Next Article in Journal
Drying-Induced Salt Deposition Patterns as a Tool for Label-Free Protein Quantification
Next Article in Special Issue
SERS-Driven Evolution of Lateral and Vertical Flow Assays in Medical Diagnostics
Previous Article in Journal
Polypyrrole-Modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae Used in Microbial Fuel Cell
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Characterisation of a Microneedle Sensor for Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microneedle–Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions

1
Queensland Quantum and Advanced Technologies Research Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
2
Centre for Regional and Rural Futures (CeRRF), Centre for Sustainable Bioproducts (CSB), School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia
3
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2025, 15(8), 521; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080521
Submission received: 24 June 2025 / Revised: 2 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 9 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano/Micro Biosensors for Biomedical Applications (2nd Edition))

Abstract

Microneedle (MN)–tissue interactions play a critical role in the efficiency and reliability of transdermal drug delivery and biosensing, yet their mechanistic understanding remains limited. This study systematically investigates the effects of biological (tissue type and temperature) and mechanical (needle design, material, and insertion velocity) parameters on the performance of microneedle insertion and extraction. Experiments were performed on porcine skin, chicken breast, and agarose gel to represent varying tissue properties. Additionally, the effect of tissue temperature on replicating physiological conditions, such as hypo- and hyperthermia, was evaluated using porcine skin as the sample. A novel conical MN design integrated with surface suction-cup structures was developed to improve tissue adhesion. Mechanical responses were analyzed through force–displacement measurements, evaluating insertion force, extraction force, and relaxation time. Results show that elevated tissue temperature reduces insertion and extraction forces while shortening relaxation times, indicating increased tissue compliance. The suction-cup MNs significantly enhanced needle–tissue adhesion, with the most pronounced effect observed in chicken breast tissue, achieving more than a four-fold increase in extraction force compared to conventional conical needles. These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing the design of MNs for advanced biomedical applications.
Keywords: microneedles; tissue adhesion; drug delivery; biosensing; insertion force; extraction force microneedles; tissue adhesion; drug delivery; biosensing; insertion force; extraction force

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zoudani, E.L.; De Saram, P.; Engel, K.; Nguyen, N.-T.; Kashaninejad, N. Microneedle–Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions. Biosensors 2025, 15, 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080521

AMA Style

Zoudani EL, De Saram P, Engel K, Nguyen N-T, Kashaninejad N. Microneedle–Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions. Biosensors. 2025; 15(8):521. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zoudani, Elham Lori, Prabuddha De Saram, Kyle Engel, Nam-Trung Nguyen, and Navid Kashaninejad. 2025. "Microneedle–Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions" Biosensors 15, no. 8: 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080521

APA Style

Zoudani, E. L., De Saram, P., Engel, K., Nguyen, N.-T., & Kashaninejad, N. (2025). Microneedle–Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions. Biosensors, 15(8), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop