Next Article in Journal
Water Filtration Membranes Based on Non-Woven Cellulose Fabrics: Effect of Nanopolysaccharide Coatings on Selective Particle Rejection, Antifouling, and Antibacterial Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanoparticle Systems for Cancer Phototherapy: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Applications of Bio-fabricated Silver Nanoparticles to Improve Biochemical, Antioxidant, Fatty Acid and Secondary Metabolite Contents of Sunflower
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spiky Gold Nanoparticles for the Photothermal Eradication of Colon Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gold Nanoparticle DNA Damage by Photon Beam in a Magnetic Field: A Monte Carlo Study

1
Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(7), 1751; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071751
Submission received: 4 June 2021 / Revised: 29 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 3 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials in Biomedical Imaging and Cancer Therapy)

Abstract

:
Ever since the emergence of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy, it is important to investigate the impact of the magnetic field on the dose enhancement in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), when gold nanoparticles are used as radiosensitizers during radiotherapy. Gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy is known to enhance the dose deposition in the DNA, resulting in a double-strand break. In this study, the effects of the magnetic field on the dose enhancement factor (DER) for varying gold nanoparticle sizes, photon beam energies and magnetic field strengths and orientations were investigated using Geant4-DNA Monte Carlo simulations. Using a Monte Carlo model including a single gold nanoparticle with a photon beam source and DNA molecule on the left and right, it is demonstrated that as the gold nanoparticle size increased, the DER increased. However, as the photon beam energy decreased, an increase in the DER was detected. When a magnetic field was added to the simulation model, the DER was found to increase by 2.5–5% as different field strengths (0–2 T) and orientations (x-, y- and z-axis) were used for a 100 nm gold nanoparticle using a 50 keV photon beam. The DNA damage reflected by the DER increased slightly with the presence of the magnetic field. However, variations in the magnetic field strength and orientation did not change the DER significantly.

1. Introduction

In radiotherapy, the aim is to acquire a conformal dose at the tumor or target as high as possible while, at the same time, sparing the surrounding normal tissues at the minimum dose. One way to achieve this goal is to add a heavy-atom radiosensitizer such as gold nanoparticles to the tumor to increase its compositional atomic number [1,2,3]. This increase in radiosensitivity is due to a combination of the physical dose enhancement and additional chemical and biological effects associated with the nanoparticle [4]. Gold nanoparticles can be transported to living cells through a liposome-based system. This makes the treatment delivery of gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy possible [5]. There are two advantages of adding gold nanoparticles to the tumor. First, the increase in the compositional atomic number of the tumor increases the radiation dose absorption through the enhancement of the photoelectric effect. This dose enhancement is particularly significant when photon beam energy in the kilovoltage (kV) range is used, where the photoelectric effect is dominant [6,7,8]. Moreover, the dose enhancement can increase cancer cell killing. Second, due to the increase in the deviation of beam absorption between the target (with gold nanoparticle addition) and its surrounding tissue (without gold nanoparticle addition), contrast enhancement can be achieved in medical imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) using a kV photon beam [9,10,11]. The increase in target contrast will make it easier for the radiation oncologist to identify the tumor and contour it more accurately in radiation treatment planning. Therefore, gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy has become popular, resulting in many studies on the basic science and clinical application [12,13,14,15]. Many preclinical works have been carried out, and clinical trials are being conducted, building a potential roadmap to clinical implementation [16].
In radiobiology, it is well known that cancer cell killing or control is caused by the energy deposition from the secondary electrons at the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). These secondary electrons generated by the ionizing radiation in the tumor medium (water equivalent) would travel to the strands of DNA and damage the molecule, for example, causing a single- and double-strand break [17,18]. The addition of gold nanoparticles to the tumor can enhance the energy deposition because extra secondary electrons are produced by the irradiated nanoparticles. Therefore, more lethal double-strand breaks would be produced in the DNA [19]. Reproduction of the cancer cell is therefore terminated because the DNA has been damaged by the radiation and irradiated gold nanoparticles.
Recently, with advances in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy [20,21,22], MR images can be acquired during radiation dose delivery. This allows radiation staff to examine the patient’s tumor when it is irradiated by photon beams. Moreover, MR imaging can provide an excellent contrast of soft tissue compared to the routine CT imaging. This results in better tumor contouring and targeting [23]. To date, MR-guided radiotherapy has improved soft tissue visualization, management of the intrafraction and interfraction organ motion and online adaptive radiotherapy [24]. However, there is a concern over the dose distribution, affected by the magnetic field from the MR system, in the patient [25]. The absorbed dose contributing to cancer cell killing is determined by the energy deposition in the DNA, due to the secondary electrons generated from the interaction between the radiation beam and tumor medium. Since an electron is a charged particle and its traveling path is affected by the magnetic field, the electron distribution in the tumor can be affected by the presence of a magnetic field, leading to a change in final dose distribution. This may, in turn, affect the treatment outcome of MR-guided gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. Although there are macroscopic studies concerning the variation in dose distribution due to the magnetic field in MR-guided radiotherapy [26,27,28], there is a lack of study on the nanodosimetry regarding the DNA damage, not to say with gold nanoparticle addition.
In this study, we investigated this problem by focusing on the nanodosimetry of a gold nanoparticle and DNA. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we examined the dose enhancement of DNA in the presence of a gold nanoparticle when a magnetic field is or is not added to the beam irradiation. Through determining the dose enhancement factor (DER) at the DNA with different nanoparticle sizes, photon beam energies and magnetic field strengths and orientations, we can find out the relationship between the DNA damage and the presence of the magnetic field when an irradiated gold nanoparticle interacts with a DNA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Monte Carlo Simulation

Monte Carlo simulation was used to investigate the influence of the magnetic field on dose enhancement in the DNA when a gold nanoparticle was irradiated by a photon beam. Monte Carlo simulation is a widely used mathematical method in medical physics to model radiation techniques, assess the dose distribution and analyze radiation effects in a certain environment under different experimental conditions [29,30]. In this study, Geant4 software developed by CREN was used to conduct Monte Carlo simulation [31]. The source code, Geant4-DNA, is an extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit used to simulate the irradiation of gold nanoparticles and DNA with a photon beam [32]. The code can construct the environment of a gold nanoparticle near a DNA irradiated by a photon beam at a distance from the nanoparticle in the presence of a magnetic field. Geant4-DNA provides a virtual machine containing CentOS Linux, and the latest version of Geant4 (version 10.7), analysis tools, visualization tools and other utilities were used in the simulation. VMware Workstation 16 player was used for running the virtual machine. This machine consists of a Linux distribution of CentOS 8 64-bit. The virtual machine has pre-installed codes and all the software required to run Geant4. The virtual machine was installed from the CREN website (https://geant4.cenbg.in2p3.fr/ accessed date: 1 January 2021).
The default DNA physics list class, “G4EmDNAPhysics_option2”, was implemented in this study, which is recommended for cellular-scale simulations. It includes several physics models that cover physical interactions needed for particle transport in water medium [33]. Different physics models have to be defined in gold nanoparticles for different particles such as photons and electrons. Since the transportation of particles in Geant4-DNA is only valid in water medium, a macroscopic physics list, for example, “G4LivemorePhysics”, is defined for physical interactions of photons with gold medium. In this study, the environmental model of the cell was assumed to be water equivalent.

2.2. Simulation Model and Geomtry

A DNA model according to Henthorn et al. [34], alongside a gold nanoparticle, was defined inside a spherical water phantom with a radius of 0.5 µm. The simulation variables were similar to Chun et al. [35]. In this model, the backbones and bases were constructed as tiny spheres with a radius of 0.24 nm and 0.208 nm, respectively. Figure 1 shows the simulation setup for the study. The radiation source was defined as a circular plane source with a radius of twice the radius of the gold nanoparticle. The three photon beam energies considered for this simulation were 50, 100 and 150 keV. The primary photons emitted from the left side of the gold nanoparticle reached the DNA molecule. The most important cause of energy deposition in the DNA is the secondary electrons emitted from the gold nanoparticle. In this study, different nanoparticle diameters (30, 50 and 100 nm) with a nanoparticle-to-DNA distance of 30 nm were used. Photon beam energies of 50, 100 and 150 keV were used with a uniform magnetic field (0, 1 and 2 T) defined along each axis, in order to examine the effect of the magnetic field on the dose enhancement. In Figure 1, three orientations were considered for the magnetic field (Bx, By and Bz), separately. Since the primary photons were emitted along the z-axis, the magnetic field orientation parallel to the z-axis was also parallel to the trajectory of the photon, and the magnetic field orientation parallel to the x-axis and y-axis was perpendicular to the trajectory of the photon.
Figure 2 shows electron tracks in the simulation model. Energy deposition happened when secondary electrons (yellow dots) were generated along the electron tracks (red). If energy deposition occurred in the DNA (i.e., right-hand side of Figure 2), ionization of the strand of DNA may happen, leading to DNA damage [9,19,36]. The number of histories for the photons interacting with the gold nanoparticle was equal to 300 million in this study, and more photons (~2 billion) were required to achieve a similar uncertainty (2–5% standard deviation) for the simulation model without the gold nanoparticle.

2.3. Dose Enhacnement Ratio

The enhancement of energy deposition in the presence of gold nanoparticles, resulting in DNA damage, can be expressed as the DER [37]:
Dose   Enhancement   Ratio   ( DER ) = Dose   in   the   DNA   with   gold   nanoparticle   addition Dose   in   the   DNA   without   gold   nanoparticle   addition
When no gold nanoparticle was added to the simulation model, the material of the particle was changed from gold to water. This mimicked the environment of a homogeneous tumor with water equivalent. The DER is therefore equal to one. A DER greater than one shows a dose enhancement due to the gold nanoparticle addition.

3. Results and Discussion

The relationships between the DER and different simulation variables, namely, nanoparticle size and magnetic field strength and orientation for photon beam energies of 50, 100 and 150 keV, are shown in Figure 3a–c, respectively. The gold nanoparticle diameters were equal to 30, 50 and 100 nm, and the magnetic field strengths were equal to 0, 1 and 2 T, with orientations parallel to the x-, y- and z-axis, as shown in Figure 1. The distance between the nanoparticle and DNA was equal to 30 nm.

3.1. Dependence of DER on Nanoparticle Size and Beam Energy

When there was no magnetic field present in the simulation model (i.e., magnetic field strength = 0), the DER was found to increase with the gold nanoparticle size. The rates of increase in the DER were 3.4%, 4.5% and 2.9%/nm for photon beam energies equal to 50, 100 and 150 keV, respectively (Figure 3a–c). The maximum DER was found to be 7.16 for the gold nanoparticle with a diameter equal to 100 nm using the 50 keV photon beam, while the minimum DER was 3.59 for the nanoparticle with a 30 nm diameter using the 150 keV beam. The reason for an increase in the DER with an increase in the nanoparticle size is that the larger particle contains more gold atoms to interact with photons in order to produce secondary electrons, resulting in more energy deposition in the DNA [6]. However, when the nanoparticle size becomes larger, the self-absorption of electrons in the nanoparticle also becomes more significant. This self-absorption effect would decrease the DER when the nanoparticle size increases [38].
For the same nanoparticle size with various photon beam energies, it was found that the DER decreased with a beam energy increase. For the nanoparticle with a 50 nm diameter, as shown in Figure 3a–c, the DER was found to decrease from 6.09 to 4.55 when the photon beam energy increased from 50 to 150 keV. This can be explained by the enhancement of the photoelectric effect as the cross-section or attenuation coefficient of the photoelectric interaction decreased with an increase in the photon energy [7,8,9]. The trends of variation in the DER on the nanoparticle size and photon beam energy agreed with results of our previous work using an older DNA model in the simulation [35].

3.2. Dependence of DER on Magnetic Field Strength and Orientation

For the nanoparticle with a 100 nm diameter using the 50 keV photon beam, as shown in Figure 3a–c, the DER was found to be 7.16, 7.35 and 7.36 when the magnetic field strength was equal to 0, 1 and 2 T along the z-axis. These were increases of about 2.5% and 2.7% in the DER when a magnetic field of 1 and 2 T was added to the simulation model along the z-axis (Figure 1). Similar increases in the DER could be found in the nanoparticles with diameters equal to 30 and 50 nm. It is found that the presence of the magnetic field along the central beam axis would increase the energy deposition in the DNA slightly. However, the increase in the magnetic field strength did not lead to a significant increase in energy deposition in the DNA.
When considering the nanoparticle with a 100 nm diameter using the 50 keV photon beam, with the magnetic field perpendicular to the central beam axis, but parallel to the DNA (i.e., x-axis in Figure 1), the DER was found to be 7.16, 7.36 and 7.46 when the magnetic field strength was equal to 0, 1 and 2 T (Figure 3a–c). These were increases of about 2.7% and 4.0% when a magnetic field of 1 and 2 T was added to the simulation model along the x-axis. Similar increases in the DER were found for nanoparticles of 30 and 50 nm diameter. However, the increase in the DER was in the range of 0.50–1.8%, which was smaller than the nanoparticle with a 100 nm diameter. It is seen that the presence of a magnetic field perpendicular to the central beam axis would increase the energy deposition in the DNA more than along the central beam axis, and the increase was more significant for the larger nanoparticle.
With the same photon beam energy of 50 keV, with the magnetic field along the y-axis (Figure 1), the orientation of the field was perpendicular to the central beam axis and the DNA. This beam and magnetic field geometry was different from placing the magnetic field along the x-axis because the DNA was parallel to the x-axis of the photon beam. For the nanoparticle with a diameter of 100 nm, the DER was found to increase by 2.8% and 4.9% when the magnetic field strength increased by 1 and 2 T, respectively (Figure 3a–c). This increase in energy deposition in the DNA was very similar to the magnetic field orienting in the x-axis. It is seen that the orientation of DNA did not affect its energy deposition significantly regarding the magnetic field orientation.
This work focused on the nanodosimetric change in the DNA interacting with an irradiated gold nanoparticle in the presence of a magnetic field. Based on the results in this study, it is worthwhile to further investigate the dependence of the DER on multiple nanoparticles with different distribution patterns, sizes and shapes. Moreover, macroscopic Monte Carlo simulation [39] can be carried out to investigate the dose enhancement of a tumor in a patient treated with magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. This multi-scale study can help us to understand, in detail, the impact of the magnetic field on cancer control from the nanometer to centimeter scales.

4. Conclusions

The DER determined, based on the energy deposition in the DNA, for varying gold nanoparticle diameters (30, 50 and 100 nm), photon beam energies (50, 100 and 150 keV) and magnetic fields (0 T, 1 T and 2 T) in the x, y and z orientations was investigated using Monte Carlo simulation. In general, the DER with no magnetic field present increased as the gold nanoparticle size increased. Moreover, the DER decreased as the photon beam energy increased, since the secondary electrons generated at high energies are less than the electrons generated at lower energies. In the presence of a magnetic field, the DER increased by about 2.5–5% for various field strengths (1 and 2 T) and orientations (x-, y- and z-axis) for the largest nanoparticle (diameter equal to 100 nm) using the lowest photon beam energy (50 keV) in this study. It was found that the increase in the DER was even smaller for smaller gold nanoparticles using a higher photon beam energy.
The results in this work provide important information concerning the variation in energy deposition in DNA when a magnetic field is present in an irradiated gold nanoparticle. Moreover, this single-nanoparticle model can act as a base for the construction of a more complicated multi-nanoparticle model focusing on a more realistic cellular environment for clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.L.C.; methodology, J.C.L.C.; software, J.C.L.C. and M.J.; validation, J.C.L.C. and M.J.; formal analysis, M.J.; investigation, M.J.; resources, J.C.L.C. and M.J.; data curation, M.J.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.L.C. and M.J.; writing—review and editing, J.C.L.C.; visualization, J.C.L.C. and M.J.; supervision, J.C.L.C.; project administration, J.C.L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chun He and Kaden Kujanpaa from the University of Toronto, Canada, for their assistance in the Monte Carlo simulation using the Geant4-DNA code.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siddique, S.; Chow, J.C.L. Application of nanomaterials in biomedical imaging and cancer therapy. Nanomaterials. 2020, 10, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cui, L.; Her, S.; Borst, G.R.; Bristow, R.G.; Jaffray, D.A.; Allen, C. Radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles: Will they ever make it to the clinic? Radiother. Oncol. 2017, 124, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chithrani, D.B.; Jelveh, S.; Jalali, F.; Van Prooijen, M.; Allen, C.; Bristow, R.G.; Hill, R.P.; Jaffray, D.A. Gold nanoparticles as radiation sensitizers in cancer therapy. Radiat. Res. 2010, 173, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Her, S.; Jaffray, D.A.; Allen, C. Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 109, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chithrani, D.B.; Dunne, M.; Stewart, J.; Allen, C.; Jaffray, D.A. Cellular uptake and transport of gold nanoparticles incorporated in a liposomal carrier. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010, 6, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chow, J.C.L. Chapter 15 Dose enhancement effect in radiotherapy: Adding gold nanoparticle to tumour in cancer treatment. In Nanostructures for Cancer Therapy; Ficai, A., Grumezescu, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 383–400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chow, J.C.L. Chapter 10: Characteristics of secondary electrons from irradiated gold nanoparticle in radiotherapy. In Handbook of Nanoparticles; Aliofkhazraei, M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leung, M.K.K.; Chow, J.C.L.; Chithrani, B.D.; Lee, M.J.; Oms, B.; Jaffray, D.A. Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by x-rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production. Med. Phys. 2011, 38, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chow, J.C.L. Chapter 2-Photon and electron interactions with gold nanoparticles: A Monte Carlo study on gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. In Nanobiomaterials in Medical Imaging: Applications of Nanobiomaterials; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 8, pp. 45–70. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mututantri-Bastiyange, D.; Chow, J.C.L. Imaging dose of cone-beam computed tomography in nanoparticle-enhanced image-guided radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo phantom study. AIMS Bioeng. 2020, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdulle, A.; Chow, J.C.L. Contrast enhancement for portal imaging in nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo phantom evaluation using flattening-filter-free photon beams. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Moore, J.; Chow, J.C.L. Recent progress and applications of gold nanotechnology in medical biophysics using artificial intelligence and mathematical modeling. Nano EX 2021, 2, 022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Siddique, S.; Chow, J.C.L. Gold nanoparticles for drug delivery and cancer therapy. App Sci. 2020, 10, 3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chow, J.C.L. Synthesis and applications of functionalized nanoparticles in biomedicine and radiotherapy. In Additive Manufacturing with Functionalized Nanomaterials; Singh, S., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 193–214. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chow, J.C.L. Recent progress of gold nanomaterials in cancer therapy. In Handbook of Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications; Kharissova, O.V., Torres-Martínez, L.M., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ricketts, K.; Ahmad, R.; Beaton, L.; Cousins, B.; Critchley, K.; Davies, M.; Evans, S.; Fenuyi, I.; Gavriilidis, A.; Harmer, Q.J.; et al. Recommendations for clinical translation of nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ross, G.M. Induction of cell death by radiotherapy. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 1999, 6, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Leenhouts, H.P.; Chadwick, K.H. The crucial role of DNA double-strand breaks in cellular radiobiological effects. In Advances in Radiation Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978; Volume 7, pp. 55–101. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chow, J.C.L. Monte Carlo nanodosimetry in gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. In Recent Advancements and Applications in Dosimetry; Maria, F.C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollard, J.M.; Wen, Z.; Sadagopan, R.; Wang, J.; Ibbott, G.S. The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided. Br. J. Radiol. 2017, 90, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kurz, C.; Buizza, G.; Landry, G.; Kamp, F.; Rabe, M.; Paganelli, C.; Baroni, G.; Reiner, M.; Keall, P.J.; van den Berg, C.A.; et al. Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Slotman, B.; Gani, C. Online MR-guided radiotherapy—A new era in radiotherapy. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 18, 102–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kristensen, B.H.; Laursen, F.J.; Løgager, V.; Geertsen, P.F.; Krarup-Hansen, A. Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of an open low-field magnetic resonance simulator for radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours. Radiother. Oncol. 2008, 87, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Corradini, S.; Alongi, F.; Andratschke, N.; Belka, C.; Boldrini, L.; Cellini, F.; Debus, J.; Guckenberger, M.; Hörner-Rieber, J.; Lagerwaard, F.J.; et al. MR-guidance in clinical reality: Current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 14, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Raaijmakers, A.J.; Raaymakers, B.W.; Lagendijk, J.J. Magnetic-field-induced dose effects in MR-guided radiotherapy systems: Dependence on the magnetic field strength. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xia, W.; Zhang, K.; Li, M.; Tian, Y.; Men, K.; Wang, J.; Yi, J.; Li, Y.; Dai, J. Impact of magnetic field on dose distribution in MR-guided radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohajer, J.K.; Nisbet, A.; Velliou, E.; Ajaz, M.; Schettino, G. Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy. Br. J. Radiol. 2019, 92, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, X.; Prior, P.; Chen, G.P.; Schultz, C.J.; Li, X.A. Dose effects of 1.5 T transverse magnetic field on tissue interfaces in MRI-guided radiotherapy. Med. Phys. 2016, 43, 4797–4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chow, J.C.L. Recent progress in Monte Carlo simulation on gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. AIMS Biophys. 2018, 5, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rogers, D.W.O. Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006, 51, R287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.A.; Apostolakis, J.; Araujo, H.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Axen, D.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.; et al. GEANT4—A simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 2003, 506, 250–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Incerti, S.; Baldacchino, G.; Bernal, M.; Capra, R.; Champion, C.; Francis, Z.; Guèye, P.; Mantero, A.; Mascialino, B.; Moretto, P.; et al. The Geant4-DNA project. Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput. 2010, 1, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Villagrasa, C.; Francis, Z.; Incerti, S. Physical models implemented in the GEANT4-DNA extension of the GEANT-4 toolkit for calculating initial radiation damage at the molecular level. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2011, 143, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Henthorn, N.T.; Warmenhoven, J.W.; Sotiropoulos, M.; Mackay, R.I.; Kirkby, K.J.; Merchant, M.J. Nanodosimetric simulation of direct ion-induced DNA damage using different chromatin geometry models. Radiat. Res. 2017, 188, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chun, H.; Chow, J.C.L. Gold nanoparticle DNA damage in radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study. AIMS Bioeng. 2016, 3, 352–361. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chow, J.C.L. Application of nanoparticle materials in radiation therapy. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Martinez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 3661–3681. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zheng, X.J.; Chow, J.C.L. Radiation dose enhancement in skin therapy with nanoparticle addition: A Monte Carlo study on kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams. World J. Radiol. 2017, 9, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chow, J.C.L.; Leung, M.K.K.; Jaffray, D.A. Monte Carlo simulation on gold nanoparticle irradiated by electron beams. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012, 57, 3323–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Martelli, S.; Chow, J.C.L. Dose enhancement for the flattening-filter-free and flattening-filter photon beams in nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo phantom study. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The Monte Carlo model geometry simulated in Geant4-DNA (not to scale). The gold nanoparticle was placed between the photon beam (green) and the DNA molecule. Nanoparticle diameters of 30, 50 and 100 nm were used in the simulation.
Figure 1. The Monte Carlo model geometry simulated in Geant4-DNA (not to scale). The gold nanoparticle was placed between the photon beam (green) and the DNA molecule. Nanoparticle diameters of 30, 50 and 100 nm were used in the simulation.
Nanomaterials 11 01751 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing the gold nanoparticle irradiated by the photon beam with electron tracks (red) generated from the nanoparticle. Energy deposition happens when the secondary electrons (yellow dots) are generated along the electron paths. When energy deposition occurs in the DNA, lethal DNA damage such as a double-strand break may be produced, leading to cancer cell killing.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing the gold nanoparticle irradiated by the photon beam with electron tracks (red) generated from the nanoparticle. Energy deposition happens when the secondary electrons (yellow dots) are generated along the electron paths. When energy deposition occurs in the DNA, lethal DNA damage such as a double-strand break may be produced, leading to cancer cell killing.
Nanomaterials 11 01751 g002
Figure 3. Relationships between the DER and simulation variables of gold nanoparticle size and magnetic field strength and orientation using photon beams with energies equal to (a) 50, (b) 100 and (c) 150 keV.
Figure 3. Relationships between the DER and simulation variables of gold nanoparticle size and magnetic field strength and orientation using photon beams with energies equal to (a) 50, (b) 100 and (c) 150 keV.
Nanomaterials 11 01751 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jabeen, M.; Chow, J.C.L. Gold Nanoparticle DNA Damage by Photon Beam in a Magnetic Field: A Monte Carlo Study. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071751

AMA Style

Jabeen M, Chow JCL. Gold Nanoparticle DNA Damage by Photon Beam in a Magnetic Field: A Monte Carlo Study. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(7):1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jabeen, Mehwish, and James C. L. Chow. 2021. "Gold Nanoparticle DNA Damage by Photon Beam in a Magnetic Field: A Monte Carlo Study" Nanomaterials 11, no. 7: 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071751

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop