Next Article in Journal
Hierarchical Nanocauliflower Chemical Assembly Composed of Copper Oxide and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Enhanced Photocatalytic Dye Degradation
Previous Article in Journal
Silk Fibroin Coated Magnesium Oxide Nanospheres: A Biocompatible and Biodegradable Tool for Noninvasive Bioimaging Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/nano11030694
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supercritical CO2 Assisted Solvothermal Preparation of CoO/Graphene Nanocomposites for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

by
Ruoxin Yuan
†,
Hao Wen
†,
Li Zeng
,
Xi Li
,
Xingang Liu
* and
Chuhong Zhang
*
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Polymer Research Institute of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(3), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030694
Submission received: 7 February 2021 / Revised: 6 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Supercritical CO2 (scCO2) is often used to prepare graphene/metal oxide nanocomposite anodes for high performance lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the assisted solvothermal method due to its low viscosity, high diffusion, zero surface tension and good surface wettability. However, the formation mechanism of metal oxides and the combination mechanism between metal oxides and graphene in this system are superficial. In this work, a cobalt monoxide/graphene (CoO/G) nanocomposite is fabricated via the scCO2 assisted solvothermal method followed by thermal treatment. We elucidate the mechanism that amorphous intermediates obtain by the scCO2 assisted solvothermal method, and then ultrafine CoO nanoparticles are crystallized during the heat treatment. In addition, scCO2 can promote CoO to be tightly fixed on the surface of graphene nanosheets by interfacial chemical bonds, which can effectively improve its cycle stability and rate performance. As expected, the CoO/G composites exhibit higher specific capacity (961 mAh g−1 at 100 mA g−1), excellent cyclic stability and rate capability (617 mAh g−1 after 500 cycles at 1000 mA g−1) when applied as an anode of LIB.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the increasing demand for recyclable energy, electrochemical energy storage devices that can effectively store the renewable energy sources of unstable output are in great demand, where lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been recognized as one of the most promising electrochemical energy storage devices [1,2]. However, the energy density of commercial LIB has met its bottle neck due to the low theoretical specific capacity of the commercial graphite anode (372 mAh g−1) [3], so it is urgent to develop anode materials with high specific capacity and energy density. Transition metal oxides acted as spotlights in the past decades due to their high theoretical specific capacity, vast choice of metal sources, and ease in controlling surface morphology [4,5,6,7,8]. Among them, Cobalt monoxide (CoO) has attracted increasing attention due to its high theoretical capacity (715 mAh g−1), highly reversible electrochemical reaction, low cost and high thermal stability [9]. However, the application of the CoO anode in LIBs is hampered by its poor cycling stability caused by large volume variation during the Li+ insertion/extraction, leading to electrode pulverization and electrical detachment from the current collector [10]. The mostly used paradigms to solve the above-mentioned problems are nano-sizing electrode particles combined with highly conductive buffer fillers [11,12]. Nevertheless, nano-sizing will lead to re-aggregation during cycling, which calls for tightly anchoring on the conductive substrate [13,14,15,16,17]. For the later strategy, hybridizing CoO with graphene not only facilitate electron transfer, but also inhibit the volume expansion of CoO during charge/discharge process due to the excellent electronic conductivity and superior mechanical robustness of graphene [18].
Up to now, many synthetic methods have been applied on preparing CoO/graphene composites, such as solvothermal [19], chemical reduction [20], solution phase coordination [17], and so on. Among them, solvothermal (or autoclave) method have been widely used because of its advantages such as high yield, simple manipulation, easy control, lower air pollution, and low energy consumption [21]. However, the inorganic particles obtained by the traditional solvothermal method are easy to agglomerate and are difficult to be uniformly distributed on graphene, resulting in unsatisfactory cycle stability. Supercritical CO2 (scCO2) has attracted wide attention due to its chemical inertness, non-toxicity, cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness. The unique physical properties of scCO2, including low viscosity, high diffusion, zero surface tension, and good surface wettability make it recognizable as a promising alternative to traditional solvents [22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, the scCO2 assisted solvothermal method has been widely used to prepare carbon-based composites for high performance LIB [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Due to the above unique physical properties, scCO2 can reduce the polarity of the solvent, so the nano-sized active materials can be evenly dispersed on the surface of carbon matrix, which greatly improves the cyclic stability of the nanocomposites. Although the role that scCO2 played in the formation of monodisperse nanoparticles has been discussed in literature [29,31,34], the formation mechanism of metal oxides and the combination mechanism between metal oxides and graphene in this system are vacant.
Herein, CoO/graphene nanocomposites (CoO/G-sc) were prepared by the scCO2 assisted solvothermal method followed by thermal treatment. Compared with the CoO/graphene composites prepared in air, the ultrafine CoO nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed on the surface of graphene nanosheets without agglomeration. In addition, XPS spectra show that there are more Co-O-C chemical bond in CoO/G-sc, indicating that the combination of CoO and graphene is more stable. Thus, the cycle stability, reversible capacity and rate performances of CoO/G-sc anodes are improved when applied as anodes in LIBs, which provides a reliable theoretical basis for the preparation of high-performance anode materials for a secondary energy storage system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

Cobalt nitrate hydrate (Co (NO3)2·6H2O), graphite oxide powder, and absolute alcohol were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China), Sixth Element Materials Technology Co., Ltd. (Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China), and Chengdu Kelong Chemical Reagents Co., (Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China) respectively. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of CoO/Graphene Composites (CoO/G)

Graphene oxide (GO) colloidal was prepared by sonicating graphite oxide powder in ethanol for 2 h, and Co (NO3)2·6H2O) was added in above solution by 0.4 mol L−1. Then, as-prepared solution was transferred into a lab-assembled stainless steel autoclave of 50 mL. The autoclave was filled with CO2 up to 12 Mpa and maintained at 200 °C for 2 h. Then, the autoclave was slowly depressurized after it cooled down to room temperature naturally. The intermediate was filtered and then dried in vacuum at 80 °C for 6 h. For the sintering process, the obtained intermediate was calcined in a tube furnace under Ar at 450 °C for 2 h, which was denoted as CoO/G-sc. For comparison, samples also prepared without CO2, which was designated as CoO/G-a (a represents air).

2.3. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku (Smart lab III) using Cu Kα radiation within 2θ = 10–75°. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a TGA-Q50 (TA Instruments Co, Ltd., New Castle, DE, USA) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from 30 °C to 800 °C under the air atmosphere. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on an Escalab 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology and microstructure were characterized from field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Quanta FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The chemical bond information was confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

The anodes were prepared by mixing CoO/G composites with acetylene black carbon and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), at a weight ratio of 8:1:1, in the solvent of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The obtained slurry was uniformly cast onto a copper foil and dried at 120 °C in a vacuum for 12 h. Then, the working electrodes were punched to diameter of 14 mm discs with about 1 mg active materials. Subsequently, CR 2032 coin-type cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box. Lithium foil was used as the counter electrode, a porous polypropylene film (Celgard 2325, Charlotte, NC, USA) was used as separator and 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 dissolved in 1:1 (vol/vol) mixture of ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate was used as the electrolyte. Galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements were done at various current densities in the voltage range of 0.1–3 V (vs. Li/Li+) using an automatic battery tester system (Land CT2001A, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were performed in the potential range of 0.1–3 V (vs. Li/Li+) with a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out by applying an AC voltage of 5 mV in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz using VMP3 electrochemical workstation (Biologic Science Instruments, Paris, France).

3. Results

XRD measurements were employed to characterize the intermediate and final product prepared with and without scCO2. As illustrated in Figure 1a, intermediate synthesized without scCO2 shows a crystal phase of cubic CoO (JCPDS No. 75–0393). The other two peaks at 12.5° and 22.9° correspond to GO and graphene, respectively. While for the one prepared with scCO2, no crystalline diffraction peaks are found, suggesting an amorphous nature, which may be related with amorphous coordination complex containing CO32− and NO3− [35]. After sintering, both samples are good agreement with the cubic phase CoO, and the characteristic peak of graphene (24.2°) can also be found, as depicted in Figure 1b. Average crystalline grain sizes are calculated as 8.5 and 11.5 nm for CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a by applying Scherrer equation, suggesting that sample prepared with scCO2 has smaller grain size and crystallinity. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to evaluate fraction of CoO, as illustrated in Figure 1c. As shown, 25 wt% of the initial weight is lost in the temperature range 300–500 °C for both samples, which mainly derived from decomposition of graphene. Thus, the content of CoO can be calculated as 75 wt% for both samples. FT-IR patterns displayed in Figure 1d provide further information for understanding the forming mechanism of the two intermediates. Compared with CoO/G-a Intermediate, CoO/G-sc Intermediate shows stronger absorption between 500–1600 cm−1. The peaks at 1538 and 1225 cm−1 (red line) correspond to the asymmetrical vibration of ν4(−OCO2) and symmetric vibration of ν1(−OCO2) [36]; and peaks at 1384, 1325 and 1048 cm−1 (blue line) correspond to the asymmetrical vibration of ν4(-ONO2), asymmetrical vibration of ν1(−ONO2) and in-plane asymmetrical stretching vibration of ν2(−ONO2), respectively; the adsorption peaks marked as black lines centered at 830 and 650 cm−1 are related with out-plane bending vibration of ν8(−OCO2) and ν6(−ONO2) and in-plane symmetrical bending vibration of ν6(−OCO2) and ν3(−ONO2) [22,37,38,39,40]. In addition, the absorption peak of CoO/G-sc intermediate at 3950 cm−1 is stronger than that of CoO/G-a intermediate, which is attributed to the vibration of ν (H2O) [39]. It can be clearly found that there is a large amount of CO32− in the CoO/G-sc intermediate, but not in the CoO/G-a intermediate, which may be the reason that the CoO/G-sc intermediate is amorphous.
XPS was carried out to examine components and valence states of elements in synthesized samples. Similar patterns are displayed for CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc in Figure 2a, with only the existence of C, O and Co. As shown in Figure 2b, the C 1s peaks of both samples can be fitted with three components: C-C/C=C (284.7 eV), C-O (286.2 eV) and C=O (288.8 eV), on which the latter two are related to the resident functional groups on graphene. The Co 2p2/3 (780.4 eV) and Co 2p1/2 (796.5 eV) peaks can be found in XPS spectra of Co 2p (Figure 2c), confirming the formation of CoO [17,41]. The O 1s peak also can be split into three components at 530.0, 531.7 and 533.4 eV, which related to the Co-O bond in CoO, residual oxygen on graphene and Co-O-C bonds between CoO and graphene, respectively. The existence of the Co-O-C covalent bond indicates a strong interaction between CoO and graphene [42,43,44]. The content of Co-O-C bonds in CoO/G-sc can be calculated as 48.6%, which is much higher than that of CoO/G-a (39.5%). This result strongly suggests that more CoO particles can be fastened tightly on the surface of graphene nanosheets with the help of scCO2. The massive Co-O-C bonds can facilitate fast transport of electron and Li+ between graphene and CoO particles, and stabilize CoO during charge/discharge cycles, ensuring that superior electrochemical performance of the CoO/G-sc electrode.
Figure 3a shows the surface morphology of the CoO/G-a intermediates, where the CoO particles agglomerate very seriously. After heat treatment, the agglomeration of CoO particles become more serious, and many large isolated CoO agglomerated particles are formed. For the CoO/G-sc intermediates, ultrafine particles are adhered uniformly on surface of graphene, as shown in Figure 3c. Even after heat treatment, there is no aggregation in CoO/G-sc sample (Figure 3d). The TEM image (Figure 3e) clearly shows that CoO nanoparticles with a size of about 10 nm are uniformly distributed on the graphene surface, and the SAED results indicate that CoO has good crystallinity. From the above results, we can conclude that scCO2 plays a crucial role in the formation and uniform distribution of monodisperse CoO nanoparticles during the solvothermal process. The probable reaction mechanisms [31,35] are proposed and illustrated in Figure 4. First of all, due to the unique physical properties of scCO2, the mixed solvent can completely infiltrate the graphene oxide nanosheets, thus ensuring that the Co2+ can be fully and uniformly dispersed around the nanosheets, which is the prerequisite for achieving uniform nucleation of the precursor on the graphene [23]. Secondly, CO32− generated by the reaction of scCO2 with water participates in the coordinated sedimentation and nucleation growth of Co2+, forming long-range disordered amorphous particles with low free energy on the surface of graphene, so can avoid the self-aggregation effectively [35]. Finally, after heat treatment, uniformly dispersed ultrafine CoO nanoparticles are formed on the surface of the graphene nanosheets.
CV and galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were tested to investigate the electrochemical performance of the CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a. Figure 5a shows the CV curves of CoO/G-sc with a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 between 0.1 and 3 V vs Li+/Li. In the first cathodic scan, two reduction peaks are observed centered at 1.0 V and 0.6 V, which are characters typical of CoO-based anodes. The peak at 1.0 V is attributed to the insertion of Li+ into CoO and the partial reduction of CoO (CoO + xLi+ + xe−→LixCoO) and the latter one could be related to the formation of metallic Co (LixCoO + (2x)Li+ + (2x)e−→Co + Li2O) and the formation of solid electrolyte interfaces (SEI) [45,46,47]. In the successive CV cycles, these reduction peaks move to a higher potential of 0.95 and 1.34 V because of smaller cathodic polarization [48]. In the first anodic scan, a broad peak located at 2.06 V appears, which can be attributed to the re-oxidation of Co to form CoO [46]. In addition, a pair of redox peaks could be found near 0 V, which could be the result of Li+ intercalation/extraction of graphene (C + xLi+ + xe−↔ LixC). From the second scan cycle, the cathodic and anodic peaks reproduce very well, indicating that an excellent cyclic stability of the CoO/G-sc. For comparison, the CV curves of CoO/G-a (Figure S1a) show similar electrochemical reactions during the charge/discharge process but with inferior cyclic stability.
Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a at a current density of 100 mA g−1 between 0.1–3 V vs Li+/Li are displayed in Figure 5c and Figure S1b, respectively. It can be observed that both electrodes show a discharge plateau around 1.0 and 0.7 V in the first discharge process, which is in accordance with CV results. In the following first charge process, a Co oxidation charge plateau located at 2.1 V is observed for both samples. The initial discharge and charge capacities of CoO/G-sc are 1294 and 887 mAh g−1, which are much higher than that of CoO/G-a (1113 and 810 mAh g−1). The higher specific capacity would be attributed to the nano-size of CoO particles, which brings more reaction site for Li+ storage. On the other hand, the nano-sizing brings a larger surface contact area between the electrolyte and the electrode, which leads to the formation of more SEI, resulting more irreversible capacity. Therefore, the initial coulombic efficiency of CoO/G-sc (68.6%) is lower than that of CoO/G-a (72.8%). Up to the 20th cycle, the specific discharge capacity remains about 919 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention of 71.0%, which is much higher than CoO/G-a (685 mAh g−1).
As depicted in Figure 5c, for the second cycle, the coulombic efficiency of CoO/G-sc is as high as 98.72%, and it remains stable in the following cycles. It is striking to note that the specific discharge capacity gradually increases in the following cycles, which is related to a reversible formation of a gel-like polymer membrane [45,49,50]. After 100 cycles, the reversible specific capacity reaches 961 mAh g−1, which is much higher than that of CoO/G-a (535 mAh g−1). For the CoO/G-a, the reversible specific capacities fading is associated with the repeat expansion and shrink of CoO aggregates. What is more, the large number of Co-O-C bonds in CoO/G-sc make CoO nanoparticles firmly anchored on the graphene surface, resulting in excellent cycle stability even at high current densities. Such cycle stability can also be demonstrated by SEM image after cycle, as negligible size change and agglomeration could be found (Figure S2) when compared with fresh sample. Therefore, the CoO/G-sc electrode can maintain a reversible specific capacity of 617 mAh g−1 after 500 cycles at a current density of 1 A g−1, which is 11.4 times that of the CoO/G-a electrode (Figure 5d). Moreover, the CoO/G-sc exhibits enhanced rate performance, as shown in Figure 5e. The specific capacity is maintained at values as high as 507 mAh g−1 even at 2 A g−1, and the capacity can be restored to 969 mAh g−1 when the current densities return to 100 mAh g−1, which indicates superior cycle stability and rate performances. The capacity retentions between high current density and initial 100 mA g−1 are calculated and illustrated in Figure 5f. Higher capacity retention is suggested for CoO/G-sc when compared with CoO/G-a in any current density. Even in a high current density of 2 A g−1, the value is 54% for CoO/G-sc, while the latter one is only 12%. We further compared the electrochemical performance of CoO/graphene composite electrodes reported in recent years. As shown in Table S1, the electrochemical behavior of our CoO/G-sc is significantly better than other CoO/graphene composites, which is mainly due to the uniform dispersion of ultrafine CoO and the large number of Co-O-C bonds with graphene.
The transport kinetics of the electrode were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. Figure 6a and Figure S3 show the Nyquist plots of the two electrodes before and after 5 cycles, respectively. The semicircle for CoO/G-sc in the high/medium frequency range is much smaller than that of the CoO/G-a, indicating a lower contact and charge-transfer resistances for the CoO/G-sc electrode. The equivalent circuit is shown in the inset of Figure 6a, where Re is the ohmic resistance, Rct and CPE represent the charge–transfer resistance and the double layer capacitance, respectively, and Zw is the Warburg impedance, which corresponds to the diffusion of the lithium ion into the bulk electrode. By applying equivalent circuits on the impedance data, the fitting results are displayed in Table 1. It can be observed that Rct and Zw of CoO/G-sc are 96.1 Ω and 45.64 Ω s−1/2, which are clearly smaller than those of CoO/G-a (207.3 Ω and 462.8 Ω s−1/2), indicating better transmission for electrolyte and Li+, thus prompts good rate performances. The Li+ diffusion coefficient (DLi) could be calculated by applying Equation 1 [51,52], and the relationships between Z’ and ω−1/2 of two samples are shown in Figure 6b. Thus, the DLi of CoO/G-sc can be calculated as 3.10 × 10−13 cm2 s−1, which is 2 orders of magnitude higher than CoO/G-a (7.68 × 10−15 cm2 s−1).

4. Conclusions

In summary, a solvothermal treatment with the assistance of scCO2 followed by a calcination process has been adopted to prepare a CoO/graphene nanocomposite. The formation mechanism of ultrafine nano-CoO was analyzed by FTIR, XPS, SEM, etc. The presence of scCO2 can control the deposition and nucleation of Co2+, so that CoO nanoparticles can be uniformly distributed and fixed on the graphene nanosheets by means of interfacial chemical bonds. When applied as an anode of LIB, the CoO/G-sc electrode exhibits a higher reversible capacity, excellent rate performance and cycling stability. The reaction route described herein offers a facile and green strategy for preparation of CoO/G composites as promising anode material for LIBs, which can also be applied to prepare many other graphene-based composite materials for energy storage applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/3/694/s1, Figure S1: (a) Cyclic voltammograms at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 and (b) galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of CoO/G-a, Figure S2: SEM images of CoO/G-sc after 100 cycles at 100 mA g−1, Figure S3: Nyquist plots of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc before cycling, Table S1: Lithium storage performance comparison of CoO/graphene composite anodes from references.

Author Contributions

C.Z. and X.L. (Xingang Liu) conceived the idea; H.W. and R.Y. performed the experiment, collected and analyzed the data; L.Z. and X.L. (Xi Li) collected part of the data; R.Y. prepared the original draft; X.L. (Xingang Liu) did the proofreading. All authors discussed the results and improved the final text of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2017YFE0111500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51933007 and 51673123).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goodenough, J.B. Evolution of Strategies for Modern Rechargeable Batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bruce, P.G.; Freunberger, S.A.; Hardwick, L.J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Li-O2 and Li-S Batteries with High Energy Storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, Y.; Xie, L.; Ming, H.; Guo, Y.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Wang, W.; He, X.; Wang, L.; Alshareef, H.N.; Sun, Y.-K.; et al. An Empirical Model for the Design of Batteries with High Energy Density. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poizot, P.; Laruelle, S.; Grugeon, S.; Dupont, L.; Tarascon, J.M. Nano-Sized Transition-Metal-Oxides as Negative-Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nature 2000, 407, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.-T.; Zhang, P.; Sun, N.; Anasori, B.; Zhu, Q.-Z.; Liu, H.; Gogotsi, Y.; Xu, B. Self-Assembly of Transition Metal Oxide Nanostructures on MXene Nanosheets for Fast and Stable Lithium Storage. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deng, M.; Li, S.; Hong, W.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, W.; Shuai, H.; Zou, G.; Hu, Y.; Hou, H.; Wang, W.; et al. Octahedral Sb2O3 as High-Performance Anode for Lithium and Sodium Storage. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 223, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Y.; Yang, H.; Xiong, T.; Adekoya, D.; Qiu, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Balogun, M.S. Adsorption Energy Engineering of Nickel Oxide Hybrid Nanosheets for High Areal Capacity Flexible Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Yamauchi, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Luo, D.; et al. MoOx Nanoparticles Anchored on N-doped Porous Carbon as Li-Ion Battery Electrode. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, S.-H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, D.J.; Sung, Y.-E.; Hyeon, T. Conversion Reaction-Based Oxide Nanomaterials for Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. Small 2016, 12, 2146–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, C.; Gao, M.; Pan, H.; Liu, Y.; Yan, M. Lithium Alloys and Metal Oxides as High-Capacity Anode Materials for Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 575, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bruce, P.G.; Scrosati, B.; Tarascon, J.-M. Nanomaterials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2930–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonaccorso, F.; Colombo, L.; Yu, G.; Stoller, M.; Tozzini, V.; Ferrari, A.C.; Ruoff, R.S.; Pellegrini, V. Graphene, Related Two-Dimensional Crystals, and Hybrid Systems for Energy Conversion and Storage. Science 2015, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, J.; Liu, J.; Ding, R.; Ji, X.; Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Hu, A.; Wu, F.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, X. Direct Synthesis of CoO Porous Nanowire Arrays on Ti Substrate and Their Application as Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, F.D.; Wang, Y. Self-Assembled Echinus-Like Nanostructures of Mesoporous CoO Nanorod@CNT for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6636–6641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Qin, L.; Pan, Q. Fabrication and Electrochemical Behavior of Flower-Like ZnO-CoO-C Nanowall Arrays as Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 9207–9213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yao, W.; Chen, J.; Cheng, H. Platelike CoO/Carbon Nanofiber Composite Electrode with Improved Electrochemical Performance for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2011, 15, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, Y.; Hu, X.; Luo, W.; Huang, Y. Ultrathin CoO/Graphene Hybrid Nanosheets: A Highly Stable Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 20794–20799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, S.; Cui, G.; Pang, S.; Cao, Q.; Kolb, U.; Feng, X.; Maier, J.; Mullen, K. Fabrication of Cobalt and Cobalt Oxide/Graphene Composites: Towards High-Performance Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pan, E.; Jin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Bo, X.; Jia, M. Facile Synthesis of Mesoporous 3D CoO/Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Aerogel as High-Performance Anode Materials for Lithium Storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 267, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bindumadhavan, K.; Yeh, M.-H.; Chou, T.-C.; Chang, P.-Y.; Doong, R. Ultrafine CoO Embedded Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites: A High Rate Anode for Li-Ion Battery. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 5758–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, W.; Song, S.; Zhang, H. Hydrothermal Synthetic Strategies of Inorganic Semiconducting Nanostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5714–5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, W.; Tripp, C.P. Reaction of Silanes in Supercritical CO2 with TiO2 and Al2O3. Langmuir 2006, 22, 5748–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, X.; Heinonen, S.; Levanen, E. Applications of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Materials Processing and Synthesis. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 61137–61152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, M.-J.; Zhu, H.-H.; Guo, J.-Q.; Wang, K.; Tao, W.-Q. The Development Technology and Applications of Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle in Nuclear Energy, Solar Energy and Other Energy Industries. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 126, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meng, M.; Qiu, Z. Experiment Study of Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of Bituminous Coals Influenced by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Fuel 2018, 219, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, J.; Sun, E.; Li, M.; Liu, H.; Zhu, B. Key Issues and Solution Strategies for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Coal Fired Power Plant. Energy 2018, 157, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Zhuo, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L. Synthesis and Electrochemical Properties of LiFePO4/C Composite Cathode Material Prepared by a New Route Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Solvent. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6975–6980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, Z.; Liu, Z.; Han, B.; An, G. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Assisted Deposition of Tin Oxide on Carbon Nanotubes. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 4565–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, L.; Zhuo, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, F. Carbon Dioxide-Induced Homogeneous Deposition of Nanometer-sized Cobalt Ferrite (CoFe2O4) on Graphene as High-Rate and Cycle-Stable Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 275, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. An, G.; Na, N.; Zhang, X.; Miao, Z.; Miao, S.; Ding, K.; Liu, Z. SnO2/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites Synthesized in Supercritical Fluids: Highly Efficient Materials for Use as a Chemical Sensor and as the Anode of a Lithium-Ion Battery. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 435707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhuo, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, F. Trace Amounts of Water-Induced Distinct Growth Behaviors of NiO Nanostructures on Graphene in CO2-Expanded Ethanol and Their Applications in Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7065–7071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, X.; Ma, M.; Zeng, M.; Sun, Y.; Chen, L.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ai, X.; Mendes, R.G.; Ruemmeli, M.H.; et al. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Anchored Fe3O4 Nanoparticles on Graphene Foam and Lithium Battery Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22527–22533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Zhuo, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, F. Embedding NiCo2O4 Nanoparticles into a 3DHPC Assisted by CO2-Expanded Ethanol: A Potential Lithium-Ion Battery Anode with High Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10813–10820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Qin, Y.; Hu, W. Fabrication of Co3O4/Graphene Oxide Composites Using Supercritical Fluid and Their Catalytic Application for the Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 2001–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ming, J.; Wu, C.; Cheng, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, F. Reaction of Hydrous Inorganic Metal Salts in CO2 Expanded Ethanol: Fabrication of Nanostructured Materials via Supercritical Technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2011, 57, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fujita, J.; Martell, A.E.; Nakamoto, K. Infrared spectra of metal chelate compounds. VIII. Infrared spectra of co(III) carbonato complexes. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 36, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Addison, C.C.; Gatehouse, B.M. The infrared spectra of anhydrous transition-metal nitrates. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 613–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stober, W.; Fink, A.; Bohn, E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1968, 26, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zotov, N.; Petrov, K.; Dimitrovapankova, M. Infrared-spectra of Cu(II)-Co(II) mixed hydroxide nitrates. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1990, 51, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Petrov, K.; Zotov, N.; Mirtcheva, E.; Garcia Martinez, O.; Rojas, R.M. Effect of composition on the lattice-parameters and thermal-behavior of nickel(II)-cobalt(II) hydroxide nitrate solid-solutions. J. Mater. Chem. 1994, 4, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leng, X.; Ding, X.; Hu, J.; Wei, S.; Jiang, Z.; Lian, J.; Wang, G.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, J. In Situ Prepared Reduced Graphene Oxide/CoO Nanowires Mutually-Supporting Porous Structure with Enhanced Lithium Storage Performance. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, G.; Wang, D.-W.; Yin, L.-C.; Li, N.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.-M. Oxygen Bridges between NiO Nanosheets and Graphene for Improvement of Lithium Storage. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3214–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Y.; Wei, J.; Tan, L.; Yu, J.; Chen, Y. A Facile Approach to NiCoO2 Intimately Sstanding on Nitrogen Doped Graphene Sheets by One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis for Supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7121–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ren, M.; Li, F.; Liu, W.; Li, M.; Li, G.; Hei, J.; Su, L.; Wang, L. CoO@N-Doped Carbon Composite Nanotubes as Excellent Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 2862–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Du, N.; Yang, D. Highly Loaded CoO/Graphene Nanocomposites as Lithium-Ion Anodes with Superior Reversible Capacity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2337–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reddy, M.V.; Prithvi, G.; Loh, K.P.; Chowdari, B.V.R. Li Storage and Impedance Spectroscopy Studies on Co3O4, CoO, and CoN for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 680–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xie, K.; Wu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, Y.; Wang, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, T. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon-Wrapped Porous Single-Crystalline CoO Nanocubes for High-Performance Lithium Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10602–10607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, G.; Shao, J. Pomegranate-Like CoO@ Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Microspheres with Outstanding Rate Behavior and Stability for Lithium Storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 9801–9806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, D.; Ji, G.; Ma, Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Lu, J. Graphene-Encapsulated Hollow Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Aggregates as a High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 3078–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, L.; Kang, Q.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Cheng, Y. Assembly Control of CoO/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Their Enhanced Lithium Storage Behavior. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, S.B.; Lai, M.O.; Lu, L. Study on Li+-Ion Diffusion in Nano-Crystalline LiMn2O4 Thin Film Cathode Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition Using CV, EIS and PITT Techniques. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 111, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wen, H.; Kang, W.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C. Two-Phase Interface Hydrothermal Synthesis of Binder-free SnS2/Graphene Flexible Paper Electrodes for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 23607–23613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g001 550
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) intermediates and (b) CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a; (c) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc (d) FT-IR spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a intermediates.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) intermediates and (b) CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a; (c) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc (d) FT-IR spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a intermediates.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g001
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a; High-resolution (b) C 1s, (c) Co 2p and (d) O 1s XPS spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a; High-resolution (b) C 1s, (c) Co 2p and (d) O 1s XPS spectra of CoO/G-sc and CoO/G-a.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g002
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) the intermediate and (b) final product of CoO/G-a; (c) the intermediate and (d) final product of CoO/G-sc; (e) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and (f) Selected areal electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of CoO/G-sc.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) the intermediate and (b) final product of CoO/G-a; (c) the intermediate and (d) final product of CoO/G-sc; (e) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and (f) Selected areal electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of CoO/G-sc.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g003
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the formation mechanism of CoO/G-sc.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the formation mechanism of CoO/G-sc.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g004
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) cyclic voltammograms (CV) at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 and (b) galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of CoO/G-sc; Cycle stability and Coulombic efficiency of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc at specific current of (c) 100 mA g−1 and (d) 1 A g−1; (e) rate performance and (f) capacity retention ratio relative to 100 mA g−1 of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc electrodes.
Figure 5. (a) cyclic voltammograms (CV) at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 and (b) galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of CoO/G-sc; Cycle stability and Coulombic efficiency of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc at specific current of (c) 100 mA g−1 and (d) 1 A g−1; (e) rate performance and (f) capacity retention ratio relative to 100 mA g−1 of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc electrodes.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g005
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Nyquist plots for CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc after 5 cycles (inset: Equivalent circuit used to fit the experimental data), (b) Z’ vs. ω−1/2 plot in the low frequency region of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc electrodes.
Figure 6. (a) Nyquist plots for CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc after 5 cycles (inset: Equivalent circuit used to fit the experimental data), (b) Z’ vs. ω−1/2 plot in the low frequency region of CoO/G-a and CoO/G-sc electrodes.
Nanomaterials 11 00694 g006
Table
Table 1. Values of equivalent resistance used for fitting the experimental data.
Table 1. Values of equivalent resistance used for fitting the experimental data.
SampleRe (Ω)Rct (Ω)CPE (μF)Zw (Ω s−1/2)
CoO/G-a5.79207.39.5462.8
CoO/G-sc3.7096.149.9045.64
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, R.; Wen, H.; Zeng, L.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C. Supercritical CO2 Assisted Solvothermal Preparation of CoO/Graphene Nanocomposites for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030694

AMA Style

Yuan R, Wen H, Zeng L, Li X, Liu X, Zhang C. Supercritical CO2 Assisted Solvothermal Preparation of CoO/Graphene Nanocomposites for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(3):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Ruoxin, Hao Wen, Li Zeng, Xi Li, Xingang Liu, and Chuhong Zhang. 2021. "Supercritical CO2 Assisted Solvothermal Preparation of CoO/Graphene Nanocomposites for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries" Nanomaterials 11, no. 3: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop