Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Porous TiO2 for Enhanced Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Remazol Dye
Next Article in Special Issue
Material Design and Optimisation of Electrochemical Li-Ion Storage Properties of Ternary Silicon Oxycarbide/Graphite/Tin Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Applications of Nanofluids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/nano11071714
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polymer Binders of Ceramic Nanoparticles for Precision Casting of Nickel-Based Superalloys

by
Paweł Wiśniewski
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Wołoska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(7), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071714
Submission received: 29 April 2021 / Revised: 20 June 2021 / Accepted: 27 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Properties and Applications of Ceramic Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study presents the general characteristics of binders used in precision casting of Nickel-based superalloys. Three groups of binders were described: resins, organic compounds, and materials containing nanoparticles in alcohol or aqueous systems. This study also includes literature reports on materials commonly used and those recently replaced by water-soluble binders, i.e., ethyl silicate (ES) and hydrolysed ethyl silicate (HES). The appearance of new and interesting solutions containing nano-alumina is described, as well as other solutions at the initial stage of scientific research, such as those containing biopolymers, biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL), or modified starch. Special attention is paid to four binders containing nano-SiO2 intended for the first layers (Ludox AM, Ludox SK) and structural layers (EHT, Remasol) of shell moulds. Their morphology, viscosity, density, reactions, and electrokinetic potential were investigated. The binders were characterized by a high solid-phase content (>28%), viscosity, and density close to that of water (1–2 mPa·s) and good electrokinetic stability. The nanoparticles contained in the binders were approximately spherically shaped with an average particle size of 16–25 nm.

1. Introduction

Investment casting is the primary method for manufacturing aircraft turbine parts from nickel superalloys because it can be used to fabricate products with intricate geometries.
When used for turbines, the process consists of the following steps:
(a)
preparation of a wax pattern,
(b)
fabrication of a multilayer ceramic shell mould on the readymade wax pattern,
(c)
dewaxing/stripping,
(d)
burn off of a ceramic shell mould,
(e)
casting, in which ceramic shell moulds are filled with metal alloys (e.g., IN713C, IN100, Mar 247, CMXS 6, M509),
(f)
hardening and hammering shell moulds,
(g)
finishing and assessing the properties of the readymade shell moulds.
The process of making subsequent layers in a casting mould using the lost-wax process requires the use of appropriate binding agents to ensure the production of ceramic moulds with adequate parameters, i.e., high heat resistance, mechanical strength, gas permeability, dimensional stability, and required surface smoothness of the first layer [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The basic materials for the production of sand and ceramic casting moulds are binders, ceramic powders, and auxiliary materials, i.e., agents that limit foaming during mixing, wetting agents, pH stabilizers, and modifiers of rheological properties of the ceramic slurry [9,10,11,12,13,14].
Binders are liquid substances used to bind ceramic matrix particles. These are mostly synthetic materials with different chemical natures produced mainly by the chemical and food industries [15]. Binders can be divided according to the following criteria: consistency (solid or liquid); chemical nature (organic, inorganic, or organic-inorganic); type of bonding (chemical, by solidification, or by dehydration); binding capacity (low, medium, or high); and bonding temperature (sub-zero, ambient, or elevated temperatures) [16,17,18].
The binders used for the production of ceramic slurries and casting moulds determine their physical and mechanical properties. Thus this paper reviews selected binders used in the precision casting of Nickel-based superalloys.

2. Synthetic Resins

Synthetic resins are amorphous high-molecular-weight products obtained by polymerization, especially by condensation. Polymerization is a chemical reaction in which low-molecular-weight compounds (monomers) are transformed into high-molecular-weight compounds (polymers). In the casting industry, intermediate products (oligomers) are mainly used, in which the final stage of the reaction takes place only in the moulding or core mass. Polycondensation, on the other hand, is a chemical reaction involving one or more types of monomers, with the chemical composition of the resulting polymer differing from that of the starting monomers. The reaction proceeds with the release of low-molecular-weight by-products. Polycondensation is a stepwise reaction, in which the monomers must have at least two reactive functional groups. Polycondensation yields phenol-formaldehyde, melamine-formaldehyde, urea-formaldehyde, aldehyde, polyester, ketone, xylene-formaldehyde, sulphonamides, and polyamide resins. The first resin used in casting was a phenol-formaldehyde resin, which was used in the Croning method. Over time, other types of synthetic resins were used, i.e., phenol-urea, urea-formaldehyde, phenol-formaldehyde-furfuryl, urea-formaldehyde-furfuryl, and acrylic resins [1,19].
Currently, new binders are being researched, including systems containing biopolymers such as BioCo polymer binder, biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL), modified starch, methylcellulose or carboxymethyl cellulose, etc. [20,21,22]. The literature suggests it is possible to use biodegradable materials as additives in petroleum-based binders to accelerate the biodegradation of materials produced by the petrochemical industry. PCL is an example that is compatible with many other polymers. PCL is partially compatible or mechanically compatible with polymers such as polyvinyl acetate (PVAc), polystyrene (PS), polycarbonate, etc. PCL is also compatible with polymers such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC), styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN), poly(hydroxy ether), etc. [23,24,25,26]. This feature of PCL allows the creation of various blends by using it as a biodegradable component. Another benefit of using PCL as a biodegradable additive is an increase in the flexibility of the moulding sand. PCL acts as a plasticizer and also decreases the contact angle of the ceramic mass, which improves the coverage of both the wax model (in the case of the first layer) and subsequent mould layers [27,28,29,30,31,32].

3. Alcoholic Binders

During the precision casting of aerospace parts, the following types of alcohol-based binders are used:
  • ethyl silicate (ES) and hydrolysed ethyl silicate (HES);
  • silicic acid sol (SAS, e.g., Sizol 30);
  • ES and HES mixtures (copolymer binders, e.g., Sikop);
  • binders containing nano-silica, in which water is the diluent [19].
Until recently, binders based mostly on alcoholic (ethyl) solvents, e.g., HES, were used for the manufacture of ceramic moulds for the precision casting of turbine parts in the machine and aviation industries [33,34].

3.1. Ethyl Silicate

Ethyl silicate is a chemically heterogeneous mixture that is an ester of silicic acid and ethyl alcohol formed in the reaction shown in Equation (1):
SiCl4 + 4C2H5OH → (C2H5O)4Si + 4HCl
It is a liquid with a characteristic odour, with a yellow or light brown colour and a density similar to water. Chemically, it is a mixture of ethyl orthosilicate, its incomplete hydrolysis products, and organic silicon compounds (e.g., a series of linear oligomers) containing ethoxy groups attached to silicon atoms. When used to make ceramic moulds, ES should contain many linear oligomers to obtain a silica content of about 40% by weight [35].

3.2. Hydrolysed Ethyl Silicate

Pure ethyl silicate does not show binding properties, but it undergoes efficient hydrolysis (Equation (2)):
(C2H5O)4Si + 4H2O → Si(OH)4 + 4C2H5OH
This reaction forms water-insoluble silica that has a strong binding capacity for loose ceramic materials at elevated temperatures [36]. To initiate hydrolysis, a catalyst is needed, e.g., ethyl alcohol, acetone, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, or other organic acids. The hydrolysed ES transforms into a hard, glassy, and water-insoluble material (SiO2) that is relatively resistant to high temperatures, is chemically inert, and can bind ceramic powders. The addition of an alcohol solvent accelerates this process but negatively affects the environment and the comfort of mould workers.
Hydrolysed ethyl silicate retains its binding properties for 48 h after preparation. After this time, its viscosity increases due to progressive gelation. Mixtures based on alcoholic binders ensure the rapid drying of individual mould layers and the high stability of technological parameters [37,38].
By appropriately choosing reactants and water content, the volume fraction of SiO2 in the binder and the bond strength—which depends directly on the silicon oxide content—can be controlled. The higher the SiO2 concentration, the higher the bond strength and, thus, the effectiveness of HES in casting mould making [39].

3.3. Silicic Acid Sol

Silicic acid sol (SAS) is a suspension of silica in an aqueous medium, in which the diameter of the SiO2 particles is in the range of 1–100 µm. In freshly prepared SAS, the particles are highly dispersed. The binder ages over time, which is manifested as the polymerization and aggregation of silicic acid molecules. After exceeding their critical size, gelation occurs.
It should be noted that ES, HES, and SAS-type binders, due to their relatively short storage time, are often prepared at foundries. On the other hand, copolymer binders and water binders are primarily commercial products that must be purchased from dedicated suppliers [19].

3.4. ES and HES Mixtures

Binders in this group combine the advantages of ES and SAS. The patent [40] shows that ethyl silicate hydrolyses to form polysilicic acid, which then reacts with SiO2 nanoparticles. The binder contains block copolymers, which are comprised of blocks of oligomers of polysilicic acid and polyanoxysilicolates in a water-alcohol system with a pH of 1–2. Blocks of polysilicic acid molecules are formed by the acidification of a colloidal silica solution. The hydrolytic condensation of ethyl silicates is carried out in an ethanol solution. The finished binder is a copolymer with a maximum of 30% alcohol, making it non-flammable and safer to use than ES. Other features of copolymer binders are:
  • long storage life and parameter stability;
  • good surface wettability of the wax model;
  • longer drying process of individual layers of a ceramic mould (up to 4 h), which is about 1.5 times longer than the moulding systems based on ES;
  • sufficient strength of a casting mould obtained with a binder which is a mixture of ES and HES;
  • ease of binder preparation during precision casting [41].
Due to increasingly strict environmental standards concerning the use of harmful and hazardous substances in technological processes, modern precision casting facilities specialising, for example, in the production of engine parts, have stopped using binders based on ethyl silicate and have switched to aqueous colloidal silica suspensions [42,43]. To improve the strength and flexibility of casting moulds, liquid polymers based on poly(vinyl alcohol) (for acidic systems) or latexes (for alkaline systems) have recently been introduced into binders. Polymer-modified binders have become the subject of patents. Today, the leading suppliers of aqueous binders and additives for moulding systems are Ransom & Randolph (USA) and REMET (UK).

4. Water Binders

4.1. Water-Soluble Binder Containing Nano-Al2O3

Several other binders are used in the manufacture of ceramic casting moulds, but their use is limited for various reasons. An example is the Imerys binder containing nano-Al2O3 (Evonik, Germany), which has been applied in creating Y2O3 moulding sands intended for casting mould relief layers, moulding sands, and moulds [44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
Table 1 shows the basic properties of the used casting binder containing nano-alumina.
The binder density was determined using a glass areometer with a measuring range up to 1.5 g/cm3. The pH of the binder was measured with a sensION-1 (Hach, Vienna) pH meter, equipped with an electrode for suspensions. Figure 1 shows the dynamic viscosity result of the W440 binder, and Figure 2 shows an example of the morphology of Al2O3 nanoparticles in the binder.
The dynamic viscosity testing of the binder was performed in a TG Instruments Ares 4400 analyser (USA) in a plate–plate configuration at increasing shear rates in the range of 5–200 s−1. The analysed fluid was characterized by pseudoplastic properties, i.e., its viscosity decreased at increasing shear rates from 61 to 54 mPa·s (Figure 1).
Figure 2 shows an example of the morphology of a dried binder on a graphite grid. The study was carried out using a Hitachi 5500 SEM/TEM (Tokyo, Japan) using an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. The binder was diluted 10 times and applied to copper grids and then sputtered with osmium. It can be seen from the images that the Al2O3 nanoparticles contained in the binder are globular and equiaxial in shape. The polymer component of the binder coated the surface of the alumina particles and caused them to strongly agglomerate. Based on stereological measurements, the average particle size of nano-Al2O3 was estimated to be 16 nm [45].
Figure 3 shows an example of a SiC mould in its raw state (after the 3rd layer was applied) obtained using the Imerys W440 binder. The suitability of this binder for obtaining actual silicon carbide casting moulds was confirmed.

4.2. Water-Soluble Binders Containing Nano-SiO2

Colloidal silica is a hydrosol of orthosilicic acid dispersed in water. Orthosilicic acid is obtained by acidifying a silicate solution (e.g., Na2SiO3 or water glass). The resulting silicic acid sol, due to water binding, spontaneously dehydrates to SiO2 through di-, tri-, etc. silicic acid steps, followed by polysilicic acid steps (with decreasing amounts of water). The final result is a colloidal silica sol dispersed in water. The SiO2 particles in the colloidal solution are spherical and range in size from a few to tens of nanometers [51].
Among the competing green materials, binders based on colloidal silica (CS), a hydrosol of silicic acid suspended in water, are the most commonly used binders in the casting industry. The binding agent for binding the ceramic powder particles is silica gel, which is formed when water is evaporated from the sol. Compared with alcohol-based binders, colloidal silica, is environmentally neutral and harmless to workers [52].
Compared with alcohol-based binders, water-based binders also have several disadvantages. The main ones include longer drying and curing times of individual mould layers and their instability over time, which makes it necessary to check the properties of ceramic mixtures and casting moulds [53].
In the first densification step, a colloidal solution of 3–5% SiO2 up to a concentration of 25–50% was obtained. Before or during the thickening process, the diluted colloidal silica is subjected to a stabilization and modification process. For this purpose, e.g., sodium, alginate, or aluminium salts, and polymers such as latex or poly(vinyl alcohol) are introduced to maintain an appropriate charge on the surface of SiO2 nanoparticles and to provide appropriate strength and “elasticity” of the binder after gelation, i.e., in the hardened state [54]. An example of the microstructure of the Remasol binder in the cured state is shown in Figure 4. Polymer “bridges” can be seen, which ensure cohesion, despite cracks in the layer.
As a standard, binder stability is ensured by maintaining an appropriate pH (usually strongly alkaline) by introducing sodium or ammonium hydroxide into the solution. As shown in Figure 5, OH- ions react with the H+ ion of the hydroxyl group from the surface of the SiO2 particles. The reaction produces a water molecule, and an unbalanced negative charge appears on the surface of the SiO2 particle. The negatively-charged SiO2 particles repel each other so that they remain uniformly dispersed in the dispersing medium without agglomeration. A major inconvenience with this stabilization is that the particle charge strongly depends on the pH. Unavoidable changes in pH during mix preparation and use may result in accelerated ageing of the binder or premature gelation. The pH should therefore be continuously monitored and maintained at an appropriate level [55].
There are other ways to modify binders with water-soluble aluminium salts. The incorporation of Al3+ cations into the silicon chain (Figure 6) results in an unbalanced negative charge on the surface of the SiO2 particle regardless of the pH of the surrounding environment. The appearance of this charge is the result of the different valences of silicon and aluminium cations.
It is also possible to modify (coat) the surface of SiO2 particles in the colloid with hydrated aluminium oxide, which forms a positive charge on the surface of the colloidal particles (Figure 7).
The technological properties of binders based on colloidal silica are influenced by the content and size of SiO2 particles, chemical composition (presence of stabilizers and modifiers), reaction solution, time, and temperature. Colloidal silica is environmentally benign [55]. The binding of the colloidal silica-based binder is related to the sol-gelation process, which is accomplished via water evaporation. During drying, due to the reaction between hydroxyl groups on the surface of silica particles, SiO2 particles irreversibly combine into spatial structures with -Si-O-Si- bonds, as shown in Figure 8 [56].
The advantages of colloidal silica-based binders include [57]:
(a)
long lifetime (period of technological usefulness),
(b)
good surface wettability of the wax model,
(c)
sufficient strength of the mould throughout the whole technological process,
(d)
ease of binder preparation in facility conditions.
An undoubted disadvantage of these binders is the relatively long drying and hardening time of subsequent ceramic layers applied on the wax model compared with the time required to harden the layers formed using ethyl silicate.

4.3. Properties of Selected Binders Based on Colloidal Silica

The basic technological properties that should be determined for colloidal silica-based binders before preparing the ceramic mass used in fused model technology are [58]:
  • content of solid phase in binders,
  • wettability of binders,
  • viscosity and density of binders,
  • bonding capacity of binders.
The following section presents examples of the properties of two commercially-available binders used to produce the first mould layer, Ludox AM and Ludox SK (Remet UK), and two other binders used to create structural layers of the ceramic moulds, EHT (Ransom and Randolph USA) and Remasol (Remet UK).

4.3.1. External Appearance, pH, and Solid-Phase Content of Selected Binders Based on Colloidal Silica

The simplest way to evaluate silica-based binders is to evaluate their colour, homogeneity (delamination, deposits, and impurities) and check their odour. When properly stored and handled, a nano-SiO2-based binder should be a clear solution with a uniform colour throughout. Binders may be completely transparent (Ludox AM) or milky white (EHT) and odourless (Ludox SK) or with strong irritating odours (Remasol). Another test to confirm the usability of a binder is to meaure the reaction’s progress. Example results of pH measurements for selected binders are shown in Figure 9.
As a rule, binders based on colloidal silica undergo an alkaline reaction; however, acidic binders are also available, such as Ludox SK. The reaction of the binder depends on the method of stabilization and the type of water-soluble polymers added. The nature of the reaction of the binder determines the type of matrix (ceramic dust) from which the ceramic mass will be prepared. The ceramic dust (matrix) should not significantly change the pH of the prepared liquid ceramic mass, as this may decrease the stability of the colloidal system because it may fall into an unstable state.
The solid-phase content and wettability of hydrophobic surfaces are important technological parameters for characterizing binders. The solid-phase content is determined by measuring the weight of a binder before and after water evaporation. Figure 10 shows the measured solid contents of colloidal silica-based binders. In the precision casting of nickel and cobalt alloys, binders with a solid-phase content between 25 and 40% by weight are used. From the obtained results, it can be seen that the proportion of solid phase in all these binders is within this range.

4.3.2. Microstructure of Polymeric Binders Based on Colloidal Silica

Figure 11 shows the morphology of SiO2 nanoparticles in colloidal silica-based polymer binders.
As shown in Figure 11, SiO2 nanoparticles contained in the tested binders were spherical, similar to the Imerys W440 binder. This is especially true for silica nanoparticles in Ludox SK, Ludox AM, and Remasol binders. The most irregular-shaped colloidal SiO2 were observed in the composition containing the EHT binder. Compared with the other binders, the silica nanoparticles in the EHT binder showed the highest agglomeration tendency (Figure 11d). Based on stereological measurements, the average particle size range of nano-SiO2 in the binders was estimated to be 18–20 nm.

4.3.3. Zeta Potential of Selected Binders Based on Colloidal Silica

Colloidal silica-based binders have an ionic nature because there are unbalanced electric charges on the surface of SiO2 particles. If the amounts of positive and negative charges on the silicon oxide surface are equal, the system is in isoelectric equilibrium (IEP - isoelectric point). The zeta potential is then equal to zero, which means that at this point, the dispersion has no electrostatic stability. Since the concentration of H+ and OH- ions depends on the pH of the solution, the isoelectric equilibrium corresponds strictly to the pH value.
In the isoelectric state, SiO2 nanoparticles readily assemble into larger units, which consequently leads to agglomeration, which is driven by the attraction of dissimilar electric charges. When the zeta potential is strongly positive or strongly negative, positive or negative charges prevail on the particle surface, respectively. The unipolar charges repel each other, which hinders agglomeration, and the system is in a steady state [58].
The zeta potential, or electrokinetic potential, is defined as the difference in electrical potentials at the surface of an electrically-charged solid-phase particle. The value of this potential depends on the type of solid and the composition of the solution. The type and concentration of ions and surfactant present in the solution also affect the zeta potential value. Plotting the zeta potential curve as a function of pH allows the determination of stable and unstable areas for the binders.
In a more acidic environment, the total electrostatic external charges of the grains will be positive. In a more alkaline environment, the total surface charges will be negative. It is possible to distinguish a suspension’s stability range using the zeta potential value, as shown in Table 2. It is assumed that a stable water dispersion has a zeta potential greater than 30 mV [16].
In addition to reactions, the zeta potential value is affected by changes in conductivity and changes in additive concentration, but pH has the greatest effect. Figure 12 and Figure 13 show the zeta potential changes of the binders used to prepare ceramic masses applied to model and structural layers. Measurements were performed using a ZetaSizer Nano ZS potential analyser (Malvern UK).
For Remasol, EHT, and Ludox AM binders, the zeta potential curves are similar. Isoelectric equilibrium occurs at pH = 1–2. Above this range, the zeta potential is negative over the entire measurement range, which means that the binders are stable from pH = 5.0–12.0.
A different zeta potential curve was recorded for the Ludox SK binder. It has been shown that isoelectric equilibrium is reached at pH 3.5. Below pH 3.5, the zeta potential is positive and at pH 2.2, it reaches 20 mV. At pH values above 3.5, the potential is strongly negative and takes a value of −45 mV for pH 5.0. The presence of aluminate salt and poly(vinyl alcohol) in the Ludox SK binder significantly changed the nature of the zeta potential curve. The binder is stable in an acidic environment.

4.3.4. Viscosity and Density of Selected Binders Based on Colloidal Silica

The dynamic and kinematic viscosity and density of binders are the basic parameters for characterizing a binder in terms of its ability to cover the surface of ceramic matrix particles that form the moulding sand. Binders should have the lowest possible viscosity, which, along with good wettability, facilitates dispersion of matrix powder particles in a ceramic cast and helps surround these particles with the binder layer. Example morphologies are shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15. The surface morphology of the first dried layer in Ludox SK–ZrO2 powder and Ludox AM–Al2O3 powder mixed systems was revealed using a Hitachi SU-70 high-resolution scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using a 2 kV accelerating voltage and a secondary electron detector. The collected mixture samples were dried at room temperature and then sputtered with osmium.
The Ludox SK–ZrO2 system formed a porous layer with randomly distributed pores (Figure 14). In contrast, the Ludox AM–Al2O3 system was cracked (Figure 15), which was practically not observed in the Ludox SK– ZrO2 system. For both binders, the micro-grains of the moulding powders were relatively well-surrounded by the SiO2 nanoparticles of the binder, indicating the good wettability of both systems.
In industrial practice, binder and moulding sand viscosity tests are carried out using Ford or Zahn flow cups. Example results of measurements of the conventional viscosity of the tested binders using a Zahn cup are shown in Figure 16. As can be seen from the cited data, currently available binders based on colloidal silica have a low viscosity, comparable to that of water.
Methods for measuring the relative and conventional viscosity (Zahn cup flow time) are simple techniques readily used in industrial practice, but they do not allow for the complete characterization of the rheological properties of the binder; therefore, rheometers that provide quantitative dynamic viscosity and shear stress values as a function of shear rate are used increasingly frequently to evaluate the viscosity of binders. Example results of dynamic viscosity and shear stress (determined using a rotational viscometer) for the binders used to produce the first layer and the binder for the so-called mould construction layers are shown in Figure 17.
The binders used for the first layers (Ludox SK and AM) are Newtonian liquids, i.e., their viscosity does not depend on the shear rate. Ludox SK obtained an average value of 1.12 mPa·s, while for Ludox AM it was 0.8 mPa·s; therefore, the flow curves, which show the dependence of shear stress on shear rate, are straight lines described by Newton’s equation; however, the binders used for the structural layers (Remasol and EHT) are pseudoplastic liquids whose viscosity decreased upon increasing the shear rate and are not thixotropic.
The EHT binder has a slightly higher viscosity than the Remasol binder over the entire shear rate range. The viscosity of the EHT binder varies from 2.1 to 0.7 mPa·s and that of the Remasol binder from 1.3 to 0.6 mPa·s. The density of binders is best determined using aerometers. Figure 18 shows the densities of four selected colloidal silica-based binders, which have similar values that are only slightly higher than that of water [26].
Due to their favourable properties, four selected binders were used to obtain ceramic casting moulds. Figure 19 and Figure 20 show examples of the ceramic moulds obtained with binders containing colloidal silica.

5. Conclusions

Binders are one of the main components of ceramic moulds that combine powder particles and provide appropriate rheological and technological properties to moulding sand and casting moulds. Until recently, alcohol (ethanol) binders based on hydrolysed ethyl silicate were used to make ceramic moulds.
Due to ecological aspects, binders based on colloidal silica are currently used, which, compared with ethylene binders, are characterized by longer drying times and a greater tendency to crack the ceramic shell in the unburnt form; however, they are characterized by good wettability and a longer technological shelf life. They also increase the mechanical strength and gas permeability of moulds compared with analogous systems based on HES. Their undoubted advantage is to ensure the comfort and safety of workers in casting facilities.
This article reviewed selected polymeric binders dedicated to precision casting of nickel-based superalloys. The most attention was paid to four binders containing nano-SiO2 for model layers of casting moulds (Ludox AM, Ludox SK) and for structural layers (EHT, Remasol). The binders were characterized by high solid-phase contents (28–40%), viscosities, and densities close to that of water (1–2 mPa·s; Zahn cup flow time 5–6 s), as well as good electrokinetic stability. Nanoparticles contained in the binders were characterized by a near-spherical shape and an average particle size of 16–20 nm.
Such materials are commonly used to make casting moulds of electrocorundum, ZrO2, quartz, and aluminosilicates. As an alternative, nano-Al2O3 based binders can be used to make Y2O3 model layers, silicon carbide moulding compounds, and moulds. Interesting solutions in this field of research are the application of modified starch, polycaprolactone, and other polymers of natural origin.

Funding

This study was financed by the Faculty of Materials Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Ref. No. 504/04449/1090/44.000000.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lewandowski, J.L. Tworzywa na Formy Odlewnicze; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akapit: Kraków, Poland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reed, R.C. The Superalloys, Fundamentals and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones, S.; Yuan, C. Advances in shell moulding for investment casting. J. Mat. Proc. Technol. 2003, 135, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gandin, C.-A.; Rappaz, M.; Tintillier, R. Three-Dimensional Probabilistic Simulation of Solidification Grain Structures: Application to Superalloy Precision Castings. Metall. Trans. A 1993, 24, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perzyk, M. Odlewnictwo; Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne: Warszawa, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, J.; Ma, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Sun, B.; Dong, A.; Li, F.; Bührig-Polaczek, A. Freckle Defect Formation near the Casting Interfaces of Directionally Solidified Superalloys. Materials 2016, 9, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wiśniewski, P.; Małek, M.; Mizera, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Effect of adding water-based binders on the technological properties of ceramic slurries based on silicon carbide. Mater. Technol. 2017, 51, 225–227. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kanyo, J.E.; Schafföner, S.; Uwanyuze, S.R.; Leary, K.S. An overview of ceramic molds for investment casting of nickel superalloys. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 4955–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pattnaik, S.; Karunakar, D.B.; Jha, P.K. Developments in investment casting process—A review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2012, 212, 2332–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dong, Y.W.; Li, X.L.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, J.; Dao, M. Modeling of shrinkage during investment casting of thin-walled hollow turbine blades. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 244, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Winardi, L.; Littleton, H.E.; Bates, C.E. New technique for measuring permeability of cores made from various sands, binders, additives and coatings. AFS Trans. 2005, 113, 393–406. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolczyk, J.; Zych, J. Rheological properties of ceramic slurries with colloidal binders used in the investment casting technology. Metalurgija 2013, 52, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanjay, K.; Karunakar, D.B. Enhancing the permeability and properties of ceramic shell in investment casting process using ABS powder and needle coke. Int. J. Metalcast. 2019, 13, 588–596. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, S.; Karunakar, D.B. Characterization and Properties of Ceramic Shells in Investment Casting Process. Int. J. Metalcast. 2020, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Jin, S.; Lai, X.; He, B.; Li, F. Influence of complex structure on the shrinkage of part in investment casting process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 77, 1191–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Angrecki, M.; Kamińska, J.; Jakubski, J.; Wieliczko, P. Strength properties of ceramic moulds containing spent moulding sand after initial reclamation. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2019, 19, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wiśniewski, P.; Sitek, R.; Towarek, A.; Choińska, E.; Moszczyńska, D.; Mizera, J. Molding Binder Influence on the Porosity and Gas Permeability of Ceramic Casting Molds. Materials 2020, 13, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, P.; Lu, G.; Yan, Q.; Mao, P. Effect of Ceramic and Nylon Fiber Content on Composite Silica Sol Slurry Properties and Bending Strength of Investment Casting Shell. Materials 2019, 12, 2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Haratym, R.; Biernacki, R.; Myszka, D. Ekologiczne Wytwarzanie Dokładnych Odlewów w Formach Ceramicznych; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Żymankowska-Kumon, S.; Bobrowski, A.; Grabowska, B. Comparison of the Emission of Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Moulding Sands with Furfural Resin with the Low Content of Furfuryl Alcohol and Different Activators. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2016, 16, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Grabowska, B.; Grabowski, G.; Olejnik, E.; Kaczmarska, K. Studies of the Thermal Degradation of the BioCo3 Polymer Binder. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2013, 11, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Major-Gabryś, K.; Dobosz, S.M.; Jakubski, J. Thermal deformation of moulding sands with biopolymer binders. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2010, 10, 129–132. [Google Scholar]
  23. Faber, J.; Perszewska, K.; Żmudzińska, M. Aromatic compounds in waste gases formed during thermal decomposition of foundry binders. Trans. Foundry Res. Inst. 2015, 55, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  24. Major-Gabryś, K.; Hosadyna-Kondracka, K.; Grabarczyk, A.; Kamińska, J. Selection of hardening technology of moulding sand with hydrated sodium silicate binder devoted to aluminum alloys ablation casting. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2019, 64, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  25. Middleton, J.; Tipton, A. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as medical devices. Med. Plast. Biomater. 1998, 3, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eastman, J. Protein—Based binder update: Performance put to the Test. Mod. Cast. 2000, 10, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi, E.J.; Park, J.K. Study on biodegradability of PCL/SAN blend using composting method. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1996, 52, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scott, G. Green polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wiles, D.M.; Scott, G. Polyolefins with controlled environmental degradability. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shah, A.A.; Hasan, F.; Hameed, A.; Ahmed, S. Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 246–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iwamoto, A.; Tokiwa, Y. Enzymatic degradation of plastics containing polycaprolactone. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1994, 45, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eastmond, G.C. Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blends. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2000, 149, 59–222. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sposób Otrzymywania Krzemionki Koloidalnej w Roztworze Wodnym. Polish Patent P-116013, 31 May 1978.
  34. Wojnowski, W.; Przyjemska, K.; Konieczny, S.; Karwiński, A.; Stachańczyk, J.; Luśniak, L.; Piech, K. Spoiwo Kopolimerowe Sikop. Polish Patent PAT.135579, 30 November 1985. [Google Scholar]
  35. Piłkowski, Z.; Nadolski, M. Niektóre Problemy Wytrzymałości Cienkościennych Form Odlewniczych. Arch. Foundry 2004, 4, 413–419. [Google Scholar]
  36. Doles, R.S. Method of Increasing the Strength and Solids Level of Investment Casting Shells. U.S. Patent 6540013, 1 April 2003. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guerra, M. Fast Processing Water Based Binder System. U.S. Patent 5629369, 13 May 1997. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, C.; Jin, S.; Lai, X.; Wang, F.; Li, F. Permafrost Analysis Methodology (Pam) For Ceramic Shell Deformation in the Firing Process. Int. J. Metalcast. 2019, 13, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karwiński, A.; Haratym, R.; Biernacki, R. Accuracy of Ceramic Mould Filling with Liquid AlSi9 Aluminium Alloy in the Process Using Back-pressure. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2013, 13, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Karwiński, A.; Adamczyk, Z.; Stachańczyk, J. Spoiwo Krzemianowe Nieorganiczne w Wodnym Roztworze EKOSIL. Polish Patent Pat.182949, 2 October 2001. [Google Scholar]
  41. Parashar, G.; Srivastava, D.; Kumar, P. Review: Ethyl silicate binders for high performance coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2001, 42, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ospennikova, O.G.; Pikulina, L.V.; Antipin, L.M. Application of a Hydrolyzed Ethyl Silicate in Investment Casting. Inorg. Mater. 2010, 46, 563–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ismael, M.R.; Anjos, R.D.D.; Salomao, R.; Pandolfelli, V.C. Colloidal silica as a nostructured binder for refractory castables. Refract. Appl. News 2006, 11, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wiśniewski, P. Evaluating Silicon Carbide-Based Slurries and Molds for the Manufacture of Aircraft Turbine Components by the Investment Casting. Crystals 2020, 10, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bechstedt, F.; Kackell, P.; Zywietz, A.; Karch, K.; Adolph, B.; Tenelsen, K.; Furthmuller, J. Polytypism and Properties of Silicon Carbide. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 1997, 202, 35–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hirata, Y.; Miyano, K.; Sameshima, S.; Kamino, Y. Reaction between SiC surface and aqueous solutions containing Al Ions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998, 133, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferenc, J.; Matysiak, H.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Organic Viscosity Modifiers for Controlling Rheology of Ceramic Slurries Used in the Investment Casting. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Małek, M.; Wiśniewski, P.; Matysiak, H.; Zagórska, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Technological properties of SiC-based ceramic slurries for manufacturing investment casting shell moulds. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2014, 59, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Małek, M.; Wiśniewski, P.; Szymańska, J.; Mizera, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Technological Properties of Ceramic Slurries Based on Silicon Carbide with Poly (vinyl alcohol) Addition for Shell Moulds Fabrication in Precision Casting Process. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2016, 129, 528–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Matysiak, H.; Wiśniewski, P.; Ferenc-Dominik, J.; Michalski, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Badania właściwości reologicznych ceramicznych mas lejnych do odlewania precyzyjnego części turbin lotniczych. Szkło Ceram. 2011, 62, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  51. Książek, M.; Tchórz, A.; Krzak, I.; Żaba, K.; Kurdziel, P.; Dydak, A.; Sitek, R.; Mizera, J. An investigation on microstructural and mechanical properties of ceramic moulds applied in the investment casting of critical parts of aircraft engines. In Proceedings of the 73rd World Foundry Congress, Kraków, Poland, 23–27 September 2018; pp. 107–108. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nowicki, J. Badanie Właściwości Mas Lejnych Oraz Form Ceramicznych na Bazie SiC. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. Budzik, G.; Ferenc, J.; Jakubowicz, G.; Kurzydłowski, K.J.; Lipiński, Z.; Matysiak, H.; Michalski, J.; Wawulska, P.; Zych, J. Formy ceramiczne do odlewania precyzyjnego techniką wytapianych modeli. unpublished.
  54. Malesa, M. Nanonapełniacze kompozytów polierowych Nanonapełniacze kompozytów polimerowych. Część II. Krzemionka, Elastomery 2006, 10, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bergna, H.E.; Roberts, W.O. Colloidal Silica Fundamentals and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; Volume 131. [Google Scholar]
  56. Beeley, P.R.; Smart, R.F. Investment Casting; The University Press Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  57. Matysiak, H.; Ferenc, J.; Lipinski, Z.; Grabarz, K.; Michalski, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Charakterystyka i kontrola właściwości technologicznych mieszanek ceramicznych do wytworzenia form odlewniczych do odlewania precyzyjnego części turbin lotniczych metodą Bridgmana. Inż. Mater. 2009, 30, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kosmulski, M. Surface charge and zeta potential of silica In mixtures of organic solvents and water. Surf. Sci. Ser. 2000, 90, 343–367. [Google Scholar]
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g001 550
Figure 1. Dynamic viscosity versus shear rate (black curve) and shear stress versus shear rate (red curve) of Imerys W440 binder.
Figure 1. Dynamic viscosity versus shear rate (black curve) and shear stress versus shear rate (red curve) of Imerys W440 binder.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphology of Al2O3 nanoparticles in Imeris W440 polymer binder.
Figure 2. Morphology of Al2O3 nanoparticles in Imeris W440 polymer binder.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g003 550
Figure 3. Example SiC mould (raw state) obtained using Imerys W440 binder.
Figure 3. Example SiC mould (raw state) obtained using Imerys W440 binder.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g004 550
Figure 4. Example morphology of a mixture of the Remasol-aluminosilicate system after gelation.
Figure 4. Example morphology of a mixture of the Remasol-aluminosilicate system after gelation.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic of the charge formation on the surface of SiO2 particle in colloidal silica-based binder stabilized by sodium hydroxide, adapted from [53].
Figure 5. Schematic of the charge formation on the surface of SiO2 particle in colloidal silica-based binder stabilized by sodium hydroxide, adapted from [53].
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g005
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g006 550
Figure 6. Charge formation on the surface of SiO2 particles in the binder stabilized with an aluminium salt, adapted from [53].
Figure 6. Charge formation on the surface of SiO2 particles in the binder stabilized with an aluminium salt, adapted from [53].
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g006
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface modification of a SiO2 particle to change the particle charge to positive, adapted from [53].
Figure 7. Surface modification of a SiO2 particle to change the particle charge to positive, adapted from [53].
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g007
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g008 550
Figure 8. Binding scheme of colloidal silica-based binders: (a) chemical structure of the colloidal system, (b) reaction between hydroxyl groups from the surface of SiO2 particles leading to the creation of siloxane bonds, (c,d) three-dimensional chains of SiO2 particles. Adapted from [53].
Figure 8. Binding scheme of colloidal silica-based binders: (a) chemical structure of the colloidal system, (b) reaction between hydroxyl groups from the surface of SiO2 particles leading to the creation of siloxane bonds, (c,d) three-dimensional chains of SiO2 particles. Adapted from [53].
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g008
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g009 550
Figure 9. The reaction of selected binders based on colloidal silica.
Figure 9. The reaction of selected binders based on colloidal silica.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g009
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g010 550
Figure 10. Solid-phase content of selected binders based on colloidal silica.
Figure 10. Solid-phase content of selected binders based on colloidal silica.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g010
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g011 550
Figure 11. Morphology of nano-SiO2 in the binders: (a) LUDOX SK, (b) LUDOX AM, (c) REMASOL, (d) EHT.
Figure 11. Morphology of nano-SiO2 in the binders: (a) LUDOX SK, (b) LUDOX AM, (c) REMASOL, (d) EHT.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g011
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g012 550
Figure 12. Dependence of the zeta potential on pH for Ludox SK and Ludox AM binders used to produce the first layer of a ceramic mould.
Figure 12. Dependence of the zeta potential on pH for Ludox SK and Ludox AM binders used to produce the first layer of a ceramic mould.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g012
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g013 550
Figure 13. Dependence of zeta potential on pH for Remasol and EHT binders used to produce structural layers of a ceramic casting mould.
Figure 13. Dependence of zeta potential on pH for Remasol and EHT binders used to produce structural layers of a ceramic casting mould.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g013
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g014 550
Figure 14. ZrO2 powder grain surrounded by silica nanoparticles from the Ludox SK binder.
Figure 14. ZrO2 powder grain surrounded by silica nanoparticles from the Ludox SK binder.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g014
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g015 550
Figure 15. Morphology of the dried mixture of the Ludox AM-Al2O3 system.
Figure 15. Morphology of the dried mixture of the Ludox AM-Al2O3 system.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g015
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g016 550
Figure 16. The relative viscosity of the binders determined with a Zahn cup, T = 21 °C.
Figure 16. The relative viscosity of the binders determined with a Zahn cup, T = 21 °C.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g016
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g017 550
Figure 17. Dependence of (a) dynamic viscosity and (b) shear stress on shear rate for colloidal silica-based binders.
Figure 17. Dependence of (a) dynamic viscosity and (b) shear stress on shear rate for colloidal silica-based binders.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g017
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g018 550
Figure 18. The density of binders produced based on colloidal silica.
Figure 18. The density of binders produced based on colloidal silica.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g018
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g019 550
Figure 19. Examples of corundum ceramic moulds obtained with Ludox AM and Remasol binders.
Figure 19. Examples of corundum ceramic moulds obtained with Ludox AM and Remasol binders.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g019
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g020 550
Figure 20. Example of a ZrO2 ceramic mould obtained with Ludox SK and EHT binders.
Figure 20. Example of a ZrO2 ceramic mould obtained with Ludox SK and EHT binders.
Nanomaterials 11 01714 g020
Table
Table 1. Basic properties of binder containing nano-alumina.
Table 1. Basic properties of binder containing nano-alumina.
BinderSolid-Phase Content
[%]		Density
[g/cm3]		pHTime out of Zahn’s Cup #4
[s]
Imerys W44044.001.287.676.8
Table
Table 2. Stability of suspension depending on the zeta potential, ξ.
Table 2. Stability of suspension depending on the zeta potential, ξ.
Zeta Potential ξ
[mV]		Suspension Properties
approx. 0–5Fast coagulation
approx. 5–10Slow coagulation
approx. 10–30Instability
approx. 30–40Variable stability
approx. 40–60Good stability
>60Very good stability
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wiśniewski, P. Polymer Binders of Ceramic Nanoparticles for Precision Casting of Nickel-Based Superalloys. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071714

AMA Style

Wiśniewski P. Polymer Binders of Ceramic Nanoparticles for Precision Casting of Nickel-Based Superalloys. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(7):1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wiśniewski, Paweł. 2021. "Polymer Binders of Ceramic Nanoparticles for Precision Casting of Nickel-Based Superalloys" Nanomaterials 11, no. 7: 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071714

APA Style

Wiśniewski, P. (2021). Polymer Binders of Ceramic Nanoparticles for Precision Casting of Nickel-Based Superalloys. Nanomaterials, 11(7), 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop