# Accurate Truncations of Chain Mapping Models for Open Quantum Systems

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

## 3. Results

#### 3.1. Fitted Chain

#### 3.2. Next-Nearest Neighbor Coupled Chain

## 4. Discussion

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Gardiner, C.W.; Zoller, P. Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Breuer, H.P.; Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- de Vega, I.; Alonso, D. Dynamics of Non-Markovian Open Quantum Systems. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**2017**, 89, 015001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Franke, S.; Hughes, S.; Kamandar Dezfouli, M.; Kristensen, P.T.; Busch, K.; Knorr, A.; Richter, M. Quantization of Quasinormal Modes for Open Cavities and Plasmonic Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2019**, 122, 213901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Roden, J.; Eisfeld, A.; Wolff, W.; Strunz, W.T. Influence of Complex Exciton-Phonon Coupling on Optical Absorption and Energy Transfer of Quantum Aggregates. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2009**, 103, 058301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Strunz, W.T.; Diósi, L.; Gisin, N. Open System Dynamics with Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1999**, 82, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Manzano, D. A Short Introduction to the Lindblad Master Equation. AIP Adv.
**2020**, 10, 025106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feist, J.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I.; García-Vidal, F.J. Macroscopic QED for Quantum Nanophotonics: Emitter-Centered Modes as a Minimal Basis for Multiemitter Problems. Nanophotonics
**2020**, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Novotny, L.; Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Scheel, S.; Buhmann, S.Y. Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics—Concepts and Applications. Acta Phys. Slovaca
**2008**, 58, 675–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Buhmann, S.Y. Dispersion Forces I; Springer Tracts in Modern Physics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanimura, Y.; Kubo, R. Time Evolution of a Quantum System in Contact with a Nearly Gaussian-Markoffian Noise Bath. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
**1989**, 58, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tanimura, Y. Nonperturbative Expansion Method for a Quantum System Coupled to a Harmonic-Oscillator Bath. Phys. Rev. A
**1990**, 41, 6676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; Bai, S.; Shi, Q. Reduced Quantum Dynamics with Arbitrary Bath Spectral Densities: Hierarchical Equations of Motion Based on Several Different Bath Decomposition Schemes. J. Chem. Phys.
**2014**, 140, 134106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tanimura, Y. Numerically “Exact” Approach to Open Quantum Dynamics: The Hierarchical Equations of Motion (HEOM). J. Chem. Phys.
**2020**, 153, 020901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Diósi, L.; Strunz, W.T. The Non-Markovian Stochastic Schrödinger Equation for Open Systems. Phys. Lett. A
**1997**, 235, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shabani, A.; Roden, J.; Whaley, K.B. Continuous Measurement of a Non-Markovian Open Quantum System. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2014**, 112, 113601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Suess, D.; Eisfeld, A.; Strunz, W.T. Hierarchy of Stochastic Pure States for Open Quantum System Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2014**, 113, 150403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Vidal, G. Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2004**, 93, 040502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Prior, J.; Chin, A.W.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Efficient Simulation of Strong System-Environment Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2010**, 105, 050404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Chin, A.W.; Prior, J.; Rosenbach, R.; Caycedo-Soler, F.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. The Role of Non-Equilibrium Vibrational Structures in Electronic Coherence and Recoherence in Pigment–Protein Complexes. Nat. Phys.
**2013**, 9, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Garraway, B.M. Decay of an Atom Coupled Strongly to a Reservoir. Phys. Rev. A
**1997**, 55, 4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mazzola, L.; Maniscalco, S.; Piilo, J.; Suominen, K.A.; Garraway, B.M. Pseudomodes as an Effective Description of Memory: Non-Markovian Dynamics of Two-State Systems in Structured Reservoirs. Phys. Rev. A
**2009**, 80, 012104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Mascherpa, F.; Smirne, A.; Somoza, A.D.; Fernández-Acebal, P.; Donadi, S.; Tamascelli, D.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Optimized Auxiliary Oscillators for the Simulation of General Open Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. A
**2020**, 101, 052108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pleasance, G.; Garraway, B.M.; Petruccione, F. Generalized Theory of Pseudomodes for Exact Descriptions of Non-Markovian Quantum Processes. Phys. Rev. Res.
**2020**, 2, 043058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hassler, F.; Stubenrauch, J.; Ciani, A. Equation of motion approach to black-box quantization: Taming the multimode Jaynes-Cummings model. Phys. Rev. B
**2019**, 99, 014515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Strasberg, P.; Schaller, G.; Lambert, N.; Brandes, T. Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics in the Strong Coupling and Non-Markovian Regime Based on a Reaction Coordinate Mapping. New J. Phys.
**2016**, 18, 073007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iles-Smith, J.; Lambert, N.; Nazir, A. Environmental Dynamics, Non-Gaussianity, and the Emergence of Noncanonical Equilibrium States in Open Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. A
**2014**, 90, 032114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Iles-Smith, J.; Dijkstra, A.G.; Lambert, N.; Nazir, A. Energy Transfer in Structured and Unstructured Environments: Master Equations beyond the Born-Markov Approximations. J. Chem. Phys.
**2016**, 144, 044110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Restrepo, S.; Böhling, S.; Cerrillo, J.; Schaller, G. Electron Pumping in the Strong Coupling and Non-Markovian Regime: A Reaction Coordinate Mapping Approach. Phys. Rev. B
**2019**, 100, 035109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chin, A.W.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Chain Representations of Open Quantum Systems and Their Numerical Simulation with Time-Adaptive Density Matrix Renormalisation Group Methods. In Semiconductors and Semimetals; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 85, p. 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinazzo, R.; Vacchini, B.; Hughes, K.H.; Burghardt, I. Communication: Universal Markovian Reduction of Brownian Particle Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys.
**2011**, 134, 011101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Woods, M.P.; Groux, R.; Chin, A.W.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Mappings of Open Quantum Systems onto Chain Representations and Markovian Embeddings. J. Math. Phys.
**2014**, 55, 032101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - de Vega, I.; Bañuls, M.C. Thermofield-Based Chain-Mapping Approach for Open Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. A
**2015**, 92, 052116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - del Pino, J.; Schröder, F.A.Y.N.; Chin, A.W.; Feist, J.; Garcia-Vidal, F.J. Tensor Network Simulation of Non-Markovian Dynamics in Organic Polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2018**, 121, 227401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Cerrillo, J.; Cao, J. Non-Markovian Dynamical Maps: Numerical Processing of Open Quantum Trajectories. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2014**, 112, 110401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Rosenbach, R.; Cerrillo, J.; Huelga, S.F.; Cao, J.; Plenio, M.B. Efficient Simulation of Non-Markovian System-Environment Interaction. New J. Phys.
**2016**, 18, 23035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Medina, I.; García-Vidal, F.J.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I.; Feist, J. Few-Mode Field Quantization of Arbitrary Electromagnetic Spectral Densities. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2021**, 126, 093601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tamascelli, D.; Smirne, A.; Lim, J.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Efficient Simulation of Finite-Temperature Open Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2019**, 123, 090402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Leggett, A.J. Quantum Tunneling in the Presence of an Arbitrary Linear Dissipation Mechanism. Phys. Rev. B
**1984**, 30, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reid, M.T.H. SCUFF-EM. 2012. Available online: http://github.com/homerreid/scuff-EM (accessed on 17 August 2021).
- Reid, M.T.H.; Johnson, S.G. Efficient Computation of Power, Force, and Torque in BEM Scattering Calculations. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
**2015**, 63, 3588–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Woods, M.P.; Cramer, M.; Plenio, M.B. Simulating Bosonic Baths with Error Bars. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2015**, 115, 130401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Schröder, F.A.Y.N.; Turban, D.H.P.; Musser, A.J.; Hine, N.D.M.; Chin, A.W. Tensor Network Simulation of Multi-Environmental Open Quantum Dynamics via Machine Learning and Entanglement Renormalisation. Nat. Commun.
**2019**, 10, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Riss, U.V.; Meyer, H.D. Reflection-Free Complex Absorbing Potentials. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.
**1995**, 28, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Manolopoulos, D.E. Derivation and Reflection Properties of a Transmission-Free Absorbing Potential. J. Chem. Phys.
**2002**, 117, 9552–9559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shemer, O.; Brisker, D.; Moiseyev, N. Optimal Reflection-Free Complex Absorbing Potentials for Quantum Propagation of Wave Packets. Phys. Rev. A
**2005**, 71, 32716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Gurlek, B.; Sandoghdar, V.; Martín-Cano, D. Manipulation of Quenching in Nanoantenna–Emitter Systems Enabled by External Detuned Cavities: A Path to Enhance Strong-Coupling. ACS Photonics
**2018**, 5, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

**Figure 1.**(

**a**) Quantum system coupled to a discrete set of environment modes; (

**b**) quantum system coupled to a reaction mode (a collective environment mode), with this mode coupled to a residual bath of modes; (

**c**) chain mapping for the environment modes after n steps, with a residual bath of $N-n$ modes at the end of the chain.

**Figure 2.**(

**a**) Spectral density for an emitter in the combined sphere-bowtie antenna (illustrated in the inset). The emitter is situated at the center of the bowtie (indicated by the red arrow), with its frequency chosen close to the maximum of the spectral density (indicated by the thin vertical line); (

**b**) chain mapping frequencies ${\tilde{\mathsf{\Omega}}}_{n}$, ${\mathsf{\Omega}}_{n}$ and coupling parameters ${\tilde{D}}_{n}$, ${\lambda}_{n}$ for the phonon and particle mapping.

**Figure 3.**Excited-state population of an initially excited two-level quantum emitter with frequency ${\omega}_{e}=3.6$ eV and dipole moment ${\mu}_{e}=0.6$ e nm coupled to the antenna shown in Figure 2a, calculated using chains truncated after different numbers of sites ${N}_{C}$.

**Figure 4.**Population of the same emitter as in Figure 3 for two different chain lengths: ${N}_{C}=30$ (orange) and ${N}_{C}=25$ (blue) compared with a long chain (${N}_{C}=300$), which is considered exact. Comparison between the chains without any absorbing terms (dashed lines) and chains with a single absorbing term at their end, given by $\gamma =2\pi {J}_{{N}_{C}}\left({\mathsf{\Omega}}_{{N}_{C}}\right)$.

**Figure 5.**(

**a**) Population for the quantum emitter for three different chain lengths: ${N}_{C}=30$ (orange), ${N}_{C}=25$ (blue) and ${N}_{C}=15$ (green) compared to the “exact” one (black). An absorbing function has been added to the first three chains. The parameters are chosen to give a good description of the dynamics, but a wide range is valid for the first to lengths. When the chain is very short, as for ${N}_{C}=15$, the prediction of the dynamics starts to break down; (

**b**) effective spectral densities when the absorbing terms are added in the Hamiltonian for the same lengths as in (

**a**). For ${N}_{C}=30$ and ${N}_{C}=25$, the effective spectral density is similar to ${J}_{0}\left(\omega \right)$, although neither of them describes it in detail. For ${N}_{C}=15$, the effective spectral density presents a shift in the frequency of the main peak of ${J}_{0}\left(\omega \right)$, affecting the dynamics.

**Figure 6.**Population of the quantum emitter for ${N}_{C}=15$ after the fit to the spectral density (orange) and the fit to the correlation function (blue).

**Figure 7.**(

**a**) Fit of the spectral density of Figure 2a when allowing next-nearest neighbor interactions in the chain, compared to a fit with only nearest neighbor interactions with the same number of modes ($N=15$); (

**b**) fit of the spectral density of Ref. [38] using a chain with next-nearest neighbor interactions. Black line: Original fit using a full matrix ${\omega}_{ij}$, with all modes coupled to the emitter. Yellow line: Fit of the same data using a chain with only next-nearest neighbor interactions, and the emitter only coupled to the first two sites.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Sánchez-Barquilla, M.; Feist, J.
Accurate Truncations of Chain Mapping Models for Open Quantum Systems. *Nanomaterials* **2021**, *11*, 2104.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11082104

**AMA Style**

Sánchez-Barquilla M, Feist J.
Accurate Truncations of Chain Mapping Models for Open Quantum Systems. *Nanomaterials*. 2021; 11(8):2104.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11082104

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Sánchez-Barquilla, Mónica, and Johannes Feist.
2021. "Accurate Truncations of Chain Mapping Models for Open Quantum Systems" *Nanomaterials* 11, no. 8: 2104.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11082104