Next Article in Journal
Heavy Metal Ion Detection Based on Lateral Flow Assay Technology: Principles and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Democratization of Point-of-Care Viral Biosensors: Bridging the Gap from Academia to the Clinic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Whole Cells of Microorganisms—A Powerful Bioanalytical Tool for Measuring Integral Parameters of Pollution: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Intelligent Microbial Biosensing: A Comprehensive Review of Biomedical and Environmental Applications

by
Alemayehu Kidanemariam
1 and
Sungbo Cho
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Semiconductor Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
3
Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2025, 15(7), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070437
Submission received: 23 May 2025 / Revised: 29 June 2025 / Accepted: 4 July 2025 / Published: 7 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Biosensor: From Design to Applications—2nd Edition)

Abstract

Metal–organic framework (MOF)-based nanozymes represent a groundbreaking frontier in advanced microbial biosensing, offering unparalleled catalytic precision and structural tunability to mimic natural enzymes with superior stability and specificity. By engineering the structural features and forming composites, MOFs are precisely tailored to amplify nanozymatic activity, enabling the highly sensitive, rapid, and cost-effective detection of a broad spectrum of microbial pathogens critical to biomedical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. These advanced biosensors surpass traditional enzyme systems in robustness and reusability, integrating seamlessly with smart diagnostic platforms for real-time, on-site microbial identification. This review highlights cutting-edge developments in MOF nanozyme design, composite engineering, and signal transduction integration while addressing pivotal challenges such as biocompatibility, complex matrix interference, and scalable manufacturing. Looking ahead, the convergence of multifunctional MOF nanozymes with portable technologies and optimized in vivo performance will drive transformative breakthroughs in early disease detection, antimicrobial resistance surveillance, and environmental pathogen control, establishing a new paradigm in next-generation smart biosensing.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The global burden of infectious diseases, increase in antimicrobial resistance, and increasing environmental contamination have underscored the urgent need for rapid, sensitive, and reliable microbial detection technologies [1,2,3]. The early identification of pathogenic microorganisms is essential for effective outbreak response, informed treatment decisions, and public health management in settings ranging from hospitals and food production to water quality monitoring [4,5].
Traditional microbial detection methods including culture-based assays, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have long served as diagnostic gold standards [6,7,8]. However, these approaches are often time-intensive, laborious, and dependent on sophisticated instrumentation and trained personnel [9]. These constraints limit their applicability in decentralized and resource-limited environments where rapid decision making is critical [10,11].
To overcome these limitations, significant research efforts have been directed toward the development of advanced biosensors using functional nanomaterials [12,13]. Nanomaterials such as noble metal nanoparticles (e.g., Au, Ag), carbon-based nanostructures (e.g., graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes), quantum dots, and magnetic nanoparticles have been explored for their unique physicochemical properties, enabling diverse detection modalities such as fluorescence, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and electrochemical sensing [14,15,16]. These systems provide high sensitivity and rapid response but often face practical challenges, including poor stability under physiological conditions, limited biorecognition specificity, and potential cytotoxicity [17,18].
Enzyme-based biosensors offer high catalytic efficiency and specificity but suffer from inherent limitations such as environmental instability, high cost, and short shelf life due to protein denaturation [19,20,21]. These drawbacks have driven the emergence of nanozymes, which are nanomaterials that mimic natural enzymatic activity while offering enhanced robustness and functional versatility [22,23]. Among various nanozyme candidates, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered increasing attention for microbial biosensing due to their highly tunable structures and multifunctionality [24,25].
MOFs are crystalline, porous materials composed of metal nodes coordinated to organic linkers, forming extended three-dimensional architectures [26]. Their ultrahigh surface area, tunable pore environment, and modular chemistry make MOFs ideal platforms for mimicking enzymatic active sites and incorporating biorecognition elements [27,28]. Unlike conventional nanomaterials, MOFs offer the advantage of structural programmability at the molecular level, allowing for precise control over catalytic behavior, target specificity, and sensor performance [29].
In the context of microbial detection, MOFs can serve dual roles: as nanozyme catalysts facilitating signal generation and as scaffolds for immobilizing recognition units such as aptamers, antibodies, DNA probes, and molecularly imprinted polymers [30,31]. These attributes have enabled the creation of highly sensitive and selective biosensors capable of detecting a wide range of microbial targets including bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus) and viruses (e.g., influenza, SARS-CoV-2) through various transduction mechanisms such as colorimetric, fluorescent, electrochemical, and luminescent readouts [32,33,34].
Furthermore, the adaptability of MOFs has supported their integration into portable and digital diagnostic platforms [35]. The combination of MOF-based nanozymes with smartphone interfaces, paper-based sensors, and microfluidic systems is paving the way for next-generation point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools [36]. These compact and affordable systems hold promise for on-site microbial monitoring in clinical, agricultural, and environmental applications, enabling real-time decision making and outbreak containment [25,37].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in MOF-based nanozymes for microbial detection and assay development. We examine key aspects of MOF nanozyme design, including catalytic mechanism tuning, surface modification strategies, and hybrid material construction. Emphasis is placed on the integration of MOFs with biorecognition molecules to enhance detection specificity and performance.
In addition, we critically analyze the current challenges associated with MOF nanozyme-based biosensors, such as matrix interference in complex samples, reproducibility issues, biocompatibility, and long-term stability. Potential strategies to address these challenges such as advanced composite engineering, robust synthesis protocols, and biointerface optimization are discussed. Finally, we explore future directions for the field, including the incorporation of MOFs into Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled smart diagnostic networks and regulatory considerations for their clinical translation.
By synthesizing insights from materials science, microbiology, and sensor engineering, this review offers a strategic roadmap for harnessing MOFs to develop next-generation biosensing technologies for microbial detection.

2. Fundamentals of MOF Nanozymes

The integration of MOFs with nanozyme technologies has opened new avenues for the development of next-generation biosensors [38]. MOF nanozymes synergistically combine the advantages of MOFs, such as high porosity, structural tunability, and chemical functionality, with the catalytic properties of nanozymes that mimic natural enzymes [39].

2.1. MOFs: Structure and Properties

MOFs are crystalline porous materials composed of metal ions or clusters coordinated with organic ligands that form highly ordered network structures [40]. Their defining characteristics include ultrahigh surface areas, tunable pore sizes, and the ability to be chemically tailored at both the metal center and linker levels [41]. This structural tunability allows for the precise modulation of surface chemistry and functionality, enabling MOFs to be customized for a wide range of application areas such as catalysis, gas storage, drug delivery, and biosensing (Scheme 1) [42,43,44]. In the context of biosensing, their porosity and chemical versatility enable the selective adsorption and interaction with target microbial analytes, laying the structural foundation for nanozyme integration.

2.2. Nanozymes: Definition and Classification

Nanozymes are nanomaterials that exhibit intrinsic enzyme-like catalytic activities, mimicking natural enzymes such as peroxidase, oxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase [45,46]. Unlike natural enzymes, nanozymes offer significant advantages, including higher operational stability, ease of large-scale production, and enhanced resistance to harsh conditions, broadening their practical applications [47]. These properties enable nanozymes to serve diverse roles in biosensing, therapeutics, and environmental monitoring. Nanozymes can be broadly classified based on their catalytic mechanisms and material composition into three main categories: metal-based, carbon-based, and composite nanozymes [48]. Metal-based nanozymes typically consist of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles (e.g., Fe, Ce, Mn oxides) and primarily mimic oxidoreductase enzymes. Carbon-based nanozymes involve functionalized carbon materials like graphene and carbon nanotubes, providing stable and tunable enzyme-like activities [49]. Composite nanozymes combine metals, metal oxides, and polymers to create multifunctional catalysts with enhanced versatility [50].
Representative examples illustrate these categories and their associated applications. FePPOP-1, a porphyrin-based porous polymer synthesized via Sonogashira–Hagihara coupling, exhibits peroxidase-like activity by catalyzing the oxidation of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, enabling the sensitive colorimetric detection of H2O2, glucose, and various antioxidants [51]. This example highlights how metal-based nanozymes can amplify biosensing signals through their catalytic properties. In composite nanozymes, Smutok et al. developed a biosensor combining carbon microfiber-based peroxidase-mimetic nanozymes functionalized with hemin and decorated with platinum nanoparticles along with microbial lactate oxidase, achieving selective and sensitive L-lactate detection relevant for food quality control and clinical diagnostics [52]. This synergy between nanozymes and biological enzymes improves selectivity and sensitivity.
In therapeutic applications, cerium oxide nanozymes modified with branched poly(ethylene imine)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) (CNP@bPEI-g-PEG) mimic both superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, enabling regenerative reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging through cerium redox cycling. In vivo experiments confirmed their therapeutic efficacy in a dry eye disease model, demonstrating reduced oxidative damage, the restoration of corneal and conjunctival integrity, and increased goblet cell density [53]. Figure 1 schematically illustrates this therapeutic mechanism, showing how CNP@bPEI-g-PEG nanozymes mimic enzymatic activities, scavenge ROS via redox cycling between Ce3+ and Ce4+, and exert protective effects on ocular tissues. This work underscores the clinical potential of metal oxide nanozymes in treating oxidative stress-related disorders.
Finally, multifunctional composite nanozymes like Mn3O4@g-C3N4 exhibit diverse enzyme-like activities including superoxide dismutase, catalase, oxidase, and peroxidase allowing efficient ROS scavenging and serving as label-free colorimetric probes for phenolic pollutant detection, thus bridging environmental remediation and sensing applications [54]. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that understanding nanozyme classification based on catalytic mechanism and material composition facilitates the rational design of nanozymes with tailored properties for diverse and impactful applications, highlighting their potential as robust and versatile alternatives to natural enzymes.

2.3. MOFs as Nanozyme Platforms

MOFs provide a unique and versatile scaffold for constructing nanozymes, owing to their ability to spatially isolate catalytic sites, host metal centers with redox activity, and allow for the diffusion of substrates through their porous matrices [55]. The confinement effect and high local concentration of active sites within MOFs often lead to enhanced catalytic efficiency compared with other nanozyme platforms [56]. Moreover, the modularity of MOF design enables the rational incorporation of functional groups and metal species tailored to specific microbial sensing mechanisms [57]. As such, MOFs serve not only as passive supports but also as active participants in enzyme-mimetic catalysis, offering vast potential in intelligent biosensing applications [58]. A summary of the key concepts discussed in this section is provided in Table 1.

3. Design Strategies for MOF Nanozymes in Microbial Biosensing

The performance of MOF nanozymes in microbial biosensing applications is strongly influenced by how their structural and functional properties are engineered to interact effectively with microbial targets such as bacterial cells or their biomarkers [59]. Strategic modifications at the metal center, organic linker, particle size, and hybrid composition levels enable precise control over catalytic activity, selectivity, and substrate recognition, all of which are critical for detecting microorganisms or their associated molecules in complex environments [44,60].

3.1. Metal Center Engineering

The metal nodes within an MOF play a pivotal role in defining the catalytic behavior of nanozymes [61]. By selecting metals such as Fe, Co, Cu, or Mn with redox activity, researchers can tailor enzyme-mimicking functions like peroxidase-like or oxidase-like activity [62]. Such tailoring enhances the nanozyme’s ability to detect microbial entities by catalyzing colorimetric, fluorescent, or electrochemical signals in response to bacterial presence or activity [63].
One highly relevant study engineered dual atomic site catalysts (DASCs) within an MOF-808 framework to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Through formic acid modulation, abundant defect sites were introduced to facilitate Co atom incorporation, creating Co2–O10 dual sites with high metal loading (11.1 wt%). These DASCs exhibited exceptional peroxidase-like activity, amplifying chemiluminescence by ~5800-fold in a luminol-H2O2 system. They enabled ultrasensitive MRSA detection over a range of 102−107 CFU/mL with a limit of detection (LOD) of 47 CFU/mL and also proved effective in antibiotic susceptibility testing [64]. This underscores how precise metal center engineering can directly support real-time microbial diagnostics.
Another example involves a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-doped bimetallic CuZr-MOF nanozyme, used for the electrochemical detection of Salmonella Typhimurium. Functionalized with signal DNA probes, the platform achieved high sensitivity (LOD = 0.82 CFU/mL) via the peroxidase-mimetic electrocatalysis of H2O2 and was successfully applied to quantify Salmonella DNA in milk [65]. Here, the synergy among Cu(II), Zr(IV), and AuNPs significantly enhanced microbial target detection.
To address microbial endotoxin detection, Cu2+-modified nanoscale MOFs (Cu2+-NMOFs) were developed as electrochemical biosensors for lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a key bacterial component. Cu2+-NMOFs served as both recognition elements (via electrostatic binding to LPS carbohydrate moieties) and nanozymes catalyzing dopamine oxidation into aminochrome. The system demonstrated ultra-low LOD (0.61 pg/mL) and broad linearity (0.0015–750 ng/mL) in serum samples, offering superior specificity compared to traditional LPS-binding proteins or aptamers [66].
A direct fluorescent biosensing approach was established using a turn-on Fe-MOF platform to detect two major foodborne pathogens, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Fluorescence enhancement occurred due to surface interactions with bacterial membranes, modulating electron transfer. The biosensor achieved LODs of 0.464 log CFU/mL (Staphylococcus aureus) and 0.584 log CFU/mL (Escherichia coli) in PBS, water, and milk, all under 1 h [67]. This highlights the practical and rapid potential of Fe-MOF nanozymes in food safety-related microbial diagnostics.
Additionally, Shen et al. synthesized an amine-functionalized bimetallic Fe–Ni MOF-74 nanozyme for detecting pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. Through a layered double hydroxide-assisted method, Fe and Ni worked synergistically to enhance peroxidase-like activity. The platform showed robust detection performance for both small biomolecules and bacterial pathogens, making it highly suitable for microbial biosensing contexts [68]. These results demonstrate the promise of metal-doped MOF nanozymes as adaptable platforms for microbial biosensing and broader bioanalytical applications.
Defect engineering was applied by Ren et al. to a Co-based MOF (ZIF-L-Co), using cysteine to introduce coordination disruptions that enhanced oxidase-like activity [60]. This approach disrupted the coordination environment between cobalt and nitrogen atoms, leading to lattice distortion and enhanced oxygen adsorption capacity. The resulting nanozyme exhibited significantly improved oxidase-like activities, including over fivefold, twofold, and threefold increases in ascorbate oxidase, glutathione oxidase, and laccase-like activities, respectively (Figure 2). When integrated into an online electrochemical sensing system, the modified MOF effectively eliminated common interferences during uric acid detection in a biological environment. While the study primarily targeted neurological biomarkers, the metal defect engineering and multi-enzyme mimicry strategy hold strong translational potential for microbial biosensing platforms. By tailoring the metal–ligand coordination and catalytic reactivity, such MOFs could be adapted for selective pathogen detection, particularly when coupled with DNA probes or microbial recognition elements.
Similarly, controlling the internal microenvironment of MOF nanozymes is another essential design strategy for improving microbial detection. In one strategy, Li et al. embedded poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) into PCN-222-Fe to regulate local pH, boosting peroxidase activity at physiological conditions (pH 7.4), a crucial requirement for stable enzymatic sensing in biological samples [69]. Although originally designed for multi-enzyme cascades, this microenvironment modulation approach is directly translatable to microbial sensing systems operating under physiologic or food-relevant pH ranges (Figure 3).
Therefore, tailoring metal centers within MOFs through doping, nanoparticle incorporation, and microenvironmental control significantly enhances nanozyme catalytic activity and specificity. These improvements enable the sensitive detection of diverse biological targets and facilitate integration into practical diagnostic platforms, underscoring the promise of engineered MOF nanozymes for advanced biomedical applications.

3.2. Ligand Functionalization

The chemical modification of organic linkers in MOFs offers a powerful route to enhance microbial biosensing performance by improving molecular recognition, signal amplification, and electron transfer [70]. Functional groups such as aptamers, antibodies, redox-active moieties, or fluorophores can be integrated into the ligand backbone, enabling selective binding to microbial biomarkers and facilitating catalytic signal transduction [71,72]. This tunability is central to achieving high specificity, sensitivity, and robustness in MOF-based biosensing platforms [73].
An illustrative approach involves the use of ultrathin two-dimensional MOFs (2D-MOFs) conjugated with fluorescent dye-labeled peptides, forming a versatile sensor array for microbial fingerprinting [74]. These 2D-MOFs exhibit high surface area and strong fluorescence quenching capability, efficiently adsorbing the labeled peptides and suppressing emissions. Upon pathogen introduction, diverse non-specific interactions such as electrostatic or biomolecular binding induce peptide displacement, resulting in fluorescence recovery. This pattern shift enables rapid and accurate discrimination between microbial species with 100% classification accuracy, even in complex biological matrices like urine, within approximately 15 min.
Ligand functionalization can also impart dual functionality for detection and disinfection. For example, boronic acid-modified UiO-66 (Zr-UiO-66-B(OH)2) exploits selective interactions with bacterial glycolipids for label-free fluorescence detection, achieving a detection limit as low as 1.0 CFU/mL [75]. Under light irradiation, the same MOF generates ROS, conferring photocatalytic antibacterial activity. This multifunctional design underscores the potential of rational ligand engineering for integrated biosensing and antimicrobial functions.
Targeted microbial recognition has also been achieved through the conjugation of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) with lytic bacteriophages, immobilized via glutaraldehyde cross-linking [76]. The MOF scaffold enhances phage stability and signal amplification, enabling the rapid and specific detection of Escherichia coli at levels as low as 652 CFU/mL within 10–12 min. The approach combines pathogen-specific recognition with MOF-mediated signal output, directly addressing needs in real-time microbial diagnostics.
In another ligand-engineered platform, NH2-MIL-53(Fe) was conjugated with galactose and mannose to create glycosylated MOFs (Glyco-MOFs) for the selective detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli [77]. The carbohydrate ligands target lectins on bacterial surfaces, enabling label-free luminescent detection with detection limits of 8 CFU/mL and 202 CFU/mL, respectively. The Glyco-MOFs demonstrated high specificity and environmental stability, suitable for real-world pathogen monitoring.
Innovative ligand strategies can also enable programmable biosensing behavior. For example, ZIF-8 was functionalized and encapsulated within DNA-based surfactant micelles to form nucleic acid nanocapsules (NANs) [78]. This architecture allowed dual-gated enzymatic activity and analyte release controlled by environmental stimuli such as pH and enzymatic degradation. Such ligand–shell coordination provides tunable signal output and enhanced selectivity in biologically complex systems.
Ligand functionalization also enhances electrochemical biosensing performance. Shahrokhian et al. developed an aptamer-based MOF biosensor for Escherichia coli O157:H7, using amino-functionalized MOF linkers to stably immobilize aptamers via glutaraldehyde chemistry [79]. The incorporation of conductive polyaniline into the MOF improved electron transfer, resulting in a wide detection range (2.1 × 101 to 2.1 × 107 CFU/mL) and a low detection limit of 2 CFU/mL.
Beyond functional group incorporation, ligand intercalation can stabilize atomically dispersed catalytic sites within MOFs. In a dual MOF-on-MOF system (CoNi-MOF@PCN-224/Fe), ligand intercalation tuned the coordination environment to promote Fenton-like catalysis and efficient electron transfer, leading to a 17-fold enhancement in electrochemiluminescence (ECL) for H2O2 detection [80]. Similarly, the integration of metalloporphyrin ligands in PMOF(Fe) provided abundant Fe active sites with intrinsic peroxidase-like activity [63]. Anchoring Pt nanoparticles on the ligand interface further amplified catalytic performance via synergistic electron transfer, demonstrating superior biosensing capabilities.
These examples collectively demonstrate that strategic ligand engineering via functionalization, conjugation, or intercalation can substantially elevate MOF nanozyme performance in microbial biosensing by integrating recognition specificity with catalytic amplification.

3.3. Morphology and Size Control

The morphology and size of MOFs critically influence their performance in microbial biosensing applications. Nanoscale MOFs with well-defined shapes and dimensions offer enhanced surface reactivity, improved analyte diffusion, and superior interactions with microbial targets [81]. These physical features directly affect catalytic activity, detection sensitivity, and the efficiency of signal transduction, making morphology control a key design parameter in MOF-based biosensors [82].
Precise size reduction is one strategy to enhance performance. Usman et al. demonstrated that downsizing MOF crystals to below 100 nm significantly improved their surface area, pore accessibility, and dispersibility under physiological conditions, which are factors crucial for biosensing in biological matrices [83]. Such nanoscale control can be achieved via bottom-up (e.g., modulation of reaction time, temperature, or solvent polarity) and top-down (e.g., mechanical grinding or sonication) approaches. These methods regulate MOF nucleation and growth kinetics, enabling uniform particle size, enhanced crystallinity, and biocompatibility for practical sensor deployment.
Morphology engineering also plays a vital role in nanozyme-based microbial detection. Singh et al. utilized a biomimetic mineralization strategy to encapsulate enzymes such as glucose oxidase (GOx), organophosphorus hydrolase (OpdA), and α-chymotrypsin within ZIF-8 nanocrystals (Figure 4) [84]. The resulting ZIF-8@enzyme composites exhibited uniform morphology and high structural stability, preserving enzymatic activity under harsh conditions. These composites were integrated into electrochemical biosensors, where their nanoscale features facilitated efficient electron transfer and robust microbial detection with high sensitivity and selectivity.
Morphology optimization further enhances electrocatalytic properties in pathogen-related sensing. Nataraj et al. synthesized ZIF-67 using various methods such as co-precipitation, autoclaving, and hydrothermal synthesis to explore morphology-performance correlations in a dual-mode sensing platform [85]. Among the variants, ZIF-67-C exhibited the most favorable characteristics, including a uniform rhombic-dodecahedral morphology and minimal aggregation, which contributed to superior electrocatalytic activity and peroxidase-like behavior. This morphology enhanced the adsorption of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and hydroxyl radical (•OH) generation from H2O2, enabling efficient substrate oxidation and high signal output. ZIF-67-C achieved low detection limits (0.014 μM electrochemical, 0.034 μM colorimetric) and demonstrated high recovery in real water samples, reinforcing the importance of morphology optimization for sensitive biosensing. This enhanced morphology improved the detection of model substrates and demonstrated the importance of synthesis-controlled morphology for biosensor performance in aqueous samples.
Additionally, Wang et al. reported a rapid synthesis of CdTe@ZIF-8 core–shell nanocomposites with tunable morphology and pore size for selective molecular detection [86]. The ZIF-8 shell functioned as a size-selective membrane, allowing the passage of small analytes (e.g., hydrogen peroxide) while excluding larger biomolecules. This design enabled fluorescence quenching only by reaction intermediates, facilitating sensitive detection of enzymatic activity from uricase and GOx. The ability to selectively control molecular transport based on MOF pore architecture highlights the utility of morphology design in microbial biosensing, where size exclusion is vital for specificity.

3.4. Composite and Hybrid Structures

The integration of MOFs with functional materials such as carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, metal nanoparticles, and conductive polymers has emerged as a powerful strategy to overcome the inherent limitations of pristine MOFs, including low conductivity and limited stability [87]. These hybrids often demonstrate improved signal transduction, environmental durability, and broader functionality, making them ideal candidates for developing robust and multifunctional microbial biosensors [27,88].
A compelling example is the development of a copper-based hybrid nanozyme, ML-Cu2O@Cu-MOF, which incorporates Cu2O nanocrystals into a mixed-ligand MOF [89]. This structure hosts multiple copper valence states (Cu0/Cu+/Cu2+) and defect-rich domains, significantly improving electrochemical conductivity and aptamer immobilization. Integrated into an aptasensor for Staphylococcus aureus detection, the composite achieved ultralow detection limits (2.0 CFU m/L via EIS and 1.6 CFU m/L via DPV) with strong stability in food samples. This example highlights the potential of multivalent metal composites for ultrasensitive microbial pathogen monitoring.
Hybrid MOF systems have also demonstrated clinical relevance. A Zr-based MOF-enabled aptasensing platform was designed for the selective detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in blood [90]. The strategy employed Zr-MOFs for two complementary roles: magnetic enrichment via Zr-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Zr-mMOF) and fluorescence amplification via fluorescein-loaded MOFs (F@UIO-66-NH2). Two aptamer-functionalized probes targeting bacterial surface markers and lipopolysaccharides formed a sandwich complex, and phosphate-induced MOF decomposition amplified the signal. This platform achieved detection as low as 10 CFU mL−1 within 2.5 h, with >90% aptamer loading and high recovery efficiency, demonstrating strong potential for bloodstream infection diagnostics.
To tackle the challenge of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB), a hybrid nanozyme platform combining an MOF–COF (covalent organic framework) composite with boric acid functionality and a DNA-based multivalent aptamer scaffold was developed [91]. The hybrid system exhibited dual-mode peroxidase-like activity and high microbial affinity, enabling the fluorescence and colorimetric detection of A. baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa down to 2–3 CFU m/L. The sensor maintained excellent performance in complex biological fluids, including serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, emphasizing its clinical utility.
Another sophisticated design featured an MOF-on-MOF nanozyme architecture (MOF-818@PMOF(Fe)) with cascade catalytic activity [92]. In this configuration, MOF-818 generated H2O2 in situ, which was subsequently utilized by PMOF(Fe) to produce ROS, enabling amplified chemiluminescence and colorimetric signals (Figure 5). When combined with a chlorpyrifos-specific aptamer, this dual-catalyst system achieved high sensitivity and selectivity in microbial sensing scenarios, demonstrating the power of rationally engineered hybrid nanozymes.
Beyond detection, composite systems have enabled the real-time monitoring of microbial metabolism. Ma et al. developed a 3D gradient porous fiber (GPF) membrane functionalized with CNT/MOF composites for the direct detection of H2O2 secreted by live cells (Figure 6) [93]. CNTs enhanced conductivity and MOF dispersion, while the MOF component served as a stable peroxidase mimic. This integrated scaffold allowed nonenzymatic, high-performance biosensing with excellent stability, offering a valuable platform for microbial metabolic profiling and diagnostics.
Minimally invasive diagnostics have also benefited from MOF hybrids. Zhao et al. introduced a microneedle-based biosensor using swellable hydrogel tips loaded with a DNAzyme@MOF composite for uric acid detection [94]. The DNAzyme enhanced the peroxidase-like activity of the MOF, enabling sensitive colorimetric analysis of trace analytes in interstitial fluid without relying on natural enzymes. This wearable hybrid platform exemplifies the growing biomedical relevance of MOF-based composites for microbial-related analyte monitoring.
Nanoparticle integration further improves MOF sensor performance. Guan et al. developed a composite nanozyme (Fe3O4@Au/MOF) by incorporating magnetic Fe3O4 and conductive Au nanoparticles into the MOF matrix [95]. The dual-nanoparticle system enhanced both recyclability and electron transfer, producing a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for p-aminophenol with excellent selectivity and stability. Such platforms demonstrate how multifunctional nanocomposites can be tailored for efficient and reusable microbial biosensing.
In another example, a stimuli-responsive MOF/polymer hybrid was created by grafting dual-responsive poly(N-2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDM) onto UiO-66-NH2 scaffolds [96]. This “soft cage” encapsulated GOx and horseradish peroxidase (HRP), providing a dynamic microenvironment that responded to pH and temperature changes. The hybrid enhanced catalytic efficiency nearly ninefold and enabled colorimetric glucose detection in rat serum, underscoring the potential of MOF–polymer composites for adaptive biosensing in complex microbial contexts.
In summary, a variety of rational design strategies have been employed to enhance the enzyme-mimicking properties of MOF nanozymes for microbial biosensing. These strategies include active center engineering, pore environment modulation, surface functionalization, and hybridization with other functional materials. Each approach offers distinct advantages in improving catalytic efficiency, sensitivity, and target selectivity. Table 2 summarizes representative examples of these MOF nanozyme design strategies, highlighting the target microorganisms, type of enzyme-mimetic activity, detection methods, and associated benefits.

4. Detection Mechanisms and Signal Transduction

The effectiveness of MOF nanozymes in microbial biosensing relies not only on their design but also on the detection mechanisms employed [97]. Signal transduction converts microbial presence into quantifiable outputs, and MOFs can facilitate this through catalytic reactions that generate optical, electrochemical, or fluorescent signals [98,99].

4.1. Colorimetric Detection

Colorimetric sensing leverages the catalytic oxidation of chromogenic substrates such as TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine) by MOF nanozymes in the presence of microbial analytes or their metabolic byproducts [100]. This method offers a simple, cost-effective, and visible output, suitable for point-of-care or field-based microbial detection.
Teymouri et al. embedded a Cu-MOF into an agar matrix to create Cu-MOF@AF, a multifunctional film that responded colorimetrically to microbial spoilage indicators such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3) [101]. This film not only exhibited enhanced mechanical properties (e.g., stretchability, water resistance, and UV blocking) but also showed potent antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. More importantly, the film served as a colorimetric sensor with a strong and irreversible response to volatile spoilage gases like hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3). Owing to the high surface area and active site availability of the Cu-MOF, the film achieved low limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), while its dynamic and multi-hued color transitions allowed precise correlation with microbial spoilage indicators such as pH, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), and total viable count (TVC). Therefore, with this colorimetric platform, the real-time monitoring of food freshness and microbial contamination could be achieved.
Building on the need for selective detection of bacterial pathogens, Wang et al. designed a Cu-MOF nanoparticle (~550 nm) with intrinsic peroxidase-like activity that catalyzed the oxidation of TMB in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), resulting in a visible yellow color change [102]. This construct catalyzed TMB oxidation in the presence of H2O2, resulting in a distinct yellow color change. The aptamer-functionalized MOF enabled the selective recognition and magnetic separation of Staphylococcus aureus, demonstrating its applicability for targeted pathogen detection.
For enhanced selectivity toward viable bacteria, Li et al. integrated a bacteriophage (SapYZUs8) onto a Cu-MOF nanozyme to construct a biosensor for detecting viable Staphylococcus aureus in food matrices [103]. The resulting SapYZUs8@Cu-MOF hybrid enabled visual detection within 30 min and demonstrated high specificity and a low detection limit of 1.09 × 102 CFU/mL. The sensor remained effective even in complex matrices such as pork and milk, underscoring its applicability for real-world food safety monitoring.
In efforts to improve both accuracy and versatility, Wang et al. developed a dual-mode biosensor integrating both colorimetric and electrochemical outputs for the detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus [104]. This sensor employed phenylboronic acid-modified CuO2 nanodots embedded within an MOF (CP@MOF), which facilitated hydroxyl radical generation under acidic conditions, oxidizing TMB and producing a visible color change. The system also allowed Cu2+ ion-based electrochemical quantification, achieving a combined detection accuracy of 88.7%, thus offering an effective strategy for on-site seafood pathogen monitoring.
To combat challenges associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, Li et al. engineered a self-cascade MOF@MOF nanozyme consisting of Cu-functionalized MOF-808 and iron porphyrin MOFs [105]. This cascade system mimicked both catechol oxidase and peroxidase activities, enabling in situ H2O2 generation followed by amplified TMB oxidation (Figure 7). Coupled with specific aptamers, the system achieved the ultrasensitive detection of MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with detection limits as low as 5 and 2 CFU/mL, respectively. The synergistic catalytic effect of the hybrid nanozyme provided a highly specific and sensitive tool for MDR bacteria monitoring in both clinical and food settings.
To facilitate quick differentiation among bacterial species, Hao et al. fabricated a 2D Ni–Co bimetallic MOF (2D-NCM) that demonstrated enhanced peroxidase-like activity and allowed multichannel absorbance-based detection [106]. This material exhibited enhanced peroxidase-like activity and produced distinct, time-dependent absorbance changes upon interaction with different microbial species, including clinical pathogens and brewing fungi. The resulting multichannel detection profile enabled label-free, wash-free microbial discrimination within 30 min, making it suitable for high-throughput diagnostics in clinical and food environments.
Further advancing the versatility of MOF nanozymes in colorimetric sensing, Ren et al. synthesized a two-dimensional cobalt-based MOF (MVCM@β-CD) with enhanced oxidase-like activity, achieved by modulating the Co(III)/Co(II) ratio and surface functionalizing with β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) [107]. This rational design improved surface accessibility and catalytic efficiency, enabling the highly sensitive colorimetric detection of aminophenol isomers. Notably, while the system showed no background reaction with ABTS (Figure 8A), it generated a strong visual signal upon TMB oxidation (Figure 8B), achieving a detection limit of 0.16 μM for m-aminophenol. Although originally demonstrated with chemical contaminants, the catalytic and surface engineering strategies of MVCM@β-CD can be readily adapted to microbial sensing platforms, particularly for detecting pathogen-related metabolites or environmental pollutants linked to microbial activity. This highlights its potential for developing rapid, low-cost, and label-free biosensors relevant to microbial monitoring.
Collectively, these studies underscore the versatility and efficacy of nanozyme-based MOFs in colorimetric microbial detection. By combining catalytic activity with molecular recognition (via aptamers or phages) and innovative sensor platforms (films, cascades, or dual-mode systems), MOF-based nanozymes offer rapid, sensitive, and field-deployable tools for pathogen monitoring in food safety, clinical diagnostics, and environmental surveillance.

4.2. Electrochemical Detection

Electrochemical biosensors based on MOF nanozymes have gained traction in microbial diagnostics due to their sensitivity, portability, and ability to provide real-time readouts. These sensors often rely on redox reactions involving microbial byproducts (e.g., H2O2) or recognition events facilitated by aptamers or antibodies [108,109].
To address both the detection and treatment of MRSA, Mo et al. constructed a multifunctional nanozyme system using G-quadruplex/hemin DNAzyme-aptamer probes and tannic acid-chelated Au nanoparticle (Au-TA)-decorated Cu-based MOF nanosheets (GATC) [110]. This system integrates Cu-based MOF nanosheets with tannic acid-chelated gold nanoparticles (Au-TA) and G-quadruplex/hemin DNAzyme-aptamer probes. Among several MOF compositions, monometallic Cu-ZIFs showed superior catalytic and probe-loading efficiency over bimetallic alternatives such as CoCu-ZIF and ZnCu-ZIF. The hybrid system exhibited enhanced peroxidase (POD)-like activity for robust hydroxyl radical (•OH) production, along with catalase-like and GSH oxidase-like functionalities to alleviate hypoxia and minimize ROS scavenging, respectively. GATC enabled aptamer-mediated selective recognition of MRSA, achieving potent antibacterial activity at low concentrations (3 μg/mL). Furthermore, the platform supported both electrochemical and chromogenic detection modes, offering the real-time monitoring of infection treatment. This multifunctional construct exemplifies the integration of detection and therapeutic functionalities into a single MOF-based nanozyme system.
In another electrochemical strategy, Gao et al. reported an electrochemical platform specifically designed for the detection of H2O2 as a biomarker for microbial oxidative stress responses [111]. The system employed a synergistic hybrid of graphene (Gr) and MOF-on-MOF nanozymes composed of iron and copper (FeCu-NZs). Fe-MOFs were first synthesized via a solvothermal route and then decorated with Cu2+ ions to enhance their peroxidase-like catalytic efficiency. Integration with graphene further amplified the signal response due to improved conductivity. The FeCu-NZs-based sensor achieved a remarkable detection limit of 0.06 μM across a broad linear range (0.1–3800 μM) for H2O2. In addition to its electrochemical capabilities, this system enabled complementary colorimetric detection via hydroxyl radical generation and TMB oxidation. Application to real samples showed high recovery rates (>95.7%), underlining its utility for microbial monitoring in complex biological or environmental matrices. Given that H2O2 is a critical marker in host–pathogen interactions, especially under inflammatory or infection conditions, this system holds promise for diagnostic applications in microbiology and medicine.
To explore the role of MOF nanozymes in redox-active microbial sensing, Chen et al. developed a zinc-based MOF (Zn-MOF)-supported electrochemical platform, where metal nanoparticles were electrodeposited onto Zn-MOFs with varying morphologies to form a self-supported nanozyme system [112]. Among the tested nanoparticles, silver (AgNPs) exhibited superior electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) reduction compared to platinum (PtNPs) and gold (AuNPs). The study further revealed that two-dimensional Zn-MOFs (2D Zn-MOFs) offered higher surface area, better conductivity, and improved metal dispersion compared to their three-dimensional counterparts (3D Zn-MOFs), resulting in enhanced electrochemical performance. The Ag/2D Zn-MOF-modified electrode demonstrated a low detection limit of 1.67 μM and a wide linear range from 5.0 μM to 70 mM for H2O2 detection (Figure 9). This system was successfully employed to monitor H2O2 released by both normal and tumor cells during drug stimulation, demonstrating the potential of MOF-based nanozymes for real-time microbial and cellular redox monitoring.
Beyond electrochemical sensing, nanozyme MOFs also enable fluorescence and luminescence-based microbial detection, offering high sensitivity and visual readouts. The following section outlines key advances in this area.

4.3. Fluorescence and Luminescence

Fluorescence and luminescence-based microbial detection using MOF nanozymes offers dual-mode signal output and high analytical sensitivity [113]. These systems often exploit catalytic signal amplification in combination with optical reporters that respond selectively to microbial targets or associated molecules [114,115,116].
To target biofilm-associated infections, Liu et al. developed Ce-MOF nanozymes with dual DNase- and peroxidase-like activities [117]. The Ce(IV) complex degraded extracellular DNA (eDNA), a key structural biofilm component, while the MOF catalyzed H2O2 to eliminate released bacteria. This synergistic system effectively disrupted biofilms, inhibited bacterial recolonization, and promoted wound healing in vivo underscoring nanozyme-MOFs’ therapeutic potential.
For detecting microbial residues in food and clinical samples, Ye et al. engineered a ratiometric fluorescence sensor using a hemin-loaded MOF with intrinsic blue fluorescence and peroxidase activity [118]. Tetracycline enhanced peroxidase catalysis via π–π stacking with confined hemin, oxidizing TMB to a dark blue product. Concurrently, tetracycline aggregation triggered green fluorescence (λem = 535 nm) while quenching the MOF’s native blue emission (λem = 425 nm) via IFE. This enabled ratiometric fluorescence sensing (F535/F425), achieving detection limits of 27.2 nM (colorimetric) and 4.1 nM (fluorescent), showcasing excellent selectivity and on-site application potential. Therefore, nanozyme-based MOFs offer greater potential for structural modification, enabling the development of high-performance, multifunctional biosensors for microbial detection. A comprehensive comparison of the reported MOF nanozyme-based microbial biosensing strategies, including detection modes, nanozyme systems, target analytes, and performance metrics, is summarized in Table 3.

5. Biomedical Applications

In biomedical contexts, the rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic microbes is critical for early diagnosis, infection control, and treatment monitoring [119]. MOF nanozymes offer significant promise due to their tunable biorecognition capabilities and efficient signal generation [120].

5.1. Pathogen Detection in Clinical Samples

The rapid and accurate detection of clinically relevant bacteria including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and multidrug-resistant strains such as MRSA remains a significant challenge in clinical diagnostics [121]. MOF-based nanozymes have emerged as promising platforms due to their tunable surface chemistry, high surface area, and catalytic capabilities. These features allow them to be engineered for the selective recognition of microbial biomarkers or toxins, enabling rapid and sensitive detection in various clinical matrices such as blood, urine, saliva, and wound exudates [122]. Moreover, their compatibility with existing clinical workflows facilitates early disease diagnosis and timely therapeutic intervention [123].
The global rise in antimicrobial resistance, particularly among pathogens like MRSA, underscores the urgent need for advanced diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Traditional antibiotics such as vancomycin are increasingly undermined by bacterial adaptations, including metabolic tolerance mechanisms driven by the accumulation of toxic byproducts. To address these issues, Wang et al. developed a multifunctional gallium/copper-based MOF (Ga/Cu-MOF) nanozyme designed for both pathogen detection and eradication [124]. This nanozyme leverages the structural advantages of MOFs to co-deliver antibiotics and release Ga3+ and Cu2+ ions in a controlled manner. These ions disrupt bacterial metabolism by suppressing nitric oxide synthesis and promoting the degradation of S-nitrosothiols, thereby weakening the bacteria’s stress response systems. It not only enhances antibiotic susceptibility but also induces programmed bacterial cell death via ferroptosis and cuproptosis. The Ga/Cu-MOF nanozyme also demonstrated excellent antibacterial activity by disrupting biofilms and eliminating intracellular bacteria residing within host immune cells. When tested in clinically relevant infection models, including skin wounds and osteomyelitis, the nanozyme effectively reduced bacterial burden, mitigated inflammation, and promoted tissue healing, highlighting its potential for integrated diagnostic and therapeutic applications in infectious disease management.
To overcome limitations in traditional lateral flow assays (LFAs) such as low sensitivity and the need for amplification steps, Li et al. designed a next-generation detection platform by combining a rationally engineered multivalent aptamer (multi-Apt) targeting Staphylococcus aureus with a multifunctional nanozyme, Fe3O4@MOF@PtPd, functionalized with vancomycin [125]. The optimized aptamer significantly improved binding affinity (from 135.9 nM to 16.77 nM), and the resulting MA-MN LFA system enabled magnetic capture, signal amplification, and simplified the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Figure 10). This ternary complex-based assay achieved ultra-sensitive detection, with a limit of just 2 CFU/mL and a dynamic range spanning from 10 to 1 × 108 CFU/mL all within 30 min. Its simplicity, speed, and high specificity make it well-suited for real-time clinical diagnostics, particularly for Gram-positive bacterial infections. Together, these advances underscore the versatility and promise of MOF-based nanozyme platforms in the clinical setting not only for rapid and accurate pathogen detection but also for integrated antimicrobial strategies that address both diagnosis and treatment in the era of rising antibiotic resistance.

5.2. Real-Time and POC Diagnostics

The development of portable, user-friendly biosensors is vital for decentralized healthcare [126]. MOF nanozymes enable real-time monitoring through catalytic reactions that produce immediate colorimetric or electrochemical signals [127]. These sensors are especially valuable in resource-limited settings or during outbreaks where rapid screening is essential.
Bacterial infections remain a major public health concern, necessitating rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic tools for timely intervention. To address this, Ren et al. reported that a smart, dual-mode biosensor was developed using nanozyme-based MOFs for the point-of-care detection of pathogenic bacteria [128]. This innovative sensor integrates a SERS platform with oxidase-like nanozyme activity, enabling both colorimetric and spectroscopic detection. The system comprises two key components: an iron oxide nanoparticle-based capture module functionalized with specific aptamers for bacterial recognition and enrichment and a signal module composed of mesoporous MnO2 nanozymes loaded with plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Functionalized with concanavalin A, the signal module creates strong SERS hotspots and catalyzes the oxidation of non-SERS-active TMB into a highly active oxTMB form, producing both a strong Raman signal and a visible color change. This dual readout enhances detection reliability, with limits as low as 7 CFU/mL for SERS and 30 CFU/mL for colorimetric analysis. The sensor demonstrates excellent specificity for Staphylococcus aureus and performs effectively in complex clinical samples such as sepsis-infected blood. These features underscore the promise of nanozyme MOF-based smart sensors for real-time, on-site microbial diagnostics in clinical applications.
Access to clean water is vital for human health, yet underdeveloped regions and emergency scenarios often lack efficient, low-energy water purification methods. To address this challenge, Fu et al. reported that a novel class of portable disinfection materials was developed by integrating Fe-MIL-101 nanozyme metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) onto flexible carboxymethyl cellulose substrates (e.g., filter paper, cotton, gauze) through in situ cross-linking growth [129]. These Fe-MIL-101@fiber composites function as point-of-use (POU) water disinfection modules, offering strong antibacterial activity, ease of transport, and biosafety (Figure 11). Among them, the Fe-MIL-101@carboxymethyl filter paper (Fe-MIL-101@CMFP) demonstrated exceptional performance, maintaining structural integrity and filtration efficiency even after 200 cycles of manual or mechanical stress. The composite exhibits robust oxidase- and peroxidase-mimicking activity, producing ROS such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and superoxide (O2), which enable rapid and efficient bacterial elimination (~99%). Notably, the material is effective against microbes present in real field water without inducing biosafety concerns. These flexible, nanozyme-powered MOF composites show great promise for decentralized microbial disinfection, offering a practical and safe solution for water sterilization in resource-limited or emergency healthcare settings.
Sensitive, portable, and non-invasive methods to detect pathogenic bacteria are crucial for POC diagnostics. Feng et al. developed an advanced ECL biosensor by combining a flexible paper-based sensor with a disposable three-electrode detection system. Cellulose paper was functionalized to specifically respond to Staphylococcus aureus by using an aptamer as the recognition element and a probe DNA linked to GOx (probe DNA-GOD) for signal amplification [130]. When the aptamer binds to Staphylococcus aureus, it triggers the controlled release of probe DNA-GOD. The residual probe DNA-GOD on the paper sensor reacts with glucose, causing a notable decrease in the ECL signal. To enhance the biosensor’s ECL performance, numerous Ru(bpy)32+ molecules were incorporated into porous zinc-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) to create Ru(bpy)32+-functionalized MOF nanoflowers (Ru-MOF-5 NFs). This biosensor allows for the precise, non-destructive, and real-time detection of Staphylococcus aureus contamination in food samples, offering a novel approach for sensitive bacterial identification (Table 4).

5.3. Wound Monitoring and Infection Control

Chronic wounds, particularly in diabetic patients, are highly susceptible to microbial colonization and persistent infections, which significantly impede the healing process and increase the risk of complications [140]. These infections are often compounded by the presence of bacterial biofilms and rising antibiotic resistance, necessitating the development of multifunctional wound care systems capable of both real-time infection monitoring and active therapeutic intervention [131]. When integrated into wound dressings or hydrogels, MOF nanozymes can provide a dual function, sensing infection-associated biomarkers such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or glutathione and simultaneously catalyzing therapeutic reactions that neutralize pathogens and oxidative stress [141].
A notable example of such a multifunctional platform is the nanozyme reported by Zhao et al., in which gold nanoclusters (Au NCs) were anchored onto zirconium-based porphyrin MOFs (Au NCs@PCN) via in situ growth [142]. The resulting hybrid nanozyme exhibited both strong reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and photothermal effects under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, achieving localized heating up to 56.2 °C. This synergistic response enabled efficient bacterial membrane disruption and protein leakage, with bactericidal rates of 95.3% against MRSA and 90.6% against ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli. Moreover, in diabetic wound models, Au NCs@PCN treatment significantly accelerated healing, reducing wound size to just 2.7% within 21 days. Immunoblot analysis further demonstrated the increased expression of angiogenic and epithelial proliferation markers, highlighting the platform’s regenerative potential.
Building on this concept, Ren et al. developed a peroxidase-mimicking nanozyme by integrating Au NCs into a zeolitic imidazolate framework (Au@ZIF-8) [143]. This nanozyme exhibited enhanced peroxidase-like activity and photothermal effects upon NIR exposure, leading to effective bacterial membrane disruption (66.3%) and MRSA clearance (up to 97%). The platform catalyzed the conversion of endogenous H2O2 into hydroxyl radicals (•OH), facilitating both bacterial eradication and biofilm degradation (Figure 12). The in vivo application of Au@ZIF-8 resulted in a remarkable wound closure rate of 97.4%, underscoring its suitability for chronic wound care where biofilm-associated infections are prevalent.
To address another critical aspect of wound-healing oxidative stress, Chao et al. proposed a smart antioxidative hydrogel system (MOF/Gel) comprising an MOF nanozyme embedded in a biocompatible gel matrix [132]. The nanozyme mimicked the activity of natural antioxidant enzymes, continuously scavenging excess ROS and restoring redox homeostasis. This biochemical regulation facilitated the transition of the wound environment from an inflammatory to a proliferative phase, leading to enhanced tissue regeneration. In comparative studies, a single application of MOF/Gel demonstrated healing efficacy comparable to that of clinically used epidermal growth factor (EGF) gels, further validating its therapeutic potential.
To combat the increasing threat of antibiotic resistance, Liu et al. engineered an antibiotic-free nanozyme system by growing ultrasmall AuNPs in situ on MOF-stabilized Fe3O4 NPs (Fe3O4@MOF@Au, or FMA NPs) [144]. These hybrid nanozymes exhibited robust POD-like activity even at low H2O2 concentrations (0.97 mM), producing bactericidal •OH radicals. The FMA-NPs showed strong antibacterial efficacy against both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, with excellent biocompatibility. In vivo studies confirmed their wound-healing acceleration capabilities, demonstrating that MOF-based nanozymes can effectively circumvent the limitations of conventional antibiotics.
In addition to therapeutic efficacy, real-time infection monitoring is crucial for timely clinical intervention. Le et al. addressed this need by developing a dual-functional hydrogel composed of lysozyme-based hemin-loaded nanoparticles (Ly@He NPs) co-encapsulated with silver nitrate (AgNO3) in a double-network hydrogel matrix of gelatin and polyvinyl alcohol [133]. This system combined sustained antibacterial action mediated by silver ion release and nanozyme-catalyzed ROS production with colorimetric biosensing capabilities. Specifically, the peroxidase-like activity of Ly@He NPs enabled the hydrogel to detect glutathione, a bacterial infection biomarker, via visible color change. Both in vitro and in vivo results validated the hydrogel’s dual functionality in infection control and dynamic infection monitoring, paving the way for the next generation of smart wound dressings that integrate diagnostics with on-demand therapy. Therefore, by integrating catalytic activity with infection-responsive sensing and therapeutic features, these advanced materials offer a multifaceted solution to the pressing challenges of wound healing, especially in the context of diabetic ulcers and drug-resistant infections.

6. Environmental Applications

The environmental monitoring of microbial contamination is vital for water safety, air quality, and soil health. MOF nanozyme-based sensors offer portable, selective, and rapid detection solutions that can be deployed in diverse ecological settings. This section explores how these systems are adapted for environmental biosensing.

6.1. Waterborne Pathogen Detection

Waterborne pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Legionella are major contributors to drinking water contamination, posing severe public health risks and environmental concerns [145]. The early and reliable detection of these pathogens is vital to prevent outbreaks and ensure safe water supplies. Traditional culture-based microbiological methods are often inadequate due to their slow turnaround time and inability to detect viable but non-culturable (VBNC) organisms. While molecular techniques such as RT-PCR and ELISA offer improved sensitivity, they are generally labor-intensive, costly, and not well-suited for on-site or field-based applications [146].
To overcome these limitations, nanozyme-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising tools for waterborne pathogen detection. These hybrid materials combine the high surface area, porosity, and chemical tunability of MOFs with the catalytic (enzyme-like) activity of nanozymes, thereby facilitating efficient signal amplification in biosensing platforms [147]. MOF-based nanozymes have been effectively integrated into optical and electrochemical sensors, enabling rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective detection of pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7 in contaminated water (Table 4). Their compatibility with portable systems, including smartphone-based readouts, further enhances their applicability for point-of-care and real-time environmental monitoring.
An illustrative example of this potential is the work by Magar et al., who developed a portable biosensing platform for the rapid and selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus, a common waterborne and foodborne pathogen [134]. This system employed copper-based MOFs (Cu-MOFs) integrated with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) to immobilize specific antibodies onto a screen-printed electrode (SPE). The resulting disposable sensor (anti- Staphylococcus aureus@MPA/AuNPs-Cu-MOF@SPE) demonstrated a broad detection range from 10 to 107 CFU/mL and a low detection limit of 0.132 CFU/mL, with high selectivity against non-target bacteria. Impressively, the entire sensing process was completed within 20 min, showcasing its effectiveness for on-site pathogen detection in water samples.
In another notable study, Zhao et al. synthesized a europium-based MOF, [Eu(DHBDC)1.5(DMF)2]·DMF, which exhibited high thermal and water stability along with ligand-based fluorescence at 506 nm [148]. Although the material lacked initial Eu3+-centered emission due to an energy mismatch with the ligand (2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid, DHBDC2−), the introduction of 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (DPA), a biomarker of Bacillus anthracis, restored the red fluorescence of Eu3+ at 593, 618, and 699 nm. This interaction produced a dual-emission ratiometric signal with a detection limit as low as 1.3 μM and strong anti-interference capabilities.
Moreover, recent insights into microbial signaling pathways further emphasize the importance of advanced detection tools. Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease, utilizes a quorum-sensing molecule known as Legionella autoinducer-1 (LAI-1) for interspecies and interkingdom communication. Fan et al. demonstrated that LAI-1, synthesized by the enzyme lqsA, is secreted through outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), which facilitate both microbial signaling and host–pathogen interactions [135]. Using a Vibrio cholerae luminescence reporter and LC-MS/MS, LAI-1 was detected in OMVs derived from both Escherichia coli and Legionella pneumophila expressing lqsA. These OMVs activated bacterial signaling pathways and inhibited amoeba migration, indicating their role in environmental virulence. Furthermore, the overexpression of lqsA enhanced LAI-1 secretion, OMV production, and intracellular replication of Legionella pneumophila in macrophages. These findings underscore OMVs as vehicles for pathogen-derived biomolecules and advocate for the development of MOF-based nanozyme sensors targeting quorum-sensing signals for the effective monitoring of waterborne microbial threats.

6.2. Soil and Air Microbial Sensing

MOF-based nanozymes have emerged as powerful tools for monitoring and modulating microbial activity in soil and air environments, owing to their unique features such as high surface area, tunable porosity, and intrinsic enzyme-mimicking properties. These materials play a critical role in environmental remediation, microbial detection, and pollutant degradation.
Su et al. demonstrated the application of Mn3O4 nanozyme-coated microbial consortia to remediate heavy metal–polluted paddy soils. By enhancing the microbial reduction in toxic Cr6+ and promoting the immobilization of As3+, the nanozyme significantly reduced metal bioavailability, thereby lowering uptake by rice plants [149]. In the context of soil pesticide monitoring, Kumar et al. developed a nanozyme sensor array composed of carbon nanotubes decorated with various transition metals. This system could detect multiple pesticides in both soil and water samples with high sensitivity, showing detection limits in the range of 10.8–28.8 nM. The sensor array provided distinct colorimetric signatures for different analytes, allowing for easy field-level discrimination [150]. To mitigate cadmium (Cd) contamination in agricultural soils, Kong et al. introduced a microbial organic fertilizer (MOF) strategy. This approach boosted the population of iron-oxidizing bacteria in the rhizosphere, which facilitated iron plaque formation on rice roots. These plaques acted as a barrier to Cd uptake, effectively reducing Cd bioavailability in soil and its accumulation in rice grains [136].
For antibiotic residue detection, Ju et al. fabricated a Zn-based MOF sensor capable of selectively recognizing sulfasalazine, a common sulfonamide antibiotic. The sensor displayed a low detection limit of 31 nM and could be incorporated into paper-based test strips for on-site monitoring [151]. Additionally, Li et al. designed a cadmium-based MOF (Cd-MOF) capable of the dual fluorescent detection of both antibiotics and bacterial contaminants. This sensor achieved a limit of detection as low as 47 CFU/mL for Streptomyces albus, demonstrating its potential in environmental biosafety applications [152]. Addressing soil pollutants more broadly, Guselnikova et al. developed an MOF-5-based coating integrated with a plasmonic grating structure to serve as a highly sensitive SERS platform. This device allowed for the trace-level detection of organophosphorus compounds, achieving detection limits down to 10−12 M, highlighting its utility in chemical hazard surveillance [137].
For airborne microbial threats, Zhu et al. engineered nanofibrous membranes by integrating UiO-66-NH2 MOFs with quaternary ammonium groups. These membranes not only provided excellent filtration efficiency (>95%) against particulate matter but also exhibited potent antibacterial activity, making them suitable for high-performance air filters in healthcare and industrial settings [153]. Furthermore, Pan et al. reported a novel gas-phase biosensing platform based on cobalt-doped ZnO superparticles derived from MOFs. This material demonstrated high selectivity for detecting Listeria monocytogenes through its volatile biomarker, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (3H-2B), offering a non-invasive and rapid detection method for foodborne pathogens in the air [154].

7. Challenges and Future Perspectives

MOF-based nanozyme microbial biosensors hold tremendous potential for highly sensitive and selective microbial detection. However, several critical challenges must be addressed before these systems can be widely adopted in practical applications [138].
First and foremost, the long-term stability and reusability of MOF nanozymes pose significant concerns. Many MOFs are prone to structural degradation and loss of catalytic activity after repeated usage or when exposed to harsh environmental conditions such as moisture, extreme pH levels, and microbial metabolites [155]. While innovative designs—like electrochemiluminescence biosensors incorporating covalently attached Ru complexes on NH2-MIL-53(Al)—have demonstrated enhanced durability and consistent performance, these remain exceptional cases rather than the norm [139]. To improve the reliability of MOF nanozymes, future research should prioritize enhancing their structural robustness and catalytic longevity. Strategies such as ligand engineering, post-synthetic modifications, and forming composites with highly stable materials like graphene or polymers are promising approaches to achieve this goal.
In addition to stability challenges, achieving high selectivity and specificity for target microbial strains remains an unmet need. Most current MOF nanozyme biosensors rely largely on generalized catalytic activity, which limits their ability to precisely identify microbial strains within complex biological matrices [156]. To overcome this limitation, integrating MOFs with selective biorecognition elements such as aptamers, antibodies, or molecularly imprinted polymers could significantly improve target specificity. Thanks to their tunable structures, large surface areas, and ease of surface modification, MOFs are ideally suited to develop sensors capable of highly selective microbial detection through mechanisms like photoinduced electron transfer (PET), resonance energy transfer (RET), and structural transformations [157].
Moreover, scaling up MOF production while maintaining quality and reducing costs remains a significant barrier to commercial viability. Although MOFs can be synthesized relatively straightforwardly in the laboratory, the transition to large-scale manufacturing is hindered by the need for high-purity metal precursors, energy-intensive synthesis, and complex purification processes. These factors not only increase production costs but also lead to batch-to-batch inconsistencies [158]. Therefore, future efforts should focus on developing green, low-cost, and scalable synthesis methods that ensure reproducibility and sustainability, making MOF nanozyme biosensors more economically feasible for widespread use.
Looking forward, the integration of MOF nanozymes into smart sensor platforms empowered by artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) offers exciting prospects. Such integrated systems could facilitate the real-time, remote monitoring of microbial contamination in diverse settings including food safety, water quality, and healthcare environments. However, creating seamless interfaces between MOF materials and electronic components, data processing units, and wireless communication modules presents considerable technical challenges that require interdisciplinary innovation [159]. The tunable catalytic properties of MOFs combined with smart responsive materials provide a strong foundation for developing next-generation adaptive biosensors with enhanced sensitivity and selectivity.
Finally, ensuring the biosafety of MOF nanozyme biosensors and navigating the regulatory requirements are essential for real-world implementation. The use of novel nanomaterials in the clinical and environmental contexts requires comprehensive toxicity evaluations, biocompatibility assessments, and environmental impact studies [160]. Potential cytotoxicity and long-term safety must be rigorously examined [161]. Establishing standardized testing protocols and clear regulatory guidelines will be critical to guarantee safe application and foster public trust [162]. Without addressing these concerns, the translation of MOF-based biosensors from laboratory prototypes to practical tools will remain limited.
Therefore, tackling challenges related to stability, specificity, scalability, smart integration, and safety is vital for unlocking the full potential of MOF-based nanozyme microbial biosensors (Table 5). Through continued research and interdisciplinary innovation, these advanced biosensing platforms hold the key to revolutionize microbial detection, delivering sensitive, selective, cost-effective, and intelligent diagnostic solutions across a range of real-world applications.

8. Conclusions

Nanozymatic MOF-based biosensors have emerged as transformative platforms for highly sensitive and selective microbial detection, leveraging the intrinsic tunability of MOFs through structural alteration, composite formation, and the precise control of pore size, surface functionality, and metal centers to finely tailor their enzyme-mimicking catalytic activity, stability, and specificity. These engineered nanozymes offer rapid, cost-effective, and robust biosensing solutions that outperform conventional enzyme-based sensors in stability, reusability, and responsiveness, rendering them ideal for diverse biomedical and environmental applications. Integration with advanced signal transduction systems and smart diagnostic devices further enhances their capacity for the real-time, selective detection of pathogens and microbial metabolites. These multifunctional properties of MOF nanozymes as next-generation intelligent biosensing materials are critical for addressing challenges such as early disease diagnostics, antimicrobial resistance monitoring, and environmental pathogen surveillance. Efforts to improve biocompatibility, operational stability in complex biological and environmental matrices, and scalable synthesis methods are essential for accelerating clinical translation and widespread deployment, bridging the gap between laboratory innovation and impactful real-world applications. As immediate next steps, researchers should prioritize long-term stability testing under application-relevant conditions, the development of integrated, AI-compatible sensor prototypes, and the establishment of standardized protocols for biosafety evaluation and regulatory compliance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and S.C.; visualization, A.K.; funding acquisition, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2023R1A2C1003669) and the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through “Technology Development Project for Biological Hazards Management in Indoor Air” Project, funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (G232021010381).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ABTS2,2′-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
AgNPSilver nanoparticle
AuNPGold nanoparticle
bPEI-g-PEGPoly(ethylene imine)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol)
CATCatalase
CFCarbon microfiber
CLChemiluminescence
CNTCarbon nanotube
DAPDiaminophenazine
DHBDC2−2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid
ECLElectrochemiluminescence
FQFluoroquinolone antibiotics
GDY-CNTGraphdiyne/carbon nanotube
GoxGlucose oxidase
IFEInner filter effect
LODLimit of detection
LoxLactate oxidase
MNMicroneedle
MOFMetal–organic framework
NIRNear-infrared
NPNanoparticle
ODOxidase
OMVOuter membrane vesicle
OPDo-phenylenediamine
PAAPoly(acrylic acid)
PPasePyrophosphatase
PPiPyrophosphate
PODPeroxidase
PtNPPlatinum nanoparticle
ROSReactive oxygen species
SODSuperoxide dismutase
TMB3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine
UAUric acid
ZIFZeolitic imidazolate framework

References

  1. Oluwaseun, O.; Singleton, I.; Sant, A.S.; January, S. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’s public news and information. Food Microbiol. 2020, 73, 177–208. [Google Scholar]
  2. Taylor, J.; Lai, K.M.; Davies, M.; Clifton, D.; Ridley, I.; Biddulph, P. Flood management: Prediction of microbial contamination in large-scale floods in urban environments. Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Novikova, N.D. Review of the knowledge of microbial contamination of the russian manned spacecraft. Microb. Ecol. 2004, 47, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Edmiston, C.E.; Seabrook, G.R.; Cambria, R.A.; Brown, K.R.; Lewis, B.D.; Sommers, J.R.; Krepel, C.J.; Wilson, P.J.; Sinski, S.; Towne, J.B. Molecular epidemiology of microbial contamination in the operating room environment: Is there a risk for infection? Surgery 2005, 138, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dacarro, C.; Picco, A.M.; Grisoli, P.; Rodolfi, M. Determination of aerial microbiological contamination in scholastic sports environments. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tropea, A. Microbial Contamination and Public Health: An Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fredricks, D.N.; Relman, D.A.; Diseases, I. Application of Polymerase Chain Reaction to the Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. In Application of Polymerase Chain; David, N.F., David, A., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; Volume 29, pp. 475–486. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4460932 (accessed on 24 May 2025).
  8. Mendoza, L.G.; McQuary, P.; Mongan, A.; Gangadharan, R.; Brignac, S.; Eggers, M. High-Throughput Microarray-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Biotechniques 1999, 27, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Austin, P.; Elia, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Risk of Microbial Contamination of Aseptically Prepared Doses in Different Environments. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 12, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koskinen, M.T.; Wellenberg, G.J.; Sampimon, O.C.; Holopainen, J.; Rothkamp, A.; Salmikivi, L.; van Haeringen, W.A.; Lam, T.J.G.M.; Pyörälä, S. Field comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and bacterial culture for identification of bovine mastitis bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5707–5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. White, P.L.; Parr, C.; Thornton, C.; Barnes, R.A. Evaluation of Real-Time PCR, Galactomannan Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and a Novel Lateral-Flow Device for Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sutarlie, L.; Ow, S.Y.; Su, X. Nanomaterials-based biosensors for detection of microorganisms and microbial toxins. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gupta, R.; Raza, N.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Vikrant, K.; Kim, K.H.; Bhardwaj, N. Advances in nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for the detection of microbial toxins, pathogenic bacteria in food matrices. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Šefčovičová, J.; Tkac, J. Application of nanomaterials in microbial-cell biosensor constructions. Chem. Pap. 2015, 69, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, M.Q.; Khan, J.; Alvi, M.A.H.; Nawaz, H.; Fahad, M.; Umar, M. Nanomaterial-based sensors for microbe detection: A review. Discov. Nano 2024, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bhalla, N.; Pan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Payam, A.F. Opportunities and Challenges for Biosensors and Nanoscale Analytical Tools for Pandemics: COVID-19. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 7783–7807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Li, X.; Jian, M.; Geleta, G.S.; Wang, Z. Two-Dimensional Layered Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Detecting Microbial Toxins. Toxins 2019, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bobrinetskiy, I.; Radovic, M.; Rizzotto, F.; Vizzini, P.; Jaric, S.; Pavlovic, Z.; Radonic, V.; Nikolic, M.V.; Vidic, J. Advances in Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Foodborne Pathogen Detection. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mehta, D.; Gupta, D.; Kafle, A.; Kaur, S.; Nagaiah, T.C. Advances and Challenges in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Immunosensors for Small Cell Lung Cancer Biomarker Neuron-Specific Enolase. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khor, S.M.; Choi, J.; Won, P.; Ko, S.H. Challenges and Strategies in Developing an Enzymatic Wearable Sweat Glucose Biosensor as a Practical Point-Of-Care Monitoring Tool for Type II Diabetes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bedendi, G.; De Torquato, L.D.M.; Webb, S.; Cadoux, C.; Kulkarni, A.; Sahin, S.; Maroni, P.; Milton, R.D.; Grattieri, M. Enzymatic and Microbial Electrochemistry: Approaches and Methods. ACS Meas. Sci. Au 2022, 2, 517–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, J.W.; Ha, D.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, T. Review of micro/nanotechnologies for microbial biosensors. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, K.; Du, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, R.; Zhu, L.; Xu, W. Exploring Nucleic Acid Nanozymes: A New Frontier in Biosensor Development. Biosensors 2025, 15, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. An, Y.; Fang, X.; Cheng, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, Z.; Tong, Y. Research progress of metal–organic framework nanozymes in bacterial sensing, detection, and treatment. RSC Med. Chem. 2023, 15, 380–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Niu, X.; Li, X.; Lyu, Z.; Pan, J.; Ding, S.; Ruan, X.; Zhu, W.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Metal–organic framework based nanozymes: Promising materials for biochemical analysis. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 11338–11353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mahmoud, M.E.; Amira, M.F.; Seleim, S.M.; Mohamed, A.K. Amino-decorated magnetic metal-organic framework as a potential novel platform for selective removal of chromium (Vl), cadmium (II) and lead (II). J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, M.; Zhang, G.; Boakye, A.; Chai, H.; Qu, L.; Zhang, X. Recent Advances in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Biosensing Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 797067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.S.; Wang, Y.H.; Ding, Y. Development of biological metal–organic frameworks designed for biomedical applications: From bio-sensing/bio-imaging to disease treatment. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 3788–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miller, S.E.; Teplensky, M.H.; Moghadam, P.Z.; Fairen-Jimenez, D. Metal-organic frameworks as biosensors for luminescence-based detection and imaging. Interface Focus 2016, 6, 20160027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Lan, P.C.; Ma, S. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enzyme Immobilization: Beyond Host Matrix Materials. ACS Central Sci. 2020, 6, 1497–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Hou, M.; Li, X.; Wu, X.; Ge, J. Immobilization on Metal-Organic Framework Engenders High Sensitivity for Enzymatic Electrochemical Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13831–13836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aggarwal, V.; Solanki, S.; Malhotra, B.D. Applications of metal-organic framework-based bioelectrodes. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 8727–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shang, Y.; Xing, G.; Lin, H.; Chen, S.; Xie, T.; Lin, J.M. Portable Biosensor with Bimetallic Metal-Organic Frameworks for Visual Detection and Elimination of Bacteria. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 13368–13375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Elgazar, A.; Sabouni, R.; Ghommem, M.; Majdalawieh, A.F. Novel metal-organic framework biosensing platform for detection of COVID-19 RNA. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 25437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Leelasree, T.; Selamneni, V.; Akshaya, T.; Sahatiya, P.; Aggarwal, H. MOF based flexible, low-cost chemiresistive device as a respiration sensor for sleep apnea diagnosis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 10182–10189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, T.; Tang, M.; Yang, S.Y.; Fa, H.; Wang, Y.; Huo, D.; Hou, C.; Yang, M. Development of a novel ternary MOF nanozyme-based smartphone-integrated colorimetric and microfluidic paper-based analytical device for trace glyphosate detection. Food Chem. 2024, 464, 141780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Wu, L.; Ma, J.; Tan, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chai, H. MOF nanozymes: Active sites and sensing applications. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 12, 400–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, D.; Jana, D.; Zhao, Y. Metal-Organic Framework Derived Nanozymes in Biomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liang, J.; Liang, Z.; Zou, R.; Zhao, Y. Heterogeneous Catalysis in Zeolites, Mesoporous Silica, and Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zorlu, T.; Hetey, D.; Reithofer, M.R.; Chin, J.M. Physicochemical Methods for the Structuring and Assembly of MOF Crystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2024, 57, 2105–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Redfern, L.R.; Farha, O.K. Mechanical properties of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 10666–10679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stavila, V.; Talin, A.A.; Allendorf, M.D. MOF-based electronic and opto-electronic devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5994–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Burtch, N.C.; Heinen, J.; Bennett, T.D.; Dubbeldam, D.; Allendorf, M.D. Mechanical Properties in Metal-Organic Frameworks: Emerging Opportunities and Challenges for Device Functionality and Technological Applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kidanemariam, A.; Cho, S. Recent Advances in the Application of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Coordination Polymers in Electrochemical Biosensors. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gharib, G.; Bütün, I.; Muganlı, Z.; Kozalak, G.; Namlı, İ.; Sarraf, S.S.; Ahmadi, V.E.; Toyran, E.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Koşar, A. Biomedical Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, X.; Fang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shi, W.; Wang, X.; He, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, C. Cascaded nanozyme-based high-throughput microfluidic device integrating with glucometer and smartphone for point-of-care pheochromocytoma diagnosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 251, 116105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, N.; Liu, C.; Liu, R.; Niu, X.; Xiong, D.; Wang, K.; Yin, D.; Zhang, Z. Biomimic Nanozymes with Tunable Peroxidase-like Activity Based on the Confinement Effect of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Biosensing. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 4821–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, Y.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Nanozymes: Classification, Catalytic Mechanisms, Activity Regulation, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4357–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gao, L.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Wang, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.; Perrett, S.; et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdullah, K.A.; Tahir, T.F.; Qader, A.F.; Omer, R.A.; Othman, K.A. Nanozymes: Classification and Analytical Applications—A Review. J. Fluoresc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cui, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Deng, X.; Liu, T.; Li, D.; Zhang, X. Porphyrin-based porous organic framework: An efficient and stable peroxidase-mimicking nanozyme for detection of H2O2 and evaluation of antioxidant. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 277, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smutok, O.; Kavetskyy, T.; Prokopiv, T.; Serkiz, R.; Šauša, O.; Novák, I.; Švajdlenková, H.; Maťko, I.; Gonchar, M.; Katz, E. Biosensor Based on Peroxidase-Mimetic Nanozyme and Lactate Oxidase for Accurate L-Lactate Analysis in Beverages. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zou, H.; Wang, H.; Xu, B.; Liang, L.; Shen, L.; Lin, Q. Regenerative cerium oxide nanozymes alleviate oxidative stress for efficient dry eye disease treatment. Regen. Biomater. 2022, 9, rbac070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ali, S.; Sikdar, S.; Basak, S.; Mondal, M.; Mallick, K.; Haydar, S.M.; Ghosh, S.; Roy, M.N. Assemble multi-enzyme mimic tandem Mn3O4@ g-C3N4 for augment ROS elimination and label free detection. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 463, 142355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nadar, S.S.; Rathod, V.K. Magnetic-metal organic framework (magnetic-MOF): A novel platform for enzyme immobilization and nanozyme applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 2293–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lin, A.; Wei, H. Nanozyme-Enabled Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, Y.; Tan, G.; Fang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Kumar, A.; Trivedi, M.; Liu, D.; Liu, J. Biomedical applications of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based nano-enzymes. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 20987–21000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Hu, N.; Chen, J.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y. Recent progress in the design fabrication of metal-organic frameworks-based nanozymes and their applications to sensing and cancer therapy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 178–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, S.; Hou, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.; Cao, H.; Huang, Y. Promoting Active Sites in MOF-Derived Homobimetallic Hollow Nanocages as a High-Performance Multifunctional Nanozyme Catalyst for Biosensing and Organic Pollutant Degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 2581–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, G.; Dong, F.; Zhao, Z.; Li, K.; Lin, Y. Structure Defect Tuning of Metal–Organic Frameworks as a Nanozyme Regulatory Strategy for Selective Online Electrochemical Analysis of Uric Acid. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 52987–52997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baranwal, A.; Polash, S.A.; Aralappanavar, V.K.; Behera, B.K.; Bansal, V.; Shukla, R. Recent Progress and Prospect of Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes in Biomedical Application. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khan, S.; Cho, W.C.; Sepahvand, A.; Hosseinali, S.H.; Hussain, A.; Babadaei, M.M.N.; Sharifi, M.; Falahati, M.; Jaragh-Alhadad, L.A.; Hagen, T.L.M.T.; et al. Electrochemical aptasensor based on the engineered core-shell MOF nanostructures for the detection of tumor antigens. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ling, P.; Cheng, S.; Chen, N.; Qian, C.; Gao, F. Nanozyme-Modified Metal-Organic Frameworks with Multienzymes Activity as Biomimetic Catalysts and Electrocatalytic Interfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 17185–17192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gao, J.; Luo, S.; Fan, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Fu, Z. Preparation of Co dual atomic site catalysts loaded on defect-engineered MOFs material with superb chemiluminescent enhancement effect for sensitive detection of bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1282, 341909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cao, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Hu, H.; Chen, K.; Yang, J.; He, S.; Sun, H.; Ye, Y. Electrochemical detection of S. typhimurium based on peroxidase-like activity of gold nanoparticle-doped CuZr-MOF nanozyme. Microchim. Acta 2025, 192, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Z.; Dai, G.; Luo, F.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chu, Z.; He, P.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Q. An electrochemical sensor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide detection based on dual functional Cu2+-modified metal–organic framework nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kabak, B.; Soyuçok, A. Fe-MOF based turn-on fluorescence sensor for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens in multiple matrices. Food Biosci. 2025, 69, 106910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shen, H.; Tang, Y.; Ma, H. Accelerated peroxidase-like activity of ultrathin amine-tagged bimetallic MOF-74 nanozyme for construction of versatile bioassays from small molecules to enzymes and bacteria. Microchem. J. 2024, 201, 110706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, W.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Xing, H.; Otake, K.I.; et al. Microenvironmental modulation breaks intrinsic pH limitations of nanozymes to boost their activities. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zheng, S.; Sun, Y.; Xue, H.; Braunstein, P.; Huang, W.; Pang, H. Dual-ligand and hard-soft-acid-base strategies to optimize metal-organic framework nanocrystals for stable electrochemical cycling performance. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwab197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jahani, P.M.; Tajik, S.; Dourandish, Z. Electrochemical Sensor Based on Ce-MOF Modified Screen Printed Electrode for Metronidazole Determination. Chem. Methodol. 2024, 8, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ameen, S.S.M.; Bedair, A.; Hamed, M.; Mansour, F.R.; Omer, K.M. Recent Advances in Metal-Organic Frameworks as Oxidase Mimics: A Comprehensive Review on Rational Design and Modification for Enhanced Sensing Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 17, 110–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, M.; Chen, J.; Wu, W.; Fang, Y.; Dong, S. Oxidase-like MOF-818 Nanozyme with High Specificity for Catalysis of Catechol Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15569–15574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sun, Z.; Wu, S.; Peng, Y.; Wang, M.; Jalalah, M.; Al-Assiri, M.; Harraz, F.A.; Yang, J.; Li, G. Sensor array for rapid pathogens identification fabricated with peptide-conjugated 2D metal-organic framework nanosheets. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zuo, W.; Liang, L.; Ye, F.; Zhao, S. An integrated platform for label-free fluorescence detection and inactivation of bacteria based on boric acid functionalized Zr-MOF. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 345, 130345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sethi, S.; Rathod, V. Isolation and chemical immobilization of E. coli-specific bacteriophage with NH2-MIL-101 (Fe) MOF, a high photoluminescence rod-shaped microcrystals for low-level bacteria detection. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2024, 38, e7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bhatt, D.; Singh, S.; Singhal, N.; Bhardwaj, N.; Deep, A. Glyco-conjugated metal-organic framework biosensor for fluorescent detection of bacteria. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2023, 415, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tolentino, M.Q.; Hartmann, A.K.; Loe, D.T.; Rouge, J.L. Controlled release of small molecules and proteins from DNA-surfactant stabilized metal organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 5627–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shahrokhian, S.; Ranjbar, S. Aptamer immobilization on amino-functionalized metal-organic frameworks: An ultrasensitive platform for the electrochemical diagnostic of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Analyst 2018, 143, 3191–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, C.; Hang, T.; Jin, Y. Atomically Fe-anchored MOF-on-MOF nanozyme with differential signal amplification for ultrasensitive cathodic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Exploration 2023, 3, 20220151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rohra, N.; Gaikwad, G.; Dandekar, P.; Jain, R. Microfluidic Synthesis of a Bioactive Metal-Organic Framework for Glucose-Responsive Insulin Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 8251–8265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Z.; Liu, Y. Metal-Organic Frameworks as Sensors of Biomolecules. In ACS Symposium Series; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 1394, pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Usman, K.A.S.; Maina, J.W.; Seyedin, S.; Conato, M.T.; Payawan, L.M.; Dumée, L.F.; Razal, J.M. Downsizing metal-organic frameworks by bottom-up and top-down methods. NPG Asia Mater. 2020, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Singh, R.; Musameh, M.; Gao, Y.; Ozcelik, B.; Mulet, X.; Doherty, C.M. Stable MOF@enzyme composites for electrochemical biosensing devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 7677–7688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nataraj, N.; Chen, T.W.; Gan, Z.W.; Chen, S.; Hatshan, M.; Ali, M. Bifunctional 3D-MOF-based nanoprobes for electrochemical sensing and nanozyme enhanced with peroxidase mimicking for colorimetric detection of acetaminophen. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, K.; Li, N.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Dang, F. Size-selective QD@MOF core-shell nanocomposites for the highly sensitive monitoring of oxidase activities. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chen, Y.; Yang, Z.; Hu, H.; Zhou, X.; You, F.; Yao, C.; Liu, F.J.; Yu, P.; Wu, D.; Yao, J.; et al. Advanced Metal–Organic Frameworks-Based Catalysts in Electrochemical Sensors. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 881172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jayaramulu, K.; Mukherjee, S.; Morales, D.M.; Dubal, D.P.; Nanjundan, A.K.; Schneemann, A.; Masa, J.; Kment, S.; Schuhmann, W.; Otyepka, M.; et al. Graphene-Based Metal-Organic Framework Hybrids for Applications in Catalysis, Environmental, and Energy Technologies. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 17241–17338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tian, J.Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, K.; Zhu, L.; Song, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Du, M. Novel aptasensing strategy for efficiently quantitative analyzing Staphylococcus aureus based on defective copper-based metal-organic framework. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, S.; Guo, Y.; Fan, J.; Yang, Y.; Zuo, C.; Bai, S.; Sheng, S.; Li, J.; Xie, G. A fluorometric assay for rapid enrichment and determination of bacteria by using zirconium-metal organic frameworks as both capture surface and signal amplification tag. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, R.; Yan, J.; Feng, B.; Sun, M.; Ding, C.; Shen, H.; Zhu, J.; Yu, S. Ultrasensitive Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Based on Boric Acid-Functionalized Fluorescent MOF@COF. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 18663–18671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chai, H.; Yu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.; Huang, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G. MOF-On-MOF Dual Enzyme-Mimic Nanozyme with Enhanced Cascade Catalysis for Colorimetric/Chemiluminescent Dual-Mode Aptasensing. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 10785–10794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ma, S.; Xiao, S.; Hong, Y.; Bao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, D.; Huang, X. Coupling metal organic frameworks nanozyme with carbon nanotubes on the gradient porous hollow fiber membrane for nonenzymatic electrochemical H2O2 detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1293, 342285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, J.; Zhu, W.; Mao, Y.; Ling, G.; Zhang, P. Enhanced enzyme-like DNAzyme@MOFs for non-enzymatic uric acid detection in interstitial fluid. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 500, 156837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S. A novel enhanced electrochemical sensor based on the peroxidase-like activity of Fe3O4@Au/MOF for the detection of p-aminophenol. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2022, 52, 989–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tajwar, M.A.; Qi, L. Dual Stimulus-Responsive Enzyme@Metal–Organic Framework-Polymer Composites toward Enhanced Catalytic Performance for Visual Detection of Glucose. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2024, 7, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chandio, I.; Ai, Y.; Wu, L.; Liang, Q. Recent progress in MOFs-based nanozymes for biosensing. Nano Res. 2023, 17, 39–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Bu, H.; Zia, D.S.; Dai, P.; Liu, J. Nanomaterials for molecular recognition: Specific adsorption and regulation of nanozyme activities. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 3625–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ma, T.; Huang, K.; Cheng, N. Recent Advances in Nanozyme-Mediated Strategies for Pathogen Detection and Control. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hou, H.; Wang, L.; Gao, Y.; Ping, J.; Zhao, F. Recent advances in metal-organic framework-based nanozymes and their enabled optical biosensors for food safety analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 173, 117602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Teymouri, Z.; Shekarchizadeh, H.; Karami, K. Innovative real-time monitoring of fish freshness via agar-based film embedded with Cu-MOF colorimetric indicators. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 510, 161751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, S.; Deng, W.; Yang, L.; Tan, Y.; Xie, Q.; Yao, S. Copper-Based Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles with Peroxidase-Like Activity for Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 24440–24445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, L.; Zhu, G.; Gu, X.; Yang, Z. Nanozyme colourimetry based on temperate bacteriophage for rapid and sensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food matrices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 416, 110657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, W.; Xiao, S.; Zeng, M.; Xie, H.; Gan, N. Dual-mode colorimetric-electrochemical biosensor for Vibrio parahaemolyticus detection based on CuO2 nanodot-encapsulated metal-organic framework nanozymes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 387, 133835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, R.; Qian, G.; Shen, H.; Yu, S. Self-cascade MOF@MOF nanozyme for ultrasensitive and low-background detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Microchem. J. 2025, 209, 112695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hao, M.; Huang, W.; Feng, B.; Teng, M.; Ding, C.; Shen, H.; Yu, S.; Wang, L. Layered Double Hydroxide-Derived Two-Dimensional Bimetallic Metal–Organic Framework Nanozymes for Microorganism Identification. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 4610–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ren, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Qu, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. A Co-based MOF as nanozyme with enhanced oxidase-like activity for highly sensitive and selective colorimetric differentiation of aminophenol isomers. Talanta 2023, 255, 124219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Abedeen, Z.; Yadav, L.; Gupta, R. Sensitive electrochemical determination of hydrogen peroxide in milk and water utilizing AgNPs@Sn MOF nanozyme. Microchim. Acta 2025, 192, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mansouri, S. Detection of pathogenic bacteria with nanozymes-based colorimetric biosensors: Advances, challenges and future prospects. Microchem. J. 2024, 205, 111392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mo, F.; Zhong, S.; You, T.; Lu, J.; Sun, D. Aptamer and DNAzyme-Functionalized Cu-MOF Hybrid Nanozymes for the Monitoring and Management of Bacteria-Infected Wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 52114–52127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gao, H.; Yu, H.; Yang, S.; Chai, F.; Wu, H.; Tian, M. Ultrasensitive detection of H2O2 via electrochemical sensor by graphene synergized with MOF-on-MOF nanozymes. Microchim. Acta 2024, 191, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chen, S.; Xie, Y.; Guo, X.; Sun, D. Self-supporting electrochemical sensors for monitoring of cell-released H2O2 based on metal nanoparticle/MOF nanozymes. Microchem. J. 2022, 181, 107715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yasin, G.; Ibrahim, S.; Ajmal, S.; Ibraheem, S.; Ali, S.; Nadda, A.K.; Zhang, G.; Kaur, J.; Maiyalagan, T.; Gupta, R.K.; et al. Tailoring of electrocatalyst interactions at interfacial level to benchmark the oxygen reduction reaction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wei, J.J.; Li, H.B.; Wang, G.Q.; Zheng, J.Y.; Wang, A.J.; Mei, L.P.; Zhao, T.; Feng, J.J. Novel Ultrasensitive Photoelectrochemical Cytosensor Based on Hollow CdIn2S4/In2S3 Heterostructured Microspheres for HepG2 Cells Detection and Inhibitor Screening. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 12240–12247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Li, X.; Zhu, H.; Liu, P.; Wang, M.; Pan, J.; Qiu, F.; Ni, L.; Niu, X. Realizing selective detection with nanozymes: Strategies and trends. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 143, 116379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sradha, S.A.; George, L.; Keerthana, P.; Varghese, A. Recent advances in electrochemical and optical sensing of the organophosphate chlorpyrifos: A review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2022, 52, 431–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, Z.; Wang, F.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. A series of MOF/Ce-based nanozymes with dual enzyme-like activity disrupting biofilms and hindering recolonization of bacteria. Biomaterials 2019, 208, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ye, T.; Bai, L.; Yu, J.; Shi, W.; Yuan, M.; Wang, J.; Cao, H.; Hao, L.; Wu, X.; Yin, F.; et al. Fluorescent nanozyme for the dual-mode detection of tetracycline: Aggregation-induced luminescence and boosting peroxidase-like activity. Food Control 2025, 171, 111109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Du, J.; Shi, F.; Wang, K.; Han, Q.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Dong, B.; Wang, L.; Xu, L. Metal-organic framework-based biosensing platforms for diagnosis of bacteria-induced infectious diseases. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 175, 117707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Quijia, C.R.; Alves, R.C.; Hanck-Silva, G.; Frem, R.C.G.; Arroyos, G.; Chorilli, M. Metal-organic frameworks for diagnosis and therapy of infectious diseases. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cesewski, E.; Johnson, B.N. Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 159, 112214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hu, W.C.; Zhao, X.P.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Xia, X.H. Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks-based biosensors for pathogen detection. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 178, 117857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gu, W.; Miller, S.; Chiu, C.Y. Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2019, 14, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Wang, M.; Li, R.; Sheng, S.; Yang, H.; Tang, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Bai, L.; Chen, X.; et al. MOF nanozyme mediated bacterial metabolic regulation to intervene MRSA antibiotic tolerance for enhanced antimicrobial efficacy. Nano Today 2025, 63, 102753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Li, X.; Li, G.; Pan, Q.; Xue, F.; Wang, Z.; Peng, C. Rapid and ultra-sensitive lateral flow assay for pathogens based on multivalent aptamer and magnetic nanozyme. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 250, 116044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Liu, C.; Yu, H.; Zhang, B.; Liu, S.; Liu, C.G.; Li, F.; Song, H. Engineering whole-cell microbial biosensors: Design principles and applications in monitoring and treatment of heavy metals and organic pollutants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 60, 108019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gao, L.; Wen, J.; Huang, Z.; Sheng, S.; Xu, F.; Ma, G.; Tan, H. pH Meter-Assisted Biosensor Based on Glucose Oxidase-Conjugated Magnetic Metal–Organic Framework for On-Site Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 31224–31232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ren, Z.; Wang, X.; Jia, B.; Liu, X.; Qu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, M.; Li, Y.Q. Nanozyme-Energized SERS Sensor for Ultrasensitive Dual-Mode Bacterial Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2025, 8, 8385–8396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fu, H.; Li, H.; He, Q.; Du, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Lin, B. Flexible fiber composite functional materials based on Fe-MOFs nanozyme catalytic activity for efficient point-of-use water disinfection. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 490, 151879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Feng, Q.; Wang, C.; Miao, X.; Wu, M. A novel paper-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor for non-destructive detection of pathogenic bacteria in real samples. Talanta 2024, 267, 125224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, Y.F.; Ni, P.W.; Huang, Y.; Xie, T. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection. Chin. J. Traumatol. 2022, 25, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chao, D.; Dong, Q.; Yu, Z.; Qi, D.; Li, M.; Xu, L.; Liu, L.; Fang, Y.; Dong, S. Specific Nanodrug for Diabetic Chronic Wounds Based on Antioxidase-Mimicking MOF-818 Nanozymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 23438–23447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Le, G.; Li, Y.; Cai, L.; Zhang, L.; Pei, W.; Zhu, X.; Xu, S.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J. Lysozyme-based nanozyme encapsulated in double-network hydrogel for monitoring and repair of MRSA infected wounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 146421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Magar, H.S.; Hemdan, B.A.; Rashdan, H.R.M.; Hassan, R.Y.A. Rapid and Selective Detection of Foodborne Pathogens Using a Disposable Bio-sensing System Designed by Stepwise Antibody Immobilization on AuNPs@Cu-MOF Nanocomposite. J. Anal. Test. 2024, 8, 478–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Fan, M.; Kiefer, P.; Charki, P.; Hedberg, C.; Seibel, J.; Vorholt, J.A.; Hilbi, H. The Legionella autoinducer LAI-1 is delivered by outer membrane vesicles to promote interbacterial and interkingdom signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 299, 105376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kong, F.; Lu, S. Effects of microbial organic fertilizer (MOF) application on cadmium uptake of rice in acidic paddy soil: Regulation of the iron oxides driven by the soil microorganisms. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 307, 119447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Guselnikova, O.; Postnikov, P.; Elashnikov, R.; Miliutina, E.; Svorcik, V.; Lyutakov, O. Metal-organic framework (MOF-5) coated SERS active gold gratings: A platform for the selective detection of organic contaminants in soil. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1068, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Souza, J.E.d.S.; de Oliveira, G.P.; Alexandre, J.Y.N.H.; Neto, J.G.L.; Sales, M.B.; Junior, P.G.d.S.; de Oliveira, A.L.B.; de Souza, M.C.M.; dos Santos, J.C.S. A Comprehensive Review on the Use of Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Coupled with Enzymes as Biosensors. Electrochem 2022, 3, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sun, L.; Chen, Y.; Duan, Y.; Ma, F. Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence Biosensor Based on Functionalized Two-Dimensional Metal–Organic Frameworks for Bacterial Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 38923–38930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Falcone, M.; De Angelis, B.; Pea, F.; Scalise, A.; Stefani, S.; Tasinato, R.; Zanetti, O.; Paola, L.D. Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 26, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, L.; Ouyang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; He, L.; Lei, Y.; Zou, Z.; Feng, F.; Yang, R. The fluorescence imaging and precise suppression of bacterial infections in chronic wounds by porphyrin-based metal-organic framework nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 8048–8055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhao, X.; Chang, L.; Hu, Y.; Xu, S.; Liang, Z.; Ren, X.; Mei, X.; Chen, Z. Preparation of Photocatalytic and Antibacterial MOF Nanozyme Used for Infected Diabetic Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 18194–18208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ren, X.; Chang, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xu, S.; Liang, Z.; Mei, X.; Chen, Z. Au@MOFs used as peroxidase-like catalytic nanozyme for bacterial infected wound healing through bacterial membranes disruption and protein leakage promotion. Mater. Des. 2023, 229, 111890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Liu, C.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Li, R.; Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Wan, M.; Wang, X. Metal-organic framework-modulated Fe3O4 composite au nanoparticles for antibacterial wound healing via synergistic peroxidase-like nanozymatic catalysis. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Wu, W.; Yan, Y.; Xie, M.; Liu, Y.; Deng, L.; Wang, H. A critical review on metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-based sensors for foodborne pathogenic bacteria detection. Talanta 2025, 281, 126918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Oon, Y.L.; Ayaz, M.; Deng, M.; Li, L.; Song, K. Waterborne pathogens detection technologies: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1286923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhou, Q.; Natarajan, B.; Kannan, P. Nanostructured biosensing platforms for the detection of food- and water-borne pathogenic Escherichia coli. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2023, 415, 3111–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhao, X.Y.; Wang, J.; Hao, H.G.; Yang, H.; Yang, Q.S.; Zhao, W.Y. A water-stable europium-MOF sensor for the selective, sensitive ratiometric fluorescence detection of anthrax biomarker. Microchem. J. 2021, 166, 106253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Su, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Q. A mechanism of microbial sensitivity regulation on interventional remediation by nanozyme manganese oxide in soil heavy metal pollution. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumar, M.; Kaur, N.; Singh, N. Colorimetric Nanozyme Sensor Array Based on Metal Nanoparticle-Decorated CNTs for Quantification of Pesticides in Real Water and Soil Samples. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ju, P.; Zhang, G.; Lu, W.; Wang, S.; Li, A.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Fei, S.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, E. A new hydroxyl group functionalized Zn-MOF as an efficient fluorescent probe for sulfasalazine residue detection in water, milk and soil. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1311, 138437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Li, Q.Q.; Wen, M.J.; Zhang, Y.S.; Guo, Z.S.; Bai, X.; Song, J.X.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, J.L. Multiple fluorescence response behaviors towards antibiotics and bacteria based on a highly stable Cd-MOF. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 127132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Bao, L.; Chen, J.; Duan, S.; Chen, S.C.; Xu, P.; Wang, W.N. Self-decontaminating nanofibrous filters for efficient particulate matter removal and airborne bacteria inactivation. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 8, 1081–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pan, M.M.; Feng, D.; Ouyang, Y.; Yang, D.; Yu, X.; Xu, L.; Willner, I. MOF-templated synthesis of cobalt-doped zinc oxide superparticles for detection of the 3-hydroxy-2-butanone microbial biomarker. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 358, 131482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ali, A.; Ovais, M.; Zhou, H.; Rui, Y.; Chen, C. Tailoring metal-organic frameworks-based nanozymes for bacterial theranostics. Biomaterials 2021, 275, 120951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Qin, J.; Guo, N.; Yang, J.; Wei, J. Recent advances in metal oxide nanozyme-based optical biosensors for food safety assays. Food Chem. 2024, 447, 139019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhao, Y.; Zeng, H.; Zhu, X.W.; Lu, W.; Li, D. Metal-organic frameworks as photoluminescent biosensing platforms: Mechanisms and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4484–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Leoi, M.W.N.; Zheng, X.T.; Yu, Y.; Gao, J.; Ong, D.H.S.; Koh, C.Z.H.; Chen, P.; Yang, L. Redefining Metal Organic Frameworks in Biosensors: Where Are We Now? ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 13246–13278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qian, W.; Lei, F.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X.; Lin, Y.; Wang, F. Recent advances in MOF-based nanozymes: Synthesis, activities, and bioapplications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 263, 116593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Xu, Z.; Long, L.L.; Chen, Y.Q.; Chen, M.L.; Cheng, Y.H. A nanozyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for sensitive detection of aflatoxin B1. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 128039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ahmadi, S.; Rahimizadeh, K.; Shafiee, A.; Rabiee, N.; Iravani, S. Nanozymes and their emerging applications in biomedicine. Process Biochem. 2023, 131, 154–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Feng, L.; Zhang, M.; Fan, Z. Current trends in colorimetric biosensors using nanozymes for detecting biotoxins (bacterial food toxins, mycotoxins, and marine toxins). Anal. Methods 2024, 16, 6771–6792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic overview of MOF properties and their application areas. MOF, metal–organic framework.
Scheme 1. Schematic overview of MOF properties and their application areas. MOF, metal–organic framework.
Biosensors 15 00437 sch001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of CNP@bPEI-g-PEG nanozymes and their antioxidant mechanism in alleviating oxidative damage associated with dry eye disease (DED). Copyright 2022, Regenerative Biomaterials [53].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of CNP@bPEI-g-PEG nanozymes and their antioxidant mechanism in alleviating oxidative damage associated with dry eye disease (DED). Copyright 2022, Regenerative Biomaterials [53].
Biosensors 15 00437 g001
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of (a) the synthesis process and key characteristics of ZIF-L-Co-10 mg Cys and (b) real-time uric acid monitoring using a microreactor containing immobilized ZIF-L-Co-10 mg Cys, integrated with in vivo microdialysis and electrochemical sensing. Copyright 2021 ACS [60].
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of (a) the synthesis process and key characteristics of ZIF-L-Co-10 mg Cys and (b) real-time uric acid monitoring using a microreactor containing immobilized ZIF-L-Co-10 mg Cys, integrated with in vivo microdialysis and electrochemical sensing. Copyright 2021 ACS [60].
Biosensors 15 00437 g002
Figure 3. Overcoming pH constraints to enhance the catalytic performance of MOF-based nanozymes. Copyright 2024, Nature Communications [69].
Figure 3. Overcoming pH constraints to enhance the catalytic performance of MOF-based nanozymes. Copyright 2024, Nature Communications [69].
Biosensors 15 00437 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of the biomimetic mineralization process involved in the growth of ZIF-8 on enzyme surfaces. 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the raw enzyme, the growth of MOF crystals on the enzyme, and the final composite material in which the enzyme is fully encapsulated by the MOF, respectively. Copyright 2021, RSC [84].
Figure 4. Illustration of the biomimetic mineralization process involved in the growth of ZIF-8 on enzyme surfaces. 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the raw enzyme, the growth of MOF crystals on the enzyme, and the final composite material in which the enzyme is fully encapsulated by the MOF, respectively. Copyright 2021, RSC [84].
Biosensors 15 00437 g004
Figure 5. Depiction of the catalytic mechanism and aptasensing application employing an MOF-on-MOF nanozyme system. Copyright 2023, ACS [92].
Figure 5. Depiction of the catalytic mechanism and aptasensing application employing an MOF-on-MOF nanozyme system. Copyright 2023, ACS [92].
Biosensors 15 00437 g005
Figure 6. Diagram outlining the main stages in the preparation of GPF-CNT@MOF electrodes and the underlying sensing mechanism. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [93].
Figure 6. Diagram outlining the main stages in the preparation of GPF-CNT@MOF electrodes and the underlying sensing mechanism. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [93].
Biosensors 15 00437 g006
Figure 7. Standard procedure for colorimetric detection of MDRB and associated sensing techniques. Copyright 2025, Elsevier [105].
Figure 7. Standard procedure for colorimetric detection of MDRB and associated sensing techniques. Copyright 2025, Elsevier [105].
Biosensors 15 00437 g007
Figure 8. (A) UV–Vis absorption spectra comparing ABTS with various catalysts: (a) ABTS alone, (b) MVCM@β-CD, (c) ZIF-67 + ABTS, (d) 2D Co-MOF + ABTS, (e) MVCM + ABTS, and (f) MVCM@β-CD + ABTS. (B) UV–Vis absorption spectra of TMB under similar conditions: (a) TMB alone, (b) MVCM@β-CD, (c) ZIF-67 + TMB, (d) 2D Co-MOF + TMB, (e) MVCM + TMB, and (f) MVCM@β-CD + TMB, all measured in NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 3.0) after 10 min at room temperature (Inset: corresponding colorimetric changes captured in photographs). Copyright 2023, Elsevier [107].
Figure 8. (A) UV–Vis absorption spectra comparing ABTS with various catalysts: (a) ABTS alone, (b) MVCM@β-CD, (c) ZIF-67 + ABTS, (d) 2D Co-MOF + ABTS, (e) MVCM + ABTS, and (f) MVCM@β-CD + ABTS. (B) UV–Vis absorption spectra of TMB under similar conditions: (a) TMB alone, (b) MVCM@β-CD, (c) ZIF-67 + TMB, (d) 2D Co-MOF + TMB, (e) MVCM + TMB, and (f) MVCM@β-CD + TMB, all measured in NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 3.0) after 10 min at room temperature (Inset: corresponding colorimetric changes captured in photographs). Copyright 2023, Elsevier [107].
Biosensors 15 00437 g008
Figure 9. Illustration of the key steps involved in constructing MNPs/Zn-MOF-modified electrodes and their application in an H2O2 sensor for the real-time monitoring of H2O2 released by living cells upon drug stimulation, with data transmission to the electrochemical workstation. Copyright 2022, Elsevier [112].
Figure 9. Illustration of the key steps involved in constructing MNPs/Zn-MOF-modified electrodes and their application in an H2O2 sensor for the real-time monitoring of H2O2 released by living cells upon drug stimulation, with data transmission to the electrochemical workstation. Copyright 2022, Elsevier [112].
Biosensors 15 00437 g009
Figure 10. Illustration of the HCR-multi-Apt assembly process and its application in bacterial detection. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [125].
Figure 10. Illustration of the HCR-multi-Apt assembly process and its application in bacterial detection. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [125].
Biosensors 15 00437 g010
Figure 11. (a) Bacterial culture results on agar plates following treatment with Fe-MIL-101@CMFP. (b) Quantification of bacterial colonies. (c) OD600 measurements of the filtrate over a 12 h period. (d) Comparison of sterilization efficiency across different filter paper materials. (e) Schematic illustration of the bacterial killing mechanism. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [129].
Figure 11. (a) Bacterial culture results on agar plates following treatment with Fe-MIL-101@CMFP. (b) Quantification of bacterial colonies. (c) OD600 measurements of the filtrate over a 12 h period. (d) Comparison of sterilization efficiency across different filter paper materials. (e) Schematic illustration of the bacterial killing mechanism. Copyright 2024, Elsevier [129].
Biosensors 15 00437 g011
Figure 12. (a) Illustration of the synthesis procedure for the Au@ZIF-8/H composite. (b) Diagram showing its antibacterial action, stimulation of cellular activity, and promotion of skin cell and epidermal regeneration to enhance the healing of diabetic infected wounds. Copyright 2023, Elsevier [143].
Figure 12. (a) Illustration of the synthesis procedure for the Au@ZIF-8/H composite. (b) Diagram showing its antibacterial action, stimulation of cellular activity, and promotion of skin cell and epidermal regeneration to enhance the healing of diabetic infected wounds. Copyright 2023, Elsevier [143].
Biosensors 15 00437 g012
Table 1. Summary of key design and functional concepts in MOF-based nanozyme biosensing.
Table 1. Summary of key design and functional concepts in MOF-based nanozyme biosensing.
Key ConceptDescriptionRelevance to BiosensingRepresentative ExamplesRefs.
Structural Features of MOFsMOFs are crystalline porous materials formed by metal ions/clusters and organic ligands, offering ultrahigh surface area, ordered networks, and tunable pore sizes.Enable selective adsorption, diffusion of analytes, and high loading of active sites, forming the structural basis for biosensing and nanozyme integration.Use of porous MOFs to concentrate microbial analytes or catalytic substrates.[40,41,42,43,44]
Chemical Tunability of MOFsMOFs can be customized at both the metal center and linker level, allowing the modulation of surface chemistry and catalytic activity.Facilitates precise design of nanozyme activity, target specificity, and sensing selectivity.Functionalized MOFs with redox-active metals or tailored linkers enhancing specificity for microbial detection.[41,42,43,44]
Classification of NanozymesNanozymes are classified into metal-based, carbon-based, and composite types based on material and catalytic mechanism.Understanding classification aids in selecting the most suitable catalytic system for microbial biosensing applications.FePPOP-1 for peroxidase-like sensing; Smutok et al.’s composite biosensor for L-lactate; cerium oxide nanozymes for ROS-related diagnostics; Mn3O4@g-C3N4 for pollutant sensing.[45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]
Advantages of MOFs as Nanozyme HostsMOFs offer high porosity, active site confinement, and chemical compatibility for hosting nanozymes.Improves catalytic efficiency, stability, and substrate accessibility, enhancing detection sensitivity and robustness.Use of MOFs to stabilize catalytic centers and provide porous diffusion pathways for microbial analytes.[55,56,57]
Integration of MOFs and NanozymesRational design of MOF–nanozyme hybrids leverages both structural and catalytic advantages, enabling multifunctional biosensing platforms.Enhances sensitivity, selectivity, and potential for intelligent (e.g., point-of-care or responsive) microbial biosensing platforms.Cerium oxide nanozymes within polymer-modified MOFs for ROS scavenging; multifunctional Mn3O4@g-C3N4 composites for pollutant sensing with enzyme-mimetic properties.[53,54,58]
Table 2. Summary of MOF nanozyme design strategies for microbial biosensing.
Table 2. Summary of MOF nanozyme design strategies for microbial biosensing.
Design StrategyTarget MicroorganismType of Enzyme-mimetic ActivityAdvantagesRepresentative ExamplesDetection MethodRef.
Active Center EngineeringMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)Peroxidase-likeHigh catalytic activity; ultrasensitive detection; antibiotic susceptibility testingCo2–O10 dual atomic sites in MOF-808; amplified chemiluminescence (~5800-fold)Chemiluminescence[64]
Salmonella TyphimuriumPeroxidase-mimetic electrocatalysisHigh sensitivity; synergistic catalysis via Cu, Zr, and AuNPsAuNP-doped CuZr-MOF functionalized with DNA probesElectrochemical[65]
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (endotoxin)Dopamine oxidation catalysisUltra-low LOD; electrostatic recognition; high specificityCu2+-modified nanoscale MOFsElectrochemical[66]
Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureusFluorescence modulation via surface interactionRapid detection; multiplex pathogen detection; applicable in food samplesTurn-on Fe-MOF fluorescence biosensorFluorescence[67]
Staphylococcus aureusPeroxidase-likeSynergistic metal doping; enhanced catalytic activityAmine-functionalized bimetallic Fe–Ni MOF-74Colorimetric/Electrochemical[68]
Oxidase-like (ascorbate, glutathione, laccase)Defect engineering enhances multi-enzyme mimicry; improved oxygen adsorptionCysteine-deficient Co-based MOF (ZIF-L-Co)Electrochemical (uric acid sensing)[60]
Peroxidase-likeLocal pH regulation improves activity at physiological pHPAA embedded in PCN-222-FeColorimetric[69]
Pore Environment ModulationPeroxidase-likeMicroenvironment tuning for physiological stabilityPAA-modulated PCN-222-FeColorimetric[69]
Surface FunctionalizationMultiple microbial speciesFluorescence quenching/recoveryRapid microbial fingerprinting; high classification accuracy in complex matrices2D-MOFs with fluorescent dye-labeled peptidesFluorescence[74]
Bacteria (general)ROS generation (photocatalytic antibacterial)Dual detection and disinfection capabilityBoronic acid-modified UiO-66 (Zr-UiO-66-B(OH)2)Fluorescence[75]
Escherichia coliPeroxidase-likeRapid, specific detection; enhanced phage stability and signal amplificationNH2-MIL-101(Fe) conjugated with lytic bacteriophagesColorimetric/Fluorescence[76]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coliLuminescent detectionLabel-free, specific carbohydrate binding; stable in environmentGlycosylated NH2-MIL-53(Fe) with galactose/mannose ligandsLuminescence[77]
Dual-gated enzymatic activityProgrammable, tunable biosensing behaviorZIF-8 functionalized with DNA surfactant micellesFluorescence/Enzymatic[78]
Escherichia coli O157:H7Peroxidase-likeWide detection range; improved electron transfer via polyanilineAmino-functionalized MOF aptasensorElectrochemical[79]
Fenton-like catalytic activityEnhanced ECL signal; improved electron transferCoNi-MOF@PCN-224/Fe dual MOF-on-MOF systemElectrochemiluminescence[80]
Hybridization with Other MaterialsStaphylococcus aureusPeroxidase-likeImproved conductivity and aptamer immobilization; ultralow detection limitsML-Cu2O@Cu-MOF composite nanozymeElectrochemical (EIS, DPV)[89]
Acinetobacter baumanniiFluorescence amplificationMagnetic enrichment; rapid detection; high recovery efficiencyZr-mMOF magnetic + fluorescein-loaded MOF aptasensing platformFluorescence[90]
A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosaPeroxidase-likeDual-mode detection; good performance in complex fluidsMOF–COF composite with boric acid and DNA aptamer scaffoldFluorescence/Colorimetric[91]
Chlorpyrifos (pesticide, microbial sensor)Cascade catalysis (ROS generation)Signal amplification via in situ H2O2 generationMOF-818@PMOF(Fe) nanozymeChemiluminescence/Colorimetric[92]
Live microbial cells (H2O2 secretion)Peroxidase-likeReal-time metabolic monitoring; high stabilityCNT/MOF composite on 3D gradient porous fiber membraneElectrochemical[93]
Peroxidase-likeWearable sensing; minimally invasive; colorimetric detectionDNAzyme@MOF composite in hydrogel microneedle tipColorimetric[94]
Peroxidase-likeEnhanced recyclability and electron transferFe3O4@Au/MOF dual nanoparticle compositeElectrochemical[95]
Peroxidase-likeResponsive microenvironment; enhanced catalytic efficiencyPDM grafted UiO-66-NH2 polymer hybridColorimetric[96]
Table 3. Summary of signal transduction strategies in MOF nanozyme-based microbial biosensing.
Table 3. Summary of signal transduction strategies in MOF nanozyme-based microbial biosensing.
Detection ModeMOF Nanozyme UsedTarget AnalyteLimit of Detection (LOD)AdvantageLimitationsRef.
ColorimetricCu-MOF@AF filmH2S, NH3 (spoilage gases)-Visible signal, pH/TVB-N/TVC correlation, field-deployableSemi-quantitative, limited to volatile markers[101]
ColorimetricAptamer-functionalized Cu-MOFStaphylococcus aureus-High selectivity, magnetic separationMay require aptamer regeneration[102]
ColorimetricSapYZUs8@Cu-MOFViable Staphylococcus aureus1.09 × 102 CFU/mLHigh specificity, effective in pork and milkTarget-specific, may not detect non-viable cells[103]
Colorimetric + ElectrochemicalCP@MOF (CuO2 nanodots in MOF)V. parahaemolyticus-Dual mode improves accuracy (88.7%)Complex setup[104]
ColorimetricMOF@MOF (Cu-MOF-808 + Fe-porphyrin MOFs)MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa5 CFU/mL (MRSA), 2 CFU/mL (Pseudomonas aeruginosa )Self-cascade amplifies signal, aptamer specificityComplex synthesis[105]
Colorimetric (Multichannel)2D Ni–Co bimetallic MOFMultiple microbes-Label-free, multichannel readout, 30 min detectionQualitative/semi-quantitative[106]
ColorimetricMVCM@β-CD (2D Co-MOF)m-Aminophenol (proxy for microbial metabolites)0.16 μMHigh catalytic efficiency, tunable surfaceNot yet applied directly to microbes[107]
Electrochemical + ColorimetricGATC (Cu-ZIF + Au-TA + G-quadruplex/hemin aptamer)MRSA-Therapeutic + diagnostic, dual-modePotential toxicity, multi-step synthesis[110]
Electrochemical + ColorimetricGr/FeCu-NZs (Graphene + FeCu-MOF-on-MOF)H2O2 (microbial oxidative marker)0.06 μMSynergistic conductivity, broad range (0.1–3800 μM)Requires precise material tuning[111]
ElectrochemicalAg/2D Zn-MOFH2O2 (cellular secretion)1.67 μMReal time, broad range (5 μM–70 mM)Selectivity could be improved[112]
Fluorescence-BasedCe-MOFBiofilm matrix (eDNA) + H2O2-Therapeutic + detection, biofilm disruptionNo quantification of microbial load[117]
Fluorescence + Colorimetric (Ratiometric)Hemin@MOF (blue-fluorescent MOF + hemin)Tetracycline (residue)27.2 nM (colorimetric), 4.1 nM (fluorescence)Dual-readout, high selectivityMay be limited to specific antibiotic residues[118]
Table 4. Comparative performances of nanozyme platforms for biosensing applications.
Table 4. Comparative performances of nanozyme platforms for biosensing applications.
Nanozyme TypeBiomedical ApplicationEnvironmental ApplicationRef.
MOF-basedZr@ICG-NH2@HPW/OVA MOF nanozyme for Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection through GSH-depletion and photodynamic/photothermal therapyCe-FMA MOF nanozyme for colorimetric detection of Escherichia coli in water via peroxidase-like activity[86,93]
Carbon-basedPrGO/Fe-N-C nanozyme integrated with aptamer for colorimetric detection of Salmonella typhimurium3D-rGO@Au–Pt hybrid used in colorimetric paper sensor for Salmonella enteritidis detection in contaminated milk[120,122]
Metal oxide-basedMnFe2O4@SiO2 NPs with peroxidase-like activity for sensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus in infected woundsFe3O4 NPs in lateral flow immunoassay for Escherichia coli O157:H7 detection in water and food samples[106,110]
Noble metal-basedPtCo@Au NPs integrated with aptasensor for electrochemical detection of Salmonella typhimuriumAu@Pt NPs for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food[128,131]
Transition metal-basedCoFe-LDH nanozyme modified electrode for electrochemical detection of Listeria monocytogenesCuFe2O4 nanozyme-based immunosensor for Salmonella enteritidis detection in milk[132,133]
Metal sulfide-basedCuS@BSA nanocluster with peroxidase-like activity for colorimetric detection of Staphylococcus aureusCdS QDs@MOF hybrid for visible-light-induced photocatalytic detection of Escherichia coli in water[134,135]
Hybrid nanozymesAg/Cu-TCPP MOF nanozyme for fluorescence and colorimetric dual-mode detection of Helicobacter pyloriAu-Pt@CeO2-rGO hybrid nanozyme for ultrasensitive Escherichia coli O157:H7 detection in wastewater[95,126]
Polymer-basedChitosan–Cu nanozyme for selective detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella via smartphone-integrated colorimetryMolecularly imprinted polymer-coated Fe3O4 nanozymes for target-specific bacterial detection in water[136,137]
2D material-basedMoS2–CeO2 heterostructure for fluorescence biosensing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via GSH-level detectionGraphene oxide/Au nanozyme composite for colorimetric detection of Escherichia coli in environmental water[138,139]
Table 5. Summary of key challenges, implications, and proposed solutions for MOF-based nanozyme microbial biosensors.
Table 5. Summary of key challenges, implications, and proposed solutions for MOF-based nanozyme microbial biosensors.
ChallengesImplicationsProposed SolutionsRefs.
Stability and ReusabilityStructural degradation and loss of catalytic activity after repeated use or harsh conditions.Enhance structural robustness and catalytic longevity via ligand engineering, post-synthetic modifications, composites with graphene or polymers.[139,155]
Selectivity and SpecificityLimited ability to precisely identify microbial strains in complex biological matrices.Integrate selective biorecognition elements (aptamers, antibodies, molecularly imprinted polymers); exploit MOFs’ tunable structures for PET, RET, structural transformations.[156,157]
Scalability and CostHigh production costs, batch inconsistencies, and difficulty in large-scale manufacturing.Develop green, low-cost, scalable synthesis methods ensuring reproducibility and sustainability.[158]
Smart System IntegrationTechnical challenges in interfacing MOFs with electronics, data processing, and communication units.Innovate interdisciplinary solutions to integrate MOFs with AI, IoT, and smart responsive materials for adaptive biosensors.[159]
Biosafety and Regulatory ApprovalPotential cytotoxicity and environmental impact; lack of standardized testing and clear guidelines.Conduct comprehensive toxicity and biocompatibility assessments; establish standardized protocols and regulatory frameworks.[160,161,162]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kidanemariam, A.; Cho, S. Recent Advances in Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Intelligent Microbial Biosensing: A Comprehensive Review of Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Biosensors 2025, 15, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070437

AMA Style

Kidanemariam A, Cho S. Recent Advances in Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Intelligent Microbial Biosensing: A Comprehensive Review of Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Biosensors. 2025; 15(7):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kidanemariam, Alemayehu, and Sungbo Cho. 2025. "Recent Advances in Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Intelligent Microbial Biosensing: A Comprehensive Review of Biomedical and Environmental Applications" Biosensors 15, no. 7: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070437

APA Style

Kidanemariam, A., & Cho, S. (2025). Recent Advances in Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Intelligent Microbial Biosensing: A Comprehensive Review of Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Biosensors, 15(7), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop