Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Annealing Temperature Effect of Tin Oxide on the Efficiency of Planar Structure Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Experiment and Analysis of Termination Robustness Design for 1200 V 4H-SiC MOSFET
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase and Valence State Engineering of MOFs-Derived Iron Oxide@Carbon Polyhedrons for Advanced Microwave Absorption

1
State Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Technology and Functional Materials, School of Physics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
2
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056000, China
3
Electron Microscopy Centre, School of Materials and Energy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(11), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110806
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 27 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section 2D and Carbon Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based composites are considered to be valuable materials for the design of high-performance microwave absorbents. Regulating phase structures and introducing mixed-valence states within the composites is a promising strategy to enhance their charge transfer properties, resulting in improved microwave absorption performance. In this study, iron oxide components show a temperature-dependent phase evolution process (α-Fe2O3→Fe3O4→Fe3O4/FeO), during which the valence states of iron ions are regulated. The tunable phases modulate the magnetic Fe3O4 component, resulting in enhanced magnetic loss. The changed valence states affect the polarization relaxation by adjusting the electronic structure and tune the electron scattering by introducing defects, leading to enhanced dielectric loss. The microwave absorption properties of iron oxide@carbon composites display phase- and valence state-dependent characteristics. Especially, Fe3O4@C composites exhibit superior microwave absorption properties, ascribed to the improved magnetic/dielectric losses induced by good impedance matching and strong microwave attenuation capacity. The minimum reflection loss of Fe3O4@C composites reaches −73.14 dB at 10.35 GHz with an effective absorption bandwidth of 4.9 GHz (7.69–12.59 GHz) when the absorber thickness is 2.31 mm. This work provides new insights into the adjustment of electromagnetic parameters and microwave absorption properties by regulating the phase and valence state.

1. Introduction

With the continuous progress of modern science and technology, electromagnetic technologies have become increasingly integrated into various aspects of contemporary life, such as communication, medical, military, and so on. The proliferation of electromagnetic devices has generated increasing electromagnetic pollution, which calls for the exploration of high-performance microwave absorbents [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Generally, ideal microwave absorbers are expected to simultaneously optimize four critical performance parameters: minimal thickness, reduced mass density, strong absorption capability and wide effective absorption bandwidth (EAB) [7,8,9,10]. Nevertheless, conventional microwave absorption materials face intrinsic limitations, for example, large density for ferrites and metals/alloys, easy oxidation for metals/alloys and impedance mismatching for carbon materials, which greatly restrict their performance and operational applicability [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, exploring novel microwave absorption materials is urgently demanded to meet the requirements of today’s complex and changeable electromagnetic environment.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are regarded as promising precursors for the construction of lightweight microwave absorption materials, owing to crystallographically tunable architectures, high porosity, large specific surface areas and excellent component processability [18,19,20,21]. These inherent characteristics enable precise modulation of electromagnetic parameters at molecular scales, particularly through strategic selection of metal nodes and organic linkers containing π-conjugated systems [22,23]. MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based composites inherit these structural advantages of their MOF precursors, and simultaneously integrate dual loss mechanisms, with dielectric loss from the graphitized carbon matrix and magnetic loss from the embedded magnetic species. In addition, the inherited porous structure and high specific surface area is favorable for prolonging the transmission path of microwaves, enhancing the opportunity for interaction between microwaves and absorbents [24,25]. Magnetic species are homogeneously dispersed within the carbon matrix, thereby avoiding aggregation issues caused by magnetic attraction, leading to enhanced magnetic loss capability [26,27,28,29]. This synergistic configuration theoretically satisfies the essential requirements for high-performance microwave absorption, appropriate impedance matching and multi-scale energy conversion. Nowadays, the design of MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based microwave absorption materials mainly focuses on the aspects of component modulation and multidimensional structural integration [30,31,32,33]. Novel perspectives are needed to deeply understand the enhanced microwave absorption mechanisms.
The strategic regulation of phase structures and introduction of mixed-valence states within composite materials is a promising strategy for the enhancement of interfacial charge transfer kinetics, thereby significantly improving dielectric dissipation capacity through intensified polarization relaxation processes [34,35,36,37]. These modulation mechanisms synergistically optimize impedance-matching conditions and amplify microwave attenuation capacity, ultimately achieving superior microwave absorption. To implement this paradigm, Fe-based MOF precursors were subjected to controlled annealing in Ar/H2 atmospheres at different temperatures, resulting in the formation of iron oxide@carbon composites with precise phase control of iron oxide species (Fe2O3/Fe3O4/FeO) and quantitative modulation of Fe2+/Fe3+ ratios. Through systematic investigation of phase composition evolution and valence state variations, this work establishes a definitive structure–performance correlation between the material’s crystallochemical characteristics (phase configuration, valence distribution) and its electromagnetic response mechanisms (ε″/μ″ variation, microwave absorption performance). This work bridges the gap between atomic-scale compositional engineering of MOF-derived magnetic carbon composites and macroscopic microwave absorption performance, providing new insights for developing novel microwave absorbents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Iron trichloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Terephthalic acid (PTA) was sourced from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). The chemicals were directly used as received.

2.2. Preparation of Fe-Based MOFs Precursor

First, 5 mmol of FeCl3·6H2O and 5 mmol of terephthalic acid were sequentially dissolved in 60 mL of deionized water under magnetic stirring at room temperature, forming a homogeneous solution. The resultant mixture was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, which was then sealed and heated at 170 °C for 24 h. After natural cooling to room temperature, the reddish-brown precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 2 min, followed by alternating washing with deionized water and ethanol three times each. The purified product was dried at 60 °C for 24 h.

2.3. Preparation of Iron Oxide@Carbon Composites

Iron oxide@carbon composites were obtained by a carbonization process. In detail, an Fe-based MOF precursor was placed in a tubular furnace and heated under a flowing Ar/H2 gas mixture (90% Ar + 10% H2, 100 sccm). The heating rate and duration time were set as 2 °C·min−1 and 3 h, respectively. The carbonization temperatures were variously 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, and 600 °C, and the resulting samples were named as FexOy@C-T (T = 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, and 600).

2.4. Testing and Characterization

Microstructural analysis was conducted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Apreo S, ThermoFisher Scientific. Waltham, MA, USA) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20, FEI. Hillsboro, OR, USA). The SEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, and the TEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. Phase structure was characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker. Beijing, China) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The diffraction patterns were collected in the range of 10° to 90°. Surface elemental composition and chemical states were studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB Xi+, ThermoFisher Scientific. Waltham, MA, USA) using an Al target. The electromagnetic parameters were evaluated using a vector network analyzer (VNA, Agilent Technologies N5232A. Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in the frequency range of 0.1–18 GHz with 801 sampling points and an intermediate frequency bandwidth (IFBW) of 300 Hz. The samples were uniformly mixed with paraffin wax with a filling ratio of 70 wt%, and then pressed into toroidal-shaped specimens (outer diameter: 7.0 mm, inner diameter: 3.04 mm). Prior to measurement, a full two-port SOLT (Short-Open-Load-Thru) calibration was performed using standard calibration kits. The complex permittivity (ε) and permeability (μ) were derived from S-parameters via the Nicholson–Ross–Weir (NRW) algorithm using the co-axial transmission/reflection method.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a illustrates the preparation process of the Fe-based MOFs precursor and the derived composites. The Fe-based MOFs precursor was first synthesized by a hydrothermal route, using Fe3+ and terephthalic acid as the metal node and organic linker, respectively. The Fe-based MOFs show a micro-scale polyhedral shape with porous structure. FexOy@C-T derivatives were fabricated by carbonization treatment of Fe-based MOFs in Ar/H2 atmosphere, during which the phases of iron oxide were modulated by simply changing the annealing temperatures. SEM images of FexOy@C-T composites (Figure 1b–e) reveal that the samples retained the well-defined polyhedral morphology of the parent Fe-based MOFs, with individual FexOy@C particles measuring ~1.5 μm in size. By increasing the carbonization temperature, the porous structure of FexOy@C-T derivatives progressively collapses, resulting in a concomitant increase in surface smoothness. Representative TEM image (Figure 1f) of a single FexOy@C-500 particle shows sharp-edged polyhedral morphology, accordant with the SEM results. HRTEM images (Figure 1g,h) show that the FexOy particles are coated by a thin amorphous carbon layer. The interplanar spacing of FexOy@C-500 is measured to be 0.252 nm, corresponding to the (311) crystal plane of cubic Fe3O4. A SAED image of a single FexOy@C-500 particle (Figure 1i) displays monocrystalline characteristic. Figure 1j presents a HAADF-STEM image along with the corresponding EDX elemental mappings of a single FexOy@C-500 particle. Fe, C, and O elements are uniformly distributed throughout the particle region, suggesting that FexOy is uniformly embedded within the carbon framework (the detected carbon signal around the particles is caused by the carbon film).
The crystallographic phase evolution of FexOy@C-T composites under controlled carbonization temperatures was systematically elucidated through XRD analysis (Figure 2), demonstrating precise phase engineering from antiferromagnetic hematite (α-Fe2O3) to ferrimagnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) and ultimately paramagnetism wüstite (FeO). Initial carbonization at 350 °C exclusively yielded hexagonal α-Fe2O3 with a pace group of R-3c (No. 167), identified by characteristic diffraction peaks at 24.2°, 33.2°, 35.6°, 40.8°, 49.5°, 54.1°, 57.6°, 62.5°, 64.0°, 72.3°and 75.5° which correspond to the (012), (104), (110), (113), (024), (116), (018), (214), (300), (119) and (220) crystal planes of α-Fe2O3, respectively (JCPDS No. 79-1741). Elevating temperatures to 400–500 °C triggered complete phase transformation from hexagonal α-Fe2O3 into cubic spinel Fe3O4 with an Fd-3m space group, demonstrated by the disappearance of all characteristic peaks of α-Fe2O3 and the emergence of diffraction peaks at 18.3°, 30.2°, 35.5°, 37.2°, 43.2°, 53.6°, 57.1°, 62.7° and 74.2°, corresponding to the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440) and (533) crystal planes of Fe3O4 (JCPDS No. 88-0315). Progressive annealing at 550–600 °C induced phase conversion from Fe3O4 to FeO, evidenced by the emergence of diffraction peaks at 35.9°, 41.7°, 60.5°, 72.4° and 76.2°, attributed to the (111), (200), (220), (311) and (222) crystal planes of FeO (JCPDS No. 89-0687). This transformation is attributed to the hydrogen-induced reduction reaction through oxygen vacancy formation: Fe3O4 + H2 → 3FeO + H2O.
XPS analysis of FexOy@C-T composites (Figure 3) was employed to systematically elucidate the temperature-dependent evolution of iron oxidation states, complementing XRD phase characterization. The survey spectra (Figure 3a) confirm the presence of C, O, and Fe elements with distinct C 1s (284.8 eV), O 1s (531.5 eV), and Fe 2p (710–725 eV) signals, consistent with the previous SEM and XRD observations. High-resolution Fe 2p spectra (Figure 3b–e) show the characteristic spin-orbit doublets at ~710 eV for Fe 2p3/2 and ~725 eV for Fe 2p1/2, with satellite peaks at ~719 eV and ~733 eV for iron oxides. Fe 2p3/2 can be fitted into two peaks with 711.5 eV for Fe3+ and 710 eV for Fe2+. Quantitative deconvolution analysis of peak areas (Figure 3f) reveals temperature-dependent valence state evolution: progressive Fe3+ content is reduced from 100% (FexOy@C-350) to 44% (FexOy@C-600). This valence evolution aligns with the phase transformations observed by XRD. FexOy@C-350 contains solely Fe3+ ions, attributed to its pure α-Fe2O3 phase. FexOy@C-500 reveals a Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio of about 1:2, consistent with its Fe3O4 (FeO·Fe2O3) phase. Further temperature elevation induced progressive reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+, with FexOy@C-550 and FexOy@C-600 showing increasing Fe2+ proportions as partial Fe3O4 was transformed into FeO via hydrogen-mediated reduction. The complementary XRD and XPS characterizations conclusively validate the phase evolution (Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → Fe3O4/FeO) and progressive Fe2+/Fe3+ valence state modulation.
The FexOy@C-T composites were uniformly dispersed in paraffin wax at a filler loading of 70 wt%, followed by compression into a toroidal shape for electromagnetic characterization. Given that pure paraffin wax is transparent to microwaves, it is commonly used as a binder in microwave absorption materials to hold fillers together. The electromagnetic parameters of microwave absorption materials serve as critical indicators for characterizing the interaction with electromagnetic waves, encompassing loss mechanisms and impedance matching characteristics. Microwave absorption performance fundamentally depends on the material’s complex permittivity ( ε r = ε j ε ) and complex permeability ( μ r = μ j μ ), where the real components ( ε , μ ) quantify energy storage capacity, while the imaginary components ( ε , μ ) reflect energy dissipation efficiency [17].
Figure 4a,b presents the complex permittivity of the FexOy@C-T composites. Contrary to conventional observations that elevated carbonization temperatures typically improve the graphitization degree of carbon materials and raise the electrical conductivity and complex permittivity [38,39,40], these FexOy@C-T composites exhibit a non-monotonic permittivity evolution. In FexOy@C-350 composites, the minimal permittivity is ascribed to the combined effects of a weak graphitization degree of the carbon matrix caused by low carbonization temperature and limited electron transport in the single-phase Fe2O3 with sole Fe3+. For FexOy@C-400/450/500 composites, the phase transition to Fe3O4 introduces Fe2+ ions, establishing a Fe2+/Fe3+ mixed-valence system within the spinel structure. This configuration enables electron hopping between the adjacent Fe2+ and Fe3+ in spinel structure, which would accelerate the electron transition process and induce dipole polarization relaxation within crystal lattices, resulting in enhanced complex permittivity and dielectric loss. Notably, the comparable complex permittivity values observed between Fe3O4@C-450 and Fe3O4@C-500 composites reveal a carbonization temperature-insensitive dielectric response, suggesting that the carbon matrix’s graphitization degree exerts minimal influence on complex permittivity. Compared with the Fe3O4@C system, FexOy@C-550 exhibits diminished complex permittivity, primarily attributed to weakened Fe2+/Fe3+ charge transfer caused by the progressive FeO phase formation. In contrast, FexOy@C-600 demonstrates significantly enhanced permittivity due to two synergistic effects: (1) The formation of well-defined Fe3O4/FeO heterojunctions through phase evolution facilitates intensified interfacial polarization at grain boundaries; (2) the hydrogen reduction-induced oxygen vacancies during valence state transformation create localized defect dipoles that amplify polarization relaxation. These dual mechanisms cooperatively optimize electromagnetic energy conversion through enhanced polarization loss pathways.
Figure 4d,e delineates the complex permeability of FexOy@C-T composites, suggesting non-monotonic μ (f) and μ (f) variations modulated by phase transition. The variation tendency of complex permeability directly correlates with the phase transition sequence: antiferromagnetic Fe2O3 → ferrimagnetic Fe3O4 → ferrimagnetic Fe3O4/paramagnetic FeO, as governed by carbonization temperature. The improved permeability in FexOy@C-400/450/500 composites is ascribed to emergent ferrimagnetic Fe3O4. The subsequent paramagnetic FeO formation disrupts long-range magnetic ordering, resulting in reduced values for FexOy@C-550/600 composites. Notably, the μ curves of the Fe3O4@C system display a broad resonance spanning range of 1–10 GHz, corresponding to the natural ferromagnetic resonance of ferrimagnetic Fe3O4. The broad resonance bandwidth is associated with the distribution of domain sizes and variations of crystalline anisotropy energy.
The dielectric loss tangent ( tan δ ε = ε / ε ) and magnetic loss tangent ( tan δ μ = μ / μ ) serve as quantitative metrics for evaluating electromagnetic energy dissipation characteristics, where tan δ ε quantifies dielectric loss and tan δ μ corresponds to magnetic loss [41]. As demonstrated in Figure 4c,f, both parameters exhibit distinctive frequency-dependent behaviors. Notably, the evolution of tan δ μ values shows strong correlation with crystallographic phase evolution, where increased concentration of ferrimagnetic Fe3O4 significantly boosts the magnetic loss. Comparative analysis of loss tangents reveals tan δ μ > tan δ ε for FexOy@C-400/450/500 composites, establishing magnetic loss as the predominant energy dissipation mechanism. This dominance can be attributed to natural resonance characteristics arising from the ferrimagnetic Fe3O4 phase formation.
The reflection loss (RL) serves as the principal metric for evaluating microwave absorption performance, derived from transmission line theory through the following equations [17]:
R L = 20 log | Z i n Z 0 Z i n + Z 0 |
Z 0 = μ 0 / ε 0
Z i n = Z 0 ( μ r | ε r ) 1 / 2 tanh { j ( 2 π f d / c ) ( μ r ε r ) 1 / 2 }
where Z 0 (377 Ω) denotes the intrinsic impedance of free space, Z i n is the input impedance of absorber, f is the microwave frequency, d is the absorber thickness, and c is the velocity of light. The RL values directly reflect the microwave absorption efficiency, where lower RL values (more negative) correspond to reduced electromagnetic wave reflection and enhanced absorption capabilities. Quantitatively, an RL threshold of −10 dB corresponds to 90% wave attenuation, defining the effective absorption bandwidth (EAB) as the frequency range satisfying RL ≤ −10 dB, which serves as a critical parameter determining practical applicability [42]. Figure 5a–h presents the typical three-dimensional (3D) RL mappings and corresponding contour profiles of FexOy@C-T composites. The microwave absorption properties are significantly affected by the phase transition of iron oxide caused by carbonization temperatures. FexOy@C-350 (Fe2O3@C) shows weak absorption capabilities with RL > −10 dB in the entire frequency range, caused by the ultralow dielectric loss and negligible magnetic loss. FexOy@C-550 and FexOy@C-600 (Fe3O4/FeO@C) exhibit effective microwave absorption (RL ≤ −10 dB) in specific frequency bands through optimal thickness modulation. However, both of them exhibit relatively low absorption capabilities, narrow EAB and greater absorber thickness: FexOy@C-550 reveals a minimum RL (RLmin) value of −28.7 dB at 5.0 mm, while the EAB is only 2.6 GHz at 2.5 mm; the RLmin value of FexOy@C-600 is only −22.8 dB at 4.25 mm, accompanied by an EAB of 3 GHz at 2.0 mm. Notably, FexOy@C-500 (Fe3O4@C) displays an RLmin value of −73.14 dB at 10.35 GHz and a broad EAB of 4.9 GHz (7.69–12.59 GHz) with a thin thickness of only 2.31 mm. Table 1 summarizes the comparison of microwave absorption properties of MOFs-derived Fe3O4@C with other reported Fe3O4-based composites [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. The Fe3O4@C composites prepared in this work display remarkable RLmin value and moderated EAB at a relatively thin thickness. The superior microwave absorption properties of FexOy@C-500 primarily stem from the synergistic interplay between improved magnetic loss and optimized dielectric loss characteristics. This performance enhancement is achieved through precisely engineered phase composition and valence state manipulation, which facilitates broadband ferromagnetic resonance for improved magnetic loss while simultaneously establishing optimal interfacial polarization and dipole polarization effects for balanced dielectric loss. Additionally, as shown in Figure 1b–e, FexOy@C-T composites exhibit abundant porous structures. The porous structure is beneficial because it introduces rich air–material interfaces, enhancing multiple reflections and scattering of incident electromagnetic waves. This is due to the effect described by the Maxwell–Garnett (MG) effective medium theory [49]:
ε e f f M G = ε 1 ( ε 2 + 2 ε 1 ) + 2 p ( ε 2 ε 1 ) ( ε 2 + 2 ε 1 ) p ( ε 2 ε 1 )
where ε 1 and ε 2 represent the permittivity of solid component and air component, respectively, and p denotes the volume ratio of air. The porous structure can effectively reduce the equivalent permittivity of composites, thereby optimizing impedance matching.
The enhanced microwave absorption capabilities of microwave absorbers arise from dual fundamental mechanisms: optimized impedance matching characteristic and efficient electromagnetic attenuation capacity [50]. Impedance matching, quantified by the normalized impedance parameter ( Z = | Z i n / Z 0 | ), determines the electromagnetic wave penetration efficiency through minimal interfacial reflection. Optimal absorption occurs when Z approaches unity ( Z → 1), indicating complete transmission of incident electromagnetic waves into the microwave absorber. Figure 5i–l presents the normalized impedance ( Z ) curves of FexOy@C-T composites by varying absorber thicknesses. Notably, FexOy@C-500 exhibits optimal impedance-matching characteristics with Z values close to 1. Electromagnetic attenuation capacity is mathematically described by the attenuation coefficient α, which combines both dielectric and magnetic loss components through the following relationship [17]:
α = 2 π f c ( μ ε μ ε ) + ( μ ε μ ε ) 2 + ( μ ε + μ ε ) 2
Higher α values signify enhanced energy conversion from electromagnetic waves to thermal dissipation through polarization processes and magnetic resonance effects. The frequency dependent α curves of FexOy@C-T composites (Figure 6) demonstrates that FexOy@C-500 basically maintains the highest α magnitudes, displaying optimal attenuation capability. This exceptional attenuation capability originates from synergistic contributions of enhanced magnetic dissipation and optimized dielectric polarization processes, achieved through controlled magnetic Fe3O4 phase configuration engineering, an improved electron transition process among Fe2+/Fe3+ and interfacial charge redistribution at Fe3O4/C interfaces. The synergistic integration of optimal impedance matching and superior attenuation capacity make Fe3O4@C composites display improved microwave absorption performance.
Microwave dissipation through destructive interference is another mechanism for the consumption of electromagnetic energy, which can be described by the quarter-wavelength matching theory (λ/4) [26]:
t m = n c 4 f m | μ r ε r | .. ( n   =   1 ,   3 ,   5 )
where t m is the matching thickness and f m is the corresponding peak frequency. When t m and f m satisfy the λ/4 condition, the phase difference between microwave reflections at air–absorber and absorber–metal interfaces reaches 180°, resulting in coherent destructive interference that dissipates propagating waves through anti-phase superposition. The λ/4 condition also governs the thickness–frequency correlation of the microwave absorber. The RL curves of FexOy@C-500 at different absorber thicknesses (top of Figure 7) clearly reveal the absorption frequency shift to a lower frequency due to increasing the absorber thickness. The lower part of Figure 7 shows the simulated λ/4 curves. The blue rhomboid reflects the thickness–frequency correlation obtained from the RL curves (top of Figure 7), which is located at the λ/4 curves. This indicates that the relationship between matching thickness and frequency of FexOy@C composites matches well with the λ/4 theory.
Based on the aforementioned results, Figure 8 schematically illustrates the microwave absorption mechanism of FexOy@C composites enabled by phase and valence state engineering. Upon microwave irradiation, incident waves experience three primary processes: partial surface reflection, partial penetration through the absorber, and energy dissipation via dielectric/magnetic losses (Figure 8a). The combined efforts of phase engineering and valence state modulation give rise to enhanced magnetic loss and optimized dielectric loss, thereby enhancing microwave absorption through two crucial processes. First, impedance matching is improved by balancing the complex permittivity and permeability. This effectively minimizes surface reflection, ensuring that more microwaves enter into the absorber. Second, the microwave attenuation capacity is strengthened. This is achieved through intensified polarization effects and magnetic resonance, which significantly enhance the ability of the absorber to dissipate the microwaves which penetrate it (Figure 8b). Compared to antiferromagnetic Fe2O3 and paramagnetic FeO, the unpaired electron spins of Fe2+/Fe3+ in ferrimagnetic Fe3O4 form a strong net magnetic moment. In an alternating electromagnetic field, the magnetic moment undergoes precession due to natural resonance, and converts electromagnetic energy into heat through interaction with the crystal lattice (relaxation), thereby enhancing magnetic loss. An increase in the ferrimagnetic Fe3O4 content leads to a strong and broad natural resonance in the GHz frequency range as evidenced in Figure 4e, thereby augmenting magnetic loss (Figure 8c). Due to the conductivity differences between semiconductive FexOy and conductive carbon, there is localized charge accumulation and separation at the heterogeneous interfaces. Under an alternating electromagnetic field, the redistribution of charges lags behind the change in the electric field direction, leading to relaxation and space charge polarization, which generates interfacial polarization. During this process, charge migration and collisions dissipate electromagnetic energy as heat, resulting in enhanced dielectric loss (Figure 8d). Moreover, the Fe2+/Fe3+ mixed-valence states promote electron hopping between adjacent Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. Crystal defects (such as oxygen vacancies) in Fe3O4 and the mixed valence states of Fe2+/Fe3+ lead to uneven charge distribution, forming localized electric dipoles. In an alternating electromagnetic field, dipoles are hindered by lattice constraints or defects and need to overcome potential barriers in order to reorient, causing polarization response to lag behind the electric field change. This accelerates the electron transition process and induces dipole polarization relaxation, resulting in an enhancement of the complex permittivity and dielectric loss (Figure 8e). This synergistic design, which integrates phase modulation, mixed-valence engineering and carbon-confined nanostructures, establishes a robust strategy for enhancing the microwave absorption of MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based composites by optimizing impedance matching and leveraging dual-loss mechanisms.

4. Conclusions

In summary, this work demonstrates a novel strategy for optimizing microwave absorption performance by tailoring phase structures and valence states in MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based composites. By simply controlling the carbonization temperature, the iron oxide components undergo a temperature-dependent phase evolution (α-Fe2O3→Fe3O4→Fe3O4/FeO), accompanied by tunable valence states of iron ions, leading to tunable magnetic and dielectric losses. The formation of Fe3O4@C composite emerges as a critical milestone, achieving an RLmin of −73.14 dB at 10.35 GHz and an effective absorption bandwidth of 4.9 GHz (7.69–12.59 GHz) with a thickness of 2.31 mm. The enhanced microwave absorption performance is attributed to the synergistic effects of improved magnetic loss (via Fe3O4 phase modulation) and optimized dielectric loss (via polarization relaxation and electron scattering induced by valence state variation and Fe3O4/C interfaces), resulting in favorable impedance matching and strong microwave attenuation capacity. This study not only provides a feasible strategy for designing advanced microwave absorbers through phase and valence state regulation, but also deepens the understanding of electromagnetic loss mechanisms in composite materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; Validation, X.Y.; Formal Analysis, X.L. and X.Y.; Investigation, X.Y., Y.D. and X.D.; Resources, X.L., X.Z. (Xiuhong Zhu), X.Z. (Xinliang Zheng), Y.Z. and J.F.; Data Curation, X.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.Y. and S.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, X.L.; Visualization, X.L. and X.Y.; Supervision, X.L., X.Z. (Xiuhong Zhu), X.Z. (Xinliang Zheng), J.F. and H.X.; Project Administration, X.L.; Funding Acquisition, X.L., X.Z. (Xiuhong Zhu), X.Z. (Xinliang Zheng), Y.Z. and J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11504293) and Natural Science Foundation from Department of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province (2021JM-304, 2021JQ-427).

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Huang, M.; Wang, L.; Pei, K.; You, W.; Yu, X.; Wu, Z.; Che, R. Multidimension-Controllable Synthesis of MOF-Derived Co@N-Doped Carbon Composite with Magnetic-Dielectric Synergy toward Strong Microwave Absorption. Small 2020, 16, 200158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kolanowska, A.; Janas, D.; Herman, A.P.; Jędrysiak, R.G.; Giżewski, T.; Boncel, S. From blackness to invisibility-Carbon nanotubes role in the attenuation of and shielding from radio waves for stealth technology. Carbon 2018, 126, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, S.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Huang, Z.; Lin, T.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Hong, Y.; Liu, J. State of the Art and Prospects in Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Microwave Absorption Materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 67–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yusmaniar; Erdawati; Sosiati, H.; Budi, S.; Alaydrus, M.; Handoko, E. Microwave absorbing characteristics of Fe3O4@SiO2 core-shell polyaniline-based composites. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 046101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, X.; Zhen, M.; Meng, F.; Meng, X.; Zhu, M. Progress, Challenges and Prospects of Biomass-Derived Lightweight Carbon-Based Microwave-Absorbing Materials. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jia, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, F.; Yi, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Piao, M. Exploring the Microstructural Effect of FeCo Alloy on Carbon Microsphere Deposition and Enhanced Electromagnetic Wave Absorption. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, W.; Liu, Y.; Bi, Y.; Su, X.; Lu, C.; Han, X.; Ma, Y.; Feng, C.; Ma, M. Recent advancement of magnetic MOF composites in microwave absorption. Synth. Met. 2023, 294, 117307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meng, F.; Wang, H.; Huang, F.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hui, D.; Zhou, Z. Graphene-based microwave absorbing composites: A review and prospective. Compos. Part B 2018, 137, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Munir, A. Microwave Radar Absorbing Properties of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Polymer Composites: A Review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2015, 36, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saeed, M.; Haq, R.S.U.; Ahmed, S.; Siddiqui, F.; Yi, J. Recent advances in carbon nanotubes, graphene and carbon fibers-based microwave absorbers. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 970, 172625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chang, H.; Xiao, P.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.; Chen, Y. Broadband and Tunable High-Performance Microwave Absorption of an Ultralight and Highly Compressible Graphene Foam. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2049–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kong, L.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Li, Q.; Ye, F.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, L. Electromagnetic Wave Absorption Properties of Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified by Maghemite Colloidal Nanoparticle Clusters. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 19701–19711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, B.; Wu, Q.; Fu, Y.; Liu, T. A review on carbon/magnetic metal composites for microwave absorption. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 86, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Green, M.; Chen, X. Recent progress of nanomaterials for microwave absorption. J. Mater. 2019, 5, 503–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.; Feng, J.; Xing, H.; Lv, M.; Zong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, X. Progress in the use of MoS2-based composites for microwave absorption. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2024, 161, 100838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, X.; Peng, R.; Xing, H.; Xie, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Deng, X.; Li, X.; Peng, Y.; Zheng, X. Magnetic vortex configuration in Fe3O4 nanorings/nanotubes for aspect ratio and magnetic orientation regulated microwave absorption. Results Phys. 2024, 58, 107543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lv, M.; Wang, H.; Xing, H.; Wang, L.; Feng, J.; Zong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, X. Bimagnetic CoxNi100−x Nanocrystals Anchored on MoS2 Nanosheets for Applications as Microwave Absorption Materials. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 24201–24212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Xu, Q. Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 5369–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mao, L.; Qian, J. Interfacial Engineering of Heterogeneous Reactions for MOF-on-MOF Heterostructures. Small 2024, 20, 2308732–2308760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zeggai, F.Z.; Ait-Touchente, Z.; Bachari, K.; Elaissari, A. Investigation of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Synthesis, Properties, and Applications-An In-Depth Review. Chem. Phys. Impact 2025, 10, 100864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Cai, Z.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Xia, L.; Ma, S.; Yin, Z.; Huang, Y. A Review on Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Porous Carbon-Based Novel Microwave Absorption Materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 56–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Contreras-Pereda, N.; Pané, S.; Puigmartí-Luis, J.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Conductive properties of triphenylene MOFs and COFs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 460, 214459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, X.; Tian, X.; Qin, Y.; Qiao, J.; Pan, F.; Wu, N.; Wang, C.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W. Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks with Tunable Dielectric Properties for Boosting Electromagnetic Wave Absorption. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 12510–12518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cheng, J.; Liu, J.; Cui, B.; Li, Y. Preparation and wave-absorbing properties of cobalt-chromium ferrite/carbon fiber composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2025, 36, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xia, Z.; Zou, J.; Gu, Z.; Wu, G. MOF-derived NiFe2S4/Porous carbon composites as electromagnetic wave absorber. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 610, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Feng, J.; Du, Y.; Bai, J.; Fan, H.; Zhang, H.; Peng, Y.; Li, F. One-pot synthesis of CoFe2O4/graphene oxide hybrids and their conversion into FeCo/graphene hybrids for lightweight and highly efficient microwave absorber. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 5535–5546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, J.; Pu, F.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Bai, J. Interfacial interactions and synergistic effect of CoNi nanocrystals and nitrogen-doped graphene in a composite microwave absorber. Carbon 2016, 104, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, X.; Feng, J.; Zong, Y.; Miao, H.; Hu, X.; Bai, J.; Li, X. Hydrophobic graphene nanosheets decorated by monodispersed superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanocrystals as synergistic electromagnetic wave absorbers. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 4452–4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Lv, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, M.; Xu, C.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, M.; Yang, L.; You, W.; et al. Multi-interfacial 1D magnetic ferrite@C fibers for broadband microwave absorption. Mater. Today Phys. 2023, 35, 101140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qu, N.; Sun, H.; Sun, Y.; He, M.; Xing, R.; Gu, J.; Kong, J. 2D/2D coupled MOF/Fe composite metamaterials enable robust ultra-broadband microwave absorption. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Huang, M.; Yu, X.; You, W.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Che, R. MOF-Derived Ni1−xCox@Carbon with Tunable Nano-Microstructure as Lightweight and Highly Efficient Electromagnetic Wave Absorber. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ma, Z.; Liu, M.; Li, B.; Yan, F.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, C. Hierarchically nitrogen-doped carbon hollow microspheres assembled with loose and porous magnetic carbon sheets for enhanced microwave absorption. Carbon 2023, 212, 118165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, H.; Wang, F.; Cui, L.; Xu, X.; Han, X.; Du, Y. Composition Optimization and Microstructure Design in MOFs-Derived Magnetic Carbon-Based Microwave Absorbers: A Review. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Afshariazar, F.; Morsali, A. Mixed-valence metal-organic frameworks: Concepts, opportunities, and prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025, 54, 1318–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, Z.; Shi, L.; Sun, R.; Ding, L.; He, M.; Li, J.; Guo, H.; Gao, T.; Liu, P. Low-Temperature Oxidation Induced Phase Evolution with Gradient Magnetic Heterointerfaces for Superior Electromagnetic Wave Absorption. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 17, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Zhu, D.; Chai, X.; Qing, Y. Influence of synergistic effect of Mn valence state and oxygen vacancy concentration on microwave absorbing properties of CaMnO3. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 9882–9889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, X.; Ni, C.; Lin, Z.; Wu, D.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Du, W. Phase and morphology evolution of high dielectric CoO/Co3O4 particles with Co3O4 nanoneedles on surface for excellent microwave absorption application. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 396, 125205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, Y.; Liu, T.; Yu, B.; Gao, H.; Xu, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Han, X. The electromagnetic properties and microwave absorption of mesoporous carbon. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135, 884–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hotta, M.; Hayashi, M.; Lanagan, M.T.; Agrawal, D.K.; Nagata, K. Complex Permittivity of Graphite, Carbon Black and Coal Powders in the Ranges of X-band Frequencies (8.2 to 12.4 GHz) and between 1 and 10 GHz. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 1766–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, X.; Wu, D.; Wu, H.; Hou, C.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, R.; Zhang, S.; Wang, B.; Du, W. Dielectric parameters of activated carbon derived from rosewood and corncob. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 18077–18084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, B.; Qi, C.; Yang, H.; Wu, X.; Yang, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Li, Y. Recent advances of carbon-based electromagnetic wave absorption materials facing the actual situations. Carbon 2023, 208, 390–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Xue, Y.; Lu, X. Structural Engineering of Hierarchical Magnetic/Carbon Nanocomposites via In Situ Growth for High-Efficient Electromagnetic Wave Absorption. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yi, Y.; Zhao, C.; Shindume, H.L.; Ren, J.; Chen, L.; Hou, H.; Ibrahim, M.M.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Guo, Z. Enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption of magnetite-spinach derived carbon composite. Colloids Surf. A 2024, 694, 134149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.; Xie, Y.; Lu, W.; Chou, T.W. Flexible electromagnetic wave absorbing composite based on 3D rGO-CNT-Fe3O4 ternary films. Carbon 2018, 129, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cui, Y.; Yang, K.; Wang, J.; Shah, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, B. Preparation of pleated RGO/MXene/Fe3O4 microsphere and its absorption properties for electromagnetic wave. Carbon 2021, 172, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Z.; Lin, H.; Ding, S.; Ling, H.; Wang, T.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Meng, A.; Li, Q. Synthesis and enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption performances of Fe3O4@C decorated walnut shell-derived porous carbon. Carbon 2020, 167, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cao, K.; Ye, W.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Xue, W. Construction of three-dimensional porous network Fe-rGO aerogels with monocrystal magnetic Fe3O4@C core-shell structure nanospheres for enhanced microwave absorption. Mater. Today Phys. 2024, 42, 101383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiang, Z.; Song, Y.; Xiong, J.; Pan, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Liu, R.; Yang, H.; Lu, W. Enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption of nanoporous Fe3O4@carbon composites derived from metal-organic frameworks. Carbon 2019, 142, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, D.; Yang, X.; Xing, H.; Feng, J.; Zong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, X. Insight to the enhanced microwave absorption of porous N-doped carbon driven by ZIF-8: Competition between graphitization and porosity. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2023, 30, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, J.; Ye, W.; Wang, S.; Cao, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, J.; Hao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Xue, W. A strategy based on composition control and structural design to prepare 3DOM RFCo composites with a 3D ordered macroporous structure for enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 10748–10757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of the preparation process of the Fe-based MOFs precursor and derivatives. (be) SEM images of FexOy@C-T. (f) TEM, (g,h) HRTEM and (i) SAED images of FexOy@C-500. (j) HAADF-STEM image and corresponding EDX elemental mappings of a single FexOy@C-500 particle.
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of the preparation process of the Fe-based MOFs precursor and derivatives. (be) SEM images of FexOy@C-T. (f) TEM, (g,h) HRTEM and (i) SAED images of FexOy@C-500. (j) HAADF-STEM image and corresponding EDX elemental mappings of a single FexOy@C-500 particle.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) crystallographic phase evolution of FexOy@C-T.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) crystallographic phase evolution of FexOy@C-T.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g002
Figure 3. (a) Full scan XPS spectra and (be) high-resolution Fe 2p spectra of FexOy@C-T. (f) Quantitative analysis of the Fe3+/Fe2+ proportions in FexOy@C-T.
Figure 3. (a) Full scan XPS spectra and (be) high-resolution Fe 2p spectra of FexOy@C-T. (f) Quantitative analysis of the Fe3+/Fe2+ proportions in FexOy@C-T.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g003
Figure 4. Temperature-modulated electromagnetic parameters of FexOy@C-T composites: (a) ε , (b) ε , (c) tan δ ε , (d) μ , (e) μ and (f) tan δ ε .
Figure 4. Temperature-modulated electromagnetic parameters of FexOy@C-T composites: (a) ε , (b) ε , (c) tan δ ε , (d) μ , (e) μ and (f) tan δ ε .
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g004
Figure 5. (ad) 3D RL representations, (eh) 2D RL contour profiles and (il) Z curves of FexOy@C-T composites (The white dashed lines in (fh) represent the optimal absorber thicknesses with the broadest EAB. The black dashed lines in (il) represent Z = 1).
Figure 5. (ad) 3D RL representations, (eh) 2D RL contour profiles and (il) Z curves of FexOy@C-T composites (The white dashed lines in (fh) represent the optimal absorber thicknesses with the broadest EAB. The black dashed lines in (il) represent Z = 1).
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g005
Figure 6. Frequency dependent α curves of FexOy@C-T.
Figure 6. Frequency dependent α curves of FexOy@C-T.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g006
Figure 7. RL curves of FexOy@C-500 at different absorber thicknesses and thickness–frequency correlation through λ/4 theory.
Figure 7. RL curves of FexOy@C-500 at different absorber thicknesses and thickness–frequency correlation through λ/4 theory.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of microwave absorption mechanisms in FexOy@C composites: (a) interactions between microwave absorber and incident electromagnetic waves; (b) the synergistic effect of impedance matching and attenuation capacity; (c) natural resonance; (d) interfacial polarization; (e) dipole polarization.
Figure 8. Illustration of microwave absorption mechanisms in FexOy@C composites: (a) interactions between microwave absorber and incident electromagnetic waves; (b) the synergistic effect of impedance matching and attenuation capacity; (c) natural resonance; (d) interfacial polarization; (e) dipole polarization.
Nanomaterials 15 00806 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the microwave absorption properties of MOFs-derived Fe3O4@C with other reported Fe3O4-based composites.
Table 1. Comparison of the microwave absorption properties of MOFs-derived Fe3O4@C with other reported Fe3O4-based composites.
SamplesThickness
(mm)
EAB
(GHz)
RLmin
(dB)
Ref.
Fe3O4-Fe@CNFs/Al-Fe3O4-Fe4.35.6 −59.3[42]
Fe3O4@spinach-derived carbon4.54.73−48.81[43]
CNT film-Fe3O4-rGO-PDMS1.425.7−50.5[44]
3D pleated RGO/MXene/Fe3O4 microspheres2.94.7−51.2[45]
Fe3O4@walnut shell-derived porous carbon2.462.72−56.61[46]
Fe3O4@C core-shell structure nanospheres2.96.96−64.89[47]
Fe3O4@NPC3.04.5−65.5[48]
Fe3O4@C-T2.314.9−73.14This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, X.; Han, S.; Xing, H.; Dong, Y.; Deng, X.; Zong, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, X. Phase and Valence State Engineering of MOFs-Derived Iron Oxide@Carbon Polyhedrons for Advanced Microwave Absorption. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110806

AMA Style

Yang X, Han S, Xing H, Dong Y, Deng X, Zong Y, Feng J, Zhu X, Li X, Zheng X. Phase and Valence State Engineering of MOFs-Derived Iron Oxide@Carbon Polyhedrons for Advanced Microwave Absorption. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(11):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Xiaojiao, Shuai Han, Hongna Xing, Yi Dong, Xia Deng, Yan Zong, Juan Feng, Xiuhong Zhu, Xinghua Li, and Xinliang Zheng. 2025. "Phase and Valence State Engineering of MOFs-Derived Iron Oxide@Carbon Polyhedrons for Advanced Microwave Absorption" Nanomaterials 15, no. 11: 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110806

APA Style

Yang, X., Han, S., Xing, H., Dong, Y., Deng, X., Zong, Y., Feng, J., Zhu, X., Li, X., & Zheng, X. (2025). Phase and Valence State Engineering of MOFs-Derived Iron Oxide@Carbon Polyhedrons for Advanced Microwave Absorption. Nanomaterials, 15(11), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop