Next Article in Journal
A Putative Amidase Endolysin Encoded by Clostridium perfringens St13 Exhibits Specific Lytic Activity and Synergizes with the Muramidase Endolysin Psm
Next Article in Special Issue
Distribution of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Encoding Genes among Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens Collected from Three Different Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clonal Complex 398 as a Major MRSA Lineage in Dogs and Cats in Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Susceptibility Testing of Colistin for Acinetobacter baumannii: How Far Are We from the Truth?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High Risk Clone: A Proposal of Criteria Adapted to the One Health Context with Application to Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the Pig Population

Antibiotics 2021, 10(3), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030244
by Maud de Lagarde 1, Ghyslaine Vanier 1, Julie Arsenault 2,3 and John Morris Fairbrother 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Antibiotics 2021, 10(3), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030244
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 25 February 2021 / Published: 28 February 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors sequenced A total of 183 isolates originating from diseased pigs (1990-2018) and detected virulence, resistance genes or replicons. Phylogenetic trees were then constructed and clones were identified using predefined criteria. This is a very interesting work However, some questions need to resolve before publishing:

In Antimicrobial Susceptibility, what are selecting rules when use 10 antimicrobial agents?

Please give the simple description of DNA extraction.

Line 27: have a widespread should be has a widespread…

Line 35: environmental

Line 191, Line 520: please give the full or abbreviated name of MDR.

Line 265: please give the details of farms if it is possible such as location and scale breeding.

Line 290: space format of Figure2 and FigureS2

Line 297: please give italic parC, gyrA and other gene names in full text.

Line 305: the ampC gene

References: non-standard format in Refs. 2, 6, 10, 17-19, 24-26, 32, 47 and 60

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. The abstract needs to be restructured as background-significance-work done in the paper-salient findings.
  2. Lines #53-55 need to be rephrased to convey that continued fluoroquinolone treatment despite it resistance amounted to the 'high risk clone'.
  3. line #62-65 need grammar modification.
  4. Line #77-please rephrase
  5. Certain sentences in results need grammar modifications.
  6. the antibiotic resistance data needs better represented.
  7. Some of the information seems redundant please take a good look at those and avoid repetitions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript written by Maud de Lagarde and colleague is a very interesting summary of a study aimed at the revisioning of the criteria for defining as “high risk clone” the bacterial clones that enhance the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. Authors reported/applied the revised criteria suggested to the case of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) F4 Associated with Enrofloxacin Non-Susceptibility in the Porcine Population in North America. The manuscript is to this Reviewer of scientific sound and of a great novelty. Neverteless, to this Reviewer opinion, the One Health aspect is not as central as one might expect from the title and introductive part. In other words, the discussion section of this manuscript should emphasize the importance of revising the high-risk criteria in the one health perspective. To this purpose authors must shed light on the role/importance of the potential transmission of the AMR traits among microorganisms either harboring the same ecological niche (e.g. the gut microbiota) or harboring two apparently distinct niches (e.g. feces and soil). Underlining the potential of transmission of AMR through horizontal gene transfer or other mobile elements (e.g. bacteriophages) across the boundaries of the three One health pillars (human, animals and environment) is of pivotal role in supporting the revised criteria proposed by this manuscript (e.g. doi: 10.3390/ijms21061914). In this light, implementing the experimental design by accounting for samples other than animal derived ones is encouraged, such as considering environmental samples from the neighborhood of the farms and human samples to be taken from the animal caretakers and breeders.

 

Minor comments:

 

the title can be shortened to enhance fluency

abstract section should be lightened of the results and better focusing on the main message the study wish to carry and the experimental hypothesis of the study along with the conclusion on the basis of the experiment performed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The revised version of the manuscript addressed the issues raised by the Reviewers and it is, in my opinion, suitable for publication.

Back to TopTop