequent phenotypic validation.
Mutant isolation was also attempted by seeding 107, 108, and 109 CFUs of S. aureus ATCC 29213 onto Müller–Hinton II agar plates with 100 µM of Compound 18. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h to allow a selection of late-growing mutants. Eleven colonies were selected for phenotypic validation. The frequency of mutation was calculated as the ratio of resistant colonies to the total number of viable CFU plated.
In both cases, the obtained colonies were cultured in Müller–Hinton II broth and used to determine the MIC of Compound 18 against them. Colonies with a 4-fold or greater increase in their MICs compared to the reference strain were selected for secondary validation, which consisted of seeding 5 µL of 10-fold serial dilutions on Müller–Hinton agar plates containing 50, 100, or 200 µM of Compound 18.

4.6. Genomic DNA Extraction

Mutants of S. aureus with decreased susceptibility to Compound 18 were grown overnight in tubes containing 5 mL of Müller–Hinton II broth. Bacteria were then collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 400 µL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA). Lysostaphin (Sigma) was then added at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL, and the mixture was incubated for one hour at 37 °C. Then 0.05 mg of proteinase K dissolved in 75 µL of a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution were added and samples were incubated for 10 min at 65 °C. Genomic DNA extraction was performed by adding 750 µL of chloroform–isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v). Samples were mixed thoroughly before centrifugation (5 min, 13,500 RCF). The supernatant was transferred to tubes containing 420 µL of ice-cold isopropanol. DNA precipitation was carried out at −20 °C for two hours before centrifuging samples (5 min, 13,500 RCF) to collect the nucleic acids. Pellets were finally resuspended in 50 µL of nuclease-free water (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was quantified by absorbance readings at 260 nm using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.7. Whole Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA of seventeen mutants and the parental S. aureus ATCC 29213 was sequenced at the FISABIO Sequencing and Bioinformatics Service (Valencia, Spain) using Illumina technology or at the CIBA genomics facility (Zaragoza, Spain) using IonTorrent technology. Reads were filtered with fastp [43] to remove low-quality bases at the 3′ end. The filtered reads were subsequently mapped to the S. aureus ATCC 29213 chromosome (available at https://genomes.atcc.org/genomes/21eea9803c88405a, accessed on 16 March 2026) with BWA [44], and potential duplicates were removed with Picard tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard, accessed on 16 March 2026). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified using VarScan [45]; if at least 20 reads supported the genomic position, the SNP was found at a frequency of 0.9 or higher and was not found near an indel region (10 bp). Indels were identified using Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK) [46]. SNPs and indels were annotated using SnpEFF [47], and those common to the parental strain were later removed.

4.8. Genetic Validation of Mutations Associated with Compound 18 Resistance

Mutations identified in Compound 18-resistant S. aureus mutants were validated using the pMAD vector [48] to perform allelic replacement in the parental strain. Mutant alleles were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA as the template and cloned between the XmaI and SfoI restriction sites of pMAD. The resulting plasmids were then electroporated into the methylase-deficient Escherichia coli GM2929 to obtain plasmid DNA suitable for electroporation into S. aureus. One microgram of each plasmid was electroporated into electrocompetent S. aureus and transformants were selected on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Difco) plates containing 2.5 µg/mL erythromycin and 80 µg/mL X-gal (5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl β-D-Galactopyranoside) after 72 h of incubation at 28 °C. Then, one cyan colony from each transformation was transferred to Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Difco) with 2.5 µg/mL erythromycin and incubated at 44 °C overnight. This culture was inoculated onto TSA plates containing erythromycin and X-gal at 44 °C to select colonies in which the recombinant pMAD derivative was integrated into the chromosome of S. aureus. Such cyan colonies were replicated onto TSA plates with erythromycin and X-gal and cultured in TSB without erythromycin overnight at 28 °C; once grown, they were 10-fold serially diluted and seeded onto erythromycin-free TSA plates with X-gal and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h; white colonies (indicative of the loss of integrated pMAD derivative) were screened by colony PCR followed by Sanger sequencing to confirm the presence of the mutation.

4.9. Cytotoxicity Assays

Cytotoxicity of compounds 02, 11, 18, 19, and 27 (from a 10 mM DMSO stock solution) was tested in HepG2 cells (ECACC 85011430), which were exposed to a concentration of 250 µM and to a series of two-fold dilutions from 100 to 1.56 µM. Toxicity was determined using the Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) assay as described in ISO 10993-5:2009(E) [49]. Cells were seeded in 96-well flat-bottomed plates at a density of 2.5·104 cells/well and incubated for 24 h in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). Then, the culture medium was replaced with 100 µL of fresh DMEM with the compounds to be tested. The assay was performed in technical triplicates, including 2.5% DMSO (final concentration of DMSO in the 250 µM wells), 10% DMSO (death control), and 1 µg/mL rifampicin (positive control).
After incubation with the compounds for 24 h, the culture medium was replaced by neutral red-containing medium. Cells were subsequently incubated for 3 h before the desorb solution (1% glacial acetic acid, 50% ethanol, v/v) was added and optical density was measured at 540 nm. Compounds were also tested under the same conditions in plates without cells in order to ensure that their strong colors did not interfere with the readout method. In the absence of cells, compounds alone showed negligible interference with the assay readout, as the compound-containing medium was replaced with neutral red-containing medium.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics15030321/s1. Figure S1: Drop-dilution Compound 18 susceptibility testing of nineteen S. aureus mutants.; Table S1: Bacterial strains used in the screening of the photoactive molecular material compound collection; Table S2: Single-shot assay of the 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives; Table S3: Summary of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives used in this study; Table S4: Mutations identified in S. aureus resistant mutants. Table S5. Absorbance of the compounds used in this study relative to the positive growth control for each strain. Table S6. UV spectra of the compounds used in this study. Figures S2–S70: Spectral Characterization Data For New Synthesized Compounds. Refs [17,21,22,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.F., J.A.A., S.R.-G.; investigation: J.M.E.-A., R.A.-R., A.L.; formal analysis: J.M.E.-A., R.A.-R., A.L.; resources: R.A., S.F.; supervision: S.F., J.A.A., S.R.-G.; writing—original draft: J.M.E.-A., S.F.; writing—review and editing: J.M.E.-A., R.A., S.F., J.A.A., S.R.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a fellowship from the Spanish Government (Programa de Formación de Profesorado Universitario) Ref. FPU18/03873 to J.M.E-A. This work was supported by internal funds from the University of Zaragoza (J.A.A. and S.R.-G). R.A. and S.F. were funded by Gobierno de Aragón-FEDER Fondo Social Europeo (E47_23R) and the University of Zaragoza (UZ2023-CIE-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

WGS data were submitted to SRA under accession number PRJNA1240371. All other relevant data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iñigo Lasa (Public University of Navarra) for providing pMAD and the protocol for genetic manipulation of S. aureus; Begoña Gracia (University of Zaragoza) for conducting the activity screening assay against M. tuberculosis; and Lara Muñoz and Begoña Gracia (University of Zaragoza) for providing reference MIC values for S. aureus strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMRAntimicrobial Resistance
HTSHigh-Throughput Screening
MRSAMethicillin-Resistant S. aureus
MSSAMethicillin-Susceptible S. aureus
PMMPhotoactive Molecular Materials
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration
MBCMinimum Bactericidal Concentration
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
WHOWorld Health Organization
SARStructure–Activity Relationship
BHIBrain Heart Infusion
ADCAlbumin–Dextrose–Catalase supplement
DMSODimethyl Sulfoxide
MTT[3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide]
LBLuria–Bertani
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
TKATime-Kill Kinetic Assay
SNPSingle Nucleotide Polymorphism
TSATryptic Soy Agar
TSBTryptic Soy Broth
DMEMDulbecco Modified Eagle Medium
LLOQLower Limit of Quantification
WGSWhole Genome Sequencing

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report 2022, 1st ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Naghavi, M.; Vollset, S.E.; Ikuta, K.S.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Gray, A.P.; Wool, E.E.; Aguilar, G.R.; Mestrovic, T.; Smith, G.; Han, C.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis with Forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lewis, K.; Lee, R.E.; Brötz-Oesterhelt, H.; Hiller, S.; Rodnina, M.V.; Schneider, T.; Weingarth, M.; Wohlgemuth, I. Sophisticated Natural Products as Antibiotics. Nature 2024, 632, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fleischmann, R.D.; Adams, M.D.; White, O.; Clayton, R.A.; Kirkness, E.F.; Kerlavage, A.R.; Bult, C.J.; Tomb, J.F.; Dougherty, B.A.; Merrick, J.M. Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus Influenzae Rd. Science 1995, 269, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Payne, D.J.; Gwynn, M.N.; Holmes, D.J.; Pompliano, D.L. Drugs for Bad Bugs: Confronting the Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tommasi, R.; Brown, D.G.; Walkup, G.K.; Manchester, J.I.; Miller, A.A. ESKAPEing the Labyrinth of Antibacterial Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bax, B.D.; Chan, P.F.; Eggleston, D.S.; Fosberry, A.; Gentry, D.R.; Gorrec, F.; Giordano, I.; Hann, M.M.; Hennessy, A.; Hibbs, M.; et al. Type IIA Topoisomerase Inhibition by a New Class of Antibacterial Agents. Nature 2010, 466, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Watkins, R.R.; Thapaliya, D.; Lemonovich, T.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Gepotidacin: A Novel, Oral, ‘First-in-Class’ Triazaacenaphthylene Antibiotic for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections and Urogenital Gonorrhoea. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ling, L.L.; Schneider, T.; Peoples, A.J.; Spoering, A.L.; Engels, I.; Conlon, B.P.; Mueller, A.; Schäberle, T.F.; Hughes, D.E.; Epstein, S.; et al. A New Antibiotic Kills Pathogens without Detectable Resistance. Nature 2015, 517, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Darby, E.M.; Trampari, E.; Siasat, P.; Gaya, M.S.; Alav, I.; Webber, M.A.; Blair, J.M.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance Revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leeson, P.D.; Davis, A.M. Time-Related Differences in the Physical Property Profiles of Oral Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6338–6348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. O’Shea, R.; Moser, H.E. Physicochemical Properties of Antibacterial Compounds: Implications for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2871–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brown, D.G.; May-Dracka, T.L.; Gagnon, M.M.; Tommasi, R. Trends and Exceptions of Physical Properties on Antibacterial Activity for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10144–10161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. World Health Organization. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  16. Andreu, R.; Carrasquer, L.; Franco, S.; Garín, J.; Orduna, J.; Martínez De Baroja, N.; Alicante, R.; Villacampa, B.; Allain, M. 4 H -Pyran-4-Ylidenes: Strong Proaromatic Donors for Organic Nonlinear Optical Chromophores. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6647–6657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franco, S.; Garín, J.; Martínez de Baroja, N.; Pérez-Tejada, R.; Orduna, J.; Yu, Y.; Lira-Cantú, M. New D−π–A-Conjugated Organic Sensitizers Based on 4H-Pyran-4-Ylidene Donors for Highly Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marco, A.B.; Martínez De Baroja, N.; Andrés-Castán, J.M.; Franco, S.; Andreu, R.; Villacampa, B.; Orduna, J.; Garín, J. Pyranylidene/Thienothiophene-Based Organic Sensitizers for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2019, 161, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tejeda-Orusco, V.; Andreu, R.; Orduna, J.; Villacampa, B.; Franco, S.; Civera, A. Twisted One-Dimensional Charge Transfer and Related Y-Shaped Chromophores with a 4H-Pyranylidene Donor: Synthesis and Optical Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 3152–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Royo, R.; Mainik, P.; Benitez-Martin, C.; Andreu, R.; Blasco, E.; Najera, F.; Villacampa, B. Highly Efficient Photoninitiators Based on 4 H -Pyranylidene Derivatives for Two-Photon Laser Printing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2023, 8, 2300571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Andrés-Castán, J.M.; Andreu, R.; Villacampa, B.; Orduna, J.; Franco, S. 4H-Pyranylidene Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Twisted Structures towards Enhanced Power Conversion Efficiencies. Sol. Energy 2019, 193, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pérez-Tejada, R.; Martínez de Baroja, N.; Franco, S.; Pellejà, L.; Orduna, J.; Andreu, R.; Garín, J. Organic Sensitizers Bearing a Trialkylsilyl Ether Group for Liquid Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 123, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Walesch, S.; Birkelbach, J.; Jézéquel, G.; Haeckl, F.P.J.; Hegemann, J.D.; Hesterkamp, T.; Hirsch, A.K.H.; Hammann, P.; Müller, R. Fighting Antibiotic Resistance—Strategies and (Pre)Clinical Developments to Find New Antibacterials. EMBO Rep. 2023, 24, e56033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. World Health Organization. 2023 Antibacterial Agents in Clinical and Preclinical Development: An Overview and Analysis; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramos-Castañeda, J.A.; Ruano-Ravina, A.; Barbosa-Lorenzo, R.; Paillier-Gonzalez, J.E.; Saldaña-Campos, J.C.; Salinas, D.F.; Lemos-Luengas, E.V. Mortality Due to KPC Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Infect. 2018, 76, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Parish, T. In Vitro Drug Discovery Models for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Relevant for Host Infection. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2020, 15, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Muñoz, K.A.; Hergenrother, P.J. Facilitating Compound Entry as a Means to Discover Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Bacteria. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 1322–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Imai, Y.; Meyer, K.J.; Iinishi, A.; Favre-Godal, Q.; Green, R.; Manuse, S.; Caboni, M.; Mori, M.; Niles, S.; Ghiglieri, M.; et al. A New Antibiotic Selectively Kills Gram-Negative Pathogens. Nature 2019, 576, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wong, F.; Zheng, E.J.; Valeri, J.A.; Donghia, N.M.; Anahtar, M.N.; Omori, S.; Li, A.; Cubillos-Ruiz, A.; Krishnan, A.; Jin, W.; et al. Discovery of a Structural Class of Antibiotics with Explainable Deep Learning. Nature 2024, 626, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Torres, M.D.T.; Brooks, E.F.; Cesaro, A.; Sberro, H.; Gill, M.O.; Nicolaou, C.; Bhatt, A.S.; de la Fuente-Nunez, C. Mining Human Microbiomes Reveals an Untapped Source of Peptide Antibiotics. Cell 2024, 187, 5453–5467.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zoete, V.; Daina, A.; Bovigny, C.; Michielin, O. SwissSimilarity: A Web Tool for Low to Ultra High Throughput Ligand-Based Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cho, K.H. The Structure and Function of the Gram-Positive Bacterial RNA Degradosome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marincola, G.; Schäfer, T.; Behler, J.; Bernhardt, J.; Ohlsen, K.; Goerke, C.; Wolz, C. RNase Y of Staphylococcus Aureus and Its Role in the Activation of Virulence Genes. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 85, 817–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bechhofer, D.H.; Deutscher, M.P. Bacterial Ribonucleases and Their Roles in RNA Metabolism. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 54, 242–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martini, M.C.; Hicks, N.D.; Xiao, J.; Alonso, M.N.; Barbier, T.; Sixsmith, J.; Fortune, S.M.; Shell, S.S. Loss of RNase J Leads to Multi-Drug Tolerance and Accumulation of Highly Structured mRNA Fragments in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laalami, S.; Zig, L.; Putzer, H. Initiation of mRNA Decay in Bacteria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 1799–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Muller, P.Y.; Milton, M.N. The Determination and Interpretation of the Therapeutic Index in Drug Development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barnes-Seeman, D.; Jain, M.; Bell, L.; Ferreira, S.; Cohen, S.; Chen, X.-H.; Amin, J.; Snodgrass, B.; Hatsis, P. Metabolically Stable Tert-Butyl Replacement. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bredael, K.; Geurs, S.; Clarisse, D.; De Bosscher, K.; D’hooghe, M. Carboxylic Acid Bioisosteres in Medicinal Chemistry: Synthesis and Properties. J. Chem. 2022, 2022, 2164558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thakur, S.; Kumar, D.; Jaiswal, S.; Goel, K.K.; Rawat, P.; Srivastava, V.; Dhiman, S.; Jadhav, H.R.; Dwivedi, A.R. Medicinal Chemistry-Based Perspectives on Thiophene and Its Derivatives: Exploring Structural Insights to Discover Plausible Druggable Leads. RSC Med. Chem. 2024, 16, 481–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Y.; Song, G.; Sun, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Prevalence and Therapies of Antibiotic-Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weinstein, M.P. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Supplement M100, 30th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. Fastp: An Ultra-Fast All-in-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, H. Aligning Sequence Reads, Clone Sequences and Assembly Contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Koboldt, D.C.; Chen, K.; Wylie, T.; Larson, D.E.; McLellan, M.D.; Mardis, E.R.; Weinstock, G.M.; Wilson, R.K.; Ding, L. VarScan: Variant Detection in Massively Parallel Sequencing of Individual and Pooled Samples. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2283–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce Framework for Analyzing next-Generation DNA Sequencing Data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cingolani, P.; Platts, A.; Wang, L.L.; Coon, M.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, L.; Land, S.J.; Lu, X.; Ruden, D.M. A Program for Annotating and Predicting the Effects of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the Genome of Drosophila Melanogaster Strain w1118; Iso-2; Iso-3. Fly 2012, 6, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Arnaud, M.; Chastanet, A.; Débarbouillé, M. New Vector for Efficient Allelic Replacement in Naturally Nontransformable, Low-GC-Content, Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6887–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. ISO 10993-5:2009; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part5: Tests for in vitro Cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  50. Abate, A.; Pérez-Tejada, R.; Wojciechowski, K.; Foster, J.M.; Sadhanala, A.; Steiner, U.; Snaith, H.J.; Franco, S.; Orduna, J. Phosphonic Anchoring Groups in Organic Dyes for Solid-State Solar Cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 18780–18789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moreno-Yruela, C.; Garín, J.; Orduna, J.; Franco, S.; Quintero, E.; López Navarrete, J.T.; Diosdado, B.E.; Villacampa, B.; Casado, J.; Andreu, R. D−π–A Compounds with Tunable Intramolecular Charge Transfer Achieved by Incorporation of Butenolide Nitriles as Acceptor Moieties. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 12115–12128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ford, J.A.; Wilson, C.V.; Young, W.R. The Preparation of 2(5H)-Furanones and Dyes Derived from Them. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, C.-H.; Lindsey, J.S. One-Flask Synthesis of Meso-Substituted Dipyrromethanes and Their Application in the Synthesis of Trans-Substituted Porphyrin Building Blocks. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11427–11440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Smith, M.J.; Blake, I.M.; Clegg, W.; Anderson, H.L. Push–Pull Quinoidal Porphyrins. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 3648–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Y.; Lin, H.; Dy, J.T.; Tamaki, K.; Nakazaki, J.; Nakayama, D.; Uchida, S.; Kubo, T.; Segawa, H. N-Fused Carbazole–Zinc Porphyrin–Free-Base Porphyrin Triad for Efficient near-IR Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4010–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Andrés-Castán, J.M.; Franco, S.; Villacampa, B.; Orduna, J.; Pérez-Tejada, R. New Efficient Tert-Butyldiphenyl-4H-Pyranylidene Sensitizers for DSSCs. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 106706–106709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Galán, E.; Andreu, R.; Garín, J.; Mosteo, L.; Orduna, J.; Villacampa, B.; Diosdado, B.E. Influence of Thiazole Regioisomerism on Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Chromophores. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 6427–6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Marco, A.B.; de Baroja, N.M.; Franco, S.; Garín, J.; Orduna, J.; Villacampa, B.; Revuelto, A.; Andreu, R. Dithienopyrrole as a Rigid Alternative to the Bithiophene π Relay in Chromophores with Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties. Chem. Asian J. 2015, 10, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vanallan, J.A.; Reynolds, G.A.; Petropoulos, C.C.; Maier, D.P. Reactions of Some 4-methylene-4H-pyran Derivatives with Primary and Secondary Amines. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1970, 7, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tejeda-Orusco, V.; Blais, M.; Cabanetos, C.; Blanchard, P.; Andreu, R.; Franco, S.; Orduna, J.; Diosdado, B.E. 4H-Pyranylidene-Based Small Push-Pull Chromophores: Synthesis, Structure, Electronic Properties and Photovoltaic Evaluation. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 178, 108357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pérez Tejada, R.; Pellejà, L.; Palomares, E.; Franco, S.; Orduna, J.; Garín, J.; Andreu, R. Novel 4H-Pyranylidene Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Effect of Different Heteroaromatic Rings on the Photovoltaic Properties. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 3237–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abaev, V.; Karsanov, I.; Urtaeva, Z.; Blinokhvatov, A.; Bumber, A. Production and Properties of (4H-Pyran-4-Yl)Diphenylphosphine Oxides. Zh Obs. Khim 1990, 60, 1012–1019. [Google Scholar]
  63. Andreu, R.; Galán, E.; Garín, J.; Herrero, V.; Lacarra, E.; Orduna, J.; Alicante, R.; Villacampa, B. Linear and V-Shaped Nonlinear Optical Chromophores with Multiple 4H-Pyran-4-Ylidene Moieties. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Erdmann, D.; Schuehrer, K.; Koch, W.; Schneider, G. Process for the Preparation of 3,4-Disubstituted ″(5H)-Furanones. DE2116416A1. 19 October 1972. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/DE2116416A1/en (accessed on 12 September 2024).
  65. Holliday, S.; Ashraf, R.S.; Nielsen, C.B.; Kirkus, M.; Röhr, J.A.; Tan, C.-H.; Collado-Fregoso, E.; Knall, A.-C.; Durrant, J.R.; Nelson, J.; et al. A Rhodanine Flanked Nonfullerene Acceptor for Solution-Processed Organic Photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Posner, G.H.; Li, Z.; White, M.C.; Vinader, V.; Takeuchi, K.; Guggino, S.E.; Dolan, P.; Kensler, T.W. 1 Alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Analogs Featuring Aromatic and Heteroaromatic Rings: Design, Synthesis, and Preliminary Biological Testing. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4529–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Reynolds, G.A.; Chen, C.H. Some Reactions of 4H-pyrylium Salts with Tributylphosphine and with Tertiary Amines. J. Heterocycl. Chem 1981, 18, 1235–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ermer, S.; Lovejoy, S.M.; Bedworth, P.V.; Leung, D.S.; Warren, H.B.; Epstein, J.A.; Girton, D.G.; Dries, L.S.; Taylor, R.E.; Barto, R.R., Jr.; et al. Low-Voltage Electro-Optic Modulation Using Amorphous Polycarbonate Host Material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2002, 12, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nagahora, N.; Tokumaru, H.; Ikaga, S.; Hanada, T.; Shioji, K.; Okuma, K. Synthetic Studies on a Series of Functionalized Pyrylium Salts, 4-Chloro- and 4-Bromophosphinines. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 1880–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abdelrazek, F.M.; Michael, F.A. New Data about the Reaction of Benzyolacetonitrile with Malononitrile and Its Self-condensation. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Marco, A.B.; Andreu, R.; Franco, S.; Garín, J.; Orduna, J.; Villacampa, B.; Alicante, R. Efficient Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Chromophores Based on Dithienothiophene and Thienothiophene Bridges. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 3919–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Andreu, R.; Galán, E.; Orduna, J.; Villacampa, B.; Alicante, R.; Navarrete, J.T.L.; Casado, J.; Garín, J. Aromatic/Proaromatic Donors in 2-Dicyanomethylenethiazole Merocyanines: From Neutral to Strongly Zwitterionic Nonlinear Optical Chromophores. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 15 00321 g001
Figure 1. Chemical structures of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive species. Compounds 02, 11, 18, and 19 were reported in [21]; Compound 27 was reported in [22].
Figure 1. Chemical structures of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive species. Compounds 02, 11, 18, and 19 were reported in [21]; Compound 27 was reported in [22].
Antibiotics 15 00321 g001
Antibiotics 15 00321 g002
Figure 2. Time-kill kinetics of Compound 18 against Staphylococcus aureus. ATCC 29213 (MSSA, MIC = 25 µM) and ATCC 43300 (MRSA, MIC = 6.25 µM). Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) was 400 CFU/mL.
Figure 2. Time-kill kinetics of Compound 18 against Staphylococcus aureus. ATCC 29213 (MSSA, MIC = 25 µM) and ATCC 43300 (MRSA, MIC = 6.25 µM). Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) was 400 CFU/mL.
Antibiotics 15 00321 g002
Antibiotics 15 00321 g003
Figure 3. Drop-dilution Compound 18 susceptibility testing of S. aureus ATCC 29213 and one of the resistant mutants isolated (mutant 15). Compound 18 concentrations are indicated in µM (horizontally).
Figure 3. Drop-dilution Compound 18 susceptibility testing of S. aureus ATCC 29213 and one of the resistant mutants isolated (mutant 15). Compound 18 concentrations are indicated in µM (horizontally).
Antibiotics 15 00321 g003
Antibiotics 15 00321 g004
Figure 4. Time-kill kinetics of Compound 18 against S. aureus rny engineered point mutants. Wild-type S. aureus ATCC 29213 was engineered to replace wild-type rny with alleles carrying the P280L or G240D mutation and itself. Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) was 400 CFU/mL.
Figure 4. Time-kill kinetics of Compound 18 against S. aureus rny engineered point mutants. Wild-type S. aureus ATCC 29213 was engineered to replace wild-type rny with alleles carrying the P280L or G240D mutation and itself. Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) was 400 CFU/mL.
Antibiotics 15 00321 g004
Antibiotics 15 00321 g005
Figure 5. Pharmacophore of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes. The presence of tert-butyl substituents, pyranylidene and thiophene rings, and a carboxyl group are required for antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria.
Figure 5. Pharmacophore of 4H-pyran-4-ylidenes. The presence of tert-butyl substituents, pyranylidene and thiophene rings, and a carboxyl group are required for antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria.
Antibiotics 15 00321 g005
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations for the nine compounds tested in dose–response assays. Concentrations are expressed in µM. MIC and MBC values ≤ 50 µM are color-coded: the darkest shade of blue represents the lowest values (≤1.56 µM), the intermediate shade represents 3.125–6.25 µM, and the lightest shade represents the highest values (12.5–50 µM). MICs and MBCs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates. MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations for the nine compounds tested in dose–response assays. Concentrations are expressed in µM. MIC and MBC values ≤ 50 µM are color-coded: the darkest shade of blue represents the lowest values (≤1.56 µM), the intermediate shade represents 3.125–6.25 µM, and the lightest shade represents the highest values (12.5–50 µM). MICs and MBCs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates. MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
C. diphtheriaeC. glutamicumE. faecalisMSSAS. epidermidisS. agalactiae
CompoundMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBC
026.256.256.256.252525252512.512.512.512.5
0512.5>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
07>50>50>50>50>50>5025–50>50>50>50>50>50
1112.512.52525505050>5012.512.512.512.5
1325–5025–50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
181.561.566.256.251.563.1225253.123.126.256.25
190.781.563.123.120.780.78>50>50>50>503.123.12
271.561.566.256.253.123.12>50>50>50>501.561.56
391.561.56–6.25>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
Table 2. Antimicrobial activity of Compound 18 against genetically engineered S. aureus ATCC 29213 rny mutants. MICs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates.
Table 2. Antimicrobial activity of Compound 18 against genetically engineered S. aureus ATCC 29213 rny mutants. MICs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates.
StrainMIC Fold Change Relative to Wild-Type
S. aureus ATCC 29213 Rny WT1
S. aureus ATCC 29213 Rny P280L8
S. aureus ATCC 29213 Rny G240D4
Table 3. Cytotoxicity of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives against HepG2 cells and selectivity indices (calculated as the ratio CC50/MIC90). ND: not determined, due to the lack of activity of the compounds against specific strains; CC: cytotoxic concentration. Selectivity indices above 10 are shown in blue. CCs were determined in two independent experiments with technical triplicates.
Table 3. Cytotoxicity of 4H-pyran-4-ylidene derivatives against HepG2 cells and selectivity indices (calculated as the ratio CC50/MIC90). ND: not determined, due to the lack of activity of the compounds against specific strains; CC: cytotoxic concentration. Selectivity indices above 10 are shown in blue. CCs were determined in two independent experiments with technical triplicates.
CC50 and CC90 (µM) of Compound
Compound0211181927
CC50167370575826
CC90250>25010010050
StrainSelectivity index (CC50/MIC90)
S. aureus (MSSA)6.687.44.56NDND
S. epidermidis13.3629.618.24NDND
S. agalactiae13.3629.69.1218.5616.64
E. faecalis6.687.436.4874.268.32
C. glutamicum26.7214.89.1218.564.16
C. diphtheriae26.7229.636.4874.2616.64
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of Compounds 40–47. Concentrations are expressed in µM. MIC and MBC values ≤ 50 µM are color-coded: the darkest shade of blue represents the lowest values (6.25 µM), and the lightest shade represents the highest values (12.5–50 µM). MICs and MBCs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates. MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of Compounds 40–47. Concentrations are expressed in µM. MIC and MBC values ≤ 50 µM are color-coded: the darkest shade of blue represents the lowest values (6.25 µM), and the lightest shade represents the highest values (12.5–50 µM). MICs and MBCs were determined in two independent experiments using technical duplicates. MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
C. diphtheriaeC. glutamicumE. faecalisMSSAS. epidermidisS. agalactiae
CompoundMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBC
40>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
41>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
4212.525>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>50
4312.512.512.512.5255050>5012.52512.512.5
446.256.2512.512.55050505025–5025–502525
4512.512.525252525255012.512.512.512.5
465050>50>50>50>50>50>50>50>502525
4712.512.512.512.52550505012.5252525
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ezquerra-Aznárez, J.M.; Alonso-Román, R.; Lucía, A.; Andreu, R.; Franco, S.; Aínsa, J.A.; Ramón-García, S. New Chemical Scaffold with Antimicrobial Activity Identified in a Screening of Industrial Photoactive Compounds. Antibiotics 2026, 15, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15030321

AMA Style

Ezquerra-Aznárez JM, Alonso-Román R, Lucía A, Andreu R, Franco S, Aínsa JA, Ramón-García S. New Chemical Scaffold with Antimicrobial Activity Identified in a Screening of Industrial Photoactive Compounds. Antibiotics. 2026; 15(3):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15030321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ezquerra-Aznárez, José Manuel, Raquel Alonso-Román, Ainhoa Lucía, Raquel Andreu, Santiago Franco, José A. Aínsa, and Santiago Ramón-García. 2026. "New Chemical Scaffold with Antimicrobial Activity Identified in a Screening of Industrial Photoactive Compounds" Antibiotics 15, no. 3: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15030321

APA Style

Ezquerra-Aznárez, J. M., Alonso-Román, R., Lucía, A., Andreu, R., Franco, S., Aínsa, J. A., & Ramón-García, S. (2026). New Chemical Scaffold with Antimicrobial Activity Identified in a Screening of Industrial Photoactive Compounds. Antibiotics, 15(3), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15030321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop