Next Article in Journal
Colorimetric Detection of DNase Type I 3′OH DNA Ends Using an Isothermal Amplification-Assisted Paper-Based Analytical Device
Next Article in Special Issue
A Reversible Optical Sensor Film for Mercury Ions Discrimination Based on Isoxazolidine Derivative and Exhibiting pH Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
A Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW)-Based Lab-on-Chip for the Detection of Active α-Glycosidase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual Optical Nanosensor Based on Ormosil Nanoparticles for Monitoring O2 and pH

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2
Chemistry Department, Science College, Suez University, 43518 Suez, Egypt
Biosensors 2022, 12(11), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12111011
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 November 2022 / Published: 12 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Optical Biosensors and Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

:
Monitoring O2 and pH has excellent potential in different sensing applications, especially in biological and clinical applications. This report presents a protocol for synthesizing an optical dual nanosensor for those two parameters. The organically modified silica (ormosil) nanoparticles were prepared based on phenytrimethoxysilane in an aqueous solution using an acid-base one-pot strategy. Ormosil was selected as a lipophilic matrix for loading fluorescent O2-sensitive dye platinum(II)-tetrakis-(pentafluorophenyl) porphyrin (Pt-TPFPP), which was quenched in the presence of O2 gas and exhibited a considerable detection proficiency within a percentage range of (0–100%) O2. Commercially available drug ingredient salicylamide was labeled on the surface of the nanoparticles using a coupling agent (3-glycidoxypropyl) trimethoxysilane (GPTMS). For measuring pH, salicylamide acted for the first time as a pH-sensitive probe based on a turn-on process with increasing pH. The nanosensor displayed a significant pH detection efficiency in the range of (pH = 6–10). Salicylamide turn-on fluorescence was attributed to the excited state intramolecular transfer (ESIPT) process followed by the inter charge transfer (ICT). The presented dual nanosensor opens new opportunities as a promising candidate material for industrial systems and medical applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the spread of chemical sensors in many fields, there was an urgent need to develop multi-functional nanosensors. This type of sensor requires new materials with some specifications and standards. The essential standards of these materials are to be compatible, safe, and non-toxic, especially for medical applications. Therefore, scientists have recently tried to design new materials for chemical sensing. pH and pO2 are chemical parameters of significant interest in industrial, environmental, and medical applications. They are needed to be measured together and monitored continuously with high accuracy in different applications, especially in the medical and biochemical fields [1,2]. They can help the understanding of cellular behavior.
Optical sensors are a promising tool for monitoring those two parameters. Fluorescence has high-significance advantages in terms of the precision and accuracy of optical sensors [3,4,5]. Different probes have been used for this purpose, including organic fluorophores and polymers [6,7,8,9]. However, most are not biocompatible and only based on measuring one parameter. Fluorescence sensors, including measuring two parameters simultaneously, are rare. They save time, effort, and cost [10]. We can achieve this feature by applying two standard fluorophores that can be excited at the same wavelength to obtain two different signals at two different wavelengths to work as a dual sensor. However, the challenge is to find a suitable matrix for both fluorophores, as gas sensors need hydrophobic materials with high permeability, while sensors for pH require hydrophilic materials.
Fluorescent silica nanoparticles are still one of the most preferred chemical and biochemical sensing materials. Silica nanoparticles have no fluorescence but can be doped or immobilized with other fluorophores on their surface [11]. They have high stability, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity. Silica nanoparticles can be prepared using sol-gel technology through the hydrolysis and condensation of suitable inorganic metal alkoxides as glass-like or ceramic materials are produced [12,13]. Silica nanoparticles have been recently reported for detecting several analytes, such as pH [14]. However, this type of silica has low porosity and is unsuitable for doping with organic molecules for sensing gases. Using alternative inorganic precursors such as alkyl-substituted silicon alkoxide produces better properties than inorganic silane nanoparticles. Introducing the organic groups to the network of silicon increases the hydrophobicity and porosity of the nanoparticles. These modified materials are called organically modified silica (ormosil) nanoparticles. These nanoparticles can be prepared at low temperatures, and their compositions change according to the organic precursors. They possess many advantages, including their ability to act as a suitable host for different organic dyes by incorporating fluorescent active dyes into them [15]. Furthermore, these nanoparticles are water-dispersible, making them a biocompatible matrix for carrying hydrophobic dyes in aqueous media that open the way for different applications in the chemical and medical industries [16].
Ormosil nanoparticles display a high porosity and surface area compared to the silicone-based sensor, which allow higher concentrations of reagents to be incorporated into the matrix, resulting in improved sensor sensitivity. Additionally, they enhance the photochemical properties, including absorption and emission. Moreover, several types of reactive functional groups can be introduced in their matrix, which can be successively used for specific covalent labeling of other molecular recognition groups [17,18]. Ormosil is a promising candidate for all these advantages as a matrix nanosensor for an efficient and suitable use for sensing gases and pH.
Salicylamide is a commercially available hydrophilic material. It is the common name for the substance o-hydroxybenzamide. It has an analgesic and antipyretic activity [19]. Salicylamide is used combined with other drugs such as acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine to treat migraine and pain in addition to significant cytotoxic activity [20]. Few reports study the optical properties of salicylamide. Salicylamide has never been used as a fluorophore in optical sensors. However, it is highly sensitive to measuring the pH of the solution-based ESIPT (excited state intramolecular proton transfer) mechanism [21,22]. However, it is insensitive to O2.
A lipophilic oxygen-sensitive dye, platinum porphyrin, has been widely used for pO2 optical sensors [23,24,25]. However, the hydrophobicity of the probe limited its biological applications. Platinum porphyrin doped in ormosil coating was used as an oxygen sensor exhibiting high oxygen sensitivity and quantum yield [26]. Platinum porphyrin dyes have a long excitation-emission wavelength with significant Stokes shifts and high quantum yields, which result in reduced background light scattering and autofluorescence [27].
Various dual fluorescent chemical sensors for pH and pO2 have been reported. Most are designed as planer hydrogel [28] or polymer films [29,30,31,32]. Dual fluorescent nanosensors allow both intracellular and extracellular applications [33]. They are established on the immobilization of two probes on the surface of the nanoparticles. Other sensors are based on the immobilization of one probe on the surface and the other doped inside the nanoparticles, provided that the analyte can penetrate the particles and reach the indicator dye, like gasses.
Here, we introduce a novel strategy for introducing nanosensors with single excitation-dual emission fluorescence for pO2 and pH. The pH probe salicylamide has never been used previously for optical sensing. The ormosil nanosensor was synthesized using acid-base hydrolysis in the one-pot method. They were doped with sensitive O2 probe platinum(II)-tetrakis-(pentafluorophenyl) porphyrin (Pt-TPFPP), and then the surface was modified with an epoxy group which enabled labeling of pH probe salicylamide.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents and Materials

The 3-Glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilane (GPTMS) and Phenyltrimethoxysilane (PTMS) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. (Lancashire, England). The O2 sensitive probe Pt (II) 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophenyl)-porphyrin (Pt-TPFPP) was purchased from Porphyrin Systems. All other chemicals were, in this work, of the analytical-reagent grade and used without further purification. For the pH calibration of the nanosensor, we prepared different pH solutions ranging from 2 to 12 using a stock solution of 20 mM Britton Robinson (BR) universal buffer. Then, the different solutions with pH values were adjusted using appropriate volumes of 1 M HCl or NaOH solution. Dry nitrogen and oxygen gases (99.99% purity) were used to obtain standard gas mixtures with different percentages of oxygen ranging from 0 to 100% using gas flowmeters. The gas mixtures were passed through the nanosensor sample’s cuvette to record the nanosensor’s luminescent emission spectra at atmospheric pressure at room temperature. Response times and reversibility of the O2 nanosensor were determined by detecting the time traces of the emission peak at 648 nm.

2.2. Instruments

The absorption spectra (UV–Vis) were recorded using Evolution™ 200 series (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) UV–Visible spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra of the probes and nanosensor were measured with JASCO FP6300 spectrofluorometric using a quartz luminescence-free cell with a path length of 1 cm and 5 nm bandpass excitation and emission filters. Transmission electron microscopy images of ormosil nanosensors were recorded using a JEOL-100S, Japan. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses of the synthesized ormosil nanoparticles were recorded.
Using Malvern Instrument (Malvern, UK), the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopies (FT-IR) were measured using a Perkin Elmer FT-IR spectrometer. A thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was measured using a Perkin Elmer thermal analyzer at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen.

2.3. One-Pot Synthesis of Ormosil Nanosensor

A 50 mL round-bottomed flask was washed with ethanol and ultrapure water and allowed to air dry. Next, 31 mL of deionized water was added to the round flask, and the temperature was adjusted in a water bath at 60 °C. Then, 38 µL of nitric acid HNO3 25% was added to the flask, and the solution kept stirred. Then, 100 µL of PTMS was added to the reaction. After 20 min, 6 mL of ammonium hydroxide was added, and the reaction proceeded for two hours as the solution became milky [34]. Next, 1.5 mg of the oxygen-sensitive dye PtTPFPP soluble in 1 mL of THF was added to the reaction mixture, which was kept stirring for an additional hour, and then 25 µL of GPTMS was added into the mixture [35]. After 24 h, 127 µL (1 mg/mL) of salicylamide was added, and the reaction proceeded for another three hours. The resulting ormosil nanoparticles were centrifuged at 4000 rpm, rinsed three times with water, and resuspended in a water/ethanol 1:2 mixture with sonication for 5 min, then centrifuged again and allowed to air-dry. The obtained nanosensor was characterized using different methods.

2.4. UV-Vis and Fluorescence Measurements for Salicylamide and Ormosil Nanosensor

The UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra of salicylamide were measured in an aqueous solution of 20 mM BR buffer at different pH ranges from 2 to 12. For all measurements, the excitation and emission slit widths were 5 nm. To investigate the response of the ormosil nanosensor, 0.4 mg/mL of the nanosensor was utilized in an aqueous BR buffer solution (20 mM) for fluorescence titration. For pH calibration, the intensity of the emission spectra at 457 nm was recorded after adjusting the pH of the suspended nanosensor inside the cuvette within the range of the buffer solution of different pH values. Oxygen calibrations were performed using a buffer of pH 7 bubbled with standard O2/N2 gas mixtures (0–100% O2). Upon gas equilibration, the intensity at 648 nm was measured at room temperature in atmospheric pressure.

3. Results

3.1. Choice of Materials and Method of Preparation

The dual nanosensor was prepared based on the ormosil matrix. PTMS was chosen as a precursor for building the ormosil nanoparticles using the acid-base hydrolysis method. Ormosil-based PTMS behaves as a suitable hydrophobic host material for the O2 probe Pt-TPFPP in the core and allows the immobilization of the pH probe salicylamide on the surface. Ormosil is proper for doping the O2 probe due to the organic moiety inside the nanoparticles and provides high permeability for sensing O2 gas. Ormosil has many advantages over other sensing matrixes materials such as being optically transparent, high chemical stability, bioinert material, and that it can be loaded with hydrophobic and hydrophilic molecules [36].
Although the Pt-TPFPP probe has been widely reported for sensing oxygen gas, most of the reported materials doped with Pt-TPFPP as a dual optical sensor for pH and O2 are primarily based on planer thin films or polymer nanosensors [26,37]. Salicylamide is a water-soluble, inexpensive, and commercial material. Different studies have been reported on its analgesic and antipyretic properties. It has been used as a drug component for treating migraine and pain. Salicylamide has never been reported as an optical pH probe, although it exhibits an intense fluorescence turn-on in a basic medium. So, we present here a new fluorescent pH-sensitive probe. At the same time, it can be easily immobilized to the surface of the Pt-PTFPP-doped ormosil nanoparticles via GPTMS as a linker in one-pot synthesis rot. To obtain the target, the epoxy-modified ormosil nanoparticles were reacted with the amide group of salicylamide in solution in a basic aqueous medium for immobilization. Worth noting, the two probes mentioned above can be excited at the same wavelength (365 nm), simultaneously providing dual sensing for the pH and O2.
The preparation reaction of ormosil proceeded in an aqueous solution based on the acid-base sol-gel process. Where the acid allowed the hydrolysis of the precursor PTMS, a milky solution was formed. This was followed by the alkylation of the solution using ammonium hydroxide, as the co-condensation started to occur, and the reaction was continued. Then, the dopant O2 probe Pt-TPFPP was introduced to the reaction. The hydrophobic host moiety of the nanoparticles facilitated the entrapment of Pt-TPFPP, eliminating leaching effects and obtaining a homogeneous solution of the Pt-TPFPP-doped ormosil nanoparticles. The linker GPTMS was added as it has three methoxy groups hydrolyzed in water. Condensation occurred between GPTMS and the ormosil nanoparticles, using an essential catalyst as the reaction rate of condensation increased [35]. The schematic mechanism of the reaction is shown in Scheme 1. The synthesized nanosensor showed excellent stability and dispersibility in water at a different pH, and no precipitation was observed in the solution.

3.2. Structural Characterization of the Ormosil Nanosensor

Characterization of the nanosensor was managed using different methods, including FTIR, TGA, TEM, and DLS. TEM images of the ormosil nanoparticles are shown in Figure 1a. The synthesized nanoparticles’ size was assigned to be 227 nm. Furthermore, the dynamic light scattering DLS measurements and particle size distribution approved the nanoparticles’ approximate size (see Figure 1b and Figure 1c, respectively). The DLS data showed that the mean size was 230 nm with std 3.33 for the synthesized nanoparticles.
The IR-Analysis is an essential characteristic technique for the most straightforward proficient detection of multiple functional groups of nanoparticles [38]. FT-IR spectra were used to confirm the ormosil nanoparticles’ structure. Figure 2 shows the FT-IR analysis of epoxy-modified ormosil and salicylamide immobilization ormosil nanoparticles after modification. The spectra of epoxy-modified ormosil showed the characteristic band at 3277 cm−1 attributed to stretching N–H of core porphyrin, and significant bands of aromatic (3079 cm−1) and aliphatic (2925 cm−1) v(C-H) that can be ascribed to the stretching vibrational bands from phenyl and epoxy groups, correspondingly [17]. Further, the FT-IR spectrum of salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanoparticles was measured. This recognized the numerous peaks in the functional group district peaks area of the salicylamide-labeled particles spectrum (1409 cm−1) and the second hydroxyl absorbance peak delocalized at 1379 and 1041 cm−1,respectively [39]. Further, the prominent absorption peak of hydroxyl and amine groups occurred around 3400 cm−1. Finally, the disappearance of the epoxy peak at 2925 cm−1 proved the surface labeling of the nanoparticles with salicylamide molecules.
A thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for the epoxy-modified ormosil nanoparticles before and after immobilization with salicylamide was utilized to investigate the surface modification. TGA characterized the composition of the two synthesized nanomaterials (Figure 3). The samples’ treatment with oxygen or air escorted to intense exothermic reactions and irreversible TG diagrams. Both samples exhibited a minor mass loss within a temperature range of 100–400 °C; this could be attributed to the thermal degradation of the solvent and water molecules. These degradable molecules were bonded to the nanoparticles’ surface based on the hydroxyl groups by condensation reaction. The weight loss was continued due to the thermal degradation of the organic molecules joined to Si atoms. Salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanoparticles had greater thermal temperatures and weight loss than epoxy-modified ormosil. The results exhibited a difference in the weight loss between the nanoparticle before and after the immobilization of salicylamide. Thus, data proved that the salicylamide molecules were successfully attached to the surface of the nanoparticles.

3.3. Optical Properties of Salicylamide and the Ormosil Nanosensor

The absorption spectra of salicylamide in an aqueous solution at different pH values are shown in Figure 4a. The spectra in the neutral solution showed two prominent peaks centered at 240 and 303 nm. The absorption bands were assigned to π-π* and n-π* transitions. The pka of salicylamide was recorded in an aqueous solution using a range of buffer solutions of different pH values and assigned to 8.1. With an increase in the pH from the acidic to neutral medium, a redshift has occurred in the absorbance peak at 299, and a new peak has appeared at 328 nm. When the pH increased to the basic, an increase in the absorbance of the peak located at 328 nm synchronized with a decrease in the absorbance maxima at the 299 nm peak. The calibration curve of the absorption peaks’ ratio (A328/A299) of the salicylamide versus pH of the studied solutions is exhibited in Figure 4b.
Salicylamide has an emission band centered at 452 nm in an aqueous solution under excitation at 353 nm, as shown in Figure 5, with a significant Stokes shift of approximately 100 nm. Very little interest has been paid to studying the fluorescence properties of salicylamide [22,40].
The emission spectra of salicylamide were based on the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) process, in which the excitation of the salicylamide molecule produces a photo-induced proton tautomerization from enol form (E*) to the keto form (K*), associated with proton migration from the hydroxyl group to the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group (-C=O). The enol form was recovered by reverse proton transfer after the relaxation of the salicylamide’s keto form (see Figure 6). The emission from K* fluorescence was produced with a significant Stokes shift; however, low or non-emission from E* occurred. This process is affected by different parameters and is sensitive to the pH and the solvent of the surrounding medium. This is attributed to the influence of the solvent on the intramolecular H-bonding between a proton donor (–OH) and a proton acceptor (C=O) of the probe.
To understand the fluorescence properties of salicylamide, the emission spectra were measured at different pH. In the acidic and neutral medium, salicylamide was present in a protonated form with an intramolecular hydrogen bond between (OH) and (C=O), which provided the accessibility of the ESIPT process ascribed to the tautomeric equilibrium. Meanwhile, a substantial fluorescence intensity enhancement at higher pH is attributable to the internal charge transfer (ICT) process [41]. With the increased pH of the medium, salicylamide started to deprotonate with no intramolecular hydrogen bonding. However, a donor-acceptor charge transfer occurred, and an intense turn-on was observed in the emission with a small redshift. The charge transfer mechanism was performed from the electron-rich phenolate anion to the electron-deficient benzene ring. As a result, a negative charge was delocalized over the conjugated system. Salicylamide had a weak fluorescence in the acidic medium. An intense turn-on of about 83% was observed in the intensity from the neutral to the basic medium (pH 12), as shown in Figure 7a. There was a calibration curve of I/Imax at 452 nm of salicylamide in aqueous solution 20 mM BR buffer versus pH range of (2–12) (see Figure 7b). A substantial enhancement of the emission peak of salicylamide was observed by increasing the pH value from 6 to 12. Further, a slight redshift ~5nm in the emission peak at pH 10 to 12 was observed. For comparison, salicylamide was studied in different oxygen concentrations upon excitation with 365 nm. The peak at 457 nm had no change in the presence of different O2 concentrations, indicating the insensitivity of the salicylamide to O2 concentration.
The synthesized ormosil nanosensor doped with Pt-TPFPP and immobilized with salicylamide had an excitation wavelength (365 nm) as the emission peak of salicylamide detected at 457 nm with a minimal shift in the maximum peak ~5 nm. This can be attributed to labeling salicylamide molecules to the ormosil nanoparticles. The emission of Pt-TPFPP was observed at 648 nm, as shown in Figure 8.
Moreover, Pt-TPFPP doped in the ormosil nanoparticles was insensitive to pH changes. Upon excitation at 365 nm, the nanosensor emitted blue and red fluorescence at 457 nm and 648 nm respectively. The blue emission at 457 nm has pH-dependent fluorescence however, the red emission at 648 nm is pH-insensitive. The titrimetric reaction of the optical nanosensor with a changing pH of the solution within the range of (4 to 12) using 20 mM RB buffer is exhibited in Figure 9a. The calibration curve intensity at 457 nm versus the pH of the solution is shown in Figure 9b.
Additionally, we examined the ormosil nanoparticles as an O2 nanosensor, which showed high performance. The titrimetric reaction of the nanosensor using different concentrations of oxygen gas is demonstrated in Figure 10a. The excess oxygen concentration provided a significant quenching of the Pt-TPFPP dye. On the other hand, salicylamide was insensitive to O2. To investigate the sensitive performance of the oxygen sensor, we plotted the intensity of the red emission peak (at 648 nm for Pt-TPFPP) under excitation at 365 nm with oxygen concentrations of 0–100%, as shown in Figure 10b.
The Stern–Volmer plot for the oxygen sensing is shown in Figure 11. The plot is linear, which indicates that the sensor was sensitive to oxygen in this range where the KSV was 0.049%−1 and R2 was 99.29. The oxygen sensitivities (F0/F100) of the nanosensor were calculated to be about 6, where F0 and F100 were the luminescence intensities at 0 and 100% oxygen, respectively.
The response of the optical nanosensor was examined randomly at different pH values and oxygen percentages, and the conditions were chosen randomly to be conditions (1) pH 9, O2 100%; conditions (2) pH 7, O2 60%; and conditions (3) pH 4, O2 20%. The system response was efficient and dealt with the previous preliminary data introduced at different pH values or oxygen percentages (see Figure 12).

3.4. Response, Response Time, and Reversibility of the Ormosil Nanosensor

The response time and reversibility of the nanosensor for O2 detection were studied by recording the intensity signals of the nanosensor at 648 nm on cycling between N2 and 100% of the saturated dissolved O2 (Figure 13). The response times (defined as the time for 95% of the signal change to occur) were ~30 s for switching from N2 to O2 and ~60 s for switching from O2 to N2. The signal changes were fully reversible. Furthermore, the pH nanosensor had a rapid equilibrium rate because the pH probe salicylamide was located at the surface of the nanosensor and exhibited good contact with the aqueous samples and complete reversibility.

4. Conclusions

Here, we present a dual fluorescent nanosensor for detecting two of the potential parameters in medical and industrial applications: O2 and pH. The nanosensor was based on ormosil nanoparticles produced from the organic precursor PTMS in the one-pot method. Ormosil nanoparticles were used as a proper matrix for hosting the two probes of O2 (Pt-TPFPP) and pH (salicylamide). Firstly, the nanoparticles were doped with the O2-sensitive probe Pt-TPFPP, and then modified with the linker GPTMS on the surface to link the second probe salicylamide on the surface for pH sensing. The nanosensor had a diameter of 227 nm. The surface modification was characterized using different methods, including FT-IR and TGA, to verify the existence of salicylamide on the ormosil surface. Upon excitation with 365 nm, blue and red fluorescence emitted at 457 and 648 nm corresponded to the presence of the two probes, salicylamide and Pt-TPFPP, respectively. The two emission peaks allowed a dual analysis for the two mentioned parameters, pH and O2. The nanosensor can detect the pH in the range of 6–10 and O2 in the 0–100% range.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (QU-IF-4-3-2-28320). The authors also thank Qassim University for the technical support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (QU-IF-4-3-2-28320). The authors also thank Qassim University for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reinders, Y.; Meier, R.J.; Liebsch, G.; Pohl, F.; Schreml, S.; Prantl, L.; Haubner, F. Imaging of pH and pO2 gives insight in molecular processes of irradiated cells. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 628–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lian, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X. Active-Targeting Polymeric Dual Nanosensor for Ratiometrically Measuring Proton and Oxygen Concentrations in Mitochondria. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 8291–8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Peng, H.; Stolwijk, J.A.; Sun, L.N.; Wegener, J.; Wolfbeis, O.S. A nanogel for ratiometric fluorescent sensing of intracellular pH values. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 4342–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Steinegger, A.; Wolfbeis, O.S.; Borisov, S.M. Optical sensing and imaging of pH values: Spectroscopies, materials, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 12357–12489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saleh, S.M.; Elkady, E.M.; Ali, R.; Alminderej, F.; Mohamed, T.A. Novel chemical sensor for detection Ca (II) ions based on ferutinin. Spectrochim. Acta A 2018, 205, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ali, R.; Elshaarawy, R.F.; Saleh, S.M. Turn-on ratiometric fluorescence sensor film for ammonia based on salicylaldehyde-ionic liquid. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4813–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Corsi, M.; Paghi, A.; Mariani, S.; Golinelli, G.; Debrassi, A.; Egri, G.; Leo, G.; Vandini, E.; Vilella, A.; Dähne, L.; et al. Bioresorbable Nanostructured Chemical Sensor for Monitoring of pH Level In Vivo. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2202062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, K.-K.; Li, K.; Hou, J.-T.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y.-M.; Yu, X.-Q. Rhodamine based pH-sensitive ‘intelligent’ polymers as lysosome targeting probes and their imaging applications in vivo. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 5804–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, S.-L.; Chen, X.-P.; Zhang, X.-F.; Miao, J.-Y.; Zhao, B.-X. A rhodamine B-based lysosomal pH probe. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, R.; Alminderej, F.M.; Messaoudi, S.; Saleh, S.M. Ratiometric ultrasensitive optical chemisensor film based antibiotic drug for Al (III) and Cu (II) detection. Talanta 2021, 221, 121412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saleh, S.M.; Ali, R.; Wolfbeis, O.S. New silica and polystyrene nanoparticles labeled with longwave absorbing and fluorescent chameleon dyes. Microchim. Acta 2011, 174, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brinker, C.J.; Sherer, G.W. Sol–Gel Science, The Principle and Chemistry of Sol–Gel Processing; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  13. Saleh, S.; Younis, A.; Ali, R.; Elkady, E. Phenol removal from aqueous solution using amino modified silica nanoparticles. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 36, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, R.; Saleh, S.M.; Elshaarawy, R.F.M. Turn-on pH nano-fluorosensor based on imidazolium salicylaldehyde ionic liquid-labeled silica nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 86965–86975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. del Monte, F.; Ferrer, M.L.; Levy, D. Probing the chemical environment at the porous cage of ormosils through the fluorescence of oxazine 1. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, S.; Pudavar, H.E.; Prasad, P.N. Dye-concentrated organically modified silica nanoparticles as a ratiometric fluorescent pH probe by one-and two-photon excitation. Chem. Commun. 2006, 19, 2071–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jung, C.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Ha, J.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Koo, S.M. One-pot synthesis and surface modifications of organically modified silica (ORMOSIL) particles having multiple functional groups. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 367, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, R.K.; Das, S.; Maitra, A. Surface modified ormosil nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 277, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Babhair, S.A.; Al-Badr, A.A.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Salicylamide. In Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 13, pp. 521–551. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kushkevych, I.; Kollar, P.; Suchy, P.; Parak, T.; Pauk, K.; Imramovsky, A. Activity of selected salicylamides against intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2015, 36, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nishiya, T.; Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N.; Baba, M.; Hanazaki, I. Fluorescence studies of intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded o-hydroxyacetophenone, salicylamide, and related molecules. J. Phys. Chem. A 1986, 90, 5730–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woolfe, G.J.; Thistlethwaite, P.J. Excited-state prototropic reactivity in salicylamide and salicylanilide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6917–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L.; Sung, T.W. Enhanced oxygen sensing properties of Pt (II) complex and dye entrapped core–shell silica nanoparticles embedded in sol–gel matrix. Talanta 2010, 82, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Borisov, S.M.; Klimant, I. Luminescent nanobeads for optical sensing and imaging of dissolved oxygen. Microchim. Acta 2009, 164, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, S.; Fan, Z.; Wang, W.; Fan, H.; Mei, Z.; Sun, D.; Cheng, X.; Zhao, X.; Tian, Y. Microfabricable ratiometric gaseous oxygen sensors based on inorganic perovskite nanocrystals and PtTFPP. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 271, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basu, B.J. Optical oxygen sensing based on luminescence quenching of platinum porphyrin dyes doped in ormosil coating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mills, A.; Lepre, A. Controlling the response characteristics of luminescent porphyrin plastic film sensors for oxygen. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4653–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schröder, C.R.; Polerecky, L.; Klimant, I. Time-resolved pH/pO2 mapping with luminescent hybrid sensors. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Borchert, N.B.; Ponomarev, G.V.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. O2/pH multisensor based on one phosphorescent dye. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meier, R.J.; Schreml, S.; Wang, X.; Landthaler, M.; Babilas, P.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Simultaneous photographing of oxygen and pH in vivo using sensor films. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10893–10896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, H.; Jin, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, W.; Holl, M.R.; Meldrum, D.R. New ratiometric optical oxygen and pH dual sensors with three emission colors for measuring photosynthetic activity in cyanobacteria. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 19293–19301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zou, X.; Pan, T.; Chen, L.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, W. Luminescence materials for pH and oxygen sensing in microbial cells–structures, optical properties, and biological applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, X.; Stolwijk, J.A.; Lang, T.; Sperber, M.; Meier, R.J.; Wegener, J.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Ultra-small, highly stable, and sensitive dual nanosensors for imaging intracellular oxygen and pH in cytosol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17011–17014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Koo, Y.-E.L.; Cao, Y.; Kopelman, R.; Koo, S.M.; Brasuel, M.; Philbert, M.A. Real-time measurements of dissolved oxygen inside live cells by organically modified silicate fluorescent nanosensors. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 2498–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kang, H.U.; Park, J.K.; Kim, S.H. Material and rheological properties of (glycidoxypropyl) trimethoxysilane modified colloidal silica coatings. Korea Aust. Rheol. J. 2004, 16, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  36. Roy, I.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, R.; Ohulchanskyy, T.Y.; Yong, K.T.; Prasad, P.N. Ormosil nanoparticles as a sustained-release drug delivery vehicle. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 53498–53504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meng, Q.; Han, T.; Wang, G.; Zheng, N.; Cao, C.; Xie, S. Preparation of a natural dye doped Ormosil coating for the detection of formaldehyde in the optical gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 196, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saleh, S.M.; Ali, R.; Hirsch, T.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Detection of biotin–avidin affinity binding by exploiting a self-referenced system composed of upconverting luminescent nanoparticles and gold nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011, 13, 4603–4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brugnerotto, J.; Lizardi, J.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Argüelles-Monal, W.; Desbrieres, J.; Rinaudo, M. An infrared investigation in relation with chitin and chitosan characterization. Polymer 2001, 42, 3569–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Catalan, J.; Toribio, F.; Acuna, A.U. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding and fluorescence of salicylaldehyde, salicylamide, and o-hydroxyacetophenone in gas and condensed phase. J. Phys. Chem. A 1982, 86, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chou, P.T.; Chiou, C.S.; Yu, W.S.; Wu, G.R.; Wei, T.H. Studies of the triplet state of the proton-transfer tautomer in salicylaldehydes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 370, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic for synthesizing ormosil nanosensors dopped with O2 probe Pt-TPFPP and immobilized with pH probe salicylamide.
Scheme 1. Schematic for synthesizing ormosil nanosensors dopped with O2 probe Pt-TPFPP and immobilized with pH probe salicylamide.
Biosensors 12 01011 sch001
Figure 1. (a) TEM images; (b) DLS; (c) particle size distribution of the as-prepared ormosil nanosensor.
Figure 1. (a) TEM images; (b) DLS; (c) particle size distribution of the as-prepared ormosil nanosensor.
Biosensors 12 01011 g001aBiosensors 12 01011 g001b
Figure 2. FT-IR of the epoxy-modified ormosil (blue) and the covalent immobilization of salicylamide to the ormosil nanoparticles (red).
Figure 2. FT-IR of the epoxy-modified ormosil (blue) and the covalent immobilization of salicylamide to the ormosil nanoparticles (red).
Biosensors 12 01011 g002
Figure 3. TGA of the salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanoparticles before (blue) and after (red) immobilization.
Figure 3. TGA of the salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanoparticles before (blue) and after (red) immobilization.
Biosensors 12 01011 g003
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution at different pH values; (b) calibration curve of the absorption spectra of salicylamide.
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution at different pH values; (b) calibration curve of the absorption spectra of salicylamide.
Biosensors 12 01011 g004
Figure 5. Excitation and emission spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution.
Figure 5. Excitation and emission spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution.
Biosensors 12 01011 g005
Figure 6. The schematic diagram for the intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) mechanism in salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanosensor; E and K are the enol and keto tautomer species, respectively. The asterisk sign indicates the excited state.
Figure 6. The schematic diagram for the intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) mechanism in salicylamide-immobilized ormosil nanosensor; E and K are the enol and keto tautomer species, respectively. The asterisk sign indicates the excited state.
Biosensors 12 01011 g006
Figure 7. (a) Emission spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution at different pH ranging (2–12) upon excitation with 350 nm; (b) calibration curve of I/Imax (452 nm) at different pH.
Figure 7. (a) Emission spectra of salicylamide in aqueous solution at different pH ranging (2–12) upon excitation with 350 nm; (b) calibration curve of I/Imax (452 nm) at different pH.
Biosensors 12 01011 g007
Figure 8. The emission spectrum of the ormosil nanosensor doped with Pt-TPFPP and immobilized with salicylamide under excitation with 365 nm.
Figure 8. The emission spectrum of the ormosil nanosensor doped with Pt-TPFPP and immobilized with salicylamide under excitation with 365 nm.
Biosensors 12 01011 g008
Figure 9. (a) The emission of the ormosil nanosensor in different pH buffer solutions ranging from 4–12; (b) the corresponding calibration curve of the intensity at 457 nm of the ormosil nanosensor at different pH.
Figure 9. (a) The emission of the ormosil nanosensor in different pH buffer solutions ranging from 4–12; (b) the corresponding calibration curve of the intensity at 457 nm of the ormosil nanosensor at different pH.
Biosensors 12 01011 g009
Figure 10. (a) The emission of the ormosil nanosensor at different concentrations of O2 (0–100%); (b) the calibration curve of the nanosensor at different oxygen concentrations upon excitation with 365 nm.
Figure 10. (a) The emission of the ormosil nanosensor at different concentrations of O2 (0–100%); (b) the calibration curve of the nanosensor at different oxygen concentrations upon excitation with 365 nm.
Biosensors 12 01011 g010
Figure 11. Stern–Volmer plot for the oxygen nanosensor for oxygen concentration in the 0–100% range.
Figure 11. Stern–Volmer plot for the oxygen nanosensor for oxygen concentration in the 0–100% range.
Biosensors 12 01011 g011
Figure 12. The emission of the ormosil nanosensor at different concentrations of O2 and pH values under excitation with 365 nm.
Figure 12. The emission of the ormosil nanosensor at different concentrations of O2 and pH values under excitation with 365 nm.
Biosensors 12 01011 g012
Figure 13. Response times and reversibility of the O2 ormosil nanosensor on switching between 100% O2 and 100% N2 under excitation at 365 nm; emission was detected at 648 nm.
Figure 13. Response times and reversibility of the O2 ormosil nanosensor on switching between 100% O2 and 100% N2 under excitation at 365 nm; emission was detected at 648 nm.
Biosensors 12 01011 g013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, R. Dual Optical Nanosensor Based on Ormosil Nanoparticles for Monitoring O2 and pH. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12111011

AMA Style

Ali R. Dual Optical Nanosensor Based on Ormosil Nanoparticles for Monitoring O2 and pH. Biosensors. 2022; 12(11):1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12111011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Reham. 2022. "Dual Optical Nanosensor Based on Ormosil Nanoparticles for Monitoring O2 and pH" Biosensors 12, no. 11: 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12111011

APA Style

Ali, R. (2022). Dual Optical Nanosensor Based on Ormosil Nanoparticles for Monitoring O2 and pH. Biosensors, 12(11), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12111011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop