Next Article in Journal
Tailoring Architecture of Carbon Aerogel via Self-Assembly Template for Balanced Mechanical and Thermal Insulation Performance
Previous Article in Journal
DNA Unwinding Driven by Gold Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Few-Layer Graphene–Ubiquitin Interactions with Optical Spectroscopy Techniques

Biophysics Laboratory, Physics Department, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, 35430 Izmir, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(24), 1873; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15241873
Submission received: 23 October 2025 / Revised: 9 December 2025 / Accepted: 11 December 2025 / Published: 13 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section 2D and Carbon Nanomaterials)

Abstract

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of protein–nanoparticle interactions is crucial for enabling the development of new applications in biomedicine and nanotechnology. Ubiquitin, an important and structurally small functional protein, plays a central role in numerous cellular processes. Therefore, in the current study, we focused on the few-layer graphene (FLG)–Ubiquitin complexes formed by exfoliating FLG structures using only water. Optical spectroscopic techniques (Raman, FT-IR, UV-Vis and circular dichroism) were employed to investigate these complexes on the molecular level. Overall, both CD and FT-IR data reveal that the formation of the FLG–Ubiquitin complexes occurred without inducing disordered structures in the protein. Based on the existence of a blue shift (hypsochromic shift) in the UV-Vis data, the presence of a single tyrosine and two phenylalanine residues in ubiquitin enables the detection of FLG-induced micro-environmental changes, particularly influencing the protein’s β-sheet and α-helix structures. The CD spectral results and CDPro quantitative estimations are in line with ATR FT-IR results, confirming the absence of disordered structure formation while altering the protein’s chirality. UV-Vis and CD spectroscopy results revealed concentration-dependent trends consistent with FLG–protein interactions that preserve the overall protein structure. This study has potential applications in both academic research and practical usage, particularly in biomedicine and nanotechnology specifically for FLG.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Protein–nanoparticle interactions have been subject to scientific interest due to their possible biomedical applications [1,2,3,4]. The extremely small size of nanoparticles and their potential to penetrate nearly every part of the body necessitate their study in a wide range of areas, from drug delivery to emerging field of nanotoxicity [5,6,7]. Due to their exceptional electrochemical properties, high thermal conductivity, superior electrical conductivity and optical characteristics, graphene/graphene derivatives have found extensive applications in fields such as biomedicine and biosensor applications [8]. The interaction of proteins with graphene and graphene-based materials has emerged as a critical area of research. When proteins encounter graphene surfaces, they undergo adsorption driven by multiple non-covalent interactions, including hydrophobic Van der Waals forces, and electrostatic interactions [9,10]. These interactions can induce significant conformational changes in proteins’ secondary and/or tertiary structure, with consequences depending on the graphene’s form, oxidation level, and dimensions as well as the protein characteristics and environmental conditions [11,12].
Computational studies provided insights into the protein–graphene interactions, revealing that adsorption is driven by the different arrangements of hydrophobic and aromatic residues on their surfaces. In the presence of single-layer graphene systems, proteins often undergo extensive structural rearrangements, adopting parallel orientations relative to the graphene plane to maximize hydrophobic and π-π stacking interactions [13,14]. The choice of graphene derivatives can also influence this process. Few-layer graphene (FLG) enables simultaneous protein–surface contact and structural preservation (0.3–0.4 nm interlayer spacing prevents protein penetration between layers) while maintaining pristine domains suitable for future biosensor functionalization. Therefore, in our study, few-layer graphene (FLG) structures synthesized through the exfoliation method were exploited. When combined with biomolecules, FLG nanocomposites exhibit superior biocompatibility, enhanced biofunctionality, and low cytotoxicity, offering more advantages and greater development potential than traditional graphene-based materials in biological and biomedical fields [10]. Although they have been highly studied and widely recognized in the academic field, the fundamental interactions between nanomaterials and proteins remain not well understood [15,16]. A number of studies on nanoparticle–protein complexes have been conducted to gather relevant information by using various spectroscopic techniques such as circular dichroism (CD), FT-IR, UV/fluorescence spectroscopy, and others [17,18]. However, the interaction of few-layer graphene (FLG) and ubiquitin has not been studied so far.
Ubiquitin is a small signaling protein composed of 76 amino acids. Ubiquitin plays a crucial role in various cellular processes within living organisms, including proteasomal degradation, immune response, and DNA damage repair [19,20]. Due to its small size, low molecular weight, and favorable properties, ubiquitin not only serves as a model system for various biophysical and computational techniques but also acts as a target for studying interactions with nanomaterials [11,12,17]. Therefore, in the current study, we selected FLG:Ubiquitin complexes as a representative model to investigate the interaction between proteins and nanomaterials.
Various techniques have been employed for graphene synthesis; however, graphite exfoliation remains one of the most straightforward and widely utilized methods for producing graphene and graphene oxide. Graphene layers are stabilized by two distinct types of bonding interactions. Within each layer, carbon–carbon atoms are connected by strong covalent bonds with a bond length of approximately 0.142 nm. In contrast, adjacent graphene layers are held together by weak van der Waals forces, with an interlayer spacing of approximately 0.341 nm. This weak interlayer interaction facilitates the exfoliation of graphite into individual graphene layers [21]. Layered materials, such as graphite, are composed of two-dimensional platelets that are weakly stacked to form three-dimensional structures. Liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) is a top-down approach for exfoliating natural graphite into few-layer graphene dispersed in liquid media. LPE has gained prominence due to its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and ability to produce defect-free graphene. Additionally, it allows for the deposition of dispersed graphene in various environments and on diverse substrates, which is not feasible with mechanical cleavage or growth methods [22,23,24].
Raman spectroscopy has thus far been the most used technique for determining the number of layers, N, in graphitic materials in a cost-effective way [25]. In our study, Raman spectroscopy as a vibrational spectroscopic technique was also chosen for the characterization of the structures obtained through exfoliation based on their molecular signatures. Fourier transform–infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy offers a significant advantage in providing highly detailed insights into the structural and conformational changes in proteins [26,27,28]. Infrared spectroscopy is increasingly employed for protein and protein–nanoparticle analysis due to its ability to probe universally present bonds in peptides. Proteins generate nine characteristic IR absorption bands—amide A, B, and I−VII—of which the amide I and II bands are the most prominent vibrational features of the protein backbone. FT-IR spectroscopy allows structural analysis of proteins and peptides in diverse environments, with direct correlations between amide I band (1700–1600 cm−1) frequencies and secondary structure components. FT-IR second-derivative spectra are widely used to assess structural changes in nanoparticle–protein complexes [1,26,27,28].
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely employed technique for investigating protein structures. Far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy (180–250 nm) is primarily used in order to analyze the proteins. The characteristic secondary structures of the peptide backbone, including α-helices, β-sheets, turns, and disordered regions, significantly affect the CD spectrum. CD spectroscopy has been widely utilized for assessing protein folding, stability, intermolecular interactions, and ligand binding [27,29,30]. In this context, various algorithms have been developed and refined to facilitate the analysis of protein secondary structures [31,32]. UV-Vis spectroscopy is widely employed for investigating nanoparticle–protein complexes. However, it typically provides limited qualitative information regarding the binding of proteins to nanomaterials, primarily through the observation of peak shifts, broadening of the absorption spectra, and variations in spectral intensity [33,34]. To overcome these limitations, this study employs UV-Vis spectroscopy in conjunction with complementary spectroscopic techniques for a more comprehensive analysis [35,36].
In the current study, optical spectroscopic techniques, including Raman, FT-IR, UV-Vis and CD, were used to characterize exfoliated FLG and to analyze the effect of few-layer graphene (FLG) on the ubiquitin structure on the molecular level. FT-IR second-derivative analysis was utilized for tracking alterations in protein secondary structures and the CD results contributed to both secondary structure analysis and prediction in percentage, while UV absorption spectroscopy provided insights into the micro-environmental changes surrounding the single tyrosine (Tyr) and two phenylalanine (Phe) residues. Herein, the FLG–Ubiquitin complex was selected as a model system to explore protein–nanomaterial interactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) nanostructures were kindly provided by Prof. Dr. Cem Çelebi, IZTECH-Physics Department. Ubiquitin from bovine erythrocytes was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without any further treatment. Physiologically suitable 20 mM potassium phosphate (KPi, pH 7.4) was used as protein solution buffer.

2.2. Ultrasonic Exfoliation of FLG in Water

An ultrasonicator (ISOLAB, D2012, 60W, Isolab Laborgeräte GmbH, Eschau, Germany) was used for the exfoliation method. The process was carried out for 2 h at a frequency of 40 kHz and a temperature of 313 K (±276 K), as described [37]. The temperature was monitored from the sonicator’s digital screen; when needed, a cold press was applied to sustain the temperature within the desired range. During this process, the temperature was regularly monitored. In order to keep the concentration at 6.7 mg/mL, water levels were cautiously monitored and as much water that had evaporated was provided back. After the process was completed, the solution was centrifuged at 1500 relative centrifugal force for 30 min.

2.3. Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy

For the characterization of HOPG (in flake form) and FLG (exfoliated and sonicated), a Renishaw inVia Qontor Raman confocal spectrometer (Renishaw plc, Wotton-under-Edge, UK) was used combined with the Renishaw Centrus 4AUL44-1040 × 256 detector equipped with a 532 nm laser, used in normal mode. A grating of 2400 lines/mm was preferred for the visible region. Exposure time was set to 10 s; laser power (50 mW) was used as 100%. Raman data were recorded in the spectral region between 120 cm−1 and 3500 cm−1 on a gold substrate. Data visualization and analysis were performed using OPUS 8.7 (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) and OriginPro, Version 2025 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

2.4. Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform–Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR FT-IR)

Samples were prepared by mixing the FLG solutions with protein solutions at FLG:Ubiquitin ratios of 0:1 (refers to a blank ubiquitin solution), 1:1 (the FLG:Ubiquitin complex) and 1:0 (blank FLG solution). All the samples were shaken at 310 K at 300 rpm for 2 h. Measurements were performed by using an FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, UATR Two, PerkinElmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) coupled with an MIR-TGS detector and an attenuated total reflection (ATR) unit. The FT-IR spectra were recorded at room temperature in the spectral range of 4000–600 cm−1 (mid-IR) under equal conditions for the samples of buffer solution, FLG solution, protein solution and FLG–Ubiquitin complex. The spectrum of air was recorded when the ATR unit (diamond, single reflection) was empty and clean. A total of 128 scans were averaged before Fourier transformation, taking the air spectrum as background. The resolution was 4 cm−1 and the data interval was 1 cm−1 during the measurements. The second derivative of the spectra was computed using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm with 9 smoothing points to resolve the superimposed bands. The second derivative of the spectra was calculated by using OPUS 8.7 (Bruker, Germany), visualized by OriginPro, Version 2025 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

2.5. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The samples were adjusted to the FLG/Ubiquitin ratios of 1:0, 0:1, 1:1 and 4:1 with a constant protein concentration of 0.15 mg/mL. All samples were shaken at 310 K and 300 rpm for 2 h. Measurements were performed using the Perkin Elmer LAMBDATM 950 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) at room temperature. Spectra were obtained in the range of 200–800 nm. Each of the samples was placed in 0.7 mL quartz cuvettes with a pathlength of 10 mm. The acquisition step was set to 1 nm. Corresponding deionized water and buffer mixtures were taken as background. Data visualization and analysis were also performed using OPUS 8.7 (Bruker, Germany) and OriginPro, Version 2025 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

2.6. Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy

A CD spectrometer Jasco J-1500 (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) was used for CD measurements. The FLG/Ubiquitin complexes were prepared (0:1, 1:1, 4:1, 1:0) by adding various amounts of FLG to a constant protein concentration of 0.15 mg/mL. Each sample was shaken at 310 K at 300 rpm for 2 h; the samples were then placed in quartz cuvettes (volume: 400 μL; pathlength: 0.2 cm) and measured at room temperature. CD spectra were recorded in the range of 190–350 nm with the parameters as follows: bandwidth: 1.0 nm, data pitch: 0.1 nm, DIT: 4 s, number of accumulation scans: 8 and scanning speed: 50 nm/min. CD is reported in degrees of ellipticity (θ), which is defined as the ratio of the minor to the major axis of the ellipse formed by the electric field vector of elliptically polarized light after its transmission through a chiral sample, upon which linearly polarized light was initially incident [32].
The protein secondary structure analysis from the CD spectra was accomplished by a curve fitting program in CDPro software (version 4.31) using the CONTINLL method [27]. According to this method, the analysis of a CD spectrum identifies six secondary structural elements: regular and distorted α-helixes, regular and distorted β-sheets, turns, and unordered structures [38]. For simplicity, the percentage values of regular and distorted α-helixes were summed to determine the total α-helix content, while the values of regular and distorted β-sheets were combined to obtain the total β-sheet content. Data visualization and analysis were also performed using OPUS 8.7 (Bruker, Germany) and OriginPro, Version 2025 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of HOPG and FLG

3.1.1. Raman Spectroscopy Reveals the Structural Integrity of Few-Layer Graphene Structures

Raman spectroscopy is a predominant technique for the structural characterization of graphite, graphene, and nanostructured carbon-based materials [25,39]. In graphitic materials the D band arises from disordered carbon atoms, while the G band corresponds to the in-plane vibration of sp2 carbon atoms and can be utilized to assess the thickness of multilayer graphene. Accordingly, the presence of a G band arising around 1580 cm−1 and a 2D band positioned around 2700 cm−1 is a valid characteristic of graphene [40], and were observed clearly before and after the exfoliation process. The I_G/I_2D ratio and width of the 2D peak detected around 2700 cm−1 have valuable information regarding the number of layers of graphene material [41].
The Raman spectrum of HOPG (Figure 1b) exhibits peaks at 1350 cm−1, 1577 cm−1 and 2712 cm−1 which correspond to the D band, G band and 2D band, respectively, while the Raman spectrum of exfoliated samples (Figure 1a) shows peaks at 1348 cm−1, 1579 cm−1 and 2716 cm−1, corresponding to the D band, G band and 2D band, respectively. The position of the 2D peak was shifted from 2712 cm−1 to 2716 cm−1 after the exfoliation process. The I_G/I_2D ratios of HOPG and exfoliates sample were calculated as 2.2 and 2.4, respectively. The FWHM of the 2D band of the exfoliated sample was approximately 74 cm−1. It was formerly reported that an I_G/I_2D >1.3 and an FWHM of the 2D band higher than 60 cm−1 indicate the presence of few-layer graphene [42]. In light of these results, the exfoliated samples probed here have few-layer graphene structures. The weak D peaks observed at 1350 cm−1 (Figure 1b) and 1348 cm−1 (Figure 1a) in the samples indicate high crystallinity. The D peak signal (generally expected around 1350 cm−1) exhibited no substantial variation in the exfoliated sample, which demonstrates that no defect was generated during the sample preparation process.

3.1.2. UV-Vis Absorption Analysis Confirming Non-Oxidized FLG Formation

UV-Vis measurements were performed to determine whether the exfoliated samples had undergone oxidation, which can be detected by a peak around 230 nm [43]. It is known from UV-Vis spectroscopic studies that the characteristic spectrum of graphene/graphene materials exhibits a prominent peak around 270 nm. In our results (Figure 2) we have detected the mentioned peak at 277 nm, indicating the presence of graphene. In conjunction with this result, the exfoliation process was found to be consistent with the Raman results, indicating that it did not cause any damage to the material’s characteristic structure. Additionally, no peak in the neighborhood of 230 nm, associated with the presence of graphene oxide, was observed. This suggests that the FLG obtained was not oxidized to a detectable extent according to the UV-Vis spectra [36,44]. Multiple repeated measurements performed on FLG yielded consistent results, in line with each other.

3.2. The FLG–Ubiquitin Interactions

3.2.1. FT-IR Spectroscopic Analysis Reveals FLG-Induced Conformational Changes in Ubiquitin

The FT-IR technique is a valuable tool for structural analysis and monitoring changes in the secondary structure of proteins and/or polypeptides [27,30,45,46]. A significant advantage of FT-IR spectroscopy for structural characterization is that it is not constrained by the protein size or the physical state of the samples. In the current study, FT-IR was used to monitor the conformational changes in ubiquitin’s secondary structure due to the presence of FLG. In the FT-IR second-derivative spectrum, the amide I region (Figure 3) shows that the IR peak absorbing at 1652 cm−1 was upshifted towards 1653 cm−1, indicating that FLG causes a slight conformational change in the protein’s alpha-helical structures. Given that there is no significant change in the spectral pattern in the 1625–1600 cm−1 region (due to absorption of amino acid side chains such as Lys, Asn and Trp [46]), the spectral change detected at 1652 cm−1 (due to α-helix) is reasonable, indicating the local interactions of ubiquitin with FLG. Such small shifts (on the order of a few wavenumbers) are expected for regular secondary structural elements as they produce highly collective and stable vibrational modes. However, large shifts (greater than 5–10 cm−1) accompanied by band broadening are typically observed when the protein is completely unfolded (denatured) [27]. Based on our data, the IR signals absorbing in the 1625–1640 cm−1 and 1670–1690 cm−1 spectral regions (due to β-sheets and turns) also exhibit slight shifts in the presence of FLG while the IR signals arising from the amino acid side chains in the 1625–1600 cm−1 region overlap without discernible shifts. By comparing the IR second-derivative spectra of blank ubiquitin and the 1:1 complex, we can conclude that the presence of FLG might have induced minor changes in the secondary structures of the protein without causing unordered patterns. These changes strongly reveal that FLG can affect a protein’s secondary structure in a versatile manner [for band assignments, see refs. [27,28,46]].

3.2.2. CD Analysis Unveils FLG-Induced Conformational and Chirality Changes in Ubiquitin

The far-UV region of CD spectra, between 250 and 190 nm, has been widely used to analyze the secondary structures of proteins, including α-helixes, β-sheets, and random coils. It is a simple, fast, and non-destructive method for estimating the conformations of proteins. The CD spectra of the α-helix conformation typically show strong negative bands at 208 nm (π → π*) and 222 nm (n → π*) with a positive peak around 190 nm (π → π*). The β-sheet structures exhibit a negative band around 215 nm (n → π*) and a positive band around 195 nm (π → π*). However, the experimental results of β-sheet conformations may show significant variation due to structural differences, such as parallel and antiparallel arrangements, β-turns, and twists. Random coil conformations are also detectable in CD spectra by a relatively weak positive band at approximately 212 nm (n → π*) and a negative band around 195 nm (π → π*) [32,32,36,47].
In our results (Figure 4), the spectrum of ubiquitin shows two distinct minima at approximately 207 nm and 222 nm and a positive band around 195 nm. These minima are characteristic signals corresponding to the alpha-helix structures in the secondary structure of the protein. Observation of the CD signal at 217 nm corresponds to beta-sheets in the secondary structure of the protein [30,36]. When the CD spectra of the FLG:Ubiquitin complexes (ratios of 1:1 and 4:1) were examined, concentration-dependent spectral changes were clearly detected. The molar ellipticity values gradually decreased, indicating a change in chirality of the protein in the presence of FLG. Minimal changes appeared at the 1:1 ratio, while at the 4:1 ratio, the intensities of the 208 nm and 222 nm bands decreased noticeably. CD spectra of FLG:Ubiquitin complexes at both ratios of 1:1 and 4:1 showed progressive decreases in molar ellipticity compared to neat ubiquitin, which indicates that FLG induces concentration-dependent conformational changes in proteins without causing disorder. Despite these changes, the overall spectral profile remained characteristic of folded ubiquitin, indicating that chirality was altered without inducing protein unfolding. These findings altogether strongly indicate that FLG interacts with the ubiquitin protein and induces conformational rearrangements without causing a disordered structure in the secondary structure of the protein. There was no CD signal detected from FLG due to their intrinsically non-chiral nature.
The assignments of the secondary structure elements were obtained by a software program, CDPro, using the CONTINLL method. This method uses the reference sets of proteins, whose 3D structures are well known from X-ray diffraction studies. A 42-protein reference set of those databases was used for each CD spectrum between 190 and 240 nm. Our CD data estimates that ubiquitin consists of 3.9% alpha-helixes, 39.8% beta-sheets, 19.8% turns and 36.5% unordered structures; the complex with the 1:1 ratio includes 3.8% alpha-helixes, 39.8% beta-sheets, 19.8% turns and 35.6% unordered structures; and the complex with the 4:1 ratio gives 3.7% alpha-helixes, 40.4% beta-sheets, 19.7% turns and 36.1% unordered structures. Estimates showed minimal variation between native structures and complexes (≤0.6% change in any structural elements). This percentage is not statistically significant for a 76-residue protein, where each residue represents ~1.3% of the sequence. Nevertheless, the concentration-dependent ellipticity reduction combined with the preserved overall spectral characteristics suggests progressive interaction. The presence of FLG resulted in a notable change around 217 nm in the CD spectrum of ubiquitin (Figure 4), indicative of a reduction in the protein’s β-sheet content [13], agreeing with our spectral results. The secondary structure predictions were compared with the XRD results reported in the literature. Estimations for β-sheet structures exhibit a high degree of agreement [48]. It could be interpreted that the structural elements calculated by the method as ‘unordered structures’ correspond to alpha-helix structures. The results of the CD measurements and secondary structure estimations indicate that the interaction of ubiquitin with FLG causes alterations in the protein structure while influencing overall chirality without leading to the disruption of secondary structural elements.

3.2.3. UV-Vis Spectroscopic Characterization of FLG-Induced Aromatic Micro-Environmental Changes in Ubiquitin

The UV absorption of proteins between 180 and 230 nm primarily arises from π → π* transitions in peptide bonds. In the 230–300 nm range, absorption is mainly influenced by the aromatic side chains of tryptophan (Trp), tyrosine (Tyr), and phenylalanine (Phe) residues, with a minor contribution from disulfide bonds near 260 nm [49]. In this study, ubiquitin, used as a model protein, contains only one tyrosine (Tyr) and two phenylalanine (Phe) residues. The Phe residues are located on the β-sheet structures of the protein, while the Tyr residue is positioned on the α-helix structure (Figure 5). The UV-Vis spectrum of ubiquitin exhibits signals in the 200–250 nm range (Figure 6), which provides insights into the protein’s secondary structure. This spectral range provides information regarding the secondary structure of the protein [50,50,51].
The UV-Vis absorption spectra for the 0:1, 1:1 and 4:1 complexes showed two prominent peaks. Signals originating from secondary structure elements are observed in the 201–204 nm range (203 nm for the 1:1 complex), while a broad signal in the 273–277 nm range (276 nm for 1:1 complex) is attributed to phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr) residues. The spectra indicate that the spectral properties of these amino acids contribute to the absorption bands within the structure of ubiquitin. In contrast, the spectrum of FLG presents a significantly lower signal. Upon examining the FLG:Ubiquitin complexes, a blue shift (hypsochromic shift [52]) was clearly observed. The related blue shift arising from alterations in the secondary structure of the protein induced by FLG is due to the π-π stacking between aromatic residues of the protein and the backbone of graphene [52]. The spectral shift occurring approximately from 277 nm to 273 nm shows changes in the microenvironment of phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr) residues. These shifts demonstrated that FLG interacts with the ubiquitin protein, causing conformational and micro-environmental changes in ubiquitin’s structure. Another rational insight comes from the progressive hypsochromic (blue) shift with increasing FLG concentration (native: 277 nm; 1:1 complex: 276 nm; 4:1 complex: 273 nm), representing a total shift of 4 nm from native to the highest FLG concentration. Considering the positions of the tyrosine (Tyr) and phenylalanine (Phe) residues within the protein’s structure (Figure 5), the overall spectral trend highlights that FLG interacts with ubiquitin, inducing micro-environmental changes around Phe and Tyr residues. It is evident that changes occur in the vicinity of both the β-sheet and α-helix structures. The absence of tryptophan in the protein’s structure, along with the presence of only three aromatic residues (one tyrosine and two phenylalanine) in total, contributes to the low intensity and broad band profile.
In the current study, the ultrasonication process, performed using an ultrasonic bath, was preferred as a rapid, simple, and clean method to produce few-layer graphene (FLG) and yielded successful results. Raman analyses demonstrated that the exfoliated graphene structures remained intact, with no structural degradation, and that FLG was successfully formed. The data obtained from the second derivative analysis of the ATR FT-IR spectrum clearly demonstrated that the presence of FLG induces measurable changes in the alpha-helix, beta-sheet, and turn structures that constitute the secondary structure of the protein. The absence of disordered structure formation is a significant finding for the future of this study. The CD results are in agreement with the findings from ATR FT-IR analyses. This further confirms the absence of disordered structure formation while revealing a reduction in beta-sheet components and changes in the chirality of the protein. UV-Vis measurements are consistent with results obtained from ATR FT-IR and CD analysis. The results indicate that FLG:Ubiquitin complexes form without leading to structural disorder and that the presence of FLG induces minor changes in the secondary structures of the protein, as supported by the progressive spectral profile in FLG concentration CDPro results. Since the ubiquitin protein contains only one tyrosine (Tyr) and two phenylalanine (Phe) residues, the UV-Vis results provide insights into the micro-environmental changes surrounding these amino acids. Spectroscopic data clearly reveal that the micro-environments of these side chains are affected by the presence of FLG.
The studies by Mondal et al. [12] and Malik et al. [11] have been incorporated, both of which demonstrate graphene oxide–ubiquitin interactions and conclude that the protein’s structural integrity was largely preserved. Their findings are in line with our observation that FLG induces minor structural changes without causing disorder. This consistency across FLG (our study), single-layer graphene [13,14], and graphene oxide systems [11,12] establishes that the degree of structural perturbation depends critically on material properties such as the layer number, oxidation state, and surface chemistry. Wei’s team investigated ubiquitin folding upon absorption to a graphene surface using discontinuous molecular dynamics [14]. According to their study, after the first contact, the alpha-helix part rolled down towards graphene surface. The beta-sheet content started to collapse onto the surface while aligning parallel to the surface. After that, beta-sheets became random coils. The first contact was made by Leu50 due to hydrophobic interactions, followed by Leu56 and Ile61. Tyr59 and His68 residues were responsible for π-π interactions. Compared with our experimental design, the key difference lies in the structural constraints implied by our FLG structure. In Wei’s work, ubiquitin can lie parallel to the graphene, which leads to structural collapse. For an FLG structure the interlayer spacing is approximately 0.3–0.4 nm. As a result of this, ubiquitin cannot penetrate the graphene layers. Therefore, it cannot align in a parallel manner, which prevents further interactions and hence complete disorder. This geometric constraint may explain why beta-sheet reduction is observed. In FLG, these π-π interactions of course are highly likely to occur at both the top and bottom surfaces of the multilayer structure. It also creates multiple interaction sites which roll down towards the graphene surface. This ensemble point of view shows controlled perturbations rather than complete denaturation. The observed minor FT-IR and UV shifts and the CD results are consistent with our hypothesis of localized conformational alterations rather than overall protein unfolding.

4. Conclusions

The present work reveals that few-layer graphene alters the secondary structure of ubiquitin in a controlled manner, maintaining its overall conformational stability. Our findings demonstrate that FLG interacts with ubiquitin without inducing structural disorder while leading to minor alterations in the regular protein secondary structures and changes in protein chirality. The FT-IR second-derivative analysis confirmed alterations in the secondary structure, while CD spectroscopy provided additional insights into structural modifications upon FLG concentration and chirality shifts. Notably, the UV-Vis results support the CD findings by corroborating the observed changes in β-sheet structures. Furthermore, UV-Vis absorbance spectroscopy enabled an evaluation of the micro-environmental changes surrounding the single tyrosine and two phenylalanine residues, highlighting their sensitivity to FLG interactions via a concentration-dependent spectral trend.
The presence of multiple layers in the FLG structures enabled the formation of a different complex to those reported in the existing literature, as the protein could not penetrate between the layers. The interlayer regions remained pristine, and they are highly amenable to modification for sensor technologies. Moreover, the existence of these layers may provide an important alternative for sensor-based applications as they allow the protein to interact with the graphene surface without being fully adsorbed onto it and losing its structure.
These findings provide a clear understanding of how few-layer graphene can modulate protein conformation while preserving overall structural integrity, offering valuable guidance for designing protein–nanomaterial interfaces in biomedical and nanotechnological applications. Further work is in progress to analyze thermodynamic stability and perform detailed mapping of conformational transitions and energy transfer pathways in the FLG:Ubiquitin complexes by using FT-IR and CD spectroscopies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.G. and G.G.; methodology, B.G. and G.G.; software, B.G.; validation, B.G. and G.G.; formal analysis, B.G.; investigation, B.G. and G.G.; resources, G.G.; data curation, B.G.; writing—original draft preparation, B.G. and G.G.; writing—review and editing, B.G. and G.G.; visualization, B.G.; supervision, G.G.; project administration, B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK)-1004 Excellence Center Support Program (İYTE-2 Project No: 22AG014, to L.Ö. and G.G.). This work was also supported by the TUBİTAK 2209-A program (Project no: 1919B012310026, to B.G. under the supervision of G.G.).

Data Availability Statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge BIOMER and MAM (IZTECH, Turkey) for the instrumental facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FLGFew-layer graphene
ATR FT-IR Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform–infrared spectroscopy
CDCircular dichroism
LPELiquid-phase exfoliation
UV-VisUV-Vis, ultraviolet–visible

References

  1. Wang, M.; Fu, C.; Liu, X.; Lin, Z.; Yang, N.; Yu, S. Probing the mechanism of plasma protein adsorption on Au and Ag nanoparticles with FT-IR spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 15191–15196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Di, S.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Li, Z. Recent advances of graphene-biomacromolecule nanocomposites in medical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 11, 500–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giri, K.; Shameer, K.; Zimmermann, M.T.; Saha, S.; Chakraborty, P.K.; Sharma, A.; Arvizo, R.R.; Madden, B.J.; McCormick, D.J.; Kocher, J.P.A.; et al. Understanding protein-nanoparticle interaction: A new gateway to disease therapeutics. Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 1078–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gunawan, C.; Lim, M.; Marquis, C.P.; Amal, R. Nanoparticle–protein corona complexes govern the biological fates and functions of nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 2060–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Durán, N.; Silveira, C.P.; Durán, M.; Martinez, D.S.T. Silver nanoparticle protein corona and toxicity: A mini-review. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ou, L.; Song, B.; Liang, H.; Liu, J.; Feng, X.; Deng, B.; Sun, T.; Shao, L. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: A general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2016, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lynch, I.; Dawson, K.A. Protein–Nanoparticle Interactions. In Nano-Enabled Medical Applications, 1st ed.; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2020; pp. 231–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peña-Bahamonde, J.; Nguyen, H.N.; Fanourakis, S.K.; Rodrigues, D.F. Recent advances in graphene-based biosensor technology with applications in life sciences. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gostaviceanu, A.; Gavrilaș, S.; Copolovici, L.; Copolovici, D.M. Graphene-Oxide Peptide-Containing Materials for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, J.; Wang, D.; Yurtsever, A.; Watanabe, S.; Sun, L. Nanopipette-Based Probe Deciphering Nanoscale Charge Distribution of Graphene Layers Affecting Peptide Binding and Assembling. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 21106–21112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malik, S.A.; Mohanta, Z.; Srivastava, C.; Atreya, H.S. Modulation of protein–graphene oxide interactions with varying degrees of oxidation. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mondal, S.; Thirupathi, R.; Rao, L.P.; Atreya, H.S. Unraveling the dynamic nature of protein–graphene oxide interactions. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 52539–52548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, G.; Luan, B.; Ge, C.; Chong, Y.; Dong, X.; Guo, J.; Tang, C.; Zhou, R. Understanding the graphene quantum dots-ubiquitin interaction by identifying the interaction sites. Carbon 2017, 121, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, S.; Wei, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wei, T. Graphic contrastive learning analyses of discontinuous molecular dynamics simulations: Study of protein folding upon adsorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 122, 253701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ding, F.; Radic, S.; Chen, R.; Chen, P.; Geitner, N.K.; Brown, J.M.; Ke, P.C. Direct observation of a single nanoparticle–ubiquitin corona formation. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9162–9169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mahmoudi, M.; Lynch, I.; Ejtehadi, M.R.; Monopoli, M.P.; Bombelli, F.B.; Laurent, S. Protein-nanoparticle interactions: Opportunities and challenges. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5610–5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Calzolai, L.; Franchini, F.; Gilliland, D.; Rossi, F. Protein-nanoparticle interaction: Identification of the ubiquitin-gold nanoparticle interaction site. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3101–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boulos, S.P.; Davis, T.A.; Yang, J.A.; Lohse, S.E.; Alkilany, A.M.; Holland, L.A.; Murphy, C.J. Nanoparticle-protein interactions: A thermodynamic and kinetic study of the adsorption of bovine serum albumin to gold nanoparticle surfaces. Langmuir 2013, 29, 14984–14996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jenson, J.; Goldstein, G.; Breslow, E. Physical-Chemical Properties of Ubiquitin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1980, 624, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agrata, R.; Komander, D. Ubiquitin—A structural perspective. Mol. Cell 2025, 85, 323–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moosa, A.; Abed, M. Graphene preparation and graphite exfoliation. Turk. J. Chem. 2021, 45, 493–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, M.; Tian, T.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Cui, P.; Tang, J.; Qin, L.-C. Production of Graphene by Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Intercalated Graphite. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 2014, 9, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, L.; Meng, Y. Liquid-phase exfoliation of fluorinated graphite to produce high-quality graphene sheets. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2019, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ciesielski, A.; Samorì, P. Graphene via sonication assisted liquid-phase exfoliation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 43, 381–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Silva, D.L.; Campos, J.L.E.; Fernandes, T.F.D.; Rocha, J.N.; Machado, L.R.P.; Soares, E.M.; Miquita, D.R.; Miranda, H.; Rabelo, C.; Vilela Neto, O.P.; et al. Raman spectroscopy analysis of number of layers in mass-produced graphene flakes. Carbon 2020, 161, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adochitei, A.; Drochioiu, G. Rapid Characterization of Peptide Secondary Structure by FT-IR Spectroscopy. Rev. Roum. Chim 2011, 56, 783–791. [Google Scholar]
  27. Güler, G.; Vorob’Ev, M.M.; Vogel, V.; Mäntele, W. Proteolytically-induced changes of secondary structural protein conformation of bovine serum albumin monitored by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and UV-circular dichroism spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 161, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Öztoprak, N.; Vorob’ev, M.M.; Yagmurcukardes, M.; Güler, G. Biophysical Characterization of Temperature-Dependent Structural Modifications in β-Lactoglobulin during Tryptic Hydrolysis. Optim. Sci. J. 2024, 1, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Micsonai, A.; Wien, F.; Kernya, L.; Lee, Y.H.; Goto, Y.; Réfrégiers, M.; Kardos, J. Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E3095–E3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Güler, G.; Džafić, E.; Vorob’ev, M.M.; Vogel, V.; Mäntele, W. Real time observation of proteolysis with Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and UV-circular dichroism spectroscopy: Watching a protease eat a protein. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 79, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sreerama, N.; Woody, R.W. Estimation of Protein Secondary Structure from Circular Dichroism Spectra: Comparison of CONTIN, SELCON, and CDSSTR Methods with an Expanded Reference Set. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 287, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Martin, S.R.; Schilstra, M.J. Circular Dichroism and Its Application to the Study of Biomolecules. Methods Cell Biol. 2008, 84, 263–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Y.; Ni, Y. Combination of UV–vis spectroscopy and chemometrics to understand protein–nanomaterial conjugate: A case study on human serum albumin and gold nanoparticles. Talanta 2014, 119, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cedervall, T.; Lynch, I.; Lindman, S.; Berggård, T.; Thulin, E.; Nilsson, H.; Dawson, K.A.; Linse, S. Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quntify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2050–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sapsford, K.E.; Tyner, K.M.; Dair, B.J.; Deschamps, J.R.; Medintz, I.L. Analyzing nanomaterial bioconjugates: A review of current and emerging purification and characterization techniques. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 4453–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Greenfield, N.J. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 1, 2876–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tyurnina, A.V.; Tzanakis, I.; Morton, J.; Mi, J.; Porfyrakis, K.; Maciejewska, B.M.; Grobert, N.; Eskin, D.G. Ultrasonic exfoliation of graphene in water: A key parameter study. Carbon 2020, 168, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sreerama, N.; Venyaminov, S.Y.U.; Woody, R.W. Estimation of the number of alpha-helical and beta-strand segments in proteins using circular dichroism spectroscopy. Protein Sci. A Publ. Protein Soc. 1999, 8, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, K.; Brambilla, L.; Sartori, P.; Moscheni, C.; Perrotta, C.; Zema, L.; Bertarelli, C.; Castiglioni, C. Development of Tailored Graphene Nanoparticles: Preparation, Sorting and Structure Assessment by Complementary Techniques. Molecules 2023, 28, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Qian, M.; Zhou, Y.S.; Gao, Y.; Park, J.B.; Feng, T.; Huang, S.M.; Sun, Z.; Jiang, L.; Lu, Y.F. Formation of graphene sheets through laser exfoliation of highly ordered pyrolytic graphite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 173108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Papanai, G.S.; Sharma, I.; Gupta, B.K. Probing number of layers and quality assessment of mechanically exfoliated gr aphene via Raman fingerprint. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Z.S.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z.D.; Huang, Z.H.; Liu, C.S.; Fu, D.J.; Liu, J.R. Raman spectroscopy of few-layer graphene prepared by C2–C6 cluster ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2013, 307, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lai, Q.; Zhu, S.; Luo, X.; Zou, M.; Huang, S. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of graphene oxides. AIP Adv. 2012, 2, 32146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Çiplak, Z.; Yildiz, N.; Cąlimli, A. Investigation of Graphene/Ag Nanocomposites Synthesis Parameters for Two Different Synthesis Methods. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct 2015, 23, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, H.; Yang, S.; Kong, J.; Dong, A.; Yu, S. Obtaining information about protein secondary structures in aqueous solution using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barth, A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 1073–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, S.; Peng, Z.; Leblanc, R.M. Method to Determine Protein Concentration in the Protein-Nanoparticle Conjugates Aqueous Solution Using Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 6455–6459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vijay-Kumar, S.; Bugg, C.E.; Wilkinson, K.D.; Cook, W.J. Three-dimensional structure of ubiquitin at 2.8 A resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 3582–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Antosiewicz, J.M.; David, S. UV-Vis spectroscopy of tyrosine side-groups in studies of protein structure. Part 2: Selected applications. Biophys. Rev. 2016, 8, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosenheck, K.; Doty, P. The far ultraviolet absorption spectra of polypeptide and protein solutions and their dependence on conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1961, 47, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akyüz, E.; Vorob’ev, M.M.; Güler, G. Biophysical assessment of protein stability in ethanol-stressed environments via UV absorption and fluorescence spectroscopies. Biophys. Chem. 2026, 329, 107538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, D.; Zhang, W.; Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Su, Z.; Wei, G. When biomolecules meet graphene: From molecular level interactions to material design and applications. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 19491–19509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Raman spectra of the (a) exfoliated samples and (b) HOPG.
Figure 1. The Raman spectra of the (a) exfoliated samples and (b) HOPG.
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g001
Figure 2. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of exfoliated sample, FLG.
Figure 2. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of exfoliated sample, FLG.
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g002
Figure 3. The FT-IR second-derivative spectra of amide I band for the ubiquitin protein (black solid line) and for the FLG:Ubiquitin complex (the 1:1 ratio, red solid line).
Figure 3. The FT-IR second-derivative spectra of amide I band for the ubiquitin protein (black solid line) and for the FLG:Ubiquitin complex (the 1:1 ratio, red solid line).
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g003
Figure 4. The CD spectra of FLG (black), ubiquitin (red) and the FLG:Ubiquitin complexes at the ratios of 1:1 (blue) and 4:1 (green).
Figure 4. The CD spectra of FLG (black), ubiquitin (red) and the FLG:Ubiquitin complexes at the ratios of 1:1 (blue) and 4:1 (green).
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g004
Figure 5. The 3D structure of ubiquitin showing Tyr (purple) and Phe (yellow) residues in color codes (reproduced in the PDB web from PDB ID: 2ZCC).
Figure 5. The 3D structure of ubiquitin showing Tyr (purple) and Phe (yellow) residues in color codes (reproduced in the PDB web from PDB ID: 2ZCC).
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g005
Figure 6. The UV-Vis spectra for FLG (black), ubiquitin (red), the 1:1 complex (blue) and the 4:1 complex (green).
Figure 6. The UV-Vis spectra for FLG (black), ubiquitin (red), the 1:1 complex (blue) and the 4:1 complex (green).
Nanomaterials 15 01873 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gencay, B.; Güler, G. Investigation of Few-Layer Graphene–Ubiquitin Interactions with Optical Spectroscopy Techniques. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15241873

AMA Style

Gencay B, Güler G. Investigation of Few-Layer Graphene–Ubiquitin Interactions with Optical Spectroscopy Techniques. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(24):1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15241873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gencay, Burcu, and Günnur Güler. 2025. "Investigation of Few-Layer Graphene–Ubiquitin Interactions with Optical Spectroscopy Techniques" Nanomaterials 15, no. 24: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15241873

APA Style

Gencay, B., & Güler, G. (2025). Investigation of Few-Layer Graphene–Ubiquitin Interactions with Optical Spectroscopy Techniques. Nanomaterials, 15(24), 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15241873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop