Next Article in Journal
Novel Phage Lysin Abp013 against Acinetobacter baumannii
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence and Therapeutic Management of Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
First Description of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance in a ST13 KPC-70-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain from Portugal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/antibiotics11020168
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Gene Clusters Mediating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

by
Samy Selim
1,*,
Osama Ahmed Faried
2,
Mohamed S. Almuhayawi
3,
Osama A. Mohammed
4,5,
Fayez M. Saleh
6 and
Mona Warrad
7
1
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia
2
Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62513, Egypt
3
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
5
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Bisha University, Bisha 61922, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences at Al-Quriat, Jouf University, Al-Quriat 77454, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(2), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020168
Submission received: 19 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Severe Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acinetobacter baumanni (A. baumannii), a nonfermenting Gram-negative bacterium, has recently been associated with a broad range of nosocomial infections. To gain more meaningful insight into the problem of nosocomial illnesses caused by the multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii, as well as the factors that increase the risk of catching these infections, this investigation included a total of 86 clinical A. baumannii infections. Repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP)-PCR was used to investigate imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates for dynamic gene clusters causing carbapenem resistance. Four distinct A. baumannii lineages were found in the REP-PCR-DNA fingerprints of all isolates, with 95% of the samples coming from two dominant lineages. Imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin were less effective against genotype (A) isolates because of enhanced antibiotic tolerance. Lastly, to gain more insight into the mode of action of imipenem, we explored the binding affinity of imipenem toward different Acinetobacter baumannii OXA beta-lactamase class enzymes.

1. Introduction

There has recently been a rise in the prevalence of A. baumannii-related skin and soft-tissue infections (e.g., wound infections, urinary tract infections, and secondary meningitis [1,2]. Despite this, ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infections are the leading causes of mortality among patients in intensive care units [3]. A. baumannii may enter the body via a variety of routes, including intravascular catheters, mechanical ventilators, and even open wounds. Prolonged hospitalization, male gender, and older age all play a role in A. baumannii-induced infections [4,5].
Additional reports have shown A. baumannii to cause community-acquired diseases, such as pneumonia and bacteremia. Skin, soft-tissue, and eye infections and endocarditis are also potential A. baumannii community-acquired diseases [6,7]. Pneumonia caused by community-acquired A. baumannii is much more dangerous than that acquired within the hospital; it is usually fulminant (resulting in death within 8 days of diagnosis), and fatality rates may reach 60% [8]. Acquiring pneumonia in the community occurs most often in tropical and subtropical areas during the summer months [8].
As a relatively new problem, A. baumannii has been linked to infections after injuries in combat zones, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, or following the Marmara earthquake in Turkey [9,10]. Anecdotal evidence suggests that morphine may increase the risk of A. baumannii infection after a battle or crush injuries as a result of its immunosuppressive effect [11]. Instead of being the result of a causal link, A. baumannii outbreaks may be a reflection of the great stress on hospital emergency rooms, leading to a failure in infection control measures and the subsequent epidemic spread of A. baumannii [12].
Acinetobacter baumannii infections may be deadly, with fatality rates ranging from 8% to 35%, depending on the strain and the infected host [8]. Different A. baumannii strains may have different levels of pathogenicity, as demonstrated by two studies using the mouse model of pneumonia [13]. An MDR strain isolated from the blood culture of a patient with nosocomial pneumonia showed 80% mortality in mice, whereas a strain causing meningitis showed only 13% mortality [14,15]. The expression of particular virulence factors and determinants may explain differences in mortality. In a mouse model of pneumonia, two strains with an identical PFGE profile—one mucoid from cerebrospinal fluid and the other nonmucoid from a ventriculoperitoneal catheter—had death rates of 48% and 19%, respectively [16].
The predominance of certain A. baumannii lineages has been related to the MDR phenotype of infecting strains [17]. However, it is not yet apparent whether epidemic strains acquired the MDR phenotype or if the MDR phenotype is necessary for individual strains to become pandemic [12]. Antimicrobial resistance in A. baumannii has steadily grown since the 1970s, when the great majority of strains were susceptible to frequently used antibiotics. Most isolates (depending on nation, hospital, medical department, and clinical sample) became MDR by 2007, including carbapenem resistance, which was long regarded as the cornerstone against MDR A. baumannii infections [18]. Carbapenem-resistant bacteria have been found in isolates from both military and civilian establishments [19,20].
Colistin seems to be the most effective antibiotic in vitro against MDR A. baumannii, although colistin usage has been linked with a variety of adverse effects and is not suited for treating all infections [8]. Some locations are seeing strains resistant to all known antibiotics resulting from the spread of colistin resistance around the globe [21,22]. At the same time, findings of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. in cattle and other animals [23,24] and in the Seine River in Paris, France, suggest that resistance is spreading to the population [25]. In the last few decades, A. baumannii has developed a resistance to a wide range of antimicrobial drugs. The ability of this bacterium to acquire resistance genes, frequently through horizontal gene transfer, is a major factor in this ability [26]. A. baumannii’s effectiveness as a nosocomial pathogen may be linked to its ability to acquire the MDR phenotype, according to recent research [27].
In hospitals, bacterial infections are a leading cause of illness and death [28]. Bacteremia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and peritonitis are only some of the possible consequences that might arise from these illnesses [29]. Because of concerns about colistin’s toxicity and the emergence of newer antibiotics with better safety profiles during the last 30 years, its use has been restricted [30,31]. Colistin’s strong effectiveness against MDR A. baumannii has rekindled interest in its use, despite the dearth of novel antimicrobial drugs and the growing prevalence of this pathogen.
Beta-lactam antibiotics have been widely used for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. However, due to the widespread resistance to beta-lactams in A. baumannii infections, carbapenems have been currently considered as the most effective therapeutic agents for treatment of Acinetobacter infections. Carbapenems represent a subclass of antibiotics belonging to the class of beta-lactam antibiotics, and they have been recently considered for the treatment of severe multidrug-resistant bacterial infections [32,33,34,35]. Nevertheless, the production of carbapenemases, also known as beta-lactamases or oxacillinases (OXA), that hydrolyze carbapenem antibiotics, has been shown to be the major paradigm causing carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii infections, leading to a serious risk to public health [36,37,38,39]. Carbapenemases are categorized using the Ambler classification method into four classes A–D. Class A, B, and D carbapenemases (serine beta-lactamase) are recognized by the serine residue in their active sites, while class B carbapenemases (metallo beta-lactamase) are metallo-proteinases that require Zn for their activity [40,41,42,43]. In Acinetobacter spp., there are more than six OXA carbapenemases have been identified, namely, OXA-23, OXA-24/40, OXA-51, OXA-58, OXA-143, and OXA-235 [44,45]. The hydrolytic mechanism of OXA classes is still elusive, except for OXA-23 which has been previously reported for meropenem [45]. Identification of the hydrolytic mechanism of antibiotics plays a critical role for the discovery of drug-like compounds. Toward this, the molecular modeling strategy is considered a potential tool to help in understanding the binding of specific small molecules and proteins [46,47].
To this end, we were able to type and molecularly explore antibiotic resistance elements in A. baumannii isolates from Saudi Arabia in this study, to better recognize epidemiological features of A. baumannii in nosocomial infection and the connection between antimicrobial resistance and gene clusters. Furthermore, we have in silico investigated and analyzed the interaction of imipenem with various A. baumannii OXA carbapenemases.

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out during the period from December 2021 to January 2022. A total of 86 different A. baumannii isolates were obtained from patients attending the outpatient clinics in the Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Bacterial isolates were processed in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.

2.1. Strain Conservation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The Vitek GNI system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was used to identify A. baumannii isolates. An inoculum consisting of 104 cfu per spot was used to determine the MICs of multiple antibiotics for these isolates. The methods used were the agar dilution method with Müeller–Hinton agar and the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method [48,49,50]. It is recommended to use antibiotics such as imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX), cefepime (FEP), doxycycline (DO), and amikacin (AMK). Patients gave their written consent to have their health information preserved in the hospital database.

2.2. PCR Amplification of blaVIM1 and blaVIM2 Genes

A simple boiling approach was used to acquire bacterial DNA for genotypic testing. The nucleotide sequences were used to build VIM1 (F: 5′–AGTGGTGAGTATCCGACAG–3′, R: 5′–ATGAAAGTGCGTGGAGAC–3′) and VIM2 (F: 5′–ATGTTCAAACTTTTGAGTAAG–3′, R: 5′–CTCAACGACTGAGCGATTG–3′) primers. The blaVIM1 (261 bp) and blaVIM2 (798 bp) genes were identified using optimized PCR. A 20−l mixture of the primary solution was made with a PCR kit containing the following ingredients: 10× polymerase-cyclase buffer, 0.4 µL of dNTP, 1.25 µL of MgCl2, 0.2 µL of Taq DNA polymerase, and 13.55 mL of distilled water. The PCR procedure was run for 35 cycles for initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min before 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 40 s at 55 °C, and 50 s at 72 °C, with a final 5 min extension at 72 °C. The accuracy of the PCR products was checked using agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer with a 1.5% concentration. Finally, the PCR products were visualized using UV light and gels stained with ethidium bromide [51].

2.3. Repetitive Element Sequence-Based PCR (REP-PCR)

REP-PCR typing was used to identify the common REP types among A. baumannii isolates. The following primers were used for REP typing; F: 5′–IIIGCGCCGICATCAGGC–3′ and R: 5′–ACGTCTTATCAGGCCTAT–3′ [52]. The final volume of the reaction was adjusted to 25 µL. Reactions were carried out with the following components: 2.5 µL of 10× PCR buffer, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, UK), 0.8 µL of 2 mM mixed deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 µL of 25 mM magnesium chloride, and 5 µg of template DNA. The primers and template DNA were prepared as follows: 10 min of denaturation at 94 °C, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 45 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; the amplification reaction was carried out by a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, CA, USA. Followed by 16 min of final extension at 72 °C. On agarose 2% w/v gels, samples of each PCR end-product were examined.

2.4. Ethical Considerations

Approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee, Jouf University (Ethical Approval No. 3-04-43) and the Research Ethics Committee, Qurayyat Health Affairs (Registered with NCBE, Reg NO: H-13-S-071; Saudi Arabia; Project No. 111). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. In this study, a written consent form was obtained from each patient.

2.5. In Silico Molecular Modeling Study

The binding affinity of imipenem to the OXA beta-lactamase binding site was explored by in silico molecular modeling using the Molecular Operating Environment software (MOE, 2015.10, Chemical Computing Group ULC, Tokyo, Japan. There are several crystal structures for the different OXA beta-lactamases available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). To intensely explore the binding affinity of imipenem toward the OXA beta-lactamase protein, we extensively investigated the binding of imipenem toward the different available crystal structures of the OXA beta-lactamase protein. The 3D crystallographic structures of OXA proteins (PDB codes 3fyz, 4jf4, 4k0w, 4zdx, 5iy2, 6skq, 6skr, and 7khq) were obtained from the PDB website (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb, accessed on 19 December 2021). The unnecessary chains and water molecules were removed. The protonated 3D proteins were prepared for the docking studies using the protonate 3D protocol in MOE with default options. The 2D structure of imipenem was obtained using the Chemdraw program. For energy minimization and geometry optimization, the Conf Search module in MOE was applied; all the partial charges were automatically expressed, and the MMFF94x force field was used. Validation of the modeling protocol was achieved by redocking the original co-crystallized ligand to the binding site. For the validation step, the London dG scoring function and Triangle Matcher placement protocol were applied. The validated protocol was then used to dock imipenem in the OXA beta-lactamase binding site to assess its binding affinity. The obtained results were assessed, and the poses with high ligand–enzyme binding affinity were selected for energy assessment [53,54,55,56,57,58,59].

2.6. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using the chi-square test, Z-test, and two-way ANOVA. The similarity matrix was calculated with the Pearson product-moment correlation algorithm. The unweighted pair group with mathematical average method was used for dendrogram construction.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 lists the antibiotic resistance profiles of 86 isolates of A. baumannii. Ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic in the fight against A. baumannii (29.1%). Imipenem had the highest level of resistance among all isolates tested (89.5%). Using REP-PCR, it was discovered that imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates were distributed in five clusters, A, B, C, D, and E, with distribution rates of 45.5% (n = 35/77), 26% (n = 20/77), 19.5% (n = 15/77), 5.2% (n = 4/77), and 3.9% (n = 3/77), respectively. REP fingerprinting failed to discriminate between the REP patterns of 11 A. baumannii isolates (Figure 1).
Introducing antibiotic-resistant isolates from external sources, such as patients transferred from other institutions, could be a possible cause of antibiotic-resistant A. baumannii development [60]. REP-PCR DNA fingerprints of A. baumannii indicated two major lineages denoted genotypes (A) and (B) upon initial analysis. Antibiotic resistance may have evolved in the local genotype (D) isolates. It is possible that the bacteria evolved as a result of the increasing use of antibiotics, which exerted selection pressure [61]. Despite this, all genotype isolates had comparable REP-PCR DNA fingerprints and could have developed outside of a hospital setting. Antibiotype profile isolates are becoming increasingly common, which raises the possibility that they could evolve in situ into organisms with resistance qualities on par with genotype isolates [62]. The remarkably consistent REP-PCR fingerprints of Genotype 1 suggest the stability of the REP element positions in the bacterial genome and Genotype 4 isolates over the last decade. There were also consistent REP-PCR DNA fingerprints among distinct antibiotype profiles within a genotype, which shows that resistance acquisition may not have entailed gene insertion or deletion that affected the placement of the REP sequence elements. Acinetobacter spp. may have developed resistance to antibiotics because of other processes, such as gene mutation and gene silencing. REP-PCR amplification, on the other hand, may not have included any genomic area containing the acquired genes that contributed to antibiotic resistance [63].

In Silico Molecular Modeling Study

Molecular docking is considered a valuable computational approach to evaluate the binding affinity of a drug toward a targeted protein [64]. To date, the exact hydrolytic mechanism of carbapenems by different OXA carbapenemases is still unexplored. To gain insights into the mechanistic mode of action of carbapenems toward OXA carbapenemases, we extensively investigated the binding affinity of imipenem toward the active site of different plausible models of OXA proteins [65,66,67,68,69,70,71].
We performed in silico molecular modeling studies for several 3D crystal structures which are available for OXA proteins in PDB, and the results were extracted for comparison (Table 2). The selection of the best poses was based on the ability of imipenem to possess the major interactions for binding to the protein. The applied docking protocol was initially validated through redocking of the co-crystallized ligand to the binding site of the different OXA proteins. This step was successfully carried out for OXA protein crystal structures within a 1.0–1.5 Å of the original co-crystallized ligand. In all presented cases, the selected poses demonstrated the main interactions occurring in the original ligand–protein interactions.
Next, we applied the validated protocol to explore and evaluate the affinity of imipenem to bind to the active site of OXA proteins. The scoring results and interactions of the docking process are presented in the Table 2. The binding sites of OXA enzymes have been identified in the cleft regions [72]. The surface of the enzymes is occupied by water molecules, and the active sites contain a serine residue (Ser80) together with other amino-acid residues (Lys83, Ser127, Thr217, Trp222, and Arg260) [73]. Our results indicated that imipenem has a high binding affinity toward the active site of OXA protein with high docking scores. Furthermore, imipenem has the ability to bind to the binding site of OXA proteins via a set of hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions (Figure 2, Table 2). Under validated docking conditions, imipenem demonstrated the ability to form the main interactions of the original co-crystallized ligand with high to moderate binding scores (Table 2). In addition, imipenem exhibited the ability to form extra hydrogen bonding interactions with residues in the active site of OXA protein. For example, the most favorable pose of imipenem demonstrated an additional hydrogen bonding interaction with Trp219 residue (OXA-23, PDB, 4jf4), with Tyr211 residue (OXA-48 and OXA-24, PDB, 7khq and 3fyz), and with Arg260 residue (OXA-23 A220 PDB, 4k0w) (Figure 2, Table 2). The interaction between imipenem and OXA protein was thermodynamically favorable as indicated by the negative values of binding scores. The analysis of docked poses revealed the role of the hydrophobic interactions in improving the binding affinity of imipenem. In fact, imipenem exhibited hydrophobic contacts between the hydrophobic residues of the protein cavity and the hydrocarbon moiety of the scaffold (Figure 2). According to our results, OXA-23 is the most potent OXA enzyme to be further studied. Furthermore, these results revealed the characteristics of the binding efficiency of carbapenems (imipenem) to the different OXA enzymes. The obtained noncovalent complexes imply proper interactions with active amino-acid residues which lead to stability and high binding energy [74]. Overall, our molecular modeling studies reveal that the effect of imipenem could be attributed to its ability to bind to the active site of OXA proteins. Further extensive studies are still required to fully explore the dynamic hydrolytic mechanism of OXA enzymes toward carbapenems, which would help in identifying novel targets against A. baumannii infections.
According to a recent study, nosocomial infection has been shown to have a significant impact on patient mortality and morbidity [75]. It was more common for infections to be bacterial in origin in the early days, with the most prevalent sources of infection being the circulatory system, abdomen, urinary tract, and drain [76]. A higher infection rate was shown to be associated with prolonged use of parenteral feeding and time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) [77]. Effective treatment of infections requires early detection and treatment for patients to ensure the best outcome. In selecting a preventive regimen, the prevalent bacterial isolates found in the hospital must be considered. Taking into account our findings, future research into infection risk and effective prophylaxis is warranted.
MDR Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacilli are frequently seen in nosocomial infections [78]. These infections are linked to allograft acute rejection, reoperation after transplant, and abdominal infection. A patient’s prognosis is much worse with MDR Gram-negative Bacillus and is related to bacterial infections, renal impairment, stomach infection, and extended endotracheal intubation. Growing numbers of MDR Gram-negative Bacilli complicate clinical treatment.

4. Conclusions

Our in vitro and in silico molecular modeling study found a wide range of genes coding for imipenem in our area. A. baumannii strains also included genes linked to imipenem, which highlights the need to prevent and control their spread.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; methodology, S.S., O.A.F., F.M.S. and M.W.; software, O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; validation, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; formal analysis, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A. and O.A.M.; investigation, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; resources, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; data curation, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A. and M.W.; writing—review and editing, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A., O O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; visualization O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; supervision, M.S.A., O.A.M., F.M.S. and M.W.; project administration, S.S., O.A.F., M.S.A. and M.W.; funding acquisition, S.S., O.A.F. and M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No. DSR-2021-01-0350.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University for funding this work through research grant No (DSR-2021-01-0350).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bergogne-Bérézin, E.; Towner, K.J. Acinetobacter Spp. as Nosocomial Pathogens: Microbiological, Clinical, and Epidemiological Features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 9, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roca, I.; Espinal, P.; Vila-Farrés, X.; Vila, J. The Acinetobacter Baumannii Oxymoron: Commensal Hospital Dweller Turned Pan-Drug-Resistant Menace. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dijkshoorn, L.; Nemec, A.; Seifert, H. An Increasing Threat in Hospitals: Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wisplinghoff, H.; Perbix, W.; Seifert, H. Risk Factors for Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections Due to Acinetobacter Baumannii: A Case-Control Study of Adult Burn Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 28, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peleg, A.Y.; Seifert, H.; Paterson, D.L. Acinetobacter Baumannii: Emergence of a Successful Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 538–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Chang, W.N.; Lu, C.H.; Huang, C.R.; Chuang, Y.C. Community-Acquired Acinetobacter Meningitis in Adults. Infection 2000, 28, 395–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Falagas, M.E.; Karveli, E.A.; Kelesidis, I.; Kelesidis, T. Community-Acquired Acinetobacter Infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Falagas, M.E.; Rafailidis, P.I. Attributable Mortality of Acinetobacter Baumannii: No Longer a Controversial Issue. Crit. Care 2007, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Joly-Guillou, M.-L. Clinical Impact and Pathogenicity of Acinetobacter. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections among Patients at Military Medical Facilities Treating Injured U.S. Service Members, 2002–2004. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2004, 53, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar]
  11. Breslow, J.M.; Monroy, M.A.; Daly, J.M.; Meissler, J.J.; Gaughan, J.; Adler, M.W.; Eisenstein, T.K. Morphine, but Not Trauma, Sensitizes to Systemic Acinetobacter Baumannii Infection. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011, 6, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Antunes, L.C.S.; Visca, P.; Towner, K.J. Acinetobacter Baumannii: Evolution of a Global Pathogen. Pathog. Dis. 2014, 71, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wijers, C.D.M.; Pham, L.; Menon, S.; Boyd, K.L.; Noel, H.R.; Skaar, E.P.; Gaddy, J.A.; Palmer, L.D.; Noto, M.J. Identification of Two Variants of Acinetobacter Baumannii Strain ATCC 17978 with Distinct Genotypes and Phenotypes. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00454-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Eveillard, M.; Kempf, M.; Belmonte, O.; Pailhoriès, H.; Joly-Guillou, M.-L. Reservoirs of Acinetobacter Baumannii Outside the Hospital and Potential Involvement in Emerging Human Community-Acquired Infections. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, e802–e805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. de Breij, A.; Eveillard, M.; Dijkshoorn, L.; van den Broek, P.J.; Nibbering, P.H.; Joly-Guillou, M.-L. Differences in Acinetobacter Baumannii Strains and Host Innate Immune Response Determine Morbidity and Mortality in Experimental Pneumonia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Eveillard, M.; Soltner, C.; Kempf, M.; Saint-André, J.-P.; Lemarié, C.; Randrianarivelo, C.; Seifert, H.; Wolff, M.; Joly-Guillou, M.-L. The Virulence Variability of Different Acinetobacter Baumannii Strains in Experimental Pneumonia. J. Infect. 2010, 60, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Diancourt, L.; Passet, V.; Nemec, A.; Dijkshoorn, L.; Brisse, S. The Population Structure of Acinetobacter Baumannii: Expanding Multiresistant Clones from an Ancestral Susceptible Genetic Pool. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kempf, M.; Rolain, J.-M. Emergence of Resistance to Carbapenems in Acinetobacter Baumannii in Europe: Clinical Impact and Therapeutic Options. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 39, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Keen, E.F.; Murray, C.K.; Robinson, B.J.; Hospenthal, D.R.; Co, E.-M.A.; Aldous, W.K. Changes in the Incidences of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Organisms Isolated in a Military Medical Center. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2010, 31, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mera, R.M.; Miller, L.A.; Amrine-Madsen, H.; Sahm, D.F. Acinetobacter Baumannii 2002–2008: Increase of Carbapenem-Associated Multiclass Resistance in the United States. Microb. Drug Resist. 2010, 16, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cai, Y.; Chai, D.; Wang, R.; Liang, B.; Bai, N. Colistin Resistance of Acinetobacter Baumannii: Clinical Reports, Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Strategies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Al-Sweih, N.A.; Al-Hubail, M.A.; Rotimi, V.O. Emergence of Tigecycline and Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter Species Isolated from Patients in Kuwait Hospitals. J. Chemother. 2011, 23, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Poirel, L.; Bonnin, R.A.; Nordmann, P. Genetic Basis of Antibiotic Resistance in Pathogenic Acinetobacter Species. IUBMB Life 2011, 63, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Seiffert, S.N.; Hilty, M.; Perreten, V.; Endimiani, A. Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms in Livestock: An Emerging Problem for Human Health? Drug Resist. Updates 2013, 16, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Girlich, D.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. First Isolation of the BlaOXA-23 Carbapenemase Gene from an Environmental Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Adams, M.D.; Goglin, K.; Molyneaux, N.; Hujer, K.M.; Lavender, H.; Jamison, J.J.; MacDonald, I.J.; Martin, K.M.; Russo, T.; Campagnari, A.A.; et al. Comparative Genome Sequence Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 8053–8064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Imperi, F.; Antunes, L.C.S.; Blom, J.; Villa, L.; Iacono, M.; Visca, P.; Carattoli, A. The Genomics of Acinetobacter Baumannii: Insights into Genome Plasticity, Antimicrobial Resistance and Pathogenicity. IUBMB Life 2011, 63, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Danasekaran, R.; Mani, G.; Annadurai, K. Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections: Protecting Patients, Saving Lives. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2014, 1, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pleguezuelo, M.; Benitez, J.M.; Jurado, J.; Montero, J.L.; De la Mata, M. Diagnosis and Management of Bacterial Infections in Decompensated Cirrhosis. World J. Hepatol. 2013, 5, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lim, L.M.; Ly, N.; Anderson, D.; Yang, J.C.; Macander, L.; Jarkowski, A.; Forrest, A.; Bulitta, J.B.; Tsuji, B.T. Resurgence of Colistin: A Review of Resistance, Toxicity, Pharmacodynamics, and Dosing. Pharmacotherapy 2010, 30, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wertheim, H.; Van Nguyen, K.; Hara, G.L.; Gelband, H.; Laxminarayan, R.; Mouton, J.; Cars, O. Global Survey of Polymyxin Use: A Call for International Guidelines. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2013, 1, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cui, X.; Zhang, H.; Du, H. Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Detection and Antimicrobial Therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bin-Jumah, M.; Abdel-Fattah, A.-F.M.; Saied, E.M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Acrylamide-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Manifestations, Mechanisms, and Potential Treatment Modalities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 13031–13046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vila, J.; Pachón, J. Therapeutic Options for Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2008, 9, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Banhart, S.; Saied, E.M.; Martini, A.; Koch, S.; Aeberhard, L.; Madela, K.; Arenz, C.; Heuer, D. Improved Plaque Assay Identifies a Novel Anti-Chlamydia Ceramide Derivative with Altered Intracellular Localization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5537–5546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kobs, V.C.; Ferreira, J.A.; Bobrowicz, T.A.; Ferreira, L.E.; Deglmann, R.C.; Westphal, G.A.; França, P.H.C. de The Role of the Genetic Elements Bla Oxa and IS Aba 1 in the Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter Baumannii Complex in Carbapenem Resistance in the Hospital Setting. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2016, 49, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Egan, A.J.F.; Cleverley, R.M.; Peters, K.; Lewis, R.J.; Vollmer, W. Regulation of Bacterial Cell Wall Growth. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 851–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frère, J.M. Beta-Lactamases and Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 16, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saied, E.; Eid, A.M.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Salem, S.S.; Radwan, A.A.; Halawa, M.; Saleh, F.M.; Saad, H.A.; Saied, E.M.; Fouda, A. The Catalytic Activity of Biosynthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles (MgO-NPs) for Inhibiting the Growth of Pathogenic Microbes, Tanning Effluent Treatment, and Chromium Ion Removal. Catalysts 2021, 11, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ambler, R.P. The Structure of Beta-Lactamases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1980, 289, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Majiduddin, F.K.; Palzkill, T. Amino Acid Residues That Contribute to Substrate Specificity of Class A Beta-Lactamase SME-1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3421–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lohans, C.T.; Freeman, E.I.; van Groesen, E.; Tooke, C.L.; Hinchliffe, P.; Spencer, J.; Brem, J.; Schofield, C.J. Mechanistic Insights into β-Lactamase-Catalysed Carbapenem Degradation Through Product Characterisation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Samak, D.H.; El-Sayed, Y.S.; Shaheen, H.M.; El-Far, A.H.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Noreldin, A.E.; El-Naggar, K.; Abdelnour, S.A.; Saied, E.M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; et al. Developmental Toxicity of Carbon Nanoparticles during Embryogenesis in Chicken. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 19058–19072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Evans, B.A.; Amyes, S.G.B. OXA β-Lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 241–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sgrignani, J.; Grazioso, G.; De Amici, M. Insight into the Mechanism of Hydrolysis of Meropenem by OXA-23 Serine-β-Lactamase Gained by Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Calculations. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 5191–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Choubey, S.K.; Prabhu, D.; Nachiappan, M.; Biswal, J.; Jeyakanthan, J. Molecular Modeling, Dynamics Studies and Density Functional Theory Approaches to Identify Potential Inhibitors of SIRT4 Protein from Homo Sapiens: A Novel Target for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 35, 3316–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Healey, R.D.; Saied, E.M.; Cong, X.; Karsai, G.; Gabellier, L.; Saint-Paul, J.; Del Nero, E.; Jeannot, S.; Drapeau, M.; Fontanel, S.; et al. Discovery and Mechanism of Action of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Ceramidases **. Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202109967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jain, R.; Danziger, L.H. Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Infections: An Emerging Challenge to Clinicians. Ann. Pharmacother. 2004, 38, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Selim, S.A. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil and Methanol Extract of the Egyptian Lemongrass Cymbopogon Proximus Stapf. Grasas Aceites 2011, 62, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Selim, S.; Alfy, S.E.; Al-Ruwaili, M.; Abdo, A.; Jaouni, S.A. Susceptibility of Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa to Flavonoid Glycosides of Date Palm (Phoenix Dactylifera L.) Tamar Growing in Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mirbagheri, S.Z.; Meshkat, Z.; Naderinasab, M.; Rostami, S.; Nabavinia, M.S.; Rahmati, M. Study on Imipenem Resistance and Prevalence of BlaVIM1 and BlaVIM2 Metallo-Beta Lactamases among Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa from Mashhad, Northeast of Iran. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2015, 7, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Srinivasan, V.B.; Rajamohan, G.; Pancholi, P.; Stevenson, K.; Tadesse, D.; Patchanee, P.; Marcon, M.; Gebreyes, W.A. Genetic Relatedness and Molecular Characterization of Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated in Central Ohio, USA. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2009, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. El Azab, I.H.; Saied, E.M.; Osman, A.A.; Mehana, A.E.; Saad, H.A.; Elkanzi, N.A. Novel N-Bridged Pyrazole-1-Carbothioamides with Potential Antiproliferative Activity: Design, Synthesis, in Vitro and in Silico Studies. Future Med. Chem. 2021, 13, 1743–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gaber, A.; Refat, M.S.; Belal, A.A.M.; El-Deen, I.M.; Hassan, N.; Zakaria, R.; Alhomrani, M.; Alamri, A.S.; Alsanie, W.F.; Saied, E.M. New Mononuclear and Binuclear Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) Thiosemicarbazone Complexes with Potential Biological Activity: Antimicrobial and Molecular Docking Study. Molecules 2021, 26, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gaber, A.; Alsanie, W.F.; Kumar, D.N.; Refat, M.S.; Saied, E.M. Novel Papaverine Metal Complexes with Potential Anticancer Activities. Molecules 2020, 25, 5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Saied, E.M.; El-Maradny, Y.A.; Osman, A.A.; Darwish, A.M.G.; Abo Nahas, H.H.; Niedbała, G.; Piekutowska, M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Balbool, B.A.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M. A Comprehensive Review about the Molecular Structure of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Insights into Natural Products against COVID-19. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohamed, D.I.; Abou-Bakr, D.A.; Ezzat, S.F.; El-Kareem, H.F.A.; Nahas, H.H.A.; Saad, H.A.; Mehana, A.E.; Saied, E.M. Vitamin D3 Prevents the Deleterious Effects of Testicular Torsion on Testis by Targeting MiRNA-145 and ADAM17: In Silico and In Vivo Study. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Samaha, D.; Hamdo, H.H.; Cong, X.; Schumacher, F.; Banhart, S.; Aglar, Ö.; Möller, H.M.; Heuer, D.; Kleuser, B.; Saied, E.M.; et al. Liposomal FRET Assay Identifies Potent Drug-Like Inhibitors of the Ceramide Transport Protein (CERT). Chem. A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 16616–16621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sharar, M.; Saied, E.M.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Arenz, C.; Montes-Bayón, M.; Linscheid, M.W. Elemental Labelling and Mass Spectrometry for the Specific Detection of Sulfenic Acid Groups in Model Peptides: A Proof of Concept. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 2015–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, M.-F.; Lan, C.-Y. Antimicrobial Resistance in Acinetobacter Baumannii: From Bench to Bedside. World J. Clin. Cases 2014, 2, 787–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Davies, J.; Davies, D. Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Misbah, S.; AbuBakar, S.; Hassan, H.; Hanifah, Y.A.; Yusof, M.Y. Antibiotic Susceptibility and REP-PCR Fingerprints of Acinetobacter Spp. Isolated from a Hospital Ten Years Apart. J. Hosp. Infect. 2004, 58, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vila, J.; Marcos, M.A.; Jimenez de Anta, M.T. A Comparative Study of Different PCR-Based DNA Fingerprinting Techniques for Typing of the Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus-A. Baumannii Complex. J. Med. Microbiol. 1996, 44, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sliwoski, G.; Kothiwale, S.; Meiler, J.; Lowe, E.W. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 2014, 66, 334–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kaitany, K.-C.J.; Klinger, N.V.; June, C.M.; Ramey, M.E.; Bonomo, R.A.; Powers, R.A.; Leonard, D.A. Structures of the Class D Carbapenemases OXA-23 and OXA-146: Mechanistic Basis of Activity against Carbapenems, Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporins, and Aztreonam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 4848–4855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Smith, C.A.; Antunes, N.T.; Stewart, N.K.; Frase, H.; Toth, M.; Kantardjieff, K.A.; Vakulenko, S. Structural Basis for Enhancement of Carbapenemase Activity in the OXA-51 Family of Class D β-Lactamases. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 1791–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Toth, M.; Smith, C.A.; Antunes, N.T.; Stewart, N.K.; Maltz, L.; Vakulenko, S.B. The Role of Conserved Surface Hydrophobic Residues in the Carbapenemase Activity of the Class D β-Lactamases. Acta Cryst. D 2017, 73, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Leiros, H.-K.S.; Thomassen, A.M.; Samuelsen, Ø.; Flach, C.-F.; Kotsakis, S.D.; Larsson, D.G.J. Structural Insights into the Enhanced Carbapenemase Efficiency of OXA-655 Compared to OXA-10. FEBS Open Bio 2020, 10, 1821–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stojanoski, V.; Hu, L.; Sankaran, B.; Wang, F.; Tao, P.; Prasad, B.V.V.; Palzkill, T. Mechanistic Basis of OXA-48-like β-Lactamases’ Hydrolysis of Carbapenems. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 445–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Smith, C.A.; Antunes, N.T.; Stewart, N.K.; Toth, M.; Kumarasiri, M.; Chang, M.; Mobashery, S.; Vakulenko, S.B. Structural Basis for Carbapenemase Activity of the OXA-23 β-Lactamase from Acinetobacter Baumannii. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bou, G.; Santillana, E.; Sheri, A.; Beceiro, A.; Sampson, J.M.; Kalp, M.; Bethel, C.R.; Distler, A.M.; Drawz, S.M.; Pagadala, S.R.R.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Crystal Structures of 6-Alkylidene-2′-Substituted Penicillanic Acid Sulfones as Potent Inhibitors of Acinetobacter Baumannii OXA-24 Carbapenemase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13320–13331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Scott, M.G.; Dullaghan, E.; Mookherjee, N.; Glavas, N.; Waldbrook, M.; Thompson, A.; Wang, A.; Lee, K.; Doria, S.; Hamill, P.; et al. An Anti-Infective Peptide That Selectively Modulates the Innate Immune Response. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Toth, M.; Antunes, N.T.; Stewart, N.K.; Frase, H.; Bhattacharya, M.; Smith, C.A.; Vakulenko, S.B. Class D β-Lactamases Do Exist in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kalp, M.; Sheri, A.; Buynak, J.D.; Bethel, C.R.; Bonomo, R.A.; Carey, P.R. Efficient Inhibition of Class A and Class D Beta-Lactamases by Michaelis Complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 21588–21591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Koch, A.M.; Nilsen, R.M.; Eriksen, H.M.; Cox, R.J.; Harthug, S. Mortality Related to Hospital-Associated Infections in a Tertiary Hospital; Repeated Cross-Sectional Studies between 2004–2011. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2015, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Najar, M.; Saldanha, C.; Banday, K. Approach to Urinary Tract Infections. Indian J. Nephrol. 2009, 19, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Estívariz, C.F.; Griffith, D.P.; Luo, M.; Szeszycki, E.E.; Bazargan, N.; Dave, N.; Daignault, N.M.; Bergman, G.F.; McNally, T.; Battey, C.H.; et al. Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition Supplemented With Glutamine Dipeptide to Decrease Hospital Infections in Critically Ill Surgical Patients. JPEN J. Parente. Enter. Nutr. 2008, 32, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Weinstein, R.A.; Gaynes, R.; Edwards, J.R. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Overview of Nosocomial Infections Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 11 00168 g001 550
Figure 1. Acinetobacter baumannii relationships are depicted in this dendrogram. Using the unweighted pair group method of arithmetic averages of Acinetobacter baumannii REP-PCR DNA fingerprints, the dendrogram was built. Imipenem resistance profiles, Acinetobacter isolates, and REP-PCR fingerprints are all displayed. The dotted vertical line indicates the 90% similarity threshold.
Figure 1. Acinetobacter baumannii relationships are depicted in this dendrogram. Using the unweighted pair group method of arithmetic averages of Acinetobacter baumannii REP-PCR DNA fingerprints, the dendrogram was built. Imipenem resistance profiles, Acinetobacter isolates, and REP-PCR fingerprints are all displayed. The dotted vertical line indicates the 90% similarity threshold.
Antibiotics 11 00168 g001
Antibiotics 11 00168 g002a 550Antibiotics 11 00168 g002b 550Antibiotics 11 00168 g002c 550
Figure 2. The 2D and 3D molecular docking interactions of imipenem (green in 3D interactions) with OXA proteins: OXA-23 (A), OXA-48 (B), OXA-23 A220 (C), OXA-24 (D), OXA-143 (E), OXA-655 (F), OXA-10 (G), and OXA-51 (H). The hydrogen bonds are illustrated as dotted blue arrows; (C atoms, green; S atoms, yellow; O atoms, red).
Figure 2. The 2D and 3D molecular docking interactions of imipenem (green in 3D interactions) with OXA proteins: OXA-23 (A), OXA-48 (B), OXA-23 A220 (C), OXA-24 (D), OXA-143 (E), OXA-655 (F), OXA-10 (G), and OXA-51 (H). The hydrogen bonds are illustrated as dotted blue arrows; (C atoms, green; S atoms, yellow; O atoms, red).
Antibiotics 11 00168 g002aAntibiotics 11 00168 g002bAntibiotics 11 00168 g002c
Table
Table 1. Comparison of drug resistance patterns of 86 Acinetobacter baumanni isolates against antimicrobial agents.
Table 1. Comparison of drug resistance patterns of 86 Acinetobacter baumanni isolates against antimicrobial agents.
Antimicrobial AgentAcinetobacter baumannii Isolates (n = 86)p-Value *
SusceptibleResistance
Imipenem 9 (10%)77 (89%)<0.05
Meropenem 18 (21%)68 (79%)<0.05
Ciprofloxacin 25 (29%)61 (71%)<0.05
Levofloxacin13 (15%)73 (85%)<0.05
Piperacillin + tazobactam 23 (27%)63 (73%)<0.05
Ceftazidime 19 (22%)67 (78%)<0.05
cefotaxime19 (22%)67 (78%)<0.05
Cefepime 16 (19%)70 (81%)<0.05
Amikacin 13 (15%)73 (85%)<0.05
Doxycyclin 15 (17%)71 (83%)<0.05
Cloistin 13 (15%)73 (85%)<0.05
* The p-value represents the difference in antibiotic resistance rates.
Table
Table 2. Interactions and scores of the docking process of imipenem in OXA beta-lactamase binding sites.
Table 2. Interactions and scores of the docking process of imipenem in OXA beta-lactamase binding sites.
ProteinPDBDocking Score (kcal/mol)Interactive Residues
Hydrophilic InteractionsHydrophobic Interactions
OXA-243fyz−10.39Ser219, Arg261, Trp221, Lys218Met223, Val130, Leu168, Met114, Trp115
OXA-234jf4−13.21Thr217, Ser126, Arg259, Gly218, Trp219, Met221, Trp113Phe110, Leu125, Val128, Ala220, Leu166, Ala112
OXA-23 A2204k0w−11.86Ser79, Trp219, Lys216, Thr217, Arg260Ala78, Ala257, Val128, Leu166
OXA-514zdx−8.52Gln60, Thr174, Gln176--
OXA-1435iy2−10.29Ser81, Trp221, Gly220, Ser219Leu127, Ala80, Leu168, Val130, Trp115, Met114
OXA-6556skq−9.82Gln101, Phe208, Arg250, Thr206Val114, Trp102, Met99, Leu155, Leu117
OXA-106skr−8.46Thr206, Phe208, Arg250Ala66, Leu247, Pro248, Val117, Met99, Trp102
OXA-487khq−10.73Thr104, Thr209, Ser118, Arg250, Tyr211Trp105, Ile102, Val120, Leu247
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Selim, S.; Faried, O.A.; Almuhayawi, M.S.; Mohammed, O.A.; Saleh, F.M.; Warrad, M. Dynamic Gene Clusters Mediating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020168

AMA Style

Selim S, Faried OA, Almuhayawi MS, Mohammed OA, Saleh FM, Warrad M. Dynamic Gene Clusters Mediating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(2):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Selim, Samy, Osama Ahmed Faried, Mohamed S. Almuhayawi, Osama A. Mohammed, Fayez M. Saleh, and Mona Warrad. 2022. "Dynamic Gene Clusters Mediating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates" Antibiotics 11, no. 2: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020168

APA Style

Selim, S., Faried, O. A., Almuhayawi, M. S., Mohammed, O. A., Saleh, F. M., & Warrad, M. (2022). Dynamic Gene Clusters Mediating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates. Antibiotics, 11(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop