Next Article in Journal
Formation of Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells by Applying Li-Doped CuSCN Hole Conductor and Interface Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon-Based Nanomaterials as Alternative Electrodes to Graphite for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Exploration of Single and Co-Toxic Effects of Polypropylene Micro-Plastics and Cadmium on Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vanadium Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanocomposite as High-Performance Cathode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: The Structural and Electrochemical Characterization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 22
10.3390/nano12223968
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries

by
Jingzhe Liang
1,
Wanqing Song
1,
Haozhi Wang
2,
Jia Ding
1,* and
Wenbin Hu
1,2
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Composite and Functional Materials, Key Laboratory of Advanced Ceramics and Machining Technology (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Joint School of National University of Singapore and Tianjin University, International Campus of Tianjin University, Binhai New City, Fuzhou 350207, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(22), 3968; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12223968
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 6 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Potassium–sulfur batteries (KSBs) are regarded as a promising large-scale energy storage technology, owing to the high theoretical specific capacity and intrinsically low cost. However, the commercialization of KSBs is hampered by the low sulfur utilization and notorious shuttle effect. Herein, we employ a porosity engineering strategy to design nitrogen-rich carbon foam as an efficient sulfur host. The tremendous micropores magnify the chemical interaction between sulfur species and the polar nitrogen functionalities decorated carbon surface, which significantly improve the sulfur utilization and conversion. Meanwhile, the abundant mesopores provide ample spaces, accommodating the large volume changes of sulfur upon reversible potassation. Resultantly, the constructed sulfur cathode delivers an ultrahigh initial reversible capacity of 1470 mAh g−1 (87.76% of theoretical capacity) and a superior rate capacity of 560 mAh g−1 at 2 C. Reaching the K2S phase in potassiation is the essential reason for obtaining the ultrahigh capacity. Nonetheless, systematic kinetics analyses demonstrate that the K2S involved depotassiation deteriorates the charge kinetics. The density functional theory (DFT) calculation revealed that the nitrogen-rich micropore surface facilitated the sulfur reduction for K2S but created a higher energy barrier for the K2S decomposition, which explained the discrepancy in kinetics modification effect produced by the porosity engineering.

1. Introduction

Pursuit for high energy density and low-cost electrode materials is of great significance in developing efficient electrochemical energy conversion devices [1,2,3,4]. Alkali-metal–sulfur batteries (LSBs, NSBs, KSBs) have attracted tremendous attention because of the high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mAh g−1), low cost, and environmental friendliness of the sulfur cathode [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Nevertheless, due to the scarceness and exorbitant price of Li metal, NSBs and KSBs are more suitable for the large-scale energy storage applications [11,12,13,14,15,16]. High-temperature (HT) NSBs have been demonstrated since the 1960s and have been successfully commercialized over the decades. However, the safety problems caused by the high temperature (300–350 °C) and the limited theoretical capacity (557 mAh g−1) limit its further development [2,17]. Consequently, it is urgent to develop room- temperature (RT) NSBs and KSBs. For the more negative redox potential of metal K (K+/K = −2.93 V vs. SHE) than that of metal Na (Na+/Na = −2.71 V vs. SHE), a potassium-based system is expected to deliver higher operating voltage, which is beneficial for the high energy density of practical devices [18,19,20,21]. Recently, researchers have been increasingly pursuing batteries with high active material loading and high energy density to meet the requirements in practical devices. Designing freestanding cathodes to reduce inactive binders or collectors to increase weight capacity and energy density is an effective method [22]. For instance, a freestanding sulfur cathode designed by Lee et al. can achieve ultrahigh sulfur areal loading (7 mg cm−2) by optimizing the precursor composition, which facilitates the applicability in large-scale fabrication [23].
Like the LSBs and NSBs, KSBs also face several critical problems [24,25,26,27]. First, the KSBs share the same issues of low electrical conductivity of sulfur (5 × 10−30 S cm−1) and the severe volume expansion (up to 300%) of LSBs and NSBs. Second, analogous to LSBs and NSBs, long-chain potassium polysulfides (KPSs) can be dissolved in electrolytes, especially ether-based electrolytes. Soluble KPSs will shuttle to the anode side, leading to the loss of active material, rapid capacity decay, and poor cycle stability, which is the notorious shuttle effect. Moreover, the K2S3 phase with low solubility in ether-based electrolytes is easily deposited and the further potassiation of K2S3 is a solid-phase reaction [28]. This makes it easier for the fast accumulation of insoluble K2S2 and K2S on the cathode, causing sluggish kinetics and terminating the discharge process with high overpotential [28]. All of these issues clearly indicate that KSBs still face enormous challenges.
To address the aforementioned issues, the design of cathode materials for KSBs is critical. Similar to LSBs and NSBs, various carbonaceous materials with excellent electrical conductivity, precisely controlled porosity, low cost, and simple preparation have been used to host sulfur for KSBs [29,30]. The design strategies for carbon matrix mainly focus on chemical or physical constraints on sulfur species [24,31]. Chemical constraints of sulfur species mainly focus on doping of heteroatoms (N [32], O [33], P [34], B [35], etc.) in carbon matrix and the formation of covalent bonds between sulfur and carbon matrix, as in the case of the pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile/sulfur nanocomposite (SPAN) [36,37]. Sulfur species are anchored to the carbon matrix by strong chemical adsorption, which can effectively mitigate shuttle effect. As for the physical constraints of sulfur species, the main focus is on designing diverse nanostructures of the carbon matrix, such as delicately designed carbon nanofibers [38] (1D), carbon nanosheets [39] (2D), carbon nanospheres [40] (3D), and regulating the porosity of carbon matrix, for example, microporous carbon and hierarchical porous carbon [41,42]. The physical adsorption between carbon matrix and sulfur species can be improved by nanostructure design, so that sulfur species are somewhat confined to the cathode side. Research on KSBs cathode materials is still in its infancy stage. In particular, the effects of porosity structure of the carbon host on the K-S redox mechanisms and kinetics have rarely been explored in previous research.
Herein, we employ a porosity engineering strategy towards nitrogen-rich carbon foam as a distinguished sulfur host (named P-NCF). The P-NCF with abundant porosity was created by pre-pyrolysis lyophilization and post-pyrolysis CO2 activation. The enormous micropores enhance the chemical interaction between sulfur species and carbon host decorated with polar nitrogen functionalities, which greatly facilitate the utilization and conversion of sulfur. Furthermore, the rich mesopores provide sufficient spaces to accommodate the huge volume expansion of sulfur during reversible potassation. The S@P-NCF cathode delivers excellent electrochemical performances with an ultrahigh reversible specific capacity of 1470 mAh g−1 (87.76% of theoretical capacity) and a superior rate capacity of 560 mAh g−1 at 2 C. More K2S phase in the discharge product is the reason for the ultrahigh capacity achieved by S@P-NCF. The kinetics analyses show that S@P-NCF exhibits superior discharge kinetics but inferior charge kinetics. DFT calculation suggested that the nitrogen-rich micropore surface boosted the formation of K2S but simultaneously produced a higher energy barrier for the decomposition of K2S, which explains the different modification effect towards K-S redox kinetics by porosity engineering.

2. Result and Discussion

The introduction of g-C3N4 as both a nitrogen source and sacrificial template in the starch gelatinization enables the preparation of nitrogen-doped carbon materials with abundant pores. Following this methodology, nitrogen-rich carbon foam (NCF) based on porosity engineering strategy (P-NCF) was synthesized and the schematic process is summarized in Figure 1a. First, the g-C3N4 was obtained via pyrolysis of urea in static air [43]. During the subsequent high-temperature carbonization, g-C3N4 degrades automatically and creates porous structures and nitrogen heteroatoms in the carbon matrix [44]. The g-C3N4 was dispersed in deionized water and heated to 100 °C under vigorous stirring. Subsequently, the starch solution was added into the aforementioned mixture under continuous stirring, and the mixture gradually thickened. After the starch gelatinization process, the viscous mixture is cooled to room temperature and freeze dried to obtain starch xerogel. Subsequently, the starch xerogel was carbonized at 900 °C under Ar atmosphere, and then activated at 800 °C under CO2 atmosphere to form the final product P-NCF. In contrast, the sample without CO2 activation is named as NCF. The final cathode materials S@P-NCF and S@NCF were obtained by an initial sulfur vapor-infiltrated method at 500 °C and a following heat treatment at 200 °C to remove the surficial sulfur. The morphologies of the carbon hosts and sulfur-impregnated composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 1b–g, Figures S1 and S2, all samples exhibit a macro-morphology, which consists of graphene-like flexible ultrathin nanosheets. The structure stability of P-NCF/NCF as a sulfur host is verified by the unchanged macro-morphology after sulfur loading. There are no agglomerated sulfur particles in Figure 1e–g and Figure S2, indicating the complete penetration of sulfur into the porosity of carbon hosts. As further evidence, the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mappings show a uniform distribution of sulfur signal in P-NCF (Figure 1h–j). Notably, in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (Figure 1g inset and Figure S2c inset), only diffuse diffraction rings are observed, suggesting the amorphous texture of sulfur in the composites. The nitrogen signal overlaps well with the carbon matrix, indicating a nitrogen-rich surface chemistry of the sulfur host. The nitrogen groups enhance the polarity of the carbon surface, which increase the affinity between the sulfur species and carbon host [45].
The electrochemical activity of sulfur is significantly affected by the molecular structure, which is closely related to the pore structure of the carbon host [46]. Micropores are promising reservoirs to accommodate small-molecule sulfur and avoid the formation of long-chain KPSs [47]. The pore structures of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF were analyzed by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (Figure 2a). A large quantity of adsorption at low P/P0 and an obvious hysteresis loop at medium P/P0 indicate the existence of micropores and mesopores, respectively. The Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) surface areas of P-NCF and NCF are 1167.41 and 619.95 m2 g−1, respectively (Table S1). According to the cumulative pore volumes in Figure 2b, P-NCF has much higher micropore volume (0.34 cm3 g−1) than NCF (0.14 cm3 g−1). Figure 2c show the pore size distributions of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF. More importantly, in addition to the microporosity at 0.6 nm, 0.8 nm, and 1.2 nm, there is extra microporosity with a size of 0.5 nm for P-NCF, which is absent for NCF (Figure 2c). The mesopore volume of P-NCF is also higher than that of NCF. The larger pore volume of P-NCF and the newly created micropores with a diameter of 0.5 nm indicate the intensive porosity generation effect of CO2 activation process. Evidently, after sulfur loading, the BET surface area and pore volume of both samples sharply reduced (Table S1). The dramatic decrease in adsorption at low P/P0 indicates that sulfur occupies the micropores of the carbon matrices. The apparent hysteresis loops at medium P/P0 indicate that some mesopores still exist in S@P-NCF and S@NCF. The above-mentioned results show that sulfur occupied almost all micropores in the carbon matrix. Due to the space confinement of the micropores, the sulfur encapsulated in the micropores can only exist as small molecules of sulfur, which is expected to reduce the production of long-chain KPSs and inhibit the shuttle effect [48,49]. Furthermore, the abundant mesopores could accommodate huge volume expansion of sulfur during the reversible potassiation [50]. These advantages are all attributed to the pore engineering of the carbon hosts.
The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of carbon hosts and composites are presented in Figure 2d. All samples display two broadened shoulder peaks at 2θ ≈ 24° and 44°, corresponding to the carbon phase. Notably, there are no diffraction peaks of sulfur in S@P-NCF and S@NCF patterns, indicating the amorphous form of sulfur, which is in line with the SAED. As shown in Figure 2e, the Raman spectra were fitted by four Lorentzian peaks: disorder sp3 (A), disorder (D), amorphous (B), and graphitic (G) [51]. The area ratio of peak D to peak G (ID/IG) can reflect the graphitization degree of carbon [52]. The ID/IG values of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF are 2.26, 2.89, 2.57, and 3.08, respectively (Figure S3). The lower ID/IG value of P-NCF indicates that CO2 is more likely to react with the higher energy disordered carbon during the activation process, thereby increasing the graphitization degree [53]. Increased graphitization induces higher electronic conductivity, which is favorable for the charge transfer in sulfur redox [54]. In addition, there is a weak peak located at ~460 cm−1, which is attributed to the S-S stretching [55]. As shown in the TGA data in Figure 2f, the sulfur contents in S@P-NCF and S@NCF are calculated to be 37% and 27%, respectively. The higher sulfur content of S@P-NCF is strong evidence for the improved affinity between sulfur species and P-NCF host via porosity engineering, which restrains the sulfur loss during high temperature sulfur peregrination procedure (500 °C, much higher than routine 155 °C for sulfur loading). The much higher surface area provided by the largely increased porosity can significantly amplify the chemical interaction between the sulfur and polar nitrogen functionalities’ decorated carbon host. Apart from inhibiting sulfur loss during high temperature, the intensified sulfur host affinity is also favorable for the alleviation of electrochemical shuttle effect in the KSBs.
The composition and surface chemical states were further investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The peaks of O, N, C, and S elements are observed in the survey XPS spectra of S@P-NCF and S@NCF (Figure S4a). High-resolution XPS spectra of S and C elements for S@P-NCF are illustrated in Figure 2g and h, respectively. As shown in Figure 2g, two strong peaks located at 165.3 and 164.1 eV correspond to the S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2. The small peak at 162.4 eV indicates a partial charge transfer between the carbon matrix and sulfur [49], which contributes to the sulfur anchoring. In addition, two peaks at the high binding energies of 170.2 and 168.3 eV are ascribed to the presence of sulfate and sulfite [56]. The peak located at 286.1 eV in the C 1s spectrum (Figure 2h) is attributed to the C-N/C-S bond [57], demonstrating the chemical bonding-induced strong affinity between the carbon surface and sulfur. High-resolution XPS spectra of S and C elements for S@NCF (Figure S4b,c) are similar to those for S@P-NCF, which proves that the analogous surface chemistry of S@NCF to S@P-NCF. In addition, high-resolution XPS spectra of N 1s for P-NCF and NCF are shown in Figure 2i and Figure S4d, respectively. The atom percent of nitrogen are 3.5 at% for P-NCF and 3.06 at% for NCF. In particular, in the N 1s XPS spectrum of P-NCF, peaks located at 401.2, 400.0, and 398.4 eV can be assigned to graphitic-N, pyrrolic-N, and pyridinic-N, respectively [58]. The contents of the three types of nitrogen heteroatoms in P-NCF and NCF are shown in Figure S5. Compared to NCF, the proportion of graphitic-N is lower and the proportion of pyrrolic-N and pyridinic-N are higher in P-NCF. It is known that pyridinic-N and pyrrolic-N exhibit relatively stronger interactions with sulfur species [59]. Therefore, the higher proportion of pyridinic-N and pyrrolic-N in P-NCF is one of the underlying reasons for the stronger affinity toward sulfur.
In order to examine the electrochemical properties of the S@P-NCF cathode, K-S coin cells were assembled utilizing K metal anode, glass fiber separator, and carbonate solution (0.8 M KPF6 in EC/DEC = 1/1 by volume) electrolyte. The cyclic voltammograms (CV) curves of S@P-NCF were recorded at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage window of 0.5–3.0 V (vs. K+/K) (Figure 3a). During the first discharge process, a major peak located at 0.54 V, which corresponds to the reduction from sulfur to KPSs [56,60]. In the following charge process, a broad peak located at 1.71 V (Anodic I) and a weak peak located at 1.97 V (Anodic II), which are related to the depotassiation process and the stepped oxidation reaction of KPSs to sulfur. Specially, the Anodic I peak can be attributed to the oxidation of short-chain KPSs to long-chain KPSs, and the Anodic II peak is ascribed to the final formation of sulfur species [60]. In addition, the CV curve of the initial discharge process is different from the following cycles, which may be attributed to the formation of a cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) during the initial discharge process [61]. In the subsequent cycles, the cathodic peak located at 0.54 V is replaced by three peaks located at 1.64 (Cathodic I), 1.24 (Cathodic II), and 0.77 V (Cathodic III). This suggests that a multistep conversion of sulfur species occurs during the potassiation process [57]. In addition, there is no obvious difference in the following CV curves, indicating the outstanding reversibility. The counterpart CV curves of S@NCF are shown in Figure S6. Obviously, the voltage hysteresis between the peak Anodic I and the peak Cathodic III of S@NCF (1.05 V) is larger than that of S@P-NCF (0.94 V). Figure 3b displays the first three discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at 0.1 C (1 C = 1675 mAh g−1) within the voltage window of 0.5–3.0 V. After the first cycle, two long discharge plateaus at ~1.5 V and ~0.8 V and a long charge plateau at ~1.6 V can be observed, which are consistent with the CV results. Most importantly, S@P-NCF exhibits an ultrahigh initial reversible capacity (1470 mAh g−1), much higher than S@NCF (850 mAh g−1). The above-mentioned results indicate that richer micropores and larger polar surface area enhance the interaction between sulfur and carbon matrix, improve the utilization and conversion of sulfur, and reduce the polarization of S@P-NCF.
The rate capabilities of sulfur cathodes were measured at current densities from 0.2 to 2 C (Figure 3c). The S@P-NCF delivers reversible capacities of 1430, 1170, 950, 755, and 560 mAh g−1 at 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, and 2 C, respectively. On the contrary, S@NCF only delivers capacities of 680 and 400 mAh g−1 at current densities of 0.2 and 2 C, respectively, much lower than that of S@P-NCF. However, at small current densities S@P-NCF exhibits a more rapid capacity decay than S@NCF. Figure 3d shows the corresponding discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF under various current densities, which reveal much lower polarization potentials, compared to S@NCF (Figure S7). As illustrated in Figure 3e, compared with recently reported KSBs, the rate performance of our S@P-NCF is among the best to date [56,57,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Figure 3f shows the cycling performances of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at the current density of 0.2 C. The S@P-NCF exhibits a much higher specific capacity, with an initial reversible capacity of 1470 mAh g−1. After 100 cycles, the remaining capacity is 832 mAh g−1 and the Coulombic efficiency is ~100%. S@NCF only delivers an initial reversible capacity of 690 mAh g−1 and remaining capacity of 556 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles. The higher specific capacity of S@P-NCF demonstrates that more abundant micropores and larger polar surface area can enhance the interaction between sulfur and carbon matrix, and thus promote the conversion of sulfur species and realize higher utilization of sulfur. In addition, during the cycling process, the rich mesopores provide ample space for the volume expansion of sulfur species [72]. As shown in Figure 3g, long-term cycling performances of S@P-NCF and S@NCF were performed at a current density of 2 C. After 300 cycles at a current density of 2 C, S@P-NCF delivers a higher capacity retention of 39.0% and a lower capacity loss of 0.13% each cycle. In contrast, S@NCF shows rapid capacity decay during the 50–100 cycles and operates at the low value of <200 mAh g−1. The electrochemical performance of S@P-NCF-based K-S batteries under high areal loading conditions has also been attempted to be measured. Figure S8 shows the first five discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF with sulfur areal loading of 2.0 mg cm−2 at 0.1 C. Of interest is that S@P-NCF delivers a high initial reversible capacity (1100 mAh g−1) even at a high sulfur areal loading of 2.0 mg cm−2. To further demonstrate the stable long-term cycling performance of the electrodes, the cell impedances of S@P-NCF and S@NCF in the charged states after the 1st and 100th cycles were analyzed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Figure 3h and Figure S9). The semicircle at high frequency corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (Rct) through the electrode/electrolyte interface. The equivalent circuit model and fitted electrode resistance data are shown in Figure 3h and Table S2, respectively. Obviously, S@NCF shows a larger increment of Rct from 1411 Ω (1st) to 4901 Ω (100th), compared to S@P-NCF from 383.7 to 1429 Ω. The lower Rct of S@P-NCF after the first cycle indicates that porosity engineering and polar nitrogen functionalities provide the fast ion transport and excellent electrical conductivity, which contribute to sulfur utilization and conversion. In addition, the smaller Rct increment of S@P-NCF after 100 cycles indicates the superior cycling stability and structural stability of S@P-NCF. The above electrochemical tests show that S@P-NCF has higher specific capacity, sulfur utilization, and better long-term cycling performance at a high current density than S@NCF. Obviously, the ultrahigh initial reversible capacity of S@P-NCF is related to the tight binding between sulfur in the micropores and carbon matrix, which effectively increases the utilization of sulfur. In addition, the larger polar surface area, higher content of pyridinic-/pyrrolic-N, and more abundant mesopores of P-NCF also make an essential contribution to the high capacity and excellent cycling performance.
Multi-scan rates CVs and the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) were employed to demonstrate the kinetics of the sulfur cathodes. The CVs at different scan rates were further examined for the in-depth kinetic analyses. Figure 4a,b display the CV curves at the scan rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mV s−1 of S@P-NCF and S@NCF, respectively. These CV curves exhibit a similar profile, except for a noticeable shift as the scan rate increases. As the scan rate increases, two major peaks (labeled Peak-R and Peak-O, respectively) for both S@P-NCF and S@NCF can be observed. The reaction mechanisms of S@P-NCF and S@NCF can be evaluated based on an established formula of log i = b log v + log a, where i is the peak current, v is the scan rate of the CV and b is a constant ranging from 0.5 to 1. When the b value is approaching 0.5 or 1, the system is under the diffusion dominated or surface capacitive-controlled process, respectively [73]. Figure 4c shows the b values of S@P-NCF for Peak-R and Peak-O, which are fitted to be 0.905 and 0.747, respectively. This indicates that the reduction conversion reaction of S@P-NCF is a rapid dynamic pseudocapacitance behavior. The b values of S@NCF for Peak-R and Peak-O are 0.857 and 0.782, respectively (Figure 4d). Interestingly, for S@P-NCF, the b value of Peak-R is higher than that of S@NCF, while the b value of Peak-O is lower than that of S@NCF. This indicates that S@P-NCF exhibits more facile discharge kinetics, while for the charge process, S@NCF shows better reaction kinetics. The GITT was measured to further reveal the K-ion diffusion kinetics. Figure S10 displays the discharge/charge profiles of GITT. Figure 4e,f show the K-ion diffusion coefficients under different voltages calculated based on Figure S11 during discharge and charge process, respectively. As shown in Figure 4e, in the discharge process, S@P-NCF delivers higher K-ion diffusion coefficients than those of S@NCF. Nonetheless, in the charge process, S@NCF has higher K-ion diffusion coefficients (Figure 4f). This indicates that the reaction kinetics of S@P-NCF is better in the discharge process and inferior during the charge process than that of S@NCF, which is consistent with the results in Figure 4c,d. It is reasonable to believe that more microporous structures and nitrogen heteroatoms in P-NCF can enhance the binding between sulfur and carbon matrix, improve the reaction kinetics during the discharge process, and accelerate the conversion of sulfur species to K2S, thus, achieving an ultrahigh specific capacity and large utilization of sulfur. Nevertheless, during the charge process, the depotassiation of low-order KPSs is more sluggish for S@P-NCF, which makes insoluble and insulating low-order KPSs easy to accumulate to form “dead polysulfide”, and thus lose electroactivity, leading to capacity decay and pessimistic capacity retention [28].
HRTEM was performed to investigate the origin of the ultrahigh capacity for S@P-NCF. From the state of potassiation to 0.5 V for S@P-NCF, the HRTEM images clearly show that some nanosized crystals embed in the carbon matrix (Figure 5a,b), which are ascribed to the K2S phase. For S@NCF, a lot of K2S2 nanocrystals can be observed in the HRTEM images (Figure 5c,d). The SAED images (Figure S12) also demonstrate the difference. As shown in Figure S12a, the diffraction rings are ascribed to the (220), (222), (400) planes of K2S phase for S@PNCF. For S@NCF there are clear diffraction spots attributed to K2S2 in the SAED image (Figure S12b). Different discharge products determine the number of electrons involved in the reaction process. S@P-NCF reaching K2S in the discharge product displays much higher capacity. In contrast, for S@NCF, kinetics being more sluggish during the discharge process leads to an earlier end of the discharge process with a large amount of K2S2 in the discharge product. Therefore, porosity engineering can enhance the kinetics during the discharge process and accomplish a deeper discharge, thereby enabling higher capacity for the cathode.
In order to gain atomistic insight into the mechanism of the interaction between KPSs and micropores, DFT simulations were performed to determine the role of micropores in the adsorption and conversion of KPSs. As shown in Figure 5e, carbon defects on the nitrogen-doped graphene layer are used to simulate the micropores, and the pore-free graphene model is used as a comparison. The optimized configurations of various KPSs adsorbed on microporous carbon and graphene are displayed in Figure S13. As shown in Figure 5f, the binding energy of KPSs on microporous carbon is significantly more negative compared to the non-porous model. In general, the strength of adsorption increases as the binding energy becomes more negative. This indicates that the microporous carbon is more effective in adsorbing KPSs. As shown in Figure 5g, the Gibbs free energies for all reaction steps from sulfur to K2S during the discharge process were calculated. Overall, the reaction from sulfur to K2S is spontaneously exothermic on microporous carbon but endothermic on non-porous model. This suggests that the discharge process is more thermodynamically favorable with the influence of the micropores. On the contrary, because the discharge process on graphene is endothermic, this means that the reaction from K2S to sulfur is spontaneously exothermic on the non-porous model. This suggests that the charge process on graphene is thermodynamically favorable without the influence of micropores. Moreover, the K2S decomposition barriers on microporous and non-porous carbon models were investigated (Figure 5h). Obviously, both the dissociation energy and the decomposition barrier of K2S are higher on microporous carbon. This indicates that the micropore plays an inhibitory role in the decomposition of K2S and is unfavorable to the oxidation of K2S during the charge process. DFT simulation results show that micropores have a strong adsorption to KPSs, which is favorable to the discharge process. Nonetheless, on the other side, the decomposition of K2S becomes difficult, which is detrimental to the charge kinetics.

3. Conclusions

In this report, we employ a porosity engineering strategy to a nitrogen-rich carbon foam to construct a sulfur host for high-performance room temperature K-S batteries. The abundant microporosity greatly enlarges the polar surface area of the carbon host, thereby reinforcing the affinity of sulfur species on the electrode, both at the pristine state and during electrochemical cycling. Meanwhile, the mesoporosity create ample room to buffer the large volume change of sulfur upon repeated potassiation. Ultra-high capacity of 1470 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C was obtained with 560 mAh g−1 remaining at high rate of 2 C, which is superior to most state-of-the-art KSB performances to date. Both electrochemical analysis (GITT and multi-rate CVs) and DFT calculation demonstrate that the microporosity with nitrogen functionalities contribute to the sulfur reduction for the end member of K2S, which nonetheless deteriorates the oxidation (charge) kinetics by increasing the energy barrier of K2S decomposition.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12223968/s1, Figure S1: (a) SEM and (b,c) TEM images of the NCF (inset: the corresponding SAED image); Figure S2: (a) SEM and (b,c) TEM images of the S@NCF (inset: the corresponding SAED image); Figure S3: ID/IG values of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF calculated from the Raman spectra; Figure S4: (a) XPS survey spectra of S@P-NCF and S@NCF. High-resolution XPS spectra of (b) S 2p and (c) C 1s for S@NCF, and (d) N 1s for NCF; Figure S5: Distribution of three nitrogen species (pyridinic-N, pyrrolic-N, and graphitic-N) in the P-NCF and NCF; Figure S6: CV of the S@NCF at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1; Figure S7: Galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of S@NCF at various current densities; Figure S8: Galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF with sulfur areal loading of 2.0 mg cm−2; Figure S9: EIS Nyquist plots and corresponding fitted lines of the S@P-NCF and S@NCF at different cycles; Figure S10: GITT profiles of the (a) discharge and (b) charge processes measured at the current density of 0.03 C; Figure S11: Schematic diagram of the parameters in the GITT curve used to calculate the diffusion coefficient: (a) discharge process and (b) charge process. (IR drop is the voltage change that occurs when the charge/discharge process and the relaxation switch with each other); Figure S12: SAED images of (a) S@P-NCF and (b) S@NCF discharged to 0.5 V versus K+/K; Figure S13: Detailed adsorption atomic configuration for KPSs on microporous carbon and non-porous carbon; Table S1: The surface area and pore volume of the as-prepared samples; Table S2: Electrode resistance obtained from the equivalent circuit. References [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81] were cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and J.D.; Methodology, J.L., W.S. and J.D.; Software, J.L. and H.W.; Validation, J.D. and W.H.; Formal Analysis, J.L. and W.S.; Investigation, J.L. and J.D.; Resources, J.D. and W.H.; Data Curation, J.L. and H.W.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.L. and W.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, J.D. and W.H.; Visualization, J.L.; Supervision, J.D. and W.H.; Project Administration, J.D. and W.H.; Funding Acquisition, J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

J.D. (conception of idea, manuscript preparation, supervision) were funded by the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52072257) and the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFE0118800).

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included within the article and its Supporting Information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seh, Z.W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5605–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Palomares, V.; Shanmukaraj, D.; Sun, B.; Tang, X.; Wang, C.; Armand, M.; Rojo, T.; Wang, G. Revitalising sodium–sulfur batteries for non-high-temperature operation: A crucial review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3848–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, J.; Ding, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Z.; Song, W.; Ding, J.; Han, X.; Hu, W. Boosting Energy Efficiency and Stability of Li-CO2 Batteries via Synergy between Ru Atom Clusters and Single-Atom Ru-N4 sites in the Electrocatalyst Cathode. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2200559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Ding, J.; Xu, L.; Tian, Y.; Mitlin, D.; Ding, J.; Hu, W. Nanosecond laser lithography enables concave-convex zinc metal battery anodes with ultrahigh areal capacity. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 51, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ding, J.; Zhang, H.; Fan, W.; Zhong, C.; Hu, W.; Mitlin, D. Review of Emerging Potassium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1908007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aslam, M.K.; Seymour, I.D.; Katyal, N.; Li, S.; Yang, T.; Bao, S.J.; Henkelman, G.; Xu, M. Metal chalcogenide hollow polar bipyramid prisms as efficient sulfur hosts for Na-S batteries. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, B.W.; Sheng, T.; Liu, Y.D.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, L.; Lai, W.H.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Gu, Q.F.; Chou, S.L.; et al. Atomic cobalt as an efficient electrocatalyst in sulfur cathodes for superior room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. A Progress Report on Metal–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Shen, Y.; Yuan, L.-X.; Huang, Y.-H. Next-Generation Energy Storage Technologies and Their Key Electrode Materials. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, K.; Sun, Z.; Fang, R.; Li, F.; Cheng, H. Development of Graphene-based Materials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Chen, J. Potassium-sulfur batteries: A new member of room-temperature rechargeable metal-sulfur batteries. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 9000–9005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, X.; Bowden, M.E.; Sprenkle, V.L.; Liu, J. A low cost, high energy density, and long cycle life potassium-sulfur battery for grid-scale energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5915–5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Bai, Z.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Ding, Y.; Xu, X.; Du, Y.; Dou, S.; et al. High-performance room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery enabled by electrocatalytic sodium polysulfides full conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, Z.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Lai, W.; Wang, W.; Xia, Q.; Wang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Lu, H.; Chou, S.L.; et al. A High-Kinetics Sulfur Cathode with a Highly Efficient Mechanism for Superior Room-Temperature Na-S Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1906700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ye, C.; Jiao, Y.; Chao, D.; Ling, T.; Shan, J.; Zhang, B.; Gu, Q.; Davey, K.; Wang, H.; Qiao, S.Z. Electron-State Confinement of Polysulfides for Highly Stable Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1907557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, P.; Sun, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Elucidating electrochemical intercalation mechanisms of biomas-derived hard carbon in sodiu-/potassium-ion batteries. Carbon Energy 2021, 3, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hao, H.; Wang, Y.; Katyal, N.; Yang, G.; Dong, H.; Liu, P.; Hwang, S.; Mantha, J.; Henkelman, G.; Xu, Y.; et al. Molybdenum Carbide Electrocatalyst In Situ Embedded in Porous Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nanotubes Promotes Rapid Kinetics in Sodium-Metal-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2106572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hwang, J.-Y.; Myung, S.-T.; Sun, Y.-K. Recent Progress in Rechargeable Potassium Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pramudita, J.C.; Sehrawat, D.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sharma, N. An Initial Review of the Status of Electrode Materials for Potassium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, X.; Mei, J.; Wen, L.; Tong, Y.; Vasileff, A.J.; Wang, L.; Liang, J.; Sun, Z.; Dou, S.X. Nonlithium Metal-Sulfur Batteries: Steps Toward a Leap. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1802822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Song, W.; Zhong, C.; Ding, J.; Hu, W. Toward Theoretical Capacity and Superhigh Power Density for Potassium-Selenium Batteries via Facilitating Reversible Potassiation Kinetics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 6828–6840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Deng, Y.; Han, P.; Yuan, N.; Zhang, L.; Feng, M.; Wang, C.a.; Liu, R. Carbon-based flexible self-supporting cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries: Progress and perspective. Carbon Energy 2021, 3, 271–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, K.; Kim, S.; Yang, X.; Cho, M.; Lee, Y. Binder-Free and High-Loading Cathode Realized by Hierarchical Structure for Potassium-Sulfur Batteries. Small Methods 2022, 6, e2100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vijaya Kumar Saroja, A.P.; Xu, Y. Carbon materials for Na-S and K-S batteries. Matter 2022, 5, 808–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.; Lu, Y.; Qian, Z.; Wang, R.; Guo, Z. Potassium-sulfur batteries: Status and perspectives. EcoMat 2020, 2, e12038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiao, C.; Song, W.; Liang, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Zhong, C.; Ding, J.; Hu, W. P-block tin single atom catalyst for improved electrochemistry in a lithium–sulfur battery: A theoretical and experimental study. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 3667–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dai, Y.Y.; Xu, C.M.; Liu, X.H.; He, X.X.; Yang, Z.; Lai, W.H.; Li, L.; Qiao, Y.; Chou, S.L. Manipulating metal-sulfur interactions for achieving high-performance S cathodes for room temperature Li/Na-sulfur batteries. Carbon Energy 2021, 3, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gu, S.; Xiao, N.; Wu, F.; Bai, Y.; Wu, C.; Wu, Y. Chemical Synthesis of K2S2 and K2S3 for Probing Electrochemical Mechanisms in K–S Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2858–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, L.; Lv, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.; Jin, Z. Recent Advances in Emerging Non-Lithium Metal–Sulfur Batteries: A Review. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, C.; Lai, W.H.; Cai, X.; Chou, S.L.; Liu, H.K.; Wang, Y.X.; Dou, S.X. Carbonaceous Hosts for Sulfur Cathode in Alkali-Metal/S (Alkali Metal = Lithium, Sodium, Potassium) Batteries. Small 2021, 17, e2006504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, W.-F.; Liu, M.-N.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.-G. Progress of Lithium/Sulfur Batteries Based on Chemically Modified Carbon. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.-M.; Liang, W.; Li, S.; Zou, F.; Bhaway, S.M.; Qiang, Z.; Gao, M.; Vogt, B.D.; Zhu, Y. A nitrogen doped carbonized metal–organic framework for high stability room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12471–12478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, D.; Gong, B.; Cheng, X.; Ling, F.; Zhao, L.; Yao, Y.; Ma, M.; Jiang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Rui, X.; et al. An Efficient Strategy toward Multichambered Carbon Nanoboxes with Multiple Spatial Confinement for Advanced Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 20607–20618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, J.; Shi, Y.; Ding, Y.; Peng, L.; Zhang, W.; Yu, G. A Conductive Molecular Framework Derived Li2S/N,P-Codoped Carbon Cathode for Advanced Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, L.; Feng, J.; Zhou, H.; Fu, C.; Wang, G.; Yang, L.; Xu, C.; Chen, Z.; Yang, W.; Kuang, Y. Hydrothermal preparation of nitrogen, boron co-doped curved graphene nanoribbons with high dopant amounts for high-performance lithium sulfur battery cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 7403–7415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.; Sadan, M.K.; Kim, C.; Jo, J.; Seong, M.; Cho, K.-K.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Ahn, H.-J. Enhanced reversible capacity of sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode for room-temperature Na/S batteries by electrochemical activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, T.; Jing, M.; Yang, L.; Zou, G.; Hou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Ji, X. Controllable Chain-Length for Covalent Sulfur-Carbon Materials Enabling Stable and High-Capacity Sodium Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, W.; Zhong, W.; Wu, Y.; Qi, Y.; Guo, B.; Liu, D.; Bao, S.-J.; Xu, M. Vanadium carbide nanoparticles incorporation in carbon nanofibers for room-temperature sodium sulfur batteries: Confining, trapping, and catalyzing. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 124978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lai, W.H.; Wang, H.; Zheng, L.; Jiang, Q.; Yan, Z.C.; Wang, L.; Yoshikawa, H.; Matsumura, D.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Y.X.; et al. General Synthesis of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions and Room-Temperature Na-S Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 22171–22178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, W.; Xu, Q.; Zhan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Xu, M. Synthesis of hollow porous carbon microspheres and their application to room-temperature Na-S batteries. Mater. Lett. 2018, 221, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Lu, H.; Chang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, X.; Xia, Q.; Yan, C.; Xia, H. Ultrastable Sodium-Sulfur Batteries without Polysulfides Formation Using Slit Ultramicropore Carbon Carrier. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mou, J.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, M.; Xu, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, M. Hierarchical porous carbon sheets for high-performance room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries: Integration of nitrogen-self-doping and space confinement. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 24590–24597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ye, H.; Kong, K.; Gong, X.; Hua, J.; Tian, H. Molecular Engineering of Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Polymer/g-C3N4 Heterostructures for Significantly Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution under Visible-Light Irradiation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ong, W.J.; Tan, L.L.; Ng, Y.H.; Yong, S.T.; Chai, S.P. Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4)-Based Photocatalysts for Artificial Photosynthesis and Environmental Remediation: Are We a Step Closer To Achieving Sustainability? Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159–7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Su, D.; Cortie, M.; Wang, G. Fabrication of N-doped Graphene–Carbon Nanotube Hybrids from Prussian Blue for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 7, 1602014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, X.; Yu, Z.; Yao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Rui, X.; Liu, J.; Yu, Y. A High-Efficiency Mo2C Electrocatalyst Promoting the Polysulfide Redox Kinetics for Na-S Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2200479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eng, A.Y.S.; Wang, Y.; Nguyen, D.T.; Tee, S.Y.; Lim, C.Y.J.; Tan, X.Y.; Ng, M.F.; Xu, J.; Seh, Z.W. Tunable Nitrogen-Doping of Sulfur Host Nanostructures for Stable and Shuttle-Free Room-Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 5401–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wei, S.; Xu, S.; Agrawral, A.; Choudhury, S.; Lu, Y.; Tu, Z.; Ma, L.; Archer, L.A. A stable room-temperature sodium-sulfur battery. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Y.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Gaskell, K.; Cychosz, K.A.; Eichhorn, B.; Xu, K.; Wang, C. Confined Sulfur in Microporous Carbon Renders Superior Cycling Stability in Li/S Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 4312–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shan, X.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Duan, L. Mesoporous TiO2 Nanofiber as Highly Efficient Sulfur Host for Advanced Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 32, s10019–s10033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, H.; Zhu, S.; Cui, Z.; Li, Z.; Wu, S.; Liang, Y. Boosting oxygen reduction catalysis with abundant single atom tin active sites in zinc-air battery. J. Power Sources 2021, 490, 229483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, H.B.; Miao, J.; Hung, S.-F.; Chen, J.; Tao, H.B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, R.; Gao, J.; Chen, H.M.; et al. Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in N-doped graphene materials: Development of highly efficient metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gunasekaran, S.S.; Badhulika, S. High-performance solid-state supercapacitor based on sustainable synthesis of meso-macro porous carbon derived from hemp fibres via CO2 activation. J. Energy Storage 2021, 41, 102997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, J.; Xia, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. An electrochemical sensor based on metal-organic framework-derived porous carbon with high degree of graphitization for electroanalysis of various substances. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 251, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yu, X.-g.; Xie, J.-y.; Yang, J.; Huang, H.-j.; Wang, K.; Wen, Z.-s. Lithium storage in conductive sulfur-containing polymers. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 573, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ge, X.; Di, H.; Wang, P.; Miao, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.; Yin, L. Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Nitrogen-Doped Cobalt Nanocluster Inlaid Porous Carbon as High-Efficiency Catalyst for Advanced Potassium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 16022–16035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhao, X.; Hong, Y.; Cheng, M.; Wang, S.; Zheng, L.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y. High performance potassium–sulfur batteries and their reaction mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 10875–10884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, J. Nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur composite as cathode material for high capacity lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 256, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, F.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Li, W.; Qiao, W.; Long, D.; Ling, L. High efficiency immobilization of sulfur on nitrogen-enriched mesoporous carbons for Li-S batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 5630–5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hwang, J.-Y.; Kim, H.M.; Sun, Y.-K. High performance potassium–sulfur batteries based on a sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode and polyacrylic acid binder. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14587–14593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kensy, C.; Leistenschneider, D.; Wang, S.; Tanaka, H.; Dörfler, S.; Kaneko, K.; Kaskel, S. The Role of Carbon Electrodes Pore Size Distribution on the Formation of the Cathode–Electrolyte Interphase in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Batter. Supercaps 2020, 4, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hwang, J.-Y.; Kim, H.M.; Yoon, C.S.; Sun, Y.-K. Toward High-Safety Potassium–Sulfur Batteries Using a Potassium Polysulfide Catholyte and Metal-Free Anode. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 540–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xiong, P.; Han, X.; Zhao, X.; Bai, P.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y. Room-Temperature Potassium-Sulfur Batteries Enabled by Microporous Carbon Stabilized Small-Molecule Sulfur Cathodes. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 2536–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lai, N.-C.; Cong, G.; Lu, Y.-C. A high-energy potassium–sulfur battery enabled by facile and effective imidazole-solvated copper catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 20584–20589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ma, R.; Fan, L.; Wang, J.; Lu, B. Confined and covalent sulfur for stable room temperature potassium-sulfur battery. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 293, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Xiang, Y.; Zou, G.; Hou, H.; Deng, W.; Ji, X. High Sulfur-Doped Hard Carbon with Advanced Potassium Storage Capacity via a Molten Salt Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 30431–30437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yuan, X.; Zhu, B.; Feng, J.; Wang, C.; Cai, X.; Qin, R. Free-standing, flexible and stable potassium–sulfur battery enabled by controllable porous carbon cloth. J. Power Sources 2020, 480, 228874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. A reversible nonaqueous room-temperature potassium-sulfur chemistry for electrochemical energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 15, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, L.; Ge, L.; He, G.; Tian, Z.; Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Brett, D.J.L.; Hofkens, J.; Lai, F.; Liu, T. Tuning the Linkers in Polymer-Based Cathodes to Realize High Sulfur Content and High-Performance Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 18604–18613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ye, C.; Shan, J.; Chao, D.; Liang, P.; Jiao, Y.; Hao, J.; Gu, Q.; Davey, K.; Wang, H.; Qiao, S.Z. Catalytic Oxidation of K2S via Atomic Co and Pyridinic N Synergy in Potassium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 16902–16907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yuan, X.; Zhu, B.; Feng, J.; Wang, C.; Cai, X.; Qin, R. High-Performance Stable Potassium–Sulfur Batteries Enabled by Free-Standing CNT Film-Based Composite Cathodes. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 3037–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bao, W.; Su, D.; Zhang, W.; Guo, X.; Wang, G. 3D Metal Carbide@Mesoporous Carbon Hybrid Architecture as a New Polysulfide Reservoir for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 8746–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Augustyn, V.; Come, J.; Lowe, M.A.; Kim, J.W.; Taberna, P.L.; Tolbert, S.H.; Abruna, H.D.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hammer, B. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 7413–7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Blochl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Behler, J. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9901–9904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dees, D.W.; Kawauchi, S.; Abraham, D.P.; Prakash, J. Analysis of the Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (GITT) as applied to a lithium-ion porous electrode. J. Power Sources 2009, 189, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ma, Q.; Zhong, W.; Du, G.; Qi, Y.; Bao, S.J.; Xu, M.; Li, C. Multi-step Controllable Catalysis Method for the Defense of Sodium Polysulfide Dissolution in Room-Temperature Na-S Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 11852–11860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g001
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of P-NCF. (b,e) SEM and (c,d,f,g) TEM images of (b–d) P-NCF and (e–g) S@P-NCF. The insets in (d,g) are the corresponding SAED images. (h) Annular dark-field STEM image and (i–k) corresponding elemental mappings of S@P-NCF.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of P-NCF. (b,e) SEM and (c,d,f,g) TEM images of (b–d) P-NCF and (e–g) S@P-NCF. The insets in (d,g) are the corresponding SAED images. (h) Annular dark-field STEM image and (i–k) corresponding elemental mappings of S@P-NCF.
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g001
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g002
Figure 2. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms, (b) cumulative pore volumes, and (c) pore size distributions of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF. (d) XRD patterns and (e) Raman spectra of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, S@NCF, and pure S. (f) TGA curves of S@P-NCF and S@NCF. High-resolution XPS spectra of (g) S 2p, (h) C 1s for S@P-NCF, and (i) N 1s for P-NCF.
Figure 2. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms, (b) cumulative pore volumes, and (c) pore size distributions of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, and S@NCF. (d) XRD patterns and (e) Raman spectra of P-NCF, S@P-NCF, NCF, S@NCF, and pure S. (f) TGA curves of S@P-NCF and S@NCF. High-resolution XPS spectra of (g) S 2p, (h) C 1s for S@P-NCF, and (i) N 1s for P-NCF.
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g002
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g003
Figure 3. (a) CV curves of S@P-NCF cathode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of S@P-NCF and S@NCF in the first three cycles at 0.1 C. (c) Rate performance of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at various current densities. (d) Galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF at various current densities. (e) A comparison of the rate performance of S@P-NCF with recently reported cathodes for KSBs. (f) Cycling performance of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at 0.2 C. (g) Long-term cycle stability of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at 2 C over 300 cycles. (h) Nyquist plots and corresponding fitted lines of S@P-NCF and S@NCF after the initial cycle; the inset is the equivalent circuit model.
Figure 3. (a) CV curves of S@P-NCF cathode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of S@P-NCF and S@NCF in the first three cycles at 0.1 C. (c) Rate performance of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at various current densities. (d) Galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles of S@P-NCF at various current densities. (e) A comparison of the rate performance of S@P-NCF with recently reported cathodes for KSBs. (f) Cycling performance of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at 0.2 C. (g) Long-term cycle stability of S@P-NCF and S@NCF at 2 C over 300 cycles. (h) Nyquist plots and corresponding fitted lines of S@P-NCF and S@NCF after the initial cycle; the inset is the equivalent circuit model.
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g003
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g004
Figure 4. CV curves of (a) S@P-NCF and (b) S@NCF at different scan rates from 0.1 to 1 mV s−1. The linear relation of peak currents and scan rates of (c) S@P-NCF and (d) S@NCF. The K-ion diffusion coefficient as a function of the states of the (e) discharge process and (f) charge process.
Figure 4. CV curves of (a) S@P-NCF and (b) S@NCF at different scan rates from 0.1 to 1 mV s−1. The linear relation of peak currents and scan rates of (c) S@P-NCF and (d) S@NCF. The K-ion diffusion coefficient as a function of the states of the (e) discharge process and (f) charge process.
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g004
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g005
Figure 5. HRTEM images of (a,b) S@P-NCF and (c,d) S@NCF discharged to 0.5 V versus K+/K. (e) Schematic illustration of microporous carbon model and non-porous carbon models. (f) Comparison of the binding energies of various K2Sx molecules bound to microporous and non-porous carbon models, respectively. (g) Energy profiles for the reduction in KPSs on microporous and non-porous carbon models; the insets are the corresponding adsorption configurations of KPSs on microporous carbon model. (h) The decomposition energy profiles of K2S on microporous and non-porous carbon models; the insets are decomposition path of K2S on microporous carbon model.
Figure 5. HRTEM images of (a,b) S@P-NCF and (c,d) S@NCF discharged to 0.5 V versus K+/K. (e) Schematic illustration of microporous carbon model and non-porous carbon models. (f) Comparison of the binding energies of various K2Sx molecules bound to microporous and non-porous carbon models, respectively. (g) Energy profiles for the reduction in KPSs on microporous and non-porous carbon models; the insets are the corresponding adsorption configurations of KPSs on microporous carbon model. (h) The decomposition energy profiles of K2S on microporous and non-porous carbon models; the insets are decomposition path of K2S on microporous carbon model.
Nanomaterials 12 03968 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, J.; Song, W.; Wang, H.; Ding, J.; Hu, W. Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12223968

AMA Style

Liang J, Song W, Wang H, Ding J, Hu W. Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(22):3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12223968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Jingzhe, Wanqing Song, Haozhi Wang, Jia Ding, and Wenbin Hu. 2022. "Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries" Nanomaterials 12, no. 22: 3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12223968

APA Style

Liang, J., Song, W., Wang, H., Ding, J., & Hu, W. (2022). Porosity Engineering towards Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Host Enables Ultrahigh Capacity Sulfur Cathode for Room Temperature Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. Nanomaterials, 12(22), 3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12223968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop