Next Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of Te and Ag2Te Microrods for Light-Activated Bending-Responsive Photodetectors
Next Article in Special Issue
Nonequilibrium Photocarrier and Phonon Dynamics in Dirac Semimetal NiTe2 Microcrystals Probed by Ultrafast Reflectivity Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Stacking Order-Dependent Electronic and Optical Properties of h-BP/Borophosphene Van Der Waals Heterostructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Low-Power Consumption Hydrogen Sensor Based on TiOx/Pt Nanocontacts via Local Atom Migration

Core Electronics Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Higashi 1-1-1, Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Kita 14, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(15), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151154
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025

Abstract

Hydrogen (H2) gas sensors are essential for detecting leaks and ensuring safety, thereby supporting the broader adoption of hydrogen energy. The performance of H2 sensors has been shown to be improved by the incorporation of TiO2 nanostructures. The key findings are summarized as follows: (1) Resistive random-access memory (ReRAM) technology was used to fabricate extremely compact H2 sensors via various forming techniques, and substantial sensor performance enhancement was investigated. (2) A nanocontact composed of titanium oxide (TiOx)/platinum (Pt) was subjected to various forming operations to establish a Schottky junction with a nanogap structure on a tantalum oxide (Ta2O5) layer, and its properties were assessed. (3) When the Pt electrode was on the positive side during the forming operation used for ReRAM technology, a Pt nanopillar structure was produced. By contrast, when the forming operation was conducted with a positive bias on the TiOx side, a mixed oxide film of Ta and Ti was produced, which indicates local Ta doping into the TiOx. A sensor response of over 1000 times was achieved at a minimal voltage of 1 mV at room temperature. (4) This sensor fabrication technology based on the forming operation is promising for the development of low-power consumption sensors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As the global demand for sustainable energy solutions intensifies, hydrogen (H2) energy emerges as a fundamental alternative to fossil fuels. Its clean combustion and its production of water only makes it an attractive option for reducing carbon emissions. H2 gas is used in transportation, power generation, and industrial processes [1,2]. However, the safe implementation of hydrogen technologies necessitates effective monitoring systems. H2 gas sensors are essential for detecting leaks and ensuring safety, thereby supporting the broader adoption of hydrogen energy [3,4,5,6]. While various types of hydrogen sensors have been developed [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], the metal oxide semiconductor type is one of the sensors that had already been commercialized as a gas alarm because of its simple structure and low energy consumption [15]. Recently, various groups were actively investigating and developing hydrogen sensors utilizing machine learning algorithms to improve gas selectivity [16,17,18]. Moreover, the performance of H2 sensors has been improved by incorporating TiO2 nanostructures [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. A recent study demonstrated high-speed H2 sensing using a TiOx/Pt sensor [26]. Schottky junctions formed at the interface between a thin TiOx layer and a Pt electrode were called TiOx nanocontacts (NCs). The TiOx layer was produced as a native TiOx layer. TiOx NCs achieved H2 sensing at room temperature in a dry environment but not in a wet environment. The length and thickness of the TiOx layer of TiOx NCs were small, 20 and 1 nm, respectively; however, its width was approximately 2 μm, indicating that it can be further miniaturized with respect to the width. Functional oxides such as titanium oxide are well known as resistive random-access memory (ReRAM) when sandwiched between metal electrodes. ReRAM is a promising non-volatile memory technology. It operates by inducing local structural changes in the oxide layer with voltage, creating a resistive state for data storage. ReRAM offers high speed, low power consumption, and superior scalability [27,28,29,30,31]. Wei et al. developed an ultra-small, low-power consumption H2 sensor by ReRAM using tantalum oxide (TaOx) [32]. This ReRAM device was 0.18 µm in size and electrically localized conductive filaments fabricated through a forming operation were even smaller, resulting in low power consumption (0.4 mW). The results indicated H2 sensing at room temperature, but the authors did not explore operation in a wet environment. The dimensions of the electrically conductive filaments could be significantly reduced via a forming operation, thus reducing the power consumption of the sensing device. These filament regions were formed in a Ta2O5 layer, and their resistances were changed by transmitting H2 through a metal layer above the Ta2O5 layer. Furthermore, we recently fabricated planar ReRAMs using exposed conductive filaments [33]. The Ta2O5 layer has been reported to localize migrated metal atoms in the layer during the forming operation, and in this study, the Ta2O5 layer was employed to form stable conductive filaments [34]. Pt/TiO2/Ti and Pt/TiO2/Pt multilayer structures have also been reported to form conductive filaments and function as ReRAMs [28,29]. Combining these techniques could enable low-power consumption H2 sensors by exposing localized TiOx NCs.
In this study, several forming operations were performed on TiOx NCs aligned on a Ta2O5 layer, and the contact characteristics were investigated. During a forming operation with the Pt electrode positively biased, Pt nanopillar structures formed. During a forming operation with TiOx positively biased, a mixed oxide film of Ta and Ti formed. The H2 sensing properties of these TiOx NCs achieved a resistance change exceeding 1000 times, even with 1 mV applied at room temperature during the forming operation, resulting in significant power savings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of Sensor Devices

Figure 1a,b presents the structure of the TiOx NC devices fabricated in this study. A 10 nm-thick Ta2O5 layer was deposited via reactive sputtering on a Si substrate coated with a 30 nm-thick SiN layer, which was deposited by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. Initial and secondary patterns were created using photolithography. Two cycles of shadow evaporation in an electron beam evaporator were used to produce two metal layers. The fabrication procedure is detailed in a previous study [35]. Nanogaps were formed because the metal layer fabricated during the second shadow evaporation was disrupted by the mask at the edges of the first evaporated layer. In the first evaporation, a 26 nm-thick Ti layer was evaporated on to the Ta2O5 layer. After liftoff, the second patterning step was performed. Subsequently, 1 nm-thick Ti and 13 nm-thick Pt wire ware deposited at certain evaporation angles relative to the substrate during the second evaporation. The size of the gap could be controlled by varying the evaporation conditions. The Pt wires were not connected to Pt pads where probes were placed for the characterization of devices. In this study, without changes in the layer heights, the fabrication conditions led to a gap size of approximately 20 nm. The contact between the left Pt wire and the diffused Ti layer resulted in the formation of TiOx NCs.

2.2. Structural and Gas-Sensing Characterization of Sensor Devices

The sensor structures were observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; Hitachi S5000, Tokyo, Japan). Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis was performed using a JEOL JEM-ARM200F Dual-X (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) to evaluate sensor characteristics. The elemental local mappings were investigated using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) inside the STEM chamber. A focused ion beam was utilized to fabricate samples for STEM analysis. A schematic of the experimental setup used for gas-sensing characterization is shown in Figure S1. The electrical properties of the fabricated samples were measured using a Keithley 2636 SourceMeter (TEKTRONIX, INC., Beaverton, OR, USA) with a probe station. Measurements were conducted at room temperature (293 K) under ambient conditions (50% relative humidity [RH]). In this study, H2 was diluted with balanced dry air (~1.33% H2 content; 99.9995% purity for N2, O2, and H2 gases) and balanced dry air were introduced into the solenoid valve at a flow rate of 100 mL/min, which was controlled using the mass flow controllers. Gases were passed through a water-filled gas-washing bottle to increase humidity. Once gases passed through the washing bottle at this flow rate, their RH was 88%, which is typical of wet environments. When a three-port solenoid valve was switched, gas was directed to the fabricated sample through the tip of a micropipette.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization of TiOx NC Device Before Forming Operation

Figure 1c,d shows the FESEM images of the fabricated devices. The diffused Ti layer is connected to the left Pt film. Details of the diffused Ti layer are provided in a previous study [24]. The nanogap size was measured to be 25 nm (Figure 1d), which is slightly larger than the designed size of 20 nm. This discrepancy is discussed in Section 3.5.

3.2. Gas-Sensing Properties of TiOx NC Device Before Forming Operation

Figure 1e,f shows the typical resistance–voltage (R–V) curves of the fabricated TiOx NC device in dry H2 gas, wet H2 gas, and ambient air. The curves obtained in dry H2 gas exhibited characteristic Schottky conduction behavior [23]. The resistance difference between the dry H2 and other gases was measured, indicating that the TiOx NC is applicable to a H2 sensor similar to sensors using Pt/TiO2 Schottky junctions [23]. Figure 1f shows the typical response of the TiOx NC with and without dry or wet H2 gases. Resistance was observed at 1 V. The response of dry H2 was distinct. Compared with a previously proposed TiOx NC [26], the present nanocontact exhibited a significantly smaller resistance change, which may be attributed to the difference in the nanogap size. Furthermore, compared with the observed resistance in dry H2, wet H2 showed minimal sensitivity to H2 gas. Although the resistance slightly decreased in Figure 1e, the current change was caused by water adsorption on the nanogap, and the response was to water, not hydrogen [26,36].
Figure 1g shows a schematic band diagram of the TiOx NC sensor. Red and black curves show band structures with and without introducing H2 gas, respectively. Upon the introduction of H2 gas, the Schottky barrier (ΔϕB) between the Pt and TiOx is reduced due to the dissociative diffusion of hydrogen atoms at the TiOx/Pt interface. This reduction in the Schottky barrier is attributed to the formation of dipole layers induced by the diffused hydrogen atoms at the TiOx/Pt interface [26]. The current difference in Figure 1e reflects changes in Schottky currents.

3.3. Sensor Response Changes of TiOx NC Device After Forming Operation

Figure 2a shows the current–voltage curves of the TiOx NC devices during six forming operations with flowing dry H2 gas. The curve with red dots shows the result of applying positive forming voltages from 0 to 12 V to the left side of the electrode (Figure 1a) at a current compliance (CC) of +1, +10, and +100 μA. The curve with blue dots shows the result of applying negative forming voltages from 0 to −20 V at a CC of −1, −10, and −100 μA. The devices labeled “+10 μA CC” were TiOx NC devices fabricated through a forming operation at a CC of +10 μA. During the entire forming operation, the observed currents reached the magnitude of the CC, indicating that device breakdown could be avoided. The magnitudes of the forming voltages on the negative side were larger than those of the forming voltages on the positive side, which reflects the asymmetric electrical characteristics of the Schottky junction of the TiOx NC.
Figure 2b shows the typical R–V curves after the forming operations. Under all forming conditions, the resistances at 1 V in the dry H2 environment were consistently lower than that measured in air. The sensor responses in the positive voltage forming operations exhibited large differences at various CC values. Therefore, the CC values were optimized, thus improving the device performance in this voltage operation. By contrast, in the negative voltage forming operations, the sensor response did not change significantly with the CC, suggesting that similar structures formed regardless of the CC magnitude. Except in the +1 and +100 μA CC cases, the difference in resistance between the measurements in air and dry H2 was larger at lower voltages. Thus, the forming operations effectively reduced the required read bias voltage.

3.4. Structural Changes in TiOx NC Device After Forming Operation

Figure 3a and Figure 3b show typical FESEM images of the TiOx NC devices at +10 and −10 μA CC, respectively. Figure 3a reveals a local 6 nm-wide nanopillar structure (red arrow). On the left electrode, the contrast of the electrode edge varied (arrow), suggesting deformation of the Pt electrode. Moreover, the shapes of their local structural changes differed from those at +100 and +1 μA CC, which are shown in Figure S2a,b. The CC magnitude and resistance change in Figure 2b corresponded to the amount of structural change. The red arrow in Figure 3b shows these structural changes, such as the curling of the structure and the expansion of the gap width on the right-side electrode. The change at –10 μA CC had a larger area than that at +10 μA CC. The areas indicated by the blue arrows in Figure 3b indicate areas where scattered structures connected on the upper and lower sides of the curling structure bridging the nanogap. These structural changes (curling and scattering) are also shown in the FESEM images in Figure S2c,d, which show the TiOx NC devices at −100 and −1 μA CC, respectively. The curl structures varied depending on the CC magnitude, and the scattered structures were similar in size. Considering the relationship between this result and the resistances in Figure 2b, we conclude that the scattered structures are effective for hydrogen response.

3.5. Elemental Analysis of TiOx NC Device After Forming Operation

Figure 3c shows a typical cross-sectional STEM image of the structural change region after forming operations at +10 μA CC. The height of the Ti layers on the right side was ~50 nm, indicating that the evaporated 26 nm Ti layers oxidized and thickened. Figure 3d,e also indicate that the entire Ti layer oxidized and thickened. The Ti layer was oxidized via surface oxidation and self-diffusion from the Ta2O5 layer [33]. The nanogap width could be extended to 25 nm because of the thickening of the Ti layer, which was the mask for the fabrication of the nanogap [35]. Figure 3f shows that the Ta2O5 layer was not significantly deformed by the forming operation. Figure 3g shows that the Pt atoms extended from the left-side electrode. When electric fields were applied to the nanogap, metal atoms were pulled up from the surface of the metal electrodes [37]. This observation indicates that a Pt nanopillar structure was created during the forming operation, as shown in the model in Figure 4a, resulting in the fabrication of small local TiOx NC devices.
Figure 3h shows the cross-sectional STEM image of the structural change region around the red arrow in Figure 3b after forming operations at −10 μA CC. The Ta2O5 layer was eroded on the left side and deposited on the right side. The left-side Pt electrode was lifted by the rise in the separated Ta2O5 layer. The right-side electrode expanded toward the opposite electrode. Figure 3i–k shows that the expanded area consisted of a mixture of Ti and Ta oxide. A comparison of the amounts of Ta and Ti showed that the extended area was likely a Ti-rich oxide layer, resembling a Ta-doped TiOx structure [38,39]. The resistivity of TiO2 is significantly reduced by doping it with Ta, and a large resistance change can be induced in the TiO2 layer via the forming operation. Figure 4b illustrates a schematic model of structural changes during the forming operations at −10 μA CC. During the forming operations, oxygen and Ti ions migrated, and oxygen holes were generated under the edge of the left electrode, suggesting the scattering of Ta oxides [33,40,41,42]. Moreover, Figure 3h reveals a ~10 nm separation between the left and right electrodes, indicating that this area was electrically disconnected and hence did not constitute a conductive path for a H2 sensor. The scattered structures (blue arrows in Figure 3b) contained a mixture of Ti and Ta oxide, as shown in Figure 4c, demonstrating the fabrication of a conductive path sized several tens of nanometers for a H2 sensor. Local doping is reported to induce changes in Schottky barrier height and band bending [43], it is considered that localized regions were formed where resistance changes occur preferentially in hydrogen reaction. Figure 4d shows a band diagram of the devices around the scattering position. Red and black curves denote the band structures with and without the introduction of H2 gas, respectively. Upon introducing H2 gas, after the Ta-doped Ti layer formed a highly doped layer in the Schottky junction and ohmic conduction dominated by tunneling conduction, resulting in the linear R–V curve at −10 μA CC (Figure 2b). The temperature dependence of the R–V characteristics before and after forming also supports this result. The results of the temperature-dependent measurements are shown in Figure S3.

3.6. Read Voltage Dependence of TiOx NC Device After Forming Operation

Figure 5 and Figure S4 show the response of the TiOx NC devices after the forming operation. Read voltages of 1, 10, 100, and 1000 mV were applied while controlling the humidity during the introduction of H2 gas and air, respectively. The yellow regions in Figure 5 and gray regions in Figure S4 indicate the introduction of H2 and air, respectively. Here, the high resistance at the read voltages of 1 and 10 mV may be evaluated as a small value because of noise during the current measurement, so the actual resistance change is likely greater than the evaluated values. In Figure S4, although the resistance depended on the humidity response at the read voltage of 1000 mV, this pattern differed at lower read voltages. The humidity dependence of the tunneling current through the nanogap electrodes remained negligible at low bias voltages but showed a relationship between the tunneling current and water vapor pressure at large bias voltages [34]. Therefore, gas sensing at a small read bias voltage can efficiently suppress both tunneling current fluctuations and humidity-induced variations. Table 1 shows the sensor responses (SR), sensing times (Tsen), recovering time (Trec), and power consumption (P). The Tsen and Trec represent the times required for the normalized resistance (ΔR) to reach 0.1 and 0.9 after the introduction and shutting of H2 gas, respectively. ΔR and observed resistance (Rob) are given by
R = R o b R H 2 R A i r R H 2 ,
where RAir and R H 2 are the resistances just before the flows of H2 gas and air, respectively. Power consumption (P) is
P = V 2 / R H 2 ,
where V is the read voltage. In the introduction of dry H2 gas, clear SRs, with resistance changes exceeding 1000, were also observed, even at the read voltage of 1 mV. Moreover, it appears that the smaller the read voltage, the shorter the recovery time. This tendency is consistent with the results of a previous study [24]. These indicate that, in addition to low power consumption, humidity dependence can be effectively suppressed. In contrast, under wet H2 gas environments, the resistance changes were smaller than those observed under dry H2 gas environments. This suggests the influence of the adsorbed water on the Pt electrode, which worked as a catalyst for hydrogen [20,44,45]. Compared with the TiOx NC devices after forming operations at −10 μA CC, those after forming operations at +10 μA CC exhibited reduced resistance change magnitudes upon introduction of wet H2 gas under applied bias voltage. The former sensors (−10 μA CC) showed clearer responses, with SR values exceeding 100 even at a read voltage of 1 mV, even when wet H2 gas was flowed toward the sensor.

3.7. Sensor Response of TiOx NC Device to Various H2 Concentrations After Forming Operation

The characteristics of TiOx NC devices after forming operations at +10 and −10 μA CC under varying H2 concentrations at ambient temperature are depicted in Figure 6. The H2 concentration was adjusted by mixing 1.33% H2 gas with dry air. The read voltage was 100 mV, which shows the highest SR in Table 1. The results demonstrated a correlation between SRs and H2 gas concentrations, indicating that the sensor may be useful for H2 sensing.

4. Conclusions

A sample containing a TiOx/Pt NC with a nanogap structure on a Ta2O5 layer was subjected to several forming operations, and its properties were evaluated. During the forming process with the Pt electrode on the positive side, a Pt nanopillar structure was formed, whereas a Ta-doped TiOx layer was produced during the forming process with the TiOx electrode on the positive side. This result indicates that localized doping can be achieved by the application of forming operations. The sensor attained a high resistance ratio, even at a read voltage of 1 mV and low power consumption, because of the forming operations. In particular, sensors with a Ta-doped TiOx layer detected H2 even in a moist environment, demonstrating robust environmental performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano15151154/s1, Figure S1: Schematic of experimental setup for gas-sensing characterization, Figure S2: Typical FESEM image of TiOx NC devices at (a) +100 μA CC, (b) +1 μA CC, (c) −100 μA CC, and (d) −1 μA CC, Figure S3: Temperature and environment dependence of R–V curves and Schottky plots of TiOx NC devices, Figure S4: Typical time dependence of resistance for TiOx NC devices in dry- and wet-air, Figure S5: The long-term stability and repeatability of TiOx NC devices after forming operation, Table S1: Comparison of power consumptions of hydrogen gas sensors.

Author Contributions

Y.N.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Visualization, Funding acquisition; H.S.: Resources, Writing—Review and Editing, Project administration; H.A.: Resources, Writing—Review and Editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI [Grant 23K04551].

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kazunari Homma, Koji Katayama, Ken Kawai, Satoru Ito, Satoru Fujii, and Shinichi Yoneda from Nuvoton Technology Corporation, Japan, for their discussion and valuable comments on the sensors. The fabrication of the materials was partly supported by the AIST Nano-Processing Facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AISTNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
ReRAMResistive random-access memory
NCNanocontact
FESEMField-emission scanning electron microscopy
STEMScanning transmission electron microscopy
EDXEnergy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
CCCurrent compliance
RHRelative humidity
SRSensor response

References

  1. Schlögl, R. Sustainable energy systems: The strategic role of chemical energy conversion. Top. Catal. 2016, 59, 772–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turner, J.A. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 2004, 305, 972–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Itaoka, K.; Saito, A.; Sasaki, K. Public perception on hydrogen infrastructure in Japan: Influence of rollout of commercial fuel cell vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 7290–7296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zimmer, R.; Welke, J. Let’s go green with hydrogen! The general public’s perspective. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 17502–17508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boon-Brett, L.; Bousek, J.; Black, G.; Moretto, P.; Castello, P.; Hübert, T.; Banach, U. Identifying performance gaps in hydrogen safety sensor technology for automotive and stationary applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ricci, M.; Bellaby, P.; Flynn, R. What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 5868–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, L.; Tian, Y.; Hussain, A.; Guan, Y.; Xu, G. Recent developments and challenges in resistance-based hydrogen gas sensors based on metal oxide semiconductors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2024, 416, 3697–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maksymov, I.S.; Kostylev, M. Magneto-Electronic Hydrogen Gas Sensors: A Critical Review. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, L.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Y. Microscale chemiresistive hydrogen sensors: Current status and recent developments. Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. 2024, 7, 045002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pathak, A.K.; Verma, S.; Sakda, N.; Viphavakit, C.; Chitaree, R.; Rahman, B.M.A. Recent Advances in Optical Hydrogen Sensor including Use of Metal and Metal Alloys: A Review. Photonics 2023, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, L.; Song, J. Review—Recent Progress in the Design of Chemical Hydrogen Sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024, 171, 017510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, M.; Li, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Q. Highly selective H2 gas sensor fabricated via growth of PtAu/SnW3O9 nanosheet arrays on planar substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2025, 36, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tanaka, T.; Yanagida, T.; Uchida, K.; Tabuchi, K.; Tatehora, K.; Shiiki, Y.; Nakagawa, S.; Takahashi, T.; Shimizu, R.; Ishikuro, H.; et al. Low-Power and ppm-Level Multimolecule Detection by Integration of Self-Heated Metal Nanosheet Sensors. IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. 2019, 66, 5393–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Fei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zong, H.; Liu, B.; Duan, G.; Luo, Y. Pt/SnO2-Pd nanoelectrode applied for hydrogen sensor with zero-power consumption and low detection limit. Sens. Actuat. B. 2023, 388, 133848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dougami, N.; Miyata, T.; Orita, T.; Nakatani, T.; Kakunaka, R.; Taniguchi, T.; Mitsuhashi, H.; Nakao, S. Hot-wire-type micromachined chemiresistive gas sensors for battery-powered city gas alarms. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2025, 64, 01SP13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duoc, V.T.; Nguyen, H.; Ngoc, T.M.; Xuan, C.T.; Hung, C.M.; Duy, N.V.; Hoa, N.D. Hydrogen gas sensor based on self-heating effect of SnO2/Pt thin film with ultralow power consumption. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 61, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dhall, S.; Mehta, B.R.; Tyagi, A.K.; Sood, K. A review on environmental gas sensors: Materials and technologies. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, J.; Li, H.; Cheng, J.; Ma, X.; Fu, Y. Advances in metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor arrays based on machine learning algorithms. J. Mater. Chem. C 2025, 13, 4285–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tasyurek, L.B.; Isik, E.; Isik, I.; Kilinc, N. Enhancing the performance of TiO2 nanotube-based hydrogen sensors through crystal structure and metal electrode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 54, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, X.; Tao, T.; Bao, Y.; Xia, X.; Homewood, K.; Wang, Z.; Lourenço, M.; Huang, Z.; Shao, G.; Gao, Y. Dynamic reaction mechanism of P-N-Switched H2-sensing performance on a Pt-decorated TiO2 surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 25472–25482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bao, Y.; Wei, P.; Xia, X.; Huang, Z.; Homewood, K.; Gao, Y. Remarkably enhanced H2 response and detection range in Nb doped rutile/anatase heterophase junction TiO2 thin film hydrogen sensors. Sens. Actuators B 2019, 301, 127143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumarage, G.W.C.; Hakkoum, H.; Comini, E. Recent Advancements in TiO2 Nanostructures: Sustainable Synthesis and Gas Sensing. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cerchez, M.; Langer, H.; El Achhab, M.; Heinzel, T.; Ostermann, D.; Lüder, H.; Degenhardt, J. Dynamics of hydrogen sensing with Pt/TiO2 Schottky diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 033522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haidry, A.A.; Schlosser, P.; Durina, P.; Mikula, M.; Tomasek, M.; Plecenik, T.; Roch, T.; Pidik, A.; Stefecka, M.; Noskovic, J.; et al. Hydrogen gas sensors based on nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 2011, 9, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Suzuki, T.T.; Ohgaki, T.; Adachi, Y.; Sakaguchi, I. Polarity reversal of resistance response to trace H2 gas in the air between asymmetrically shaped electrodes on rutile-TiO2 single crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 034501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Naitoh, Y.; Sumiya, T.; Shima, H.; Akinaga, H. High-speed hydrogen sensor fabricated using a platinum/titanium oxide nanocontact. Sens. Actuat. B 2022, 371, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoneda, S.; Ito, S.; Hayakawa, Y.; Wei, Z.; Muraoka, S.; Yasuhara, R.; Kawashima, K.; Himeno, A.; Mikawa, T. Newly developed process integration technologies for highly reliable 40 nm ReRAM. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 58, SBBB06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zahoor, F.; Hussin, F.A.; Isyaku, U.B.; Gupta, S.; Khanday, F.A.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Abbas, H. Resistive random access memory: Introduction to device mechanism, materials and application to neuromorphic computing. Discover Nano 2023, 18, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nivetha, T.; Bindu, B.; Kamsani, N.A. A Review on Resistive RAM: From Material Properties to Switching Characteristics, Reliability, Models and Applications. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, W.Y.; Kim, G.H.; Seok, J.Y.; Kim, K.M.; Song, S.J.; Lee, M.H.; Hwang, C.S. A Pt/TiO2/Ti Schottky-type selection diode for alleviating the sneak current in resistance switching memory arrays. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 195201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoon, K.J.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, G.H.; Song, S.J.; Seok, J.Y.; Han, S.; Yoon, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Hwang, C.S. Memristive tri-stable resistive switching at ruptured conducting filaments of a Pt/TiO2/Pt cell. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 185202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wei, Z.; Homma, K.; Katayama, K.; Kawai, K.; Fujii, S.; Naitoh, Y.; Shima, H.; Akinaga, H.; Ito, S.; Yoneda, S. From memory to sensor: Ultralow power and high selectivity hydrogen sensor based on ReRAM technology. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 5189–5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naitoh, Y.; Shima, H.; Akinaga, H. Visualizing the local composition changes during resistive switching in planar TaOx-ReRAMs. ACS Appl. Electron Mater. 2023, 5, 4240–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nayak, A.; Wang, Q.; Itoh, Y.; Tsuruoka, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Boodhoo, L.; Mizuta, H.; Aono, M. Position detection and observation of a conducting filament hidden under a top electrode in a Ta2O5-based atomic switch. Nanotechnol 2015, 26, 145702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Naitoh, Y.; Tsukagoshi, K.; Murata, K.; Mizutani, W. A reliable method for fabricating sub-10 nm gap junctions without using electron beam lithography. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2003, 1, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Korotkov, A.L.; Bowman, M.; McGuinness, H.J.; Davidovic, D. Influence of H2O molecules on sub-nanometre scale gaps between Au leads. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suga, H.; Suzuki, H.; Shinomura, Y.; Kashiwabara, S.; Tsukagoshi, K.; Shimizu, T.; Naitoh, Y. Highly stable, extremely high-temperature, nonvolatile memory based on resistance switching in polycrystalline Pt nanogaps. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hsu, C.H.; Chen, K.T.; Lin, L.Y.; Wu, W.Y.; Liang, L.S.; Gao, P.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Huang, P.H.; Lien, S.Y.; et al. Tantalum-doped TiO2 prepared by atomic layer deposition and its application in perovskite solar cells. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hitosugi, T.; Furubayashi, Y.; Ueda, A.; Itabashi, K.; Inaba, K.; Hirose, Y.; Kinoda, G.; Yamamoto, Y.; Shimada, T.; Hasegawa, T. Ta-doped anatase TiO2 epitaxial film as transparent conducting oxide. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, L1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, S.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X.; Kumari, N.; Davila, N.; Strachan, J.P.; Vine, D.; Kilcoyne, A.L.D.; Nishi, Y.; Williams, R.S. Oxygen migration during resistance switching and failure of hafnium oxide memristors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 103503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moors, M.; Adepalli, K.K.; Lu, Q.; Wedig, A.; Bäumer, C.; Skaja, K.; Arndt, B.; Tuller, H.L.; Dittmann, R.; Waser, R.; et al. Resistive switching mechanisms on TaOx and SrRuO3 thin-film surfaces probed by scanning tunneling microscopy. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1481–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kondo, H.; Arita, M.; Fujii, T.; Kaji, H.; Moniwa, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Fujiwara, I.; Yoshimaru, M.; Takahashi, Y. The observation of “conduction spot” on NiO resistance random access memory. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 081101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jiao, Y.; Hellman, A.; Fang, Y.; Gao, S.; Käll, M. Schottky barrier formation and band bending revealed by first- principles calculations. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Haidry, A.A.; Dong, B.; Sun, L.; Fatima, Q.; Xie, L.; Yao, Z. Facile synthesis of nitrogen doped ordered mesoporous TiO2 with improved humidity sensing properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 742, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Haidry, A.A.; Ebach-Stahl, A.; Saruhan, B. Effect of Pt/TiO2 interface on room temperature hydrogen sensing performance of memristor type Pt/TiO2/Pt structure. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 253, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabricated TiOx NC device. (b) Magnified image on the red arrows in (a). (c) Typical FESEM image of fabricated structure. (d) Magnified FESEM image of area in red dashed-line box in (c). (e) Typical resistance–voltage (R–V) curves of TiOx NC devices with blowing dry H2 (0% RH) and wet H2 (88% RH) and without blowing (air). (f) Typical time dependence of resistance at 1 V. The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating manner every 300 s to introduce H2 gas. The solid and dashed lines indicate dry and wet H2, respectively. (g) Schematic model and band diagram of devices with (dashed line) and without (solid line) dissociated hydrogen atoms.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabricated TiOx NC device. (b) Magnified image on the red arrows in (a). (c) Typical FESEM image of fabricated structure. (d) Magnified FESEM image of area in red dashed-line box in (c). (e) Typical resistance–voltage (R–V) curves of TiOx NC devices with blowing dry H2 (0% RH) and wet H2 (88% RH) and without blowing (air). (f) Typical time dependence of resistance at 1 V. The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating manner every 300 s to introduce H2 gas. The solid and dashed lines indicate dry and wet H2, respectively. (g) Schematic model and band diagram of devices with (dashed line) and without (solid line) dissociated hydrogen atoms.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g001
Figure 2. (a) Typical current–voltage curves of TiOx NC devices during six forming operations in dry H2 environment. (b) Typical R–V curves of TiOx NC devices after six forming operations with and without dry H2.
Figure 2. (a) Typical current–voltage curves of TiOx NC devices during six forming operations in dry H2 environment. (b) Typical R–V curves of TiOx NC devices after six forming operations with and without dry H2.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g002
Figure 3. Typical FESEM images of TiOx NC devices at (a) +10 μA CC and (b) −10 μA CC. Typical cross-sectional STEM and EDX intensity mapping images of TiOx NC devices at (cg) +10 μA CC and (hl) −10 μA CC. EDX intensity mapping images of (d,i) O, (e,j) Ti, (f,k) Ta, and (g,l) Pt. The purple and green dashed lines indicate the interfaces between TiOx and Ta2O5 and the positions of the electrode edges before the forming operations.
Figure 3. Typical FESEM images of TiOx NC devices at (a) +10 μA CC and (b) −10 μA CC. Typical cross-sectional STEM and EDX intensity mapping images of TiOx NC devices at (cg) +10 μA CC and (hl) −10 μA CC. EDX intensity mapping images of (d,i) O, (e,j) Ti, (f,k) Ta, and (g,l) Pt. The purple and green dashed lines indicate the interfaces between TiOx and Ta2O5 and the positions of the electrode edges before the forming operations.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g003
Figure 4. Schematic model of structural changes in TiOx NC devices before and after forming operations at (a) +10 and −10 μA CC at (b) curling and (c) scattering positions (after forming). (d) Band diagram of TiOx NC devices around scattering position.
Figure 4. Schematic model of structural changes in TiOx NC devices before and after forming operations at (a) +10 and −10 μA CC at (b) curling and (c) scattering positions (after forming). (d) Band diagram of TiOx NC devices around scattering position.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g004
Figure 5. Typical time dependence of resistance at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 mV for TiOx NC devices after forming operations at +10 μA CC (upper) and −10 μA CC (lower). The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating fashion every 300 s to introduce H2 gas. The solid and dashed lines denote dry and wet H2 gas, respectively.
Figure 5. Typical time dependence of resistance at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 mV for TiOx NC devices after forming operations at +10 μA CC (upper) and −10 μA CC (lower). The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating fashion every 300 s to introduce H2 gas. The solid and dashed lines denote dry and wet H2 gas, respectively.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g005
Figure 6. Typical time dependence of resistance at 100 mV for TiOx NC devices after forming operations at +10 μA CC (red line) and −10 μA CC (blue line) in H2 environment at various concentrations. The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating fashion every 300 s to introduce H2 gas.
Figure 6. Typical time dependence of resistance at 100 mV for TiOx NC devices after forming operations at +10 μA CC (red line) and −10 μA CC (blue line) in H2 environment at various concentrations. The solenoid valve was switched on and off in an alternating fashion every 300 s to introduce H2 gas.
Nanomaterials 15 01154 g006
Table 1. Humidity and read voltage dependence of sensor response (SR), H2-sensing time (Tsen), recovering time (Trec) and energy consumption (P) of TiOx NC devices.
Table 1. Humidity and read voltage dependence of sensor response (SR), H2-sensing time (Tsen), recovering time (Trec) and energy consumption (P) of TiOx NC devices.
SampleRH (%)V (mV)SRTsen (s)Trec (s)E (W)
w/o forming010003.6027.9318.302.10 × 10−11
8810001.1019.2014.902.00 × 10−11
+10 uA CC016.03 × 1031.734.987.81 × 10−13
103.01 × 1043.0735.371.11 × 10−10
1009.72 × 1043.77150.239.47 × 10−9
10002.31 × 1034.40147.703.09 × 10−7
8811.971.7434.328.86 × 10−16
1021.81.3075.076.67 × 10−14
1003563.97159.102.06 × 10−11
10002612.63115.006.52 × 10−9
−10 uA CC011.60 × 1033.027.092.60 × 10−12
102.91 × 1043.0340.802.86 × 10−10
1002.07 × 1052.60140.432.38 × 10−8
10003.13 × 1041.77120.831.57 × 10−6
8811041.3024.295.10 × 10−14
106121.3024.371.86 × 10−12
1001.18 × 1031.3364.139.46 × 10−11
10001.17 × 1032.6093.503.95 × 10−8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naitoh, Y.; Shima, H.; Akinaga, H. Fabrication of Low-Power Consumption Hydrogen Sensor Based on TiOx/Pt Nanocontacts via Local Atom Migration. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151154

AMA Style

Naitoh Y, Shima H, Akinaga H. Fabrication of Low-Power Consumption Hydrogen Sensor Based on TiOx/Pt Nanocontacts via Local Atom Migration. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(15):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naitoh, Yasuhisa, Hisashi Shima, and Hiroyuki Akinaga. 2025. "Fabrication of Low-Power Consumption Hydrogen Sensor Based on TiOx/Pt Nanocontacts via Local Atom Migration" Nanomaterials 15, no. 15: 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151154

APA Style

Naitoh, Y., Shima, H., & Akinaga, H. (2025). Fabrication of Low-Power Consumption Hydrogen Sensor Based on TiOx/Pt Nanocontacts via Local Atom Migration. Nanomaterials, 15(15), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop