Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances in Functionalization Strategies and Biomedical Applications
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Preparation Methods for GQDs
2.1. Top-Down Synthesis of GQDs
2.1.1. Electrochemical Method
2.1.2. Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Method
2.1.3. Microwave Ultrasonic Assisted Stripping Method
2.1.4. HC Method
2.1.5. Combination of Ultrasonic and Ball Mill Method
2.1.6. PCL Method
2.2. Bottom-Up Synthesis of GQDs
2.2.1. Carbonization and Pyrolysis Method
2.2.2. C60 Open Cage Method
2.2.3. Solution Chemical Method
2.2.4. CVD Method
2.3. Chemical Method
3. Properties of GQDs
3.1. Optical Properties
3.2. Electrical Properties

3.3. Thermal Properties

3.4. Magnetic Properties
4. Functionalization of GQDs
4.1. Doping of GQDs via Variety of Heteroatoms
4.2. Bandgap Study of GQD

4.3. GQDs Composites
4.3.1. GQDs Composites Based on the Organic Components
4.3.2. GQDs Composites Based on the Inorganic Components
4.3.3. GQDs Composites Based on the Hybrid Components
4.4. Structure–Property–Application Relationship in GQDs
5. Medical Applications of GQDs
5.1. Bioimaging Applications
5.1.1. FL Imaging
5.1.2. FL and Ultrasound Imaging

5.2. Drug Delivery Applications
| Method | Structure and Size (nm) | Advantages | Disadvantages | Finding | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-step co-precipitation process. | Superparamagnetic properties, enhanced drug release at acidic pH, non-toxicity to healthy cells, effective in vitro cytotoxicity, sustainable drug release, and high selectivity | Limited specificity of folic acid targeting, complexity in drug loading, and potential challenges in scaling up | This study demonstrates superparamagnetic behavior (Ms = 60.6 emu/g) and cumulative curcumin (Cur) release of 33% at pH 5.5 and 15% at pH 7.4 over 150 h. The carrier exhibits enhanced cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and MG-63 cells, while remaining non-toxic to normal cells. | [303] | |
| Hydrothermal method | 15 and 51 nm | Improved drug loading efficiency, pH-responsive drug release, enhanced cytotoxicity, increased cellular internalization, and versatile nanocomposites | Size variation of nanocomposites, limited release at natural pH, complex functionalization, and potential toxicity of boron | he study finds GOQDs-GlcN-BA for cancer therapy with DOX loading efficiencies of 57% and 90%, respectively, for GOQDs-GlcN-DOX and GOQDs-GlcN-BA-DOX. Boric acid boosts DOX release to 20% at pH 5.5 and 10% at pH 7.4 over 96 h, enhancing cytotoxicity and cellular internalization in MCF-7 cells, showing strong anticancer drug delivery potential. | [304] |
| Ultrasonic peeling | 11.73 ± 3.24 nm | Enhanced chemotherapy efficacy, high drug loading capacity, and reduced side effects | Limited drug release at the tumor site, potential toxicity of GQDs, and short-term stability | This study reports GQDs@GE11 with a drug loading of 67 mg/g for DOX and 50 mg/g for cisplatin. In vivo, the system demonstrates specific tumor targeting, enhanced chemotherapy effects, and significant inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, highlighting its potential for targeted therapy and drug release monitoring. | [305] |
| Two-step method | Well-dispersed with a size of 6.53 nm | Low cytotoxicity, potential to overcome drug resistance, and high drug loading efficiency | Potential for aggregation, specificity to Plasmodium falciparum, and complex synthesis | This study demonstrated controlled drug release (98%, 96%, and 90% over 36 h for GQD-Art/Chi, GQD-Mef/Chi, and GQD-Art-Mef/Chi, respectively). The IC50 values were 9.2, 18.6, and 3.6 μg/mL, with no toxicity to the PC12 cell line and effective targeting of Plasmodium falciparum in cell culture. | [306] |
| pH-sensitive drug release, improved stability and controlled release, high drug loading capacity, and favourable biocompatibility | Drug release decreases with higher MGQD concentration, complexity in preparation, and possible variations in drug release kinetics | The study develops CS-based hydrogel beads loaded with magnetic GQDs (MGQD) for pH-sensitive methotrexate (MTX) release. Loading efficiencies are 84%, 83%, 77%, and 64% for CS, CS-MGQD 5%, CS-MGQD 10%, and CS-MGQD 15%, respectively. The CS-MGQD 15% beads show stability and controlled release at pH 5, suggesting their potential for implantable, pH-sensitive drug delivery in cancer treatment. | [307] | ||
| Double emulsion method | Spherical shape with a size of 453.23 nm. | High encapsulation efficiency, good stability, well-dispersed nanocarriers, biocompatibility and targeting, and multiple functionalities | Potential cytotoxicity of nanocarriers, and complexity in synthesis and scale-up | This study develops CS-Al-GQDDs-based hydrogel nanocarriers for quercetin (QUE) delivery, achieving an 87% encapsulation efficiency, with a particle size of 453.23 nm and a zeta potential of 11.06 mV. The system demonstrates controlled, pH-dependent release over 96 h and effective toxicity against lung cancer cells, highlighting its potential for targeted cancer therapy. | [308] |
5.2.1. EPR-pH Delivery-Release Mode
5.2.2. Ligand-pH Delivery-Release Mode

5.2.3. EPR-Photothermal Delivery-Release Mode
5.2.4. Core/Shell-Photothermal/Magnetic Thermal Delivery-Release Mode
5.3. Biosensing Applications

5.3.1. FL Sensors

5.3.2. Electrochemical Sensors



5.3.3. ECL Sensors



5.4. Tissue Engineering Applications
| Method | Structure and Size (nm) | Advantages | Disadvantages | Finding | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microplasma-assisted synthesis | Pore size of approximately 200–300 μm | Synergistic scaffold properties, enhanced osteogenesis, promotion of uniform bone growth, enhanced cell migration and distribution, and excellent biocompatibility and bioactivity | Degradation rate of magnesium (Mg), long-term stability of the hydrogel, potential cytotoxicity of GQDs, limited tissue interaction at the early stage, difficulty in controlling scaffold morphology, and degradation products. | The study develops a GQD hydrogel–Mg composite scaffold for bone defect repair. The scaffold enhances osteoblast activity and osteogenesis, with in vivo studies showing faster and more uniform bone growth compared to traditional Mg-based scaffolds, offering potential for improved bone repair and broader applications. | [380] |
| liquid exfoliation method | Improved mechanical properties, mimicry of the extracellular matrix, enhanced biocompatibility, increased cell adhesion and proliferation, non-toxicity to structural cells, and a green synthesis method | Limited long-term stability, potential biodegradation issues, challenges in scaling up, complexity in structural control, and issues with cost and accessibility | The study develops collagen-GQD bio-matrices for tissue regeneration, demonstrating enhanced stability, 3D surface topology, and biocompatibility. These matrices promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and angiogenesis, indicating potential for soft tissue regeneration. | [381] | |
| Electrochemical method | Fine-tuned morphology of bio-scaffold | Improved cytocompatibility, porosity and swelling properties, cardiac marker gene expression, biocompatibility, and safety | Long-term efficacy, limited in vivo validation, cost and reproducibility concerns, and risk of toxicity | The study develops bioactive cardiac scaffolds using p-phenylenediamine-functionalized CQDs in Silk fibroin/PLA nanofibers. The scaffolds exhibit improved mechanical properties, enhanced cardiomyocyte growth, and increased cardiac marker gene expression, indicating their potential for myocardial tissue regeneration. | [382] |
5.5. PDT and PTT Applications


5.6. Antimicrobial Applications
6. Conclusions
7. Challenges and Future Outlooks
- The synthesis of GQDs is essential for their application in biomedical and environmental fields due to their nontoxic nature. Several synthesis methods have been developed for GQDs, including top-down, bottom-up, and chemical approaches. Environmentally friendly techniques, such as hydrothermal processes utilizing GO, have been explored, while acid treatment of graphite facilitates large-scale production. Although commercially available GQDs can be tailored to specific needs, optimizing cost-effective, sustainable production remains challenging. Research on GQDs is still nascent compared to graphene, and further studies are required to improve their applications and develop eco-friendly production methods. Many existing techniques involve toxic chemicals, highlighting the need for safer, greener synthesis strategies.
- The functionalization and structural regulation of GQDs are key to optimizing their physicochemical and biological performance. Surface functionalization, particularly through versatile chemical modifications, plays a central role in introducing specific recognition sites and functional linkers for subsequent integration with biomolecules or hybrid materials. Covalent and non-covalent modifications enable precise tuning of bandgap, redox properties, and interfacial interactions. In addition, improving aqueous dispersibility remains a critical challenge, as pristine GQDs may exhibit limited solubility or stability in biological environments. The incorporation of hydrophilic functional groups (e.g., –COOH, –OH, –NH2) or polymer coatings can significantly enhance dispersion, stability, and biocompatibility. Heteroatom doping, especially with nitrogen, further modulates the electronic structure; however, systematic understanding of doping with elements of varying electronegativity remains limited. Future research should therefore focus on developing highly versatile and controllable surface engineering strategies to simultaneously optimize solubility, functionality, and performance.
- Bioimaging applications: GQDs are highly valued in bioimaging for their fluorescent properties, with high QY and brightness being essential for effective imaging. Despite progress, many systems still exhibit low intensity and non-uniform optical behavior, particularly in the NIR region. A promising strategy to overcome these limitations involves the development of hybrid systems through the integration of GQDs with other nanomaterials (e.g., metal NPs, semiconductors, or polymers), which can enhance optical properties via energy transfer, plasmonic effects, or signal amplification. Surface chemistry and heteroatom doping also play crucial roles in modulating PL. These combined approaches are expected to significantly improve imaging sensitivity and expand the applicability of GQDs in advanced biomedical diagnostics.
- Drug delivery applications: GQDs show promise in drug delivery, capable of releasing anticancer drugs and transporting genes, peptides, and other substances. Nevertheless, several challenges must be addressed before the widespread biomedical use of GQDs, including the evaluation of long-term toxicity and the investigation of their effects on the immune, reproductive, and nervous systems in animal models. GQDs synthesized through various methods display differences in their physicochemical properties, emphasizing the necessity for standardized characterization techniques. Furthermore, their size influences toxicity, surface functionalization, and the ability to traverse biological barriers, underscoring the need for further research into size-dependent behaviors.
- Biosensing applications: GQDs hold great potential for biosensing; however, their effectiveness can be limited by chemical and optical interferences in complex biological environments. Surface functionalization is essential for improving selectivity, particularly through the introduction of specific recognition elements. In this context, bioconjugation—the controlled attachment of biomolecules such as antibodies, aptamers, enzymes, or nucleic acids—represents a critical pathway toward real-world applications. Such strategies enable highly selective target recognition and improved signal transduction. Nevertheless, challenges remain in ensuring stability, reproducibility, and minimizing nonspecific interactions. Future GQD-based biosensors should therefore emphasize robust bioconjugation strategies, anti-fouling surface design, and integration with portable or wearable platforms to enhance practical applicability.
- Tissue engineering applications: Current challenges in GQDs for tissue engineering include ensuring biocompatibility, promoting cell adhesion and growth, and controlling GQD toxicity in complex biological environments. While GQDs offer advantages like FL and enhanced mechanical properties, their potential cytotoxicity and limited understanding of long-term effects on tissue regeneration remain significant concerns. Additionally, the difficulty in precisely controlling GQD size, surface functionalization, and dispersion in hydrogels complicates their integration into scaffolds for tissue engineering. Further studies are needed to optimize GQD properties for safe and effective use in tissue regeneration and to better comprehend their interactions with cells and tissues in vivo.
- PDT and PTT applications: In cancer treatment using GQDs for PDT and PTT, the primary challenge is minimizing toxicity to healthy cells and reducing clearance rates, which can be addressed by modulating GQD structure. Single GQDs may limit PDT/PTT efficiency, leading to unpredictable damage. Researchers are investigating surface functionalization and new synthesis strategies to overcome these issues. Key concerns include potential normal cell damage, synthesis criteria for targeted therapy, necessary in vitro and in vivo studies, and the clinical applicability and cost-effectiveness compared to existing treatments. Comprehensive studies are needed to assess long-term safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics for regulatory approval. Collaboration among scientists, clinicians, and engineers is vital to advancing GQD-based cancer therapies and enabling personalized treatment strategies.
- Antimicrobial applications: GQDs are gaining interest in antimicrobial applications, inspired by the use of traditional carbon materials in clinical settings, such as the Quantum Dot Sterilising Spray used against the novel coronavirus. However, challenges remain, including limited raw material availability and concerns about GQDs promoting bacterial growth or biofilm formation. Key research questions include whether GQDs facilitate microorganism growth, their antimicrobial activity against different species, effects on microbial viability, and antifungal properties. While current research focuses on basic antimicrobial activity, further exploration of factors like microbial species and physiological changes is needed. As GQD structures and properties are optimized, they are expected to become effective antimicrobial agents in biomedicine.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| 0D | Zero-dimensional |
| 2D | Two-dimensional |
| 3D | Three-dimensional |
| 5-FU | 5-fluorouracil |
| AA | Ascorbic acid |
| aPDT | Antimicrobial PDT |
| BPA | Bisphenol-A |
| CC | Catechol |
| CCM | Cancer cell membrane |
| CDs | Carbon dots |
| CHEF | Chelation-enhanced fluorescence |
| CHQF | Chelation-quenched fluorescence |
| CL | Chemiluminescence |
| CNTs | Carbon nanotubes |
| CQDs | Carbon quantum dots |
| CS | Chitosan |
| Cur | Curcumin |
| CVDs | Cardiovascular diseases |
| CVD | Chemical vapor deposition |
| Cys | L-cysteine |
| DA | Dopamine |
| DI | Deionized water |
| DFT | Density functional theory |
| DMF | Dimethylformamide |
| DOC | Docetaxel |
| DOX | Delivery of doxorubicin |
| EDA | Ethylenediamine |
| ECL | Electrochemiluminescent |
| EPR | Enhanced permeability and retention |
| FRET | Fluorescence resonance energy transfer |
| FUS | Fluorescence and ultrasound |
| FL | Fluorescence |
| GCE | Glassy carbon electrodes |
| GO | Graphene oxide |
| GOQDs | Graphene oxide quantum dots |
| GPT | Glutamate pyruvate transaminase |
| GQDs | Graphene quantum dots |
| HA | Hyaluronic acid |
| HC | Hydrodynamic cavitation |
| HCC | Hepatocellular carcinoma |
| HER | Hydrogen evolution reaction |
| HMI | Heavy metal ion |
| hMSN | Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticle |
| H2O2 | Hydrogen peroxide |
| HOMO | Highest occupied molecular orbital |
| HRP | Horseradish peroxidase |
| ICD | Immunogenic cell death |
| IFE | Inner filter effect |
| LECs | Light-emitting electrochemical cells |
| LOD | Limit of detection |
| LUMO | Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital |
| MAL | Malathion |
| Mg | Magnesium |
| MD | Magneto-dielectric |
| MIPs | Molecularly imprinted polymers |
| MB | Methylene blue |
| MOFs | Metal-organic frameworks |
| MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
| MRSA | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
| MTX | Methotrexate |
| MWCNTs | Multi-walled carbon nanotubes |
| NADPH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
| NDDS | Nanodrug delivery systems |
| NGQDs | Nitrogen-doped GQDs |
| NS-GQDs | Nitrogen- and sulfur-doped GQDs |
| NIC | Nicotine |
| NFMs | Nanofibrous membranes |
| NIR | Near-infrared |
| NPs | Nanoparticles |
| NN | 1-nitroso-2-naphthol |
| OES | Optical emission spectroscopy |
| OER | Oxygen evolution reaction |
| PCL | Plasma contacting liquid |
| PCL | Polycaprolactone |
| PDT | Photodynamic therapy |
| PEG | Polyethylene glycol |
| PEI | Polyetherimide |
| PET | Photoinduced electron transfer |
| PG | Poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin |
| PL | Photoluminescence |
| PANI | Polyaniline |
| PTT | Photothermal therapy |
| QDs | Quantum dots |
| QYs | quantum yields |
| QUE | Quercetin |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| Se | Selenium |
| SER | Serotonin |
| SERS | surface-enhanced Raman scattering |
| SiC | Silicon carbide |
| SMPU | Shape memory polyurethane |
| SPGE | Screen-printed gold electrodes |
| ROS | Reactive-oxygen-species |
| SQDs | Semiconductor quantum dots |
| SPR | Surface plasmon resonance |
| SWV | Square wave voltammetry |
| TAPP | Tetraaminophenylporphyrin |
| UCPL | Up-conversion photoluminescence |
| UV | Ultraviolet |
| WLEDs | White light-emitting diodes |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
References
- Polonschii, C.; Potara, M.; Iancu, M.; David, S.; Banciu, R.M.; Vasilescu, A.; Astilean, S. Progress in the Optical Sensing of Cardiac Biomarkers. Biosensors 2023, 13, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Wagle, N.S.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 17–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.R.; Nacer, H.; Lawson, C.A.; Khunti, K. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Can. J. Cardiol. 2024, 40, 1016–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, B.; Dar, M.I.; Choudhary, B.; Basist, P.; Khan, R.; Alhalmi, A. Cardiovascular Diseases Among Indian Older Adults: A Comprehensive Review. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2024, 2024, 6894693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, J.; Denning, D.W. The SSS Revolution in Fungal Diagnostics: Speed, Simplicity and Sensitivity. Br. Med. Bull. 2023, 147, 62–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mollarasouli, F.; Bahrani, S.; Amrollahimiyandeh, Y.; Paimard, G. Nanomaterials-Based Immunosensors for Avian Influenza Virus Detection. Talanta 2024, 279, 126591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, S.; Iqbal, R.A. Biosensor for Rapid and Accurate Detection of Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Progress and Prospects in Biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2023, 14, 100388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura-Aguilar, R.I.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Mendoza-Acevedo, S.; Bosquez-Molina, E. Nanomaterials for Designing Biosensors to Detect Fungi and Bacteria Related to Food Safety of Agricultural Products. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 195, 112116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, K.; Sharma, M. Optical Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Bacterial Detection. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aladhadh, M. A Review of Modern Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Praharaj, C.; Nara, S. Nanotechnology Driven Biorecognition Element and Label Free Sensing of Pesticides. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aftab, S.; Koyyada, G.; Rubab, N.; Assiri, M.A.; Truong, N.T.N. Advances in Wearable Nanomaterial-Based Sensors for Environmental and Health Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Luo, Y.; Hao, Z.; Qu, M.; Huang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yang, J.; Liang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Song, Q.; et al. Graphene-Based Wearable Biosensors for Point-of-Care Diagnostics: From Surface Functionalization to Biomarker Detection. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 32, 101667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jang, M.; Na, W.; Lee, M.; Jung, S.; Woo, Y.; Yoo, H.Y.; Lee, T.; Min, J. Light-Induced Field Effect Transistor-Based Biosensor Consisted of Aptamer and ReS2 Single Crystal Layer for Exosome Detection. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 35, 102281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Guo, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Ding, L.; Liu, H.; Yu, X. Nanozyme-Enhanced Electrochemical Biosensors: Mechanisms and Applications. Small 2024, 20, e2307815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wijaya, L.N.A.; Jang, D.W.; Hu, Y.; You, J.; Cai, Y.; Gao, Z.; Mi, Y.; Luo, Z. 2D Materials-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensors for Healthcare. Small 2025, 21, e2408961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Ma, B.; Ju, H. Device Integration of Electrochemical Biosensors. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2023, 1, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, A.R.; Alves, J.F.; Frasco, M.F.; Piloto, A.M.; Serrano, V.; Mateus, D.; Sebastião, A.I.; Matos, A.M.; Carmo, A.; Cruz, T.; et al. An Ultra-Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor Using the Spike Protein for Capturing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Point-of-Care. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 16, 100354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abuzeid, H.R.; Abdelaal, A.F.; Elsharkawy, S.; Ali, G.A.M. Basic Principles and Applications of Biological Sensors Technology. In Handbook of Nanosensors; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
- Long, Z.; Gan, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Zou, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Fluorescence Biosensors and Phototherapy: A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2025, 222, 113608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usman, F.; Ghazali, K.H.; Fen, Y.W.; Meriaudeau, F.; Jose, R. Biosensing through Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: A Review on the Role of Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Polymer Composites. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 195, 112250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajapati, V.; Shrivastav, P. Bioreceptors for Antigen–Antibody Interactions. In Biosensors Nanotechnology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 371–394. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Fang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zuo, X.; Li, G. Application of Functional Peptides in the Electrochemical and Optical Biosensing of Cancer Biomarkers. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 3383–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdollahiyan, P.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Seidi, F.; Pashazadeh-Panahi, P. An Innovative Colorimetric Platform for the Low-Cost and Selective Identification of Cu(II), Fe(III), and Hg(II) Using GQDs-DPA Supported Amino Acids by Microfluidic Paper-Based (ΜPADs) Device: Multicolor Plasmonic Patterns. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, Y.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Cong, W.; Hu, H.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y. A Reagent-Free, Fouling-Resistant Electrochemical Multifunctional Peptide Sensor for Highly Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 33, 102081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, J.; Cao, X.; Bao, H.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wen, Y.; Yang, J.; Ge, G.; Wang, P.; Chen, L.; et al. Magnetic Nanobead Assisted the Dual Targets Driven Fluorescent Biosensor Based on SPEXPAR and MNAzyme for the Olfactory Marker Protein Detection. Mater. Today Bio 2024, 29, 101272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Chang, H.; Zhang, N.; He, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, B.; Fang, Y. Recent Advances in Enzyme Inhibition Based-Electrochemical Biosensors for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis. Talanta 2023, 253, 124092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.-F.; Guo, Z.-B.; Ge, G.-B. Enzyme-Based Biosensors and Their Applications. Biosensors 2023, 13, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, S.; Mohammadi, M.H.; Nakatsuka, N. Aptamer-Functionalized Capacitive Biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 224, 115014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stangherlin, S.; Liu, J. Nanomaterials Enabled and Enhanced DNA-Based Biosensors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 6994–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savas, S.; Sarıçam, M. A Novel PCR-Free Ultrasensitive GQD-Based Label-Free Electrochemical DNA Sensor for Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Francisella Tularensis. Micromachines 2024, 15, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nashruddin, S.; Abdullah, J.; Mohammad Haniff, M.; Mat Zaid, M.; Choon, O.; Mohd Razip Wee, M. Label Free Glucose Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxy Thiophene):Polystyrene Sulfonate/Titanium Carbide/Graphene Quantum Dots. Biosensors 2021, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saylan, Y.; Kılıç, S.; Denizli, A. Biosensing Applications of Molecularly Imprinted-Polymer-Based Nanomaterials. Processes 2024, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Luo, L.; Kong, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Davenport, A.; Li, B. Recent Advances in Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Electrochemical Sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 249, 116018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumitha, M.S.; Xavier, T.S. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors—A Brief Review. Hybrid Adv. 2023, 2, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uniyal, A.; Srivastava, G.; Pal, A.; Taya, S.; Muduli, A. Recent Advances in Optical Biosensors for Sensing Applications: A Review. Plasmonics 2023, 18, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Kumar, P.; Gupta, A.; Sapra, G. Piezoelectric Biosensors in Healthcare. In Enzyme-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances and Applications in Healthcare; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 255–271. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, S.; Saini, A.; Devi, R.; Lata, S. Transducers in Biosensors. In Biomaterials-Based Sensors; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 101–125. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, W.; Zhang, M.; Luo, Y.; Gu, C.; Zhang, A.; Wang, L. Advanced Progress of Sub-Nanomaterials: From Synthesis Strategies, Unique Properties to Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 43, 102491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asha, A.B.; Narain, R. Nanomaterials Properties. In Polymer Science and Nanotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 343–359. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, S.; Abbas, A.; Zahra, T.; Kazmi, J.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmed, N.; Lim, T.M.; Cong, H. Green and Gram-Scale Synthesis of Uniform Graphene Quantum Dots from Biomass Waste: A Highly Selective Probe for Nanomolar Hg2+ Sensing. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 47, 102830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-mashriqi, H.S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Qaed, E.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, H. Fabrication of Chiral Fluorescence Carbon Dots-Based Nanosensor for Selective Sensing of L-Cysteine, Antibiotic Drug in Biological Fluid, and Bioimaging Application. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 49, 103050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beygisangchin, M.; Rashid, S.A.; Shafie, S.; Kamarudin, S.K. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyaniline-Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Potential for Pyrene Detection Using Photoluminescence Spectroscopy. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2024, 50, 3869–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, S. Advance Nanomaterials for Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, E.C.; Powell, J.M.; Clevinger, T.B.; Fairman, A.E.; Shukla, A. Advances in Biosensors and Diagnostic Technologies Using Nanostructures and Nanomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J.V.; Rhim, J.-W. Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots for Food Contaminants Detection Applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, D.J.; Malek, N.I.; Kailasa, S.K. Fluorescence OFF-ON-OFF Mechanism for the Detection of Digoxin, La3+, and Epinephrine Using Bovine Serum Albumin Functionalized Molybdenum Oxide Quantum Dots. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 27, 101291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beygisangchin, M.; Hossein Baghdadi, A.; Kartom Kamarudin, S.; Abdul Rashid, S.; Jakmunee, J.; Shaari, N. Recent Progress in Polyaniline and Its Composites; Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 210, 112948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourmadadi, M.; Rahmani, E.; Rajabzadeh-Khosroshahi, M.; Samadi, A.; Behzadmehr, R.; Rahdar, A.; Ferreira, L.F.R. Properties and Application of Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs) in Biosensors for Disease Detection: A Comprehensive Review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 80, 104156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrientos, K.; Arango, J.P.; Moncada, M.S.; Placido, J.; Patiño, J.; Macías, S.L.; Maldonado, C.; Torijano, S.; Bustamante, S.; Londoño, M.E.; et al. Carbon Dot-Based Biosensors for the Detection of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases. Talanta 2023, 251, 123791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krok-Janiszewska, D.; Wielgus, W.; Środa, P.; Tyszka-Czochara, M.; Lepcio, P.; Kasprzyk, W.; Ortyl, J. Graphene Quantum Dots–From Spectroscopic Performance to 3D Printing Applications and Interaction Studies with Normal and Cancer Cells. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 212, 113052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Bi, S. Two-Dimensional Quantum Dot-Based Electrochemical Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nesakumar, N.; Srinivasan, S.; Alwarappan, S. Graphene Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications to the Development of Optical and Electrochemical Sensors for Chemical Sensing. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Pandey, K.; Kaur, R.; Vashishat, N.; Kaur, M. Nanocomposites of Carbon Quantum Dots and Graphene Quantum Dots: Environmental Applications as Sensors. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chungchai, W.; Amatatongchai, M.; Meelapsom, R.; Seebunrueng, K.; Suparsorn, S.; Jarujamrus, P. Development of a Novel Three-Dimensional Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Device (3D-ΜPAD) for Chlorpyrifos Detection Using Graphene Quantum-Dot Capped Gold Nanocomposite for Colorimetric Assay. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 100, 1160–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, I.J.; Tomás, H.; Rodrigues, J. Carbon Dots and Dendrimers Nanohybrids: From Synthesis to Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 32, 101662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharthi, S.; Alotaibi, M.; Khalil, A.K.; Hefny, A.H.; Amin, T.A.; Mohamed, E.H.; Afify, H.G.; Gomaa, M.; Alfarouk, O.; Mohy-Eldin, M.S.; et al. Advanced Fluorescence Biosensor Utilizing Nitrogen/Oxygen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots in a Modified Carboxy Cellulose Matrix for Quantitative Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Discov. Nano 2026, 21, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaker, M.; Shahalizade, T.; Mumtaz, A.; Hemmati Saznaghi, M.; Javanmardi, S.; Gaho, M.A.; Cao, W.; Hu, W.; Jin, Z.; Ge, Q.; et al. A Review on the Role of Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Quantum Dots in Secondary-Ion Battery Electrodes. FlatChem 2023, 40, 100516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nangare, S.; Chandankar, S.; Patil, P. Design of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots Based Nanotheranostics Applications for Glioblastoma Management: Recent Advanced and Future Prospects. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 89, 105060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshavarz, M.; Chowdhury, A.K.M.R.H.; Kassanos, P.; Tan, B.; Venkatakrishnan, K. Self-Assembled N-Doped Q-Dot Carbon Nanostructures as a SERS-Active Biosensor with Selective Therapeutic Functionality. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 323, 128703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Singh, S.; Khan, R.; Verma, S.; Singh, A.; Gupta, M.K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; et al. Graphene Quantum Dots: A Contemporary Perspective on Scope, Opportunities, and Sustainability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 111993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansuriya, B.; Altintas, Z. Applications of Graphene Quantum Dots in Biomedical Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Roy, M.; Saha, M. Recent Advances in Biomedical Applications of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots: A Review. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2024, 121, 1469–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adampourezare, M.; Saadati, A.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Dehghan, G.; Feizi, M.H. Reliable Recognition of DNA Methylation Using Bioanalysis of Hybridization on the Surface of Ag/GQD Nanocomposite Stabilized on Poly (β-cyclodextrin): A New Platform for DNA Damage Studies Using Genosensor Technology. J. Mol. Recognit. 2022, 35, e2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalbă, R.-I.; Isac, D.L.; Soriga, Ș.G.; Man, I.-C. Theoretical Insights into the Activity of the N Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Oxygen Reduction Reaction as a Function of the Shape and Edge Terminations. Mol. Catal. 2024, 563, 114243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henna, T.K.; Pramod, K. Graphene Quantum Dots Redefine Nanobiomedicine. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 110, 110651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaurav, A.; Jain, A.; Tripathi, S.K. Review on Fluorescent Carbon/Graphene Quantum Dots: Promising Material for Energy Storage and Next-Generation Light-Emitting Diodes. Materials 2022, 15, 7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehata, M.S.; Biswas, S. Synthesis of Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots from Graphene Oxide and Their Application in Fabrication of GQDs@AgNPs Nanohybrids and Sensing of H2O2. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 19063–19072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shi, F.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Yan, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, W. Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Horseradish Peroxidase and Black Phosphorene Quantum Dot Modified Electrode. Molecules 2023, 28, 6151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Qu, H.; Han, Z.; Wang, Y.; Kipper, M.J.; Belfiore, L.A.; Tang, J. Review of Performance Improvement Strategies for Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Fluorescence-Based Sensing. Synth. Met. 2021, 276, 116758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohal, N.; Maity, B.; Basu, S. Size-Dependent Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots. In Handbook of Functionalized Carbon Nanostructures; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.-P.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kong, S.-M.; Li, H.-C.; Jian, W.; Bai, F.-Q.; Zhang, H.-X. Computational Studies on the Materials Combining Graphene Quantum Dots and Pt Complexes with Adjustable Luminescence Characteristics. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sengupta, S.; Pal, S.; Pal, A.; Maity, S.; Sarkar, K.; Das, M. A Review on Synthesis, Toxicity Profile and Biomedical Applications of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs). Inorg. Chim. Acta 2023, 557, 121677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borane, N.; Aralekallu, S.; Boddula, R.; Singh, J.; Kurkuri, M.D. Recent Trends in the “Bottom-up” and “Top down” Techniques in the Synthesis and Fabrication of Myriad Carbonaceous Nanomaterials. In Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Biosystems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 91–120. [Google Scholar]
- Cho, H.; Bae, G.; Hong, B.H. Engineering Functionalization and Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) with Controllable Synthesis for Energy and Display Applications. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 3347–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, F.; Ghosh, H.; Tan, Z.; Sivoththaman, S. Top-down Synthesis and Enhancing Device Adaptability of Graphene Quantum Dots. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 185601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.; Stokes, G.A.; Valimukhametova, A.; Nguyen, S.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Bhaloo, A.; Coffer, J.; Naumov, A.V. Automated Approach to In Vitro Image-Guided Photothermal Therapy with Top-Down and Bottom-Up-Synthesized Graphene Quantum Dots. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Ruiz, D.L.; Granados-Martínez, F.G.; Gutiérrez-García, C.J.; Ambriz-Torres, J.M.; Contreras-Navarrete, J.d.J.; Flores-Ramírez, N.; Méndez, F.; Domratcheva-Lvova, L. Synthesis of Carbon Nanomaterials by Chemical Vapor Deposition Method Using Green Chemistry Principles. In Handbook of Greener Synthesis of Nanomaterials and Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 273–314. [Google Scholar]
- Kadian, S.; Sethi, S.K.; Manik, G. Recent Advancements in Synthesis and Property Control of Graphene Quantum Dots for Biomedical and Optoelectronic Applications. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 627–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cukierman, A.L.; Bonelli, P.R. Strategies for Sustainable Synthesis Processes of Nanocarbons from Biomass. In Bio-Based Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 21–51. [Google Scholar]
- Pooresmaeil, M.; Hassanpouraghdam, Y.; Namazi, H. Chitosan/Carboxymethyl Starch Bio-Coated Naproxen@GQDs/Copper Glutamate MOFs: A New System for Colon-Specific Drug Delivery Relay on the Special Structure of the Used Polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 184, 111802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Hong, J.; Lee, H.; Choi, S.; Shin, K.; Gu, M.; Kim, S.-H. Advances in Polyphenol-Based Carbon Dots for Biomedical Engineering Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 197, 112354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalkal, A.; Kadian, S.; Pradhan, R.; Manik, G.; Packirisamy, G. Recent Advances in Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Optical and Electrochemical (Bio)Analytical Sensors. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 5513–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Liu, L.; Shi, M.; Wang, Y.; Meng, X.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Q.; Liu, C. A Review of Advances in Graphene Quantum Dots: From Preparation and Modification Methods to Application. C 2024, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajik, S.; Dourandish, Z.; Zhang, K.; Beitollahi, H.; Le, Q.V.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M. Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots: A Review on Syntheses, Characterization, Biological and Sensing Applications for Neurotransmitter Determination. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 15406–15429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadyan, P.; Malik, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al Harrasi, A.; Mohan, S.; Yadav, M.; Dalal, S.; Ramniwas, S.; Kumar Kataria, S.; Arasu, T. Comprehensive Review on Synthesis, Applications, and Challenges of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs). J. Nanomater. 2023, 2023, 2832964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavie, J.; Vu, V.B.; Medina-Lopez, D.; Dappe, Y.; Liu, T.; Rondin, L.; Lauret, J.; Latil, S.; Campidelli, S. Bottom-Up Synthesis, Dispersion and Properties of Rectangular-Shaped Graphene Quantum Dots. Helv. Chim. Acta 2023, 106, e202300034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Zheng, H.; Jiang, S.; Zhu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, D.; Fan, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L. A New FeOCl/Graphene Quantum Dot Catalyst for Peroxymonosulfate Activation to Efficiently Remove Organic Pollutants and Inactivate Escherichia coli. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 5939–5947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, Q.; Jia, L.; Cui, Y.; Luan, J.; Tan, Z.; Yu, H. Enhancing Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Nitric Oxide with Lignite-Derived Graphene Quantum Dots/BiOBr Heterojunctions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 343, 127118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, P.; Tang, L.; Lau, S.-P.; Teng, K.-S. Graphene Quantum Dots: Preparations, Properties, Functionalizations and Applications. Mater. Futures 2023, 3, 022301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurel, A.; Avignon, F.; Wang, G.; Lau, S.; Piquemal, J.-Y.; Perruchot, C.; Schaming, D. Electrochemical Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Application. Carbon Trends 2024, 15, 100354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongrat, E.; Nuengnit, T.; Panyathip, R.; Chanlek, N.; Hongsith, N.; Choopun, S. Highly Selective Room Temperature Ammonia Sensors Based on ZnO Nanostructures Decorated with Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 326, 128983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Zhang, X.; Tong, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, P.; Yao, F.; Guo, R.; Yuan, C. Preparation of Graphene Quantum Dots with High Quantum Yield by a Facile One-Step Method and Applications for Cell Imaging. Mater. Lett. 2020, 271, 127806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Facure, M.H.M.; Schneider, R.; Mercante, L.A.; Correa, D.S. Rational Hydrothermal Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots with Optimized Luminescent Properties for Sensing Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isha; Aneesha; Mehata, M.S. Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) from Paddy Straw for Bilirubin Detection. Plasmonics 2024, 20, 2359–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, R.; Vithalani, R.; Patel, D.; Lad, U.; Modi, C.K.; Suthar, D.; Solanki, J.D.; Surati, K.R. Highly Fluorescent Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots (N-GQDs) as an Efficient Nanoprobe for Imaging of Microbial Cells. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2021, 29, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, H.; Xie, W.; Wang, Y.; Jia, X.; Nawaz, A.; Xin, Q.; Song, M.; Gong, J.R. Preparation of Blue- and Green-Emissive Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots from Graphite and Their Application in Bioimaging. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Du, P.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Du, B.; Luo, L.; Sun, Z.; Zou, B. Preparation and Photoelectric Properties of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Modified SnO2 Composites. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 141, 106416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, X.; Sun, X. Ultrasonic-Assistant Hydrothermal Synthesis of ZnIn2S4/Graphene-Quantum-Dots Nanowires and the Sono-Effect Improved Catalytic Activity. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 65, 105807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanwal, S.; Jahan, S.; Mansoor, F. An Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis of Leather-Derived Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots: Catalytic Reduction and Switch on–off Probe for Nitro-Explosives. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 22959–22965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D.; Rani, S.; Nandan, B.; Srivastava, R.K. Nonpolar Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Hydrophobic Coating from Microwave-Assisted Treatment of Styrofoam Waste. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Qi, X.; Liu, D.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Jin, T.; Fang, D.; Wang, J. Synthesis of Uniform Sized ZnS Quantum Dots Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Their Characterization. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 095931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, D.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qi, X.; Chen, Y.; Jin, T.; Wang, J. Green Preparation of Gqds with Small Particle Size, Low Defects, and High Quantum Yield by Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation Technology. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2024, 150, 111700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azimi, Z.; Alimohammadian, M.; Sohrabi, B. Graphene Quantum Dots Based on Mechanical Exfoliation Methods: A Simple and Eco-Friendly Technique. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 31427–31437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai, V.-P.; Tran, D.N.; Kosugi, K.; Takahashi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kikuchi, T. One-Step Synthesis of N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots via Plasma Contacting Liquid for Multiple Heavy Metal Ion Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 12664–12672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, S.; Hsieh, C.-T.; Yuan, C.-Y.; Ashraf Gandomi, Y.; Chang, J.-K.; Fu, C.-C.; Yang, J.-W.; Juang, R.-S. Fluorescence of Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots Prepared from Infrared-Assisted Pyrolysis of Citric Acid and Urea. J. Lumin. 2020, 217, 116774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, E. Synthesis and Characterization of High Quantum Yield Graphene Quantum Dots via Pyrolysis of Glutamic Acid and Aspartic Acid. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2022, 24, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Zhuo, Z.; Ni, K.; Kim, N.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xiang, B.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Lee, Z.; et al. Rupturing C 60 Molecules into Graphene-Oxide-like Quantum Dots: Structure, Photoluminescence, and Catalytic Application. Small 2015, 11, 5296–5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Zheng, P.; Zheng, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wu, F.; Shao, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Synthesized by C 60 /Nitrogen Plasma with Excitation-Independent Blue Photoluminescence Emission for Sensing of Ferric Ions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 29613–29619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, T.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, P.; Jiang, F.-L.; Liu, Y. Bridge between Temperature and Light: Bottom-Up Synthetic Route to Structure-Defined Graphene Quantum Dots as a Temperature Probe In Vitro and in Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 22002–22011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, A.; Nambiar, A.; Sobha, A. Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots by Liquid Phase Exfoliation Method and Its Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [CrossRef]
- Ha, J.M.; Lee, N.E.; Yoon, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Hwang, Y.S.; Suk, J.K.; Lee, C.Y.; Kim, C.R.; Yeo, S. Universal Dry Synthesis and Patterning of High-Quality and -Purity Graphene Quantum Dots by Ion-Beam Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition. Carbon 2022, 186, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Moon, J.; Ri, V.; Lee, S.; Kim, C.; Cairns, E.J. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots: Sulfiphilic Additives for the High-Performance Li–S Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 3518–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, N.E.; Lee, S.Y.; Lim, H.S.; Yoo, S.H.; Cho, S.O. A Novel Route to High-Quality Graphene Quantum Dots by Hydrogen-Assisted Pyrolysis of Silicon Carbide. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, Y.; Bao, R.; Yi, J.; Tao, J.; Liu, P.; Ma, R.; Luo, H.; Ma, D. Highly Efficient Heterostructures of C3N4 and O-GQDs with Enrichment of Specific Oxygen-Containing Groups for Photocatalytic Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 923, 166327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapoor, S.; Jha, A.; Ahmad, H.; Islam, S.S. Avenue to Large-Scale Production of Graphene Quantum Dots from High-Purity Graphene Sheets Using Laboratory-Grade Graphite Electrodes. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 18831–18841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, L.; Cheng, C.; Yao, C.; Jin, X. Flexible Supercapacitor Electrode Based on Lignosulfonate-Derived Graphene Quantum Dots/Graphene Hydrogel. Org. Electron. 2020, 78, 105407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrionuevo, S.D.; Fioravanti, F.; Nuñez, J.M.; Muñeton Arboleda, D.; Lacconi, G.I.; Bellino, M.G.; Aguirre, M.H.; Ibañez, F.J. Stacking-Configuration-Preserved Graphene Quantum Dots Electrochemically Obtained from CVD Graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llaver, M.; Barrionuevo, S.D.; Núñez, J.M.; Chapana, A.L.; Wuilloud, R.G.; Aguirre, M.H.; Ibañez, F.J. Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots-Enhanced Machine Learning for the Accurate Detection and Quantification of Hg2+ and Fe3+ in Real Water Samples. Environ. Sci. Nano 2024, 11, 2703–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beygisangchin, M.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Rashid, S.A. Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Polyaniline–Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposites: Comprehensive Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Yang, J. Preparation and Formaldehyde Sensitive Properties of N-GQDs/SnO2 Nanocomposite. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2063–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beygisangchin, M.; Jakmunee, J.; Rashid, S.A.; Shafie, S.; Saetang, S. Effect of Graphene Quantum Dot Concentration on P-Toluenesulfonic Acid-Doped Polyaniline–Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposites: Chemical, Optical, and Electrical Characterization for Benzo[Def]Phenanthrene Detection. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2025, 57, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, N.; Srivastava, R.; Roy, S.; De, A.K.; Kar, R.K. Physico-Chemical Properties and Biological Evaluation of Graphene Quantum Dots for Anticancer Drug Susceptibility. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2025, 245, 114322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romero, M.R.; Bracamonte, A.G. Optical Active Meta-Surfaces, -Substrates, and Single Quantum Dots Based on Tuning Organic Composites with Graphene. Materials 2024, 17, 3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabbir, H.; Wojnicki, M. Recent Progress of Non-Cadmium and Organic Quantum Dots for Optoelectronic Applications with a Focus on Photodetector Devices. Electronics 2023, 12, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Ghamdi, H.S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Opening Band Gap of Multi-Color Graphene Quantum Dots Using D-Fructose as a Green Precursor. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 79, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Jiao, L.; Zhou, X.; Guo, Z.; Bian, H.; Dai, H. Highly Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots from Biorefinery Waste for Tri-Channel Sensitive Detection of Fe3+ Ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinilla-Peñalver, E.; García-Béjar, B.; Contento, A.M.; Ríos, Á. Graphene Quantum Dots an Efficient Nanomaterial for Enhancing the Photostability of Trans-Resveratrol in Food Samples. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, I.J.; Sulleiro, M.V.; Dolečková, A.; Pizúrová, N.; Medalová, J.; Bednařík, A.; Preisler, J.; Nečas, D.; Zajíčková, L. Structure Elucidation of Multicolor Emissive Graphene Quantum Dots towards Cell Guidance. Mater. Chem. Front. 2022, 6, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, S.; Jin, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhou, R.; Li, Y. Fluorescence Sensing Mechanisms of Versatile Graphene Quantum Dots toward Commonly Encountered Heavy Metal Ions. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 3812–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.; Chen, D.; Gu, B.; Gao, B.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Zheng, X.; Wang, G. Yellow Emissive Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as a Label-Free Fluorescent Probe for Fe3+ Sensing and Bioimaging. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 104, 107749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, Y.; Ji, J.; Qin, A.; Liao, L.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, K.; Ou, J. Cane Molasses Graphene Quantum Dots Passivated by PEG Functionalization for Detection of Metal Ions. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 6763–6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, R.; Khan, B.; Singh, M.K. Synthesis, Optical, Dielectric, and Magneto-Dielectric Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs). J. Mater. Res. 2022, 37, 3459–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Tang, S.; Chen, D.; Li, X.; Peng, Z.; Gu, C. Multicolor Graphene Quantum Dots via Solvatochromic Tuning and Sulfur Doping for Light-Emitting Diodes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 12325–12334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, S.; Yin, X.; Li, H.; Du, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Q.; Yang, R. Multi-Color Fluorescent Carbon Dots: Graphitized Sp 2 Conjugated Domains and Surface State Energy Level Co-Modulate Band Gap Rather Than Size Effects. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 8129–8136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kansara, V.; Shukla, R.; Flora, S.J.S.; Bahadur, P.; Tiwari, S. Graphene Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Navigational Applications against Cancer. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wei, D.; Sun, J.; Guo, Z.; Fan, H. Photoluminescence-Tunable Carbon Dots from Synergy Effect of Sulfur Doping and Water Engineering. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 388, 124199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Chen, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Gu, C.; Cao, Z. Mechanisms behind Multicolor Tunable Near-Infrared Triple Emission in Graphene Quantum Dots and Ratio Fluorescent Probe for Water Detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 617, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, W.-S.; Chang, C.-Y.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Su, P.-L.; Wang, J.-Y.; Wu, P.-C.; Kao, H.-F.; Tseng, S.-W.; Lin, S.-H.; Lin, Y.-S.; et al. Single-Sized N-Functionality Graphene Quantum Dot in Tunable Dual-Modality near Infrared–I/II Illumination Detection and Photodynamic Therapy under Multiphoton Nonlinear Excitation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 241, 115648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ebrahimi, M.; Sadeghi, F.; Soleimanian, V.; Ghasemi, M.; Nekoeinia, M. Study of Nonlinear Optical Properties of ZnCo2O4/GQD Nanocomposite and Their Correlation with Microstructure. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 1059c7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarwar, S.; Yaqoob, J.; Khan, M.U.; Hussain, R.; Zulfiqar, S.; Anwar, A.; Assiri, M.A.; Imran, M.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Mersal, G.A.M.; et al. Deciphering the Role of Alkali Metals (Li, Na, K) Doping for Triggering Nonlinear Optical (NLO) Properties of T-Graphene Quantum Dots: Toward the Development of Giant NLO Response Materials. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 24396–24414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danial, W.H.; Abdullah, M.; Abu Bakar, M.A.; Yunos, M.S.; Ibrahim, A.R.; Iqbal, A.; Adnan, N.N. The Valorisation of Grass Waste for the Green Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots for Nonlinear Optical Applications. Opt. Mater. 2022, 132, 112853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elamkulavan, H.J.; Purayil, N.P.; Subramaniam, S.; Keloth, C. Impact of Tamm Plasmon Structures on Fluorescence and Optical Nonlinearity of Graphene Quantum Dots. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jana, S.; Dey, T.; Shivakiran Bhaktha, B.N.; Ray, S.K. Probing the Tunable Optical Properties of Highly Luminescent Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots as Downconverters for Superior Detection of Ultraviolet Radiation. Mater. Today Nano 2023, 24, 100400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandchi, M.; Darvish, G.; Moravvej-Farshi, M.K. Properties of Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots for Integrated Optics: An Ab Initio Study. Photonics 2020, 7, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Xu, W.; Meng, L.; Tian, W.; Li, L. Recent Progress on Semiconductor Heterojunction-Based Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Small Sci. 2022, 2, 2100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Yang, J.; Luo, X.; Li, Y.; Qiu, Q.; Xie, T. Selection, Preparation and Application of Quantum Dots in Perovskite Solar Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddique, R.; Yadav, R.K.; Singh, S.; Shahin, R.; Dubey, A.K.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, A.K.; Gupta, N.K.; Baeg, J.; Kim, T.W. Photocatalytic Oxygenation of Sulfide Using Solar Light and Ingenious GQDs@AQ Catalyst: Mechanistic and Synthetic Investigations. Photochem. Photobiol. 2024, 100, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallikkara, A.; Sebastian, D.; Ramakrishnan, K. An Investigation on the Effect of Extended Conjugation on the Photophysical Properties of Graphene Quantum Dot-Porphyrin Dyads. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 12224–12232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Lenzini, F.; Chen, D.; Tanner, P.; Han, J.; Thiel, D.; Lobino, M.; Li, Q. Chemically Derived Graphene Quantum Dots for High-Strain Sensing. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 141, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basak, T.; Basak, T. Edge Modification and Site-Selective Functionalization of Graphene Quantum Dots: A Versatile Technique for Designing Tunable Optoelectronic and Sensing Devices. J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 5335–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Li, W.; Huang, K.; Guo, H.; Li, Z.; Fang, Y.; Yadav, R.M.; Shanov, V.; Ajayan, P.M.; Wang, L.; et al. Regulation of Functional Groups on Graphene Quantum Dots Directs Selective CO2 to CH4 Conversion. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallikkara, A.; Ramakrishnan, K. Probing the Photophysics of Covalently and Non-covalently Bonded Graphene Quantum Dots-Tetraaminophenylporphyrin Nanohybrids. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202201265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, P.; Wu, Q. Computationally Engineering Optoelectronic Properties and Photocatalytic Performance in Graphene Quantum Dot/Platinum(II) Complex Photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 447, 115199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, G.; Pan, Y.; Qiao, L.; Ran, X.; Li, T.; Chi, Z.; Liu, P.; He, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Guo, L. Band Alignment Driven Efficient Electron Transfer and Enhanced Photoelectric Property of Gold Nanoclusters Sensitized Graphene Quantum Dot Composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 969, 172261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, D.; Li, X.; Chi, Q.; Low, J.; Deng, P.; Wu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Li, W.; Xu, M.; et al. Direct Electron Transfer from Upconversion Graphene Quantum Dots to TiO2 Enabling Infrared Light-Driven Overall Water Splitting. Research 2022, 2022, 9781453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jauja-Ccana, V.R.; Córdova Huamán, A.V.; Feliciano, G.T.; La Rosa-Toro Gómez, A. Optical and Electronic Properties of TiO2/GOQDs Composites: A Combined Experimental and First-Principles Calculations Study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 195, 110503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Mei, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, K.; Cao, F.; Zhang, L.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Xu, Z. Ag-Conjugated Graphene Quantum Dots with Blue Light-Enhanced Singlet Oxygen Generation for Ternary-Mode Highly-Efficient Antimicrobial Therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Win, T.T.; Raengthon, N.; Prasittisopin, L. Advanced Cement Composites: Investigating the Role of Graphene Quantum Dots in Improving Thermal and Mechanical Performance. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdy, E.; Saad, L.; Abulfotuh, F.; Soliman, M.; Ebrahim, S. Enhancement of Molten Nitrate Thermal Properties by Reduced Graphene Oxide and Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21345–21354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.G.; Zanwar, D.R.; Meshram, A.A.; Fulekar, H.; Gajghate, P. Synthesis and Thermophysical Properties of Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots for Enhancing Heat Transfer of Conventional Fluid. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 3577–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabiyan Nejad, S.; Babaie, A.; Bagheri, M.; Rezaei, M.; Abbasi, F.; Shomali, A. Effects of Graphene Quantum Dot (GQD) on Photoluminescence, Mechanical, Thermal and Shape Memory Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Nanocomposites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020, 31, 2279–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Liu, F.; Wang, S.; Yan, M.; Hu, X.; Xu, M. D-GQDs Modified Epoxy Resin Enhances the Thermal Conductivity of AlN/Epoxy Resin Thermally Conductive Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, M.; An, J.; Lee, H.; Jang, H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, D.; Song, J.Y.; Kim, S.M.; Oh, M.-W.; Shin, H.; et al. High Figure-of-Merit for ZnO Nanostructures by Interfacing Lowly-Oxidized Graphene Quantum Dots. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, S.; Revia, R.A.; Zhang, M. Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Applications in Bioimaging, Biosensing, and Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 1904362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, N.; Tang, T.; Pan, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Du, Y. Magnetic Properties of Graphene. In Spintronic 2D Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 137–161. [Google Scholar]
- Biswal, R.; Yadav, P.; Kumar, P.; Singh, M.K. Synthesis, Structural, Dielectric, Magnetic and Magnetodielectric Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) Decorated ZnFe2O4 Hybrid Nanocomposite (GQD-ZHN). J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2024, 34, 2445–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, R.; Yadav, P.; Mishra, P.; Kumar, P.; Singh, M.K. Synthesis, Structural, Optical, Dielectric, Magnetic and Magneto-Dielectric Properties of CoFe2O4 and Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) Decorated CoFe2O4 Hybrid Nanocomposite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 318, 129271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, M.S.; Makarov, V.I.; Mendoza, F.; Sajjad, M.; Barrionuevo Diestra, D.G.; Inbanathan, F.P.N.; Skelton, E.; Premadasa, U.I.; Cimatu, K.L.A.; Habiba, K.; et al. Superparamagnetic Properties of Metal-Free Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 135, 083904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiutiunnyk, A.; Laroze, D.; Correa, J.D.; Mora-Ramos, M.E. Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Stacked Graphene Quantum Dots. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 131, 109550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, B.; Shen, W.; Fang, F.; Qin, H.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Pan, D.; Shen, L. Enriched Graphitic N Dopants of Carbon Dots as F Cores Mediate Photothermal Conversion in the NIR-II Window with High Efficiency. Carbon 2020, 162, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Sun, B.; Xu, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L. Intrinsic Mechanisms for the Inhibition Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Catalysis Activity of Alpha Amylase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 453, 131389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, M.; Fu, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhao, P.; Ma, J.; Wang, W.; Xiao, H.; Wu, J.; Zhao, M.; Jia, J. Advances in Understanding the Regulation Effect of Carbon Dots on Intrinsic Activity of Metal and Metal-Free Catalysts for Electrocatalysis Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 489, 151544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velumani, A.; Sengodan, P.; Arumugam, P.; Rajendran, R.; Santhanam, S.; Palanisamy, M. Carbon Quantum Dots Supported ZnO Sphere Based Photocatalyst for Dye Degradation Application. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamila, G.S.; Sajjad, S.; Leghari, S.A.K.; Long, M. Nitrogen Doped Carbon Quantum Dots and GO Modified WO3 Nanosheets Combination as an Effective Visible Photo Catalyst. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gizem Güneştekin, B.; Medetalibeyoglu, H.; Atar, N.; Lütfi Yola, M. Efficient Direct-Methanol Fuel Cell Based on Graphene Quantum Dots/Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 1977–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi-Alavi, H.; Kareem Abbas, A.; Safaei-Ghomi, J. Sonosynthesis of Pyranochromenes and Biscoumarins Catalyzed by Co3O4/NiO@GQDs@SO3 H Nanocomposite. Nanocomposites 2020, 6, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Üzek, R. Engineering a Graphene Quantum Dot-Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Hg2+ Ions. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 12, 2400679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N.; Tan, L.; Li, H.-F.; Hu, H.-Y.; Wang, C.; Pan, M.; Wu, F.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.-D.; Zeng, Z.; et al. Manipulation of 3D Nanocarbon Hybrids toward Synthesis of N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots with High Photoluminescence Quantum Yield. J. Lumin. 2020, 219, 116827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, M.; Mandal, S.; Pillai, V.K. Effect of Hetero-Atom Doping on the Electrocatalytic Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Feng, J.; Liu, H.; Yu, L.; Dong, L. Underlying Electrochemical Activity Mechanisms on Tunable Electronic Structures of Graphene Quantum Dots Doped with Nitrogen and Sulfur Heteroatoms. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 166518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijaya Kumar Saroja, A.P.; Garapati, M.S.; ShyiamalaDevi, R.; Kamaraj, M.; Ramaprabhu, S. Facile Synthesis of Heteroatom Doped and Undoped Graphene Quantum Dots as Active Materials for Reversible Lithium and Sodium Ions Storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 504, 144430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kansara, V.; Patel, M. Modulating the Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots by Heteroatom Doping for Biomedical Applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 691, 133906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Guo, Q.; Song, N.; Liu, H.; Dong, H.; Chen, Y.; Yu, L.; Dong, L. Density Functional Theory Study on Optical and Electronic Properties of Co-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Based on Different Nitrogen Doping Patterns. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2021, 113, 108264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Haddad, Y.; Ouarrad, H.; Drissi, L.B. Insights into the Optoelectronic Behaviour of Heteroatom Doped Diamond-Shaped Graphene Quantum Dots. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 12639–12649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, G.; Jia, P.; Zhang, T.; Tang, S.; Pervez, M.N.; Pang, Y.; Li, B.; Cao, C.; Zhao, Y. Synergistic Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Intrinsic Defect and Graphitic N of N, P Co-Doped Carbon Microspheres for BPA Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 145888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Du, Y.; Ma, M.; Zhang, J. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Coated with Molecularly Imprinted Polymers as a Fluorescent Sensor for Selective Determination of Warfarin. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 7537–7544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algadi, H.; Ren, J.; Alqarni, A. A High-Performance Self-Powered Photodetector Based on Solution-Processed Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots/All-Inorganic Perovskite Heterostructures. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 2023, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, F.; Ahmad, V.; Alshahrani, T.; Al-Rasheidi, M.; Alanazi, A.M.; Irshad, K.; Zahir, M.H.; Kim, J.H. Influence of Synthesis Parameters of N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots and Polymer Composite Layer on the Performance of CIGS Solar Cells. Opt. Mater. 2023, 135, 113251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Pan, C.; Wei, Z.; Wei, X.; Yang, F.; Mao, L. Bionanosensor Based on N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Coupled with CoOOH Nanosheets and Their Application for in Vivo Analysis of Ascorbic Acid. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1100, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algarra, M.; Moreno, V.; Lázaro-Martínez, J.M.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Soto, J.; Morales, J.; Benítez, A. Insights into the Formation of N Doped 3D-Graphene Quantum Dots. Spectroscopic and Computational Approach. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 561, 678–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Xia, W.; Ou, L.; Zheng, L.; Hou, B.; Pan, T.; Sun, W.; Koole, L.H.; Shao, Y.; Qi, L. Utilization of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots to Neutralize ROS and Modulate Intracellular Antioxidant Pathways to Improve Dry Eye Disease Therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 2691–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, Z.G.; Agrawal, T.N.; Bari, S.B.; Nangare, S.N.; Patil, P.O. Application of Surface Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots in the Sensing of Ferric Ions and Glutathione: Spectroscopic Investigations and DFT Calculations. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 306, 123608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mandal, B.; Samal, P. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Extensive Production of Hydrogen: A Hybrid Density Functional Study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 53, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, T.B.N.; Vo, T.N.T. Enhancing Photoluminescence Performance and PH Photostability of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots via Surface-Passivated by Polyethylene Glycol. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2023, 14, 045009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniawan, D.; Weng, R.-J.; Setiawan, O.; Ostrikov, K.; Chiang, W.-H. Microplasma Nanoengineering of Emission-Tuneable Colloidal Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as Smart Environmental-Responsive Nanosensors and Nanothermometers. Carbon 2021, 185, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, R.T.; Lu, C.; Croxall, M.P.; Yu, K.; Cynthia Goh, M. Facile Oxidation Reaction to Produce Monolayered Highly Crystalline Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 578, 151919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inbanathan, F.P.N.; Cimatu, K.L.A.; Ingram, D.C.; Erasquin, U.J.; Dasari, K.; Sultan, M.S.; Sajjad, M.; Makarov, V.; Weiner, B.R.; Morell, G.; et al. Paramagnetism in Microwave-Synthesized Metal-Free Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. Materials 2023, 16, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Xu, M.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Anwar, S.; Tedesco, A.C.; Morais, P.C.; Bi, H. Fluorine-Containing Graphene Quantum Dots with a High Singlet Oxygen Generation Applied for Photodynamic Therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 2598–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Q.; Yu, F.; Cai, H.; Wu, X.; Ma, M.; Li, Z.; Tedesco, A.C.; Zhu, J.; Xu, Q.; Bi, H. Photo-Activated Autophagy-Associated Tumour Cell Death by Lysosome Impairment Based on Manganese-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 2466–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, H.; Wang, D.; Sadat, A.; Li, Z.; Hu, X.; Xu, M.; de Morais, P.C.; Ge, B.; Sun, S.; Ge, J.; et al. Single-Atom Gadolinium Anchored on Graphene Quantum Dots as a Magnetic Resonance Signal Amplifier. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 2798–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rabeya, R.; Mahalingam, S.; Manap, A.; Satgunam, M.; Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Chia, C.H. Structural Defects in Graphene Quantum Dots: A Review. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2022, 122, e26900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, D.; Sarkar, K.; Devi, P.; Kim, K.-H.; Kumar, P. Current and Future Perspectives of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots: From Synthesis to Strategy for Building Optoelectronic and Energy Devices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, D.; Han, P.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Ye, J.; Zhang, Y. Vibrational Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots: Effects of Confinement, Geometrical Structure, and Edge Orientation. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 085430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.M.; Haque, M.F.; Hsieh, E.Y.; Nahid, S.M.; Zarin, I.; Jeong, K.; So, J.; Park, H.; Nam, S. Strain Engineering of Low-Dimensional Materials for Emerging Quantum Phenomena and Functionalities. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2107362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Xie, C.; Wu, Z.; Ji, M.; Shan, J.; Cheng, P.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Zhou, B.; Sun, W. Lateral Size Homogeneous and Doping Degree Controllable Potassium-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots by Mechanochemical Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelsalam, H.; Atta, M.M.; Saroka, V.A.; Zhang, Q. Anomalous Magnetic and Transport Properties of Laterally Connected Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 14356–14370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagayaraj, P.J.J.; Augustin, A.; Shanmugam, M.; Honnappa, B.; Natarajan, T.S.; Wilson, K.; Lee, A.F.; Sekar, K. Graphene Quantum Dots for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Energy Technol. 2023, 11, 2300563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda-Martínez, M.; Pérez Martínez, A.N.; El Hamdaoui, J.; Courel Piedrahita, M.; Feddi, E.M.; Thirumuruganandham, S.P.; Ojeda Martínez, M.L.; Cuevas Figueroa, J.L.; Velásquez Ordoñez, C.; Mowbray, D.J. Tuning the Energy Gap of Graphene Quantum Dots Functionalized by OH and COOH Radicals: First Principle Study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 311, 128543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajhi, A.A.; Alaziz, K.M.A.; Oviedo, B.S.R.; Yadav, A.; Hernández, E.; Gallegos, C.; Alamri, S.; Duhduh, A.A. Enhancing the Performance of Quantum Dot Solar Cells through Halogen Adatoms on Carboxyl Edge-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 447, 115240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Gu, B.; Guo, G.; Li, Y.; Li, T.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, D. Bright Tunable Multicolor Graphene Quantum Dots for Light-Emitting Devices and Anticounterfeiting Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 3245–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Haydel, P.; Sui, N.; Wang, L.; Liang, Y.; Yu, W.W. Wide Emission Shifts and High Quantum Yields of Solvatochromic Carbon Dots with Rich Pyrrolic Nitrogen. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2492–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Qin, B.; Si, C.; Sun, X.; Li, B. Electrochemical Reactions Catalyzed by Carbon Dots from Computational Investigations: Functional Groups, Dopants, and Defects. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2024, 12, 2520–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, P.; Xue, Y. Enhancing Photovoltaic Performance of Boron Nitride Quantum Dots: A Density Functional Theory Study on Carbon Doping and Amino Functionalization. FlatChem 2024, 44, 100625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.; Wang, Z.; Sun, K.; Wang, A.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, R.; Raj, J.; Wu, J.; Jiang, J.; et al. N—B—OH Site-Activated Graphene Quantum Dots for Boosting Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Production. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, B.J.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, A.; Oh, Y.; Lee, S.-K.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, T.-W.; Hong, B.H.; Bae, S. Structure-Controllable Growth of Nitrogenated Graphene Quantum Dots via Solvent Catalysis for Selective C-N Bond Activation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, S.; Park, J.H.; Wu, C.; Kim, T.W. Biosynaptic Devices Based on Chicken Egg Albumen:Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Cheng, N.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Zi, W.; Sun, Z. Boost the Performance of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with PEDOT:PSS/Graphene Quantum Dots Composite Hole Transporting Layer. Org. Electron. 2020, 78, 105575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L. Biomemristic Behavior for Water-Soluble Chitosan Blended with Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposite. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Li, C.; Li, S.; Su, B.; Hu, M.Z.; Gao, X.; Gao, C. Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs)-Polyethyleneimine as Interlayer for the Fabrication of High Performance Organic Solvent Nanofiltration (OSN) Membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Fan, C.; Cao, Y.; Sheng, R.; Liu, A.; et al. Graphene Quantum Dot Reinforced Electrospun Carbon Nanofiber Fabrics with High Surface Area for Ultrahigh Rate Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 11669–11678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, N.; Sahoo, G.; Swain, S.K. Graphene Quantum Dot Decorated Magnetic Graphene Oxide Filled Polyvinyl Alcohol Hybrid Hydrogel for Removal of Dye Pollutants. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 302, 112591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arthisree, D.; Madhuri, W. Optically Active Polymer Nanocomposite Composed of Polyaniline, Polyacrylonitrile and Green-Synthesized Graphene Quantum Dot for Supercapacitor Application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 9317–9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Lin, D.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, P. A Dual-Mode Nanoprobe for the Determination of Parathion Methyl Based on Graphene Quantum Dots Modified Silver Nanoparticles. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 5583–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y.-K.; Li, Y.-Y.; Zhou, R.-H.; Pan, Y.-P.; Yao, H.-C.; Li, Z.-J. N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot-Decorated Three-Dimensional Ordered Macroporous In2O3 for NO2 Sensing at Low Temperatures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 34245–34253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, Y.J.; Ko, K.B.; Lee, K.S.; Seo, T.H.; Hong, C.-H.; Cuong, T.V.; Son, D.I. Solution Processed Graphene Quantum Dots Decorated ZnO Nanoflowers for Mediating Photoluminescence. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Lei, Y.; Yuan, M.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Du, P.; Wu, Y. Enhanced Photoelectric Performance of GQDs Anchored WO3 with a ‘Dot-on-Nanoparticle’ Structure. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 075602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Zhao, P.; Wang, C.; Yang, P.; Xie, Y.; Fei, J. Ultra-Sensitive Amperometric Determination of Quercetin by Using a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with a Nanocomposite Prepared from Aminated Graphene Quantum Dots, Thiolated β-Cyclodextrin and Gold Nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, S.; Sahu, T.K.; Gogoi, D.; Peela, N.R.; Qureshi, M. Bio-Template Assisted Hierarchical ZnO Superstructures Coupled with Graphene Quantum Dots for Enhanced Water Oxidation Kinetics. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, P.; Lee, C.Y.; Doong, R.-A.; Oon, C.E.; Kim Thanh, N.T.; Lee, H.L. A Titanium Dioxide/Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposite to Mitigate Cytotoxicity: Synthesis, Characterisation, and Cell Viability Evaluation. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 21795–21805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Yin, C.; Zhou, J.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Garner, S.; Fu, Y.; Duan, H. Ultrathin Glass-Based Flexible, Transparent, and Ultrasensitive Surface Acoustic Wave Humidity Sensor with ZnO Nanowires and Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 39817–39825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, N.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Nemati, A. Comparison between Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Detection of Dopamine Based on Titania-Ceria-Graphene Quantum Dots Nanocomposite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 151, 111977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murali, G.; Reddeppa, M.; Seshendra Reddy, C.; Park, S.; Chandrakalavathi, T.; Kim, M.-D.; In, I. Enhancing the Charge Carrier Separation and Transport via Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot-TiO2 Nanoplate Hybrid Structure for an Efficient NO Gas Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 13428–13436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadian, S.; Manik, G.; Das, N.; Nehra, P.; Chauhan, R.P.; Roy, P. Synthesis, Characterization and Investigation of Synergistic Antibacterial Activity and Cell Viability of Silver–Sulfur Doped Graphene Quantum Dot (Ag@S-GQDs) Nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 3028–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Dong, H.; Wu, K.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Gu, W.; Hong, Z.; Liu, M.; Shen, Y.; Lu, W. Graphene Quantum Dots Coated LiCoO2 for Improved Cycling Stability and Thermal Safety at High Voltage. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 866, 114109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daugherty, M.C.; Gu, S.; Aaron, D.S.; Kelly, R.E.; Ashraf Gandomi, Y.; Hsieh, C.-T. Graphene Quantum Dot-Decorated Carbon Electrodes for Energy Storage in Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 7834–7842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, C.; Yang, R.; Huang, Y.; Mao, L.; Yang, Y.; Gong, L.; Dong, X.; Yan, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zhong, L.; et al. Graphene Quantum Dots as Sulfiphilic and Lithiophilic Mediator toward High Stability and Durable Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 85, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baslak, C.; Demirel, S.; Kocyigit, A.; Erdal, M.O.; Yıldırım, M. Electrolyte Performance of Green Synthesized Carbon Quantum Dots from Fermented Tea for High-Speed Capacitors. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 139, 110275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, W.; Zhu, J.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Guo, N.; Lin, H.; Zhang, S.; Jia, D. Micelle-Induced Assembly of Graphene Quantum Dots into Conductive Porous Carbon for High Rate Supercapacitor Electrodes at High Mass Loadings. Carbon 2020, 161, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.; Yang, Z.; Cui, H.; An, K.; Ren, C.; Liu, Q.; Wang, K. Fabricating a Signal-off Photoelectrochemical Sensor Based on BiPO4-Graphene Quantum Dots Nanocomposites for Sensitive and Selective Detection of Hydroquinone. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 868, 114177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, P.; Zhao, P.; Shi, X.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, B. Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of Electrospun Hollow Titanium Dioxide Nanofibers Decorated with Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 2138–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shooshtari Gugtapeh, H.; Rezaei, M. N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Incorporated into NiCo Bimetallic-Organic Framework as an Electrocatalyst for Alkaline Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 2086–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaka, A.; Iqbal, M.W.; Almutairi, B.S.; Alrobei, H.; Ansar, M.Z. Augmented Energy Storage and Electrocatalytic Performance via Iron Metal–Organic Framework Infused with Reduced Graphene Oxide/Graphene Quantum Dots. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Li, R.; Yang, L.; Wang, R.; Liu, R.; Chen, Y.; Yan, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y. Flexible PTh/GQDs/TiO2 Composite with Superior Visible-Light Photocatalytic Properties for Rapid Degradation Pollutants. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 1765–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohapatra, P.; Behera, S.; Sahoo, S.; Mishra, A.; Kesh, A.; Shubhadarshinee, L.; Jali, B.R.; Mohapatra, P.; Barick, A.K. Synergistic Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene Quantum Dots Nanohybrids Reinforced Polyaniline Ternary Nanocomposites on Optical, Thermal, and Dielectric Properties. Compos. Interfaces 2024, 32, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Aziz, M.E.A.; Tohamy, H.-A.S.; Youssef, A.M.; El Desouky, F.G. Preparation and Optimization of Grafted Hydroxyethyl Cellulose, Polypyrrole, and Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots Bionanocomposites for Electrical, Optical, and Photoluminescence Multicoloring Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilczewska, P.; Breczko, J.; Bobrowska, D.M.; Wysocka-Żołopa, M.; Goclon, J.; Basa, A.; Winkler, K. Enhancement of Polypyrrole Electrochemical Performance with Graphene Quantum Dots in Polypyrrole Nanoparticle/Graphene Quantum Dot Composites. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 923, 116767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, K.; De, S.; Das, B.; Bera, S.; Guria, B.; Ali, M.S.; Chattopadhyay, D. Development of an Efficient Immunosensing Platform by Exploring Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorns (SWCNHs) and Nitrogen Doped Graphene Quantum Dot (N-GQD) Nanocomposite for Early Detection of Cancer Biomarker. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5541–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahto, V.K.; Pal, M.; Prakash, V.; Singh, A.K.; Rai, A.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, V.K. Carbon Quantum Dots for the Efficient Degradation of Organic Contaminants. Nanotechnol.-Based Sustain. Agric. 2025, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bijoy, G.; Sangeetha, D. Biomass Derived Carbon Quantum Dots as Potential Tools for Sustainable Environmental Remediation and Eco-Friendly Food Packaging. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roopan, S.M.; Prakash, S.H.; Manjupriya, R.; Afridha, M.S.H.F.; Rajesh, A.; Sneha, R.; Kumar, P.V.; Shobika, M. Biomass-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots-Supported Metal Oxide Composite for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Toxic Pollutants. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 15, 26177–26196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madadi, M.; Rohani Moghadam, M.; Salarizadeh, P.; Bazmandegan-Shamili, A.; Shahbakhsh, M. Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine Using CuCo2O4/Graphene Quantum Dots-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025, 171, 113566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suman; Rani, G.; Ahlawat, R.; Kumar, H. Green Source-Based Carbon Quantum Dots, Composites, and Key Factors for High-Performance of Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2024, 617, 235170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, R.K.; Chianella, I.; Sarkar, J.; Yazdani Nezhad, H.; Goel, S. Nanostructured ZnO-CQD Hybrid Heterostructure Nanocomposites: Synergistic Engineering for Sustainable Design, Functional Properties, and High-Performance Applications. ChemNanoMat 2024, 10, e202400020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A.; Liu, X.; Che, H.; Tian, T.; Guo, Z.; Mu, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H. Graphene Quantum Dots-Decorated N-Doped Bi2MoO6 Hollow Nanostructures: Coupling Defect Engineering with Interface Engineering toward Enhanced Charge Storage for Supercapacitors. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 7936–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, Y.-J.; Liou, J.R.; Lin, W.; Tung, K.-L.; Chiang, W.-H. Plasma-Engineered GQD-Inorganic Membranes with Tunable Interactions for Ultrahigh-Efficiency Molecular Separations. J. Memb. Sci. 2024, 690, 122248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beygisangchin, M.; Jakmunee, J.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Baghdadi, A.H.; Saetang, S.; Thipprasert, S. A Critical Review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Adverse Effects on Human Health: Insights from the Past Six Years. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alivand, M.S.; Tehrani, N.H.M.H.; Askarieh, M.; Ghasemy, E.; Esrafili, M.D.; Ahmadi, R.; Anisi, H.; Tavakoli, O.; Rashidi, A. Defect Engineering-Induced Porosity in Graphene Quantum Dots Embedded Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Benzene and Toluene Adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Liu, H.; Hsu, W.; Wu, T. The Room Temperature Highly Sensitive Ammonia Gas Sensor Based on Polyaniline and Nitrogen Doped Graphene Quantum Dot Coated Flower-like Tungsten Oxide Composite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, e55209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadia, N.M.A.; Mumtaz, M.A.; Waris, M.H.; Iqbal, M.W.; Khalil, S.; Ismayilova, N.A.; Alzaid, M.; Mohamed, W.S.; Hasaneen, M.F.; Alanazi, A. Enhanced Supercapacitor Performance Using NbSn-MOF@GQDs Hybrid Material: A Novel Approach for High Energy Storage and Improved Electrochemical Properties. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Zhang, L.; Gao, X.; Yu, W.; Hu, C.; Tang, W.; Li, Z.; Cheng, L.; Wu, M. Se-Vacancy Porous Ultrathin ZnSe Nanosheet/Carbon Composite for Sodium Storage via Electron Beam Irradiation Strategy. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, L.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, B.; Chen, H.; Gao, P.; Zhang, P.; Wang, A.; Sheldon, R.A. Near-Infrared Light-Driven Asymmetric Photolytic Reduction of Ketone Using Inorganic-Enzyme Hybrid Biocatalyst. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cheng, Y.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Zhu, J.; Deng, W.; Zhu, J.; He, D. Preparation and Adsorption Performance Study of Graphene Quantum Dots@ZIF-8 Composites for Highly Efficient Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, F.D.; Rohmatulloh, B.I.; Sari, A.F.N.; Putri, P.H.; Lukmantoro, A.; Absor, M.A.U. Nitrogen-Enriched Graphene Quantum Dots from Biomass as Fluorescent Probes for Fe3+ Ions: A Combined Experimental and DFT Study. J. Electron. Mater. 2026, 55, 759–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Combs, C.; Okosun, B.O.; Tayutivutikul, K.; Darland, D.C.; Zhao, J.X. Fe3+-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Nanozyme for H2O2 Detection in Cellular Metabolic Distress. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2025, 8, 2774–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasheed, P.A.; Ankitha, M.; Pillai, V.K.; Alwarappan, S. Graphene Quantum Dots for Biosensing and Bioimaging. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 16001–16023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, R.; Qureshi, A.; Azhar, M.; Hassan, Z.U.; Gul, S.; Ahmad, S. Recent Progress of Fluorescent Carbon Dots and Graphene Quantum Dots for Biosensors: Synthesis of Solution Methods and Their Medical Applications. J. Fluoresc. 2024, 35, 2623–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Wei, S.; Wang, C.; Yin, X.; Song, X.; Jiang, C.; Sun, G. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Portable Fluorescent Sensors for the Sensitive Detection of Fe3+ and ATP with Logic Gate Operation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 6082–6094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanwar, S.; Sharma, A.; Mathur, D. A Graphene Quantum Dots–Glassy Carbon Electrode-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Monitoring Malathion. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2023, 14, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Zhu, W.; She, X.; Yu, Q.; Yang, Q.; Huang, H.; Tsou, C.; Manuel, D.G. A Tough Fluorescent Nanocomposite Hydrogel Probe Based on Graphene Quantum Dots for the Selective Detection of Fe3+ Ions. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 7579–7589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thadathil, A.; Thacharakkal, D.; Ismail, Y.A.; Periyat, P. Polyindole-Derived Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Dopamine Detection. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Q.; Yuan, C.; He, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhai, C.; Bin, D.; Zhu, M. A Label-Free Photoelectrochemical Sensor of S, N Co-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot (S, N-GQD)-Modified Electrode for Ultrasensitive Detection of Bisphenol A. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, N.; Kim, K. Current Advances in the Biomedical Applications of Quantum Dots: Promises and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Hao, H.; Zeng, H.; Li, H.; Niu, X.; Qi, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, K. Harnessing the Potential of Graphene Quantum Dots for Multifunctional Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rec. 2024, 24, e202400185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Emre, D.; Denizhan, N.; Ozkan-Ariksoysal, D.; Bilici, A.; Sonkaya, Ö.; Algi, F.; Yilmaz, S. Graphene Quantum Dots-Polyfluorene Hybrid Nanobiosensor for Mitomycin C-DNA Interaction Sensing. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2024, 299, 116944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arab, K.; Jafari, A.; Shahi, F. The Role of Graphene Quantum Dots in Cutting-edge Medical Therapies. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2024, 35, e6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younis, M.R.; He, G.; Lin, J.; Huang, P. Recent Advances on Graphene Quantum Dots for Bioimaging Applications. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, R.; Feng, B.; Zhong, X.; Ostrikov, K. Photoluminescence Mechanism of Carbon Dots: Triggering High-Color-Purity Red Fluorescence Emission through Edge Amino Protonation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.T.; Lee, B.H.; Lin, C.-W.; McDonald-Boyer, A.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Vasireddy, S.; Tsedev, U.; Coffer, J.; Belcher, A.M.; Naumov, A. V Near-Infrared Emitting Graphene Quantum Dots Synthesized from Reduced Graphene Oxide for in Vitro/in Vivo/Ex Vivo Bioimaging Applications. 2D Mater. 2021, 8, 035013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valimukhametova, A.R.; Fannon, O.; Topkiran, U.C.; Dorsky, A.; Sottile, O.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Coffer, J.; Naumov, A. V Five Near-Infrared-Emissive Graphene Quantum Dots for Multiplex Bioimaging. 2D Mater. 2024, 11, 025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Tao, Q.; Yang, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Ding, G.; Gao, X.; Dong, H.; Rong, L. K+ Concentration-Based NMR-Fluorescence Dual-Functional Senescence Sensing Using Graphene Quantum Dots with Crown Ether Structure. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 431, 137442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, R.; Li, Z.; Chang, P.; Shan, S.; Jiang, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Ou, S. Enhanced Intracellular Calcium Detection Using Dopamine-Modified Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual Emission Mechanisms. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 328, 125475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Qi, W.; Gao, X.; Wu, Q.; Tian, L.; Wu, W. Graphene Quantum Dots Prepared by Electron Beam Irradiation for Safe Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor. Nanotheranostics 2022, 6, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatay, A.; Erdener, D.; Gürcan, C.; Yildiz, E.A.; Yilmazer, A.; Boyacıoğlu, B.; Unver, H.; Yıldız, M.; Elmali, A. Amino-Functionalized Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots and Silver-Graphene Based Nanocomposites: Ultrafast Charge Transfer and a Proof-of-Concept Study for Bioimaging Applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2022, 426, 113741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodwihok, C.; Tam, T.V.; Choi, W.M.; Suwannakaew, M.; Woo, S.W.; Wongratanaphisan, D.; Kim, H.S. Preparation and Characterization of Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots from Watermelon Rind Waste for the Detection of Ferric Ions and Cellular Bio-Imaging Applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.; Liu, Y. Gram-Scale Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots via Energetic Material Deflagration for Bioimaging Application. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2024, 184, 111718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khose, R.V.; Bangde, P.; Bondarde, M.P.; Dhumal, P.S.; Bhakare, M.A.; Chakraborty, G.; Ray, A.K.; Dandekar, P.; Some, S. Waste Derived Approach towards Wealthy Fluorescent N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Cell Imaging and H2O2 Sensing Applications. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 266, 120453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, L.; Xiao, T.; Ji, H.; Qin, Y.; Hua, F.; Dai, H.; Min, Y. Concentration-Dependent Emissive Lignin-Derived Graphene Quantum Dots for Bioimaging and Anti-Counterfeiting. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2021, 117, 108482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Shang, W.; Xiong, Z.; Zhao, L.; Sun, X.; Tian, J.; Kang, F.; Yun, S. Planted Graphene Quantum Dots for Targeted, Enhanced Tumor Imaging and Long-Term Visualization of Local Pharmacokinetics. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2210809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Z.; Xu, T.; Li, H.; She, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, J. Zero-Dimensional Carbon Nanomaterials for Fluorescent Sensing and Imaging. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 11047–11136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, T.; Mishra, S.R.; Singh, V. Comprehensive Advances in the Synthesis, Fluorescence Mechanism and Multifunctional Applications of Red-Emitting Carbon Nanomaterials. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 5717–5765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Sun, B. One-Pot Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Applications in Bioimaging and Detecting Copper Ions in Living Cells. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 27333–27343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Hou, L.; Li, Z.; Lin, T.; Tian, J.; Zhao, S. A Mitochondria-Targeted Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanoprobe for Imaging of Peroxynitrite in Living Cells. Talanta 2021, 231, 122421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Ye, C.; Wang, X.; He, P.; Yang, S.; Dong, H.; Ding, G. Fast Proton Transport Enables the Magnetic Relaxation Response of Graphene Quantum Dots for Monitoring the Oxidative Environment in Vivo. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 2382–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, S.; Gharehaghaji, N.; Divband, B. Chitosan-Coated Iron Oxide/Graphene Quantum Dots as a Potential Multifunctional Nanohybrid for Bimodal Magnetic Resonance/Fluorescence Imaging and 5-Fluorouracil Delivery. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeidi, S.; Rezaei, B.; Ensafi, A.A. Fabrication and Characterization of Upconversion N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Improving Photoelectrocatalytic Performance of Rutile Hierarchical TiO2 Nanowires under Visible and near-Infrared Light Irradiations. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yi, Z.; Guo, J.; Liao, S.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Yin, B.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Rong, Q.; et al. In Vivo Ultrasound-Induced Luminescence Molecular Imaging. Nat. Photonics 2024, 18, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valimukhametova, A.R.; Zub, O.S.; Lee, B.H.; Fannon, O.; Nguyen, S.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Akkaraju, G.R.; Naumov, A.V. Dual-Mode Fluorescence/Ultrasound Imaging with Biocompatible Metal-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 4965–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, B.H.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Valimukhametova, A.; Zub, O.; Lyle, V.; Fannon, O.; Cui, J.; Naumov, A.V. Biocompatible Aluminum-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Dual-Modal Fluorescence and Ultrasound Imaging Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 17512–17520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, M.C.; Islam, M.T.; Nandy, P.K.; Hossain, M.M. Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) for Bioimaging and Drug Delivery Applications: A Review. ACS Mater. Lett. 2021, 3, 889–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morani, D.O.; Patil, P.O. Preparation, Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Study of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Functionalized Hyaluronic Acid Loaded with Docetaxel-Catalyzed Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Imaging and Targeting In Vitro. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2024, 65, 441–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirzaei-Kalar, Z.; Kiani Nejad, Z.; Khandar, A.A. New ZnFe2O4@SiO2@graphene Quantum Dots as an Effective Nanocarrier for Targeted DOX Delivery and CT-DNA Binder. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 363, 119904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyyedi Zadeh, E.; Ghanbari, N.; Salehi, Z.; Derakhti, S.; Amoabediny, G.; Akbari, M.; Asadi Tokmedash, M. Smart PH-Responsive Magnetic Graphene Quantum Dots Nanocarriers for Anticancer Drug Delivery of Curcumin. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 297, 127336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed-Ahmed, H.K.; Nakipoglu, M.; Tezcaner, A.; Keskin, D.; Evis, Z. Functionalization of Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots for Anticancer Drug Delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 80, 104199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Long, Z.; Qiu, Q.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Guo, R.; Zhong, W.; Huang, S.; Chen, S. Graphene Quantum Dots-based Targeted Nanoprobes Detecting Drug Delivery, Imaging, and Enhanced Chemotherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2022, 7, e10270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torkashvand, H.; Dehdast, S.A.; Nateghpour, M.; Haghi, A.M.; Fard, G.C.; Elmi, T.; Shabani, M.; Tabatabaie, F. Antimalarial Nano-Drug Delivery System Based on Graphene Quantum Dot on Plasmodium Falciparum: Preparation, Characterization, Toxicological Evaluation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 132, 109670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poursadegh, H.; Barzegarzadeh, M.; Amini-Fazl, M.S. Preparation of PH-Sensitive Chitosan-Magnetic Graphene Quantum Dot Bionanocomposite Hydrogel Beads for Drug Delivery Application: Emphasis on Effects Nanoparticles. Polyhedron 2024, 247, 116705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karami, M.; Pourmadadi, M.; Abdouss, M.; Kalaee, M. Synthesis, Characterization, and In Vitro Analysis of a Chitosan/Gamma Alumina/Graphene Quantum Dots/Bio-Hydrogel for Quercetin Delivery to Lung Cancer Cells. Bionanoscience 2025, 15, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Song, X.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Ye, L.; Wang, N.; Wang, F.; Li, L.; Mohammadniaei, M.; Zhang, M.; et al. Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Applications in Drug Delivery. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 18, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmadi-Kashani, M.; Dehghani, H.; Zarrabi, A. A Biocompatible Nanoplatform Formed by MgAl-Layered Double Hydroxide Modified Mn3O4/N-Graphene Quantum Dot Conjugated-Polyaniline for PH-Triggered Release of Doxorubicin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 114, 111055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, E.; Hasan, M.T.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R.; Truly, T.; Lee, B.H.; Green, K.N.; Akkaraju, G.; Naumov, A.V. Graphene Quantum Dot Formulation for Cancer Imaging and Redox-Based Drug Delivery. Nanomedicine 2021, 37, 102408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandomi, F.; Rostami, M.; Ahmadi, F.; Mohammad Sorouri, A.; Badiei, A.; Fasihi-Ramandi, M.; Reza Ganjali, M.; Ehrlich, H.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M. ROS, PH, and Magnetically Responsive ZnFe2O4@l-Cysteine@NGQDs Nanocarriers as Charge-Reversal Drug Delivery System for Controlled and Targeted Cancer Chemo-Sonodynamic Therapy. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 150, 110544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, Z.; Fan, J.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Shi, D.; Xie, H.; Liu, B. Biomimetic Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots Nanoparticles Targeted Photothermal-Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. J. Drug Target. 2023, 31, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.; Hong, W.; Duan, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J. Graphene Quantum Dots Mediated Magnetic Chitosan Drug Delivery Nanosystems for Targeting Synergistic Photothermal-Chemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2022, 23, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarepour, A.; Khosravi, A.; Yücel Ayten, N.; Çakır Hatır, P.; Iravani, S.; Zarrabi, A. Innovative Approaches for Cancer Treatment: Graphene Quantum Dots for Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapies. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 4307–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Liu, J.; Jin, X.; Yao, S.; Chen, B.; Huang, Q.; Hu, J.; Wan, J.; Hu, Z.; Wang, B. Versatile Nanoplatform Loaded with Doxorubicin and Graphene Quantum Dots/Methylene Blue for Drug Delivery and Chemophotothermal/Photodynamic Synergetic Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 7122–7132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, R.; Liu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Peng, J.; Pan, M.; Wang, G.; Chen, W.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, C.; Qian, Z. Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Ag2S-PAsp(DOX)-CRGD Nanoparticles-Mediated Photochemotherapy Enhances the Immune Response to Tumor Therapy. Biomaterials 2022, 281, 121328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.-J.; Park, B.-N. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance-Induced Charge Carrier Localization at the Silver Nanoparticle/Graphene Quantum Dot Interface. Mater. Lett. 2024, 361, 136068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaheer, T.; Zia, S.; Pal, K.; Aqib, A.I.; Fatima, M.; Muneer, A.; Murtaza, M.; Zaheer, C.-N.F.; Sattar, J.; Kausar, T. Recent Trends in Nobel Metals and Carbon Dots in the Costume of Hybrid Nano Architecture. Top. Catal. 2024, 67, 280–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Gupta, S.; Saini, A.K.; Chakrabarti, S.; Ram, S.; Gupta, R.K.; Shukla, K.; Saini, R.V.; Kaushal, A. GQD-Decorated Dual Electrochemical Biosensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Ferritin and Vitamin D3 in Serum Samples. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2026, 173, 055502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadhasivakurup, S.; Vijayanandan, D.; Chandran, A.; Karunakaran Yesodha, S. Flexible Printed Biosensor for Selective and Enhanced Sensing of Histidine by a Pyrolysis-Free Green Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2025, 7, 9666–9677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, S.; Zhi, S.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Pan, P.; Qi, Y.; He, J. Deep Learning-Based GQDs/AgNPs Composite Enhanced Electrochemiluminescence Portable Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Point-of-Care Methimazole Monitoring. Microchem. J. 2025, 217, 114910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denizhan, N.; Yilmaz, S.; Ozkan-Ariksoysal, D.; Emre, D.; Bilici, A. Arginine-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots@palladium Composite Modified Pencil Graphite Electrode for Electrochemical Detection of DNA-Mitomycin C Interaction. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2025, 156, 112433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, T.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Cui, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Qu, K.; Cui, Z. Molecularly Imprinted Electrochemical Sensor Based on MWCNTs/GQDs for the Detection of Sulfamethazine in Aquaculture Seawater. Biosensors 2025, 15, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholamalizadeh, N.; Mazinani, S.; Abdouss, M.; Bazargan, A.M.; Fatemi, F. A Precise Flexible Printed Biosensor Based on Graphene Ink Decorated with N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1304, 137700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, N.-F.; Wu, W.-R.; Lin, J.-C. Modulation of Surface Plasmon Resonance Energy Using Graphene Quantum Dots on Biosensors Application. In Proceedings of the Biophotonics in Point-of-Care III; Canva, M.T., Giannetti, A., Moreau, J., Altug, H., Eds.; SPIE: Pune, India, 2024; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.-C.; Rinawati, M.; Chang, L.-Y.; Wang, Y.-X.; Wu, Y.-T.; Yen, Y.-H.; Chen, K.-J.; Ho, K.-C.; Yeh, M.-H. A Non-Invasive Wearable Sweat Biosensor with a Flexible N-GQDs/PANI Nanocomposite Layer for Glucose Monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 383, 133617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Fu, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, F.; Cao, J.; Liu, X. Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots from Organic Dye for the Biosensor Application. Carbon Lett. 2023, 33, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Yadav, S.; Sadique, M.A.; Khan, R. Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene Quantum Dots Based Biosensor for CD44 Breast Cancer Biomarker. Biosensors 2022, 12, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadrolhosseini, A.R.; Shafie, S.; Rashid, S.A.; Mahdi, M.A. Surface Plasmon Resonance Measurement of Arsenic in Low Concentration Using Polypyrrole-Graphene Quantum Dots Layer. Measurement 2021, 173, 108546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Abubakar Sadique, M.; Khan, R. Electrochemical Exfoliation of Graphene Quantum Dots from Waste Dry Cell Battery for Biosensor Applications. Mater. Lett. 2021, 305, 130829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ding, Y.; Xue, L.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Wu, S.; Yang, X.; et al. Cascade Amplification Based on PEI-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework Supported Gold Nanoparticles/Nitrogen–Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Amperometric Biosensing Applications. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 405, 139803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nsibande, S.A.; Forbes, P.B. Development of a Turn-on Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Fluorescent Probe for Sensing of Pyrene in Water. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 12119–12128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Jiang, L.; Hao, X.; Fan, X.; Qin, Y.; Huang, T.; Lou, Y.; Liao, L.; Zhang, K.; Chen, S.; et al. Cane Molasses Derived N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots: Dynamic Quenching Synergistically Photoinduced Electron Transfer for the Instant Detection of Nitrofuran Antibiotics. Langmuir 2023, 39, 4394–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ifrah, Z.; Shah Rukh, A.; Muhammad Nauman, S.; Maryam, S.; Rahat, U. Fluorescence Quenching of Graphene Quantum Dots by Chloride Ions: A Potential Optical Biosensor for Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 857432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yao, B.; Xiao, Y.; Tian, X.; Wang, Y. Fluorescent Quantum Dots and Its Composites for Highly Sensitive Detection of Heavy Metal Ions and Pesticide Residues: A Review. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, T.V.; Hur, S.H.; Chung, J.S.; Choi, W.M. Novel Paper- and Fiber Optic-Based Fluorescent Sensor for Glucose Detection Using Aniline-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naksen, P.; Boonruang, S.; Yuenyong, N.; Lee, H.L.; Ramachandran, P.; Anutrasakda, W.; Amatatongchai, M.; Pencharee, S.; Jarujamrus, P. Sensitive Detection of Trace Level Cd (II) Triggered by Chelation Enhanced Fluorescence (CHEF) “Turn on”: Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots (N-GQDs) as Fluorometric Paper-Based Sensor. Talanta 2022, 242, 123305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, J.; Li, N.; Li, D.; Zhang, M.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lin, X.; Shui, L. Cesium-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensors for Blood Glucose Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 8437–8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khose, R.V.; Chakraborty, G.; Bondarde, M.P.; Wadekar, P.H.; Ray, A.K.; Some, S. Red-Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots from Guava Leaf as a Turn-off Probe for Sensing Aqueous Hg(II). New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 4617–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Deng, J.; Li, J.; Dong, J.; Liu, H.; Zhao, J.; Luo, X.; Huo, D.; Hou, C. B-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Array as Fluorescent Sensor Platforms for Plasticizers Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 376, 132989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, R.; Yu, C.; Zhen, Z.; Tang, S.; Ou, S. Understanding the Selective-Sensing Mechanism of Lysine by Fluorescent Nanosensors Based on Graphene Quantum Dots. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 242, 118732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chumkaeo, P.; Davis, F.; Bunkoed, O. A Melanin-Integrated Graphene Quantum Dots Embedded Molecularly Imprinted Polymer: A Nano-Fluorescence Sensing Probe for Trace Determination of Prometryn. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 447, 115247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiq, K.; Sadia, I.; Abid, M.Z.; Waleed, M.Z.; Rauf, A.; Hussain, E. Scientific Insights into the Quantum Dots (QDs)-Based Electrochemical Sensors for State-of-the-Art Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 7268–7313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Modarres Zahed, F.; Hatamluyi, B.; Kalate Bojdi, M. A Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor Based on Graphene Quantum Dots/Hierarchical Flower-like Gold Nanostructures for Determination of Cytostatic Drug Flutamide. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2024, 300, 117109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, A.R.S.; Mikhraliieva, A.; Vanoni, C.R.; Nazarkovsky, M.; Xing, Y.; Couto, M.T.; Zaitsev, V.; Jost, C.L. 2D-Network of Boron-Functionalized N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Electrochemical Sensing of Dopamine. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2024, 146, 111259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.; Li, N.; Zhu, M.; Dai, W. Sensitive Electrochemical Sensing of Imidacloprid Based on Mulberry-like Gold-Graphene Quantum Dots Hybird as Electrode Material. Microchem. J. 2024, 200, 110377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.N.; Hasabnis, G.K.; Akin, E.; Gao, G.; Usha, S.P.; Süssmuth, R.; Altintas, Z. Developing Innovative Point-of-Care Electrochemical Sensors Empowered by Cardiac Troponin I-Responsive Nanocomposite Materials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 417, 136052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.L.; Dang, V.D.; Dega, N.K.; Lu, S.-M.; Huang, Y.-F.; Doong, R. Ultrasensitive Detection of Breast Cancer Cells with a Lectin-Based Electrochemical Sensor Using N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as the Sensing Probe. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 368, 132233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Lin, X.; Tong, L.; Tong, Q.-X. Graphene Quantum Dots/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Composite-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detecting Dopamine Release from Living Cells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1644–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghiasi, T.; Ahmadi, S.; Ahmadi, E.; Bavil Olyai, M.R.T.; Khodadadi, Z. Novel Electrochemical Sensor Based on Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode with Graphene Quantum Dots, Chitosan and Nickel Molybdate Nanocomposites for Diazinon and Optimal Design by the Taguchi Method. Microchem. J. 2021, 160, 105628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turan, H.E.; Medetalibeyoglu, H.; Polat, İ.; Yola, B.B.; Atar, N.; Yola, M.L. Graphene Quantum Dots Incorporated NiAl2O4 Nanocomposite Based Molecularly Imprinted Electrochemical Sensor for 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural Detection in Coffee Samples. Anal. Methods 2023, 15, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beigmoradi, F.; Rohani Moghadam, M.; Garkani-Nejad, Z.; Bazmandegan-Shamili, A.; Masoodi, H.R. Dual-Template Imprinted Polymer Electrochemical Sensor for Simultaneous Determination of Malathion and Carbendazim Using Graphene Quantum Dots. Anal. Methods 2023, 15, 5027–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani, M.; Tavakkoli, N.; Soltani, N. Electrochemical Sensor Based on Graphene Quantum Dot/Gold Nanoparticles and Thiol-Containing Organic Compound for Measuring Methotrexate Anti-Cancer Drug. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 136, 109954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Shi, J.; Yang, P.; Zhao, P.; Fei, J.; et al. Ultrasensitive Quercetin Electrochemical Sensor Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide/β-Cyclodextrin/Graphene Quantum Dots/Molybdenum Trioxide Composites. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 658, 130757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singhal, A.; Khan, R. Plastic Antibodies Integrated with Graphene Quantum Dots for Electrochemical Sensing of Bisphenol-A in Real Samples. Mater. Lett. 2023, 350, 134880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saisree, S.; Arya Nair, J.S.; Sandhya, K.Y. A Highly Stable Copper Nano Cluster on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for the Simultaneous Electrochemical Sensing of Dopamine, Serotonin, and Nicotine: A Possible Addiction Scrutinizing Strategy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 3974–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, J.; Dilbaghi, N.; Kumar Singhal, N.; Marrazza, G.; Kaushik, A.; Kumar, S. Electrochemiluminescent Quantum Dots as Emerging next Generation Sensing Platforms. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 146958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, K.; Adsetts, J.R.; He, S.; Zhan, Z.; Yang, L.; Wong, J.M.; Love, D.A.; Ding, Z. Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence and Electroluminescence of N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Fabricated from an Electrochemical Exfoliation Process in Nitrogen-Containing Electrolytes. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 15892–15900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Meng, H.; Han, Q.; Zhang, G.; Wang, C.; Song, L.; Fu, Y. Determination of Ascorbic Acid Using Electrochemiluminescence Sensor Based on Nitrogen and Sulfur Doping Graphene Quantum Dots with Luminol as Internal Standard. Microchim. Acta 2021, 188, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L.; De-Jager, C.R.; Adsetts, J.R.; Chu, K.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.; Ding, Z. Analyzing Near-Infrared Electrochemiluminescence of Graphene Quantum Dots in Aqueous Media. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 12409–12416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, M.; Shu, J.; Du, D.; Haghighatbin, M.A.; Yang, D.; Bian, Z.; Cui, H. A Label-Free Three Potential Ratiometric Electrochemiluminescence Immunosensor for Cardiac Troponin I Based on N-(4-Aminobutyl)-N-Ethylisoluminol Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 334, 129628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, X.; Zhan, Z.; Zhang, R.; Chu, K.; Whitworth, Z.; Ding, Z. Nitrogen- and Sulfur-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Chemiluminescence. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 3864–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhi, S.; Zhu, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Shi, J.; Pan, P.; Qi, Y.; He, J. Electrochemiluminescence Detection of Catechol and Tryptophol Using Nitrogen, Sulfur Co-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Based on a Paper-Based Sensor. Microchem. J. 2024, 200, 110408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Li, R.; Li, Y.; Pan, P.; Liu, J.; Qi, Y.; Zhou, B.; Yang, Z. Paper-Based Electrodes with Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Detection of Copper Ions via Electrochemiluminescence. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 296, 127300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabish, T.A.; Hayat, H.; Abbas, A.; Narayan, R.J. Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Electrochemical Biosensing Platform for Early Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Biosensors 2022, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zheng, M.; Su, B.; Chen, X.; Chen, X. Electrochemical Synthesis of Phosphorus and Sulfur Co-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as Efficient Electrochemiluminescent Immunomarkers for Monitoring Okadaic Acid. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhi, S.; Zou, H.; Bao, S.; Liu, J.; Yang, Z.; Shi, J.; Pan, P.; Qi, Y.; He, J. A Dual-Potential Electrochemiluminescence Sensor for Glutamate Pyruvate Transaminase Detection Based on AgNPs/N, S-GQDs Modified Paper-Based Electrode. Microchem. J. 2024, 206, 111442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Mou, Y. Nanochannel Confined Graphene Quantum Dots/Platinum Nanoparticles Boosts Electrochemiluminescence of Luminal-O2 System for Sensitive Immunoassay. Talanta 2025, 285, 127223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.-Y.; Qin, L.-L.; Liu, F.-J.; Qi, B.-P.; Shang, B.-B. Electrochemiluminescent (ECL) Aptasensor for Lysozyme Using a Graphene Quantum Dot (GQD)-Ruthenium Bipyridine-Silica Nanocomposite. Anal. Lett. 2024, 58, 1204–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Peng, J.; Lin, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Chen, X. RuSiNPs@N,S-GQDs as Self-Enhanced Anodic Electrochemiluminescent Immunobeacons for the Highly Sensitive Quantitation of Okadaic Acid in Shellfish. Microchim. Acta 2024, 191, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, D.; Hou, Y.; Kurniawan, D.; Weng, R.-J.; Chiang, W.-H.; Wang, W. 3D-Printed Graphene and Graphene Quantum Dot-Reinforced Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Bone-Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabiyan Nejad, S.; Razzaghi, D.; Rezaei, M.; Bagheri, M.; Babaie, A.; Abbasi, F. Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Shape Memory Polyurethane/Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2022, 71, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, T.; Ma, H.; Gao, X.; Sun, H.; Wang, L.; An, M. Study on Long-Term Tracing of Fibroblasts on Three-Dimensional Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Based on Graphene Quantum Dots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, N.; Yan, X.; Qiu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, B.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y. Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell Sheets Activated by Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots Repair Periodontal Bone Defects by Promoting Mitochondrial Dynamics Dependent Osteogenic Differentiation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Chen, Q.; He, H.; Jiang, H.; Hu, J.; Liu, Y.; Yao, L.; Mao, H.; Li, J.; Li, B.; et al. Carbon Dots-based Materials and Their Applications in Regenerative Medicine. MedComm—Biomater. Appl. 2024, 3, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beura, S.K.; Maharaj, S.; Kumari, N.; Yadav, R.; Sahu, M.; Khilar, L.R.; Yadav, N.; Sahoo, G.; Panigrahi, A.R.; Yadav, P.; et al. Theranostic Potential of Nanomaterials in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Insights into Biosensing, Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. In Nanomedicine; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 409–449. [Google Scholar]
- Khazaeel, K.; Sadeghi, A.; Khademi Moghaddam, F.; Mohammadi, T. The Impact of Graphene Quantum Dots on Osteogenesis Potential of Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Fibrin Hydrogel Scaffolds. Cytotechnology 2025, 77, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghadam, N.B.; Avatefi, M.; Shavali, M.; Mahmoudifard, M. Graphene Derivatives Functionalized Polycaprolactone/Gelatin Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane Through Mussel-Inspired Polydopamine: Multifunctional Scaffold with High Potential for Nerve Tissue Engineering. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 6698–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, P.-C.; Kurniawan, D.; Wu, J.-L.; Wang, W.-R.; Chen, K.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.; Veeramuthu, L.; Kuo, C.-C.; Ostrikov, K.K.; et al. Plasma-Enabled Graphene Quantum Dot Hydrogel–Magnesium Composites as Bioactive Scaffolds for In Vivo Bone Defect Repair. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 44607–44620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahina, K.M.; Kannan, K.; Vijayan, V.; Sreekumar, S.; Lakra, R.; Kiran, M.S. Zero Dimensional Graphene Quantum Dots Self-Assembled Collagen 3D Bio-Matrices for Soft Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 107244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.; Ren, Y.; Sun, X.; Jin, L.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Wang, K.; Yu, M.; Zhao, Y. Photoluminescent Functionalized Carbon Quantum Dots Loaded Electroactive Silk Fibroin/PLA Nanofibrous Bioactive Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 202, 111680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovanović, S.; Marković, Z.; Budimir, M.; Prekodravac, J.; Zmejkoski, D.; Kepić, D.; Bonasera, A.; Marković, B.T. Lights and Dots toward Therapy—Carbon-Based Quantum Dots as New Agents for Photodynamic Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagos, K.J.; Buzzá, H.H.; Bagnato, V.S.; Romero, M.P. Carbon-Based Materials in Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapies Applied to Tumor Destruction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dilenko, H.; Bartoň Tománková, K.; Válková, L.; Hošíková, B.; Kolaříková, M.; Malina, L.; Bajgar, R.; Kolářová, H. Graphene-Based Photodynamic Therapy and Overcoming Cancer Resistance Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 5637–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorshidi, A.; Bahari, A.; Hamidabadi, V.F. Compounding Methylene Blue with Selenium-Decorated Graphene Quantum Dots to Improve Singlet Oxygen Production for Photodynamic Therapy Application. J. Fluoresc. 2024, 35, 2739–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojgan, R.; Ehsan, S.; Mostafa, Z. High Photoluminescence and Afterglow Emission of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots/TiO2 Nanocomposite for Use as a Photodynamic Therapy Photosensitizer. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharibzadeh, F.; Shirkani, H.; Karimi, S.; Mehrabi, M.; Labkhandepoor, E. CuS-NPs, GQD, MSN-NPs and Doxorubicin: An Excellent Nano-Compound for Cancer Treatment by Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 980, 173624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahirwar, S.; Mallick, S.; Bahadur, D. Photodynamic Therapy Using Graphene Quantum Dot Derivatives. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 282, 121107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reagen, S.; Wu, Y.; Sun, D.; Munoz, C.; Oncel, N.; Combs, C.; Zhao, J.X. Development of Biodegradable GQDs-HMSNs for Fluorescence Imaging and Dual Cancer Treatment via Photodynamic Therapy and Drug Delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, P.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D. GQDs/HMSN Nanoplatform: Singlet Oxygen Generation for Photodynamic Therapy. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 102127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, C.I.M.; Rodríguez-Pérez, L.; Gonçalves, G.; Dias, C.J.; Monteiro, F.; Faustino, M.d.A.F.; Vieira, S.I.; Helguero, L.A.; Herranz, M.Á.; Martín, N.; et al. Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy Effects of Graphene Quantum Dots Conjugated with Aminoporphyrins. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 13079–13089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangalath, S.; Saneesh Babu, P.S.; Nair, R.R.; Manu, P.M.; Krishna, S.; Nair, S.A.; Joseph, J. Graphene Quantum Dots Decorated with Boron Dipyrromethene Dye Derivatives for Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 4162–4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zheng, D.; Pan, W.; Li, X.; Lv, B.; Gu, W.; Machuki, J.O.; Chen, J.; Liang, W.; Qin, K.; et al. Biomimetic Nanotheranostics Camouflaged with Cancer Cell Membranes Integrating Persistent Oxygen Supply and Homotypic Targeting for Hypoxic Tumor Elimination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 19710–19725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tade, R.S.; More, M.P. Emerging Application of Graphene Quantum Dots in Photodynamic/Photothermal and Hyperthermia Therapies for Cancer Treatment. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2024, 17, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perini, G.; Palmieri, V.; Friggeri, G.; Augello, A.; De Spirito, M.; Papi, M. Carboxylated Graphene Quantum Dots-Mediated Photothermal Therapy Enhances Drug-Membrane Permeability, ROS Production, and the Immune System Recruitment on 3D Glioblastoma Models. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2023, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Fan, P.; Shi, Y.; Huang, X.; Shi, C.; Ye, W.; Tong, H.; Shan, F.; Zhang, Z. Near-Infrared-Mediated Self-Assembly of Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Nanoprobes to Silence Heat Shock Protein Expression for Mild Photothermal Therapy in Liposarcoma. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 16276–16285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Li, C.; Qian, Y.; Hu, L.; Fang, J.; Tong, W.; Nie, R.; Chen, Q.; Wang, H. Magnetic-Induced Graphene Quantum Dots for Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy in the Second near-Infrared Window. Biomaterials 2020, 232, 119700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, X.; Li, J. Fabrication and Characterization of Novel CRGD Modified Graphene Quantum Dots for Chemo-Photothermal Combination Therapy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xiao, L.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, J.; Pan, D.; Chen, Y.; et al. N-Heterocycle Modified Graphene Quantum Dots as Topoisomerase Targeted Nanoantibiotics for Combating Microbial Infections. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, 2302659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosato, R.; Santarelli, G.; Augello, A.; Perini, G.; De Spirito, M.; Sanguinetti, M.; Papi, M.; De Maio, F. Exploration of the Graphene Quantum Dots-Blue Light Combination: A Promising Treatment against Bacterial Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazeminava, F.; Javanbakht, S.; Zabihi, M.; Abbaszadeh, M.; Fakhrzadeh, V.; Kafil, H.S.; Ahmadian, Z.; Joulaei, M.; Zahed, Z.; Motavalizadehkakhky, A.; et al. Crosslinking Chitosan with Silver-Sulfur Doped Graphene Quantum Dots: An Efficient Antibacterial Nanocomposite Hydrogel Films. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadyan, P.; Kumar, M.; Tufail, A.; Ragusa, A.; Kataria, S.K.; Dubey, A. Microwave-Assisted Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) Using Azadirachta Indica Leaves: Enhanced Synergistic Action of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects and Unveiling Computational Insights. Mater. Adv. 2025, 6, 805–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teymourinia, H.; Amiri, O.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Cotton-Silver-Graphene Quantum Dots (Cotton/Ag/GQDs) Nanocomposite as a New Antibacterial Nanopad. Chemosphere 2021, 267, 129293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtaq, S.; Yasin, T.; Saleem, M.; Dai, T.; Yameen, M.A. Potentiation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy by Curcumin-loaded Graphene Quantum Dots. Photochem. Photobiol. 2022, 98, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahman, M.; Milani-Hosseini, M.-R.; Jameie, S.B. High-Affinity Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Selective in Vivo and Ex Vivo Detection of Amyloid-β Plaques in an Alzheimer’s Disease Rat Model. RSC Adv. 2026, 16, 10060–10079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Jin, W.; Kim, J.; Bae, G.; Yang, S.H.; Cho, B.; Han, S.H.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.K.; et al. Graphene Quantum Dots as Antifibrotic Therapy for Kidney Disease. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2025, 8, 980–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedrozo-Peñafiel, M.; Gutierrez-Beleño, L.; Mendoza, C.A.D.; Freire-Júnior, F.L.; Lima, M.A.; Teixeira, T.; Rocha, F.V.; Zolin, G.V.S.; Garrido, S.S.; Lazzarini, A.B.; et al. In Vitro and Ex Vivo Biocompatibility, Biomolecular Interactions, and Characterization of Graphene Quantum Dots and Its Glutathione-Modified Variant for Qualitative Cell Imaging. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 16194–16206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sourani, F.; Najafzadehvarzi, H.; Ranaee, M.; Rahimi, A. Assessment of Neurobehavioral and Histopathological Impacts of Graphene Quantum Dots in NMRI Mice. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 23631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, Y.; Gu, Z.; Chen, H.; Huang, Y. Potential Toxicity of Graphene (Oxide) Quantum Dots via Directly Covering the Active Site of Anterior Gradient Homolog 2 Protein. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Yin, S.; Yang, F.; Guo, S.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Z.; Gao, T. A Single-Molecule Graphene Quantum Dot: A Novel Efficient Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Cancer Therapy. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 13923–13934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Luo, Y.; Gu, Z. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Concentration-Dependent Blockage of Graphene Quantum Dots to Water Channel Protein Openings. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahmi, M.Z.; Sugito, S.F.A.; Wibrianto, A.; Novania, S.; Widyastuti, S.; Ahmad, M.A.; Sakti, S.C.W.; Voon, L.H. Unraveling In Vivo Potential of Curcumin-Loaded Graphene Quantum Dots on Drug Delivery and Release Kinetics Aspects of Cancer Treatment. Nanotheranostics 2024, 8, 521–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




















| Method | Sub-Methods | Precursor Compounds | PL (nm) | Quantum Yield (QY) | Size (nm) | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top-down | Electrochemical method | Two graphite rods | NA | NA | 4 nm | An easy purification process, eco-friendly methodology, and highly scalable synthesis | Time-consuming, low yield, and high cost | [91] |
| Two graphite rod electrodes | NA | NA | 2.6 nm | Enhanced sensitivity and selectivity, optimal sensor performance, functionalization of GQDs, and high adsorption capacity | Complex synthesis, high production cost of GQDs, environmental stability concerns, potential degradation, and scalability challenges | [92] | ||
| Hydrothermal and solvothermal method | graphite powder | 365 nm | 0.46 | 1.84 ± 0.28 nm | Simple one-step synthesis, high QY, and small, uniform size | Potential cytotoxicity concerns, complexity of functionalization, and scalability issues | [93] | |
| Graphite | NA | 0.97 | NA | Control over functional groups, versatile luminescence probes, no need for dopants, and optimization of synthesis parameters | Low QY, reagent-intensive process, trade-offs in selective functionalization, potential structural variability, environmental and cost concerns, and stability of optical properties | [94] | ||
| Paddy Straw | 278 nm | 3.5 | 3.8 ± 0.5 nm | Sustainable synthesis, blue emission, high sensitivity, a low limit of detection (LOD) of 87.9 nM, excellent selectivity, and precise size control. Low cytotoxicity, high optical stability, strong PL, good biocompatibility, and facile synthesis. | Complex quenching mechanism, low emission at high concentrations, dependence on FL conditions, scalability issues, and potential for environmental instability | [95] | ||
| Graphite flakes (360 mesh), GO | 326 nm | NA | NA | Low cytotoxicity, high optical stability, strong PL, biocompatibility, and facile synthesis | Dependence on surface functionalization, limited emission range, scalability issues, and environmental sensitivity | [96] | ||
| Graphite flake | 202 nm | 12 | 5 nm | Superior PL, low toxicity, good biocompatibility, high product yield, low cost, and eco-friendliness | Synthesis complexity, size distribution variability, purification challenges, limited blue emission, and environmental sensitivity | [97] | ||
| citric acid and urea | 331 nm | NA | 50 nm | Enhanced photocurrent, optimized photoelectric properties, reduced electrical impedance, and synergistic effect | Synthesis complexity, limited UV response, material stability, size distribution and homogeneity, cost and scalability issues, and tuning of doping levels | [98] | ||
| Microwave ultrasonic assisted stripping method | Maltose (C12H22O11•H2O, AR, Aladdin) | NA | NA | 50 nm | Enhanced catalytic activity, increased specific surface area, improved light absorption, synergistic effect of sonochemical and photothermal processes, and dominant role of reactive radicals | Dependence on GQDs content, synthesis complexity, light absorption limitations, material stability, potential for agglomeration, high synthesis cost, and limited pollutant range | [99] | |
| Coarse graphite | 330 nm | Up to 27 | 5 nm | High FL, good efficient synthesis method, catalytic activity, enhanced sensitivity, high selectivity and sensitivity | Synthesis complexity, limited to specific applications, energy consumptions, environmental impact, and size distribution issues | [100] | ||
| Waste Styrofoam | 325 nm | NA | 6 nm | Eco-friendly process, sustainable approach, high yield, controlled size and purity, solubility in nonpolar solvents, hydrophobic and self-cleaning properties, and potential for large-scale production | Limited functionalization, precursor dependency, optimization challenges, potential release of harmful byproducts, and scale-up considerations | [101] | ||
| Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) method | NA | 112 nm | 34.07 | 1.48 nm | Non-toxic and cadmium-free, high quantum efficiency, excellent stability, biocompatibility, small particle size, uniform particle size distribution, high absorbance, and elevated QY | Process optimization required, potential surface defects, water solubility constraints, and scalability challenges | [102] | |
| Graphite powder | 225 nm | 36.77 | 1.77 ± 0.03 nm | Small particle size and uniform distribution, high FL, eco-friendliness, high stability and water solubility, low defect density, and potential for single-layer GQDs | Process optimization required, challenges in incomplete exfoliation, equipment dependence, limited control over functionalization, and potential high energy consumption | [103] | ||
| Combination of ultrasonic and ball mill method | Graphite | 610 nm | NA | 41 nm | Eco-friendly and cost-effective, simple and fast, effective exfoliation, scalable production, high nanoparticle yield, and good optical properties | Limited control over size and functionalization, particle size distribution, energy consumption, structural defects, and limited control over functional groups | [104] | |
| Plasma contacting liquid (PCL) method | Mixture of glucosamine (Glu) and deionized water (DI) | 350 nm | NA | 4.8 ± 1.2 nm | Simple and fast synthesis, doping at low temperature, high FL sensitivity, improved properties, oxygen-rich functional groups, and reduced synthesis time and cost | Surface defects, limited optimization data, scale-up challenges, and potential unwanted byproducts | [105] | |
| Bottom-up | Carbonization and pyrolysis method | Citric acid and urea | NA | 22.2 | 5–10 nm | Simple synthesis, controllable chemical and fluorescent properties, efficient QY, and binary crystallinity | Size distribution, limited control over the effects of excessive components, and the complexity of achieving optimal conditions. | [106] |
| Glutamic acid and aspartic acid | NA | 89.0 ± 2.0 | 2.05 ± 0.65 nm | Facile synthesis, high QY, precise structural control, and enhanced solubility | Small size variability, process constraints, limited stability, potential toxicity, scalability challenges, and energy and cost considerations | [107] | ||
| C60 open cage method | C60 powder | 325 nm | NA | 0.6–2.2 nm | Large scale synthesis, water solubility, unique structural composition, strong PL, catalytic activity | Oxidation process complexity, structural defect, potential toxicity, limited conductivity, and acalability challenges | [108] | |
| Carbon on a nickel foil | 370 nm | 74 | 4.5 nm | A simple and green synthesis, unique luminescence properties, uniform size distribution, as well as high sensitivity, selectivity, and low LOD of 4 × 10–7 M | Challenges in scalability, potential stability issues, and material costs | [109] | ||
| Solution chemical method | Graphene molecules | 587 nm | 3.4 | 3 nm | Chemical and PL stability, low toxicity and biocompatibility, facile functionalization, well-defined structural synthesis, and temperature-sensitive probing | Imprecise and complex structures, a controversial PL mechanism, synthesis challenges, potential stability issues, and a limited fundamental understanding | [110] | |
| graphite powder | NA | 5 nm | An effective synthesis method, crystalline nature with well-defined optical properties, and stability against moisture | Limited understanding of the growth mechanism, potential environmental and toxicological concerns, challenges related to hydrophobicity, and the need for optimization across different crops | [111] | |||
| CVD method | Fe+ ions | NA | 5 nm | A novel synthesis method, high purity and quality, patterning capabilities, and catalyst-free GQD production | A complex process, dependency on ion beam irradiation, material loss during annealing, and limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms | [112] | ||
| Chopped carbon fiber | NA | 30 nm | Enhanced Li-S cell performance, sulfiphilic properties, high discharge capacity, excellent cycle stability, high sulfur loading | Complex synthesis process, materials cost and availability, low stability, potential of low conductivity, optimization challenges | [113] | |||
| Chemical | Silicon carbide (SiC) | NA | 2.58 to 5.20 nm | High crystallinity, minimal defects, eco-friendly nature, efficient charge transfer, quantum confinement, and excellent chemical stability | Complex process control required, and limited study on high quality GQDs | [114] | ||
| Graphite | 375 nm | NA | 1.4–4.2 nm | None toxic synthesis, cost effective, excellent PL, high opto-electronic features | Synthesis complexity, inherent acidity in synthesized GQDs, and limited study on long term stability | [76] | ||
| Cutting graphene oxide (GO) | NA | 3.68 nm | High photocatalytic activity, enhanced visible light absorption, metal free and eco friendly, simple synthesis process | Potential stability issues in long term applications, energy consumption in hydrothermal treatment | [115] | |||
| Graphene sheet | NA | 0.8–1 nm | Low defect bilayer graphene sheets, cost-effective large-scale production, high-yield electrochemical exfoliation, good stability, and pronounced quantum confinement effect | Requires strong electrolytes and has limited exploration in device integration | [116] | |||
| Lignosulfonate (LS) | NA | NA | NA | Eco-friendly, cost effective, high specific capacitance, excellent cycle stability, and good mechanical flexibility | Complex synthesis process, limit study on performance in real world devices, potential challenges in maintaining long term performance, porosity control challenges | [117] |
| GQD Structure Feature | Structure and Size (nm) | Doping Functionalization | Detection Method | Target Analyte | Linear Range | LOD | Key Mechanism | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-GQDs (biomass-derived, high QY ~28%) | Not specified | Nitrogen-doped (urea-assisted hydrothermal synthesis; oxygen functional groups) | Fluorescence sensing | Fe3+ | 0–600 µM | 0.023 µM | Fluorescence quenching via Fe3+ coordination; enhanced electron transfer and stabilization due to N/O functional groups (supported by DFT) | [264] |
| N,O-CQDs (embedded in CMC thin film) | Not specified | Nitrogen/oxygen co-doped; immobilized monoclonal antibodies in epichlorohydrin-modified carboxymethyl cellulose | Fluorescence biosensing Fluorescence | SARS-CoV-2 spike protein | 3.1–700 pg/mL | 0.0323 pg/mL | quenching and recovery upon antigen–antibody interaction; stable thin-film sensing platform | [57] |
| Fe-doped GQDs nanozyme | ~4–6 | Fe3+ doping | Fluorescence biosensor | H2O2 | 0–10 μM | 20 nM | Catalytic nanozyme signal amplification | [265] |
| Lignosulfonate-derived GQDs | 3–6 | Biomass-derived functional groups | Fluorescence | Fe3+ | 0.005–500 μM | 0.5 nM | Strong PL quenching response | [266] |
| N-doped GQDs | ~2–5 | N-doping | Fluorescence | Metal ions/biomolecules | Bandgap tuning + electron density modulation | [267] | ||
| N-doped GQDs | 3–5 | N-doping | Fluorescence | Fe3+, ATP | Fe3+: 0–34 μM; ATP: 0–10 μM | Fe3+: 2.38 nM; ATP: 1.16 nM | Static quenching & internal filtration; fluorescence recovery via Fe–O–P complex formation (ATP–Fe3+ interaction); AND logic gate sensing | [268] |
| GQDs/GCE sensor | 5–8 | Surface oxygen groups | Electrochemical | Malathion | μM range | 0.15 μM | Enhanced electron transfer on electrode | [269] |
| GQD nanocomposite hydrogel | 4–7 | Polymer-GQD hybrid | Fluorescence | Fe3+ | 10–160 μM | μM level | Fluorescence quenching via metal coordination | [270] |
| N-GQDs (from polyindole, cyan fluorescent) | ~5.2 nm | Nitrogen-doped (hydrothermal synthesis from polyindole) | Electrochemical sensing | Dopamine (DA) | 0.001–1000 µM | 0.15 nM | Enhanced electrocatalytic activity due to N-doped graphitic lattice; improved electron transfer at N-GQDs/GCE interface | [271] |
| S, N-GQDs (photoactive) | Not specified | Sulfur and nitrogen co-doped (one-pot synthesis) | Photoelectrochemical (PEC) sensing | Bisphenol A(BPA) | 0.12–5 µM; 5–40 µM | 0.04 µM | Enhanced photocurrent via improved charge transfer and visible-light absorption; oxidation of BPA by photogenerated holes | [272] |
| Method | Structure and Size (nm) | Advantages | Disadvantages | Finding | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrothermal | Crystalline and 3.73 | High FL and magnetic properties, ultra-sensitivity, high specificity, and the potential for blood-brain barrier permeability | Discrepancies in LOD, long-term toxicity, complexities in synthesis, potential for interference, long-term stability, and challenges in quantification | FL LOD: 3.80 mmol/L; relaxometry LOD: 14.12 mmol/L, cellular differentiation: distinguishes between senescent and healthy cells, with the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier | [281] |
| High sensitivity and selectivity, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity | Limited linear range, potential for photobleaching, dependence on oxygen groups, synthesis variability, and challenges in quantification accuracy | DA-GQDs as a Ca2+ sensor based on FL: Enhanced FL with Ca2+ inducing a redshift. High sensitivity with a LOD of 0.05 µM and a linear range of 4.93–10.61 µM. Selective for Ca2+. Biocompatible and non-toxic. Demonstrated for intracellular imaging. | [282] | ||
| Cutting electron beams-irradiated graphite | High crystallinity and 2.75 | Simple and rapid synthesis, controlled size and red luminescence, scalability potential, enhanced biocompatibility and solubility, reduced in vivo toxicity, high selectivity, and reliability | Electron beam irradiation required, potential for structural defects, biodegradation, mechanisms of tumor accumulation, and quantification of toxicity reduction | Electron beam irradiation yielded 2.75 nm GQDs emitting red luminescence at 610 nm, which, when PEGylated and combined with simvastatin, enabled biocompatible and tumor-selective FL imaging. | [283] |
| Hydrothermal reaction of polyethyleneimine and citric acid | Spherical shape and 6 to 13 | Novel and efficient synthesis, ultrafast energy transfer, high sensitivity, and enhanced biological uptake | FL Quenching, Reduced Structural Stability, and Enhanced Chemical Stability | AgNPs/PEI N-doped GQDs nanocomposites were successfully synthesized, exhibiting ultrafast electron transfer, enhanced reactivity, and efficient uptake by A549 cells, underscoring their optical, biological, and medical potential. | [284] |
| Hydrothermal process | Spherical particles and 6.46 | Eco-friendly synthesis, high QY, excellent selectivity, low cytotoxicity, and strong PL | Limited stability in complex matrices, potential FLquenching, and limited functionalization capacity | This study demonstrates the successful conversion of watermelon rind waste into functional GQDs, which detect Fe3+ with a high sensitivity and LOD of 0.28 μM, exhibit strong FL under 405 nm excitation, show low cytotoxicity in HeLa cells, and highlight their potential for sustainable water quality monitoring and bio-imaging applications. | [285] |
| Deflagration | Well-dispersed CDs with small sizes of 1~2 | Ultrafast and simple synthesis, high yield, uniform dispersion, and remarkable optical properties | Material compatibility issues, the need for post-synthesis processing, and limited method optimization | This study presents an ultrafast deflagration method for synthesizing high-quality carbon nanomaterials (yield ~3 g), achieving high graphitization for GQD optical properties, enabling successful FL imaging of HeLa cells, and demonstrating the technique’s scalability for large-scale bioimaging and diagnostics. | [286] |
| Microwave synthesis | 2–3 | Sustainable synthesis, high FL, successful bioimaging, good biocompatibility, and versatile characterization | Limited stability in complex media, potential FL quenching, and scaling challenges | This study reports the successful use of N-GQDs for bioimaging MDA-MB-231 cells, demonstrating bright blue FL, FL quenching with H2O2 for sensing, and non-toxic effects (70% cell survival) at concentrations up to 1.8 mg/mL, highlighting their potential for in vivo cell culture applications. | [287] |
| A facile two-step method (hydrothermal treatment and acidic hydrotrope synthesis) | 2.20 ± 0.40 | Sustainable source material, non-oxidative synthesis, ultralong photostability, and low cytotoxicity | Complexity in scaling up and dependency on functional group interactions | This study demonstrates GQDs with ultralong photostability (12 months) and negligible cytotoxicity, making them promising for anti-counterfeiting and bioimaging applications. | [288] |
| Bottom-up molecular approach | Crystalline structure with a lateral size of 3–4 nm | Enhanced tumor accumulation, multimodal imaging capability, highly photostable GQDs, targeted bioimaging, and sustainability with biocompatibility | Potential immunogenicity, complex synthesis process, and specificity modification challenges | This study presents blood circulation over four times longer and tumor accumulation 7–8 times greater than typical GQDs, enabling targeted molecular imaging and real-time pharmacokinetic visualization, offering a new strategy for broad in vivo biomedical applications of GQDs. | [289] |
| Sensing Material | Preparation Method | Detection Method | Features | Analyte | Linear Range | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GQDs/SPPE-based electrochemical sensor | Bottom-up synthesis of GQDs; in-house fabricated SPPE | Electrochemical (CV, DPV, EIS) | High sensitivity; dual-analyte detection (ferritin & vitamin D3); excellent repeatability (RSD 4.04%) and reproducibility (RSD 0.52%); good selectivity vs. VB12, VB9, vitamin C, IL-6, IL-β; 6-month stability (~9.7% signal loss); validated with serum samples | Ferritin (and Vitamin D3) | NR | 2.0 fg mL−1 | [320] |
| N-GQDCF/GCE and N-GQDCF/SPE | Pyrolysis-free green synthesis (14% N-doping); compared with pyrolysis (1.5%) and PANI-derived (10%) | Electrochemical sensing | High N-doping; eco-friendly synthesis; high selectivity; real sample analysis (blood, urine); wearable-compatible SPE; signal enhancement (~6.6×) | Histidine (HIS) | 10–10 to 10–3 M | 0.1 nM (GCE); 0.01 nM (SPE) | [321] |
| GQDs/AgNPs-modified paper electrode | GQD/AgNP nanocomposite exploiting LSPR; portable Raspberry Pi-based detection system with 3D-printed module | Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) with deep learning (U-Net) image analysis | Strong ECL enhancement; improved signal accuracy via AI segmentation; portable and cost-effective; suitable for point-of-care testing; high stability | Methimazole (MMI) | 10−9–10−3 M | 0.327 nM | [322] |
| Arg@GQD@Pd-modified PGE | Arginine-functionalized GQDs decorated with Pd NPs | Electrochemical (DPV, CV, EIS) | Simultaneous detection of guanine oxidation and MC; enhanced signal response; first demonstration of MC–DNA interaction; improved sensitivity over bare electrode | dsDNA; Mitomycin C (MC) | NR | 0.019 pg/50 μL (modified); 0.713 pg/50 μL (bare) | [323] |
| MIP/CNTs/GQDs-modified GCE | Composite of CNT and GQDs; molecular imprinting via electropolymerization (template: sulfamethazine; monomer: o-phenylenediamine) | Electrochemical | High selectivity via molecular imprinting; good sensitivity; stable and reusable; successful application in aquaculture water; good recovery (95.4–104.8%); RSD < 4.14% | Sulfamethazine | 0.5–200 μM | 0.068 μM | [324] |
| PANI–GQD nanocomposite film (PANI-GQD-3) | Oxidative polymerization of aniline with GQDs (100–500 ppm) under acidic conditions | PL spectroscopy/Gas chromatography (GC) | Enhanced sp2 hybridization; improved molecular ordering; tunable bandgap; high PL intensity; morphology control; suitable for environmental sensing | Benzo[def]phenanthrene | 0.001–10 × 10−9 mol L−1 | 1.5 × 10−9 mol L−1 | [122] |
| GOx/N-GQDs/PGE | Nitrogen-doped GQDs integrated with printed graphene electrodes; enzyme immobilization | Electrochemical (amperometric) | Third-generation biosensor; high electron mobility; excellent electrocatalytic activity; high enzyme loading (3.33 × 10−7 mol cm−2); high sensitivity; good selectivity in serum samples | Glucose | NR | ~0.098 mM | [325] |
| PANI–GQD nanocomposite film | Synthesis of PANI–GQD composite thin film | PL spectroscopy | Optical sensing; high sensitivity; low-cost and rapid detection; user-friendly; superior performance vs. PANI and GQD alone; environmentally relevant detection (below WHO limit) | Pyrene | 0.001–10 × 10−9 mol L−1 | 0.40 × 10−9 mol L−1 | [43] |
| GQDs-based SPR biochip | Integration of GQDs with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) platform; antibody–antigen interaction | Optical (SPR) | Rapid detection; high sensitivity; label-free biomolecular interaction monitoring; suitable for point-of-care biochips; cost-effective and fast screening | CA19-9 antigen | NR | ~10 U mL−1 | [326] |
| GOx/N-GQDs/PANI flexible electrode | N-GQDs anchored onto PANI matrix; enzyme immobilization (GOx); flexible electrode integration | Electrochemical (enzyme-based sensing via H2O2) | Wearable and flexible; high sensitivity (68.1 ± 1.11 μA mM−1 cm−2); enhanced electron transfer; crack-resistant under bending; stable performance (93.2% retention); suitable for sweat analysis | Glucose | 0.05–0.5 mM | 0.034 mM | [327] |
| GQDs (RR2-derived) | Facile synthesis from organic dye (Reactive Red 2) in polluted water | PL spectroscopy | Waste-to-resource approach; eco-friendly synthesis; strong PL emission (λ_ex = 360 nm, λ_em = 428 nm); low biotoxicity; suitable for bio-applications | Al3+ | 90–800 μM NR | NR | [328] |
| Anti-CD44/GQDs-modified electrode | Electrochemical exfoliation of waste dry batteries (eco-friendly GQD synthesis); antibody immobilization | Electrochemical (DPV, CV, EIS) | Green synthesis; high surface area for antibody loading; ultra-high sensitivity; applicable in serum samples; cost-effective | CD44 antigen | 0.1 pg mL−1–100 ng mL−1 (PBS); 1.0 pg mL−1–100 ng mL−1 (serum) | 2.11 fg mL−1 (PBS); 2.71 fg mL−1 (serum) | [329] |
| PPy-GQD | Electrochemical polymerization | Surface plasmon resonance | High sensitivity | As+3 | 0.005–10 ppm | 0.005 ppm | [330] |
| GQDs | Electrophoretic exfoliation of waste dry batteries (single-step, cost-effective) | Electrochemical and optical characterization | Green synthesis; low-cost; luminescent properties (λ = 279 nm); nanoscale size (6–10 nm); high surface concentration; potential for biosensing applications | NR | NR | NR | [331] |
| AuNPs/N-GQDs–P-MOF/GOx-modified electrode | PEI-functionalized MOF supporting AuNPs/N-GQDs; enzyme immobilisation (GOx) forming cascade nanoreactor | Electrochemical (amperometric) | Dual-function sensing (H2O2 & glucose); POD activity; cascade catalysis; high sensitivity; low overpotential; excellent selectivity and reproducibility; validated in serum samples | H2O2; Glucose | 3.38 μM (H2O2); 0.7 μM (glucose) | [332] | |
| GQD-AuNPs | Hydrolysis | Electrochemical | Good sensitivity and selectivity, low-cost | Chlorpyrifos organophosphate pesticide | 0.001 to 1.0 µg mL−1 | 0.0007 µg mL−1 | [55] |
| GO-CA denoted GO-GQDs | Chemical | Fluorescence | Feasibility of pursuing cheaper and greener environmental monitoring | Pyrene | 2–10 × 10−6 mol L−1 | 0.325 × 10−6 mol L−1 | [333] |
| GO-CA denoted CA-GQDs | 0.242 × 10−6 mol L−1 |
| Property | PDT | PTT |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Generation of ROS upon light irradiation | Conversion of light (usually NIR) into heat to induce thermal damage |
| Light source | Visible light (commonly 600–800 nm) | NIR light (typically 700–1100 nm) |
| Target | Tumor cells via ROS-mediated damage to cellular structures | Tumor cells via localized heat-induced damage to cellular components |
| Key advantage | Effective in oxygen-rich environments, non-invasive | High tissue penetration depth due to NIR light, less dependent on oxygen |
| Challenges | Limited by oxygen availability, shallow tissue penetration | Efficiency depends on GQD concentration, light intensity, and exposure time |
| Depth of Penetration | Limited by tissue absorption of visible light | Deeper penetration due to NIR light’s ability to pass through tissues |
| Efficiency dependence | Dependent on ROS generation, light exposure, and GQD size | Dependent on GQD’s photothermal conversion efficiency and light power |
| Biocompatibility | High, with potential for targeted delivery | High, with minimal invasiveness and potential for targeted treatment |
| Applications | Treatment of surface tumors, skin cancers, and other accessible tumors | Treatment of deep-seated tumors and in hypoxic tumor environments |
| Combination potential | Can be combined with PTT for synergistic effects | Can be combined with PDT for enhanced therapeutic outcomes |
| Therapeutic outcome | Induces oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis | Induces necrosis and apoptosis through heat-induced damage |
| GQD Type/Functionalization | Model System | Dose Range | Key Findings | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-GQDs (high QY, BBB-permeable fluorescent probe) | AD rat model (in vivo & ex vivo) | Not specified (cytotoxicity <10% at 250 µg mL−1) | Selective and sensitive detection of Aβ aggregates (LOD ~1.6 µM); high photostability and biocompatibility; efficient BBB penetration (~7.4 nm size); ~2-fold FL increase in AD brain; strong binding affinity to Aβ | [406] |
| Pristine GQDs (antioxidant/anti-inflammatory therapeutic) | C57BL/6 mice (UUO-induced renal fibrosis, in vivo) & kidney epithelial cells (in vitro) | Not specified | Attenuated renal fibrosis by reducing ROS, apoptosis, and proinflammatory cytokines; inhibited TGF-β1/Smad signaling and EMT; protected against oxidative stress and inflammation | [407] |
| GQDs, GSH-functionalized GQDs | Human cell lines (in vitro) | 16–260 μg/mL | ~100% cell viability; low hemolysis (<9%); high biocompatibility | [408] |
| Pristine GQDs (neurotoxicity study) | Adult male NMRI mice (in vivo) | 10–40 mg/kg (oral, 30 days) | Impaired memory and increased anxiety at low doses; reduced locomotor activity at high doses; increased oxidative stress (↑MDA, ↓CAT); significant hippocampal histopathological alterations indicating neuronal damage | [409] |
| Theoretical + MD toxicity study (GQDs vs. GOQDs | ) Protein interaction models | Not specified | Surface chemistry influences protein binding and potential toxicity pathways | [410] |
| Single-molecule GQDs (well-defined structure) | In vitro & in vivo (tumor models) | μM range profile | Efficient ROS generation for PDT; therapeutic efficacy with controlled toxicity | [411] |
| GQDs/GOQDs | Membrane protein (AQP1 channel) simulations | Concentration-dependent | Higher concentrations may block water channels, suggesting dose-dependent toxicity | [412] |
| Curcumin-loaded GQDs (GQDs/Cur; magnetic-based drug carrier) | Mice (in vivo cancer model) | Not specified | Effective drug delivery with reduced tumor size and increased body weight; enhanced curcumin release (highest at acidic pH); good biocompatibility and targeting potential | [413] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Beygisangchin, M.; Jakmunee, J.; Kungwan, N.; Ounnunkad, K.; Sangthong, P.; Baghdadi, A.H.; Kamarudin, S.K. Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances in Functionalization Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Biosensors 2026, 16, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16050249
Beygisangchin M, Jakmunee J, Kungwan N, Ounnunkad K, Sangthong P, Baghdadi AH, Kamarudin SK. Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances in Functionalization Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Biosensors. 2026; 16(5):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16050249
Chicago/Turabian StyleBeygisangchin, Mahnoush, Jaroon Jakmunee, Nawee Kungwan, Kontad Ounnunkad, Padchanee Sangthong, Amir Hossein Baghdadi, and Siti Kartom Kamarudin. 2026. "Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances in Functionalization Strategies and Biomedical Applications" Biosensors 16, no. 5: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16050249
APA StyleBeygisangchin, M., Jakmunee, J., Kungwan, N., Ounnunkad, K., Sangthong, P., Baghdadi, A. H., & Kamarudin, S. K. (2026). Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Biosensors: Recent Advances in Functionalization Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Biosensors, 16(5), 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16050249

